Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Permission i s hereby given t o publish with appropriate acknowledgments, excerpts or summaries not to exceed one-fourth of the entire text of the paper. Permission to print in more extended form subsequent to publication by the Institute must be obtained from the Executive Director of the Society of Mining Engineers of AIME. If and when this paper is published by the Suciety of Mining Engineers of AOME, it may embody certain changes made by agreement between the Technical Publications Committee and the author, so that the form in which it appears here is not necessarily that in which it may be published later. These $reprints are available for sale. Mail orders to PREPRINTS, Society of Mining Engineers, Caller No. D, Littleton, Colorado 80.929. PREPRINT AVAILABILITY LIST IS PUBLISHED PERlODICAbbY IN MINING ENGINEERING
INTRODUCTION
Coal i.s expected t o become an i n c r e a s i n g l y important source of energy i n the future. Coal production has already increased from about 650
mining t o
Consol produces 45
I n t h i s paper,
from 1950 t o 1982 a r e b r i e f l y reviewed t o show t h e impact of t h e enactment of t h e Coal Mine E e a l t h and S a f e t y Act of 1969 on t h e c o a l indus-
try.
t o improve p r o d u c t i v i t y and s a f e t y a r e p r e s e n t e d .
SAFETY
PRODUCTIVITY
s a f e t y improvement came from t h e a d o p t i o n of roof b o l t s u p p o r t s , c o n t i n uous miners, s h u t t l e c a r s , and conveyor b e l t s i n room-and-pillar mining.
I n p l a c e of wood t i m b e r s , roof b o l t i n g became t h e primary s u p p o r t system i n c o a l mines, machines. f r e e i n g up t h e narrow e n t r i e s f o r continuous mining
s h e l l anchor t y p e b o l t by t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n of t h e r e s i n grouted b o l t . The r e s i n grouted b o l t reduces t h e h i g h s t r e s s c o n c e n t r a t i o n a t t h e b o l t anchor and e l i m i n a t e s t h e p o t e n t i a l f o r l o s s of t h e a p p l i e d b o l t tension. Under roof b o l t s u p p o r t y l a r g e continuous miners w i t h s h u t t l e conveyors have s t e a d i l y improved t h e industry safety
c a r s and b e l t
r e c o r d a s p r e s e n t e d i n F i g u r e 1.
The f a t a l i n j u r y r a t e p e r m i l l i o n t o n s
decreased from 1970 t o 1978 a t a r a t e of 1.1 t o n s p e r man s h i f t p e r y e a r p a r t l y b e c a u s e of t h e enactment of mining r u l e s and r e g u l a t i o n s such a s t h e 1969 Coal Mine H e a l t h and S a f e t y Act.
To improve p r o d u c t i v i t y , method.
'
g e o l o g i c c c n d i t i o n s d i d n o t meet t h e i r p o t e n t i a l (Moroni,
1973).
The
l.imited v a l u e
t h e I n e b i l i t y of a c c u r a t e l y determining t h e p r o p e r t j e s of
geologic m a t e r i a l in-situ.
The r o c k above and below a c o a l seam i s p e n e r a l l y weak and incompetent s h a l e 3rd claystone. Obtaining meaningful p h y s i c a l properties from
laboratory t e s t s i s very d i f f i c u l t .
A d e t a i l e d d e s c r i p t i o n of r o c k c o r e i s a good y a r d s t i c k f o r judging t h e
p h y s i c a l c o n d i t i o n of t h e rock formations.
book t o cored rock can b e used t o i d e n t i f y t h e r o c k t y p e s a c c u r a t e l y and c o n s i s t e n t l y (Ferm and Smith, 1980). I n a d d i t i o n t o t h e c o r r e c t identi.-
index compressive s t r e n g t h o b t a i n e d from rock c o r e s n e a r a c o a l seam. Four groups a r e found i n t h e p l o t : limestone. claystone, shale, sandstone, and
T h e r e f o r e , t h e c o r r e c t i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of t h e r o c k formation
can h e l p i n f i n d i n g problem a r e a s .
Geologic
log
analyses
as
well
as
lab
tests
can
provide
useful
comparisons.
a r e n e c e s s a r y t o determine t h e r e s p o n s e of t h e weak c o a l measure rock f o r any d e s i g n purpose and a back c a l c u l a t i o n method can b e used f o r a p p l i c a t i o n t o s i m i l a r mining c o n d i t i o n s . Thus, a follow-up study i n
The h e a d g a t e f o r one l o n g w a l l
p a n e l and t h e t a i l g a t e f o r t h e n e x t a r c developed a s a s e t of e n t r i e s a t
t h e same time.
t h e c o a l p i l l a r s i n t h e headgate and t h e t a i l g a t e e n t r i e s i s important t o p r o t e c t t h e t a i l g a t e e n t r y having weak roof rock even where t h e roof
A method f o r computing
The r e s u l t s of
t h e a n a l y s i s h a s been t e s t e d a t v a r i o u s mfnes.
The
183m (600 f e e t )
overburden.
t h e i n c r e a s e i n s t r e s s a s t h e longwall f a c e r e t r e a t e d . t h e l a y o u t of t h e instrumented p i l l a r s .
t h e stress i n c r e a s e a g a i n s t t h e positf.on of
was on t h e o r d e r of 6.9 MPa (1,000 p s i ) e x c e p t f o r one s t r e s s meter (D). The measured s t r e s s i s w i t h i n the. t h e o r e t f c n l abutment p r e s s u r e of 8.6
MPa ( I ,250 p s i ) .
s t r e s s was of
t h e o r d e r of
a l i g n e d w i t h t h e s t r e s s meters.
roof f a i l u r e i n t h e t a i l g a t e e n t r y .
roof of
without e x c e p t i o n a s shown i n F i g u r e 7.
s e c t i o n of t h e t r a c k e n t r y .
f a i l u r e a n a l y s i s i s u s e f u l i n the
design of any o t h e r longwall f a c e s under s i m i l a r c o n d i t i o n s where t h e side-abutment tently. in-situ tion, 25.6m p r e s s u r e c a u s e s t h e f a i l u r e of t h e roof f o r m a t i o n c o n s i s -
In addi-
t h e o b s e r v a t i o n s i n d i c a t e t h a t a row of c o a l h l o c k s of 25.6 by
(84 by 84 f e e t ) i s s u f f i c i e n t t o s u p p o r t t h e abutment p r e s s u r e
T h i s a s p e c t i s d i s c u s s e d i n conjunc-
WIDTH OF FACE
According
to
recent
survey
(Peake,
1984),
the
average width
of
1.ongwall f a c e s i n c r e a s e d from 159. l m (522 f e e t ) t o 167.3111 (548.9 f e e t ) from 1979 t o 1982. It i s expected t h a t t h i s t r e n d w i l l c o n t i n u e because
To i n v e s t i g a t e t h e i n f l u e n c e of t h e fa.ce width on t h e f a c e c o n d i t i o n , i t
i s d e s i r a b l e t o measure t h e front-abutment p r e s s u r e a t v a r i o u s l o c a t i o n s
along t h e face.
A s a p r a c t i c a l matter,
however,
t h e measurement i s
q u i t e d i f f i c u l t because t h e i n s t a l l a t i o n of
s t r e s s m e t e r s a t t h e wide
If
the
f r o n t abutment the
pressure
i s assumed e q u a l t o t h e
presented previously
side-abutment
pressure,
s t r e s s measurements
4 .
the face.
A s t h e f a c e becomes wider, t h e i n f l u e n c e of t h e c h a i n p i l l a r
on t h e c e n t r a l p o r t i o n of t h e f a c e diminishes.
I n a d d i t i o n , t h e h y d r a u l i c p r e s s u r e i n t h e l e g s of f a c e s h i e l d s u p p o r t s
was measured i n an a t t e m p t t o d e f i n e t h e e f f e c t of t h e front-abutment
A h i g h front-abutment
and
therefore
deteriorating
increasing l e g pressures. of t h e f r o n t l e g s of
122 f a c e s u p p o r t s of
becomes l a r g e r , a l a r g e amount of s t r a i n energy i s s t o r e d i n t h e roof which can b e r e l e a s e d i n a f a s h i o n s i m i l a r t o c o a l bumps. C o n s o l t s mines have s e v e r a l sandstone i n t h e r o o f , roof f o r m a t i o n s . S i n c e most of
s t r o n g f o r n a t i o n s such a s l i m e s t o n e and
i t i s e s s e n t i a l t o monitor t h e breakup of t h e
t h e l e g s of
t h e unsuccessful a t -
h i g h p r e s s u r e a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e roof breakup.
Consol r o u t i n e l y monitors t h e ground movement t o d e t e c t t h e roof breakup when a longwall i s intgoduced t o a new a r e a . F i g u r e 9 i s t h e p l o t of
a t a l l (cepe a ) .
figure.
A f t e r t h e b r e a k of
t h e roof
formation,
t h e ground movement
It
is
pointed
out,
however, t h a t t h e c a s e s of a , b , c , and d had almost t h e same a r e a of s u r f a c e subsidence. During t h a t p e r i o d , t h e overburden rock formations
were b r e a k i n g up making a h i g h e r f r a c t u r e d zone above t h e c o a l seam. The maximum subsidence t h e n o c c u r r e d immediately a s t h e (case e ) and continued as the panel was retreated. f a c e moved With the
t h e support c a p a c i t y of
coal p i l l a r s .
though t h e roof i n t h e c r o s s c u t s f a i l e d , t h e subsidence p r o f i l e i n d i c a t e s t h a t t h e c o a l p i l l a r s a r e s u p p o r t i n g t h e side-abutment p r e s s u r e . Furthermore, t h e t a i l g a t e e n t r y was n o t s u b j e c t e d t o a d d i t i o n a l p r e s s u r e coming from t h e p r e v i o u s l y mined-out panel.
CONCLUSIOPJS
The paper summarizes some r e s u l t s of ground c o n t r o l work c a r r i e d o u t i n planning f o r longwall mining. The,results contributed t o t h e successful It i s expected t h a t longwall
o p e r a t i o n s of l o n g w a l l s i n Consol's mines.
The work d e s c r i b e d i s a p a r t of
f o r t h e i r p a t i e n c e and encouragement i n c o l l e c t i n g t h e b a s e d a t a .
REFERENCES
Anon.,
1970-1981,
IC8613, IR1062,
IR1074, IR1075, IR1076, IR1097, IR1108, IR1108, IR1112, IB1122, IR1133, IR1134, Mine S a f e t y and H e a l t h A d m i n i s t r a t i o n end p r e d e c e s s o r agencies: MESA and USBM.
Anon.,
1950-1976,
Government P r i n t i n g O f f i c e .
Anon.,
Choi, D.
S.
and McCain,
D.
L.,
2
1982, "Design
of Longwall Systems,"
F e r n , J. C.
1980, "A
Moroni, E. T.,
6 Seam"
Peake,
C.
V.,
~ g e ,August, pp 6 1 .
P i l k i n s o n , J . F . , 1985, "0utlook 1985: Heavy S t o c k p i l e s Squeeze P r i c e s , " Coal Age, January, pp 50-60.
Source: Injury Experience in Coal Mining. Informational Reports of MSHA, or Its Predecessors.
Figure I.
Fatal Injury Rates Bituminous Coal Industry Underground Mines 1950 - 1982
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Rock Quality Designation vs. Diametral Compressive Strength o f Coal Measure Rock
Face Position, m ( f t )
Figure 5 . Stressmeters A 8 B
Face Position,
m (ft 1
Figure 6. Stressmeters C 81 D
l o o
Shield Number
(- 50)
- 1 5.2
15.2 (50)
30.5 (1 00)
4 7 . 7 (150)
Position, m ( f t 1
6 1 .O (200)
76.2 (250)
. e 8 '-
.30
a Q)
(1)
0
LZ
w .u , -61 5 (2)
8)
.91 ( 3)
I
0
I
3048 (1000)
228.6 152.4 76.2 (750) (250) (500) Distance From Start-up Position, m (fi)
Panel Center
Figure I I. Ground Movement Across Longwall Panel with 213m Over burden