Cloud Computing in Conjunction with Libraries: Descriptive Literature Review

Mayank Yuvaraj Junior Research Fellow Dept. of LIS, Banaras Hindu University Varanasi, India Ajay Pratap Singh Head & Associate Professor Dept. of LIS, Banaras Hindu University Varanasi, India

Cloud computing is the essence of future computing needs that has emerged to be a savior for library professionals. It is an emerging technology characterized by an element of novelty where the research community has recently embarked. Since, 2008 explosively increasing amount of research has been conducted. This paper presents a descriptive literature review of cloud computing paradigm from vivid perspectives. There has been drastic shift in the trinity of libraries: books which have become electronic, user which prefers web resources than print and the staff which has become cybrarian. In this changed library landscape there is need to shift our competencies for the challenges offered by IT. Availability of independent computing components on demand like cloud as CPU, Storage in cloud has removed the web of IT and librarians can focus on their mission and services. In this paper we analyze the normative literature to extract a functional methodology or working model of cloud computing to be implied in libraries. KEYWORDS: Cloud computing, Literature review, Libraries, Cloud computing in libraries


INTRODUCTION With the encroachment of IT in library services the commitment of library and information professionals to provide people with information has come to stake. Library and information professionals are involved in the business of buying, configuring, installing, and maintaining servers which has nothing to do with the day-to-day library mission and services. One must engage in such affairs unless we absolutely must do so. In such circumstances Cloud computing has emerged as blessings in disguise that has brought decentralization to the computing world. It is concerned with the abstraction of software, services and storage facilities provided the access to network. The concept of cloud computing has sprung from the “intergalactic computer network” developed by J.C.R Licklider in 1960s where he wanted that everyone could use computer and anyone could get data irrespective of location and time in world. In 1961 John McCarthy, a computer scientist predicted that someday the computational power will be offered as a public service, such as water and electricity. This concept however, declined in early 1970`s due to the lack of physical infrastructure that could satisfy the needs of implementation of cloud

Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. Vol.2 No.2 (Jul – Dec 2012)

technology. The relative novelty and exploding growth of cloud computing makes it an exciting area for research. The present paper aims to assess the state of cloud computing research. METHODOLOGY Defining any term seeks to study the qualitative and quantitative behavior. Henceforth, the four methods of literature review viz. narrative review, descriptive review, vote counting and meta analysis has to be given the same treatment. King and He32 have placed the four methods in a “qualitative-quantitative continuum”. Figure 1. Qualitative-quantitative continuum


Narrative review is the traditional method of reassessment of literature slanted towards qualitative behavior of the literature. According to King and He32 this method is conducted by “verbally describing the past studies, focusing on theories and frameworks, elementary factors and their research outcomes, regarding a hypothesized relationship. However, Yang and Tate (2009) argues that “there is no consensus towards a standardized procedure of narrative review. How to conduct a narrative review largely depends on the reviewer’s personal preference, thus this approach is easily vulnerable to subjectivity”. (p. 808). It is not rare for “two reviewers to arrive at rather different conclusion from the same general body of literature” (Guzzo et al., 1987, p. 408). Descriptive review focuses on revealing an interpretable pattern from the existing literature (Guzzo et al., 1987). King and He (2005) surmises that descriptive review studies “produces some quantification, often in the form of frequency analysis, such as publication time, research methodology, research outcomes etc. Such a review method often has a systematic procedure including searching, filtering and classifying processes. First a reviewer needs to

Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. Vol.2 No.2 (Jul – Dec 2012)

p. As the concept is still in its infancy which has not fully ripened so it was difficult to fetch information from the library collections. However. 668). or theories. 2005. The premise underlying this approach is that “repeated results in the same direction across multiple studies. Since. 667). Efforts were laid to get information from online databases. Hence due to an element of novelty it was difficult to find plethora of information on this topic. search engines and repositories. 809). p. “Qualitative studies have to be excluded by a meta-analysis due to its extremely quantitative nature. The incentive of this approach is to generate a much less judgmental and subjective literature review upon a specific research context. therefore the publication channels are still largely scattered” (p. Vol. Meta-analysis aims at statistically providing supports to a research topic by “combining and analyzing the quantitative results of many empirical studies” (King and He. The facets of cloud computing is a dawning research area. p. 2005. which makes it next to impossible to examine any variables. Only similar quantitative studies are collected for a meta-analysis. correlations.2 No. 2005. it may specifically examine the relationships between certain Independent Variables (IVs) and Dependent Variables (DVs) derived from existing research findings. 809). even some of them are non-significant.” (p. 668). 808) Vote counting is generally used to “draw qualitative inferences upon focal relationships by combining individual research findings”. Under such circumstances descriptive review is the most appropriate one. 809).conduct a comprehensive literature search to collect as many relevant papers as possible in an investigated area.The outcome of such a review is often claimed to be representative of the state of art of a research domain. Then the reviewer treats an individual study as one data record and identifies trends and patterns among the papers surveyed . 2009. In most cases. Most likely it is applied to generate insights from a series of experiments”. journals. Traditionally this is done by scanning some prominent journals and conferences exclusively dedicated to the subject. may be more powerful evidence than a single significant result” (King and He. (Yang and Tate.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . cloud computing arena is one of the sprouting sectors of computing world. according to Yang and Tate (2009) “focusing on limited outlets cannot be justified for a literature review on cloud computing as this is a recent phenomenon which just emerged two years ago. For most of the concurrent phenomena Information Science researchers and scholars are using online databases as their first literature collecting strategy. p. It attempts to explore pertinent literature through computer or manual searches. “Here a tally is made of the frequency with which existing research findings support a particular proposition. 2009. LITERATURE SEARCH Literature search is a pre-requisite for reviewing literature on any subject. p. All the Web based references mentioned in 88 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. (King and He . ” (Yang and Tate.

