Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
, is to me so great an absurdity, that I believe no man, who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking, can ever fall into it." --Sir Isaac Newton (1692) "By magnetic curves, I mean lines of magnetic force..., which could be depicted by iron filings; or those to which a very small magnetic needle would form a tangent." ~Michael Faraday, ExperimentalResearches(1831 )
Chapter 3
3ol
3~1~I
Introduction
Development of the Electric Field Concept
In electrostatics, the electric force between two charges can be thought of as instantaneous action at a distance, no matter the separation between the charges. When Michael Faraday, beginning in the 1830s, espoused an alternative view based on lines of force that exist everywhere in space, most other experts in electricity thought it superfluous. Nevertheless, over a century earlier Isaac Newton, despite his quantitative success describing gravity via action at a distance, felt that an instantaneous response is untenable: when a distant star moves, by action at a distance a mass light-years away would have to feel a changed gravitational force instantaneously. Similarly, Faraday believed that an instantaneous electrical response was untenable. Repeatedly throughout his long career, Faraday tried to determine the speed at which changes in electric forces propagate. Because, as we will discuss in Chapter 15, such changes propagate at a very high speed (that of light, about
108
3.1 Introduction
109
3 x 108 m/s), Faraday was unable to measure this speed with the methods of his time. By thorough and self-critical experimentation, Faraday tested his ideas, rejecting some and refining others, ultimately employing the concept of magnetic lines of force in completely new ways, and extending this concept from magnetism to electricity. Faraday's concepts were first given mathematical form in 1845 by William Thomson. (Thomson was later made Lord Kelvin, for supervising the laying of the first effective trans-Atlantic telegraph cable, in 1865. In this project, he made great practical application of his knowledge of electricity.) James Clerk Maxwell, in 1855, began his own program to develop Faraday's ideas mathematically. He developed the concept of the electric field, the magnetic field, and (when time-dependent phenomena were included) the electromagnetic field. Because of Maxwell, lines of force are now called field lines. In 1865, he found that the resulting equations unified electricity, magnetism, and light. His prediction of electromagnetic radiation, propagating at the speed of light, is one of the greatest of any scientific achievements: radio, TV, and microwave communications are all practical consequences of that work. Thus Faraday was correct about electricity: electric forces do propagate at a finite speed. In 1916, Newton was shown to be correct about gravity, when Albert Einstein developed a theory~since verified experimentally~in which the gravitational field propagates with a finite speed that is the same as the speed of light. The concept of the gravitational field did not arise until after the field concept had entered the area of electromagnetism. The idea of the electric field (sometimes called the electric force field) is simple: one electric charge produces an electric field, and another electric charge feels a force due to that field. An example of a field, and of interactions via a field, can be seen in the interaction of two water striders on a water surface. The weight of each depresses the water's surface, and the depressions produced by each can be felt by the other. See Figure 3.1. The field, in that case, is t h e distortion of the water's surface. The two water striders interact through that field. When one moves, the distortion changes locally, and there must be a time delay before the change makes its presence felt at the other. Similarly, electric charge produces an electric field, and when one charge moves there must be a time delay before the signal reaches the other charge. Indispensible for describing dynamic phenomena, the electric field concept also provides insights into static phenomena. Electric field lines for a configuration of electric charges give the pattern of the electric field with only minimal
Figure 3.1 Two water striders on a water surface. One water strider can detect the presence of the other by the latter's deflection of the water surface. The total deflection of the surface is the sum of the deflections due to each.
110
computation. The electric field concept has two additional advantages, even in electrostatics. First, because electric charge is the source of the electric field, there is a deep relationship between field lines and electric charge (recall Figure R.9). We will develop this in Chapter 4. Second, electrical potential energy can be expressed in terms of the electric field. We will develop this in Chapter 5.
Fm
m
(3.1)
Neil Armstrong, the first person to set foot on the moon, can claim to have served as a test mass on both the earth and the moon. He found that ]glmoon ~" (]/6)lglearth. Any mass m on the surface of the moon is subject to a ~ of this magnitude and feels a gravitational force m~. A directional check on (3.1) is that, since on the earth's surface/~m points to the earth's center, (3.1) says that also points to the earth's center, as expected. By analogy, the electric field E at a given point P is defined as the ratio of the electrical force /~q on a test body at P to its electrical charge q"
E -.
Fq
q
{defini~on of f i e l d ) f ~ i ~ i
Experimentally, any value for the test charge q yields the same value for/~. That
O O
Co)
(a)
Figure 3.2 The orientation of grass seeds in response to an applied electric field is the same if the electric field is reversed. (a) Field in one direction. (b) Reversed field.
111
is why the field idea works: it is a property of the point in space, not of the test charge. The test charge does not feel a force due to itself; the electric field is due to charge other than the test charge. The unit of the electric field is N / C . / ~ is called a field because it is defined at all points ~ in space. To represent/~ at the position ~, draw the vector representing E with its tail at the position ~.
Electricfield of a proton
Find the electric field acting on the electron due to the proton, in Figure 3.3 (a). Take the separation to be 1.0 x 10 -l~ m.
Solution: First consider the direction of/~. The force on the electron is, by "opposites attract, likes repel," to@---- Source ~ Test charge ward the proton, which is considT ered to be the source of the electric field acting on the electron. See Figure 3.3(a). From (3.2), because the sign of the charge on the elecTest charge @---- Source tron is negative (q = - e ) , the direction of the electric field on the electron is opposite that of the force Positive charge Negative charge on it. Hence the electric field at the makes outward field makes inward field site of the electron is away from the (a) (b) positively charged proton. (Note that/~ has its tail at the point where Figure 3.3 Measuring the electric field it is measured--the electron.) BeE, whose tail is at the point where it is cause the electric field is a property measured--the test charge. (a) Positive source and negative test charge. (b) of space, we conclude quite generNegative source and positive test charge. ally that positive charge produces an electric field that points outward from the charge.
Similarly, as shown in Figure 3.3(b), for the electron as the source,
negative charge produces an electric field that points inward to the charge.
Now consider the field magnitude 1/~1. Section 2.4.1 finds that for an electron and proton separated by 1.0 x 10 -l~ m, the force on the electron has magnitude IFI- 2.3 x 10 -8 N. With q - - 1 . 6 x 10 -19 C, (3.2) yields, for the magnitude of the electric field due to the proton, at the site of the electron, F
IEI -
Any charge q at this position is subject to an/~ of this magnitude and feels an electrical force q/~. The electric field due to the electron, acting on the proton, has the same magnitude, because the magnitudes of the force on the proton due to the electron, and the magnitude of the proton charge, are the same as in the previous case.
112
Ey = Fy _ - 4 . 9 2 x 102 N q C'
P IFI = 7.42 x 102N I/~1 = q = Iql C" Because q is positive, by (3.2) the direction of E is along F. If the test charge q were negative, then F would be in the opposite direction, but E would be unaffected.
3~2ol
Experimental Caution
The test charge q can produce electrostatic induction or polarization in nearby materials, in proportion to q. These induced charges can then contribute to the electric field. To eliminate this effect the test charge q must be very small: /~ lim --.Fq q--~0 q
(3.3)
To see how electrostatic induction can change the electric field, consider an everywhere neutral infinite sheet of aluminum foil. It produces no electric field:/~ - 6. A positive charge q, brought up to the foil, alters the distribution of conduction electrons, shifting their orbitals toward the positive charge. This produces an electric field that, at the site of the positive charge, points toward the foil, with strength proportional to q. Figure 3.4(a) depicts the force F acting on q (dark arrow), the field/~ at the site of q (shaded arrow), and the humplike
-q
(a)
(b)
Figure 3.4 Force on test charges above a neutral, infinite conducting sheet. (a) +q, (b) -q.
113
shape of the charge distribution induced on the foil. (This part of the figure is schematic; the induced charge density does not actually rise up near q, but rather it is largest near q.) If the sign of the charge q is reversed, the sign of the induced surface charge will reverse, which then reverses the direction of the induced electric field: it will now point away from the foil. See Figure 3.4(b). In both cases, there is a force on q, of magnitude proportional to q2. Therefore, as q -+ 0, (3.3) yields/~ - 0. (A similar effect occurs when a charge q is brought up to a neutral piece of paper, as in the amber effect.) The test charge must be of small physical dimension, both to define the observation position of the field measurement and to minimize polarization or induction effects on the test charge itself.
F q -
-~
~i
kqqi Ri R2 i
- q
]~i ~. [~i
(3.4)
Figure 3.5 (a) Geometry for the force on q due to ql and q2. Lowercase vectors refer to distances from the origin, and uppercase vectors refer to relative distances. (b) Field at site of q, due to ql and q2.
