Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Semipre Generalized Continuous and Irresolute Mappings in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Topological Spaces
M. Thirumalaiswamy1 and K. Ramesh2
2
Asso. Prof., Department of Mathematics, NGM College, Pollachi-642001, Tamil Nadu, India. Asst. Prof., Department of Science and Humanities, PA College of Engineering and Technology, Pollachi642002, Tamil Nadu,India.
ABSTRACT: In this paper we introduce intuitionistic fuzzy semipre generalized continuous mappings and
intuitionistic fuzzy semipre generalized irresolute mappings. Some of their properties are studied.
Keywords: Intuitionistic fuzzy topology, intuitionistic fuzzy point, intuitionistic fuzzy semipre generalized
closed sets, intuitionistic fuzzy semipre generalized continuous mappings and intuitionistic fuzzy semipre generalized irresolute mappings. AMS Subject Classification (2000): 54A40, 03F55. I. INTRODUCTION The concept of fuzzy sets was introduced by Zadeh [17] and later Atanassov [1] generalized this idea to intuitionistic fuzzy sets using the notion of fuzzy sets. On the other hand Coker [4] introduced intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces using the notion of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In this paper we introduce intuitionistic fuzzy semipre generalized continuous mappings and intuitionistic fuzzy semipre generalized irresolute mappings and studied some of their basic properties.
II. PRELIMINARIES
Definition 2.1:[1] Let X be a non-empty fixed set. An intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS in short) A in X is an object having the form A = {x, A(x), A(x)/ x X} where the functions A: X [0,1] and A : X [0,1] denote the degree of membership (namely A(x)) and the degree of non-membership (namely A(x)) of each element x X to the set A, respectively, and 0 A(x) + A(x) 1 for each x X. Denote by IFS(X), the set of all intuitionistic fuzzy sets in X. Definition 2.2: [1] Let A and B be IFSs of the form A = {x, A(x), A(x)/ x X} and B = {x, B(x), B(x)/ x X}. Then (i) A B if and only if A(x) B(x) and A(x) B(x) for all x X, (ii) A = B if and only if A B and B A, (iii) Ac = { x, A(x), A(x)/ x X }, (iv) A B = { x, A(x) B(x), A(x) B(x)/ x X }, (v) A B = { x, A(x) B(x), A(x) B(x)/ x X }. For the sake of simplicity, we shall use the notation A = x, A, A instead of A = { x, A(x), A(x)/ x X }. Also for the sake of simplicity, we shall use the notation A = x, (A, B), (A, B) instead of A = x, (A/A, B/B), (A/A, B/B). The intuitionistic fuzzy sets 0~ = { x, 0, 1/ x X } and 1~ = { x, 1, 0/ x X } are respectively the empty set and the whole set of X. Definition 2.3: [4] An intuitionistic fuzzy topology (IFT in short) on X is a family of IFSs in X satisfying the following axioms: (i) 0~, 1~ , (ii) G1 G2 , for any G1, G2 , (iii) Gi for any family {Gi / i J} . In this case the pair (X, ) is called an intuitionistic fuzzy topological space(IFTS in short) and any IFS in is known as an intuitionistic fuzzy open set(IFOS in short)in X. The complement Ac of an IFOS A in an IFTS (X, ) is called an intuitionistic fuzzy closed set (IFCS in short) in X. Definition 2.4: [4] Let (X, ) be an IFTS and A = x, A, A be an IFS in X. Then (i) int(A) = { G / G is an IFOS in X and G A },
www.irjes.com
41 | Page
www.irjes.com
42 | Page
www.irjes.com
43 | Page
www.irjes.com
44 | Page
The reverse implications are not true in general in the above diagram. Theorem 3.23: If f : (X, ) (Y, ) is an IFSPG continuous mapping, then for each IFP c(, ) of X and each A such that f(c(, )) A. Then there exists an IFSPGOS B of X such that c(, ) B and f(B) A. Proof: Let c(, ) be an IFP of X and A such that f(c(, )) A. Put B = f -1(A). Then by hypothesis B is an IFSPGOS in X such that c(, ) B and f(B) = f(f -1(A)) A. Theorem 3.24: Let f : (X, ) (Y, ) be an IFSPG continuous mapping. Then f is an IFSP continuous mapping if X is an IFSPT1/2 space.
www.irjes.com
45 | Page
Proof: (i) (ii) is obvious true by Theorem 3.26. (ii) (iii) Let B be any IFS in Y. Then int(B) is an IFOS in Y. Then f -1(int(B)) is an IFSPGOS in X. Since X is an IFSPT1/2 space, f -1(int(B)) is an IFSPOS in X. Therefore f -1(int(B)) cl(int(cl(f -1(int(B))))) cl(int(cl(f -1(B)))). (iii) (i) Let B be an IFOS in Y. By hypothesis f -1(B)= f -1(int(B)) cl(int(cl(f -1(B)))). This implies f -1(B) is an IFOS in X. Therefore it is an IFSPGOS in X and hence f is an IFSPG continuous mapping, by Theorem 3.26. Theorem 3.28: Let f : (X, ) (Y, ) be a mapping from an IFTS X into an IFTS Y. Then the following conditions are equivalent if X and Y are IFSPT1/2 space: (i) f is an IFSPG continuous mapping, (ii) int(cl(int(f -1(B)))) f -1(spcl(B)) for each IFCS B in Y, (iii) f -1(spint(B)) cl(int(cl(f -1(B)))) for each IFOS B of Y, (iv) f(int(cl(int(A)))) cl(f(A)) for each IFS A of X. Proof: (i) (ii) Let B be any IFCS in Y. Then f -1(B) is an IFSPGCS in X. Since X is IFSPT1/2 space, f -1(B) is an IFSPCS. Therefore int(cl(int(f -1(B)))) f -1(B) = f -1(spcl(B)). (ii) (iii) can be easily proved by taking complement in (ii). (iii) (iv) Let A X. Taking B = f(A) we have A f -1(B). Here int(f(A))= int(B) is an IFOS in Y. Then (iii) implies that f -1(spint(int(B))) cl(int(cl(f -1(int(B))))) cl(int(cl(f -1(B)))). Now (cl(int(cl(Ac))))c (cl(int(cl(f -1(Bc)))))c (f -1(spint(int(B))))c. Therefore int(cl(int(A))) f -1(spcl(cl(B))). Now f(int(cl(int(A)))) f(f -1(spcl(cl(B)))) cl(B) = cl(f(A)). (iv) (i) Let B be any IFCS in Y. Then f -1(B) is an IFS in X. By hypothesis f(int(cl(int(f -1(B))))) cl(f(f -1(B))) cl(B) = B. Now int(cl(int(f -1(B)))) f -1(f(int(cl(int(f -1(B)))))) f -1(B). This implies f -1(B) is an IFCS and hence it is an IFSPGCS in X. Thus f is an IFSPG continuous mapping.
www.irjes.com
46 | Page
www.irjes.com
47 | Page
REFERENCES
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] K. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 1986, 87-96. A. Bhattacharjee and R. N. Bhaumik, Pre-semi closed sets and pre-semi separation axioms in intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces, Gen.Math.Notes,Vol.8, No. 2, 2012, pp.11-17. C. L. Chang, Fuzzy topological spaces, J.Math.Anal.Appl. 24, 1968, 182-190. D. Coker, An introduction to intuitionistic fuzzy topological space, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 88, 1997, 81-89. H. Gurcay, Es. A. Haydar and D. Coker, On fuzzy continuity in intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces, J.Fuzzy Math.5 (2) , 1997, 365-378. R. Santhi and K. Arun Prakash, On Intuitionistic Fuzzy Semi-Generalized Closed Sets and its Applications, Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 34, 2010, 1677-1688. R. Santhi and K. Arun Prakash, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Semi-Generalized Irresolute Mapping, Tamkang Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2012. R. Santhi and D. Jayanthi, Intuitionistic fuzzy generalized semi-pre closed sets (accepted). R. K. Saraf, Govindappa Navalagi and Meena Khanna, On fuzzy semi-pre generalized closed sets, Bull.Malays.Math.Sci.Soc.(2)28(1), 2005, 19-30. Seok Jong Lee and Eun Pyo Lee, The category of intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces, Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 37, No. 1, 2000, pp. 63-76. Shyamal Debnath, On semi open sets and semi continuous functions in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Topological Spaces, IOSR-J.Math. Vol 3, 2012, 35-38. S. S. Thakur, Bajpai Pandey Jyoti, Intuitionistic Fuzzy w-closed sets and intuitionistic fuzzy wcontinuity, International Journal of Contemporary Advanced Mathematics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2010, 1-15. S. S. Thakur, Bajpai Pandey Jyoti, Intuitionistic Fuzzy sg- continuous mappings, International Journal of Applied Mathematical Analysis and Application 5(1), 2010, 45-51. M. Thirumalaiswamy and K. M. Arifmohammed, Semipre Generalized Open Sets and Applications of Semipre Generalized Closed Sets in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Topological Spaces (submitted). M. Thirumalaiswamy and K. Ramesh, Intuitionistic fuzzy semi-pre generalized closed sets (submitted). Young Bae Jun and Seok- Zun Song, Intuitionistic fuzzy semi-pre open sets and Intuitionistic fuzzy semi-pre continuous mappings, Jour. of Appl. Math & computing, 2005, 467-474. L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Information and control, 8, 1965, 338-353.
www.irjes.com
48 | Page