Which Denomination Did Jesus Build?

Years ago I had a lady tell me it was impossible to be just a Christian without being in a
denomination. Did Jesus build a denomination? Which denomination did Jesus build?

I fear the lady I spoke of above was in grave error those many years ago but she was in a
bind. What do I mean? Those who are in denominational churches generally all agree
that those in other denominations can be saved the same as they can. Which means what?

It logically follows if you hold to that thinking that you can never admit your
denomination is the one church Jesus built. If you did that it would put all other
denominations outside the church thus you have to take the position this woman took.
Jesus is "the Savior of the body" (Eph. 5:23 NKJV) and the body is his body, the church.
(Eph. 1:22-23) That is the very thing your denomination can never admit to being if you
believe others in other denominations can and will be saved.

Think about that long and hard. You can never admit your group is the body of Christ,
the church Jesus built. Is there something wrong here? Why would anyone want to be a
member of your group if it is not the body of Christ, not the church Jesus built, if you
cannot admit that it is? If it is the body of Christ, the church Jesus did build, then it
excludes all other groups.

Of course they say the answer to that is that all denominations collectively make up the
one church and our denomination is a part of that one church, the universal church. It
would be comical if not so serious. The implication is that doctrine and truth do not
matter nor does practice. Believe what you want, practice what you want, just believe
intellectually that Jesus is the Son of God and that is all that matters.

What a waste Paul writing all those letters to the church at Corinth trying to correct
wrong practices (shall we say sin). A waste because it did not matter; they believed in
Jesus and were going to be saved anyway. And Jesus too for there was evidently,
according to denominationalism, no need for those 7 letters to the churches of Asia found
in Revelation, especially those giving warning for doctrine and practice do not matter if
you can be saved in any denomination regardless of belief and practice.

Paul spoke of his ways in Christ which he said "I teach everywhere in every church." (1
Cor. 4:17 NKJV) Every church in New Testament times received the same teaching.
There were no opposing doctrines save from false teachers. What was taught in one
place by a Holy Spirit inspired teacher was taught in every place. Now we say it doesn't
matter; they will be saved the same as we, just believe in Jesus.

What does it mean to believe in Jesus? Does it mean it makes little to no difference what
he taught on a subject through the inspired writers of the New Testament? Is the idea we
will believe in Jesus for salvation but we will not believe him in doctrinal teaching and it
won't matter in the least? Is that the idea?
Denominationalism by its very nature has at its core the concept that doctrine does not
matter. It teaches opposing and contradictory doctrines and sometimes things clearly
condemned in scripture, things like the acceptance of homosexuality, women preachers
and women in leadership positions in the church, these things just as examples, and we
say they will be saved too because they believe in Jesus.

I have long felt people do not know what it means to believe in Jesus. Today it seems to
mean you can believe he is the Savior but you cannot believe another word he uttered. Is
that faith in Jesus, the faith that matters, the faith that saves? Or, we just take the
approach that he said it but it does not matter. If you want to okay, if not okay.

Paul said we were to all be "of one mind." (2 Cor. 13:11 NKJV) To the saints at Philippi
he said, "stand fast in one spirit, with one mind." (Phil. 1:27 NKJV) We are to be
"likeminded … being of one accord, of one mind." (Phil 2:2 NKJV) Peter taught the
same thing in 1 Peter 3:8, "all of you be of one mind." (NKJV) Denominationalism says
it does not matter; we can be saved with division and difference being of many minds, not
just one mind.

Jesus prayed in John 17, "I do not pray for these alone, but also for those who will
believe in Me through their word; that they all may be one." (John 17:20-21 NKJV)

One sin of denominationalism stands out very clearly for any thinking individual. If your
denomination thinks those in another denomination can be saved the same as you can and
will be (?) is it not sin on your group's part if you do not disband and join together with
them? If not why not? Who gives your group the right to stay separated from fellow
believers that you admit will be saved? Why are you not guilty of willful sin if you
refuse to disband and join with them, if you refuse to be of one mind with them?

If your disagreements are considered to be insignificant as far as sin and salvation is

concerned why are you so hard hearted as to refuse to be one with them? Why do you
refuse to be of one mind?

It is sometimes said that in the parable of the vine and the branches in John 15 that the
branches represent the denominations. Whoa! When Jesus spoke that parable there was
not a denomination in the world. Not even the one true church he built had yet been
established. He was speaking to his audience, his disciples. He says, "If anyone does not
abide in Me, he is cast out as a branch and is withered." (John 15:6 NKJV) He says, "If
you abide in Me." (John 15:7 NKJV) Get the words "anyone" and "you".

If he was speaking to denominations, obviously false, it was as an act of prophecy for

there would not be a denomination established anywhere for well over 1,000 years into
the future.

One has to ask the question why is it that a person cannot be just a member of the church
Christ established? Why must one also be a member of a denomination which was
unheard of in Jesus' time? I asked the lady that who I mentioned in the first paragraph of
this article. She could never give me an answer other than to say just because, just
because it was no longer possible.

Do you believe that? If so why do you believe it? Why could one not just follow the
teachings of the New Testament and do what they did in the first century to become
Christians (there are many examples of conversions in the book of Acts), then join
together in a congregation of like minded people and worship doing exactly what they did
way back in the days of the apostles, no more, no less, organize the congregation as they
organized theirs -- elders leading the congregation with deacons serving -- and just try
and do exactly the same things in the same way as they did back then? Let us then call
ourselves nothing but disciples, nothing but Christians, and give our congregation a name
that is scriptural (call it what they called it back then). If we were to do that would that
make us just another denomination or would it make us a true church of Christ, a church
built by Jesus?

Some believe it would make you just another denomination. Think about that. It is the
same as saying what Jesus established in the first century was a denomination. If we did
what they did back then we would just be a denomination. Jesus established a
denomination? Yeah, I really believe that don't you?

Can the church we find in the New Testament be restored in a community today? If not
why not? As long as you have the original plans you can restore or make anew anything
just as it was in its original form. Give me the original plans for a piece of antique
furniture that has been unseen for even hundreds of years and it can be made again today
just like it was originally.

Give me a set of plans for playing a game, say a game the American Indians played 200
years ago, and even though I have never seen the game played I can replicate it simply by
following the plans. When I play that game I will be playing what they played. You get
the idea. All one needs is the plan. Does the New Testament give us a plan regarding the
one church? To ask is to answer.

The original New Testament church we read about in our Bibles did end up in apostasy.
This was prophesied. "Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come
(the Day of Judgment – DS) unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin be
revealed, the son of perdition, who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called
God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself
that he is God." (2 Thess. 2:3-4 NKJV)

Paul also told the elders of the church in Ephesus, "For I know this, that after my
departure savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock. Also from
among yourselves men will rise up, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples
after themselves." (Acts 20:29-30 NKJV)

While Catholics believe they are the one church there is none of them that I know of who
would claim they are the church one would have if he was able to replicate today the
church we find on the pages of the New Testament. They readily admit they must go
outside of the pages of the New Testament to get the church they have today. Authority
with them does not reside solely in scripture.

You cannot find the original New Testament church in the Catholic church of today but
neither can you find it in any of the Protestant denominations either. If Jesus built a
church and just one there was a time when he did that – on the Day of Pentecost in Acts
2.

Thus we have a time for its establishment admitted by all (at least as far as I know never
having heard of any who disagree). Yet, not a single denomination will lay any claim
whatsoever as to having come into existence back then. When one admits the group he is
a member of did not even exist in New Testament times he pretty much has lost his case
as to making any claim as to being a part of that which was established.

If your desire is to be a part of the church Jesus built you have the original plans for it.
You are only a denomination because you want to be one. If you have the plans for the
original church Jesus built what more do you need than the will to implement them?
Once you do so you can then admit to being the one church Jesus built and will no longer
have to deny it. I would call that a bright day.