Cloud Computing in Conjunction with Libraries: Descriptive Literature Review

Mayank Yuvaraj Junior Research Fellow Dept. of LIS, Banaras Hindu University Varanasi, India Ajay Pratap Singh Head & Associate Professor Dept. of LIS, Banaras Hindu University Varanasi, India

Cloud computing is the essence of future computing needs that has emerged to be a savior for library professionals. It is an emerging technology characterized by an element of novelty where the research community has recently embarked. Since, 2008 explosively increasing amount of research has been conducted. This paper presents a descriptive literature review of cloud computing paradigm from vivid perspectives. There has been drastic shift in the trinity of libraries: books which have become electronic, user which prefers web resources than print and the staff which has become cybrarian. In this changed library landscape there is need to shift our competencies for the challenges offered by IT. Availability of independent computing components on demand like cloud as CPU, Storage in cloud has removed the web of IT and librarians can focus on their mission and services. In this paper we analyze the normative literature to extract a functional methodology or working model of cloud computing to be implied in libraries. KEYWORDS: Cloud computing, Literature review, Libraries, Cloud computing in libraries


INTRODUCTION With the encroachment of IT in library services the commitment of library and information professionals to provide people with information has come to stake. Library and information professionals are involved in the business of buying, configuring, installing, and maintaining servers which has nothing to do with the day-to-day library mission and services. One must engage in such affairs unless we absolutely must do so. In such circumstances Cloud computing has emerged as blessings in disguise that has brought decentralization to the computing world. It is concerned with the abstraction of software, services and storage facilities provided the access to network. The concept of cloud computing has sprung from the “intergalactic computer network” developed by J.C.R Licklider in 1960s where he wanted that everyone could use computer and anyone could get data irrespective of location and time in world. In 1961 John McCarthy, a computer scientist predicted that someday the computational power will be offered as a public service, such as water and electricity. This concept however, declined in early 1970`s due to the lack of physical infrastructure that could satisfy the needs of implementation of cloud

Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. Vol.2 No.2 (Jul – Dec 2012)

technology. The relative novelty and exploding growth of cloud computing makes it an exciting area for research. The present paper aims to assess the state of cloud computing research. METHODOLOGY Defining any term seeks to study the qualitative and quantitative behavior. Henceforth, the four methods of literature review viz. narrative review, descriptive review, vote counting and meta analysis has to be given the same treatment. King and He32 have placed the four methods in a “qualitative-quantitative continuum”. Figure 1. Qualitative-quantitative continuum


Narrative review is the traditional method of reassessment of literature slanted towards qualitative behavior of the literature. According to King and He32 this method is conducted by “verbally describing the past studies, focusing on theories and frameworks, elementary factors and their research outcomes, regarding a hypothesized relationship. However, Yang and Tate (2009) argues that “there is no consensus towards a standardized procedure of narrative review. How to conduct a narrative review largely depends on the reviewer’s personal preference, thus this approach is easily vulnerable to subjectivity”. (p. 808). It is not rare for “two reviewers to arrive at rather different conclusion from the same general body of literature” (Guzzo et al., 1987, p. 408). Descriptive review focuses on revealing an interpretable pattern from the existing literature (Guzzo et al., 1987). King and He (2005) surmises that descriptive review studies “produces some quantification, often in the form of frequency analysis, such as publication time, research methodology, research outcomes etc. Such a review method often has a systematic procedure including searching, filtering and classifying processes. First a reviewer needs to

Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. Vol.2 No.2 (Jul – Dec 2012)

809). p. according to Yang and Tate (2009) “focusing on limited outlets cannot be justified for a literature review on cloud computing as this is a recent phenomenon which just emerged two years ago.” (p. (Yang and Tate. 667). Most likely it is applied to generate insights from a series of experiments”. However. Then the reviewer treats an individual study as one data record and identifies trends and patterns among the papers surveyed . search engines and repositories. 668). cloud computing arena is one of the sprouting sectors of computing world. may be more powerful evidence than a single significant result” (King and He. p. All the Web based references mentioned in 88 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. it may specifically examine the relationships between certain Independent Variables (IVs) and Dependent Variables (DVs) derived from existing research findings. p. 668).The outcome of such a review is often claimed to be representative of the state of art of a research domain. even some of them are non-significant. “Here a tally is made of the frequency with which existing research findings support a particular proposition.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . (King and He . In most cases. It attempts to explore pertinent literature through computer or manual searches. ” (Yang and Tate. 2005. 2009. The premise underlying this approach is that “repeated results in the same direction across multiple studies. 809).conduct a comprehensive literature search to collect as many relevant papers as possible in an investigated area. which makes it next to impossible to examine any variables. Hence due to an element of novelty it was difficult to find plethora of information on this topic. Vol. 2009. Traditionally this is done by scanning some prominent journals and conferences exclusively dedicated to the subject. “Qualitative studies have to be excluded by a meta-analysis due to its extremely quantitative nature. Efforts were laid to get information from online databases. Only similar quantitative studies are collected for a meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH Literature search is a pre-requisite for reviewing literature on any subject. p. 809).2 No. Under such circumstances descriptive review is the most appropriate one. p. For most of the concurrent phenomena Information Science researchers and scholars are using online databases as their first literature collecting strategy. The incentive of this approach is to generate a much less judgmental and subjective literature review upon a specific research context. correlations. Since. Meta-analysis aims at statistically providing supports to a research topic by “combining and analyzing the quantitative results of many empirical studies” (King and He. 2005. or theories. therefore the publication channels are still largely scattered” (p. 808) Vote counting is generally used to “draw qualitative inferences upon focal relationships by combining individual research findings”. journals. As the concept is still in its infancy which has not fully ripened so it was difficult to fetch information from the library collections. 2005. The facets of cloud computing is a dawning research area.

com Dogpile.rclis. NOPR DJLIT Freefullpdf. it is almost impossible to review all the literature available on a concerned subject. Efforts have been laid to mention only those web addresses which are likely to work during this work but there are possibility that some links may not work. the title and abstract of the document was scanned properly and those found to be relevant were take Mamma. Keyword and abstract searching was done on following web-resources TOOLS o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o SOURCES ACM Digital library IEEE Xplore Proquest (ABI/INFORM) ScienceDirect (Elsevier) Eprints. accessibility. time and proficiency keeps a check on it. the full text of the documents were reviewed and the Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Authorstream. Slideshare.2 No. In spite of these. attempts have been undertaken to review literature relevant to present study. Table Scribd.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . Google books Google scholar Google analytics BASE JURN Total papers or documents 132 Relevant papers or documents 54 Online databases Institutional repositories or archives PDF documents search PPT search 20 5 80 48 89 60 75 38 55 Search engines Specialized searching Academic search engines 54 31 118 46 INFORMATION FILTERING PROCESS Out of the total information retrieved from the web-sources two methods were employed to get the desired information on cloud computing. Impediments like Google. Secondly. However due to the dynamicity of web they may not be functional Pdfqueen.this work were retrieved during research period of September 2011 to March 2012.

 Pre Cloud Phase. conference proceedings) relevant to a particular issue. LITERATURE REVIEW Most challenging task of a research study is to review the past related literature to extract a functional methodology or working model for a research problem. providing a description.(1999-2006): Internet developed as a mechanism to provide application as a service. area of research.2 No.(2008) compare and contrasted cloud computing with grid computing and inferred that “cloud computing is an evolved version of grid computing”. The great idea remained in history pages until it was put in application by salesforce. Vol. Another feather in the cap was added by Google that developed Google Apps entirely based on architecture of cloud computing. The term cloud computing was coined in which used a simple website to deliver its enterprise application to users. First research initiatives were started by Google and IBM in cooperation with “six American universities: Carnegie Mellon. the University of California. NetCentric tried to trademark “cloud computing” but was abandoned in April 1999. According to Lyons (2010) “Not to be confused with a book review.documents rich in information content having no sketchy ideas dealing fundamentally with the research problem were finally taken into consideration for the research work. typically referring to a joint hardware and software deployment concept. “The history of cloud computing faced huge competition only when Amazon started its cloud-based Amazon web services”. To keep pace with the technology. The purpose of a literature review is to offer an overview of significant literature published on a topic. Microsoft in 2008 developed cloud based Azure services platform. Cyberpassionteam (2011). dissertations. The first public usage of the term “cloud” as a metaphor for the internet in a paper published by MIT in 1996. or theory. Lohr (2008). a literature review surveys scholarly articles. 2002. Stanford University. Banerjee (2011):  Idea Phase. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. p. Literature review is an essential approach to “conceptualize research areas and survey and synthesize prior research” (Webster and Watson. Foster et al. books and other sources (e. Berkeley. and critical evaluation of each work.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) 90 . the University of Maryland and the University of Washington”.(1960s-pre internet bubble era): During this period core ideas of utility and grid computing developed. Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. scanned and reviewed. xiii). For convenience the review study can be divided into various sections: Section I: Transition to cloud computing The roots of cloud computing can be traced to the days of mainframe computers (1960s) when the concept of utility computing came to light where the computing power could be split into metered service like power and telephone supply. “Cloud computing evolution can be split into three phases. In May 1997.” Substantial amount of literature relating to cloud computing was collected. summary.

expertise with.” Commenting on the evolution of the cloud landscape Yang and Hsu (2011) concludes that “Cloud computing services first emerged as an IT paradigm five years ago. cloud Computing delivers scalable IT services via the Internet on a payper-use basis” (p. SUN. Oracle. Basically cloud is a metaphor for internet and is an abstraction for the complex infrastructure it conceals”. It is first initiated by Amazon. or control over the technology infrastructure that supports them. I can't think of anything that isn't cloud computing with all of these announcements. it`s all about ways to improve delivery of the server-centric. They are joined by Gardner (2012) who argues that “cloud computing is often regarded as a revolution. But the overarching concept of delivering computing resources through a global network is rooted in the sixties. no common standard or definition for cloud computing seems to exist Grossman (2009).com. Voas & Zhang (2009)”. Users would not need to know or care about how the computers. But. it`s just an evolution of infrastructure efficiency. It is a style of computing in which IT-related capabilities are provided as a service allowing users to access technology enabled services from the internet without knowledge of. scholars like Wohl (2009) perceive “Cloud Computing to be a vague term for a very vague and distant future in which computing would occur in a few remote locations without the need for very much human intervention. 392). and Software as a Service (SaaS).(2007. Madhubala. such as Google.” According to Mohamed (2009) “Cloud computing has evolved through a number of phases which included grid and utility computing. several prominent technology companies. Contrary to above arguments. their software.2 No. or the network functioned. Vol. Further. Out of these in fact.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) 91 . PaaS & SaaS got formalized. (p. For IT. and Salesforce. (2012) put forth her view that “Cloud computing is a paradigm that focuses on sharing data and computations over a scalable network of nodes. soon followed”. 286).” Section II: The concept of cloud computing Plethora of interpretations has been contested on the conceptualization of Cloud Computing. Cloud Phase.” On the other hand. Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. grid computing and distributed computing. (2009) argues that “combining elements of existing technologies such as virtualization. application service position (ASP). IBM. applicationcentric environment. The computer industry is the only industry that is more fashion-driven than women's fashion. Infinite computing resources would be available for any need at costs approaching zero. But to IT. (2008) find “Cloud computing as a style of computing where massively scalable IT-enabled capabilities are delivered as a service to external customers using internet technologies”. Weinhardt et al.till date) Cloud computing became popular and the sub classification IaaS. R. According to Farber (2008) “The interesting thing about cloud computing is that we've redefined cloud computing to include everything that we already do.” Sultan (2010) argues that “A study by McKinsey (the global management consulting firm) found that there are 22 possible separate definitions of cloud computing. Plummer et al. (p. 109).

. Misra and Mondal. virtualization and pay-as-you-go pricing model. Mingchang (2011) Cloud computing provides the opportunity of flexibility and adaptability to attract the market on demand. (2009). What is new is that cloud computing combines and integrates these approaches. application software. the term cloud is derived from the idea of businesses and users being able to access applications from anywhere in the world on demand”. (2010). The concept is derived from the imagery of the Internet cloud.  The monitoring of resource utilization to support dynamic load-balancing and reallocations of applications and resources”. ( p. Vol. Cloud computing is also. He opined that cloud computing is a new model of computing used widely in today`s industry and society. Boss et al. (2009) argues that “Cloud computing is the infrastructural paradigm shift that is sweeping across the Enterprise IT world that has as many definitions as there are squares on a chess-board”. According to Low.2 No. Erdogmus. (2010) (p. However. Hartig (2008) refers to Cloud Computing as the phenomenon of “virtualization of resources that maintains and manages itself”. Chinyao. Sultan. 122). e. (2011) opines that “as we could expect. Chen and Wu. (2007) argues that “Cloud is a pool of virtualized computer resources which allows:  The dynamic scale-in and scale-out of applications by the provisioning and deprovisioning of resources.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . In nutshell. in which the imagery of a cloud is traditionally used to represent the internet or some large networked environment. Geelan. (2010). distributed computing. 55).” (p. defined as a collection of disembodied services accessible from anywhere using any mobile device with an internet-based connection. Pyke (2009) that “cloud computing services can provide the user seamlessly. such as utility computing. according to Weiss (2007). “Cloud computing has spread out through the main areas related to information systems and technologies. (2009).g by means of virtualization. His arguments are supplemented by Hand (2007) who argues that “in cloud computing not just our data but even our software resides within the cloud. It draws on existing technologies and approaches. 17). 1007). Kossmann and Kraska (2010) have put forth three important principles that depend on each other and can only provide additional value if implemented in concert These are: automation. “cloud computing is not a fundamentally new paradigm. Inspired by similar thoughts Low. Some of the scholars have attempted to trace the roots of Cloud Computing from business. and the quality-stable technological support that can develop the enormous potential demand”. and we access everything not only through our PCs 92 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. the convenience. Yahsueh and Wu.4). software-as-a-service. (p. and technological solutions for firms” Armbrust et al. (p. and centralized data centres.However. ” Under such circumstances there is a general agreement of scholars like Buyya et al. such as operating systems. Chen.

2 (Jul – Dec 2012) 93 . to run applications. The Cloud Computing model constitutes three service delivery and three deployment models. etc. Vol. 963). & Grance (2009): The service delivery models are: Private cloud: a cloud platform is dedicated for specific organization. Yahoo. (p. clients are being offered with storage. such as smart phones. Scholars have also used models to study cloud computing. and Hybrid cloud: a private cloud that can extend to use resources in public clouds. To run required service a special platform or application infrastructure is also being provided to the clients where clients can build their web based applications. In IaaS. Section III: Models of cloud computing Models are mental or pictorial representation of an event or phenomenon. Mell. and there might be constraints as to which applications can be deployed. storage. networking and processing of data. but do not themselves control the cloud infrastructure.  Platform as a Service (PaaS) Consumers purchase access to the platforms. The operating systems and network access are not managed by the consumer. VMWare vCloud are some of its examples Jericho Forum (2009) has put forth “cloud cube model to differentiate cloud formations from each other and the manner of their provision. Windows Azure. Public cloud available to public users to register and use the available infrastructure. For example email and few other services offered by Google. the mega-computer enabled by virtualization and software as a service”. PDAs. Google App Engine and Force. enabling them to deploy their own software and applications in the cloud. Generally models are employed to study such phenomenon which cannot be seen or felt. The deployment models are:  Software as a Service (SaaS) Consumers purchase the ability to access and use an application or service that is hosted in the cloud. The cube represents four dimensions of cloud activities:  Location of data: Internal/ External Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. and network connectivity. Sify. Client does not require to know programming language.2 No. Skype etc. database management can be few of good examples of PaaS  Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) Consumers control and manage the systems in terms of the operating systems. applications.but also cloud friendly devices. Hotmail. Amazon’s Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) or Simple Storage Service (S3).

Section V: Adoption of cloud computing The emergent phenomenon of cloud computing aims at transforming the traditional way of computing by providing both software applications and hardware resources as a service. 156). These were resisted by the vendors just like the fate of cloud computing”. government agencies. (2009) has enlisted the various difficulties of developing standards for effective cloud computing. From the financial point of view. Thus. Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. According to Sriram and Khajeh-Hosseini (2010) “cloud computing can benefit from standardized API interfaces as generic tools that manage cloud infrastructures can be developed for all offerings. memory.   Ownership of cloud technology: Proprietary/ Open Operations: Perimeterised (Within traditional IT perimeter)/ De-perimeterised (Outiside IT perimeter) Availability of service: Insourced (By third party)/ Outsourced (By own)” Mikkilineni and Sarathy (2009) “compared the evolution of cloud computing with intelligent network infrastructure in telecommunications and proposed a Virtual Resource Mediation Layer (VRML) to support interoperability between public and private clouds. achieving standardized API appears to be rather politically than technically challenging”. there is also a document called the open cloud manifesto in which various stake holders express why open standards will benefit cloud computing Sriram and Khajeh-Hosseini (2010). Vol. CPU power etc) Tsaravas and Themistocleous (2011) (p. These are business models for companies with an existing IT infrastructure and business models for startup companies. Keahey et al. However. Grossman (2009) asserts that” the current state of standards and interoperability in cloud computing is similar to the early Internet era where each organization had its own network and data transfer was difficult.26 -27). bandwidth and storage depending on needs” (p.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . which changed with the introduction of TCP and other Internet standards. Misra and Mondal (2010) built two types of business models that can be drawn for companies (cloud users) willing to adopt cloud computing services. (p. businesses and/or individuals can either provide or use services within a near limitless computing environment (storage.2 No. VRML is an abstraction layer that sits on top of the IaaS layer and allows applications to access CPU. Section IV: Standardization of cloud computing There are three active bodies working towards standardizing cloud computing practices:    Cloud computing Interoperability Forum Open cloud consortium DMTF Open Cloud Standards Incubator 94 However. 58).

