4296 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No.
19 / Thursday, January 29, 2004 / Notices
• Activities associated with
construction of a Water Reclamation
Plant (WRP) adjacent to the Santa Clara
River and required bank protection;
• Water quality control facilities
(sedimentation control, flood debris,
and water quality basins);
• Ongoing maintenance activities by
the LACDPW; and
• Temporary haul routes for grading
equipment.
3. Scope of Analysis. The DEIS will be
a project-level document which
addresses a number of interrelated
actions over a specific geographic area
that (1) would occur as logical parts in
the chain of contemplated actions, and
(2) would be implemented under the
same authorizing statutory or regulatory
authorities. The information in the DEIS
will be sufficient for the Corps to make
a decision regarding the issuance of a
long-term Section 404 permit for the
Newhall Ranch Specific Plan.
The document will be a joint Federal
and state document. The California
Department of Fish and Game (CDFG)
will prepare an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act
for the same project regarding a state
streambed alteration agreement and
state endangered species permit. The
Corps and CDFG will work
cooperatively to prepare a joint DEIS/
DEIR document, and to coordinate the
public noticing and hearing processes
under Federal and state laws.
The impact analysis will follow the
directives in 33 CFR part 325 which
requires that it be limited to the impacts
of the specific activities requiring a 404
permit and only those portions of the
project outside of ‘‘waters of the United
States’’ over which the Corps has
sufficient control and responsibility to
warrant Federal review. The Corps will
extend the geographic scope of the
environmental analysis beyond the
boundaries of ‘‘waters of the United
States’’ in certain areas to address
indirect and cumulative impacts of the
regulated activities, and to address
connected actions pursuant to NEPA
guidelines (40 CFR part 1508). In these
upland areas, the Corps will evaluate
impacts to the environment and identify
feasible and reasonable mitigation
measures and the appropriate state or
local agencies with authority to
implement these measures if they are
outside the authority of the Corps. In
evaluating impacts to areas and
resources outside the Corps’
jurisdiction, the Corps will consider the
information and conclusions from the
Final Program EIR for the Specific Plan
prepared by Los Angeles County
Department of Regional Planning.
VerDate jul<14>2003 15:10 Jan 28, 2004 Jkt 203001
However, the Corps will exercise its
independent expertise and judgment in
addressing indirect and cumulative
impacts to upland areas due to issuance
of the proposed Section 404 permit.
4. Issues. There are several potential
environmental issues that will be
addressed in the DEIS/DEIR. Additional
issues may be identified during the
scoping process. Issues initially
identified as potentially significant
include:
(a) Surface Water Hydrology, Erosion
and Sedimentation;
(b) Groundwater;
(c) Water Quality;
(d) Biological Resources;
(e) Land Use;
(f) Cultural and Paleontological
Resources;
(g) Air Quality;
(h) Noise;
(i) Traffic;
(j) Visual Resources;
(k) Parks, Recreation and Trails.
5. Alternatives. Alternatives initially
being considered for the proposed
improvement project include the
following:
(a) Alternate locations and
configurations of various proposed
facilities such as buried bank
stabilization, bridges, and grade control
structures, along each of the major side
drainages including Chiquito Canyon,
Potrero Canyon, San Martinez Grande,
and Long Canyon, as well as the Santa
Clara River;
(b) No Federal action (no construction
of facilities within ‘‘Waters of the
U.S.’’);
(c) No Project (no physical changes).
6. Scoping Process. A public scoping
meeting to receive input on the scope of
the DEIS will be conducted on February
19, 2004 at 6:30 p.m. at Castaic Middle
School, located at 28900 Hillcrest
Parkway in Castaic, California.
Participation in the scoping meeting by
Federal, state, and local agencies, and
other interested private citizens and
organizations are encouraged.
7. Availability of the Draft EIS/EIR.
The joint lead agencies expect the Draft
EIS/EIR to be made available to the
public in the summer of 2004. A public
hearing will be held during the public
comment period for the Draft EIS/EIR.
Dated: January 7, 2004.
John V. Guenther,
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army, Acting District
Engineer.
[FR Doc. 04–1671 Filed 1–28–04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–92–P
PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection Requests
AGENCY: Department of Education.
SUMMARY: The Leader, Regulatory
Information Management Group, Office
of the Chief Information Officer, invites
comments on the proposed information
collection requests as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before March
29, 2004.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) requires that
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) provide interested Federal
agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
statutory obligations. The Leader,
Regulatory Information Management
Group, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, publishes that notice containing
proposed information collection
requests prior to submission of these
requests to OMB. Each proposed
information collection, grouped by
office, contains the following: (1) Type
of review requested, e.g. new, revision,
extension, existing or reinstatement; (2)
Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4)
Description of the need for, and
proposed use of, the information; (5)
Respondents and frequency of
collection; and (6) Reporting and/or
Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites
public comment.
The Department of Education is
especially interested in public comment
addressing the following issues: (1) Is
this collection necessary to the proper
functions of the Department; (2) will
this information be processed and used
in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate
of burden accurate; (4) how might the
Department enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (5) how might the
Department minimize the burden of this
collection on the respondents, including
through the use of information
technology.
