The Fascinating Process of Self Liberation Under Common Law

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVe...
Page 1 of 32
To view the LaTeXMathML notation use Internet Explorer 6+MathPlayer or Netscape/Mozilla/Firefox From Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff
Main: TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVersusDivineCommonLaw The Fascinating Process of Self Liberation under Common Law
By Arend Lammertink. In the past months, David Wilcock posted an epic work on Financial Tyranny. One of the most interesting parts of that story is a lawsuit against the central banking system that has been filed by Neil Keenan, a story that had been covered by Benjamin Fulford for quite some time already. When I investigated this story further, I found out that current International Civil law and thus all the nations operating under this jurisdiction (including the corporate US government) ultimately are legally nothing but vassals of the Vatican. In other words: (virtually) all nations are legally operated as (de-facto) corporations under the jurisdiction of the Vatican. And as we will see, that gives some very interesting possibilities that may offer some solutions to the problems we are facing. The story starts with the Keenan lawsuit, which uses a powerful commercial lien process under Common Law. One of the advisors in that process is Winston Shrout, who is considered to be an expert in this field. In an interview with Wilcock, Shrout referred to the Bible as his source for the legal processes he was using, but Shrout was not aware of any books people may read for more information. So, I went looking on the internet what I could find, and I found the book "Pied Pipers of Babylon" (pdf) by Verl K. Speer, which goes into the history and fundamental principles of Common Law, the law system used by the Anglo-Saxons in England. He claims that this system originates from the Israelites, which migrated to Northern Europe and that it is the same system one can find in the Bible. Another part of this story, is the process talked about by a fellow named Drake. He talks about returning the US to common law before Law Enforcement agencies in the US will perform mass arrests of the bankers in the US. In this process, juries are formed (an important feature of common law) in various states, which file some paperwork by which the states declare their independence of the corporate Washington government and return to their original constitution and bill of rights.
http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVersusDiv... 11-3-2013
Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVe... Page 2 of 32
The flags of the Dutch Batavian Republic (source) Because of the intriguing nature of this process, I started studying the history of our own constitution and found out that the 1798 constitution of the Batavian Republic is the only Dutch constitution that has been lawfully ratified by the people under common law. All later ones, including the 1801 version under Napoleon, were either illegal or not ratified under the authority of the people but under the authority of someone else. Interestingly, the constitution OF the Batavian Republic and the 1801 one were the only constitutions OF The Netherlands. ALL the later constitutions are constitutions FOR The Netherlands and thus OF someone else.... Further investigations revealed that the authority the current Kingdom of The Netherlands, as well as the rest of Europe and (most of) the World, legally operates under up to this day is none less than the Vatican, which gives us some very interesting possibilities to liberate the people of this planet from literally ages of (financial) tyranny under jurisdiction, authority, sovereignty and responsibility of the Vatican. One of the most revealing clues on how to do this can be found in the Treaty of Paris of 1815 (also see this section below): The Allied Powers having by their united efforts, and by the success of their arms, preserved France and Europe from the convulsions with which they were menaced by the late enterprise of Napoleon Bonaparte, and by the Revolutionary system reproduced in France, to promote its success; What this says is basically that the French and thus Dutch and United States revolutions are a direct and severe threat to the Vatican's objectives and therefore a blessing to all freedom loving people on this planet, even though the whole French revolution may (initially) have been a kind of false flag operation along the lines set out by Prof. Veith. Either way, here is why these revolutions actually ARE a deadly weapon against the dark Cabal: The essential trick for a nation to liberate itself, is to declare a bill of rights and a republican constitution by referendum under common law and under the authority of the people themselves, after the example that has been set in the late 1700s by all three mentioned republics. As far as I am aware, the US did not use a referendum, but the Dutch Batavian Republic definitely did. It may be possible to use some other process, but with a constitution ratified by the people of a nation by referendum there is no question about the legal validity nor authority of said constitution. In other words: NO ONE can legally prevent the people of a nation to declare their independence under common law. What this does is that it establishes a new legal entity, a free and really independent Republic, under the jurisdiction of Common Law instead of under the jurisdiction of international civil law, which up to this day still operates under authority and sovereignty of the Vatican. In other words: you now have two DIFFERENT legal entities governing over one and the same country, of which only one is really free and independent and operates under the authority of the People now actually OWNING their land instead of legally STILL being a vassal of the Vatican. The latter STILL being the case for at least all previous colonies of the United Kingdom, France, The Netherlands and Spain as well as ALL of Europe and Russia. The other side of this is that the legal entity that still exists as a vassal of the Vatican no longer has any subjects nor any possessions within the now liberated country, BUT it is still burdened with ALL of its obligations and liabilities established under the authority and responsibility of the Vatican. So, these are NOT the problem of the now liberated people, which were after all just subjects ruled under the sovereignty of the Vatican. In other words: we now have not only a nice trick to liberate a nation, but also a convenient way to get rid of the problem of nation's debt, which is now the problem of the Vatican and not of the nation's self-liberated people. How nice! What's even more interesting, is that this process could in principle also be done at a global level by the UN. If the general assembly would make a statement in which they declare the whole planet to be free and independent under Common Law by declaring a bill of rights and a global constitution after the example set by the US and the Dutch Batavian Republic, then all people would be free from suppression by the Dark Cabal. And the burden of ALL global debts established under the authority and responsibility of the Vatican would no longer be the problem of the people of this planet.
Now THAT would be something I would love to see. :)
It turns out that Benjamin Fulford and his fellowship is aware of this principle, too: Yes, we are aware of this. If the US removes the P2 fascist government run via the United States of America corporation, then all US external debts will not have to be paid by the American people. We are trying to bankrupt that war mongering and murdering corporation and their fascist overseers at the P2 Roman empire headquarters. This in no way implies we are opposed to the beliefs held by the majority of Catholics. Benjamin Fulford This P2 lodge can indeed be linked to the Vatican as well as various (international) crimes, as you can read in this paragraph.
Update February 27, 2013: The One Peoples Public Trust (OPPT) appears to have Lawfully Foreclosed "Corporations, Banks and Governments for Operating Slavery and Private Money Systems" using and extending the principles explained in this article: Many of you have heard many have not. Announced publicly on 25 December 2012, the system of Corporate-Governmental rule has been foreclosed. Legally foreclosed via one of its own mechanisms. The Powers That Be are now the Powers That Were. All debt has been erased and corporations including but not limited to Corporate Governments and Banks have been foreclosed. Sure, they may continue to play along in hopes we will play along with them. But thanks to a series of UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) filings made by the One Peoples Public Trust (known as OPPT) the choice is now yours to make. A new framework for social governance is now in effect; a fact that has been ratified by the legal framework of its corporate-controlled predecessor. Systemically speaking WE ARE FREE!! As far as I understand the OPPT documents at this moment, it appears they not only lawfully declared the whole planet to be free, they also circumvented the authority claimed by the Vatican. The Vatican's authority is essentially based on claiming the Pope to be the intermediary between We, The People, and the Creator. Since the OPPT declaration directly draws it's authority from the Creator itself by means of a very clever lawful declaration in which each person is recognized as BEing an aspect of the Creator AND this part BEing indistuingishable from the whole, this declaration lawfully declares that We, The People have no one to answer to, but the Creator itself. Wow! Update March 8, 2013: The way I see it, the OPPT at its very core invalidated the authority of the Pope and thus, by extension, of the whole Roman type Civil law system. It claims that we as a people have no one to answer to but ourselves and the creator and are essentially bound to common law, which is exactly the jurisdiction under which not only the United States but also the (former) Dutch Batavian and French Republics have been founded, even though the latter two have been overthrown by the defeat of Napoleon. Interestingly, the legal entitity Batavian Republic still exists. It has essentially been occupied by a foreign entity, the Kingdom of The Netherlands, which derives its authority from the holy and individed trinity a.k.a. the Vatican and/or The Pope. So, IMHO the OPPT is essentially a global declaration of independence and a bill of rights. And since the declarations by the above mentioned republics were legally valid, I see no reason why this one would not be legally valid. Yes, these republics filed their declarations in a different way, basically by publishing it and/or noticing their previous ruler which would be some king, but that does not mean that the way the OPPT published their declaration is invalid. Now of course, no one asked for your permission when founding any of the above mentioned republics. However, none of these take away anything from you, especially regarding your rights. All they do is declare you to be free and answerable only to the creator. What you do with those rights is totally up to you. In other words: the whole thing is most of all an idea. And the idea is that all people are created equal and free. And I believe this is going to work, if only because of what Vicor Hugo said: Nothing is as powerful as an idea whose time has come.
The Pied Pipers of Babylon
In "Pied Pipers of Babylon" (pdf) by Verl K. Speer you can read all about how "common law" is essentially the law God passed to the Israelites, which is contained in the Bible in various ways: The Doctor of Common Law, Verl K. Speer released his book Pied Pipers of Babylon in 1985. Out of print with limited used copies in circulation, this book needs to be in the hands of all who care for their future, the world we live in, and the system we are subjects to/of. Much of what Winston Shrout teaches is based on Dr. Speers work. He was way ahead of his time in respects to understanding the truth about law and the mercantile system, Dr. Speer experienced the destruction first hand through the subsidies and controls inflicted upon his family farm in Kansas. From the intro of Speers book: The key discovery of Dr. Speer is that Americans have become subject to a foreign system of law - essentially a form of the Roman civil law. This jurisdiction, he says, was imposed on our country by England. He Contrasts this with the "other great system," the common law. "Common law," as Speer defines it, is based on reason and the immutable laws of God and nature. It is the law of conscience - and as such, it can not be written, only written about. REVOLUTION One of the first things of interest this reviewer learned from "Pipers" was the cause of the American Revolution. It was not, as most people think, the tax on tea or "taxation without representation." Rather, as is mentioned in two separate places in the Declaration of Independence, it was England's attempt to subject Americans to the civil law. [..] Today, says Speer, maritime law has come ashore and threatens to squeeze Out all our rights. How then have Americans been tricked out of their common-law rights and into the admiralty courts, just as happened more than 200 years ago? Speer explains this in his book. Furthermore, he examines the principles applicabl e to the resolution of this dilemma, and how they may be invoked and implemented. Among the topics covered in great detail by Speer are the "malady of paper money" and the powers of the jury to judge the facts and the law , and to nullifv the law where necessary-that is, whenever the law is unjust. Also covered at length is the subject of land patents and alodial land title . It is very fascinating to see the legal battle currently being fought (by Neil Keenan a.o.) essentially deals about restoring common law, Biblical Anglo-Saxon law, which law can be summarized in one sentence:
"Love your neighbor like yourself". Since common law is described in the Bible, it is interesting to take a look at this video by prof. Walter Veith, in which he gives an excellent analysis of the French revolution based on the bible. And he also shows how astonishingly accurate the Bible predicted the French revolution:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGiXc9ydhqw Now the essential difference between common law and civil law is the *authority* under which the legal system operates. With common law AND trial by jury, the government is under control of the people, because a proper jury cannot only sentence according to the law, it can ALSO judge the law itself. VERY important detail. See Speer for all the details. An interesting detail is that, according to a comment on David Wilcock's site, "maritime law" refers to the See as in Holy See: This whole thing about "Admiralty Law" is a fraud. Admiralty law is also known as Maritime law and it was formed in the 13th Century by the the Venetian/Magyar trading families. The word "Maritime" is a 13th Century word formed from two Latin words maris meaning sea and see as in Holy See and timeo meaning to fear, be afraid (of). Hence the literal original meaning of maritime law is to be fearful and afraid of the Law of the Holy See (Vatican). If you want to learn more, read the Canons of Positive Law. In other words: we are looking at a war between the peoples authority and centralized authority, with the Vatican, the Holy See, at the ultimate control, hiding behind the scenes. The woman (a church) that rides the beast (a kingdom) in Biblical symbolism. Interestingly, this can be (legally) confirmed based on a/o the 1815 treaties of Paris and Vienna, as you can read in this section. Now in the symbolism of the pyramid with the capstone with all seeing eye floating above the pyramid, you have the symbol for the hidden force behind the scenes, the Vatican. All right. Now according to Veith, the Huguenots were the true followers of the word of God, the Bible. Translated into law terms this means: the Huguenots were the proponents of Common Law, while Napoleon, probably a Freemason who apparently actually worked for the Vatican and the Jesuits, was a proponent of Civil Law. In other words: accordingly, the Feemasons setup the French revolution as agents of the Vatican in order to hide and regroup, because the printing and widespread availability of the (Gutenberg) Bible blew their cover. The idea that the Freemasons were involved in the French Revolution is further substantiated by Albert Pike's book, as you can read in this paragraph. Either way, the protestants identified the anti-christ very clearly to be none other than the Vatican, as is clearly witnessed by the statue at the Nurnberg city hall:
(high res version) In this image, you clearly see the beast at the right side of the statue to be identified with the Roman Empire, which is in accordance with the so-called protestant historicist interpretation of the Bible: The Protestant reformation was born of the rediscovery of Christ's salvation and identifying the papacy as the Antichrist. Protestant historicists saw prophecy fulfilled down through the centuries and into the modern era. Rather than expecting a single Antichrist to rule the earth during a future Tribulation period, Martin Luther, John Calvin and other Protestant Reformers saw the Antichrist as a present feature in the world of their time, fulfilled in the papacy. They were unanimous in this interpretation lending emphasis to their reformation. It led them to protest against Rome and it became their rally and battle cry. Controversial features of the Reformationist Historicist interpretations is the identification of the Antichrist (1 and 2 John), the Beasts of Revelation 13, the Man of Sin or Man of Lawlessness in 2 Thessalonians 2, the "Little horn" of Daniel 7 and 8, and the Whore of Babylon (Revelation 17) with the Roman Catholic Church, the Papacy and Papal States, and each successive Pope himself. So, now that their cover was blown, the Roman Empire had to use another strategy in order to suppress the Divine Common law and the vehicle they chose was the French declaration of human rights, whereby the people were to be governed by civil law instead of Biblical common law:
(Source: Wikipedia) Take special notice of the symbolism. As Veith pointed out, you got the Jacobin or Phrygian cap, an ancient symbol of Mithraism, which is why the Pope's hat is called a mitre. In the Roman Empire the deity Mithras was honoured as the patron of loyalty to the emperor. And you got fasces or fascii, the symbol of the Roman absolute dictatorship:
The traditional Roman fasces consisted of a bundle of birch rods, tied together with a red leather ribbon into a cylinder, and often including a bronze axe (or sometimes two) amongst the rods, with the blade(s) on the side, projecting from the bundle. They were carried by the lictors who accompanied the magistrates. The axe often represents the power over life or death through the death penalty, although after the laws of the twelve tables, no Roman magistrate could summarily execute a Roman citizen. It was used as a symbol of the Roman Republic in many circumstances, including being carried in processions, much the way a flag might be carried today. Interestingly, you can also find fasces on the "statue of liberty" on top of the Dome of the US Capitol, of which one could say it looks like a mirror, an image, of the Vatican Dome:
high res version source At some point, of course the Huguenots had to be dealth with. And so they did: In what became known as the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre of 24 August 3 October 1572, Catholics killed thousands of Huguenots in Paris. Similar massacres took place in other towns in the weeks following. The main provincial towns and cities experiencing the Massacre were Aix, Bordeaux, Bourges, Lyon, Meaux, Orleans, Rouen, Toulouse, and Troyes." Now Veith states that the Huguenots ended up mainly in South Africa and not much more, BUT that is not entirely accurate: They relocated to Protestant nations, such as England, Denmark, Switzerland, the Dutch Republic, the Electorate of Brandenburg, Electoral Palatinate (both in the Holy Roman Empire), and the Duchy of Prussia, and also to the Dutch Cape Colony in present-day South Africa and the English 13 colonies of North America. [...] After the revocation of the Edict of Nantes, the Dutch Republic received the largest group of Huguenot refugees, an estimated total of 75,000 to 100,000 people. Amongst them were 200 clergy. Many came from the region of the Cvennes, for instance, the village of Fraissinet-de-Lozre. This was a huge influx as the entire population of the Dutch Republic amounted to ca. 2 million at that time. Around 1700, it is estimated that nearly 25% of the Amsterdam population was Huguenot. Now it turns out that the Batavian Republic, which was mainly protestant and a significant portion thereof were Huguenots, also made a declaration of human rights:
(high res) (source) There are a few remarkable differences in the wordings compared to the French one and also the symbolism is totally different. Even though at first glance the symbolism appears to be very similar, in reality the details are VERY, VERY different. There is no Jacobinian hat and thera are no fascii. Also, the declaration itself is significantly different in a few key points compared with the French Masonic/Cabal version. The first article of the Dutch version reads: 1. All Humans are born with equal Righs and these Natural Rights cannot be taken away from them [i.e. are inalienable]. The French version: 1. Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good. Note the difference. The French version basically says that the people are subjugated to the higher good, while the Dutch (Huguenot) version declares the natural rights (as given in the Bible of course) to be inalienable. Then the definiton of liberty: 3. Liberty is the power deserved by every Human Being to be allowed to do everything which does not disturb others in their Rights; the Nutral determination of Liberty therefore exists in this rule: DO NOT UPON OTHERS THAT WHICH YOU DO NOT WANT TO HAPPEN UPON YOU. The French version: 4. Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights. These limits can only be determined by law. Note the differences. In the French versions, limits to freedom can be determined by (civil, Roman type) law. In other words: freedom can (and WILL) be limited by the government in the French version, where in de Dutch version it is defined along the Biblical concept of "love thy neighbor like thyself". Then the article about the freedom of religion:
5. Every Human has the Right to serve God in such a way as he wants to; without it being possible to be forced therein, in any way. The French version: 10. No one shall be disquieted on account of his opinions, including his religious views, provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by law. Once again, totally different. In the Dutch version, one is essentially bound to God's highest command, which is: "love thy neighbor like thyself", while the French version is once again conditional. It can be limited by law, the law determined by the government of course. Interestingly, in the flag of the Batavian Republic, we do find fasces:
Model (Arms) for the National flag of the Batavian Republic, Dirk Langendijk (high res)(source) However, these Arms were adopted at May 4th 1796: The Batavian Republic was founded in 1795 used in its first year the arms of the Republic of the Seven United Provinces, the Dutch lion or lion with crown generality, sheaf of arrows and swords. But on May 4, 1796 the Dutch Lion badge was replaced by a free drawing of the Netherlands Maiden around an altar with an anchor dismantled, but it was decided to keep States Lion with HER. So, during the first year of the Republic, the Arms of the United Provinces was used:
In 1574 a new heraldic motive was chosen, which had to include the Dutch Lion, a widely recognized and respected heraldic motive in the Netherlands. This new Dutch Republic Lion should represent every region and not one in particular. The chosen design was a gold lion on a red field. Its symbolism meant a blend of the coat of arms of the provinces of Brabant, Gelderland (from these two the golden lion was taken) and Holland (whose coat of arms was the opposite) and those of Burgundy and Nassau. The Dutch Republic Lion had also a sheaf of arrows and a sword bar, taken from the crest of Charles V in his seal as "Lord of the Netherlands" and the sheaf of arrows as a symbol of unity. Their sovereignty emphasized the "Mightiness lords" of the States General by a crown to place their arms.
Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...
Page 10 of 32
The arrows symbolize the seven provinces that made up the Republic, the sword the determination to defend their liberty, and the coronet their soveriegnty. An interesting detail is that declaration of human rights was established by the independent Provinces, particularly Holland who announced it officially, while the Arms and constitution were crafted later by a (central) parliament. The constitution was adopted after a coup on january 22nd 1798 by a group of radical Batavians under leadership of Pieter Vreede (1750-1837) and Wijbo Fijnje (1750-1809) with the support of French troups. So, it is clear that French influence increased rapidly.
Albert Pike, Freemasonry and the Jesuits

The idea that the Freemasons were involved with the French revolution is further substantiated by Albert Pike, in his book Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. Right from the horse's mouth: A Lodge inaugurated under the auspices of Rousseau, the fanatic of Geneva, became the centre of the revolutionary movement in France, and a Prince of the blood-royal went thither to swear the destruction of the successors of Philippe le Bel [King of France 1285 -1314] on the tomb of Jacques de Molai. The registers of the Order of Templars attest that the Regent, the Duc d'Orleans, was Grand Master of that formidable Secret Society, and that his successors were the Duc de Maine, the Prince of Bourbon-Cond, and the Duc de Coss-Brissac. The Templars compromitted the King; they saved him from the rage of the People, to exasperate that rage and bring on the catastrophe prepared for centuries; it was a scaffold that the vengeance of the Templars demanded. The secret movers of the French Revolution had sworn to overturn the Throne and the Altar upon the Tomb of Jacques de Molai. When Louis XVI. was executed, half the work was done; and thenceforward the Army of the Temple was to direct all its efforts against the Pope. Jacques de Molai and his companions were perhaps martyrs, but their avengers dishonored their memory. Royalty was regenerated on the scaffold of Louis XVI., the Church triumphed in the captivity of Pius VI., carried a prisoner to Valence, and dying of fatigue and sorrow, but the successors of the Ancient Knights of the Temple perished, overwhelmed in their fatal victory. Note the peculiarities: "Royalty was regenerated" and "the Church triumphed in the captivity of Pius VI". Apparently, in the eyes of Albert Pike, Royalty was restored by overturning the power of the Pope, while this was a positive thing for "the Church". In his book, one can find lots of information about the World's history, symbolism and the inner workings of freemasonry from the perspective of a 33-degree freemason, like: The pavement, alternately black and white, symbolizes, whether so intended or not, the Good and Evil Principles of the Egyptian and Persian creed. It is the warfare of Michael and Satan, of the Gods and Titans, of Balder and Lok; between light and shadow, which is darkness; Day and Night; Freedom and Despotism; Religious Liberty and the Arbitrary Dogmas of a Church that thinks for its votaries, and whose Pontiff claims to be infallible, and the decretals of its Councils to constitute a gospel. Civil and religious Freedom must go hand in hand; and Persecution matures them both. A people content with the thoughts made for them by the priests of a church will be content with Royalty by Divine Right,the Church and the Throne mutually sustaining each other. They will smother schism and reap infidelity and indifference; and while the battle for freedom goes on around them, they will only sink the more apathetically into servitude and a deep trance, perhaps occasionally interrupted by furious fits of frenzy, followed by helpless exhaustion. Truths are the springs from which duties flow; and it is but a few hundred years since a new Truth began to be distinctly seen; that MAN IS SUPREME OVER INSTITUTIONS, AND NOT THEY OVER HIM. Man has natural empire over all institutions. They are for him, according to his development; not he for them. [...] Masonry early comprehended this Truth, and recognized its own enlarged duties. [...] It aided in bringing about the French Revolution, disappeared with the Girondists, was born again with the restoration of order, and sustained Napoleon, because, though Emperor, he acknowledged the right of the people to select its rulers, and was at the head of a nation refusing to receive back its old kings. He pleaded, with sabre, musket, and cannon, the great cause of the People against Royalty, the right of the French people even to make a Corsican General their Emperor, if it pleased them. Masonry felt that this Truth had the Omnipotence of God on its side; and that neither Pope nor Potentate could overcome it. So, is Masonry on our side, or on the side of the Pontiff? Is there a difference between Masonry and Freemasonry? Are there different factions within Masonry? And are there connections between Freemasonry and the Jesuits? An excerpt from "PROOFS OF A CONSPIRACY" by George Forman, 1798: German Masonry appeared a very serious concern, and to be implicated with other subjects with which I had never suspected it to have any connection. I saw it much connected with many occurrences and schisms in the Christian church; I saw that the Jesuits had several times interfered in it; and that most of the exceptionable innovations and dissentions had arisen about the time that the order of Loyola was suppressed; so that it should seem, that these intriguing brethren had attempted to maintain their influence by the help of Free Masonry. I have met with many particular facts, which convince me that this use had been made of the meetings of Masons, and that at this time the Jesuits interfered considerably, insinuating themselves into the Lodges, and contributing to encrease that religious mysticism that is to be observed in all the ceremonies of the order. This society is well known to have put on every shape, and to have made use of every mean that could promote the power and influence of the order. And we know that at this time they were by no means without
Page 11 of 32
hopes of re-establishing the dominion of the Church of Rome in England. Their services were not scrupled at by the distressed Royalists, even such as were Protestants, while they were highly prized by the Sovereign. We also know that Charles II. was made a Mason, and frequented the Lodges. The Lodges in France naturally became the rendezvous of the adherents to their banished King, and the means of carrying on a correspondence with their friends in England. At this time also the Jesuits took a more active hand in Free Masonry than ever. They insinuated themselves into the English Lodges, where they were caressed by the Catholics, who panted after the re-establishment of their faith, and tolerated by the Protestant royalists, who thought no concession too great a compensation for their services. At this time changes were made in some of the masonic symbols, particularly in the tracing of the Lodge, which bear evident marks of Jesuitical interference. The Knights Templars of Jerusalem, and the Knights of the Desert, whose office it was to protect pilgrims, and to defend the holy city, afforded very apt models for Masonic mimicry, because the Temple of Solomon, and the Holy Sepulchre, always shared the same fate. Many contended doctrines of the theologians had also their Chevaliers to defend them. In all this progressive mummery we see much of the hand of the Jesuits, and it would seem that it was encouraged by the church. These cheats found it convenient to make Masonry one of their conditions, and by a small degree of art, persuaded their pupils that they were the only true Masons. These Rosycrucian Lodges were soon established, and became numerous, because their mysteries were addressed, both to the curiosity, the sensuality, and the avarice of men. They became a very formidable band, adopting the constitution of the Jesuits, dividing the Fraternity into circles, each under the management of its own superior, known to the president, but unknown to the individuals of the Lodges. These superiors were connected with each other in a way known only to themselves, and the whole was under one General. At least this is the account which they wish to be believed. If it be just, nothing but the absurdity of the ostensible motives of their occupations could have prevented this combination from carrying on schemes big with hazard to the peace of the world. But the Rosycrucian Lodges have always been considered by other Free Masons as bad Societies, and as gross schismatics. This did not hinder, however, their alchemical and medical secrets from being frequently introduced into the Lodges of simple Free Masonry; and in like manner, exorcism, or ghost-raising, magic, and other gross superstitions, were often held out in their meetings as attainable mysteries, which would be immense acquisitions to the Fraternity, without any necessity of admitting along with them the religious deliriums of the Rosycrucians. And what about connections between the Vatican and the Jesuits? On this page, a/o the following is claimed: The Jesuit Order is since 1814 in complete control of the - obscenely wealthy - Vatican institution (and its Catholic clergy hierarchy) and presently also controls various other organizations together with the Military Order of Malta, such as: * the United Nations * NATO * European Commission * Council on Foreign Relations * various central banks * big corporations * secret services * numerous societies and cults, such as Freemasonry ("The Brotherhood") and Opus Dei These are intriguing questions that are not easy to answer, but the links just above may give you some clues. More books on the Jesuits here.
Propaganda Due
This (masonic) P2 Lodge mentioned by Fulford is an interesting entity: Propaganda Due, or P2, was a Masonic lodge operating under the jurisdiction of the Grand Orient of Italy from 1945 to 1976 (when its charter was withdrawn), and a pseudo-Masonic, "black", or "covert" lodge operating illegally (in contravention of Article 18 of the Constitution of Italy banning secret associations) from 1976 to 1981. During the years that the lodge was headed by Licio Gelli, P2 was implicated in numerous Italian crimes and mysteries, including the collapse of the Vatican-affiliated Banco Ambrosiano, the murders of journalist Mino Pecorelli and banker Roberto Calvi, and corruption cases within the nationwide bribe scandal Tangentopoli. P2 came to light through the investigations into the collapse of Michele Sindona's financial empire. And these are/were powerfull people: "God's Banker" Roberto Calvi's connections with the Worshipful Master Licio Gelli became a particular focus of press and police attention, and caused the lodge (then secret) to be discovered. A list of adherents was found by the police in Gelli's house in Arezzo in March 1981, containing over 900 names, among which were very important state officers, some important politicians (four ministers or former ministers, and 44 deputies), and a number of military officers, many of them enrolled in the Italian secret services. Notably, the then future Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi was on the list, although he had not yet entered elective politics at the time. Another famous member was Victor Emmanuel, Prince of Naples, the current head of the House of Savoy. A document was also found in the possession of Licio Gelli titled "Piano di Rinascita Democratica" (Democratic Rebirth Plan) which amounted to a declaration of the lodge's intent; essentially, Gelli's goal was to form a new political and economic elite to lead Italy towards a more authoritarian form of democracy, in an anti-communist perspective. And this Roberto Calvi is connected to the Vatican: Roberto Calvi (13 April 192017 June 1982) was an Italian banker dubbed "God's Banker" by the press because of his close association with the Holy See.
Page 12 of 32
And the dots can be connected : Banco Ambrosiano was an Italian bank which collapsed in 1982. At the centre of the bank's failure was its chairman, Roberto Calvi and his membership in the illegal Masonic Lodge Propaganda Due (aka P2). Vatican Bank was Banco Ambrosiano's main shareholder, and the death of Pope John Paul I in 1978 is rumored to be linked to the Ambrosiano scandal, giving one of the subplots of The Godfather Part III. Vatican Bank was also accused of funneling covert United States funds to Solidarity and the Contras through Banco Ambrosiano. A special report on George Bush and the 12333 serial murder ring by EIR (pdf), also contains a paragraph on P2, linking it to various international crimes: Propaganda Two When the Italian Banco Ambrosiano went bust in the early 1980s, and the bank's president, Roberto Calvi, was discovered hanging from Blackfriars Bridge in London, the apparent victim of a Freemasonic ritualistic murder, an international scandal erupted, exposing the role of the illegal Italian Freemasonic Lodge, P-2, in a wide range of criminal activities, including a rash of right-wing bombings and assassinations all across Europe, during the late 1970s and early 1980s. When the membership list of the P-2 Lodge was leaked to the press, many of Europe's most prominent politicians, military officers, and intelligence chiefs were driven from office. In Italy alone, 47 Army generals and six Navy admirals resigned, following the May 20, 1981 public expos of the lodge. Not coincidentally, the public exposure of P-2 came jsut seven days after the unsuccessful assassination attempt against Pope John Paul II, by Mehmet Ali Agca. Many in the Vatican, and in the Italian security services, felt that the P-2 Lodge had played some kind of role in the attempt on the pontiff's life. The chief of SISMI, Italian military counterintelligence, for whom Pazienza worked, was also identified as a lodge member. P-2 Grand Master Licio Gelli, a wartime Nazi collaborator, later suspected of ties to Soviet bloc intelligence, could also boast of strong ties to several people in the Reagan-Bush administration in Washington. One of the most prominent of the Reagan-Bush administration national security figures publicly tied to Gelli and his P-2 Lodge, was Michael Ledeen, a consultant to the National Security Council, and a close associate of President Reagan's first secretary of state, Alexander Haig (a former secretary general of NATO). Ledeen, although officially listed merely as a White House "consultant," was the liaison to Manucher Gorbanifar, the Israeli Mossad-linked Iranian "businessman" who brokered the original arms-for-hostage deals, through which the United States and Israel funnelled tons of weapons to the Ayatollah's regime, throughout the Iran-Iraq War. At his 1987 trial in Bologna, Italy, Francesco Pazienza confirmed Ledeen's links to the P-2, and to the "Super SISMI" apparatus, run by SISMI chief and P-2 member Gen. Giuseppe Santovito. [...] Ledeen had inserted himself into the Reagan administration, courtesy of his P-2 friends. In October 1980, on the eve of the U.S. Presidential elections, Ledeen and Arnaud de Borchgrave had co-authored a series of front-page stories in the Washington Times, a newspaper owned by South Korean Rev. Sun Myung-Moon and his Unification Church. The stories revealed that Billy Carter, the brother of President Jimmy Carter, had been involved in secret business deals with Italian "businessman" Michele Papa (later exposed as a P-2 member), and Libyan dictator Muammar Qadaffi. The scandal had little impact on election day, because Ronald Reagan was to defeat Carter easily. It did, however, boost the credibility of Ledeen and Haig, his close associate, helping to land both men important posts in the newly elected Reagan-Bush administration. Italian investigative magistrate Palermo, during his own investigations of P-2, found that, in addition to Billy Carter, Michele Papa's Libya dealings had involved another P-2-linked financier, Giovanni Mario Ricci, of the Seychelles. The Ricci links to Qadaffi were further explored by Africa Confidential in the April 1987 issue that highlighted the Ricci-PazienzaWilliamson-Marc-Rich embargo-busting collusion. "The Seychelles International Bank continues to fascinate, by reason of its association with various exotic financiers, including some involved in such interesting escapades as the collapse of the Italian Banco Ambrosiano, the Italian bank which went under in 1982, leaving a huge hole in its accounts," Stephen Ellis wrote. Note: Another most interesting and shocking report (pdf) by EIR deals about how the African continent is allegedly being "managed" under the guise of "environmental protection" in the name of the WWF. Note that the Freemasons are in this case rumored to be linked to the death of a Pope, which is not the first time Freemasons have been involved with "special treatment" of a Pope. According to Albert Pike, Pope Pius VI also made himself not too popular with the Freemasons and was treated accordingly. So, while one can find many links to the Vatican as an institution being involved in various crimes, this does not mean one can draw conclusions on particular members of neither the Roman Catholic Church nor the Freemasons. It appears that within these organizations different opposing factions exist, which makes researching this subject pretty confusing. And the ordinary "uninitiated" followers/members of these organizations have absolutely no idea about the crimes that are being perpetrated in the name of these organizations.
The Chief Pontiff and the treaties of Paris and Vienna

In the Treaty of Paris of 1815, we find a remarkable preample: Definitive treaty between Great Britain and France In the Name of the Most Holy and Undivided Trinity.
Page 13 of 32
The Allied Powers having by their united efforts, and by the success of their arms, preserved France and Europe from the convulsions with which they were menaced by the late enterprise of Napoleon Bonaparte, and by the Revolutionary system reproduced in France, to promote its success; Participating at present with his Most Christian Majesty in the desire to consolidate, by maintaining inviolate the Royal Authority, and by restoring the operation of the Constitutional Charter, the order of things which had been happily re-established in France, as also in the object of restoring between France and her Neighbours those relations of reciprocal confidence and goodwill which the fatal effects of the Revolution and of the system of conquest had for so long a time disturbed; Persuaded, at the same time, that this last object can only be obtained by an arrangement framed to secure to the Allies proper indemnities for the past and solid guarantees for the future; In other words: we here have a treaty that says that the "Royal Authority" has been "happily re-established" in France in 1815, in the Name of the "Most Holy and Undivided Trinity". The "Final Act of the Congress of Vienna/General Treaty" is signed in the name of the same legal entity: In the name of the Most Holy and Undivided Trinity. So, what we are looking at, are two legal contracts between several parties under the authority of some legal entity, identified by the name "Most Holy and Undivided Trinity", because these treaties have been signed "in the NAME of" or "under authority of" that legal entity. In other words, what we got here is some legal entity claiming ownership of essentially all of Europe (and it's colonies) appointing certain rulers (kings) over parts of it's supposed territory. Today, this legal entity appears to have actually split itself into the so-called Trinity of the City:
Anyhow, because the "Royal Authority" was re-established in France in 1815 by means of the treaties of Paris and Vienna, and both treaties were signed in the Name of the "Most Holy and Undivided Trinity", we can legally identify this "Most Holy and Undivided Trinity" by going back further in history. All we have to do is find out under which name/authority the "Royal Authority" was issued before 1815. After all, the Paris Treaty says this was "re-established". In other words: in 1815, the "Royal Authority" returned to it's pervious owner. And we can find out who that was in a document from 1213: Medieval Sourcebook: John I: Concession Of England To The Pope. http://www.fordham.edu/Halsall/source/john1a.asp do offer and freely concede to God and His holy apostles Peter and Paul and to our mother the holy Roman church, and to our lord pope Innocent and to his Catholic successors, the whole kingdom of England and the whole kingdom Ireland, with all their rights and appurtenances,[...]; and now receiving and holding them, as it were a vassal, from God and the Roman church, [...] we perform and swear fealty for them to him our aforesaid lord pope Innocent, and his catbolic successors and the Roman church, according to the form appended; and in the presence of the lord pope, if we shall be able to come before him, we shall do liege homage to him; binding our successors aid our heirs by our wife forever, in -similar manner to perform fealty and show homage to him who shall be chief pontiff at that time, and to the Roman church without demur. How interesting. So, ALL Kings of England, as of 1213, operate under the authority of the "chief pontiff", which is of course the head of the Roman church. So, legally the "chief pontiff" can also be identified under the name "Most Holy and Undivided Trinity", since that is the name under whose authority the 1815 treaties of Vienna and Paris were signed. Later in history, under this same authority - either direct or via the King of England - ownership of the Americas has been claimed, under te legal pretence that the ownership of these lands had not been claimed before: But this State had no title to the territory prior to the title of the King of Great Britain and his subjects, nor did it ever claim as lord paramount to them. This State was not the original grantor to them, nor did they ever hold by any kind of tenure under the State, or owe it any allegiance or other duties to which an escheat is annexed. How then can it be said that the lands in this case naturally result back
Page 14 of 32
by a kind of reversion to this State, to a source from whence it never issued, and from tenants who never held under it? MARSHALL v. LOVELESS, 1 N.C. 412 (1801), 2 S.A. 70 However, in 1611 we find a document authorized by the King, still operating under the authority of the "chief pontiff" of course, that says otherwise: http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/1611-Bible/1611-King-James-Bible-Introduction.php To the most high and mightie Prince, James by the grace of God King of Great Britaine, France and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, &c. http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/1611_Genesis-Chapter-1/ 1 In the beginning God created the Heauen, and the Earth. 26 And God said, Let vs make man in our Image, after our likenesse: and let them haue dominion ouer the fish of the sea, and ouer the foule of the aire, and ouer the cattell, and ouer all the earth, and ouer euery creeping thing that creepeth vpon the earth. In other words, here we have a document, authorized (indirectly) by the legal entity identified by a number of names, amongst which "chief pontiff" and "Most Holy and Undivided Trinity", wherein it is testified that some entity, legally identified by the name "God", made (authored) the Earth and gave it to the people (article 26). In other words: legally, we are looking at an authorized document, written well before the birth of Jesus Christ, in which the ownership of the Earth is claimed and given to the people. So, if this legal entity, identified by a/o the NAME "Most Holy and Undivided Trinity", can legally claim ownership of the Earth, it can only do so if it can come up with a document that proves that the people, who were given dominion over the Earth according to article 26, handed the ownership of the Earth over to this legal entity. If it cannot, then of course all people and all nations have the right to declare their independence and to claim ownership of the lands they are living in under Common Law, the laws of the people, the laws of conscience, the law of loving thy neighbor. I would say one can safely assume that there is no such document on this planet... Avro Manhattan claims in his book "The Vatican Billions" that the document the Roman Catholic Church bases it's claims on, the Donation of Constantine, is a forgery: At this point this most spectacular of all forgeries makes its official appearance: the Donation of Constantine. Purporting to have been written by the Emperor Constantine himself, it emerged from nowhere. The document with one master stroke put the popes above kings, emperors and nations, made them the legal heirs to the territory of the Roman Empire, which it granted to them, lock stock, and barrel, and gave to St. Peter - or rather to St. Silvester and his successors - all lands to the West and beyond, indeed, all lands of the planet. The document was a sum of the previous forgeries, but unlike past fabrications it was definite, precise and spoke in no uncertain terms of the spiritual and political supremacy which the popes had been granted as their inalienable right. The significance and consequences of its appearance were portentous for the whole western world. The social structure and political framework of the Middle Ages were molded and shaped by its contents. With it the papacy, having made its boldest attempt at world dominion, succeeded in placing itself above the civil authorities of Europe, claiming to be the real possessor of lands ruled by Western potentates, and the supreme arbiter of the political life of all Christendom. [...] Such policies went a step further when, basing papal claims on an even more daring interpretation of the Donation, it was stated that the secular rulers should be made to pay tribute to the papacy. A vehement advocate of this was Otto of Freisingen, who in his Chronicles composed in 1143-6, did not hesitate to declare that as Constantine, after conferring the imperial insignia on the pontiff, went to Byzantium to leave the empire to St. Peter, so other kings and emperors should pay tribute to the popes. For this reason the Roman Church maintains that the Western kingdom have been given over to her possession by Constantine, and demands tribute from them to this day, with the exception of the two kingdoms of the Franks (i.e. he French and German). [...] From then onwards, by virtue of the Donation of Constantine, the popes loudly claimed to be the feudal lords of all the islands of the ocean, and started to dispose of them according to their will. Laboring to obtain papal supremacy, they used these rights as a powerful political bargaining power by which to further their political dominion over Europe: 1. by compelling kings to acknowledge them as their masters 2. by granting to such kings dominion over lands of which the papacy claimed ownership 3. by making the spiritual and political dominion of the Church supreme in the lands thus let to friendly nations.
Page 15 of 32
The most famous example of such a bargain in transfer is undoubtedly Ireland. Ireland had been for some time the prey of internecine wars which were steadily but surely bringing it to total state of quandary. By 1170, in fact, she had already had sixty-one kings. It so happened that the popes, having decided to bring the Irish, among whom were many pagan, ungodly and rebellious rulers, under the stern hand of Mother Church, planned a grand strategy thanks to which they would not only impose the discipline of their religious system, but also tie to the papacy more firmly than ever the English kingdom by conferring upon the English monarch the sole right to conquer that island and subjugate its people. On the website of the Fordham University, the Jesuit University of New York, Manhatten's claim about the Donation of Constantine being a forgery is confirmed: This is perhaps the most famous forgery in history. For centuries, until Lorenzo Valla proved it was forgery during the Renaissance it provied the basis for papal territorial and jurisdictional claims in Italy. Probably at least a first draft of it was made shortly after the middle of the eighth century in order to assist Pope Stephen II in his negotiations with the Frankish Mayor of the Palace, Pepin the Short. The Pope crossed the Alps to anoint the latter as king in 754, thereby enabling, the Carolingian family, to which Pepin belonged, to supplant the old Merovingian royal line which had become decadent and powerless and to become in law as well as in fact rulers of the Franks. In return, Pepin seems to have promised to give to the Pope those lands in Italy which the Lombards had taken from Byzantium. The promise was fulfilled in 756. Constantine's alleged gift made it possible to interpret Pepin's grant not as a benefaction but as a restoration.
Conclusions
In this article, we found some fascinating links between Biblical prophecy and real, hard evidence about the nature of the Vatican as an institute, linking it not only to the legal framework the nations of the world currently operate under, but also to secret societies like the Jesuits and the Freemasons. While it is unclear what the influence of these secret societies is, it is clear that the Vatican up to this day claims to own the whole world and that (most) nations up to this day operate under it's jurisdiction as vassal states, including the United States of America with their corporate Washington government. However, the history of the United States and the two republics that were established during the same time period, the French and Dutch Batavian Republics, reveal that there is a way nations can liberate themselves from the legal system operating under the jurisdiction and sovereignty of the Vatican, which comes down to declaring their independence under common law, the law system that operates directly under the authority and sovereignty of free people. That way, a new legal entity is created, which does not only liberate the people of a nation, but also gets rid of the debt of such a nation, because that debt consists of liabilities by ANOTHER legal entity, ANOTHER legal entity operating under the responsibility of the Vatican. And that gives us a solution of not only the problem of people basically being enslaved by their own government, but also gives us an opportunity to make a transition to a new, free and above all peaceful society. There is no doubt in my mind that Drake and Bill Brockbrader (who has been arrested, btw) know what they are talking about when they say that the wars they have been fighting in, were fought for no other reason than for making someone large profits:
And of course, we can find this pattern all trough history. For example, we know who financed Hitler and the Bolsheviks:
Page 16 of 32
We also have very good reasons to believe Auschwitz was an uranium enrichtment facility, without which the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki would not have been possible, and we know who profited from this all the way up to the "highest circles" in The Netherlands (have been interviewed (mp3) by John Loftus on this matter), which may possibly also include (circles around) the former German Kaiser Wilhelm, even though this last connection is highly speculative. And we know how the Muslim Brotherhood, the Nazis and Al-Qaeda fit into the picture. And once again, there appear to be connections to the Vatican both in Vietnam as well as in WWII. And of course, it is well known that the Vatican operated the so called ratlines after WW-II. You see, the problem is not that we, the people of this planet are not capable of producing enough food and stuff for every human being on this planet to live a life of luxury. We have the technology, we have the knowledge, we know our current science is a mess. But we can do better, we have the manpower to do it. We can turn the deserts green by letting the military and the oil companies use their skills for the people. Our car companies and engineers can convert our cars to run on water by tapping the power from the aether, we can do all that. If only we put our minds to it. So, logically speaking, there should be no problem deciding who gets what, because there could be more than enough for everyone. The problem is that just a handful of people are too greedy to let that happen. And those are not the communists, socialists, republicans, democrats or whatever on the streets. And as long as we do net get our acts together and recognize where the problem lies, we are never going to solve it. So, maybe its time to try something else. My idea: a Republic after the example of the United States, which did work until the "corporation" took it over and created the corporate Washington government and the FED banking cartel. So, in addition to founding new independence republics, we have to get rid of all corporations and replace them with independent selfgoverned, democratic controlled cooperatives by the people for the people: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative A cooperative (coop), co-operative (co-op), or coperative (cop) is an autonomous association of persons who voluntarily cooperate for their mutual social, economic, and cultural benefit.[1] Cooperatives include non-profit community organizations and businesses that are owned and managed by the people who use its services (a consumer cooperative) and/or by the people who work there (a worker cooperative). And this has been shown to work, too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Wilhelm_Raiffeisen Raiffeisen stated that there is a connection between poverty and dependency. In order to fight poverty one should fight dependency first. Based on this idea he came up with the three S formula: self-help, self-governance and self-responsibility. Originally in German: Selbsthilfe, Selbstverwaltung and Selbstverantwortung. When put into practice the necessary independence from charity, politics and loansharks could be established. In addition to that, I would suggest to make use of the principle of Liquid Democracy as pioneered by the German Pirate Party: http://liquidfeedback.org/mission/ Lets start with an old dream mentioned by Alexander Hamilton in 1788: It has been observed by an honorable gentleman that a pure democracy, if it were practicable, would be the most perfect government. With this notion he unfavorably compared pure (or direct) democracy to the republic proposed by the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. This republic was to be what we call today a representative democracy.
Page 17 of 32
A representative democracy is founded on the principle of elected individuals representing the people. Usually you elect a representative (individual or party) for a fixed term if you change your mind during the term you cant do much about it. Also representatives usually stand for a whole package of political objectives. If you dont find your own mix you need to accept compromises. On the other hand a pure (or direct) democracy may be less efficient, is believed to be impracticable on a large scale, and warnings of a mob rule go back as far as Plato. This being said many people, honorable or otherwise, hold up the dream of a pure democracy. New technology such as the Internet could place it within reach. Of course this is only the technical aspect. The remaining question is: will everybody be able to deal with every question or will people stop participating? Or will there be superficial decisions? sounds good lets vote for it.
This is where Liquid Democracy comes in. The basic idea: a voter can delegate his vote to a trustee (technically a transitive proxy). The vote can be further delegated to the proxys proxy thus building a network of trust. All delegations can be done, altered and revoked by topic. I myself vote in environmental questions, Anne represents me in foreign affairs, Mike represents me in all other areas but I can change my mind at any time. Anyone can select his own way ranging from pure democracy on the one hand to representative democracy on the other. Basically one participates in what one is interested in but for all other areas gives their vote to somebody acting in their interest. Obviously one may make a bad choice once in a while but they can change their mind at any time. This gives the people a combination with which to control both problems created by the Vatican and their bankers: With a Republic under common law, whereby all laws are to be approved by the People using liquid democracy, the People can control the power of the State and the Government. With (liquid) democratic controlled cooperatives, the People can control the money and debt system, using self-help, selfgovernance and self-responsibility. One of the interesting features of this system is that cooperatives have to be established. And therefore, they are by definition under the jurisdiction of the State, which derives it's sovereignty from the people. In other words: cooperatives can legally be considered to be subjects of the people. That gives the possibility to create civil-type laws that apply to cooperatives, while the people remain free under common law. And since the membership of a cooperative is on a voluntary basis, people can freely join a cooperative and thus be bound by contract to (a part of) civil laws on a voluntary basis. That way, the State can for example raise taxes trough these cooperatives, without infringing on the freedom of people. (Also see some notes on this.) As for regulating important issues, such as how to behave in traffic, the people can give the state a mandate to regulate such things, depending on how you define freedom and such in your bill of rights. In the 1795 Dutch bill of rights, limited provisions to freedom can be made: I. All Humans are born with equal Righs and these Natural Rights cannot be taken away from them [i.e. are inalienable]. II. These rights exist in Equality, Freedom, Security, Property and Resistance to Oppression. VIII. The objective of all Civil Societies must be, to insure the People the peaceful enjoyment of their Natural Rights. IX. The Natural Freedom of being allowed to do anything which does not disturb others in their Rights, can never be prevented, except when absolutely required for the objective of the Civil Society. X. Such provisions of the Natural Freedom are not allowed to be made, but by the People, or their Representatives. In other words: under the 1795 Dutch bill of rights, the People would (probably) be allowed to give the State a mandate to make a traffic law, when they think this is absolutely required for their security.
Page 18 of 32
And if you have trial by jury, whereby a jury has to decide unanimously, the jury can decide not to convict someone for breaking the law, either because they think the law is unreasonable or works out unreasonably in a particular case. So, what are we waiting for?? Arend Lammertink, MSc.
Updates
Update June 30, 2012: There is a very interesting British document (pdf) (source) about a notification process under Common Law using the Magna Carta. Now if the people have been granted certain rights under the Magna Carta, and it is the Vatican under which authority and sovereignty this right was given by to a nation, then common law demands that all be treated equal in equal matters. And therefore, the whole planet has the right, either in part or as a whole, to publicly file the same kind of notice for all mankind at once. The concession Of England To The Pope was in 1213, the Magna Carta is from 1215, and therefore the Magna Carta applies to all nations currently operating under international civil law since it has been established under the jurisdiction of the Vatican. And that means this document can be extrapolated from and turned into a document whereby the people of the planet Serve Notice, under Common Law, to all politicians and all officials of all countries on the planet, that failure to take action to restore the peoples Sovereignty, and to overturn the treason and criminality that has occurred and is occurring at the highest levels on this planet, will lead to charges of being personally complicit in this treason and criminality and therefore liable to prosecution under Common Law. Update 2 June 30, 2012: There appears to be some interesting action going on in Canada against the Vatican by Kevin Annett. A recent blog post, Ending the Reign of Terror: We Will Name and Detain the Guilty, contains the following statement and an interview by Alfred Lambremont Webre: Hello everyone. Please post and circulate this most recent interview with Kevin, taped on Friday, June 8. It contains the latest updates about the campaign to name and arrest child raping priests, disestablish the criminal churches and establish a Republic of Kanata. Please use this video to promote Kevins upcoming tour through North America and Europe. Thank you. JJ for ITCCS
In this video interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, Rev. Kevin Annett, Acting Secretary of the International Tribunal for Crimes of Church and State www.itccs.org discusses a public declaration to Pope Ratizinger and the Vatican stating that unless specific actions are taken by the Pope and the Vatican by September 15, 2012, every known Roman Catholic priest or official who has harmed a child or protected those who have will be publicly named by our network, and will be publicly arrested and expelled from their churches. On the homepage of The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS), there is an article Historic Lawsuit to be Filed in Federal Court Against Church and Crown: Toronto, Canada: A joint media release by The Association of Citizen Prosecutors (ACP) and The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) is to be released on "Canada Day", July 1, 2012. It announces the first class action lawsuit in Canadian history to name as co-defendants the Vatican, the Crown of England, Canada and its churches, and big pharmaceutical companies, all of which are accused of crimes against humanity and criminal conspiracy. The lawsuit is brought by Jason Bowman of the ACP and Rev. Kevin Annett of the ITCCS, on behalf of a group of many others. The lawsuit will be explained in detail at a press conference held on the date of filing at the Federal Court Building, on Wednesday, July 4 at 1 pm EST at 180 Queen Street West in Toronto.
Page 19 of 32
I don't know anything further about this lawsuit nor the people involved in this, but it may be significant. So, use your own judgment. I will watch this video later. Update 2 June 30, 2012: Just found out that Anonymous posted an interesting video in 2011 already, which has been reported at 2012: What's the 'real' truth? blog and at ZeroHedge. Update July 26, 2012 I received a colorful email from Paul Andrew Mitchell who calls himself Private Attorney General, also posted at soundofheart.org. Since he posted it online and cc-ed his payed subscription mailing list, he apparantly has no objections to this being published. So, here it is. Update December 15, 2012 Neil Keenan has posted a video with an update on the state of his lawsuit:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaPXcq72ZcQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnC1_o2Rmqk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EV4-SlkmiKU Apparently, matters have not progressed as smoothly as many people had hoped for. However, progress has been made and according to Neil some announcements are at hand. I don't know any more than this, so we just have to wait and see what happens. Meanwhile, you may want to consider buying some physical silver (coins) to not only protect your wealth against banker occupation, but also to smoke the bankers out of their holes. Our friend Turd Ferguson gives lots of good advice on this subject: http://www.tfmetalsreport.com/blog/4376/back-break You may have noticed that I was gone all day yesterday. Eleven, full hours with no phone and no internet and it WAS GREAT! So, what did I miss? Silver is all the way back to....where it was a month ago. Oh, no! The sky is falling!! Seriously. I haven't even bothered to look over the comments to the previous thread as I'm sure they're full of despondent traders and gleeful trolls. Whatever. As I said yesterday, no one is going to stop me from doing what I do because I know, in the long term, that I am correct. Global central banks are going to print and print in their efforts to manage their way out of this debt crisis. They will fail and, with them, fiat currency will fail, too. In the end, a new international trade settlement system will emerge with a gold-backed unit of exchange at its heart. The only protection that I have against this wealth destruction is my stash of physical metal, which currently resides in a heavily-guarded vault at the bottom of the Marianas Trench. So what do you do today? You buy the freaking dip, that's what you do. If The Bullion Bank Cartel is going to insist upon giving us all more time to accumulate metal at deeply-discounted prices, I strongly urge you to take them up on it. Lord knows the Chinese, the Russians, the Indians and the Turks are doing so. You should be doing the same. Namely, convert your rapidly-devaluing dollar reserves into hard assets, primarily gold and silver. Forget the goons in the media and the water-carrying shills for The Cartel, gold and silver are NOT in bubbles. That is complete nonsense! Since when does an asset that is currently owned by just 1% of global investors considered a "bubble"? Since The Cartel shills in the media declared it so, that's when. Ridiculous. Update December 15, 2012 A very interesting interview with Benjamin Fulford has been released a couple of days ago:
Page 20 of 32
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqnhLU645Hs Update December 16, 2012 David Wilcock posted an interesting update, too: http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1097-russiantv Update December 17, 2012
There's a very interesting detail on these paper bills posted by David: More recently, the banking families tried to pass off sheets of Euro bills that were allegedly worth a million dollars each -- to the increasingly frustrated Asians who have still never been properly paid the money they are owed. The biggest and most painful fraud of all, in this case, is that each note clearly says "NOT LEGAL TENDER" on it! They obviously think the Asians are stupid -- but they know exactly what is going on, and are working to end this once and for all -and free our planet. Let's first head head over to http://www.goldstockbull.com/articles/15-trillion-bond-fraud-to-prop-up-the-u-s-dollar/ : It reads right out of a fictional spy novel and is quite interesting considering the scale of the potential money laundering fraud \$15 TRILLION! The plot involves the US government lying about hundreds of thousands of tons of imaginary gold, illegal wire transfers and loans or counterfeiting totalling \$15 trillion used to prop up the U.S. dollar as bond buyers have disappeared.
Page 21 of 32
This staggering amount of \$15 Trillion matches the total amount of the U.S. official debt. It would be easy to dismiss this story on the surface as fake, but the funds were apparently cleared and accepted by senior executives at both HSBC and the Royal Bank of Scotland. And let's not forget the tungsten gold bar story we had in 2009: http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article14996.html When the news of tungsten salted gold bars in Hong Kong first surfaced, many people who I am acquainted with automatically assumed that these bars were manufactured in China because China is generally viewed as the knock-off capital of the world. Heres what I now understand really happened: The amount of salted tungsten gold bars in question was allegedly between 5,600 and 5,700 400 oz good delivery bars [roughly 60 metric tonnes]. This was apparently all highly orchestrated by an extremely well financed criminal operation. Within mere hours of this scam being identified Chinese officials had many of the perpetrators in custody. And heres what the Chinese allegedly uncovered: Roughly 15 years ago during the Clinton Administration [think Robert Rubin, Sir Alan Greenspan and Lawrence Summers] between 1.3 and 1.5 million 400 oz tungsten blanks were allegedly manufactured by a very high-end, sophisticated refiner in the USA [more than 16 Thousand metric tonnes]. Subsequently, 640,000 of these tungsten blanks received their gold plating and WERE shipped to Ft. Knox and remain there to this day. I know folks who have copies of the original shipping docs with dates and exact weights of tungsten bars shipped to Ft. Knox. The balance of this 1.3 million 1.5 million 400 oz tungsten cache was also plated and then allegedly sold into the international market. Apparently, the global market is literally stuffed full of 400 oz salted bars. And it appears that no less than 15,000 tons of western gold, supposedly held by our central banks in their vaults, is actually long gone. "leased": http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/KWN_DailyWeb/Entries/2012/10/29_Turk__15,000_Tons_Of_Western_Central_Bank_Gold_Is_Gone.html Today James Turk once again shocked King World News when he stated, ... in 1997 over (a stunning) 2,000 tons of gold moved out of Great Britain. Turk added, Now since Great Britain is not a gold miner, we know that gold had to come out of the Bank of England (where they store other countries gold), and it probably went into Zurich (Switzerland) for whats called leasing but I use the word lending, or lending into the market. Turk added this stunning estimate, At the time I had concluded that it was about 15,000 tons of gold which had actually been put into the market out of central bank vaults. This is approximately half of what central banks reported to own at the time. But first, here is what Turk had to say about his last interview titled, The Entire German Gold Hoard Is Gone, which has received an incredible amount of attention around the world: Yes, its getting increasing attention, Eric, and rightly so. There has been a lot of deception about how much gold is really in central bank vaults. The reason why there is this deception, if you look at a balance sheet of a central bank like the Bundesbank, Bank of Italy or the Bank of England, they basically say gold in the vault and gold out on loan, they show it as one line item. They call it, gold and gold receivables. Anybody who understands generally accepted accounting principles knows that cash is different from an account receivable..... And a recent leaked secret IMF report confirms that central banks have been actively manipulating the gold markets: http://www.gata.org/node/12016 Western central banks conceal their gold loans and swaps because information about them is "highly market-sensitive" and accountability about them would hinder secret currency market interventions by central banks, according to a confidential report by the International Monetary Fund obtained this week by GATA. The report, provided to GATA by its researcher R.M., was written in March 1999 as the IMF staff proposed to strengthen financial reporting standards for central banks. The report shows that the objections by gold-lending central banks were decisive in weakening the standards. While the first draft of the new reporting rules would have required disclosing central bank gold loans and swaps, the revised rules, later adopted, allowed central banks to hide their gold loans and swaps within their gold reserves and even not to disclose the amount of their monetary gold at all, just the value assigned to it. That is, the explicit but secret policy of Western central banking toward gold is to deceive and manipulate markets, as GATA long has complained.
