Sie sind auf Seite 1von 12

200,000 Girls in US at Risk of Female Genital Mutilation

Auch hier bei uns finden Sie diese Bruche, es sind keine Einzelflle, tausende Mdchen werden jhrlich auf diese Weise gefoltert.
Ja ich nenne es Folter -in den Augen der Juden und Reptoiden ist es nichts Anderes als das Melken einer Kuh. Der Reptoid und auch der Jude ziehen Energien vom menschlichen Krper ab ber solche Rituale, es ist ein Teil Ihrer Nahrung.

Ein lebender Beweis bezglich dieser Foltermethode ist unser Liebling Michel Friedman, Fernsehmoderator, liebevoll auch der Pisser genannt. Pisser Friedman ist auch dafr bekannt, da er kein Ende findet, hat er erst einmal Blut geleckt, bei Ihm berlebt keiner eine Beschneidung, er frit dann selbst noch das pochende Herz der beklagten und suft die letzten Tropfen Blut, die er bersehen hat. Fr den Juden, wie auch dem Reptoiden ist dieser Planet wie eine Weide, auf der die bescheuerten scharfen Schafe stehen Nutten fr alle mglichen und unmglichen Wunschvorstellungen-, natrlich auch die Bcke, die Kartolieschen Priester sind im Besonderem, die Hirten der Bckchen, sind sie doch die bevorzugte Nahrungsquelle der Reptos und ganz spezieller Juden. Die Qeen macht dem Papst bei seiner Visite auch diesbezglich Geschenke, die dieser nicht ablehnt, einen hbschen Jungen von vielleicht 8 Jahren, nach vorne gestoen von MI5 -diese Bande wei was schwule geile Scke lieben, bevor sie bluten, die Kinder. Viele werden nur zu diesem Zweck gezchtet, andere werden von der Strae gefangen. Ganz "legal" jedoch wird beschnitten, wobei ganz "legal" gefttert wird, der Jude und der Reptoid!

March 16, 2013 By Daniel Greenfield That number alone tells us something about the scale of immigration involved. What was once a European immigrant problem is now becoming an American immigrant problem. The ancient, brutal practice of female genital mutilation (FGM), once considered primarily a problem of the developing world, is a growing threat to girls and women in the United States, according to a new report. The New York City-based non-profit organisation, which specialises in gender-based violence, said up to 200,000 girls and women in the United States are at risk of FGM and that the number is growing.

People in the United States think that FGM only happens to people outside of the United States, but in all actuality, people here all over the country have been through FGM, said Jaha, 23, formerly from Gambia and now a survivor and advocate against FGM. Kids that were born in this country are taken back home every summer and undergo this procedure, she was quoted as saying in the report. The study cited analysis of data from the 2000 census that found between 1990 and 2000 the number of girls and women in the United States at risk of the procedure which involves the partial or total removal of external female genitalia increased by 35 percent. Most prevalent in immigrant African and Middle Eastern communities, FGM generally originates in the belief by some cultures that it preserves a girls virginity before marriage and discourages her from promiscuity after she is wed. In many communities, a girl is deemed unfit for marriage if she has not undergone FGM. As Middle Eastern and African immigration to the United States rises, we end up struggling with barbaric practices that will persist regardless of any attempts to regulate them, just as they have in Europe. Filed Under: The Point Tagged With: America, female genital mutilation fgm, Immigration 41
Print This Post

About Daniel Greenfield

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century. Login Follow the discussion

Comments (24)
Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity -10

WhateverMan 16 hours ago This comment has been deleted by the administrator. Report 7 replies active 5 hours ago +2

Edward Cline 16 hours ago Whatever Man: Don't make accusations without citing evidence. For all you know, Greenfield may be as opposed to that as he is to FGM. Report Reply +10

cassie 16 hours ago Circumcision is NOT barbaric, although i strongly believe that all babies should be given a local so not to feel it. Circumcision leads to a much cleaner life, and does nothing to affect the sexual pleasure in a man. Statistics have shown it helps to prevent cervical cancer and other diseases. FGM DOES in fact harm girls and women for the rest of their lives! Report Reply 0

dusty 5 hours ago

You obviously don't know what your talking about. Very sexist! And yes circumcision ruins a mans senses just the way cutting the woman does. All in the name of Christianity. One more reason I am pagan! You really anger me with your ignorance. Report Reply +4