cloud computing is becoming a key service offering of many IT firms. such as utility computing and the smart data centre. Under such conditions.resource lease manager.Various researches have been undertaken to imply cloud computing in various domains. Sotomayor et al. Vol. such as IBM. increase the quality of their students’ learning outcomes”. Grossman et al. Lim et al. Buyya et al. such as Amazon. Governments that are looking for answers against bureaucracy and complication of procedures are almost obligated to implement new technological solutions to provide public services effectively”. (2009) stresses on “feedback control service for scaling in the cloud. and traditional IT service firms. Google. (2009) opines that Cloud computing and web collaboration are two major concepts that underlie new and innovative developments in library 95 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. and Salesforce. cloud computing is being rapidly adopted by organizations in both developed countries such as the U. On the demand side. (2009) developed a cloud-based infrastructure that had been optimized for performance networks and supported necessary data mining applications. ( 2009) presents two tools for managing cloud infrastructure: OpenNebula.2 No. 124). HP and Fujistu.virtual infrastructure manager and Haizea. Scaling choices must be under control of the users. and thus. with the involvement with IT the commitment as well as services has been miserably infested. Vaquero et al.S. According to Kossmann and Kraska (2010) “Cloud Computing promises to lower the bar for new services to become worthwhile by making things cheaper. Section VI: Adoption of cloud computing in libraries Library and information centres are constantly in search of low-cost solutions due to low funding. faster. Su (2011) In the field of education Thomas (2011) argues that “Cloud Computing has a significant place in the higher education landscape both as a ubiquitous computing tool and a powerful platform that can enhance engagement among educational researchers and educators to understand and improve practice. cloud computing helps optimizing the long tail of processes which are currently not supported by IT and helps to reduce the cost of those processes that indeed are already automated” (p. and emerging economies such as China. This way. cloud computing is the savior of all the ebbs of the information technology. (2009) have also dealt with market-oriented resource allocation of cloud computing by leveraging third-generation Aneka enterprise grid technology. Ironically. in order to have control over spending and to be able to work towards maximizing return on investments”.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . and automating the tasks that traditionally has also to be carried out by Buschman and Leckie (2009) posit that “librarians need to be critical in their use of technology”. Banerjee (2009) provides an overview of technological research studies that were performed in HP labs and that adopted cloud-scale smart environments. On the supply side. including both firms that specialize in cloud computing.

To meet their needs. The future of computing lies in cloud computing. (2010). SirsiDynix. From the emergence of World Wide Web. and more effective cost reduction. (2007). (2011) (p. Wolf (2010). Today. scholastic predictions indicated that the library in serving future users may offer referral to “potentially appropriate points in a vast network of resources accessible through the internet or its successors” (Lancaster. OhioLink. easier access. Historically libraries have turned to huge capital investment on IT infrastructure for various online as well as subscription based services. 96 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. The web has also expanded the scope of services provided by librarians. “Migrating to a cloud-based application may turn out to be cost neutral but at the same time still have the benefit of allowing staff to concentrate on libraryspecific issues”. Cloud computing will bring an end to the ILS server. (p. has made it imperative that libraries offer their services online. 27). library and information science scholarship has remodeled the future for libraries. Today`s consumers of information have more alternative and attractive ways of finding information than using the traditional library Sadeh. the economics. Mitchell. 59-60). Cloud computing is important in the context of LIS education for two reasons Tomer and Alman (2011). including OCLC. the embrace of cloud computing by many organizations. Instead. The growing internet usage among library users and potential users. Vol. “First. 6). and perhaps the personnel requirements of library computing in years to come”. (2007). plus the time these users spend on the internet. libraries need to adopt the communication and information tools and services that users are accustomed to Sadeh. Much of these tools and services will not be owned by the library but are necessary to carry out the enduring work of making library collections and services known and accessible to users. These predictions have to come true. It will provide all its web-scale subscribers with a vendor database which will list their details avoiding data redundancy in libraries.2 No. availability and flexibility and decreasing processing time Hayes (2008).automation. Moulasion and Corrado. (1997). reliability. Recently. OCLC started Web-scale management services which can perform the in-house library operations through mutual co-operation. recognizing that future libraries may not own their collection of resources Lancaster. and the Library of congress suggests that this mode of computing will have a significant impact on the configuration. (2010). whose major goal is reducing the cost of IT services while increasing processing throughput. Libraries can work cooperatively in a flexible environment where they can share solutions to problems instead of having to reinvent the wheel at each library. Cloud services allow for more optimal resource utilization. p. 1997. the library`s users are accessing the information needed in the comfort and security of their homes or in their own personal or customized spaces. The introduction of the internet to libraries was part of a significant shift from print/in-house-focused services to online/ externally provided services.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . With these success libraries are motivated for using subscription based cloud IT infrastructure. OCLC web scale management services.

Other vendors can take advantage of the cloud. categorization and analytics to help users manage the vast repositories of both structured and unstructured information) as well as the cost-savings and flexibility that they can provide. Internet world stats (2011). They have also emerged as an key players in the provision of internet services to the user communities Kinney (2010) During this time libraries have re-directed services both to support in-house internet use and to serve the needs of users via digital means. Vendors can provide a remotely hosted service which allows for the creation of modular content. so you don`t need a client on your local PC. both strategic and operational. Goscinski and Brock. (2009). “In World India is the third and in Asia second largest country in internet adoption”. Libraries are in a unique position to experiment with cloud computing given their service oriented mission and need to find appropriate solutions using limited resources.. Blowers (2010). Wolf (2010). It is imperative that all senior technologists have a solid understanding of the ramifications of cloud computing since its impact is likely to permeate the entire IT landscape” Rhoton. vulnerabilities in cloud computing that may lead to such risks. 97 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. It also lowers the technical skills needed to create web pages. (2009). Moore (2010) asserts that “use analysis now requires a cloud computing orientation”. Vol. Fox (2009) observes that the goals of the organization have an impact on their use of cloud solutions. Smartphones are being used by the users these days for accessing information services for fast and easy communication. which many libraries wouldn`t be able to create on their own. the cloud computing adoption rate is not growing as fast as expected Banerjee. “A study conducted by IMAI and IMRB reveals that there are 121 million internet users in India out of which 97 million access atleast once in a month” Times of India. (2011). Further. Like other cloud applications it is accessible from any internet connection. sorting. While cloud computing has been discussed as a new technology develop that can provide several advantages. There seems to be an utmost use of web based services in libraries and information centres since the evolution of internet. and impacts and. Now the information formats have also changed. Buyya et al.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . (2009). to its adopters. “There is a tremendous amount of enthusiasm around cloud-based solutions and services (filtering. As such cloud computing has the seeds for reinvigoration of library and information science professions.2 No. through cloud computing instead of having own servers and employing personnel for its maintenance libraries can hire a vendor on a monthly charge and enjoy the benefit of same server function. Moreover. (2010) Section VII: Security concerns of cloud computing ENISA firstly addressed the security risks related to adopting cloud computing along with the affected assets.

and quality of service. Hayes. Armbrust et al. simplification and convenience of the way computing-related services are delivered seem to be among the main drivers of cloud computing Erdogmus. (2009).Similar efforts have been laid by CSA .2 No. The shift to Cloud computing moved much of a user’s normal activity to the Web browser. Some scholars are of the opinion that Cloud computing service providers are incentivized by the profits to be made from charging consumers for access to these services.. Dasmalchi. and access to market information mobilization. ease of implementation. efficient coordination among firms. better customer communications. It may take users a long time to understand and implement the new system. Bernd et al. 50). segregation and data recovery. (2009) discuss the technical security issues arising from adopting the cloud computing model such as XML-attacks. However. Vol. the market is expected to reach $241 billion in 2020. (2010).7 billion in 2010. complexity of an innovation can act as a barrier to implementation of new 98 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. Meiko et al. Economic. payment and privacy of sensitive information. Buyya et al. “Providing IT services in the cloud shifts much of this expense to a pay-as-you-go-model and consequently offers significant cost advantages according to one view”. Kresimir et al. (2010) raises issues concerning the “security vulnerabilities existing in the cloud platform”. browsing history and other sensitive information in a single place. Subashini (2010) discusses the security challenges of the cloud service delivery model. Zhu. compared to $40. IT research firm Forrester published the first industry report that offered a sizing of the cloud computing market..2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . Trappler (2010) asserts that “if it is in the cloud.. firms may not have confidence in a cloud computing system because it is relatively new to them. (2010) discusses high level security concerns in the cloud computing model such as data integrity. Thus. (2009) discuss the security SLA`s specifications and objective relating to data locations. Lin. get it on paper”. (p. The expected benefits of embedded cloud computing services include the following: speed of business communications. freeing up of internal resources. browser`s related attacks and flooding attacks. (2009). is using the skilled practitioners. Fu. such as a logged in email account or online banking session. Section VIII: Benefits of cloud computing Pyke (2009) has described the following benefits of cloud computing: scalability. As such it is possible for malicious websites to exploit browser vulnerabilities in order to steal information associated with other existing or previous browsing sessions. (2008). (2009). Balchandra et al. Many see huge potential of the technology in reducing the cost of IT to organizations and freeing them from the expense and hassle of having to install and maintain applications locally Leavitt. (2009). Firms are attracted by the opportunity for reducing or eliminating costs associated with “in-house” provision of these services Buyya et al. According to this report. (2009). Web browsers generally store all of a user’s saved passwords.

(2011) “the services that libraries can acquire through the use of cloud computing platforms may indeed be valuable. (1994). (p. SLA management. He advocates that because companies might be storing documents which should not be made public. cloud computing is not an exception in terms of trust and security issues. meaning that librarians can make use of services without incurring any cost for their libraries”. “The elastic aspect of cloud computing allows applications to scale and grow without needing traditional ‘fork lift’ upgrades”. research has shown that there are some major obstacles which hinder the adoption and growth of Cloud computing. service portability.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . many users may fail to realize that they are in fact using an Internet based service. thereby allowing their own employees to take care of other obligations in lieu of monitoring version changes and upgrades. (2012) (p. Tsaravas and Marinos (2011) Despite the potential benefits and revenues that could be gained from the cloud computing model. availability and reliability of data. multi-tenancy and isolation. (2010). and continue to function when the user is not connected to the Internet.” Ramgovind et al. they can also rely on the software provider to carry out all updates. Further cloud computing will given even the smallest organization the ability to use the power of network computing within a minimal infrastructure. quite a few of the cloud-based software platforms are available for free. Grundy and Muller.2 No. (2011) “If librarians can save on buying and maintaining servers. Furthermore. 4-5). This will free libraries from the shackles of IT management and allow us to focus on services and resources. According to Moulasion and Corrado..elasticity engines. the model still has a lot of open issues that impact the model creditability and pervasiveness. Potential Cloud organisations and vendors need to be aware that it may become easier for attackers to threaten clouds by moving towards a single cloud interface. Vendor lock-in. Section IX: Downsides of cloud computing However. . Madhubala. and cloud security are well known open research problems in the cloud computing model. Once data are outsourced to a third-party cloud provider. R. As every technological concept. several concerns arise about security. (2010) Katz (2009) focuses on many areas where the cloud may impinge on education.287). With cloud computing we are getting closer to the reality of purchasing computer power. This risk of confusion will likely increase when cloud based applications lack any recognizable browser branding. Wolf. data management.. Premkumar et al.(2010) “As computer manufacturers. Depending on the service. there are reasons for concern about what can happen to the information. employers and universities deploy cloud based tools on desktops. but 99 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. Vol.Moulasion and Corrado. Morsy. complexity factor is usually negatively just like they did before the digital age. they can save their parent institution money.

5). Lenk. Harmer. 2009. Koehler and Anandasivam. Mika and Tummar Chun and Maniatis 2009.2010. elo. 2010. 100 Benefits Business Impediments Model Pricing Privacy Standards Security Storage Technology Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science.2009. et al.. Zeng etal.. Briscoe.2010. Ramireddy. 2009 Bernstein. 2009. 2009. Armbrust et al. Vol.2009..2010. Shigeo and Nagamori. Sugimoto.. Grossman. et al.. Briscoe and Marions. 2007. Wolf. Matthew and Spraetz. 2009. Bhardwaj et al. et al. 2009. Weinhardt et al.. Furht and Escalante. Lim et al. Mikkilineni and Sarathy. 2010. Table 2. Mitshuharu. et al. Overview of cloud computing research ISSUES Adoption CONTRIBUTORS Hazelhurst. 2010.. 2011 Buyya et al. 2009. et al.. 2010.2009.2009. Keahey 2009. Delic and Riley. 2009.2008.2009. Assuncao et al. Matthews. et al. et al..2009. Nurmi. 2009.. Pascal. (p. Sun. Dikaiakos et al. Vaquero et al.Stefan.. Holger and Matzke.. 2009. 2009.2009. Ried. Dodda et al. 2009. 2010. Pearson. 2009. Vaquero et al.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . Leimeister et al. Jan. 2010. 2008.2010. Baars & Kemper. can become a considerable hurdle to effective provision of services”.. Saya et al. even if bandwidth is not currently at a premium.. Jericho forum (2009). Askhoj... et al.... Youseff et al. Velte et al. Yeo et al..2010. Wilson 2009. Pueschel & Neumann.the cost of internet access. 2009. Joint et al. Ohlman. 2009. Anandasivam & Weinhardt. Kisker. 2009. 2008... 2009.2 No. Ratogi.2010. 2009.2009.

2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . a comparative study of cloud computing. Figure 2. It revealed that the term gained momentum post-2009.RESULTS Popularity of the terms and search To analyse the popularity of “cloud computing” searching was done on Google Trends. During 2010 onwards it was at its peak. taken from Google Trends 101 Further. Searches for cloud computing on Google.2 No. Also there is high scope of research on cloud computing in conjunction with libraries in near future. It revealed that cloud computing has gained tremendous popularity in Vol. libraries and online services was done on Google Insights to determine the interest areas worldwide. Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science.

Figure 3. Vol. Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . Searches for cloud computing from Google books Ngram Viewer 102 It reveals that post 2006 there has been sharp increase in the usage of the term in books. Table 4. It revealed that post 2006 there has been sudden increase in the usage of the term in books. Searches for cloud computing taken from Google Insights To analyse the average use of the term “cloud computing” in books searching was done on Google Books Ngram Viewer.2 No.

Distribution of articles by year An analytical study of the references was done to find out the most productive year for cloud computing literature. We found that during 2010 maximum number of literature was written.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . Figure 5. Distribution of articles by year 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2 1 12 15 Distribution of articles by year 26 29 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 103 Distribution of articles by publication To analyse the most productive sources for “cloud computing” literature an analysis of the available literature was done.2 No. It revealed that conference proceedings were the best source of dissemination of the concept on cloud computing Figure 6. Vol. Distribution of articles by year 30 20 10 2 0 Distribution of articles by publication 19 15 18 20 22 10 12 14 12 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science.

Fox. Buschman. Version 1. J. Tobias Walloschek .. 26.. Stoica. Joseph. Fox. 11. IBM high performance on demand solutions.D. I. 1-28 9. Yeo. Buyya. Katz.html.. Banerjee. .com/node/1744132." IEEE Security and Privacy. (2010) Understanding Cloud-Computing Vulnerabilities. & Hall H (2007) Cloud computing. (2009).K. Blowers.Rabkin. I. Future Generation Computer Systems. 13. Retrieved from: http://news. and Buschman. Retrieved from: http://www. Retrieved from: http://cloudcomputing. Legregni L. Malladi P. Armbrust. 50-58.E. Boss G. Dan. 6-10... (2009). September 26. A. Cloud expo: blog feed post. Udayan (2011) The evolution of cloud computing. (2009). H. A view of cloud computing.V. M. Konwinski.jsp?punumber=4795428 4. An intelligent IT infrastructure for the future. 16. (2009) Twenty-one experts define cloud M. In grid computing workshop (GCE`08). REFERENCES 1.S.CONCLUSION Cloud computing is a novel concept where theory building is not at the centre of research rather most studies focus on praxis. Cloud computing: does Nirvana hide behind the nebula? IEEE Software. Erdogmus. Broberg. Gardner. in Leckie. Computers in Libraries 30(4).ecommercetimes. J.Raicu. Raleigh. evolution. I. Foster.. Geelan. Y.sys-con. Venugopa. E-commerce times.. Banerjee. (2009) Cloud security issues in PROC`09 IEEE International conference on services computing. R. 25. A.html. hype.cnet. 12. and Leckie. D. 7. (Eds).2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . Technical report.2 No. Introduction: information technologies and libraries – why do we need new critical approaches?. Cloud computing and emerging it platforms: vision. R.. and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility”. 50-57. P. (2010) From realities to values: a strategy for digital 8. 53. HPCA. Cloud computing journal. (2008) Oracle`s Ellison nails cloud computing.. (2009) Library in the clouds. Vol. The technology has been explored at its utmost from technical purview and its implication in library is yet to be explored due to its relative edge in libraries. CNET News. USA. 25( 3). January. Lee.. (2008) Cloud computing and grid computing 360-degree compared.J. Quan S. 104 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. and Rakshit. Bernd Grobauer. Balchandra. A. Retrieved from: ieeexplore. Information technology in librarianship: new critical approaches Westport. R. A. 99.Zhao. London. Connecticut Libraries Unlimited. Retrieved from H. Proceedings of 15th International Symposium on High-performance Computer Architecture. Patterson. Griffith. and Zaharia. I. 1-10. J. S. (2009).. 5. & Elmar Stöcker. Retrieved from: http://yourravi. A. G..J. & Brandic. Communications of the ACM. 599-616 10. 2007-10-08. OCLC Systems & Services. P. G. It is of prime importance for the reinvigoration of the library profession. Cyberpassionteam (2011) History of cloud computing. 156-161 15. Dana (2012) Cloud computing: revolution vs.E. 3. (2010). NC. R. Although the present paper cannot claim as exhaustive one yet it attempts to draw insights into the present state-ofthe-art.. Ramakrishna. Farber. . J. C. & LU. R. 4-6. 14.sys-con. 517-520.

162 – 165. 29( 2). Balachandra. 42(1).R. Sabala. Cloud computing. (Ed.opengroup. Industrial management & data systems. Communications of the Association for Information Systems . R. Low. IT Professional.Z. & Wu. 229-236 26.L. K. & Parekh. Ramakrishna . Leavitt. 111(7). 29.L. 25. Donald & Kraska. 2009. Cloud computing: IT as a service.H. 43-51. J. October).htm. and the digital divide. (2009) Cloud Cube Model: Selecting Cloud Formations for Secure Collaboration Version 1.. 23. Future Generation Computer Systems. 9-11. Nature.E. (2008). Frank Cervone. R. 36. Chinyao. 1006-1023.0. 24. Y. 35. Grossman. Chen. 2005. (1997). Technologies and services. Tech Titans Building Boom. 21.A. 11( 2). 10-13. M. R. 1.. Atanu (2009) Cloud security issues.B. 449. D. Fu. Tsugawa. 19.pdf 28. & Fortes. Internet computing.Tim (2010) Data management in the cloud: promises. Google and I. and Brock.I.. & Zeljko (2010) Cloud computing security issues and challenges. 38. 344-349. E. & Grossman. Public library quarterly. (2009) The case for cloud computing. Lim. Lohr. in Raitt. 32. (2007) Heads in the clouds. Retrieved from http://www.. H. & Katzell. & Rakshit. 40. (2008).html?_r=1&ex=1349496000&en=9227 f0f65ea0d75&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&oref=slogin 40. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International conference on Services computing.16.. 9. 11( 2).. Goscinski. Third international conference on Advances in Human-oriented and Personalized mechanisms. D. 26 (3). R. & Dasmalchi. 963. 39. IEEE Spectrum.G. A. 20.I. Hocenski. discovery and selection for cloud computing”. Kinney. 31. Library Association. King.M. Lin. .com/top20. Zeljko. Join in ‘Cloud Computing’ Research. Gu. . A .. G. IEEE 13( 5).) Libraries for the new millennium: implications for managers. M. J. S. N. B.. Hand. What is cloud computing? Cloud computing journal. Future Generation Computer Systems. (1987). Chase.G. (2009).17. Communications of the ACM. (1999) The Effect of User Engagement on System Success: A MetaAnalytical Integration of Research Findings. 25. Reddy. Babu. 947970. (2008). state-of-theart. 105 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. Information & Management . Internet World Stats: usage and population statistics (2011). “Toward dynamic and attribute based publication. Vol. London. and open questions. F. Hwang. Kossmann. 33. Patauri. Katz. M.. S. W. Datenbank Spektrum.2 No. Understanding the Role and Methods of Meta-Analysis in Is Research. 26. OCLC Systems & Services International digital library perspectives. Hartig. (2009) Sky computing. 51. H. Jericho Forum. (2009). Zhu. 517-520. Popovic. Research in Organizational Behavior. Yahsueh .. Meta-Analysis Analysis. W. (2010). Hayes. & He. Compute and storage clouds using wide area high performance networks.. Bo (2010) The Internet. 407-442. Matsunaga. 121-129 34. Retrieved from www. Retrieved from: http://cloudcomputing. 19-38. Public libraries.35. Lancaster. 13-18. New York Times (8. R. 23-27.sys-con.H. 179-183. R.. Kresimir. (2010) An overview of virtual and cloud computing. Is cloud computing really made for prime time? Computer. Jericho Forum Specification. J.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . Keahey.nytimes. Kandakuri.W. 10. 46(2). Mingchang (2011) Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption.. K. & Zhang. S. Retrieved from: http://www. (2009).internetworldstats. 104-161. 30. 18. IT Professional.A. Jackson. (2009) Automated control in cloud computing: challenges and opportunities. Steve. M. In ACDC`09: Proceedings of the 1st workshop on automated control of datacenters and clouds. Artificial intelligence and expert system technologies: prospects. 15-20 37. 22.

International journal of soft computing and engineering. “Implementation of electronic data interchange: an innovation diffusion perspective”. John .amazon. Retrieved from: www. M. & Sarathy. C. . Thomas J. 214 –224. 50. 56.(2010). In Enabling Technologies: infrastructure for collaborative enterprises. 44. 53. Thomas. (2010). 11. 55. Daryl. The Electronic Library. Recursive press. E. Madhubala. 3-11 51. Jensenh Jorg.computerweekly. Pyke. content and the cloud. & Muller. Heather Lea & Corrado. S. Austin. "Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants. The Management of Security in 58. Identification of a company’s suitability for the adoption of cloud computing and modelling its corresponding return on investment. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. J. Arif (2009) A history of cloud computing. White Paper. Retrieved from: http://www. 2009. Mell.pdf 45. Corrado and Heather Lea Moulasion. . 157-186. Misra. Rhoton. URL: http://library. 18th International Workshops on. Computerweekly. Tom. Cearley.cs. Lyons. David Mitchell (2008) Cloud Computing: defining and describing an emerging phenomenon. S. R. “Now is the time to take the cloud seriously”. Retrieved from: www. Ramamurthy. & Mondal. R. How to write a literature review. WETICE` 09. Geoffrey (2010) Atmosphere: 61. (2011) Cloud computing: A potential paradigm for practicing the scholarship of teaching and learning. In Edward M.pdf posted by EVENTS@google. 29 ( 2).R. Corrado and Heather Lea Moulasion.pdf. Security for South Africa (ISSA). 57-62.Getting started with cloud computing. Tim (2009) The NIST definition of cloud computing. Nils. 46(3). 106 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. V. Mohamed John (2009) Cloud computing explained: implementation handbook for enterprises. 1-5. A..41. Mohamed. In Edward M. & Chowa. (2009) Cloud computing and the lessons from the past. (1994).M.pdf. Banglore 2009. N. Morsy. 52(12). David W. K. 2006. Jeyaraj. Kenneth (2010) Concordia University libraries.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . Edward M. and Smith. Ramgovind. he_cloud_seroiusly_online_1_. 46. Sabherwal. Proceedings of ASPEC 2010 Cloud Meiko. 344-349. Retrieved from: www.concordia. Kindle e-book. Getting started with cloud computing UK: Facet. Ingo (2010) An analysis of the cloud computing security problem. & McLean. UK: Facet. 48..php 42.C. 159-166. Mikkilineni. G. Erik (2010) What cloud computing means for libraries.cordys. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2010 Information 59. Plummer. Youtube video. 49. (2011) Perspectives on cloud computing in g.auckland.. "A Meta-Analytic Assessment of the Delone and Mclean Is Success Model: An Examination of Is Success at the Individual Level. (2009). Gruschka and Iacono. & Sree.. Moulasion. Journal of Management Information Systems.2 No.. A. Retrieved from: http://www. 286-290. 504-21. Petter. 57. Schwenk. Peter & Grance. R. 1( 6). S. Retrieved from: http://www. Retrieved from: http://www. P. April 12. 43. Cloud Computing. Mitchell. (2012) An illustrative study on cloud computing. C. Grundy. 42:33." Information & Management. & Luigi Lo (2009) On cloud technical security issues in cloud computing in IEEE ICCC. 52.. & Smith." Management Science. Vol.emory. 1-7 60. 47. E.nist. Premkumar.

tagsolutions. Zenoss (2010) 2010 Virtualization and cloud computing survey. Thomas. 1(5). Yang. W. 81. Getting started with cloud computing. A. Mediterranean & Middle Eastern conference on Information system. & Khajeh-Hosseini. N.pdf 67. 13(5). International Journal of Information Management.aisnet. 59-68. Networker 11(4). Web-scale management services. N. I. Michalk. 307-316. L. 72. & J. URL : http://aisel. 12( 4). Retrieved from: aisel. B. & Foster. Weinhardt. 50-55. 79.2 No. Paper 26. EDUCAUSE Q.. MD: Zenoss. Retrieved from: www. Christinger & Alman. Tomer. 83. In 1st ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing. Sotomayor. Business & Information Systems Engineering.Y.pdf 107 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. (2009) Cloud computing: new wine or a just a new bottle. J.Amy (2009) Succeeding at SaaS: computing in the cloud. Carol (2011) The organizing vision of cloud computing in Taiwan. Cloud computing for education: a new dawn?.3259. Business Models. T.cms 69. 11( 2). (2010). Borissov. & Watson. I. & Computing_Survey_(Zenoss). Thomas J. Trappler. Wolf. UK: Facet. (2009) Cloud Computing—A classification. /EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/IfItsintheCloudGetItonPaperClo/206532. 391-399. V.. 80. L.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) .org/webscale/default. Subhasini. Meinl. 109-116.htm 78. T. 214-224. 39(1 ). Shirley Ou & 82. Su.indiatimes. C.. Wohl. Vaquero. 65. MIS Quarterly. Vol. Anadasivam. J. Get it on Paper: Cloud Computing Contract Issues. 68. 66. 85. Charalampos & Themistocleous. J. Ali (2010) Research agenda in cloud technologies. Robert (2010) Cloud computing. Webster. Corrado & Heather Lea Moulasion(Ed. Voas. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. Haibo and Tate. IT Professional. A. 73. (2010) A survey on security issues in service delivery models of cloud computing. (2009) Virtual infrastructure management in private and hybrid clouds. SOCC URL: arxiv. Ning (2011)Emergence of Cloud Computing: An Institutional Innovation Perspective.oclc. IEEE.chinacloud. & Zhang. 84.). 257-271. (2011) Cloud computing for lis education. 63.. Stößer. "Where are we at with Cloud Computing?: A Descriptive Literature Review" (2009). R. Caceres. Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. J. & M. Internet computing. ACIS 2009 Proceedings. 71.T. 68( 2).. Rodero-Merino. Weiss A (2007) Computing in the clouds. 64. (2002). Times of India report (2011) Retrieved from: http://timesofindia. Retrieved from: http://www. Anapolis. North Carolina libraries. Blau. (2007). (2009) A Break in the Clouds: Towards a Cloud Definition. (2011) Cloud Computing: a potential paradigm for practicing the scholarship of teaching and learning. 26 (2). The Electronic library. I. Journal of network and computer applications. (2010). In: ICISAssociation for Information Systems. http://www. Sriram. 30. Retrieved from: 77. Tsaravas.. 15-17. “Time for a change: new approaches for a new generation of library users”. In Edward M. Lindner. 76. Marinos (2011) Cloud computing and Egovernment: a literature If it’s in the Cloud.educause. Sultan. 108 ( 7/8). Ruba. and Research Directions. Sadeh. 16-25.undertheradarblog. Retrieved from: http://www.62. Retrieved from: http://www. Mary. Llorente. Susan W. 70. iii-xiii. 154-164 74. European. S. Journal of electronic commerce research.aisnet. B. 29 (2). New Library World.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful

Master Your Semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Special offer for students: Only $4.99/month.

Master Your Semester with a Special Offer from Scribd & The New York Times

Cancel anytime.