29JAN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 19 / Thursday, January 29, 2004 / Notices
Dated: January 23, 2004.
Angela C. Arrington,
Leader, Regulatory Information Management
Group, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
Office of Postsecondary Education
Type of Review: Reinstatement.
Title: Annual Performance Reports for
FIPSE International Consortia Programs.
Frequency: Annually.
Affected Public: Not-for-profit
institutions; State, Local, or Tribal
Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden:
Responses: 85.
Burden Hours: 20.
Abstract: The renewal of FIPSE’s
annual performance report for the three
international programs is necessary to
ensure that the information and data
collected results in a balanced and
effective assessment of the student
exchanges and curricular developments
of the EC–US Program, the North
American Program, and the US–Brazil
Program.
Requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request may be
accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov,
by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending
Collections’’ link and by clicking on
link number 2442. When you access the
information collection, click on
‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view.
Written requests for information should
be addressed to Vivian Reese,
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., Room 4050, Regional
Office Building 3, Washington, DC
20202–4651 or to the e-mail address
vivian_reese@ed.gov. Requests may also
be electronically mailed to the Internet
address OCIO_RIMG@ed.gov or faxed to
202–708–9346. Please specify the
complete title of the information
collection when making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or
the collection activity requirements
should be directed to Joe Schubart at his
e-mail address Joe.Schubart@ed.gov
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339.
[FR Doc. 04–1898 Filed 1–28–04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection Requests
AGENCY: Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed information
collection requests.
VerDate jul<14>2003 15:10 Jan 28, 2004 Jkt 203001
SUMMARY: The Leader, Regulatory
Information Management, Office of the
Chief Information Officer, invites
comments on the proposed information
collection requests as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: An emergency review has been
requested in accordance with the Act
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 3507 (j)), since
public harm is reasonably likely to
result if normal clearance procedures
are followed. Approval by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
been requested by February 9, 2004. A
regular clearance process is also
beginning. Interested persons are
invited to submit comments on or before
March 29, 2004.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding the emergency review should
be addressed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Melanie Kadlic, Desk Officer:
Department of Education, Office of
Management and Budget; 725 17th
Street, NW., Room 10235, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503 or should be electronically
mailed to the Internet address
Melanie_Kadlic@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Director of OMB provide
interested Federal agencies and the
public an early opportunity to comment
on information collection requests. The
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) may amend or waive the
requirement for public consultation to
the extent that public participation in
the approval process would defeat the
purpose of the information collection,
violate State or Federal law, or
substantially interfere with any agency’s
ability to perform its statutory
obligations. The Leader, Information
Management Group, Office of the Chief
Information Officer, publishes this
notice containing proposed information
collection requests at the beginning of
the Departmental review of the
information collection. Each proposed
information collection, grouped by
office, contains the following: (1) Type
of review requested, e.g., new, revision,
extension, existing or reinstatement; (2)
Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4)
Description of the need for, and
proposed use of, the information; (5)
Respondents and frequency of
collection; and (6) Reporting and/or
Recordkeeping burden. ED invites
public comment.
The Department of Education is
especially interested in public comment
addressing the following issues: (1) Is
this collection necessary to the proper
PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM
4297
functions of the Department; (2) will
this information be processed and used
in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate
of burden accurate; (4) how might the
Department enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (5) how might the
Department minimize the burden of this
collection on respondents, including
through the use of information
technology.
Dated: January 26, 2004.
Angela C. Arrington,
Leader, Regulatory Information Management,
Office of the Chief Information Officer.
Federal Student Aid
Type of Review: New Collection.
Title: Pell Grant reporting under the
Common Origination and Disbursement
(COD) system.
Abstract: The Federal Pell Grant
Program is a student financial assistance
program authorized under the Higher
Education Act of 1965 (HEA), as
amended. This program provides grant
assistance to an eligible student
attending an institution of higher
education. The institution determines
the student’s award (based on a formula
established in statute) and disburses
program funds to the student on behalf
of the Department (ED). To account for
the funds disbursed, institutions report
student payment information to ED
electronically. Electronic reporting was
formerly done through the Recipient
Financial Management System (RFMS),
but is now done through the Common
Origination and Disbursement (COD)
system. COD is a simplified process for
requesting, reporting, and reconciling
Pell Grant funds.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: An
emergency request for clearance has
been requested for approval by February
9, 2004. Collection activity for this
collection is ongoing. Approval is
requested to ensure that program
funding could be disbursed to students.
Frequency: On Occasion; Monthly.
Affected Public: Not-for-profit
institutions (primary), Businesses or
other for-profit, State, Local, or Tribal
Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden:
Responses: 5,000,000.
Burden Hours: 350,000.
Requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request may be
accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov,
by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending
Collections’’ link and by clicking on
link number 2446. When you access the
information collection, click on
‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view.
Written requests for information should
29JAN1