Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CPE Process
RU N Project Manager (PM) will schedule a meeting of the Evaluation Committee (EC)
consisting of applicable stakeholders to perform the CPE after the completion phase of the sub
contract. Evaluations are to be performed on all designated pre-qualified trades for a particular
subproject. However, evaluations are advocated on all sub contracts or purchase orders
whether pre-qualification is selected or not. Parties participating in the EC shall include, at a
minimum, the RU N Project Manager and Grants, Subcontracts and Compliance Office (GSC).
RU N GSC will forward the completed CPE to the Subcontractor or Vendor for review. The PM
will share the evaluation with the Subcontractor or Vendor to ensure areas for improvement
are discussed. The PM will attach the performance evaluation to the Subcontractor or Vendor
entry in the master database maintained by GSC Office for future reference.
Subcontractors or Vendors receiving an unsatisfactory mark (score equal to or below 14) will
be considered for removal from the master database for a period of no less than six months.
Prior to removal action, the Subcontractors or Vendors will be given the opportunity to rebut
either in writing or by scheduling a meeting through the PM. GSC will invite the Subcontractor
or Vendor to attend the rebuttal meeting or review the written rebuttal with the EC.
The final removal decision will be made by the GSC considering the CPE (which is subproject
specific) and additional factors such as other project know-hows, contractual relationships,
prior consequence precedence, and other influences and will formulate a recommendation
with justification. The Grant, Subcontract & Compliance Manager will forward the
recommendation regarding removal with all supporting information to the Chief of Party (CoP).
Evaluation
Overall marking 28 and only one criterion are allowed to have a mark
equal to 3.
Very satisfactory
Overall marking 18 to 27 and all of the criteria must have a mark greater
than or equal to 3.
Quite satisfactory
Satisfactory
Not satisfactory
A. PROJECT DETAILS
1. Project:
2. Brief description of the works:
3. Contract Number:
4.
Date
of
signature:
5. Contractor:
6. Contract Value :
7. Contract start date:
8. Contract completion date:
9.
Justified
time
extension:
.
10. Undue delay:
11.
Date
of
Substantial
Completion:
.
12. Date of Final Completion:.
(a) Quality of workmanship, QAQC Plan, documentation implementation and testing, and
materials adequacy and storage, and as-built drawings based on the technical
specifications of the sub Contract
.
.
.
.
...........................................................................................................
..
Marking score based on 5 (maximum mark):
(c) Response/ compliance of the Subcontractor or Vendor to/ with the provisions of the
sub Contract regarding the management of environmental, social and health and safety
issues for the work and social environment, personnel and key stakeholders public
Note any undue delay and the approved term of the sub contract in weeks.
Marking score based on 5 (maximum mark):
....................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................
.
...............................................................................................
Note the overall request for time extension and the approved time extension in months/ weeks.
Marking score based on 5 (maximum mark):
(f) Timely submission of Submittals, Schedules, Reports, Invoices, and Claims for
liquidated damages4
.
.
........................................................................
.
.....................................................................................................................................................
....
.....................................................................................................................................................
...
Note the overall financial claims of the Subcontractor or Vendor and the provisional final
amount of the Contract.
Marking score based on 5 (maximum mark):
(g) Submission of temporary statement based on the terms of the Sub Contract (deadline
and adequacy of statement)
.
.
........................................................................
(h) Remarks related with breach of other terms of the Sub Contract by the Subcontractor
or Vendor
.
.
....................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................
.
.....................................................................................................................................................
.
Marking score based on 5 (maximum mark):
Based on the above, the Evaluation Committee finds the performance of the Subcontractor or
Vendor as:
Very satisfactory
Quite satisfactory
Satisfactory
Not satisfactory
1. .......................................................
Signature:
2. ........................................................ Signature:
Signature:
Date: