Doria v. Case-Mate - Am. Compl.

Case 2:12-cv-09544-GAF-AJW Document 7 Filed 03/19/13 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:30
1 Daniel M. Cislo, Esq., No. 125,378

Kelly W. Cunningham, Esq., No. 186,229
2 CISLO & THOMAS LLP
1333 2nd Street Suite 500
3 Santa Monica, California 90401-4110
Tele]?hone: (310) 451-0647
4 Telefax: (310) 394-4477
5 Attorneys for Plaintiff
Doria International, Inc.
6
ti\::1
.-::
!
, .. ,
(--:!['"'

::::::--1
...
r?-lc;:
C:) ._ '

rq
fJJ (") --.

-1
....,
=
..,.,
;:ll:

"'<"1
-
1.0

r-;
-o
c
::0:
'!!
c.n
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DORIA INTERNATIONAL, INC., a
California corporation,
12
13
14
vs.
Plaintiff,
CASE-MATE, INC. a Georgia
15 corporation; and DOES 1-9, mclusive,
16 Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. CV 12-09544 GAF (AJWx)
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
I
S
L
O

&

T
H
O
M
A
S

L
L
P

A
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
s

a
t

L
a
w

S
U
I
T
E

5
0
0

1
3
3
3

2
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

S
A
N
T
A

M
O
N
I
C
A
,

C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A

9
0
4
0
1
-
4
1
1
0

T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

4
5
1
-
0
6
4
7

F
a
c
s
i
m
i
l
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

3
9
4
-
4
4
7
7

Plaintiff Doria International, Inc. (Doria), alleges as follows:

I. THE PARTIES

1. Doria is a California corporation with its principal place of business
located at 1149 3rd Street, Suite 210, Santa Monica, California 90403 in this
judicial district.
2. Upon information and belief, Defendant Case-Mate, Inc.
(Defendant), is a Georgia corporation with its principal place of business
located at 2048 Weems Road, Tucker, Georgia 30084.
3. The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate or
otherwise of Defendants Does 1-9 inclusive, are unknown to Doria, who therefore
sues them by such fictitious names. Doria will seek leave to amend this complaint
to allege their true names and capacities when they have been ascertained. Doria
is informed and believes and thereon alleges that each of the fictitiously named
Defendants is responsible in some manner for the occurrences herein alleged and
that Dorias damages as herein alleged were proximately caused by those
Defendants. At all times herein mentioned, Defendants Does 1-9 inclusive were
the agents, servants, employees or attorneys of their co-defendants, and in doing
the things hereinafter alleged were acting within the course and scope of their
authority as those agents, servants, employees or attorneys, and with the
permission and consent of their co-defendants.

II. JURISDICTION & VENUE

1. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to
28 U.S.C. 1331, 1338(a), 1367, and 2201(a) since the right to a declaratory
judgment arises under the federal Declaratory Judgment statute, 28 U.S.C.

3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
I
S
L
O

&

T
H
O
M
A
S

L
L
P

A
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
s

a
t

L
a
w

S
U
I
T
E

5
0
0

1
3
3
3

2
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

S
A
N
T
A

M
O
N
I
C
A
,

C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A

9
0
4
0
1
-
4
1
1
0

T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

4
5
1
-
0
6
4
7

F
a
c
s
i
m
i
l
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

3
9
4
-
4
4
7
7

2201(a), the patent invalidity and noninfringement claims arise under the patent
laws of the United States, including 35 U.S.C. 281 and 289, and the trade
dress invalidity and noninfringement claims arise under the federal Lanham Act,
15 U.S.C. 1051, et seq.
2. Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)
since a substantial part of the events and omissions giving rise to the claims
occurred in this judicial district. Additionally, venue is proper in this judicial
district under 28 U.S.C. 1400(b) to the extent that the Defendants several
offers for sale through online commercial websites, through which Defendants
have offered the accused products, constitutes a regular and established place of
business in this judicial district.
4. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant in that it maintains
a web site at www.case-mate.com through which it actively markets, advertises,
promotes, sells, and services California residents as its customers. Defendants
web site is freely available to any online user worldwide, including users in this
judicial district. On its web site, Defendant advertises and offers for sale iPhone
cases, among other things, and users can purchase these items directly from
Defendants web site, making Defendants web site an interactive website that
subjects Defendant to personal jurisdiction in this judicial district.

III. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

5. Doria is a global supplier of innovative fashion-forward accessories
for mobile phones and other personal consumer electronic devices. From the
beginning, Doria has had a commitment to approachable fashion and customer-
centric design.
6. Today, Doria continues to break new ground in fashion and design
for mobile accessories, pairing warm, sophisticated design with industry leading

4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
I
S
L
O

&

T
H
O
M
A
S

L
L
P

A
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
s

a
t

L
a
w

S
U
I
T
E

5
0
0

1
3
3
3

2
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

S
A
N
T
A

M
O
N
I
C
A
,

C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A

9
0
4
0
1
-
4
1
1
0

T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

4
5
1
-
0
6
4
7

F
a
c
s
i
m
i
l
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

3
9
4
-
4
4
7
7

innovation. It has hundreds of stylish and functional accessory designs, many of
which enjoy their own intellectual property protection. They are novel, unique,
innovative, and highly acclaimed.
7. On or about September 18, 2012, Doria received a cease and desist
letter from Defendant in which Defendant asserts trade dress rights in and to
certain shapes of camera windows in mobile phone cases. In the letter, Defendant
itself describes this feature as, a camera window with two perpendicularly-
angled edges connected by a curved arc. Doria attaches as Exhibit 1 hereto a
true and correct copy of a cease and desist letter dated September 18, 2012 as
Doria received it purporting to be from Defendants counsel with this description
of Defendants purported trade dress.
8. Doria adamantly denies that Defendant has developed any trade dress
right in a camera window with two perpendicularly-angled edges connected by a
curved arc or that it even could have a trade dress right in a camera window
with two perpendicularly-angled edges connected by a curved arc. Doria also
adamantly denies that any of its highly acclaimed designs infringe any trade dress
right Defendant attempts to assert.
9. In the last paragraph on the first page of Defendants cease and desist
letter, Defendant also asserted that, These actions . . ., in anticipation of their
allowance by the Patent Office(s), will be in violation of Case-Mates design
patent rights upon issuance. Doria recently learned that the United States Patent
and Trademark Office (PTO) issued U.S. Design Patent No. D673,554 (the
554 Patent) to Defendant on January 1, 2013. Doria attaches as Exhibit 2
hereto a true and correct copy of the 554 Patent.
10. Doria contends that the 554 Patent is invalid for several reasons,
including, but not limited to, the grounds that every feature of the claimed design
is functional and the prior art anticipates or renders obvious the claimed design.


5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
I
S
L
O

&

T
H
O
M
A
S

L
L
P

A
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
s

a
t

L
a
w

S
U
I
T
E

5
0
0

1
3
3
3

2
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

S
A
N
T
A

M
O
N
I
C
A
,

C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A

9
0
4
0
1
-
4
1
1
0

T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

4
5
1
-
0
6
4
7

F
a
c
s
i
m
i
l
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

3
9
4
-
4
4
7
7

11. Doria contends that the 554 Patent is not enforceable for several
reasons, including, but not limited to, the grounds that Defendant failed to
disclose highly relevant prior art references to the United States Patent and
Trademark Office during prosecution.
12. Doria also contends that it does not infringe the 554 Patent for
several reasons, including, but not limited to, the grounds of intervening prior
art.
13. This dispute, therefore, gives rise to the following causes of action.

IV. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Declaratory Judgment of Design Patent Invalidity
(Under 35 U.S.C. 101, 102, and 103)

14. Doria hereby repeats and incorporates herein the allegations set forth
in paragraphs 1 through 13 above.
15. In the last paragraph on the first page of Defendants cease and desist
letter, Defendant also asserted that, These actions . . ., in anticipation of their
allowance by the Patent Office(s), will be in violation of Case-Mates design
patent rights upon issuance. Upon information and belief, the 554 Patent is the
design patent Case-Mate was asserting against Doria in its cease and desist letter
since it was the only design patent for which Case-Mate had any PTO notice of
allowance at the time Case-Mate delivered its cease and desist letter.
16. Doria, on the other hand, contends that the 554 Patent is invalid for
several reasons. First, every feature of the claimed design is functional. The
scope of the design claimed in the 554 Patent is defined by the solid lines shown
in Figures 1-7 thereof. (See, Exhibit 2, pages 3 and 4). Every facet of this
claimed design, however, is dictated by the most efficient case shape for covering
and conforming to the outer surfaces of a standard iPhone.

