Knowledge Management in Cloud Environments

Dirk Langenberg
Pumacy Technologies AG Bartningallee 27 Berlin, Germany +49 30 2216128-0

Christian Kind
Pumacy Technologies AG Bartningallee 27 Berlin, Germany +49 30 2216128-0

Martin Dames
Pumacy Technologies AG Bartningallee 27 Berlin, Germany +49 30 2216128-0

Communication and sharing of knowledge are important challenges for virtual organizations (VO) in the globalized economy. There are various tools available to virtually reduce geographical distances and to support collaboration. Also for the management of knowledge appropriate solutions are available. But VOs typically have limited time to setup the entire ITinfrastructure for their collaboration. Therefore the trend to buy ready-to-use products exists. This paper characterizes requests of VOs for SaaS products, proposes functionalities to support team work and describes challenges with their solutions in the cloud.

Categories and Subject Descriptors
H.3.5 [Information Storage and Retrieval]: On-line Information Services – Commercial services, Data sharing, Web-based services C.2.4 [Distributed Systems]: Distributed applications – Cloud Computing

Today, various collaboration platforms are established for VOs [5], which provide file management typically. For knowledgeintensive works this is not enough. In VOs the members require more capabilities to collect, manage and provide knowledge for its reuse in the joint projects [14]. Sharing of experiences in VOs is mostly done by direct communication without any KM system. Preferred solutions to exchange files are project servers. However, even here are some remaining challenges: Firstly, project servers have to be accessible by all project members via the Internet. In many companies security policies hinder operation of such services. Secondly, project servers require hardware and software investments, administration and support. Often these costs cannot be specified for each project partner. Thirdly, the whereabouts of data and the possible access by end of project must be regulated. Additionally, VOs have limited time to setup and to operate an adequate infrastructure. Therefore a ready-to-use solution of a specialized provider is required, which can be bought and used instantly. The announcements of the arising cloud computing providers sound promising. This paper proposes a solution for a collaborative KM platform based on the new cloud technologies.

General Terms

Collaborative KM software has to meet several challenges to support VOs [8]. At first, communication between project members has to be facilitated to overcome geographical and cultural distances. After that, simplified and effective sharing of knowledge has to be enabled. Last but not least, management of the collaboration environment has to be simplified. Figure 1 shows the main functionalities to support VOs.

knowledge management, virtual organizations, cloud computing, software as a service.

In industry, virtual organizations (VO) are a common strategy to organize the development, production and maintenance of products. Most companies concentrate on their core competences and draw additional services from subcontractors. VOs are temporary consortiums of companies that work together with a common goal [2]. Therefore cross company collaborations are inevitable [11], but knowledge management (KM) stops at organizational borders, today. It is almost impossible to achieve sharing of knowledge between various parties in these VOs. Reasons for this are geographic distances, affiliation to different organizations and often the resulting formal flow of information. Also security policies hinder direct access to knowledge.

Figure 1. Functionalities for support of VOs [8]

Yellow Pages and ideas are typical knowledge articles. It can be used worldwide by all project partners. Cloud computing shares the same vision [4]. But security requirements remain. So they have to be implemented adequate to the behavior in the VO. the data is deleted. until the usage and disposal phase. This is neither limited to specific companies nor with respect to time. structuring and provision of knowledge. The usage of a common KM service by all partners simplifies capturing and retrieving of knowledge. However. With these new solutions. Especially the current trend to provide SaaS on a pay-per-use basis is interesting for VOs. On the other side.” [3] Grid solutions are mainly used to provide computing power and storage capacity for calculation and simulation tasks [7] [15]. 5. Therefore a ready-to-use solution of a specialized provider is required. There are different approaches for KM. Independent of the chosen approach.When we take a look at the communication aspects. or meta information like creation time express correlations about the background of an article. Of course. “traditional” communication tools like email are still required. With such KM service all involved disciplines share their knowledge throughout the entire product lifecycle process. Beginning in the early stages. The knowledge base can be extended by new articles comfortably and work processes of each project team member can be assisted by deploying existing knowledge. They can buy the required IT-solution including (virtualized) hardware. which is currently developed in the research project KnowledgeCloud [13]. software has to support collection. The KM service KMcloud by Pumacy Technologies is such a SaaS solution for collaboration-oriented KM. There are explicit links to describe connections between knowledge items. tools for surveys and voting assist to form opinions. 4. However. the challenges here lie more in the legal situation regarding intellectual property rights to be respected. which FOSTER defined as: “Grid Computing is concerned with coordinated resource sharing and problem solving in dynamic. KM as a service on basis of Cloud technologies [8] . FAQs. Based on the demand-oriented settlement. workflows formalize the KM process. Regarding KM. Regarding faith in secure access to data during and after the project. tags. They might enforce reviews for knowledge articles before publication. the product and process knowledge is documented in the cloud. Figure 2. For example. operation and maintenance (backups and security patches). Lessons Learned. To improve the management of VOs. COLLABORATIVE KM AS A SERVICE The proposed solution is to provide a project-based KM and collaboration service in the Cloud. all members of a project and respectively of a VO are interested in the project specific topics – and not in running an information technology infrastructure. It is a further development of grid computing. technical barriers have to be solved.0 communication technologies (Twitter. Especially the internet-based VOs ask for integration of these tools into their collaboration environment. Usage of a common platform avoids media breaks and ensures the location and system-independent information delivery. there are other ways to assist interaction between VO members with further collaboration functionalities. For example. In cloud environments. when requirements and their effects on the product are defined. Thereby VOs can establish an own KM environment for the duration of cooperation without having to invest into and maintain an own technical infrastructure. Typically. Platform (hardware and basic software) as a Service (PaaS) or Software as a Service (SaaS). One approach for more interaction inside of VOs in the context of collaborative KM is to deploy workflows. 3. they rent virtualized Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS). outsourcing of applications with confidential information was not made because of security reasons. They can buy required IT functionalities including setup. there are various implicit links: Categories. for example semistructured wikis or management systems for structured knowledge articles. cross links between all knowledge items are important. As long as the data is provided. KM systems were installed only in the company. If the service is no longer needed. the costs are borne by the partners. the availability is much higher than most companies would typically achieve hosting the system locally. One advantage is that anyone can use the service without disciplinespecific knowhow. users purchase IT-infrastructure for a freely defined time period. KMcloud is a solution with a new architecture based on cloud technologies (Figure 2) and on the platform KMmaster® [12]. At the same time. Just a few years ago. Then the entire group can focus their efforts on the joint project. Of course. a neutral service provider can often make arrangements easier. common calendars and task management support the planning.1 Description of the KM-Service KMcloud As shown above the current trend providing SaaS is interesting for VOs and medium sized companies. we see at first current Web 2. project partners will participate fairly in the costs. setup. operation and maintenance. involve more people in the creation process and ensure a higher quality level of documented knowledge. Project partners have to trust in the service provider in equal measure. These tools reduce the distance between the partners virtually and enable more discussions. KNOWLEDGECLOUD 5. The demand to outsource IT-solutions forces the realization of cloud-based services. A comfortable search function has to make this knowledge reusable for other people. because they store important contributions to the intellectual property of companies. blogs and RSS). which are set by authors. any company can create its IT-environment. multi-institutional virtual organizations. CLOUD COMPUTING AS SOLUTION Currently arising cloud computing technologies are a new form of virtualization in computing platforms.

4 Availability KMcloud is based on the existing KMmaster® platform. Here. Regarding infrastructure and operating system.3.1 Overview Basis of every KMcloud instance is a typical J2EE application with four layers. • • • 5. This ensures confidentiality and integrity of data. Due to this.g.3. For this. After the contract ends. KMcloud uses the Hibernate framework which understands many different SQL Dialects but no cloud database dialects. These databases are extremely fast. Both. The business logic is implemented in Enterprise Java Beans (EJB) and the creation of web pages is realized in Java Servlet Pages (JSP). KMcloud cannot use solutions of the cloud providers for scalability and load balancing.3 File Storage in the Cloud Another service used for KMcloud is a file based cloud storage.In KnowledgeCloud concepts for scalable integration of external IT resources (computing. etc. KMcloud uses such cloud storage directly as data vault for big data sets (e. each with their own advantages and disadvantages: a. Here.) from a cloud are in the foreground. Every customer has its own community and does not see any data of other communities. Therefore a JDBC driver is currently developed in KnowledgeCloud to create an interface between Hibernate and a NoSQL cloud database (see Figure 3). all data of a customer has to be deleted from the KMcloud database. 5. at weekends) from the cluster. first results show that single database requests are much slower than in a relational database. the focus of a SaaS provider regarding data security and safety is on the application itself. As cloud databases are not optimized for this type of usage. As a consequence. there is on the lowest layer a database. EJBs and JSPs are running in the context of an application server. attached files) and as a backup service for all user and system data. customers use their own KM service and do not share any resources with any other client. there are limited possibilities for KMcloud to enforce data security. The next chapters present solutions for the most relevant challenges in the cloud environment. This has many disadvantages like lower scalability. On server side. There are different possibilities. This approach is suitable if the system load is nearly constant or easy predictable. Figure 3. For all data outside of the KMcloud service (e. backups) strong encryption methods have to be used.16]. Therefore. To have a high availability system it must be possible that if one cluster node crashes another node is able to serve client requests immediately. It can be summarized in the following activities and concepts: • • • Encrypted connections prevent the interception of data. DBs. KMcloud uses a SQL server at the moment. 5. Regular backups in defined periods and processes achieve safety of the service against data loss. Optional private cloud solutions increase security against access by third parties. The development is based on the described functionalities (chapter 2) and the requirements of the application scenario above (chapter 4). in the morning) or removed (e.g.3 Architecture and Availability 5.g. Semi-automatic node management: At fixed points in time.3. . when higher load is expected nodes are added (e. Unfortunately they are not compliant with the SQL standard so it is not possible to use them with existing applications. Manual node management: A node is added (or removed) "by hand" to the system. Instead it has to realize this on its own by clustering application servers which could run on many instances in parallel. b. System Architecture & Communication Paths Now it is possible to add more computing resources with just adding a new cluster node to the system. 5. because even in the improbable case something could fail.3. Database Architecture 5. Therefore it is important for the success of a SaaS provider to fulfill the demand for adequate security. which is the container of the entire application. Figure 4. Of course. users access the application with an Internet web browser.g. And there are still several challenges [6. On client side. which requires a specific application server. storage. Such storage is optimized for scalability and safety against data loss. scalable and cheap even with huge datasets. A community concept ensures confidentiality of data. On the other hand money can be saved by turning off unused nodes. the service provider can only configure the basis software in a secure way and install updates regularly. for backups a second provider should be used. But we expect that many concurrent requests will show a better relative performance.2 Database in the Cloud Some cloud providers offer simple NoSQL databases [10].2 Data Security Security of their data and documents is perhaps the most important requirement of users in the cloud [9]. the user session has to be distributed all the time over the whole cluster like it is shown in Figure 4.

CONCLUSIONS With the SaaS-System KMcloud project partners are able to share their relevant knowledge across organizational boundaries easily. Kooperationsplattformen für virtuelle Unternehmen. Security and Privacy Challenges in Cloud Computing Environments. From the view of the provider. et al. Krause. 507–514. 184-175. 2010. Website about KMcloud. D. [10] Leavitt. D. and Stark. [4] Foster. I. 2010. To enhance the availability of the system N. 2008. In IEEE Grid Computing Environments Workshop 2008. [6] Kaufman. 4. 2010.kmcloud. [5] Hayka. and Wilhelm.... Will NoSQL Databases Live Up to Their Promise? Computer 43.. [15] Stark. 2008. C. [12] Pumacy Technologies AG. N. Zhao.. IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine 8. C. Joshi. and Welker.. Kesselman. Open Journal of Knowledge Management 3.. W. . To avoid that the load balancer is a single point of failure it's started on every node but only one is used. 2011. 24-31. Service providers like Pumacy Technologies benefit from the new cloud technologies. R. and Tuecke. 8. managed and provided for the use by the whole project team. D. Each node receives its requests from a load balancer. New potentials for virtual product creation by utilizing grid technology.3. They change into complete solution providers (software + service) and reach new markets around the world. 6. 2009. and Lu. Is Cloud Computing Really Ready for Prime Time? Computer 42.5 Load Balancing To distribute the user request between the several KMcloud instances a load balancer is needed. To lower the inner cluster communication the load balancer keeps track of sessions so a subsequent request will be sent to the node which already has the affected session data. 200-222. 693699. This project is co-funded by the German Government (BMWi. 7. F. 1.-L.D.... EP101090) and supervised by EuroNorm GmbH. International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications 15. Can Public-Cloud Security Meet Its Unique Challenges? IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine 8. After that. [3] Foster. R. H.. 143-146. ZWF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 99. Hayka. In case the active load balancer drops out it can easily be replaced by a load balancer on another node. 2011. 2011. S. Application nodes and data storage are allocated dynamically based on the requests. 58-64.. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 3.. H. and Stark.. Hayka. Therefore it scales flexible and can be used for a single client or for hundreds of VOs. [2] Dryndos. L. the staffs can focus their work on high quality results of the collaborative project... 9. S. Configuration of knowledge templates is available for every customer. [13] Pumacy Technologies AG. [9] Leavitt. REALIZED SYSTEM The development in the project KnowledgeCloud is accomplished in two main phases. 12-14. 9. 3. Automatic node management: The cluster decides internally if nodes are added or removed. The service core supports multi-tenancy. Thus. Raicu. 1 (January 2009). H. 1-10. The anatomy of the grid: Enabling scalable virtual organizations. Potenziale der Grid-Technologie in der Produktentwicklung. 55-57. Website about KMmaster. Langenberg. F.C. 13-19. I. 3. 605-634. H. 2000. Kind. 6. 15-21. Elmaraghy. It is also very high scalable.Manufacturing Technology 56.-Y. will be in the near future with the following key functionalities:      KMcloud service is operating in a cloud environment and is accessible from the Internet. Gärtner. [8] Langenberg. CIRP Annals . H. and Ahn. 2004. The whole system except the database is redundant that any component of it could drop out and nearly no impact on the whole service is noticeable. This approach is very complex because many parameters have to be taken into account. 5. 500–504. structure. the KMcloud service makes use of various cloud resources. R. 2010. The necessary knowledge is structured. Knowledge management in virtual communities. Because a load balancer for a few nodes is fairly easy to setup there is no need to use a billed service for that. D. J. D. A comparison of load balancing techniques for scalable Web servers. J. R. S.. 2001. and Langenberg. KMcloud provides functionalities to collect. nodes for fallbacks can be started in additional locations of other IaaS providers. [7] Krause.. In the first phase. H. 2(February 2010). 7-8. and Kure.S. The service needs almost no set-up time and can be used as long as the collaboration in the VO continues. [14] Stark. CIRP Annals . In Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising (ICE). It could be booked as a cloud service but this will result in further charges. manage and provide knowledge. www.kmmaster. several enhancements will be added until the end of the project.. 4...-L. Klovning. A Scientific Foundation of Collaborative Engineering. Collaborative Virtual Engineering for SMEs: Technical Architecture. E. I. A.c. 2010.. a pilot environment with basic functionalities is developed.kmcloud. Cloud Computing and Grid Computing 360-Degree Compared. IEEE Network 14. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The presented results with respect to the KM service KMcloud have partly been developed during the project KnowledgeCloud. H. [11] Lu. ZWF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 105. 2009. [16] Takabi. O. G. 2. REFERENCES [1] Bryhni. There are various optimization approaches available to optimize load balancing [1]. Löh. The service core scales flexible. M. Competing in engineering design -The role of Virtual Product Creation.B.. Schuh. R. G. Kazi.. www. and Langenberg. So session replication appears as little as possible.Manufacturing Technology 58..-J. Y. The rollout of KMcloud (www.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful