Social Return on Inve SROI Network

Organisation Objectives
Touchstone Kirklees Advocacy service Supporting service users voice to be heard, promoting co-production across Kirklees Provision of advocacy support (96 referrals a month)

Activity Scope

Objective of Activity Purpose of Analysis

Contract/Funding/ Part Funded by Kirklees council of org

Stage 1 Stakeholders Intended/ unintended changes Stage 2 Inputs Outputs
Value Summary of activity in numbers

The Outcomes (what changes)

Description How would we describe the change?

Who will we have an What do we think What will effect on? will change for they invest? Who will have an them? effect on us?

Community Participation

Community participation 87 leading to helping others e.g. neighbours

Service users (inc in clients, peers)

Health and social care services

0.00

Reduced risk of relapse, lower 87 use of expensive support services

Independence

Feeling "uplifted" and being able 87 to address plans for self

Social support. Less isolation, peer network users greater social resource

time/travel (reimbursed )

146 network Increased users. 40 peer 0.00 social/peer advocates. resource 1197 hours

Improved legal compliance

1056 Less risk of contacts. 103 litigation referrals

Commissioners

increased personalisation

funding

SDS 51,300 3 applications applications made made

Increased service quality

negative service outcomes mitigated. Commissioners able to redeploy time 0 103 referrals 0.00 made, 87 worked with Representation and support

Referrers

Proper independent support offered Increased contribution to society - helping others

Volunteers

Move to become 0.00 10 volunteers service contributor

Total

51,300.00

Social Return on Investment - The Impact Map

oting co-production across Kirklees

Objective of Activity Purpose of Analysis

Supporting peer networks and representational advocacy To evaluate service social and economic value against funding investment

Stage 3 The Outcomes (what changes)

Indicator Source Quantity Duration Financial Proxy Value Source

How would we Where did measure it? we get the information from?

How How long What proxy did much will it last? we use to value change the change? will there be? One hour weekly social support (to friend/neightbour) offered

What is the value Where did we of the change? get the information from?

Increased self reporting of community participation

Advocacy star reports (q1-q4 20112)

12.18 1 year

Estimated based 1,000.00 on Touchstone SDS costs

Increased self reporting of positive use of support services

Advocacy star reports (q1-q4 20112)

19.14 1 year

Estimated reduction in GP visits and prescription costs. Earlier discharge from hospital (500 per day)

based on Personal social services 888.00 research unit report on Unit costs in H and SC 2010 Based on model of S2R cost 390.00 suggested by Touchstone costs

Increased self reporting of self/peer advocacy

Advocacy star reports (q1-q4 20112)

34.8 1 year

Estimated Cost of S2R support group (2 hours, 2 staff, 5 attendees)

Increasing time offered by peer network

Annual kirklees Advocacy Service annual report (2011-12) News stories of claims brought against NHS trusts

1197 1 year

Cost of support hour

Estimated based 20.00 on Touchstone SDS costs

Cost of case for wrongful detention

0.2 1 year

Sample damages from recent court case

300,000.00

News reports from 2009

Value of SDS awards in first KAS records year

3 1 year

Average SDS award per annum

6,720.00

Touchstone records

Time liberated Average of by advocacy commissione service's r salaries presence Timesheets and annual report Annual Kirklees Advocacy Service annual report

5 1 year

Commissioning manager salary cost in public sector

1,200.00

Job adverts for local posts

Time of staff

87 1 year

Costs of staff support

120.00

Touchstone records

Time of volunteers

995 1 year

Costs of staff support

20.00

Touchstone records

Name Date Time Period Forecast or Evaluation

John White 7th September 2012 1 year

Evaluation

Stage 4 Deadwe Displ Drop ight acem off % ent % %

What would have happened without the activity? What activity would we displac e? Will the outcome drop off in future years?

Stage 5 Impact Calculating Social Return

Quantity times financial proxy, less deadweight, displacement and attribution 0.0% Discount rate Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 (after activity)

Year 4

20%

5%

0%

9,256.80

9,256.80

60%

0%

0%

6,798.53

6,798.53

10%

0%

0%

12,214.80

12,214.80

0%

0%

0%

23,940.00

23,940.00

0%

0%

0%

60,000.00

60,000.00

0%

0%

0%

20,160.00

20,160.00

0%

0%

0%

6,000.00

6,000.00

0%

0%

0%

10,440.00

10,440.00

50%

0%

0%

9,950.00

9,950.00

158,760.13

158,760.13

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

Present value of each year (after dsicounting) 158,760.13 Total Present Value (PV) Net Present Value (PV minus the investment) Social Return per

Return

Year 5

0.00 0.00 158,760.13 107,460.13 3.09