Article 1, December 27th, 2013, AJN/RFB

The Way is away or The Necessity of a living Impulse

First of all a few general thoughts on the idea of the path, and however it can be understood. There is no system of a path. The transfer of knowledge from the PATH happens always based on necessity and the existing conditions. There is no "schema", no formulated "lore". Any proceeding depends on certain requirements. The PATH has always existed. It might have been more embedded in a social structure in earlier days. It' s transfer always takes place in living contact, still there have to be differentiated an original impulse and it' s aftereffects. The degrees of actuality or levels of degeneration can be defined as follows: 1) a living core, based on authenticity, the practitioner learns and experiences concrete development steps on the PATH to gaining awareness. 2) a systematization that generalizes single experiences. 3) the freezing in a fixed lore. 4) fragmentations with the according by-products as functionaries, cultures et cetera. 5) the consumption of an aftermath wave through a public observed from the outside. The living impulse is necessary it keeps the transfer and passing on of knowledge alive. But this is the least known aspect of the PATH. It is only mentioned in the actual situation and there are no constant forms it could be identified with. Maybe there are fragments of an oral tradition reintroduced in another context, maybe not. It is always about the described content. In general the public reacts to this fact with two patterns of reaction: a) It is correctly recognized, that there is no system that can capture the elusive manifestations. The deduction that there thus is no PATH and every mentoring is in vain is not the less incorrect. In this case people are left to themselves, forced to remain captive of their own self-perception. The claim, life itself is the best teacher, ignores the fact, that people imprisoned in their self-perception can not be changed even by the harshest stroke of fate in their adopted basic nature. b) The second pattern is demanding fixed guidelines and reference points as the course of action could otherwise not be understood. This opinion demands fixed reference points, to hold on tightly to them. The PATH however, does not condition but un-conditions. It frees of crutches. Who refuses to go by oneself demands crutches as sign and proof of serious support and backing? This behavior is the one, creating and demanding cults, social establishments and so forth for those who need this footing and support.

To be able to recognize and distinguish these patterns of reaction requires a developed distinctive sense. It is the precondition to be able to start with the actual material. Now what does a teacher, a mentor, a living impulse in this context: Teach you how to learn. There is not a single superficially constant sign or attribute to the PATH. Where such happens it could be anything, but not the PATH. The PATH is an understanding and understanding is a state of constant evolution. After undergoing the necessary tests and experiences, the initial understanding is corrected and transforms into a new quality of understanding, an actual memory.

For true thinking is acting and true memory is true presence. Not because you think therefore you are,

when you are, you do not need to think.

The PATH is not seizable. Try to fixate it through categorizations and principles and it vanishes under your feet. Now what if we relate all of the mentioned above onto a small field, for example the interaction of two human beings in a physical dispute? We could describe the situation on the basis of basic principles. By this I mean the optimal utilization of human possibilities in terms of one's anatomy et cetera considering also the physics of our planet. For example: Absorb what comes - accompany what goes - is the path clear, advance. The relation to the PATH can also be described as follows: The path is never clear, it only seems to us that way, for something adapts to us which we do not perceive. Where something condenses to an extent we can perceive it we touch the surface, which we, if we have an intent, are able to use at that moment, to move along it, to cause effectiveness on a desired certain point. In other words: We take the path from our attacker, use his idea of the path to become effective in whatever form ourselves, while he is still occupied to finish following his path to the end. There is no such thing as a precomposed solution. It is created in every moment a new and changes in accordance unstoppably. If one is not capable of facing this case in it' s entity, then one tries to create a path, meaning one tries to adjust a situation by force and speed, or however else you want to say it. The PATH is not an expansion, the PATH is a quality living within all and everything (Thoughts, Places, People, Things, Situations et cetera), temporarily or with sufficient unfolding permanently. SALVE! AJN & RFB we move people!