Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Archaeological Evaluation
Rathmell
Archaeology Ltd
Data Structure Report – Springbank Farm, Brodick
Overview
This Data Structure Report (DSR) presents the findings of an archaeological evaluation
undertaken prior to the determination of planning consent for a proposed residential
development on land at Springbank Farm, Brodick (NGR: NS 021 357). These
archaeological works were designed to allow the consideration of archaeology within the
planning process and allow the development of mitigation for any adverse impact from the
proposed development on the archaeology present on-site.
North Ayrshire Council requested this programme of archaeological work, commencing with
an evaluation, to inform the planning determination process (N/03/00869/PP). The West of
Scotland Archaeology Service, who advise North Ayrshire Council on archaeological matters,
have advised on the scale and character of the required works. The main objective of the
evaluation was to determine the location, extent, nature, condition and significance of any
archaeological features that lie within the development area.
The development area is currently open ground, elements of which had been wooded until
recently, covering an area of roughly 1.44 ha. The area around Brodick is known to be a rich
environment for prehistoric archaeology. In close proximity to the development area there
had been recorded a standing stone (NMRS: NS03NW11) and there had been some
tentative suggestion of the existence of an earthwork suggesting a fort at Springbank Farm
(NMRS: NS03NW17).
Rathmell Archaeology Ltd was appointed to act on behalf of John Thomson Construction Ltd.
The terms of the evaluation were agreed through a Written Scheme of Investigation in
advance with the West of Scotland Archaeology Service on behalf of North Ayrshire Council.
Project Works
The programme of works agreed with the West of Scotland Archaeology Service included an
intrusive evaluation of the development area through machine cut trenches extending to 5%
of the land take. These works were undertaken broadly in keeping with the submitted Written
Scheme of Investigation with on site works running from 19th January 2004 to 22nd January
2004.
Due to felling work that had already been undertaken within the development area some
elements of the previously agreed trench layout proved impractical. It was necessary to
improvise a revised trench layout, which would sample the entire development area and give
the required percentage of the area (see Fig 1). Due to the presence of fallen trees, heaps of
timber and the steepness of the embankment either side of the burn there were small areas
of the site where trenches could not be placed. All exposed features within the trenches were
investigated and evaluated to determine archaeological significance.
All works were conducted in accordance with WoSAS Standard Conditions, the Institute of
Field Archaeology’s Standards and Policy Statements and Code of Conduct and Historic
Scotland Policy Statements.
Figure 1: Trench Layout (development boundary in red; trenches in dark blue; burn in pale
blue; Ordnance Survey woodland edge in green; modern structures in yellow)
West of Burn
The ground to the west of the burn contained four trenches (Trenches 6 to 9). The northern
pair of trenches was empty of features, bar a single ceramic field drain [703] in Trench 7. The
southern pair of trenches, towards their western limits, each contained four linear cuts (see
trench descriptions). Two of these may cross between the trenches ([807]=[903] &
[809]=[907]) while the others appear to be unrelated and hence discontinuous. All these
linear features are relatively shallow, 160mm to 100mm, and have fills comparable to the
overlying topsoil. The cross-section character of these features was varied, covering V-, U-
and scooped cross-sections. All are aligned broadly downslope, roughly south to north.
Trench 8 was clearly cut next to the demolished remains of a part brick glasshouse shown on
the modern Ordnance Survey (see ‘b’ on Fig 1) and underlying the area shown as gardens
on the 1868 1st edition Ordnance Survey. The foundations of this structure were not exposed
within the trench. The terrace to the immediate south of the former glasshouse proved to be
solely banked topsoil amounting to a roughly 250mm topsoil difference over the break in
slope.
A ceramic drain noted in Trench 9 [909] is presumably the continuation of that exposed in
Trench 7.
Access Ground
The trenches in the access ground area (Trenches 10 and 11), to the west of Springfield
Farm, were massively impacted on by tree roots. The ground was also prone to sever
saturation and water flowed as an irregular stream along the western edge of this ground. No
features were noted within these trenches other than the mass of modern building debris at
the south end of Trench 10 (see description and Fig 8). This is most likely the remains of the
structure shown on the modern Ordnance Survey (see ‘a’ on Fig 1), an outbuilding of
Springbank Farm.
The shallow nature of the topsoil and the prevalence of outcropping bedrock in both trenches
in this area suggest that the area has either never supported a significant soil profile or the
area has been severely truncated and disturbed in the past. This has been compounded by
the dense stand of trees and, to the north and east of the trenches, a water main that was
not exposed.
Discussion
It is clear that the area to the east of the burn and the access ground are both
archaeologically sterile with no features or artefacts of any note. Both areas had been heavily
affected by mature woodland, although the ground to the east of the burn had clearly been
used as open field for a prolonged period. The preponderance of field drains on the western
side of this latter ground may reflect an attempt to maintain this ground as field prior to the
encroachment of the woodland that flanked the burn.
The ground to the west of the burn gives the appearance of containing more features with
archaeological potential. These are the series of north to south aligned shallow linear cuts in
Trenches 8 and 9 that appear to be a combination of slots and possibly ditches. All of these
trenches lie in the area that is known to be used for gardens (probably market gardens) since
the mid nineteenth century. Given the absence of any anthropic material from these features,
the comparability of the fills to the topsoil and the shallow nature of these features it is
inferred that they pertain to the preparation of this ground for gardens or the use of the
gardens.
Nothing of archaeological significance was recovered from any of the trenches and none of
the features investigated yielded or appeared to be part of a larger structure. All features
exposed were investigated and none gave suggestion of being elements of any structures.
Certainly none of the features gave any suggestion of prehistoric origin and rather appear to
be agricultural or horticultural in origin, probably dating from the nineteenth and twentieth
century.
Fig 6: View from north of Springbank Farm to Brantwood Lodge, looking east
Conclusion
An archaeological evaluation was carried out between the dates of 19th to 22 nd January 2004
on 1.44ha of agricultural ground to be developed for residential units at Springbank Farm,
Brodick, North Ayrshire. The evaluation comprised 11 trenches covering approximately 5% of
the total development area, opened to a depth of between 300mm and 650mm. A
representative sample, as agreed with the West of Scotland Archaeology Service, of all of
the uncovered features with archaeological potential was investigated.
Those features investigated included: eight shallow linear features; numerous field drains;
modern structures; and tree throws. No significant anthropic material was recovered and the
features were assessed to not be of archaeological significance, being derived from modern
agricultural or horticultural activity. Other features in the topography of the site were proven
to be linked to gardens laid out across the western part of the site in the mid nineteenth
century.
On balance we propose that this evaluation has demonstrated that the proposed
development will not adversely impact on any archaeological remains and we recommend
that no further archaeological works are appropriate should the development proceed as
proposed.
202 Subsoil – orange sandy gravel with occasional medium small stones
301 Topsoil – mid-brown waterlogged humic
302 Subsoil – orangey clayey sand
303 Field Drain – 250mm broad, beach cobble and gravel fill
304 Dump – black fill, pottery fragments, glass fragments, cinders
401 Topsoil – mid-brown sandy soil
402 Subsoil – clayey gravel
403 Dump – glass, clinker, pot, waterlogged
404 Cut - 300mm broad, 100mm deep, scooped cross-section
405 Fill of [404] – very similar to topsoil
501 Topsoil – mid-brown very humic
502 Subsoil – clayey gravel
601 Topsoil – root rich mid-brown silty sand, waterlogged
602 Subsoil – Orange clayey sand
701 Topsoil – mid-brown, very humic
702 Subsoil – orange gravel sand, changes to silty sand
703 Ceramic Drain – cut 750mm broad, 100mm deep
801 Topsoil – mid-brown silty sand
802 Subsoil – orange clayey sand changing to sandy silt
803 Cut of linear feature – 600mm broad, 100mm deep, scooped section
804 Fill of [803] – very similar to topsoil
805 Cut of linear feature – 360mm broad, 120mm deep
806 Fill of [805] – very similar to topsoil
807 Linear Cut – 400mm broad
808 Fill of [807] – fragments of red sandstone
809 Cut of linear feature – 510mm broad, 160mm deep, v-shaped cross section
810 Fill of [809] – very similar to topsoil
901 Topsoil – mid-brown, very humic
902 Subsoil – orange sandy gravel
903 Linear Cut - 550mm broad, 100mm deep, scooped cross section
904 Fill of [903] – very similar to topsoil
905 Cut of linear feature – 700mm broad, 150mm deep, scooped cross section
906 Fill of [905] – very similar to topsoil
907 Cut of linear feature – 250mm broad, 50mm deep, scooped cross section
Drawing Record
No. Title Scale Date Author
1 Plan of Trenches 1 to 8 1:100 22/01/04 TR
2 Plan of Trenches 9 to 11 1:100 22/01/04 TR
Photographic Record
Film No. Description From Date
1 16 Trench 1 general view E 21/01/04
1 17 Trench 1 [109] field drain N 21/01/04
1 18 Trench 1 [106] linear cut N 21/01/04
1 19 Trench 2 general view S 21/01/04
1 20 Trench 3 [304] dump view NE 21/01/04
1 21 Trench 3 general view SW 21/01/04
1 22 Trench 4 general view N 21/01/04
1 23 Trench 5 general view SW 21/01/04
1 24 Trench 6 general view W 21/01/04
1 25 Trench 7 general view SE 21/01/04
2 1 Trench 7 [703] drain N 21/01/04
2 2 Trench 8 general view W 21/01/04
2 3 Trench 8 [803] N 21/01/04
2 4 Trench 8 [805] S 21/01/04
2 5 Trench 8 [809] SE 21/01/04
2 6 Trench 8 [809] SE 21/01/04
2 7 Trench 9 general view W 21/01/04
2 8 Trench 9 [903] N 21/01/04
2 9 Trench 9 [905] N 21/01/04
2 10 Trench 11 general view S 21/01/04
Contact Details
Rathmell Archaeology can be contacted at its Registered Office or through the web:
Rathmell Archaeology Ltd
8, Underwood
Kilwinning
Ayrshire
KA13 7HR
www.rathmell-arch.co.uk
The West of Scotland Archaeology Service can be contacted at their office or through the
web:
www.wosas.org.uk