POST ASSESSMENT MODERATION REPORT

Demonstrate the knowledge of ALGEBRA using linear systems to solve problems (5262)
Programme Name: WLCNZ Diploma in Electronics Unit / Paper Number: 5262 Level: 3 Assessor Name: Muhammad Waseem Soomro Moderation Date: 04 09 2012 Name of Moderator: Saud Altaf Paper Name: Demonstrate the knowledge of ALGEBRA using linear systems to solve problems Credits (1-20): 20

Quick Report Assessment attached Marking Schedule/Model Answer attached Samples attached Suggested answers match the questions Marking is Fair Marking is valid Marking is accurate Marking is consistent The student scripts are authentic Moderator Signature

Yes / No

Comment

Date

04 09 2012

Student Samples Paper A:

Student Samples Paper B:

Student Samples Paper C:

REPORT IN DETAIL
The Post-Assessment Moderation is based on 5 measures. The moderator must check the assessment for its Fairness, Validity, Accuracy, Consistency, and Authenticity.
PART A: 1. 2. 3. 4. FAIR YES / NO

QUESTIONS Does the assessment meet the unit standard / learning outcome requirements? (Honest reflection) Is the assessment produced appropriate to the unit standard / learning outcome? Did all students have a fair chance to succeed in doing the assessment? (Guidelines / timeframe) Has the assessment been impartially marked?

Comments

PART B:

VALID YES / NO

QUESTIONS 5. Is the assessment precisely relevant to the learning outcomes / performance criterias. 6. Is the assessment task current to unit standard / paper and / or industry field? 7. Is the assessment marking reasonable and logical? Comments

PART C:

ACCURATE YES / NO

QUESTIONS 8. Is the assessment edited / professionally presented and concise? Spelling / punctuation / verbs and tasks? 9. Is the way the assessment is written accurately enough to assess? Comments

PART D:

CONSISTENT (RELIABLE) QUESTIONS 10. Is the assessment consistent across the student samples? 11. Is the assessment marking at a consistent level? 12. Is the assessment presentation consistent with course requirements?

YES / NO

Comments

PART E:

AUTHENTIC YES / NO

QUESTIONS 13. Has each student had independently carried out their assessments? 14. Is the assessment task authentic/relevant to the field / industry Comments

POST ASSESSMENT MODERATION REPORT

Demonstrate the knowledge of ALGEBRA by using numerical methods to solve problems (5264)
Programme Name: WLCNZ Diploma in Electronics Unit / Paper Number: 5264 Paper Name: Demonstrate the knowledge of ALGEBRA by using numerical methods to solve problems Credits (1-20): 20

Level: 3 Assessor Name: Muhammad Waseem Soomro Moderation Date: 02 10 2012

Name of Moderator: Saud Altaf

Quick Report Assessment attached Marking Schedule/Model Answer attached Samples attached Suggested answers match the questions Marking is Fair Marking is valid Marking is accurate Marking is consistent The student scripts are authentic Moderator Signature

Yes / No

Comment

Date

02 10 2012

Student Samples Paper A:

Student Samples Paper B:

Student Samples Paper C:

REPORT IN DETAIL
The Post-Assessment Moderation is based on 5 measures. The moderator must check the assessment for its Fairness, Validity, Accuracy, Consistency, and Authenticity.
PART A: 1. 2. 3. 4. FAIR YES / NO

QUESTIONS Does the assessment meet the unit standard / learning outcome requirements? (Honest reflection) Is the assessment produced appropriate to the unit standard / learning outcome? Did all students have a fair chance to succeed in doing the assessment? (Guidelines / timeframe) Has the assessment been impartially marked?

Comments

PART B:

VALID YES / NO

QUESTIONS 5. Is the assessment precisely relevant to the learning outcomes / performance criterias. 6. Is the assessment task current to unit standard / paper and / or industry field? 7. Is the assessment marking reasonable and logical? Comments

PART C:

ACCURATE YES / NO

QUESTIONS 8. Is the assessment edited / professionally presented and concise? Spelling / punctuation / verbs and tasks? 9. Is the way the assessment is written accurately enough to assess? Comments

PART D:

CONSISTENT (RELIABLE) QUESTIONS 10. Is the assessment consistent across the student samples? 11. Is the assessment marking at a consistent level? 12. Is the assessment presentation consistent with course requirements?