com Freefullpdf. time and proficiency keeps a check on Authorstream.this work were retrieved during research period of September 2011 to March 2012. the full text of the documents were reviewed and the Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science.rclis. Impediments like language. Keyword and abstract searching was done on following web-resources TOOLS o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o SOURCES ACM Digital library IEEE Xplore Proquest (ABI/INFORM) ScienceDirect (Elsevier) Google books Google scholar Google analytics BASE JURN Total papers or documents 132 Relevant papers or documents 54 Online databases Institutional repositories or archives PDF documents search PPT search 20 5 80 48 89 60 75 38 55 Search engines Specialized searching Academic search engines 54 31 118 46 INFORMATION FILTERING PROCESS Out of the total information retrieved from the web-sources two methods were employed to get the desired information on cloud NOPR DJLIT Pdfgeni. In spite of these. attempts have been undertaken to review literature relevant to present study.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . accessibility. Table Pdfqueen. the title and abstract of the document was scanned properly and those found to be relevant were take out.2 Dogpile. Mamma. it is almost impossible to review all the literature available on a concerned subject. Efforts have been laid to mention only those web addresses which are likely to work during this work but there are possibility that some links may not work. However due to the dynamicity of web they may not be functional now. Firstly. Moreover. Slideshare.

The first public usage of the term “cloud” as a metaphor for the internet in a paper published by MIT in 1996.2 which used a simple website to deliver its enterprise application to users. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2002. conference proceedings) relevant to a particular issue. dissertations. The great idea remained in history pages until it was put in application by salesforce.  Pre Cloud Phase. a literature review surveys scholarly articles.(1960s-pre internet bubble era): During this period core ideas of utility and grid computing developed. “The history of cloud computing faced huge competition only when Amazon started its cloud-based Amazon web services”. Stanford University. typically referring to a joint hardware and software deployment concept.(1999-2006): Internet developed as a mechanism to provide application as a service. For convenience the review study can be divided into various sections: Section I: Transition to cloud computing The roots of cloud computing can be traced to the days of mainframe computers (1960s) when the concept of utility computing came to light where the computing power could be split into metered service like power and telephone supply. The term cloud computing was coined in 2007. First research initiatives were started by Google and IBM in cooperation with “six American universities: Carnegie Mellon. Literature review is an essential approach to “conceptualize research areas and survey and synthesize prior research” (Webster and Watson. providing a description. Cyberpassionteam (2011). Another feather in the cap was added by Google that developed Google Apps entirely based on architecture of cloud computing. summary. “Cloud computing evolution can be split into three phases.(2008) compare and contrasted cloud computing with grid computing and inferred that “cloud computing is an evolved version of grid computing”. Microsoft in 2008 developed cloud based Azure services platform. the University of Maryland and the University of Washington”. area of research.” Substantial amount of literature relating to cloud computing was collected. Banerjee (2011):  Idea Phase. xiii). NetCentric tried to trademark “cloud computing” but was abandoned in April 1999. Vol. Berkeley. To keep pace with the technology. books and other sources (e. The purpose of a literature review is to offer an overview of significant literature published on a topic. In May 1997. Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science.g. According to Lyons (2010) “Not to be confused with a book review. Foster et al. scanned and reviewed. or theory. Lohr (2008). and critical evaluation of each work.documents rich in information content having no sketchy ideas dealing fundamentally with the research problem were finally taken into consideration for the research work.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) 90 . p. LITERATURE REVIEW Most challenging task of a research study is to review the past related literature to extract a functional methodology or working model for a research problem. the University of California.

Out of these in fact. It is first initiated by Amazon. grid computing and distributed computing. and Software as a Service (SaaS).” Commenting on the evolution of the cloud landscape Yang and Hsu (2011) concludes that “Cloud computing services first emerged as an IT paradigm five years ago. Plummer et al. or control over the technology infrastructure that supports them. and Salesforce. But the overarching concept of delivering computing resources through a global network is rooted in the sixties. Infinite computing resources would be available for any need at costs approaching zero. (2009) argues that “combining elements of existing technologies such as virtualization. expertise with. For IT. Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. Oracle. It is a style of computing in which IT-related capabilities are provided as a service allowing users to access technology enabled services from the internet without knowledge of.” On the other hand. Contrary to above it`s just an evolution of infrastructure efficiency.2 No. soon followed”. applicationcentric environment. (p.” Section II: The concept of cloud computing Plethora of interpretations has been contested on the conceptualization of Cloud Computing.(2007.” According to Mohamed (2009) “Cloud computing has evolved through a number of phases which included grid and utility computing. Weinhardt et al. such as Google. According to Farber (2008) “The interesting thing about cloud computing is that we've redefined cloud computing to include everything that we already do. The computer industry is the only industry that is more fashion-driven than women's fashion. scholars like Wohl (2009) perceive “Cloud Computing to be a vague term for a very vague and distant future in which computing would occur in a few remote locations without the need for very much human intervention. or the network functioned. But. Basically cloud is a metaphor for internet and is an abstraction for the complex infrastructure it conceals”. Madhubala. Cloud Phase. several prominent technology companies. application service position (ASP). it`s all about ways to improve delivery of the server-centric. 392).till date) Cloud computing became popular and the sub classification IaaS. their software. (p. They are joined by Gardner (2012) who argues that “cloud computing is often regarded as a revolution. SUN. Voas & Zhang (2009)”.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) 91 . R. (2008) find “Cloud computing as a style of computing where massively scalable IT-enabled capabilities are delivered as a service to external customers using internet technologies”. cloud Computing delivers scalable IT services via the Internet on a payper-use basis” (p. But to IT. 109). 286). Vol. Users would not need to know or care about how the computers. I can't think of anything that isn't cloud computing with all of these announcements.” Sultan (2010) argues that “A study by McKinsey (the global management consulting firm) found that there are 22 possible separate definitions of cloud computing. no common standard or definition for cloud computing seems to exist Grossman (2009). Further. PaaS & SaaS got formalized. IBM. (2012) put forth her view that “Cloud computing is a paradigm that focuses on sharing data and computations over a scalable network of nodes.

Pyke (2009) that “cloud computing services can provide the user seamlessly. Boss et al. (2010). It draws on existing technologies and approaches.2 No. “cloud computing is not a fundamentally new paradigm. Vol. and technological solutions for firms” Armbrust et al.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . (2009) argues that “Cloud computing is the infrastructural paradigm shift that is sweeping across the Enterprise IT world that has as many definitions as there are squares on a chess-board”. (2010) (p. ” Under such circumstances there is a general agreement of scholars like Buyya et al. What is new is that cloud computing combines and integrates these approaches.” (p. Yahsueh and Wu. e. Inspired by similar thoughts Low. In nutshell. His arguments are supplemented by Hand (2007) who argues that “in cloud computing not just our data but even our software resides within the cloud. (2009). Chen. in which the imagery of a cloud is traditionally used to represent the internet or some large networked environment. and centralized data centres. Misra and Mondal. and the quality-stable technological support that can develop the enormous potential demand”. However. Kossmann and Kraska (2010) have put forth three important principles that depend on each other and can only provide additional value if implemented in concert These are: automation. 17). 55). 122). Sultan.However. Mingchang (2011) Cloud computing provides the opportunity of flexibility and adaptability to attract the market on demand.  The monitoring of resource utilization to support dynamic load-balancing and reallocations of applications and resources”. such as utility computing. According to Low. (2009). He opined that cloud computing is a new model of computing used widely in today`s industry and society. Chinyao. (2010). the convenience. The concept is derived from the imagery of the Internet cloud. application software. defined as a collection of disembodied services accessible from anywhere using any mobile device with an internet-based connection. Hartig (2008) refers to Cloud Computing as the phenomenon of “virtualization of resources that maintains and manages itself”. (p. (2011) opines that “as we could expect. Erdogmus. and we access everything not only through our PCs 92 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science.4). distributed computing. “Cloud computing has spread out through the main areas related to information systems and technologies. 1007). such as operating systems. Chen and Wu.. virtualization and pay-as-you-go pricing model. ( p. Some of the scholars have attempted to trace the roots of Cloud Computing from business. the term cloud is derived from the idea of businesses and users being able to access applications from anywhere in the world on demand”. (2007) argues that “Cloud is a pool of virtualized computer resources which allows:  The dynamic scale-in and scale-out of applications by the provisioning and deprovisioning of resources.g by means of virtualization. according to Weiss (2007). Geelan. Cloud computing is also. (p. software-as-a-service.

The cube represents four dimensions of cloud activities:  Location of data: Internal/ External Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. storage. In IaaS. Skype can be few of good examples of PaaS  Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) Consumers control and manage the systems in terms of the operating systems. VMWare vCloud are some of its examples Jericho Forum (2009) has put forth “cloud cube model to differentiate cloud formations from each other and the manner of their provision. and network connectivity. The deployment models are:  Software as a Service (SaaS) Consumers purchase the ability to access and use an application or service that is hosted in the cloud.  Platform as a Service (PaaS) Consumers purchase access to the platforms. Hotmail. Public cloud available to public users to register and use the available infrastructure. such as smart phones. Amazon’s Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) or Simple Storage Service (S3). The operating systems and network access are not managed by the consumer. and there might be constraints as to which applications can be deployed.2 No. PDAs. database management systems. 963). Section III: Models of cloud computing Models are mental or pictorial representation of an event or phenomenon. Google App Engine and Force. to run applications. the mega-computer enabled by virtualization and software as a service”. Mell. Scholars have also used models to study cloud computing. (p. For example email and few other services offered by Google. clients are being offered with storage. Vol.but also cloud friendly devices. but do not themselves control the cloud infrastructure. Windows Azure. networking and processing of data. enabling them to deploy their own software and applications in the cloud.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) 93 . Sify. and Hybrid cloud: a private cloud that can extend to use resources in public clouds. applications. Client does not require to know programming language. Yahoo. To run required service a special platform or application infrastructure is also being provided to the clients where clients can build their web based applications. & Grance (2009): The service delivery models are: Private cloud: a cloud platform is dedicated for specific organization. etc. Generally models are employed to study such phenomenon which cannot be seen or felt. The Cloud Computing model constitutes three service delivery and three deployment models.

Vol. 156). bandwidth and storage depending on needs” (p. Misra and Mondal (2010) built two types of business models that can be drawn for companies (cloud users) willing to adopt cloud computing services. (2009) has enlisted the various difficulties of developing standards for effective cloud computing. VRML is an abstraction layer that sits on top of the IaaS layer and allows applications to access CPU. However. From the financial point of view. These were resisted by the vendors just like the fate of cloud computing”. Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. which changed with the introduction of TCP and other Internet standards.26 -27). (p. Keahey et al. According to Sriram and Khajeh-Hosseini (2010) “cloud computing can benefit from standardized API interfaces as generic tools that manage cloud infrastructures can be developed for all offerings. government agencies. CPU power etc) Tsaravas and Themistocleous (2011) (p. These are business models for companies with an existing IT infrastructure and business models for startup companies.2 No. achieving standardized API appears to be rather politically than technically challenging”. there is also a document called the open cloud manifesto in which various stake holders express why open standards will benefit cloud computing Sriram and Khajeh-Hosseini (2010).2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . memory. businesses and/or individuals can either provide or use services within a near limitless computing environment (storage.   Ownership of cloud technology: Proprietary/ Open Operations: Perimeterised (Within traditional IT perimeter)/ De-perimeterised (Outiside IT perimeter) Availability of service: Insourced (By third party)/ Outsourced (By own)” Mikkilineni and Sarathy (2009) “compared the evolution of cloud computing with intelligent network infrastructure in telecommunications and proposed a Virtual Resource Mediation Layer (VRML) to support interoperability between public and private clouds. Section V: Adoption of cloud computing The emergent phenomenon of cloud computing aims at transforming the traditional way of computing by providing both software applications and hardware resources as a service. Section IV: Standardization of cloud computing There are three active bodies working towards standardizing cloud computing practices:    Cloud computing Interoperability Forum Open cloud consortium DMTF Open Cloud Standards Incubator 94 However. Grossman (2009) asserts that” the current state of standards and interoperability in cloud computing is similar to the early Internet era where each organization had its own network and data transfer was difficult. Thus. 58).

com. This way. and emerging economies such as China. Google. cloud computing helps optimizing the long tail of processes which are currently not supported by IT and helps to reduce the cost of those processes that indeed are already automated” (p. Grossman et al. such as utility computing and the smart data centre.S. (2009) have also dealt with market-oriented resource allocation of cloud computing by leveraging third-generation Aneka enterprise grid technology. Buschman and Leckie (2009) posit that “librarians need to be critical in their use of technology”. Su (2011) In the field of education Thomas (2011) argues that “Cloud Computing has a significant place in the higher education landscape both as a ubiquitous computing tool and a powerful platform that can enhance engagement among educational researchers and educators to understand and improve practice. including both firms that specialize in cloud computing. (2009) stresses on “feedback control service for scaling in the cloud. and Salesforce.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . and thus. Vaquero et al. Ironically. Scaling choices must be under control of the users. ( 2009) presents two tools for managing cloud infrastructure: OpenNebula. with the involvement with IT the commitment as well as services has been miserably infested. (2009) developed a cloud-based infrastructure that had been optimized for performance networks and supported necessary data mining applications.resource lease manager. cloud computing is becoming a key service offering of many IT firms. in order to have control over spending and to be able to work towards maximizing return on investments”. Governments that are looking for answers against bureaucracy and complication of procedures are almost obligated to implement new technological solutions to provide public services effectively”.Various researches have been undertaken to imply cloud computing in various domains. Vol. cloud computing is the savior of all the ebbs of the information technology. Banerjee (2009) provides an overview of technological research studies that were performed in HP labs and that adopted cloud-scale smart environments. cloud computing is being rapidly adopted by organizations in both developed countries such as the U. and automating the tasks that traditionally has also to be carried out by experts. and traditional IT service firms. Under such conditions. 124).virtual infrastructure manager and Haizea. According to Kossmann and Kraska (2010) “Cloud Computing promises to lower the bar for new services to become worthwhile by making things cheaper. Lim et al.2 No. On the demand side. faster. increase the quality of their students’ learning outcomes”. Sotomayor et al. (2009) opines that Cloud computing and web collaboration are two major concepts that underlie new and innovative developments in library 95 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. Buyya et al. HP and Fujistu. such as IBM. such as Amazon. Section VI: Adoption of cloud computing in libraries Library and information centres are constantly in search of low-cost solutions due to low funding. On the supply side.

Much of these tools and services will not be owned by the library but are necessary to carry out the enduring work of making library collections and services known and accessible to users. the economics. p. 1997. including OCLC. The future of computing lies in cloud computing. the embrace of cloud computing by many organizations. scholastic predictions indicated that the library in serving future users may offer referral to “potentially appropriate points in a vast network of resources accessible through the internet or its successors” (Lancaster. Moulasion and Corrado. easier access. Libraries can work cooperatively in a flexible environment where they can share solutions to problems instead of having to reinvent the wheel at each library. has made it imperative that libraries offer their services online. (2007). 59-60). The introduction of the internet to libraries was part of a significant shift from print/in-house-focused services to online/ externally provided services. Historically libraries have turned to huge capital investment on IT infrastructure for various online as well as subscription based services. Wolf (2010). With these success libraries are motivated for using subscription based cloud IT infrastructure. The web has also expanded the scope of services provided by librarians. 96 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. and perhaps the personnel requirements of library computing in years to come”. and the Library of congress suggests that this mode of computing will have a significant impact on the configuration. library and information science scholarship has remodeled the future for libraries. Cloud services allow for more optimal resource utilization. Instead. Cloud computing is important in the context of LIS education for two reasons Tomer and Alman (2011). (2007). libraries need to adopt the communication and information tools and services that users are accustomed to Sadeh. 27). Vol. whose major goal is reducing the cost of IT services while increasing processing throughput. “Migrating to a cloud-based application may turn out to be cost neutral but at the same time still have the benefit of allowing staff to concentrate on libraryspecific issues”. Today`s consumers of information have more alternative and attractive ways of finding information than using the traditional library Sadeh. The growing internet usage among library users and potential users. “First. the library`s users are accessing the information needed in the comfort and security of their homes or in their own personal or customized spaces. 6). SirsiDynix.automation. These predictions have to come true. Today. (2010). From the emergence of World Wide Web. (p. Recently. OCLC web scale management services. Cloud computing will bring an end to the ILS server. plus the time these users spend on the internet. and more effective cost reduction. (1997). OhioLink. recognizing that future libraries may not own their collection of resources Lancaster. It will provide all its web-scale subscribers with a vendor database which will list their details avoiding data redundancy in libraries. (2010).2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . Mitchell. reliability. availability and flexibility and decreasing processing time Hayes (2008). To meet their needs. OCLC started Web-scale management services which can perform the in-house library operations through mutual co-operation. (2011) (p.2 No.