Page 22 of 32
The confidential IMF report says that to strengthen its financial reporting standards for central banks -- its Special Data Dissemination Standard reserves template -- IMF staff members consulted top officials of the organization as well as the Bank for International Settlements, the European Central Bank, the Bank of England, the German Bundesbank, the Bank of France, and other European central banks. "Central bank officials," the confidential report says, "indicated that they considered information on gold loans and swaps to be highly market-sensitive, in view of the limited number of participants in such transactions. Thus, they considered that the Special Data Dissemination Standard reserves template should not require the separate disclosure of such information but should instead treat all monetary gold assets, including gold on loan or subject to swap agreements, as a single data item. They also confirmed a view, taken by a number of countries (both inside and outside the G-10) at the December board meeting that the disclosure of the composition of reserves by individual currencies would be market-sensitive but that they would have no objection to disclosure of such information by groups of currencies. ..." (Page 6, Paragraph 15.) And we have the remarkable timing of the dumping of 400 tons of gold by Gordon Brown on the market between 1999 and 2001: http://www.silverdoctors.com/germanys-gold-repatriation-and-browns-bottom/ The 400 tons of gold that Gordon Brown dumped on the market between 1999 and 2001 (60% of the UKs gold reserves) likely went DIRECTLY TO THE BULLION BANKS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF MEETING THE BUNDESBANKS 1000 TON GOLD REPATRIATION REQUEST!! It seems to me that when we add 1 and 1 together, it looks like the biggest scam in history has been going on a lot longer than we thought. It is clear that at least during the last couple of years the paper scam has been running at maximum speed and it is also clear that our bankers are being cornered. What I so far did not realize with David's story is that on the one hand these gold bonds are real in the sense that they have been issued by the FED and/or the US treasury, and on the other hand they are actually just worthless paper, up to a certain degree. What we are looking at is the counterfeiting of bonds and bills by the same entities that issue the valid/legal versions of these bonds/bills. And just like the "not legal tender" million Euro-bills that accordingly may have been used as payment by western (central) bankers, the 1934 series gold bonds that have actually been issued cannot be cashed, because they are "not legal tender". There is evidence that large denomination bills have indeed been issued, but their gold backing appears to have been "adjusted" by the "Old Series Currency Adjustment Act" of 1961. So, then the question for the Azians becomes: "how do we get our money back"? The answer to that question is very simple: get all the physical gold and silver you can get your hands on as fast and as cheaply as possible, and that is exactly what we see happening in the market. And the irony wants it that the western central banks insist on continueing selling out their metal at bargain prices: http://www.tfmetalsreport.com/blog/4376/back-break Global central banks are going to print and print in their efforts to manage their way out of this debt crisis. They will fail and, with them, fiat currency will fail, too. In the end, a new international trade settlement system will emerge with a gold-backed unit of exchange at its heart. The only protection that I have against this wealth destruction is my stash of physical metal, which currently resides in a heavily-guarded vault at the bottom of the Marianas Trench. So what do you do today? You buy the freaking dip, that's what you do. If The Bullion Bank Cartel is going to insist upon giving us all more time to accumulate metal at deeply-discounted prices, I strongly urge you to take them up on it. Lord knows the Chinese, the Russians, the Indians and the Turks are doing so. You should be doing the same. Namely, convert your rapidly-devaluing dollar reserves into hard assets, primarily gold and silver. (For more on why one should consider buying physical silver, see this.) One of the Wikileaks cables reveals that China is indeed buying, and is buying in order to back it's RMB with gold: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/wikileaks-discloses-reasons-behind-chinas-shadow-gold-buying-spree Wondering why gold at \$1850 is cheap, or why gold at double that price will also be cheap, or frankly at any price? Because, as the following leaked cable explains, gold is, to China at least, nothing but the opportunity cost of destroying the dollar's reserve status. Putting that into dollar terms is, therefore, impractical at best, and illogical at worst. We have a suspicion that the following cable from the US embassy in China is about to go not viral but very much global, and prompt all those mutual fund managers who are on the golden sidelines to dip a toe in the 24 karat pool. The only thing that matters from China's perspective is that "suppressing the price of gold is very beneficial for the U.S. in maintaining the U.S. dollar's role as the international reserve currency. China's increased gold reserves will thus act as a model and lead other countries towards reserving more gold. Large gold reserves are also beneficial in promoting the internationalization of the RMB." Now, what would happen if mutual and pension funds finally comprehend they are massively underinvested in the one asset which China is without a trace of doubt massively accumulating behind the scenes is nothing short of a worldwide scramble, not so much for paper, but every last ounce of physical gold... That leads us to the central question: Is there much more physical gold available than we thought or not?
Page 23 of 32
David writes: Most people believe there is only about 140,000 metric tons of gold in the world -- about the size of an Olympic-sized swimming pool. Its apparent scarcity is what makes it so valuable. The reality, as Neil Keenan has been told from the "Elders" in Asia, is that 2.5 million metric tons of gold was either stolen or handed over to the Federal Reserve at gunpoint -- beginning in the late 1920s. 85 percent of this gold was taken from Asian countries. Much of this gold was originally pulled from a massive vein of gold running through China, Cambodia, Laos and Thailand that has remained highly classified ever since its discovery -- centuries ago now. I also remember David talking to a fellow with connections to people that could protect him, and this fellow said that gold was as plentyful as sand or something along that direction. IIRC, it was estimated that about 10 times as much gold exists than has been officially acknowledged. Now if you believe all these bonds are real because they have been issued as collateral in exchange for depositing real, physical gold into a banks' vault, you would probably assume that the gold you have deposited stays in the vault of the bank, because it is "redeemable". However, it is clear that this is not the case. Gold is being "leased" out by central banks, which means that the actual metal is being sold on the market in exchange for an IOU. In other words: we are looking at a massive Ponzi-scheme revolving around physical gold, which comes down to physical gold being sold over and over again. It is simply moved in and out of the same bank vaults over and over again. This is essentially what is known as "fractional reserve banking" and/or "leveraging", whereby currently the amount of "leveraging" is "of the charts": http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/KWN_DailyWeb/Entries/2012/7/20_London_Trader__The_LBMA_Gold_Price_Fixing_Scheme_Is_Over.html As this scandal is brought to light, that the unallocated gold and silver are not there, and much of the allocated gold and silver is not at these banks either, and as you see these naked short positions unwound, the world will witness a massive price rise in in both gold and silver. The move in gold and silver, at that point, will literally frighten most people. They simply wont understand what is happening. When someone goes to a bank and deposits money, if you look at the small print, you dont actually own that money, youve simply loaned it to the bank. The banks will then turn right around and lend ten to one or whatever leverage they determine to use with your cash. Well, when there is a run on the banks, as there has been in Europe, the money is printed by governments and given to the customers to calm things down. The underlying problem here is that when the run on physical gold and silver begins, how will the banks print the gold and silver? Its not possible. So something is brewing here. Theres no smoke without a fire. The reason this information is beginning to be discussed more openly is because of legal reasons. They need to be able to say, We disclosed to people that the gold and silver wasnt there. Yes, this will include a scandal at the LBMA in those unallocated accounts. The paper leverage in the LBMA system is off the charts. Investors believe their gold and silver is sitting in those unallocated accounts, and they will be in shock when they find out it isnt there. And China continues to buy (same article): The London Trader also stated: I would also add that demand for gold from China is unceasing. The Chinese not only want to diversify out of dollars, but now they also want to diversify out of the euro as well. They are trying to do this in size. They want out of those currencies, and what they are doing is exchanging them at the fixes in London for gold, and this will surprise some people, but we are beginning to see it in silver as well. Gold is the primary focus, but very recently, and on every dip, we are seeing significant purchases of silver in size. So yes, demand from China, its unceasing. They want out of these debasing currencies. I would add that they are buying anything thats tangible, land, timber, mines, art, etc.. So, one thing is pretty certain: Western central banks are running out of physical gold. And it is also pretty clear that a massive Ponzi scheme has been going on for years. Now if really "2.5 million metric tons of gold was either stolen or handed over to the Federal Reserve at gunpoint", we have 2 possibilities: 1. There is no actual 2.5 million metric tons of gold, only paper claims. 2. The 2.5 million metric tons does exist and has been handed over to the Fed as the elder said. If case 2 is true, it is clear that this gold is no longer under the control of the Fed, because otherwise they would not have needed to resort to tungsten counterfeiting and we would not see such a tight physical market, which has lead for example to the outright stealing of customer's gold at MF Global.
Page 24 of 32
Now if this supposedly existing 2,5 million tons is not under the control of the Fed, it must be under control of "the good guys", which would then control well over 94.4% of all the 2,5 millions tons of gold that supposedly exists. In that case: why bother about the remaining 5.6%?? And, more importantly, why accumulate gold if there is so much of it? And why leave silver alone, which has been all but used up in the past decades and has a lot of industrial applications? The estimations are that silver above ground is about 5 times as rare as gold, because all silver has been used up. Now if there would be about 10 times as much gold as has been thought, then silver would be about 50, yes FIFTY (!), times as rare as gold, while it's price is about 50 times cheaper than gold. In other words: if the Asians really believed that about 2,5 million tons of gold exists, silver would be trading at at least 10 times the price of gold, because silver is an indispensable industrial metal. Now consider that, and compare it with the situation that there really is no more than, say, max. 200,000 tons of gold, while you know the paper game is about to end and you want your money back. In that case, you would be interested in keeping as much people as possible off the physical markets. One way to do that would be to spread rumors like that there is much more gold available than actually exists. So, all things considered, I think it is most likely that the massive amounts of physical gold that are supposed to back the (Asian's) 1934 series bonds are nothing but a giant paper scam. Update 2 December 17, 2012: The million Euro notes David posted appear to be "bank notables": http://www.banknotables.com/eurobanknotables.html A limited quantity of Press Sheets of One Million Euro Banknotables. Don't miss out on this unique one-of-a-kind collectible! Sheet size is 26" x 24.75" / 28 notes per sheet. These are original press run sheets complete with color bars and invisible inks, printed front and back. The sheets were sent through an 8 color Heidelberg press 3 times for offset printing; a De la Rue Giori press once for intaglio printing; and a numbering press once. Sheets are consecutively numbered. These are true collectors items, and once they are sold out, they will be gone forever just like the Million Euro single notes. Specially priced at \$99.95 while supplies last! Unique features include: Limited Edition, Consecutive numberingno two sheets are the same. Excellent art piece when framed, Special banknote paper with security thread, Contains over 30 security features (some of which have never been used in circulation) Apparantly, these come with a certificate of authenticity:
Some high-res pictures here: http://securityprinting.org/english/banknote/naples/n01.htm
Page 25 of 32
And quite a lot other "Promotion & test banknotes" can be found here: http://securityprinting.org/english/tiskarny.htm A press release about these one million Euro notes: http://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/one-million-euro-commemorative-banknote-issued-by-naples-bank-note-company154509795.html Naples, Florida - To commemorate the Euro's adoption in January 2002 as the legal currency of 15 participating countries that comprise the European Union, Naples Bank Note Company has created a one-of-a-kind limited edition collectible One Million Euro, of genuine banknote calibre and quality. Designed by world-famous engraver Richard Baratz and award-winning banknote artist Christopher McCauley (formerly of American Banknote Company), the One Million Euro is printed on specially made banknote security paper, in both intaglio (engraved) and offset, according to company CEO Bob Bednar, a successful expert in the field of document security. Mr. Bednar has developed and designed security paper for U.S. Food Coupons, U.S. Treasury checks, stock certificates, postage stamps, banknotes and documents for many nations. With 28 special security features incorporated in the 150,000 consecutively numbered One Million Euro notes, the verification, authenticity and value of this unique collectible is assured, Mr. Bednar said. With the flags of 15 European nations displayed prominently thereon, the One Million Euro banknote offers European bankers, government officials and financial executives a first and last opportunity to own a valuable collectible which represents a major milestone in Europe's long and colourful history, Bednar noted. The design's marriage of individual national flags with a new panEuropean currency will have emotional and patriotic appeal throughout the 15 participating nations, he added. The notes, priced at US\$18.50, are available also in quantity as gifts to an organisation's customers, employees or other important persons. Also available is a limited edition double-matted Banknote Art piece, suitable for framing. Very interesting detail about the company owner on this page: http://www.banknotables.com/allaboutbob.html Bob Bednar grew up in the Philadelphia suburbs where he still maintains a residence. He is currently a Trustee at the University of Scranton, a Catholic & Jesuit university in Pennsylvania. He is a well know expert on Document Security and is considered a Counterfeit Expert. http://www.scranton.edu/board/index.shtml The Board of Trustees at the University of Scranton serves an institution that is founded in the Catholic, Jesuit tradition, committed to scholarship, community, and service. The primary duties of the Board include the oversight of the institutions budget, the establishment of fundamental institutional policies, and the selection and appointment of the Universitys President. And, last but not least, a very familiar company logo:
Update 2 December 19, 2012:

Gepost op: http://gata.org/feedback : --::-Hello, This is an email I sent to the Dutch parliament and an answer I got from one of the politicians who asked parliamentary questions about the gold stock recently. I sent the secret IMF report to the official email address of the Dutch parliament, so it is now part of the public record. I also referred to your publication and a few others, as you can read, and I specifically addressed the bookkeeping trick of taking "gold" and "gold receivables" together. In the answer by the Minister on the parliamentary questions, we read:
Page 26 of 32
http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten-en-publicaties/kamerstukken/2011/10/06/beantwoording-kamervragen-goudvoorraaddnb.html "Er wordt een locatiebeleid gevoerd waarbinnen het goud is opgeslagen in Amsterdam (11%), Londen (18%), New York (51%) en Ottawa (20%). De spreiding over meerdere locaties vergroot zowel de veiligheid van de opslag als de beschikbaarheid van de goudvoorraad. Ook is het opportuun om de goudvoorraad dicht bij grote internationale financile centra te hebben, zoals in New York en Londen. Overigens zijn er in recente jaren geen goudtransacties verricht door DNB. De laatste goudverkoop vond plaats in 2008 en DNB is in datzelfde jaar gestopt met zowel het uitlenen van goud als met het handelen in goudswaps." Which translates to: "A location policy is conducted in which the gold is stored in Amsterdam (11%), London (18%), New York (51%) and Ottawa (20%). The spread of multiple locations increases the security of both the storage and the availability of the gold stock. It is also advantageous to have the gold stock close to major international financial centers, such as New York and London. Incidentally, in recent years no gold transactions have been conducted by DNB. The last gold sales took place in 2008 and in the same year DNB stopped with both the lending of gold as the trading in gold swaps." In the answer to earlier parliamentary questions (nov 2011), there is also an interesting piece: http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten-en-publicaties/kamerstukken/2011/10/06/beantwoording-kamervragen-goudvoorraaddnb.html "Vraag 6 Kunt u bevestigen dat er sinds 1991 van de 1 700 ton goud ongeveer 1 100 ton verkocht is? Klopt de waarneming van Peter de Waard dat er door vroegtijdige verkopen van het goud ongeveer 30 miljard euro is gederfd? Zo nee, wat is volgens u dan wel het juiste bedrag? Antwoord vraag 6 Sinds 1991 is 1.100 ton goud verkocht. Destijds is vastgesteld dat DNB in internationaal perspectief relatief veel goud bezat. Besloten is de goudhoeveelheid meer in lijn te brengen met andere belangrijke goudhoudende landen. De verkoopopbrengsten zijn toegevoegd aan de algemene reserves van DNB en rentedragend belegd. Een vergelijking van de gemiddelde verkoopprijs van destijds met de huidige, onder invloed van de financile crisis gestegen goudprijs, leidt inderdaad tot een verschil in de orde van grootte van het door de heer De Waard genoemde bedrag. Wel dient nog rekening gehouden te worden met de beleggingsrendementen die sinds de verkopen zijn gemaakt op de belegde opbrengsten en met het feit dat de uitkomst van dergelijke berekeningen afhankelijk is van de sterk fluctuerende goudprijs." This translates to: "Question 6 Can you confirm that since 1991 of the 1700 tons of gold about 1100 tons have been sold? Is the perception of Peter de Waard that by early selling of the gold about 30 billion is foregone? If not, what do you think is the correct amount? Answer question 6 Since 1991, 1,100 tons of gold have been sold. At the time, it is determined that DNB possesed comparatively a lot of gold in international perspective. It was decided to bring the amount of gold more in line with other major gold-bearing countries. The sales benefits are allocated to the general reserves of DNB and interest-bearing investments. A comparison of the average selling price at the time with the current, risen under the influence of the financial crisis, gold price, indeed leads to a difference in the magnitude of the amount mentioned by Mr De Waard mentioned." It continues to mention that the yield and interest on the invested benefits also need to be taken into account and that the gold price is very volatile. So, we have confirmation of activity on the gold market at least between 1991 and 2008, during which period 1,100 tons was sold. The prices it was sold at, is reported by the mentioned Mr. De Waard in "De Volkskrant", a leading Dutch newspaper, in september 2011: http://www.volkskrant.nl/vk/nl/2844/Archief/archief/article/detail/2893763/2011/09/07/Moet-Nederland-zijn-laatste-goudverkopen.dhtml "In 1991 had Nederland nog 1.707 duizend kilo of 1.707 ton goud. In 1992 werd 300 ton verkocht voor 7,5 miljard gulden, in 1996 nog eens 400 ton voor 6,4 miljard gulden en daarna verspreid over verschillende jaren nog eens bijna 400 ton - geschatte opbrengst 7,5 miljard gulden. In totaal heeft het goud 21,4 miljard gulden opgeleverd, net geen 10 miljard euro." This translates to: "In 1991 the Netherlands still had 1,707 thousand kilo or 1,707 tons of gold. In 1992, 300 tons were sold for 7.5 billion guilders, in 1996, another 400 tons for 6.4 billion guilders, and then spread over several years, nearly another 400 tons - estimated revenue 7.5 billion guilders. In total, the gold yielded 21.4 billion guilders, just under 10 billion euros." (The guilder has been exchanged for the euro at a rate of 2.20371, IIRC.) Note that in the 2011 questions, gold swaps were not mentioned at all, while now all the Minister says is that "DNB stopped with both the lending of gold as the trading in gold swaps" in 2008. So, at least we have a confirmation that there have been gold swaps in the past, but we have no idea about the amounts of gold involved. The answer I got yesterday from Mr. Van Hijum translates: "Thank you for your message and interesting information. Partly in response to your signal (and many others) we have asked additional questions to Minister of Finance Dijsselbloem today. We have also included the issue that you have raised about the 'gold swaps' explicitly. Following the answers, we will debate this issues with the Minister in the coming months, with the intention to get certainty about the actual size and the availability of our gold reserves." Kind regards and keep up the good work,
Page 27 of 32
Arend Lammertink, Goor, The Netherlands. Forwarded message ---------From: Hijum van Y.J. <E.vHijum@tweedekamer.nl> Date: Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:17 PM Subject: RE: Gelekt IMF rapport bevestigt actieve benvloeding goudmarkt door centrale banken. To: Arend Lammertink <lamare@gmail.com> Geachte heer Lammertink, Hartelijk dank voor uw bericht en de interessante informatie. Mede naar aanleiding van uw signaal (en vele andere) hebben we vandaag aanvullende vragen gesteld aan minister Dijsselbloem van Financin. Ook de kwestie die door u is opgeworpen van de goudswaps hebben we daarin expliciet opgenomen. Naar aanleiding van de antwoorden zullen we de komende maanden een debat over de kwestie voeren met de minister, met als inzet om zekerheid te krijgen over de feitelijke omvang en de beschikbaarheid van onze goudreserve. Met vriendelijke groet, Eddy van Hijum Van: Arend Lammertink [lamare@gmail.com] Verzonden: dinsdag 18 december 2012 14:27 Aan: Merkies A.; Hijum van Y.J. Onderwerp: Fwd: Gelekt IMF rapport bevestigt actieve benvloeding goudmarkt door centrale banken. Ter info. M. Vr. Gr. -- Arend Lammertink -Forwarded message ---------From: Arend Lammertink <lamare@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:47 PM Subject: Gelekt IMF rapport bevestigt actieve benvloeding goudmarkt door centrale banken. To: De voorzitter van Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal <voorzitter@tweedekamer.nl> Geachte voorzitter, Graag breng ik het volgende artikel onder uw aandacht, waarin een gelekt IMF rapport wordt besproken waaruit blijkt dat centrale banken "goud" en "goud vorderingen" ("gold loans and swaps") onder n noemer in de boekhouding op te nemen vanwege het "hoogst markt gevoelig" zijn van deze cijfers, terwijl volgens de normale boekhoudregels er toch een duidelijk verschil is tussen "kas" en "te ontvangen bedragen". Opmerkelijk is dan ook dat het IMF het in eerste instantie wilde vereisen dat "goud" en "goud vorderingen" apart vermeld dienden te worden. Hier is echter van af gezien omdat men deze informatie als "hoogst markt gevoelig" zag. Men kan hierme immers "achterhalen welke goud transacties plaats gevonden hebben". Welnu, als men zich niet actief bezig houdt met "goud transacties" en de goudvoorraad keurig in de kluis laat liggen, dan kan er ook geen sprake zijn van "markt gevoeligheid". Met andere woorden: in dit rapport bevestigt het IMF dat centrale banken zich actief bezig houden met het benvloeden c.q. manipuleren van de goudmarkt door middel van het uitlenen (leasen) van goud, met de bij behorende transacties op de goudmarkt, en waarbij men zich onttrekt aan het rapporteren daarvan door middel van het samen opnemen van de posten "goud" en "goud vorderingen" in de boekhouding: http://www.gata.org/node/12016 -:- Western central banks conceal their gold loans and swaps because information about them is "highly market-sensitive" and accountability about them would hinder secret currency market interventions by central banks, according to a confidential report by the International Monetary Fund obtained this week by GATA. The report, provided to GATA by its researcher R.M., was written in March 1999 as the IMF staff proposed to strengthen financial reporting standards for central banks. The report shows that the objections by gold-lending central banks were decisive in weakening the standards. While the first draft of the new reporting rules would have required disclosing central bank gold loans and swaps, the revised rules, later adopted, allowed central banks to hide their gold loans and swaps within their gold reserves and even not to disclose the amount of their monetary gold at all, just the value assigned to it. That is, the explicit but secret policy of Western central banking toward gold is to deceive and manipulate markets, as GATA long has complained. The confidential IMF report says that to strengthen its financial reporting standards for central banks -- its Special Data Dissemination Standard reserves template -- IMF staff members consulted top officials of the organization as well as the Bank for International Settlements, the European Central Bank, the Bank of England, the German Bundesbank, the Bank of France, and other European central banks. "Central bank officials," the confidential report says, "indicated that they considered information on gold loans and swaps to be highly market -sensitive, in view of the limited number of participants in such transactions. Thus, they considered that the Special Data Dissemination Standard reserves template should not require the separate disclosure of such information but should instead treat all monetary gold assets, including gold on loan or subject to swap agreements, as a single data item. They also confirmed a view, taken by a number of countries (both inside and outside the G-10) at the December board meeting that the disclosure of the composition of reserves by individual currencies would be market-sensitive but that they would have no objection to disclosure of such information by groups of currencies. ..." (Page 6, Paragraph 15.)
Page 28 of 32
[...] The confidential IMF report confirms and elaborates on the Bank of England's admission to GATA a year ago that the bank's gold swap and leasing information is "market sensitive" and its disclosure "would allow enquirers to find out what gold transactions have been taking place." Such knowledge of what the bank was doing in the gold market, a spokesman for the bank said, would harm the interests of both the British government and the bank's "private customers," to whom the bank "owes a duty of confidentiality". -:Het bewuste rapport dat ik tevens heb aangehecht is te vinden op: http://www.gata.org/files/IMFGoldDataMemo--3-10-1999.pdf Het probleem bij het rapporteren van de centrale banken over hun daadwerkelijke goudvoorraad is dan ook het feit dat men "goud in kas (kluis)" tezamen neemt met "goud vorderingen" en dat dit officieel door het IMF is toegestaan. Hierdoor kloppen de cijfertjes, maar een accountantsverklaring omtrent de juistheid van deze cijfers geeft geen enkel inzicht in de verhouding tussen "goud in kas" en "goud vorderingen". In theorie kan de kluis leeg zijn en de gerapporteerde goudvoorraad enkel en alleen bestaan uit vorderingen aan derden, waarbij uiteraard het risico bestaat dat deze derde failliet gaat op het moment dat men het goud daadwerkelijk wil repatriren. Er is echter informatie beschikbaar die doet vermoeden dat substantile delen van de goudvoorraad is uitgeleend en ook de DNB zou u hierover moeten kunnen informeren. Interessant in deze is het bericht dat de Oostenrijkse centrale bank naar buiten heeft gebracht dat het 300 miljoen euro verdiend heeft aan het leasen, verhuren, van goud: http://www.gata.org/node/11954 : "The bank said that the reason to store gold abroad was that because in a time of crisis it could be speedily traded. Since 2007 Austria's national bank had had a constant reserve of around 280 tons of gold. Through leasing of its gold the Austrian National Bank has in the last 10 years earned around 300,000,000 euros." Volgens dit artikel zou het hierbij om circa 20% van de goudvoorraad gaan dat is uitgeleend c.q. verhuurd: http://gizadeathstar.com/2012/12/max-keiser-austrian-central-bank-on-gold-leasing/ "Now this is wonderful in any number of ways, for not since the days of Conrad von Hoetzendorf have we seen such wishful thinking on the part of those highly placed in Austrian power circles. This wishful thinking is ably, if not enthusiastically, exposed by Keiser: (1) the Austrian central bank admits that it has leased out almost 20% of its gold (thus making our rehypothecation scenario a little more plausible), (2) audits of gold are often audits of ledger entries, rather than the physical gold, (3) banks are stalling on audits of physical gold, because real physical audits would end the obfuscation of amounts that have made the rehypothecation possible." Volgens James Turk is er inmiddels dusdanig veel goud "geleased" (goud dat in feite op de markt verkocht is in ruil voor een vordering op een bank, welke bank daarover rente betaalt) dat vermoed wordt dat inmiddels de helft van de goudvoorraad van westerse banken niet meer daadwerkelijk in fysieke vorm aanwezig is, maar als "vordering" te boek staat en in feite niet meer terug te halen is tegen de huidige markt prijzen: http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/KWN_DailyWeb/Entries/2012/10/29_Turk_15,000_Tons_Of_Western_Central_Bank_Gold_Is_Gone.html "Back in 2003 I did a major report looking at customs information in Great Britain, and showed that in 1997 over (a stunning) 2,000 tons of gold moved out of Great Britain. It was gold being reported in a monetary form being moved out of Great Britain. Now since Great Britain is not a gold miner, we know that gold had to come out of the Bank of England (where they store other countries gold), and it probably went into Zurich (Switzerland) for whats called leasing but I use the word lending or lending into the market. The gold is taken out of the vault, borrowed by bullion banks, and then gold fabricators melt it down, and disperse it throughout the globe in various forms of fabrication. Its all documented and its a tremendous amount of gold. At the time I had concluded that it was about 15,000 tons of gold which had actually been put into the market out of central bank vaults. This is approximately half of what central banks reported to own at the time. Omtrent de staat van dienst van de Amerikaanse Fed in New York, is nog te melden dat bij een bezoek van de Duitse president-directeur van de Reichsbank, Hjalmar Schacht ( http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hjalmar_Schacht ), in de jaren 20 van de vorige eeuw men niet in staat bleek het Duitse goud te localiseren in hun eigen kluis: http://www.resourceinvestor.com/2012/11/01/what-repatriating-gold-bullion-says-about-a-countr "Back in the mid-1920s, the head of the German Central Bank, Herr Hjalmar Schacht, went to New York to see Germanys gold. However the NY Fed officials were unable to find the palette of Germanys gold bullion. The Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Benjamin Strong was mortified, but to put him at ease Herr Schacht turned to him and said Never mind, I believe you when you when you say the gold is there. Even if it werent you are good for its replacement." Tot slot merk ik nog graag even op dat wanneer het goud dat namens ons land in een buitenlandse kluis is opgeslagen in de vorm van goud baren, dat deze baren een serienummer zouden moeten hebben. Indien uw kamer overweegt onze goudvoorraad te controleren, dan kunt u overwegen om eerst een lijst aan te laten leveren met de serienummers van alle opgeslagen baren en er hier vervolgens steekproefsgewijs een aantal van te controleren. U zou kunnen denken aan het repatriren van een aantal baren op basis van de serienummers en deze vervolgens in
Page 29 of 32
eigen land uitgebreid te controleren, aangezien in 2009 gebleken is dat er een aanzienlijke hoeveelheid met wolfraam gevulde baren in omloop is(*). Wellicht is dit ook de werkwijze die door Duitsland wordt toegepast, omdat ook zij slechts een klein gedeelte van hun voorraad repatriren. Met vriendelijke groet, Ir. Arend Lammertink, <adres> (*) Zie: http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article14996.html "Roughly 15 years ago during the Clinton Administration between 1.3 and 1.5 million 400 oz tungsten blanks were allegedly manufactured by a very high-end, sophisticated refiner in the USA. Subsequently, 640,000 of these tungsten blanks received their gold plating and WERE shipped to Ft. Knox and remain there to this day. I know folks who have copies of the original shipping docs with dates and exact weights of tungsten bars shipped to Ft. Knox. The balance of this 1.3 million 1.5 million 400 oz tungsten cache was also plated and then allegedly sold into the international market."
Analysis of common law, physical gold and some info on "not legal tender" bank notables.
Forwarded message ---------From: Arend Lammertink <lamare@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:23 PM Subject: Analysis of common law, physical gold and some info on "not legal tender" bank notables. To: <@david wilcock's email> Hi David, Some time ago, I tried to point you to my article on a/o common law, the Roman Catholic church *still* claiming to own the whole planet and the principles of declaring independence (from the Vatican!) under common law as has been done by the US and other republics: http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVersusDivineCommonLaw It has been published by a/o Drake, Newtomorrow.us and Jean Haines and has 11,138 page views of which 8,769 unique reads at this moment. NewTomorow describes my article as follows: http://newtomorrow.us/commonlaw.html "The following research article provides a mind-bending look into the true nature of the history of law in our world. It shows us that we in the 21st century are once again engaged in an ancient battle for our basic human rights. Yet what makes this battle much different than any other throughout the course of human history is that we are now engaged in a GLOBAL fight for freedom against tyrannical forces that have secretly usurped power and have enslaved humanity under the false pretenses of 'civil law', which dates all the way back to the time of the empirical Roman empire. This is a MUST READ for anyone who wishes to understand just how deeply it is that we have been lied to for thousands of years, and just how vital it is that all free people of the earth now join together in this crucial battle for freedom." One of the things I explain is why a newly declared republic under common law is a nice way to get rid of the debt problem, which has been confirmed by Ben: -:- In other words: we now have not only a nice trick to liberate a nation, but also a convenient way to get rid of the problem of nation's debt, which is now the problem of the Vatican and not of the nation's self-liberated people. [...] It turns out that Benjamin Fulford and his fellowship is aware of this principle, too: Yes, we are aware of this. If the US removes the P2 fascist government run via the United States of America corporation, then all US external debts will not have to be paid by the American people. We are trying to bankrupt that war mongering and murdering corporation and their fascistoverseers at the P2 Roman empire headquarters. This in no way implies we are opposed to the beliefs held by the majority of Catholics. Benjamin Fulford -:-
It also contains a reference to the work of Verl Speer, who wrote a book about the history and principles of common law: http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Material/Pied-Pipers-of-Babylon-Verl-K-Speer.pdf This week, I updated the article with an analysis of the gold question, inspired by your discovery of "not legal tender" notes: http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVersusDivineCommonLaw#CommentOnWilcock I came to the following conclusion: "So, all things considered, I think it is most likely that the massive amounts of physical gold that are supposed to back the (Asian's) 1934 series bonds are nothing but a giant paper scam."
Page 30 of 32
Of course, you may not agree with all of it, but please do consider reading my article. I think you will enjoy it and appreciate the many references I included. And you are free to copy my work, as stated on the page itself. Namaste! Arend Lammertink, <adres>
Conversation about Einstein theory and Quantum Mechanics.

Dear Salih, Thanks for your reply. Don't let this dissappoint you. From what I saw, you are capable of thinking for yourself, which is a very useful tool. So, this may be a very nice opportunity for you. Take some time to study the material I sent you and, if you can, perform the Wheatstone experiment, or have someone else do it for you. And then see if you can answer the question: "How can I fit this aether theory together with the things I already know?" Then I'm sure you will be very succesful! The choice is yours. Namaste! (look up what this means, if you don't already know) :) -- Arend --
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Salih Krcalar <> wrote:
Dear Arend, Many thanks for your interest Best Regards, Salih
Dear Salih, Thank you for contacting me, but I'm afraid I cannot mean much to you. I am a firm believer in the aether theory and I reject both Einstein's relativity theory as well as the Quantum theory, both at a fundamental level. I have written an article about why Einstein's theory is incorrect. An error has been made in the Maxwell equations, which eventually has lead to the incorrect relativity theory, as Nikola Tesla said all along: http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/Ruins96YearsEinsteinRelativity About my objections to the Quantum theory, I posted something at the energetic forum: http://www.energeticforum.com/196786post2680.html The rest of the thread: http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3235-gray-tube-replication-90.html#post196786 At this moment I do not have form experimental proof, other than Wheatstone's experiment from 1834, in which the theoritical propagation speed for longitudinal electric waves of pi/2 times c has been measured within a reasonable amount of error: http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/WheatstoneExperimentsToMeasureTheVelocityOfElectricity This experiment could be repeated pretty easily using modern components: http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/11853-anyone-feels-like-repeating-wheatstones-1834-experiment-disproveeinstein.html http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3235-gray-tube-replication-90.html#post200653 As for the relation between space and time, Eric Dollard gave some hints some time ago: http://www.gestaltreality.com/energy-synthesis/eric-dollard/the-theory-of-anti-relativity-by-e-p-dollard/ As for some information on a very good start in the direction of a unified physics theory, I wholeheartedly recommend studying Paul Stowe's theory: http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/StowePersonalEMail Kindest regards,
Page 31 of 32
-- Arend -On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Salih Krcalar <> wrote:
Dear Dr. Lammertink, I send my article to you PDF format in attachment. Please can you analysis my web site www.timeflow.org ? In addition You can find in my web site in http://www.chronos.msu.ru/rweblinks.html 'Personal Sites and Web-Pages' . Thanks. Best Regards Salih KIRCALAR
Patent for the invention of a long-lasting battery principle for portable purposes
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3235-gray-tube-replication-92.html#post219211 Originally Posted by lamare View Post The polarization of a dielectric is a very interesting effect: Dielectric - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A dielectric is an electrical insulator that can be polarized by an applied electric field. When a dielectric is placed in an electric field, electric charges do not flow through the material as they do in a conductor, but only slightly shift from their average equilibrium positions causing dielectric polarization. [...] When the electric field is removed the atom returns to its original state. The time required to do so is the so-called relaxation time; an exponential decay. [...] The relationship between the electric field E and the dipole moment M gives rise to the behavior of the dielectric, which, for a given material, can be characterized by the function F defined by the equation: M = F(E). [...] Dielectric relaxation is the momentary delay (or lag) in the dielectric constant of a material. This is usually caused by the delay in molecular polarization[disambiguation needed] with respect to a changing electric field in a dielectric medium (e.g. inside capacitors or between two large conducting surfaces). Dielectric relaxation in changing electric fields could be considered analogous to hysteresis in changing magnetic fields (for inductors or transformers).
So, it appears that when you apply a very strong electric field, which apparantly can be in the shape of a sharp rising pulse (large dE/dt) propagating trough your dielectric (a longitudinal shockwave), you get a very strong polarization. Because there is a relaxation effect, the polarization does not go away instantly and it appears a dielectric can remain polarized for a considerable time. Bedini reported "cold boiling" lead batteries that kept on boiling for up to half an hour after removing the charger. To sum this up: What you can do with a londitudinal shock wave in the shape of a sharp rising edge (large dE/dt) and a soft dropping falling edge is to super-polarize a dielectric, such that it keeps it's polarization for a considerable time, depending on the applied voltage, etc. When you put such a polarized dielectric in between capacitor plates, you can get an effect whereby capacitors spontaneously recharge after having been shortcutted. This has been observed with electrolytic capacitors, whereby you have a very thin layer of aluminum oxide as your dielectric on one of the capacitor plates. This is a very similar construction as with a lead-acid battery, especially in the old days. In other words: you can super-polarize a dielectric layer within both an electrolytic capacitor as well as a lead-acid battery, which would result as the cap/battery being observed as having been charged. Just as the MIT dissectible Leyden jar, whereby the energy is "stored" in the dielectric... Seems like a perfect idea for making long-lasting batteries for mobile phones.
Page 32 of 32
So, I hereby claim to have invented a long-lasting battery principle for portable purposes and donate this to the public domain. Namaste! -- Arend --
Final words
Notes and further references. Does the ESM Treaty violate the 1960s Vienna Treaty? [NOTE: This article may be freely copied, distributed, translated, etc. A link to this page and/or mentioning of www.tuks.nl as source is appreciated, because the page may be updated further in the future. There is a link to this article at the front page] Comments can be made here. And there is a thread for discussion at my favorite forum. Contact info, etc. here, where I also explain why a Batavian horn blower has some score to settle with the Vatican. And you can follow me on Twitter and Facebook.
Retrieved from http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVersusDivineCommonLaw Page last modified on March 08, 2013, at 10:27 AM

The Fascinating Process of Self Liberation Under Common Law

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

The Fascinating Process of Self Liberation Under Common Law

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVe...

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVe... Page 2 of 32

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVe... Page 3 of 32

Now THAT would be something I would love to see. :)

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVe... Page 4 of 32

The Pied Pipers of Babylon

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVe... Page 5 of 32

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVe... Page 6 of 32

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVe... Page 7 of 32

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVe... Page 8 of 32

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLawVe... Page 9 of 32

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Albert Pike, Freemasonry and the Jesuits

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

The Chief Pontiff and the treaties of Paris and Vienna

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Some high-res pictures here: http://securityprinting.org/english/banknote/naples/n01.htm

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Update 2 December 19, 2012:

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Conversation about Einstein theory and Quantum Mechanics.

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff | Main / TheFascinatingHistoryOfCivilLaw...

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen