360 views

Uploaded by Prantik Adhar Samanta

Wind Load , Seismic Load other load

- Using STAAD Pro 2005 Courseware
- American_App_Examples_2007_Complete
- Verification Manual Staad Fundation v8i
- What's New in STAAD Foundation Advanced SS1
- staad pro manual.pdf
- Design of Steel Truss STAAD
- StaadPro Knowledge Base
- STAAD Floor 11
- Staad Pro v8i Manual 2016
- STAAD Pro Advanced Analysis
- STAAD(X) Tower UserManual En
- STAAD.foundation User's Manual
- Staad Pro Tutorial
- truss design Fundamentals
- Learn Staad Pro at Home
- STAAD.pro Advanced Training Manual
- FOOTINGS.XLS
- STUDENT_STEEL_BRIDGE_COMPETITION_2011
- Steel Beam Design as Per AISC ASD
- Staad[1].Pro 2006 Technical Reference (Halid)

You are on page 1of 126

Pro

TRN00XXXX-X/000X

Trademarks

AccuDraw, Bentley, the B Bentley logo, MDL, MicroStation and SmartLine are registered trademarks; PopSet and Raster Manager are trademarks; Bentley SELECT is a service mark of Bentley Systems, Incorporated or Bentley Software, Inc. Java and all Java-based trademarks and logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the U.S. and other countries. Adobe, the Adobe logo, Acrobat, the Acrobat logo, Distiller, Exchange, and PostScript are trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated. Windows, Microsoft and Visual Basic are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. AutoCAD is a registered trademark of Autodesk, Inc. Other brands and product names are the trademarks of their respective owners.

Patents

United States Patent Nos. 5,8.15,415 and 5,784,068 and 6,199,125.

Copyrights

2000-2006 Bentley Systems, Incorporated. MicroStation 1998 Bentley Systems, Incorporated. IGDS file formats 1981-1988 Intergraph Corporation. Intergraph Raster File Formats 1993 Intergraph Corporation. Portions 1992 1994 Summit Software Company. Portions 1992 1997 Spotlight Graphics, Inc. Portions 1993 1995 Criterion Software Ltd. and its licensors. Portions 1992 1998 Sun MicroSystems, Inc. Portions Unigraphics Solutions, Inc. Icc 1991 1995 by AT&T, Christopher W. Fraser, and David R. Hanson. All rights reserved. Portions 1997 1999 HMR, Inc. All rights reserved. Portions 1992 1997 STEP Tools, Inc. Sentry Spelling-Checker Engine 1993 Wintertree Software Inc. Unpublished rights reserved under the copyright laws of the United States and other countries. All rights reserved.

4/17/2008 Copyright 2006 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Do Not Duplicate

STAAD.Pro

STAAD.Pro is a suite of proprietary computer programs of Research Engineers, a Bentley Solutions Center. Although every effort has been made to ensure the correctness of these programs, REI will not accept responsibility for any mistake, error or misrepresentation in or as a result of the usage of these programs.

2006 Bent ley Syst ems, Incorporat ed. All Right s Reserved.

About STAAD.Pro

STAAD.Pro is a general purpose structural analysis and design program with applications primarily in the building industry - commercial buildings, bridges and highway structures, industrial structures, chemical plant structures, dams, retaining walls, turbine foundations, culverts and other embedded structures, etc. The program hence consists of the following facilities to enab le this task. 1. Graphical model generation utilities as well as text editor based commands for creating the mathematical model. Beam and column members are represented using lines. Walls, slabs and panel type entities are represented using triangular and quadrilateral finite elements. Solid blocks are represented using brick elements. These utilities allow the user to create the geometry, assign properties, orient cross sections as desired, assign materials like steel, concrete, timber, aluminum, specify supports, apply loads explicitly as well as have the program generate loads, design parameters etc. Analysis engines for performing linear elastic and pdelta analysis, finite element analysis, frequency extraction, and dynamic response (spectrum, time history , steady state, etc.). Design engines for code checking and optimization of steel, aluminum and timber members. Reinforcement calculations for concrete beams, columns, slabs and shear walls. Design of shear and moment connections for steel members. Result viewing, result verification and report generation tools for examining displacement diagrams, bending moment and shear force diagrams, beam, plate and solid stress contours, etc. Peripheral tools for activities like import and export of data from and to ot her widely accepted formats, links with other popular softwares for niche areas like reinforced and prestressed concrete slab design, footing design, steel connection design, etc. A library of exposed functions called OpenSTAAD which allows users to access STAAD.Pros internal functions and routines as well as its graphical commands to tap into STAADs database and link input and output data to third -party software written using languages like C, C++, VB, VBA, FORTRAN, Java, Delphi, etc. Thus, OpenSTAAD allows users to link in-house or third-party applications with STAAD.Pro.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

The documentation for STAAD.Pro consists of a set of manuals as described below. These manuals are normally provided only in the electronic form at, with perhaps some exceptions such as the Getting Started Manual which may be supplied as a printed book to first time and new-version buyers. All the manuals can be accessed from the Help facilities of STAAD.Pro. Users who wish to obtain a printed copy of the books may contact Research Engineers. REI also supplies the manuals in the PDF format at no cost for those who wish to print them on their own. See the back cover of this book for addresses and phone numbers. Getting Started and Tutorials : This manual contains information on the contents of the STAAD.Pro package, computer system requirements, installation process, copy protection issues and a description on how to run the programs in the package. Tutorials that provide detailed and step -by-step explanation on using the programs are also provided. Examples Manual This book offers examples of various problems that can be solved using the STAAD engine. The examples represent various structural analyses and design problems commonly encountered by structural engineers. Graphical Environment This document contains a detailed description of the Graphical User Interface (GUI) of STAAD.Pro. The topics covered include model generation, structural analysis and design, result verification, and report generation. Technical Reference Manual This manual deals with the theory behind the engineering calculations made by the STAAD engine. It also includes an explanation of the commands available in the STAAD command file. International Design Codes This document contains information on the various Concrete, Steel, and Aluminum design codes, of several countries, that are implemented in STAAD. The documentation for the STAAD.Pro Extension component(s) is available separately.

Table of Contents

Modeling Problems Zero Stiffness Conditions Understanding Instabilities

Dynamic Analysis Seismic Analysis using UBC and IBC codes Calculating mode shapes, frequencies, participation factors Response Spectrum Analysis Time History Analysis for seismic accelerations Time History Analysis subjected to a harmonic loading Time History Analysis subjected to a random excitation Mat Foundations Automatic Spring Support Generation Modeling soil supports as compression only Viewing soil pressure diagrams and intensities Load Generation Moving Loads Floor Loads Wind Loads

Zero Stiffness

Question : Answer :

What does a zero stiffness warning message in the STAAD output file mean? The procedure used by STAAD in calculating displacements and forces in a structure is the stiffness method. One of the steps involved in this method is the assembly of the global stiffness matrix. During this process, STAAD verifies that no active degree of freedom (d.o.f) has a zero value, because a zero value could be a potential cause of instability in the model along that d.o.f. It means that the structural conditions which exist at that node and degree of freedom result in the structure having no ability to resist a load acting along that d.o.f. A warning message is printed in the STAAD output file highlighting the node number and the d.o.f at which the zero stiffness condition exists.

Question : What are examples of cases which give rise to these conditions? Answer :

Consider a frame structure where some of the members are defined to be trusses. On this model, if a joint exists where the only structural components connected at that node are truss members, there is no rotational stiffness at that node along any of the global d.o.f. If the structure is defined as STAAD PLANE, it will result in a warning along the MZ d.o.f at that node. If it were declared as STAAD SPACE, there will be at least 3 warnings, one for each of MX, MY and MZ, and perhaps additional warnings for the translational d.o.f. These warnings can also appear when other structural conditions such as member releases and element releases deprive the structure of stiffness at the associated nodes along the global translational or rotational directions. A tower held down by cables, defined as a PLANE or SPACE frame, where cable members are pinned supported at their base will also generate these warnings for the rotational d.o.f. at the supported nodes of the cables.

In a SPACE frame structure, connections may be modeled in such a manner that all members meeting at any given node have a moment release along all 3 axes. The joint is thus deprived of any rotational stiffness. Solid elements have no rotational stiffness at their nodes. So, at all nodes where you have only solids, these zero stiffness warning messages may appear.

The reason why these conditions are reported as warnings and not errors is due to the fact that they may not necessarily be detrimental to the proper transfer of loads from the structure to the supports. If no load acts at and along the d.o.f where the stiffness is zero, that point may not be a trouble-spot.

A zero stiffness message can be a tool for investigating the cause of instabilities in the model. An instability is a condition where a load applied on the structure is not able to make its way into the supports because no paths exist for the load to flow through, and may result in a lack of equilibrium between the applied load and the support reaction. A zero stiffness message can tell us whether any of those d.o.f are obstacles to the flow of the load.

Understanding Instabilities

Question :

I have instability warning messages in my output file like that shown below. What are these?

***WARNING - INSTABILITY AT JOINT 26 DIRECTION = FX PROBABLE CAUSE SINGULAR-ADDING WEAK SPRING K-MATRIX DIAG= 5.3274384E+03 L-MATRIX DIAG= 0.0000000E+00 EQN NO 127 ***NOTE - VERY WEAK SPRING ADDED FOR STABILITY **NOTE** STAAD DETECTS INSTABILITIES AS EXCESSIVE LOSS OF SIGNIFICANT DIGITS DURING DECOMPOSITION. WHEN A DECOMPOSED DIAGONAL IS LESS THAN THE BUILT-IN REDUCTION FACTOR TIMES THE ORIGINAL STIFFNESS MATRIX DIAGONAL, STAAD PRINTS A SINGULARITY NOTICE. THE BUILT-IN REDUCTION FACTOR IS 1.000E-09 THE ABOVE CONDITIONS COULD ALSO BE CAUSED BY VERY STIFF OR VERY WEAK ELEMENTS AS WELL AS TRUE SINGULARITIES.

Answer :

An instability is a condition where a load applied on the structure is not able to make its way into the supports because no paths exist for the load to flow through, and may result in a lack of equilibrium between the applied load and the support reaction. Examples and causes of Instability : Defining a member as a TRUSS when it needs shear and bending capacity. A framed structure with columns and beams where the columns are defined as "TRUSS" members is definitely a cause of instability. Such a column has no capacity to transfer shears or moments from the regions above it to the supports. When you declare all members connecting at specific nodes to be truss members, the alignment of the members must be such that the axial force from each member must be able to make its way through the common node to the other members. For example, if you have 3 members meeting at a point, one of them is purely vertical and the other 2 are purely horizontal, and they are all truss

members, the axial force from the vertical member cannot be transmitted into the horizontal members. On the other hand, if they are frame members, the load will be transmitted into the horizontals in the form of shear. This is an inherent weak point of trusses, and a potential cause of instability. A better option to calling a member a TRUSS is to define it as a frame member and use partial moment releases at its ends. Improper support conditions. When the supports of the structure are such that they cannot offer any resistance to sliding or overturning of the structure in one or more directions. For example, a 2D structure (frame in the XY plane) that is defined as a SPACE FRAME with pinned supports and subjected to a force in the Z direction will topple over about the X-axis. Another example is that of a space frame with all the supports released for FX, FY or FZ. Connecting a very stiff member to a very flexible member. A math precision error is caused when numerical instabilities occur in the matrix decomposition (inversion) process. One of the terms of the equilibrium equation takes the form 1/(1-A), where A=k1/(k1+k2); k1 and k2 being the stiffness coefficients of two adjacent members. When a very "stiff" member is adjacent to a very "flexible" member, viz., when k1>>k2, or k1+k2 .k1, A=1 and hence, 1/(1-A) =1/0. Thus, huge variations in stiffnesses of adjacent members are not permitted. Artificially high E or I values should be reduced when this occurs. Math precision errors are also caused when the units of length and force are not defined correctly for member lengths, member properties, constants etc. Excessive number of releases. Releases completely deprive a member of any ability to transmit a particular type of force or moment to the next member. Imagine for example, a portal frame that looks like a table, with columns pinned at their base, and each column attached to 2 orthogonal beams at the top.

If the beams are pinned connected to top of the column, it is customary to specify releases on the beams along the lines 2 3 START MX MY MZ The above release signifies that 100% of the resistance to MX, MY and MZ has been switched off at the beam-ends. The beam is hence behaving as a simply supported beam at that location. This condition, along with the pinned column base, deprives the column of any ability to transmit torsion to the base, leading to instability about the global MY degree of freedom at the pinned support. Improper connection between members. When members cross each in space, if a connection exists between 2 members, that point of contact should be represented by a common node between the members. Simply because lines appear to cross each other in space, it doesnt guarantee that STAAD will assume a connection between those members. The user has to ensure that. One tool for creating such common nodes is available under the Geometry menu. It is called Intersect Selected Members. Duplicate nodes. They are 2 or more nodes, having distinct node numbers, but the same X, Y, Z coordinates. For example, if node number 5 has coordinates of (7, 10, 0), and node 83 also has coordinates of (7, 10, 0), node 5 and 83 are considered duplicate. If you have 2 members, one attached to node 5, and the other to node 83, then, those 2 members are not connected to each other at that point in space. Go to Tools Check Duplicate Nodes to detect and merge such sets of nodes into a single node. Improper connection between members and plate elements. In the figure shown below, the beam goes from node 5 to node 6. The element is connected between 2, 3, 4 and 1. Thus, the beam has no common nodes with the element. No transfer of loads is possible between these entities.

In order for the above set of entities to be properly connected, the element would have to be broken into 2, and the beam too needs to be split at node 2, as shown below.

While there are no simple tools for splitting elements, using finer meshes of elements always helps. See the Generate Plate Mesh and Generate Surface Meshing options of the Geometry menu. A beam in the situation above may be broken up into pieces by using means like Insert Node, or Break Beams at Selected Nodes, both of which are in the Geometry menu.

Overlapping members. When 2 members are collinear, and further, at least one of the nodes of one of those members happens to lie within the span of the other, but the 2 members are not connected at that node, those 2 members are considered as overlapping collinear members. In STAAD, the tool for detecting such members is Tools Check Overlapping collinear members. An example of 2 members which would qualify as overlapping collinear is:

STAAD SPACE UNIT FEET KIP JOINT COORDINATES 1 0 0 0; 2 0 10 0; 3 10 10 0; 4 10 0 0; 5 13 10 0; 6 -4 10 0; MEMBER INCIDENCES 1 1 2; 2 2 3; 3 3 4; 101 5 6 FINISH

Here, members 2 and 101 are overlapping collinear. Member 2 is entirely confined within the span of member 101, and collinear, but they are not attached to each other. Another example is:

STAAD SPACE UNIT FEET KIP JOINT COORDINATES 1 0 0 0; 2 0 10 0; 3 10 10 0; 4 10 0 0; 5 13 10 0; 6 -4 10 0; MEMBER INCIDENCES 1 1 2; 2 2 3; 3 3 4; 101 2 5 FINISH

Here, again, members 2 and 101 are overlapping collinear. But even though they are connected to each other at node 2, again

member 2 is entirely confined within the span of member 101, and collinear. Overlapping plates. These are elements whose nodes intersect other elements at points other than the defined nodes. This entails plates whose boundaries with adjacent plates are not attached at the nodes or plates within other plates (in the same plane).

The figure above represents such a condition. Elements 1 and 2 share only one common node which is node 4. Though the drawing appears to indicate a common boundary along nodes 4, 5 and 3, there is no connection along that boundary. From the Tools menu, choose Check Overlapping Plates to detect such conditions in the model. The next figure shows what needs to be done to ensure proper connection. Our original element 1 is converted to 3 triangular elements to accomplish it.

Question : Answer :

If there are instability messages, does it mean my analysis results may be unsatisfactory? There are many situations where instabilities are unimportant and the STAAD approach of adding a weak spring is an ideal solution to the problem. For example, sometimes an engineer will release the MX torsion in a single beam or at the ends of a series of members such that technically the members are unstable in torsion. If there is no torque applied, this singularity can safely be "fixed" by STAAD with a weak torsional spring. Similarly a column that is at a pinned support will sometimes be connected to members that all have releases such that they cannot transmit moments that cause torsion in the column. This column will be unstable in torsion but can be safely "fixed" by STAAD with a weak torsional spring.

Sometimes however, a section of a structure has members that are overly released to the point where that section can rotate with respect to the rest of the structure. In this case, if STAAD adds a weak spring, there may be large displacements because there are loads in the section that are in the direction of the extremely weak spring. Another way of saying it is, an applied load acts along an unstable degree of freedom, and causes excessive displacements at that degree of freedom.

Question : Answer :

If there are instability messages, are there any simple checks to verify whether my analysis results are satisfactory? There are 2 important checks that should be carried out if instability messages are present. a. A static equilibrium check. This check will tell us whether all the applied loading flowed through the model into the supports. A satisfactory result would require that the applied loading be in equilibrium with the support reactions. The joint displacement check. This check will tell us whether the displacements in the model are within reasonable limits. If a load passes through a corresponding unstable degree of freedom, the structure will undergo excessive deflections at that degree of freedom.

b.

One may use the PRINT STATICS CHECK option in conjunction with the PERFORM ANALYSIS command to obtain a report of both the results mentioned in the above checks. The STAAD output file will contain a report similar to the following, for every primary load case that has been solved for :

***TOTAL APPLIED LOAD ( KG METE ) SUMMARY (LOADING 1) SUMMATION FORCE-X = 0.00 SUMMATION FORCE-Y = -817.84 SUMMATION FORCE-Z = 0.00 SUMMATION OF MOMENTS AROUND THE ORIGINMX= 291.23 MY= 0.00 MZ= -3598.50

***TOTAL REACTION LOAD( KG METE ) SUMMARY (LOADING 1 ) SUMMATION FORCE-X = 0.00 SUMMATION FORCE-Y = 817.84 SUMMATION FORCE-Z = 0.00 SUMMATION OF MOMENTS AROUND THE ORIGINMX= -291.23 MY= 0.00 MZ= 3598.50

MAXIMUM DISPLACEMENTS ( CM /RADIANS) (LOADING 1) MAXIMUMS AT NODE X = 1.00499E-04 25 Y = -3.18980E-01 12 Z = 1.18670E-02 23 RX= 1.52966E-04 5 RY= 1.22373E-04 23 RZ= 1.07535E-03 8 Go through these numbers to ensure that i. ii. The "TOTAL APPLIED LOAD" values and "TOTAL REACTION LOAD" values are equal and opposite. The "MAXIMUM DISPLACEMENTS" are within reasonable limits.

10

Question : Answer :

What is the meaning of this message, "Probable cause warningnear singular" While performing the triangular factorization of the global stiffness matrix, a diagonal matrix is computed. These computed diagonals are the same as or smaller than the global stiffness matrix diagonals. If the computed diagonals become zero then the matrix is singular and the structure is unstable. In STAAD we say that the structure is unstable/singular if any computed diagonal is less that (1.E-9) * (the corresponding stiffness matrix diagonal). Likewise in STAAD we say that the structure is nearly unstable/singular if any computed diagonal is less that (1.E-7) * (the corresponding stiffness matrix diagonal). If the overall results look OK, then ignore nearly singular messages.

Question : Answer :

How to avoid instabilities if TRUSSES or RELEASES are the cause? There is a rather simple way to eliminate instabilities, especially if truss members are present or when MEMBER RELEASE commands are used and certain degrees of freedom are subjected to a 100% release. In reality, connections always have some amount of force and moment capacity. Use PARTIAL RELEASES to enable the connection to retain at least a very small amount of capacity. This is a mechanism by which you can declare that, at the start node or end node of a member, rather than fully eliminating the stiffness for a certain moment degree of freedom (d.o.f), you are willing to allow the member to have a small amount of stiffness for that d.o.f. The advantage of this command is that the extent of the release is controlled by you.

11

For example, if member 5, has a pinned connection at its start node, if you specify 5 START MY MZ it means MY and MZ are 100% released at the start node. But if you say, 5 START MP 0.99 you are saying that the bending and torsional stiffnesses are 99% less than what they would be for a fully moment resistant connection. Thus, the 1% available stiffness might be adequate to allow the load to pass through the node from one member to the other. So, this is what may be done : a. Change the declaration of the truss members in your model from MEMBER TRUSS to MEMBER RELEASE memb-list START MP 0.99 memb-list END MP 0.99 or MEMBER RELEASE memb-list Both MP 0.99 b. Run the analysis. Check to make sure the instability warnings no longer appear. Then check your nodal displacements. If the displacements are large, reduce the extent of the release from 0.99 to say 0.98.

c.

12

Repeat steps (b) and (c) by progressively reducing the extent of the release until the displacements are satisfactory. When they look reasonable, check the magnitude of the moments and shear at the nodes of those members and make sure that the connection will be able to handle those forces and moments. STAAD.Pro 2002 onwards, you can apply these partial releases to individual moment degrees of freedom. For example, you could say MEMBER RELEASE memb-list Both MPX 0.99 MPY 0.97 MPZ 0.95 This flexibility permits you to adjust just the specific degree of freedom that is the problem area. You can refer to Section 5.22.1 of the Technical Reference Manual for details.

Question : Answer :

Is there any graphical facility in STAAD by which I can examine the points of instability? Yes, there is. Go to the Post processing mode. If instabilities are present, the Nodes page along the left side should contain a subpage by the name Instability. If you click on this, two tables will appear along the right hand side. The upper table lists the node number, and the global degrees of freedom at that node which are unstable. A zero for a d.o.f indicates that all is well, and, 1 indicates it is unstable. Click on the row and the node and all members connected to it will be highlighted in the drawing. The lower table has all of the joints in the order that gives the stiffness matrix the minimum bandwidth which minimizes the running time. When a joint is unstable, it means that the joint and some or all of the joints before it in the list form an unstable structure. That is, even fixing every subsequent joint in the list would not make it stable.

13

If the instability is at the last joint [or sometimes the last joint and one other joint], then the whole structure is free in that direction. Note that the instability is reported at the last joint in the list that is on the unstable component. If a column is pinned at the base and floor connections are released in global My, the column will be torsionally unstable, but only one joint on the column will be reported as unstable and it could be any joint on the column.

14

Basic principle When a building is subjected to an earthquake, it undergoes vibrations. The weights of the structure, when accelerated along the direction of the earthquake, induce forces in the building. Normally, an elaborate dynamic analysis called time history analysis is required to solve for displacements, forces and reactions resulting from the seismic activity. However, codes like UBC and IBC provide a static method of solving for those values. The generalized procedure used in those methods consists of 3 steps Step 1 : Calculate Base Shear = Factor f * Weight W where "f" is calculated from terms which take into consideration the Importance factor of the building, Site Class and soil characteristics, etc. W is the total vertical weight derived from dead weight of the building and other imposed weights. Step 2 : The base shear is then distributed over the height of the building as a series of point loads. Step 3 : The model is then analyzed for the horizontal loads generated in step 2.

The input required in STAAD consists of 2 parts. Part 1, which appears under a heading called DEFINE UBC LOAD or DEFINE IBC LOAD contains the terms used to compute "f" and "W" described in step 1. Part 2, which appears within a load case, contains the actual instruction to generate the forces described in step 2 and analyze the structure for those forces. Let us examine this procedure using the example problem shown below. STAAD SPACE SET NL 5 The structure is defined as a space frame type. The maximum number of primary load cases in the model is set to 5. UNIT KIP FEET JOINT COORD 1 0 0 0 ; 2 0 10 0 ; 3 13 10 0 ; 4 27 10 0 ; 5 40 10 0 ; 6 40 0 0 7 0 20.5 0 ; 8 20 20.5 0 ; 9 40 20.5 0 REPEAT ALL 1 0 0 11 Joint coordinates are specified using a mixture of explicit definition and generation using REPEAT command.

MEMBER INCI 1 1 2 5 ; 6 1 3 ; 7 4 6 ; 8 2 7 ; 9 7 8 10 ; 11 9 5 ; 12 2 8 ; 13 5 8 21 10 11 25 ; 26 10 12 ; 27 13 15 ; 28 11 16 ; 29 16 17 30 ; 31 18 14 32 11 17 ; 33 14 17 41 2 11 44 45 7 16 47 51 1 11 52 10 2 53 2 16 54 11 7 55 6 14 56 15 5 57 5 18 58 14 9 Member incidences are specified using a mixture of explicit definition and generation. MEMBER PROPERTIES 1 5 8 11 21 25 28 31 TA ST W14X90 2 3 4 22 23 24 TA ST W18X35 9 10 29 30 TA ST W21X50 41 TO 44 TA D C12X30 45 TO 47 TA D C15X40 6 7 26 27 TA ST HSST20X12X0.5 51 TO 58 TA LD L50308 12 13 32 33 TA ST TUB2001205

Various section types are used in this model. Among them are double channels, hollow structural sections and double angles. CONSTANTS E STEEL ALL POISSON STEEL ALL DENSITY STEEL ALL Structural steel is the material used in this model. SUPPORT 1 6 10 15 FIXED Fixed supports are defined at 4 nodes. MEMBER TENSION 51 TO 58 Members 51 to 58 are defined as capable of carrying tensile forces only. UNIT POUND DEFINE UBC ACCIDENTAL LOAD ZONE 0.3 I 1 RWX 2.9 RWZ 2.9 STYP 4 NA 1 NV 1 SELFWEIGHT FLOOR WEIGHT YRANGE 9 11 FLOAD 0.4 YRANGE 20 21 FLOAD 0.3 There are two stages in the command specification of the UBC loads. The first stage is initiated with the command DEFINE UBC LOAD. Here we specify parameters such as Zone factor, Importance factor, site coefficient for soil characteristics etc. and, the vertical loads (weights) from which the base shear will be calculated. The vertical loads may be specified in the form of selfweight, joint weights, member weights, element weights or floor weights. Floor weight is used when a pressure acting over a panel has to be applied when the structural entity which makes up the panel (like a aluminum roof for example) itself isnt defined as

part of the model. The selfweight and floor weights are shown in this example. It is important to note that these vertical loads are used purely in the determination of the horizontal base shear only. In other words, the structure is not analyzed for these vertical loads. LOAD 1 UBC LOAD X This is the second stage in which the UBC load is applied with the help of load case number, corresponding direction (X in the above case) and a factor by which the generated horizontal loads should be multiplied. Along with the UBC load, deadweight and other vertical loads may be added to the same load case (they are not in this example). PERFORM ANALYSIS PRINT LOAD DATA CHANGE A linear elastic type analysis is requested for load case 1. We can view the values and position of the generated loads with the help of the PRINT LOAD DATA command used above along with the PERFORM ANALYSIS command. A CHANGE command should follow the analysis command for models like this where the MEMBER TENSION command is used in conjunction with UBC load cases. LOAD 2 UBC LOAD Z We define load case 2 as consisting of the UBC loads to be generated along the Z direction. The structure will be analyzed for those generated loads. PERFORM ANALYSIS PRINT LOAD DATA CHANGE The analysis instruction is specified again.

LOAD 3 SELF Y -1.0 FLOOR LOAD YRANGE 9 11 FLOAD -0.4 YRANGE 20 21 FLOAD -0.3 In load case 3 in this problem, we apply 2 types of loads. The selfweight is applied in the global Y direction acting downwards. Then, a floor load generation is performed. In a floor load generation, a pressure load (force per unit area) is converted by the program into specific points forces and distributed forces on the members located in that region. The YRANGE (and if specified, the XRANGE and ZRANGE) values are used to define the region of the structure on which the pressure is acting. The FLOAD specification is used to specify the value of that pressure. All values need to be provided in the current UNIT system. For example, in the first line in the above FLOOR LOAD specification, the region is defined as being located within the bounds YRANGE of 9-11 ft. Since XRANGE and ZRANGE are not mentioned, the entire floor within the YRANGE will become a candidate for the load. The -0.4 signifies that the pressure is 0.4 Kip/sq. ft in the negative global Y direction. The program will identify the members lying within the specified region and derive MEMBER LOADS on these members based on two-way load distribution. PERFORM ANALYSIS CHANGE The analysis instruction is specified again. LOAD 4 REPEAT LOAD 1 1.0 3 1.0 Load case 4 illustrates the technique employed to instruct STAAD to create a load case which consists of data to be assembled from other load cases already specified earlier. We would like the

program to analyze the structure for loads from cases 1 and 3 acting simultaneously. PERFORM ANALYSIS PRINT STATICS CHECK CHANGE The analysis instruction is specified again. LOAD 5 REPEAT LOAD 2 1.0 3 1.0 In load case 5, we instruct STAAD to create a load case consisting of data to be assembled from cases 2 and 3 acting simultaneously. PERFORM ANALYSIS PRINT STATICS CHECK CHANGE The analysis instruction is specified again. LOAD LIST 4 5 PRINT JOINT DISPLACEMENTS PRINT SUPPORT REACTIONS PRINT MEMBER FORCES LIST 51 TO 58 Various results are requested for just load cases 4 and 5. FINISH The STAAD run is terminated.

Question :

When I specify vertical weights under the DEFINE UBC LOAD command, why do I have to specify them again under the actual load case? Won't STAAD be double-counting those weights? Generally, all code related seismic methods follow a procedure called static equivalent method. That is to say, even if seismic forces are dynamic in nature, they can be solved using a static approach. That means, one has to first come up with static loads. These are calculated usually using an equation called H = constant x V where H is the horizontal load which is calculated. V is the applied vertical load. In STAAD, the V has to be defined under commands like DEFINE IBC LOAD or DEFINE IBC LOAD There, they are defined in the form of selfweight, joint weight, member weight, etc. The data specified over there is used just to compute the V. Hence, once the H is derived from the V, the V is discarded. If a user wants the structure to be analysed for the vertical loads, they have to be explicity specified with Load cases. That is what you'll find in example 14. Load cases 1 & 2 contain a horizontal load and a vertical load. The horizontal load comes from the UBC LOAD X and UBC LOAD Z commands. The vertical load comes from selfweight, joint load commands. So, there is no double counting.

Answer :

Question : We would like to know what Ta and Tb in the static seismic base

shear output stand for. We know that both are computed time periods, but we would like to know why there are two values for it.

Answer :

The UBC and IBC codes involve determination of the period based on 2 methods - Method A and Method B. The value based on Method A is called Ta. The value based on Method B is called Tb. What is the difference between a JOINT WEIGHT and a JOINT LOAD? The JOINT WEIGHT option is specified under the DEFINE UBC LOAD command and is used merely to assemble the weight values which make up the value of "W" in the UBC equations. In other words, it is the amount of lumped weight at the joint and a fraction of this weight eventually makes up the total base shear for the structure. A JOINT LOAD on the other hand is an actual force which is acting at the joint, and is defined through the means of an actual load case.

Question : Answer :

Question :

When using the "ACCIDENTAL" option in the "DEFINE UBC LOAD" command, it appears that for the mass displacement along a given axis STAAD.Pro only considers the displacement in one direction rather than a plus or minus displacement. Is this true? You can verify this by adding the "ACCIDENTAL" option to Example Problem 14 and comparing the reactions. Use the "ACC f2" option as explained in the command syntax in section 5.32.12 of the Technical Reference manual. You can specify a negative value for f2 if you want the minus sign for the torsional moments. You will need STAAD.Pro 2003 to use this.

Answer :

10

Question : Answer :

How do I display the Load values of an IBC2000 load case? First run the analysis. Then go to the View menu, choose Structure Diagrams. Click on the Loads and Results tab. Select the load case corresponding to the IBC load command. Switch on the checkbox for Loads, click on OK.

In STAAD, there are 2 methods for obtaining the frequencies of a structure. 1. The Rayleigh method using the CALCULATE RAYLEIGH FREQUENCY command The elaborate method which involves extracting eigenvalues from a matrix based on the structure stiffness and lumped masses in the model.

2.

The Rayleigh method in STAAD is a one-iteration approximate method from which a single frequency is obtained. It uses the displaced shape of the model to obtain the frequency. Needless to say, it is extremely important that the displaced shape that the calculation is based on, resemble one of the vibration modes. If one is interested in the fundamental mode, the loading on the model should cause it to displace in a manner which resembles the fundamental mode. For example, the fundamental mode of vibration of a tall building would be a cantilever style mode, where the building sways from side to side with the base remaining stationary. The type of loading which creates a displaced shape which resembles this mode is a lateral force such as a wind force. Hence, if one were to use the Rayleigh method, the loads which should be applied are lateral loads, not vertical loads. For the eigensolution method, the user is required to specify all the masses in the model along with the directions they are capable of vibrating in. If this data is correctly provided, the program extracts as many modes as the user requests (default value is 6) in ascending order of strain energy. The mode shapes can be viewed graphically to verify that they make sense.

Eigenvalue extraction method The input which is important and relevant to the analysis of a structure for frequencies and modes using the eigenvalue extraction method is explained below. These are explained in association with an example problem provided at the end of this section. 1. The DENSITY command One of the critical components of a frequency analysis is the amount of "mass" undergoing vibration. For a structure, this mass comes from the selfweight, and from permanent/imposed loads on the building. To calculate selfweight, density is required, and is hence specified under the command CONSTANTS. 2. The CUT OFF MODE SHAPE command Theoretically, a structure has as many modes of vibration as the number of degrees of freedom in the model. However, the limitations of the mathematical process used in extracting modes may limit the number of modes that can actually be extracted. In a large structure, the extraction process can also be a very time consuming process. Further, not all modes are of equal importance. (One measure of the importance of modes is the participation factor of that mode.) In many cases, the first few modes may be sufficient to obtain a significant portion of the total dynamic response. Due to these reasons, in the absence of any explicit instruction, STAAD calculates only the first 6 modes. (Versions of STAAD prior to STAAD/Pro 2000 calculated only 3 modes by default). This is like saying that the command CUT OFF MODE SHAPE 6 has been specified. If the inspection of the first 6 modes reveals that the overall vibration pattern of the structure has not been obtained, one may ask STAAD to compute a larger (or smaller) number of modes with the help of this command. The number that follows this command

is the number of modes being requested. In our example, we are asking for 10 modes by specifying CUT OFF MODE SHAPE 10. 3. The MODAL CALCULATION REQUESTED command. This is the command which triggers the calculation of frequencies and modes. It is specified inside a load case. In other words, this command accompanies the loads which are to be used in generating the mass matrix. Frequencies and modes have to be calculated when dynamic analysis such as response spectrum or time history analysis are carried out. But in such analyses, the MODAL CALCULATION REQUESTED command is not explicitly required. When STAAD encounters the commands for response spectrum (see example 11) and time history (see examples 16 and 22), it automatically will carry out a frequency extraction without the help of the MODAL .. command. 4. The MASSES which are to be used in assembling the MASS MATRIX The mathematical method that STAAD uses is called the subspace iteration eigen extraction method. Some information on this is available in Section 1.18.3 of the STAAD.Pro Technical Reference Manual. The method involves 2 matrices - the stiffness matrix, and the mass matrix. The stiffness matrix, usually called the [K] matrix, is assembled using data such as member and element lengths, member and element properties, modulus of elasticity, poisson's ratio, member and element releases, member offsets, support information, etc.

For assembling the mass matrix, called the [M] matrix, STAAD uses the load data specified in the load case in which the MODAL CAL REQ command is specified. So, some of the important aspects to bear in mind are: i. The input you specify is weights, not masses. Internally, STAAD will convert weights to masses by dividing the input by "g", the acceleration due to gravity.

ii. If the structure is declared as a PLANE frame, there are 2 possible directions of vibration - global X, and global Y. If the structure is declared as a SPACE frame, there are 3 possible directions - global X, global Y and global Z. However, this does not guarantee that STAAD will automatically consider the masses for vibration in all the available directions. You have control over and are responsible for specifying the directions in which the masses ought to vibrate. In other words, if a weight if not specified along a certain direction, the corresponding degrees of freedom (such as for example, global Z at node 34) will not receive a contribution in the mass matrix. The mass matrix is assembled using only the masses from the weights and directions specified by the user. In our example, notice that we are specifying the selfweight along global X, Y and Z directions. Similarly, the element pressure load is also specified along all 3 directions. We have chosen not to restrict any direction for this problem. If a user wishes to restrict a certain weight to certain directions only, all he/she has to do is not provide the directions in which those weights cannot vibrate in. iii. As much as possible, provide absolute values for the weights. STAAD is programmed to algebraically add the weights at nodes. So, if some weights are specified as positive numbers, and others as negative, the total weight

at a given node is the algebraic summation of all the weights in the global directions at that node. STAAD SPACE * EXAMPLE PROBLEM FOR CALCULATION OF MODES AND FREQUENCIES UNIT FEET KIP JOINT COORDINATES 1 0 0 0; 2 0 0 20; 3 20 0 0; 4 20 0 20; 5 40 0 0; 6 40 0 20; 7 0 15 0; 8 0 15 5; 9 0 15 10; 10 0 15 15; 11 0 15 20; 12 5 15 0; 13 10 15 0; 14 15 15 0; 15 5 15 20; 16 10 15 20; 17 15 15 20; 18 20 15 0; 19 20 15 5; 20 20 15 10; 21 20 15 15; 22 20 15 20; 23 25 15 0; 24 30 15 0; 25 35 15 0; 26 25 15 20; 27 30 15 20; 28 35 15 20; 29 40 15 0; 30 40 15 5; 31 40 15 10; 32 40 15 15; 33 40 15 20; 34 20 3.75 0; 35 20 7.5 0; 36 20 11.25 0; 37 20 3.75 20; 38 20 7.5 20; 39 20 11.25 20; 40 5 15 5; 41 5 15 10; 42 5 15 15; 43 10 15 5; 44 10 15 10; 45 10 15 15; 46 15 15 5; 47 15 15 10; 48 15 15 15; 49 25 15 5; 50 25 15 10; 51 25 15 15; 52 30 15 5; 53 30 15 10; 54 30 15 15; 55 35 15 5; 56 35 15 10; 57 35 15 15; 58 20 11.25 5; 59 20 11.25 10; 60 20 11.25 15; 61 20 7.5 5; 62 20 7.5 10; 63 20 7.5 15; 64 20 3.75 5; 65 20 3.75 10; 66 20 3.75 15; 67 20 0 5; 68 20 0 10; 69 20 0 15; MEMBER INCIDENCES 1 1 7; 2 2 11; 3 3 34; 4 34 35; 5 35 36; 6 36 18; 7 4 37; 8 37 38; 9 38 39; 10 39 22; 11 5 29; 12 6 33; 13 7 8; 14 8 9; 15 9 10; 16 10 11; 17 18 19; 18 19 20; 19 20 21; 20 21 22; 21 29 30; 22 30 31; 23 31 32; 24 32 33; 25 7 12; 26 12 13; 27 13 14; 28 14 18; 29 18 23; 30 23 24; 31 24 25; 32 25 29; 33 11 15; 34 15 16; 35 16 17; 36 17 22; 37 22 26; 38 26 27; 39 27 28; 40 28 33; ELEMENT INCIDENCES SHELL 41 7 8 40 12; 42 8 9 41 40; 43 9 10 42 41; 44 10 11 15 42; 45 12 40 43 13; 46 40 41 44 43; 47 41 42 45 44; 48 42 15 16 45; 49 13 43 46 14; 50 43 44 47 46; 51 44 45 48 47; 52 45 16 17 48; 53 14 46 19 18; 54 46 47 20 19; 55 47 48 21 20; 56 48 17 22 21;

57 18 19 49 23; 58 19 20 50 49; 59 20 21 51 50; 60 21 22 26 51; 61 23 49 52 24; 62 49 50 53 52; 63 50 51 54 53; 64 51 26 27 54; 65 24 52 55 25; 66 52 53 56 55; 67 53 54 57 56; 68 54 27 28 57; 69 25 55 30 29; 70 55 56 31 30; 71 56 57 32 31; 72 57 28 33 32; 73 18 19 58 36; 74 19 20 59 58; 75 20 21 60 59; 76 21 22 39 60; 77 36 58 61 35; 78 58 59 62 61; 79 59 60 63 62; 80 60 39 38 63; 81 35 61 64 34; 82 61 62 65 64; 83 62 63 66 65; 84 63 38 37 66; 85 34 64 67 3; 86 64 65 68 67; 87 65 66 69 68; 88 66 37 4 69; MEMBER PROPERTY 1 TO 40 PRIS YD 1 ZD 1 ELEMENT PROPERTY 41 TO 88 THICKNESS 0.5 CONSTANTS E CONCRETE ALL DENSITY CONCRETE ALL POISSON CONCRETE ALL CUT OFF MODE SHAPE 10 SUPPORTS 1 TO 6 FIXED UNIT POUND FEET *MASS DATA AND INSTRUCTION FOR COMPUTING FREQUENCIES AND MODES LOAD 1 SELFWEIGHT X 1.0 SELFWEIGHT Y 1.0 SELFWEIGHT Z 1.0 ELEMENT LOAD 41 TO 88 PR GX 300.0 41 TO 88 PR GY 300.0 41 TO 88 PR GZ 300.0

Understanding the output : After the analysis is completed, look at the output file. This file can be viewed from File - View - Output File - STAAD output. i. Mode number and corresponding frequencies and periods Since we asked for 10 modes, we obtain a report which is as follows:

ii.

In the explanation above for the CUT OFF MODE command, we said that one measure of the importance of a mode is the participation factor of that mode. We can see from the above report that for vibration along X direction, the first mode has a 90.89 percent participation. It is also apparent that the 4th mode is primarily a Y direction mode due to its 50.5 % participation along Y and 0 in X and Z. The SUMM-X, SUMM-Y and SUMM-Z columns show the cumulative value of the participation of all the modes up to and including a given mode. One can infer from those terms that if one is interested in 95% participation along X, the first 5 modes are sufficient. But for the Z direction, even with 10 modes, we barely obtained 0.6%. The reason for this can be understood by a close examination of the nature of the structure. Our model has a shear wall which spans in the YZ plane. This makes the structure extremely stiff in that plane. It would take a lot of energy to make the structure vibrate along the Z direction. Modes are extracted in the ascending order of energy. The higher modes are high energy modes, compared to the lower modes. It is likely that unless we raise the number of modes extracted from 10 to a much larger number - 30 or more -

using the CUT OFF MODE SHAPE command, we may not be able to obtain substantial participation along the Z direction. Another unique aspect of the above result are the modes where all 3 directions have 0 or near 0 participation. This is caused by the fact that the vibration pattern of the model for that mode results in symmetrically located masses vibrating in opposing directions, thus canceling each other's effect. Torsional modes too exhibit this behavior. See the next item for the method for viewing the shape of vibration. Localized modes, where small pockets in the structure undergo flutter due to their relative weak stiffness compared to the rest of the model, also result in small participation factors. iii. Viewing the mode shapes After the analysis is completed, select Post-processing from the mode menu. This screen contains facilities for graphically examining the shape of the mode in static and animated views. The Dynamics page on the left side of the screen is available for viewing the shape of the mode statically. The Animation option of the Results menu can be used for animating the mode. The mode number can be selected from the "Loads and Results" tab of the "Diagrams" dialog box which comes up when the Animation option is chosen. The size to which the mode is drawn is controlled using the "Scales" tab of the "Diagrams" dialog box.

10

How are modes, frequencies and the other terms are calculated The process of calculating the MODES and FREQUENCIES is known as Modal Extraction and is performed by solving the equation: 2 [ m ] { q } - [ K ] { q } = o Where [ m ] = the mass matrix (assumed to be diagonal, i.e., no mass coupling) = the natural frequencies (eigenvalues) { q } = the normalized mode shapes (eigenvectors) Frequency (HZ or CPS) = /2 The solution method used in STAAD is the Subspace iteration method. Please note that various nomenclature is used to refer to the normal modes of vibration. (Eigenvalue, Natural Frequency, Modal Frequency and Eigenvector, Mode Shape, Modal Vector, Normal Modes, Normalized Mode Shape. Generalized Weight and Generalized Mass Each eigenvector {q} has an associated generalized mass defined by Generalized Mass (GM) = { q } T [ M ] { q } Generalized Weight (GW) = GM * g

11

Participation Factors - A participation factor (Qi) is computed for each eigenvector for each of the three global (Xi) translational directions. N is the number of modes.

(q j,i )( w j,i )

j=1 N

Qi =

GW

Modal Weights - The modal weight for each mode is (GW)(Q i ). The summation of modal weights for all modes in a given direction is equal to the Base Shear which would result from a one g base acceleration. The sum of the modal weights for the computed modes may be compared to the total weight of the structure (only the weight that has not been lumped at supports). The difference is the amount of weight missing from a dynamic, base excitation, modal response analysis. If too much is missing, then rerun the eigensolution asking for a greater number of modes. STAAD prints the "MASS PARTICIPATION FACTOR IN PERCENT" for each mode. This is the modal weight of a mode as a percentage of the total weight of the structure. Also a running sum for all modes is given so that the last line indicates the percent of the total weight that all of the modes extracted would represent in a 1g base excitation.

12

Description Response spectra are plots of maximum response of single degree of freedom (SDOF) systems subjected to a specific excitation. For various values of frequency of the SDOF system and various damping ratios, the peak response is calculated. Structures normally have multiple degrees of freedom (MDOF). The dynamic analysis of a MDOF system having "n" DOF involves reducing it to "n" independent SDOF systems. The modal superposition method is used and the maximum modal responses are combined using SRSS, CQC and other methods available in STAAD. The command syntax for defining response spectrum data is explained in Section 5.32.10.1 of the Technical Reference manual. It is important to understand that once the combination methods like SRSS or CQC are applied, the sign of the results is lost. Consequently, results of a spectrum analysis, like displacements, forces and reactions do not have any sign. Because spectrum analysis requires modes and frequencies, the mass data and other details explained in the chapter on calculating modes and frequencies are all applicable in the case of spectrum analysis also. In other words, the mode and frequency calculation is a pre-requisite to performing response spectrum analysis.

Calculation of Base Shear in a Response Spectrum Analysis The base shear, for a given mode for a given direction, reported in the response spectrum analysis is obtained as A*B*C*D where A = Mass participation factor for that mode for that direction B = Total mass specified for that direction C = Spectral acceleration for that mode D = direction factor specified in that load case A is calculated by the program from the mass matrix and mode shapes B is obtained from the masses specified in the response spectrum load case C is obtained by interpolating between the user provided values of period vs. acceleration and multiplying the resulting value by the SCALE FACTOR. D is specified by the user Bending Moment Diagram for a load case that involves the Response Spectrum Analysis In a response spectrum analysis in STAAD, the member forces are computed accurately only at the 2 ends of the member. The sign of these forces cannot be determined due to the fact that the method used to combine the contribution of modes does not allow for the determination of the sign of the forces. Further, these force values do not necessarily indicate whether these forces occur at the same instant of time.

In order to draw the bending moment diagram, one needs to know the moments at the intermediate section points on the member. In order to calculate these section force values, the forces at the member ends have to be used. However, due to the special nature of these end force values as described in the paragraph above, it makes no sense to calculate the intermediate section forces based on the end force values. Due to this reasoning, the bending moment diagram simply cannot be drawn accurately for the response spectrum loading. STAAD merely plots a straight line that joins the bending moment values at the start and end joints of the member which are as mentioned earlier, absolute (positive) values. Current versions of STAAD do not let the user draw the diagram at all from certain places such as the Member Query. Comparison of results of a spectrum analysis (which uses the UBC spectrum data) with the results of an equivalent UBC static analysis For the following reasons, this comparison isn't meaningful : 1. In a spectrum analysis, the number of modes to be combined is a decision made by the engineer. If 100% participation from the modes isn't utilized in the displacement calculation, it is obvious that the results will be only approximate. In a spectrum analysis, the contribution from the various modes is combined using an SRSS method or a CQC method, both of which are only approximate methods. One very important drawback of both these methods is that the sign of the displacements and forces cannot be determined. Also, the results can vary significantly depending on the type of method used in the combination. In the UBC method, only a single period is used. Normally, the assumption is that this period is associated with a mode that encompasses a significant portion of the overall response of the structure. This may not necessarily be true in reality. If

2.

3.

more than one mode is required to capture the overall response of the structure, that fact is not brought to light in the UBC static equivalent approach. 4. The UBC static equivalent method involves several parameters such as Importance factor, soil structure coefficient, etc. which are incorporated through an emperical formula. In a response spectrum analysis, there is no facility available to incorporate these factors in a direct manner.

Due to these reasons, a direct comparison of the results of a spectrum analysis and a static equivalent approach is not recommended.

Question : Answer :

What is the Scale Factor (f4) that needs to be provided when specifying the Response Spectra? The spectrum data consists of pairs of values which are Period vs. Accn. or Period vs. Displacement. The acceleration or displacement values that you obtain from the geological data for that site may have been provided to you as normalized values or un-normalized values. Normalization means that the values of acceleration or displacement have been divided by a number (called normalization factor) which represents some reference value. One of the commonly used normalization factors is 'g', the acceleration due to gravity. If the spectrum data you specify in STAAD is a normalized spectrum data, you should provide the NORMALIZATION FACTOR as the SCALE FACTOR. If your spectrum data is unnormalized, there is no need to provide a scale factor(Another way of putting it is that if you provide un-normalized spectrum values, the scale factor is 1, which happens to be the default value also.) Make sure that the value you provide for the SCALE FACTOR is in accordance with the length units you have specified. (A common error is that if the scale factor is 'g', users erroneously provide 32.2 when the length unit is in INCHES.)

STAAD will multiply the spectral acceleration or spectral displacement values by the scale factor. Hence, if you provide a normalized acceleration value of 0.5 and a scale factor of 386.4 inch/sq.sec., it has the same effect as providing an un-normalized acceleration value of 193.2 inch/sq.sec. and a scale factor of 1.0.

Question : Answer :

What is the Direction Factor that needs to be provided when specifying the Response Spectra? The Direction factor is a quantity by which the spectral displacement for the associated direction is multiplied. For example, if the command reads as SPECTRUM SRSS X 0.7 Y 0.5 Z 0.65 DISP DAMP 0.05 SCALE 32.2 the following is done: 1. 2. For each mode, the period is determined. Corresponding to the period, the spectral displacement for that mode is calculated by interpolation from the input pairs of period vs. spectral displacement. Call this "sd" Calculate the spectral displacement for each direction by multiplying "sd" by the associated Direction factor. The X direction spectral displacement = sd * 0.7 The Y direction spectral displacement = sd * 0.5 The Z direction spectral displacement = sd * 0.65 These factored values are then multiplied by a. b. the mode shape value corresponding to that degree of freedom, participation factor.

3.

Call the result T(m) where "m" stands for the mode number.

Once the T(m) is determined for all modes, subject them to the SRSS calculation. That will provide the node displacement corresponding to that degree of freedom.

Question :

The results of the response spectrum load case are always positive numbers. Why? How do I know that the positive value is always critical, especially from the design standpoint? In a spectrum analysis, the contribution of the individual modes is combined using methods such as SRSS or CQC to arrive at the overall response. The limitation of these methods is that the sign of the response cannot be determined after the method is applied. This is the reason why the output you get from STAAD for a response spectrum analysis are absolute values. One way to deal with the problem is to create 2 load combination cases for each set of load cases you wish to combine. For example, if the dead load case is 1, and the spectrum load case is 5, you could create LOAD COMB 10 1 1.1 5 1.3 LOAD COMB 11 1 1.1 5 -1.3 and use the critical value from amongst these 2 load combination cases for design purposes. What you accomplish from this process is that you are considering a positive effect as well as the negative effect of the spectrum load case.

Answer :

Question :

In the Technical Reference manual section 5.32.10.1, you state: " Note, if data is in g acceleration units, then set SCALE to a conversion factor to the current length unit (9.81, 386.4, etc.)" What does "g acceleration units" mean?

Related question : What is the Scale Factor (f4) that needs to be provided

when specifying the Response Spectra?

Answer :

The spectrum data consists of pairs of values which are Period vs. Accn. or Period vs. Displacement. The acceleration or displacement values that you obtain from the geological data for that site may have been provided to you as normalized values or un-normalized values. Normalization means that the values of acceleration or displacement have been divided by a number (called normalization factor) which represents some reference value. One of the commonly used normalization factors is 'g', the acceleration due to gravity. If the spectrum data you specify in STAAD is a normalized spectrum data, you should provide the NORMALIZATION FACTOR as the SCALE FACTOR. If your spectrum data is unnormalized, there is no need to provide a scale factor(Another way of putting it is that if you provide un-normalized spectrum values, the scale factor is 1, which happens to be the default value also.) Make sure that the value you provide for the SCALE FACTOR is in accordance with the length units you have specified. (A common error is that if the scale factor is 'g', users erroneously provide 32.2 when the length unit is in INCHES.) STAAD will multiply the spectral acceleration or spectral displacement values by the scale factor. Hence, if you provide a normalized acceleration value of 0.5 and a scale factor of 386.4 inch/sq.sec., it has the same effect as providing an un-normalized acceleration value of 193.2 inch/sq.sec. and a scale factor of 1.0.

Question :

STAAD allows me to use SRSS, ABS, CQC, ASCE4-98 & TEN Percent for combining the responses from each mode into a total response. The CQC & ASCE4 methods require damping. But, ABS, SRSS, and TEN do not use damping unless Spectra-Period curves are made a function of damping. Why? The spectral acceleration versus period curve is for a particular value of damping. So the user has selected a damping when he selects the acceleration curve. The damping on the SPECTRUM command only affects the calculation of the closely spaced modal interaction matrix which SRSS, ABS, and TEN do not use. I have some doubts in how to use the Spectrum command. First of all, dead loads are always applied in the Y axis direction (downwards). When Im going to run a spectrum analysis and I use the same dead loads, do I have to modify the direction of the loads?

Answer :

Question :

Answer :

The load data you provide in the load case in which the SPECTRUM command is specified goes into the making of the mass matrix. The mass matrix is supposed to be populated with terms for all the global directions in which the structure is capable of vibrating. To enable this, the loads must be specified in all the possible directions of vibration. Consequently, the load case for response spectrum might look something like this : LOAD 20 SPECTRUM IN X DIRECTION * SELFWEIGHT X 1 SELFWEIGHT Y 1 SELFWEIGHT Z 1

MEMBER LOAD 274 TO 277 UNI GX 1.36 272 466 998 UNI GX 4.13 313 314 474 477 UNI GX 6.29 274 TO 277 UNI GY 1.36 272 466 998 UNI GY 4.13 313 314 474 477 UNI GY 6.29 274 TO 277 UNI GZ 1.36 272 466 998 UNI GZ 4.13 313 314 474 477 UNI GZ 6.29 JOINT LOAD 420 424 FX 47.32 389 TO 391 FX 560 420 424 FY 47.32 389 TO 391 FY 560 420 424 FZ 47.32 389 TO 391 FZ 560 SPECTRUM CQC X 1 ACC SCALE 9.81 DAMP 0.07 0.025 0.14; 0.0303 0.1636; 0.05 0.2455; 0.0625 0.2941; 0.0769 0.3479; 0.0833 0.3713; 0.1 0.3713; 0.125 0.3713; 0.1667 0.3713; 0.1895 0.3713; 0.25 0.2815; 0.2857 0.2463; 0.3333 0.2111; 0.4 0.1759; 0.5 0.1407; 0.6667 0.1056; 1 0.0704; 2 0.0344; 10 0.001372;

LOAD 21 SPECTRUM IN Z DIRECTION SPECTRUM CQC Z 1 ACC SCALE 9.81 DAMP 0.07 0.025 0.14; 0.0303 0.1636; 0.05 0.2455; 0.0625 0.2941; 0.0769 0.3479; 0.0833 0.3713;

10

0.1 0.3713; 0.125 0.3713; 0.1667 0.3713; 0.1895 0.3713; 0.25 0.2815; 0.2857 0.2463; 0.3333 0.2111; 0.4 0.1759; 0.5 0.1407; 0.6667 0.1056; 1 0.0704; 2 0.0344; 10 0.001372;

Question : Answer :

Can I specify a different spectrum for each of the 3 directions (x , y or z)? Yes.

Question : Can I decide how many modes I want to include in the spectrum

analysis?

Use the command CUT OFF MODE SHAPE. Refer to example problems 11, 28, 29, etc. In the results, what are the dynamic, missing, and modal weights?

The dynamic weight line contains the total potential weight for base shear calculations. Missing Weight is the amount of weight missing in the modes; Modal weight is the total weight actually used in the modes. If you algebraically add up Dynamic & Missing, you should get Modal.

SRSS MODAL COMBINATION METHOD USED. DYNAMIC WEIGHT X Y Z MODAL WEIGHT X Y Z 8.165253E+02 8.165294E+02 8.165276E+02 POUN MISSING WEIGHT X Y Z -4.118054E+01 -3.292104E+02 -4.840284E+02 POUN 7.753447E+02 4.873190E+02 3.324991E+02 POUN

11

Question : Answer :

What is meant by MASS PARTICIPATION FACTORS IN PERCENT? When the weight of the building is accelerated in a certain direction, it produces a force in that direction. That force can be broken down into small parts, with each part coming from a specific mode. The sum of the values of these parts is called the base shear. The percentage of the weight of the building, participating in the vibration in a mode in a specific direction is called the PARTICIPATION factor. It is a reflection of the "part" of the base shear, generated by that mode in that direction.

Question :

I am a little bit confused with the response spectrum analysis results. Refer your Example 11 results. The support reactions that we are getting are the same for both the supports for load cases 3 & 4. In combining lateral loads (response spectrum loading in this case) with vertical loads, one support should have less force than the other. At one support, the vertical reaction from the lateral load case will add to that from the vertical load case, and, at the other, it will get subtracted. Why do I not see that in the results? The support reaction values from a response spectrum analysis (like any other results from a response spectrum analysis) are absolute quantities. Consequently, the reactions from case 2, which is the spectrum case, are both equal and have the same sign. The primary reasons for this are a. b. when the numbers are subjected to the SRSS, CQC or other methods, their sign is lost the values do not necessarily reflect the result at the same instant of time.

Answer :

When you combine these results with those from the dead load case, it leads to the same value at both supports.

12

If you want the results to truly reflect the sign, use a static equivalent method like that stipulated by the UBC code. Alternatively, perform a time history analysis where the sign of the values is obtained for each time step.

Question : Answer :

Is it possible to get the vertical distribution of the total base shear in a response spectrum analysis, like one can for a UBC analysis? Unfortunately No. Since the values from a response spectrum analysis are absolute quantities (numbers without sign), there is no reasonable way to obtain it. You may add up the shears in the columns above that level for an approximate estimate. Can you please let me know if we can print nodal acceleration from response spectra runs? If so, how do I print the data in the report format or display it in the Post-Processing mode?

Question :

Answer :

Add the word SAVE at the end of the SPECTRUM command. A .ACC file will be created. There is unfortunately no facility available for displaying it in the post-processing mode. However, since the ACC file is simply a text file, you can open it using any text editor, and in Excel too. In Excel, you can use the graph generation facilities for plotting it.

Question :

In a response spectrum analysis using the STAAD.Pro, the base shear is not matching with the summation of the support reaction values in that direction. Why? Also, which values should be taken for designing the foundation? the base shear value or the support reaction value? If it is the base shear value then what is the method generally used to distribute this base shear to all the supports? The results are statistical, SRSS, CQC, etc. The numbers are all peak positive values. Since each of the reactions at the time of peak base shear could be less than that reaction's peak and could be positive or negative, it is likely that the peak base shear will be much less than the sum of the peak reactions.

Answer :

13

There is no way to distribute the base shear to the supports. Even if you could, that would not be the peak reaction at the support, the reaction printed by STAAD is the peak value. If there are several components of reaction at a joint, these are peak values that may have occurred at different times.

Question :

The base shear reported by STAAD does not match with the Summation of Support Reactions in the relevant direction. I want to know the reason for the same. When the SRSS method is used, all results from a Response Spectrum analysis are a result of a square root of a sum of the squares (SRSS) of the desired output quantity from each mode. The reactions within a single mode may have equal and opposite reactions of the various supports such that the base shear for that mode is near zero. Therefore the contribution of that mode to a SRSS of all the modal base shears will be nearly zero. However, in that same mode, a particular support may have a large reaction value. So when that value is SRSSed with that supports reaction value from all the other modes, that same mode may be a major contributor to the final result for the support reaction while that mode contributes little to the base shear. Of course if all the support reactions in all of the modes have the same sign, then the answers will be close.

Answer :

Question :

I am getting a large Difference in the results ( Base shear ) of between Seismic Coefficient Method (UBC) Response Spectrum Method. Can you explain why? Also, the CQC method produces a higher base shear than the SRSS method. If the base shear is spread over many frequencies, the Response Spectrum method will result in a base shear that is much lower than an absolute sum of the base shears of all the modes. The theory of SRSS combination is that the peak value from each mode will occur at a different time and is statistically independent. In

Answer :

14

STAAD 200x the base shear is also printed using Absolute Sum combination which assumes that the modes are all in phase and peaks occur at the same time. You will note that in many problems the absolute sum result is much higher than the SRSS result. I believe that the UBC approach is closer to the absolute response since a static case is entirely in phase. For close spaced eigenvalues the CQC method will amplify the response of those modes as compared to the SRSS method.

Question :

I am trying to correlate the relationship between the base shears and the Global Support Reactions. For example, on the attached model, the total base shear in the x-direction does not add up to the total reaction in the x-direction for the dynamic load case. I'm thinking that STAAD solves a reaction for each mode and subsequently sums them in either SRSS or CQC, but I am trying to justify in my mind why the total base shear in the X direction is not also the total Global Reaction in the X direction. Could you try to explain? Every individual output result value in a response spectrum analysis is independent and all results are absolute (positive).

Answer :

15

Lets say you have two modes and 4 supports in the x direction. Then for the SRSS combination method the results are computed as follows: ****************************************************** *** Support# Mode 1 Mode 2 Sum of Squares Square root Reaction Reaction SRSS 1 2 3 4 SRSS Base Shear Reactions)

1586 = 39.8

****************************************************** *** Note that SRSS base shear (39.8) does not equal the sum of the SRSS reactions (18.0+19.6+46.2+12.4=96.2). In effect the procedure says that the maximum likely reaction value at each support is as shown. However the maximum likely sum is the Base shear as shown. This is due to the fact that the individual maximums would not occur at the same time and not necessarily with the same sign. So the base shear magnitude is usually much less than the sum of the reactions.

SPECTRUM SRSS X 1 ACC SCALE 0.9806 DAMP 0.05 0.03 0.8702; 0.05 1.0752; 0.1 1.5876; 0.15 2.1; 0.3 2.1; 0.5 2.1; 0.7 1.5; 0.9 1.1667; 1.1 0.9545; 1.3 0.8077; 1.5 0.7; 1.7 0.6176; 1.9 0.5526;

16

2.1 0.4762; 2.3 0.397; 2.5 0.336; 2.7 0.2881; 2.9 0.2497; 3.1 0.2185; 3.3 0.1928; 3.5 0.1714; 3.7 0.1534; 3.9 0.1381; 4.1 0.1249; 4.3 0.1136; 4.8 0.0911; 6 0.0583; 7 0.0429; 8 0.0328; 10 0.021; 20 0.0053; 30 0.0023; For Load case 2, I have

SPECTRUM SRSS Z 1 ACC SCALE 0.9806 DAMP 0.05 0.03 0.8702; 0.05 1.0752; 0.1 1.5876; 0.15 2.1; 0.3 2.1; 0.5 2.1; 0.7 1.5; 0.9 1.1667; 1.1 0.9545; 1.3 0.8077; 1.5 0.7; 1.7 0.6176; 1.9 0.5526; 2.1 0.4762; 2.3 0.397; 2.5 0.336; 2.7 0.2881; 2.9 0.2497; 3.1 0.2185; 3.3 0.1928; 3.5 0.1714; 3.7 0.1534; 3.9 0.1381; 4.1 0.1249; 4.3 0.1136; 4.8 0.0911; 6 0.0583; 7 0.0429; 8 0.0328; 10 0.021; 20 0.0053; 30 0.0023; For Load case 3, I have SPECTRUM SRSS X 1 Z 1 ACC SCALE 0.9806 DAMP 0.05 0.03 0.8702; 0.05 1.0752; 0.1 1.5876; 0.2 2.1; 0.3 2.1; 0.5 2.1; 0.7 1.5; 0.9 1.1667; 1.1 0.9545; 1.3 0.8077; 1.5 0.7; 1.7 0.6176; 1.9 0.5526; 2.1 0.4762; 2.3 0.397; 2.5 0.336; 2.7 0.2881; 2.9 0.2497; 3.1 0.2185; 3.3 0.1928; 3.5 0.1714; 3.7 0.1534; 3.9 0.1381; 4.1 0.1249; 4.3 0.1136; 4.8 0.0911; 6 0.0583; 7 0.0429; 8 0.0328; 10 0.021; 20 0.0053; 30 0.0023; Load combination 5 is an SRSS of 1 & 2. LOAD COMBINATION SRSS 5 berlagerung

17

1 1.0 2 1.0 Should load case 5 produce the same answers as load case 3?

Answer :

Load case 1 means the earthquake is acting in the X direction at an intensity of say 100%. Load case 2 means the earthquake is acting in the Z direction at an intensity of say 100%. Then, load case 3 means the earthquake is acting at a 45 degree angle to the X and Z directions at an intensity of 141.414%. Load combination 5 will not produce the same result as load case 3. An earthquake with a 100% intensity in X and another with a 100% intensity in Z is not the same as one with a 141.4% intensity at a 45 degree angle to X and Z. The combination methods such as SRSS or CQC are not linear. Another reason for the difference has to do with the Direction factor.

18

Time history analysis is an extension to the process of calculating modes and frequencies in the sense that it occurs after those are calculated. The input which is relevant to the time history analysis of a structure for seismic accelerations is explained below. There are two stages in the command specification required for a time-history analysis. Stage 1 : The first stage is defined as shown in the following example. Here, the characteristics of the earthquake, the arrival time, and damping are defined. Example : UNIT METER DEFINE TIME HISTORY TYPE 1 ACCELERATION SCALE 9.806 READ EQDATA.TXT ARRIVAL TIME 0.0 DAMPING 0.05 Each data set is individually identified by the number that follows the TYPE command. In this file, only one data set is defined, which is apparent from the fact that only one TYPE is defined. The word ACCELERATION that follows the TYPE 1 command signifies that this data set is for a ground acceleration. (If one wishes to specify a forcing function, the keyword FORCE or MOMENT must be used instead.) Notice the expression "READ EQDATA.TXT". It means that we have chosen to specify the time vs. ground acceleration data in the file called EQDATA.TXT. That file must reside in the same folder as the one in which the data file for this structure resides. As explained in the small examples shown in Section 5.31.4 of the Technical Reference manual, the EQDATA.TXT file is a simple

text file containing several pairs of time-acceleration data. A sample portion of that file is as shown below. 0.0000 0.0200 0.0400 0.0600 0.0800 0.1000 0.006300 0.003640 0.000990 0.004280 0.007580 0.010870

While it may not be apparent from the above numbers, it may also be noted that the geological data for the site the building sits on indicate that the above acceleration values are a fraction of "g", the acceleration due to gravity. Thus, for example, at 0.02 seconds, the acceleration is 0.00364 multiplied by 9.806 m/sec^2 (or 0.00364 multiplied by 32.2 ft/sec^2). Consequently, the burden of informing the program that the values need to be multiplied by "g" is upon us. We do that by specifying the term SCALE 9.806 alongside TYPE 1 ACCELERATION. The arrival time value indicates the relative value of time at which the earthquake begins to act upon the structure. We have chosen 0.0, as there is no other dynamic load on the structure from the relative time standpoint. The modal damping ratio for all the modes is set to 0.05. Stage 2 : UNIT POUND FEET LOAD 3 DYNAMIC LOAD CASE SELFWEIGHT X 1.0 SELFWEIGHT Y 1.0 SELFWEIGHT Z 1.0 ELEMENT LOAD 41 TO 88 PR GX 300.0 41 TO 88 PR GY 300.0 41 TO 88 PR GZ 300.0

Load case 3 is the dynamic load case, the one which contains the second part of the instruction set for a dynamic analysis to be performed. The data here are a. loads which will yield the mass values which will populate the mass matrix the directions of the loads, which will yield the degree of freedom numbers of the mass matrix for being populated.

b.

Thus, the selfweight, as well as the imposed loads on the structural slab are to be considered as participating in the vibration along all the global directions. This information is identical to what is specified in the situation where all that we are interested is frequencies and modes. GROUND MOTION X 1 1 The above command too is part of load case 3. Here we say that the seismic force, whose characteristics are defined by the TYPE 1 time history input data, acting at arrival time 1, is to be applied along the X direction. Example: LOAD 1 Mass data in weight units GROUND MOTION direction Type# Arrival Time# PERF ANAL FINISH

A sinusoidal loading is one which has the characteristic of repetitiveness, as in the case of a tower at the top of which are two radar antennas which cause a rotational type of dynamic loading with a specified rotation rate and a nominal turning circle. A sinusoidal loading usually can be described using the equation.

F (t) = F0sin ( t + )

In the above equation, F(t) = Value of the force at any instant of time "t" F = Peak value of the force = Frequency of the forcing function = Phase angle A plot of the above equation is shown in the figure below.

Definition of input in STAAD for the above forcing function As can be seen from its definition, a forcing function is a continuous function. However, in STAAD, a set of discrete timeforce pairs is generated from the forcing function and an analysis is performed using these discrete time-force pairs. What that means is that based on the number of cycles that the user specifies for the loading, STAAD will generate a table consisting of the magnitude of the force at various points of time. The time values are chosen from time '0' to n*tc in steps of "STEP" where n is the number of cycles and tc is the duration of one cycle. STEP is a value that the user may provide or may choose the default value that is built into the program. Users may refer to section 5.31.4 of the Technical Reference Manual for a list of input parameters that

need to be specified for a Time History Analysis on a structure subjected to a Sinusoidal loading. A typical example of input specification for the above is shown below. Some typical input that normally appears prior to these commands is also included. UNIT KIP INCH DEFINE TIME HISTORY TYPE 1 FORCE FUNCTION SINE AMPLITUDE 10.8 FREQUENCY 47 PHASE 30 CYCLES 150 TYPE 2 FORCE FUNCTION COSINE AMPLITUDE 12.3 FREQUENCY 28 PHASE 40 CYCLES 200 ARRIVAL TIME 0.0 3.0 DAMPING 0.06 There are two stages in the command specification required for a time-history analysis. The first stage is defined above. Here, the parameters of the sinusoidal loading are provided. Each data set is individually identified by the number that follows the TYPE command. In this file, two data sets are defined, which is apparent from the fact that two TYPEs are defined. The word FORCE that follows the TYPE n command signifies that this data set is for a forcing function. (If one wishes to specify an earthquake motion, an ACCELERATION may be specified.) The command FUNCTION COSINE indicates that instead of providing the data set as discrete TIME-FORCE pairs, a sinusoidal function, which describes the variation of force with time, is provided. The parameters of the cosine function, such as FREQUENCY, AMPLITUDE, and number of CYCLES of application are then defined. STAAD internally generates discrete TIME-FORCE pairs

of data from the sine function in steps of time defined by the default value (See section 5.31.6 of the Technical Reference Manual for more information). The arrival time value indicates the relative value of time at which the force begins to act upon the structure. The modal damping ratio for all the modes is set to 0.075. LOAD 1 DEAD LOAD SELF Y -1.0 The above is a static load case. LOAD 2 LOADING FOR TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS SELF X 1.0 SELF Y 1.0 SELF Z 1.0 JOINT LOAD 10 FX 7.5 10 FY 7.5 10 FZ 7.5 TIME LOAD 7 FX 1 1 14 FZ 2 1 17 FZ 2 2 The above is the second stage of command specification for time history analysis. The 2 sets of data specified here are a) the weights for generation of the mass matrix and b) the application of the time varying loads on the structure. The weights (from which the masses for the mass matrix are obtained) are specified in the form of selfweight and joint loads. Following that, the sinusoidal force is applied using the "TIME LOAD" command. The forcing function described by the TYPE 1 load is applied on joints 7 it starts to act starting at a time defined by the 1st arrival time number. At joint 14, the TYPE 2 force is applied along FZ, also starting at arrival time number 1. Finally, at

joint 17, the TYPE 2 force is applied along FZ, starting at arrival time number 2. LOAD COMB 3 1 1.2 2 1.4 The static and dynamic load cases are combined through the above case. PERFORM ANALYSIS PRINT SUPPORT REACTIONS PRINT MEMBER FORCES PRINT JOINT DISPLACEMENTS The member forces, support reactions and joint displacements are calculated for every time step. For each degree of freedom, the maximum value of these values is extracted from these histories and reported in the output file using the above commands. How modes, frequencies and the other terms calculated The process of calculating the MODES and FREQUENCIES is known as Modal Extraction and is performed by solving the equation: 2 [ m ] { q } - [ K ] { q } = o Where [ m ] = the mass matrix (assumed to be diagonal, i.e., no mass coupling) = the natural frequencies (eigenvalues) { q } = the normalized mode shapes (eigenvectors) Frequency (HZ or CPS) = /2 The solution method used in STAAD is the Subspace iteration method.

Please note that various nomenclature is used to refer to the normal modes of vibration. (Eigenvalue, Natural Frequency, Modal Frequency and Eigenvector, Mode Shape, Modal Vector, Normal Modes, Normalized Mode Shape. Generalized weight and generalized mass Each eigenvector {q} has an associated generalized mass defined by Generalized Mass (GM) = { q } T [ M ] { q } Generalized Weight (GW) = GM * g Participation Factors - A participation factor (Qi) is computed for each eigenvector for each of the three global (Xi) translational directions. N is the number of modes.

(q j,i )( w j,i )

j=1 N

Qi =

GW

Modal Weights - The modal weight for each mode is (GW)(Q i ). The summation of modal weights for all modes in a given direction is equal to the Base Shear which would result from a one g base acceleration. The sum of the modal weights for the computed modes may be compared to the total weight of the structure (only the weight that has not been lumped at supports). The difference is the amount of weight missing from a dynamic, base excitation, modal response analysis. If too much is missing, then rerun the eigensolution asking for a greater number of modes. STAAD prints the "MASS PARTICIPATION FACTOR IN PERCENT" for each mode. This is the modal weight of a mode as a percentage of the total weight of the structure. Also a running sum for all modes is given so that the last line indicates the percent of the total weight that all of the modes extracted would represent in a 1g base excitation.

A random excitation is a force which varies with time, and not necessarily in an orderly fashion. An example of the same is a blast loading. The only difference between this type of loading and the sinusoidal loading is that the force versus time data has to be defined explicitly under the DEFINE TIME HISTORY command. An example of it is shown below.

UNIT METER KNS DEFINE TIME HISTORY TYPE 1 FORCE 0.00001 -0.000001 0.005 -650 0.01 -800 0.015 -800 0.02 -800 0.025 -800 0.03 -700 0.035 -350 0.04 -250 0.045 -500 0.05 -730 0.055 -600 0.06 -350 0.065 -280 0.07 -450 0.075 -600 0.08 -550 0.085 -440 0.09 -415 0.095 -410 0.1 -420 ARRIVAL TIME 0.0 DAMPING 0.07 For a blast type of loading, there will be a sudden spike in the value of the force over a very short period of time. DEFINE TIME HISTORY TYPE 1 FORCE 0.0 0.0 0.1 80.0 0.2 0.1 0.35 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.0 0.0 ARRIVAL TIMES 0.0 DAMPING 0.05

Mat foundations

Description STAAD has the ability to generate supports for structures like slabs on grade, which also go by the name mat foundations. A mat foundation is a large concrete slab sitting on soil. The support for the structure is the soil itself. The resistance of the soil is represented through a term called Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, the definition of which may be found in many textbooks on foundation analysis. The general approach to solving such problems is to sub-divide the slab into several plate elements. Each node of the meshed slab will then have an influence area or a contributory area, which is to say that soil within the area surrounding that node acts like a spring. The influence area is then multiplied by the subgrade modulus to arrive at the spring constant. Subgrade modulus has units of force per length^3. So, the spring will have units of force/length.

The problem with using this method is that, for irregularly-shaped or large slabs with many nodes, computing the influence area for each node can become quite tedious and time-consuming. The model below exemplifies the problem.

This is where the Foundation type of support can be useful. STAAD will calculate the influence areas of all the nodes by itself and derive the spring constants for you. In STAAD, we refer to facility as SPRING SUPPORT GENERATION. STAAD has two options for such supports: a) The ELASTIC MAT option b) The PLATE MAT option The ELASTIC MAT option : When the spring support generation facility was first introduced in STAAD, it was based on this method. In fact, this was the only method available until and including STAAD.Pro 2002 Build 1004. This method calculates the influence area of the various nodes using the Delaunay triangle method.

The distinguishing aspect of this method is that it uses the jointlist that accompanies the ELASTIC MAT command to form a closed surface. The area within this closed surface is then determined and the share of this area for each node in the list is then calculated. Hence, while specifying the joint-list, one should make sure that these joints make up a closed surface. Without a proper closed surface, the area calculated for the region may be indeterminate and the spring constant values may be erroneous. Consequently, the list should have at a minimum, 3 nodes. While forming the closed surface, namely, a polygon, the sides of the polygon have to be assembled by lining up points along the edges. The edge detection aspects of this method are very sensitive to out-of-straightness, which may occur if the coordinates of the nodes aren't precise to a significant number of digits. Also, the internal angle formed by 2 adjacent lines connecting 3 consecutive nodes in the list should be less than 180 degrees, which is to say that, the region should have the shape of a convex polygon. Failure to form straight edges and convex polygons can lead to erroneous influence area values and consequently, erroneous spring constants. This is the limitation of this feature. The example below explains the method that may be used to get around a situation where a convex polygon is not available. For the model comprised of plate elements 100 to 102 in the figure below, one wishes to generate the spring supports at nodes 1 to 8. However, a single ELASTIC MAT command will not suffice because the internal angle between the edges 1-8 and 8-7 at node 8 is 270 degrees, which violates the requirements of a convex polygon.

So, one should break it up into 2 commands: 1 2 3 8 ELASTIC MAT DIREC Y SUBG 200. 3 4 5 6 7 8 ELASTIC MAT DIREC Y SUBG 200.

Joints 3 and 8 will hence get the contribution from both of the above commands. Because this method uses nodes to generate contours, it may be used whether the mat is defined using plates, or solids. This is the advantage of this method.

The PLATE MAT option : If the foundation slab is modeled using plate elements, the influence area can be calculated using the principles used in determining the tributary area of the nodes from the finite element modeling standpoint. In other words, the rules used by the program in converting a uniform pressure load on an element into fixed end actions at the nodes are used in calculating the influence area of the node, which is then multiplied by the subgrade modulus to obtain the spring constant. This feature has been available since STAAD.Pro 2002 Build 1005. The advantage of this method is that it overcomes one of the major limitations of the Delaunay triangle method, which is that the contour formed by the nodes of the mat must form a convex hull. Example SUPPORTS 17054 TO 17081 PLATE MAT DIR YONLY SUBGRADE 5000.0 PRINT YR -.01 0.01 PLATE MAT DIR YONLY SUBGRADE 5000.0 The first of the above 2 commands instructs STAAD to internally generate supports for the nodes at the corners of plate elements 17054 TO 17081. The second example instructs STAAD to internally generate supports for the nodes at the corners of plate elements which lie in the global XZ plane bound by the YRANGE value of -0.01 and +0.01 length units. Another advantage of the PLATE MAT method is that it enables us to view soil pressure contours beneath the base of the slab. After the analysis, go to the post-processing mode, and click on the Plates page. In the selection box for choosing the type of result to plot, choose base pressures. This is not currently available with the ELASTIC MAT method.

Question :

How do I tell STAAD that my soil spring is effective only in COMPRESSION, and should not be considered when it goes into tension? This may be done by using the ELASTIC MAT or PLATE MAT command in conjunction with the SPRING COMPRESSION command. The program iteratively solves the problem so that the final answer reflects the condition corresponding to actual contact between slab & soil. Example problem 27 illustrates this. Is it possible to get a report which shows the influence area generated by STAAD for each support node? Yes. Use the PRINT option available with the ELASTIC MAT or PLATE MAT commands. This will produce a report of the influence areas. An example of such a report is shown below.

Answer :

Question : Answer :

To get a report of the spring constants themselves, use the command PRINT SUPPORT INFORMATION

Question : Answer :

Is it possible to find out the base pressure at each node for each load case? Yes. In the post-processing mode, go to the Node Base pressure page. A table will appear along the right side of the screen showing these values. The Summary tab will show the maximum and minimum pressure along with the associated node for each of the 3 global directions. How does subgrade modulus differ from soil bearing capacity? A soil must be capable of carrying the loads it is subjected to, without undergoing a shear failure, or excessive settlements. This capacity is referred to as the soil bearing capacity. The modulus of subgrade reaction is a measure of the stiffness of soil if it were to behave like a spring. It is the relationship between bearing pressure and soil deflection. The modulus of subgrade reaction is the quantity by which the influence area of a support node is multiplied by to get the equivalent spring constant which can be used at the analysis stage. One would provide this as an input item when one wishes STAAD to generate spring supports using the ELASTIC MAT command, as explained in section 5.27.3 of the STAAD.Pro Technical Reference manual. At the end of the mat foundation analysis, the maximum soil pressure you get from STAADs soil pressure diagram should be within the limits of the soils bearing capacity. If the actual pressure exceeds the capacity, it is an indication of failure.

Question : Answer :

Question :

If you have the value for soil bearing pressure, how do you use that to come up with the subgrade modulus that STAAD uses for elastic mat definitions? One doesn't use the bearing capacity of soil to determine the subgrade modulus. Instead, it is a separate attribute of soil. If you have a look at the text book "Foundation Analysis and Design" by Joseph Bowles, you will find a few sections devoted to that topic, with specific values listed for specific types of soil. The basic difference between these 2 attributes is that, bearing capacity (or bearing pressure) is the pressure at which the soil fails, either in shear or compression. It hence has units of force per unit area. Subgrade Modulus on the other hand is a measure of the "spring constant" of soil. It is the distance that a unit area of soil would deflect under a unit load.

Answer :

This type of loading occurs classically when the load-causing units move on the structure, as in the case of trucks on a bridge deck. The mobile loads are discretized into several individual immobile load cases at discrete positions. Defining the input data There are 2 stages for specifying these types of loads. Stage 1 is as shown in the example below. DEFINE MOVING LOAD TYPE 1 LOAD 119.6 108.3 94.5 DISTANCE 1.778 1.5 WIDTH 1.8 TYPE 2 LOAD 34.9 34.9 34.9 34.9 DISTANCE 1.3 1.3 1.3 WIDTH 1.7 The above lines represent the first out of two sets of data required in moving load generation. The type number (1) is a label for identification of the load-causing unit, such as a truck. 3 axles ( 119.6 108.3 94.5) are specified with the LOAD command. The spacing between the axles in the direction of movement (longitudinal direction) is specified after the DISTANCE command. Since there are 3 axles, there are 2 spacings between them. WIDTH is the spacing in the transverse direction, that is, it is the distance between the 2 prongs of an axle of the truck. For the TYPE 2 truck, there are 4 axles and 3 spacings. LOAD 1 SELF Y -1.0 Load case 1 is a static load case. LOAD GENERATION 75 TYPE 1 -3.278 0. 4. XINC 1.5 TYPE 2 -3.9 0. 6. XINC 1.5 This constitutes the second of the two sets of data required for moving load generation. 75 load cases are generated using the Type 1 and Type 2 vehicles whose characteristics were described earlier. For the first of these load cases, the X, Y and Z location of

the reference load (see section 5.31.1 of the Technical Reference Manual) have been specified after the command TYPE 1 and TYPE 2 respectively. The X Increment of 1.5ft denotes that the vehicle moves along the X direction and the individual positions which are 1.5ft apart will be used to generate the remaining 74 load cases. The basis for determining the number of load cases to generate, 75 in the example above, is as follows : As seen in Section 5.31.1 of the Technical Reference manual, the reference wheel is on the last axle. The first load case which is generated will be the one for which the first axle is just about to enter the bridge. The last load case should be the one for which the last axle is just about to exit the bridge. Thus, the total distance travelled by the reference load will be the length of the vehicle (distance from first axle to last axle) plus the span of the bridge. Let us call this term "D". If we want the vehicle to move forward in 1.5 feet increments (each 1.5 foot increment will create a discrete position of the truck on the bridge), it would required (D/1.5+1) cases to be generated. PERFORM ANALYSIS PRINT LOAD DATA The load generation commands are followed by the PERFORM ANALYSIS command. The PRINT LOAD DATA option is used to obtain a report in the output file of the values and positions of the generated loads.

I want to move a crane along a beam. How do I use the moving load generation for this case? Use the same procedure as in the case of a bridge. Set the WIDTH value to zero. Could you tell me how I can display the generated moving loads graphically? I want to see whether I enter and generate the moving loads correctly. If you wish to obtain the position of the concentrated loads generated from a moving vehicle, this is what you can do. First, make sure the input file does have the commands required to generate loads from a vehicle. Example 12 is a good reference. Then, run the analysis. After the analysis is successfully completed, the "Select Load" drop down list box will contain individual load case numbers for each generated load case. For example, if your sequence of load data is LOAD 1 LOAD 2 LOAD 3 LOAD GENERATION 30 then, after the analysis, the load selection box will list them as LOAD 1 LOAD 2 LOAD 3 LOAD GENERATION, LOAD # 4 LOAD GENERATION, LOAD # 5 LOAD GENERATION, LOAD # 6 etc.

Answer :

Select those cases, and switch on the load display icon. Or, right click the mouse on the drawing area. Select Structure Diagrams. In the Loads and Results tab, switch on the check box for Loads, select the load case from the list, and click on Apply. Keep changing the load case, and keep clicking on Apply.

Question: Answer :

Is there any way to generate a moving load on an inclined member ? Yes you can. Have a look at Section 5.32.12 of the Technical Ref Manual. You will find an option called YRANGE. So, have the load located at an elevation below the lower node of the member, and provide a YRANGE which will enable the program to apply the load on members whose longitudinal axis lie in the range between the lower and upper ends of the inclined member. However, there is no guarantee that it will work every time.

Question : Answer :

How do I define the moving load data through an external file? See example below : Example : When data is provided through the external file "MOVLOAD" Data in the input file UNIT KIP FEET DEFINE MOVING LOAD FILE MOVLOAD TYPE 1 AXLTYP1 TYPE 2 AXLTYP2 1.25

Data in the external file "MOVLOAD" AXLTYP1 10 20 15 5.0 7.5 6.0 AXLTYP2 20 20 10 7.5

Question :

I am modeling a steel building consisting of columns and beams. The floor slab is a non-structural entity, which, though capable of carrying the loads acting on it, is not meant to be an integral part of the framing system. It merely transmits the load to the beamcolumn grid. There are uniform area loads on the floor (think of the load as wooden pallets supporting boxes of paper). Since the slab is not part of the structural model, is there a way to tell the program to transmit the load to the beams without manually figuring out the beam loads on my own?

Answer:

STAAD's FLOOR LOAD option is ideally suited for such cases. This is a facility where you specify the load as a pressure, and the program converts the pressure to individual beam loads. Thus, the input required from the user is very simple - load intensity in the form of pressure, and the region of the structure in terms of X, Y and Z coordinates in space, of the area over which the pressure acts. In the process of converting the pressure to beam loads, STAAD will consider the empty space between crossing beams (in plan view) to be panels, similar to the squares of a chessboard. The load on each panel is then transferred to beams surrounding the panel, using a triangular or trapezoidal load distribution method. Users can verify the accuracy of the values of the joint and member loads generated by the FLOOR LOAD and AREA LOAD option by using the command PERFORM ANALYSIS PRINT LOAD DATA The output file will contain the values of the generated loads. If the values are not what you expect, you may directly specify the JOINT LOADs and MEMBER LOADs on those members instead of using the FLOOR LOAD option to generate loads for those members.

STAAD also provides an option called ONEWAY load if the distribution is desired along the shorter direction of a panel instead of a 2-way action. This and additional information on the FLOOR LOAD facility is available in example problem 15 in the examples manual, and section 5.32.4 in the STAAD.Pro Technical Reference manual.

Question : Answer :

Are there any graphical tools to examine the individual panels the program considers in processing the floor load command? Yes. Click the right mouse button, and select Labels. Under Loading Display Options, Display Floor Load Distribution will show the division of panels into influence areas based on a colorcoded scheme (see figure below). Display Floor Loads will show the triangular and trapezoidal loading on the individual members around each panel.

Question : Answer :

When does one use FLOOR LOAD and when does one use ELEMENT LOAD? When modeling a grid system made up of horizontal beams and the slabs which span between the beams, there are 2 approaches one may take : 1. Model the beams only, and do not include the slabs in the model. However, the large in-plane stiffness of the slab may be taken into account by using the master-slave relationship to tie together the nodes of the deck so that a rigid diaphragm effect is simulated for the horizontal plane at the slab level. Include the slabs by modeling them using plate elements.

2.

The question that arises is, how does one account for the distributed loading (load per area of floor) which is present on top of the slab? If you model the structure using method (1), the load can be assumed to be transferred directly on to the beams. The slab-beam grillage is assumed to be made up of a number of panels, similar to the squares of a chessboard. The load on each panel is then transferred to beams surrounding the panel, using a triangular or trapezoidal load distribution method. You can do this in STAAD by defining the load intensity in the FLOOR LOAD command. In other words, the pressure load on the slabs (which are not included in the model) are converted to individual beam loads by utilizing the FLOOR LOAD facility. In method (2), the fact that the slab is part of the model makes it very easy to handle the load. The load can be applied on individual elements using the ELEMENT LOAD facility. The connectivity between the beams and elements ensures that the load will flow from the plates to the beams through the columns to the supports.

Question :

I have a floor made up of several panels. The floor consists of straight-line edges but with a concave face and a convex face, like a boomerang. The total floor area is 381 sq.m. and I am applying a floor load of 1 t/sq.m. on the entire area. Thus, expecting a total load of 381 t. From analysis I get total load as 810.2 t which is not correct. When I try to apply floor load to individual panel I get nearly the expected load. But when the floor load is applied on group of panels or on entire area, graphically it shows wrong distribution of load and total load is also not correct.

Answer :

The problem you mention is one of the limitations of the floor load routine. If you have a floor whose shape contains a mixture of concave and convex edges, break up the floor load command into several parts, as you have done. This will force the program to localize its search for panels and the solution will be much better. If you don't do this, the entire floor will end up being treated as one giant panel with unsatisfactory results. The example below illustrates a case where the floor has to be subdivided into smaller regions for the floor load generation to yield proper results. The internal angle at node 6 between the sides 108 and 111 exceeds 180 degrees. A similar situation exists at node 7 also. As a result, the following command LOAD 1 FLOOR LOAD YRANGE 11.9 12.1 FLOAD -0.35 will not yield acceptable results.

Instead, the region should be subdivided as shown in the following example LOAD 1 FLOOR LOAD YRANGE 11.9 12.1 FLOAD -0.35 XRANGE -0.1 15.1 ZRANGE -0.1 8.1 YRANGE 11.9 12.1 FLOAD 0.35 XRANGE 4.9 10.1 ZRANGE -7.9 16.1

Description Wind load generation in STAAD.Pro is a facility, which takes as input wind pressure, and height ranges over which those pressures act and generates nodal point loads on windward and leeward sides of buildings. This may be found in sections 5.31.3 and 5.32.12 of the Technical Reference manual, and in example problem 15 of the Examples manual. Until and including STAAD.Pro 2003, this feature is capable of generating loads on panel type of exposed faces. So, the basis of this generation is that the program first identifies panels regions circumscribed by members and the ground and assumes that the wind pressure acts on the panel area. So, the force on that panel is calculated by multiplying the pressure by the panel area. Consequently, this type of load generation is applicable to closed structures such as office buildings where the component constituting the panels could be a glass faade, or walls made of wood or other material that was not considered to be part of the structural model. This facility has been enhanced in STAAD.Pro 2004 by considering lattice type open structures also. Defining the input data There are 2 stages for specifying these types of loads. Stage 1 is as shown in the example below. UNIT KIP FEET DEFINE WIND LOAD TYPE 1 INT .015 .022 .026 .028 HEI 10. 30. 60. 100. EXPOSURE 1.2 YR 0. 75. The numbers which follow the word INTENSITY are the wind pressures. The first intensity acts from the ground (the datum) to

10 ft, the second from 10 ft to 30 ft, and so on. EXPOSURE factors, which are magnification or reduction factors for the resulting generated loads should be specified if their value is different from 1.0. Here, all nodes between 0 and 75 feet are assigned a value 1.2. LOAD 1 DW SELFWEIGHT Y -1. LOAD 2 WIND WIND LOAD X -1. TYPE 1 LOAD 3 WINDZ WIND LOAD Z 1. TYPE 1 The second part of the command consists of the actual load application and is done through the WIND LOAD command as shown above.

Question : Answer :

What is the significance of the TYPE command and the number that follows? STAAD permits the definition of several different wind loads, each with certain characteristics. In order to distinguish the wind load having one set of characteristics from another wind load with a different set of characteristics, each wind load is identified using a TYPE command followed by an identification number. In other words, the TYPE command and the number are entirely a creation of the user. They are not terminologies that the user will find from any code or handbook that provides guidelines on loading for structures. The advantage of this feature is that the user is now able to communicate to the program information such as that the wind pressure is different at different heights, the structure has openings at certain heights and so on.

Question : Answer :

What is Wind Intensity? Wind intensity as required for input in STAAD is merely the wind pressure in units of Force per unit area. The user is required to compute the pressure from any coefficients that codes require. Does the wind load command in STAAD take into account any wind codes like ASCE 7? Does it take into account the drag factor, or shape factor for different shapes like angle, channel etc. WIND LOAD generation in STAAD is not based on any code. It also does not take into account any of the other factors you mentioned. It is based purely on the concept of influence areas of nodes and multiplying them by the user defined wind pressures for the respective heights. Any reduction or magnification of the resulting force is achieved by multiplying the generated values by exposure factors for nodes. Influence area of a node is defined as the region surrounding a node over which any wind pressure acting over that area is transmitted entirely into that node as a concentrated force. Influence area is equal to influence length multiplied by influence height where: influence length is half the distance from the joint to the joints to the left and to the right of the joint and influence height is the distance from the joint to the joints at the top and to the bottom. Multiply the influence area of each joint by the wind intensity and the exposure factor for the joint. This will yield the concentrated horizontal force for the joint. The exposure factor becomes useful for situations where the entire panel area is not effective due to the presence of openings or needs to be magnified due to a curvilinear shape of the load bearing panel.

Question :

Answer :

Question :

If I have wind speeds from different directions acting on a tower having (round shaped) discs fitted to it, how can I make the software take the discs into account which are also exposed to wind? The influence area calculation will work correctly if and only if the exposed area is parallel to one of the global planes. A region which is curvilinear in shape cannot be handled by the program. Can the wind force be generated in the Y-direction? No. Wind forces can be computed for horizontal (X and Z) directions only. What if the windward face of the structure is inclined to the X and Z axes, viz., not perpendicular to X or Z axes? The feature works best when the panels are parallel to one of the global planes. The program does have some capability for generating loads on inclined planes too. However, if the user finds the results unsatisfactory, other load generation methods like the "ELEMENT LOAD JOINTS" option may be used. What influence do finite elements have on wind load generation? The presence or absence of elements, along or perpendicular to the direction of wind has no effect on wind load generation. Wind load generation is possible only with panels surrounded by members as described above. If the panels are already defined using plate elements, apply the load using the ELEMENT PRESSURE option instead of using wind load generation for those panels.

Answer :

Question : Answer :

Question :

I have three questions. 1) How can I tell STAAD that the load is acting on the LEEWARD side and not on the WINDWARD side of the building? 2) How do I specify that a load acts from east to west instead of west to east? 3) How do I specify a suction load instead of one which bears against the structure? The command syntax accommodates all of the above. For example, along the X direction, the following four types are allowed. WIND LOAD WIND LOAD WIND LOAD WIND LOAD +X -X +X -X +f +f -f +f

Answer :

See the figure below for the meaning of the four commands.

Y Y

X or Z

X or Z

X or Z

Y

+f

Y

-X or -Z

+f

X or Z

X or Z

X or Z

-f

-X or -Z

-f

Question : Answer :

Can STAAD perform wind load generation on open-lattice structures? In STAAD.Pro 2004, the wind load generation facility has been enhanced for generating loads on open structures too. These are structures like electrical transmission towers, in which the region between members is open allowing the wind to blow through. For those, the program first calculates the exposed surface area of individual members of the model. Then, that exposed area is multiplied by the wind pressure and divided by the member length to arrive at a uniform distributed member load. It is assumed that all members of the structure within the specified ranges are subjected to the pressure and hence, they will all received the load. The concept of members on the windward side shielding the members in the inside regions of the structure does not exist for open structures.

- Using STAAD Pro 2005 CoursewareUploaded bydktiong
- American_App_Examples_2007_CompleteUploaded bySarzu Mulmi
- Verification Manual Staad Fundation v8iUploaded byjesus40
- What's New in STAAD Foundation Advanced SS1Uploaded bySarang Dhere
- staad pro manual.pdfUploaded byFarhan Tahir
- Design of Steel Truss STAADUploaded byrebtagg
- StaadPro Knowledge BaseUploaded byingsabrina
- STAAD Floor 11Uploaded byandresboy123
- Staad Pro v8i Manual 2016Uploaded byLarry
- STAAD Pro Advanced AnalysisUploaded byGuru Prasad
- STAAD(X) Tower UserManual EnUploaded byYoselyn Moreno
- STAAD.foundation User's ManualUploaded byKang'ethe Geoffrey
- Staad Pro TutorialUploaded bySammish83
- truss design FundamentalsUploaded byAtul Kumar Engineer
- Learn Staad Pro at HomeUploaded byJohn David Belda
- STAAD.pro Advanced Training ManualUploaded byShaiju Pv
- FOOTINGS.XLSUploaded byMohammed Sumer
- STUDENT_STEEL_BRIDGE_COMPETITION_2011Uploaded byTomas Krasauskas
- Steel Beam Design as Per AISC ASDUploaded byChanthy Kov
- Staad[1].Pro 2006 Technical Reference (Halid)Uploaded byVictoria WU Mengqian
- Staad Pro Advanced TrainingUploaded byleodegarioporral
- STAAD Foundation Advanced ManualUploaded byMarius Rizea
- Technical Reference v8iUploaded byGrant Hosie
- STAAD.pro V8i Manual 2014Uploaded byOwais Ali
- STAAD+Technical_Reference_2005Uploaded byДмитрий Чиндаров
- Staad ManualUploaded byakaashmohan
- STAAD Instruction ManualUploaded bySaphal Lamichhane
- Transmission Towers Foundation Design BookUploaded byaamir_janjua_3
- steel design parameters used in staadUploaded byGuessss..........!!!!!
- STAAD PRO TUTORIALUploaded bysaisssms9116

- Crompton Greaves Domestic Pumps Price ListUploaded byknsaravana
- Common Math ErrorsUploaded byphonchaister
- Laplace TableUploaded byhyd arnes
- DiagonalizableUploaded byPrantik Adhar Samanta
- Quiz Newton Raphson SolutionUploaded byPrantik Adhar Samanta
- Cayle y HamiltonUploaded byrammar147
- Evalue Magic Tricks HandoutUploaded byPrernaKabtiyal
- 2250 e i Gen AnalysisUploaded byPrantik Adhar Samanta
- ICBUploaded byAnonymous lfw4mfCm
- Piled Raft References and BooksUploaded byIancu-Bogdan Teodoru
- ila0601Uploaded byFlorence Cheang
- NewtonExample.pdfUploaded bySathish Bala
- Caley Hamilton Theorem ProofUploaded byMariya Ivanova Vasileva
- Cayle y Hamilton SystemsUploaded byPrantik Adhar Samanta
- Transforms and Partial Differential EquationsUploaded byVignesh Velmurugan
- Torsion in Main Girder (1)Uploaded byprozoam21
- Frequency calculation in STAADUploaded byPrantik Adhar Samanta
- Earthquake Risk in Indian CitiesUploaded byPrantik Adhar Samanta
- Example Runge KuttaUploaded byPrantik Adhar Samanta
- Section5.4Uploaded bynishusaini
- Combined Footing DesignUploaded bymanzoor_quadri
- Seismic WeightUploaded byPrantik Adhar Samanta
- Agri Catalogue 4Oct10Uploaded byexecutive engineer1
- Cable Price ListUploaded byPrantik Adhar Samanta
- Control Panel (for Single Phase Submersible Pump Set)Uploaded byPrantik Adhar Samanta
- Electrical Submersible PumpUploaded byJorge Mártires
- Feasibility Analysis for Solar agricultural water pumps in IndiaUploaded byPrantik Adhar Samanta
- Fire SafetyUploaded byMarappan Bhuvanasundar
- Pile Foundations PPtUploaded byyennamsri04
- Crack Width Calculation is 456Uploaded bysansarep

- Al Water Summary r2Uploaded byDavid E. Y. Sarna
- ADNOC ICV English E-BrochureUploaded byakhileshkuniyil
- EMCO Large Engine Catalog 2008Uploaded byRobert Kirk
- Reaktor 5 Instrument Reference EnglishUploaded byMincy69
- Revised Pension RulesUploaded byరామకృష్ణ పాశల
- ooad diagrams with explanationUploaded byP.Nanda Kumar
- Tactics eBookUploaded byJavier Vallejo
- web 2 0Uploaded byapi-272868299
- 1 - Grace and GCPUploaded byT.C. Burak Demirhan
- 6.Creativity and Innovation ManagementUploaded byJoe Jacob
- ICCROM_doc04_StandardsPreventiveConserUploaded bySimion Mihaela
- Taiichi Ohno, Norman Bodek-Toyota Production System_ Beyond Large-Scale Production-Productivity Press (1988)Uploaded byAgriniSriGambeeraGanapathy
- Basic Measurement PiezoeletricUploaded byALEX_INSPETOR
- ATR-AFCSUploaded byJavier
- diseño de GAVION h=3mUploaded byFrancisco Fernando Eme Trujillo
- 2008 Durham Police Department Crime ReportUploaded byztracer
- Debian Custom Debian DistributionUploaded bySamuel Flores Baggen
- Zomato Case StudyUploaded bySharath Kumar
- AntibioticsUploaded bypulmonologist
- Characteristics of a Twisted Pair LineUploaded byAdan Rulo Perez
- ABM Topic and Case Study by LesterUploaded byVic Francisco
- F&N - YEAR 9 (2 Yr Programme) V2Uploaded byYenny Tiga
- infographic design defense and genre analysis essayUploaded byapi-253517286
- Vol 4 - Info. TechUploaded bywilolud6720
- Catch Me if You Can-reflection PaperUploaded byJolo Roman
- 20150327 Easa t r List Acft 0Uploaded byKoenigKarl
- Winter - Kings, Commoners and KnavesUploaded byCadu Ortolan
- Grip.resumeUploaded byHannah Grip
- Mind Out of BodyUploaded byAvengingBrain
- Journal of the American Chemical Society 1927 HendersonUploaded bylambda230