Other vendors can take advantage of the cloud. (2009). Vendors can provide a remotely hosted service which allows for the creation of modular content. It is imperative that all senior technologists have a solid understanding of the ramifications of cloud computing since its impact is likely to permeate the entire IT landscape” Rhoton.2 No. “In World India is the third and in Asia second largest country in internet adoption”. There seems to be an utmost use of web based services in libraries and information centres since the evolution of internet. While cloud computing has been discussed as a new technology develop that can provide several advantages. to its adopters. They have also emerged as an key players in the provision of internet services to the user communities Kinney (2010) During this time libraries have re-directed services both to support in-house internet use and to serve the needs of users via digital means. Moore (2010) asserts that “use analysis now requires a cloud computing orientation”. Blowers (2010). Fox (2009) observes that the goals of the organization have an impact on their use of cloud solutions. As such cloud computing has the seeds for reinvigoration of library and information science professions. and impacts and. vulnerabilities in cloud computing that may lead to such risks. through cloud computing instead of having own servers and employing personnel for its maintenance libraries can hire a vendor on a monthly charge and enjoy the benefit of same server function. Internet world stats (2011). Moreover. Goscinski and Brock. Wolf (2010).. “A study conducted by IMAI and IMRB reveals that there are 121 million internet users in India out of which 97 million access atleast once in a month” Times of India. so you don`t need a client on your local PC. the cloud computing adoption rate is not growing as fast as expected Banerjee. Smartphones are being used by the users these days for accessing information services for fast and easy communication. both strategic and operational. “There is a tremendous amount of enthusiasm around cloud-based solutions and services (filtering. Now the information formats have also changed. Further. Buyya et al. which many libraries wouldn`t be able to create on their own. (2009). Libraries are in a unique position to experiment with cloud computing given their service oriented mission and need to find appropriate solutions using limited resources. Vol. 97 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. categorization and analytics to help users manage the vast repositories of both structured and unstructured information) as well as the cost-savings and flexibility that they can provide. sorting. It also lowers the technical skills needed to create web pages. (2009). Like other cloud applications it is accessible from any internet connection.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . (2010) Section VII: Security concerns of cloud computing ENISA firstly addressed the security risks related to adopting cloud computing along with the affected assets. (2011).

Buyya et al. and quality of service. Section VIII: Benefits of cloud computing Pyke (2009) has described the following benefits of cloud computing: scalability. Hayes. Some scholars are of the opinion that Cloud computing service providers are incentivized by the profits to be made from charging consumers for access to these services.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) .Similar efforts have been laid by CSA . 50). (2010) raises issues concerning the “security vulnerabilities existing in the cloud platform”. (2009) discuss the technical security issues arising from adopting the cloud computing model such as XML-attacks. freeing up of internal resources. However. and access to market information mobilization. (2009).. “Providing IT services in the cloud shifts much of this expense to a pay-as-you-go-model and consequently offers significant cost advantages according to one view”. Kresimir et al. (2009). compared to $40.. Zhu. Many see huge potential of the technology in reducing the cost of IT to organizations and freeing them from the expense and hassle of having to install and maintain applications locally Leavitt. payment and privacy of sensitive information. It may take users a long time to understand and implement the new system. simplification and convenience of the way computing-related services are delivered seem to be among the main drivers of cloud computing Erdogmus. Dasmalchi. is using the skilled practitioners. Armbrust et al. Subashini (2010) discusses the security challenges of the cloud service delivery model. Economic. (2008). (2009). Lin. Thus. efficient coordination among firms. Vol. firms may not have confidence in a cloud computing system because it is relatively new to them. Firms are attracted by the opportunity for reducing or eliminating costs associated with “in-house” provision of these services Buyya et al. As such it is possible for malicious websites to exploit browser vulnerabilities in order to steal information associated with other existing or previous browsing sessions. The shift to Cloud computing moved much of a user’s normal activity to the Web browser. complexity of an innovation can act as a barrier to implementation of new 98 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science.. (2009). Fu. (2010) discusses high level security concerns in the cloud computing model such as data integrity. Bernd et al. browsing history and other sensitive information in a single place. According to this report. (2010). Web browsers generally store all of a user’s saved passwords. (2009) discuss the security SLA`s specifications and objective relating to data locations. (p. Trappler (2010) asserts that “if it is in the cloud. such as a logged in email account or online banking session. segregation and data recovery. (2009). better customer communications. ease of implementation. IT research firm Forrester published the first industry report that offered a sizing of the cloud computing market. Balchandra et al. The expected benefits of embedded cloud computing services include the following: speed of business communications. the market is expected to reach $241 billion in 2020. Meiko et al. get it on paper”. browser`s related attacks and flooding attacks.7 billion in 2010.2 No.

many users may fail to realize that they are in fact using an Internet based service. Morsy. Premkumar et al.Moulasion and Corrado.(2011) “the services that libraries can acquire through the use of cloud computing platforms may indeed be valuable. meaning that librarians can make use of services without incurring any cost for their libraries”. Madhubala. data management. Vol.. SLA Once data are outsourced to a third-party cloud provider. (2011) “If librarians can save on buying and maintaining servers. but 99 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. and cloud security are well known open research problems in the cloud computing model.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) .2 No. According to Moulasion and Corrado. Vendor lock-in.” Ramgovind et al. As every technological concept. multi-tenancy and isolation.(2010) “As computer manufacturers. research has shown that there are some major obstacles which hinder the adoption and growth of Cloud computing. This risk of confusion will likely increase when cloud based applications lack any recognizable browser branding. “The elastic aspect of cloud computing allows applications to scale and grow without needing traditional ‘fork lift’ upgrades”. complexity factor is usually negatively affected. (p. cloud computing is not an exception in terms of trust and security issues. 4-5). This will free libraries from the shackles of IT management and allow us to focus on services and resources. Grundy and Muller. they can also rely on the software provider to carry out all updates. thereby allowing their own employees to take care of other obligations in lieu of monitoring version changes and upgrades.elasticity engines. R. Tsaravas and Marinos (2011) Despite the potential benefits and revenues that could be gained from the cloud computing model. availability and reliability of data.. there are reasons for concern about what can happen to the information. and continue to function when the user is not connected to the Internet. (2010) Katz (2009) focuses on many areas where the cloud may impinge on education. (1994). quite a few of the cloud-based software platforms are available for free. just like they did before the digital age. (2012) (p. employers and universities deploy cloud based tools on desktops.287). Furthermore. service portability. He advocates that because companies might be storing documents which should not be made public. With cloud computing we are getting closer to the reality of purchasing computer power. Potential Cloud organisations and vendors need to be aware that it may become easier for attackers to threaten clouds by moving towards a single cloud interface. Depending on the service. (2010). the model still has a lot of open issues that impact the model creditability and pervasiveness. Further cloud computing will given even the smallest organization the ability to use the power of network computing within a minimal infrastructure. . several concerns arise about security. Section IX: Downsides of cloud computing However. they can save their parent institution money. Wolf.

. 2010.2009. 2009. Matthews. Mikkilineni and Sarathy. 2010. 2010.2009. Ramireddy. Vaquero et al. 2009. 2010. Ohlman. 2009.2009. Wolf... Armbrust et al. Ried. 2009. Weinhardt et al. Koehler and Anandasivam. 2008. Briscoe. Briscoe and Marions. 2009. Dikaiakos et al.2010.2010. even if bandwidth is not currently at a premium.2010. et al.. Furht and Escalante. Lenk.2 No.. et al. 5). 2009. Velte et al.2009. Sugimoto. 2009.. Lim et al. 2008. Harmer. Mitshuharu.... Baars & Kemper. 2010. Bhardwaj et al. 2009. Wilson 2009.. 2009. Delic and Riley. Ratogi.the cost of internet access..2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . Yeo et al. Jan. Keahey 2009.. Pearson. Jericho forum (2009). 2009. Table 2. et al.. Nurmi.. Zeng etal... Joint et al. Dodda et al.2010. Saya et al. 2011 Buyya et al. Matthew and Spraetz. Shigeo and Nagamori. Mika and Tummar Chun and Maniatis 2009.2010. Vaquero et al. et al. Askhoj. et al.2008. Kisker. (p. Anandasivam & Weinhardt.2009. Sun. Holger and Matzke. Pascal.Stefan. 2009 Bernstein. Leimeister et al. Assuncao et al. 100 Benefits Business Impediments Model Pricing Privacy Standards Security Storage Technology Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. elo. 2007.2010. et al. Grossman. 2009..2009. 2009. 2009.. 2009. et al. et al.2009. Overview of cloud computing research ISSUES Adoption CONTRIBUTORS Hazelhurst. Vol.. Youseff et al. 2009. 2009. 2010. 2009... Pueschel & Neumann.2009. can become a considerable hurdle to effective provision of services”..

a comparative study of cloud computing.2 No. Searches for cloud computing on Google. Figure (Jul – Dec 2012) .RESULTS Popularity of the terms and search To analyse the popularity of “cloud computing” searching was done on Google Trends. During 2010 onwards it was at its peak. It revealed that cloud computing has gained tremendous popularity in India. Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. Also there is high scope of research on cloud computing in conjunction with libraries in near future. libraries and online services was done on Google Insights to determine the interest areas worldwide. It revealed that the term gained momentum post-2009. taken from Google Trends 101 Further. Vol.

Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. It revealed that post 2006 there has been sudden increase in the usage of the term in books. Searches for cloud computing from Google books Ngram Viewer 102 It reveals that post 2006 there has been sharp increase in the usage of the term in books.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . Table 4. Vol.2 No.Figure 3. Searches for cloud computing taken from Google Insights To analyse the average use of the term “cloud computing” in books searching was done on Google Books Ngram Viewer.

2 No. It revealed that conference proceedings were the best source of dissemination of the concept on cloud computing Figure 6. Distribution of articles by year 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2 1 12 15 Distribution of articles by year 26 29 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 103 Distribution of articles by publication To analyse the most productive sources for “cloud computing” literature an analysis of the available literature was done. Figure 5. Vol. We found that during 2010 maximum number of literature was written. Distribution of articles by year 30 20 10 2 0 Distribution of articles by publication 19 15 18 20 22 10 12 14 12 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science.Distribution of articles by year An analytical study of the references was done to find out the most productive year for cloud computing literature.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) .

Fox.V.. 13.Rabkin. (2010) Understanding Cloud-Computing Vulnerabilities. Farber. London. R. Buyya.. Cloud computing journal. A. and Leckie. G. HPCA. evolution. 14. Blowers... Future Generation Computer Systems. Konwinski. 2007-10-08. Computers in Libraries 30(4). J. Cyberpassionteam (2011) History of cloud computing. A. in Leckie. Gardner. 517-520.J. Cloud computing: does Nirvana hide behind the nebula? IEEE Software. hype.0 8. Version 1. A.cnet. and Rakshit. January. An intelligent IT infrastructure for the future.. R. Legregni L.. Venugopa.Zhao. 11. 25. and Buschman. (2009) Twenty-one experts define cloud computing.S.. (2009). 26. 50-57." IEEE Security and Privacy.J. A. Stoica. 4-6. & LU. M. A view of cloud computing. Information technology in librarianship: new critical approaches Westport.. 3. I. Boss G.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . Geelan. REFERENCES 1. & Elmar Stöcker. (2009) Library in the clouds.. Retrieved from http://cloudcomputing. G. The technology has been explored at its utmost from technical purview and its implication in library is yet to be explored due to its relative edge in (2009). and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility”. 156-161 15. D. 12. Ramakrishna. . Joseph. 99. Retrieved from: http://www. I. A. Fox. Foster..E. Udayan (2011) The evolution of cloud computing.. 53. Patterson. (2009).ieee. J. (2009). R. 16. G. IBM high performance on demand solutions. (2010). 599-616 10.sys-con. 2. Buschman.D.. In grid computing workshop (GCE`08). Connecticut Libraries Unlimited. J.jsp?punumber=4795428 P. Balchandra. & Brandic. 50-58. (2010) From realities to values: a strategy for digital natives. CNET News. Banerjee. OCLC Systems & Services. 1-28 9. Proceedings of 15th International Symposium on High-performance Computer Architecture. Dana (2012) Cloud computing: revolution vs. 7. . Cloud expo: blog feed post. Although the present paper cannot claim as exhaustive one yet it attempts to draw insights into the present state-ofthe-art. H. (Eds). Communications of the ACM.sys-con. 25( 3).2 No. J. Yeo. 6-10.html. 5. (2009) Cloud security issues in PROC`09 IEEE International conference on services computing.Raicu. Tobias Walloschek . (2008) Cloud computing and grid computing 360-degree compared. 1-10. (2008) Oracle`s Ellison nails cloud computing.E. Retrieved from: Erdogmus. Y.. Technical report. P. & Hall H (2007) Cloud computing.K. R. 104 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. Dan. September 26.html.CONCLUSION Cloud computing is a novel concept where theory building is not at the centre of research rather most studies focus on praxis. Retrieved from: http://news. M. S. Griffith. Armbrust.. Bernd Grobauer. C. Katz. NC.S. Broberg. I. Retrieved from: http://yourravi. I. USA.ecommercetimes. and Zaharia. Raleigh. Cloud computing and emerging it platforms: vision. Vol. Introduction: information technologies and libraries – why do we need new critical approaches?. Quan It is of prime importance for the reinvigoration of the library profession. Retrieved from: ieeexplore. Malladi P. Banerjee. Lee. H. E-commerce times.

947970.B. D. Public library quarterly.A. Google and I. 31. Lancaster. Kossmann. 51.16. 27. M. discovery and selection for cloud computing”. (2010) An overview of virtual and cloud computing.35. 10. 2009. (1997). E. Chinyao. (1999) The Effect of User Engagement on System Success: A MetaAnalytical Integration of Research Findings. 963. 32. J. W. 33.M. 344-349. (2009) Automated control in cloud computing: challenges and opportunities. Information & Management . Grossman.I. 229-236 26. Steve..0. 179-183. New York Times (8.) Libraries for the new millennium: implications for managers. Kinney.H... Retrieved from www. October). Guzzo. Mingchang (2011) Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption. Babu. Patauri. Hand. state-of-theart. 9. & Zhang. F. 162 – 165.. Popovic. 23-27. Public libraries. Lim. Is cloud computing really made for prime time? Computer. R. Retrieved from: http://www. Keahey. Low. (2007) Heads in the clouds.nytimes. 18. Hartig. Cloud computing: IT as a service.sys-con. M. Leavitt. M. 9-11. and open questions. Tsugawa. 38. 121-129 34. 11( 2). 30. Tech Titans Building Boom. 24.Tim (2010) Data management in the cloud: promises. Hayes. Future Generation Computer Systems. Research in Organizational Behavior.. & Thorn.G. Yahsueh . 25. 105 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. N. A. R. 36. W. 449. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International conference on Services computing. Chase. What is cloud computing? Cloud computing journal. in Raitt. 15-20 37. Artificial intelligence and expert system technologies: prospects. 39. 40. Meta-Analysis Analysis. Atanu (2009) Cloud security issues. Understanding the Role and Methods of Meta-Analysis in Is Research. M.pdf 28. OCLC Systems & Services International digital library perspectives. 43-51. “Toward dynamic and attribute based publication. 42(1). S. Donald & Kraska. IT Professional. Retrieved from: http://cloudcomputing. (2009) Sky computing. Join in ‘Cloud Computing’ Research. 23. S. Balachandra. Bo (2010) The Internet. (2009) Cloud Cube Model: Selecting Cloud Formations for Secure Collaboration Version 1. Third international conference on Advances in Human-oriented and Personalized mechanisms. Jericho Forum. Compute and storage clouds using wide area high performance networks. Technologies and services.htm. & Dasmalchi. Future Generation Computer Systems. & Katzell. 22. In ACDC`09: Proceedings of the 1st workshop on automated control of datacenters and clouds. (Ed. Hocenski. Lin. H. & Fortes. Library Association. and the digital divide. J. 35. 21. Ramakrishna .html?_r=1&ex=1349496000&en=9227 f0f65ea0d75&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&oref=slogin 40. 19-38. & Zeljko (2010) Cloud computing security issues and challenges. (2009). Hwang.I. Vol. R. R. S. 111(7).2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . 517-520.. Internet computing. Nature. & Parekh. Goscinski. King. London. (2008).com/top20. 11( 2).. 407-442. (2008). . Reddy. D. IT Professional. & He. (2010). 1. Zhu. G. Chen..L..0 . & Rakshit. Cloud computing. R. Industrial management & data systems..G.Z. & Wu. (2009) The case for cloud computing. Communications of the ACM. 10-13. Datenbank Spektrum. IEEE Spectrum. Matsunaga. 25. 29. Kandakuri. Lohr. 20. 104-161. Internet World Stats: usage and population statistics (2011). K. (2009).E. 29( 2). Communications of the Association for Information Systems . R.A. Y. Frank Cervone. 13-18. Gu.L. 26 (3). (1987). 26.. 2005. Jericho Forum Specification. Jackson. 1006-1023.H. B.opengroup.R. Grossman. K.internetworldstats. (2009). (2008). IEEE 13( 5).17. Zeljko. Retrieved from http://www. J. A .J. Kresimir. Katz. Sabala. and Brock. 46(2). Fu..2 No..W.

" Management Science. Bittman. Premkumar. 286-290. Retrieved from: www. "Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants. Retrieved from: www.emory. Mohamed Al. Moore. Vol. Gruschka and Iacono. In Edward M. Peter & Grance. Corrado and Heather Lea Moulasion. The Management of Security in 58. R. International journal of soft computing and engineering. Erik (2010) What cloud computing means for libraries. R. 1849. A.(2010). Sabherwal.cs. Jensenh Jorg. 1( 6). The Electronic Library. Mohamed. E. Kindle e-book. 106 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science. E. S. V. Petter. 46. Rhoton.pdf 45.. Heather Lea & Corrado. Identification of a company’s suitability for the adoption of cloud computing and modelling its corresponding return on investment. Kenneth (2010) Concordia University libraries.Getting started with cloud computing. 214 –224. & McLean. 2006. 52. (2009) Cloud computing and the lessons from the past. M. Youtube video. & Sree.nist. content and the cloud. Lyons. Madhubala. Morsy. Banglore 2009. 48. 49. URL: http://library. Nils. and Smith. & Muller.. C. & Sarathy.41.. Corrado and Heather Lea 61. & Chowa. Recursive press. G.pdf. “Now is the time to take the cloud seriously”. Geoffrey (2010) Atmosphere: core. Security for South Africa (ISSA). Retrieved from: http://www. Computerweekly. Moulasion. 53. Thomas J. Tom. (2009).. April 12. "A Meta-Analytic Assessment of the Delone and Mclean Is Success Model: An Examination of Is Success at the Individual Level. (2010). (2012) An illustrative study on cloud computing. Edward M. John (2009) Cloud computing explained: implementation handbook for enterprises. .M. Tim (2009) The NIST definition of cloud computing. posted by EVENTS@google. Thomas. Retrieved from: http://www. N. 42:33. Jeyaraj. 52(12).C. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2010 Information 59. David Mitchell (2008) Cloud Computing: defining and describing an emerging phenomenon. 46(3)." Information & Management. Retrieved from: http://www.computerweekly. WETICE` 09. S.pdf Meiko. S.pdf. How to write a literature review. In Enabling Technologies: infrastructure for collaborative enterprises. 1-7 60. Cearley. 2009. & Luigi Lo (2009) On cloud technical security issues in cloud computing in IEEE ICCC.R. Ramgovind..cordys. Retrieved from: www.2 No. White Paper. & Smith. A. 18th International Workshops on..auckland. UK: Mitchell. Arif (2009) A history of cloud computing. Journal of Management Information Systems. In Edward M. 3-11 51. 344-349.. J. Ingo (2010) An analysis of the cloud computing security problem. 55. (1994). 43. 159-166. K. Austin. P. . Grundy. C. 29 ( 2).com/cordyscms_sites/objects/bb1a0bd7f47b1c91ddf36ba7db88241d/time_to_take_t he_cloud_seroiusly_online_1_.concordia. “Implementation of electronic data interchange: an innovation diffusion perspective”. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 2009. Pyke. David W. (2011) Perspectives on cloud computing in libraries. Proceedings of ASPEC 2010 Cloud workshop. 57-62. 11. 50. g. Mikkilineni. 42. Misra. John . Mell. Getting started with cloud computing UK: Facet.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . 57. Schwenk. 56. Eloff. Ramamurthy. Cloud Computing. 53. Retrieved from: http://www. (2011) Cloud computing: A potential paradigm for practicing the scholarship of teaching and learning. 44. & Mondal.

63. 29 (2). Rodero-Merino. "Where are we at with Cloud Computing?: A Descriptive Literature Review" (2009). The Electronic library. Charalampos & Themistocleous. Networker 11(4). Sriram. & Khajeh-Hosseini. 68( 2).cms 69. R. Lindner. T. 108 ( 7/8). 70. A. Trappler. Anadasivam. 85. MIS Quarterly.. Llorente. Sadeh.2 (Jul – Dec 2012) . V. Corrado & Heather Lea Moulasion(Ed. 30-31. Su. N. North Carolina libraries. Business & Information Systems Engineering. Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review.. 30. Retrieved from: 72. J. 76.undertheradarblog. 16-25. 1(5). (2002).). 14-22. Tsaravas. Carol (2011) The organizing vision of cloud computing in Taiwan. & Zhang. L. I. (2010). Haibo and Tate.3259. Weinhardt. (2009) Cloud computing: new wine or a just a new bottle.Y.htm 78. Ruba. Caceres. Yang. Journal of network and computer applications. Retrieved from: http://www.. Blau. 39(1 ). 11( 2). 26 (2). 84. EDUCAUSE Q. and Research Directions. Wolf. (2009) Virtual infrastructure management in private and hybrid clouds. L.aisnet. S. Meinl. Yang. In Edward M. In: ICISAssociation for Information Systems. Journal of electronic commerce research.. (2010). Robert (2010) Cloud computing. iii-xiii. Times of India report (2011) Retrieved from: http://timesofindia. N. 71. & Watson. Susan W. Stößer.aisnet. P. 50-55. Zenoss (2010) 2010 Virtualization and cloud computing survey. Sotomayor.pdf 107 Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science.. IEEE. (2009) Cloud Computing—A classification. Marinos (2011) Cloud computing and Egovernment: a literature review. T..Amy (2009) Succeeding at SaaS: computing in the cloud.oclc. 59-68. Retrieved from: 77. Webster. I. Borissov. Ning (2011)Emergence of Cloud Computing: An Institutional Innovation Computing_Survey_(Zenoss).com/blog/a-brief-history-of-cloud-computing/ 82. “Time for a change: new approaches for a new generation of library users”.tagsolutions. B. J. B. Wohl. Mary. & M. 66. Thomas J.educause. I. Vol. (2011) Cloud computing for lis education. Business Models.2 No. 13(5).chinacloud. Mediterranean & Middle Eastern conference on Information system. /EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/IfItsintheCloudGetItonPaperClo/206532. A. Anapolis. Internet computing. 75.indiatimes. 68. ACIS 2009 Proceedings. Get it on Paper: Cloud Computing Contract Issues. Voas. 307-316. In 1st ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing. 79. 64.pdf 67. Retrieved from: http://www. 65. 81. 80. & J. 257-271. 12( 4). Retrieved from: aisel. Christinger & Alman. Weiss A (2007) Computing in the clouds. IT Professional. 83. Thomas. New Library World. Web-scale management services. Ali (2010) Research agenda in cloud technologies.T. Michalk. J. SOCC URL: arxiv. If it’s in the Cloud. W. 154-164 74. URL : http://aisel. (2007). International Journal of Information Management. & Kavitha. Tomer. UK: Facet. Subhasini. & Foster. MD: Zenoss. (2010) A survey on security issues in service delivery models of cloud computing. European. 109-116. Cloud computing for education: a new dawn?. (2011) Cloud Computing: a potential paradigm for practicing the scholarship of teaching and learning. http://www. Shirley Ou & Hsu. Vaquero. 214-224. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. Retrieved from: http://www. (2009) A Break in the Clouds: Towards a Cloud Definition. Paper 26. Getting started with cloud computing. 391-399..

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful

Master Your Semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Special offer for students: Only $4.99/month.

Master Your Semester with a Special Offer from Scribd & The New York Times

Cancel anytime.