6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
I
S
L
O

&

T
H
O
M
A
S

L
L
P

A
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
s

a
t

L
a
w

S
U
I
T
E

5
0
0

1
3
3
3

2
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

S
A
N
T
A

M
O
N
I
C
A
,

C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A

9
0
4
0
1
-
4
1
1
0

T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

4
5
1
-
0
6
4
7

F
a
c
s
i
m
i
l
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

3
9
4
-
4
4
7
7

17. Second, the prior art anticipates or renders obvious the claimed
design. In particular, numerous iPhone cases existed as of November 30, 2011,
the earliest possible priority date for the 554 Patent. These iPhone cases
comprise this claimed design, and therefore, anticipate it.
18. Should there be any slight difference between the design of these
prior art iPhone cases and the claimed design, then the differences are
insubstantial such that the prior art iPhone cases, at a minimum, render the
claimed design obvious.
19. That is, Doria contends that the claimed design is entirely dictated by
functional concerns, is anticipated by designs found in the prior art, and/or at a
minimum, is rendered obvious by the teachings of the prior art. Accordingly,
Doria contends that the 554 Patent is invalid.
20. This creates an Article III case and controversy warranting a
declaratory judgment by this Court. Doria therefore requests a judgment
declaring that the 554 Patent is invalid.

V. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Declaratory Judgment of Design Patent Unenforceability
(Under 35 U.S.C. 101)

22. Again, Defendant asserted in its cease and desist letter to Doria that
Doria will infringe Defendants patent rights once the allowed patent application
issues as a design patent, namely, the 554 Patent.
23. Doria, on the other hand, contends that the 554 Patent is
unenforceable on the grounds of inequitable conduct on the part of Case-Mate for
failure of Case-Mate to disclose materially relevant prior art references.

7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
I
S
L
O

&

T
H
O
M
A
S

L
L
P

A
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
s

a
t

L
a
w

S
U
I
T
E

5
0
0

1
3
3
3

2
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

S
A
N
T
A

M
O
N
I
C
A
,

C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A

9
0
4
0
1
-
4
1
1
0

T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

4
5
1
-
0
6
4
7

F
a
c
s
i
m
i
l
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

3
9
4
-
4
4
7
7

24. The prior art is replete with numerous iPhone cases that existed as of
November 30, 2011, the earliest possible priority date for the 554 Patent. These
iPhone cases comprise this claimed design, and therefore, would have blocked the
554 Patent, but for Case-Mates failure to disclose them to the PTO during
prosecution of the 554 Patent.
25. That is, Doria contends that the PTO would not have issued the 554
Patent, but for Case-Mates failure to disclose materially relevant prior art design.
declaring that the 554 Patent is unenforceable.

VI. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Declaratory Judgment of Noninfringement of Design Patent
(Under 35 U.S.C 101)

28. Again, Defendant asserted in its cease and desist letter to Doria that
Doria will infringe Defendants patent rights once the allowed patent application
issues as a design patent, namely, the 554 Patent.
29. Doria, on the other hand, contends that it does not infringe the 554
Patent. Dorias design is distinct in several ways, and several prior art references
intervene between the design claimed in the 554 Patent and Dorias designs, and
any attempt to extend this design to encompass Dorias design would be improper
as it would ensnare numerous prior art designs as well.
declaring that Doria does not and has not infringed the 554 Patent.

8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
I
S
L
O

&

T
H
O
M
A
S

L
L
P

A
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
s

a
t

L
a
w

S
U
I
T
E

5
0
0

1
3
3
3

2
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

S
A
N
T
A

M
O
N
I
C
A
,

C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A

9
0
4
0
1
-
4
1
1
0

T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

4
5
1
-
0
6
4
7

F
a
c
s
i
m
i
l
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

3
9
4
-
4
4
7
7

VII. FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Declaratory Judgment of Functionality of Trade Dress
(Under 15 U.S.C. 1125(a)(3))

32. Defendant insists that certain identified Doria products infringe
Defendants trade dress and demands that Doria stop selling these identified Doria
products to avoid any further infringement.
33. Doria additionally contends that Defendants claimed trade dress is
functional and therefore not protectable as a trade dress.
34. First, Doria contends that Defendants description of its purported
description is singularly unintelligible. To the extent Defendant meant the shape
shown on the first page of the attachments to Defendants letter (denoted by
Defendant with a circle-A), only a very few alternative designs for a camera
window exist. Defendants circle-A design is merely a rectangular window that,
along one corner, conforms to the curvature of the corner on the mobile phone
itself since it abuts this corner. That is, all aspects of this design are dictated by
function. A rectangle is one of the most, perhaps the most, efficient camera
window shapes. When the rectangle occupies the upper-left-most corner of the
mobile phone case, it naturally will need to conform to the upper left-hand corner
of the mobile phone case. The shape of the upper left-hand corner of the mobile
phone case is dictated by the shape of the upper left-hand corner of the mobile
phone. (See, for example, camera windows shown in the pages of Defendants
attachment to its cease and desist letter, reproduced as Exhibit 1 to this
Complaint).
35. Any other shape would be inefficient and arbitrarily complex for no
good reason. Trade dress protection should not force competitors to adopt less

9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
I
S
L
O

&

T
H
O
M
A
S

L
L
P

A
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
s

a
t

L
a
w

S
U
I
T
E

5
0
0

1
3
3
3

2
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

S
A
N
T
A

M
O
N
I
C
A
,

C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A

9
0
4
0
1
-
4
1
1
0

T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

4
5
1
-
0
6
4
7

F
a
c
s
i
m
i
l
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

3
9
4
-
4
4
7
7

efficient, less workable, or arbitrarily fanciful camera window designs that would
put the competitors at a financial disadvantage. This is what the doctrine of
functionality is intended to prohibit.
36. An actual case and controversy therefore exists between Doria and
Defendant as to whether Defendant is barred by the doctrine of functionality from
claiming a trade dress right in either a camera window with two perpendicularly-
angled edges connected by a curved arc or the camera window shown in its
attachment circle-A to its cease and desist letter, which is reproduced as Exhibit 1
to this Complaint.

VIII. FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Declaratory Judgment of Lack of Secondary Meaning in Trade Dress
(Under 15 U.S.C. 1125(a))

products to avoid any further trade dress infringement.
39. Doria contends that Defendants description of its purported trade
dress is singularly unintelligible. To the extent Defendant meant the shape shown
on the first page of the attachments to Defendants letter (denoted by Defendant
with a circle-A), Doria contends that the camera window shown denoted as circle-
A does not serve as a trademark or trade dress and has not developed any
trademark significance.
40. Doria insists that Defendant therefore does not own the asserted trade
dress, that Defendant has not acquired secondary meaning in the asserted trade
dress, and that it therefore does not perform as a trademark or trade dress.

10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
I
S
L
O

&

T
H
O
M
A
S

L
L
P

A
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
s

a
t

L
a
w

S
U
I
T
E

5
0
0

1
3
3
3

2
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

S
A
N
T
A

M
O
N
I
C
A
,

C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A

9
0
4
0
1
-
4
1
1
0

T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

4
5
1
-
0
6
4
7

F
a
c
s
i
m
i
l
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

3
9
4
-
4
4
7
7

41. Defendants asserted camera window is inherently not distinctive, and
there are a multitude of similar and near-identical camera window shapes that
have been on the market long before Defendants purported products. The field is
too crowded, especially for such a non-distinctive camera window design, for
there to be any secondary meaning among the consuming public.
Defendant as to whether Defendant has a trade dress right in either a camera
window with two perpendicularly-angled edges connected by a curved arc or the
camera window shown in its attachment circle-A to its cease and desist letter,
which is reproduced as Exhibit 1 to this Complaint.

IX. SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Declaratory Judgment of Noninfringement of Trade Dress
(Under 15 U.S.C. 1125(a))

products to avoid any further trade dress infringement.
45. First, Doria contends that Defendants description of its purported
description is singularly unintelligible. To the extent Defendant meant the shape
shown on the first page of the attachments to Defendants letter (denoted by
Defendant with a circle-A), however, Doria contends that none of its products
contain any camera window that is sufficiently similar to this to constitute trade
dress infringement. Only a very few of its numerous different designs contain
anything like this, and even these few camera windows are noticeably different
(see, for example, camera windows shown in the remaining pages of Defendants

11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
I
S
L
O

&

T
H
O
M
A
S

L
L
P

A
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
s

a
t

L
a
w

S
U
I
T
E

5
0
0

1
3
3
3

2
n
d

S
t
r
e
e
t

S
A
N
T
A

M
O
N
I
C
A
,

C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A

9
0
4
0
1
-
4
1
1
0

T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

4
5
1
-
0
6
4
7

F
a
c
s
i
m
i
l
e
:

(
3
1
0
)

3
9
4
-
4
4
7
7

attachment denoted by Defendants with a circle-B).
46. Doria therefore contends that it does not infringe and has not
infringed Defendants professed trade dress rights.
Defendant as to whether Dorias accused camera window designs infringe
Defendants purported trade dress rights.

X. DORIA INTERNATIONAL INC.S PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Doria International, Inc., prays that this Court:
1. Enter a declaratory judgment that U.S. Design Patent No. D673,554
is invalid;
2. Enter a declaratory judgment that U.S. Patent No. D673,554 is
unenforceable;
3. Enter a declaratory judgment that Doria does not infringe U.S.
Design Patent No. D673,554;
4. Enter a declaratory judgment that Defendant does not have any trade
dress rights in its asserted camera window design on the grounds of functionality.
5. Enter a declaratory judgment that Defendant does not have any trade
dress rights in its asserted camera window design on the grounds that there is no
secondary meaning.
6. Enter a declaratory judgment that Doria does not infringe and has not
infringed Defendants professed trade dress rights.
7. Grant judgment for Doria for the costs of this action and its
attorneys fees incurred; and

,...
,...
.,
.,
.q.
01
C')
0-
-0
:..

....l
-
....l oi.i
v:!
If) 0 X
;S tieti
-'i .. u
;;

'-' onoo

- " N-
I-.. ..J
t iil
(I').
l'l<,.._
'"' -o.,
i 40
- oo
lf J
-
<U>
C)

<-

i.j
z
0
I:
CL
"'
.J
{:!
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8. Order such other and further legal and equitable relief as the Court
may deem appropriate.
Dated: March 19, 2013 By:
T\ 1227().12\Firsr amended complaim ror dcclar:uory judgmcnr.doc
Respectfully submitted,
CISLO & THOMAS LLP
VL d1 (/'-),
Daniel M. Cislo, Esq. \
Kelly W. Cunningham, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
12
1
2
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
3 Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ .P. 38, Plaintiff Doria International , Inc. hereby
4 demands a trial by jury on all issues raised by the Complaint that are triable to a
5 JUry.
6
7
8
9
10 Dated: March 19, 2013
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
T:\1227042\FirsL amended complnilu ror dccl:oraLOry judgmcnL.doc
Respectfully submitted,
CISLO & THOMAS LLP
fLti1k:t'
Kelly W. Cunningham, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
EXHIBIT 1
'
GARDNER GROFF
GARDNER GROFF GREENWALD & VILLANUEVA, PC
PATENT, TRADEMARK AND COPYRIGHT LAW AND RELATED MATTERS EXCLUSIVELY
September 18,2012
Doria lntemationallnc. Via Email
support@x-doria.com c/o American Certification Institute
4301 E. Valley Blvd. 02
Los Angeles, CA 90032
Re: Intellectual Property Notice
Our File: 2C25.9-200
To Whom It May Concern:
(Confirmation via FedExJ
Tracking #: 7989 8869 4332
This firm represents Case-Mate, Inc. in intellectual property matters. Case-Mate
is a well-known electronics case manufacturer and enjoys international sales of its
innovative designs. Correspondingly, Case-Mate invests significant resources to
protect the intellectual property embodied in its innovative cases.
For example, Case-Mate has developed and marketed the distinctive and
ornamental case feature as shown in Attachment A, comprising a camera window with
two perpendicularly-angled edges connected by a curved arc. As a result of significant
marketing exposure and sales, this camera-window design has become distinctly
recognized in the marketplace as trade dress of Case-Mate, protected under Section
43{a) of the United States Lanham Act. Additionally, Case-Mate has filed a number of
design patent applications, both domestic and internationally, to protect this design
feature.
It has been brought to our attention that Doria International Inc. (a.k.a. "X-Doria
11
)
has begun marketing a mobile telephone case with a camera window design that is
likely to cause confusion in the marketplace with Case-Mate's above-described trade
dress and patent-pending design. Specifically, Attachment B shows a variety of the X-
Doria cases with camera window designs that are virtually indistinguishable from Case-
Mate's design.
These actions are in violation of Case-Mate's trade dress rights, and in
anticipation of their allowance by the Patent Office(s), will be in violation of Case-Mate's
design patent rights upon issuance. Accordingly, we hereby demand that X-Doria
immediately and permanently terminate any and all marketing and sale of mobile
telephone cases with camera windows that create a likelihood of confusion with the
above described Case-Mate design. Since X-Doria is at least now aware of Case-
Mate's rights, any continued marketing or sale by X-Doria of such cases will be
considered willful and may be subject to enhanced damages in a court of law.
20 IS POWERS FERRY ROAD, SUITE 800, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30339 U.S.A.
TELEPHONE 770.984.2300 FACSIMILE 770.984.0098
WWW.GARONERGROFF .COM
Doria International Inc.
c/o American Certification Institute
September 18, 2012
Page -2-
Please provide us with confirmation of your understanding and compliance. If we
receive your agreement to these terms within two weeks of the date of this letter, Case-
Mate will agree to waive its claim for monetary damages for violation of its intellectual
property rights on this matter to date. In the absence of such timely agreement, Case-
Mate reserves all rights to injunctive, monetary and other relief of any kind. I look
forward to your prompt response.
BKG:rjh
Enclosures
cc: Doria International Inc.
3592 Rosemead Blvd, #220
Very truly yours,
~
~ ' Bradley K. Groff
For the Firm
(Via FedEx - Tracking#: 7989 8871 6889)
Case 2:12-cv-09544-GAF-AJW Document 7 Filed 03/19/13 Page 17 of 26 Page ID #:46 Barely There Slim Case for iPhone 5 I Case-Mate
http://www.ease-mate.com/ iPhone-5-Cases/Case-Mate-iPhone-5-Bare ...
2 of 3
Home 1/J > Sma11phonc Cettlfhltp.//Wt-.'w.c cie-mole.com/cclCS/SmoJIPhone--COlti O\P) > i?hone Co1e1 (hllp.I/Y.ww csp} >
il'none 5 Sc:el'f In ore Cme1
BARELY THERE for iPhone 5
write a review (lil'hone-5-Cases/Case-Male-iPhone-5-Barely-There-Cases-write-review.asp)
I I
DETAILS REVIEWS
Think thin wilh tho original slim case. The Barely There !Phone 5 case forms a classic and
protective design that shows off the timeless look of your device. The impact resistant hard shell
covers lhe back and sides. while lhe l ay-flat feature protects lhc front of your iPhooe by
extending tho bezel above U1e screen. A silicone interior liner provides Impact cushioning and an
impressive detailed paHem.
l.JI.e 24 lw<>et 3 5 26
Select Color- Titanium Grey
CM022398 In Stock!
$30.00 OTY
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
Utlra-Siim, snap-on design wilh tay-ftal screen
protection lor your iPhone 5
Interior patterned Inlay adds greater protection &
finished feel throughout
Premium soft touch finish that's easy to hold
Orders now ship September 21,2012
Also available lor !Phone 4(4s lhttal!www case-mate com
liPhone-4-CasostCasc-Mato-IPhonc-4-45-Barcly-Tbere-
Cascs.aspl
ALSO RECOMMENDED

5-Cases
/Case-
Tortolseshcii (/1Phonc-5-Cases/Case-Mate-1Phone-
5Tortolsosheii-C:.sos.asp)
foriPhone 5
$40.00
Tough Case (/IPhone-5-Cases/Case-Mate-IPhone-
Mate-IPhone-s-Tough-Casos.asp)
5-TortoiseshEOl !Phone
5
Cascs.asp)
540
.
00
5-Cases
/ Case-
Recycled
1.1ate-iPhoneiiiPhonc5-C:Isos/Case-M:.te-IPhone-5-Recycled-
5-Tough
Casos.asp) r Pet-Cases.a.sp)
(/!Phone- for !Phone 5
5-Cases S35.00
r.1ate-iPhone-sarety There
5-Rccycled-

for i?honc 5
530.00
5-Cascs
/Casc-
Mate-iPhone-
5-Barely-
GET THE LATEST ON DEALS I enrcr your email address
a
f"':. :u :.not :11cn\
9/ 17/20 12 10:53 AM
X-Doria
I of2
D
DASH
iPhone 5
$34.99
I I
http://shop.x-doria.com/productslkick1409834
Kick
iPnonc 5
$29.99
Colors Add to Cart>
outSide the USA? r=l
OVERVIEW SPECS FAQ
back and enjoy handsfree Facclime(tm). movies and more witn Kick fO<
the iPhone 5. A pop-oul kickstund puts your iPhono ot tho porfect viowing
onglc. either in horizontal or vcr1ic.at orientations. Kick's two piece design gives
you u glossy, smooth top mated With o matte-touch. rubbery bottom IO< gnppy
pcrfcrmonc.c.
Froo Standard Shipping On All USA Orders.
VENUE
oPhonc 5
$34.99

(
I
I
KICK
oPhone 5
$29.99
J

SHIELD
iPhone 5
$39.99
9/1 7/2012 10:52AM
X-Doria 1 Faccbook
X-Doria
2,404 likes 2S talking about this
Electronics
X-Doria Is a leading maker of fashion-f orward accessories for mobile lifestyles.
I of6
About

X- Doria updated their cover photo.
13 September
like Comment Share
! I l l ~ , Lalit Kumar Jain and Kristin Banjany like this.
Highlights
http://www.facebook.com/XDoriaProducts
Email or Phone
Keep me logged in
is on Facebook.
To connect with X-Doria, sign
J
/
Photos
Also on
http://www .x-doria.com
Recent Posts by Others on X-Doria
Lauren Bene
Is there a way to be notified when the
1 Friday at 08:24
l
~ ! Kristin Banjany
When will your Shield cases for iPhone
2 13 September at 17:10
-
9117/2012 10:52 AM
X-Doria I Facebook
http://www. facebook.com/ XDoriaProducts
2 of6
X-Doria Timeline Now
II
X-Doria
12 September
The new iPhone 5 is here and we've got the style to go with it!
Check out our new lineup for iPhone at http://www.x-doria.com/
Like Comment Share
Kristin Banjany, Michael D Smith, Manal Sedlk and 6 others like this.
Vanessa Fel ice When will this style be available? All the VENUE say out of stock.
Friday at 20:38
More Posts
X-Doria Hi Vanessa Felice, Charcoal Black is available now and available at our site. The other colors, unfortunately, won't be ava
month.
II
Friday at 21:04
X-Doria shared a link.
11 September
Likes
9117/2012 10:52 AM
EXHIBIT 2
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
USOOD673554S
c12) United States Design Patent (10) Patent No.: US D673,554 S
** Jan.1,2013
Simmer
(54) ELECTRONIC DEVICE CASE WITH
BEVELED EDGE
(75) Inventor: Garrett Paul Simmer, Atlanta, GA (US)
(73) Assignee: Case-Mate, Inc., Tucker, GA (US)
(**) Term: 14 Years
(21) Appl. No.: 29/422,180
(22) Filed: May 17,2012
Related U.S. Application Data
(63) Continuation of application No. 29/407,529, filed on
Nov. 30, 2011.
(51) LOC (9) Cl. .................................................. 14-03
(52) U.S. Cl. ...................................................... Dl4/250
(58) Field of Classification Search ... D14/203.3-203.7,
D14/217, 496, 238.1, 240,447, 137, 138AA,
D14/138 R, 138 G, 218, 341-347, 248, 250-253,
D14/440; D3/103, 247, 201, 218, 269, 273,
D3/301, 303; D13/103, 107-108, 119; 220/4.02;
248/309.1; 361/679.56, 679.3, 679.25, 816;
379/426, 433.11, 455; 455/575.1, 575.8;
206/305, 320
See application file for complete search history.
(56) References Cited
U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
D574,819 S *
D575,056 S *
D587,267 S *
7,612,997 B1 *
D617,784 S
D619,361 S *
D622,716 S *
D623,180 S *
D624,304 S *
D628,374 S *
8/2008 Andre et a!. ................... D3/269
8/2008 Tan ................................ D3/218
212009 Wang ........................... D14/356
1112009 Diebel eta!. ............. 361/679.56
6/2010 Richardson eta!.
7/2010 Andre et a!. ................... D3/269
8/2010 Andre eta!. ................. D14/250
9/2010 Diebel ......................... D14/250
9/2010 Danze et al .................... D3/201
12/2010 Lee et al ........................ D3/201
(Continued)
(45) Date of Patent:
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Original Case-Mate AT&T/ Verizon Apple iPhone 4, iPhone 4S
Barely There Rubberized Hard Case, <URL:http:/ /www.acces-
sorygeeks.com/case-mate-iphone-4-4s-barely-there-rubber-hard-
case-cm016445-pur.html>, retrieved from internet on Aug. 27,
2012.*
(Continued)
Primary Examiner- Carla Jobe Wright
(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm- Gardner Groff Greenwald
& Villanueva, PC
(57) CLAIM
The ornamental design for an electronic device case with
beveled edge, substantially as shown and described.
DESCRIPTION
FIG. 1 is a back perspective view of an electronic device case
with beveled edge according to the claimed design.
FIG. 2 is a first end view of the electronic device case of FIG.
1.
FIG. 3 is a second end view of the electronic device case of
FIG. 1.
FIG. 4 is a first side view of the electronic device case of FIG.
1.
FIG. 5 is a second side view of the electronic device case of
FIG. 1.
FIG. 6 is a back view of the electronic device case of FIG. 1;
and,
FIG. 7 is a front view of the electronic device case of FIG. 1.
The claim is directed to the exterior rear, sides, top, and
bottom of the electronic device case with beveled edge. The
dot-dash-dot broken lines represent boundaries of the
claimed design. The dash-dash-dash broken lines depict
unclaimed environmental structure. The broken lines form no
part of the claimed design.
1 Claim, 2 Drawing Sheets
U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
D634,741 S 3/2011 Richardson eta!.
D635,131 S * 3/2011 Roman
D637,592 S * 5/2011 Magness et a!.
D638,006 S * 5/2011 Chang.
D642,170 S 7/2011 Johnson et a!.
D644,218 S * 8/2011 Akana et al.
D647,519 S * 10/2011 Rothbaum et a!.
D649,539 S * 1112011 Hong
D651,203 S 12/2011 Michie eta!.
D651,204 S * 12/2011 Wibbyet a!.
D662,923 S * 7/2012 Piedra et al.
D662,925 S * 7/2012 Mayberry et a!.
D663,263 S * 7/2012 Gupta eta!.
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
US D673,554 S
Page 2
D14/240
D14/250
D14/250
D14/341
D14/250
D14/250
D14/250
D14/250
D14/250
D13/103
slim-silicone-iphone-4-case>, retrieved from internet on Aug. 28,
2012.*
Hybrid Cover for iPhone 4S and iPhone 4 by Incase, <URL:http://
goincase.corn/products/detail/hybrid -cover-c 159820/2>, retrieved
from internet on Aug. 28, 2012.*
Review of CandyShell Flip for iPhone 4S/4, published on Apr. 27,
2012 by SpeckCases, <URL:http://www.youtube.com/
, retrieved from internet on Aug. 28,
2012.*
Review of Speck CandyShell View Case for iPhone 4 & 4S, published
on Aug. 26, 2012 by uncletone99, <URL:http:/ /www.youtube.com/
retrieved from internet on Aug. 28,
2012.*
Review of Caze Ultra Slim Silicone iPhone 4 Case, posted on Jul. 8,
2010, <URL :http:/ /iphonecasesblog.corn/iphone-4-case/caze-ultra-
Speck Products, "The CandyShell Collection", Inspired(https://
www.speckproducts.com/collections/candyshell), p. 1 of 5.
Otterbox, "!Phone 4 Defender Series Case", (http:/ /www.otterbox.
corn/iPhone-4-Defender-Series-Case/ APL2-I4XXX,default,pd.

iphone-4-cases), p. 1 of2.
* cited by examiner
U.S. Patent Jan.1,2013 Sheet 1 of2 US D673,554 S
--
U.S. Patent Jan.1,2013 Sheet 2 of2 US D673,554 S

I

il
I
\ ...
_.. ..................................................................................................................................................................................
I

lcj

j

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
PROOF OF SERVICE
I am over the age of eighteen (18) years, employed in the State of California, and not a party to the
above-entitled action. My business address is 1333 2nd Street, Suite 500, Santa Monica, California 90401-
4l10.
0
0
0
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013, I served:
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
addressed as follows to:
Case-Mate, Inc.
c/o Steven A. Curlee
2048 Weems Road
Tucker, Georgia 30084
BY MAIL: I am readily familiar with the Firm's practice of collecting and processing
correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited with the United States
Postal Service on the same day with a postage thereon fully prepaid at Santa Monica, California, in
the ordinary course of business. I am aware that, on the motion of the party served, serv1ce is
presumed invalid if the postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one (I) day after
the date of deposit for mailing shown on this proof of service.
BY FEDERAL EXPRESS/OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: I caused a copy of such document to be
sent via overnight delivery to the office(s) of the addressee(s) shown above.
BY ELECTRONIC PROCESS: An electronic copy of this document was sent to the above email
address(es) via the Electronic Court Filing (ECF) procedure provided by this Court.
BY PERSONAL SERVICE: I caused such envelope to be delivered by band to the person(s)
18 identified above.
19 I declare, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and
that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of this Court at whose direction the service was
20 made.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case 2:12-cv-09544-GAF-AJW Document 7-1 Filed 03/19/13 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:56
ATIACHMENTS
a. Exhibit 1- Lender's Application for Payment of Insurance Claim
b. Exhibit 2- Order for Withholding of Employee Wages
c. Exhibit 3- Garnishment Hearing Decision
d. Exhibit 4- Ledger Update
EXHIBIT 1
\ ~ ~ ) - 7 - ~
--- - - ---
.. .. .
;. , .
j

' ,
'

.
.
. .
:- ..
' .
.
.. _. ..... .. ,.._.,.,.J'\I,
M..VI.,. .. .. ftiiiiii!IMI ....... ..... ......................
(l)lllllllll!liap.._. .... ............... .
...
81768 G9r
\\
3:)1::1.::!0 HrHH 1-U'H 61 :S't mez:-vr-Ntlf
- - --.--... - ..... -- --- -- -- - - - ---
C7:QT
-- --

"'
"
:cr
..
. ,
;
: i
B ot
JMT1At..S:
' rxJE
,.
Elf.i: . DATi -, .. ay ...
-
-.
_,
t:eA,iC112TIME: .. d
8:J.J.:9.5
_:!
"
1::!58
DATI!

--
ltlfOO: OIUGINAL SUP:
;:z :ltrr6.
s--rru
'
CRACE END!

.. AllJ. RE.Stll. OAYS: - .
. ....

RJDO: ADJ. SUP 'QA-rt!;
.::
n
""'
liM' Mft!: AUG

;
OI!.C '
' .i
fl
R.(t
A!S MAJI APR MAY .NNe oWLY AllO S&PT (leT
NOV CEC

\8_ JAN Fe MAA APR MA"t .ruNE JU\.V AU<l sur OCT ,.0\1 I)I!C .- .-

.
19_ JAM
.... M.\R APR UAV ..WNii JULY AUO sur Oc:T HOV D&:C

>
Ul- FEB lt'IAA APR MAY JUNE .a.n .. v AUG Se.Pr' aCT NOV DIC
18....:- Fn UAR .APR !GAY JULY AYQ am OCT NOV DEe "'
.
1i_dAN fEB. W.ft Af'il MAY JUNE .WL's' A.UO SiPT ocrr HO\f OGC ., .. _
.:
cr
I
! t9 __ JAH
NAil APR Hli.V JUHS
JUI.Y AUG
stiJtr OCT Nev nac :
'
te_m.J J:O MAA AJIR MAY
JULY AUG SI!P'f ocr Die
1t_JAN JII!1J ifAR APR .. JUNt JUlY AUG UP'f ocr NOV DE.C
1ti-JAN PES MAR APft MAY .IUNE JULY AllC: LI::Fr aar NOV cee
10-JAH
,.
MAA PJIR
*-Y
.1\11\iE .ntLY ..tUr:i S&Ff OCT
NOV .OEC
,. ___
FEB MAR MA'I Jllml. Jtll.V Aim SEFY' OCT NOV OISC
18_JM4 FU lUA APR M.Q,'f JUN& Jut. 'I AUG Slin OT JK1V
l)(i{: __ ,
11-J,\N FU MAR APfl MAY JUNE JUI.Y .AUO $eFT CiGT MOY nee
. DarreAMEHTS P. D.GR.lCE
OntER OTMEA

"""""'""'=
c
.
__
_:.., ' .
Pet ft1-?l1-
FW!Jf

Po l .. tU--QLD Alslan. P of C
AGO O!sabi!ity
. F'MD
L\ -at..l-qto
Oeafh
Oays:

CitaUOt'J
1stM.C. Judgmeflt
H3r=lantp ?antJI AniQrt.
--..... _..__ ........
90:91 010l / 80/L0
--- - - - - -
EXHIBIT 2
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF eoucRtt()JN I 0 PM 4: 23
STUDENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE

**AUTO .
#WG 0659Yll 523411 9#
LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS
9300 IMPERIAL HWY STE RM132
DATE : JUNE 17, 2003
DOWNEY CA ryo242-2813
J(,J,,IJ iuuJ,J,Ju11al1laalriJ,,J nullnJI,IImllmlaluJ
SUNDAY A NYENKE
lfll-23-0659
185,995.17
ORDER FOR WITHHOLDING OF EMPLOYEE WAGES
FOR DEBT OWED TO U.S . GOVERNMENT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 488A OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION ACT OF 1965, AS
AMENDED, (20 U.S.C. l095A), AND NOTWITHSTANDING ANY PROVISION OF STATE
LAW TO THE CONTRARY, THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION ORDERS YOU TO WITHHOLD
AND REMIT TO THE U.S . DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AT THE ADDRESS LISTED
BELOW 10.% OF THE WEEKLY DISPOSABLE WAGES PER PAY PERIOD, OR SUCH LESSER
AMOUNT AS IS PERMITTED BY FEDERAL LAW, OF THE ABOVE-REFERENCED
INDIVIDUAL ON ACCOUNT OF A DEBT OWED THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
< EDJ .
NOTICE OF THIS ACTION HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN SENT TO THE INDIVIDUAL, AND
HE/SHE HAS BEEN AFFORDED THE MANDATORY DUE PROCESS. FOR YOUR
INFORMATION, A COPY OF SECTION 488A OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION ACT OF 1965,
AS AMENDED <20 U. S.C. l095Al , WHICH AUTHORIZES THIS ACTION IS ENCLOSED.
DISPOSABLE PAY IS DEFINED AS THAT PART OF THE COMPENSATION OF ANY
INDIVIDUAl FROM AN EMPLOYER REMAINING AFTER THE DEDUCTION OF ANY AMOUNTS
REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE WITHHELD.
PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER , YOU ARE REQUIRED TO BEGIN WITHHOLDING FROM THE
DISPOSABLE WAGES OF REFERENCED EMPLOYEE THE LESSER OF:
(A) 10% OF THE DISPOSABLE WAGES OF THE EMPLOYEE, OR
(B) THE AMOUNT, IF ANY, BY WHICH THE EMPLOYEE'S DISPOSABlE WAGES FOR
EACH WORKWEEK IN A PAY PERIOD EXCEEDS THIRTY TIMES THE CURRENT
FEDERAL HOURLY MINIMUM WAGE .
PLEASE MAKE ALL PAYMENT INSTRUMENTS PAYABLE TO THE "U.S . DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION" AND INCLUDE A MANIFEST SHEET WITH THE EMPLOYEE'S NAME AND
SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER ALONG WITH THE PAYMENT INSTRUMENT.
PAYMENTS TO: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
NATIONAL PAYMENT CENTER
P.O. BOX 4142
GREENVILLE, TEXAS 75403-4142
YOU ARE REQUESTED, BUT NOT REQUIRED UNDER LAW, TO COMPLETE AND RETURN
THE ENCLOSED "EMPLOYER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF WITHHOLDING" <EAWWl TO THE
ABOVE ADDRESS WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THIS ORDER. RECEIPT OF THIS
INFORMATION WILL PROVIDE ASSURANCE IN THE EFFICIENT IMPLEMENTATION OF
14- 7-
5
Vll 0000279 0306161809
------------
1TED STATES GOVERNMEN
E GARNISHMENT ORDER
!. Date of !his Q; 2. Date Mai led to Employer:
APRIL 21, 2004 APRIL 22 2004
RE: 4. Employee Name:
SUNDAY A NYENKE
TO:
6. Employer:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS
FROM:
8. Creditor Agency:
u. s. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
STUDENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
COLLECTIONS
10. Contact Name:
ADAM EVANS
12. Internet e-mail address:
FSA.AWGQ>ED . GOV
14. Amount Due:
$
A-t .... ..- _._, ,. .-
"'i' .LOJ 1 y ..,i) -t"J
15. As of (Month/ Day/Year):
.... , ,_ , , _ ,..._,

3. Credit Agency No. (refer to t his number in al l
correspondence):
5411230659
S. Employee Social Security No.:
411-23-0659
7. Employer Mailing Address (include street address, p.o. box, suite no., city,
state, zip code):
9300 IMPERIAL SUITE RM 132
DOWNEY CA 90242-00.00
9. Cr editor Ag;ency Mailing Address {inctude street address, cit y, state. zip

P.O. BOX 4142
GREENVIllE, TX 75403-4142
11. Telephone No.:
404-562-6013
13. Fax No.:
404-562- 6110
Note: The amount due may be increased as a result
of additional interest, penalties, and ot her costs
being assesed by the Creditor Agency.
Section 1. ORDER. YOU, the Employer, are hereby ORDERED to deduct from all disposable pay paid by you
to the Employee the Wage Garnishment Amount described in Section 2 ofthis Order. You are ordered t o begin
deductions on the first pay day after you receive this Order. If the first pay day is within 10 days after you
this Order, you may begin deductions on the second pay day after you receive this Order. You are ordered to
continue deductions until you receive notification from t he Creditor Agency to suspend or discontinue deductiom
YOU are further ORDERED to pay the Cr editor Agency all Wage Garnishment Amounts deducted by you unde
STANDARD FORM 3298 !ll
Prcscribed 31 CFR 28.
Vll 0001235
- -' _ .. _ -..... -. .,;,.
116. ABA Routing No.: 17. Acrount No.: 18. Agency Code (ALC) No.:
1\1/A N/A
19. Account Title: 20. Other information required (i.e, tr:lcklng no., debtor nam, etc.):
I
I 1\l/A N/A
Otherwise, mail checks (postmarked within 3 business days of the withhoiding) to:
21. Mailing address for cheti< payments:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
P .O . DOX 4142
GREENVILLE TX
ectnon 2. WAGE GARNISHMENT AMOUNT.
1\l/A
(a) The Wage Garnishment Amount is S per pay period in accordance with an
agreement between the Creditor Agency and the Employee.
-OR-
(b) The Wage Garnishment Amount for each pay period is the lesser of:
(l) of the Employee's disposable pay (not to exceed 15%);
(2) the garnishment amount set forth in !5 U.S.C. l673(a)(2) (the amount by which the employee's
disposable pay exceeds an amount equivalent to 30 times the maximum wage); or
(3) 25% of the Employee's disposable pay less the amounts withheld under the withholding
orders with priority. A withholding order with priority is a valid, legally enforceable withholding order thai. either (i) was
received by the Employer prior to this Order, or (2) is an order for family support regardless of date received. Upon termination
of any withholding order with priority or upon receipt of an order for family support subsequent to the receipt of this Order, the amour
withheld for this order shall be recalculated based on the formula described in this Section 2(b).
Mote: l'llie Employer may use ll.be attached Wage Garnishment Wmrksheet
fl:o cakullate the Wage Garnishment Ammllnt.
CRIEDITOR AGENCY ClER1fHFJ!CATaON. The <CIRJEDHTOIR AGENCY llllereby cerrliftfl!es that this Order i:
issued in accordance with the requirements of3l U.S.C. 3720D and 31 C. F.R. 285.11 and is mailed to t he
Employer on the date shown above.
Title: Director, Atlanta Service Center
CREDITOR AGENCY SIGNATURE
Print Name: Erin Swanson-Hall
STANDARD FORM 329B (ll-9Sl BACi:
Yll
0001235
.. - - ----
EXHIBIT 3
.s
i
,,

,<
'
:.:

"
T-0 ' d
L0/S0 39\Jd
December 15, 2009
Ms. Sunday Nyenke
4750 West Washington Boulevard
Los Angeles. CA 90016
Federal family Education Loans
Debt No.: G 199609000902107
F1996040Il27630l
f199604011276302
F199604011276303
F199604011276304
F199604011276305
Fl996040ll276306
Balance: $76,414.85
GARNISHMENT HEARlN'G DEClSION
Dear Ms. Nyeuke:
This letter presents the findings at!d conclusions after the e0$I'it
requested by you regarding att objection to collection of il defaulted student loan
account held by U.S. Department of Education. Federal Student Aid, through wage
garnishment action, This decision was .rlte.r of your argun1ents
and all available recQJ:'ds related io you.. account, including those mlbmitted by you Md
those held by the Department. OUr fmdinwo are conolusive and constitute t..he
Dqllil.f'tments :final decis!on on your o\Uectious.
Your letter dated .August 20, 2009

The Department's original determination thai yOUt' wages are subject to a garnishment
order, as proposed in at the;. rate of lS percent of your disposable pey, stands.
On 9, 2008, the iswecl a decision that this debt is by
wage garnishment at the rate stated in the decision. You ttow object t o wage gsmisbm@nt
81?68 29 8T.8
S30I..:::l.::IO 1'r\lJI
:DI.:::l=:!O H9IH Nf8
lg6ll01T8LS60l0Tt
- - - - ---- --- -
' ".;
C:0"d
L0 /10 39'ii'd
Page 2. - Ms. Sunday Nyenke
due to financial hardship. We therefore consider your curr-ent objection to he a request for
reoonsideTatioo ofthe prior decigion thlllt the debt was enforceable by wage garnishment
at the r.ate sW.ted in the deci3iQn.
$ You object to the ptoposed garnishment 6lCtion on the grounds that the Department' a
pri"Vate CQUection agency contractor has either !efused to work with you lo resolve the
debts in question or hag in some manner "i.o!e.ted. your rights under the Fair Debt
CQllection Practices Act.
W@ :regret that you <rre dissatisfied \\liih the manner in which your account is being
administered. Representativ\:s ofthe Department and collection agency empioyees llt<e
trained to deal with the public in a courteons a..11d professional mw.ner. When we are
notified ()f specific, substantiated instance& ofhara-9s..ment, we review tb@ evidence and
take appropriate action.
The Department notes that you have aUijged unprofessional :fiom our contract
representative in efforts to recover funds due t o the Oeparent. Any allegations
regarding our oontract.ocs are apru't from the hearings process. the
PepRmnent is notified of and insta:nces of hata$s.ment, the
Department reviews the evidence and takes apf?ropriate The will
address your concerns with the contractor involved upon receipt of your written
allegatilllls.
You should note that collection agtrncies.are t equired under ofthei1' oortu-acts to
oollect past due debts. The collection may:
{) conduct address checks by oon1acti:K1gt.Wrd parties;
e inform yon. that your debt is due and payable in full;
0 advise you
e t e'Cfiew your credit report;
your employer to verify employment;
111 refer your a<ecount for iitiggtion in fedetal. court.
'<1
81768 <:9 BT-8
HDIH Nff 010C-vl-Ntif
538 I..:L::lO M'v''l
Sl:gr 0t0Z/80/L0
md "lt:Hru
s::0 d
L0/00 39\td
Pagc3 - Ms. SundayNycnk.e
Y <>u must submit your l.Vl'it.ten allegations against the private collection agency io the
address below:
U.S. of Education
ATTN: Contract Services Branch
61 Forsyth Street. Sutu l9T89
Atla.trta, GA 30303
However, these allegations have no bearittg on the validity or the existence offh.e debts,
the status, or the araount due Of past due on the debts.
o You that yott have not :receivo" a r-esponse to yonr previous inquiries.
Our recorda indka!.te that on September 24, 2004, we sent a letter to yol.l addressing your
concerns.
You "vish to avoid garnishment by establishing a. voluntary agreement.
0-uf recor<Js indicate that we you a Notice of Proposed Wag:e Ga.mishment" on
FebruMy 19. 2004, you of our intentions to order your employer i:o garnish
your Wflges. This :notice gave you an opportunity to e3Iablish an agreement to repay this
debt in tnonthly i115tallmen1s, request a lwaring, or to raise e. hardship issue within
30 days.
Because you failed to est.abtish rmd adhere to an approved repayment agreement in
timely !l'l.l.Wner or prove a vaHd objection to Wtigfl ga..rnishtn.ent, we sent a withhoidL"lg
ordert<.) your employer on April21, 2004. Once tbe Departmeu! bas felt warranted L
initiating a.dminietrn'iive wag-e garnishment. it is the Deprut.tnenf s policy to le.we 1he
garnishmetl.t in foo::e until 'the delinquent claim ts fully satisfied.
& You objected to the garnishment on the basis that your federal and/or state tax refun&
m- other payments are l.Jeing it\ partis.i repayment oHhis debt; causing finat"!Oial.
hardship fur you.
Administrative 'treasury offset of federal and state. tax refunds and other payments is
authorized by the Debt Collection Act of 1982 and the Debt Collection Improvement
of 1996. P..s1y llCC!"JU!llt with the Department thai has a ba'lal1oo and is not in vohn1.ta.ry
repayment is eligible for refe:ml.l to 1h.e U.S. Department of the Treasury's Fin<IDciai
Service fur offget. Because wage garnishment paymeJtts are not voluntary,
the Department 1'1\ay Tt>fer rut for garnishment and Treasury offset
simultaneously.
<)-'\J bf -:LS
817GB 81:8
3.'J l.:h!O HDl H NfS:
0t.0c-vr- NBf
538 I.:J.::iO Mtrl L956G01S18LS60601S1
-- . -... __ - ------ - --------
> \
!

.
t
!.
! -
1: 0 "d
L0/20 39'v'd
Page 4 SundayNyenke.
Our r.,cords indicata tlmt sent you a notice on A1.1gust 15,2000. This notice stated in
part that if we oid not receive payments. we would refer your account to Treasucy for
offset. TI1e R\Otice nlso provided a telephone number you could contact for infonnation
abo1.rt. your repayment options. However. we did not receive any payments within 65
ofthe notice. 1htJ funds t.M..at "have been offset will not be returned to you. Your account
will be removed from the offset when this debt is satisfleiL
You objected to garnishment on the basis that withholding at the rate o:f 15 percent of
your disposable pay would cause a financial hardship to you_
The Request for Hea.ting advised ycu to submit a :financial discloSLU"e statetnen't in orde;-
to be considered in evaluating your objection to garnishmellt. k oft.\e date ofthls letter,
the Department bas not received a. completed finMcial di.sclosu:re or ether
explam\tion of your financicd circumstances to supJX>rt your clttim of hardship.
\Ve conclude that this debUs ciL'f<>rceable by garnishment aithis time in the amount stated
in the notice. with aC\..-"Tued interest and costs of collection, at the rate of 15 percent of
yout disposable pay. Because your Reque'llt fur Hearing was not timely f!led. the
Department directed your employer to garnish 15 percent of your &posable pay.
bal"'-nce sho'Wil includes the outstanding principal of$60,417.55, accrued interest of ..,
$1 .. 038.82. 31td unpaid fees aXld projected coUection of$14.958.48. The unpaid
prill!:ipal balance noted above wiH confuwe to accrue You .::an have tbis wage
ganlisbment action cancelled by the Deprutment by sending pn.yment in :full.
Send paynlcnt in fuH to;
U.S. Department of Education
National Payment Center
P.O. :H)5028
Atlanta, GA 30348-.5028
Make all instru-vnents payable to the
11
U.S. of and
include yout name and Social Number on the :fu.cf} ofthe payment 1:nsttument.
You may request t o hnve us reconsider this decision en tlu, existence. past dt.Hl
status, and enforceability of this clebi:. To obtain reconaideration, you must submit
evidence that you did not previously aubmit lliat yetSUades us that we should
If we agree to teconsider this detision, we will notify you.
817GB <:9: BTB
:::D1::b!O H9IH. N.[B
S38L:l.:l0
L953601ETBEL5660TT
0T.El 6/80/L0
I
.
l
.
. '
l
J

-.
'
Pag 5 - Ms. Stmda.y Nyen..l(e
You may also request of this dt1cision due to financial To
reque$ eith or on the grounds of financial haroship, you
must submit evidettCe with your that demonstrates that your situation
bas materially changed since we issued our decision so t.hat we shot.old reduce:: the amount
issued under t.he orde:r. You may n .. Financial Disclosure Statement" from our
customer service representative at o.r download tlle form at
www.l SOOiwiUpay .cont/awgfs.
The request for or reconsideration wili no!. delay Qr ctmcel the
wifuholdins; tntder any order thai bas already been issued. submit your request.
along with a copy of the original dedsioa and the eviden{Je you W<tnt us ro consider, to:
U.S. Depa:dment ofEdncation
A WG Hearings Unil.
P.O. Bmc 5227
TX 754035227
It' you dl6agree with this you may have this decision reviewed by bringing a
lawsuit in a Federal District Court.
Your employer may not discharge you from employmen'4 uor diacip!int-.ry
against you as a resuit of an Order for nor can a prospective erop1oyer
refuse to employ you as a re.sru:tt of this proposed action or exi!ltence of an Order fol
Withholding. lf any actions for such ar i.nken against you, you may sue that
employer U.1state or fedetai oourt for back pay, attorney' s fees. tUtd.
punithre damages.
This determumtion affects only th.e debt described in the notice of g;mlishment, and is
totally separate from any notice of proposed payment offset or you
may ha-ve from a guaranty agency. If you Teceivecl n notice; of collection
frmn a gutttatrty agency. you ;ftlust present any objectiotas 'i.O coll@ction. gctiou -to that
agen(;}'.
sm.cereiy,
Jacquenette Thompson
Official
Boi'TQWer
'* -;_.r:J
.
.. \. .
G0'd
L0/t>0
. --- ---- ----
-- -
-- ______ , ____ .
3:1 l.:l::iO H81 H NfH
LS5l l0118SLS5ZZ.01E1
-- --- - ---
- - ----- . ,

010Z./80/L0
---------------- - -
EXHIBIT 4
~ 3 ~ r - :2--5
- ----
- o .. ----- ---- __________________
LEDGER UPDATE
----- ------ ----------------- --- -
411 - 23 - 0659 PT5484282 NYENKE,SUNDAY A
DISTRICT: 10199 LA CO. OFFICE OF EDUCATION
CURRENT BAL EMP STATUS VENDOR
FEE CODE
CUR'tENT CASE NUMBER
411230659 999/El
EFFECTIVE DATE
07/ 10/2003
ORIGINAL BAL
185,995.17 188,315.10 ACTIVE 0000005221 US DEPT OF EDUCATION NPCENTER
GARNTYPE
EWO Student Loan
GARN STATUS
ACTIVE
PRIORITY
1
PRIME CYCLE
E1
----- - ------- B WARRANT - - ----------
--------------- A WARRANT ------------- ---
NUMBER DATE

c=.J
PRE-SET COMMENT:
S UBNIT i
f ; .
NUMBER
:-------------,
. I

DATE PAY SCHED
AMOUNT PAYMENT APPLY TO BAL
Yes -
FREE FORM C:OMI>'.ENT:
!__________________________________________ .......................
CANCEL- G.iill_Nl$HMEi'!T SUrlMAR'( [ VIEW !IRS 0ARNJSi f\1LNl'S
-------------. --. ---
-------- B WARRANT-------- -------- A WARRANT --------
NUMBER DATE NUMBER DATE
0020298292
0020235697
0020186043
0020123418
0020043853
0027105285
0027077707
0027077138
0019972591
0019914938
0019861934
0019861941
0019858933
0019796336
0019564529
0019487558
0019423561
0019371422
0019314162
0019225125
0019146694
0019091483
0019024487
0018953497
0018891411
0018812176
0018726923
0018641278
0018570454
0018520126
0018449119
0018369515
0018298759
0018242669
0018175161
0018107112
0018043260
0017964357
0017885317
0017804090
0017729399
0017674450
0017601705
0017522101
0017452298
0025328697
0017391627
)017321131
)017243746
)017166708
)017075367
)016974800
)016877520
)016802945
)016741527
02/04/2013
01/03/2013
12/04/2012
11/02/ 2012
10/04/2012
10/01/ 2012
09/10/ 2012
09/07/ 2012
09/04/2012
08/02/2012
07/05/2012
0007340276 03/05/2013
0007294836
0007249365
0007198739
0007151468
0007106284
0007105285
0007077707
0007077138
0007064553
0007036855
0006995824
02/05/2013
01/04/2013
12/05/2012
11/05/ 2012
10/05/2012
10/ 01/2012
09/ 10/ 2012
09/07/ 2012
09/05/ 2012
08/03/2012
07/09/2012
07/05/2012
07/05/2012- .. 0006995824 07/05/2012
07/03(2012 . 0006995824 07/05/2012
06(04/2012 0006944486 06/05/2012
03/02/2012
02/02(2012
01/04/2012
12/02/2011
11/03/2011
10/04/2011
09/01/2011
08/04/ 2011
07/01/2011
06/ 01/2011
05/03/ 2011
04/04/ 2011
03/03/2011
02/03/2011
01/04/2011
12/03/2010
11/04/2010
10/04/ 2010
09/02/2010
08/03/2010
07/01/2010
06/02/2010
05/04/2010
04/02/2010
03/04/2010
02/04/20 10
01/04/ 2010
12/03/ 2009
11/ 03/2009
10/ 02/ 2009
09/03!2009
09/01/2009
08/04/2009
07/02/2009
06/04/2009
05/04/2009
04/03/2009
03/03!2009
02/03/2009
01/05/2009
12/04/2008
0006798185
0006753815
0006710259
0006657821
0006608027
0006559073
0006520389
0006496669
0006449596
0006397066
0006346876
0006296502
0005246675
0006196193
0006148064
0006088950
0006036935
0005984468
0005946712
0005921436
0005871491
0005816241
0005760406
0005705783
0005650804
0005598608
0005545833
0005486928
0005430788
0005373234
0005328929
0005328697
0005298786
0005245906
0005182715
0005120996
0005059977
0009470841
0009412230
0009346573
0009275917
05/ 24/2012
03/05/2012
02/03/2012
01/05/2012
12/05/2011
11/04/2011
10/05/ 2011
09/ 02/ 2011
08/05/2011
07/05/2011
06/03/2011
05/05/ 2011
04/05/2011
03/04/2011
02/04/2011
01/05/2011
12/03/2010
11/05/2010
10/05/2010
09/03/ 2010
08/05/ 2010
07/02/2010
06/04/2010
05/05/2010
04/05/2010
03/05/2010
02/05/2010
01/05/2010
12/04/2009
11/05/2009
10/05/ 2009
09/04/2009
09/01/2009
08/05/2009
07/02/2009
06/05/2009
05/05/2009
04/03/ 2009
03/05/2009
02/05/2009
01/05/2009
12/05/2008
PAY
SCHED
E1P
E1N
Ell
ElJ
ElH
Elf
271
C3B
249
ElD
E1B
E1X
E1X
ElX
E1V
E1P
E1N
ElL
Ell
E1H
Elf
ElD
ElB
ElX
E1V
EIT
E1R
ElP
El N
Ell
Ell
E1H
E1F
ElD
El B
E1X
E1V
ElT
El R
ElP
ElN
Ell
ElJ
E1H
ElF
ElD
E1B
E1X
E1V
ElT
E1R
ElP
ElN
Ell
ElJ
AMOUNT
1,030.05
1,046.41
1,013. 49
950.62
930.61
1,096.27
900.81
341.99
107.58
1,175.99
916.48
- 1,194.88
1,080.96
--1"13;92
1,194.88
1,093.63
-99,999.99
949.51
954.87
947.59
935.75
956.40
944.11
927.25
929.15
945. 91
945.91
945.91
945.91
945.91
945.91
944.16
949.62
949.62
947.82
930.64
931.82
937.93
1,114.66
1,097.13
1,064.91
988.62
961.75
962. 26
1,055.04
1,025.14
954.04
1,058.36
214.96
921.29
933.68
937.89
938.90
938.90
938.90
928.89
1, 001.92
925. 61
BALANCE PMT GARN OPERATOR
DUE Y/ N STAT INITIALS
188,315. 10 A IBM
189,345.15 A IBM
190,391.56 A IBM
191,405.05 A IBM
192,355.67 A IBM
193,286.28 A IBM
194,382. 55 A JOE
195,283.36 A JOE
195,625.35 A JOE
195, 732.93 A IBM
196,908.92 A IBM
198,906.36 N A JOE
197,825.40 A JOE
198,906.36 N A JOE
197,711.48 A IBM
198,906.36 A IBM
199,999.99 N P JOE
100,000.00 P IBM
100,949.51 A IBM
101,904.38 A IBM
102,851.97 A lBM
103,787.72 A IBM
104,744. 12 A IBM
105,688.23 A IBM
106,615.48 A IBM
107.544.63 A IBM
108,490. 54 A IBM
109,436.45 A
110,382.36 A
111,328. 27 A
112, 274.18 A
113,220.09 A
114, 164.25 A
115, 113.87 A
116,063.49 A
117,011.31 A
117,941.95 A
118,873.77 A
119,811.70 A
120,926.36 A
122, 023.49 A
123,088.40 A
124,077.02 A
125,038.77 A
126,001.03 A
127,056.07 A
128,081.21 A
129,035.25 A
130, 093.61 A
130,308.57 A
13 1,229.86 A
132,163.54 A
133,101.43 A
134,040.33 A
134,979. 23 A
135,918.13 A
136,847.02 A
137,848.94 A
COMMENTS
SUPP 249 1'-JC 0'1-06 :ll112.JB
J?.c\L_AOJ BASfQ_QtA
OllT TO V#5221 ON 07-10201216 iB-
Q5..T.:::.?J';.iif' REFUND 16-WT t: 1 'l!i(i
Ct.tICEU.ED 07-092.0l 2m
ROti CALC
0016551761
001.6472221
0016397848
OO:t0311134
0016227939
0016150619
0016055658
0015946184
0015849590
0015754690
0015585924
0015602330
0015502620
0015392995
0015314392
0015231354
0015144133
0015059688
0014966829
0014847817
0014750179
0014660915
0014591653
0014509934
0014414028
0014320235
0014246005
0014166773
0014079704
0013997820
0013896302
0013788868
0013690741
0013596394
0013532364
0013448975
0013343028
00 13246857
0013178821
0013092107
0013003797
0012921150
0012816241
0012706389
0012608977
0012500570
0012430283
0012355102
0012246510
0012153053
0012079571
0025540231
001 1990536
0011902736
0011803178
0011711282
0011598080
0011488213
0011389938
0011326425
0011235106
0011136055
0011044383
0010967108
10/ 02/2008
09/05/2008
08/04/ 2008
07/01/2008
06/03/2008
05/05/2008
04/04/2008
03/04/2008
02/05/2008
01/03/2008
12/04/2007
11/05/2007
10/09/2007
09/05/2007
08/03/2007
07/03/2007
06/05/2007
05/04/2007
04/05/2007
03/05/2007
02/05(2007
01/05/2007
12/05/ 2006
11/03/2006
10/05/2006
09/05/2006
08/04/2006
07/05/2006
06/05/2006
05/05/2006
04/04/2006
03/03/2006
02/03/2006
01/04/2006
12/05/2005
11/04/ 2005
10/ 04/2005
09/02/ 2005
08/05/2005
07/05/2005
06/03/2005
05/05/2005
04/05/2005
03/04/2005
02/04/2005
01/04/2005
12/03/2004
11/ 05/2004
10/05/2004
09/03/2004
08/05/2004
07/22/ 2004
07/02/2004
06/04/2004
05/04/2004
04/05/2004
03/05/2004
02/05/2004
01/05/2004
12/05/2003
11/04/2003
10/03/2003
09/05/ 2003
08/05/2003
0009138475
0009090919
0009054477
0008987855
0002998108
0008827974
0008752153
0008676045
0008599280
0008529128
0008448041
0008372645
0008302820
0008244478
0008164012
0008095948
0008010965
0007931420
0007857698
0007773698
0007691767
0007622407
0007534977
0007462122
0007391980
0007335076
0007285668
0007215258
0007121472
0007046039
0006963845
0006888576
0006815954
0006745603
0006665598
0006589746
0006519892
0006464770
0006417536
0006344834
0006265101
0005184074
0006101695
0006022191
0005947151
0005876234
0005796211
0005721233
0005646946
0005593577
0005552532
0005540231
0005483575
0005399579
0005323095
0005249409
0005172168
0005100718
0005029823
0004949433
0004676346
0004802847
0004746471
0004700730
120 -
10/03/2008
09/05/2008
08/05/2008
07/03/2008
06/05/2008
05/ 05/2008
04/04/2008
03/05/2008
02/05/2008
01/04/2008
12/05/2007
11/05/2007
10/05/2007
09/05/2007
08/03/2007
07/05/2007
06/05/2007
05/04/2007
04/05/2007
03/05/2007
02/05/ 2007
01/05/2007
12/ 05/2006
11/03/2006
10/05/2006
09/05/2006
08/04/ 2006
07/05/2006
05/ 05/2006
05/05/2006
04/05/2006
03/03/2006
02/03/2006
01/05/2006
12/05/2005
11/04/2005
10/05/2005
09/02/2005
08/05/2005
07/05/2005
06/03/2005
05/05/2005
04/05/2005
03/04/2005
02/04/2005
01/05/2005
12/03/2004
11/05/2004
10/05/2004
09/03/2004
08/05/2004
07/22/2004
07/02/ 2004
06/15/2004
06/04/2004
05/05/2004
04/05/2004
03/05/2004
02/05/2004
01/05/2004
12/05/2003
11/05/2003
10/03/2003
09/05/2003
08/05/2003
TOTALING
ElF
ElD
E1B
E1X
E1V
ElT
E1R
E1P
E1N
Ell
EU
E1H
ElF
ElD
ElB
ElX
E1V
ElT
E1R
E1P
ElN
Ell
ElJ
E1H
ElF
E1D
ElB
ElX
E1V
E1T
E1R
ElP
E1N
Ell
ElJ
E1H
ElF
E1D
ElB
ElX
ElV
ElT
E1R
ElP
E1N
Ell
ElJ
E1H
E1F
E1D
E1B
ElX
E1V
ElT
E1R
ElP
E1N
Ell
ElJ
ElH
ElF
ElD
ElB
916.31
955.55
1,059.61
1,033.00
1,062.59
1,019.57
1,038.39
1,038.39
1,051.83
1,022.26
1,025.56
1,065.58
1,047.07
1,014.85
1, 046.48
993.30
882.34
786.14
643.01
935.61
953.29
985.55
1,003.02
1,003.02
1,025.70
915.05
852.26
809.44
809.44
809.44
809.44
809.44
809.44
799.99
796.76
795.76
796.76
789.86
789.86
756.76
756.76
743.51
743.51
743.51
743.51
743.51
741. 67
741.67
741.67
735.35
735.35
88.89
707.27
0.00
471.51
478.52
518.09
511.71
471.51
471.51
471.10
471.10
471.10
466.90
506.09
3,625.36
139,710.55
140,526.86
141,582.41
142,642.02
143,675.02
144,737.61
145,757.18
146,795 57
147,833.96
148,885.79
149,908.05
150,933 61
151,999.19
153,046.26
154,051.11
155,107.59
156,100. 89
156,983.23
157,769.37
158,412.38
159,347.99
160,301.28
161,287.83
162,290.85
163,293.87
164,319.57
165,234.62
166,086.88
166,896.32
167,705.76
158,515.20
169,324.64
170,134.08
170,943.52
171,743.51
172,540.27
173,337 03
174,133.79
174,923.65
175,713.51
176,470.27
177,227.03
177,970.54
178,714. 05
179, 457.56
180,201.07
180, 944.58
181,686.25
182,427.92
183,169.59
183,904.94
184,640.29
184,729.18
185,436.45
180,686.03
181,157.54
181,636.06
182,154.15
182,665.86
183,137.37
183,608.88
184,079.98
184,551.08
185,022.18
185,489.08
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
MODIFIED

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
PROOF/CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, certifY that I am over 18 years of age and not a party to
this action. My business address is 100 Oceangate, lih Floor, Long Beach, CA
90802.
On March 13, 2013, I served copies of the following document(s):
Plaintiff's First_ Amended Complaint Against Defendant, U.S. Department o
Education
on the interested parties in this action as follows:
1.
2.
Roger West, Esq.
U.S. Attorney's Office (Civil)
Centra] District of California
300 North Los Angeles Street, i h Floor
General Counsel
U.S. Department of Education
400 Maryland A venue S W
Washington DC, 20202
*I hereby certifY that I served the above-described document by depositing it in the
19
20
/.1
2 2
23
United States Mail in a sealed envelope with the postage thereon fully prepaid.
*I hereby certify that I am a member of the Bar of the United States District Court,
Central Dj strict of California.
*I hereby certifY under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
: : Executed on March 13, 2013, at ____________ _
2 6
27
28
LAW OFFICE OF ALABA
100 Oceangate, 12
1
Floo
Long_Beach CA 9080
Tel.: 56'2.628.5578
Fax: 562,628.557
Alaba S. Ajetunmob
Cert i f icate o f Serv i ce - 1

Doria v. Case-Mate - Am. Compl.

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Doria v. Case-Mate - Am. Compl.

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Case 2:12-cv-09544-GAF-AJW Document 7 Filed 03/19/13 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:30

1 Daniel M. Cislo, Esq., No. 125,378

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen