Iowa State Violations - Summary Disposition

SUMMARY DISPOSITION REPORT
Iowa State University Case No. M380
April 8, 2013
INDIVIDUALS WHO MAY BE MENTIONED WITHIN THIS REPORT Case No. M380 Iowa State University April 8, 2013
Bleil, Bill assistant football coach. Burnham, Shane assistant football coach. Elliott, Bobby then assistant football coach and current University of Notre Dame assistant football coach. Flaherty, Eileen then assistant director of compliance and current University of Maine, Orono, associate athletics director for compliance. Gray, Dustin then assistant compliance director and current compliance director. Hoiberg, Fred head men's basketball coach. Leath, Steven president. Moore, Keith then student men's basketball coach. Robinson, Daniyal then assistant men's basketball coach and current University of Houston assistant men's basketball coach. Snyder, Josh then associate athletics director for compliance and current University of Missouri-Kansas City associate athletics director for compliance. Wells, Luke then assistant football coach and current Utah State University assistant football coach.
SUMMARY DISPOSITION REPORT Case No. M380 Iowa State University April 8, 2013
A.
Case Chronology. 1. How the investigation began. In the spring of 2011, Fred Hoiberg (Hoiberg), head men's basketball coach, was in attendance at his son's nonscholastic basketball game and witnessed Keith Moore (Moore), then student men's basketball coach, at the game. Knowing that Moore had previously coached one of the participating nonscholastic teams and that Moore's attendance at a nonscholastic event was contrary to NCAA legislation, Hoiberg approached Moore and asked why he was present and whether he had been contacting men's basketball prospective student-athletes. Moore replied that he had. That night, Hoiberg reported the potential violation to Jamie Pollard, the institution's director of athletics. The institution relieved Moore of his responsibilities and initiated an internal investigation the next day. The discovery of impermissible telecommunication with prospects by Moore ultimately led the internal investigative team to a comprehensive telephone and text messaging audit, not only of the men's basketball program, but of all its sports programs (18) and all its coaches (69). The review covered a three-year time period (2008-09 through 2010-11 academic years). At the conclusion of the review, the institution discovered that there were a significant number of recruiting communication violations involving most of its sports programs and provided a self-report to the NCAA enforcement staff November 23, 2011 (Exhibit NCAA-3). 2. Date of notice of inquiry. Steven Leath, president, received a verbal notice of inquiry January 31, 2012.
A-1
SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________
B.
General Overview of Findings. 1. Nature of the violations. The violations in this case involve impermissible telephone calls in all of the institution's sports programs, impermissible text messaging by Moore, impermissible coaching activities involving nonscholastic-based basketball by Moore and a current women's basketball noncoaching staff member, and a failure to monitor by the institution. 2. Why the case is major. The enforcement staff, institution and involved individuals agree that the findings detailed in this summary disposition report constitute a major infractions case as a whole. More specifically, based on the significant number and frequency of the telephone call violations, as detailed in Finding Nos. 1, 2-b and 3 through 7, as well as the volume of impermissible text messages sent by Moore as detailed in Finding No. 2-a, the institution and enforcement staff are in agreement that those findings constitute major violations. However, with regard to some of the involved individuals, while all agree that the case as a whole constitutes a major infractions case, some involved individuals will be taking the position that some findings standing alone should be found to be secondary violations. The information following the specific findings will highlight if such a position has been taken with regard to any particular finding. Finally, as detailed in Finding No. 8, the institution did not follow its procedures for monitoring telephone calls for a three-year period and the fact that the coaches involved did not understand logging requirements indicated deficiencies in rules education, which contributed to the significant number of violations outlined in Finding Nos. 1, 2-b and 3 through 7. Therefore, the institution and the enforcement staff agree that Finding No. 8 constitutes a major violation. 3. Show-cause advisement. The following coaches have been advised that by consenting to the use of the summary disposition process, they are acknowledging personal involvement in their respective findings and are at risk for a show-cause penalty, as outlined in NCAA Bylaw 19.5.2.2-(1): a. Bobby Elliott (Elliott), then assistant football coach and current University of Notre Dame assistant football coach, is named and at risk for his involvement in Finding No. 1-b-(1).
B-1
b.
Bill Bleil (Bleil), assistant football coach, is named and at risk for his involvement in Finding No. 1-b-(2). Shane Burnham (Burnham), assistant football coach, is named and at risk for his involvement in Finding No. 1-b-(3). Luke Wells (Wells), then assistant football coach and current Utah State University assistant football coach, is named and at risk for his involvement in Finding No. 1-b-(4). Moore is named and at risk for his involvement in Finding Nos. 2-a and Secondary Finding No. 3-a. Daniyal Robinson (Robinson), then assistant men's basketball coach and current University of Houston assistant men's basketball coach, is named and at risk for his involvement in Finding No. 2-c-(1).
c.
d.
e.
f.
4.
Culpability Analysis A thorough review of the evidence revealed that the telephone call violations in this case occurred across all sports and the majority of the violations were attributable to systemic logging failures wherein coaches failed to log a short call rendering subsequent calls within the legislated time period impermissible. Very specifically, systemic logging failures occurred because many of the coaches were not logging calls in which they left messages or did not make contact. Thereafter, subsequent impermissible calls were placed. As a result, numerous violations occurred and the monitoring processes in place at the time failed to detect this ongoing, deficient practice. [Note: One thousand four hundred five of the 1,484 total impermissible calls involved logging issues.]. In addition, while some rules education was provided via email in July 2008 (Exhibit NCAA-4) and a general PowerPoint presentation in June 2009 (football coaches only) and October 2009 (all other sports programs), some of the institution's coaches generally reported a lack of knowledge regarding the need to log all calls, even calls where no contact occurred or voicemail messages were left (Exhibit NCAA-5). As a result, the institution's coaches generally reported a lack of knowledge of the need to log all calls, even calls where no contact occurred or voicemail messages were left. While coaches are responsible for all violations in which he or she is involved, it is also important to look at the totality of the circumstances in assessing the culpability of the coaches who commit violations. Because of the circumstances in this case, specifically the institution's acknowledgement of a systemic deficiency with regard to the prior standards set by the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions for contemporaneous documentation of telephone calls,
B-2
the enforcement staff believed that it was important to look at more than just the total number of impermissible calls attributed to a coach in determining individual culpability. While acknowledging that the culpability analysis used in this case is a different approach than has been taken in past cases, the enforcement staff is mindful of recent efforts to deregulate these types of contacts. While the degree of deregulation of telephone call deregulation is up for debate, the enforcement staff believes that the membership generally supports deregulation. In addition, the enforcement staff believed that the remarkable number of logging-type violations involved in this case, coupled with a lack of adequate rules education regarding logging requirements, dictated that a new and appropriate approach be used to distinguish the violations that could be attributed to what appeared to be institutional-wide, systemic breakdowns from violations to which specific, individualized culpability should be assessed. In order to evaluate individual culpability in a more precise manner the enforcement staff used the following analysis: a. All telephone call violations were identified based on existing standards as set by the Committee on Infractions. More specifically, the calls were identified without regard to a one-, two- or three-minute analysis. The total number of telephone call violations for all sports was 1,484. [Note: The 1,484 number includes 55 impermissible calls placed by noncoaching staff members in football and men's basketball as detailed in Finding Nos. 2-a and 7.] The more clear-cut, intentional violations were then separated out from the violations where some type of logging issue was involved. Specifically, all calls placed when the coaches were not allowed to make any telephone contact at all (e.g., before April 15 of a prospect's junior year in football or calling during an impermissible time period) were identified. Those types of more clear-cut violations were counted and that number was placed in the "culpable call" category for each coach. [Note: Out of the total 1,484 impermissible calls, 24 of these calls were the more clear-cut, intentional type violations.] With regard to the remaining impermissible calls involving logging issues (1,405) (i.e., those calls where a permissible call is made and then followed up by additional contact), the first step in the process was to identify the applicable "trigger call." Specifically:
b.
c.
B-3
(1)
Initially, the enforcement staff analyzed the facts under the established Committee on Infractions requirements that a "trigger call" occurred if there was no contemporaneous documentation of the call. Using that standard, over 33 coaches across all sports programs would have been named and considered at-risk for 1,405 impermissible calls. Because of the nature and extent of the systemic breakdowns, the enforcement staff then re-examined what constituted an unquestionable "trigger call." (i) Initially, the enforcement staff identified the "trigger call" as any initial call longer than one minute in length. Based on that standard, over 26 coaches across all sports programs would have been named and considered at-risk for 938 violations. Based on the degree of systemic breakdowns, in order to mitigate the large number of potential involved individuals, the enforcement staff then identified the "trigger call" as any initial call longer than two minutes in length. This approach significantly reduced the number of coaches at risk to six.
(2)
(ii)
(3)
With the "trigger call" identified, the enforcement staff then identified the subsequent impermissible call(s). If a coach made a "trigger call" of more than two minutes in length and then that same coach placed a subsequent impermissible call, the enforcement staff deemed that violation to fall in the "culpable call" category. If the subsequent call was placed by a different coach, that violation was placed in the "logging issue" category. Finally, the enforcement staff then looked at the total number of culpable calls for each individual, which included those clear-cut, culpable calls and those logging issues where the same coach placed the trigger and offending call(s). That total number of culpable calls was then analyzed taking into consideration the overall total number of impermissible calls, frequency and nature of the violations.
(4)
The following diagram provides a simplified breakdown of the analysis of the "culpable" versus the "logging issues" calls. Also, a chart showing the complete breakdown of all calls in all sports can be found at Exhibit NCAA-6.
B-4
Additionally, an abbreviated chart can be found following each finding that shows the analysis of the culpable calls for each coach.
Total Impermissible Telephone Calls for All Sports 1,484
Clear-Cut Intentional Telephone Call Violations 24
Noncoaching Staff Impermissible Contact Telephone Call Violations 55
Remaining Impermissible Telephone Calls 1,405
Culpable Telephone Call Violations 145
Pure Logging Issues 1,260
B-5
C.
Specific Findings and Narratives. 1. [NCAA Bylaws 13.1.3.1 and 13.1.3.1.2] It is agreed that between July 2008 and May 2011, members of the football coaching staff violated NCAA recruiting communication legislation by placing 919 impermissible telephone calls to 235 football prospective student-athletes. Specifically: a. The majority of impermissible calls (821) were attributed to systemic logging failures wherein a football coach failed to document a message or lack of contact resulting in a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible. The remaining 98 impermissible calls were the result of the football coaches placing calls for which more specific, individualized culpability was attached. Specifically: (1) Between May 2010 and May 2011, Bobby Elliott (Elliott), then assistant football coach, placed 19 impermissible telephone calls. All calls were placed after Elliott had already made one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period. Between January 2009 and March 2011, Bill Bleil (Bleil), assistant football coach, placed 20 impermissible telephone calls. Specifically: (a) Bleil placed one call prior to April 15 of a prospect's junior year. Bleil placed one call after May 31 but prior to September 1 of a prospect's senior year. Bleil placed 18 calls after he had already made one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.
b.
(2)
(b)
(c)
(3)
Between October 2009 and February 2011, Shane Burnham (Burnham), assistant football coach placed 13 impermissible telephone calls. Specifically: (a) Burnham placed four calls after May 31 but prior to September 1 of a prospect's senior year.
C-1
(b)
Burnham placed nine calls after he had already made one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.
(4)
Between December 2009 and December 2010, Luke Wells (Wells), then assistant football coach, placed 12 impermissible telephone calls. Specifically: (a) Wells placed one call prior to April 15 of a prospect's junior year. Wells placed seven calls after May 31 but prior to September 1 of a prospect's senior year. Wells placed four calls after he had already made one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.
(b)
(c)
(5)
Between July 2008 and May 2011, 11 members of the football coaching staff placed a total of 34 impermissible telephone calls. Specifically: (a) The coaches placed five calls after May 31 but prior to September 1 of a prospect's senior year. The coaches placed 29 calls after they had already placed one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.
(b)
Supporting Narrative: The NCAA enforcement staff, institution, Bleil, Burnham, Elliott and Wells are in agreement with the facts of these findings. The enforcement staff believes that major violations of NCAA legislation occurred. While the institution agrees that this is a major infractions case overall, the institution takes no position and defers to the judgment of the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions on whether a finding against each involved individual should be deemed to be major or secondary. Bleil, Burnham, Elliott and Wells argue that their individual violations constitute secondary violations. Please see each individual's position statement attached to this report explaining their position. The institution's telephone audit revealed that members of the football staff placed a total of 919 impermissible telephone calls to 235 prospects. A thorough review
C-2
of the evidence revealed that the majority of the telephone call violations involving the football staff (821) were attributed to systemic logging failures wherein a football coach failed to document a message or lack of contact, which caused a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible. The following information details the remaining 98 impermissible calls relating to the "culpable calls," including those placed by individual football staff members that the enforcement staff believes should be named and at risk for Finding No. 1: a. Elliott. In addition to the 180 impermissible calls that Elliot placed due to staffwide "logging issues," Elliott placed 19 "culpable calls" to 12 prospects during a 12-month period. All 19 of Elliott's "culpable calls" were placed after he had already made one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period. The following is a detailed breakdown of Elliott's impermissible telephone calls: Coach Elliott Total Violations 199 Logging Issue 180 Impermissible Time Period 0 Culpable 19 Total Culpable 19
During his August 22, 2011, interview with the institution, Elliott stated that he used his own personal log book to track telephone contact made with a prospect. Elliott explained that he would continue to call the prospect until he reached the prospect. Elliott reported that he did not document voicemails, unanswered calls or dropped calls. Elliott reported that he felt a one- or two-minute call "spoke for itself;" he did not feel it was necessary to mark those as calls on his logs and he has never documented those types of calls during his coaching career. Additionally, Elliott reported that he is not that good with technology and he believed many of the calls attributed to him to be "pocket dials" even though he did not note them as such in his phone logs. Elliott stated that he did not recall receiving rules education about the subject and that it was not until he was questioned about this issue during the institution's inquiry that the compliance staff talked to him about the need to log such calls. Elliott stated that he was not familiar with the 2008 NCAA enforcement document outlining that there was no "three-minute rule" and that a countable call occurred unless a log showed
C-3
contemporaneous documentation indicating no contact was made on the call. 1 During the investigation, the institution produced documentation showing that July 28, 2008, the institution sent an email to all coaches regarding that there was no "three-minute rule" and also attached to the email the enforcement document explaining the need to contemporaneously document all calls. In addition, a PowerPoint presentation was given to the football coaches in June 2009 that generally addressed telephone calls (Exhibit NCAA-5). Elliott began employment at the institution in February 2010 after the documentation and presentation was provided to coaches. b. Bleil. In addition to the 58 impermissible calls that Bleil placed due to staff-wide "logging issues," Bleil placed 20 "culpable calls" to five prospects over a 26-month period. Bleil placed one "early" call (i.e., prior to a permissible time to make contact), two calls during an impermissible time period and the remaining "culpable calls" were placed after Bleil had already made one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period. The following is a detailed breakdown of Bleil's impermissible telephone calls: Coach Bleil Total Violations 78 Logging Issue 58 Impermissible Time Period 2 Culpable 18 Total Culpable 20
During his August 22, 2011, interview with the institution, Bleil explained that if he placed a call to a prospect and left a message, he would try and remember to put an "M" in the log to indicate that he left a message. Bleil stated that if he did not put an "M" in the log when he left a message, it was a housekeeping error and he believed that most of the time he noted in the log when he had left a message. Bleil reported that he was not sure what conversations the compliance staff had with him regarding how to log such calls, but stated that he was sure the staff did talk to him about logging these types of calls. Bleil added that Dustin Gray, then assistant compliance director and current compliance director, and Josh Snyder, then associate athletics director for compliance, were good at their jobs and they met with the compliance staff once per month. Bleil stated that
NCAA member institutions and its coaches were under the false belief that calls made to prospects that were less than three minutes in length were not a countable call under NCAA legislation.
C-4
failing to log an "M" meant he did not make contact with the prospect and he did not view such calls as a countable call. Bleil stated that he was not familiar with the 2008 NCAA enforcement document outlining there was no "three-minute rule" and that a countable call occurred unless a log showed contemporaneous documentation indicating no contact was made on the call. [Note: On July 28, 2008, the institution sent an email to all coaches regarding that there was no "threeminute rule" and also attached to the email the enforcement document explaining the need to contemporaneously document all calls (Exhibit NCAA-4). In addition, a PowerPoint presentation was given to the football coaches in June 2009 that generally addressed telephone calls (Exhibit NCAA-5).] Bleil began employment at the institution in December 2009. c. Burnham. In addition to the 80 impermissible calls that Burnham placed due to staffwide "logging issues," Burnham placed 13 "culpable calls" to eight prospects over a 16-month period. Four of Burnham's calls were placed during a time period when it was not permissible to place telephone calls and nine calls were placed after he had already made one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period. The following is a detailed breakdown of Burnham's impermissible telephone calls: Coach Burnham Total Violations 93 Logging Issue 80 Impermissible Time Period 4 Culpable 9 Total Culpable 13
Regarding the four calls placed during an impermissible time period, Burnham explained that the calls were placed around the time of an institutional camp and Burnham believed that three of the prospects that were called had either attended camp or expressed an interest in camp. During his August 22, 2011, interview with the institution, Burnham explained he kept a file on all prospects he was recruiting and in that file he noted each time he talked by phone with a prospect. Burnham explained that at the end of each month, information was provided to the assistant recruiting coordinator who then entered the calls in Recruiting Radar. 2 Burnham stated that to ensure that the football staff only placed one call per week to a prospect, each coach was responsible for calling the
2
Recruiting Radar is a web-based compliance tool used by the institution to track recruiting telephone calls placed by coaches.
C-5
prospects they were recruiting. The lead recruiter would then ask the head coach to call the prospect if needed during a particular week. Burnham stated that if a call was placed to a prospect but no contact was made, he may have documented that in the log on a few occasions. Burnham reported that a compliance staff member may have told him it was necessary to log a telephone call made to a prospect even if he only left a message or made no contact, but he said he did not know that failing to log such calls could result in the calls being deemed a violation of NCAA legislation. Burnham stated that he was not familiar with the 2008 NCAA enforcement document outlining that there was no "three-minute rule" and that a countable call occurred unless a log showed contemporaneous documentation indicating no contact was made on the call. [Note: On July 28, 2008, the institution sent an email to all coaches regarding that there was no "three-minute rule" and also attached to the email the enforcement document explaining the need to contemporaneously document all calls (Exhibit NCAA-4). In addition, a PowerPoint presentation was given to the football coaches in June 2009 that generally addressed telephone calls (Exhibit NCAA-5).] Burnham began employment at the institution in February 2009. d. Wells. In addition to the 81 impermissible calls Wells placed due to staff-wide "logging issues," Wells placed 12 "culpable calls" to nine prospects over a 16-month period. Eight of Wells' calls were placed during a time period when it was not permissible to place telephone calls and four calls were placed after he had already made one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period. The following is a detailed breakdown of Wells' impermissible telephone calls: Coach Wells Total Violations 93 Logging Issue 81 Impermissible Time Period 8 Culpable 4 Total Culpable 12
Regarding the calls he placed during an impermissible time period, Wells explained during his April 22, 2011, interview that five of the calls were placed to prospects near the time they attended an institutional camp. Wells also reported that he kept a file for each individual prospect he recruited and he would provide his logs to the assistant recruiting coordinator who would then turn them into compliance. Wells explained he typically would not note in his file if he did not reach the prospect or left a message. Wells stated that he did not know that he was supposed to
C-6
identify a left message in his logs and that on the occasions he did note left message it was for his own personal knowledge, not for compliance purposes. Wells reported that he was never informed by anyone at Iowa State University or his previous institution that he needed to document dropped calls, pocket dials or voicemail messages. [Note: On July 28, 2008, the institution sent an email to all coaches regarding that there was no "threeminute rule" and also attached to the email the enforcement document explaining the need to contemporaneously document all calls. In addition, a PowerPoint presentation was given to the football coaches in June 2009 that generally addressed telephone calls (Exhibit NCAA-5).] Wells began employment at the institution in February 2009. e. Other staff members. Regarding the remaining 34 "culpable calls" placed by other members of the football staff, most of the coaches reported that they did not think calls in which they did not make contact with a prospect or left a message were presumed to be a countable call without contemporaneous documentation. Some coaches reported that even if they identified a left message on the log, it was not for a compliance reason but for personal use to track that they had attempted to contact a prospect. The coaches also reported that they met monthly with the compliance staff to review NCAA rules. Most of the coaches reported that they were unaware of the 2008 educational document from the NCAA informing institutions it was necessary to document all calls, including voicemail messages, as without contemporaneous documentation, those calls would be deemed countable calls. The following is a detailed breakdown of the impermissible telephone calls placed by the other coaches on the football staff: Coach A B C D E F G H Total Logging Impermissible Total Culpable Violations Issue Time Period Culpable 57 51 1 5 6 92 87 0 5 5 33 28 0 5 5 16 11 0 5 5 43 40 2 1 3 30 28 2 0 2 6 4 0 2 2 23 21 0 2 2
C-7
Coach I J K L M N O P Q R S T 2.
Total Logging Impermissible Total Culpable Violations Issue Time Period Culpable 17 15 0 2 2 81 80 0 1 1 30 29 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 7 7 0 0 0
[NCAA Bylaws 13.1.3.1.2 (2008-09 NCAA Division I Manual), 13.1.3.4.1 and 13.4.1.2] It is agreed that between July 2008 and August 2011, members of the men's basketball coaching staff violated NCAA recruiting communication legislation by sending 160 impermissible text messages and placing 158 impermissible telephone calls to 21 men's basketball prospective student-athletes. Specifically: a. Between August 2010 and August 2011, Keith Moore (Moore), then student men's basketball coach and former boy's nonscholastic coach, sent 160 impermissible text messages and placed 12 impermissible telephone calls to five prospects. [NCAA Bylaw 13.4.1.2] The majority of impermissible calls (118) were attributed to systemic logging failures wherein a men's basketball coach failed to document a message or lack of contact resulting in a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible. The remaining 28 impermissible calls were the result of the men's basketball coaches placing calls for which more specific, individualized culpability was attached. Specifically: (1) Between July 2008 and February 2009, Daniyal Robinson (Robinson), then assistant men's basketball coach, placed 21 impermissible telephone calls. All calls were placed after Robinson had already made the permissible call(s) to a prospect during the legislated time period. [NCAA Bylaws 13.1.3.1.2 (2008-09 NCAA Division I Manual)] C-8
b.
c.
(2)
Between July 2009 and February 2011, two members of the men's basketball staff placed a total of seven impermissible telephone calls. All calls were placed after the coaches had already made the permissible call(s) to a prospect during the legislated time period. [NCAA Bylaws 13.1.3.1.2 (2008-09 NCAA Division I Manual)]
Supporting Narrative: The NCAA enforcement staff, institution and Robinson are in agreement with the facts of these findings. The enforcement staff believes that major violations of NCAA legislation occurred. While the institution agrees that this is a major infractions case overall, the institution takes no position and defers to the judgment of the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions on whether a finding against each involved individual should be deemed to be major or secondary. Please see Robinson's position statement attached to this report explaining his position. After several requests by the enforcement staff, Moore failed to respond or submit information related to the violations outlined in this finding. (See Exhibit NCAA-7.) The institution's telephone audit revealed that members of the men's basketball coaching staff placed 158 impermissible telephone calls to 21 prospects and that one then assistant student men's basketball coach sent 160 impermissible text messages to five prospects. A thorough review of the evidence revealed that the majority of the telephone call violations (118) involving the men's basketball staff were attributed to systemic logging failures wherein a men's basketball coach failed to document a left message or lack of contact, which caused a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible. The following information details the remaining 40 "culpable calls," including those placed by individual men's basketball staff members that the enforcement staff believes should be named and at risk for Finding No. 2: a. Moore. Prior to being hired as a student coach for the men's basketball program in the fall of 2010, Moore attended the institution from 1977 through 1981 and was a member of the baseball and men's basketball teams. Immediately prior to returning to the institution as a student coach, Moore coached the 15- and 16-year-old teams for the All Iowa Attack nonscholastic boys' basketball club. While employed as a student coach at Iowa State University, Moore sent 160 text messages to prospects that he coached with the All Iowa Attack squads.
C-9
During his April 18, 2011, interview with the institution, Moore indicated that he received NCAA rules education from the compliance staff regarding limitations on his relationship with the prospects he had previously coached. Moore also stated that he knew he could not recruit those prospects on behalf of the institution, and he was aware that the limitations on contact with those prospects included placing telephone calls and sending text messages. Moore explained that he received text messages from the prospects in the fall of 2010 and the spring of 2011, which corresponded with the conclusion of the 2010 and the beginning of the 2011 nonschoalstic basketball seasons. Moore stated that he did not view the contacts with the prospects as "recruiting" because his communication with them was related to their nonscholastic team; therefore, he did not think it was an issue. However, during his August 23, 2011, interview with the institution, Moore clarified that his knowledge surrounding whether he could text message prospects evolved over his time at the institution. Moore explained that he initially thought he could text his former players, then believed he could only respond to texts and finally came to the conclusion that he could not text at all 3. b. Robinson. In addition to the 43 impermissible calls that Robinson placed due to staffwide "logging issues," Robinson placed 21 "culpable calls" to two prospects over a seven-month period. All 21 of Robinson's "culpable calls" were placed after he had already made the permissible call(s) to a prospect during the legislated time period. The following is a detailed breakdown of Robinson's impermissible telephone calls: Coach Robinson Total Violations 64 Logging Issue 43 Impermissible Time Period 0 Culpable 21 Total Culpable 21
During his June 27, 2012, interview with the enforcement staff and institution, Robinson stated that he used a notebook to track the telephone calls placed to prospects and he would then provide the notebook to a graduate assistant or manager who entered the information into Recruiting Radar. 4 Robinson explained that the only calls he logged in the notebook were calls in which he made contact with a prospect or a parent.
3
Moore was not issued an institutional cell phone. Moore placed all of the impermissible calls and sent all of the impermissible text messages from his personal cell phone. 4 Recruiting Radar is a web-based compliance tool used by the institution to track recruiting telephone calls placed by coaches.
C-10
Robinson stated that he was told he did not have to log calls in which no contact was made with a prospect or only left a message, but Robinson could not recall who told him that information. Robinson reported that he received NCAA rules education from compliance on a regular basis through meetings that involved the men's basketball staff and other meetings that included the entire athletics department. However, Robinson stated that he was not familiar with the 2008 NCAA enforcement document outlining that there was no "three-minute rule" and that a countable call occurred unless a log showed contemporaneous documentation indicating no contact was made on the call. [Note: On July 28, 2008, the institution sent an email to all coaches regarding that there was no "three-minute rule" and also attached to the email the enforcement document explaining the need to contemporaneously document all calls (Exhibit NCAA-4). In addition, a PowerPoint presentation was given to the coaches in October 2009 that generally addressed telephone calls (Exhibit NCAA-5).] Robinson began employment at the institution in May 2008. c. Other staff members. Regarding the other seven "culpable calls" placed by the basketball staff, the most common explanation provided by the other coaches for the telephone call violations was that they did not believe that calls in which no contact was made with the prospect constituted a countable call. The following is a detailed breakdown of impermissible telephone calls placed by other coaches on the men's basketball staff: Coach A B C D E F 3. Total Violations 33 23 10 9 6 1 Logging Issue 33 18 8 9 6 1 Impermissible Time Period 0 0 0 0 0 0 Culpable 0 5 2 0 0 0 Total Culpable 0 5 2 0 0 0
[NCAA Bylaws 13.1.3.1 (2008-09 NCAA Division I Manual) and 13.1.3.1.1] It is agreed that between September 2008 and December 2010, members of the men's and women's track and cross country coaching staffs violated NCAA recruiting communication legislation by placing 138 impermissible telephone calls to 41 men's and women's track and cross country prospective studentathletes. Specifically: C-11
a.
The majority of impermissible calls (122) were attributed to systemic logging failures wherein a track and field and cross country coach failed to document a message or lack of contact resulting in a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible. The remaining 16 impermissible calls were the result of five track and field and cross country coaches placing calls to a prospect after that coach had already placed one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.
b.
Supporting Narrative: The NCAA enforcement staff and institution are in agreement of the facts of these findings. The enforcement staff believes that major violations of NCAA legislation occurred. While the institution agrees that this is a major infractions case overall, the institution takes no position and defers to the judgment of the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions on whether a finding against each involved individual should be deemed to be major or secondary. The following is a detailed breakdown of the impermissible telephone calls for coaches on the track and cross country staffs: Total Violations 28 16 54 4 21 11 Logging Issue 22 12 51 2 20 11 Impermissi ble Time Period 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Culpable 6 4 3 2 1 0
Coach Coach A Coach B Coach C Coach D Coach E Coach F
Culpable 6 4 3 2 1 0
The institution's telephone audit revealed that members of the men's and women's track and field and cross country staff placed a total of 138 impermissible telephone calls to 41 prospects. A thorough review of the evidence revealed that the majority of the telephone call violations (122) involving the track and field and cross country programs were attributed to systemic logging failures wherein a track and field and cross country coach failed to document a left message or lack of contact, which caused a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible. There were a total of 16 "culpable calls" among five staff members with the largest number attributed to one staff member being six. As a result of the low number of culpable calls, the enforcement staff and the institution did not believe C-12
that any involved track and field or cross country coach should be named and at risk. Two track and field and cross country coaching staff members interviewed by the institution and/or enforcement staff explained that the track and field and cross country coaches used Recruiting Radar 5 to track calls to prospects, but there was confusion among the staff interviewed regarding what calls needed to be logged. One coach reported that she knew all calls, including voicemail messages, needed to be logged into Recruiting Radar, but she was unaware that failing to log such calls would mean the calls were presumed to be countable calls. Another coaching staff member reported that he used Recruiting Radar to track calls to prospects, but he did not know that they were required to log all calls, including voicemail messages. The two coaches interviewed attributed the majority of the impermissible calls to failing to log voicemail messages or dropped calls with prospects. One coach interviewed recalled receiving an email from compliance a few years prior noting the importance of documenting dropped calls and voicemail messages and admitted that the coaches needed to do a better job logging such calls. The other coach stated that he was not familiar with the 2008 NCAA enforcement document outlining that there was no "three-minute rule" and that a countable call occurred unless a log showed contemporaneous documentation indicating no contact was made on the call. [Note: On July 28, 2008, the institution sent an email to all coaches regarding that there was no "three-minute rule" and also attached to the email the enforcement document explaining the need to contemporaneously document all calls (Exhibit NCAA-4). In addition, a general PowerPoint presentation was given to coaches in October 2009 that generally addressed telephone calls (Exhibit NCAA-5).] The reporting coaches' employment at the institution began after July 2008 but before October 2009. 4. [NCAA Bylaw 13.1.3.1.4] It is agreed that between July 2008 and June 2011, members of the women's basketball coaching staff violated NCAA recruiting communication legislation by placing 55 impermissible telephone calls to 19 women's basketball prospective student-athletes. Specifically: a. The majority of impermissible calls (45) were attributed to systemic logging failures wherein a women's basketball coach failed to document a
C-13
message or lack of contact resulting in a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible. b. The remaining 10 impermissible calls were the result of two women's basketball coaches placing three calls to a prospect prior to April of the prospect's junior year and three coaches placing seven calls to a prospect after that coach had already placed one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.
Supporting Narrative: The NCAA enforcement staff and institution are in agreement with these findings. The enforcement staff believes that major violations of NCAA legislation occurred. While the institution agrees that this is a major infractions case overall, the institution takes no position and defers to the judgment of the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions on whether a finding against each involved individual should be deemed to be major or secondary. The following is a detailed breakdown of the impermissible telephone calls placed by the coaches on the women's basketball staff: Coach Coach A Coach B Coach C Coach D Total Violations 24 6 23 2 Logging Issue 19 3 21 2 Impermissible Time Period 2 0 1 0 Culpable 3 3 1 0 Total Culpable 5 3 2 0
The institution's telephone audit revealed members of the women's basketball coaching staff placed a total of 55 impermissible telephone calls to 19 prospects. A thorough review of the evidence revealed that the majority of the telephone call violations (45) involving the women's basketball staff were attributed to systemic logging failures wherein a women's basketball coach failed to document a left message or lack of contact, which caused a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible. There were a total of 10 "culpable calls" among four staff members with the largest number attributed to one staff member being five. As a result of the low number of culpable calls, the enforcement staff and the institution did not believe that any involved women's basketball coach should be named and at risk. The women's basketball coaching staff member interviewed by the institution regarding the impermissible calls explained that the coaches used Recruiting
C-14
SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________ Radar 6 to track calls to prospects and that signatures of the coaches were required after the printouts were reviewed. The coach interviewed attributed the majority of the impermissible calls to failing to log voicemail messages or dropped calls with prospects. The coach recalled receiving an email from compliance a few years prior noting the importance of documenting dropped calls and voicemail messages and admitted that the coaches needed to do a better job logging such calls. [Note: On July 28, 2008, the institution sent an email to all coaches regarding that there was no "three-minute rule" and also attached to the email the enforcement document explaining the need to contemporaneously document all calls (Exhibit NCAA-4).] The reporting coach was employed at the institution in both July 2008 and October 2009. 5. [NCAA Bylaw 13.1.3.1 (2008-09 Manual) and 13.1.3.1 (2011-12 Manual)] It is agreed that between July 2008 and April 2010, members of the women's tennis coaching staff violated NCAA recruiting communication legislation by placing 50 impermissible telephone calls to seven women's tennis prospective student-athletes. Specifically: a. The majority of impermissible calls (42) were attributed to systemic logging failures wherein a women's tennis coach failed to document a message or lack of contact resulting in a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible. The remaining eight impermissible calls were the result of a women's tennis coach placing one call prior to July 1 following a prospect's junior year and two coaches placing seven calls to three prospects after that coach had already placed the one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.
b.
Supporting Narrative: The NCAA enforcement staff and institution are in agreement with these findings. The enforcement staff believes that major violations of NCAA legislation occurred. While the institution agrees that this is a major infractions case overall, the institution takes no position and defers to the judgment of the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions on whether a finding against each involved individual should be deemed to be major or secondary. The following is a detailed
6
C-15
breakdown of the impermissible telephone calls placed by the coaches on the women's tennis staff: Coach Coach A Coach B Total Violations 45 5 Logging Issue 40 2 Impermissible Time Period 1 0 Culpable 4 3 Total Culpable 5 3
The institution's telephone audit revealed that members of the women's tennis staff placed 50 impermissible telephone calls to seven prospects. A thorough review of the evidence revealed that the majority of the telephone call violations (42) involving the women's tennis program were attributed to systemic logging failures wherein a women's tennis coach failed to document a message or lack of contact, which caused a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible. There were eight total "culpable calls" among two staff members with each coach having placed four "culpable calls." As a result of the low number of culpable calls, the enforcement staff and the institution did not believe that any involved tennis coach should be named and at risk. One tennis coach interviewed reported that the tennis staff met with compliance once per month to go over NCAA rules and the staff also received emails from compliance updating the staff on NCAA legislation. In addition, the coach explained that he did not believe he was required initially to identify whether he had left a voicemail with a prospect within the Recruiting Radar 7 software. The coach reported that prior to the institution obtaining Recruiting Radar, he logged calls in a recruiting log book, made copies of the log and provided it to compliance at the end of each month. The coach reported that before the institution began investigating the issue, he only logged telephone calls in which he actually spoke to the prospect and he did not log left messages or unanswered calls in Recruiting Radar. The coach stated that he did not remember compliance instructing him to put an "LM" or "NA" in the log if he did not reach a prospect, but he did recall compliance telling him to make sure to log all calls. The coach explained that he took that directive to mean staff needed to be more cognizant in logging all calls. The coach stated that he was not familiar with the 2008 NCAA enforcement document outlining that there was no "three-minute rule" and that a countable call occurred unless a log showed contemporaneous documentation indicating no contact was made on the call. [Note: On July 28, 2008, the institution sent an
7
C-16
email to all coaches regarding that there was no "three-minute rule" and also attached to the email the enforcement document explaining the need to contemporaneously document all calls (Exhibit NCAA-4). In addition, a PowerPoint presentation was given to the coaches in October 2009 that generally addressed telephone calls (NCAA-5).] The reporting coach was employed at the institution in both July 2008 and October 2009. 6. [NCAA Bylaw 13.1.3.1] It is agreed that between July 2008 and April 2011, coaches from eight sports programs (other than the sports programs identified in Finding Nos. 1 through 5) violated NCAA recruiting communication legislation by placing 121 impermissible telephone calls to 64 prospective student-athletes. Specifically: a. The majority of impermissible calls (112) were attributed to systemic logging failures wherein a coach failed to document a message or lack of contact resulting in a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible. The remaining nine impermissible calls were the result of coaches placing calls for which more specific, individualized culpability was attached. Specifically: (1) Between July 2008 and October 2010, three wrestling coaches placed three impermissible telephone calls to three prospects. One call was placed prior to July of a prospect's junior year and two calls were placed after the coach had already placed one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period. In February 2011, a women's soccer coaching staff member placed one impermissible telephone call to a prospect. The call was placed after the coach had already placed one permissible call to the prospect during the legislated time period. Between August 2010 and January 2011, two members of the women's gymnastics staff placed a total of three impermissible calls to three prospects. The calls were placed after the coaches had already placed one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period. In September 2010, a women's swimming and diving coach placed one impermissible telephone call to a prospect. The call was placed after the coach had already placed one permissible call to the prospect during the legislated time period.
b.
(2)
(3)
(4)
C-17
(5)
In September 2008, a women's golf coach placed one impermissible telephone call to a prospect. The call was placed after the coach had already placed one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period. In November 2008, a women's volleyball coach placed one impermissible telephone call to a prospect. The call was placed after the coach had already placed one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.
(6)
Supporting Narrative: The NCAA enforcement staff and institution are in agreement with these findings. The enforcement staff believes that major violations of NCAA legislation occurred. While the institution agrees that this is a major infractions case overall, the institution takes no position and defers to the judgment of the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions on whether a finding against each involved individual should be deemed to be major or secondary. The institution's telephone audit revealed coaching staff members from eight sports programs not previously identified in Finding Nos. 1 through 5 placed a total of 121 impermissible telephone calls to 64 prospects. A thorough review of the evidence revealed that the majority of the telephone call violations (112) involving these other sports programs were attributed to systemic logging failures wherein a coach failed to document a message or lack of contact, which caused a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible. The coaching staff members in the eight sports programs were not specifically interviewed regarding the impermissible calls attributed to their sports programs because the number of impermissible calls was low and because the majority of the impermissible calls were a result of the coaches failing to properly log calls. Also, most of the coaches in the other sport programs interviewed during the investigation provided explanations regarding logging failures and the institution's rules education program consistent with the other coaches interviewed. As a result, the enforcement staff and institution did not believe it necessary or efficient to conduct interviews with each coach from every sport program. 7. [NCAA Bylaw 13.1.3.4.1] It is agreed that between August 2008 and January 2011, noncoaching staff members from the football and men's basketball staffs violated NCAA recruiting
C-18
communication legislation by placing 43 telephone calls as impermissible recruiters to 14 prospective student-athletes. Specifically: a. Between October 2008 and July 2010, a then assistant football recruiting coordinator and current graduate assistant football coach placed 30 telephone calls as an impermissible recruiter to eight prospects. Between August and November 2008, a then assistant director of football operations placed seven impermissible telephone calls as an impermissible recruiter to a prospect. In June 2010, a then graduate assistant football coach placed two impermissible telephone calls as an impermissible recruiter to a prospect. In June 2010, an assistant director of football operations placed two impermissible telephone calls as an impermissible recruiter to two prospects. In April 2010, a then graduate assistant men's basketball coach placed an impermissible call as an impermissible recruiter to a prospect. In January 2011, a then assistant director of men's basketball operations and current assistant men's basketball coach placed one call as an impermissible recruiter to a prospect.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
Supporting Narrative: The NCAA enforcement staff and institution are in agreement with these findings. The enforcement staff believes that major violations of NCAA legislation occurred. The institution takes no position. With regard to the then assistant football recruiting coordinator and current graduate assistant football coach referenced in Finding No. 7-a (football noncoaching staff member No. 1), the enforcement staff did not believe it was appropriate to consider him to be at risk for his involvement in this finding because a majority of his telephone calls were placed around the time that many of the prospects paid a deposit to enroll at the institution or during the prospect's official paid visit. In addition, football noncoaching staff member No. 1 reported that any calls he placed to prospects was done at the direction of a coach and that, typically, those calls were related to collecting academic transcripts or other necessary paperwork. Football noncoaching staff member No. 1 explained that the main recruiter for that particular prospect would have been the coach who directed him to make the call but he was not able to identify a specific coach who
C-19
directed him to make such calls. The full-time football coaches interviewed in this case denied telling football noncoaching staff member No. 1 to make calls to prospects; rather, the coaches indicated that he likely placed the call on his own initiative in order to obtain paperwork. The then assistant director of football operations referenced in Finding No. 7-b (football noncoaching staff member No. 2) reported that once a recruited prospect had signed a National Letter of Intent or once a walk on had paid the proper enrollment fees, he believed that it was permissible to call those individuals in order to collect final admission paper work (e.g., transcripts, housing forms, etc.). Football noncoaching staff member No. 2 stated that he did not recall anyone informing him that it was permissible to make such contact, but he believed that since the prospect had signed or paid an enrollment fee, it was permissible to call. Football noncoaching staff member No. 2 stated that he knew he could not place recruiting telephone calls to prospects, but he also believed that it was permissible to call prospects that were on campus for official paid visits because the prospect was physically located on campus. Football noncoaching staff member No. 2 reported he received NCAA rules education through monthly football meetings with compliance and taking the NCAA coaches certification exam and the Big 12 Conference exam. Based on a lack of clear evidence of culpability of football noncoaching staff member No. 1 and/or the full-time football coaches, the institution and the enforcement staff did not believe that an individual should be named or at risk for Finding No. 7. Additionally, because of the information reported by football noncoaching staff members No. 1 and 2, and the low number of culpable telephone calls attributed to the coaches detailed in Finding Nos. 7-c through 7-f, the enforcement staff did not believe it necessary to interview those individuals. 8. [NCAA Constitution 2.8.1] It is agreed that from July 2008 through August 2011, the scope and nature of the violations detailed in Finding Nos. 1 through 7 demonstrate that the athletics department failed to adequately monitor its sports programs and educate its coaches regarding telephone communication with prospective student-athletes. Specifically, regarding the failure to monitor, the institution failed to follow procedures in place to monitor telephone calls in the sport of football from July 2008 to May 2011 and, in all sports, the institution did not consistently crosscheck the coaches' telephone logs with their telephone records, which contributed to the violations outlined above occurring over a three-year period. Additionally, the NCAA rules education provided to athletics department staff members regarding telephone calls to prospects was inadequate because (a) coaching staff members reported that they were not told that the failure to contemporaneously
C-20
document a message or no contact would result in a countable call and (b) no rules education about the contemporaneous documentation requirement was provided to athletics department staff members after October 2009. Supporting Narrative: The NCAA enforcement staff and institution are in agreement with these findings and that major violations of NCAA legislation occurred. Between July 2008 and August 2011, coaches from 13 sport programs placed over 1,484 impermissible telephone calls as detailed in Finding Nos. 1, 2-b, 2-c, and 3 through 7. During his August 23, 2011, interview with institution, Dustin Gray (Gray), then assistant director of compliance and current director of compliance, reported that in August 2008, the institution began requiring coaches to use Recruiting Radar 8 to track contacts and telephone calls with prospects. Gray explained that coaches or a designated staff member were supposed to input their telephone contacts with prospects and associated handwritten notes into Recruiting Radar, print out individual reports for each coach and provide those reports to compliance. Gray reported that compliance was supposed to also conduct random audits on one to two sports programs per month and that Eileen Flaherty (Flaherty), then assistant director of compliance, was responsible for determining which sports were audited each month. During her September 15, 2012, interview with the enforcement staff and institution, Flaherty explained that if a team that was just audited was selected again by the program, she would do another random selection. Flaherty reported that she never spoke with Josh Snyder (Snyder), then associate athletics director for compliance, about the auditing process and was never questioned about the sports that were or were not audited. However, during his September 16, 2012, interview with the enforcement staff and institution, Snyder reported that he oversaw the compliance staff from May 2005 through December 2010, and he had informed Flaherty that she was to include one football or one men's basketball coach each month in the audit due to the high profile nature of those sports. However, Flaherty stated that she did not keep track to make sure each sports program was audited every year, and there was never any direction to give special attention to any particular sport program during certain high recruiting periods.
Recruiting Radar is a web-based compliance tool used by the institution to track recruiting telephone calls placed by coaches
C-21
Regarding the institution's failure to adequately educate coaches regarding NCAA telephone legislation, the compliance staff members reported that the issue of contemporaneous documentation was discussed verbally with the coaches several times. As previously mentioned, the institution provided an email sent to all coaches July 28, 2008, containing a memo from the enforcement staff outlining the need to document all telephone calls to prospects. Further, the institution provided the enforcement staff with a PowerPoint presentation from an October 2009 rules education session conducted by the compliance staff for institutional coaching staff members, which included an instruction that coaches log messages and dropped calls. However, the session did not include information indirectly that failing to document such calls could result in a countable call under NCAA rules. Many coaches interviewed by the institution and/or the enforcement staff reported that they did not know, nor were they ever told by compliance, that it was necessary for them to log all telephone calls placed to prospects, even calls where no contact was made or a voicemail message was left. In addition, many of the coaches involved in the violations were not employed at the institution when the July 28, 2008, email was sent, and those new coaches could not recall being informed of the memo by their previous institutions. Further, besides the July 28, 2008, email, June 2009 PowerPoint (football coaches only) and October 2009 PowerPoint (all other sports programs), the institution was unable to provide any other documentation indicating it educated its coaches about the need to log all telephone calls. In summary, despite having a monitoring system in place, the institution failed to follow those procedures in that telephone calls were not adequately monitored, especially in the sport of football from July 2008 to May 2011. In addition, with regard to all sports, the institution did not consistently cross-check the coaches' telephone logs with their telephone records. Further, the lack of adequate NCAA rules education that was provided to the institution's coaches regarding the need to log all telephone calls contributed to the violations outlined in Finding Nos. 1 through 7.
C-22
D.
The Involved Parties' Statements and Overall Positions on the Infractions Case. 1. Statement submitted by Bill Bleil. See Exhibit NCAA-8. 2. Statement submitted by Shane Burnham. See Exhibit NCAA-9. 3. Statement submitted by Bobby Elliott. See Exhibit NCAA-10. 4. Statement submitted by Keith Moore. No statement provided. 5. Statement submitted by Daniyal Robinson. See Exhibit NCAA-11. 6. Statement submitted by Luke Wells. See Exhibit NCAA-12. 7. Statement submitted by Iowa State University. See Exhibit NCAA-13. 8. Statement submitted by University of Notre Dame. See Exhibit NCAA-14. 9. Statement submitted by University of Houston. See Exhibit NCAA-15. 10. Statement submitted by Utah State University. No statement provided. 11. Statement submitted by the enforcement staff. See Exhibit NCAA-16. D-1
E.
Review of Other Issues. 1. Unresolved allegations. There are no unresolved allegations. 2. Ethical conduct. Although the coaches named in this case committed the text messaging and/or recruiting telephone call violations detailed in this summary disposition report, the enforcement staff and institution do not believe their actions rose to the level of unethical conduct because of the low number of culpable calls. Additionally, the enforcement staff thought that it was important to consider the feedback provided by the membership for less emphasis and a deregulation of telephone call violations. Telephone calls placed during a time period when it is impermissible to have any contact at all is the primary concern in the aftermath of deregulation. In this case, most of the calls placed by the coaches involved institutional-wide logging issues with very few calls placed during impermissible time periods. For these reasons, the enforcement staff did not believe it was appropriate to allege an unethical conduct charge against the coaches in addition to the underlying violations. Regarding Wells, who placed eight calls during a time period when he should not have been calling, Wells reported a majority of those calls were related to camp. Because calls related to camp are now permissible under NCAA legislation, the enforcement staff did not believe it was appropriate to specifically subject Wells to an unethical conduct charge despite the large number of culpable calls. 3. Secondary infractions. a. [NCAA Bylaw 13.11.1.7] It is agreed that between April 2010 and April 2011, members of the men's and women's basketball staffs impermissibly participated in coaching activities involving nonscholastic-based basketball. Specifically: (1) Between August 2010 and April 2011, Moore provided individual skill instruction to several girls' basketball prospective studentathletes. Between May 2010 and July 2011, the women's basketball director of basketball operations participated in coaching activities involving a boys' nonscholastic basketball team. On at least five
(2)
E-1
occasions, the director of operations served as an assistant coach for a boys' nonscholastic-based team. 4. Student-athlete reinstatement issues. All student-athlete reinstatement issues in this case have been resolved. 5. Miscellaneous issues. There are no remaining issues.
E-2
F.
Institution's Corrective Actions and Penalties. 1. Institution's corrective actions. a. Invest over $82,000 over the next three years in compliance and recruiting software with Bluechip Athletics Solution. The software will simplify recording telephone calls and monitoring telephone calls and text messages as it will be one system from start to finish. Further, other recruiting and monitoring processes will be improved. Added a statement at the bottom of the Telephone Log Form in the Recruiting Logbook indicating the necessity to denote a no answer/left message call. Discontinue the practice of assigning student coaches from the continuing education program to sports-specific functions Require all current University coaching staff members named in this inquiry to attend an educational session on NCAA compliance in addition to the monthly meetings. Dedicate a monthly coaches' meeting to telephone calls and in the meeting emphasize to the coaching staff members the necessity to log a no answer/left message call.
b.
c.
d.
e.
2.
Institution's self-imposed penalties for major violations. a. Place itself on a two-year probationary period effective November 13, 2011. Impose a Department-wide forfeiture of one-week of recruiting phone calls for all sports, served at an appropriate time for each sport. Undertook overall punitive actions for each sport and individual coaching staff members involved in a text message or impermissible telephone call violation utilizing the following guidelines. All penalties are stackable, for example: each coach gets the one-week department penalty, plus any team penalties, plus individual penalties. (1) Team Penalties (a) Less than 25 violation in that sport One week of no telephone calls by all coaching staff members.
b.
c.
F-1
(b)
25 to 60 violations in that sport Two weeks of no telephone calls by all coaching staff members. 61 to 199 violations in that sport Three weeks of no telephone calls by all coaching staff members and decrease recruiting opportunities by one per prospect for the 2011-12 recruiting year; and More than 900 violations in that sport Five weeks of no telephone calls by all coaching staff members, reduce official visits by 20 percent from the four year average, and limit the number of off campus recruiters to five for the spring evaluation period.
(c)
(d)
(2)
Individual Penalties (a) Less than 30 violation for that coach No additional individual restrictions; 30 to 50 violations for that coach One additional week of no telephone calls and a letter of admonishment; 50 to 80 violations for that coach Four additional weeks of no telephone calls and a letter of reprimand; and More than 100 violations for that coach Nine additional weeks of no telephone calls and no off-campus recruiting for a month.
(b)
(c)
(d)
d.
The penalties by team/individual were as follows: (1) Women's Gymnastics Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects November 13-19, 2011.
(2)
Men's Basketball (a) Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects November 13-19, 2011.
F-2
(b)
Serve an additional two-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the weeks of November 20-26 and November 27 December 3, 2011. Decrease the number of recruiting opportunities by one for all prospects during the 2011-12 academic year. Cease recruiting any of the prospects Student Coach Keith Moore had impermissible telephone or text contact with; Reduce official visits by 20 percent from the previous four year average for 2011-12. Coach A received an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of December 4 10, 2011. Student Coach Keith Moore was relieved from his duties as student coach and removed from the athletics department continuing education program.
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(3)
Women's Basketball (a) Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects. Serve an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the weeks of November 20-26.
(b)
(4)
Men's Golf Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects November 13-19, 2011.
(5)
Women's Golf Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects November 13-19, 2011.
(6)
Women's Swimming and Diving
F-3
Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects November 13-19, 2011.
(7)
Women's Soccer Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects November 13-19, 2011.
(8)
Softball Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects November 13-19, 2011.
(9)
Tennis (a) Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects November 13-19, 2011. Serve an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the weeks of November 20-26. Coach B received an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 27 December 3, 2011.
(b)
(c)
(10)
Men's and Women's Track and Cross Country (a) Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects November 13-19, 2011. Serve an additional two-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the weeks of November 20-26 and November 27 December 3, 2011. Decrease the number of recruiting opportunities by one for all prospects during the 2011-12 academic year. Coach C received an additional three-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from December 4 24, 2011.
(b)
(c)
(d)
F-4
(11)
Women's Volleyball Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects November 13-19, 2011.
(12)
Wrestling (a) Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects November 20-26, 2011. Serve an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 27 December 3, 2011.
(b)
(13)
Football (a) Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects February 5-11, 2012. Serve an additional four-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from February 12 March 10, 2012. Decrease the number of recruiting contacts by one for all prospects during the 2011-12 academic year. Reduce official visits by 20 percent from the previous fouryear average for the 2011-12 academic year; Decrease the number of permissible off-campus recruiters by two for the spring 2012 evaluation period. Coach D received an additional five-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 April 14, 2012. Coach Bleil received an additional three-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 31, 2012. Coach E received an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 17, 2012.
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
F-5
(i)
Coach S. Burnham an additional five-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 April 14, 2012. Coach F received an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 17, 2012. Coach G received an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 17, 2012. Coach Elliott was not allowed to have off-campus contact in the month of December, and an additional 10-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 May 19, 2012. Coach H received an additional five-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 April 14, 2012. Coach I received an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 17, 2012. Coach J received an additional five-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 April 14, 2012.
(j)
(k)
(l)
(m)
(n)
(o)
3.
Conference actions. The Big 12 Conference took no additional actions.
4.
Application of NCAA Executive Regulations [Bylaws 19.5.2.2-(e), 31.2.2.3 and 31.2.2.4]. Not applicable.
F-6
G.
Background Information on the Institution. 1. General information. Iowa State University is classified as a NCAA Division I Bowl Championship Subdivision member institution and is a member of the Big 12. The institution sponsors 7 men's programs (basketball, cross country, football, golf, indoor track and field, outdoor track and field, and wrestling), and 11 women's programs (basketball, cross country, golf, gymnastics, soccer, softball, tennis, indoor track and field, outdoor track and field, swimming and diving, and volleyball). 2. Overview of athletics department structure. The structure of the institution's intercollegiate athletics department is presented in the organization chart attached as Exhibit NCAA-17. 3. Previous major infractions cases. Iowa State has been involved in one prior major infraction case. December 19, 1986 The institution's major infractions case in 1986 primarily involved major violations in its football program and a failure to properly monitor by the institution. A summary of the violations found by the Committee on Infractions and penalties imposed is as follows: a. Members of the football staff arranged for four junior-college prospects to receive free lodging and food on credit from a local motel. Further, a former member of the football coaching staff paid cash deposits towards rent and utilities for four student-athletes' apartment. On numerous occasions, an assistant coach provided impermissible automobile transportation to prospects for their personal use and money to one prospect for rent. During two or three occurrences, the assistant coach allowed prospects to charge gasoline expenses to a university credit card. Also, on one occasion the assistant coach leased an apartment for three Prospects and another assistant coach provided money to prospects to pay the rent. An assistant coach arranged for prospects to participate in winter conditioning drills with the team and intermittently monitored the prospects working out at another facility.
b.
c.
G-1
d.
Head coach paid the balance of meal charges incurred by the juniorcollege prospects at the local motel using his personal funds, as well as money from an undisclosed source. Former head coach and former assistant coach violated the NCAA Principles of Ethical Conduct by knowingly and willfully operating the university's football program contrary to NCAA legislation. Also, the former head coach provided false and misleading information when questioned on his involvement in the matter by the NCAA. The Committee on Infractions issued a public reprimand to the institution and placed the institution on probation for two years, required the institution to develop and implement a comprehensive educational program to instruct coaches and athletics department personnel on NCAA legislation and instructed the institution to file progress reports with the enforcement staff. Additionally, the Committee of Infractions imposed a reduction in grants-in-aid to 26 for one year. The institution self-imposed further corrective and disciplinary measures, including terminating the head coaches' services, notifying bowl game representatives the university would not accept invitations to any bowl games following the 1986 season and suspending relations with the local motel for one year.
e.
f.
g.
4.
Background information for the football and men's basketball programs. a. Overview of grant-in-aid information. The overview of the grant-in-aid information is presented in the sports data chart attached as Exhibit NCAA-18. b. Student-athletes on athletically related financial aid. The student-athletes on athletically related financial aid information is presented in the sports data chart attached as Exhibit NCAA-19. c. Redshirt data. The redshirt data is presented in the sports data chart attached as Exhibit NCAA-19.
G-2
d.
Student-athletes on athletically related financial aid who withdrew. The student-athletes on athletically related financial aid who withdrew is presented in the sports data chart attached as NCAA Exhibit-20.
e.
Institution's win-loss records. The institution's win-loss records are presented in the sports data chart attached as Exhibit NCAA-19.
f.
Official visits. The institution's official visit numbers are presented in the sports data chart attached as Exhibit NCAA-19.
g.
Institution's squad lists (past four academic years). The institution's squad lists are presented in the document attached as Exhibit NCAA-20.
h.
Room, board, books and tuition data. The institution's room, board, books, and tuition data are presented in the full grant-in-aid costs chart attached as Exhibit NCAA-18.
i.
Pre-existing contracts. The license for live telecasts to contests has been granted generally to the Big 12 for all football games and first right to all other sports. An additional license for live contests not selected under the obligations of the Big 12 license for live telecasts has been granted to the institution's licensee, Learfield Sports, doing business as Cyclone Sports Properties.
j.
Media guides (past two academic years). Iowa State has not published media guides since 2008-09.
5.
Identities, titles and biographical background for all involved individuals named in a Finding. The identities, titles, and biographical background for all involved individuals named are presented in biographies document as Exhibit NCAA-21.
G-3
H.
Exhibits NCAA-1 NCAA-2 NCAA-3 NCAA-4 NCAA-5 NCAA-6 NCAA-7 NCAA-8 NCAA-9 NCAA-10 NCAA-11 NCAA-12 NCAA-13 NCAA-14 NCAA-15 NCAA-16 NCAA-17 Detailed chronology. Interview list. Iowa State University self report. July 2008 email to coaching staff regarding no "three-minute rule." July 2008/October 2009 PowerPoint presentation. Chart detailing all calls in all sports. Enforcement staff correspondence with Keith Moore. Bill Bleil's personal statement. Shane Burnham's personal statement. Bobby Elliott's personal statement. Daniyal Robinson's personal statement. Luke Wells' personal statement. Iowa State University's position statement. University of Notre Dame's position statement. The University of Houston's position statement. Enforcement staff's position statement. Agreements by the parties.
Iowa State-1 Iowa State University's athletics department organizational chart. Iowa State-2 Iowa State University's grant-in-aid costs chart. Iowa State-3 Iowa State University's student-athlete sports data. Iowa State-4 Iowa State University's 2009-13 squad lists. Iowa State-5 Involved individuals' biographies.
H-1
Detailed Chronology Case No. M380 Iowa State University April 8, 2013 Detailed Chronology April 2011 Fred Hoiberg (Hoiberg), men's basketball head coach, observed Keith Moore (Moore), former men's basketball student coach, in attendance at a boy's nonscholastic basketball game, which was contrary to NCAA legislation. Hoiberg then contacted Jamie Pollard, director of athletics, to make him aware of Moore's actions. April 18, 2011 The institution interviewed Moore. August 22 and 23, 2011 The institution conducted interviews with several coaches and studentathletes. September 6, 2011 The institution informed Julie Roe Lach, then NCAA vice president of enforcement, that it discovered numerous telephone call violations within several sports programs and was preparing to provide a self-report to the NCAA enforcement staff related to the violations. September 15 and 16, 2011 The enforcement staff and institution conducted telephone interviews with two former assistant directors of compliance. January 31, 2012 A verbal notice of inquiry was provided to the institution. February 15, 2012 The enforcement staff and institution conducted on-campus interviews. June and July 2012 The enforcement staff conducted additional telephone interviews with several former Iowa State University coaches from various sports programs. September 11, 2012 The enforcement staff sent a draft of the summary disposition report to all involved individuals and the institution. October 16, 2012 The enforcement staff informed the involved individuals that it will be noted in the summary disposition report that they disagree that their violations should be considered major. December 10, 2012 The enforcement staff received the final involved individuals' amendments to the daft summary disposition report. January 31, 2012 The enforcement staff sent the revised draft of the summary disposition report to all involved individuals and the institution.
NCAA-1
Interview List Case No. M380 Iowa State University
Interviews conducted jointly by the enforcement staff and institution Name of Interviewee Abdelmassih, Matt Carper, Josh Flaherty, Eileen Hoiberg, Fred Mann, Cornell McKim, Ryan Otzelberger, TJ Pope, Kenneth Popp, Kristy Rutter, Jeff Snyder, Josh Date of Interview February 15, 2012 February 15, 2012 September 15, 2011 February 15, 2012 February 15, 2012 March 15, 2012 February 15, 2012 June 25, 2012 June 25, 2012 February 15, 2012 September 16, 2011
Interviews conducted by the enforcement staff Name of Interviewee Ash, Chris Link, Eric Fountain, Scott Robinson, Danyial Date of Interview July 2, 2012 June 26, 2012 July 3, 2012 June 27, 2012
NCAA-2
INTERVIEW LIST April 8, 2013 Page No. 2 _________
Interviews conducted by the institution Name of Interviewee Bleil, Bill Burnham, Shane Date of Interview August 22, 2011 August 22, 2011 August 23, 2011 August 22, 2011 August 23, 2011 Elliott, Bobby Espinoa, Armando Grey, Dustin August 22, 2011 August 23, 2011 August 23, 2011 August 22, 2011 August 23, 2011 Messingham, Courtney Moore, Keith Otzelberger, TJ August 22, 2011 April 18 and August 23, 2011 August 23, 2011 August 23, 2011 August 22, 2011 Rhoads, Paul Steyer, Jodi Uhlenhopp, Nick Wells, Luke Wiens, Nate August 22, 2011 August 23, 2011 August 22, 2011 August 22, 2011 August 23, 2011
NCAA-2
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY

OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Julie Roe Lach Vice President of Enforcement jlach@ncaa.org The National Collegiate Athletic Association 700 W. Washington Street P.O. Box 6222 Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-6222
College of Veterinary Medicine Department of Biomedical Sciences Ames, Iowa 50011-1250 Phone (515) 294-2440 FAX (515) 294-2315
November 23, 2011 Ms Lach, Attached is a detailed report from Iowa State University that summarizes our internal investigation into violations related to phone calls and their documentation. We enlisted the assistance of The Compliance Group (Lanexa, KS) in our investigation, and this report is pursuant to a conversation that you had with Chuck Smrt in August of this year. As the Faculty Athletics Representative, I can attest that the investigation was extremely thorough and diligently pursued every possible violation. I can also attest that the written report is an accurate representation of all of the findings of that thorough investigation. Please do not hesitate to contact me directly if I can assist or facilitate the work of your office. Respectfully, Tim Day Professor of Molecular Pharmacology Faculty Athletics Representative Office: 515-294-7100 Cell Phone: 515-451-9258 day@iastate.edu
NCAA-3
REPORT TO: NCAA ENFORCEMENT STAFF FROM: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY

November 2011
NCAA-3
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. A. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW .. 1. 2. 3. B. Initiation of Inquiry.. Results of Inquiry. Contents of Report 1 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 6 6 6 7 8 8 9 9 9 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 12 12 13 13 13 13 14 14 15 15 17
INQUIRY. 1. 2. Overview Overview of NCAA Involvement.....
C.
TELEPHONE VIOLATIONS...... 1. Overview a. NCAA Legislation b. Violations.. c. Overall Reasons. Analysis by Sport.. a. Womens Gymnastics... b. Mens Basketball... c. Womens Basketball.. d. Mens Golf. e. Womens Golf.... f. Womens Swimming/Diving..... g. Womens Soccer.... h. Softball...... i. Womens Tennis.... j. Mens & Womens Track And Field/Cross Country.... k. Womens Volleyball.... l. Wrestling.... m. Football......
2.
D.
TEXT MESSAGE VIOLATIONS... 1. 2. 3. 4. Overview a. NCAA Legislation. b. Text Messaging Billing Documentation.... Violations Overall Reasons.. Analysis By Sport... a. Mens Basketball b. Other Sports
NCAA-3
Page No. E. FAILURE TO MONITOR 1. 2. Overview a. NCAA Legislation. b. Violation................................................................................................................. Monitoring Program a. Overview. b. Specific Monitoring and Audit Process..... c. Current Process Education Program.. a. Overview.. b. Coaches Knowledge of Logging No Contact Calls.... 18 18 18 18 19 19 19 24 24 24 25 26
3.
F.
CORRECTIVE AND PUNITIVE ACTIONS.. 1. 2.
Institutions Corrective Actions. 26 Institutions Punitive Actions. 27 37
G.
CONCLUSION..
EXHIBITS: Exhibit A List of Individuals Interviewed Exhibit B Dates of Impermissible Calls Exhibit C Recruiting Logbook Screen Regarding Telephone Calls Exhibit D Recruiting Radar Page From Compliance Manual Exhibit E Recruiting Radar Input Screen Exhibit F July 2008 E-Mail and Attachment
NCAA-3
A.
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 1. Initiation of Inquiry In April 2011, the head mens basketball coach notified the institutions Director of Athletics concerning a potential violation involving a student coach, who was assigned to the mens basketball team as part of the athletics departments continuing education program for former student-athletes. Athletics Director for Compliance. The Director of Athletics and mens basketball coach immediately shared the information with the institutions Assistant The Assistant Athletics Director for Compliance then The Assistant Athletics Director for notified the Faculty Athletics Representative.
Compliance and Faculty Athletics Representative interviewed the student coach and reported they believed the student coach had participated in impermissible text messaging and phone conversations with several prospects who the student coach previously coached on an AAU team. Upon receiving the information from the Assistant Athletics Director for Compliance and Faculty Athletics Representative about the potential violations, the Director of Athletics and Faculty Athletics Representative both contacted the institutions President. In addition, the Director of Athletics made the decision the student coach be immediately relieved of his assignment with the mens basketball team and also be discontinued from the athletics departments continuing education program. Furthermore, the Faculty Athletics Representative and the Director of Athletics requested and received approval from the institutions President to engage The Compliance Group (TCG) to assist the institution in a thorough and complete review of the potential violations. Based on the results of the initial review and the advice of TCG, the decision was made to have the institutions compliance staff conduct a full telephone and text audit of all the institutions coaches (69 coaches) in all the institutions 18 sports for a three-year-period (2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 academic years). The scope of the audit included all sports and all coaches for a three-year-period because the institution wanted to be sure the department was in compliance with NCAA rules. The results of those audits were then reviewed and supported by TCG.
1
NCAA-3
2.
Results of Inquiry The extensive and thorough review of phone and text records for all 18 sports over a three year period resulted in the institution self-identifying the following inadvertent violations: a. b. A total of 31 telephone calls were made to prospects during impermissible time periods. A total of 38 telephone calls were made to prospects during a week that another member of the coaching staff had previously contacted the prospect. c. A total of 126 telephone calls were made to prospects during a week in which the coach had previously contacted the prospect. d. e. A total of 34 telephone calls were made by an impermissible caller. A student coach in mens basketball sent 160 impermissible text messages. or initiating contact with members of his former team. In addition to the violations noted above, the institutions investigation found members of its coaching staff failed to adequately record in their telephone logs over the three-year-period 1,243 calls to prospects in which no impermissible contact was involved. Specifically, the vast majority of these were instances in which no contact was made with the prospect or in which the call was a return of a dropped call. call. Although the institutions comprehensive and thorough audit did not result in the discovery of any other violations of NCAA rules, the institution acknowledges a violation of Bylaw 2.8.1. While the institution had an auditing program that compared telephone records and recruiting logs, the institution should have undertaken more effective efforts to identify insufficient documentation and any other types of impermissible telephone calls. impermissible calls, the majority of the violations could have been avoided.
2
The
majority of the text messages were the result of the student coach either responding to
While these instances do not involve
impermissible contact, the calls are a violation because the coaches failed to properly log the
Had the
institution had a more effective process for identifying insufficient documentation and
NCAA-3
As a result of the discovery of these violations, the institution has:

a.
Imposed significant corrective actions, including (1) investing over $82,000 in software to assist in compliance, (2) the elimination of sport specific duties for students participating in the athletic departments continuing education program, (3) the detailing of a specific audit process in order to improve monitoring text and telephone activities and (4) conducting additional educational activities for each sport staff in this area; and
b.
Imposed significant punitive actions, including (1) placing itself on two years probation, (2) suspending recruitment of and all contact with two potential student athletes for over eight months (3) applying significant reductions in the number of future telephone calls (4) applying significant reductions in the periods when these calls can occur, (5) enforcing a reduction in the number of official visits, and (6) imposing a reduction in the number of off-campus recruiters.
Although these actions are significant, the University believes it received a limited, if any, competitive and recruiting advantage as a result of these impermissible telephone calls and text messages because:

a.
The vast majority (nearly 82%) of the impermissible telephone calls were three minutes or less, which resulted in no contact between the coaching staff members and the prospect;
b.
The violations resulted from a lack of clarity or carelessness on applicable legislation as opposed to deliberate violations. Coaching staff members did not deliberately violate the legislation; and
c.

The student-athletes interviewed during this investigation indicated their choice of institution was not affected by additional telephone calls.
3.
Contents of Report This report will detail: (1) the Universitys inquiry; (2) those violations the University believed occurred; and (3) the corrective, punitive, and other actions taken by the University.
3
NCAA-3
B.
INQUIRY 1. Overview In April 2011, the head mens basketball coach, Fred Hoiberg, notified the institutions Director of Athletics, Jamie Pollard, that a student coach (Keith Moore) assigned to mens basketball by the athletics department as part of the departments continuing education program for former student-athletes, may have had impermissible contact with several prospects who the student coach had previously coached on an AAU team. Pollard and Hoiberg immediately shared the information with the institutions Assistant Athletics Director for Compliance, Dustin Gray. Gray immediately contacted the institutions Faculty Athletics Representative, Dr. Tim Day, and apprised him of the possible rules violation, per University policy. Gray and Day interviewed Moore on April 18. He reported telephone and text contacts with four of his former players from the team he had coached. After reviewing Moores records a fifth former player was identified. While the institution only intended to recruit two of these individuals, all five individuals are considered prospects due to their age. Since Moore did not have access to a University-issued cell telephone because he was only a student coach, the University requested and Moore provided his personal telephone and text records to Gray on April 22. Shortly thereafter, text messages and telephone records were reviewed, and impermissible texts messages were identified. Upon receiving more substantive indication that violations may have occurred, Day and Pollard independently notified the institutions President, Dr. Gregory Geoffroy. In addition, in consultation with Day, Gray and Hoiberg, Pollard made the decision that Moore be relieved immediately of his assignment with the mens basketball team and also be discontinued from the athletics departments continuing education program. In addition, the decision was made to immediately cease recruitment of the two individuals the mens basketball coaching staff had previously intended to recruit. Furthermore, Day and Pollard requested and received approval from Geoffroy to engage The Compliance Group (TCG) to assist the institution in a thorough and complete review of the potential violations.
4
NCAA-3
On April 25, institutional officials contacted Chuck Smrt with TCG to discuss the institutions inquiry. Shortly thereafter, the Director of Athletics instructed the basketball staff to cease any contact with Moore or others who could be interviewed about the investigation. Moore also was asked not to have any contact with any of the participants on the team he formerly coached. The review of the mens basketball staff records ensued.
In its review, the institution had numerous conversations with its cell telephone provider (Verizon) about its position that text message records of coaching staff members could not be provided to the institution. Due to the institutions persistence, text message records were provided by Verizon for the period of June 2010 to the present. Thorough review of those records revealed nearly all of the text message violations involved Moore and his former team members. In early August, the institution concluded its initial review of all telephone calls for the prior three academic years. Soon after, the institution began submitting restoration requests for fall sports in accordance with NCAA student-athlete reinstatement procedures. In late August, Smrt visited campus and interviewed numerous coaches, student-athletes, and Gray. Regarding the interviews, a determination was made that those coaching staff members still employed at the University who were potentially involved in numerous telephone or text messaging violations initially would be interviewed by Smrt. Some currently enrolled student-athletes who may have received these messages or calls were also interviewed. All of these interviews were tape recorded by Smrt and observed by Day. In addition, interviews with two former compliance staff members were subsequently conducted in conjunction with the NCAA Enforcement Staff. Exhibit A is a list of the persons interviewed by University and TCG personnel to date. In late August, as required by NCAA procedures, the institution began declaring recipient student-athletes ineligible as a result of these telephone call violations. To date, all studentathletes have been reinstated by the NCAA through the normal reinstatement process, without loss of competition. 2. Overview of NCAA Involvement On September 6, 2011, Smrt contacted NCAA Vice President for Enforcement Services Julie Roe Lach to inform Roe Lach of the Universitys inquiry. Roe Lach asked that the University keep the Enforcement Staff apprised of the
5
NCAA-3
investigation. She requested that the Enforcement Staff be present for the interviews of the two former compliance staff members. These were conducted on September 15 and 16, 2011. C. TELEPHONE VIOLATIONS 1. Overview a. NCAA Legislation NCAA Bylaw 13.1.3.1 details the permissible time period and frequency of telephone contact between coaching staff members and prospective student-athletes. These time periods and frequencies vary by sport. In this case, telephone violations occurred in 18 sports. Three of these sports have legislation on the number of contacts specific to that sport, while the others have language that is the same as other sports. Bylaw 13.1.3.4.1 restricts telephone contact with prospects only to certain authorized staff members. Generally, legislation in most of the sports restricts telephone calls to once per week. Once an institution reaches its applicable limit on the number of telephone calls to a prospect per week, it may not initiate any additional telephone calls during this same period, even if no conversation occurs (i.e., the coaching staff member could not leave a voice mail message). [NOTE: Legislation has been enacted for mens basketball, and is expected to be enacted for all other sports during this academic year, to allow unlimited telephone calls to prospective student-athletes entering their junior year in high school.] b. Violations The University acknowledges the following: During June 2008 through July 2011, the University violated NCAA legislation pertaining to telephone calls made to prospects by coaching staff members in that approximately 229 impermissible calls occurred. Also, on approximately 1,243 occasions, coaching staff members did not contemporaneously document their phone call as a noncountable call (e.g., place a notation on their recruiting logs that the coaching staff member did not make contact with the prospect during a telephone attempt, or that a call was dropped); the absence of those contemporaneous notes makes those countable calls (even without contact), and therefore renders
6
NCAA-3
subsequent calls in excess of numeric call restrictions. [NCAA Bylaws 13.1.3.1 and 13.1.3.4.1 ] Below is a summary of the violations by sport:
Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 16 2 45 9 68 25 48 7 3 0 11 1 4 1 8 2 19 2 14 0 43 7 120 17 5 0 26 4 3 0 777 123 33 29 1243 229 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Call Imp. Another After an Time Coach Earlier >3 Period Previously Min. Call Called 0 1 1 3 0 6* 2 7^ 16 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 6 1 0 16 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 17 19 87# 2 7 20% 31 38 160
W Gymnastics M Basketball Current Staff M Basketball Previous Staff W Basketball M Golf Current Staff M Golf Previous Staff W Golf W Swimming/Diving W Soccer Softball W Tennis MW Track & Field W Volleyball Wrestling Current Staff Wrestling Former Staff Football Current Staff Football Former Staff TOTAL
18 54 93 55 3 12 5 10 21 14 50 137 5 30 3 900 62 1472
*One call was made by an impermissible recruiter; ^One call was made by an impermissible recruiter; #29 calls were made by an impermissible recruiter; %Three calls were made by an impermissible recruiter
c.
Overall Reasons During their interviews, University coaching staff members stated they understood NCAA restrictions concerning contact with prospects via telephone and that only one call per week was permissible. Further, almost all of the coaches expressed some level of understanding they were supposed to log all of their calls, and several diligently denoted this on their phone logs. However, the inadequate monthly auditing process in place at the institution failed to reinforce the necessity of noting, left message or no contact. Therefore, while the coaches were informed they were supposed to log all calls (not just calls in which contact was made with a prospect), they did not clearly understand a failure to do so would render further phone calls in that week as violations. Further, the auditing process in place was not effective in identifying the insufficient practices it fostered.
7
NCAA-3
The following are several other general reasons coaching staff members reported why violations occurred: i. ii. iii. A few indicated their lack of knowledge about necessity to document a dropped call; Several reported they did not realize another coaching staff member already had made the one call per week; and The coaching staff member had forgotten he or she previously had made the one call earlier that week. As will be noted later in this report, the University believes it took significant educational measures to ensure coaching staff members understood NCAA legislation about one call per week and these coaching staff members understood other applicable telephone legislation. However, while education existed, the institution acknowledges further education could have reinforced the necessity of documenting a call that did not result in a contact with a prospect and that absent such documentation, the call became countable. 2. Analysis by Sport Below is an overview of the violations by sports. Exhibit B details the dates of the impermissible calls: a. Womens Gymnastics
Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 3 1 7 1 1 0 5 0 16 2 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Another Imp. Call Time Coach After an Period Previously Earlier > 3 Called Min. Call 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jay Ronayne Jay Santos Teshawne Jackson Jessica Bartgis TOTAL
4 8 1 5 18
8
NCAA-3
b. Mens Basketball Current Staff

Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 7 3 17 3 0 1 21 2 45 9 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Another Imp. Call Time Coach After an Period Previously Earlier > 3 Called Min. Call 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 1* 0 0 2 3 0 6
Fred Hoiberg TJ Otzelberger Matt Abdelmassih Elwyn McRoy TOTAL
10 20 1 23 54
*This call was made by an impermissible recruiter.
Mens Basketball Previous Staff

Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 5 4 11 2 48 16 4 2 0 1 68 25 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Another Imp. Call Time Coach After an Period Previously Earlier > 3 Called Min. Call 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 2 14 0 1 1 0 *1 0 2 7 16
Greg McDermott TJ Otzelberger Daniyal Robinson Jeff Rutter Nathan Wieseler TOTAL
9 13 64 6 1 93
c. Womens Basketball
Bill Fennelly Jodi Steyer Latoja Schaben Jack Easley TOTAL
23 24 6 2 55
d. Mens Golf Current Staff

Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 3 0 3 0 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Another Imp. Call Time Coach After an Period Previously Earlier > 3 Called Min. Call 0 0 0 0 0 0
Andrew Tank TOTAL
3 3
9
NCAA-3
Mens Golf Previous Staff

Jay Horton TOTAL
12 12
e. Womens Golf
Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 4 1 4 1 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Call Imp. Another After an Time Coach Earlier >3 Period Previously Min. Call Called 0 0 1 0 0 1
Christie Martens TOTAL
5 5
f. Womens Swimming and Diving

Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 6 1 2 1 8 2 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Call Imp. Another After an Time Coach Earlier >3 Period Previously Min. Call Called 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1
Kelly Nordell Duane Sorenson TOTAL
7 3 10
g. Womens Soccer
Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 6 0 9 1 0 1 4 0 19 2 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Call Imp. Another After an Time Coach Earlier >3 Period Previously Min. Call Called 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Tim Bennett Wendy Dillinger Tracy Grose Ben Madsen TOTAL
6 10 1 4 21
10
NCAA-3
h. Softball
Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 14 0 14 0 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Call Imp. Another After an Time Coach Period Previously Earlier > 3 Min. Call Called 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stacey Gemeinhardt TOTAL
14 14
i. Womens Tennis
Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 41 4 2 3 43 7 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Call Imp. Another After an Time Coach Period Previously Earlier > 3 Min. Call Called 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 3 6
Armando Espinosa Chris Williams TOTAL
45 5 50
j. Mens and Womens Track/Cross Country

Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 51 3 11 5 20 1 3 0 22 6 2 2 11 0 120 17 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Call Imp. Another After an Time Coach Earlier >3 Period Previously Min. Call Called 0 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 16
Nate Wiens Travis Hartke Corey Ihmels John Dagata Kristy Popp Grant Wall Pete Herber TOTAL
54 16 21 3 28 4 11 137
k. Womens Volleyball
Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 3 0 1 0 1 0 5 0 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Call Imp. Another After an Time Coach Period Previously Earlier > 3 Min. Call Called 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dawn Sullivan Christy Johnson Trudy Vande Berg TOTAL
3 1 1 5
11
NCAA-3
l. Wrestling Current Staff

Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 19 0 1 0 5 4 1 0 26 4 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Call Imp. Another After an Time Coach Period Previously Earlier > 3 Min. Call Called 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1
Yero Washington Chris Bono Kevin Jackson Molly Donnelly TOTAL
19 1 9 1 30
Wrestling Previous Staff

Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 3 0 3 0 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Call Imp. Another After an Time Coach Period Previously Earlier > 3 Min. Call Called 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cael Sanderson TOTAL
3 3
m. Football Current Staff

Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 81 11 60 18 28 2 80 13 40 3 29 1 183 16 20 3 79 2 41 2 83 10 2 0 13 3 23 9 2 29 11 1 2 0 777 123 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Call Imp. Another After an Time Coach Earlier >3 Period Previously Min. Call Called 1 6 4 2 1 15 2 0 0 3 4 6 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 16 0 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 9 0 0 29* 0 1 0 0 0 0 17 19 87
Paul Rhoads Bill Bleil Curtis Bray Shane Burnham Wally Burnham Nick Caley Bobby Elliott Tom Herman Courtney Messingham Ken Pope Luke Wells Markus Alleyne Eric Link Chris Ash Ryan McKim Scott Fountain Matt Karleskint TOTAL
92 78 30 93 43 30 199 23 81 43 93 2 16 32 31 12 2 900
* McKim made 27calls as an impermissible recruiter.
12
NCAA-3
Football Previous Staff

Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 2 2 0 3 1 0 0 3 3 3 4 8 20 0 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 7 33 29 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Call Imp. Another After an Time Coach Period Previously Earlier > 3 Min. Call Called 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 7 0 0 0 3* 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 7 20
Gene Chizik Shawn Raney Chris Ash Ryan McKim Wayne Bolt Scott Fountain Jay Rodgers Tom Howe Tony Petersen Robert McFarland Jeff Koonz Shane Beatty TOTAL
4 3 1 3 6 12 20 3 1 1 1 7 62
* McKim made 3 calls as an impermissible recruiter.
D.
TEXT MESSAGE VIOLATIONS 1. Overview a. NCAA Legislation Effective August 1, 2007, NCAA Bylaw 13.4.1.2 prohibits the sending of text messages by coaching staff members to prospective student-athletes. An override vote on January 12, 2008, at the NCAA Convention ultimately upheld the legislation. [NOTE: Legislation has been enacted for mens basketball and is expected to be enacted for all other sports during this academic year to allow unlimited texting to prospective student-athletes entering their junior year in high school.] b. Text Messaging Billing Documentation Based upon interviews with coaching staff members, nearly all telephone calls to prospects originated from University-issued cellular telephones. Few occurred from their University office telephones. The coaches indicated their cellular telephones were their primary mode of communication.
13
NCAA-3
During the time of the violations in this case, the University was unable to receive monthly detailed text reports from Verizon, its service provider. Upon initiation of the inquiry, the institution began a lengthy process of cajoling Verizon to provide text message information in monthly bill statements, as Verizon indicated such provision was not possible. After significant discussions, text message records beginning in June 2010 were provided. (A monthly text report will be provided moving forward). The text messaging records indicated the telephone number that was texted and whether it was an incoming or an outgoing text. It should be noted the possibility exists that one text message resulted in two or more text messages being reflected in the billing statement. violations. Other than with the student coach, the University discovered only four impermissible text messages over the past 12 months. 2. Violations The University acknowledges the following: During the period of August 2010 to August 2011, a then-student coach, assigned to mens basketball by the athletics department as part of the departments continuing education program for former student-athletes, sent 160 impermissible text messages to several prospective student-athletes who had played on a team previously coached by the thenstudent coach. The student coach also made 12 impermissible telephone calls to these same prospects. Further, coaches in three other sports made a total of four impermissible texts to various prospects. [NCAA Bylaws 13.1.3.1 and 13.4.1.2] The following chart depicts the number of impermissible texts by sport: Sport Mens Basketball Womens Volleyball Softball Mens Track & Field Total 3. Number 161 2 1 1 165 Nevertheless, the University still classified it as multiple
Overall Reasons Only four sports had any impermissible texts, and the student coach assigned to the basketball program during the 2010-11 academic year sent 97 percent of those texts. Other than the then-student coach, coaching staff members stated they
14
NCAA-3
understood the prohibition on text messages. All coaches clearly understood texts were prohibited until at least after the prospect signed a NLI. The texts in three other sports were inadvertent. 4. Analysis By Sport a. Mens Basketball Approximately 97 percent of all text messages resulted from the actions of then-student coach Keith Moore. Moore attended Iowa State and competed in basketball and baseball during the 1977-78 through 1980-81 academic years. He subsequently played and coached in the Continental Basketball Association. In 2006, he started his own business in the Ames area that included providing basketball skill development instruction for boys and girls at different age levels. In 2008, he became affiliated with the All Iowa Attack AAU basketball team. During the summer of 2008, he coached a fifth-grade team, and during each of the subsequent three summers (2009, 2010, and 2011), he progressed with the majority of those team members on a sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade team. During the summers of 2010 and 2011, he also coached a 15-year-old and a 16-year-old team for the All Iowa Attack. In the fall of 2010, the athletics department offered Moore the opportunity to return to Iowa State University as part of its continuing education program. The departments continuing education program allows former student-athletes to return to school to complete their undergraduate degrees. In return for the institution paying for the students tuition, fees and books, the student agrees to serve in some capacity within the athletics department. In the fall of 2010, Moore returned to Iowa State University as a full-time undergraduate student. Moore took a total of 24 credit hours during the 2010-11 academic year and needed an additional 12 more credit hours, at the time he was dismissed from the departments continuing education program, to receive his undergraduate degree. In return for Iowa State University paying for his tuition, fees and books, Moore was assigned by the athletics department to mens basketball to serve in the role as an undergraduate student coach beginning in the fall of 2010.
15
NCAA-3
In early April of 2011, Hoiberg became aware Moore had been staying in contact with several of his former AAU players. Hoiberg immediately brought that information to Pollard and the investigation began. The investigation revealed during the 2010-11 academic year, Moore had made 160 impermissible outgoing texts to prospects and 12 outgoing calls. All of these were to members of his previous team and are summarized below: Prospective Student-Athlete # Impermissible Texts 65 60 26 4 5 # Impermissible Calls 8 2 2 0 0
The majority of these texts and calls occurred either in the fall of 2010 or the spring of 2011. During his interview with the institution, Moore indicated that as a result of the education he received from the compliance staff upon being hired in the fall of 2010, he knew his relationship with the four prospects that he had coached for the last two years needed to change. He understood he could not recruit the prospects, and he knew recruitment included telephone calls and texts. (At that time, the institution only had interest in recruiting very close relationship with and Moore reported he had had a for the two years in that he had coached the young
man and became a confidant. However, he understood he needed to separate himself from his former players due to his status as a student coach. He reported he made these efforts, but the majority of these calls in the fall related to the conclusion of the AAU season or in the spring when the players began texting or calling him about his coaching their team during the upcoming summer. He did not perceive these contacts as recruiting since they related to the AAU program. Regarding Moore indicated that since the young mans seventh grade. . Moore coached

Moore indicated he has known
during the summers prior to the prospects

16
NCAA-3
As a result, Moore indicated he has a very close relationship with student coach, he indicated that
in that
previously was calling him a lot about life situations. Until he began his role as the called him almost daily. When he took his that he could not come to his games position at the University, Moore said he told have reestablished their close relationship.

or call him anymore. Moore indicated that since his release by the University, he and
during the Universitys self-imposed cessation of recruiting and contact. Moore reported that he Moore indicated that he never coached but provided him
skill instruction on six to seven occasions during the young mans at least one year prior to becoming a student assistant coach at Iowa State. paid Moore for these sessions.
During his recent interview, he initially indicated that he probably knew that he could not text prospects. He later indicated that his belief on texting evolved in that he initially thought he could text his former team members, he later believed he that he could respond to a text, and he subsequently believed that he could not text. (The institution believes it was made very clear to Moore upon his hiring when he received an individual educational session about the impermissibility of texting prospects, including his former team members). Nevertheless, the institution believes that Moores relationship with the five prospects and the purpose of many of these texts and calls allowed Moore to believe that contacts with his former team members were not considered recruiting and permissible. b.

Other Sports The number of texts in these sports were minimal and resulted primarily from not realizing a text had been sent or to whom.
17
NCAA-3
E.
FAILURE TO MONITOR 1. Overview a. NCAA Legislation The majority of violations previously acknowledged in this selfreport focused upon impermissible telephone calls, primarily related to the lack of documentation of a no contact telephone call to a prospective student-athlete. The University believes it undertook significant educational efforts with coaching staff members about NCAA legislation regarding the number of permissible calls, as all coaching staff members stated they were aware of the legislation restricting telephone calls to once per week. The University also believes it undertook significant efforts to monitor telephone calls. In essence, the institution required coaching staff members to submit monthly recruiting logs. The compliance staff reviewed those logs to ensure they did not reveal violations. As an additional measure, the institution compared the recruiting logs to telephone records in some sports for a period of time. However, based upon the results of this inquiry, the University realizes more effort could have been undertaken to reinforce the necessity of documenting those occasions when they made a call but did not make a contact with the prospect. Although the correct information was provided to the coaches, inadequate monitoring failed to detect or correct lax practices by the coaches and failed to reinforce the necessity of contemporaneous records for all attempted phone calls to prospects. The institution acknowledges the overall auditing process was not as effective as it needed to be, as evidenced by the 229 telephone call violations occurred in 18 sports over a three-year period. b. Violation The University acknowledges that: While the institution educated its coaching staff members on applicable NCAA legislation, many coaching staff members did not adequately understand that a nocontact telephone call with a prospect is a countable call unless the coach
18
NCAA-3
contemporaneously denotes it as such on a recruiting log. Further, while the institution undertook efforts to compare coaches monthly telephone logs to long distance billing statements, the institutions monitoring processes were not sufficient to detect impermissible calls. As a result, from the 2008-09 academic year through spring 2011, the scope and nature of the violations detailed in this report demonstrates that the institution failed to adequately monitor its sports programs to assure compliance regarding NCAA telephone call legislation. [NCAA Bylaw 2.8.1] 2. Monitoring Program a. Overview The general monitoring process in the telephone records area utilized by the Universitys compliance staff involved the following: i. Coaches were required to submit telephone logs monthly to the compliance staff. A member of the compliance staff reviewed these logs to ensure no violations existed based upon the information on the logs; and ii. The person then compared these telephone logs to actual billing statements. (The Universitys billing statement did not list text messages). This audit process occurred for at least the 2008-09 academic year. b. Specific Monitoring and Audit Process As noted above, the institution had a program in which coaching staff members were required to submit telephone logs monthly from the institutions recruiting software entitled Recruiting Radar. Effective August 1, 2008, all telephone logs had to be submitted by coaching staff members to the compliance staff using Recruiting Radar. Prior to and subsequent to that time, the compliance staff distributed a recruiting logbook that included contact, evaluation, and telephone log sheets. Some coaching staff members contemporaneously utilized the logbook to denote telephone calls, while others denoted elsewhere the date, time, and prospect called. Regardless of the means by which the call was initially denoted, the information had to be included in the Recruiting Radar system, and the telephone logs submitted to the compliance staff had to be printed off from Recruiting Radar. The page in the Recruiting Logbook for telephone calls included the following columns (See Exhibit C):
19
NCAA-3
Date Time Name (of PSA) School (State) Phone Number
Position Call Made From Call Made To (Cell/Home/Other) Call Complete (Y/N)
No definition of Call complete Y/N is provided. Besides the option of inserting the above contact information in the Logbook, the coaching staff members could insert the information directly into Recruiting Radar. The screen from Recruiting Radar includes (See Exhibit D): Type of Contact Date Response Phone # Call Origination Phone History
As indicated in Exhibit D, under Response, the drop down screen includes: Talk with Prospect Left Message No Answer Prospect Initiated Call Talked with Coach
As noted above, if the coaching staff member contemporaneously denoted the telephone contact/attempt in the Logbook, that information needed to be inserted into Recruiting Radar in order for the Recruiting Radar logs to be printed and submitted to the compliance staff. As part of this inquiry, the institution reviewed the logs printed out from Recruiting Radar. The number of no answer/left message (NA/LM) calls denoted on the printout varied by coach. While it is unknown whether a call resulted in a NA/LM unless noted, it appears some coaches routinely placed a NA/LM in their logs, while many coaches did not. Overall, it appears many coaching staff members did not frequently write down the no answer/left message NA/LM calls in their logbook. If they did, they did not insert that information into Recruiting Radar when the information was transferred. Instead, only the calls in which contact was made were denoted. The printout from Recruiting Radar forwarded to the compliance staff had a different format than the Recruiting Radar input screen (See Exhibit E). If the coaching staff member inserted no information under the Response tab in Recruiting Radar, it
20
NCAA-3
defaulted to Talk with Prospect and printed out as Talk with Prospect. While Recruiting Radar allowed coaching staff members to insert LM/NA calls, some coaching staffs were more diligent than others in denoting such calls. During the time period when the majority of the violations occurred, the institutions compliance staff consisted of the following: Josh Snyder, Associate Athletics Director for Compliance (primarily responsibility was overall supervisor of the compliance staff) Eileen Flaherty, Assistant Director of Compliance (primary responsibility was monitoring and financial aid) Dustin Gray, Associate Director of Athletics for Compliance (primary responsibility was education) Ed Banach, Assistant Director of Athletics for Compliance (primary responsibility was initial and continuing eligibility and camps and clinics) Flaherty was employed at the institution from approximately August 2006 to July 2010. She had various responsibilities throughout her tenure, with one of her primary responsibilities being monitoring of several areas, including recruiting. Flaherty stated the monitoring process consisted of two steps. Initially, effective August 2008, all coaches were to submit telephone logs using the Recruiting Radar form. She reported she looked at all of the logs for all sports for all coaches monthly for any obvious violations on the logs. Flaherty also stated she monthly selected a team and compared the information from Recruiting Radar logs to the actual telephone billing statements. She stated that utilizing an Excel spreadsheet, she randomly selected one sport each month. She would not review the same sport back to back in consecutive months, although she could have done the same sport later in the year. She indicated mens and womens basketball and football were always on the Excel spreadsheet, but they were not singled out for a monthly audit. She indicated she would have reviewed all coaches for all telephone logs for that month for that sport. She stated she did this type of audit until her departure in the summer of 2010. Josh Snyder was the coordinator of the compliance staff at the University. He assumed the overall responsibility for the compliance staff in May 2005 and left the University in December 2010. Snyder reported the institutions primary monitoring
21
NCAA-3
of telephone logs was the monthly submission by coaching staff members and the audit conducted by Flaherty. Snyder believed this occurred until the summer of 2009, when the ACS system was purchased. He reported Flaherty would select at least one coach in two or three sports monthly to review logs and telephone billing statements. These were randomly selected by a computer. Snyder stated he also informed Flaherty she was to include one football or one mens basketball coach each month due to the high profile of those sports. Snyder believed Flaherty then would be reviewing at least three coaches in three different sports each month, although not all of the coaches in that sport would be reviewed. He did not get copies of Flahertys audit but occasionally talked with her about the audit results. The University has the monthly telephone logs submitted by the coaches in each sport for the three academic years. These would have been reviewed by Flaherty and served as the basis for the institutions review of the number of occasions when a NA/LM call was placed in the log. Since Flaherty indicated she kept a record of the sports she audited each month, the University attempted to locate such information. The following is a list of the sports that were audited for the 2008-09 academic year. The electronic file clearly identified the audited sport but did not indicate the results: September 2008 Wrestling October 2008 Softball November 2008 Womens Golf January 2009 Womens Tennis February 2009 Football March 2009 Womens Outdoor Track April 2009 Womens Tennis May 2009 Softball June 2009 Womens Swimming July 2009 Volleyball In the compliance department area of the athletics department hard drive, telephone records for all sports for each month of the 2009-10 academic year are filed. However, no information exists as to the specific sport that may have been audited. As noted above, the ACS system was purchased in the summer of 2009 in part to help with the auditing of the telephone records. Both Snyder and Flaherty indicated that difficulty arose from importing the Recruiting Radar data into the ACS system.
22
NCAA-3
Snyder believed that Flaherty was continuing to undertake some auditing utilizing the previous method, although he acknowledged that it was possible her efforts focused more on matching the Recruiting Radar and the ACS systems. Based upon the information, the institution is unclear if the monthly audits continued from the summer of 2009 until early 2011. No doubt exists coaches were required to submit their monthly logs from the Recruiting Radar throughout all months of the period of the violations and Flaherty was reviewing them until her departure in late summer 2010. As part of this inquiry, the institution undertook an analysis of the specific month in which each telephone violation occurred by sport in order to determine if the violations now identified should have been identified at least during the one-year period when a specific sport can be identified as having been monitored. The results are below: Time Period of Telephone Call Violations By Sport
Month 06/08 07/08 08/08 09/08 10/08 11/08 12/08 01/09 02/09 03/09 04/09 05/09 06/09 07/09 08/09 09/09 10/09 11/09 12/09 01/10 02/10 03/10 04/10 05/10 06/10 07/10 08/10 09/10 WGYM MBB X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A X X WBB X X X X MGF WGF X X X X X A X X X WSW WSOC X X X SB X X X/A X WTN X X X MWTF X X X X X X X/A X X X X WVB WR X X A FB X X X X X X X X/A X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
X X
X/A X A X X X
A X X X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X
X X X X X X
23
NCAA-3

Month 10/10 11/10 12/10 01/11 02/11 03/11 04/11 05/11 06/11 07/11 WGYM X MBB X X X WBB X X X MGF X WGF X WSW WSOC X SB WTN MWTF X X X X X X X X X A = Audited Month X X X X X X WVB WR X X FB X X X X X X X X
X X
X = Violations Occurred
Based upon a comparison of the information in the chart and the audited sports during the 2008-09 academic year, violations occurred during the month in about a third of the sports that were audited. This, in part, serves as a basis for the institutions position on acknowledging a failure to monitor.
c.
Current Process In March 2011, the University successfully instituted the use of the ACS software to perform these audits. The University used ACS to assist in determining the violations in this report until the end of its contract with ACS. In July 2011, the University purchased a new monitoring system through Bluechip Athletics Solutions, the parent company of Recruiting Radar. This system, part of Bluechips complete compliance package purchased by the University, makes for a much easier monitoring process. Monthly audits of all sports are being conducted. The audits will be conducted monthly with every sport reviewed every month. The Bluechip Athletics Soulutions system organizes and processes thousands of telephone calls in minutes through an electronic import system. The system uploads electronic telephone records, sorts them by recruiting weeks, and analyzes them under current NCAA regulations dependent upon the prospect's year in school and sport.
3.
Educational Program a. Overview The University conducts educational sessions individually with each of its sport teams on approximately eight occasions annually. These in-person sessions include written materials and PowerPoint presentations. Between meetings, coaches electronically receive e-mails, memorandums, etc. that include information about interpretations, recent NCAA infractions cases, etc.
24
NCAA-3
As noted earlier in this report, all coaches understood the NCAA telephone legislation applicable to their sport concerning the number of telephone calls per week. The violations in this report resulted primarily from a coaches failure to contemporaneously denote they did not make contact with a prospect or the call was dropped. b. Coaches Knowledge of Logging No Contact Calls In their recent interviews, Gray, Snyder, and Flaherty reported coaches were instructed during educational sessions of the need to write down at the time of the call if the coach did not have a contact with the prospect. This could have been either a no answer or a left message notation. Gray, who had primary responsibility for education, indicated he clearly understood coaching staff members had to document in their logs notations such as NA or LM and, if they did not, these calls were countable. He was very convinced the coaching staff members knew they had to document whether they made contact with a prospect, as that had always been the institutions policy. During their interviews, the majority of the coaches indicated they were not aware they had to denote on their logs a NA or LM in order to avoid being a countable call. A few reported they occasionally denoted such calls because they were to do so, but these coaches did not realize the call became countable without such notation. Moreover, none of the coaches indicated an awareness if they did not contemporaneously denote it was such on their logs, a violation would occur. Gray was asked for his reasons why he believed the coaching staff members were aware they knew not only the necessity to log a NA or LM but also this would be a countable call, and he responded that there was an interpretation in July 2008 that was forwarded to the coaching staff members. (It should be noted that several coaching staff members identified in violations began employment at the University subsequent to the July 2008 memorandum). That e-mail and attachment is included as Exhibit G. Below is the wording of an e-mail dated July 28, 2008, from Gray to all coaches concerning the institutions telephone call policy:
25
NCAA-3
Coaches, Attached is a document referring to the fictional three-minute phone call rule. Please review this document and let me know if there are any questions. The synopsis is there is not a three-minute rule; a phone call less than three minutes is likely a countable call. That can be the same for phone calls under two minutes and under a minute. In addition, this document reiterates the importance of making notes of your calls (e.g., dropped calls, left message). Thanks, Dustin As part of this inquiry, the institution reviewed all other e-mails or interpretations sent electronically to coaching staff members. While several included information on number of permissible calls, none of these additional materials specifically addressed the area of dropped calls or the reasons a NA/LM call becomes a countable call. A review of all other educational materials identifies many times telephone legislation was addressed and the requirement of documenting nontraditional phone calls but no written documentation was found specifically addressing the area of dropped calls or the reasons a NA/LM call becomes a countable call (other than the email above).. Compliance staff members reported it was discussed verbally on several occasions when telephone legislation was reviewed. As noted above, the institutions position is that educational efforts were made (and the July 28, 2008, e-mail is an example), but additional efforts could have been undertaken to reinforce the application of this NCAA legislation.
F.
CORRECTIVE AND PUNITIVE ACTIONS 1. Institutions Corrective Actions The institution has or will implement the following: a. Invest over $82,000 over the next three years in compliance and recruiting software with Bluechip Athletics Solution. The software will simplify recording telephone calls and monitoring telephone calls and text messages as it will be one system from start to finish. Further, other recruiting and monitoring processes will be improved. b. Added a statement at the bottom of the Telephone Log Form in the Recruiting Logbook indicating the necessity to denote a no answer/left message call.
26
NCAA-3
c. d. e. f.
Dismissed the student coach involved in impressible telephone calls and text messages from the programs continuing education program. Discontinued the practice of assigning students from the continuing education program to sports-specific functions Require all current University coaching staff members named in this inquiry to attend an educational session on NCAA compliance in addition to the monthly meetings. Dedicate a monthly coaches meeting to telephone calls and in the meeting emphasize to the coaching staff members the necessity to log a no answer/left message call.
2.
Institutions Punitive Actions The institution has or will implement the following: a. b. c. Place itself on a two-year probationary period effective November 13, 2011. Impose a Department-wide forfeiture of one-week of recruiting phone calls for all sports, served at an appropriate time for each sport. Undertook overall punitive actions for each sport and individual coaching staff members involved in a text message or impermissible telephone call violation utilizing the following guidelines: Team Penalties: Less than 25 violations in that sport One week of no telephone calls by all coaching staff members; 25 to 60 violations in that sport Two weeks of no telephone calls by all coaching staff members; 61 to 199 violations in that sport Three weeks of no telephone calls by all coaching staff members and decrease recruiting opportunities by one per prospect for the 2011-12 recruiting year; and More than 900 violations in that sport Five weeks of no telephone calls by all coaching staff members, reduce official visits by 20 percent from the four-year average, and limit the number of off-campus recruiters to five for the spring 2012 evaluation period. Individual Penalties (This would be in addition to the number of no telephone call weeks for that sports team penalties. For example, if the team had a penalty of four
27
NCAA-3
weeks of no telephone calls, this coach would have a total five weeks of no telephone calls): Less than 30 violations for that coach No additional individual restrictions; 30 to 50 violations for that coach One additional week of no telephone calls and a letter of admonishment; 50-80 violations for that coach Three additional weeks of no telephone calls and a letter of admonishment; 80 to 100 violations for that coach Four additional weeks of no telephone calls and a letter of reprimand; and More than 100 violations for that coach Nine additional weeks of no telephone calls and no off-campus recruiting for a month. A chart depicting the number of violations in that sport and the involved coaching staff member is provided as a reference: Womens Gymnastics
Jay Ronayne Jay Santos Teshawne Jackson Jessica Bartgis TOTAL
4 8 1 5 18
The Gymnastics coaching staff will serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011.
28
NCAA-3
Mens Basketball Current Staff

Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 7 3 17 3 0 1 21 2 45 9 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Another Imp. Call Time Coach After an Period Previously Earlier > 3 Called Min. Call 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 *1 0 0 2 3 0 6
Fred Hoiberg TJ Otzelberger Matt Abdelmassih Elwyn McRoy TOTAL
10 20 1 23 54
Mens Basketball Previous Staff

Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 5 4 11 2 48 16 4 2 0 1 68 25 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Another Imp. Call Time Coach After an Period Previously Earlier > 3 Called Min. Call 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 2 14 0 1 1 0 *1 0 2 7 16
Greg McDermott TJ Otzelberger Daniyal Robinson Jeff Rutter Nathan Wieseler TOTAL
9 13 65 6 1 93
The Mens Basketball coaching staff will: i. serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011; ii. serve an additional two-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the weeks of November 20-26 and November 27-December 3, 2011; iii. decrease the number of recruiting opportunities by one for all prospects during the 2011-12 academic year; iv. cease the recruiting any of the prospective student-athletes Student Coach Keith Moore had impermissible telephone or text contact within April 2011 and will not recruit the prospective students-athletes through December 2011; and v. reduce official visits by 20 percent from the previous four year average (10.25) for 2011-12. Coach TJ Otzelberger will: i. serve an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of December 4-10, 2011 (totaling four weeks of no telephone calls for Otzelberger); Student Coach Keith Moore was*: i. relieved of his duties as student coach; and ii. removed from the athletics departments continuing education program.
*Penalties resulting from student coach text violation.
29
NCAA-3
Womens Basketball
Bill Fennelly Jodi Steyer Latoja Schaben Jack Easley TOTAL
23 24 6 2 55
The Womens Basketball coaching staff will: i. serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011; and ii. serve an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 20-26, 2011. Mens Golf Current Staff
Andrew Tank TOTAL
3 3
Mens Golf Previous Staff

Jay Horton TOTAL
12 12
The Mens Golf coaching staff will serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011.
30
NCAA-3
Womens Golf
Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 4 1 4 1 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Call Imp. Another After an Time Coach Earlier >3 Period Previously Min. Call Called 0 0 1 0 0 1
Christie Martens TOTAL
5 5
The Womens Golf coaching staff will serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011. Womens Swimming and Diving
Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 6 1 2 1 8 2 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Another Imp. Call Time Coach After an Period Previously Earlier > 3 Called Min. Call 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1
Kelly Nordell Duane Sorenson TOTAL
7 3 10
The Womens Swimming and Diving coaching staff will serve its Department-wide, oneweek restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011. Womens Soccer
Tim Bennett Wendy Dillinger Tracy Grose Ben Madsen TOTAL
6 10 1 4 21
The Womens Soccer coaching staff will serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011.
31
NCAA-3
Softball
Stacey Gemeinhardt TOTAL
14 14
The Womens Softball coaching staff will serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 1319, 2011. Womens Tennis
Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 41 4 2 3 43 7 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Another Imp. Call Time Coach After an Period Previously Earlier > 3 Called Min. Call 1 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 6
Armando Espinosa Chris Williams TOTAL
45 5 50
The Womens Tennis coaching staff will: i. serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011; and ii. serve an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 20-26, 2011. Head Coach Armando Espinosa will: i. serve an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 27-December 3, 2011 (totaling three weeks of no telephone calls for Espinosa);
32
NCAA-3
Mens and Womens Track/Cross Country

Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 51 3 11 5 20 1 3 0 22 6 2 2 11 0 120 17 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Another Imp. Call Time Coach After an Period Previously Earlier > 3 Called Min. Call 0 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 16
Nate Wiens Travis Hartke Corey Ihmels John Dagata Kristy Popp Grant Wall Pete Herber TOTAL
54 16 21 3 28 4 11 138
The Track and Field coaching staff will: i. serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011; ii. serve an additional two-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the weeks of November 20-26 and November 27-December 3, 2011; and iii. decrease the number of recruiting opportunities by one for all prospects during the 2011-12 academic year. Coach Nate Wiens will: i. serve an additional three-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects, including the weeks of December 4-10, December 11-17, and December 18-24, 2011 (totaling six weeks of no telephone calls for Wiens);
Womens Volleyball
Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 3 0 1 0 1 0 5 0 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Another Imp. Call Time Coach After an Period Previously Earlier > 3 Called Min. Call 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dawn Sullivan Christy Johnson Trudy Vande Berg TOTAL
3 1 1 5
The Womens Volleyball coaching staff will serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 1319, 2011.
33
NCAA-3
Wrestling Current Staff

Yero Washington Chris Bono Kevin Jackson Molly Donnelly TOTAL
19 1 9 1 30
Wrestling Previous Staff

Cael Sanderson TOTAL
3 3
The Wrestling coaching staff will: i. serve its Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 20 - 26, 2011; and ii. serve an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 27 December 3, 2011.
34
NCAA-3
NCAA-3
Football Current Staff

Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 81 11 60 18 28 2 80 13 40 3 29 1 183 16 20 3 79 2 41 2 83 10 2 0 13 3 23 9 2 29 11 1 2 0 777 123 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Call Imp. Another After an Time Coach Period Previously Earlier > 3 Min. Call Called 1 2 2 3 2 0 0 0 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 6 1 0 4 1 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 19 4 15 0 6 0 1 16 0 0 1 3 0 0 9 29* 0 0 87
Paul Rhoads Bill Bleil Curtis Bray Shane Burnham Wally Burnham Nick Caley Bobby Elliott Tom Herman Courtney Messingham Ken Pope Luke Wells Markus Alleyne Eric Link Chris Ash Ryan McKim Scott Fountain Matt Karleskint TOTAL
92 78 30 93 43 30 199 23 81 43 93 2 16 32 31 12 2 900
* Alleyne made two and McKim made 27calls as impermissible recruiters.
Football Previous Staff

Sport # of Imp. Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Not Logging True Previous No Violations Contact Call or Dropped Call 2 2 0 3 1 0 0 3 3 3 4 8 20 0 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 7 33 29 Reasons for True Violations Imp. Call Imp. Another After an Time Coach Period Previously Earlier > 3 Min. Call Called 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 7 0 0 0 3* 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 7 20
Gene Chizik Shawn Raney Chris Ash Ryan McKim Wayne Bolt Scott Fountain Jay Rodgers Tom Howe Tony Petersen Robert McFarland Jeff Koonz Shane Beatty TOTAL
4 3 1 3 6 12 20 3 1 1 1 7 62
* McKim made 3 calls as impermissible recruiter.
35
NCAA-3
The Football coaching staff will: i. serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of February 5-11, 2012; ii. serve an additional four-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the weeks of February 12-18, February 19-25, February 26-March 3, and March 4-10, 2012; iii. decrease the number of recruiting contacts by one for all prospects during the 201112 academic year; iv. reduce official visits by 20 percent from the previous four year average (46.5) for the 2011-12 academic year; and v. decrease the number of permissible off campus recruiters by two for the spring 2012 evaluation period. Head Coach Paul Rhoads will: i. serve an additional five-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects, including the weeks of March 11-17, March 18-24, March 25-31, April 17, and April 8-14, 2012 (totaling ten weeks of no telephone calls for Rhoads); Coach Bill Bleil will: i. serve an additional three-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects, including the weeks of March 11-17, March 18-24, and March 25-31, 2012 (totaling eight weeks of no telephone calls for Bleil); Coach Curtis Bray will: i. serve an additional week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects, the week of March 11-17, 2012 (totaling six weeks of no telephone calls for Bray);
Coach Shane Burnham will: i. serve an additional five-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects, including the weeks of March 11-17, March 18-24, March 25-31, April 17, and April 8-14, 2012 (totaling ten weeks of no telephone calls for S. Burnham);
Coach Wally Burnham will: i. serve an additional week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects, the week of March 11-17, 2012 (totaling six weeks of no telephone calls for W. Burnham); Coach Nick Caley will: i. serve an additional week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects, the week of March 11-17, 2012 (totaling six weeks of no telephone calls for Caley);
Coach Bobby Elliott will:

36
NCAA-3
i. serve an additional ten-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects, including the weeks of March 11-17, March 18-24, March 25-31, April 17, April 8-14, April 15-21, April 22-28, April 29-May 5, May 6-12, and May 13-19, 2012 (totaling fifteen weeks of no telephone calls for Elliott); ii. not have off campus contact in the month of December; Coach Courtney Messingham will: i. serve an additional five-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects, including the weeks of March 11-17, March 18-24, March 25-31, April 17, and April 8-14, 2012 (totaling ten weeks of no telephone calls for Messingham);
Coach Ken Pope will: i. serve an additional week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects, the week of March 11-17, 2012 (totaling six weeks of no telephone calls for Pope);
Coach Luke Wells will: i. serve an additional five-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects, including the weeks of March 11-17, March 18-24, March 25-31, April 17, and April 8-14, 2012 (totaling ten weeks of no telephone calls for Wells);

G.
CONCLUSION The University believes it has conducted a thorough inquiry and has imposed appropriate corrective and punitive actions.
37
NCAA-3
IOWA STATE INDIVIDUALS INTERVIEWED Name Bleil, Bill Messingham, Courtney Wells, Luke Burnham, Shane Elliot, Bobby Uhlenhopp, Nick Rhoads, Paul Moore, Keith Espinoa, Armando Wiens, Nate Steyer, Jodi Otzelberger, TJ Gray, Dustin Flaherty, Eileen Snyder, Josh Title Asst. Head Coach/Offensive Line Asst. FB Coach/Wide Receivers Asst. FB Coach/Tight Ends Asst. FB Coach/Defensive Backs Asst. FB Coach/Secondary Asst. Recruiting Coordinator Head FB Coach Former MBB Student Asst. Coach Head WTN Coach Asst. T&F Coach Asst. WBB Coach Assoc. Head MBB Coach Asst. AD for Compliance Assoc. AD at Univ. of Maine Assoc. AD at UM, Kansas City Date of Interview 8/22/11 8/22/11 8/22/11 8/22/11 8/22/11 8/22/11 8/22/11 8/22/11 8/22/11 8/22/11 4/18/11 & 8/23/11 8/23/11 8/23/11 8/23/11 8/23/11 8/23/11 8/23/11 8/23/11 8/23/11 8/23/11 9/15/11 9/16/11
NCAA-3
REVIEW OF SPECIFIC VIOLATIONS BY SPORT 1. Womens Gymnastics a. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week April 19, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 21 2 minutes April 22 12 minutes (8:28 pm) April 22 1 minute (8:40 pm) Caller Jay Santos Jay Santos Jay Santos
b.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 10, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 14 1 minute (12:16 pm) August 14 2 minutes (12:17 pm) Caller Teshawne Jackson Teshawne Jackson
c.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 9, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 9 7 minutes August 13 3 minutes Caller Teshawne Jackson Jay Santos
d.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week June 28, 2009 August 9, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 1 2 minutes (6:25 pm) July 1 2 minutes (6:31 pm) August 11 2 minutes (4:59 pm) August 11 2 minutes (5:10 pm) Caller Jay Ronayne Jay Ronayne Jay Santos Jay Santos
e.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 16, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 18 1 minute (2:46 pm) August 18 2 minutes (2:50 pm) August 21 2 minutes (5:49 pm) August 21 2 minutes (8:36 pm) Caller Jay Santos Jay Santos Jay Santos Jay Santos
f.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week September 20, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 21 1 minute (8:55 pm) September 21 8 minutes (8:56 pm) Caller Jay Ronayne Jay Ronayne
1
NCAA-3
g.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 16, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 19 1 minute August 21 10 minutes Caller Jay Santos Jay Santos
h.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week September 26, 2010 October 10, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 29 1 minute (7:05 pm) September 29 11 minutes (7:11 pm) October 13 2 minutes October 14 3 minutes Caller Jessica Bartgis Jessica Bartgis Jessica Bartgis Jessica Bartgis
i.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week January 16, 2011 February 20, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 18 3 minutes January 19 2 minutes January 20 1 minute February 22 2 minutes February 23 2 minutes Caller Jessica Bartgis Jessica Bartgis Jessica Bartgis Jessica Bartgis Jessica Bartgis
j.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 8, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 9 6 minutes August 14 3 minutes Caller Jay Ronayne Jay Ronayne
k.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 8, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 13 2 minutes August 14 2 minutes Caller Jay Ronayne Jay Ronayne
2
NCAA-3
2.
Mens Basketball a. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Week October 5, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 6 1 minute October 6 1 minute October 7 2 minute October 7 1 minute October 7 1 minute October 7 1 minute October 7 1 minute October 8 1 minute October 8 2 minute October 8 1 minute October 8 1 minute October 11 1 minute October 26 3 minute October 28 1 minute October 29 2 minute October 31 11 minute November 3 1 minute November 5 5 minute November 6 1 minute November 6 1 minute November 6 1 minute November 10 1 minute November 11 1 minute November 15 1 minute November 15 1 minute Caller Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Greg McDermott Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson
October 26, 2008
November 2, 2008
November 9, 2008
b.
On 13 occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year prospect). Week October 12, 2008 October 19, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 12 8 minutes October 16 1 minute October 25 2 minutes October 25 2 minute October 25 3 minute October 25 1 minute October 25 2 minute October 25 1 minute October 25 2 minute October 25 1 minute October 26 1 minute October 27 1 minute November 17 2 minutes November 17 4 minute November 17 1 minute November 17 1 minute November 17 1minute November 17 1 minute November 27 1 minute November 28 2 minute November 29 3 minute Caller Daniyal Robinson Greg McDermott Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson
3
NCAA-3
October 26, 2008 November 16, 2008
November 23, 2008
Week December 14, 2008 December 21, 2008 January 4, 2009 January 11, 2009 January 18, 2009 January 25, 2009
February 22, 2009 March 1, 2009
Dates, Times, and Length of Calls December 14 1 minute December 14 1 minute December 15 9 minute December 21 1 minute December 25 7minute January 8 1 minutes January 8 1minute January 15 1 minute January 16 1minute January 18 1 minute January 19 8minute January 25 8 minutes January 30 2minute January 30 1minute January 30 3minute January 31 1minute January 31 1minute February 23 7 minutes February 24 1minute February 25 1minute March 1 1minute March 1 3minute March 1 1minute March 2 2minute March 2 1minute March 3 1minute March 6 1minute March 7 1minute
Caller Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Greg McDermott Greg McDermott Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson
c.
On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year prospect). Week July 20, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 25 1 minutes July 25 1 minutes July 25 3 minutes July 26 1 minutes July 26 3 minutes July 27 4 minutes July 30 2 minutes July 31 13 minutes August 4 7 minutes August 6 8 minutes August 7 2 minutes August 8 7 minutes August 10 5 minutes August 15 6 minutes October 12 2 minutes October 13 1 minutes October 13 4 minutes October 13 2 minutes October 29 2 minutes October 29 1 minutes October 30 2 minutes October 30 2 minutes Caller Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson TJ Otzelberger Greg McDermott Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Greg McDermott Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson TJ Otzelberger Greg McDermott Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson
4
July 27, 2008 August 3, 2008
August 10, 2008 October 12, 2008
October 26, 2009
NCAA-3
November 5, 2009 d.
November 9 2 minutes November 11 9 minutes
Greg McDermott Daniyal Robinson
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Week June 7, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 8 2 minutes June 10 2 minutes June 12 1 minutes June 12 2 minutes Caller TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger
e.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week September 27, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 29 4 minutes September 29 3 minute September 29 1 minute September 30 1 minute September 30 1 minute September 30 1 minute Caller TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger
f.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2-year prospect). Week July 5, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 6 1 minutes July 8 2 minute July 8 5 minute July 8 1 minute July 12 3 minutes July 17 2 minute Caller TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger
July 12, 2009 g.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week January 24, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 25 1 minute January 27 2 minutes January 29 2 minutes January 29 2 minutes April 12 2 minutes April 14 1 minute April 14 2 minutes Caller TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger Greg McDermott Greg McDermott Greg McDermott Greg McDermott
April 11, 2010
h.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). On one occasion and impermissible (Wieseler) caller made a call. Week April 11, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 12 4 minutes April 12 1 minute April 16 2 minutes April 16 2 minutes April 26 3 minutes (9:05) Caller Jeff Rutter Jeff Rutter Nathan Wieseler Jeff Rutter Greg McDermott
5
April 25, 2010

NCAA-3
April 26 6 minute (9:08 pm) April 26 2 minutes (9:17 pm) April 26 10 minutes April 27 8 minutes i.
Greg McDermott Greg McDermott Jeff Rutter Jeff Rutter
On six occasions, the institution violated who it may permissibly contact by calling (2010 grad). signed a NLI with November 13, 2009. Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 15, 2009 2 minutes January 9, 2010 3 minutes February 20, 2010 2 minutes May 9, 2010 1 minute June 23, 2010 1 minute June 23, 2010 1 minute Caller Greg McDermott Jeff Rutter Greg McDermott TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger
j.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week February 14, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls February 17 2 minutes February 18 1 minute (7:17 pm) February 18 9 minutes (7:18 pm) February 18 2 minutes (7:27 pm) Caller Jeff Rutter Jeff Rutter Jeff Rutter Jeff Rutter
k.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (four-year transfer). Week May 30, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 1 11 minutes June 1 1 minute June 1 1 minutes Caller Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg
l.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week August 1, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 1 1 minute August 2 5 minutes Caller Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg
m.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Month August, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 2 2 minutes August 4 5 minutes Caller Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg
n.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week August 22, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 23 6 minutes (8:40 am) August 23 1 minute (8:45 am) August 24 8 minute August 26 1 minute Caller Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg
6
NCAA-3
o.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Month August, 2010 October, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 29 2 minutes August 29 2 minute August 30 1 minute October 7 2 minutes October 8 1 minute October 8 2 minute October 8 2 minute October 11 2 minute October 12 2 minute October 18 2 minute October 26 2 minute October 27 1 minute November 3 2 minutes November 16 1 minute November 22 9 minute December 6 1 minutes December 17 1 minute December 21 2 minute Caller TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger
November, 2010 December, 2010
p.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Week October 17, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 19 2 minutes October 21 2 minute October 22 2 minute Caller TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger
q.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 24, 2010 November 14, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 24 2 minutes October 25 1 minute October 25 2 minute November 15 2 minutes November 15 2 minute November 15 7 minute Caller Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy
r.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Month October, 2010 November, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 12 2 minutes October 27 2 minutes November 11 2 minutes November 16 2 minutes November 23 1 minutes November 27 1 minutes Caller Fred Hoiberg TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg
7
NCAA-3
s.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week December 12, 2010 February 13, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls December 13 2 minutes December 18 2 minutes December 18 2 minutes February 14 2 minutes February 15 2 minutes February 16 1 minutes February 17 1 minutes Caller Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy
t.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month and on one occasion, the institution had an impermissible recruiter call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Month January, 2011 January 2, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 1 1 minute January 1 2 minutes January 4 2 minutes Caller Matt Abdelmassih Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg
u.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year prospect). Week January 30, 2011 February 2, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls February 2 1 minute February 2 1 minute February 3 33 minute February 8 1 minute February 8 4 minutes February 8 1 minutes February 11 10 minutes Caller Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy
v.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week February 2, 2011 February 13 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls February 8 2 minutes February 10 1 minutes February 15 1 minutes February 16 1 minutes February 16 1 minutes February 16 1 minutes February 16 1 minutes February 17 1 minutes February 17 1 minutes February 17 1 minutes February 17 1 minutes Caller Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy
8
NCAA-3
3.
Womens Basketball a. On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (May 2010 grad). Week/Month June 21 30, 2009 July 5, 2009 August 9, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 29 2 minutes June 30 2 minute June 30 2 minute July 16 2 minutes July 16 2 minute July 16 2 minute August 10 2 minute August 12 2 minute August 15 2 minute August 15 6 minute September 9 2 minute September 10 2 minute September 11 2 minute September 12 10 minute October 8 2 minute October 10 2 minute October 11 2 minute October 12 2 minute Caller Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer
September 6, 2009
October 4, 2009 October 11, 2009 b.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (May 2010 grad). Week July 26, 2009 August 23, 2009 September 20, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 2 2 minute August 4 2 minute August 4 11minute August 24 3 minutes August 26 2 minute August 27 11 minute September 23 2 minutes September 23 1 minute September 24 7 minute Caller Jodi Steyer Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jack Easley Latoja Schaben Jack Easley
c.
On two occasions, the institution violated the permissible time to call prospective studentathlete (2014 grad). Week February 27, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls February 27 2 minutes February 27 3 minutes Caller Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer
d.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week June 21 - 30, 2010 July 11, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 24 2 minutes June 27 2 minutes June 29 1 minute July 17 4 minutes (1:01 pm) July 17 7 minutes (1:04 pm) Caller Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly
9
NCAA-3
November 7, 2010
November 8 2 minutes November 8 2 minutes November 9 2 minutes November 9 1 minute
Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer
e.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week June 1 - 20, 2010 November 7, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 19 2 minutes June 19 2 minutes November 8 2 minutes November 8 5 minutes Caller Jack Easley Jack Easley Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer
f.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week April 11, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 12 2 minutes April 15 2 minutes Caller Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly
g.
On one occasions, the institution violated the permissible time period to call prospective student-athlete (2014 grad). Week December 23, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls December 23 Caller Bill Fennelly
h.
On one occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Month April, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 11 5 minutes April 16 2 minutes Caller Latoja Schaben Bill Fennelly
i.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 31, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 4 2 minutes November 6 2 minutes November 6 2 minutes Caller Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly
j.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Month April, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 7 2 minutes April 7 2 minute April 7 9 minutes Caller Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly
k.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Month April, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 7 2 minutes April 7 2 minutes Caller Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly
10
NCAA-3
l.
On two occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Week April, 2011 May, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 11 1 minute April 12 25 minutes May 19 2 minutes May 24 55 minutes Caller Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer
m.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Week May, 2011 June 1 20, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 12 2 minutes May 12 2 minutes May 19 11 minutes June 20 2 minutes June 20 18 minutes Caller Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodie Steyer
n.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Month May, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 11 2 minutes May 12 2 minutes May 16 23 minutes Caller Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer
o.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Week October 17, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 13 2 minutes May 16 28 minutes Caller Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer
o.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Week July 13, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 16 2 minutes July 17 1 minute Caller Latoja Schaben Latoja Schaben
p.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Week July 27, 2008 August 3, 2008 September 14, 2008 October 12, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 1 2 minutes August 1 2 minutes August 1 2 minutes August 8 2 minutes August 9 17 minutes September 15 3 minutes September 16 31 minutes October 14 2 minutes October 16 2 minutes Caller Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer
11
NCAA-3
q.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Week October 12, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 18 1 minute October 18 1 minute Caller Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer
r.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 17, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 20 1 minutes October 20 7 minutes October 20 1 minutes October 21 1 minutes October 21 4 minutes Caller Latoja Schaben Latoja Schaben Latoja Schaben Latoja Schaben Latoja Schaben
12
NCAA-3
4.
Mens Golf a. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week October 12, 2008 November 16, 2008 b. Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 16 3 minutes (8:56 pm) October 16 1 minute (8:58 pm) October 16 6 minutes (8:59 pm) November 18 1 minute November 21 1 minute Caller Jay Horton Jay Horton Jay Horton Jay Horton Jay Horton
On six occasions, the institution violated t recruitment of prospective student-athlete Week July 12, 2009 August 9, 2009 September 6, 2009 October 11, 2009 October 18, 2009 November 1, 2009
f permissible calls per week during its . Caller Jay Horton Jay Horton Jay Horton Jay Horton Jay Horton Jay Horton Jay Horton Jay Horton Jay Horton Jay Horton Jay Horton Jay Horton Jay Horton
Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 14 2 minutes July 15 14 minutes August 12 2 minutes August 13 9 minutes September 7 2 minutes (1:33 pm) September 7 15 minutes (8:40 pm) October 12 1 minute October 13 26 minutes October 22 1 minute October 23 16 minutes November 3 1 minute November 5 7 minutes November 7 2 minutes
c.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week October 24, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 28 1 minute (12:16 pm) October 28 11 minutes (12:17 pm) Caller Andrew Tank Andrew Tank
d.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week October 24, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 28 1 minute (7:15 pm) October 28 11 minutes (7:19 pm) Caller Andrew Tank Andrew Tank
e.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week March 27, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls March 30 1 minute April 2 11 minutes Caller Andrew Tank Andrew Tank
f.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week October 12, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 16 0.5 minutes October 16 0.7 minutes October 16 7.8 minutes Caller Jay Horton Jay Horton Jay Horton
13
NCAA-3
5.
Womens Golf a. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week June 29, 2008 b. Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 5 1 minute (4:01 pm) July 5 21 minutes (4:10 pm) Caller Christie Martens Christie Martens
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 31, 2008 September 21, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 3 2 minutes (9:01 pm) September 3 7 minutes (9:13 pm) September 22 2 minutes (6:54 pm) September 22 11 minutes (6:59 pm) September 25 1 minute Caller Christie Martens Christie Martens Christie Martens Christie Martens Christie Martens
c.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week October 31, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 4 2 minutes (2:01 pm) November 4 29 minutes (3:20 pm) Caller Christie Martens Christie Martens
14
NCAA-3
6.
Womens Swimming and Diving a. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week September 14, 2008 October 12, 2008 October 26, 2008 b. Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 14 2 minutes September 17 8 minutes October 15 2 minutes (8:05 pm) October 15 6 minutes (9:07 pm) October 29 2 minutes (8:08 pm) October 29 23 minutes (8:10 pm) Caller Kelly Nordell Kelly Nordell Kelly Nordell Kelly Nordell Duane Sorenson Duane Sorenson
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 30, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 31 2 minutes September 1 1 minute Caller Duane Sorenson Duane Sorenson
c.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week October 25, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 27 1 minute October 28 8 minutes Caller Kelly Nordell Kelly Nordell
d.
On one occasion, the institution violated t recruitment of prospective student-athlete Week September 26, 2010
missible calls per week during its . Caller Kelly Nordell Kelly Nordell
Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 27 5 minutes (9:11 pm) September 27 1 minute (9:37 pm)
e.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 15, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 17 2 minutes August 19 1 minute (1:18 pm) August 19 7 minutes (8:09 pm) Caller Kelly Nordell Kelly Nordell Kelly Nordell
f.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week April 3, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 3 1 minute April 6 7 minutes Caller Kelly Nordell Kelly Nordell
e.
On one occasion, the instituti he permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). This violation was self-reported. Coach Nordell made a perm ct. Following that Coach Sorenson asked Coach Nordell for the number of PSA . Coach Nordell gave Sorenson number stake. Coach Sorenson called and left a message (the voicemail wasnt set up). returned Sorensons call and informed him of the error. Sorenson reported the ion after speaking with on the phone. Week July 10, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 11 Spoke to her July 12 Left message Caller Kelly Nordell Duane Sorenson
15
NCAA-3
7.
Womens Soccer a. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . July 6, 2008 Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 11 1 minutes July 11 2 minutes July 11 4 minutes Caller Tim Bennett Tim Bennett Tim Bennett
b.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week December 21, 2008 January 4, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls December 23 1 minute December 23 1 minute December 23 11 minutes January 9 2 minutes January 9 24 minutes Caller Tim Bennett Tim Bennett Tim Bennett Tim Bennett Tim Bennett
c.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week February 1, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls February 3 1 minutes February 3 7 minutes Caller Tim Bennett Tim Bennett
d.
One two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week June 29, 2008 August 31, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 1 2 minutes July 2 1 minute September 2 2 minutes September 2 11 minutes Caller Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger
e.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week June 28, 2009 August 23, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 1 2 minutes (11:01am) July 1 2 minutes (3:36pm) July 1 5 minutes (6:12pm) August 23 2 minutes (12:50pm) August 26 8 minutes (9:21pm) Caller Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger
f.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week January 24, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 27 2 minutes (3:14pm) January 28 18 minutes (9:34am) Caller Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger
16
NCAA-3
g.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 23, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 26 1 minute (6:28pm) August 26 2 minutes (6:33pm) Caller Ben Madsen Ben Madsen
h.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 15, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 17 2 minutes August 19 2 minutes (4:05pm) August 19 1 minute (7:31pm) August 21 1 minute Caller Ben Madsen Ben Madsen Ben Madsen Ben Madsen
i.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week October 10, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 4 3 minutes October 4 1 minute (8:58pm) Caller Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger
j.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week April 3, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 7 2 minutes April 7 1 minute April 7 12 minutes Caller Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger
k.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week January 30, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls February 1 4 minutes February 1 7 minute Caller Tracy Grose Tracy Grose
l.
On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time period to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2013 grad). This violation was selfreported. Coach Dillinger was driving on campus and asked Coach Grose for ISU employee, Lindsay Long. was going to meet with Lindsay to discuss ISU. Mistakenly, Coach Grose gave Coach Dillinger phone number. Coach Dillinger called the number and it went to voicemail. At that point she realized she had called This all occurred while was in the car with Coach Dillinger. didnt answer her phone because she had it on silent. Week July 10, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 11 2 minutes Caller Wendy Dillinger
17
NCAA-3
8.
Softball a. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week July 6, 2008 b. Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 6 1 minute July 7 7 minutes Caller Gary Hines Stacy Gemeinhardt
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 31, 2008 October 5, 2008 October 19, 2008 November 2, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 2 2 minutes September 5 2 minutes October 10 2 minutes October 10 2 minutes October 23 16 minutes (8:28 pm) October 23 1 minute (8:43 pm) November 6 2 minutes November 7 3 minutes Caller Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt
c.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week September 6, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 7 2 minutes September 10 2 minutes September 11 2 minutes Caller Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt
d.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week June 28, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 4 3 minutes (6:24 pm) July 4 1 minute (6:27 pm) July 4 1 minute (6:28 pm) Caller Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt
e.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week July 12, 2009 September 6, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 15 2 minutes July 15 1 minute September 7 2 minutes September 10 2 minutes September 11 2 minutes Caller Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt
f.
On two occasions, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). These calls were related to a camp was attending. Week January 3, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 5 3 minutes January 6 2 minute Caller Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt
18
NCAA-3
9.
Womens Tennis a. On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week July 6, 2008 July 27, 2008 August 10, 2008 October 12, 2008 October 19, 2008 b. Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 10 2 minutes July 12 2 minutes (12:47 pm) July 12 8 minutes (2:23 pm) July 30 8 minutes (11:44 am) July 30 1 minute (11:52 am) August 11 2 minutes August 13 4 minutes October 12 2 minutes October 13 2 minutes October 18 2 minutes October 20 2 minutes (3:56 pm) October 20 5 minutes (4:38 pm) Caller Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week January 25, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 26 2 minutes January 27 2 minutes January 28 1 minute (10:19 am) January 28 1 minute (10:40 am) January 28 1 minute (4:11 pm) February 2 2 minutes February 3 2 minutes Caller Armando Espinosa Chris Williams Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Chris Williams
February 1, 2009 c.
On fifteen occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week, and on one occasion violated the permissible time to call, during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week June 21, 2009 July 5, 2009 August 16, 2009 August 23, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 26 2 minutes July 7 2 minutes (8:30 am) July 7 2 minutes (8:33 am) August 17 2 minutes (11:18 am) August 17 2 minutes (11:39 am) August 25 2 minutes (5:37 pm) August 25 1 minute (7:08 pm) August 26 1 minute (3:16 pm) August 26 2 minutes (3:32 pm) October 12 2 minutes October 16 1 minute October 19 1 minute October 23 6 minutes November 1 1 minute (6:23 pm) November 1 3 minutes (6:53 pm) November 1 2 minutes (7:59 pm) November 8 5 minutes November 9 2 minutes November 16 2 minutes (12:16 pm) November 16 3 minutes (6:14 pm) Caller Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa
19
October 11, 2009 October 18, 2009 November 1, 2009 November 8, 2009 November 15, 2009
NCAA-3
Week January 10, 2010 January 31, 2010 February 28, 2010 April 4, 2010 April 11, 2010
April 18, 2010
April 25, 2010
Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 19 1 minute January 11 8 minutes January 14 4 minutes (4:10 pm) January 14 3 minutes (8:27 pm) February 2 1 minute (2:08 pm) February 2 1 minute (2:29 pm) February 2 7 minutes (6:32 pm) March 6 1 minute (4:18 pm) March 6 2 minutes (4:59 pm) April 9 1 minute (2:55 pm) April 9 6 minutes (3:39 pm) April 16 1 minute April 17 1 minute (10:28 am) April 17 1 minute (11:45 am) April 17 2 minutes (1:36 pm) April 21 2 minutes (10:00 am) April 21 1 minute (11:46 am) April 21 1 minute (2:45 pm) April 21 1 minute (4:55 pm) April 23 2 minutes (6:56 pm) April 23 1 minute (7:01 pm) April 29 1 minute (12:01 pm) April 29 1 minute (12:40 pm) April 29 1 minute (6:32 pm) April 30 1 minute
Caller Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa
d.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week November 8, 2009 January 3, 2010 April 11, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 10 1 minute (4:21 pm) November 10 7 minutes (4:40 pm) January 5 2 minutes (9:17 am) January 5 1 minute (3:31 pm) April 15 1 minute April 16 1 minute (1:00 pm) April 16 2 minutes (1:38 pm) Caller Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa
e.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week October 18, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 21 1 minute (8:00 pm) October 21 21 minutes (8:31 pm) Caller Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa
f.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 16, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 18 4 minutes (7:30 am) May 18 2 minutes (7:48 am) May 18 1 minute (5:45 pm) May 19 1 minute Caller Chris Williams Chris Williams Chris Williams Chris Williams
20
NCAA-3
10.
Mens and Womens Track/Cross Country a. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week March 1, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls March 2 1 minute March 2 2 minutes March 5 2 minutes March 7 15 minutes March 9 1 minute March 12 6 minutes Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
March 8, 2009 b.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week November 30, 2008 February 15, 2009 April 19, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 30 1 minute November 30 5 minutes February 16 4 minutes February 19 2 minutes February 19 8 minutes April 21 1 minute April 21 14 minutes Caller Travis Hartke Travis Hartke Travis Hartke Travis Hartke Travis Hartke Travis Hartke Travis Hartke
c.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week October 26, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 28 2 minutes October 28 10 minutes Caller John Dagata John Dagata
d.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week October 5, 2008 November 16, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 9 1 minute October 9 11 minutes November 17 1 minute November 17 22 minutes Caller John Dagata John Dagata John Dagata John Dagata
e.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week November 2, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 5 1 minute November 6 1 minute Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
f.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week July 6, 2008 September 14, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 8 1 minute July 9 9 minutes September 18 1 minute September 18 1 minute Caller Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels
21
NCAA-3
g.
On six occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week September 21, 2008 November23, 2008 January 11, 2009 January 18, 2009 February 1, 2009 April 5, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 25 2 minutes September 25 1 minute November 25 1 minute November 25 2 minutes January 14 2 minutes (6:55 pm) January 14 2 minutes (6:56 pm) January 19 2 minutes January 21 3 minutes February 3 2 minutes February 3 1 minute April 6 2 minutes April 7 2 minutes April 11 3 minutes Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
h.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (HS senior). Week November 23, 2008 January 11, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 26 2 minutes November 26 11 minutes January 12 2 minutes January 12 8 minutes Caller Travis Hartke Travis Hartke Travis Hartke Travis Hartke
i.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (HS senior). Week March 15, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls March 19 2 minutes March 19 18 minutes Caller Pete Herber Pete Herber
j.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week December 6, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls December 8 6 minutes December 9 6 minutes December 9 3 minutes December 10 4 minutes January 5 4 minutes January 6 1 minute January 6 2 minutes Caller Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp
January 3, 2010
k.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week September 13, 2009 January 17, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 16 2 minutes September 16 2 minutes January 19 1 minute January 19 15 minutes Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
22
NCAA-3
l.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week November 15, 2009 January 24, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 18 2 minutes November 18 5 minutes January 25 2 minutes (8:50 pm) January 25 1 minute (8:51 pm) Caller Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Travis Hartke Travis Hartke
m.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week September 13, 2009 January 24, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 16 2 minutes September 16 2 minutes September 16 4 minutes January 26 8 minutes January 29 2 minutes Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
n.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week December 6, 2009 February 21, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls December 11 1 minute December 12 2 minute February 26 1 minute February 27 2 minutes Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
o.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Month August 9, 2009 February 28, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 10 1 minute August 11 11 minutes March 3 2 minutes March 3 15 minutes Caller Pete Herber Pete Herber Pete Herber Pete Herber
p.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week September 20, 2009 March 7, 2010 March 21, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 21 13 minutes (10:04 pm) September 21 27 minutes (10:18 pm) March 7 1 minute March 8 1 minute March 23 2 minutes March 23 1 minute Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
q.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 23, 2009 September 27, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 25 1 minute August 25 2 minutes August 26 12 minutes September 28 2 minutes Caller Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels
23
NCAA-3
Week November 1, 2009 November 15, 2009 r.
Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 30 7 minutes November 3 2 minutes November 4 1 minute November 5 2 minutes November 17 2 minutes November 19 1 minute
Caller Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Month September 27, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 30 2 minutes September 30 6 minutes Caller Pete Herber Pete Herber
s.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 2, 2009 November 15, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 7 2 minutes August 7 15 minutes November 19 2 minutes November 20 2 minutes Caller Pete Herber Pete Herber Pete Herber Pete Herber
t.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Month September 13, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 14 6 minutes September 17 2 minutes Caller Travis Hartke Travis Hartke
u.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week November 1, 2009 November 15, 2009 January 10, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 3 4 minutes (7:54 pm) November 3 7 minutes (7:57 pm) November 17 2 minutes November 19 1 minute January 13 11 minutes January 16 5 minutes Caller Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels
v.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week September 6, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 6 1 minute September 6 2 minutes Caller Travis Hartke Travis Hartke
w.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week November 1, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 3 2 minutes November 4 3 minutes Caller Pete Herber Pete Herber
24
NCAA-3
x.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week September 13, 2009 March 7, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 15 1 minute September 16 6 minutes March 9 1 minute March 9 5 minutes Caller Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels
y.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week November 15, 2009 November 22, 2009 November 29, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 17 2 minutes November 19 2 minutes November 25 2 minutes November 25 12 minutes November 30 1 minute November 30 2 minutes Caller Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp
z.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week January 3, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 4 1 minute January 4 1 minute Caller Travis Hartke Travis Hartke
aa.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week January 3, 2010 January 10, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 5 1 minute January 5 1 minute January 14 1 minute January 14 3 minutes Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
ab.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week January 3, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 6 2 minutes January 6 14 minutes Caller Kristy Popp Kristy Popp
ac.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week January 3, 2010 January 24, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 5 2 minutes January 7 15 minutes January 27 1 minute January 27 2 minutes January 28 1 minute January 28 7 minutes February 22 1 minute February 25 1 minute February 25 74 minutes Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
25
February 21, 2010
NCAA-3
Week February 28, 2010
Dates, Times, and Length of Calls March 5 1 minute March 5 2 minutes March 6 1 minute
Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
ad.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week January 3, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 6 1 minute January 6 2 minutes Caller Travis Hartke Travis Hartke
ae.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week January 10, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 13 2 minutes January 14 42 minutes Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
af.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week January 17, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 18 1 minute January 19 1 minute January 19 15 minutes Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
ag.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week January 17, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 21 2 minutes January 21 9 minutes Caller Kristy Popp Kristy Popp
ah.
ai.
aj.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week February 7, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls February 9 2 minutes February 10 8 minutes Caller Kristy Popp Kristy Popp
26
NCAA-3
ak.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week February 7, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls February 11 1 minute February 12 1 minute February 12 9 minutes Caller Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp
al.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week February 14, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls February 14 2 minutes February 15 5 minutes Caller Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels
am.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week February 14, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls February 17 1 minute February 17 1 minute February 18 1 minute February 18 1 minute Caller Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp
an.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week February 28, 2010 April 25, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls March 2 2 minutes March 2 7 minutes March 3 2 minutes April 26 1 minute April 26 10 minutes Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
ao.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week February 28, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls March 3 2 minutes March 3 15 minutes Caller Pete Herber Pete Herber
ap.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week February 28, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls February 3 1 minute February 3 1 minute February 3 1 minute Caller Pete Herber Pete Herber Pete Herber
aq.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week March 14, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls March 15 2 minutes March 16 2 minutes March 19 9 minutes Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
27
NCAA-3
ar.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week April 11, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 15 2 minutes April 16 2 minutes Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
as.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week April 18, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 21 8 minutes (6:00 pm) April 21 1 minute (6:08 pm) April 21 7 minutes (6:09 pm) Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
at.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week April 18, 2010 June 6, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 21 2 minutes April 22 3 minutes June 9 1 minute June 10 7 minutes June 12 4 minutes Caller Travis Hartke Travis Hartke Travis Hartke Travis Hartke Travis Hartke
au.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week April 25, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 28 1 minute April 28 6 minutes Caller Kristy Popp Kristy Popp
av.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 2, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 4 3 minutes May 5 2 minutes May 5 2 minutes Caller Grant Wall Grant Wall Grant Wall
aw.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 2, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 6 4 minutes May 6 13 minutes Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
ax.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 23, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 23 2 minutes May 24 2 minutes May 24 1 minute Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
28
NCAA-3
ay.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 30, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 2 1 minute June 2 2 minutes Caller Pete Herber Pete Herber
az.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week June 13, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 17 2 minutes June 17 1 minute Caller Kristy Popp Kristy Popp
ba.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 1, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 2 4 minutes (5:33 pm) August 2 1 minute (5:37 pm) Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
bb.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 1, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 3 14 minutes August 3 2 minutes Caller Grant Wall Grant Wall
bc.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 1, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 2 14 minutes August 5 2 minutes Caller Grant Wall Grant Wall
bd.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 8, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 11 4 minutes August 11 4 minutes Caller Kristy Popp Kristy Popp
be.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week July 25, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 31 2 minutes July 31 12 minutes Caller Kristy Popp Kristy Popp
bf.
29
NCAA-3
bg.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 1, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 2 2 minutes August 2 42 minutes Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
bh.
bi.
bj.
bk.
bl.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete Week August 8, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 11 1 minute August 11 8 minutes Caller Travis Hartke Travis Hartke
bm.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week December 12, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls December 13 2 minutes December 13 5 minutes Caller Nate Wiens Nate Wiens
bn.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week December 19, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls December 22 2 minutes December 22 9 minutes Caller Kristy Popp Kristy Popp
30
NCAA-3
bo.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week December 26, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls December 30 2 minutes December 30 6 minutes Caller Kristy Popp Kristy Popp
bp.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week December 19, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls December 19 1 minute December 20 2 minutes December 21 2 minutes December 21 2 minutes Caller Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels
bq.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week December 19, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls December 21 1 minute December 21 1 minute December 21 1 minute December 22 2 minutes December 22 4 minutes December 29 2 minutes December 30 2 minutes Caller Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels
December 26, 2010 br.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week July 6, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 9 1 minute July 10 10 minutes Caller Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels
bs.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week July 20, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 21 1 minute July 24 4minutes Caller Kristy Popp Kristy Popp
bt.
On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2013 grad). This violation was self-reported by Coach Hartke the day after the occurrence. As school policy, Hartke verified graduation year with two sources he trusted. Hartke believed was a 2012 grad so he called and left a message. called Hartke back and in the discussion informed Hartke he was a 2013 grad. Week July 17, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 22 2 minutes Caller Travis Hartke
31
NCAA-3
11.
Womens Volleyball a. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week September 14, 2008 November 2, 2008 b. Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 15 2 minutes September 18 2 minutes September 20 15 minutes November 6 3 minutes November 7 7 minutes Caller Dawn Sullivan Dawn Sullivan Dawn Sullivan Dawn Sullivan Dawn Sullivan
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 10, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 11 1 minute (8:27 pm) August 11 9 minutes (9:24 pm) Caller Christy Johnson Christy Johnson
c.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week November 1, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 2 2 minutes (6:02 pm) November 2 11 minutes (6:37 pm) Caller Trudy VandeBerg Trudy VandeBerg
32
NCAA-3
12.
Wrestling a. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week July 6, 2008 August 24, 2008 August 31, 2008 b. Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 7 2 minutes July 7 4 minutes August 28 3 minutes (9:30 pm) August 28 56 minutes(9:35 pm) September 4 1 minute September 4 1 minute Caller Cael Sanderson Cael Sanderson Cael Sanderson Cael Sanderson Cael Sanderson Cael Sanderson
On two occasions, the institution violated t recruitment of prospective student-athlete Week June 28, 2009
of permissible calls per week during its . Caller Yero Washington Yero Washington Yero Washington Yero Washington Yero Washington Yero Washington
August 9, 2009 c.
Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 1 2 minutes July 1 1 minute July 2 1 minute July 2 2 minutes August 10 2 minutes August 10 1 minute
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 9, 2009 September 27, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 11 2 minutes August 11 3 minutes September 29 5 minutes October 1 3 minutes Caller Yero Washington Yero Washington Chris Bono Kevin Jackson
d.
On one occasion, the institution violated t recruitment of prospective student-athlete Week August 23, 2009
permissible calls per week during its . Caller Chris Bono Chris Bono
Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 24 1 minute (7:53 pm) August 24 2 minutes (7:53 pm)
e.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week March 21, 2010 March 28, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls March 23 2 minutes March 26 1 minute March 29 2 minutes March 31 6 minutes Caller Yero Washington Yero Washington Yero Washington Yero Washington
f.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete Week May 9, 2010 July 11, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 10 1 minute May 13 2 minutes July 15 1 minute July 15 1 minute July 15 21 minutes Caller Yero Washington Yero Washington Yero Washington Yero Washington Yero Washington
33
NCAA-3
g.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 16, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 18 1 minute May 18 2 minutes Caller Yero Washington Yero Washington
h.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 30, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 1 1 minute June 1 2 minutes Caller Yero Washington Yero Washington
i.
On one occasion, the institution violated a permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). registered for a wrestling camp that summer. The camp was later canceled but Donnelly asserts this call was about logistics at that camp. Week June 20, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 22 2 minutes Caller Molly Donnelly
j.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week June 27, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 2 3 minutes July 2 2 minutes Caller Kevin Jackson Kevin Jackson
k.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week July 4, 2010 August 16, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 6 2 minutes July 6 9 minutes August 19 1 minute August 19 1 minute August 20 1 minute Caller Yero Washington Yero Washington Yero Washington Yero Washington Yero Washington
n.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 23, 2010 August 30, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 24 2 minutes (9:12 pm) August 24 2 minutes (9:13 pm) September 1 1 minute September 3 2 minutes Caller Kevin Jackson Kevin Jackson Kevin Jackson Kevin Jackson
34
NCAA-3
o.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 23, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 25 2 minutes August 26 2 minutes Caller Kevin Jackson Kevin Jackson
p.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week September 19, 2010 September 26, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 24 2 minutes September 24 2 minutes September 26 1 minute September 26 1 minute September 26 3 minutes Caller Yero Washington Yero Washington Yero Washington Yero Washington Yero Washington
q.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week October 24, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 26 2 minutes October 27 2 minutes Caller Yero Washington Yero Washington
r.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week October 31, 2010 November 7, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 1 2 minutes (8:39 pm) November 1 1 minute (8:40 pm) November 8 5 minutes November 9 2 minutes Caller Kevin Jackson Kevin Jackson Kevin Jackson Kevin Jackson
s.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week April 24, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 27 4 minute April 27 2 minute Caller Erik Voelker Kevin Jackson
t.
On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). called Coach Jackson and left him a voice message indicating he was committing to wrestle at ISU. In his excitement, Coach Jackson momentarily lost his train of thought and called This violation was self-reported by Coach Jackson the day after the call occurred. Week May 15, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 16 Caller Kevin Jackson
35
NCAA-3
13.
Football a. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week/Month September 5, 2010 b. Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 8 1 minute September 11 1 minute Caller Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham e calls per week during its (2 year transfer). Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
On one occasion, the institution violated t recruitment of prospective student-athlete Week/Month May 2, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 5 2 minutes May 6 2 minutes
c.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week May 23, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 24 1 minute May 28 13 minute Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells
d.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week April 4, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 5 2 minutes April 8 2 minutes April 8 5 minutes Caller Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
e.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week, and on one occasion had an impermissible caller during its recruitment of prospective studentathlete (2010 Grad). paid his deposit to attend ISU on June 10, 2010. Ryan McKim was a designated coach December 17, 2008 March 2, 2009. Week November 8, 2009 February 28, 2010 May 30, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 11 8 minutes (9:04 pm) November 11 2 minutes (9:14 pm) March 3 5 minutes (5:33 pm) March 3 1 minutes (5:38 pm) June 3 1 minutes June 4 8 minutes Caller Nick Caley Nick Caley Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Ryan McKim Ryan McKim ble calls per time period (2011 grad). Caller Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Paul Rhoads
36
f.
On four occasions, the institution violated the numb during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete Week April 15 May 31, 2010 September 12, 2010 November 14, 2010 December 19, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 27 1 minute May 27 2 minutes September 14 2 minute September 14 1 minute September 14 5minute November 18 2 minutes November 20 2 minute December 24 2 minutes December 24 12 minutes
NCAA-3
g.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Week/Month January 25, 2009 February 1, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 28 4 minutes January 28 3 minutes February 1 2 minutes February 1 2 minute February 1 2 minute February 1- 7 minutes February 9 2 minutes February 12 2 minute February 12 2 minute February 26 2 minutes February 26 2 minute Caller Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link
February 8, 2009 February 8, 2009 h.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 24, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 25 2 minutes October 25 16 minutes Caller Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope
i.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Month October 18, 2009 November 8, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 21 2 minutes October 21 11 minutes November 10 1 minute November 10 11 minutes Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Luke Wells Luke Wells
j.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 15-May 31, 2010 May 29 1 minute May 30 2 minutes May 31 1 minute May 31 1 minute Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
k.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week May 23, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 27 2 minutes May 27 1 minute Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells
l.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Month August 30, 2009 October 25, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 1 2 minutes September 2 5 minutes October 28 2 minutes October 28 1 minute Caller Tom Herman Tom Herman Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads
37
NCAA-3
Month November 22, 2009 January 31, 2010 m.
Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 28 1 minute October 28 8 minutes November 24 2 minutes November 24 4 minutes January 31 1 minute January 31 1 minute
Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Tom Herman Tom Herman Tom Herman Tom Herman
On nine occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week May 16, 2010 May 23, 2010 June 6, 2010 June 20, 2010 August 15, 2010 August 22, 2010 September 5, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 17 1 minute May 19 2 minutes May 19 2 minutes May 27 2 minutes May 27 8 minutes June 7 2 minutes June 7 2 minutes June 23 2 minutes June 23 2 minutes August 19 - 2 minutes August 19 - 7 minutes August 26 - 2 minutes August 26 - 4 minutes August 28 - 4 minutes September 5 2 minutes September 6 - 2 minutes September 6 - 1 minutes September 6 - 1 minutes September 7 - 6 minutes September 12 2 minutes September 12 - 1 minutes September 13 - 2 minutes September 13 - 1 minutes September 14 - 2 minutes September 15 2 minutes September 16 - 12 minutes (12:48 pm) September 16 - 1 minutes (1:21 pm) September 16 - 1 minutes (1:22 pm) September 16 - 1 minutes (1:51 pm) September 22 2 minutes September 23 2 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads
September 12, 2010
September 19, 2010 n.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Time Period April 15 May 31, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 17 2 minutes May 17 4 minutes Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells
38
NCAA-3
o.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Week October 12, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 15 7 minute October 16 1 minute October 17 1minute October 17 1minute February 1 1 minutes February 1 16 minute Caller Gene Chizik Shawn Raney Shawn Raney Shawn Raney Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope
February 1, 2009 p.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week, and on two occasions had an impermissible caller during its recruitment of prospective studentathlete (2010 grad). Ryan McKim was a designated coach December 17, 2008 March 2, 2009. Week December 20, 2009 February 21, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls December 21 1 minute December 21 9 minutes February 22 1 minute February 23 2 minutes February 23 1 minute February 24 10 minutes March 9 11 minutes March 9 2 minutes March 13 2 minutes March 22 1 minute March 24 1 minute March 24 1 minute March 25 2 minutes March 25 2 minutes March 25 6 minutes Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Wally Burnham Ryan McKim Luke Wells Wally Burnham Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Luke Wells
March 7, 2010 March 21, 2010
q.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Week February 1, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls February 1 1 minute February 1 1 minute February 1 2 minutes February 1 1 minute Caller Chris Ash Tom Herman Scott Fountain Scott Fountain
r.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Time Period April 15 May 31, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 31 2 minutes May 31 2 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
39
NCAA-3
s.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15 May 31, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 11 1 minute May 12 1 minute Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
t.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week April 11, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 15 2 minutes April 15 13 minutes Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads
u.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Month May 2, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 6 1 minute May 7 1 minute Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
v.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 10, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 11 2 minutes October 12 2 minute Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
w.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week November 14, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 17 2 minutes November 17 7 minutes November 19 2 minutes Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells
x.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week, and on one occasion called a prospect after he had signed an NLI with another school, during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2 year transfer). signed an NLI with on February 3, 2010. Week June 28, 2009 December 20, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 2 9 minutes (1:30 pm) July 2 1 minute (1:38 pm) December 21 1 minute December 22 1 minute December 22 1 minute December 22 1 minute December 22 1 minute December 22 1 minute December 23 1 minute December 24 2 minutes December 24 2 minutes December 26 6 minutes January 2 2 minutes January 2 3 minutes June 30 2 minutes Caller Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Paul Rhoads
40
December 27, 2009 June 27, 2010

NCAA-3
y.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on one occasion violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week May 30, 2010 October 31, 2010 November 14, 2010 December 19, 2010 December 26, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 4 1 minute November 2 1 minute November 2 13 minute November 17 1 minute November 20 3 minutes December 23 1 minute December 24 1 minute December 24 1 minute December 27 1 minute December 31 10 minute Caller Curtis Bray Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray
z.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 10, 2010 November 21, 2010 December 19, 2010 December 26, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 11 1 minute October 13 2 minutes November 23 2 minutes November 24 1 minute November 24 7 minutes December 23 1 minute December 24 1 minute December 25 1 minute December 27 1 minute December 30 1 minute December 31 10 minutes Caller Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Paul Rhoads Bobby Elliott
aa.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 31, 2010 November 21, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 3 1 minutes November 5 2 minute November 24 2 minutes November 26 2 minute Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
ab.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week May 2, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 3 1 minute May 6 4 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
ac.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 30 2 minutes May 31 1 minute Caller Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham
41
NCAA-3
ad.
On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year prospect). signed a financial aid agreement on . Week May 3, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 4 5 minutes May 5 1 minute May 5 6 minutes May 5 3 minutes May 12 9 minutes May 12 2 minutes May 16 3 minutes May 19 1 minute May 19 1 minute May 19 3 minutes June 2 5 minutes June 3 2 minutes June 18 1 minutes June 18 2 minutes June 18 2 minutes Caller Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Paul Rhoads Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash
May 10, 2009 May 17, 2009 May 31, 2009 June 14, 2009
ae.
On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on one occasion the institution had an impermissible caller during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Ryan McKim was a designated coach December 17, 2008 March 2, 2009. Week October 5, 2008 October 12, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 7 2 minutes October 8 13 minutes October 14 10 minutes October 16 11 minutes October 16 2 minutes October 16 7 minutes October 16 1 minutes October 17 1 minutes October 17 2 minutes October 17 1 minutes October 19 2 minutes January 4 2 minutes January 4 2 minutes January 14 2 minutes January 14 10 minutes February 1 1 minutes February 1 2minutes Caller Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Gene Chizik Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Ryan McKim Scott Fountain Chris Ash Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Chris Ash Scott Fountain
January 4, 2009 January 11, 2009 February 1, 2009 af.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15-May 31, 2010 May 31 5 minutes (12:15 pm) Courtney Messingham May 31 3 minutes (12:19 pm) Courtney Messingham
42
NCAA-3
ag.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Week January 11, 2009 February 21, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 15 8 minutes January 15 4 minute February 26 2 minutes February 26 5minutes Caller Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link
ah.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on one occasion violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period May 30, 2009 August 29, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 1 13 minutes September 1 1 minute September 1- 2 minute Caller Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham
ai.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on one occasion violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week May 30, 2010 September 12, 2010 December 19, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 3 10 minutes September 16 - 7 minutes September 16 - 12 minutes December 22 9 minute December 24 1 minute December 24 2 minute December 24 2 minute December 24 6 minute December 26 2 minute December 27 3 minute December 27 3 minute December 29 4 minute Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Paul Rhoads Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
December 26, 2010
aj.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 5 1 minute May 10 1 minute May 10 2 minutes May 11 1 minutes May 11 2 minutes May 12 22 minutes Caller Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley
ak.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week May 23, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 25 1 minute May 25 6 minutes Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
43
NCAA-3
al.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Week January 11, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 11 2 minutes January 11 13 minute (11:23 am) January 14 2 minute (11:37 am) January 16 2 minute January 17 4 minute February 1 1 minute February 1- 1minute Caller Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Tom Herman Tom Herman Tom Herman Paul Rhoads
February 1, 2009 am.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week February 7, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls February 10 1 minute February 10 5 minutes Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
an.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2 year transfer). Week May 16, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 16 2 minutes May 17 2 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
ao.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15-May 31, 2010 May 28 1 minute Courtney Messingham May 31 1 minute Courtney Messingham
ap.
On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week September 20, 2009 October 11, 2009 October 18, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 23 2 minutes September 24 8 minutes October 12 1 minute October 14 2 minutes October 21 1 minute October 21 1 minute October 21 1 minute October 22 1 minute October 24 2 minutes October 26 2 minutes October 31 1 minute October 31 4 minutes November 4 2 minutes November 7 2 minutes November 18 9 minutes (8:32 pm) November 18 5 minutes (8:40 pm) January 3 2 minutes January 3 2 minutes Caller Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham
44
October 25, 2009 November 1, 2009 November 15, 2009 January 3, 2010
NCAA-3
aq.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week April 15 May 31, 2010 September 26, 2010 October 3, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 15 2 minutes April 15 10 minutes September 28 1 minutes September 28 5 minutes October 5 1 minutes October 6 5 minutes Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
ar.
On one occasion, the institution violated t recruitment of prospective student-athlete Week May 2, 2010
ermissible calls per week during its . Caller Nick Caley Nick Caley
Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 5 2 minutes May 5 10 minutes
as.
On nine occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week August 29, 2010 September 19, 2010 October 3, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 1 2 minutes September 1 1 minutes September 1 7 minutes September 20 1 minutes September 20 10 minutes October 4 1 minutes October 4 1 minutes October 4 1 minutes October 5 1 minutes October 6 1 minutes October 11 9 minutes October 12 12 minute October 24 2 minutes October 25 9 minutes November 14 1 minute November 15 1 minutes November 15 8 minutes December 27 6 minute December 28 8 minute January 10 3 minutes January 11 1 minute January 30 1 minute January 31 1 minute January 31 10 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Paul Rhoads Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
October 10, 2010 October 24, 2010 November 14, 2010 December 26, 2010 January 9, 2011 January 30, 2011
at.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Although is not contemporaneous documentation, Coach Rhoads knows he never once spoke to or his family on the phone. Time Period April 15 May 31, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 19 1 minute May 28 2 minutes May 30 3 minutes May 31 2 minutes Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads
45
NCAA-3
au.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Month December 26, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls December 27 2 minutes December 29 2 minute Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
av.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 23, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 24 1 minute May 24 2 minutes Caller Nick Caley Nick Caley
aw.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week September 5, 2010 October 17, 2010 November 7, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 8 2 minutes September 8 - 1 minutes September 9 - 2 minutes October 18 2 minutes October 23 2 minutes November 12 2 minutes November 13 2 minutes Caller Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
ax.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week September 5, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 8 4 minutes (8:32 pm) September 8 2 minutes (8:38 pm) September 8 1 minutes (8:44 pm) Caller Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham
ay.
On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week August 30, 2009 September 6, 2009 September 13, 2009 November 22, 2009 March 7, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 1 2 minutes September 2 1 minute September 2 2 minutes September 9 2 minutes September 9 2 minutes September 9 2 minutes September 14 2 minutes September 16 2 minutes September 18 2 minutes November 25 3 minutes November 25 1 minute November 25 1 minute March 10 3 minutes March 10 2 minutes March 10 1 minute Caller Ken Pope Ken Pope Ken Pope Ken Pope Ken Pope Ken Pope Ken Pope Ken Pope Ken Pope Ken Pope Ken Pope Ken Pope Ken Pope Ken Pope Ken Pope
46
NCAA-3
az.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week November 7, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 11 1 minute November 13 7 minute Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
ba.
On six occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). The coaches assert the calls on October 13 were dropped calls. They were in an office together and Rhoads made the first call Bleil made the second after the call dropped. There is not any contemporaneous documentation of this. Week September 26, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 26 1 minutes September 27 2 minute September 27 1 minute September 29 2 minute September 30 1 minute October 2 1 minute October 6 2 minutes October 8 9 minutes October 13 1 minutes October 13 7 minute 9:32 pm October 13 3 minute 9:40 pm October 27 1 minutes October 28 4 minutes November 3 2 minutes November 3 5 minute December 26 2 minutes December 26 2 minute December 27 1 minutes December 27 2 minute December 28 2 minutes December 30 8 minute Caller Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Paul Rhoads Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads
October 3, 2010 October 10, 2010 October 24, 2010 October 31, 2010 December 26, 2010
bb.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Time Period April 15 May 31, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 28 2 minutes May 29 1 minute May 31 1 minute May 31 2 minutes May 31 2 minutes May 31 4 minutes Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
bc.
On two occasions, the institution violated t recruitment of prospective student-athlete Week April 15-May 31, 2010 October 10, 2010
f permissible calls per week during its (2011 grad). Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells
47
Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 30 1 minute May 30 1 minute October 13 1 minutes October 14 5 minutes
NCAA-3
bd.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week October 4, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 4 2 minutes October 7 2 minutes Caller Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
be.
On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Month April 15 May 31, 2009 September 12, 2010 September 26, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 29 1 minute May 29 10 minutes September 13 - 1 minute 9:12 pm September 13 - 6 minutes 9:13 pm September 29 2 minutes 8:59 pm September 29 1 minute 9:00 pm September 27 1 minute September 29 2 minute September 30 1 minute October 2 1 minute October 5 1 minutes October 6 1 minutes October 12 1 minute 10:13 pm October 12 6 minute 10:14 pm October 26 1 minutes 10:05 pm October 26 10 minutes 10:05 pm February 4 1 minutes February 5 2 minutes February 5 1 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
October 3, 2010 October 10, 2010 October 24, 2010 January 30, 2011
bh.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week June 20, 2010 October 10, 2010 November 7, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 21 5 minutes (3:05 pm) June 21 1 minute (3:09 pm) June 21 4 minutes (3:10 pm) October 14 1 minute October 15 1 minute November 10 1 minutes November 11 1 minutes November 11 1 minutes November 12 1 minutes November 13 9 minutes November 18 1 minute November 18 8 minutes Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells
November 14, 2010 bi.
On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). attend ISU football camp summer 2010, the coach indicates the calls were made to discuss camp logistics. Week June 6, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 6 1 minute June 6 1 minute Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells
48
NCAA-3
bj.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week September 5, 2010 October 17, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 5 8 minutes 10:04 pm September 5 - 6 minutes 10:12 pm September 11 - 5 minutes October 19 1 minutes October 20 1 minute October 20 1 minutes Caller Tom Herman Tom Herman Luke Wells Tom Herman Tom Herman Tom Herman
bk.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 28 1 minute May 31 1 minute Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells
bl.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week May 23, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 23 2 minutes May 24 2 minutes May 24 1 minute May 24 7 minutes May 24 1 minute Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
bm.
On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call, and on one occasion violated the number of permissible calls per given time period, during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week/Time Period March 28, 2010 April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 1 1 minute May 31 1 minute May 31 3 minutes Caller Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
bn.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 7 1 minute May 26 1 minute Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
49
NCAA-3
bo.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week March 21, 2010 April 18, 2010 April 25, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls March 25 2 minutes March 27 1 minute April 22 2 minutes April 22 2 minutes April 27 1 minute April 27 5 minutes Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
bp.
On twelve occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week June 6, 2010 June 13, 2010 September 5, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 7 1 minute June 7 1 minute June 15 1 minute June 16 1 minute September 5 2 minutes September 6 - 2 minutes September 6 - 1 minute September 6 - 1 minute September 13 - 1 minute September 13 - 1 minutes October 11 1 minute October 11 1 minute October 12 1 minute October 15 2 minute October 15 2 minute October 15 2 minute October 19 3 minutes October 20 8 minute November 1 1 minutes November 2 4 minutes November 8 1 minutes November 9 2 minutes November 9 1 minutes November 9 8 minutes December 22 1 minute December 22 5 minute December 29 2 minutes December 29 2 minute January 2 2 minutes January 2 2 minutes January 9 9 minutes January 11 8 minute Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliott
September 12, 2010 October 10, 2010
October 17, 2010 October 31, 2010 November 7, 2010
December 19, 2010 December 26, 2010 January 2, 2011 January 9, 2011 bq.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Time Period April 15 May 31, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 13 1 minute May 16 9 minutes Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells
50
NCAA-3
br.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 26 1 minute May 26 11 minutes Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
bs.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week September 26, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 29 2 minutes September 30 1 minute Caller Curtis Bray Curtis Bray
bt.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on two occasions the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week March 21, 2010 September 5, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls March 23 1 minute March 23 1 minute September 7 1 minutes September 10 - 2 minutes September 11 - 2 minute Caller Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhaods
bu.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 23, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 24 2 minutes May 24 3 minutes Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells
bv.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week April 11, 2010 April 25, 2010 May 23, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 12 1 minute April 12 5 minutes April 26 1 minute April 26 1 minute April 26 5 minutes May 24 2 minutes May 24 2 minutes May 26 1 minute Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
bx.
On three occasions, the institution violated th its recruitment of prospective student-athlete Week August 30, 2009 December 27, 2009
permissible calls per week during (2010 grad). Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham
Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 5 2 minutes September 5 1 minute December 29 2 minutes December 30 5 minutes
51
NCAA-3
by.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 27 1 minute May 28 8 minutes Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells
bz.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week September 13, 2009 October 4, 2009 October 18, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 16 2 minutes September 16 1 minute October 5 2 minutes October 5 13 minutes October 21 1 minute October 21 18 minutes Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
ca.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 2, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 6 2 minutes (7:01 pm) May 6 23 minutes (7:02 pm) Caller Nick Caley Nick Caley
cb.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week September 19, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 22 1 minutes September 2 4 minutes Caller Curtis Bray Curtis Bray
cc.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week June 28, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 2 4 minutes July 2 2 minutes Caller Chris Ash Chris Ash
cd.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week November 8, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 11 1 minute November 11 2 minutes November 11 17 minutes Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
ce.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week September 26, 2010 October 17, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 29 1 minutes October 2 1 minute October 18 1 minutes October 20 1 minutes October 23 2 minute Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
52
NCAA-3
January 9, 2011
January 13 1 minutes January 13 1 minute January 13 1 minute January 13 1 minute January 13 5 minute
Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
cf.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 10, 2010 October 17, 2010 December 19, 2010 December 26, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 14 1 minute October 15 1 minute October 18 1 minutes October 20 18 minutes December 22 1 minute December 24 8 minute December 27 2 minutes December 29 2 minute Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
cg.
On eight occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week September 13, 2009 September 27, 2009 October 4, 2009 October 25, 2009 November 1, 2009 November 8, 2009 November 15, 2009 January 10, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 14 1minute September 16 1 minute September 16 16 minutes September 30 1 minute September 30 15 minutes October 5 1 minute October 6 1 minute October 6 12 minutes October 27 2 minutes October 28 1 minute November 2 1 minute November 3 1 minute November 9 2 minutes November 10 2 minutes November 10 1 minute November 19 1 minute November 21 2 minutes January 14 2 minutes January 14 1 minute Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Luke Wells Luke Wells
ch.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week April 15-May 31, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 21 1 minute May 22 1 minute May 23 1 minute May 23 3 minutes September 1 1 minute September 1 8 minute September 6 2 minutes September 6 - 8 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
53
August 29, 2010 September 5, 2010
NCAA-3
ci.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 31, 2010 November 14, 2010 April 3, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 1 2 minute November 1 4 minutes November 16 2 minute November 17 2 minutes April 6 4 minutes April 6 2 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot
cj.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 24, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 26 2 minutes 10:05 pm October 26 26 minutes 10:05 pm Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
ck.
On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week June 21, 2009 August 9, 2009 September 13, 2009 September 20, 2009 September 27, 2009 October 25, 2009 June 20, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 24 1 minute June 25 1 minutes June 26 2 minutes August 9 1 minute August 9 8 minutes September 18 1 minute September 18 1 minute September 22 1 minute September 22 -1 minute September 23 24 minutes September 30 2 minutes October 1 1 minute October 27 1 minute October 28 2 minutes June 25 1 minute June 26 2 minutes Caller Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Paul Rhoads Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Paul Rhoads
cl.
On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week May 30, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 2 1 minutes Caller Shane Burnham
cm.
On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). attend ISU football camp summer 2010, the coach indicates the call were made to discuss camp logistics. Week June 13, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 14 1 minute Caller Luke Wells
54
NCAA-3
cn.
On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week June 20, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 26 1 minute Caller Curtis Bray
co.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on two occasions the institution had an impermissible caller during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). paid his acceptance fee on March 27, 2009. Ryan McKim was a designated coach December 17, 2008 March 2, 2009. Month February 14, 2009 February 21, 2009 April 5, 2009 June 7, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls February 15 4 minutes February 17 2 minute February 23 2 minutes February 23 1 minute April 7 3 minutes April 8 3 minutes April 11 1 minute June 8 3 minutes (received) June 9 2 minutes Caller Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link Ryan McKim Ryan McKim
cp.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 17, 2010 October 31, 2010 November 14, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 18 1 minutes October 20 1 minutes October 23 2 minute November 3 2 minutes November 4 2 minute November 4 12 minute November 14 1 minute November 15 2 minute November 15 1 minute November 15 2 minute November 15 8 minute Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells
cq.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week September 26, 2010 October 17, 2010 October 31, 2010 November 21, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 29 1 minutes October 30 1 minute October 21 1 minutes October 21 2 minutes November 1 2 minutes November 2 1 minute November 24 1 minute November 26 4 minutes Caller Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Paul Rhoads Curtis Bray
55
NCAA-3
cr.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Time Period April 15 May 31, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 28 2 minutes May 30 1 minute May 31 9 minutes Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads
cs.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week September 27, 2009 October 18, 2009 October 25, 2009 November 15, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 30 2 minutes September 30 8 minutes October 19 1 minute October 21 1minute October 26 1 minute October 28 1 minute November 18 1 minute November 19 13 minutes Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells
ct.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week March 14, 2010 May 9, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls March 18 1 minute March 18 2 minutes May 10 2 minutes May 11 2 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
cu.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week April 15-May 31, 2010 October 10, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 27 1 minute May 27 1 minute October 13 4 minutes 8:01 pm October 13 9 minute 8:21 pm Caller Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Paul Rhoads
cv.
On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week June 28, 2009 July 12, 2009 August 23, 2009 October 4, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 1 10 minutes (9:55 pm) July 1 1 minute (10:05 pm) July 15 2 minutes July 16 5 minutes August 23 6 minutes August 24 2 minutes August 29 2 minutes October 5 1 minute October 6 6 minutes Caller Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Courtney Messingham Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash
56
NCAA-3
October 25, 2009 November 1, 2009 November 22, 2009 cw.
October 29 2 minutes October 30 2 minutes November 4 6 minutes November 4 2 minutes November 24 3 minutes November 25 3 minutes
Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash
On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week September 20, 2009 October 25, 2009 November 1, 2009 November 8, 2009 November 22, 2009 December 27, 2009 January 3, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 22 1 minute September 23 7 minutes October 28 1 minute October 28 1 minute October 28 4 minutes November 3 7 minutes November 4 2 minutes November 11 2 minutes November 11 11 minutes November 24 1 minute November 24 1 minute November 25 1 minute December 29 2 minutes December 31 2 minutes January 3 6 minutes (3:42 pm) January 3 1 minute (3:50 pm) Caller Tom Herman Tom Herman Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Paul Rhoads Tom Herman Tom Herman Tom Herman Tom Herman Tom Herman Tom Herman Tom Herman Tom Herman Tom Herman Tom Herman
cx.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week September 5, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 8 2 minutes September 8 - 2 minutes September 8 - 2 minute September 9 - 15 minute September 15 - 2 minute 8:21 pm September 15 - 18 minutes 8:23 pm September 29 4 minutes September 30 13 minute Caller Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope
September 12, 2010 September 26, 2010 cy.
On nine occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week August 29 , 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 1 1 minutes September 1 - 1 minutes September 1 - 1 minute September 4 - 2 minute September 5 1 minutes September 5 - 1 minutes September 5 - 3 minute September 17 1 minute September 17 4 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads
September 5, 2010 September 12, 2010
57
NCAA-3
September 19, 2010 September 26, 2010 October 10, 2010 October 17, 2010 October 24, 2010 October 31, 2010 November 7, 2010
September 19 1 minutes September 19 1 minutes September 19 1 minutes September 26 1 minutes September 26 1 minutes September 26 17 minutes October 13 1 minutes October 13 17 minute October 17 1 minutes October 17 16 minutes October 27 1 minutes October 28 5 minutes October 29 10 minutes November 1 1 minutes November 1 1 minute November 12 1 minute November 12 2 minute November 12 1 minute
Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads
cz.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Time Period April 15 May 31, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 26 2 minutes May 26 9 minutes May 27 1 minute May 27 1 minute Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
da.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 30, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 31 1 minute May 31 1 minute Caller Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
db.
On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Week September 14, 2008 September 21, 2008 November 16, 2008 December 28, 2008 January 12, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 17 1 minutes September 18 7 minute September 23 1 minutes September 25 1 minute September 25 3 minute November 19 1 minutes November 10 1 minute January 2 2 minutes January 2 2 minutes January 12 2 minutes January 12 2 minutes Caller Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers
dc.
On six occasions, the institution violated t recruitment of prospective student-athlete Week September 20, 2009
of permissible calls per week during its (2010 grad). Caller Wally Burnham Wally Burnham
58
Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 23 2 minutes September 23 4 minutes
NCAA-3
October 4, 2009 October 11, 2009 October 25, 2009 November 1, 2009
January 10, 2010 dd.
October 5 2 minutes October 5 10 minutes October 11 3 minutes October 14 1 minute October 15 1 minute October 28 1 minute October 28 15 minutes November 3 1 minute November 3 1 minute November 4 9 minutes (8:44 pm) November 4 12 minutes (9:06 pm) January 15 1 minute January 15 1 minute
Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call and had an impermissible caller (Markus Alleyne) during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2001 grad). attend ISU football camp summer 2010, Markus indicates the call was made to discuss camp logistics. Week June 13, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 18 1 minute Caller Markus Alleyne le calls per given time (2011 grad). Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
de
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 30 2 minutes May 31 2 minutes
df.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week November 7, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 11 2 minute November 11 1 minute November 11 1 minute Caller Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
dg
On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week August 29 , 2010 September 12, 2010 September 19, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 1 2 minutes September 1 - 2 minutes September 2 - 5 minute September 15 - 1 minute September 18 - 1 minutes September 20 2 minutes September 21 1 minutes September 21 2 minutes September 22 2 minutes September 22 1 minutes September 22 1 minutes September 28 2 minutes September 29 1 minutes October 2 1 minutes October 6 2 minutes October 6 2 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Shane Burnham Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Bobby Elliott
59
September 26, 2010 October 3, 2010
NCAA-3
October 10, 2010
January 2, 2011
October 13 1 minutes October 13 1 minute October 14 1 minute October 15 1 minute January 2 1 minutes January 2 1 minutes January 2 1 minutes January 3 1 minutes January 3 1 minutes
Shane Burnham Bobby Elliott Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
dh.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week April 15-May 31, 2010 September 5, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 27 2 minutes May 27 1 minute September 6 2 minutes September 6 - 3 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
di
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Month February 1, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls February 1 5 minute February 1- 2minute Caller Paul Rhoads Scott Fountain
dj.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Time Period April 15 May 31, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 31 1 minute May 31 1 minute Caller Ken Pope Ken Pope
dk.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 3, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 5 2 minutes October 7 1 minutes October 9 1 minutes October 9 1 minutes October 9 2 minutes October 9 2 minutes December 22 2 minute December 24 2 minute December 25 13 minute December 27 2 minute December 28 1 minute December 28 2 minute December 28 17 minute Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham
December 19, 2010 December 26, 2010
60
NCAA-3
dl.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 25 1 minute May 25 1 minute May 25 2 minutes May 26 27 minutes Caller Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley
dm.
On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week September 13, 2009 October 11, 2009 October 25, 2009 November 15, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 17 2 minutes September 19 1 minute October 13 2 minutes October 14 2 minutes October 26 2 minutes October 26 1 minute November 18 1 minute November 18 1 minute November 18 1 minute November 19 1 minute November 19 1 minute November 19 1 minute November 19 1 minute December 31 2 minutes January 1 1 minute January 13 2 minutes January 14 12 minutes January 31 1 minute January 31 7 minutes Caller Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Ken Pope Ken Pope Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Paul Rhoads Ken Pope Ken Pope Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham
December 27, 2009 January 10, 2010 January 31, 2010 dn.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 2, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 6 1 minute May 6 6 minutes Caller Wally Burnham Wally Burnham
do.
On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 31, 2010 November 7, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 1 1 minute November 1 6 minute November 10 1 minute November 10 1 minute November 10 1 minute November 11 1 minute November 14 1 minute November 15 1 minute November 15 1 minute November 17 2 minute November 20 2 minute Caller Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham
61
November 14, 2010
NCAA-3
November 21, 2010
December 19, 2010
November 24 2 minute November 25 2 minutes November 26 4 minutes (9:23 pm) November 26 2 minutes (9:33 pm) December 23 2 minute December 24 1 minute December 25 1 minute
Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham
dp.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Week April 19, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 20 2 minutes April 21 2 minute Caller Eric Link Eric Link
dq.
On six occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week October 4, 2009 October 25, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 8 1 minute October 8 1 minute October 10 1 minute October 28 2 minutes October 29 2 minutes October 29 2 minutes October 29 1 minute November 11 1 minute November 11 14 minutes November 19 2 minutes November 19 2 minutes January 14 1 minute January 14 1 minute January 14 1 minute January 15 2 minutes January 31 2 minutes January 31 1 minute January 31 2 minutes January 31 2 minutes January 31 1 minute January 31 2 minutes Caller Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham
November 8, 2009 November 15, 2009 January 10, 2010
January 31, 2010
dr.
On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on one occasion the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Week August 1, 2008 August 31, 2008 September 7, 2008 September 21, 2008 September 28, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 1 1 minute September 1 2 minutes September 1 11 minutes September 13 2 minutes September 1 2 minutes September 27 1 minutes September 27 5 minutes (12:34 pm) September 27 1 minutes (12:51 pm) October 1 7 minutes October 2 12 minutes Caller Wayne Bolt Wayne Bolt Wayne Bolt Wayne Bolt Wayne Bolt Wayne Bolt Wayne Bolt Wayne Bolt Wayne Bolt Tom Howe
62
NCAA-3
January 11, 2009
October 3 1 minutes January 14 2 minutes January 14 1minutes January 14 1 minutes January 16 2 minutes
Wayne Bolt Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
ds.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 9 2 minutes May 25 2 minutes May 26 1 minute May 26 1 minute Caller Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham
dt.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per give time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Week September 28, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 2 2 minutes October 2 10 minutes Caller Tom Howe Tom Howe
du.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week November 8, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 11 -- 2 minutes November 11 17 minutes Caller Tom Howe Tom Howe
dv.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 24, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 24 1 minute October 24 1 minute October 24 1 minute October 30 1 minute November 7 2 minute November 7 1 minute November 17 1 minute November 17 1 minute November 17 10 minute November 23 1 minute November 23 1 minute November 25 5 minutes Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells
November 7, 2010 November 14, 2010 November 21, 2010
dw.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 26 2 minutes May 26 1 minute May 31 6 minutes Caller Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham
63
NCAA-3
dx.
On six occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period and on one occasion violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 15-May 31, 2010 April 15 2 minutes May 19 10 minutes June 6, 2010 June 8 1 minute August 29 , 2010 September 1 2 minutes September 1 - 9 minutes September 19, 2010 September 22 2 minutes September 22 2 minutes September 22 9 minutes September 26, 2010 September 28 2 minutes October 2 2 minutes October 10, 2010 October 12 2 minutes October 12 10 minute December 26, 2010 December 31 1 minute January 1 7 minute Caller Paul Rhoads Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Paul Rhoads Luke Wells Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Luke Wells Luke Wells
dy.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 17, 2010 January 2, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 21 4 minutes 12:14pm October 21 10 minutes 12:18pm January 8 1 minutes January 8 4 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
dz.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 30, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 31 2 minutes May 31 2 minutes Caller Nick Caley Nick Caley
ea.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month and on two occasions the institution had an impermissible caller during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). signed a . Ryan McKim was a designated coach December 17, 2008 March 2, 2009. Month May 17, 2009 May 31, 2009 June 7, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 19 2 minutes May 19 2 minute June 1 2 minutes June 1 1 minute June 9 3 minutes June 10 3 minute June 11 1 minute June 11 1 minute June 12 2 minute Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Ryan McKim Curtis Bray Ryan McKim
64
NCAA-3
eb.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week May 2, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 6 1 minute May 6 2 minutes May 7 1 minute May 7 9 minutes May 25 7 minutes May 28 1 minute Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
May 23, 2010 ec.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 19 2 minutes May 19 6 minutes May 27 5 minutes May 27 1 minute Caller Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
ed.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week May 23, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 26 2 minutes May 29 2 minutes Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
ee.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week January 2, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 2 8 minutes January 2 3 minutes Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
ef.
On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Week September 14, 2008 September 21, 2008 October 19, 2008 November 2, 2008 January 11, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 17 4 minutes September 19 11 minutes September 23 1 minutes September 26 3 minutes October 23 2 minutes October 23 1 minute November 6 1 minute November 6 1 minute January 11 2 minutes January 12 1 minute January 12 3 minutes Caller Tony Petersen Gene Chizik Tony Petersen Tony Petersen Gene Chizik Gene Chizik Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
65
NCAA-3
eg.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 16, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 18 2 minutes May 18 1 minute May 18 23 minutes Caller Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley
eh.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 31, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 3 1 minutes November 4 1 minute Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
ei.
On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call and on one occasion violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). It appears from the timing of the calls on July 15 called Coach McFarland and McFarland called back after a disconnect. Week July 15, 2008 January 11, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls July 15 8 minutes 4:26 pm (incoming) July 15 1 minute 4:36 pm July 15 8 minutes 4:37 pm (incoming) January 11 3 minutes January 12 2 minute January 12 1 minutes Caller Robert McFarland Robert McFarland Robert McFarland Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
ej.
On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call and had an impermissible caller (Markus Alleyne), during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . attend ISU football camp summer 2010, Markus indicates the call was made to discuss camp logistics. Week June 13, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 13 2 minutes Caller Markus Alleyne
ek.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete 2010 grad). Week November 8, 2009 November 22, 2009 December 20, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 11 1 minute November 12 1 minute November 24 1 minute November 25 2 minutes November 27 1 minute December 25 1 minute December 25 1 minute December 26 1 minute December 26 1 minute December 27 1 minute December 28 1 minute January 2 1 minute Caller Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads
December 27, 2009
66
NCAA-3
el.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 16 2 minutes May 25 2 minutes May 25 2 minutes May 25 2 minutes May 25 5 minutes Caller Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham
em.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week September 19, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 21 2 minutes September 21 2 minutes September 21 10 minutes Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
en.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week November 14, 2010 December 26, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 15 2 minutes November 17 1 minute November 18 1 minute December 27 2 minute December 27 2 minute December 27 2 minute December 31 12 minute January 12 1 minutes January 13 1 minute January 13 22 minute January 30 2 minute January 30 1 minute Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Curtis Bray Paul Rhoads Bobby Elliot Paul Roads Curtis Bray Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliott Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads
January 9, 2011 January 30, 2011 eo.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week April 15 May 31, 2010 October 31, 2010 November 7, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 25 2 minutes May 28 2 minutes November 4 2 minutes November 6 2 minute November 8 2 minute November 10 2 minute November 10 2 minute November 11 2 minute November 15 2 minute November 17 1 minute November 17 2 minute November 19 3 minute Caller Ken Pope Ken Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope
November 14, 2010
67
NCAA-3
ep.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 31, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 3 2 minutes November 3 6 minute Caller Bill Bleil Bill Beil
eq.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 30, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 31 1 minute May 31 6 minutes Caller Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham
er.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week November 8, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 10 1 minute November 11 17 minutes Caller Tom Herman Tom Herman
es.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 30, 2009 September 20, 2009 January 10, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 2 1 minute September 3 1 minute September 23 2 minutes September 23 5 minutes January 12 2 minutes January 12 1 minute January 13 3 minutes January 14 1 minute January 15 1 minute January 15 1 minute January 15 1 minute January 15 1 minute January 15 1 minute January 15 1 minute Caller Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham
et.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Official visit ended on itinerary has him arriving in at 1:35 pm. Week October 31, 2010 November 14, 2010 November 21, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 31 12 minutes (9:12 pm) November 2 2 minute November 17 2 minute November 17 1 minute November 18 4 minute November 25 2 minute November 25 5 minutes Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells
68
NCAA-3
eu.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week November 21, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 23 1 minute November 23 1 minutes Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
ev.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 15-May 31, 2010 May 9 2 minutes May 26 4 minutes November 14, 2010 November 17 2 minute November 17 5 minute Caller Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham
ew.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 27 5 minutes (4:56 pm) May 27 17 minutes (5:01 pm) Caller Ken Pope Ken Pope
ex.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 28 3 minutes May 28 1 minute May 28 13 minutes Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells
ey.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 9 1 minute May 9 7 minutes Caller Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham
ez.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 24, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 27 3 minutes October 27 3 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
fa.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week April 18, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 20 2 minutes April 21 2 minutes April 21 3 minutes Caller Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham
69
NCAA-3
fb.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week December 27, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 2 7 minutes (11:32 am) January 2 2 minutes (11:39 am) Caller Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham
fc.
On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week, and on one occasion violated the permissible time to call, during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week August 23, 2009 August 30, 2009 September 6, 2009 September 20, 2009 October 11, 2009 November 1, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 29 1 minute September 1 2 minutes September 1 7 minutes September 9 1 minute September 9 6 minutes September 23 1 minute September 23 1 minute September 23 1 minute October 14 1 minute October 14 2 minutes October 14 4 minutes November 4 1 minute November 4 1 minute Caller Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham
fd.
On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). attend ISU football camp summer 2010, the coach indicates the call was made to discuss camp logistics. Week June 6, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 6 1 minute Caller Shane Burnham
fe.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 15-May 31, 2010 May 26 2 minutes May 29 2 minutes October 17, 2010 October 20 1 minutes October 21 13 minutes Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
ff.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 17, 2010 January 2, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 18 1 minutes October 23 2 minutes January 3 1 minutes January 3 1 minutes Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
70
NCAA-3
fg.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week August 29 , 2010 September 19, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 4 1 minutes September 4 - 4 minutes September 22 2 minutes September 22 2 minutes September 23 2 minutes September 24 1 minutes September 25 1 minutes September 25 1 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads
fh.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week September 13, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 15 1 minute September 16 1 minute September 16 1 minute September 17 2 minutes September 30 1 minute September 30 7 minutes Caller Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
September 27, 2009 fi.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 31 1 minute May 31 1 minute May 31 5 minutes Caller Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham
fj.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week November 7, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 10 2 minute November 12 1 minute Caller Tom Herman Tom Herman
fk.
On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Official visit ended on , itinerary has him arriving in at 1:35 pm. Week October 31, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 31 1 minutes 9:22 pm October 31 1 minutes 9:43 pm November 1 1 minute November 1 1 minute November 10 13 minute November 11 1 minute November 17 1 minute November 19 6 minute December 22 2 minute December 24 7 minute Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells
71
November 7, 2010 November 14, 2010 December 19, 2010
NCAA-3
December 26, 2010
December 29 1 minute December 30 1 minute January 1 1 minute
Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells
fl.
On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call, and on one occasion violated the number of permissible calls per given time period, during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week/Time Period March 28, 2010 April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls March 29 1 minute May 19 1 minute May 24 1 minute May 28 1 minute Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells
fm.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week February 6, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls February 9 4 minutes February 9 2 minutes February 9 7 minutes Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
fn.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Time Period April 15 May 31, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 23 1 minute May 24 2 minutes May 31 2 minutes Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Bobby Elliott
fo.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 26 1 minute May 27 1 minute May 27 1 minute Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells
fp.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 23, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 24 1 minute May 24 1 minute Caller Nick Caley Nick Caley
fq.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Coach attests the March 22 is a left message as has an unusually long voice message. Week February 13, 2011 February 20, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls February 17 2 minute February 18 2 minute February 20 2 minutes February 20 3 minutes Caller Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
72
NCAA-3
March 20, 2011 fr.
March 22 3 minutes March 26 4 minutes
Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on one occasion violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week May 23, 2010 August 15, 2010 September 5, 2010 September 12, 2010 October 24, 2010 December 19, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 24 2 minutes May 24 2 minutes August 17 2 minute September 8 2 minutes September 8 - 8 minutes September 15 - 1 minute September 15 - 2 minutes September 15 - 1 minutes October 27 1 minutes October 27 5 minutes December 23 1 minute December 25 1 minute Caller Ken Pope Ken Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope
fs.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 26 2 minutes May 29 2 minutes May 29 2 minutes May 30 2 minutes Caller Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley
ft.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Week October 19, 2008 October 26, 2008 January 4, 2009 February 1, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 20 2 minutes October 21 1 minute October 23 1 minute October 26 4 minutes October 26 4 minute October 30 5 minute January 4 2 minutes January 4 2 minutes February 1 6 minutes February 1 2 minutes Caller Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Jeff Koonz Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Chris Ash
fu.
On 10 occasions, the institution violated either the number of permissible calls per week or had an impermissible caller have phone contact during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Beatty was a designated coach 12/1/08 12/31/08. Week August 3, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 4 2 minutes August 6 1 minute August 7 1 minute August 7 4 minutes Caller Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers
73
NCAA-3
Week August 24, 2008
August 31, 2008
September 7, 2008 October 5, 2008 November 9, 2008 November 16, 2008 November 22, 2008 December 27, 2008 February 1, 2009
Dates, Times, and Length of Calls August 27 1 minutes August 27 5 minutes August 29 5 minutes (incoming) August 29 4 minutes (incoming) August 30 2 minutes August 31 1 minute August 31 1 minute September 3 2 minutes September 5 4 minutes September 10 2 minutes September 13 1 minute October 9 1 minute October 9 1 minute October 9 18 minute November 13 2 minute November 14 1 minute November 16 1 minute November 20 11 minutes November 25 2 minute November 25 1 minute November 27 4 minutes December 29 1 minute December 29 3 minutes February 1 2 minutes February 1 2 minutes February 1 2 minutes February 1 2 minutes
Caller Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Shane Beatty Shane Beatty Shane Beatty Shane Beatty Shane Beatty Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Shane Beatty Jay Rodgers Shane Beatty Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Tom Herman Tom Herman Bill Bleil
fv.
On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week May 16, 2010 May 23, 2010 June 6, 2010 August 29, 2010 September 5, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 21 2 minutes May 22 2 minutes May 23 2 minutes May 23 9 minutes May 26 2 minutes June 7 2 minutes June 10 2 minutes August 30 1 minute August 30 9 minute September 6 2 minutes September 6 - 7 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
fw.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 16, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 21 1 minute May 21 3 minutes May 21 2 minutes Caller Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
74
NCAA-3
fx.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week November 15, 2009 December 27, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 18 2 minutes November 19 1 minute November 21 12 minutes December 27 1 minute December 28 10 minutes Caller Chris Ash Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads
fy.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week September 26, 2010 November 7, 2010 December 26, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 28 2 minutes September 28 2 minutes September 29 13 minutes November 11 2 minute November 11 2 minute November 11 19 minute December 29 1 minute December 29 2 minute December 29 6 minute December 31 1minute December 31 3minute Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
fz.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 3, 2010 December 26, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 4 1 minutes October 6 7 minutes December 28 2 minute December 30 8 minute Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads
ga.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on two occasions violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week June 20, 2010 July 11, 2010 August 29 , 2010 October 24, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 23 1 minute July 16 1 minute September 1 1 minutes September 1 - 2 minutes September 4 - 4 minute October 27 1 minutes October 27 1 minutes October 27 1 minutes Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells
gb.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 23, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 24 2 minutes May 24 1 minute Caller Curtis Bray Curtis Bray
75
NCAA-3
May 24 7 minutes gc.
Curtis Bray
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week September 5, 2010 November 14, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 8 2 minutes September 8 - 5 minutes November 17 1 minute November 17 1 minute Caller Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham
gd.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Time Period April 15 May 31, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 19 1 minute May 23 7 minutes Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads
ge.
On eight occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 15-May 31, 2010 May 27 2 minutes May 27 8 minutes August 29 , 2010 September 1 2 minutes September 1 - 2 minutes September 4 - 2 minute September 4 - 2 minute September 5, 2010 September 5 2 minutes September 6 - 1 minutes September 12, 2010 September 13 - 2 minute September 14 - 2 minutes September 15 - 1 minutes October 10, 2010 October 11 1 minutes October 12 2 minute October 31, 2010 November 1 1 minutes November 2 5 minute November 14, 2010 November 16 2 minute November 17 2 minute November 17 1 minute November 19 3 minute January 9, 2011 January 11 2 minutes January 12 2 minute Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliott
gf.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on two occasions had an impermissible caller have phone contact during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Ryan McKim was a designated coach December 17, 2008 March 2, 2009. Week May 30, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 1 2 minutes June 2 2 minutes June 2 2 minutes June 3 2 minutes Caller Ryan McKim Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Ryan McKim
76
NCAA-3
June 6, 2010 July 25, 2010
June 10 6 minutes June 11 1 minute July 26 1 minutes July 27 1 minutes July 27 2 minutes July 28 2 minutes July 28 6 minutes July 29 1 minutes
Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
gg.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 26 2 minutes May 30 2 minutes Caller Curtis Bray Curtis Bray
gh.
On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week August 30, 2009 October 11, 2009 November 8, 2009 December 27, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 1 3 minutes September 4 2 minutes September 4 2 minutes October 14 1 minute October 15 2 minutes November 11 2 minutes November 12 2 minutes December 31 2 minutes December 31 2 minutes January 2 2 minutes January 2 4 minutes January 11 1 minute January 11 1 minute Caller Tom Herman Tom Herman Tom Herman Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
January 10, 2010 gi.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week August 30, 2009 January 3, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 5 2 minutes September 5 1 minute September 5 1 minute January 3 1 minute (11:42 am) January 3 3 minutes (11:43 am) January 3 2 minutes (11:46 am) Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads
gj.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Time Period April 15 May 31, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 25 2 minutes (8:55 am) April 25 3 minutes (8:57 am) Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
77
NCAA-3
gk.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Week January 11, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 15 2 minutes January 15 2 minutes January 16 2 minutes January 16 2 minutes Caller Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain
gl.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week November 15, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 18 3 minutes (9:14 pm) November 18 10 minutes (9:16 pm) Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
gm.
On eight occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week May 16, 2010 June 6, 2010 August 15, 2010 August 29, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 17 2 minutes May 19 8 minutes June 7 2 minutes June 10 4 minutes August 20 1 minutes August 20 2 minutes August 31 1 minute September 1 2 minute September 1 1 minute September 1 2 minute September 1 1 minute September 3 8 minute September 14 - 2 minute September 15 - 2 minutes September 16 - 2 minutes February 20 2 minutes February 20 2 minutes February 21 2 minutes February 23 2 minutes February 25 2 minutes March 7 2 minutes March 8 1 minutes March 9 5 minutes March 18 2 minutes March 19 5 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
September 12, 2010 February 20, 2011
March 6, 2011 March 13, 2011 gn.
On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week June 20, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 23 2 minutes Caller Bill Bleil
78
NCAA-3
go.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week August 29 , 2010 November 21, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 1 1 minutes September 1 - 2 minutes September 1 - 6 minute November 24 4 minute November 26 1 minutes November 26 3 minutes Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Wally Burnham Shane Burnham
gp.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week December 19, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls December 22 1 minute December 22 7 minute Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads
gq.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week May 2, 2010 May 16, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 6 2 minutes May 7 8 minutes May 17 1 minute May 21 8 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
gr.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 15-May 31, 2010 May 27 2 minutes May 27 1 minute May 28 4 minutes January 2, 2011 January 2 2 minutes January 2 1 minutes January 2 1 minutes Caller Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham
gs.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 30 2 minutes May 30 4 minutes Caller Nick Caley Nick Caley
gt.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week May 23, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 24 2 minutes May 26 2 minutes May 27 2 minutes May 29 2 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
79
NCAA-3
gu.
On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on 14 occasions the institution had an impermissible caller have phone contact during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). came on official visit on and signed , accepting admissions on June 10. Ryan McKim was a designated coach December 17, 2008 March 2, 2009. Month March 8, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls March 10 5 minutes March 12 2 minute March 12 1 minute March 12 11 minute March 13 1 minute March 19 3 minutes March 20 1 minute March 20 1 minute March 20 9 minute March 27 2 minutes (incoming) March 27 1 minute March 27 1 minute March 27 1 minute March 27 1 minute March 28 1 min March 28 1 minute March 28 1 minute March 29 1 minute March 29 2 minute March 30 3minutes March 31 4 minute March 31 13 minute April 2 2minute April 3 3 minute April 3 3 min April 3 2 minute April 13 1 minute April 17 2 minutes June 2 6 minutes June 4 1 minute June 5 2 minutes June 5 1 minute June 8 3 minutes June 8 1 minute June 9 1 minutes June 10 1 minute June 10 1 minute June 10 1 minute Caller Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Paul Rhoads Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim) Ryan McKim Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Bill Bleil Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim
March 15, 2009
March 27 29, 2009 During his Official Visit
March 29, 2009
April 12, 2009 May 31, 2009
June 7, 2009
gv.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 3, 2010 November 7, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 9 2 minutes (12:29 pm) October 9 2 minutes (12:33 pm) November 10 1 minute November 10 19 minute Caller Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley
80
NCAA-3
gw.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week April 15-May 31 September 5, 2010 October 17, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 27 1 minute May 27 6 minutes September 6 3 minutes September 8 - 6 minutes October 20 1 minutes October 20 1 minutes October 20 2 minutes Caller Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham
gx.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Time Period April 15 May 31, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 23 2 minutes May 23 2 minutes Caller Luke Wells Luke Wells
gy.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week November 15, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 18 5 minutes (8:11 pm) November 18 2 minutes (8:16 pm) Caller Curtis Bray Curtis Bray
gz.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 15-May 31, 2010 May 25 2 minutes May 27 1 minute September 5, 2010 September 12, 2010 September 6 2 minutes September 8 - 8 minutes September 15 - 2 minute September 15 - 1 minutes September 15 - 2 minutes Caller Ken Pope Ken Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope
ha.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 31, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 31 5 minutes October 31 2 minute October 31 1 minute October 31 3 minute November 2 7 minute November 2 1 minute November 2 1 minute November 22 1 minute November 23 4 minutes Caller Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
November 21, 2010
81
NCAA-3
hb.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Time Period April 15 May 31, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 25 2 minutes April 25 1 minute Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
hc.
On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). attend ISU football camp summer 2010, the coach indicates the call was made to discuss camp logistics. Week June 13, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 17 1 minute Caller Luke Wells
hd.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 24, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 27 2 minutes October 28 12 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
he
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week August 30, 2009 September 6, 2009 October 18, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 3 1 minute September 5 2 minutes September 9 1 minute September 9 1 minute October 21 1 minute October 21 3 minutes Caller Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash
hf.
On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week April 15-May 31 October 24, 2010 October 31, 2010 November 7, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 19 2 minutes May 26 2 minutes May 31 4 minutes October 27 2 minutes October 27 2 minutes November 6 2 minutes November 6 6 minute November 8 2 minute November 8 1 minute Caller Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley
hg.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Time Period April 15 May 31, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 13 2 minutes May 14 2 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
82
NCAA-3
hh.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week September 5, 2010 November 14, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 8 2 minutes September 10 - 1 minutes September 10 - 5 minute November 17 1 minute November 17 1 minute November 19 1 minute November 23 1 minute Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
hi.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period, and on one occasion violated the permissible time to call, during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period/Week April 15-May 31 June 27, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 25 2 minutes May 25 5 minutes (7:37pm) May 25 1 minute (7:43 pm) July 2 1 minute Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
hj.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). accepted his admission (but did not pay the fee) on May 27, 2009. Week May 31, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 3 8 minutes June 4 4 minute Caller Nick Caley Nick Caley
hk.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 11 1 minute May 31 1 minute Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
hl.
On two occasions, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). attend ISU football camp summer 2010, the coach indicates the call was made to discuss camp logistics. Week June 13, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 17 5 minutes June 18 1 minute Caller Matt Karleskint Matt Karleskint
hm.
On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week August 30, 2009 September 13, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 1 2 minutes September 4 1 minute September 17 2 minutes (8:43 pm) September 17 1 minute (8:44 pm) Caller Tom Herman Tom Herman Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
83
NCAA-3
Week October 18, 2009 November 22, 2009 December 27, 2009 hn.
Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 20 1 minute October 20 1 minute November 27 2 minutes November 27 4 minutes December 29 2 minutes December 30 5 minutes
Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Luke Wells Luke Wells
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week June 20, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 21 1 minute June 21 2 minutes Caller Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
ho.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls April 15 2 minutes May 3 2 minutes May 19 2 minutes May 31 2 minutes Caller Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Paul Rhoads
hp.
On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week, and on two occasions had an impermissible caller (Ryan McKim) have phone contact, during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Ryan McKim was a designated coach December 17, 2008 March 2, 2009. Week October 5, 2008 October 19, 2008 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 6 6 minutes 8:35 pm October 6 2 minutes 9:03 pm October 19 2 minutes October 23 1 minute October 23 2 minutes October 23 7 minute November 13 2 minute November 16 15 minute January 4 3 minutes January 4 10 minutes January 11 1 minutes January 15 4 minutes Caller Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Gene Chizik Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain
November 9, 2008 January 4, 2009 January 11, 2009 hq.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 28 2 minutes May 28 5 minutes Caller Ken Pope Ken Pope
84
NCAA-3
hr.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week September 19, 2010 October 10, 2010 January 2, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 20 1 minutes September 22 2 minutes October 13 1 minutes October 14 1 minute October 15 1 minute January 2 1 minutes January 2 1 minutes January 2 1 minutes January 3 1 minutes January 3 1 minutes Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
hs.
On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Week June 13, 2010 June 20, 2010 October 3, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls June 15 2 minutes June 15 5 minutes June 21 2 minutes June 23 2 minutes June 23 2 minutes October 5 2 minutes October 6 2 minutes October 8 2 minutes Caller Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
ht.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week August 29 , 2010 October 17, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls September 1 2 minutes September 1 - 1 minutes September 1 - 10 minute October 20 2 minutes October 21 12 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
hu.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Time Period April 15-May 31 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 29 2 minutes May 30 6 minutes Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
hv.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Time Period April 15 May 31, 2011 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 31 1 minute May 31 2 minutes Caller Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham
85
NCAA-3
hw.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Week October 31, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls November 1 2 minutes November 2 10 minute Caller Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott
hx.
On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Week January 11, 2009 March 22, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 11 1 minutes January 11 2 minutes March 24 1 minutes March 24 7 minute Caller Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link
hy.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . Week May 9, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 14 3 minutes (11:55 am) May 14 2 minutes (11:57 am) Caller Bill Bleil Bill Bleil
hz.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week January 10, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls January 13 2 minutes January 16 2 minutes Caller Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham
ia.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Week October 25, 2009 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls October 28 1 minute October 29 2 minutes October 29 3 minutes Caller Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray
ib.
On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period, and on one occasion violated the permissible time to call, during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). attend ISU football camp summer 2010, the coach indicates the June call was made to discuss camp logistics. Time Period/Week April 15-May 31 June 13, 2010 Dates, Times, and Length of Calls May 31 1 minute May 31 10 minutes June 15 1 minute Caller Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham
86
NCAA-3
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Date Time Name Phone Number Call Complete y
N
TELEPHONE LOGS Call Made From (We=Work, Il=Horne, c-can Call Made To School (State) Pos.
(CvCeil, H'=Home, O~Other)
fNotes: fNotes:
--
y
N
I
-I -I -I -I -I
=. r=
Es: Es:
y
N
y
N
y
N
r= r=
Es: Es:
97
---
y
N
I
I
,
y
N
---
y
N
I
NCAA-3
NCAA-3
CONTACTS & EVALUATIONS

Recording telephone calls, contacts and evaluations
On the ncaa tab, complete the following fields: x Type: o Phone o Contact o Evaluation x Rec. coach (select the coach who performed the action) x Date (click on the box next to the date to select the date/time on a calendar grid) x Persons present (list any other coaches in attendance) x Location o Home o High School o Game Other o Notes The following fields are for phone calls only: x Response o Talk with prospect o Left message o No answer o Prospect initiated call o Talked with coach x x x Next call (optional sets task) Phone number Call originated o Home o Cell o Work
Iowa State University Compliance Manual
NCAA-3
54
NCAA-3
This "response" field appears blank, but it is a pull-down menu. IF THE FIELD IS NEGLECTED, IT DEFAULTS TO "TALKED WITH PROSPECT"
NCAA-3
NCAA-3
Gray, Dustin [ATHDP]

From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Importance: Gray, Dustin [ATHDP] Monday, July 28, 2008 3:01 PM Athletics - All Coaches [ATHDP] Banach, Edward J [ATHDP]; Flaherty, Eileen [ATHDP]; Snyder, Joshua M [ATHDP] FW: Information from NCAA enforcement Phone call policy 0708.doc High
Coaches, Attached is a document referring to the fictional three-minute phone call rule. Please review this document and let me know if there are any questions. The synopsis is there is not a three-minute rule; a phone call less three minutes is likely a countable call. That can be the same for phone calls under two minutes and under a minute. In addition, this document reiterates the importance of making notes of your phone calls (e.g. dropped calls, left message). Thanks, - Dustin Got Questions, Ask Compliance!
NCAA-3
--
--.,...-
History of the three-minute trigger In the last two years, the enforcement staff processed three major infractions cases involving telephone calls made by coaching staff who did not maintain logs/records. Rather than assume any call, regardless of length, established contact with the prospect, the enforcement staff used a three-minute threshold to determine when a contact occurred. Any call after that contact was assumed a violation. The staffs rationale for initially establishing the three-minute standard was to manage an infractions case involving voluminous calls in a fair and reasonable manner in establishing when a recruiting contact occurred. As a result, the staff established three minutes as the trigger for what would be considered a countable call, absent any circumstances indicating otherwise. It has come to the staff s attention that some in the membership have taken the staff s discretion exercised in a handful of cases as legislating a minimum time period for what triggers a countable contact. The staff did not intend that any call to a prospect lasting less than three minutes should be excluded from being considered a telephone contact in every circumstance and recognizes that a call lasting less than three minutes could, in fact, be a countable telephone contact with a prospect. The staff reviewed this issue with the Division I Committee on Infractions during the April 2008 agenda session. The following policy is in effect.
Major enforcement's policy NCAA Bylaw 13.1.3.1 remains in effect, and any discretion used in prior cases as a means to reasonably and fairly approach the specific facts of those cases will not presumably be applied in future cases. Future cases include any case pending, as there is not a notice requirement afforded to member institutions/representatives on how violations will be treated since the rule should not be violated in the first place. The staff reserves the discretion to analyze and evaluate each individual case it processes but wants to make clear that there is not a "three-minute rule." The starting point for the staffs analysis will consider every call a countable telephone contact. Therefore, any call after the permissible call is made to a prospect is presumably a violation. If a coaching staff makes multiple calls to a prospect within the same week, the coaching staff shoulders the burden (including contemporaneous documentation/logs/records) of demonstrating why the additional calls are not violations. Similarly, if a coaching staff is on the phone with a prospect and the call is dropped, the follow-up call to the prospect is presumed a violation unless the coaching staff member can demonstrate (along with contemporaneous documentation/logs/records) that the first call was dropped. Examining the actual phone records after-the-fact and noting where dropped calls occurred is not sufficient; contemporaneous notes/ logs should be kept by the coaching staff.
Any questions on the interpretation of the rule should be directed to Membership Services. Any questions regarding major enforcement's policy should be directed to Julie Roe, Director of Enforcement.
NCAA-3
NCAA-4
NCAA-4
Monthly Compliance Ed. Meeting

October
NCAA-5
Paperwork
NCAA-5
Guess Who
Rules
Players will alternate answering a compliance question. A player that answers a compliance question correctly gets to peel off a layer of the puzzle. The first player to correctly guess the hidden individual wins. The topic for this game is telephone calls.
NCAA-5
12 10 6 7 8 9 11
NCAA-5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1.
Violation or No Violation
It is July 10 and a coach tries calling a prospect in Barcelona, Spain. The prospects 16-year-old sister answers the phone. The coach asks to talk to the prospect. The sister says her mother is going to get him, but the sister remains on the phone. Not wanting to seem rude she begins talking to you about the Tour de France, which started in their town today. You are also a cycling enthusiast and talk to her about Lance Armstrongs chances. Five minutes later the mother comes on and says the prospect went to play ftbol with his friends and wont be back until later.
NCAA-5
NO VIOLATION
Talking to the 16-year old sister is also not an infraction as long as no recruiting took place.
Does this call count?

NCAA-5
This phone call does not count as a countable call because no recruiting actually took place. However, you should document the call and indicate that you did not talk to the prospect.
NCAA-5
2.
A coach is visiting a prospect in Valentine, Nebraska on Friday afternoon. However, the coach gets lost and cannot find the prospects house. He already called the prospect on Tuesday to make plans with prospect. He calls the prospect, gets back on Highway 20 and eventually arrives safely at the prospects house.
NCAA-5
NO VIOLATION
Coaches can make unlimited telephone calls to a prospect on the day they are making a in-person, offcampus contact.
NCAA-5
3.
You are trying to call a prospect on Wednesday afternoon. You dial her cell phone and her boyfriend answers. He says she is finishing up practice and should be free shortly. The boyfriend, apparently a big fan of yours, asks you what you think of his girlfriend. What should you do? Pick the best answer.
NCAA-5
A.
Answer the question, it would be rude not to. Call back later to talk to the prospect.
B. Answer his question and send a text later to tell the prospect to call you. Youve already used your call for the week. C. Dont answer, tell him thank you, hang up and call back later. D. Thank him for his time and dont call back later. Youve already used your call for the week for the prospect.
NCAA-5
Talking to the boyfriend about the prospect can be considered recruiting and would then count as a the phone call for the week.
BEST CHOICE = C
If you did not respond to the question the first phone call would not count against the weekly limitation if no other conversation took place. Then if you called later the second phone call would be permissible. Texting is a violation.
NCAA-5
4.
You are calling to arrange an official visit with a prospect. When you call the cell phone listed for the prospect, the prospects mother answers. She tells you they switched phones because her phone was better for texting. You talk to her about the possibility of arranging an official visit for next weekend. She says that she would be interested but you need to call the prospect to figure out the details. You hang up the phone and call the prospect to set up a visit that will occur in two weeks.
NCAA-5
VIOLATION
Once you begin discussing the possibility of an official visit the phone call counts.
NCAA-5
5.
Your phone is in your pocket while you are eating lunch. When you look at your phone later you notice the prospects number who you spoke with earlier in the day was redialed from your pocket.
NCAA-5
NO VIOLATION
If you purposely hit the call button because you forgot you or another coach already called that week and hang up before the prospect answers, that is a violation. But an accidental call will not be reported as a violation.
Do you need to record this phone call?

NCAA-5
Yes, you need to record it even though you didn't mean to dial the prospect and did not speak with the prospect, the call will still show up in your phone records. Record the call in your phone logs and include an explanation of the accidental call.
NCAA-5
6.
On Sunday evening a prospect flies home from an official visit at ISU. Later that night, you call him to make sure he made it home safely. On the following Wednesday another coach on your staff makes a telephone call to the prospect.
NCAA-5
VIOLATION
Coaches may make unlimited telephone calls to prospects the five days prior to an official visit and during an official visit. In this example, a call was made after the conclusion of the official visit.
13.1.3.3.1 & 4/16/2009
NCAA-5
7.
A prospect departs from his official visit at ISU on a Monday evening. Earlier that day, during the visit, you place several calls to the prospect while shes on campus. On Friday that same week you make a recruiting phone call to the prospect.
NCAA-5
NO VIOLATION
Coaches may make unlimited telephone calls to prospects the five days prior to an official visit and during an official visit. In weeks where a portion of the week is unlimited and another portion is limited (e.g. one call per week) ISU is allowed one call during the limited portion of the week.
13.1.3.3.1 & 3/3/1994
NCAA-5
8.
A prospect is scheduled to make an official visit on Friday so you make a phone call to her on Wednesday and Thursday that week. On Friday morning you find out the prospect has to cancel the visit. What needs to happen?
NCAA-5
A.
You notify compliance and the compliance office files an official visit cancellation exception form with the Big 12.
B. You notify compliance and compliance reports a secondary violation. No penalty is implemented as this is out of your control. C. Do nothing, you dont need to notify anyone. D. Notify compliance and record in your phone records what happened. Compliance does not report official visit cancellations.
NCAA-5
9.
While your team is going through its pregame warm-ups you take a minute to call your prized recruit to making sure theyre following the game. Youre off the phone by time the team finishes warming up and the National Anthem begins.
NCAA-5
VIOLATION
Phone calls to a prospect (or the prospective student-athlete's relatives or legal guardians) may not be made during a contests in that sport from the time the team reports on call at the competition site at the direction of the coach until the competition has concluded and the team has been dismissed by the coach. Electronic mail is permissible.
13.1.3.2.1
NCAA-5
10.
Signing date is November 11. Despite a good recruiting phone call prospect Awesome Alex doesnt sign with any institution on the 11th. The next day you call Alex again and he is so moved by your speech he signs an NLI with ISU.
NCAA-5
NO VIOLATION
Unlimited phone calls are allowed on the initial day for signing a NLI and the two days immediately following.
13.1.3.3.2
NCAA-5
Compliance Excellence Cup
NCAA-5
What is the first permissible date a coach may encourage a prospect to call a studentathlete and what year must the prospect be entering in high school?
NCAA-5
July 1 Prospect must be heading into his or her junior year of high school.
NCAA-5
On a December afternoon you download your teams online media guide to a blank 128 megabyte flash drive. The digital guide is 115 megabytes, contains color pictures throughout the guide, and is 200 pages in length.
NCAA-5
VIOLATION
08/14/2009 & 09/10/2009
NCAA-5
2010 Proposals
NCAA-5
2009-22
An individual may enter into an agreement to compete on a professional team and compete on a professional team, provided the agreement does not allow for receipt of more than actual and necessary expenses to participate on the team; further, in sports other than tennis, swimming and diving and women's volleyball, to specify that a studentathlete who does not initially enroll full-time in a collegiate institution within one year (six months for tennis) or the next opportunity to enroll following the high school graduation date.
NCAA-5
2009-87
Eliminates foreign tours.
NCAA-5
Iowa State Football Individual Culpability Analysis
Coach
Bobby Elliott Shane Burnham Luke Wells Bill Bleil Coach A Coach B Coach C Coach D Coach E Coach F Coach G Coach H Coach I Coach J Coach K Coach L Coach M Coach N Coach O Coach P Coach Q Coach R Coach S Coach T
Total Violations Average Per Month Logging Issue

199 93 93 78 57 92 33 16 43 30 6 23 17 81 30 2 4 3 20 3 1 1 1 7 8.29 4.89 4.65 3 2.86 3.4 2.75 3.2 2.04 1.66 3 1.04 4.25 5.4 1.76 2 1 3 3.3 1.5 1 1 1 1.75 180 80 81 58 51 87 28 11 40 28 4 21 15 80 29 2 4 3 20 3 1 1 1 7
Impermissible Time Period Culpable Calls Total Culpable Calls

0 4 8 2 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 9 4 18 5 5 5 5 1 0 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 13 12 20 6 5 5 5 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NCAA-6
IowaStateMen'sBasketball IndividualCulpabilityAnalysis
Coach
DaniyalRobinson CoachA CoachB CoachC CoachD CoachE CoachF
Impermissible Total Violations Average Per Month Logging Issue Time Period Culpable Calls Total Culpable Calls
64 33 23 10 9 6 1 4.06 1.13 5.75 4.6 0.42 2 1 43 33 18 8 9 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 5 2 0 0 0 21 0 5 2 0 0 0
NCAA-6
Iowa State Women's Basketball Individual Culpability Analysis
Coach
Coach A Coach B Coach C Coach D
Total Violations Average Per Month Logging Issue

24 6 23 2 0.72 0.22 0.69 0.25 19 3 21 2
Impermissible Time Period Culpable Calls Total Culpable Calls

2 0 1 0 3 3 1 0 5 3 2 0
NCAA-6
Iowa State Track and Field and Cross Country Individual Culpability Analysis
Coach
Coach A Coach B Coach C Coach D Coach E Coach F
Impermissible Total Violations Average Per Month Logging Issue Time Period Culpable Calls Total Culpable Calls
28 16 54 4 21 11 1.86 0.76 2 1.33 0.72 0.73 22 12 51 2 20 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4 3 2 1 0 6 4 3 2 1 0
NCAA-6
Iowa State Women's Tennis Individual Culpability Analysis
Coach
Coach A Coach B
Impermissible Total Violations Average Per Month Logging Issue Time Period Culpable CallsTotal Culpable Calls
45 5 2.14 0.31 40 2 1 0 4 3 5 3
NCAA-6
NCAA-7
NCAA-7
NCAA-7
Bill Bleil Iowa State University Wednesday, March 13, 2013 I would like to convey remorse for any difficulty I have caused Iowa State University through this process. I would also like to express that I do not feel my actions constitute a Major Violation. I think it is of the upmost importance to note that I did not intentionally break any NCAA rule to gain a recruiting advantage. Hopefully, I can explain myself in a manner that you will understand my actions. I understand that I cannot make more than one call per week outside the contact period and I never would have intentionally done so. When I took my current position at Iowa State University, our compliance department specifically told me that I was not responsible for documenting voicemails that were left because they were not considered countable calls. Therefore, I have no records of many of these calls because all they consisted of was a left voicemail. For four of the calls that are in questions, I left a voicemail. The NCAA has interpreted that a 3 minute message is a Countable Call. Per Verizon, any placed call that lasts 121 seconds to 180 seconds is logged as a 3 minute call. Verizon also allows customers to have a voice mailbox message of up to 2 minutes. I believe that with some recruits messages being long, it is reasonable to believe that a standard voicemail could be listed as a three minute call based on how Verizon calculates call length. Please see my attached notes from my conversation with Verizon. Another four of my calls listed as culpable were to after he had signed his FAA. It was my understanding that I was allowed unlimited calls to as the rule is currently. was returning to campus to begin his summer class work and his mom was very . I was attempting to alleviate his stress and guide him during that difficult time. As I previously stated, there was no attempt to gain a recruiting advantage, nor did I intentionally break an NCAA rule. Six of the calls in question involved . There were seven calls placed over two days resulting in six violations. family and I had been planning an Official Visit to Iowa State University on November 5th, 2010. With coming on an Official Visit I knew that I could contact an unlimited amount the 5 days prior to his visit. On the following Thursday, verbally committed to and cancelled his trip to Iowa State University. Please see the attached e-mail from mom about their intentions of making an Official Visit that weekend. My 32 year coaching record indicates that I have never attempted to circumvent the system. Furthermore, I hope the details of these calls make it apparent to anyone looking at this case that the infractions I have been accused of are not just clear-cut as there are mitigating circumstances to each. Also, it is important to note that none of the calls in questions provided Iowa State University with a recruiting advantage. Sincerely, Bill Bleil Assistant Head Football Coach
NCAA-8
Verizon Phone 3/8/2013 With the NCAAs response that a number of the placed calls on my cell phone bill that were listed as 3:00 minutes would be considered calls that I had in actuality talked with the Recruit and not left messages, I contacted Verizon and posed the question. How are placed calls timed and listed on Verizons bill.
They noted that all calls are rounded up every 60 seconds. 1:01 minutes would be billed and listed as 2:00 minutes. 2:35 minutes would be billed and listed as 3:00 minutes. I then asked the question How long (how many minutes) can a message in the Voice Mailbox be within the Verizon system. They told me that Verizon allowed voice mailbox messages of up to 2:00 minutes in length. With these answers I find it unusual that the NCAA would make the statement that a call listed as 3:00 minutes long is not capable of being a voice message, only those listed as 2:00 minutes or shorter.
NCAA-8
Dustin Please see the email from mom about coming on an Official Visit during the time period of the calls that Coach Bleil made. canceled on us late in the week and no paper work was given and no plane ticket was bought due to the uncertainty of the kid. Going forward, the recruiting office will send an email on Sunday with all kids that our coaches plan on bringing on an official for the that following weekend so we have record on both ends in case someone cancels on us late and we dont have this situation. Please let me know if I need to do something different on this to make sure all parties are covered. Thanks Nick
From: Chernoff, Gerrit M [ATHDP] [mailto:chernoff@iastate.edu] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 7:35 PM To: Nicholas N Uhlenhopp [ATHDP] Subject: Fwd: Check out our new website
Gerrit Chernoff Begin forwarded message: From: "Iowa State Football [ATHDP]" <IMCEAEX_O=IASTATE_OU=A+5FD+5FP_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=FOOTBALL-1@mail.iastate.edu> Date: October 29, 2010, 6:30:14 PM CDT To: "Bleil, William [ATHDP]" <bbleil@mail.iastate.edu> Subject: FW: Check out our new website

From: Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 2:42 PM To: Recruiting, Football Subject: Re: Check out our new website
Hi Iowa State. and from would like to go on offical visit next weekend Nov 5 th. Let us know if that would work. Thanks
NCAA-8
March 14, 2013 5025 Keats Street Ames, IA 50014 To whom it may concern: This is intended to serve as my personal statement regarding the recent findings in the final summary disposition. First and foremost I would like to apologize for any trouble I have brought upon Iowa State University. I would also like to state that I do not feel my actions constitute a major violation. At no point did I intentionally break NCAA bylaws. I understand that I cannot make more than one call per week if not in a contact period and wouldnt do so intentionally. A number of the impermissible contacts that have been documented in the report were a matter of me not being made aware by our compliance department that documentation was needed if I left a message or did not make contact with the PSA. Four of the 13 culpable calls, follow a call lasting three-minutes in length, which the NCAA deems a countable call. A call that last 121 seconds is technically a three minute call per Verizons billing structure. Verizon allows a customer to have a voicemail greeting up to 2 minutes in length. These calls, which I remember to be voicemails left at the end of the greeting, went undocumented. I attribute 2 of my culpable calls to dropped service. I re-established a connection, however the calls were not completed immediately following the dropped service. Finally, another call was made to a prospect attending camp during the summer camp window. I take great pride in my knowledge of the NCAA bylaws under which we operate. At no point in my coaching career have I intended to gain any sort of a recruiting advantage by knowingly circumventing any rules. I am very aware that I am only as good as my name, and I believe the entirety of my coaching career reflects just that. I feel that coaching is a special calling. At the end of the day, our job is to help young boys grow into young men, and I take this responsibility very seriously. Sincerely, R. Shane Burnham
NCAA-9
Iowa State University genuinely appreciates the assistance from the NCAA enforcement staff with processing this case. Specifically, Elizabeth Ramsey has been very helpful and always available, greatly assisting us in our efforts to discover, report and resolve the unique specifics of our case. Iowa State University is absolutely committed to NCAA rules compliance; the progression of this entire case is an illustration of that commitment. The telecommunications investigation was triggered when the head mens basketball coach witnessed a possible violation involving student coach, and reported that immediately to the Director of Athletics and the Compliance office. The department took immediate action (within 24 hours) to terminate the student coach and begin thoroughly investigating the possible violations. Our investigation progressed exactly as prescribed by our protocol for dealing with potential rules violations. The center of the investigation rested within the Presidents office, and the Compliance staff was uncompromisingly thorough in their investigation. All Athletics Department personnel were completely cooperative and open throughout the investigation. Due to the institutions commitment to uncover every potential violation, the resultant telecommunications investigation was the most extensive that has ever been completed, to the best of our knowledge. Our investigation included reviewing nearly three years of telecommunication records (over 750,000 phone calls), for the entire Athletics Department, including all of our 69 coaches and our non-coaching staff members.
We spared neither expense nor effort in order to discover the extent of these potential violations. The exhaustive investigation unfortunately uncovered that our institution was not thorough enough in the monitoring of our telecommunication records. This deficiency contributed to a significant number of telecommunication violations. Iowa State University profoundly regrets that these violations occurred, and the institution has already taken significant, effective action to prevent any further violations. This Summary Disposition, based on our investigative data, accurately reports those violations. Regarding the impermissible telephone calls throughout our sports programs: Our examination of over 750,000 individual telephone call records uncovered a total of 1,484 impermissible calls (less than 0.2%) over three years across all sports. Of the 1,484 phone calls, 1,260 of the calls were attributed to purely logging issues, as detailed in this report and acknowledged by the NCAAs enforcement staff. To be as clear as possible, these are instances in which coaches may not have made impermissible contact with recruits, but simply failed to properly document why the call was a noncountable call. These are binned in the Summary Disposition as Pure Logging Issues.
NCAA-13
The remaining 224 impermissible calls (0.02% of the total calls made) amongst all of our coaches and noncoaching staff over the three-year period include 145 culpable telecommunication violations, 55 noncoaching staff impermissible telecommunications contact violations, and 24 clear-cut intentional telecommunication violations. These impermissible calls are detailed in the Summary Disposition, and Iowa State University agrees with the characterization of those calls within the report. Iowa State University acknowledges that the institution failed to effectively monitor these aspects of telecommunications during this time. The compliance office had purchased software (through ACS) intended to meet the telecommunications monitoring needs of the department. When personnel experienced repeated setbacks in implementing the software, a manual process for monitoring was drafted. The process was simply not sufficiently followed, due in part to the sheer volume of phone records that were required to be reviewed manually each month. Our institutions failure to implement its own written policies is significantly responsible for the number of coaches that failed to properly log non-countable calls. If we had appropriately implemented our monitoring system, inadvertent logging practices of our coaches would have been detected, and a prompt monitoring response would have deterred those coaches from accumulating the appreciable number of logging issues in this report. It is appropriately characterized in the Summary Disposition as a systemic problem that incubated systemic logging failures. The institution deeply regrets our failure to monitor and enforce NCAA telecommunications rules and has implemented procedures to properly address this problem. Along with our monitoring failures, the coaches testimonies within the report indicate that our educational efforts left them unclear regarding logging obligations. ISU acknowledges there were educational deficits. We would ask the committee to consider that many of our coaches did understand their obligations and, in fact, most of our coaches properly logged their calls most of the time. The same dataset from which we discovered these violations also reveals that most of our coaches were properly logging their calls most of the time. The table below demonstrates that each of the randomly selected coaches properly logged most of their non-countable calls. They properly logged over 95% of their non-countable calls; although they obviously understood their obligations, their practice was deficient 5% of the time.
Analysis'of'a'Selection'of'ISU'Coaches''Phone'Records
Random' Coach'ID Sport' ID Year properly 'documented'nonF countable'calls'(e.g.' contemporaneous'"LM") improperly'documented'nonF countable'calls'(e.g.'no' contemporaneous'"LM")
Coach'A Coach'B Coach'C Coach'D Coach'E Coach'F Coach'G Coach'H Coach'I Coach'J Coach'K Coach'L Coach'M Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
2010F2011 2009F2010 2009F2010 2008F2009 2009F2010 2009F2010 2010F2011 2010F2011 2010F2011 2010F2011 2010F2011 2010F2011 2010F2011
109 48 46 51 572 140 30 7 3 9 24 3 2 1044
18 4 8 4 8 1 3 3 0 1 1 3 0 54
Coaches(were(selected(from(13(different(sports(and(their(phone(records(analyzed(for(one(year.
NCAA-13
We absolutely believe that the coaches who generated the most violations did not properly understand their logging obligations, pointing to an educational deficit. We appeal that our efforts were effective enough to educate most of the coaches, while acknowledging that they were not sufficient to prevent all misunderstanding. As described in the report, and acknowledged above, a lack of effective monitoring allowed those misunderstandings to go undetected and fostered the accumulation of a large number of logging violations over time. Our institution swiftly overhauled our entire approach to telecommunications monitoring in order to ensure timeliness and efficacy, including the purchase and implementation of a different software-based tool (Bluechip Athletic Solutions). The new, comprehensive monitoring protocols were implemented in August of 2011, and they have been demonstrably effective. For example, for the first six months, the new protocols identified an average of 1.5 impermissible phone calls per month; over the next 12 months that dropped dramatically to 0.5 impermissible phone calls per month. Firstly, this demonstrates that our new approach is effective in detecting impermissible or improperly logged phone calls. Secondly, the data show that the timely negative feedback provided through the thorough an effective monitoring system facilitated a decrease in inadvertent violations. Regarding the impermissible text messaging by an individual who was then a student coach for the men's basketball team: Keith Lefty Moore, a former Iowa State University student-athlete, was a student assistant coach working with the Mens Basketball team from the fall of 2010 through April 12, 2011. Moore was not hired by the basketball program, but rather was assigned to the basketball program, under the former head basketball coach, as a participant in a degree-completion program within the Athletics Department. Moore had coached and mentored a number of potential student-athletes on nonscholastic teams prior to returning to Iowa State University to work toward completing his degree. Our investigation discovered that Moore sent 160 impermissible text messages to five of these prospects. Again, our institution deeply regrets that Moore communicated via texts with his former players, even if he was responding as a mentor, and not in any way recruiting those prospective student athletes. Upon discovery of the violations, Iowa State University immediately removed Moore from his position and ceased all recruiting contact with the potential student athletes. None were offered athletics financial aid or a spot on the team as a walk-on student athlete, so Iowa State University clearly received no competitive advantage from Moores impermissible texts. In order to prevent future violations of this nature, our institution completely restructured the returning student-athlete program. Returning student athletes can no longer be assigned to specific sport coaching staffs; they are now limited to administrative
NCAA-13
responsibilities meeting department-wide objectives (and not objectives related to any specific sport). Regarding our self-imposed penalties We imposed meaningful sanctions in order to negate any potential advantage, and to admonish violators. Those sanctions are detailed in Section F of this report. Precedent set by the three most recent similar telecommunications cases guided our sanctions (University of California, University of Cincinnati, and Baylor University). Also, as reflected in the report produced by our collaboration with NCAA enforcement, we considered the number of violations per month for individuals, in order to normalize for the remarkably long period scrutinized in our extensive investigation. We meted the sanctions in three levels: department-wide, teams and individuals. The sanctions were stacked at each level. Firstly, the entire Athletics Department was placed on a two-year probationary period effective November 13, 2011. Further, the entire Athletics Department served a forfeiture of one week of recruiting calls at an appropriate time for each sport. To be clear, those penalties were imposed on all coaches, all sports regardless of culpability. Secondly, each specific sport was given penalties commensurate with their team culpability which were added to the department-wide penalties Thirdly, each coach was given penalties commensurate with their individual culpability, which were added to the department-wide and team penalties. The result was the self-imposition of sanctions that affected the entire department with escalated severity to specific sports and individuals as warranted by their culpability. The sanctions were quite punitive to those with the most violations, and they provided an unmistakable message to everyone in the department that all NCAA rules are taken seriously at ISU. Conclusion In conclusion, Iowa State University acknowledges and accepts responsibility for the violations detailed in this report, as discovered by our own investigation with support from NCAA enforcement. We would ask the committee to consider: 1. Our institution responded rapidly and resolutely to potential violations. 2. Our institution conducted a remarkably thorough investigation, sparing no expense in uncovering every possible violation. 3. The violations that we discovered produced very little, if any, recruiting advantage. a. Over 85% of the phone call violations did not result in contact beyond that which was permissible.
NCAA-13
b. Student-athletes interviewed in the investigation uniformly reported that any additional phone contact did not contribute to their decision to attend ISU. c. ISU discontinued recruiting of all prospects that received impermissible text messages from the student assistant basketball coach. 4. Although the telephone legislation has been and continues to be significantly deregulated, ISU took these violations seriously, imposing significant penalties. We imposed significant penalties Department-wide, on specific sports coaching staffs, and on specific coaches. 5. In the 18 months since the submission of our thorough self-report, we have enacted thoughtful, aggressive changes in protocol to address the issues that permitted the violations. The data prove that those changes have been effective.
NCAA-13
ISU & Case Precedent
NCAA-13
Where ISU Stands

Reviewed over 750,000 telephone calls; Found a total 1,484 impermissible calls; A total of 1,260 telephone calls that became violaHons due to poor documentaHon (e.g., leL message, dropped call, no answer); A total of 145 impermissible calls deemed culpable; A total of 55 impermissible calls deemed contact violaHons; A total of 24 impermissible calls deemed clear cut intenHonal violaHons; and A total of 165 text message violaHons.
NCAA-13
Case Precedent
California
February 25, 2011
NCAA-13
California
Total ViolaHons: 1. 364 Total Telephone ViolaHons 2. 305 Because of Poor DocumentaHon ViolaHon per Coach 1. Coach A 23/23 2. Coach B 22/17 3. Coach C 107/104 4. Coach D 212/161
NCAA-13
California
Penalty Structure: 1. Department 2. Team 3. Individual

NCAA-13
California
Department PenalHes: 1. Public reprimand and censure; 2. Two years of probaHon; 3. Had to place the fact they are on probaHon the departments website; 4. AddiHonal compliance educaHon for all.

NCAA-13
California
Team PenalHes: 1. The mens basketball team was limited to ve ocial visits per year (a reducHon in one per year from what they had used over the previous four years); 2. The mens basketball coaches had to inform prospects they were on probaHon prior to an ocial visit or wri]en oer of aid.
NCAA-13
California
Coach A PenalHes (23/23): 1. Was not allowed to make telephone contact for one week; and 2. Had to a]end NCAA Regional Rules Seminar.
NCAA-13
California
Coach B PenalHes (22/17): 1. Was not allowed to make telephone contact for two weeks.
NCAA-13
California
Coach C PenalHes (107/104): 1. Was not allowed to make telephone contact for Leen weeks; and 2. Had to a]end NCAA Regional Rules Seminar.
NCAA-13
California
Coach D PenalHes (212/161): 1. Was not allowed to make or receive telephone calls for one year; 2. Could not recruit o campus for two months; 3. Could not have any o campus contact for nine months; and 4. Had to a]end NCAA Regional Rules Seminar
NCAA-13
Case Precedent
CincinnaH
September 29, 2011
NCAA-13
Cincinna5
Total ViolaHons: 1. 220 Total Telephone Call ViolaHons ViolaHon per Coach 1. Womens Basketball 200 (176 from one assistant coach) 2. Football 20
NCAA-13
Cincinna5

NCAA-13
Cincinna5
Department PenalHes: 1. Public reprimand and censure; 2. Two years of probaHon; 3. AddiHonal compliance educaHon for all.

NCAA-13
Cincinna5
Womens Basketball Team PenalHes (200): 1. The sta was penalized one o-campus recruiter for six months; 2. The sta was penalized one sta member performing recruiHng coordinaHon funcHons for six months; 3. The womens basketball coaches had to inform prospects they were on probaHon prior to an ocial visit or wri]en oer of aid. 4. Had to place the fact they are on probaHon in the WBB media guide or website.
NCAA-13
Cincinna5
Head Coach PenalHes (13 to three PSAs): 1. Couldnt call for two weeks.
NCAA-13
Cincinna5
Assistant Coach A PenalHes (10 to four PSAs): 1. Couldnt call for ve weeks.
NCAA-13
Cincinna5
Assistant Coach B PenalHes (1): 1. Couldnt call for one week.
NCAA-13
Cincinna5
Former Assistant Coach PenalHes (176): 1. Couldnt place or receive calls for one year; and 2. Any insHtuHon wanHng to hire the former assistant coach within a one-year period must provide show-cause documentaHon, detailing the eorts it will make to monitor the coach.
NCAA-13
Cincinna5
Football Team PenalHes (20): 1. The enHre football sta was precluded from having telephone contact for one week a month for four months.
NCAA-13
Cincinna5
Assistant Coach A PenalHes (10): 1. Prohibited from making telephone contact for 4.5 months and received a le]er of reprimand.
NCAA-13
Cincinna5
Assistant Coach B PenalHes (5): 1. Prohibited from making telephone contact for three months and received a le]er of admonishment.
NCAA-13
Cincinna5
Assistant Coach C PenalHes (4): 1. Couldnt call two prospects for the rst two weeks of the iniHal period to call recruits.
NCAA-13
Case Precedent
Baylor
April 11, 2012
NCAA-13
Baylor
Total ViolaHons: 1. 580 Total Telephone Calls 2. 778 Text Messages 3. ?? Because of Poor DocumentaHon ViolaHon per Coach Phone Calls/Texts 1. MBB Coach A 181/17 2. MBB Head Coach B 81/24 3. MBB Former Coach 15/509 4. MBB Coach B 15/14 5. WBB coach A 184/166 6. WBB Head Coach 31/4
NCAA-13
Baylor
Other ViolaHons: 1. MBB Failure to Monitor by Head Coach 2. MBB Impermissible Talent Scouts 3. WBB Impermissible Employment of Prospects 4. WBB Impermissible RecruiHng Publicity 5. WBB Impermissible RecruiHng Contacts
NCAA-13
Baylor

NCAA-13
Baylor
Department PenalHes: 1. Public reprimand and censure; 2. Three years of probaHon; 3. Had to place the fact they are on probaHon the departments website; and 4. ConHnued educaHon for all.

NCAA-13
Baylor
MBB Team PenalHes: 1. Head coach was suspended for rst two conference games; 2. The program lost two scholarships, one in 2011-12 and one in 2012-13; 3. The program reduced its recruiHng person days by 15; 4. The team was limited to seven ocial visits per year; 5. The program removed one coach from the road during July 2010 evaluaHon period; 6. The sta a]ended the 2012 NCAA Regional Rules Seminar; 7. The program canceled its elite mens basketball camps for the summers of 2009, 2010, and 2011. 8. The mens basketball coaches had to inform prospects they were on probaHon prior to an ocial visit or wri]en oer of aid.
NCAA-13
Baylor
WBB Team PenalHes: 1. The program lost two scholarships in 2011-12;
NCAA-13
Baylor
MBB Coach A PenalHes (181 calls/17 texts): 1. Was not allowed to make telephone contact for two months; and 2. No texts to prospects he impermissibly sent texts (two weeks for each impermissible text).
NCAA-13
Baylor
MBB Head Coach PenalHes (81 calls/24 texts/Failure to Monitor): 1. Suspended from two conference compeHHons; 2. Was not allowed to make telephone contact for two months; and 3. No texts to prospects he impermissibly sent texts (two weeks for each impermissible text).
NCAA-13
Baylor
MBB Former Coach (15 calls/509 texts/Unethical Conduct): 1. One year show-cause.
NCAA-13
Baylor
MBB Coach B (15 calls/14 texts): 1. Was not allowed to make telephone contact for two weeks.
NCAA-13
Baylor
WBB Coach A PenalHes (184 calls/166 texts): 1. Was not allowed to make telephone contact for four months; and 2. No texts to prospects she impermissibly sent texts (two weeks for each impermissible text).
NCAA-13
Baylor
WBB Head Coach PenalHes (31 calls/4 texts/Improper Contact & PSA Employment): 1. Was not allowed to make telephone contact for one month and two weeks; and 2. No travel for one week in July 2010 evaluaHon period and not allowed to travel at all in July 2012 evaluaHon period.
NCAA-13
Iowa State
Penalty Structure: 1. Department PenalHes 2. Team PenalHes 3. Individual PenalHes

NCAA-13
Department Penal5es
1. Two years of probaHon; 2. One week of no outgoing calls; and 3. AddiHonal compliance educaHon for all.
NCAA-13
Team Penal5es
Team penalHes outlined in the next slide are in addi5on to the departmental penalHes.
NCAA-13
Team Penal5es
Four AddiHonal Weeks of No Outgoing Phone Calls Decrease RecruiHng OpportuniHes by One Per Prospect for 11-12 Decrease Ocial Visits by 20 Percent from Four-Year Average Restrict the Number of O-Campus Recruiters During Spring 2012
500
Three AddiHonal Weeks of No Outgoing Phone Calls Decrease RecruiHng OpportuniHes by One Per Prospect for 11-12 Decrease Ocial Visits by 20 Percent from Four-Year Average
200
Two AddiHonal Weeks of No Outgoing Phone Calls Decrease RecruiHng OpportuniHes by One Per Prospect for 11-12
60
One AddiHonal Week of No Outgoing Phone Calls
25
NCAA-13
No Team PenalHes
Individual Penal5es
Individual penalHes outlined in the next slide are in addi5on to the departmental penalHes and the team penalHes for your parHcular team.
NCAA-13
Individual Penal5es
Ten AddiHonal Weeks of No Outgoing Phone Calls A Le]er of Reprimand No O-Campus RecruiHng for a Month
100
Five AddiHonal Weeks of No Outgoing Phone Calls A Le]er of Reprimand
80
Three AddiHonal Weeks of No Outgoing Phone Calls A Le]er of Admonishment
50
One AddiHonal Week of No Outgoing Phone Calls A Le]er of Admonishment
30
No Individual Penalty
NCAA-13
NCAA Enforcement Staff Position Statement As outlined in the findings of this report, the involved individuals named and at risk acknowledge their involvement in violations of NCAA legislation but believe that the violations should be found as secondary violations. The NCAA enforcement staff believes that all coaches named and at risk should be found responsible for major violations because the violations were not isolated or inadvertent and, based on the large number of impermissible calls, provided more than a minimal recruiting advantage. The respective findings for those involved individuals who are contesting that the violations are major and the breakdown of impermissible calls for each is as follows: Finding No. 1-b-(1) Bobby Elliott, then assistant football coach and current University of Notre Dame assistant football coach:
Coach Elliott Total Violations 199 Logging Issue 180 Impermissible Time Period 0 Culpable 19 Total Culpable 19
Finding No. 1-b-(2) Bill Bleil, assistant football coach:

Coach Bleil Total Violations 78 Logging Issue 58 Impermissible Time Period 2 Culpable 18 Total Culpable 20
Finding No. 1-b-(3) Shane Burnham, assistant football coach:

Coach Burnham Total Violations 93 Logging Issue 80 Impermissible Time Period 4 Culpable 9 Total Culpable 13
Finding No. 1-b-(4) Luke Wells, then assistant football coach and current Utah State University assistant football coach:
Coach Wells Total Violations 93 Logging Issue 81 Impermissible Time Period 8 Culpable 4 Total Culpable 12
Finding No. 2-c-(1) Danyial Robinson, then assistant men's basketball coach and current University of Houston assistant men's basketball coach:
Coach Robinson Total Violations 64 Logging Issue 43 Impermissible Time Period 0 Culpable 21 Total Culpable 21
NCAA-16
ENFORCEMENT STAFF POSITION STATEMENT Page No. 2 _________
It is important to note that the culpability analysis used by the enforcement staff in determining which coaches to name in the findings outlined in this report is not the same analysis used by the enforcement staff in determining whether the violations should be classified as major or secondary. As detailed in the findings, the total impermissible calls placed by the coaches was quite significant and the enforcement staff has consistently processed allegations as major that involve such a large number of calls. Even if the staff only took into account the culpable calls in determining whether to process the violations as major or secondary, the enforcement staff has processed allegations as major where individuals had placed fewer impermissible calls than those "culpable calls" placed by coaches involved in this case. In addition, based on the large number of culpable calls for each coach, the enforcement staff believes that the calls were not inadvertent. The number of culpable calls attributed to each coach consisted largely of repeated calls by the same coach during a designated time period. Therefore, the staff does not believe the evidence supports a conclusion that the calls were inadvertent. Finally, the staff believes that as with most telephone call violations, the fact that the coaches were calling more often than other coaches resulted in more than a minimal recruiting advantage. For these reasons and based on the specific facts and circumstances outlined in this report, the staff believes that the violations involving the coaches listed above should be found to be major.
NCAA-16
NCAA-17
NCAA-17
SUMMARY DISPOSITION AGREEMENT FORM FOR INVOLVED PARTY (Former Staff Member)
BOBBY ELLIOTT
Iowa State University - Case No. M380
I understand this case wil be processed by the NCAA summary disposition process as outlined
in NCAA Bylaw 32.7 and the NCAA Committee on Infractions wil review the summary disposition report and all accompanying materials forwarded to it by the institution, the
enforcement staff and any involved individuals named in a finding of a violation. I acknowledge
that the summary disposition report wil contain findings of NCAA violations and proposed
penalties. 1 further acknowledge that 1 have been given the opportunity to propose limitations on
my athletically related duties associated with my current or future employment at an NCAA

member institution.
I have reviewed all sections of this report provided to me by the enforcement staff regarding findings in which T have been named and agree that the facts contained in those findings are
substantially correct, those findings are contrary to NCAA legislation, and thus, NCAA
violations occurred. I agree that this case is major in nature. Further, I accept and agree to the imposition of any proposed penalties set forth in the summary disposition report.
r understand that the Committee on Infractions, subsequent to its review of this summar
disposition report, may accept the proposed limitations on my athletically related duties or direct limitations on my athletically related duties based on the findings in which I am named. If there are additional limitations on my athletically related
an employing institution impose additional
duties that are not identified in the summary disposition report, 1 understand that 1 have the
opportnity to request that an expedited, in-person hearing be conducted pursuant to Bylaw
32.7.1.4.3.
Bobby Ellott
fy~
.1'.. ~ -'...
31 ~0 / VJ
Date / I
Timothy Ep Attorney
1/;) -r Irs Date t
NCAA-17
NCAA-17
NCAA-17
NCAA-17
SUMMARY DISPOSITION AGREEMENT FORM FOR NCAA ENFORCEMENT STAFF Iowa State University Case No. M380
The NCAA enforcement staff, with the consent of the institution and any involved individual, submits this summary disposition report and all accompanying materials for processing pursuant to the NCAA summary disposition process as outlined in NCAA Bylaw 32.7. The enforcement staff certifies that the enforcement staff's inquiry and investigation, as assisted by the institution, has resulted in a complete and thorough examination of issues relating to potential violations of NCAA legislation in the conduct of the athletics program at the institution. The enforcement staff further certifies that the institution and any involved individual have cooperated to the fullest extent possible during the processing of this inquiry. The enforcement staff agrees that the facts as outlined in the findings are substantially correct, those findings are contrary to NCAA legislation and thus, NCAA violations occurred. The enforcement staff further agrees that this case is major in nature. Therefore, it is the enforcement staff's position that this case qualifies for adjudication through the summary disposition process.
___________________________________ Jonathan F. Duncan Interim Vice President of Enforcement
April 8, 2013 Date
___________________________________ LuAnn Humphrey Director of Enforcement
April 8, 2013 Date
___________________________________ Elizabeth Ramsey Assistant Director of Enforcement
April 8, 2013 Date
NCAA-17
ISU ATHLETICS DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
Football Coach
Jamie Pollard Director of Athletics
Men's & Women's Basketball Coaches
Janet Lovell
Admin Specialist
Julie Bright Sr Associate AD Administration Adminstrative Services Business Services
Chris Jorgensen Sr Associate AD

Facilities, Planning, & Mgt
Frank Nogel Sr Assoicate AD External Relations Development
Steve Malchow Sr Associate AD Communications Communications
David Harris Sr Associate AD Student Services Football
Calli Sanders Sr Associate AD Sports Administration Women's Basketball
Capital Projects
Event Management
Ticket Operations
Marketing
Men's Basketball
Volleyball
Purchasing
Facilities & Grounds
Letterwinner's Organization Special Events
Web Services
Wrestling
Women's Golf Men's Golf Gymnastics
Human Resources
Concessions
Licensing
Academic Services
Equipment Operations Video Services
Special Projects
Cyclone Sports Properties
Compliance
Sports Medicine
Soccer
Technical Services
Strength & Conditioning
Softball
Swimming & Diving
Tennis
Women's Track & Cross Country Men's Track & Cross Country
Iowa State-1
01/18/11
Full Grant-in-Aid Costs
Residency Iowa Resident Non-Resident
2008-09 Tuition Room Board $5,524.00 $3,659.00 $3,297.00 $16,514.00 $3,659.00 $3,297.00
Books $400.00 $400.00
Books $400.00 $400.00
Books $400.00 $400.00
Books $400.00 $400.00
Books $800.00 $800.00
Iowa State-2
2008-09
Sport MBB MCC MFB MGO MTI MTO MWR WBB WCC WGO WGY WSB WSO WSW WTE WTI WTO WVB
# of Scholarships Used 13 n/a 84 4.5 n/a 12.6 9.9 15 n/a 6 12 11.99 13.68 13.57 8 n/a 15.79 12
# of Student-Athletes on Athletic Aid 13 n/a 90 10 n/a 31 17 16 n/a 8 12 19 26 30 8 n/a 31 14
# of Redshirts 2 6 30 2 9 12 12 0 9 2 1 0 2 0 0 5 7 0
# of Student-Athletes on Athletic Aid who Withdrew from ISU 0 n/a 0 0 n/a 0 0 0 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 n/a 1 0
Won-Loss Record 15-17 n/a 2-10 n/a n/a n/a 15-3 27-9 n/a n/a 4-15 26-29 5-12-2 5-5 10-13 n/a n/a 22-13
# of Official Visits 7 n/a 52 5 n/a 37 15 5 n/a 2 11 4 10 11 2 n/a 43 5
Iowa State-3
2009-10
# of Scholarships Used 13 n/a 79 4.49 n/a 12.6 9.72 12 n/a 5.99 12 11.96 13.99 13.36 8 n/a 17.77 12
# of Redshirts 2 7 31 0 9 11 7 0 5 1 2 2 3 1 0 14 11 1
Won-Loss Record 15-17 n/a 7-6 n/a n/a n/a 13-2 25-8 n/a n/a 9-13 26-29 7-9-4 6-4 9-15 n/a n/a 27-5
Iowa State-3
2010-11
# of Scholarships Used 13 n/a 85 4.48 n/a 12.3 9.64 11 n/a 5.99 12 11.98 14 13.96 8 n/a 17.96 11
# of Redshirts 4 10 37 2 22 23 12 0 8 2 1 0 3 0 1 13 22 1
Won-Loss Record 16-16 n/a 5-7 n/a n/a n/a 9-10 22-11 n/a n/a 8-12-2 21-28 8-10-2 5-5 10-16 n/a n/a 20-9
Iowa State-3
2011-12
# of Scholarships Used 13 n/a 85 4.51 n/a 12.55 9.9 13 n/a 6 11 11.88 13.98 14 8 n/a 17.95 12
# of Redshirts 2 5 36 1 6 9 13 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 0 11 11 1
Won-Loss Record 23-11 n/a 6-7 n/a n/a n/a 4-13 18-13 n/a n/a 8-13-1 14-39 9-9-1 5-3 4-19 n/a n/a 25-6
Iowa State-3
2012-13 (* as of 1/15/13)
# of Scholarships Used* 12 n/a 85 4.1 n/a 11.4 9.85 12 n/a 5.5 12 11.97 13.92 13.95 7 n/a 17.35 12
# of StudentAthletes on Athletic Aid* 12 n/a 85 7 n/a 22 25 13 n/a 6 13 17 30 30 9 n/a 37 13
# of Redshirts n/a 6 36 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 9 n/a n/a n/a 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a 2
# of Student-Athletes on Athletic Aid who Withdrew from ISU* 0 n/a 1 0 n/a 0 0 0 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 n/a 0 0
Won-Loss Record n/a n/a 6-7 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 10-10 n/a n/a n/a n/a 22-8
# of Official Visits* 6 n/a 27 1 n/a 31 19 7 n/a 2 4 5 9 8 1 n/a 28 3
Iowa State-3
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 I O WA S T AT E UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: 2009-10 Sport: Football Maximum Grants Permitted: 85.0 First Contest of the SPRING Segment: First Contest of the FALL Segment: 09/03/2009 Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Ini- Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant tial all valent amount award
$.00 $25,747.70 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 $.00 $14,527.70 $25,747.70 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 $15,613.70 X X X X X .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 X X X X 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 X X X X X 1.00 .90 1.00 .50
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
Term 1st # yrs # of Recr. Period enrolled rec'd seas of A n y aid util award Your
.00 2.00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 2.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 3.00 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
Athletic grant amount

$.00 $25,747.70 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 $.00 $11,979.85 $26,757.70 $26,617.70 $.00 $.00 $26,182.70 $23,618.00 $26,617.70 $13,308.85
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .90 1.00 .50
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
$11,979.85 X $11,979.85 $26,757.70 $26,617.70 $.00 $.00 $26,182.70 $23,618.00 $26,617.70 $13,308.85 $26,757.70 $26,617.70 $15,998.70 $15,397.70 $26,182.70 $26,347.70 $26,617.70 $26,617.70
$26,757.70 $25,747.70 $26,387.70 $25,747.70 $15,613.70 $25,000.00 $25,747.70 $27,434.70 $14,353.70 $25,747.70 $14,473.60 $24,763.60 $14,667.70 $15,763.70 X X X X X X X .50 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
1.50 4.00 2.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 3.00 3.00 .00 .00 2.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y N Y N N N Y N Y Y Y N N FY FY FY FY FY FY FY S FY

$13,448.85 $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 $14,473.60 $24,763.60 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$13,448.85 $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 $14,473.60 $24,763.60 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.50 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00
N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N Y
$.00 $15,397.70 $12,873.85 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $.00 $13,308.85 $.00 $13,448.85 $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,148.70 $15,397.70 $12,873.85 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 $15,397.70 $26,617.70 $14,767.70 $26,617.70 $27,153.70 $26,757.70 $15,067.70 $15,067.70 $25,547.70 X X X X X X X .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .50 .00 .50 .00 .00 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.50 1.00 .00 .00 3.00 .00 .00 0.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 N Y Y Y Y N Y N Y N Y Y Y Y F S F FY FY FY F FY FY

$.00 $15,397.70 $12,873.85 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $.00 $13,308.85 $.00 $13,448.85 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .50 .00 .50 .00 .00 .00
N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N Y N Y N Y N Y Y Y N N
$.00 $26,617.70 $25,747.70 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 $11,889.75 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,617.70 $14,527.70 $26,617.70 $25,747.70 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 $11,889.75 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 $13,122.00 $16,550.70 $15,397.70 $26,617.70 X X X X X X X X .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 X X 1.00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 3.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 2.00 .00 1.00 .00 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 N Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y N N Y Y Y FY F FY FY FY FY FY FY FY F

$.00 $26,617.70 $25,747.70 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 $11,889.75 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,617.70 $7,669.85 $15,397.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .50 1.00
$7,669.85 X $15,339.70 $15,397.70 $15,397.70
$.00 $26,617.70 $15,067.70 $26,617.70 $15,397.70 $15,613.70 $17,109.60 $26,617.70 $14,527.70 $1,888.60 $.00 $15,397.70 $10,443.83 $.00 $15,067.70 $26,617.70 $15,067.70 $26,617.70 $15,397.70 $15,613.70 $17,109.60 $26,617.70 $14,527.70 $14,527.70 $13,122.00 $15,397.70 $25,747.70 $14,527.70 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .13 .00 1.00 .41 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 1.00 3.00 .00 .00 .00 4.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 3.00 .00 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y N FY F FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY S

$.00 $26,617.70 $15,067.70 $26,617.70 $15,397.70 $15,613.70 $17,109.60 $26,617.70 $14,527.70 $1,888.60 $.00 $15,397.70 $10,443.83 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .13 .00 1.00 .41 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$26,617.70 $27,434.70 $15,397.70 $14,527.70 $25,747.70 $14,527.70 $14,672.70 $15,067.70 $27,157.70 $26,157.70 $13,466.32 $15,397.70 $14,672.70 $26,617.70 X X X X X X X 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 2.50 .00 .00 2.00 3.00 .00 .00 1.50 1.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 N Y N Y Y Y N N Y Y N Y N Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$26,617.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 $.00 $15,067.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$26,617.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 $.00 $15,067.70 $27,157.70 $26,157.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,617.70
Equivalent award
1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .89 1.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y
$24,157.70 $3,000.00 $26,157.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,617.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$11,465.85 $26,617.70 $14,773.70 $26,617.70 $26,287.70 $26,617.70 $16,617.70 $26,617.70 $13,964.85 X X X X X X X X 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .50 .00 1.00 .00 .00 X 1.00 .00 X X X 1.00 1.00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
4.00 .00 .00 2.00 3.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 2.00 3.00 .00 1.00 .00 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Y Y N Y Y Y N Y N Y Y N N Y FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY F F FY

$11,465.85 $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,287.70 $13,308.85 $.00 $26,617.70 $.00 $15,539.70 $15,067.70 $.00 $9,419.00 $26,617.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$11,465.85 $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,287.70 $13,308.85 $.00 $26,617.70 $.00
Equivalent award
1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .50 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y
$15,539.70 X $15,539.70 $15,067.70 $.00 $9,419.00 $26,617.70 $15,067.70 $11,996.00 $9,419.00 $26,617.70
$27,387.70 X X 1.00 .00 .00 X X 1.00 1.00 .00 X X 1.00 .00 X 1.00 .00 X X X 1.00 1.00 .00 X X 1.00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.50 4.00 .00 4.00 2.00 .00 2.00 .00 4.00 .00 2.00 1.00 .00 .50 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY F FY F FY

$27,387.70 $13,109.85 $.00 $7,263.85 $15,862.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $.00 $11,984.75 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 $.00 $15,397.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$27,387.70
Equivalent award
1.00 .50 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00
N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$13,109.85 X $26,219.70 $.00 $7,263.85 $15,862.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $.00 $11,984.75 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 $.00 $15,397.70 $14,527.70 $7,263.85 $15,862.70 $25,747.70 $26,617.70 $15,144.70 $11,984.75 $25,547.70 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 $15,397.70 $15,397.70
$.00 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 $14,473.60 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 $14,527.70 X X X X .00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 X X X X 1.00 .96 1.00 .00 .00 X X 1.00 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4.50 .00 .00 2.50 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y N Y Y FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 $.00 $.00 $14,029.50 $26,617.70 $14,395.10 $27,587.70 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 .96 1.00 .00 .00 .89 .00
N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y
$14,029.50 X $14,029.50 $26,617.70 $14,395.10 $27,587.70 $.00 $.00 $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $14,952.70 $27,587.70 $14,527.70 $14,672.70 $26,617.70 $15,397.70
$23,617.70 $3,000.00 $.00 $.00
$.00 $13,308.85 $26,881.70 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 $26,617.70 $26,881.70 $25,747.70 X X X X .00 .50 1.00 1.00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 1.00 .00 0.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 N Y Y N S FY FY

$.00 $13,308.85
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.00 .50 .83 1.00
Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y
$22,381.70 $4,500.00 $25,747.70 $.00
Squad-List Totals
$1,712,834.41
$1,664,505.66
25
79
73.31
76.78
* = Student-athlete's aid counts in another sport + = Student-athlete has been over-awarded > = Team limit exceeded
Contemporaneous Legislated Maximum CP Team is CP Carried Over from PREVIOUS Maximum Team Limit for CP Applicable to 2009-10 Penalties (CP) Team Limit for Sport Subject to in 2009-10 Academic Year (if any) Applicable This Academic Year Carried Over to 2010-11 (if any) (x) (y) to Current Academic Year (z) (x - y) - z (N/A in 2005-06)
Form completed by: _____________________ Title: _____________________ Form approved by: _____________________ Date: ___________ Director of Athletics' Signature: _____________________ Date: ___________ Head Coach's Signature: _____________________ Date: ___________ Additional Signature: _____________________ Title: _____________________ Additional Signature: _____________________ Title: _____________________ Required by Bylaw 15.5.10.2. File in director of athletics' ofce.
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2009-10 Sport: M e n ' s Basketball Maximum Grants Permitted: 13.0 First Contest of the REGULAR (with QRMTE) Segment: 11/02/2009 Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$24,763.60 $20,397.10 $24,295.60 $26,287.70 $25,633.60 $25,747.70 $15,998.70 $23,359.60 $25,887.70 $25,231.60 $26,617.70 $15,397.70 $7,399.85 $14,627.70 $14,630.09 $24,763.60 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 .50 .82 1.00
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
Term 1st # yrs # of Recr. Period enrolled rec'd seas of Any Your aid util award
2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 .00 2.00 .00 2.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 4.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y F/S F FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$24,763.60 $20,397.10 $24,295.60 $26,287.70 $25,633.60 $25,747.70 $.00 $23,359.60 $25,887.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$24,763.60 $20,397.10 $24,295.60 $26,287.70 $25,633.60 $25,747.70 $.00 $23,359.60 $25,887.70 $25,231.60 $26,617.70 $.00
Equivalent award
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .82 1.00 .00 1.00 .50 .82 1.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$20,731.60 $4,500.00 $26,617.70 $.00 $7,399.85 $7,263.85 $12,025.78 $24,763.60 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$7,399.85 X $7,263.85 $12,025.78 $24,763.60
Y Y Y Y Y Y
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2009-10 Sport: M e n ' s Basketball Maximum Grants Permitted: 13.0 First Contest of the REGULAR (with QRMTE) Segment: 11/02/2009 Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award 13 12.32 Rev. Dist.
E L I G F S
Athletic grant amount $295,174.98
Other cntbl. aid
Total cntbl. aid $292,275.13
Equivalent award 13.14
Squad-List Totals * = Student-athlete's aid counts in another sport + = Student-athlete has been over-awarded > = Team limit exceeded
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2009-10 Sport: Men's Cross Country Maximum Grants Permitted: 5.0 First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: 09/04/2009 E L I G F S Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$14,652.85 $14,627.70 $26,287.70 $16,717.70 $25,863.70 $26,981.70 $26,211.85 $25,747.70 $26,017.70 $16,617.70 $25,963.70 $25,747.70 $14,627.70 $26,304.20 $27,899.70 $25,747.70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 1.00 1.50 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 4.00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y u Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
Y Y Y Y
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2009-10 Sport: Men's Cross Country Maximum Grants Permitted: 5.0 First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: 09/04/2009 E L I G F S Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$27,899.70 $14,897.70 $14,427.70 $15,449.70 $27,799.70 $25,863.70 $14,534.70 $13,705.85 $14,627.70 $16,717.70 $26,287.70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 .00 3.00 1.50 .00 .00 3.00 .00 1.00 4.00 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y N Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Squad-List Totals Totals for Cross Country/Indoor Track/Outdoor Track:
$.00 $326,267.72
$.00 $315,376.24
.00 12.60
.00 13.20
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: Sport: Maximum Grants Permitted: First Contest of the $segment.segmentType Segment: First Contest of the Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E X E M P T Countable Players Change in Status 2009-10 Men's Golf 4.5 02/06/2010 09/12/2009 Rev. Dist.
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
2.00 1.00 3.50 .00 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 .00 1.00 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$13,778.11 $537.62 $11,318.68 $13,778.11 $13,143.84 $11,622.16 $.00 $7,698.84 $6,571.92 $.00 $8,716.62
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$13,778.11 $537.62 $11,318.68 $13,778.11 $13,143.84 $11,622.16 $.00 $7,698.84 $6,571.92 $.00 $8,716.62
Full grant amount

$26,757.70 $26,881.70 $14,147.70 $26,757.70 $26,287.70 $14,527.70 $26,287.70 $15,397.70 $26,287.70 $14,672.70 $14,527.70
Equivalent award
.51 .02 .80 .51 .50 .80 .00 .50 .25 .00 .60
Reason
Date
Equivalent award
.51 .02 .80 .51 .50 .80 .00 .50 .25 .00 .60
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
Squad-List Totals
$87,165.90
$87,165.90
4.49
4.49
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List R e p o r t 1/14/2013 Date: Institution: I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY City/State: AMES, IA Academic Year: 2009-10 Sport: Men's Track and Field (P and P only) (nonNCAA sport) Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.6 First Contest of the Segment: 12/11/2009 First Contest of the $segment.segmentType Segment: 01/22/2010 E X E M Term 1st # yrs # of Recr. Period Athletic Other Total P enrolled rec'd seas of grant cntbl. cntbl. T A n y aid util award amount aid aid Your $.00 $.00 Status of Student Financial Aid Countable Players Change in Status
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Full grant amount
Equi- Reason Date valent award .00
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA E L I G F S Status of Student Financial Aid Academic Year: 2009-10 Sport: Men's Track, Indoor Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.6 E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$26,781.70 $14,652.85 $14,627.70 $25,647.70 $14,427.70 $26,287.70 $26,699.70 $16,517.70 $16,717.70 $14,327.70 $25,687.70 $14,327.70 $25,863.70 $26,981.70 $26,211.85 $25,863.70 $25,183.60 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 2.50 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 2.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 N N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Y S FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y
$25,747.70 $14,627.70 $16,197.70 $14,627.70 $25,747.70 $25,837.70 $26,017.70 $26,003.70 $16,617.70 $14,435.70 $25,767.70 $25,963.70 $25,747.70 $14,627.70 $14,627.70 $27,899.70 $14,627.70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
2.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 2.50 1.00 .00 3.00 .00 .00 1.00 4.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Y FY FY S FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $12,793.85 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $12,793.85 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$25,747.70 $27,899.70 $14,427.70 $25,057.60 $25,847.70 $14,527.70 $14,897.70 $14,627.70 $25,747.70 $14,427.70 $28,018.70 $15,449.70 $14,467.70 $14,467.70 $27,799.70 $25,863.70 $12,296.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
3.00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 4.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 3.00 2.00 .00 2.50 .00 .00 2.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N FY FY FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$14,643.70 $14,534.70 $16,919.20 $25,687.70 $14,627.70 $13,705.85 $14,529.70 $15,973.70 $14,279.85 $25,747.70 $14,627.70 $16,717.70 $25,847.70 $26,287.70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4.00 3.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 4.00 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 Y N Y Y N Y Y N Y Y Y N Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y N N N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$12,793.85 $326,267.72
$12,793.85 $315,376.24
.50 12.60
.50 13.20
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2009-10 Sport: M e n ' s Outdoor Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.6 Status of Student Financial Aid E X E M P T Countable Players Change in Status Rev. Dist. Tr a c k ,
E L I G F S
.00 .50 1.00 .00 .00 2.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 .00 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 N N Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y N FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $1,462.76 $.00 $.00 $26,287.70 $.00 $400.00 $429.82 $12,973.85 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $1,462.76 $.00 $.00 $26,287.70 $.00 $400.00 $429.82 $12,973.85 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$26,781.70 $14,652.85 $14,627.70 $25,647.70 $14,427.70 $26,287.70 $26,699.70 $16,717.70 $14,327.70 $25,687.70 $.00 $14,327.70 $25,863.70 $26,981.70 $26,211.85 $25,863.70
Equi- Reason valent award

.00 .00 .10 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .02 .03 .51 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .10 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .02 .03 .51 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00
E L I G F S
4.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 3.00 .00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 Y Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY S FY FY

$15,891.48 $12,397.75 $25,747.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $2,059.80 $26,017.70 $.00 $498.52 $721.78 $.00 $25,963.70 $25,747.70 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Full grant amount

$19,818.35 $25,183.60 $25,747.70 $14,627.70 $16,197.70 $14,627.70 $25,747.70 $26,017.70 $26,003.70 $16,617.70 $14,435.70 $25,767.70 $25,963.70 $25,747.70 $14,627.70 $14,627.70

.00 .49 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .08 1.00 .00 .03 .05 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.80 .49 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .08 1.00 .00 .03 .05 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00
N Y N Y tu Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$15,891.48 X $12,397.75 $25,747.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $2,059.80 $26,017.70 $.00 $498.52 $721.78 $.00 $25,963.70 $25,747.70 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
E L I G F S
.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 .00 1.00 3.00 2.00 .00 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $1,287.38 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $1,287.38 $.00 $.00 $3,977.07 $.00 $2,614.98 $.00 $.00 $12,873.85 $.00 $27,918.70 $.00 $434.02 $1,193.07
Full grant amount

$27,899.70 $14,627.70 $25,747.70 $27,899.70 $14,427.70 $25,057.60 $25,847.70 $14,527.70 $14,897.70 $14,627.70 $25,747.70 $14,427.70 $28,018.70 $15,449.70 $14,467.70 $14,467.70

.00 .00 .05 .00 .00 .16 .00 .18 .00 .00 .50 .00 1.00 .00 .03 .08
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .05 .00 .00 .05 .00 .18 .00 .00 .41 .00 1.00 .00 .03 .08
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N N
$1,227.07 $2,750.00 $.00 $2,614.98 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$10,623.85 $2,250.00 $.00 $27,918.70 $.00 $434.02 $1,193.07 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
E L I G F S
2.50 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 4.00 3.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 Y Y N Y N Y Y N Y Y N Y Y Y N Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$27,799.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $23,199.92 $.00 $9,060.16 $435.88 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$27,799.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $23,199.92 $.00 $9,060.16 $435.88 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$27,799.70 $25,863.70 $12,296.00 $14,643.70 $14,534.70 $16,919.20 $25,687.70 $14,627.70 $13,705.85 $14,529.70 $15,973.70 $14,279.85 $25,747.70 $14,627.70 $16,717.70 $25,847.70

1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .90 .00 .66 .03 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .90 .00 .66 .03 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y N N N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
E L I G F S
4.00 3.0 Y FY

$5,331.18
Other cntbl. aid

$.00
Total cntbl. aid

$5,331.18
Full grant amount

$26,287.70

.20
Date
Equivalent award
.20
Y Y
Squad-List Totals Totals for Cross Country/Indoor Track/Outdoor Track: * = Student-athlete's aid counts in another sport + = Student-athlete has been over-awarded > = Team limit exceeded
$313,473.87 $326,267.72
$302,582.39 $315,376.24
12.10 12.60
12.70 13.20
Contemporaneous Legislated Maximum CP Team is CP Carried Over from PREVIOUS Maximum Team Limit for CP Applicable to 2009-10 Penalties (CP) Team Limit for Sport Subject to in 2009-10 Academic Year (if any) Applicable This Academic Year Carried Over to 2010-11 (if any) (y) (x) to Current Academic Year (z) (x - y) - z (N/A in 2005-06)
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: Sport: Maximum Grants Permitted: First Contest of the $segment.segmentType Segment: First Contest of the Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$25,547.70 $25,647.70 $25,747.70 $26,287.70 $14,390.20 $25,863.70 $26,088.20 $17,738.60 $24,863.60 $16,812.25 $14,627.70 $26,287.70 $14,427.70 $25,847.70 $15,167.70 $14,797.70 .70 .00 .02 .65 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .82 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .10 .03
2009-10 Men's Wrestling 9.9 12/29/2009 11/12/2009 Rev. Dist.
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 1.00 4.00 3.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4.00 1.00 4.00 .00 3.00 2.00 2.00 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 Y Y N Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY

$17,883.38 $.00 $514.94
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$17,883.38 $.00 $514.94 $17,087.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $13,858.90 $.00 $26,287.70 $.00 $.00 $1,506.76 $443.92
Equivalent award
.70 .00 .02 .59 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .82 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .10 .03
Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
$15,587.00 $1,500.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $13,858.90 $.00 $26,287.70 $.00 $.00 $1,506.76 $443.92 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y
$14,527.70 $15,780.70 $14,234.70 $26,287.70 $25,133.60 $14,713.60 $14,627.70 $14,527.70 $25,767.70 $14,627.70 $25,747.70 $18,620.75 $24,763.60 $14,467.70 $14,329.70 $21,755.50 .70 .00 .89 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .15 .02 .37 .10 1.00 .92 .30 .00 .95
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
1.00 .00 4.00 3.00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 2.00 .00 .00 4.00 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY F F FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$10,169.38 $.00 $12,692.08
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$10,169.38 $.00 $12,692.08 $26,287.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $2,179.14 $515.34 $5,447.88 $2,574.77 $18,566.75 $22,832.52 $4,340.30 $.00 $20,631.42
Equivalent award
.70 .00 .89 .87 .00 .00 .00 .08 .02 .37 .10 1.00 .92 .30 .00 .95
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
$22,787.70 $3,500.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$1,179.14 $1,000.00 $515.34 $5,447.88 $2,574.77 $18,566.75 $22,832.52 $4,340.30 $.00 $20,631.42 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: Sport: Maximum Grants Permitted: First Contest of the $segment.segmentType Segment: First Contest of the Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award 9.72 2009-10 Men's Wrestling 9.9 12/29/2009 11/12/2009 Rev. Dist.
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Other cntbl. aid
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: 1/14/2013 Institution: I O WA UNIVERSITY City/State: AMES, IA Name/I.D. No. S TAT E Academic Year: 2009-10 Sport: W o m e n ' s Basketball Maximum Grants Permitted: 15.0 First Contest of the REGULAR (no QRMTE) Segment: 11/01/2009 Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$14,527.70 $14,527.70 $14,527.70 $14,667.70 $26,739.70 $14,467.70 $26,287.70 $16,617.70 $25,747.70 $15,067.70 $14,527.70 $25,593.70 $25,747.70 X X X X .00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .99 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 X 1.00
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 2.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 3.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3.00 1.00 3.00 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 N Y N N Y N Y N N N N N Y N Y FY FY FY FY FY S FY

$.00 $14,527.70 $.00 $.00 $26,739.70 $.00 $26,058.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 $14,945.60 $23,359.60
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $14,527.70 $.00 $.00 $26,739.70 $.00 $26,058.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70
Equivalent award
.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .99 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Y Y N N N N
Y Y N N
Y Y N N N N N N N N N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y
$14,945.60 X $14,945.60 $23,359.60 $23,359.60
Squad List Report Date: 1/14/2013 Institution: I O WA UNIVERSITY City/State: AMES, IA Name/I.D. No. S TAT E Academic Year: 2009-10 Sport: W o m e n ' s Basketball Maximum Grants Permitted: 15.0 First Contest of the REGULAR (no QRMTE) Segment: 11/01/2009 Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$15,279.10 X 1.00 .00 .00 .00 X 1.00 .00 X .96 .00 X X .99 1.00 .00 X X .97 1.00
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
3.00 4.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3.00 .00 1.00 .00 3.0 4.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Y Y N N Y N Y N Y Y N Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY F
Other cntbl. aid
Total cntbl. aid

$15,377.10
Equivalent award
.92 .94 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .96 .00 .99 1.00 .00 .97 1.00
Y Y Y Y N N N N
$14,127.10 $1,250.00 $12,309.85 $.00 $.00 $15,325.60 $.00 $25,616.00 $.00 $26,376.00 $24,295.60 $.00 $25,876.00 $15,980.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$12,309.85 X $13,109.85 $.00 $.00 $15,325.60 $.00 $25,616.00 $.00 $26,376.00 $24,295.60 $.00 $25,876.00 $15,980.70 $15,067.70 $28,752.70 $15,325.60 $14,527.70 $26,599.70 $14,527.70 $26,599.70 $24,295.60 $14,527.70 $26,599.70 $15,980.70
Y Y N N
Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y
Squad-List Totals
$291,285.15
$265,279.70
12
11.91
13.77
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2009-10 Sport: Wo m e n ' s Country Maximum Grants Permitted: 6.0 First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: 09/04/2009 Status of Student Financial Aid E X E M P T Countable Players Change in Status Rev. Dist. Cross
E L I G F S
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 N N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$26,641.70 $25,847.70 $26,003.70 $14,467.70 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 $26,287.70 $24,453.70 $16,717.70 $14,527.70 $25,787.70 $14,527.70 $25,747.70 $14,868.20 $15,067.70

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
E L I G F S
.00 .00 .00 .50 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 .00 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 Y Y N Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$14,427.70 $14,683.70 $16,717.70 $25,747.70 $15,167.70 $25,747.70 $25,963.70 $14,527.70 $14,897.70 $25,747.70 $25,887.70

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$.00 $402,867.97
$.00 $407,585.97
.00 17.77
.00 17.60
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: Sport: Maximum Grants Permitted: First Contest of the Segment: First Contest of the $segment.segmentType Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$25,847.70 $26,907.70 $14,893.70 $14,743.70 $25,481.70 $27,157.70 $25,573.70 $26,617.70 $14,353.70 .42 1.00 .42 1.00 1.00 1.00 .15 1.00 .00
2009-10 Women's Golf 6.0 09/21/2009 02/07/2010 Rev. Dist.
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 .00 3.00 .00 2.50 1.00 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y F FY S FY FY FY FY FY FY

$10,942.77 $26,907.70 $6,314.82 $14,743.70 $25,481.70 $27,157.70 $3,836.04 $26,617.70 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$10,942.77 $26,907.70 $6,314.82 $14,743.70 $25,481.70 $27,157.70 $3,836.04 $26,617.70 $.00
Equivalent award
.42 1.00 .42 1.00 1.00 1.00 .15 1.00 .00
Squad-List Totals
$142,002.13
$142,002.13
5.99
5.99
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: 2009-10 Sport: W o m e n ' s Gymnastics Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.0 First Contest of the $segment.segmentType Segment: 01/08/2010 First Contest of the Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$14,527.70 $24,763.60 $24,763.60 $25,747.70 $28,942.70 $26,287.70 $25,747.70 $24,295.60 $22,838.85 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 $28,942.70 $25,747.70 $28,802.70 X X X X X X X X X X .00 .98 .90 .99 .82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .91 .00 .00 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 .00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $24,327.75 $22,391.90 $25,618.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $24,327.75 $22,391.90 $25,618.00 $23,876.00 $26,287.70 $25,747.70 $24,295.60 $22,838.85 $25,747.70 $23,376.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .98 .90 .99 .79 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .91 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$22,876.00 $1,000.00 $26,287.70 $25,747.70 $24,295.60 $22,838.85 $25,747.70 $23,376.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: 2009-10 Sport: W o m e n ' s Gymnastics Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.0 First Contest of the $segment.segmentType Segment: 01/08/2010 First Contest of the Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$26,287.70 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X X 1.00 .00 1.00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
3.00 .00 3.00 3.0 1.0 3.0 Y N Y FY FY

$26,287.70 $.00 $25,747.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$26,287.70 $.00 $25,747.70
Equivalent award
1.00 .00 1.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y
Squad-List Totals
$295,542.60
$296,542.60
12
11.60
11.57
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: Sport: Maximum Grants Permitted: First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$25,687.70 $26,037.70 $25,747.70 $24,774.60 $25,587.70 $25,687.70 $14,643.70 $15,397.70 $25,762.70 $25,747.70 $25,647.70 $27,899.70 $26,288.70 $14,527.70 $14,413.60 $15,166.85 .80 .35 1.00 .86 .75 .30 .00 .55 .00 .76 .00 .29 .75 1.00 .20 .00
2009-10 Women's Soccer 14.0 08/21/2009 Rev. Dist.
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 4.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 3.00 .00 3.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 0.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N Y Y Y Y N F FY FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY FY

$20,550.16 $8,700.69
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $500.00
Total cntbl. aid

$20,550.16 $9,200.69 $25,747.70 $21,306.15 $19,190.76 $7,706.30 $.00 $8,468.72 $.00 $19,568.24 $.00 $8,149.85 $19,716.52 $14,527.70 $2,882.72 $.00
Equivalent award
.80 .33 .71 .86 .75 .30 .00 .55 .00 .76 .00 .29 .75 1.00 .20 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$18,247.70 $7,500.00 $21,306.15 $19,190.76 $7,706.30 $.00 $8,468.72 $.00 $19,568.24 $.00 $8,149.85 $19,716.52 $14,527.70 $2,882.72 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$14,527.70 $25,988.70 $15,437.70 $14,527.70 $25,747.70 $24,763.60 $12,873.85 $14,973.60 $14,527.70 $25,647.70 $14,627.70 $14,627.70 $25,687.70 $13,109.85 $25,988.20 $25,795.70 .50 .65 .25 .80 .80 .50 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .35 .00 .75 .62
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4.00 .00 .00 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y N N Y Y Y Y F F FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY F FY

$7,263.84
Other cntbl. aid

$.00
Total cntbl. aid

$7,263.84 $16,892.32 $3,848.00 $11,622.16 $20,598.16 $12,381.79
Equivalent award
.50 .59 .21 .80 .80 .50 .47 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .35 1.00 .75 .62
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N
$15,392.32 $1,500.00 $3,178.00 $11,622.16 $20,598.16 $12,381.79 $6,050.70 $14,973.60 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $9,039.69 $13,109.85 $19,564.64 $15,989.48 $670.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$6,050.70 X $14,973.60 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $9,039.69 $13,109.85 X $19,564.64 $15,989.48
Y Y N N
Y Y N N N N
Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y
$25,747.70 .16
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
1.00 1.0 N FY
Other cntbl. aid
Total cntbl. aid

$4,066.04
Equivalent award
.10
Y Y
$2,566.04 $1,500.00
$320,745.78
$313,255.23
13.99
14.99
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$26,757.70 $23,359.60 $25,747.70 $10,201.00 $25,547.70 $13,354.00 $15,680.70 $23,359.60 $15,949.70 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 $14,527.70 $14,054.85 $25,747.00 $28,942.70 $25,747.70 .00 1.00 .60 .00 .00 .00 .99 1.00 .00 .66 .72 .49 .57 1.00 .72 .87
2009-10 Softball 12.0 02/12/2010 09/05/2009 Rev. Dist.
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 .00 .00 1.00 3.00 .00 3.00 1.00 .00 3.00 1.00 .00 2.00 1.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY F

$.00 $23,359.60 $15,448.62 $10,201.00 $.00 $.00 $15,551.00 $23,359.60 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $23,359.60 $15,448.62
Equivalent award
.00 1.00 .60 1.00 .00 .00 .99 1.00 .00 .52 .72 .49 .57 .71 .72 .87
Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$10,201.00 X $.00 $.00 $15,551.00 $23,359.60 $.00 $16,993.48 $18,538.34 $7,065.19 $7,943.84 $25,747.70 $20,838.74 $22,376.00
$13,493.48 $3,500.00 $18,538.34 $7,065.19 $7,943.84 $.00 $.00 $.00
$18,247.70 $7,500.00 $20,838.74 $22,376.00 $.00 $.00
$27,209.70 $25,747.70 $14,473.60 $26,617.70 .90 1.00 .60 .84
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY

$24,452.00 $25,747.70 $8,744.16 $22,376.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$24,452.00 $25,747.70 $8,744.16 $22,376.00
Equivalent award
.90 1.00 .60 .84
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Squad-List Totals
$277,742.97
$278,541.97
11.96
12.53
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$14,527.70 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 $27,799.70 $14,527.70 $26,287.70 $25,593.70 $26,287.70 $14,459.60 $26,127.70 $26,881.70 $26,287.70 $14,513.70 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 .03 .28 .04 .10 .72 .00 .52 1.00 .00 .50 .08 .25 .14 .35 .40 1.00
2009-10 Women's Swimming 14.0 10/16/2009 Rev. Dist.
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 1.00 3.00 .00 .00 1.00 2.00 .00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 N Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y S FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$400.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00
Total cntbl. aid

$400.00 $7,209.34 $1,029.90 $2,779.96 $10,395.00
Equivalent award
.03 .22 .04 .10 .72 .90 .31 1.00 .00 .50 .02 .25 .14 .02 .40 1.00
$5,709.34 $1,500.00 $1,029.90 $2,779.96 $10,395.00 $23,658.92 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$23,658.92 X $13,308.72 $26,287.70 $.00 $13,013.85 $2,150.52 $6,571.92 $1,966.03 $9,011.68 $10,299.08 $25,747.70
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$7,808.72 $5,500.00 $26,287.70 $.00 $13,013.85 $.00 $.00 $.00
$650.52 $1,500.00 $6,571.92 $1,966.03 $.00 $.00
$511.68 $8,500.00 $10,299.08 $25,747.70 $.00 $.00
$14,513.70 $14,513.70 $25,847.70 $14,527.70 $26,661.70 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 $14,547.70 $14,373.70 $25,747.70 $25,833.70 $26,287.70 $25,841.70 $26,287.70 $27,799.70 $26,287.70 1.00 .00 .00 .30 .25 1.00 .50 .20 .20 1.00 .25 .00 .75 .50 .50 .50
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 .00 .00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 .00 4.00 .00 2.00 2.00 3.00 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 Y N N Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$14,513.70 $.00 $.00 $4,358.30 $6,665.42 $25,747.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$14,513.70 $.00 $.00 $4,358.30 $6,665.42 $25,747.70 $12,873.84 $2,909.54 $2,874.74 $25,747.70 $6,433.42
Equivalent award
1.00 .00 .00 .30 .25 1.00 .33 .20 .20 .94 .25 .50 .75 .50 .50 .48
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$8,373.84 $4,500.00 $2,909.54 $2,874.74 $.00 $.00
$24,247.70 $1,500.00 $6,433.42 $13,143.84 $19,381.26 $13,143.84 $13,899.84 $12,643.84 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $500.00
$13,143.84 X $19,381.26 $13,143.84 $13,899.84 $13,143.84
$25,747.70 $25,747.70 $13,579.85 $25,755.70 $15,780.70 .25 .75 .00 .00 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
1.00 2.00 4.00 .00 2.00 1.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 Y Y Y N N FY FY F
Other cntbl. aid
Total cntbl. aid

$6,532.24 $19,310.76
Equivalent award
.12 .58 .99 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y
$3,032.24 $3,500.00 $14,810.76 $4,500.00 $13,379.85 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$13,379.85 X $.00 $.00
Squad-List Totals
$336,390.15
$317,707.54
13.36
14.54
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: 1/14/2013 Institution: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY City/State: AMES, IA Academic Year: Sport: Maximum Grants Permitted: First Contest of the Segment: First Contest of the $segment.segmentType Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$25,747.70 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 $26,397.70 $26,141.70 $25,847.70 $25,787.70 $14,961.70 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X X X X X X X X 1.00 1.00 1.00 .96 .95 .00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .97
2009-10 Women's Tennis 8.0 09/25/2009 01/29/2010 Rev. Dist.
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 3.00 2.00 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$25,747.70 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 $24,618.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$25,747.70 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 $24,618.00 $25,104.00 $.00 $.00 $25,787.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,047.70
Equivalent award
1.00 1.00 1.00 .96 .89 .00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .97
$23,604.00 $1,500.00 $.00 $.00 $25,787.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,047.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Squad-List Totals
$202,048.20
$203,548.20
7.88
7.82
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: 1/14/2013 Institution: I O WA S T AT E UNIVERSITY City/State: AMES, IA Academic Year: 2009-10 Sport: Women's Track and Field (P and P only) (non-NCAA sport) Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.6 First Contest of the Segment: 12/11/2009 First Contest of the $segment.segmentType Segment: 01/22/2010 E X E M Term 1st # yrs # of Recr. Period Athletic Other Total P enrolled rec'd seas of grant cntbl. cntbl. T A n y aid util award amount aid aid Your $.00 $.00 Status of Student Financial Aid Countable Players Change in Status
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Full grant amount
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2009-10 Sport: Women's Indoor Maximum Grants Permitted: 18.0 Status of Student Financial Aid E X E M P T Countable Players Change in Status Rev. Dist. Track,
E L I G F S
.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 3.00 1.00 .00 .00 3.00 .00 1.00 .00 2.00 .00 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 N Y N Y Y N Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$25,787.70 $14,527.70 $26,641.70 $25,787.70 $25,787.70 $25,847.70 $14,527.70 $27,417.70 $14,572.70 $14,513.70 $14,573.60 $26,003.70 $28,451.70 $14,467.70 $25,747.70 $14,427.70

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
E L I G F S
1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.50 1.00 4.00 4.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$14,473.60 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 $14,627.70 $14,473.60 $26,287.70 $24,453.70 $14,427.70 $25,767.70 $25,573.70 $16,717.70 $14,527.70 $25,787.70 $26,117.70 $14,527.70

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y
E L I G F S
3.50 2.00 .00 4.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .50 3.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 2.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y FY F FY FY FY FY FY S FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$25,887.70 $25,747.70 $14,868.20 $15,067.70 $14,427.70 $25,687.70 $14,683.70 $16,717.70 $25,747.70 $14,527.70 $15,167.70 $25,747.70 $14,627.70 $25,687.70 $25,963.70 $14,527.70

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y
E L I G F S
2.00 3.00 .00 .00 .00 3.00 2.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 Y Y Y Y N Y FY F FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$14,897.70 $25,747.70 $25,887.70 $26,781.70 $15,908.70 $25,747.70

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Totals for Cross Country/Indoor Track/Outdoor Track:
$.00 $402,867.97
$.00 $407,585.97
.00 17.77
.00 17.60
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY AMES, IA E L I G F S Status of Student Financial Aid E X E M P T Academic Year: 2009-10 Sport: Wo m e n ' s Outdoor Maximum Grants Permitted: 18.0 Countable Players Change in Status Rev. Dist. Tr a c k ,
.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 3.00 .00 .00 .00 3.00 .00 1.00 .00 2.00 .00 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 N Y N Y Y N Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $3,631.92 $.00 $12,843.84 $20,550.16 $.00 $14,527.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $3,631.92 $.00 $12,843.84 $20,550.16 $.00 $14,527.70 $18,849.20 $.00 $1,441.35 $3,618.39 $7,992.00 $8,535.50 $2,039.46 $25,747.70 $.00
Full grant amount

$25,787.70 $14,527.70 $26,641.70 $25,787.70 $25,787.70 $25,847.70 $14,527.70 $27,417.70 $14,572.70 $14,513.70 $14,573.60 $26,003.70 $28,451.70 $14,467.70 $25,747.70 $14,427.70

.00 .25 .00 .50 .80 .00 1.00 .69 .00 .10 .25 .31 .30 .14 1.00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .25 .00 .50 .80 .00 1.00 .58 .00 .10 .25 .31 .27 .14 1.00 .00
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$15,849.20 $3,000.00 $.00 $1,441.35 $3,618.39 $7,992.00 $7,617.50 $2,039.46 $25,747.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $918.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.50 1.00 4.00 4.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$9,842.04 $2,574.76 $12,230.15 $5,149.54 $.00 $5,934.16 $26,287.70 $24,453.70 $.00 $.00 $12,786.84 $.00 $.00 $4,880.66 $.00 $9,443.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$9,842.04 $2,574.76 $12,230.15 $5,149.54 $.00 $5,934.16 $26,287.70 $24,453.70 $.00 $.00 $12,786.84 $.00 $.00 $4,880.66 $.00 $9,443.00
Full grant amount

$14,473.60 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 $14,627.70 $14,473.60 $26,287.70 $24,453.70 $14,427.70 $25,767.70 $25,573.70 $16,717.70 $14,527.70 $25,787.70 $26,117.70 $14,527.70

.68 .10 .47 .20 .00 .41 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 .50 .00 .00 .19 .00 .65
Date
Equivalent award
.68 .10 .47 .20 .00 .41 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 .50 .00 .00 .19 .00 .65
Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y
3.50 2.00 .00 4.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .50 3.00 .00 1.00 2.00 .00 1.00 1.00 2.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y FY F FY FY FY FY FY S FY FY FY FY FY FY

$13,013.85 $17,232.40 $.00 $1,054.72 $.00 $8,961.32 $3,817.76 $.00 $25,747.70 $435.82 $.00 $514.94 $7,263.85 $13,162.49 $25,963.70 $1,452.76
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $800.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$13,013.85 $17,232.40 $.00 $1,054.72 $.00 $9,761.32 $3,817.76 $.00 $25,747.70 $435.82 $.00 $514.94 $7,263.85 $13,162.49 $25,963.70 $1,452.76
Full grant amount

$25,887.70 $25,747.70 $14,868.20 $15,067.70 $14,427.70 $25,687.70 $14,683.70 $16,717.70 $25,747.70 $14,527.70 $15,167.70 $25,747.70 $14,627.70 $25,687.70 $25,963.70 $14,527.70

.50 .67 .00 .07 .00 .38 .26 .00 1.00 .03 .00 .02 .50 .51 1.00 .10
Date
Equivalent award
.50 .67 .00 .07 .00 .35 .26 .00 1.00 .03 .00 .02 .50 .51 1.00 .10
N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y
2.00 3.00 .00 .00 1.00 3.00 2.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 Y Y Y Y N Y FY F FY FY FY

$2,397.07 $772.42 $25,887.70 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$2,397.07 $772.42 $25,887.70 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70
Full grant amount

$14,897.70 $25,747.70 $25,887.70 $26,781.70 $15,908.70 $25,747.70

.16 .03 1.00 .00 .00 1.00
Date
Equivalent award
.16 .03 1.00 .00 .00 1.00
$402,867.97 $402,867.97
$407,585.97 $407,585.97
17.77 17.77
17.60 17.60
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: 1/14/2013 Institution: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY City/State: AMES, IA Academic Year: Sport: Maximum Grants Permitted: First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment: First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$24,295.60 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 $14,961.70 $27,599.70 $17,489.60 $14,821.70 $26,201.70 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 $24,863.60 $26,642.70 $24,763.60 $14,527.70 $25,747.70 $26,181.70 X X X X X X X X X X X 1.00 .98 1.00 .63 .00 1.00 .00 .96 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .94
2009-10 Women's Volleyball 12.0 08/28/2009 Rev. Dist.
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
3.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 3.00 .00 .00 .00 3.00 2.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$24,295.60
Other cntbl. aid

$.00
Total cntbl. aid

$24,295.60 $25,182.85 $25,747.70 $9,498.00 $.00 $17,471.60 $.00 $25,240.00 $.00 $25,747.70 $24,763.60 $.00 $24,763.60 $.00 $25,747.70 $24,690.00
Equivalent award
1.00 .89 .83 .63 .00 1.00 .00 .96 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .79 .94
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$22,932.85 $2,250.00 $21,247.70 $4,500.00 $9,498.00 $.00 $17,471.60 $.00 $25,240.00 $.00 $25,747.70 $24,763.60 $.00 $24,763.60 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$20,247.70 $5,500.00 $24,690.00 $.00
Squad List Report Date: 1/14/2013 Institution: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY City/State: AMES, IA Academic Year: Sport: Maximum Grants Permitted: First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment: First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$14,473.60 X 1.00
2009-10 Women's Volleyball 12.0 08/28/2009 Rev. Dist.
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
2.00 2.0 Y FY

$14,473.60
Other cntbl. aid

$.00
Total cntbl. aid

$14,473.60
Equivalent award
1.00
Y Y
$255,371.95
$267,621.95
12
11.51
11.04
Contemporaneous Legislated Maximum CP Team is CP Carried Over from PREVIOUS Maximum Team Limit for CP Applicable to 2009-10 Penalties (CP) Team Limit for Sport Subject to in 2009-10 Academic Year (if any) Applicable This Academic Year Carried Over to 2010-11 (if any) (x) to Current Academic Year (z) (x - y) - z (y) (N/A in 2005-06)
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY AMES, IA E L I G F S Status of Student Financial Aid Academic Year: 2010-11 Sport: Football Maximum Grants Permitted: 85.0 First Contest of the FALL Segment: 09/02/2010 E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Ini- Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant tial all valent amount award
$19,014.08 $14,205.25 $27,542.70 $27,377.10 $15,976.70 $15,075.70 X X .06 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 X X 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 X X 1.00 1.00 .00 X 1.00
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 2.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 2.00 2.00 .00 1.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 Y N Y N Y N N Y Y N N Y Y N Y FY FY FY S FY FY FY FY F

$1,192.46 $.00 $27,542.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $594.79 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $27,707.70 $.00 $27,542.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$1,192.46 $.00 $27,542.70 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.06 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .04 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00
N N
N N
Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N N
$594.79 X $15,075.70 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $27,707.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 $14,893.10 $15,976.70 $26,641.70 $27,666.70 $15,621.10 $27,542.70
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
Y Y Y Y Y Y
$.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $.00 $15,976.70 $.00 $.00 $24,814.00 $.00 $.00 $15,976.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $15,811.10 $15,976.70 $26,983.10 $29,509.10 $27,542.70 $15,058.70 $15,976.70 X X X X X X .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .90 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 X X 1.00
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Y Y Y N Y N Y Y N N Y Y N Y Y FY F F FY FY FY FY F FY FY

$.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $.00 $15,976.70 $.00 $.00 $24,814.00 $.00 $.00 $13,320.85 $6,168.00 $.00 $.00 $16,192.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .90 .00 .00 .50 .41 .00 .00 1.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$13,320.85 X $26,641.70 $6,168.00 X $15,075.70 $.00 $.00 $16,192.70 $15,405.10 $.00 $16,192.70
Y Y
Y Y
.00
$27,542.70 $15,976.70 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 $26,269.10 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $28,061.10 $27,542.70 $15,811.10 $27,732.70 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .50 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .50
Rev. Dist.
1.50 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.50 1.50 .00 .00 .00 .00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Y N Y N Y S FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY FY

$27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 $.00 $15,075.70 $13,320.85 $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $.00 $13,961.35
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 $.00 $15,075.70 $13,320.85 $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $.00 $13,961.35
Equivalent award
1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .50 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .50
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N N N N N
Y Y Y Y N Y
$.00 $26,641.70 $.00 $13,961.35 $27,542.70 $15,976.70 $8,001.75 $26,641.70 $13,320.85 $27,542.70 $26,641.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $15,075.70 $27,732.70 $27,542.70 $15,976.70 $8,001.75 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $27,542.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $18,013.10 $15,976.70 $26,641.70 X X X X X X X X X X X X X .00 1.00 .00 .50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .50 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00
Rev. Dist.
.00 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 N Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N N Y FY FY S FY FY F FY F FY FY FY

$.00 $26,641.70 $.00 $13,961.35 $27,542.70 $15,976.70 $8,001.75 $26,641.70 $13,320.85 $27,542.70 $26,641.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.00 1.00 .00 .50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .50 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00
Y Y N N
.50 .00 .00 1.00 .00 4.00 2.00 2.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 2.00 1.00
N Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y N
Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y N
Y Y
$.00 $15,075.70 $.00 $7,988.35 $.00 $16,145.70 $26,641.70 $16,890.70 $15,075.70 $15,811.10 $14,370.85 $27,593.10 $16,145.70 $26,641.70 X X X X .00 1.00 .00 .56 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 X X 1.00 1.00 .00 X X X X X 1.00 .93 1.00 1.00
Rev. Dist.
.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 2.00 2.00 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 N Y Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $15,075.70 $.00 $7,988.35 $.00 $16,145.70 $26,641.70 $7,557.85 $26,641.70 $15,075.70 $.00 $15,291.70 $25,659.00 $27,542.70 $15,075.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.00 1.00 .00 .56 .00 1.00 1.00 .50 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .93 1.00 1.00
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
$7,557.85 X $15,115.70 $26,641.70 $15,075.70 $.00 $15,291.70 $25,659.00 $27,542.70 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $15,075.70 $14,910.10 $15,291.70 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 $15,075.70
Y Y
$15,075.70 $27,542.70 $16,500.34 $15,075.70 $7,932.35 $15,075.70 $27,542.70 $27,593.10 $27,542.70 $15,976.70 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 $27,542.70 $14,910.10 $8,072.85 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X .50 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .50 1.00 .00 1.00 .83 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 .50 2.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3.50 .00 .00 1.00 3.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 N Y N Y Y N N Y Y N Y Y Y N N F FY FY FY S S FY FY FY FY FY FY

$7,537.85 $27,542.70 $.00 $15,075.70 $7,932.35 $7,537.85 $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $13,248.00 $.00 $15,075.70 $27,542.70 $.00 $8,072.85
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$7,537.85 $27,542.70 $.00 $15,075.70 $7,932.35 $7,537.85 $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $13,248.00 $.00 $15,075.70 $27,542.70 $.00
Equivalent award
.50 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .50 1.00 .00 1.00 .83 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y N N N
$8,072.85 X
$27,542.70 $26,641.70 $15,630.70 $15,976.70 $26,641.70 $27,113.70 $26,641.70 $27,542.70 $26,641.70 $17,112.10 $26,641.70 X X X X X X X X X 1.00 .50 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .50 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 X 1.00
Rev. Dist.
3.00 4.00 .00 .00 2.00 1.00 1.00 .00 4.00 .00 2.00 3.00 4.00 .00 1.00 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Y FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY FY FY F
Other cntbl. aid
Total cntbl. aid

$27,542.70 $13,320.85 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $27,092.20 $26,641.70 $27,542.70 $13,340.85 $.00 $26,641.70
Equivalent award
.89 .50 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .50 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00
Y Y Y N
$24,542.70 $3,000.00 $13,320.85 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $27,092.20 $26,641.70 $27,542.70 $13,340.85 $.00 $26,641.70 $16,617.70 $16,145.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$16,617.70 X $15,630.70 $16,145.70 X $16,145.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $15,976.70 $27,542.70
Y Y Y Y Y Y
$.00 $.00 $27,719.70 $.00 $.00 $11,772.00 $26,641.70 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $13,961.35 $25,540.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $.00 $14,967.10 $27,377.10 $27,719.70 $15,786.70 $14,893.10 $11,772.00 $26,641.70 $27,377.10 $15,608.10 $26,641.70 $27,732.70 $27,542.70 $15,274.70 $26,641.70 $15,976.70 X X X X X X X X .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .50 .93 .00 1.00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 1.50 .00 .00 .00 3.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 N Y Y N Y N Y N N Y Y Y N Y Y FY F FY FY S FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $27,719.70 $.00 $.00 $11,772.00 $26,641.70 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $13,961.35 $25,540.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .50 .93 .00 1.00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y N
N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$15,976.70 $16,192.70 $15,075.70 $14,647.10 $26,641.70 $27,542.70 $15,785.46 $15,976.70 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 $6,503.00 $26,641.70 $15,811.10 $27,542.70 $15,075.70 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .95 1.00
Rev. Dist.
1.50 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 3.50 .50 1.00 .00 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N Y Y FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$15,976.70 $16,192.70 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $27,542.70 $.00 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 $6,503.00 $26,641.70 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$15,976.70 $16,192.70 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $27,542.70 $.00 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 $6,503.00 $26,641.70 $.00 $26,226.00 $15,075.70
Equivalent award
1.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .84 .88
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y N N N
Y Y Y Y Y N
Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y
$23,226.00 $3,000.00 $13,325.70 $1,750.00
$.00 $26,641.70 $27,542.70 $28,773.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $27,542.70 $28,773.70 $15,075.70 X X X X X .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 2.00 1.00 .00 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 N Y Y Y N FY FY FY FY

$.00 $26,641.70 $27,542.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.00 1.00 1.00 .81 .00
Y Y Y N
Y Y Y Y N Y
$23,355.70 $5,418.00 $.00 $.00
Squad-List Totals
$1,929,806.95
$1,864,898.36
25
85
78.39
82.96
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$26,641.70 $28,376.70 $27,542.70 $27,707.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $27,732.70 $15,075.70 $16,500.34 $27,542.70 $15,075.70 $14,703.10 $13,320.85 $27,542.70 $21,322.60 X X X X X X X X X X X 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 .00 3.00 .00 2.50 .50 .00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 4.00 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y N Y Y Y Y F FY FY FY S FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$26,624.70 $28,376.70 $27,542.70 $27,707.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $27,732.70 $.00 $.00 $27,542.70 $.00 $.00 $13,320.85 $27,542.70 $21,322.60
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$26,624.70 $28,376.70 $27,542.70 $27,707.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $27,732.70 $.00 $.00 $27,542.70 $.00 $.00 $13,320.85 $27,542.70 $21,322.60
Equivalent award
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 * *
Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$26,641.70 $26,831.70 X X 1.00 1.00
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
2.00 1.00 2.0 0.0 Y Y FY FY

$26,641.70 $26,831.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$26,641.70 $26,831.70
Equivalent award
1.00 1.00
N N
N N
$334,470.15
$334,470.15
13
13.00
13.00
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA E L I G F S Status of Student Financial Aid Academic Year: Sport: Maximum Grants Permitted: First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$15,075.70 $26,840.70 $26,624.70 $27,707.70 $20,676.10 $16,154.85 $26,831.70 $27,174.10 $26,624.70 $15,608.10 $26,641.70 $26,246.10 $26,624.70 $26,732.70 $27,707.70 $17,112.10 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
2010-11 Men's Cross Country 5.0 09/03/2010 Rev. Dist.
2.00 .00 .00 3.50 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 4.00 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$28,773.70 $25,257.35 $15,075.70 $21,322.60 $18,824.10 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 $28,773.70 $26,485.10 $15,126.10 $26,624.70 $.00 $26,485.10 $26,641.70 $26,840.70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
2.00 .00 .00 4.00 .00 .00 .00 2.50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
$.00 $324,500.94
$.00 $327,219.62
.00 12.30
.00 12.19
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: Sport: Maximum Grants Permitted: First Contest of the Segment: First Contest of the Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$27,707.70 $28,608.10 $27,707.70 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $15,075.70 X $26,641.70 $16,654.70 $26,641.70 $16,634.70 $15,075.70 .60 .01 .50 .80 .00 1.00 .00 .02 .60 .35 .60
2010-11 Men's Golf 4.5 02/05/2011 09/11/2010 Rev. Dist.
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 3.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$16,624.62 $400.00 $13,853.84 $12,060.56 $.00 $15,075.70 $3,663.46 $400.00 $15,985.02 $5,822.14 $9,045.42
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$16,624.62 $400.00 $13,853.84 $12,060.56 $.00 $15,075.70 $3,663.46 $400.00 $15,985.02 $5,822.14 $9,045.42
Equivalent award
.60 .01 .50 .80 .00 1.00 .14 .02 .60 .35 .60
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$92,930.76
$89,267.30
4.48
4.62
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: 1/14/2013 Institution: I O WA S T AT E UNIVERSITY City/State: AMES, IA Name/I.D. No. E L I G F S E X E M Term 1st # yrs # of Recr. Period Athletic Other Total P enrolled rec'd seas of grant cntbl. cntbl. T A n y aid util award amount aid aid Your $.00 $.00 Status of Student Financial Aid Academic Year: 2010-11 Sport: Men's Track and Field (P and P only) (nonNCAA sport) Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.6 Countable Players Change in Status
Full grant amount
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$26,641.70 $15,075.70 $14,893.10 $26,840.70 $14,798.10 $26,624.70 $27,707.70 $27,871.10 $20,676.10 $16,154.85 $26,831.70 $14,863.10 $15,075.70 $27,174.10 $26,641.70 $26,624.70 $15,608.10 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 2.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3.50 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 3.00 .00 .00 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$26,641.70 $26,246.10 $14,893.10 $26,641.70 $15,100.10 $27,189.20 $26,624.70 $26,831.70 $15,075.70 $16,535.10 $15,075.70 $26,732.70 $26,641.70 $15,109.10 $26,831.70 $18,976.60 $27,707.70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 .00 3.00 2.00 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY S FY FY FY S FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N N
Y Y N N
Y Y N N
Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y
$26,134.10 $17,112.10 $15,976.70 $28,773.70 $25,257.35 $14,893.10 $15,075.70 $26,831.70 $15,075.70 $21,322.60 $18,824.10 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $15,274.70 $26,507.10 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 .00 .00 1.00 2.00 .00 4.00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 Y Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$15,075.70 $26,641.70 $.00 $15,075.70 $14,893.10 $15,630.70 $28,773.70 $26,485.10 $14,919.10 $15,126.10 $26,624.70 $.00 $27,491.70 $26,485.10 $16,047.70 $27,194.70 $26,641.70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 2.00 .00 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y
3.00 .00 1.00 3.50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 4.00 2.00 .00
$26,840.70 $26,641.70 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 1.00 0.0 2.0 N Y FY

$.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00
Y Y Y Y
$.00 $324,500.94
$.00 $327,219.62
.00 12.30
.00 12.19
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: 1/14/2013 Institution: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY City/State: AMES, IA Academic Year: Sport: Maximum Grants Permitted: First Contest of the $segment.segmentType Segment: First Contest of the Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$26,641.70 $15,075.70 $14,893.10 $26,840.70 $14,798.10 $26,624.70 $27,707.70 $27,871.10 $20,676.10 $16,154.85 $26,831.70 $14,863.10 $15,075.70 $27,174.10 $26,641.70 $26,624.70 .00 .10 .00 .39 .00 .43 1.00 .00 .00 .03 1.00 .00 .03 .00 .00 .27
2010-11 Men's Track, Outdoor 12.6 12/10/2010 01/21/2011 Rev. Dist.
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 2.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3.50 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 3.00 .00 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $1,507.56 $.00 $10,467.86 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $1,507.56 $.00 $10,467.86 $.00 $11,448.62 $27,611.70 $.00 $.00 $414.29 $26,831.70 $.00 $400.00 $.00 $.00 $7,139.43
Equivalent award
.00 .10 .00 .39 .00 .26 1.00 .00 .00 .03 1.00 .00 .03 .00 .00 .27
$6,948.62 $4,500.00 $27,611.70 $.00 $.00 $414.29 $26,831.70 $.00 $400.00 $.00 $.00 $7,139.43 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$15,608.10 $26,641.70 $26,246.10 $14,893.10 $26,641.70 $15,100.10 $27,189.20 $26,624.70 $26,831.70 $15,075.70 $16,535.10 $15,075.70 $26,732.70 $26,641.70 $15,109.10 $26,831.70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .20 .00 .00 .25 .25 .00 .00 .00 .25 .00 .00 .50
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY S FY S FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $5,328.34 $.00 $.00 $6,656.16 $6,755.42 $.00 $.00 $.00 $6,433.16 $2,131.32 $.00 $13,510.85
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $250.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $5,328.34 $.00 $.00 $6,656.16 $6,755.42 $.00 $.00 $.00 $6,683.16
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .20 .00 .00 .25 .25 .00 .00 .00 .24 .08 .00 .50
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N N
Y Y N N
Y Y N N
$2,131.32 X $.00 $13,510.85
Y Y N Y
$18,976.60 $27,707.70 $26,134.10 $17,112.10 $15,976.70 $28,773.70 $25,257.35 $14,893.10 $15,075.70 $26,831.70 $15,075.70 $21,322.60 $18,824.10 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $15,274.70 .45 1.00 .00 .02 .05 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .50 .00 .05 .00 .00 .10 .05
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
3.00 2.00 .00 4.00 1.00 2.00 .00 .00 1.00 2.00 .00 4.00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 3.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$8,586.21 $27,707.70 $.00 $400.00 $798.82 $28,773.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $13,415.84 $.00 $920.12 $.00 $.00 $2,664.16 $758.32
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $100.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$8,586.21 $27,707.70 $.00 $400.00 $798.82 $28,773.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $13,415.84 $.00 $1,020.12 $.00 $.00 $2,664.16 $758.32
Equivalent award
.45 1.00 .00 .02 .05 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .50 .00 .04 .00 .00 .10 .05
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$26,507.10 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $15,075.70 $14,893.10 $15,630.70 $28,773.70 $26,485.10 $14,919.10 $15,126.10 $26,624.70 $.00 $27,491.70 $26,485.10 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .03 .00 .08 .94 .00 .00 .00 .56 .00 .75 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 .00 1.00 .00 2.00 3.00 .00 1.00 3.50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $400.00 $.00 $1,250.44 $26,935.64 $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,898.42 $.00 $20,618.76 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $400.00 $.00 $1,250.44 $26,935.64 $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,898.42 $.00 $20,618.76 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .03 .00 .08 .94 .00 .00 .00 .56 .00 .75 .00
Y Y Y Y N Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$16,047.70 $27,194.70 $26,641.70 $26,840.70 $26,641.70 .02 1.00 .00 .00 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
4.00 2.00 .00 .00 1.00 3.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 Y Y Y N Y FY FY FY

$400.00 $27,194.70 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$400.00 $27,194.70 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.02 1.00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$324,500.94 $324,500.94
$327,219.62 $327,219.62
12.30 12.30
12.19 12.19
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$.00 $27,707.70 $14,703.10 $25,628.35 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $15,265.70 $15,183.70 $26,641.70 $15,075.70 $26,831.70 $25,914.70 $26,666.10 $26,666.10 $26,831.70 $15,075.70 .00 .65 .00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .36 .53 1.00 .55 .25 .00 .00 .15 .20
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 4.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 2.00 .00 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 N Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY

$.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $18,010.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $.00 $15,265.70 $5,535.02 $14,108.00 $15,075.70 $14,785.93 $6,478.67 $.00 $.00 $4,053.25 $3,015.14
Equivalent award
.00 .60 .00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .36 .53 1.00 .55 .25 .00 .00 .15 .20
N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
$16,510.00 $1,500.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $.00 $15,265.70 $5,535.02 $14,108.00 $15,075.70 $14,785.93 $6,478.67 $.00 $.00 $4,053.25 $3,015.14 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
Y Y
$15,536.35 $.00 $25,710.35 $15,075.70 $15,621.10 $19,074.60 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 $27,707.70 $15,316.10 $15,291.70 $26,641.70 .00 .00 .00 .50 .00 1.00 .15 .00 .15 .20 .00 .46 .16 .00 .03 .85
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3.00 2.00 .00 .00 3.00 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 N N N Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $7,537.84 $.00 $19,074.60 $2,261.34 $.00 $2,261.34 $3,015.14 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $7,537.84 $.00 $19,074.60 $2,261.34 $.00 $2,261.34 $3,015.14 $.00 $6,992.26 $4,381.60 $.00 $400.00 $22,645.44
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .50 .00 1.00 .15 .00 .15 .20 .00 .40 .16 .00 .03 .85
Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
$5,992.26 $1,000.00 $4,381.60 $.00 $400.00 $22,645.44 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y
$15,075.70 $15,607.10 .45 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
1.00 .00 0.0 0.0 Y Y FY FY

$6,774.42 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$6,774.42 $.00
Equivalent award
.45 .00
Y Y Y Y
$195,813.09
$198,313.09
9.64
9.53
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY AMES, IA E L I G F S Status of Student Financial Aid Academic Year: 2010-11 Sport: W o m e n ' s Basketball Maximum Grants Permitted: 15.0 First Contest of the REGULAR (no QRMTE) Segment: 11/04/2010 E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$16,147.70 $14,234.85 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 $15,957.70 $26,641.70 $14,703.10 $26,641.70 $.00 $27,523.70 $15,075.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 X X X X X X .55 1.00 .00 .00 .71 1.00 .00 .50 .00 .93 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 .00 2.00 .00 2.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 0.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y N N Y Y N Y N Y N N N N N FY F FY FY FY FY

$7,998.00 $14,234.85 $.00 $.00 $11,298.00 $26,641.70 $.00 $13,320.85 $.00 $25,712.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$900.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$8,898.00 $14,234.85 $.00 $.00 $11,298.00 $26,641.70 $.00 $13,320.85 $.00 $25,712.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.50 1.00 .00 .00 .71 1.00 .00 .50 .00 .93 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y N N N N
Y Y Y Y N Y N N N N
Y Y N N N N N N N N N N
$.00 $26,831.70 $.00 $15,957.70 $27,523.70 $27,523.70 $.00 $15,075.70 $15,957.70 X X X X X .00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .91 .00 .00 1.00
Rev. Dist.
.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 N Y N Y Y Y N N Y FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $26,831.70 $.00 $15,957.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $26,831.70 $.00 $15,957.70 $27,523.70 $25,149.85 $.00 $.00 $15,957.70
Equivalent award
.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .73 .91 .00 .00 1.00
Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N N
$20,023.70 $7,500.00 $25,149.85 $.00 $.00 $15,957.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y
Squad-List Totals
$203,126.05
$211,526.05
11
9.60
9.28
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2010-11 Sport: Wo m e n ' s Country Maximum Grants Permitted: 6.0 First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: 09/03/2010 Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$26,434.70 $15,058.70 $27,475.70 $15,058.70 $26,857.70 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $26,840.70 $26,939.70 $26,459.10 $25,367.70 $26,641.70 $15,058.70 $15,075.70 $25,829.85 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Cross
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 2.00 3.00 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2010-11 Sport: Wo m e n ' s Country Maximum Grants Permitted: 6.0 First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: 09/03/2010 Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$15,976.70 $27,047.70 $14,868.70 $17,112.10 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $14,893.10 $28,773.70 $26,641.70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Cross
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 2.00 .00 .00 1.50 2.00 .00 2.00 1.00 0.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 N Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
Y Y Y N
$.00 $412,086.34
$.00 $420,586.34
.00 17.96
.00 17.64
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: Sport: Maximum Grants Permitted: First Contest of the Segment: First Contest of the ALL Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$15,405.10 $27,707.70 $15,976.70 $27,136.70 $24,935.70 $17,277.70 $27,542.70 $27,377.10 $25,829.85 $15,976.70 $27,136.70 .00 1.00 .00 .50 1.00 .99 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .50
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 3.00 1.50 .00 .00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.50 1.00 .00 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $27,707.70 $.00 $13,568.34 $24,935.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $27,707.70 $.00 $13,568.34 $24,935.70 $17,164.00 $27,542.70 $.00 $25,829.85 $.00 $13,568.34
Equivalent award
.00 1.00 .00 .50 1.00 .92 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .50
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
$15,914.00 $1,250.00 $27,542.70 $.00 $25,829.85 $.00 $13,568.34 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y
$149,066.63
$150,316.63
5.99
5.92
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: 2010-11 Sport: W o m e n ' s Gymnastics Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.0 First Contest of the Segment: First Contest of the $segment.segmentType Segment: 01/07/2011 Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$15,075.70 .00 .00 X .76 .00 X X X X X X X X X .98 1.00 .77 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .91 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 3.00 .00 3.00 .00 .00 .00 4.00 2.00 .00 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY F FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $13,556.85 $20,376.00 $27,113.70 $25,976.00 $27,707.70 $20,580.00 $23,618.85 $29,803.70 $29,993.70 $29,993.70 $25,177.70 $24,276.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00
Equivalent award
.00 .51 .76 1.00 .98 1.00 .77 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .91 .00
Y Y N N
$13,556.85 X $26,641.70 $20,376.00 $26,641.70
Y Y N N
$27,113.70 X $26,641.70 $25,976.00 $27,707.70 $20,580.00 $23,618.85 $29,803.70 $29,993.70 $29,993.70 $25,177.70 $24,276.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $27,707.70 $26,641.70 $23,618.85 $29,803.70 $29,993.70 $29,993.70 $25,177.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: 2010-11 Sport: W o m e n ' s Gymnastics Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.0 First Contest of the Segment: First Contest of the $segment.segmentType Segment: 01/07/2011 Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$29,803.70 $29,803.70 $26,434.70 X X 1.00 .89 .00 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 .00 4.00 0.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 Y Y Y Y FY FY FY F

$29,803.70 $26,448.00 $.00 $5,317.75
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$29,803.70 $26,448.00 $.00
Equivalent award
1.00 .89 .00 .19
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$5,317.75 X $27,707.70
$359,743.35
$313,755.05
12
11.31
13.01
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$26,641.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $27,707.70 $26,641.70 $16,119.10 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $26,213.85 $26,624.70 $26,624.70 $26,641.70 $26,624.70 $14,893.10 .75 1.00 .00 .35 .70 .00 .80 .00 .00 .15 .00 .95 1.00 .50 .75 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
1.00 3.00 4.00 2.00 1.00 .00 3.00 .00 4.00 .00 4.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 1.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y FY S FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
Other cntbl. aid
Total cntbl. aid

$19,981.27 $26,641.70
Equivalent award
.64 .72 .82 .35 .70 .00 .80 .00 .76 .15 .95 .95 1.00 .29 .75 .00
$16,981.27 $3,000.00 $19,141.70 $7,500.00 $21,742.39 $9,697.68 $18,649.18 $.00 $12,060.55 $.00 $20,247.68 $3,996.25 $24,874.00 $25,276.00 $26,624.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y N N
$21,742.39 X $9,697.68 $18,649.18 $.00 $12,060.55 $.00 $20,247.68 X $3,996.25 $24,874.00 X $25,276.00 $26,624.00 $13,320.84 $19,968.52 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y N
Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
$7,820.84 $5,500.00 $19,968.52 $.00 $.00 $.00
$15,075.70 $14,703.10 $26,624.70 $16,101.10 $26,624.70 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $17,046.70 $15,075.70 $26,434.70 $26,641.70 $26,675.10 $26,641.70 $26,624.70 $26,624.70 $15,075.70 1.00 .00 .40 .00 .50 .00 .65 .32 .80 .85 .00 .00 .00 .20 .55 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
2.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 .00 4.00 .00 4.00 .00 .00 4.00 2.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 Y Y N N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$15,075.70 $.00 $10,649.88 $.00 $13,312.34 $7,537.84
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$15,075.70 $.00 $10,649.88 $.00 $13,312.34
Equivalent award
1.00 .00 .40 .00 .50 .50 .59 .32 .80 .85 .80 .00 .50 .20 .55 .98
Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y N N
$7,537.84 X $17,317.10 $5,454.93 $12,060.56 $22,469.48 $21,313.36 X $.00 $13,320.84 X $5,324.94 $14,615.08 $14,749.85 X
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$15,817.10 $1,500.00 $5,454.93 $12,060.56 $22,469.48 $21,313.36 $.00 $13,320.84 $5,324.94 $14,615.08 $14,749.85 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y N N
$15,075.70 $26,624.70 $15,075.70 $26,624.70 $26,459.10 $26,526.70 .00 .25 .00 .93 .00 .60
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 N Y N Y N Y FY FY FY

$.00 $6,637.17 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $6,637.17 $.00 $24,880.00 $.00 $15,916.02
Equivalent award
.00 .25 .00 .88 .00 .43
Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y
$23,380.00 $1,500.00 $.00 $.00
$11,416.02 $4,500.00
Squad-List Totals
$440,215.15
$339,929.19
14.00
18.43
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: Sport: Maximum Grants Permitted: First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment: First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$27,542.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $26,459.10 $28,200.70 $15,109.10 $14,893.10 $28,200.70 $16,279.10 $15,075.70 $15,610.70 $17,749.70 $28,200.70 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .50 .00 .00 .66 .03 .00 .52 .97 1.00 .00 .00 .72
2010-11 Softball 12.0 02/11/2011 Rev. Dist.
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 3.00 4.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 .00 4.00 2.00 2.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 2.0 N Y Y Y Y N N Y Y N Y Y Y N Y Y F FY F/S FY FY FY FY F FY F FY FY

$.00 $26,641.70 $7,992.51 $.00 $14,100.34 $.00 $.00 $18,412.46 $.00 $.00 $8,072.85
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $200.00 $500.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $26,641.70
Equivalent award
.00 1.00 .30 .00 .50 .00 .00 .65 .00 .00 .52 .89 .89 .00 .33 .72
Y Y N N
$7,992.51 X $.00 $14,100.34 $.00 $.00 $18,612.46 $500.00 $.00 $8,072.85 $17,164.00 $28,200.70 $.00 $8,791.76 X $19,182.02
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$15,727.00 $1,437.00 $25,200.70 $3,000.00 $.00 $8,791.76 $19,182.02 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: Sport: Maximum Grants Permitted: First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment: First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$15,075.70 $15,405.10 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $28,200.70 $26,641.70 $26,459.10 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $26,675.10 .99 .00 1.00 .95 .83 .94 .00 1.00 .87 .00
2010-11 Softball 12.0 02/11/2011 Rev. Dist.
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
1.00 .00 2.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 2.00 3.00 .00 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y N FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$14,936.25 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$14,936.25 $.00 $26,641.70 $25,320.85 $23,276.00 $24,958.85 $.00 $26,641.70 $23,276.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.99 .00 .72 .95 .83 .78 .00 1.00 .87 .00
$19,141.70 $7,500.00 $25,320.85 $23,276.00 $.00 $.00
$20,708.85 $4,250.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $23,276.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y N
Squad-List Totals
$297,422.69
$297,525.42
11.98
11.94
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$15,075.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $28,773.70 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $14,868.70 $26,641.70 $28,773.70 $27,707.70 $26,666.10 $14,916.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 .00 .50 .15 .40 .00 .30 .00 .13 .65 .25 .50 .00 .07 .60 .68 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
1.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 2.00 4.00 .00 .50 2.00 3.00 .00 .00 2.00 3.00 4.00 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 N Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY F FY F FY FY FY FY

$400.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.03 .44 .15 .40 .31 .09 .53 .13 .65 .17 .50 .00 .07 .60 .68 .51
$400.00 X $13,320.84 $3,996.24 $11,509.48 $4,640.25 X $7,992.50 $14,089.85 X $1,909.00 $17,317.10 $7,193.42 $13,853.84 $.00 $1,044.16 $15,985.02 $18,116.35 $13,556.85 X
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$11,820.84 $1,500.00 $3,996.24 $11,509.48 $4,640.25 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y N N
$2,492.50 $5,500.00 $14,089.85 $1,909.00 $17,317.10 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
$4,775.42 $2,418.00 $13,853.84 $.00 $1,044.16 $15,985.02 $18,116.35 $13,556.85 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$15,106.70 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $15,075.70 $26,672.70 $27,518.10 $26,723.10 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $26,482.70 $26,672.70 $26,857.70 $27,707.70 $28,773.70 .50 1.00 .20 .00 .30 .19 .00 .00 .30 .45 1.00 .45 .75 .90 .60 .69
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 1.00 .00 1.00 3.00 .00 2.00 .00 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 .00 1.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$7,534.35 $15,075.70 $3,015.14 $.00 $4,522.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$7,534.35 $15,075.70 $3,015.14 $.00 $4,522.70 $5,033.95
Equivalent award
.50 1.00 .20 .00 .30 .02 .25 .00 .30 .45 .94 .45 .75 .64 .60 .69
$533.95 $4,500.00 $6,920.92 $.00 $4,522.70 $6,784.06 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$6,920.92 X $.00 $4,522.70 $6,784.06 $26,641.70 $11,917.21 $20,004.52 $24,074.72 $16,624.62 $19,985.11
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$25,141.70 $1,500.00 $11,917.21 $20,004.52 $.00 $.00
$17,074.72 $7,000.00 $16,624.62 $19,985.11 $.00 $.00
$26,672.70 $26,641.70 $14,860.70 $26,857.70 $17,112.10 .40 .75 .65 .30 .30
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 3.00 .00 .00 2.00 0.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 Y Y Y N N FY FY FY FY FY

$10,669.08
Other cntbl. aid

$.00
Total cntbl. aid

$10,669.08 $19,981.26 $9,679.05 $7,954.77 $5,183.30
Equivalent award
.40 .58 .58 .30 .25
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$15,481.26 $4,500.00 $8,679.05 $1,000.00 $7,954.77 $4,246.30 $.00 $937.00
Squad-List Totals
$342,194.76
$331,441.89
13.96
14.46
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2010-11 Sport: W o m e n ' s Tennis Maximum Grants Permitted: 8.0 First Contest of the Segment: 01/21/2011 First Contest of the Segment: 09/10/2010 Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$27,352.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $26,857.70 $26,434.70 $27,707.70 $14,888.70 X X X X X X X 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .96 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 X 1.00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.50 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 .00 2.00 .00 4.00 .00 .00 .00 3.00 1.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$27,352.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $25,518.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$27,352.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 $25,518.00 $26,857.70 $.00 $27,707.70 $.00
Equivalent award
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .96 .74 .00 1.00 .00 .51 .00 .00 .00 1.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$19,857.70 $7,000.00 $.00 $27,707.70 $.00 $13,556.85 $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$13,556.85 X $26,641.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,946.70 $26,946.70 $27,136.70 $26,641.70
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Squad-List Totals
$220,559.75
$214,002.90
7.96
8.21
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List R e p o r t 1/14/2013 Date: Institution: I O WA S T AT E UNIVERSITY City/State: AMES, IA Name/I.D. No. E L I G F S E X E M Term 1st # yrs # of Recr. Period Athletic Other Total P enrolled rec'd seas of grant cntbl. cntbl. T A n y aid util award amount aid aid Your $.00 $.00 Status of Student Financial Aid Academic Year: 2010-11 Sport: Women's Track and Field (P and P only) (nonNCAA sport) Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.6 Countable Players Change in Status
Full grant amount
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2010-11 Sport: Wo m e n ' s Indoor Maximum Grants Permitted: 18.0 Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$26,624.70 $15,607.10 $26,675.10 $15,075.70 $26,434.70 $15,058.70 $27,475.70 $27,491.70 $27,491.70 $28,266.70 $15,058.70 $15,075.70 $14,868.70 $15,058.70 $15,075.70 $15,058.70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Tr a c k ,
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 2.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 4.00 .00 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
N Y
N N
$26,857.70 $27,542.70 $26,459.10 $28,773.70 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $26,840.70 $15,058.70 $27,542.70 $15,075.70 $26,624.70 $15,075.70 $26,939.70 $26,459.10 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Tr a c k ,
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
1.00 2.00 .00 2.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 .00 .00 1.00 1.50 .00 2.00 .00 .00 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y N
$25,367.70 $26,650.70 $26,732.70 $26,641.70 $15,058.70 $15,075.70 $14,474.85 $26,641.70 $25,829.85 $15,976.70 $27,047.70 $14,868.70 $26,529.70 $17,112.10 $26,641.70 $15,058.70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Tr a c k ,
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 2.00 .00 4.00 3.00 .00 2.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.50 .00 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y N Y Y Y N Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$26,641.70 $14,893.10 $26,641.70 $28,773.70 $26,641.70 $22,386.00 $26,459.10 $15,570.70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Tr a c k ,
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
2.00 .00 1.00 2.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *
Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y N N N
Y Y Y Y
$.00 $412,086.34
$.00 $420,586.34
.00 17.96
.00 17.64
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: 2010-11 Sport: Wo m e n ' s Outdoor Maximum Grants Permitted: 18.0 First Contest of the $segment.segmentType Segment: 12/10/2010 First Contest of the Segment: 01/21/2011 Status of Student Financial Aid E X E M P T Countable Players Change in Status Rev. Dist. Tr a c k ,
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 2.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$3,083.69 $.00 $.00 $3,768.92 $.00 $1,505.86 $.00 $13,745.84 $21,993.36 $19,504.02 $10,541.08 $.00 $1,486.86 $1,505.86
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$3,083.69 $.00 $.00 $3,768.92 $.00 $1,505.86 $.00 $13,745.84 $21,993.36 $19,504.02 $10,541.08 $.00 $1,486.86 $1,505.86
Full grant amount

$26,624.70 $15,607.10 $26,675.10 $15,075.70 $26,434.70 $15,058.70 $27,475.70 $27,491.70 $27,491.70 $28,266.70 $15,058.70 $15,075.70 $14,868.70 $15,058.70

.12 .00 .00 .25 .00 .10 .00 .50 .80 .69 .70 .00 .10 .10
Date
Equivalent award
.12 .00 .00 .25 .00 .10 .00 .50 .80 .69 .70 .00 .10 .10
N Y
N N
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
4.00 .00 1.00 2.00 .00 2.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 .00 .00 2.00 1.50 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$5,039.83 $903.52
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$5,039.83 $903.52 $17,994.64 $.00 $.00 $8,689.70 $8,593.14 $26,641.70 $10,251.46 $2,664.16 $6,710.16 $.00 $16,525.62 $.00
Full grant amount

$15,075.70 $15,058.70 $26,857.70 $27,542.70 $26,459.10 $28,773.70 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $15,075.70 $26,641.70 $26,840.70 $15,058.70 $27,542.70 $15,075.70

.33 .06 .67 .00 .00 .30 .57 1.00 .68 .10 .25 .00 .60 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.33 .06 .41 .00 .00 .30 .57 1.00 .68 .10 .19 .00 .60 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
$10,994.64 $7,000.00 $.00 $.00 $8,689.70 $8,593.14 $26,641.70 $10,251.46 $2,664.16 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$5,210.16 $1,500.00 $.00 $16,525.62 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 2.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 2.00 .00 4.00 3.00 .00 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y N FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$6,656.16 $10,628.36 $26,939.70 $.00 $25,367.70 $.00 $5,346.54 $14,789.96 $3,764.66 $8,970.04 $8,684.91 $5,328.34 $10,656.68 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$6,656.16 $10,628.36 $26,939.70 $.00 $25,367.70 $.00 $5,346.54 $14,789.96 $3,764.66 $8,970.04 $8,684.91 $5,328.34 $10,656.68 $.00
Full grant amount

$26,624.70 $15,075.70 $26,939.70 $26,459.10 $25,367.70 $26,650.70 $26,732.70 $26,641.70 $15,058.70 $15,075.70 $14,474.85 $26,641.70 $25,829.85 $15,976.70

.25 .70 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .20 .56 .25 .59 .60 .20 .41 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.25 .70 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .20 .56 .25 .59 .60 .20 .41 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
2.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.50 .00 2.00 .00 1.00 2.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 2.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY FY

$27,047.70 $3,717.16 $10,081.28 $.00 $26,641.70 $1,505.86 $.00 $.00 $2,131.32 $27,858.00 $13,320.85 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$27,047.70 $3,717.16 $10,081.28 $.00 $26,641.70 $1,505.86 $.00 $.00 $2,131.32 $27,858.00 $13,320.85 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$27,047.70 $14,868.70 $26,529.70 $17,112.10 $26,641.70 $15,058.70 $26,641.70 $14,893.10 $26,641.70 $28,773.70 $26,641.70 $22,386.00 $26,459.10 $15,570.70

1.00 .25 .38 .00 1.00 .10 .00 .00 .08 .97 .50 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
1.00 .25 .38 .00 1.00 .10 .00 .00 .08 .97 .50 .00 .00 .00 *
Y Y Y Y Y N
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y N N N
Y Y Y Y
Squad-List Totals
$412,086.34
$420,586.34
17.96
17.64
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Other cntbl. aid
Full grant amount
Equi- Reason valent award 17.96
Date
Totals for Cross Country/Indoor Track/Outdoor Track: * = Student-athlete's aid counts in another sport + = Student-athlete has been over-awarded > = Team limit exceeded
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: 2010-11 Sport: W o m e n ' s Volleyball Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.0 First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: 09/03/2010 First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$15,570.70 $.00 X .58 .00 .00 X X .92 1.00 .00 .00 X X X X X .92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 X .89
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 4.50 2.00 2.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 3.00 .00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
Other cntbl. aid
Total cntbl. aid

$9,015.35 $.00
Equivalent award
.49 .00 .26 .92 .83 1.00 .00 .92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .89
Y Y N Y N N
$7,690.35 $1,325.00 $.00 $4,728.75 $25,558.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$4,728.75 X $18,049.60 $25,558.00 $26,641.70 $27,707.70 $26,641.70
Y Y Y Y Y N
$22,141.70 $4,500.00 $15,075.70 $.00 $24,558.00 $27,707.70 $26,641.70 $26,946.70 $26,641.70 $.00 $23,792.85 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$15,075.70 X $15,075.70 $.00 $24,558.00 $27,707.70 $26,641.70 $26,946.70 $26,641.70 $.00 $23,792.85 $14,868.70 $26,681.70 $27,707.70 $26,641.70 $26,946.70 $26,641.70 $15,075.70 $26,641.70
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: 2010-11 Sport: W o m e n ' s Volleyball Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.0 First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: 09/03/2010 First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$26,641.70 X .86 .00 X 1.00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
1.00 3.00 .00 1.0 3.0 0.0 Y Y Y FY FY FY

$23,018.00 $15,547.70 $15,570.70
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$23,018.00
Equivalent award
.86 1.00 1.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y
$15,547.70 X $15,075.70 $15,570.70 $15,570.70
Squad-List Totals
$285,619.55
$256,092.40
11
10.17
12.17
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY AMES, IA E L I G F S Status of Student Financial Aid Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: Football Maximum Grants Permitted: 85.0 First Contest of the FALL Segment: E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Ini- Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant tial all valent amount award
$27,919.65 $29,068.65 $15,506.60 $28,474.65 $27,919.65 $29,221.65 $25,620.10 $28,023.00 $15,507.35 $16,602.65 $28,023.00 $15,758.00 $25,340.00 $20,336.05 $16,844.60 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .89 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .96 .92 .74 .00
Rev. Dist.
2.00 .00 .00 .00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 .00 2.00 .00 .00 3.00 .00 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y N Y Y Y N FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$27,919.65 $29,068.65 $.00 $28,474.65 $27,919.65 $25,926.80 $25,620.10 $.00 $.00 $16,602.65 $.00 $15,140.80 $23,407.45 $14,950.17 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$27,919.65 $29,068.65 $.00 $28,474.65 $27,919.65 $25,926.80 $25,620.10 $.00 $.00 $16,602.65 $.00 $15,140.80 $23,407.45 $14,950.17 $.00
Equivalent award
1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .89 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .96 .92 .74 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N N
Y Y Y N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$15,697.65 $28,669.60 $15,507.35 $28,564.60 $23,304.00 $27,802.65 $15,507.35 $15,506.60 $15,581.60 $15,913.65 $28,980.85 $19,109.60 $28,624.65 $27,619.65 $17,236.65 X X X X X X X X 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .98 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .98 .00 1.00 1.00 .00
Rev. Dist.
1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.50 .00 .00 1.00 2.50 .00 1.00 1.00 2.50 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 Y N N Y Y Y N N N Y Y N Y Y N FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$15,697.65 $.00 $.00 $28,474.65 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$15,697.65 $.00 $.00 $28,474.65 $.00 $27,185.45 $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,913.65 $28,363.65 $.00 $28,624.65 $27,619.65 $.00
Equivalent award
1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .82 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .98 .00 1.00 1.00 .00
Y Y N Y Y N
Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$22,685.45 $4,500.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,913.65 $28,363.65 $.00 $28,624.65 $27,619.65 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$.00 $27,619.65 $16,526.65 $.00 $27,919.65 $.00 $26,594.65 $19,598.75 $.00 $28,022.15 $28,163.65 $27,907.45 $27,919.65 $13,939.85 $15,697.65 $16,692.60 $27,619.65 $16,526.65 $16,479.05 $27,919.65 $15,075.70 $27,794.65 $28,474.65 $15,772.65 $28,186.85 $28,163.65 $28,474.65 $27,919.65 $27,769.65 $15,697.65 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .96 .69 .00 .99 1.00 .98 1.00 .50 1.00
Rev. Dist.
2.00 1.00 3.00 .00 3.00 1.50 2.50 1.00 .00 .50 1.50 .00 .50 2.00 1.00 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $27,619.65 $16,526.65 $.00 $27,919.65 $.00 $26,594.65
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .96 .60 .00 .99 1.00 .87 1.00 .50 1.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
Y Y Y Y Y N
$17,093.75 $2,505.00 $.00 $28,022.15 $28,163.65 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$24,907.45 $3,000.00 $27,919.65 $13,939.85 $15,697.65 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y
$.00 $28,250.65 $27,569.65 $.00 $27,844.65 $17,369.65 $.00 $15,913.65 $.00 $27,919.65 $17,150.75 $28,474.65 $12,513.85 $16,602.65 $15,953.65 $15,722.60 $28,250.65 $27,569.65 $16,189.00 $27,844.65 $17,369.65 $16,882.60 $15,913.65 $22,086.00 $27,919.65 $17,170.65 $28,564.60 $26,343.65 $16,602.65 $16,364.85 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .48 1.00 .97
Rev. Dist.
.00 3.00 1.00 .00 2.00 2.00 .00 1.00 .00 3.00 .00 .00 4.00 .00 2.00 0.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 N Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $28,250.65 $27,569.65 $.00 $27,844.65 $17,369.65 $.00 $15,913.65 $.00 $27,919.65 $17,150.75
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .84 .48 1.00 .97
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
$23,974.65 $4,500.00 $12,513.85 $16,602.65 $15,953.65 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y
$.00 $17,454.80 $27,569.65 $27,857.45 $27,919.65 $16,097.65 $14,192.35 $.00 $15,747.65 $.00 $15,697.65 $.00 $28,474.65 $8,536.30 $16,558.70 $16,882.60 $18,072.00 $27,569.65 $28,474.65 $27,919.65 $16,364.85 $28,564.60 $15,712.65 $15,747.65 $28,564.60 $15,697.65 $28,564.60 $28,564.60 $17,072.60 $16,602.65 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X .00 .97 1.00 .98 1.00 .98 .50 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .50 1.00
Rev. Dist.
.00 2.00 1.00 .00 3.00 3.00 1.00 .00 3.00 .00 .50 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N FY FY FY S FY FY FY FY FY FY FY F

$.00 $17,454.80
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.00 .97 .69 .71 1.00 .98 .50 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .50 1.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
$19,069.65 $8,500.00 $20,357.45 $7,500.00 $27,919.65 $16,097.65 $14,192.35 $.00 $15,747.65 $.00 $15,697.65 $.00 $28,474.65 $8,536.30 $16,558.70 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$.00 $.00 $.00 $14,472.30 $28,564.60 $15,507.35 $15,847.70 $28,664.65 X X .00 .00 .00 .50 .00 X X X X X .98 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 X X .99 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 .00 .00 3.50 .00 1.00 .00 4.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3.00 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N Y F FY S F FY FY FY F FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $14,472.30 $7,903.85
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .50 .50 .82 1.00 .70 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .99 .00 .50
Y Y N N
Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N
$7,903.85 X $15,797.65 $27,857.45 $27,794.65 $28,474.65 $28,474.65 $27,794.65 $28,564.60
$23,357.45 $4,500.00 $27,794.65 $.00
Y Y Y N
$19,974.65 $8,500.00 $14,698.35 $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,524.65 $.00 $14,113.45 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$14,698.35 X $14,698.35 $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,524.65 $.00 $15,507.35 $15,075.70 $16,152.00 $28,770.60 $16,692.60
N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N N
$14,113.45 X $28,251.85
$28,063.65 $28,013.65 $28,774.65 $28,474.65 $28,582.65 $18,089.60 $27,919.65 $27,719.65 $28,564.60 $28,864.65 $27,954.60 $15,946.60 $11,996.00 X X X X X X X X X X 1.00 .96 1.00 .79 .98 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 X X 1.00
Rev. Dist.
2.00 2.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 3.00 2.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 4.00 .00 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$28,063.65 $26,813.65 $28,774.65 $22,357.45
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$28,063.65 $26,813.65 $28,774.65 $22,357.45 $27,965.45 $.00 $27,919.65 $27,719.65 $.00 $28,864.65 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
1.00 .96 1.00 .79 .87 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00
Y Y Y N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
$24,965.45 $3,000.00 $.00 $27,919.65 $27,719.65 $.00 $28,864.65 $.00 $.00 $.00 $13,824.85 $28,474.65 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$13,824.85 X $13,824.85 $28,474.65 $28,564.60
Y Y
$29,244.60 $27,669.65 $28,063.65 $27,644.65 $16,920.00 $28,561.85 $16,113.65 $15,912.65 $15,837.60 $28,370.65 $27,719.65 $11,996.00 $28,564.60 $28,386.85 $16,692.60 X X X X X X X X X X X X X .50 1.00 1.00 .91 .00 .98 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .99 .00
Rev. Dist.
2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 .00 3.00 2.50 1.00 .00 2.00 2.00 .00 1.00 2.00 1.50 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY S FY FY FY

$14,622.30 $27,669.65 $28,063.65
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$14,622.30 $27,669.65 $28,063.65 $25,201.25 $.00 $28,119.65 $16,113.65 $15,912.65 $.00 $28,370.65 $27,719.65 $.00 $28,474.65 $27,969.65 $.00
Equivalent award
.50 1.00 1.00 .78 .00 .98 1.00 .94 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .99 .00
N Y Y N
Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$21,451.25 $3,750.00 $.00 $28,119.65 $16,113.65 $.00 $.00 $.00
$14,912.65 $1,000.00 $.00 $28,370.65 $27,719.65 $.00 $28,474.65 $27,969.65 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$28,674.65 $16,047.65 $28,486.85 $28,050.65 $30,149.65 $15,075.70 X X X X X .98 1.00 .99 1.00 1.00 .00
Rev. Dist.
2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y N FY FY FY FY FY
Other cntbl. aid
Total cntbl. aid

$28,057.45 $15,980.25 $28,254.65 $28,050.65 $30,149.65 $.00
Equivalent award
.87 1.00 .99 1.00 .85 .00
Y Y Y Y Y N
$25,057.45 $3,000.00 $15,980.25 $28,254.65 $28,050.65 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y
$25,649.65 $4,500.00 $.00 $.00
Squad-List Totals
$1,993,075.27
$2,016,289.77
25
85
80.52
80.86
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: M e n ' s Basketball Maximum Grants Permitted: 13.0 First Contest of the REGULAR (no QRMTE) Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$27,854.65 $28,436.85 $20,664.85 $28,075.65 $27,775.65 $27,569.65 $28,564.60 $28,131.65 $16,692.60 $27,925.65 $17,409.60 $28,175.65 $27,569.66 $28,567.85 $28,054.65 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 1.00 .98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .50 1.00 1.00 .98 1.00
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
4.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 .00 .00 3.00 .00 2.00 .50 1.00 .00 3.00 2.00 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y FY S FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$27,854.65 $27,819.65 $20,664.85 $28,075.65 $27,775.65 $27,569.65 $.00 $28,131.65 $.00 $27,925.65 $8,704.80 $28,175.65 $27,569.65 $27,950.65 $28,054.65
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$27,854.65 $27,819.65 $20,664.85 $28,075.65 $27,775.65 $27,569.65 $.00 $28,131.65 $.00 $27,925.65 $8,704.80 $28,175.65 $27,569.65 $27,950.65 $28,054.65
Equivalent award
1.00 .98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .50 1.00 1.00 .98 1.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Squad-List Totals
$336,272.80
$336,272.80
13
12.46
12.46
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA E L I G F S Status of Student Financial Aid Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: Men's Cross Country Maximum Grants Permitted: 5.0 First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$15,796.60 $28,684.65 $27,590.65 $30,782.80 $27,749.60 $27,578.65 $27,977.65 $15,546.60 $15,692.65 $27,659.60 $27,569.65 $28,890.65 $27,879.65 $30,240.85 $27,739.60 $29,859.60 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 1.00 1.00 3.50 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 2.00 1.00 .50 3.00 .00 3.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N FY FY FY S FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y N N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y N Y Y Y Y N N N
Y Y Y Y
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA E L I G F S Status of Student Financial Aid Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: Men's Cross Country Maximum Grants Permitted: 5.0 First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$15,987.65 $16,823.60 $30,000.00 $29,794.65 $18,089.60 $27,809.65 $27,724.60 $27,659.65 $27,864.60 $27,472.65 $27,959.65 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 .50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 0.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y FY FY F FY FY FY FY S

$.00 $.00 $13,409.35 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .45 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y N N
$13,409.35 X $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$13,409.35 $407,970.92
$.00 $341,790.84
.00 12.55
.45 14.75
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$29,171.65 $28,570.65 $27,478.65 $28,580.65 $16,562.60 $19,925.85 $15,075.70 $15,862.60 $15,697.65 $15,887.65 $28,019.65 $15,847.65 .00 .80 .48 .80 .25 .50 .00 .50 .03 .20 .60 .35
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
4.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY

$8,724.51 $22,736.52 $13,264.62 $22,864.52 $4,165.65 $9,962.92 $.00 $7,998.82 $400.00 $3,177.53 $16,841.79 $5,599.17
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.30 .80 .48 .80 .25 .50 .00 .50 .03 .20 .60 .35
$8,724.51 X $22,736.52 $13,264.62 $22,864.52 $4,165.65 $9,962.92 $.00 $7,998.82 $400.00 $3,177.53 $16,841.79 $5,599.17
Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
Squad-List Totals
$115,736.05
$107,011.54
4.51 >
4.81
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: 1/14/2013 Institution: I O WA S T AT E UNIVERSITY City/State: AMES, IA Name/I.D. No. E L I G F S E X E M Term 1st # yrs # of Recr. Period Athletic Other Total P enrolled rec'd seas of grant cntbl. cntbl. T A n y aid util award amount aid aid Your $.00 $.00 Status of Student Financial Aid Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: Men's Track and Field (P and P only) (nonNCAA sport) Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.6 Countable Players Change in Status
Full grant amount
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$26,745.05 $27,659.60 $16,692.60 $15,796.60 $11,996.00 $28,684.65 $16,692.60 $27,590.65 $30,782.80 $15,075.70 $27,749.60 $15,716.65 $27,659.60 $27,578.65 $27,977.65 $15,546.60 $15,641.65 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 2.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 3.50 3.00 1.00 .00 4.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY F FY FY S FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N N N N N N
$17,453.65 $27,869.65 $28,435.65 $15,597.65 $22,086.00 $27,659.60 $27,619.65 $27,569.65 $15,562.10 $28,890.65 $27,659.60 $11,996.00 $27,879.65 $30,240.85 $23,304.00 $28,564.60 $15,373.10 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 2.50 2.00 .00 1.00 3.00 .00 .50 3.00 .00 .00 2.00 0.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY S F S

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *
Y Y N N
N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y
$27,739.60 $29,859.60 $15,566.65 $27,659.60 $15,987.65 $22,984.10 $27,288.65 $16,823.60 $27,919.65 $15,075.70 $15,416.65 $15,606.65 $17,319.65 $29,794.65 $18,089.60 $27,809.65 $27,724.60 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 3.00 .00 3.00 .50 3.00 .00 .00 3.00 3.00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY S FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
N Y Y Y Y N
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
$27,659.65 $16,692.60 $27,759.65 $27,864.60 $29,171.65 $28,115.65 $27,472.65 $27,959.65 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
2.00 .00 3.00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y
Totals for Cross Country/Indoor Track/Outdoor Track:
$.00 $407,970.92
$.00 $341,790.84
.00 12.55
.00 14.75
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: M e n ' s Outdoor Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.6 First Contest of the Segment: First Contest of the Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E X E M P T Countable Players Change in Status Rev. Dist. Tr a c k ,
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 3.50 3.00 .00 .00 4.00 .00 1.00 .00 0.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY F FY FY S FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $9,423.99 $.00 $9,734.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $9,423.99 $.00 $9,734.00 $11,863.97
Full grant amount

$26,745.05 $27,659.60 $15,796.60 $11,996.00 $28,684.65 $27,590.65 $30,782.80 $15,075.70 $27,749.60 $15,716.65 $27,659.60 $27,578.65 $27,977.65 $15,546.60

.00 .00 .60 .00 .34 .43 .00 .01 .43 .10 .18 .01 .43 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .60 .00 .34 .27 .70 .01 .43 .10 .18 .01 .43 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N N N
$7,363.97 $4,500.00 $21,597.55 $200.00 $11,893.62 $1,597.46 $4,849.35 $400.00 $12,141.80 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$21,597.55 X $200.00 $11,893.62 $1,597.46 $4,849.35 $400.00 $12,141.80 $.00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 2.50 2.00 .00 1.00 3.00 .00 .50 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY S F S FY

$400.00 $.00 $2,807.97 $14,287.80 $.00 $.00 $6,919.41 $13,884.82 $13,386.40 $.00 $7,292.91 $2,224.36 $.00 $27,879.65
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$400.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$15,641.65 $17,453.65 $27,869.65 $28,435.65 $15,597.65 $22,086.00 $27,659.60 $27,619.65 $27,569.65 $15,562.10 $28,890.65 $27,659.60 $11,996.00 $27,879.65

.03 .00 .00 .50 .00 .00 .25 .50 .49 .00 .25 .00 .00 1.00
Date
Equivalent award
.03 .00 .10 .50 .00 .00 .25 .50 .49 .00 .25 .08 .00 1.00
Y Y Y Y N N
$2,807.97 X $14,287.80 $.00 $.00 $6,919.41 $13,884.82 $13,386.40 $.00 $7,292.91 $2,224.36 X $.00 $27,879.65
N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
3.00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 3.00 .00 3.00 .00 .00 3.00 .00 1.00 .00 2.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$30,240.85 $.00 $.00 $794.78 $.00 $29,769.65 $.00 $2,298.40 $.00 $.00 $27,919.65 $400.00 $.00 $1,563.16
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Full grant amount

$30,240.85 $23,304.00 $28,564.60 $15,373.10 $27,739.60 $29,859.60 $15,566.65 $22,984.10 $27,288.65 $16,823.60 $27,919.65 $15,075.70 $15,416.65 $15,606.65

.00 .00 .00 .05 .00 1.00 .00 .10 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .10
Date
Equivalent award
1.00 .00 .00 .05 .00 1.00 .00 .10 .00 .00 1.00 .03 .00 .10 *
$30,240.85 X $.00 $.00 $794.78 $.00 $29,769.65 $.00 $2,298.40 $.00 $.00 $27,919.65 $400.00 X $.00 $1,563.16
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
N Y Y Y
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$889.18 $.00 $.00 $27,809.65 $13,842.32 $.00 $19,431.75 $.00 $29,171.65 $14,185.82 $.00 $27,959.65
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$889.18 $.00 $.00 $27,809.65 $13,842.32 $.00 $19,431.75 $.00 $29,171.65 $14,185.82 $.00 $27,959.65
Full grant amount

$17,319.65 $29,794.65 $18,089.60 $27,809.65 $27,724.60 $27,659.65 $27,759.65 $27,864.60 $29,171.65 $28,115.65 $27,472.65 $27,959.65

.05 .00 .00 1.00 .50 .00 .70 .00 1.00 .50 .00 1.00
Date
Equivalent award
.05 .00 .00 1.00 .50 .00 .70 .00 1.00 .50 .00 1.00
Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 2.00 .00 3.00 2.00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y
$394,561.57 $407,970.92
$341,790.84 $341,790.84
12.55 12.55
14.30 14.75
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: Men's Wrestling Maximum Grants Permitted: 9.9 First Contest of the ALL Segment: First Contest of the Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$16,702.65 $27,569.65 $26,693.65 $14,558.10 $16,692.60 $29,769.65 $28,745.05 $28,780.65 $15,787.60 $28,607.65 $15,507.35 $16,602.65 $27,659.60 $27,659.60 $27,288.65 $16,602.65 .00 .48 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .30 1.00 .00 1.00 .40 .25 .00 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 1.00 5.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 0.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y Y N Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $13,167.21 $14,720.16 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,780.65 $4,709.29 $28,607.65 $.00 $16,602.65 $11,027.86 $6,898.66 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $13,167.21
Equivalent award
.00 .48 .55 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .30 1.00 .00 1.00 .40 .25 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y N N
$14,720.16 X $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,780.65 $4,709.29 $28,607.65 $.00 $16,602.65 $11,027.86 $6,898.66 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$15,943.65 $28,770.65 $18,054.65 $28,270.65 $27,530.65 $15,787.60 $16,067.65 $16,792.65 $15,787.60 $15,787.60 $16,702.65 $16,819.65 $29,673.65 $15,787.60 $15,787.60 $16,662.65 .20 .00 .00 .25 .00 .50 .00 .20 .15 .39 .20 .90 .80 .00 .00 .13
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 4.00 3.00 .00 .00 .00 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y N Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY F FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$3,198.73 $.00 $.00 $7,067.65 $.00 $7,928.82 $.00 $3,378.54 $2,396.64 $6,153.45 $3,340.53 $15,137.68 $23,738.92 $.00 $.00 $2,172.63
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$3,198.73 $.00 $.00 $7,067.65 $.00 $7,928.82 $.00 $3,378.54 $2,396.64 $6,153.45 $3,340.53 $15,137.68 $23,738.92 $.00 $.00 $2,172.63
Equivalent award
.20 .00 .00 .25 .00 .50 .00 .20 .15 .39 .20 .90 .80 .00 .00 .13
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N N
$28,690.65 $17,008.65 $27,659.60 $15,805.65 $25,142.65 $15,656.65 $17,319.65 $15,787.60 $15,503.65 .42 .00 .00 .03 .40 .50 .40 .00 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 2.00 1.00 4.00 .00 2.00 .00 1.00 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY F

$12,050.06 $.00 $.00 $483.58 $10,057.06 $7,857.32 $6,915.73 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$12,050.06 $.00 $.00 $483.58 $10,057.06 $7,857.32 $6,915.73 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.42 .00 .00 .03 .40 .50 .40 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y N N
Squad-List Totals
$236,391.47
$221,671.31
9.90
10.45
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY AMES, IA E L I G F S Status of Student Financial Aid Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: W o m e n ' s Basketball Maximum Grants Permitted: 15.0 First Contest of the REGULAR (no QRMTE) Segment: E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$16,983.65 $15,075.70 $15,507.35 $15,075.70 $16,802.65 $15,507.35 $27,875.65 $14,473.10 $28,524.65 $15,507.35 $28,524.65 $15,507.35 $27,379.35 $15,507.35 $15,507.35 X X X X X .83 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .98 .00 .77 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
1.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 3.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Y N N N Y N Y N Y N Y N N N N FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$14,116.45 $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,802.65 $.00 $27,875.65 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$14,116.45 $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,802.65 $.00 $27,875.65 $.00 $27,907.45 $.00 $21,972.80 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.83 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .87 .00 .77 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y N N N N N N
Y Y N N
Y Y N N
Y Y N N
$24,907.45 $3,000.00 $.00 $21,972.80 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y N N N N N N N N
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY AMES, IA E L I G F S Status of Student Financial Aid Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: W o m e n ' s Basketball Maximum Grants Permitted: 15.0 First Contest of the REGULAR (no QRMTE) Segment: E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$15,507.35 $28,075.65 $28,524.65 $15,507.35 $28,474.65 $27,379.35 $15,507.35 $15,962.65 $27,794.65 $28,038.65 $15,507.35 $28,774.65 $15,501.65 $15,847.65 X X X X X X X X .00 1.00 1.00 .00 .98 .00 .00 1.00 .91 .51 .00 1.00 .00 1.00
Rev. Dist.
.00 3.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 2.00 2.00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 N Y Y N Y N N Y Y Y N Y N Y FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY

$.00 $28,075.65 $28,524.65 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $28,075.65 $28,524.65 $.00 $27,907.45 $.00 $.00 $15,962.65 $25,351.25 $14,208.85 $.00 $28,774.65 $.00 $15,847.65
Equivalent award
.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .87 .00 .00 1.00 .78 .43 .00 .84 .00 1.00
Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y N N N N
$24,907.45 $3,000.00 $.00 $.00 $15,962.65 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y N N N
$21,601.25 $3,750.00 $11,958.85 $2,250.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y
$24,274.65 $4,500.00 $.00 $15,847.65 $.00 $.00
Squad-List Totals
$276,827.80
$293,327.80
13
11.98
11.39
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: Wo m e n ' s Country Maximum Grants Permitted: 6.0 First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E X E M P T Countable Players Change in Status Rev. Dist. Cross
E L I G F S
1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 .00 3.00 1.00 .00 2.50 2.00 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$15,867.60 $28,234.65 $15,747.65 $29,769.65 $27,875.65 $27,824.65 $27,839.60 $15,797.65 $16,092.65 $15,580.65 $30,119.65 $15,785.65 $27,748.60 $27,659.60 $27,802.85

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y N N
Y Y Y N
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: Wo m e n ' s Country Maximum Grants Permitted: 6.0 First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E X E M P T Countable Players Change in Status Rev. Dist. Cross
E L I G F S
2.00 2.50 .00 .00 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$30,435.65 $17,409.60 $15,606.60 $27,568.60

.00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00
N Y
N N
Y Y Y Y
$.00 $413,186.23
$.00 $430,735.23
.00 17.95
.00 17.37
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$29,314.65 $16,692.60 $28,524.65 $28,564.60 $18,089.60 $29,275.65 $28,624.65 $16,272.60 1.00 .00 .50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .50
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 .00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 .00 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$29,314.65 $.00 $14,337.32 $28,474.65
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$29,314.65 $.00 $14,337.32 $28,474.65 $20,204.80 $29,275.65 $28,624.65 $8,091.32
Equivalent award
1.00 .00 .50 1.00 .96 1.00 1.00 .50
$17,454.80 $2,750.00 $29,275.65 $28,624.65 $8,091.32 $.00 $.00 $.00
Squad-List Totals
$155,573.04
$158,323.04
6.00
5.96
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/14/2013 I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY AMES, IA E L I G F S Status of Student Financial Aid Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: W o m e n ' s Gymnastics Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.0 First Contest of the Segment: 01/08/2012 E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$15,822.65 $31,025.65 $27,840.65 $28,092.65 $27,902.65 $27,569.65 $27,719.65 X X X X X X X .97 .87 .71 .71 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 X .83 .00 X X X 1.00 .84 .90
Rev. Dist.
1.00 .00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 3.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 3.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY
Other cntbl. aid
Total cntbl. aid

$15,305.45 $26,911.80 $19,723.45 $19,975.45 $27,902.65 $27,569.65 $27,719.65
Equivalent award
.90 .87 .71 .71 1.00 1.00 1.00 .01 .83 .00 1.00 .84 .90
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$14,305.45 $1,000.00 $26,911.80 $19,723.45 $19,975.45 $27,902.65 $27,569.65 $27,719.65 $200.00 $22,950.80 $.00 $28,055.65 $23,072.80 $25,268.80 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$200.00 X $29,026.85 $22,950.80 $.00 $28,055.65 $23,072.80 $25,268.80 $27,747.90 $27,659.60 $28,055.65 $27,569.65 $28,177.65
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Squad-List Totals
$263,656.15
$264,456.15
11
9.83
9.77
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$27,659.60 $25,485.10 $15,576.65 $24,100.10 $27,664.65 $26,641.70 $27,379.35 $27,618.65 $27,659.60 $27,538.60 $27,825.65 $27,569.65 $27,809.65 $27,659.60 $15,747.65 $27,807.65 .00 .00 .05 .35 .20 .00 .00 .40 .00 .60 1.00 .46 .33 .75 1.00 .35
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
2.00 4.00 .00 3.00 2.00 1.00 .00 .00 .50 .00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$17,733.48 $25,085.30 $783.82 $8,435.02 $5,528.93 $.00 $.00 $11,079.46 $.00 $16,529.19
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.64 .98 .05 .35 .20 .00 .00 .40 .00 .60 .69 .46 .33 .75 1.00 .35
N N
N N
$17,733.48 X $25,085.30 X $783.82 $8,435.02 $5,528.93 $.00 $.00 $11,079.46 $.00 $16,529.19 $27,825.65 $12,636.40 $9,213.57 $20,863.23 $15,747.65 $9,729.47
Y Y Y N
$19,325.65 $8,500.00 $12,636.40 $9,213.57 $20,863.23 $15,747.65 $9,729.47 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$27,330.65 $27,972.65 $.00 $15,075.70 $28,021.70 $18,274.65 $15,872.65 $27,569.65 $27,798.65 $27,628.60 $27,659.60 $27,659.60 $27,438.60 $27,977.65 $27,954.65 $15,682.65 1.00 .50 .00 .00 .65 .00 .50 .96 .34 .90 .20 .30 .00 .35 .79 .50
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 1.00 .00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Y Y N Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
Other cntbl. aid
Total cntbl. aid

$27,330.65 $13,986.32 $.00
Equivalent award
.84 .37 .00 .53 .60 .00 .50 .68 .34 .90 .20 .30 .00 .35 .74 .50
Y Y Y Y N N N N
$22,830.65 $4,500.00 $10,486.32 $3,500.00 $.00 $7,976.82 $.00 $.00
$7,976.82 X $18,254.53 $.00 $7,936.32 $26,333.06 $9,399.32 $24,784.78 $5,581.93 $8,270.89 $.00 $9,819.76 $22,157.80 $7,841.32
$16,754.53 $1,500.00 $.00 $7,936.32 $.00 $.00
$18,833.06 $7,500.00 $9,399.32 $24,784.78 $5,581.93 $8,270.89 $.00 $9,819.76 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$20,657.80 $1,500.00 $7,841.32 $.00
$16,026.65 $27,844.65 $27,563.65 .40 .50 .60
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 2.00 .00 0.0 1.0 0.0 Y Y Y FY FY FY

$6,425.64 $13,922.32 $16,538.19
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$6,425.64 $13,922.32 $16,538.19
Equivalent award
.40 .50 .60
Y Y Y Y Y Y
Squad-List Totals
$380,750.82
$356,955.22
13.98
15.15
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: Softball Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.0 First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment: First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E X E M P T
$.00 $15,922.91 $23,349.50 $3,604.14 $.00 $.00 $28,277.65 $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,149.65 $.00 $.00 $29,435.65 $20,295.82 $15,653.12
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Countable Players
Change in Status
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 .50 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 3.00 2.00 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 Y Y Y N N Y Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $15,922.91 $23,349.50
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Full grant amount

$17,098.65 $27,802.65 $27,919.65 $15,917.65 $15,656.60 $27,379.35 $28,277.65 $15,787.60 $17,319.65 $17,198.65 $28,149.65 $15,596.65 $27,379.35 $30,052.85 $28,038.65 $15,882.65
Equivalent award
.00 .57 .84 .23 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .98 .72 .99
Reason
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .57 .84 .15 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .89 .00 .00 .98 .72 .99
$2,434.14 $1,170.00 $.00 $.00 $28,277.65 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$25,149.65 $3,000.00 $.00 $.00 $29,435.65 $20,295.82 $15,653.12 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: Softball Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.0 First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment: First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E X E M P T
$.00 $24,402.41 $.00 $28,901.25 $29,160.65 $25,272.80 $808.38 $.00 $.00 $22,102.80 $28,175.65
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Countable Players
Change in Status
Rev. Dist.
1.00 2.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 N Y N Y Y Y N Y N Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY S FY

$.00 $24,402.41 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Full grant amount

$15,696.60 $29,171.65 $15,656.65 $27,594.65 $29,160.65 $29,160.65 $15,887.65 $28,970.65 $15,507.35 $27,809.65 $28,175.65
Equivalent award
.00 .84 .00 1.00 1.00 .87 .05 .00 .00 .79 1.00
Reason
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .84 .00 .74 .74 .87 .05 .00 .00 .79 1.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N
$20,401.25 $8,500.00 $21,660.65 $7,500.00 $25,272.80 $808.38 $.00 $.00 $22,102.80 $28,175.65 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y
Squad-List Totals
$303,342.38
$323,512.38
11.88
11.17
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$15,772.65 $28,309.56 $26,754.10 $15,691.65 $15,847.65 $18,024.65 $15,766.65 $15,816.65 $27,628.65 $15,777.65 $27,709.65 $27,989.65 $15,722.65 $15,747.65 $15,722.65 $29,171.65 .00 .00 .30 .00 .20 .11 .20 .20 .70 .05 .70 .00 .60 1.00 .35 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 3.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 N Y Y N Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y N N FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$400.00 $2,171.97
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.03 .08 .12 .00 .20 .11 .20 .20 .70 .05 .70 .34 .60 1.00 .35 .00
N N
N N
$400.00 X $2,171.97 X $8,026.22 $.00 $3,219.53 $1,982.70 $3,173.33 $3,193.33 $19,410.05 $793.38 $19,501.75 $9,628.69 X $9,433.59 $15,747.65 $5,539.67 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$3,214.22 $4,812.00 $.00 $3,219.53 $1,982.70 $3,173.33 $3,193.33 $19,410.05 $793.38 $19,501.75 $9,628.69 $9,433.59 $15,747.65 $5,539.67 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$27,638.65 $27,644.65 $27,538.65 $27,569.65 $27,538.65 $27,538.65 $15,697.65 $15,772.65 $27,719.65 $27,894.65 $27,538.65 $27,769.65 $27,834.65 $15,691.65 $28,044.65 $29,769.65 .75 .19 .75 .00 .75 .00 .00 .40 .00 .60 .85 .75 .50 .50 .75 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 1.00 .00 3.00 .00 .00 3.00 3.00 4.00 2.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 2.00 4.00 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$20,803.98
Other cntbl. aid

$.00
Total cntbl. aid

$20,803.98 $5,273.00 $20,653.98
Equivalent award
.75 .03 .75 .25 .75 .00 .20 .40 .51 .60 .85 .75 .50 .50 .63 .44
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$773.00 $4,500.00 $20,653.98 $6,892.41 $20,653.98 $.00 $3,139.53 $6,339.06 $14,198.45 $16,736.79 $23,407.84 $20,920.98 $13,957.32 $7,923.82 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$6,892.41 X $20,653.98 $.00 $3,139.53 X $6,339.06 $14,198.45 X $16,736.79 $23,407.84 $20,920.98 $13,957.32 $7,923.82 $21,033.48 $13,234.06 X
Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y N N
$17,533.48 $3,500.00 $13,234.06 $.00
$27,694.65 $27,829.65 $15,747.65 $15,741.65 $29,794.65 $16,826.55 .40 .00 1.00 1.00 .40 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 Y Y Y Y N N FY F FY FY FY FY

$11,137.86 $10,499.88
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$11,137.86
Equivalent award
.40 .38 .92 1.00 .33 .14
Y Y N N
$10,499.88 X $15,747.65 $15,741.65 $11,927.86 $2,334.52 X
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$14,497.65 $1,250.00 $15,741.65 $.00
$9,943.86 $1,984.00 $2,334.52 $.00
Squad-List Totals
$368,733.96
$322,280.45
14.00
15.76
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: W o m e n ' s Tennis Maximum Grants Permitted: 8.0 First Contest of the Segment: 01/14/2012 First Contest of the Segment: 09/09/2011 Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$27,014.65 $27,875.65 $28,079.65 $27,569.65 $27,594.65 $29,769.65 $27,593.65 $29,221.65 $17,188.65 $28,129.65 $27,288.65 $27,288.65 X X X X X X X X 1.00 1.00 .98 1.00 .92 1.00 .00 1.00 .0 1.00 .00 .00 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 1.50 .00 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4.00 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$27,014.65 $27,857.65 $27,479.80 $27,569.65 $25,397.80
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$27,014.65 $27,857.65 $27,479.80 $27,569.65 $25,397.80 $29,769.65 $.00 $29,221.65 $.00 $28,129.65 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
1.00 1.00 .98 1.00 .92 .76 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .51
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$22,769.65 $7,000.00 $.00 $29,221.65 $.00 $28,129.65 $.00 $.00 $14,048.45 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$14,048.45 X $27,569.65
Squad-List Totals
$229,488.95
$222,440.50
7.90
8.17
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: 1/14/2013 Institution: I O WA S T AT E UNIVERSITY City/State: AMES, IA Name/I.D. No. E L I G F S E X E M Term 1st # yrs # of Recr. Period Athletic Other Total P enrolled rec'd seas of grant cntbl. cntbl. T A n y aid util award amount aid aid Your $.00 $.00 Status of Student Financial Aid Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: Women's Track and Field (P and P only) (non-NCAA sport) Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.6 Countable Players Change in Status
Full grant amount
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
E L I G F S
.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 .00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 .00 3.00 3.00 1.00 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$16,692.60 $15,847.65 $15,867.60 $28,234.65 $29,441.65 $28,561.65 $15,747.65 $15,416.65 $15,722.65 $15,697.65 $29,769.65 $27,719.65 $27,338.65 $30,534.65 $15,897.65 $27,875.65

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
E L I G F S
.00 3.00 .00 .00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 3.00 1.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y N Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY S FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$16,695.65 $27,869.65 $16,692.60 $27,478.65 $27,288.65 $15,947.65 $27,824.65 $22,086.00 $27,839.60 $15,797.65 $16,092.65 $15,697.65 $29,142.80 $28,585.65 $15,580.65 $30,119.65

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
E L I G F S
1.00 1.00 .00 2.50 .00 .00 2.00 2.00 2.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$15,785.65 $28,624.65 $27,748.60 $27,659.60 $16,882.60 $16,052.40 $27,802.85 $27,709.65 $30,435.65 $15,606.60 $27,568.60 $15,747.65 $27,658.65

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 *
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$.00 $413,186.23
$.00 $430,735.23
.00 17.95
.00 17.37
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: Wo m e n ' s Outdoor Maximum Grants Permitted: 18.0 First Contest of the Segment: 12/09/2011 First Contest of the Segment: 01/20/2012 Status of Student Financial Aid E X E M P T Countable Players Change in Status Rev. Dist. Tr a c k ,
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 .00 2.00 1.00 .00 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $10,032.26 $1,584.26 $21,740.67 $7,391.65 $22,889.32 $11,098.95 $.00 $8,676.68 $1,590.36
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $10,032.26 $1,584.26 $21,740.67 $7,391.65 $22,889.32 $11,098.95 $.00 $8,676.68 $1,590.36 $10,634.19 $.00 $.00 $14,457.80
Full grant amount

$16,692.60 $15,847.65 $15,867.60 $28,234.65 $29,441.65 $28,561.65 $15,747.65 $15,416.65 $15,722.65 $15,697.65 $29,769.65 $27,719.65 $27,338.65 $30,534.65

.00 .63 .10 .77 .25 .80 .70 .00 .55 .10 .36 .00 .00 .47
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .63 .10 .77 .25 .80 .70 .00 .55 .10 .04 .00 .00 .41
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y
$1,129.19 $9,505.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y
2.00 .00 3.00
$12,473.80 $1,984.00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
3.00 1.00 .00 3.00 .00 .00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$12,718.12
Other cntbl. aid

$.00
Total cntbl. aid

$12,718.12 $8,672.44 $.00 $20,902.23 $.00 $17,861.11 $15,136.23 $4,305.85 $27,824.65 $.00 $1,690.77 $9,869.76 $16,092.65 $12,576.11
Full grant amount

$15,897.65 $27,875.65 $16,695.65 $27,869.65 $16,692.60 $27,478.65 $27,288.65 $15,947.65 $27,824.65 $22,086.00 $27,839.60 $15,797.65 $16,092.65 $15,697.65

.80 .31 .00 .75 .00 .65 .55 .27 1.00 .00 .06 .62 1.00 .80
Date
Equivalent award
.80 .26 .00 .75 .00 .65 .55 .27 1.00 .00 .06 .62 1.00 .80
$7,172.44 $1,500.00 $.00 $20,902.23 $.00 $17,861.11 $15,136.23 $4,305.85 $27,824.65 $.00 $1,690.77 $9,869.76 $16,092.65 $12,576.11 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 .00 .00 3.00 1.00 2.00 .00 2.50 .00 1.00 .00 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY S FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$14,612.80 $28,585.65 $.00 $24,095.72 $3,946.40 $10,344.65 $9,804.77 $27,569.65 $.00 $8,828.78 $22,377.90 $2,234.22
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$14,612.80 $28,585.65 $.00 $24,095.72 $3,946.40 $10,344.65 $9,804.77 $27,569.65 $.00 $8,828.78 $22,377.90 $2,234.22 $6,719.31 $.00
Full grant amount

$29,142.80 $28,585.65 $15,580.65 $30,119.65 $15,785.65 $28,624.65 $27,748.60 $27,659.60 $16,882.60 $16,052.40 $27,802.85 $27,709.65 $30,435.65 $15,606.60

.50 1.00 .00 .80 .25 .36 .35 1.00 .00 .55 .80 .08 .22 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.50 1.00 .00 .80 .25 .36 .35 1.00 .00 .55 .80 .08 .07 .00
N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Y Y N N
2.00 3.00 .00
$2,159.31 $4,560.00 $.00 $.00
Y Y
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 .00 .00 0.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y Y FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $13,869.32
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $13,869.32
Full grant amount

$27,568.60 $15,747.65 $27,658.65

.00 .00 .50
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .50 *
Y Y Y Y Y Y
$413,186.23 $413,186.23
$430,735.23 $430,735.23
17.95 17.95
17.37 17.37
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: W o m e n ' s Volleyball Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.0 First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment: First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: 08/26/2011 Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$16,262.60 $15,965.65 $15,787.60 $29,371.65 $28,158.65 $27,684.60 $16,240.90 $15,506.60 $16,042.65 $29,321.65 $29,556.65 X X X X X X X .00 1.00 .00 .92 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .89 1.00 .00 X X 1.00 1.00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 1.00 .00 3.00 .00 3.00 2.00 1.00 .00 2.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 3.00 0.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 3.0 Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY

$.00 $15,965.65 $.00 $27,076.80 $28,158.65 $.00 $16,240.90 $.00 $16,042.65 $26,026.80 $29,556.65 $14,343.45 $28,941.65 $27,975.65
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $15,965.65 $.00 $27,076.80 $28,158.65 $.00 $16,240.90 $.00 $16,042.65 $26,026.80 $29,556.65
Equivalent award
.00 1.00 .00 .92 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .89 1.00 .50 1.00 1.00
Y Y Y Y N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
$14,343.45 X $28,776.85 $28,941.65 $27,975.65 $28,941.65 $27,975.65
Y Y Y Y
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/14/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2011-12 Sport: W o m e n ' s Volleyball Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.0 First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment: First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: 08/26/2011 Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$27,719.65 $27,569.65 $15,747.65 $27,659.60 X X X .88 .83 1.00 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
3.00 2.00 1.00 .00 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y Y N FY FY FY

$24,422.80 $22,862.80 $15,747.65 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$24,422.80 $22,862.80 $15,747.65 $.00
Equivalent award
.88 .83 1.00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y N N
Squad-List Totals
$293,362.10
$279,018.65
12
11.52
12.02
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$29,108.60 $29,818.60 $30,537.60 $28,408.60 $16,584.60 $29,572.60 $16,490.60 $16,936.60 $29,522.60 $29,572.60 $15,887.05 $16,584.60 $28,560.60 $29,522.60 $17,646.60 X X X X X X X X X X X 1.00 .96 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .50
Rev. Dist.
4.00 .00 4.00 2.00 1.00 .00 2.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 2.00 .00 .00 4.00 3.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y N Y N Y Y FY F FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$29,108.60 $28,480.00 $30,537.60 $.00 $16,584.60 $29,572.60 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$29,108.60 $28,480.00 $30,537.60 $.00 $16,584.60 $29,572.60 $.00 $16,936.60 $29,522.60 $29,572.60 $.00 $16,584.60 $.00 $29,522.60 $8,848.30
Equivalent award
1.00 .96 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 .93 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .50
Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
$15,686.60 $1,250.00 $29,522.60 $29,572.60 $.00 $16,584.60 $.00 $29,522.60 $8,848.30 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$29,622.60 $15,465.30 $28,721.60 $17,615.60 $17,615.60 $16,490.60 $16,246.60 $16,490.60 $16,850.60 $28,696.60 $18,678.60 $28,646.60 $29,308.60 $16,490.60 $16,692.60 X X X X X X 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
1.00 .00 2.00 .00 1.50 .00 .00 .00 2.00 3.50 .00 2.00 2.00 .00 2.00 0.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 Y Y Y N N N N N Y Y N Y Y N Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$29,622.60 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$29,622.60 $.00 $28,721.60 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,850.60 $28,696.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $29,308.60 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
1.00 .00 .84 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$24,221.60 $4,500.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,850.60 $28,696.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $29,308.60 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$28,858.60 $17,410.60 $16,490.60 $24,833.05 $16,490.60 $29,522.60 $28,600.60 $14,771.05 $16,840.60 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 $16,490.60 $28,646.60 $18,216.60 X X X X X X X X 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00
Rev. Dist.
2.00 .00 .00 4.00 .00 .00 .00 1.50 .00 .50 2.50 1.00 .00 1.50 2.00 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 Y Y N Y N Y N N N Y Y Y N Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$28,858.60 $.00 $.00 $24,833.05 $.00 $29,522.60 $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$28,858.60 $.00 $.00 $24,833.05 $.00 $29,522.60 $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $18,216.60
Equivalent award
1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 .90 .00 1.00 1.00
$25,696.60 $3,000.00 $.00 $28,646.60 $18,216.60 $.00 $.00 $.00
$28,696.60 $28,736.60 $18,216.60 $29,522.60 $17,460.60 $17,833.60 $28,696.60 $16,634.60 $16,490.60 $29,572.60 $16,490.60 $16,584.60 $18,216.60 $16,882.60 $19,266.60 X X X X X X X X X X X 1.00 1.00 1.00 .97 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00
Rev. Dist.
2.00 3.00 3.00 .00 .00 2.00 4.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 2.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$28,696.60 $28,736.60 $18,216.60 $28,669.00 $.00 $17,833.60 $28,696.60 $16,634.60 $.00 $29,572.60 $.00 $16,584.60 $18,216.60 $.00 $19,266.60
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$28,696.60 $28,736.60 $18,216.60 $28,669.00 $.00 $17,833.60 $28,696.60 $16,634.60 $.00 $29,572.60 $.00 $16,584.60 $18,216.60 $.00 $19,266.60
Equivalent award
1.00 1.00 1.00 .97 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y
$28,646.60 $28,696.60 $28,646.60 $17,716.60 $16,644.60 $29,722.60 $29,522.60 $16,534.60 $28,696.60 $16,614.60 $17,696.60 $16,351.60 $29,522.60 $28,696.60 $28,646.60 X X X X X X X X X X X X 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .50 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rev. Dist.
2.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 4.00 .00 .00 1.50 2.00 .50 2.00 .00 .50 1.00 2.00 1.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY

$28,646.60
Other cntbl. aid

$.00
Total cntbl. aid

$28,646.60 $28,696.60 $28,646.60 $.00 $16,644.60 $.00 $29,522.60 $16,534.60 $28,696.60 $16,614.60 $8,898.30 $.00 $29,522.60 $28,696.60 $28,646.60
Equivalent award
1.00 .74 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .90 1.00 1.00 1.00 .50 .00 1.00 .84 1.00
Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
$21,196.60 $7,500.00 $28,646.60 $.00 $16,644.60 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$26,522.60 $3,000.00 $16,534.60 $28,696.60 $16,614.60 $8,898.30 $.00 $29,522.60 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$24,196.60 $4,500.00 $28,646.60 $.00
$17,410.60 $16,490.60 $29,672.60 $100.00 $17,410.60 $28,696.60 $28,746.60 $28,796.60 $28,646.60 $28,696.60 $17,410.60 $29,522.60 $28,746.60 $17,410.60 $16,490.60 X X X X X X X X X X X X 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .95 1.00 1.00 .86 1.00 1.00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 3.00 .00 .00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$17,410.60 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$17,410.60 $.00 $29,672.60 $100.00 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,746.60 $28,796.60 $27,321.00 $28,696.60 $17,410.60 $25,331.00 $28,746.60 $17,410.60 $.00
Equivalent award
1.00 .00 .71 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .95 .90 1.00 .86 1.00 .94 .00
Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$21,172.60 $8,500.00 $100.00 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,746.60 $28,796.60 $27,321.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$25,696.60 $3,000.00 $17,410.60 $25,331.00 $28,746.60 $.00 $.00 $.00
$16,410.60 $1,000.00 $.00 $.00
$.00 $28,646.60 $.00 $.00 $28,696.60 $.00 $28,796.60 $.00 $.00 $28,746.60 $28,646.60 $.00 $28,856.60 $16,896.60 $.00 $30,152.60 $28,646.60 $28,358.60 $18,743.60 $28,696.60 $28,600.60 $28,796.60 $17,740.10 $28,600.60 $28,746.60 $28,646.60 $17,990.60 $28,856.60 $16,896.60 $16,490.60 X X X X X X X .00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 3.00 .00 .00 2.50 2.00 .00 4.00 3.50 .00 1.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 Y Y N N Y N Y N N Y Y N Y Y N FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $28,646.60 $.00 $.00 $28,696.60 $.00 $28,796.60 $.00 $.00 $28,746.60
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid
Equivalent award
.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .74 .00 1.00 1.00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$21,146.60 $7,500.00 $.00 $28,856.60 $16,896.60 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$16,674.60 $14,754.05 $30,290.60 $28,796.60 $11,996.00 $16,490.60 $29,522.60 $28,696.60 $29,572.60 $28,696.60 $29,522.60 $17,928.60 $29,175.60 $16,739.60 $28,696.60 X X X X X X X X X X X 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rev. Dist.
2.00 .00 3.00 3.00 1.00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 3.00 .00 .50 3.00 2.00 4.00 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 Y N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
Other cntbl. aid
Total cntbl. aid

$16,674.60 $.00 $30,290.60 $28,796.60 $.00 $.00 $29,522.60 $28,742.60 $29,572.60 $28,696.60 $29,522.60 $.00 $29,175.60 $16,739.60 $28,696.60
Equivalent award
.94 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 .90 1.00 1.00 1.00 .85 .00 .90 1.00 1.00
$15,674.60 $1,000.00 $.00 $30,290.60 $28,796.60 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$26,522.60 $3,000.00 $28,742.60 $29,572.60 $28,696.60 $.00 $.00 $.00
$25,022.60 $4,500.00 $.00 $.00
$26,175.60 $3,000.00 $16,739.60 $28,696.60 $.00 $.00
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/15/2013 I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY AMES, IA E L I G F S Status of Student Financial Aid Academic Year: 2012-13 Sport: Football Maximum Grants Permitted: 85.0 First Contest of the FALL Segment: 09/01/2012 E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Ini- Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant tial all valent amount award 0 85 83.74 Rev. Dist.
Athletic grant amount $2,068,759.85
Other cntbl. aid
Total cntbl. aid $2,139,009.85
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$28,696.60 $28,746.60 $26,677.05 $28,696.60 $.00 $28,246.60 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 $28,746.60 $16,882.60 $28,696.60 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 $28,696.60 $18,266.60 X X X X X X X X X X X 1.00 1.00 .90 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
4.00 4.00 .00 2.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 4.00 .50 3.00 .00 .00 .00 .50 3.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$28,696.60 $28,746.60 $24,125.00 $28,696.60 $.00 $.00 $28,696.60 $.00 $28,746.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 $28,696.60 $18,266.60
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$28,696.60 $28,746.60 $24,125.00 $28,696.60 $.00 $.00 $28,696.60 $.00 $28,746.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 $28,696.60 $18,266.60
Equivalent award
1.00 1.00 .90 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
$28,696.60 X 1.00
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
4.00 3.0 Y FY

$28,696.60
Other cntbl. aid

$.00
Total cntbl. aid

$28,696.60
Equivalent award
1.00
$329,357.60
$329,357.60
12
11.90
11.90
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$28,600.60 $28,600.60 $16,490.60 $16,674.60 $29,468.60 $28,781.60 $28,646.60 $28,816.60 $28,811.60 $28,911.60 $16,490.60 $30,290.60 $28,448.60 $30,290.60 $28,996.60 $27,739.60 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
.00 .00 .00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 .00 2.50 .00 2.00 1.50 .00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
$30,898.60 $16,490.60 $30,650.60 $18,778.60 $28,696.60 $28,686.60 $27,659.60 $28,574.60 $28,518.60 $28,760.60 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
4.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 4.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
N N N N N N N N N N
$.00 $312,436.09
$.00 $322,436.09
.00 11.40
.00 11.05
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$30,808.60 $28,398.60 $28,646.60 $17,021.60 $16,490.60 $18,216.60 $28,646.60 $18,216.60 .80 1.00 .90 .25 .00 .20 .60 .35
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$24,646.88 $28,398.60 $25,781.94 $4,255.41 $.00 $3,643.32 $17,187.96 $6,375.82
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$24,646.88 $28,398.60 $25,781.94 $4,255.41 $.00 $3,643.32 $17,187.96 $6,375.82
Equivalent award
.80 1.00 .90 .25 .00 .20 .60 .35
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
N N N N N N N N
Squad-List Totals
$110,289.93
$110,289.93
4.10
4.10
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List R e p o r t 1/15/2013 Date: Institution: I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY City/State: AMES, IA Name/I.D. No. E L I G F S E X E M Term 1st # yrs # of Recr. Period Athletic Other Total P enrolled rec'd seas of grant cntbl. cntbl. T A n y aid util award amount aid aid Your $.00 $.00 Status of Student Financial Aid Academic Year: 2012-13 Sport: Men's Track and Field (P and P only) (nonNCAA sport) Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.6 Countable Players Change in Status
Full grant amount
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$28,600.60 $26,745.05 $28,600.60 $16,490.60 $16,674.60 $16,436.60 $29,468.60 $28,781.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $16,684.60 $28,816.60 $28,811.60 $16,534.60 $15,075.70 $28,911.60 $16,490.60 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 2.00 2.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 .00 2.00 .00 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
$30,290.60 $26,286.60 $28,448.60 $30,290.60 $28,653.60 $16,490.40 $16,490.40 $28,996.60 $14,960.40 $30,746.60 $27,739.60 $30,898.60 $17,410.40 $16,490.60 $16,490.60 $17,410.40 $28,696.60 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
2.50 .00 .00 2.00 .00 2.00 .00 1.50 .00 .00 .00 4.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y
$16,490.60 $28,646.60 $29,090.60 $16,490.40 $16,246.60 $30,650.60 $17,410.40 $18,778.60 $28,696.60 $28,686.60 $27,659.60 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 $28,574.60 $30,290.60 $28,817.60 $28,518.60 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 4.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 2.00 .00 2.00 2.00 1.00 4.00 3.00 .00 3.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$28,760.60 .00
Rev. Dist.
1.00 1.0 Y FY

$.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00
Equivalent award
.00
$.00 $312,436.09
$.00 $322,436.09
.00 11.40
.00 11.05
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/15/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2012-13 Sport: M e n ' s Tr a c k , Outdoor Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.6 First Contest of the ALL Segment: 12/07/2012 First Contest of the Segment: 01/18/2013 Status of Student Financial Aid E X E M P T Countable Players Change in Status Rev. Dist.
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 2.00 2.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $10,004.76 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $10,004.76 $.00 $11,492.76 $12,376.09 $.00 $4,297.00 $1,668.46 $800.00 $4,321.75 $800.00
Full grant amount

$28,600.60 $26,745.05 $28,600.60 $16,490.60 $16,674.60 $16,436.60 $29,468.60 $28,781.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $16,684.60 $28,816.60 $28,811.60 $16,534.60

.00 .00 .00 .00 .60 .00 .39 .43 .00 .15 .10 .03 .15 .05
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .60 .00 .20 .27 .00 .15 .10 .03 .15 .05
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
$5,992.76 $5,500.00 $7,876.09 $4,500.00 $.00 $4,297.00 $1,668.46 $800.00 $4,321.75 $800.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 2.00 .00 2.50 .00 .00 2.00 .00 2.00 .00 1.50 .00 .00 .00 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $7,227.91 $.00 $6,058.12 $.00 $.00 $7,572.66 $28,653.60 $.00 $.00 $28,996.60 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $7,227.91 $.00 $6,058.12 $.00 $.00 $7,572.66 $28,653.60 $.00 $.00 $28,996.60 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$15,075.70 $28,911.60 $16,490.60 $30,290.60 $26,286.60 $28,448.60 $30,290.60 $28,653.60 $16,490.40 $16,490.40 $28,996.60 $14,960.40 $30,746.60 $27,739.60

.00 .25 .00 .20 .00 .00 .25 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .25 .00 .20 .00 .00 .25 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
4.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$30,898.60 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,090.60 $.00 $1,624.66 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$30,898.60 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,090.60 $.00 $1,624.66 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$30,898.60 $17,410.40 $16,490.60 $16,490.60 $17,410.40 $28,696.60 $16,490.60 $28,646.60 $29,090.60 $16,490.40 $16,246.60 $30,650.60 $17,410.40 $18,778.60

1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .10 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .10 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
1.00 2.00 .00 2.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 3.00 .00 1.00 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$28,696.60 $14,343.30 $.00 $.00 $20,052.62 $.00 $30,290.60 $14,408.80 $.00 $28,760.60
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$28,696.60 $14,343.30 $.00 $.00 $20,052.62 $.00 $30,290.60 $14,408.80 $.00 $28,760.60
Full grant amount

$28,696.60 $28,686.60 $27,659.60 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 $28,574.60 $30,290.60 $28,817.60 $28,518.60 $28,760.60

1.00 .50 .00 .00 .70 .00 1.00 .50 .00 1.00
Date
Equivalent award
1.00 .50 .00 .00 .70 .00 1.00 .50 .00 1.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
N N N N N N N N N N
$312,436.09 $312,436.09
$322,436.09 $322,436.09
11.40 11.40
11.05 11.05
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/15/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: Sport: Maximum Grants Permitted: First Contest of the ALL Segment: First Contest of the Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$16,692.60 $16,729.60 $28,826.60 $16,490.60 $16,692.60 $17,410.40 $27,659.60 $26,745.05 $16,534.60 $17,785.60 $28,858.60 $16,692.60 $16,846.60 $28,858.60 $28,746.60 $22,086.00 .00 .25 .60 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .30 .18 .75 .00 .80 .50 .43 .00
2012-13 Men's Wrestling 9.9 11/03/2012 Rev. Dist.
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
1.00 .00 2.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 2.00 .00 2.00 .00 2.00 2.00 2.00 .00 1.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 Y Y Y N Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $4,182.41 $17,295.96 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $4,960.38 $3,201.40 $21,643.96 $.00 $13,514.08 $14,429.30
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $4,182.41 $17,295.96 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $4,960.38 $3,201.40 $21,643.96 $.00 $13,514.08 $14,429.30 $12,361.04 $.00
Equivalent award
.00 .25 .60 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .30 .18 .75 .00 .80 .50 .27 .00
N N Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$7,861.04 $4,500.00 $.00 $.00
$17,410.40 $17,410.40 $17,410.60 $28,646.60 $19,008.60 $17,410.60 $28,646.60 $29,740.60 $17,410.60 $16,575.05 $17,410.60 $28,646.60 $16,490.60 $16,490.60 $16,584.60 $29,767.60 .00 .00 .20 .00 .10 1.00 .25 .00 .40 .50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .20 1.00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 N Y Y N N Y Y N Y Y Y N Y Y N Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $3,482.12 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $3,482.12 $.00 $1,900.86 $17,410.60 $7,161.66 $.00 $6,964.24 $8,329.80 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $3,316.92 $29,767.60
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .20 .00 .05 1.00 .25 .00 .40 .50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .20 1.00
$900.86 $1,000.00 $17,410.60 $7,161.66 $.00 $6,964.24 $8,329.80 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $3,316.92 $29,767.60 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$16,739.60 $30,930.60 $17,410.60 $17,410.60 $16,490.60 $16,649.60 $28,962.60 $28,646.60 $18,044.60 $16,584.60 $18,216.60 $29,522.60 $16,552.60 $16,490.60 .20 .00 .00 .05 .00 .10 .42 .00 .05 .60 .55 .42 .00 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
1.00 4.00 .00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .00 2.00 1.00 3.00 .00 .00 .00 1.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$3,347.92 $24,744.48 $.00 $842.24 $.00 $1,664.96 $12,164.30 $.00 $902.24 $9,950.76 $10,019.14 $12,399.50 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$3,347.92
Equivalent award
.20 .80 .00 .05 .00 .10 .42 .00 .05 .60 .55 .42 .00 .00
Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$24,744.48 X $.00 $842.24 $.00 $1,664.96 $12,164.30 $.00 $902.24 $9,950.76 $10,019.14 $12,399.50 $.00 $.00
Squad-List Totals
$240,457.87
$221,213.39
9.85
10.44
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$16,614.60 $17,410.60 $29,522.60 $29,522.60 $.00 $15,507.35 $15,075.70 $16,779.60 X X X X X .86 .94 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 X 1.00 .00 X .77 .00 .00
Rev. Dist.
2.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 4.00 .00 1.00 .00 2.00 .00 .00 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y N N N Y Y N Y N Y N N FY FY FY F/S FY FY FY FY

$14,364.60 $16,410.60 $29,522.60 $29,522.60 $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,804.60 $14,464.30 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$14,364.60 $16,410.60 $29,522.60 $29,522.60 $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,804.60
Equivalent award
.86 .94 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .50 .00 .90 .00 .77 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y N N N Y N N Y N Y N N
$14,464.30 X $28,643.60 $.00 $29,672.60 $.00 $12,706.84 $.00 $.00 $14,473.10 $29,672.60 $.00 $16,534.60 $15,507.35 $15,507.35
$26,672.60 $3,000.00 $.00 $12,706.84 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$15,507.35 $15,507.35 $29,672.60 $.00 $15,507.35 $16,684.60 $28,646.60 $.00 $15,507.35 $29,547.60 $16,584.60 X X X X X .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .84 .00 .00 1.00 1.00
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 3.00 3.00 .00 .00 1.00 3.00 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 N N Y N N Y Y N N Y Y FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $29,672.60 $.00 $.00 $16,684.60 $24,045.00 $.00 $.00 $29,547.60 $16,584.60
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .90 .00 .00 1.00 .84 .00 .00 .85 1.00
N N Y N N Y Y N N Y Y
N N N N N N N N N N N
$26,672.60 $3,000.00 $.00 $.00 $16,684.60 $24,045.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$25,047.60 $4,500.00 $16,584.60 $.00
Squad-List Totals
$269,503.14
$265,538.84
12
11.41
11.56
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
E L I G F S
1.00 2.00 .00 2.00 2.00 2.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3.00 2.00 .00 .00 3.00 1.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$16,534.60 $28,761.60 $16,490.60 $18,388.60 $16,634.60 $30,998.60 $29,008.60 $16,441.60 $28,765.60 $28,578.60 $28,646.60 $16,638.60 $28,438.60 $28,341.60 $16,734.60

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
E L I G F S
.50 .00 2.00 1.00 .00 2.50 2.00 .00 .00 .00 3.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$29,536.60 $16,271.60 $16,617.60 $28,826.60 $28,408.60 $28,646.60 $28,796.60 $16,591.60 $28,528.60 $28,600.60

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y
N N N N N N N N N N
$.00 $434,686.36
$.00 $437,286.36
.00 17.35
.00 17.26
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$29,572.60 $16,692.60 $28,736.60 $29,717.60 $31,166.60 $29,722.60 $18,251.60 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .50
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
1.00 .00 2.00 .00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$29,572.60 $.00 $28,736.60 $29,717.60 $31,166.60 $29,722.60 $9,125.80
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$29,572.60 $.00 $28,736.60 $29,717.60 $31,166.60 $29,722.60 $9,125.80
Equivalent award
1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .50
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
N N N N N N N
Squad-List Totals
$158,041.80
$158,041.80
5.50
5.50
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$28,671.60 X .93 .00 X X X X X X .62 1.00 .74 1.00 1.00 .77 .00 X X 1.00 .87 .00 X X X 1.00 .94 1.00
Rev. Dist.
1.00 4.00 .00 .00 2.00 2.00 2.00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 .00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$26,555.00 $28,508.60 $19,847.00 $31,110.00 $21,236.60 $28,721.60 $28,842.60 $24,245.00 $.00 $28,646.60 $27,813.00 $.00 $28,861.60 $27,149.00 $29,536.60
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$26,555.00
Equivalent award
.93 1.00 .62 1.00 .74 1.00 1.00 .77 .00 1.00 .87 .00 1.00 .94 1.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$28,508.60 X $28,508.60 $19,847.00 $31,110.00 $21,236.60 $28,721.60 $28,842.60 $24,245.00 $.00 $28,646.60 $27,813.00 $.00 $28,861.60 $27,149.00 $29,536.60 $31,847.00 $31,110.00 $28,736.60 $28,721.60 $28,842.60 $31,645.00 $31,110.00 $28,646.60 $32,000.60 $28,646.60 $28,861.60 $28,750.60 $29,536.60
$31,030.00 .00
Rev. Dist.
.00 0.0 Y FY

$.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00
Equivalent award
.00
$351,073.20
$322,564.60
12
10.87
11.87
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$16,729.60 $28,731.60 $28,646.60 $16,729.60 $28,646.60 $28,553.60 $28,646.60 $28,746.60 $28,358.60 $28,891.60 $28,796.60 $28,413.60 $28,696.60 $13,716.80 $29,016.60 $28,866.60 .00 .25 .00 .15 .40 .43 1.00 .40 .05 1.00 .80 .00 .75 .00 .55 .95
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
1.00 .00 3.00 1.00 3.00 .00 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y FY FY FY FY S FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $7,182.90 $21,484.96 $2,509.45 $11,458.64 $12,361.90
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $7,182.90
Equivalent award
.00 .25 .75 .15 .40 .43 .74 .40 .05 1.00 .80 .14 .75 1.00 .55 .80
Y Y N Y Y
N N N N N
$21,484.96 X $2,509.45 $11,458.64 $12,361.90 $28,646.60 $11,498.64 $1,417.94 $28,790.00 $23,045.00 $3,876.49 X $21,522.46 $13,716.80 X $15,959.14 $27,470.78
Y Y Y Y Y N Y N Y Y
N N N N N N N N N N
.00 1.00 .50 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 4.00 2.00 1.00
$21,146.60 $7,500.00 $11,498.64 $1,417.94 $28,790.00 $23,045.00 $3,876.49 $21,522.46 $13,716.80 $15,959.14 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$22,970.78 $4,500.00
$28,776.60 $28,941.60 $28,656.60 $16,546.60 $30,490.60 $28,646.60 $28,606.60 $28,746.60 $30,290.60 $28,861.60 $28,726.60 $16,584.60 $16,729.60 $16,649.60 $28,646.60 $28,821.60 .50 .65 .35 .00 1.00 .18 .50 .20 .40 .35 .81 .75 .00 .40 .50 .60
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
2.00 3.00 .00 4.00 2.00 1.00 .00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 .00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.0 3.0 0.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY F FY FY FY FY FY FY

$14,388.30
Other cntbl. aid

$.00
Total cntbl. aid

$14,388.30 $18,812.05 $10,029.81
Equivalent award
.50 .60 .35 .50 .75 .18 .50 .20 .40 .35 .75 .75 .00 .40 .50 .60
Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$17,312.05 $1,500.00 $10,029.81 $8,273.30 $.00 $.00
$8,273.30 X $30,490.60 $5,013.16 $14,303.30 $5,749.32 $12,116.24 $10,101.57 $23,125.00 $12,419.71 $.00 $6,659.84 $14,323.30 $17,292.96
$22,990.60 $7,500.00 $5,013.16 $14,303.30 $5,749.32 $12,116.24 $10,101.57 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$21,625.00 $1,500.00 $12,419.71 $.00 $6,659.84 $14,323.30 $17,292.96 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/15/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: Sport: Maximum Grants Permitted: First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award 13.92 2012-13 Women's Soccer 14.0 08/17/2012 Rev. Dist.
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Other cntbl. aid
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
$18,023.60 $27,659.60 $28,671.60 $17,928.60 $27,379.35 $16,490.60 $18,920.00 $26,490.60 $30,185.60 $28,646.60 $28,358.60 $27,379.35 $19,837.80 $16,634.60 $16,729.60 $30,290.60 .50 .00 .93 .00 .00 .00 .83 .00 .80 .45 .65 .00 .00 1.00 .66 .85
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 .00 4.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y F FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$9,011.80 $.00 $26,555.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,670.00 $.00 $24,095.00 $12,890.98 $18,433.10 $.00 $4,074.12 $16,634.60 $11,041.54 $25,689.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$9,011.80 $.00 $26,555.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,670.00 $.00 $24,095.00 $12,890.98 $18,433.10 $.00
Equivalent award
.50 .00 .93 .00 .00 .00 .83 .00 .80 .45 .65 .00 .21 1.00 .66 .85
Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N Y
$4,074.12 X $16,634.60 $11,041.54 $25,689.00
$28,761.60 $28,796.60 $28,646.60 $28,676.60 $16,483.60 $28,246.60 $28,726.60 $28,483.60 .70 1.00 1.00 .84 .95 .00 .81 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.50 .00 3.00 4.00 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
Other cntbl. aid
Total cntbl. aid

$20,133.12 $28,695.00 $28,646.60 $24,075.00 $15,659.43 $.00 $23,125.00
Equivalent award
.58 .81 1.00 .84 .71 .00 .81 1.00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
N N N N N N N N
$16,633.12 $3,500.00 $23,195.00 $5,500.00 $28,646.60 $24,075.00 $.00 $.00
$11,659.43 $4,000.00 $.00 $23,125.00 $28,483.60 $.00 $.00 $.00
$28,483.60 X
Squad-List Totals
$319,912.89
$300,355.17
11.97
12.63
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: Name/I.D. No. 1/15/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA E L I G F S Status of Student Financial Aid Academic Year: Sport: Maximum Grants Permitted: First Contest of the Segment: E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Equi- Reason Date T grant valent amount award
$28,706.60 $14,473.10 $16,534.60 $16,639.60 $16,634.60 $28,846.60 $16,674.60 $27,079.05 $28,681.60 $16,519.60 $28,606.60 $16,490.60 $16,534.60 $16,534.60 $16,559.60 $29,111.60 .80 .00 .05 .20 .20 .70 .15 .00 .40 .20 .20 .00 .40 1.00 .35 .75
.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 4.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 2.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 Y N Y N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
Other cntbl. aid
Total cntbl. aid

$22,965.28 $.00 $813.37 $3,327.92 $3,326.92 $20,192.62 $2,501.20
Equivalent award
.75 .00 .05 .20 .20 .70 .15 .70 .40 .20 .20 .00 .40 1.00 .35 .75
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$21,465.28 $1,500.00 $.00 $813.37 $3,327.92 $3,326.92 $20,192.62 $2,501.20 $18,955.34 $11,472.64 $3,303.92 $5,721.32 $.00 $6,613.84 $16,534.60 $5,795.87 $21,833.71 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$18,955.34 X $11,472.64 $3,303.92 $5,721.32 $.00 $6,613.84 $16,534.60 $5,795.87 $21,833.71
$28,771.60 $28,606.60 $28,696.60 $28,796.60 $28,646.60 $28,606.60 $16,616.60 $28,806.60 $28,671.60 $28,816.60 $29,056.60 $16,584.60 $28,646.60 $16,490.60 $28,696.60 $18,241.60 .10 .55 .75 .75 .00 .00 .00 .45 .85 .75 .90 .50 .75 .05 .40 .60
2.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 4.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 .00 1.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
Other cntbl. aid
Total cntbl. aid

$2,877.00 $15,733.63 $21,556.96 $21,631.96 $.00 $.00
Equivalent award
.01 .36 .75 .75 .00 .00 .40 .45 .85 .75 .90 .50 .75 .05 .40 .53
Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$400.00 $2,477.00 $10,233.63 $5,500.00 $21,556.96 $21,631.96 $.00 $.00 $6,646.64 $12,962.98 $24,370.87 $21,612.46 $26,150.94 $8,292.30 $21,484.96 $800.00 $11,478.64 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$6,646.64 X $12,962.98 $24,370.87 $21,612.46 $26,150.94 $8,292.30 $21,484.96 $800.00 $11,478.64 $10,944.96
$9,694.96 $1,250.00
$16,559.60 $30,948.60 .75 .40
2.00 2.00 2.0 3.0 Y N FY FY

$12,419.71
Other cntbl. aid

$.00
Total cntbl. aid

$12,419.71 $12,379.44
Equivalent award
.75 .33
Y Y
N N
$10,343.44 $2,036.00
$361,939.00
$349,100.02
13.95
14.58
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/15/2013 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IA Academic Year: Sport: Maximum Grants Permitted: First Contest of the Segment: First Contest of the Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$28,646.60 $31,110.60 $28,646.60 X X X 1.00 1.00 .94 .00 X 1.00 .00 X X 1.00 1.00 .00 X .91
2012-13 Women's Tennis 8.0 01/19/2013 09/14/2012 Rev. Dist.
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
1.00 2.50 1.00 4.00 3.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 0.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$28,646.60 $31,110.60 $27,045.00 $28,756.60
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$28,646.60 $31,110.60 $27,045.00
Equivalent award
1.00 1.00 .94 1.00 .77 .00 1.00 1.00 .85 .91
Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y
N N N N N N N N N N
$28,756.60 X $28,756.60 $30,898.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 $30,898.60 $14,473.10 $28,646.60 $28,646.60
$23,898.60 $7,000.00 $.00 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 $25,674.00 $26,231.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$25,674.00 X $30,202.60 $26,231.00 $28,832.60
Squad-List Totals
$248,655.60
$201,225.00
6.85
8.47
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: 1/15/2013 Institution: I O WA S T AT E UNIVERSITY City/State: AMES, IA Name/I.D. No. E L I G F S E X E M Term 1st # yrs # of Recr. Period Athletic Other Total P enrolled rec'd seas of grant cntbl. cntbl. T A n y aid util award amount aid aid Your $.00 $.00 Status of Student Financial Aid Academic Year: 2012-13 Sport: Women's Track and Field (P and P only) (non-NCAA sport) Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.6 Countable Players Change in Status
Full grant amount
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
E L I G F S
.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 .00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 .00 4.00 2.00 .00 1.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$16,692.60 $16,684.60 $16,534.60 $28,761.60 $28,433.60 $28,418.60 $16,490.60 $18,388.60 $16,634.60 $16,692.60 $16,699.60 $28,458.60 $28,358.60 $16,534.60 $30,998.60 $16,490.60

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N N Y Y Y
E L I G F S
4.00 .00 .00 1.00 2.00 1.00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 3.00 2.00 .00 .00 4.00 2.00 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$28,646.60 $29,008.60 $16,692.60 $28,383.60 $29,674.60 $28,646.60 $16,441.60 $28,765.60 $28,646.60 $28,578.60 $28,646.60 $16,638.60 $28,438.60 $28,341.60 $16,734.60 $16,684.60

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
E L I G F S
.50 1.00 .00 2.00 3.00 1.00 .00 3.50 .00 2.00 4.00 .00 3.00 .00 .00 .00 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$29,536.60 $29,536.60 $16,271.60 $16,617.60 $29,597.60 $28,826.60 $28,408.60 $28,646.60 $16,882.60 $16,506.60 $28,796.60 $28,849.60 $28,696.60 $28,553.60 $16,591.60 $29,623.60

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
E L I G F S
.00 .00 .00 2.00 1.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$28,528.60 $28,528.60 $28,600.60 $16,416.60 $28,851.60

.00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Y Y Y Y Y
N N N N N
$.00 $434,686.36
$.00 $437,286.36
.00 17.35
.00 17.26
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/15/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2012-13 Sport: Wo m e n ' s Outdoor Maximum Grants Permitted: 18.0 First Contest of the ALL Segment: 01/18/2013 First Contest of the Segment: 12/07/2012 Status of Student Financial Aid E X E M P T Countable Players Change in Status Rev. Dist. Tr a c k ,
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 4.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 .00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 1.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00 $4,171.16 $1,653.46 $20,420.73 $7,108.41 $22,734.88 $.00 $5,516.58 $11,644.22 $.00 $1,669.96 $.00 $.00 $13,227.68
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $4,171.16 $1,653.46 $20,420.73 $7,108.41 $22,734.88 $.00 $5,516.58 $11,644.22 $.00 $1,669.96 $.00 $.00 $13,227.68
Full grant amount

$16,692.60 $16,684.60 $16,534.60 $28,761.60 $28,433.60 $28,418.60 $16,490.60 $18,388.60 $16,634.60 $16,692.60 $16,699.60 $28,458.60 $28,358.60 $16,534.60

.00 .25 .10 .71 .25 .80 .00 .30 .70 .00 .10 .00 .00 .80
Date
Equivalent award
.00 .25 .10 .71 .25 .80 .00 .30 .70 .00 .10 .00 .00 .80
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N N Y
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
2.00 .00 4.00 .00 .00 1.00 2.00 1.00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 3.00 2.00 1.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
Other cntbl. aid
Total cntbl. aid

$7,749.66 $.00 $21,484.96 $20,306.02 $.00 $18,449.35 $3,857.70 $.00 $1,644.16 $800.00 $.00 $5,715.72 $1,718.80 $2,163.02
Full grant amount

$30,998.60 $16,490.60 $28,646.60 $29,008.60 $16,692.60 $28,383.60 $29,674.60 $28,646.60 $16,441.60 $28,765.60 $28,646.60 $28,578.60 $28,646.60 $16,638.60

.25 .00 .75 .70 .00 .65 .13 .00 .10 .03 .00 .20 .06 .13
Date
Equivalent award
.20 .00 .75 .70 .00 .65 .13 .00 .10 .03 .00 .20 .06 .13
$6,249.66 $1,500.00 $.00 $21,484.96 $20,306.02 $.00 $18,449.35 $3,857.70 $.00 $1,644.16 $800.00 $.00 $5,715.72 $1,718.80 $2,163.02 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
.00 .00 4.00 2.00 .50 1.00 .00 2.00 3.00 1.00 .00 3.50 .00 2.00 0.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 Y Y Y N Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$800.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00
Total cntbl. aid

$800.00 $19,839.12 $15,730.52 $9,009.68 $29,536.60 $29,536.60 $.00 $4,202.41 $9,285.00 $10,089.32 $28,408.60 $28,646.60 $.00 $.00
Full grant amount

$28,438.60 $28,341.60 $16,734.60 $16,684.60 $29,536.60 $29,536.60 $16,271.60 $16,617.60 $29,597.60 $28,826.60 $28,408.60 $28,646.60 $16,882.60 $16,506.60

.03 .70 .94 .54 1.00 1.00 .00 .25 .31 .35 1.00 1.00 .00 .00
Date
Equivalent award
.03 .66 .94 .54 1.00 1.00 .00 .25 .31 .35 1.00 1.00 .00 .00
$18,739.12 $1,100.00 $15,730.52 $9,009.68 $29,536.60 $29,536.60 $.00 $4,202.41 $9,285.00 $10,089.32 $28,408.60 $28,646.60 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
4.00 .00 3.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 1.00 3.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$21,309.48 $2,884.96 $2,295.72 $11,421.44 $.00 $.00 $.00 $11,411.44 $.00 $16,416.60 $14,425.80
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$21,309.48 $2,884.96 $2,295.72 $11,421.44 $.00 $.00 $.00 $11,411.44 $.00 $16,416.60 $14,425.80
Full grant amount

$28,796.60 $28,849.60 $28,696.60 $28,553.60 $16,591.60 $29,623.60 $28,528.60 $28,528.60 $28,600.60 $16,416.60 $28,851.60

.74 .10 .08 .40 .00 .00 .00 .40 .00 1.00 .50
Date
Equivalent award
.74 .10 .08 .40 .00 .00 .00 .40 .00 1.00 .50
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
N N N N N N N N N N N
$434,686.36 $434,686.36
$437,286.36 $437,286.36
17.35 17.35
17.26 17.26
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/15/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2012-13 Sport: W o m e n ' s Volleyball Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.0 First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: 08/24/2012 First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$.00 $17,132.60 $16,246.60 $16,624.60 $15,787.60 $21,168.80 $29,143.60 $28,696.60 X X X X X .00 1.00 .00 1.00 .00 .98 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 X X X X 1.00 1.00 .90 .83
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
.00 .00 .00 2.00 1.00 4.00 .00 1.00 3.00 .00 1.00 .00 3.00 .00 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY

$.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00
Total cntbl. aid

$.00 $17,216.00 $.00 $16,624.60 $.00 $20,822.80 $29,143.60 $28,696.60
Equivalent award
.00 .99 .00 1.00 .00 .98 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 .90 .83
N Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
$16,966.00 $250.00 $.00 $16,624.60 $.00 $20,822.80 $29,143.60 $28,696.60 $17,398.60 $.00 $16,584.60 $16,836.60 $27,224.00 $24,045.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
$17,398.60 X $17,398.60 $.00 $16,584.60 $16,836.60 $27,224.00 $24,045.00 $17,928.60 $16,584.60 $16,836.60 $30,340.60 $28,948.60
Squad List Report Date: Institution: City/State: 1/15/2013 I O WA UNIVERSITY AMES, IA S TAT E Academic Year: 2012-13 Sport: W o m e n ' s Volleyball Maximum Grants Permitted: 12.0 First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: 08/24/2012 First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment: Status of Student Financial Aid E Countable Players Change in X Status E M P Full Over- Equi- Reason Date T grant all valent amount award
$28,786.60 $29,294.60 $29,048.60 $28,696.60 $16,836.60 X X X 1.00 .83 .00 .84 .00
Name/I.D. No.
E L I G F S
Rev. Dist.
2.00 .00 .00 3.00 .00 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Y Y Y Y Y FY FY FY FY

$28,786.60 $24,391.00 $.00 $24,080.00 $.00
Other cntbl. aid

$.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00
Total cntbl. aid

$28,786.60 $24,391.00 $.00 $24,080.00 $.00
Equivalent award
1.00 .83 .00 .84 .00
Y Y Y Y Y
N N N N N
Squad-List Totals
$291,600.00
$274,451.40
12
11.38
12.37
Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________
Bill Bleil - Iowa State University Athletics Official Web Site - www.C...
http://www.cyclones.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=48392&SPID=46...
Iowa State University Athletics Official Web Site - www.CYCLONES.com - The home of Iowa State Cyclone Sports 0 Tweet 0 Like 0
Bill Bleil
Position: Experience: Phone: Assistant Head Coach/Offensive Line 3 Years (515) 294-8059
Bleil Photos
View Gallery
Bill Bleil
Courtesy: cyclones.com Release: 04/06/2009
Remsen native Bill Bleil, who coached with Iowa State head Meet Bill Bleil coach Paul Rhoads at Pacific and Pittsburgh, began coaching under Rhoads as assistant head coach and offensive line coach at Iowa State in 2009. In a short time, Bleil has revamped the Cyclone offensive front. Sports Illustrated affirmed the job Bleil is doing as offensive tackle Kelechi Osemele was named a 2011 first-team All-American. Osemele also earned an individual berth in the 2012 Senior Bowl. He was a second round NFL draft pick of the Baltimore Ravens. Osemele earned first-team All-Big 12 honors in 2011 with tackle Hayworth Hicks earning honorable mention All-Big 12 recognition. Hicks signed a free agent contract with Indianapolis Colts. One of Bleil's Iowa State protgs, center Reggie Stephens, plays in the NFL for the Chicago Bears after being drafted and playing for the Cincinnati Bengals. His 2010 replacement, Ben Lamaak earned second-team All-Big 12 honors in 2010. Bleil's men in the trenches figured large in Iowa State's offensive improvement in 2011. The Cyclones improved their statistical standing in rushing offense, passing offense and total offense over 2010. Iowa State's scoring offense improved for the third straight season. In 2010, Alexander Robinson finished his career ranking fourth in rushing on the all-time Iowa State list. Quarterback Austen Arnaud finished his Cyclone tenure last season as the No. 2 passer in school history. With Bleil coaching the offensive line, Iowa State improved its rushing yards per game total by more than 40 yards per contest in 2009, ranking third in the Big 12 and 35th nationally. The Cyclones cut their sacks allowed total from 40 in 2008 (3.3 per game) to 16 (1.23 per game) in 2009. Stephens earned first-team All-Big 12 honors before departing for the NFL. Osemele earned second-team all-conference honors. Bleil, who has coached all-star performers in several conferences, including the Big Ten and Big East, was the head coach at Western Carolina for five seasons. Bleil coached four seasons at Akron, where he was the assistant head coach the last three campaigns. After overseeing the running backs in his first two seasons with the Zips, Bleil coached the tackles and tight ends in 2007 and 2008. Bleil's success in producing standout players continued at Akron in 2008 as offensive tackle Chris Kemme became the first Zip to be a three-time All-MidAmerican Conference selection. He was the eighth Akron player to be named first-team All-MAC. Kemme anchored an offensive line that allowed just 1.5 sacks per game in 2008 as the Zip offense averaged nearly 400 yards per contest. In his inaugural season at Akron, Bleil helped tutor second-team All-Mid-American Conference running back Brett Biggs, the program's first 1,000-yard rusher since the 2002 season. Biggs finished the year with 1,230 rushing yards, the fifth-highest single-season total in school history, and most since the Zips moved to the Football Bowl Subdivision in 1987. Biggs was also among the top receiving backs in the nation in 2005. His five catches per game ranked third nationally among backs. Biggs' efforts enabled the Zips to become the 31st team in NCAA history with a 1,000-yard rusher, 1,000-yard receiver and 3,000-yard passer. In 2006, Dennis Kennedy was tabbed second-team All-MAC, rushing for 914 yards despite missing a game-and-a-half due to an injury. Bleil's running backs also took care of the football. They lost just one fumble in 2005. Biggs fumbled only once in 284 carries. In 2008, Kennedy coughed the ball up just twice in 226 carries, while Andre Walker did not fumble in 65 carries.
Iowa State-5
1 of 2
1/18/2013 4:41 PM
Bill Bleil - Iowa State University Athletics Official Web Site - www.C...
Bleil spent the 2004 season as the offensive tackles/tight ends coach under Walt Harris at Pittsburgh as the Panthers went to their first-ever BCS bowl game when they took part in the 2005 Fiesta Bowl versus Utah. Rhoads was the Pitt defensive coordinator that season. He served the 2003 season under Joe Novak at Northern Illinois, knocking off traditional powers Alabama and Maryland en route to posting a schoolrecord 10-2 mark, and one year (2002) at South Dakota. Bleil also has head-coaching experience, having led the Western Carolina program for five years (1997-01). During that span, he was named 2001 Southern Conference Coach of the Year and led the Catamounts to their first winning season since 1994 with a 6-5 mark in 1998. Prior to his stint in Cullowhee, N.C., Bleil served four seasons at Pacific (1992-95) and two years at Northwestern College (1990-91), his alma mater. He was the offensive line coach at both stops before being elevated to offensive coordinator for the final three years with Pacific. Rhoads was also an assistant coach on that staff. He and his wife Laurel have two sons, Kevin, a graduate assistant coach with the Cyclones, and Tim.
To remove your e-mail address from our mailing list, please click on Customer Care and select Remove From Mailing List from the Area of Interest list and specify your e-mail address. Note: This does not apply to opt-in e-mail. To modify your opt-in e-mail deliveries, log in to the site and modify your preferences. Customer Care
Iowa State-5
2 of 2
1/18/2013 4:41 PM
Shane Burnham - Iowa State University Athletics Official Web Site - w...
Iowa State University Athletics Official Web Site - www.CYCLONES.com - The home of Iowa State Cyclone Sports 0 Tweet 0 Like 0
Shane Burnham
Position: Alma Mater: Graduating Year: Phone: Defensive Tackles South Carolina 1998 (515) 294-8059
Burnham Photos
View Gallery
Burnham Videos
Play Video More Videos
Shane Burnham
Courtesy: cyclones.com Release: 02/19/2009
Shane Burnhams coaching ability was underscored by the improved play of Iowa States defensive tackles through three seasons under Burnhams tutelage. Burnham works in Ames under his father, Iowa State defensive coordinator Wally Burnham. Defensive tackle Nate Frere finished his career under Burnham in 2009, completing his eligibility with 69 tackles, 34 of them in 2009. It was Stephen Ruempolhamer who stepped up under Burnhams coaching the last two seasons. Ruempolhamer finished his career with 91 tackles, 14 for loss, and six sacks. Former walkon Patrick Neal closed out his career with 98 tackles and 5.5 sacks. Burnhams contribution coaching special teams cant be underplayed. His oversight of the Iowa State kickoff coverage team netted great results in 2009, as the Cyclones ranked seventh nationally, allowing just 18.1 yards per return. His punt return unit improved from ranking 99th nationally in 2009 to 40th in 2010.
Cyclone Audible: Shane Burnham
Burnham had been linebackers/defensive ends coach and special teams coordinator at Elon from 2005-08. Elon finished the 2008 season ranked 19th in the final FCS coaches poll. The Phoenix was third in the Southern Conference and 29th nationally in total defense, allowing 388.9 net yards per contest. Elon landed second in the conference and 30th in the country in scoring defense. At Elon, Burnham coached former Jacksonville Jaguar Chad Nkang to SoCon Defensive Player-of-the-Year and All-America honors. As special teams coordinator, Burnham saw the Elon punt return unit rank 17th nationally by averaging 11.93 yards per return in 2007. Senior Michael Mayers, a first-team All-SoCon selection as a return specialist, ranked seventh in the country, averaging 28.77 yards per kickoff return that fall. Burnham joined the Phoenix staff for the 2005 season after serving at The Citadel as a linebackers coach in 2004. Previously, Burnham was a linebackers coach at Richmond for four years (1998, 2001-03). While there, he coached All-Atlantic 10 Conference selections Adrian Archie and Mark Thompson. He also helped the Spiders claim a conference title and an NCAA I-AA playoff berth during his tenure. A 1998 graduate of South Carolina, Burnham earned a bachelors of science degree in exercise science while collecting four varsity letters for the Gamecocks football team. The two-year starter was named his teams most outstanding inside linebacker as both a junior and a senior. As a senior, the three-time Academic All-SEC choice received his teams leadership award and was named the Honda/Jefferson-Pilot Scholar-Athlete of the Week for his performance in games against both Kentucky and Auburn. Shane Burnham is married to the former Meagan Drolet, who was a swimmer at Virginia Tech. The couple are parents of daughters Lindsay and Brady.
Iowa State-5
1 of 2
1/18/2013 4:41 PM
Shane Burnham - Iowa State University Athletics Official Web Site - w...
To remove your e-mail address from our mailing list, please click on Customer Care and select Remove From Mailing List from the Area of Interest list and specify your e-mail address. Note: This does not apply to opt-in e-mail. To modify your opt-in e-mail deliveries, log in to the site and modify your preferences. Customer Care
Iowa State-5
2 of 2
1/18/2013 4:41 PM
http://www.cstv.com/printable/schools/nd/sports/m-footbl/mtt/bob_elliot...
Bob Elliott
Position: Safeties Alma Mater: Iowa (1976)
COACHING ACCOMPLISHMENTS Spent 29 of his 33 seasons coaching defense, primarily as a defensive backs coach or defensive coordinator. Served as defensive coordinator for a combined 11 seasons at San Diego State, Kansas State, Iowa and Ball State. Has had three two-year coaching stints at Iowa State in the last 30 years and most recently served as the Cyclones' secondary coach from 2010-11. Helped improve an Iowa State pass defense that ranked 84th in pass efficiency defense the season before he arrived to 46th this year. He also helped Iowa State improve 29 spots in the pass defense rankings from 2009 to 2011. Cyclones cornerback Leonard Johnson earned second-team all-Big 12 honors in 2010 and 2011. Safety Ter'Ran Benton was an honorable mention all-Big 12 selection in 2011 and safety David Sims totaled 96 tackles in 11 games en route to earning all-Big 12 honorable mention accolades in 2010. Assistant head coach and defensive coordinator for three seasons at San Diego State from 2006-08. Added the duties of inside linebackers coach in 2008. He worked in the Aztecs athletics department in 2009. Elliott was the first hire by then-head coach Chuck Long at San Diego State. In his first two seasons with the Aztecs, San Diego State had the top tackler in Mountain West Conference games as Joe Martin averaged 10.0 tackles per game in 2006 and Russell Allen recorded 10.6 tackles per contest in 2007. In his first year at San Diego State, the Elliott's defense allowed only 171.0 passing yards per game and ranked second in pass defense in the Mountain West Conference. The Aztecs allowed scores on only 67.3 percent of opponent red zone trips to rank second in the conference. Defensive coordinator at Kansas State from 2002-05 and helped the Wildcats to a 31-19 record, including four wins over nationally-ranked opponents. K-State recorded two 11-win seasons, claimed the school's lone Big 12 championship and advanced to the 2003 Fiesta Bowl - the only BCS bowl appearance in school history.
12/17/2012 An Interview with Brian Kelly Coach Kelly discusses the upcoming National Championship Game 10/28/2012 Coach Kelly Press Conference Transcript - After Oklahoma 02/10/2012 Brian Kelly Announces 2012 Notre Dame Football Coaching Staff Kelly plus nine assistant coaches total 199 years of coaching experience.
03/30/2012 FB: Practice Update March 30 The UND.com practice report for March 30 shifts its focus to the Irish defensive safety position, under the guidance of first-year Notre Dame assistant Bob Elliott. 02/10/2012 FB: Coach Kelly Staff Changes Presser Notre Dame head coach Brian Kelly meets with the media to talk about recent changes to the coaching staff for the 2012 season. 02/10/2012 FB: New Coaching Staff Interviews
01/04/2013 Irish in Miami - Defensive Interviews & Practice (AP) Images from Thursday of Notre Dame preparing for the BCS National Championship Game.
In his four seasons as the Wildcats' defensive coordinator, Elliott's defenses allowed an average of 111.6 rushing yards per game and 194.1 passing yards per game. Kansas State intercepted 58 passes from 2002-05 and returned 12 interceptions for touchdowns. Twelve of Elliott's players received all-Big 12 accolades and four players were drafted. The 2002 defense directed by Elliott led the nation in scoring defense (11.8 points per game), ranked second in the country in total defense (249.0 yards) and rushing defense (69.5 yards) and was third in pass efficiency defense (91.7).
Iowa State-5
1 of 3
1/22/2013 10:22 AM
The 69.5 rushing yards allowed per game in 2002 was a school record while the 11.8 points per game were the second-fewest points allowed by a K-State defense. The 249.0 total yards permitted was third-best in Wildcats history. Cornerback Terence Newman was a consensus All-American at Kansas State in 2002 and was recipient of the Jim Thorpe Award, presented annually to college football's best defensive back. Newman was named 2002 Big 12 Defensive Player of the Year and became the fifth overall selection in the 2003 NFL Draft by the Dallas Cowboys. Elliott's defense intercepted 20 passes in 2002 and five picks were returned for touchdowns to set a school record. Safety Bobby Walker led the Wildcats with six interceptions in 2002. Walker returned two interceptions for touchdowns in a 23-second span against Iowa State and was named National Defensive Player of the Week for his performance. The 2003 Wildcats defense also recorded 20 interceptions, tying the 2002 squad for third-most interceptions in a season. The 40 combined interceptions in Elliott's first two seasons as Kansas State defensive coordinator were the second most in school history. Elliott's defense in his second season at Kansas State ranked sixth nationally in total defense (283.1 yards per game), seventh in pass defense (174.6), eighth in scoring defense (16.3 points) and 17th in rushing defense (108.8 yards). The Wildcats set a school record with 51 sacks in 2003. Linebacker Josh Buhl broke the Kansas State record with 184 tackles in 2003 en route to being named a first-team All-American by Sporting News and a second-team All-American by Associated Press and Sports Illustrated. From 2000-01, was the Iowa State associate head coach and worked with the Cyclones secondary and coordinated the special teams. Elliott's secondary recorded 18 interceptions in 2001, the most picks by an Iowa State defensive backfield in 25 years. The Cyclones ranked fourth nationally in passing defense (151.8 yards per game) and 21st in pass efficiency defense. Iowa State defensive backs intercepted 10 passes in 2000, the most in eight years. Defensive back Jamarcus Powers and safety Dustin Avey earned all-Big 12 honors while safety Marc Simmons was one of the Big 12's top freshman players. The Cyclone special teams shined in 2000, blocking seven kicks to lead the Big 12. Kick returner J.J. Moses earned first-team all-Big 12 accolades. Member of the Iowa athletics department from 1987-99. He was on Hayden Fry's coaching staff from 1987-94 and from 1996-98. In 1999, Elliott served as a special assistant to Iowa athletics director Bob Bowlsby. Elliott was executive director of the University of Iowa Alumni Association in 1995. Served as secondary coach from 1987-94. He returned as defensive coordinator from 1996-98 and added the title assistant head coach in 1998. Elliott's position group focus switched to the Hawkeyes outside linebackers from 1996-98. Elliott coached seven first-team all-Big Ten selections and eight second-team all-conference players at Iowa. The Hawkeyes were 74-52-5 (.584) in his 11 seasons as an assistant coach and helped Iowa get invited to seven bowl games. In his 11 seasons coaching at Iowa, opposing quarterbacks completed only 51.6 percent of passes and averaged only 176.9 yards per game. Six of Elliott's players rank in the top 10 in career interceptions at Iowa. The 1997 defense coordinated by Elliott ranked among the best in the Big Ten and the nation. The Hawks ranked fourth nationally in scoring defense and pass efficiency defense, seventh in total defense and 11th in rushing defense. Iowa recorded three shutouts in 1997 and held two other opponents to only one touchdown. Defensive lineman Jared DeVries was named Big Ten Defensive Lineman of the Year in 1997 and was a consensus All-American in 1998 en route to setting the career school record for tackles for loss and sacks. Iowa led the Big Ten in pass defense in two seasons between 1987-94 and had the best third-down defense four times in that eight-year window. Former NFL All-Pro safety Merton Hanks was a top defensive back for Elliott and helped Iowa win the Big Ten in 1990 and play in the 1991 Rose Bowl. Hanks was a first-team All-American and semifinalist for the Thorpe Award. Only stint coaching offense came at North Carolina from 1983-86 when he coached the wide receivers and tight ends. Prior to North Carolina, made his first stop at Iowa State as the secondary coach from 1981-82. The Cyclones pass defense in 1982 led the Big Eight and produced professionals Ron Osborne and John Arnaud. Earned his first defensive coordinator position at Ball State in 1980 after serving as the Cardinals' secondary coach the previous two seasons.
Iowa State-5
2 of 3
1/22/2013 10:22 AM
First full-time coaching job was as the secondary coach at Kent State in 1977 and he served as a graduate assistant at Iowa in 1976. PERSONAL INFORMATION Son of former Iowa athletics director and Michigan head football coach Bump Elliott . Graduated with high distinction from Iowa. Candidate for Rhodes Scholarship in 1976 and was named an Academic All-American in 1974 and 1975. NCAA Postgraduate Scholarship recipient and member of Phi Beta Kappa and Omicron Delta Kappa honor societies. DYNAMIC DISCIPLES Josh Buhl, LB (Kansas State) First-Team All-American; Butkus Award semifinalist Terence Newman, DB (Kansas State), Dallas Cowboys 2002 Consensus All-American; Thorpe Award winner; Big 12 Defensive Player of the Year; Fifth overall pick in 2003 NFL Draft Merton Hanks, DB (Iowa) First-Team All-American Tom Knight, DB (Iowa) First-round NFL Draft pick in 1997
Iowa State-5
3 of 3
1/22/2013 10:22 AM
http://www.cstv.com/printable/schools/hou/sports/m-baskbl/mtt/robinso...
Hometown: Rock Island, Ill. High School: Rock Island '94 Last College: UALR '99
Position: Assistant Coach Birthdate: 04/28/1976 Years at Houston: Third (in 2012-13)
Assistant coach Daniyal Robinson begins his third season with the Cougars in 2012-13. He assists in all coaching aspects with the Cougars, including practices, recruiting and scouting opponents, and owns more than a decade of coaching experience as an assistant at Illinois State, UALR and Iowa State. In addition, he has guided 18 players who have competed professionally, including Craig Brackins, who was taken with the No. 21 pick in the 2010 NBA Draft. AT WORK IN HOUSTON In 2011-12, Robinson helped lead the Cougars to wins against Arkansas and NCAA Tournament participant Southern Miss. Through Robinson's work with the Cougar frontcourt, forward TaShawn Thomas was one of two Houston players named to the Conference USA All-Freshman Team and was a two-time Freshman of the Week honoree.
10/16/2012 2012-13 Men's Basketball Season Preview Veteran Leaders, Talented Newcomers Poised for Great Things 07/06/2012 Ronnie Hamilton Joins Men's Basketball as Assistant Coach Comes to the Cougars following stints at Tulane, The Citadel, Tarleton State and UNC Pembroke 11/09/2011 Men's Basketball Inks Nationally Ranked Signing Class Freshmen forwards Danuel House, Danrad Knowles to join Cougars in 2012-13
Forward Alandise Harris also was named the league's Player of the Week after helping lead the Cougars to a win against the Razorbacks in Little Rock, Ark. Off the court, four Cougars - including Thomas and forward Rakim Stevenson - earned places on the C-USA Commissioner's Honor Roll with cumulative GPAs of 3.0 or higher. On the recruiting side, Robinson played a key role in the Cougars' award-winning signing class which was ranked among the nation's top 20 by several national media organizations. During his first season at Houston in 2010-11, Robinson worked closely with the Cougar bigs. By the end of the season, forward Maurice McNeil led the Cougars in both scoring and rebounding and was named a Conference USA Player of the Week. Harris also was named the league's Freshman of the Week following a 19-point, 11-rebound performance against Conference USA-rival SMU early in the conference season. COACHING CAREER Robinson, whose first name is pronounced Dan-YELL, joined the Houston program after working as an assistant coach at Iowa State from 2008 to 2010. In only a short time, he made a tremendous impact with the Cyclones on the court and on the recruiting trail. He was instrumental in helping ISU land Chris Colvin, who was ranked in the top 100 nationally in the majority of the recruiting services in 2009. He also played an important role in bringing in Marquis Gilstrap and LaRon Dendy, a pair of top-100 prep players who were considered two of the best junior college players in the class of 2009. Gillstrap was recognized as the 2009 Big 12 Preseason Newcomer
DANIYAL ROBINSON Full Name Born Hometown Harvey Daniyal Robinson April 28, 1976 Rock Island, Ill.
Iowa State-5
1 of 3
1/22/2013 9:47 AM
of the Year. In his first season with the Cyclones, Robinson mentored All-America Honorable Mention and All-Big 12 First-Team member Craig Brackins. Brackins, along with Gilstrap, were All-Conference performers in Robinson's second season in Ames. Under his tutelage, Gilstrap emerged as the only player in the Big 12 to average a double-double in league play. A native of Rock Island, Ill., Robinson spent the 2007-08 season as an assistant at UALR, helping his alma mater earn its first 20-win season (20-11) since 1995-96 and claim the Sun Belt Conference West Division title under head coach Steve Shields. The Trojans led the league and ranked among the top 35 teams nationally in field goal percentage defense (40.1) and 3-point field goal percentage defense (28.9). Prior to his second stint at UALR, Robinson spent four seasons (2003-07) as an assistant coach on Porter Moser's staff at Illinois State. He was the lead recruiter on 2006-07 Missouri Valley Conference Freshman of the Year Osiris Eldridge, who earned All-MVC First-Team honors in 2007-08. Eldridge was a top-150 recruit in high school with fellow Robinson signee Bobby Hill. Robinson's efforts also landed Lorenzo Gordon, MVC Newcomer of the Year and All-MVC First-Team honoree, and Levi Dyer, the 2006-07 MVC Most Improved Player. A 1999 graduate of UALR, Robinson was an administrative assistant for three seasons for Moser, when he was the head coach of the Trojans. He was a part of one of the biggest turnarounds in Sun Belt Conference history, helping the team win 18 games after registering just four wins during the previous season. PLAYING CAREER Robinson played two seasons at UALR after transferring from Indian Hills Community College in Ottumwa, Iowa. He played in 56 games during his collegiate career with the Trojans for head coach Wimp Sanderson and started 22 games as a senior in 1997-98. While at Indian Hills Community College in 1995-96, Robinson helped build a junior college dynasty with the Warriors, posting a 35-4 record and leading the team to state and regional championships as well as a berth in the NJCAA national tournament. He received All-Region Second-Team honors as the Warriors ended the regular season ranked No. 1 in the NJCAA poll.
Education
UALR 1999 Bachelor's in health education Indian Hills CC 1996 Associate's degree in arts and sciences Rock Island High 1994
Family
Wife: The former Kim Hunter Daughter: Devyn Sons: Reece, Reid School, Position Houston, assistant coach Iowa State, assistant coach UALR, assistant coach Illinois State, assistant coach UALR, administrative assistant Championship SBC West Division Champions (UALR) School (Years) UALR (1996-98) 1997-98 team co-captain Two-year letterman
COACHING EXPERIENCE Year 2010 2008-10 2007-08 2003-07 2000-03 Year 2007-08 Level College
CHAMPIONSHIPS WON
PLAYING EXPERIENCE
Indian Hills CC (1995-96) All-Region Second Team State and regional champions Junior College NJCAA National Tournament berth Led team to No. 1 ranking in final NJCAA regular-season poll Rock Island (1992-94) 1994, 1993 IBCA All-State 1994, 1993 Western Big Six All-Conference 1994 Quad City Times All-Metro First Team 1994 Team Most Valuable Player
High School
Robinson was a two-time IBCA All-State and Player School All-Conference honoree at Rock Island High School under head coach Duncan Reid. He was named to Craig Brackins Iowa State the Quad City Times All-Metro First Team and recognized as the team's Most Valuable Player while serving as team co-captain. PERSONAL
NBA PLAYERS COACHED (1)
Iowa State-5
2 of 3
1/22/2013 9:47 AM
He and his wife Kim have three children: daughter Devyn and sons Reece and Reid.
Iowa State-5
3 of 3
1/22/2013 9:47 AM
http://www.cstv.com/printable/schools/ust/sports/m-footbl/mtt/luke_well...
blank Luke Wells
Position: Co-Offensive Coordinator/TE's/Recruiting Coordinator Experience: 1st Year at USU Alma Mater: Oklahoma, 2001
Luke Wells, who helped Iowa State to back-to-back bowl appearances the past two seasons, has been named Utah State's co-offensive coordinator, tight ends coach and recruiting coordinator it was announced Saturday by Aggie head coach Matt Wells. Luke Wells is the younger brother of Matt Wells. "I am very happy to announce Luke Wells as a member of our staff," said Matt Wells. "Luke's background in the Big 12 Conference for the last four years, along with his familiarity with spread and no-huddle offenses, will be very beneficial here at Utah State. His background in recruiting Texas will be an integral part of our recruiting efforts and we are happy that he and his family are joining our Aggie football family." In all, Luke Wells spent four seasons at Iowa State (2009-12) working with the tight ends for the past two years after coaching the wide receivers during his first two seasons in Ames. During the past two years, Luke Wells helped the Cyclones to back-to-back bowl games as it played in the 2011 New Era Pinstripe Bowl against Rutgers and the 2012 Auto Zone Liberty Bowl against Tulsa. "Matt has a track record of being a great football coach and an outstanding recruiter and I'm ecstatic about coming to Utah State and working for my brother, which is something I've wanted to do for a long time and something we have talked about in the past. It's an incredible opportunity not only professionally, but personally as well," said Luke Wells. "I'm excited for the chance to come to a university that's been extremely successful on the football field and won a bunch of games, and to be part of an explosive offense that's going to put points on the board." During this past season at Iowa State, Luke Wells mentored Cyclone tight end Ernst Brun who earned honorable mention all-Big 12 honors as he caught 26 passes for 330 yards (25.4 ypg) with six touchdowns. Brun was also named ISU's Offensive Player of the Game at the Auto Zone Liberty Bowl as he had four receptions for 102 yards, which included a 69-yard touchdown. As wide receivers coach at Iowa State during the 2009 and 2010 seasons, Luke Wells coached wide receivers Darius Darks and Darius Reynolds who finished their careers combining for 208 receptions for 2,396 yards and 16 touchdowns. Darks now stands tied for seventh on the all-time Iowa State career reception list. Prior to his stint at Iowa State, Luke Wells spent six years at Louisiana-Monroe serving as an offensive graduate assistant in 2003 before being elevated to a full-time assistant coach from 2004-08. During his last two years at ULM, Wells served as the Warhawks' recruiting coordinator, as well as wide receivers coach, and helped bring in the highest-rated recruiting classes in school history. The Louisiana-Monroe offense posted the highest scoring average in the school's NCAA FBS history in 2008 as Warhawk wide receiver Anthony McCall set a school record for freshman touchdown receptions that season. Luke Wells took over the wide receivers at ULM in 2007 and mentored all-Sun Belt second-team selection LaGregory Sapp who led the league in yards per reception with 19.6 on 40 catches for 784 yards. In all, Warhawk receivers caught 16 touchdown passes that year. In 2004 and 2005, Luke Wells worked with the tight ends and all-Sun Belt first-teamer Joey Trappey who was the top receiving tight end in the Sun Belt with 42 receptions for 425 yards.
Iowa State-5
1 of 2
1/22/2013 10:26 AM
http://www.cstv.com/printable/schools/ust/sports/m-footbl/mtt/luke_well...
Prior to ULM, Luke Wells coached wide receivers at Denton High School in Texas, helping his team win the 2002 bi-district championship. Before that, Luke Wells was a student assistant coach at Oklahoma from 1999-2001. His responsibilities included assisting with quarterbacks and wide receivers, coaching and coordinating scout team defense and special teams, and assisting with recruiting. His work helped the Sooners win the 2000 Big 12 Conference crown and national title. The Sooners also won the 2001 Cotton Bowl and participated in the 1999 Independence Bowl. Wells worked under several outstanding coaches during his time at OU - Bob Stoops, Mike Leach and Mark Mangino. Luke Wells earned his bachelor's degree from Oklahoma in secondary education in 2001 and did graduate work at ULM. He is married to the former Coby Groves and the couple has one son, Walker (5), and one daughter Kinsley (3). Luke Wells File Coaching History: 2013Utah State - Co-Offensive Coordinator/TE's/Recruiting Coordinator 2009-12 Iowa State - Tight Ends/Wide Receivers 2004-08 Louisiana Monroe - Wide Receivers/Recruiting Coordinator 2003 Louisiana Monroe - Offensive Graduate Assistant 2002 Denton HS (Denton, Texas) - Wide Receivers 1999-2001 Oklahoma - Offensive Student Assistant Bowl Games: Iowa State - Auto Zone Liberty Bowl, 2012; New Era Pinstripe Bowl, 2011; Insight Bowl, 2009 Oklahoma - Independence Bowl, 1999; Orange Bowl, 2000; Cotton Bowl, 2001 Playing Experience: 1997-99 Oklahoma - Quarterback Education: 2001 Oklahoma - Secondary Education Birthdate: July 27, 1978 in Sallisaw, Okla. Family: Wife, Coby; Son - Walker (5); Daughter - Kinsley (3).
Iowa State-5
2 of 2
1/22/2013 10:26 AM

Iowa State Violations - Summary Disposition

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Iowa State Violations - Summary Disposition

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

SUMMARY DISPOSITION REPORT

Iowa State University Case No. M380

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

Total Impermissible Telephone Calls for All Sports 1,484

Clear-Cut Intentional Telephone Call Violations 24

Noncoaching Staff Impermissible Contact Telephone Call Violations 55

Remaining Impermissible Telephone Calls 1,405

Culpable Telephone Call Violations 145

Pure Logging Issues 1,260

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

Coach Coach A Coach B Coach C Coach D Coach E Coach F

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

Women's Swimming and Diving

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

Conference actions. The Big 12 Conference took no additional actions.

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

Interview List Case No. M380 Iowa State University

INTERVIEW LIST April 8, 2013 Page No. 2 _________

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY

REPORT TO: NCAA ENFORCEMENT STAFF FROM: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY

INQUIRY. 1. 2. Overview Overview of NCAA Involvement.....

CORRECTIVE AND PUNITIVE ACTIONS.. 1. 2.

Institutions Corrective Actions. 26 Institutions Punitive Actions. 27 37

While these instances do not involve

As a result of the discovery of these violations, the institution has:

18 54 93 55 3 12 5 10 21 14 50 137 5 30 3 900 62 1472

Jay Ronayne Jay Santos Teshawne Jackson Jessica Bartgis TOTAL

b. Mens Basketball Current Staff

Fred Hoiberg TJ Otzelberger Matt Abdelmassih Elwyn McRoy TOTAL

*This call was made by an impermissible recruiter.