Sie sind auf Seite 1von 14

PILOT SURVEY: Pilot survey was conducted with the employees of the organization is helped the researcher to have

incite to the strength and weakness of questionnaires. The resold pilot survey suggestion obtained from experience employees uncertain changes were made the questionnaires pilot survey also enable the researcher would take time and administrator the questionnaires. SAMPLING DESIGN The total number of employees working in VITS Bhubaneswar is105. The total number of questionnaires issued to the employees is 60 but only 50 questionnaires were used for the study. The sample size chosen for study is 50. PROCESSING THE DATA: The data collected were classified, analyzed, tabulated and interpreted at bar diagram. PRAPARATION OF REPORT: From the information gathered though questionnaires reports was prepared showing the analysis, the interpretation, suggestion, and conclusion. CHAPTER 6 DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION TEST STATISTICAL METHOD (CHI-SQUARD) Ho: There is no significant difference in view of designation group toward area of adequatesupervision. H1: There is significant in view of designation group toward area of adequate supervision. Designation Advisor Sales manager HR Staff Total Adequate 19 10 8 37 Inadequate 1 1 No-comment 10 1 1 12 Total 29 12 9 50

Calculated Value = 11.57 Table Value: (R-1)(C-1) = (3-1) (3-1) = 2X2 = (4) = 9.49 [CV<TV]

Reject Ho and Accept H1 No significant difference in the view of appropriate training among designation group. 1. TABLE REPRESENTING IDENTIFICATION OF ORIENTATION COMPONENTS: Orientation Number of Response PercentageIdentification 48 96%Un identification 2 4%Total 50 100% 1. FIGURE REPRESENTING IDENTIFICATION OF ORIENTATION COMPONENTSINFERENCE: The above table revels that 96% of employees identification the orientation components and 4%of employees are unidentification.

4. FI G URE REPRESENTIN G TREATED MEET OF EMPLOYEES WITH DI G NITYAND RESPECT:INFERENCE: The above table reveals that all the employees are treated with Dignity and respect. 5. TABLE REPRESENTIN G AWARENESS OF OR G ANIZATIONAL POLICIES ANDPROCEDURE :Awareness of organizational policies Number of ResponsePercentageAware 33 66%Unaware 12 24% No comments 5 10%Total 50 100% INFERENCE: The above table reveals that 66% of employees are awareness of organizational policies & procedure, 24% of employees are un awareness and 10% of employees are no comments. 0%100%010 2 030 4 050 6 0W i t h d ig n ity &respec tWithout d ig n ity & respec twithout d ig n ity &respec twith d ig

n ity &respec t

6. TABLE REPRESENTIN G COMPETITIVENESS OF OR G ANIZATION ON SALARY :Competences withother organization Number of Response PercentageCompetitive 43 86% Not Competitive 3 6% No Comments 4 8%Total 50 100% 6. FI G URE TABLE REPRESENTIN G COMPETITIVENESS OF OR G ANIZATION ONSALARYINFERENCE: The above table reveals that 86% of employees are feeling competitive with other organization,6% of employees are feeling not competitive, and 8% of employees have nocomments. 86%8%6%01020304050C o m p e t i t i v e n o t c o m p e t i t i v e n o c o m m e n t s competitivenot competitiveno comments

7 . TABLE REPRESENTIN G BENEFITS OF THE EMPLOYEES : Benefits to the employees Number of Response PercentageSatisfied 44 88% Not Satisfied 2 4% No comments 4 8%Total 50 100% 7 . FI G URE REPRESENTIN G BENEFITS OF THE EMPLOYEES : INFERENCE: The above table reveals that 88% if employees are satisfied with benefits package, 4% of employees are not satisfied and 8% of employees are no comments. 88%8%4%0 2 0 6 0 Sa t i s f ie No t Sa t i s f ie No co m me n satisfiednot satisfiednocomments 4 0

8 . TABLE REPRESENTIN G AWARENESS OF THE EMPLOYEES ASSISTANCEPRO G RAM AND RETURN TO WORK: Awareness of program Number of Response PercentageAware 36 72%Unawareness 5 10% No Comments 9 18%Total 50 100% 8 . FI G URE REPRESENTIN G AWARENESS OF THE EMPLOYEES ASSISTANCEPRO G RAM AND RETURN TO WORK . INFERENCE: The above table reveals that 72% of employees are having awareness of employees assistance program, 10 of employees are unawareness and 18% of employees are no comments. 365972%10%18%0510152025303540 A w a r e U n a w e r n e s s N o c o m m e n t s nocommentsunawarenessaware

9 . TABLE REPRESENTIN G ADEQUATE SUPERVISION: Nature of Supervision Number of Response PercentageAdequate 37 74%Inadequate 1 2% No Comments 12 24%Total 50 100% 9 . FI G URE REPRESENTIN G ADEQUATE SUPERVISIONINFERENCE: The above table reveals that 74% of employees feel they have adequate supervision, 2% of employees are inadequate and 24% of employees have no comments. 100%24%74%2%0102030405060 A d e q u a t e I a d e q u a t e N o c o m m e n t t o t a l t o t alnocommen t nadequa t eadequa t e

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen