Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
by
CHENG-HSIUNG CHEN
Diploma, Taipei
Institute of Technology,
1959
A MASTER' S REPORT
MASTER OF SCIENCE
1967
Approved by
Major Professor
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SYNOPSIS
INTRODUCTION
METHODS OF ANALYSES
General Method
4 4
13 19
Energy Method
Numerical Method
Moment Distribution
DESIGN METHODS
29
38
.
38
44 48
CONCLUSION
.......
52
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
NOTATION
54
55
BIBLIOGRAPHY
57
SYNOPSIS
An "exact" method and three approximate methods for the analysis of the
the AISC (14) and AASHO (15) Specifications are described and a design
INTRODUCTION
may arise from transverse forces and/or from known eccentricities of the
axial loads at one or both ends. These kinds of members are generally
referred to as beam-columns.
individual members:
(1)
Beams.
produce bending.
(2)
Columns.
compression.
(3)
Beam-columns.
combina-
can often be neglected and the member can be treated as a centrally loaded
column.
On the other hand, when the axial force is small compared with the
bending, the axial force may be negligible and the problem becomes that of
beam analysis.
The basic equation for analyzing a beam-column problem is based on the
relationship between the moment and the curvature of a beam, i.e., Ely"
and takes into account the compressive forces.
E,
I,
-M,
In the
equation Ely"
-M,
y"
moment, respectively.
Professor
N.
M.
Newmark (1)
cal approach which provides a means for obtaining an approximate but satis-
complicated
Early solution of beam-column problems have been reviewed by Bleich
(2).
Ketter, Kaminsky, and Beedle (3) have presented a method for determin-
ual stress.
Two approximate
B.
Johnston (7), the first method is based on the concept that the load
METHODS OF ANALYSES
finding the maximum deflection and maximum bending moment of a member subjected to moment and axial compression simultaneously.
is an "exact" method,
approximate methods.
GENERAL METHOD
of the beam the differential equation (8) of the axis of the beam-column as
shown in Fig.
- M
=
=
(1)
(2)
Ely"
+ Py'
+
- V
q
Ely ,v/
Py"
(3)
The differential equations can be solved by use of the given boundary conditions, and consequently the deflections, bending moments, and end rotations
may be obtained.
following sections.
The bending moments and forces shown in Fig.
1
rj-n
dx
3*P^
J I
1
P X
x
MA
P
TO]
'i
r-iCJ
M+dM
V+dV
dx
Fig.
1.
Sign conventions
Fig.
2.
El y
+ Py"
(3)
A cos kx +
B sin kx + C x +
D +
Q x *
2
,
(4)
in which
EI
(5)
B,
C,
y =
y" =
at
x =
and
x = L
0,
we obtain
- D
= k
2
L give
_
,
q 1_
2__
- cos kL
-_SJL
2P
sin kL
4,
Elk
x ( L-x 2EIk'
(6)
(y)
J^k
x=L/2
u
-
384 EI
f,(u)
1
(7)
where
kL/2
(8)
2
)
and
f
x
(u)
12(2 sec u 4
- u
(9)
5u
6,
9,
(y')_ n x=0
(u)
=
3
?7T7 24E1
f o<"> 2
(10)
where
f 2
(tan u - u)
u
3
(11)
M) " E1( *
x=L/2
qL 8
f,(u)
(12)
where
(u)
2(1 - cos u)
u
(13)
cos u
The first factors on the right-hand sides of Eqs. 7, 10, and 12 are the
values produced by
f.(u), f(u), and f(u) represent the effects of the axial compression
forces.
Fig. 3.
The bending moments in the left- and right-hand portions of the beam in
Fig.
3
are,
respectively,
9 x
Py
a
L
- sJ
(L _ X) + Py
Using Eq.
1,
we have
Ely"
x - Py
and
Eiy-
Qih - c)
(L - x)
- Py
A cos kx + B sin kx - rr x
and
(14)
PL
(15)
at x =
and at x = L, we obtain
- D tan
kL
Similarly, using the fact that the slopes and deflections of each segment
Q,
i.e.
and
y'
at x
L - c,
we obtain
Q sin kc Pk sin kL
'
"
Substituting these values of the constants into Eqs. 14 and 15, we obtain
the following equations for the two portions of the deflection curve:
Q sin kc Pk sin kL
*L
Qc ^"kx-^x,
.