YES / NO

Comments

PART E:

AUTHENTIC YES / NO

QUESTIONS 13. Has each student had independently carried out their assessments? 14. Is the assessment task authentic/relevant to the field / industry Comments

POST ASSESSMENT MODERATION REPORT

Demonstrate the knowledge of CALCULUS by Differentiate functions and use differentiation to solve problems (5265)
Programme Name: WLCNZ Diploma in Electronics Unit / Paper Number: 5265 Paper Name: Demonstrate the knowledge of CALCULUS by Differentiate functions and use differentiation to solve problems Credits (1-20): 20

Level: 3 Assessor Name: Muhammad Waseem Soomro Moderation Date: 22 10 2012

Name of Moderator: Saud Altaf

Quick Report Assessment attached Marking Schedule/Model Answer attached Samples attached Suggested answers match the questions Marking is Fair Marking is valid Marking is accurate Marking is consistent The student scripts are authentic Moderator Signature

Yes / No

Comment

Date

22 10 2012

Student Samples Paper A:

Student Samples Paper B:

Student Samples Paper C:

REPORT IN DETAIL
The Post-Assessment Moderation is based on 5 measures. The moderator must check the assessment for its Fairness, Validity, Accuracy, Consistency, and Authenticity.
PART A: 1. 2. 3. 4. FAIR YES / NO

QUESTIONS Does the assessment meet the unit standard / learning outcome requirements? (Honest reflection) Is the assessment produced appropriate to the unit standard / learning outcome? Did all students have a fair chance to succeed in doing the assessment? (Guidelines / timeframe) Has the assessment been impartially marked?

Comments

PART B:

VALID YES / NO

QUESTIONS 5. Is the assessment precisely relevant to the learning outcomes / performance criterias. 6. Is the assessment task current to unit standard / paper and / or industry field? 7. Is the assessment marking reasonable and logical? Comments

PART C:

ACCURATE YES / NO

QUESTIONS 8. Is the assessment edited / professionally presented and concise? Spelling / punctuation / verbs and tasks? 9. Is the way the assessment is written accurately enough to assess? Comments

PART D:

CONSISTENT (RELIABLE) QUESTIONS 10. Is the assessment consistent across the student samples? 11. Is the assessment marking at a consistent level? 12. Is the assessment presentation consistent with course requirements?

YES / NO

Comments

PART E:

AUTHENTIC YES / NO

QUESTIONS 13. Has each student had independently carried out their assessments? 14. Is the assessment task authentic/relevant to the field / industry Comments

POST ASSESSMENT MODERATION REPORT

Demonstrate the knowledge of TRIGNOMETRY by Manipulating trigonometric expressions, sketching graphs of trigonometric functions, and solving equations (5268)
Programme Name: WLCNZ Diploma in Electronics Unit / Paper Number: 5268 Paper Name Demonstrate the knowledge of TRIGNOMETRY by Manipulating trigonometric expressions, sketching graphs of trigonometric functions, and solving equations Credits (1-20): 20

Level: 3 Assessor Name: Muhammad Waseem Soomro Moderation Date: 05 11 2012

Name of Moderator: Saud Altaf

Quick Report Assessment attached Marking Schedule/Model Answer attached Samples attached Suggested answers match the questions Marking is Fair Marking is valid Marking is accurate Marking is consistent The student scripts are authentic Moderator Signature

Yes / No

Comment

Date

05 11 2012

Student Samples Paper A:

Student Samples Paper B:

Student Samples Paper C:

REPORT IN DETAIL
The Post-Assessment Moderation is based on 5 measures. The moderator must check the assessment for its Fairness, Validity, Accuracy, Consistency, and Authenticity.
PART A: FAIR YES / NO

QUESTIONS 1. Does the assessment meet the unit standard / learning outcome requirements? (Honest reflection) 2. Is the assessment produced appropriate to the unit standard / learning outcome? 3. Did all students have a fair chance to succeed in doing the assessment? (Guidelines / timeframe) 4. Has the assessment been impartially marked? Comments

PART B:

VALID YES / NO

QUESTIONS 5. Is the assessment precisely relevant to the learning outcomes / performance criterias. 6. Is the assessment task current to unit standard / paper and / or industry field? 7. Is the assessment marking reasonable and logical? Comments

PART C:

ACCURATE YES / NO

QUESTIONS 8. Is the assessment edited / professionally presented and concise? Spelling / punctuation / verbs and tasks? 9. Is the way the assessment is written accurately enough to assess? Comments

PART D:

CONSISTENT (RELIABLE) QUESTIONS 10. Is the assessment consistent across the student samples? 11. Is the assessment marking at a consistent level? 12. Is the assessment presentation consistent with course requirements?

YES / NO

Comments

PART E:

AUTHENTIC YES / NO

QUESTIONS 13. Has each student had independently carried out their assessments? 14. Is the assessment task authentic/relevant to the field / industry Comments