Hindu law

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An article related to

Hinduism

Deities[show] Scriptures[show] Practices[show] Philosophers[show] Other topics[show]

Hindu

History

Hinduism portal Hindu Mythology portal

Hindu law in its current usage refers to the system of personal laws (i.e., marriage, adoption, inheritance) applied to Hindus, especially in India.[1]Modern Hindu law is thus a part of the law of India established by the Constitution of India (1950). Prior to Indian Independence in 1947, Hindu law formed part of the British colonial legal system and was formally established as such in 1772 byGovernor-General Warren Hastings who declared in his Plan for the Administration of Justice that "in all suits regarding inheritance, marriage, caste and other religious usages or institutions, the laws of the Koran with respect to the Mohamedans and those of the Shaster with respect to the Gentoos shall invariably be adhered to."[2] The substance of Hindu law implemented by the British was derived from early translations of Sanskrit texts known asDharmastra, the treatises (stra) on religious and legal duty (dharma). The British, however, mistook the Dharmastra as codes of law and

failed to recognise that these Sanskrit texts were not used as statements of positive law until they chose to do so. Rather, Dharmastra contains what may be called a jurisprudence, i.e., a theoretical reflection upon practical law, but not a statement of the law of the land as such.[3] Another sense of Hindu law, then, is the legal system described and imagined in Dharmastra texts. One final definition of Hindu law, or classical Hindu law, brings the realm of legal practice together with the scholastic tradition of Dharmastra by defining Hindu law as a usable label for myriad localized legal systems of classical and medieval India that were influenced by and in turn influenced the Dharmastra tradition. Such local laws never conformed completely to the ideals of Dharmastra, but both substantive and procedural laws of the tradition did impact the practical law, though largely indirectly. It is worth emphasizing that Sanskrit contains no word that precisely corresponds to 'law' or religion and that, therefore, the label "Hindu Law" is a modern convenience used to describe this tradition. This article will briefly review the Hindu law tradition from its conceptual and practical foundations in early India (Classical Hindu Law) through the colonial appropriations of Dharmastra (Anglo-Hindu Law) to the establishment of the modern personal law system (Modern Hindu Law).
Contents
[hide]

1 Dharma and law 2 Sources of dharma 3 Important legal concepts in Dharmastra 4 Classical Hindu law 5 Anglo-Hindu law 6 Modern Hindu law 7 See also 8 Notes 9 References 10 Further reading 11 External links

[edit]Dharma

and law

Dharma and law are not precisely the same. Dharma refers to a wider range of human activities than law in the usual sense and includes ritual purification, personal hygiene regimens, and modes of dress, in addition to court procedures, contract law, inheritance, and other more familiarly "legal" issues. In this respect, Hindu law reveals closer affinities to other religious legal systems, such as Jewish law. Dharma concerns both religious and legal duties and attempts to separate these two concerns within the Hindu tradition have been widely criticised.[4] According to Rocher, the British implemented a distinction between the religious and legal rules found in Dharmastra and thereby separated dharma into the English categories of law

and religion for the purposes of colonial administration.[5] However, a few scholars have argued that distinctions of law and religion, or something similar, are made in the Hindu legal texts themselves. [6]

[edit]Sources

of dharma

There are usually three principal sources of dharma in the Dharmastra texts: 1. ruti, literally translates as "what is heard," but refers to the Vedas or Vedic literature which are the liturgical and praise hymns of the earliest Hindu tradition 2. smti, literally "what is remembered," but refers to the Dharmastra texts as well as other Sanskrit texts such as the Puras and the Epics (Mahbhrata and Rmyaa) 3. cra, literally "practice," but refers to the norms and standards established by educated people who know and live by the first two sources of dharma In two important texts, namely the Laws of Manu [Manu Smriti] (2.6) and the Laws of Yjavalkya [Yajnavalkya Smriti] (1.7) another source of dharma, tmastui, literally "what is pleasing to oneself," is also given, but later texts and commentaries severely restrict this source of dharma. [7] Effectively, the three ideal sources of dharma reduce to two texts and the practiced norms of people who know the texts. It is the latter category that gave Hindu law a tremendous flexibility to adapt to different temporal and geographic contexts.

[edit]Important

legal concepts in Dharmastra

The Dharmastra developed an extensive repertory of legal concepts denoted by Sanskrit terms, many of which were adapted from older theological, philosophical, and political discourses. Although Dharmastra itself was rarely cited directly in litigation or other legal practice, many of these concepts show up in South and Southeast Asian legal documents such as deeds, charters, and orders preserved in inscriptions or other records, including those not composed in Sanskrit (Lubin, 2012). Important examples [8] include:

vyavahra In Dharmastra, vyavahra refers to the matters justiciable before a formal court of the king or constituted by the king. Vyavahara has two principal sections legal procedure (vyavahramtk) and the traditional eighteen Titles of Hindu Law (vyavahra-pada).

adhikra practical authority, authorisation, legal capacity, entitlement, responsibility[9] prama source of epistemic authority (pramatva, prmya)[10] a debt svatva property daa threat of punishment

pryacitta penance, expiation[11]

[edit]Classical

Hindu law

Main article: Classical Hindu law There is little evidence for the practice of law in India prior to about the eighteenth century. In some regions, such as Maharashtra, a kind of hybrid Hindu and Islamic legal system was fashioned under the Maratha kings.[12] In other places, such as South India, temples were intimately involved in the administration of law.[13] Law during the classical period was highly based upon the teachings of the dharmastra and the distinguished sources of dharma as dictated by those learned in the Vedas. [14] Although theologically law was primarily derived from Vedic knowledge, in actual practice, the community norms of particular social groups determined the actually rulings. Law was therefore highly decentralized and quite particular in nature towards specific groups.[15] What is almost completely lacking for classical and medieval India are the records of courts. In lieu of such records, other kinds of evidence for legal practice must be used to piece together an outline of Classical Hindu Law in practice. Such evidence includes prominently the numerous inscriptions from this period that record a variety of legal transactions, gifts, contracts, decrees, etc. associated with political rulers, temples, corporate groups and others. Many aspects of law were likely under the jurisdiction of castes or other corporate groups such as merchant guilds, military groups, traders, and religious orders. Beginning around the eighth century, Hindu legal traditions began to be imported into certain parts of Southeast Asia (Cambodia, Java, Bali, Malaysia, Thailand, and Burma) as part of a larger cultural influence mediated by trade and diplomatic relations. In each of these regions, Hindu law fused with local norms and practices, giving rise to legal texts (gamas such as the Kura-Mnawa in Java, and the Buddhistinfluenced Dhammasattas/Dhammathats of Burma and Thailand)[16] as well as legal records embodied (as in India) in stone and copper-plate inscriptions.[17]

[edit]Anglo-Hindu

law

Main article: Anglo-Hindu law

Fort William, Calcutta, where Henry Thomas Colebrookewas appointed professor of Hindu law in 1805

The early period of Anglo-Hindu Law (17721864) is characterised by three main features: 1.) the collection and translation of importantDharmastra texts by British administrator-scholars (especially Jones, Henry Thomas Colebrooke, Sutherland, and Borrodaile) in order to "apply" the rules of such texts to Hindus which further expanded the political rule of the British, 2.) the use of court pandits in British courts to aid British judges in the interpretation of classical Hindu law, and 3.)the proliferation of case law that resulted eventually in the "redundancy" of court pandits.[18] In 1864, just after India became a formal part of the British Empire, Anglo-Hindu law entered into a second phase (18641947), one in which the court pandits were dismissed due to the extensive case law that emerged during the first phase. During this time a series of parliamentary acts were passed to fix certain aspects of Anglo-Hindu law and to provide it with a legislative foundation. With the disappearance of court pandits, continual growth of case law (on topics involving questions of Anglo-Hindu law), and new legislative foundation, the relevance and interest in Dharmastra as the source of law also diminished as the parliamentary codified what they believed to be Anglo-Hindu law . The gap between the idealised legal system of Dharmastra and the diversity of customary law throughout British-India led to the fixing of regional customary laws by the British officials. This was done through interviews, observations, and discussions with locals. Massive volumes of customary rules that were in theory being enforced were collected throughout British-India and became part of the consultative resources of the courts. One of the most interesting aspects of the development of Anglo-Hindu law is the warm reception it generally received in India.[19] The British felt that one of their great gifts to India was in fact a more rational system of law and it appears that a lot of Indians agreed. Law was generally not among the colonial legacies that the nationalist movement in India wanted to remove or overturn.

[edit]Modern

Hindu law

Main article: Modern Hindu law With the formal independence of India from Britain in 1947, Anglo-Hindu law and the other major personal law system of the colonial period, the so-called Anglo-Muhammadan law (Islamic law), came under the constitutional authority of the new nation. The new constitution was officially adopted by India in 1950 and had a primary focus on securing equality in the social, political, and economic realms. [20] Although there has been discussion that the Indian Constitution has a secular Hindu bias, an amendment to the constitution (42nd Amendment, 1976) formally inserted the word secular as a feature of the Indian republic.[21] In the early 1950s, contentious debates ensued over the so-called Hindu Code Bill, which had been offered in the Indian parliament, as a way to fix still unclear elements of the AngloHindu law. Though a small minority suggested some kind of return to classical Hindu law, the real debate was over how to appropriate the AngloHindu law. In the end, a series of four major pieces of legislation were passed in 1955 56 and these laws form the first point of reference for modern Hindu law: Hindu Marriage Act (1955), Hindu

Succession Act (1956), Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act (1956), and Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act (1956). Criticism of the document is based on the belief that the laws in the Hindu Code bill should apply to all citizens regardless of religious affiliation. [22] Though these legislative moves purported to resolve still unclear parts of the Anglo-Hindu law, the case law and interpretive tradition of British judges and Indian judges in the British employ remained and remains crucial to the application of Modern Hindu Law. There are no religious courts in India; rather all cases are adjudicated within the state district courts, presided over by state bureaucrats. In the countryside it is possible for there to still exist village tribunals that try community members according to custom and religious law; however this is not adjudicated or enforced by the state. State judges have no formal religious legal training and are thus required to apply Hindu law in an abbreviated version. It is possible for a Hindu judge to preside over a Muslim couple's divorce, just as it is possible for a Christian to preside over the adoption case of a Hindu family. It is here where courts rely on the lawyers to argue the religious laws and advocate on behalf of their clients. Modern Hindu Law as given by the Judicial System. Among the most notable aspects of Modern Hindu Law as established by the Indian judges' jurisprudence is to be mentioned the permissibility of oral partition of Hindu Family Property. Mutation of land records in government offices can be made on the basis of such an oral partition. (Source: Recent Civil Reports, year 2007, Volume No. 5, Page No. 694 Judgment given by Bombay High Court Aurangabad Bench Case Title: Shekoji Bhimrao Vs. Motiram Maruti Maratha. 2007[5] RCR[Civil] 694 [Bombay] [Aurangabad Bench].)