English analysis Are computers comprising education? From the principle In principle A.

Jones letter Are computers compromising education, she explains the recent ban to all computers from classrooms that are uneasy at Hightower to parents. Ms. Jones strongly endorses the ban and in a sensible and definite voice, giving her reasons to soothe the fears and doubts of parents by the decision. The writer regards the readers as concerned parents to attempt to coax them to accept her intention and thoughts. The writers insist that there is little evidentcomputer-centered learningmuch of the evidence is against it. Experts opinions and research based on computers indicate that they compromise a childs ability to learn to interact with others. This tries to disseminate the reader, who thinks computers have an impact on a students ability as proposed by a well regarded expert and research, positions the reader agree to with the writers view. The writer uses the hip pocket nerve, Every Dollar spent onpurchase and maintenance of a computer is a dollar taken away from quality teachers. The writer tries to inform the readers regarding the excess money spent on the inconvenient maintenance of old computers and buying new ones where money is needed elsewhere. This is an attempt or a ploy to position the readers to feel that the funds are being wasted on something entirely unworthy. This is bound to make the readers feel angry and want to protect these funds, therefore comply that computers are to be banned from classrooms. The writer elaborates on the essential need to the teachers, praising this group teachers as the most important element in a childs educational life. She tries to make the readers feel guilty that they are taking away this opportunity from a childs education if they oppose the ban for computers. This is reinforced by the picture, showing a caring and supportive environment between students and teachers, creating an image in the readers mind of this environment in contrast with a different image of an isolated student on a computer. This tries to form doubt in the readers mind about the education revolution, questioning the new approach of students learning via a computer positioning the reader to agree with the writer. Ms. Jones emphasizes on the impact of the computers on children growth, Students brains are becoming deaden by constant exposure. She elaborates on time spent at home on computers and the additional time spent at school. The writer tries to appeal to the fear and insecurity of the students use of computers that could affect their mental and physical well being, alarming the reader of this harm to the children of the future generation and tries to position the reader to feel suspicious and cautious of the computers and agree that the ban is necessary. Ms. Jones ends her letter in an outraged and determined voice that this education revolution represents a false promise and strongly supports the ban of computers from classrooms. She writes the real world is inhabitant by people, not machines and our classrooms should reflect this reality, leaves the reader to question the computers role in a students school life and if it is necessary. Ms. Jones is a principle and uses this to persuade the reader has credibility.