Vicky Bennett 10 hours ago Trust me Whateverman... circumcision is nothing compared to FM... read up on it... how many baby boys die from it? how many girls? How many boys no longer have orgasm because of it, how many girls? Big huge difference................................ Circumcism is biblical, female circumcism is barbaric from the pitt of hell. Report Reply +2

lovinight 1p 10 hours ago Circumcision is not complete removal of the penis you ASS! Report Reply +1

defcon 4 7 hours ago How is one like the other? Or can't you tell the difference between women and men? Maybe you've been practicing too much bacha bazi. Report Reply

+1

JNDaley 14 hours ago I'm not saying that circumcision isn't a bad thing here - BUT they aren't really comparable in scope. Circumcision is removal of the foreskin, as I'm sure you know. An analogous removal in a female would be removal of the clitoral hood - ONLY. FGM includes removal of some or all of the actual clitoris and some or all of the labia - in some cases, both sets of labia. The mildest version of FGM would be analogous to removing a goodsized piece of the head of the penis, while the worst form (infibulation) would be analogous to removing pretty much the entire penis. Report Reply +1

Trevor 14 hours ago "Statistics have shown it helps to prevent cervical cancer and other diseases" Personally, i believe circumcising babies, M or F, in the name of "Culture", is a form of child abuse. Why not wait until the child reaches 18 years of age and then let them decide for themselves if they want to mutilate THEIR genitals!?! Report Reply 3 replies active 5 hours ago +5

Rushbabe 10 hours ago Trevor. Circumcising baby boys is biblical, and healthy... Butchers cut these girls, often using dirty razors!

There is no similarity. Report Reply 0

Dusty 5 hours ago bah ah ah ah hah! Let me guess you voted for Obama too! Report Reply +1

dusty 5 hours ago finally someone with a brain! Report Reply -1

Trevor 14 hours ago "Statistics have shown it helps to prevent cervical cancer and other diseases" Can you cite any sources? Report Reply 3 replies active 5 hours ago

+1

Abby 13 hours ago "Jan. 6, 2011 -- Circumcising men can reduce cervical cancer risk in women, a new study shows. The study involved more than 1,200 HIV-negative, heterosexual couples living in Uganda, where circumcision of male adults is increasingly encouraged as a means of slowing the spread of HIV/AIDS. Half the men received the surgical procedure at enrollment and the other half were scheduled for circumcision after their participation in the trial ended. Two years later, the female partners of the men who remained uncircumcised were more likely than the partners of the circumcised men to be infected with human papilloma virus (HPV) types most often associated with cervical cancer. In earlier trials, Johns Hopkins University researcher Aaron A.R. Tobian, MD, PhD, and colleagues showed that male circumcision reduces HIV infection, HPV in men, and genital herpes. The new study appears online Friday in TheLancet. It is now clear that male circumcision can reduce HPV in females and possibly prevent cervical cancer in settings where HPV vaccines are not available, Tobian tells WebMD." Report Reply +1

Cat K 13 hours ago

Yes, folks, there are health benefits. So please now be quiet on that point. Removing female external genitalia, is not done at birth, but later. It is not only very painful, with the risk of infection,. but removes the woman's ability to experience sensation associated with those body parts. This is not true of circumcision. Therefore all comparisons of the two procedures are specious or worse. For the anti-Semites commenting above, I have some news:Muslim males are circumcised too. (and that is why the hate bill in San Francisco to ban Judaism there through banning circumcision never passed). Report Reply +1

Abby 13 hours ago From the World Health Organization website: "There is compelling evidence that male circumcision reduces the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in men by approximately 60%. Three randomized controlled trials have shown that male circumcision provided by well trained health professionals in properly equipped settings is safe. WHO/UNAIDS recommendations emphasize that male circumcision should be considered an efficacious intervention for HIV prevention in countries and regions with heterosexual epidemics, high HIV and low male circumcision prevalence." Report Reply +4

WilliamJamesWard 113p 5 hours ago This is sickening beyond belief and should be stopped as a vile crime against humanity. William Report Reply -1

dusty 5 hours ago This comment has been deleted by the administrator. Report 2 replies active 4 hours ago +2

Nicole 4 hours ago I thin someone should "put you down". If you think you can compare the removal of a small piece of skin that can save the male from HIV, HPV, and many other illnesses and diseases to the systematic, destructive, and contaminating removal of a woman's body parts then you should be put out of our misery. The removal of foreskin in the US is done by doctors in a sterile setting with clean tools and much oversite. The removal of these young womens' genitalia is done in a cave or hut with a dirty razor blade by some "witch" doctor with no medical training and no thought or care for the pain these girls will suffer for the rest of their lives because it will keep them from "cheating". If they don't want their wive to cheat then they should treat them with love and respect. And I can guarantee you removing the foreskin on the male does NOT interfere with their ability to orgasm, if that were true they wouldn't "get off" in less than 5 minutes, it would take hours if it ever happened at all. Once these girls go through this awful "procedure" they have no feeling whatsoever, they don't feel sex, can't achieve orgasm, don't even know when it is that time of the month because the feeling is gone. I think you need to just go away and do a little research before you start to type again! Report Reply +2

AMANDA 4 hours ago No Ovaries means No Kids and the Human Race DIES OFF, WOW, I wonder how someone can say such things and actually believe its True, LMAO.................and BTW, Male Circumcision isnt like These People MUTILATING a FEMALE CHILDS CLITORIS Because they believe she NEVER DESERVES THE PLEASURE That Comes From It...............Wake Up Please!

Report Reply +2

AMANDA 4 hours ago This is not like a Circumcision, This is Mutilation of the Clitoris and it is done b/c the Men don't think Women Deserve any Pleasure so they Mutilate and it Causes them Pain for the Rest of their Life and it make Sex Painful, but that is What those HORRIBLE IGNORANT AND STUPID MEN THINK THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO DO!!! THOSE MF NEED TO BE SHOT IN THE HEAD FOR WHAT THEY HAVE DONE TO SO MANY GIRLS and the MOTHERS, WTF, ALLOWING THIS TO HAPPEN, They should have their arse kicked and Sent out of this Country for Good while the CHILD STAYS HERE!!! Report Reply 0

Pat Chandler 2 hours ago A good video to learn from is Diane Lane's(actress) trip to Somalia, to raise awareness of FGM (female genital mutilation). As for mother's allowing the procedure, they say, "It is the will of Allah", and the girls are not deemed fit for marriage unless FGM has been done to them. FGM is the ancient brutal practice of female genital mutilation, which the Middle Eastern people practice, and the surgery is performed in other countries where immigrants from Somolia and Muslim countries have migrated to. Now this barbaric practice has come to America, and we need to wake up to this reality. What once was a brutal practice on young female children in foreign countries, is now an American immigrant problem. Report Reply 0

Pat Chandler 2 hours ago

In one village Diane Lane and her interpreters visited, they interviewed a muslim woman with four children of her own to raise (without a husband). She showed 'the knife' she used on the approximately 30 FGM's she performed daily!! Her charge was 50 cents per child. She said she had no other way of making a living for her children other than prostitution, and she was no longer young or pretty. A video of the barbaric operation was shown to Lane and she was horrified, traumatized, and tearful. This practice has been done on the young girls for at least 1425 years, when Mohammad, (the false prophet) gave instructions to his men. I have read that it will take at least 2 decades to totally eradicate the horrific practice, but feminists and others are now aware of it and are trying to have the practice stopped (Gloria Steinham, Hillary Clinton,etc). What took 1425 years to develop in a culture, will take more than 2 decades to outlaw, imho. At 1.2 billion muslims migrating the globe, I don't see this happening soon, sad to say.