.
^ n ^ 0<x<L-c
.
,,,. (16)
'
SM^
- ^,
U-iU-l
L-c_< X
<L
16 and In the
17,
the expres-
particular case
of a load applied at the center of the beam, the maximum deflection, end
rotation, and the maximum bending moment are obtained by substituting c=L/2
and the appropriate values of x into Eq. 16. This procedure gives
3"x.l/2
Sn
_
2 2
(u)
(I8)
9,
(y) '
x=0
f^TT 16E1
=
f,
3
(u)
(19)
EKy")
r
x=l,/2
,.,
* ^"^ 4 u
(20)
(u),
f_(u), and (tan u)/u are the effects of the axial compression on the beam.
r^
M,
&K
\
*b
A
B
-Li
-)
:a^~
If B^P
-Z*^fer
(a)
(b)
Fig.
4.
If
two couples M
and
M,
-~
M.
Py J
(21a)
Using Eq.
1,
we obtain
Ely"
- M
M - M -*-:
Li
x - Py
n A cos kx + B sin kx +
.
, i
M
a
- Mu
2
M
x -
(21b)
EIk L
By using the condition y =
Elk
we obtain
at x =
and x
L,
M A
=
a
'
Psin kL
(M,
- M
cos kL)
B into Eq.
21b, we obtain
L-x
L
M,
sin kx sin k L
(22)
and
M,
10
By substituting M
P e
22,
we obtain
e,
sin (~
kx x, - r) sin kL L
(23)
and 9
The rotations
ML
f
y>x=0
y ,} x=L
3E1
M L
(u) +
biT
(U)
(24)
ML
-(
6il
(u) +
3il
(U)
'
(25)
where
f f
s (u)
2u
u
1-
A (
2u
- __1__. 7 )
tan 2u
(26)
fc
(u)
sin 2u
- 2u
(27)
= M
ML 8EI
cos u
la
(28)
^x=L/2
ML t * (U) 8EI 3
c
(29)
11
28 and
*h b
<y'>
n x=0
TFT 2E1
'
^^
u
'
(30)
from which
=
EKy")
x=L/2
sec u
(31)
From the examples given above, it may be seen that the deflections,
bending moments, and end rotations are linear functions of lateral loadings
or applied couples.
which is widely used when lateral loads act alone on a beam, can also be
applied in the case of the combined axial and lateral loads, but with the
restraint that the axial forces should act with lateral load superposed.
The center deflections under three conditions of loading (i.e. uniform
load, one concentrated load at the center-line, and two equal end moments)
7,
18,
and 29 respectively.
In each case,
the deflection
tion without axial load and the second factor being an amplification factor
which is the effect of the axial compression and thus depends on the value
of "P/P
f.(u),
f
".
(u),
(u)
is
- P/P
cr
the critical
where P
load is
is
the critical
load.
12
2
TT
EI
cr
This approximate expression for the amplification factor can be used with
(u),
13
ENERGY METHOD
it
represents
energy.
Z
n
sin
(32)
where the a
sine curves.
energy of the beam will increase an amount equal to AU while the external
loads do work equal to AT.
Letting
AU
AT
(33)
where
^7* 2EI
f 2
(y")
dx
(34)
the coefficient a
14
dc
P A
II
KSI
II
Fig.
5.
II
2
'
)2 dx
ei
2
r
- 2 l. n
n
2
tt
sin
tt
12
dx
,
or
EITT r /T 3 4L
2
n
(35)
in a
is
AU
4^ Ba
n
da
=
n
EITT r .3 2L
B,
4
*
da
(36)
between the length of the deflection curve and the length of the initial
straight form, is
i -
r
:
(y'
dx
774L
2
n
n n
(37)
da
in
is
15
ds
-r
da
da
7 2L
da
(38)
AT,
1
ds
^72L
da
(39)
AT
2
=
v
(q
dcHAy)
x=c
^r
11
- da
n
(40)
and AT
in Eq.
33 gives
7
TT
"T
n
(41)
EI
(n
where
ok
P/P
cr
4qL t
TT
_
i*
-3
n
1
-Z
sin
o<
)
n x
-tt
,
.
(42)
EI
n=odd
(n
42,
(v) ^ y x=L/2
J EI ri
TT
^ql
4
1
(1
=
)
5.03 qL 384 EI
A
1
.,-.
*
(1
o<
SL
8
2
-
^
pZ
flk! + 8
3.03 qL 384 EI
P -
'
16
Fig. 6.
in a
is
AU
2L
da
(36)
in a
is
AT
ds + Q
(Ay)
x=c
da
+ Q
sin
da
,
20L
n
TT
tt-^t
El
2,2 (n n
sin
o(
)
n ttc
(45)
*
n n
(n
sin
(X
)
ntr ~ c
Li
sin
~*j
nir x
A-j
(46)
The center deflection and center moment respectively are given by the following expressions:
om 2QL
y x=L/2
3 J
l 1
_4_. TT
=
EI
o<
QftA QL .986 or 48 EI
3 J
1 1
(47)
2L
4 *
QL
4
.986 QL 48 EI
(1
P -
(48)
cX
)
'
17
Mi
>
l_
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig.
7.
In
superposition.
assumed deflection curve; then the change in strain energy due to the
virtual change
dain
is
Work done by
AT
ds
is
de
"*
da
x=0
nTT
(49)
n
18
AT
Setting AU
=
-~
L
n-rr
2
"""
da
"
2L
da
(50)
AT, we obtain
2
2M L
a
n =
-^ J
TT
EI
(n
f-
(51)
o(
a
J
r
v
EI
n n
(n
sin
-
nTT x
(52)
._..
instead of x and
M,
instead of M
b
J
z
TT
v Z
n
sin
n IT :( L-x
fc .
/c (53)
~.
EI
n (n
<X
in Fig. 6a is found to be
2M L
y =
TT
a
-
sin
- cX)
nnx
v I
TT^EI n n(n
= ML = M
,
2M, L b -
2
1
,
sin
o<
nTT (L-x)
(54)
,_.
EI n n(n
Q J
TT
4M L
EI
2 n=odd
sin
o<
)
nTT X
,rcw (55)
(n
X=L/2
1 "rT ^
=
"
1
1.03 M L
^
.
o_
8ei
r^^
(56)
>
M+P-A o
M+ o
1.03
ML 2
"J
QC T 8E1
~
1
(57)
ctf
19
NUMERICAL METHOD
By
numerical proce-
numerical procedure.
as follows:
dv dx
or
jqdx
r
dM
dx
or
vdx
(58)
m_
El
19 dx
dy_
=
J
EI
9dx
dx
'
dx
or
From the above equations, the shears, moments, slopes and deflections of a beam can be determined by successive numerical integration.
In
using this method, a beam is divided into segments and the distrib-
uted loading is reduced to equivalent concentrated loads at each division point, or station along the beam.
The equivalent concentrated loads at
stations are equal and opposite to the reactions at the stations when the
20
segments of the beam between the stations are treated as simply supported
beams.
(1) (2)
(Fig. 8a,
b)
conjugate beam.
c.
8c and d.
d.
i.e.,
(7.92)
26.76
e.
",
conjugate beam due to the lateral loads alone and are obtained by
the following equation:
M. = M.
.
V,
where
d
= =
segment length,
21
nra
mn
nra
7 (2a+b) o 7 (2b+a) o
(a)
7 (a+Ab+c)
6
mn
(b)
"1
d
U
\
nm
ran
nra
24
d
(7a+6b-c)
7- Ca+lOb+c)
12
mn
24
(3a+10b-c)
(c)
Id)
Fig. 8.
22
Station number.
tion and calculate the trial bending moments produced by the axial
load.
lc
selected in Table
are
The
are
15.35 EI
L
b.
