http://www.youtube.com/watch?

v=XfUhvmsGHws
FIST FIGHTS WITH PHYSICISTS THE CADUCEUS COIL
Here are a few pictures of Dan Winter's Imploder Nozzle design in 3D.

This is to be coupled with my video presentation here:

Rather than sending water down the grooves, why not line them with wires so that the energy will flow in a helical path as the water would. The water cycled through Dan Winter's Imploder system is enhanced. It has documented lower surface tension which increases the Zeta Potential in the blood stream thereby increasing capacitance per brain synapse. It also makes plants grow a documented 350% bigger. http://www.fractalfield.com/implodernews http://www.GoldenMean.info

Electricity and Water flow the same. All motion is curved and energy follows the path of least resistance. That path is a Phi spiral, NOT a straight line as Michio Kaku and Jack Sarfatti want people to believe and would defend with their lives. Quotes from Jack Sarfatti: "This is not of major interest at the cutting edge in physics today. We know what gravity is. It's not a mystery to physicists... End of story." "Physicists do not care about non-scientific metaphysical questions." "People in the field have no interest in alternative ideas about what is already well understood." "This is all crank crackpot nonsense." He calls Nassim Haramein a "nutcase."' Says that anytime he hears John Searl's term, Law of Squares, he thinks, "loony tunes." How open-minded we are... Well if you don't "believe" in The Natural Law of Squares, then you don't "believe" in Phi either.

Whenever you see a 2D drawing think 3D object. See a square, think a cube. See a curve, think a vortex.

Now I need to figure out a way to create a 3D Phi spiral using the Natural Law of Cubes. Every square of Phi is turned 90 degrees, so the cube will shift in a similar fashion but in 3D.

Why don't we compare the difference in efficiency to a regular toothed gear to a Helical Gear. A helical gear can move further with the same amount of force because the weight distribution is better and a lot of other things. Check it out for yourself:

So, the speed of light is measured from a straight line which is the point of most resistance. Saying you can't break the speed of light is like saying there's no such thing as a helical gear... You can go further with the same amount of force if you follow Natural Laws rather than man made rules. So pretty much, the speed of light is actually the SLOWEST light goes because you're measuring from a point of MOST resistance. That's like saying a rain drop can't fall faster than terminal velocity. Terminal velocity is judged from a straight line. By allowing energy to flow in it's natural path according to 3 Dimensional Phi... you increase the energy. Think about it... A rain drop takes a long time to fall to the ground. But in a hurricane, it comes very quickly, especially at the wall of the eye of the storm. That rain drop is falling with the same amount of force, but since its in a Helical Path down a vortex, the energy is utilized much more efficiently and we see a Drastic excess in energy at Point B.

Show me the straight line in Nature Mr. Sarfatti. Show me. Even in space, you say things travel in a straight line, but you know it's not true.

The rate of arc in space is so great that you think it's a straight line. Just like you think a "magnetic line of force" is separating the Positive from the Negative. It's an illusion. There is Negative on top AND bottom with a Ring / Disk of Positive Polarity. What you think is polarity is actually the Magnetic Current of the flux. In the top, out the bottom. You really think you can put 2 bottoms together if the flux is blowing out? No. But you think thats polarity and "people in the field have no interest in alternative ideas about what is already well understood." Right? If you were able to see your reflection in a mirror from a light year away, you'd see that your reflection begins to twist and arc as it leaves your "line" of sight. The further out you go, the faster your reflection would spin.

Why do you think NASA's pioneer satellite "mysteriously" sped up? Because all things speed up as they go down a drain. And since there's no particular up or down... any given direction you send an object will begin to arc in a Phi Spiral if you give it a long enough distance. But thanks to the illusion of relativity, you believe that even your reflection is straight because the light becomes relative once you look through your telescope. You'll see your reflection as normal because the light has to corkscrew back and forth from the destination. We don't see the path, only the end result. Much like most people choose not to see the process of an achievement, they're only interested in the end result... that free energy machine. If you don't believe in the process... how the hell are you going to build one?

Curved 3D space is the path of least resistance. Energy speeds up down a drain, so if you align your wires to follow the path of a 3 Dimensional Helix, you will see more energy out than in.

Even a Bifilar coil is dealing with 2 Dimensional electricity because it's looping on one axis. You need a vortex according to Phi. An upside down Christmas Tree. The reason why the star goes on top is because that's the point of most energy. The point of Harmonic Convergence.

Send your wires down the Caduceus and let them converge at the bottom. THEN connect your devices. If you're judging electric potential from a straight line, then anything helical will give you more than expected. The bigger the cone according to Phi and the more Helixes = more power out because you're decreasing the resistance through a Natural and Universal flow according to the Arc of Phi. You can have as many Helixes as you like, just make them equidistant. 2 Helixes = 180 degrees apart 5 Helixes = 72 degrees apart 8 Helixes = 45 degrees apart Open Letter to Michio Kaku from a REAL physicist named Dr. Robert Koontz: http://www.doctorkoontz.com/Scalar_Physics/Letters/Kaku/Open_Letter_to_Dr ._Michio_Kaku.htm Even Tesla came out the gate saying E = mc^2 is wrong and relativity is misinterpreted. So, Einstein's equation falls apart across vast distances because he had no information regarding the curvature of motion in space itself. Hitler prevented brilliant minds from seeing the real stuff from all the book burnings and information regulation.

Now look at this next picture of my graph. Think of this first line as looking at a pencil from the side so that you see the full length of the pencil on a level surface (axis). The numbers rotate around the zero point like a helicopter blade. As the numbers are rotating, the zero point itself is also traveling in a particular direction in a corkscrew.

And even this isn't accurate. This is describing a man made magnetic field. Nature's magnets are conical, not toroidal.

So I printed this out onto a transparency and formed it into a cone to see the true intersections of a helical field.

This is the difference between a straight line and a curve. The difference between a regular gear and a helical gear. Between a man made flux and nature's flux.

Here is something I found on the net. The Large HELICAL Device to "contain" a magnetic field. Is it really containing it? No.. Theyre just accounting for the shape.

A regular magnetic field is toroidal in nature (donut shaped) The Red and Blue are representative of CURRENT.... NOT Polarity. With a regular field, both currents are aligned in such a way that we can't tell them apart. Purple = magnetic resistance. There is constant resistance on a regular magnet because the fields are aligned. I don't believe you can create a free energy device using a regular field or even combinations of regular fields. It's like trying to break the speed of light using a rocket. Or a rain drop falling in a straight line from the sky to the ground. An object falling at terminal velocity is falling in a straight line and will experience most resistance. No vortex... no power. A helical field uses skewed fields where the purple is distributed in dots rather than a solid ring.

A Helical Field is conical in Nature. (Cone shaped vortex) In the center of the donut is a cone where all the energy converges. In the regular field, the red and blue are aligned to create a purple ring. In the helical field, the red and blue are skewed to create interference patterns and only dots of purple. In the regular field there is constant resistance because the 2 fields are constantly running against each other on one axis. In the helical field, there is little to "zero" resistance depending on the angle of the helix. (90 degree fields would be ideal) There will ALWAYS be some resistance, but you can reduce what Would be constant resistance to only a fraction of a pulse. It could take millions of years for the energy to dissipate. The atoms of the device would corrode before the energy dissipates, therefore we can call it "perpetual energy." The Purple represents resistance. Purple dots is much better then a solid purple ring. When the Blue skews one way.. the Red inverses automatically so we can easily distinguish the 2 fields. The purple dot is the Zero Point. Helical Fields = Free Energy

E=mc^2 works up to a point because its referring to linear space-time. Because of the reality of Phi curved space, his equation falls apart after a while. Just as a rocket will eventually curve as it leaves the atmosphere. The rate of arc in space is so great that observers believe its a straight line. They invented a Special Relativity to futiley try and explain everything past the point of noticeable curvature. You cant use mc^2 forever guys. You need to use E = mc^3 for the next 1.618 distance. And then that will only work up to a point. Follow Phi.

In reality, light doesn't travel at all. The angle at which you view "things" within that light will determine it's color, shape and characteristics. An electron is only an electron if you look at it from one angle. 180 from that angle you can call that same thing a positron. It's the same thing, but one angle you see light and the other it takes away light. It's all illusions. We are viewing the intersections and variations of rotating magnetic fields. The more intersections, the more light and "mass". 'c' is NOT a constant, so keep that in mind. This above is only a portion of the graph. (Might actually be only 1/4) If E = mc^2, then what is 1/E ? would it be: 1/E = 1/(mc^) = (m^-1)(c^-) = (1/m)(1/(c^) where Phi can equal the cube, 5th, 8th, 13th, and so on? Because you can have cube root, fifth root and so on. So, 1/E = 1/(mc^) (I think the Red and Blue are supposed to be 90 degrees to each other.. and I think that every visible color is 22.5 degrees tilted more than the previous one. That would make Blue 90 degrees to Red) Black and White are also 90 Degrees to each other, If Black and White were on the same axis, we would see Gray. But what is the color Gold? There's really no difference between Red or any other color. It's just the dimensional angle we are viewing that same light. Red is Red but it fades to orange the more you tilt it 22.5 degrees. Just like the element Platinum is Platinum, but if you shift it 22.5 degrees, you get the element Gold. Or if you shift the element Mercury 22.5 in the other "dimensional direction", you still get the element Gold.

But what exactly is the color gold? It is it's own color and it's own thing. There are no combinations of colors within our visible spectrum to make gold. But in order to make the element gold, you have to account for the surrounding Pressure in addition to the angle of light / sound / vibration, etc. But in order to make gold... you'd have to have the harmonic. Each harmonic has a color associated with it, yet there's no combination of colors to achieve gold. And if it is it's own color and pigment, then how do you create that thing without combining other things? So, all you would really need to transmute elements is a pressurized sphere that can take exponentially greater and less pressure, and something to spin inside it that created a given frequency in relation to the rate of spin. (http://www.svpvril.com/)

John Keelys Dynasphere (http://www.svpvril.com/)

This is what we are used to seeing:

But nothing ever travels in a straight line... so this feels wrong to me. Get rid of those arrows denoting that the straight line continues on. IT DOESN'T.

This feels more accurate to me. There is a point were the X becomes the Y and the Y becomes the X. And they flip.................and flip.......then flip....and flip.. flip flip flip flliiiiiip

From the zero point of the following graph going upwards would be our entire EM spectrum. I think the inverse is the spectrum of pigment in comparison to the spectrum of light. You can't make magenta or gold using the light spectrum. So is the magenta, cyan and amber spiral on the X axis... or is it the inverse on the Y? Or does it go the completely opposite direction as if to show 2 inversed swastikas on top of each other?

Id like to say that by no means am I "qualified" to speak about Physics. I don't know what I'm talking about in Physics. I'm a Magneticist, not a Physicist. There is an inverse to everything; as well as, a transition back from the inverse. People need to stop thinking objectively and start thinking cyclically. I'm for Cryodynamics and Liberation (Unlimited Freedom). They're for Thermodynamics and Conservation. (Limited Energy and Slavery through misinterpretations) They are straight lines. I'm a curve and they say I don't exist. I have 2 Spheres, and they're just all squares. I've only been at this for a few months, while all the "experts" seem to have been at it for decades. They've had their shot. They couldn't build a castle like Ed Leedskalnin let alone explain it. They don't even acknowledge Coral Castle in Homestead, Florida built by Ed Leedskalnin.

Most of these so called experts haven't even heard of Walter Russell who was regarded as the Leonardo Da Vinci of our modern era. http://www.Philosophy.org Einstein didn't even know about Russell who gave Nikola Tesla most of his ideas. If you feel this isnt just "crank crackpot nonsense," and you see validity, then please check out my other notes on scribd and Facebook. Also check out the videos on my youtube channel: http://www.YouTube.com/user/TheRealVerbz The Fallacy of a Straight Line and Misconception of Black "Holes" http://www.scribd.com/doc/36586248/The-Fallacy-of-a-Straight-Line-andMisconception-of-Black-Holes Here's what I consider the Golden Gate Bridge from Science to Spirituality and the Truth about Magnets: http://www.scribd.com/doc/44506004/The-Light-of-Truth

Add me on http://www.Facebook.com/Verbelli If something has validity, it has a sense of urgency. --Jason Verbelli