Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
and()
()
and () (). Superposition seemed to be the best way to deal with the fact that the amplitude
Lau Math 20/30 IB SL Portfolio II (Fish Production) - 7
was decreasing as x approached infinity. Also, since the original function was a sinusoidal curve, it
made sense to use trigonometric functions. As amplitude decreased, one of the functions used had to
have decreasing amplitude as well. ()
()
also had an amplitude decrease model. However, when parameters such as stretch and
placement were changed, ()
()
was
chosen. In the second trigonometric function used for superposition, () () was chosen instead
of () () because the original had a slight curve off at the beginning (the slope approached 0).
Because of this, amplitude had to be decreased using a superposition with a change in phase. Using a
sine graph seemed much easier than changing a cosine phase. The only part that had to be worked out
were the transformations.
Fish from Fish Farms
Year Mass of Fish produce in fish farms in thousands of
tonnes
1980 1.4
1981 1.5
1982 1.7
1983 2.0
1984 2.2
1985 2.7
1986 3.1
1987 3.3
1988 4.1
1989 4.4
1990 5.8
1991 7.8
1992 9.1
1993 12.4
1994 16.0
1995 21.6
1996 33.2
1997 45.5
1998 56.7
1999 63.0
2000 79.0
2001 67.2
2002 61.2
2003 79.9
2004 94.7
2005 119.8
2006 129.0
Table 3. The year and its corresponding mass of fish produced in fish farms in thousands of tonnes.
Lau Math 20/30 IB SL Portfolio II (Fish Production) - 8
Figure 5. The year and the corresponding mass of fish from fish farms in thousands of tonnes. This graph
was created using LoggerPro. From year 1980 to 2000, there is a large exponential growth. Then there is
a slight decrease from 2000 to 2002, where the decrease stops and the graph continually increases
linearly until 2006, where the graph stops. The model created displayed on Figure 3 does not fit this
graph. This has a prominent horizontal asymptote preventing the graph from entering below zero, while
the model created had a vertical asymptote. Also, the model did not account for the dip that this graph
experiences.
Year (starting with 1980 as 0) Mass of Fish produce in fish farms in thousands of tonnes
0 1.4
1 1.5
2 1.7
3 2.0
4 2.2
5 2.7
6 3.1
7 3.3
8 4.1
9 4.4
10 5.8
11 7.8
12 9.1
13 12.4
14 16.0
15 21.6
16 33.2
17 45.5
18 56.7
19 63.0
Lau Math 20/30 IB SL Portfolio II (Fish Production) - 9
20 79.0
21 67.2
22 61.2
23 79.9
24 94.7
25 119.8
26 129.0
Table 4. To view this graph more easily, the year with 1980 starting as year 0 with corresponding mass of
fish produced in fish farms in thousands of tonnes.
Figure 6. To view this graph more easily, the year with 1980 starting as year 0 with corresponding mass
of fish produced in fish farms in thousands of tonnes. This graph was created using a program called
Graph.exe. Note: The last point labelled as series 1 is not a point, it merely names the point series.
For this graph, it is better to use a piecewise function to model it. This graph can be split into 3 different
pieces:
() * ()
* ()
* ()
Lau Math 20/30 IB SL Portfolio II (Fish Production) - 10
Figures 7-9. The graph of Figure 6 split into its piecewise function.
From 0<x<20, we can see that the graph is a diverging exponential function.
This can be represented by the base exponential function: ()
Using the GDC tool PlySmlt2 tool, the equation for x {0x20} is () ()
.
From 20<x<22, we can see that the graph is a decreasing linear function
This can be expressed in the basic linear formula: ()
Using the graphing software, the equation for x {20x22} is () .
Lau Math 20/30 IB SL Portfolio II (Fish Production) - 11
And from 22<x<26, we can see that the graph is a square root function.
This can be expressed in the basic linear formula: ()
Using the graphing software, the equation for x {22x26} is () .
Figures 10-15. Figures 7-9 with their corresponding equations respectively.
Lau Math 20/30 IB SL Portfolio II (Fish Production) - 12
Figure 16. Both models put together.
Trends
As mentioned before, the trend from the fish caught at sea was slowly decreasing while the fish
produced from fish farms increased exponentially. As fish farms continue to produce more fish, the less
the need for catching fish from the sea. Fish farms can safely produce the fish needed on the market
without endangering species. These farms are environments where the number of fish produced and
killed must be controlled or else the farm would fail, whereas no government can control how much fish
is fished from the seas. Also, it takes much less effort to produce from a fish farm than to catch a fish.
Weather, equipment cost, and time it takes to catch fish all come into effect for fishermen, whereas in a
fish farm, it is also in a controlled environment where the mother company supplies everything they
need. Another reason that fish farms are growing in popularity is due to advancing technology. With this
new tech, fish produced from fish farms are more likely to be higher in quality (better genetics, more
variety), and therefore, a higher demand for fish from farms.
Conclusion
Using the trend derived from the models, with fish from the sea slowly decreasing and fish from fish
farms increasing exponentially, a possible future trend is the continuation of both trends. Due to the
exponential increase of the production of fish farms, it is likely that in some point in the future, fish
produced from farms overtake and replace the fish from seas as the main supplier of fish.