2
j <
17 EI
as the
cr
16.4 EI
L
2
/ ^ < Cr<
16.7 EI
L
2
'
To obtain a more accurate result, we can calculate average values as follows: (8) of the deflections y and y_ 2a 2c
23
3=
I
L
2a nv
Cy
{
L
r
2a
dx
ind
(60)
=
1
'^c'av
(y
2c
>
dx
(y ) y 2a av
7 L L
(y
'2a
Ax
and
(y, ) 2c av
y f 2 (y_ L 2c
Ax
2a av _ (y_ ) y 2c av
EI
'
=
"
16.58 El
.2 L
Pd
.2
2a
and y gives 2c
16.58 EI
"
'
'
For beams subjected to both lateral and axial loads, the deflections due to lateral load alone will be amplified in the case of axial
An approxima-
10,
11)
is given by
- P/P
'
cr
T/P
'
cr
24
b.
Compute the additional deflections with the estimated ones from Step a.
c.
If
tions are used as estimated ones to repeat Step b until close agree-
ment is reached.
d.
The total moments are equal to the sums of the moments due to
lateral loads alone and the moments due to axial forces with total
deflections.
2b
AJ
v>
o u
<SJ
H
II
o
ii
o
11
o
II
c o
u
00
U]
CO
<NI
00 CM
00 CM
CM
-^
1
a*
-<
^ CM
-J
CM
-a
CM T3
CM
C s D
t
CM
vO
CO
O u
I
a
0)
cr.
X)
CM
m
o
CO
o -a i w o u ^ c o e <o o m s a)
-o
<0
CO
CO en
~i
X>
00
w C c o O W-< 4-> C O D
0)
un cr
CM
vi3
00
- JS
>
00
UJ
03
CM On
o>
-*
\0
CM
XI
o
a
a)
u
a
o u
<D
CM
3
-a
c O U
H
4J
<0
a)
60
o
0)
XI
n
u:
a>
<i>
a
o
CO
a:
<
>
-"
<fl
< f t
<
1 (
26
AJ
CO
o o c o
o o f
-V ~*
to
M o o t
>
cd
H-l
u o o ^
^^
(0
w o o
^
<0
CN
Cm
w o o 1
"N.
<
o o ^
.
CN
CN
cd
cm
~o
Cm
Cm
CN T3 Cm
CN
cd
CN T3 04
v.
M
CxJ
o o o
o m
-ON
co
O o
vO
00
co
in
CN
m
-a
0)
n
CO
CO
CN
vO
vO
en CO
vO
co
00
3
C
CO
c o
m m m
r
X>
m o
CO
m
v>
m m
CN
0>
CM
vO
oo <N
<0
CO T3
CO
CO
oo CO
00
CO
m 00 m
m oo m
m
CO
LO CN
vlvl-
vO
00
c
H
i
^ u
3
J3
CM
o
C o
**
4->
u >
(_>
CD
> o
CO
^-<
3 O
w M
H u,
CO
c o
-<
i-t
w
u
0)
T3
0)
c o
<J ID
TD
OJ
0)
O
CN >
's.
00
ctj
X)
e 3
10
M
0)
cd
4-1
(0
a 3
<
(0
cm
OS
<
>
o
CO
a
5
cS
CO
c0
O
CN >i
CN >
CN >s
<
27
w
00 cm eg -J
Cd
UJ 00 CM 00 CM
00 CM -4 ^
J
00 CM -H
1
_J
4
CM
CM t3
CM -J o Oi -o
04
^0
II
ON
CM
o
1
CM CO CO
vO
co
II
CM
0m
u V
cu
<
.
CM
5 CO
m CM
00
CM
co
a.
CM CM
m
CO
CO
00
o
-o <r
CM
CO
co
CM
CO
D
c c o
m
CO
a <
a.
ON
m
CM
u
CM
i-M CM
r*.
00
CO fO
00 00
^O
CO
co
CO -^ a> -*
00 m
<J\
c
aj
vO vO
vO
*
CO
m m CM
sO
O
CO
C
0)
cu
CO
c o
CM
vO ON CO
o
CX>
co
r co
>*
-*
UJ
00
o V
<0
at
in vD
C
sO
-J-
3
c o
t-t
0)
s
(0 U)
>
CM
>
V
u o
CM <r
CM
a.
<
u
c o u
<D
Q0
c
a)
o
it
00 CO
CO vj 01
0)
a.
iJ
CO
CO
E D C
II
a> o >
> c o
<
28
00 CM
CO CM
w
<u
u c
o
CM
o
CM
J-
CO
CO
m co
0}
a
1
CO
<r r^ CO
CM co
<r ON CO
.*
co
x>
t
en
CM
vO
CT\
V D
CO
u
CO
c o
o
o
on
m
CM
x>
H
CM
CM
cr>
CO
o o
CO CM
M3
-t
CO
CO
U
0)
JJ
c
<u
o
CD
*J
c
(1)
u
CJ
e o
u
M
I
>
CO
-o
c O U
-i
<o 0)
o u
ai
X
a
<0
JB
(J
en
H
U
CO
II
to
e c
0)
>> CM
>% CM
jC
CO
29
MOMENT DISTRIBUTION
The axial compression in a slender member modifies the stiffness factors, carry-over factors, and fixed-end moments as used in the standard
Wit
For example,
increases, the stiffness continues to decrease and when the axial force
reaches the buckling load the beam will have no resistance to rotation at
Sign Convention
The bending
are assumed to be
positive.
Fig.
9.
Sign convention.
30
Fig.
10.
rotate the near end of the beam through a unit angle when the far end is
fixed.
The "near end" of the member is the end of the member where the
joint is being balanced and the "far end" is the opposite end (12).
Eqs.
and M
cl
M L 9 3E1
U)
"
ML Ml
+
V
f
U)
and
(61)
M L
9,
oilV u)
ML 3H
(u)
'
In
order to determine the stiffness factor for a beam with the far
10), all that is necessary is to substitute
.
9=1
a.
and
b
,
4E1 ab
L 4
f
2
(u)
(62)
4[f (u)J
at
31
(u)
5
.
.
ab
1 -
lu)
(63)
Wh en the axial
(u) become
ab
and C
ab
respectively.
buckling value for a beam column with one end fixed and the other end simply
supported (Fig. 10), the stiffness factor becomes zero and the carry-over
factor approaches infinity (12).
If
M L
=
*a
5il
u)
'
and
M L 9
= b
(64)
"
off
u)
'
for M
ab
(u)
1
;
(65)
When the axial force is zero (u = 0) the stiffness is 3EI/L and when it is
equal to the critical buckling load for a beam-column with simply supported
ends (u =
"FT
/2)
32
Fixed-end Moments
(a)
(c)
9,
(d)
Fig.
11.
and d.
In
lie, a
moment M
'
the horizontal and the right end of the member is assumed to be held against
M,
'
-K .9 ab a
and
M,
'
'
ab
-K .C .9 ab ab a
'
In
Fig.
lid,
moment N
is applied at the
n
This gives
ba b
and
M
"
M.
"
C,
ba
-K u C L 9
'
ba ba b
lib,
c,
'
"
-K .9 '-K.C.
9 abababab
'
and
M,
(66)
=
M,
'
+ M."
b
-K.
9 '-K C 9 babababa
If the
carry-over factors at each end of the member will be the same and the above
expressions can be written as (12)
M
=
-K
ab
(9
'
ab b
i
&.
'
and
(67)
M,
-K
ab
(9,
9 ab a
,
Uniform Load
angles of rotation of the ends must be found for the simply supported beamcolumn as shown in Fig.
2
and Eq.
10.
-e.
--ffer 24E1
Mu) 2
(68)
34
Substituting Eqs. 62, 63 and 68 into Eq. 67, the fixed-end moments (12) are
A
=
?T
(u)
'
(69)
where
f,(u)
6
~
u
2
(1
r-^ tan u
(70)
QL 16EI
Using Eqs. 62, 63, 71 and 67, the fixed-end moments become (12)
\
where
'
-\
"
(U)
<72>
(u ,
1=E2S_U)
sin u
(73)
35
(a)
Fig.
12.
cussed above, the fixed-end moments due to joint translation shown in Fig.
12a can be obtained by superposing the results of Fig.
12b, c, and d.
The
ab I A
ba L
'
ab ab L A
ba ba L
"
'
36
and
+ M
"
a
"
(K
ab
K,
ba ba
C,
7 L 7 L
(74)
M.
M,
M.
(K.
ba
K UC ab ab
If
MQ
Mk
b
"
K k (1 ab
ab
7 L
(75)
M M a
"
m M
~T
2
(u)
where
sin u 3(sin u - u cos u)
u
. c , f Q (u)
t-,c\ (76)
loads as
Therefore, it is necessary
37
J_J
LAr4-
i
R
i-*'
i r/
T*TTT"
TTTTrf
rhrrt
///*
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig.
13.
structure, gives a value of the factor "kL" for each member of the frame,
and the factor "kL" is held constant throughout the analyses of the frames
c.
=0
(77)
M u + aM
(78)
After
determining the moments in the original frame, the values of the axial
forces in the members are revised to more accurate values and the entire
38
DESIGN METHODS
Two simple approximate methods have been developed for estimating the
strength of beam-columns.
secant formula method, is based upon the concept that the load which pro-
the member as a cross between a beam under pure bending and a column under
As stated above, the secant formula method specifies that the maximum
stress in the beam-column, modified by a factor of safety, may not exceed
the yield stress of the material.
apply only to members that fail by bending in the plane of the applied
loads.
stress-strain relationship.
1J
X
1
^"F
p
(a)
P
(b)
Fig.
14.
39
maximum combined stress produced by axial load, applied bending moment, and
bending moment due to deflection.
23.
e.
(" - ~) sin kL L
s_i_n_kx
(23)
in which e
By letting
eb
ea
y J
.t-coskL ~
:
sin kL
sin kx + cos kx
1-t ~
L
x - 1)
,,
,__. (79)
Substituting Eq. 79 into Eq. 21a, we find that the expression for bending moment at any section in the member, after some rearrangement, is
P e
t
r
I
cos kL sin kL
;
/on (80)
we
r
k
arc tan
sin kL
Substituting this back into Eq. 80, after some manipulation we obtain the
maximum moment,
M max
P e
1^
C
(
sin f kL
kL +
L
)
.
(81)
40
p _
max
1
max
mnx
f a.* A
2
r
Vt2
- 2t c
kL
sin :r kL
^
to
<62>
where
pression. stress
f
thus
y
2
fy_
f
r 2
//t
- 2t cos kL ._l
sin kL
(83)
replacing P
for F
a
,
thus
f /n
Y a
1
(84)
/~~2 2 - 2t e c/r // t
cos kL +
esc kL
(0.25 + e c/r a
S
/n
p
)
B cosec 6 T
"
(85)
- 2t cos kL +
and
<}>
replaces kL.
2
is to
nonhomogeneity
Equations 84 and 85 are quite difficult to use for design, and their
41
AASHO Specifications.
1,
c f
max
[1 +
-r
2
ec
r
sec
J 2
J
kL-,
, ,
(86)
_,
and the corresponding expression for allowable stress for design use is
/n
.
a
1
r*
(87)
(ec/r
sec (kL/2)
(7)
is
e
f
max
7 A
[1 +
(^ 2
r
+ -^r-) 2 r
sec - /fr] 2r n AE J
(88)
:
1
2
+
Jt
+
'o
(ec/r
e c/r
V
/n
)
sec (L/2r)
JnV
/E
where e
is
all defects.
A good approximation for the maximum moment in a beam-column can be found from the following equation:
PA
M
max
- P/P
^~~
cr
(90)
where M
and A
42
Eq.
90 can conveniently be
written as:
+
vj;
P/P
max
cr
) ,
1-
P/P
(91)
cr
in which,
F
*
=
El
"
M L
o
If
I
max
where
o<
l
f
+ *<X 1 - 0(
o
1
(92)
P/P
cr
o
2.
Table
2.
Parameter
<\j
in Eqs.
91 and 92.
Loading condition
Constant moment
+ 0.233
- 0.178
+ 0.028
7*
2 is
43
If Eq.
90 (equal
eccentricities e, M
Pe, and
+ 0.233),
/n
^
1
(
+
1
0.233ntx
- nC*
ec 2
r
(93)
*
This equation gives results in close agreement with those obtained from Eq
89.
IV.
for nc*
0.8 <
< 0.95
(7).
44
Allowable
stresses determined from interaction formulas vary continuously and in a smooth transition from stresses for concentrically loaded columns at one
limit to stresses for beams at the other.
and M/M
where
M M
u
The following equation is the basis for several such interaction formulas:
--
u
In
i.
maximum moment at or near the center of the member may be obtained from Eq.
91 by setting
ty
= 0.
45
M M
=
max
(P/P
'
(95)
cr
where P
P
elastic critical load for buckling in the plane of applied moment, and
maximum applied moment, not including contribution of axial load interacting with deflections.
1-
(P/P
(96)
cr )J
M
u
P e
[1 - (P/P
(97)
cr )J
Gal am bos and Ketter (4) presented dimensionless interaction curves for the ultimate strength of typical wide-flange beam-columns bent in the strong
direction and having (a) equal axial-load eccentricities at both ends, and
(b)
M A *B
P
P C(
2
)
(98)
where A,
B,
condition (P
y
A f
y
).
46
Galambos-Kcttcr coefficients of Eq
in the preceding paragraph.
the
M
ZT M
0.6 + 0.4 r* M a
0.4
(99)
where M
eq
the form
f+ a
(1 Kl
^
fK
*
F
b
(100)
~)
F'
Isi
and
f
-*
O.o F
y
1,
(101)
where
ing,
F
and
and
f,
are the axial and bending stresses under the combined load-
F,
are the allowable stresses for the axially loaded column and J
F'
beam,
respectively,
theory, and C
0.4
written as
C
+
(1
f
_.
mx
a
fK
bx
)
C i\ bx
(1
- f /F'
ex
bY - f /F' a ey
my
fK
l
'
Fu
(102 ) ^ 1UZ;
by
approximate manner.
axial compression.
48
EXAMPLE
P ro b 1 em
jected to an axial force of 300 kips and a moment of 200 k-ft at the lower
end,
150 k-ft at the upper end.
and the frame is braced against sidesway buckling in the plane of the loading and in the plane perpendicular to it.
Use A-36
300 k.
18 ft
200 k-ft.
300 k.
Solution
For a quick estimate of the range of member size, consider the moment
22
109 in
3
,
Assume that, owing to the presence of axial force, twice this value
is reasonable and look for a member with section modulus of about 200 in
3
.
Entering the Tables on pages 1-12 (AISC), the 14 \F shapes are found to be
49
=
=
37.33 in
202.0 in
1476.6 in
4
,
r r
=6.29, and
=
3.76.
T x
18 x
12
"6T2T~
34 4
'
_.
7"
y
18 x
12
T^6~
e 57 5
-
0.65 x 34.4
23
0.65 x 57.5
38
ax
ksi
ay
19.35
ksi
Axial stress:
300
A,
..
50
Reduction factor:
M
C
0.6 + 0.4
(^)
use
0.4
Amplification factor:
23
281.88
ksi
F'
281.88
U,y/1
*
(sec.
1.5.1.4.5)
Fu b
!^/? Ld/A f
56 ksi
>
0.6 F
y
use
F,
=0.6
22 ksi
Bending stress:
M
c f
T"
max
_ "
200 x 12
"202
U
.
QO 88 kSl
. .
a F
8 04
1935
416>
' 13
use Formula
7).
Formula (7a)
-8 19.35
-^+
0.416*0.222
0.638< ^
Formula (7b)
8.04
22
11.88
22
0.366 + 0.54
0.906<
1.0
51
Following the same procedure shown above, further trials may be carried
out in tabular form.
From the above results in Formulas k7&> and l7b;,
(7a) controls the case.
vSo
,
it
accordingly, calculate
only the terms needed for Formula v7a) in the further trials.
Member
/22
f u /F u
Sum
14 \F
119 111
34.99
189.4
176.3
8.59
9.19
12.7
22 22
0.39
0.577
0.967
1.037
14 UF
32.65
13.6
0.418
0.619
From these results, it can be seen that 14 UF fore the column will be made of 14
VF"
111 is overstressed
There-
119.
52
CONCLUSION
beam-columns.
In
behavior of beam-columns discussed above, there are many other methods for
solving a beam-column problem.
The general method which is derived on the basis of the differential
of a member with simply supported ends, of a member with complicated loadings, and of a member with various cross-sections.
53
Such curves are reasonably easy to use for the design of bcara-columna by
trial and error.
The interaction formula is easy to use for design and is applicable for
a variety of loading conditions.
34
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Professor Vernon
H.
55
NOTATION
a,
b,
c,
A
c
e
e
Cross-sectional area
Distance from neutral axis to extreme fiber of beam
e,
Eccentricity J
iModulus of elasticity
E
f
(u),
(u)
1
L
m,
n
M M
,
M,
B,
respectively
cr
Q
q
r
Concentrated force
Intensity of distributed load
Radius of gyration
o R
R
s
S
t
Numerical ratio
Work,
tension force
56
u
U
V
x,
y'
Rectangular coordinates
First derivative, second derivative, etc.
y"...
Z
c<
Plastic modulus
L
e
Deflection
End slopes, rotations r
e.
<\>
Numerical factor
57
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.
"Numerical Procedure for Computing Deflections, Moments and Buckling Loads," N. M. Newmark, Trans ASCE Vol. 108 (1943), p. 1161.
.
2.
F.
Bleich, McGraw-Hill,
New
3.
"Plastic Deformation of Wide-Flange Beam Columns," R. L. Ketter, E. L. Kaminsky, and L. S. Beedle, Trans ASCE Vol. 120 (1955), p. 1028.
.
4.
"Column Under Combined Bending and Thrust," T. Ketter, Trans ASCE Vol. 126 Part 1 (1961),
.
B.
Galambos and
1.
R.
L.
p.
5.
"Further Studies of the Strength of Beam-columns," ASCE Vol. 126 Part 2 (1961), p. 929.
R.
L.
Ketter, Trans
6.
"Eccentrically Loaded, End -res trained Columns," P. 0. Bijlaard, G. P. Fisher, G. Winter, and R. E. Mason, Trans ASCE Vol. 120 (1955),
.
p.
7.
1070.
,
Guide to Design Criteria for Metal Compression Members B. G. Johnston, Column Research Council, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1966.
8.
S.
P.
9.
S.
T.
6.
10.
Numerical and Matrix Methods in Structural Mechanics Wiley & Sons, New York, 1966.
Numerical Analysis of 3eam and Column Structures Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1965.
,
P.
C.
Wang, John
11.
W.
G.
Godden,
12.
Moment Distribution
1963.
J.
M.
Gere,
D.
13. 14.
K.
H.
1967.
15.
American Association of
by
CHENG-HSIUNG CHEN
MASTER OF SCIENCE
1967
applied at any point on the beam, or from end moments caused by eccentricity
of the axial loads at one or both ends of the member.
The purposes of this paper are to review the appropriate methods for
servation of energy.
y = L &
forces or moments may be set equal to the potential energy stored through
the action of the internal forces and the elastic strain mechanisms of the
beam-column.
"
moment obtained.
The numerical method was first presented by N. M. Newmark.
It
provides
loading.
calculate the modified stiffness and carry-over factors for use in the method
of modified moment distribution.
The modified moment distribution method
can then be used to solve rigid frame problems. Two approaches to the design of steel beam-columns are described in
this paper.
Council) design guide (7), AASHO (15), and A1SC (14) Specifications.
sample problems are analyzed and one design example is given to illustrate
the design procedure according to the A1SC Specifications.