114
q q
Ri
(3.5)
Proceeding more systematically, (3.4) may be rewritten, for any charge q at the observation point, as
where
In principle, we should write /~(?) because the electric field depends upon position ?. Let's discuss (3.7) in terms of input and output. The input is the observation position ? and the individual source charges qi at the positions ?i. For two source charges_r this is given in Figure 3.5(a). The output is the set of individual electric fields E i and the total electric field/~ at ~. Assuming that ql > 0 and q2 < 0, Figure 3.5(b) depicts the directions for the fields/~ ] and E 2. It also depicts their sum E. The relative lengths of/~l and/~2 can only be determined when actual values for ql and q2 are given; therefore, Figure 3.5(b) is only a schematic. The fields at ~ are drawn with their tails at ~. A more explicit expression for/~, which is useful for numerical calculations, is obtained by using/~i/I/~l rather than/~i. Then (3.7) becomes E - ~iR3-z
-~ kqi Ri = ~i kqi (~ - ~i) ]r - ri ]3 "
(Ri
-~
r -
~i to observation p o i n t ri)
(3.8)
From (3.7), the electric field that a single charge ql produces at the site of q is given by kql/~l_ ql /~1, E1 - R--}4zr~0R~ k1 ~9x 4JrE0 10 9N-m2 C2 "
(/~] to observation point) (3.9) In agreement with the previous section, a positive charge source makes a field that points away from the source (i.e., toward the observation point), and a negative charge source makes a field that points toward the source (i.e., away from the observation point).
For a charge ql = 10 -9 C (typical of static electricity) at a distance of 1 cm, find the electric field. Repeat for a distance of 1 mm. In both cases, compare with the electric field above which sparking (electrical breakdown) occurs,
115
called the dielectric strength Ed. In air at atmospheric pressure, Ed is about 3 x 10 6 N/C.
Solution: By (3.9), for ql = 10-9 C and a distance of 1 cm,
1/~11 = (9
x 10 9
N-m2/C2)(10 -9 C)/(10 -2 m) 2 - 9
x 10 4
N/C;
this is less than Ed, so no sparking would occur. For the same ql - 10-9 C and a distance of 1 mm, ]E 11 - 9 x 106 N/C; this exceeds Ea, so sparking would occur. Observe that a calculation of/~ at F, using (3.7), differs from a calculation of F on q at ~, using (2.12), only in that the factor q of (2.12) is omitted from (3.7). Before getting into any detailed calculations, we present a more geometric view of electric fields.
3~
3o4~I
116
r-2.
charged sphereq
A point charge q - 10 -8 C produces N = 4 field lines. (a) How many field lines are produced by a small charged sphere of Q - - 2 x 10 -8 C? (b) At a fixed position outside the sphere, how does the magnitude I/~l of the electric field changeif the radius of the charged sphere doubles? (c) How does the magnitude IEI of the electric field change if the observer doubles her distance from the charge? Assume that, since the sphere is small, it remains small even when its radius is doubled.
Solution: (a) By symmetry, the field lines must point radially. Since q = 10 -8 C produces four field lines outward, Q - - 2 q - - 2 x 10 -8 C produces eight field lines pointing inward. (b) Doubling the sphere's radius doesn't change the number of field lines, or their density, so IEI doesn't change. (c) Since I/~1 falls off as r -2, when the observer doubles her distance, I/~1 decreases by a factor of 4.
Negat~ll ~~r'~~
117
See Figure 3.9(a), which is only intended to be qualitatively accurate. This disk is taken to be an insulator, so the charge will stay in place. (If it were a conductor, we would have to imagine some extra force holding the charge in place.) Near the disk the field lines are nearly uniformly spaced to correspond to a planar geometry. Far from the disk, the field lines correspond to those of a point charge. Clearly, a great deal can be learned simply by sketching the field lines. Typically, the field lines are not along the normal as they leave the surface.
Figure 3.9 Field lines for two-dimensional distributions of charge. (a) A uniformly charged insulator. (b) A neutral conductor in the presence of a point charge.
118
3~
35,1
= ql.
(dipole m oment m a ~ i ~ ~
{3~
Like mass, the dipole moment } is a quantity associated with a given object. The set of charges is called an electric dipole. See Figure 3.10(a) for the case of a water molecule, said to be a polar molecule because it has a permanent electric dipole moment. Polar molecules figure prominently in physics, chemistry, and biology. Charge source Without them, organisms would not be able to form cells. Water er is a good solvent because of its permanent dipole moment. See Figure 3.10(b) for the case of paper, with a dipole moment only (a) Co) when polarized by an applied elecFigure3.10 Examples of dipole moments. (a) tric field. All molecules can be Permanent dipole moment of water molecule. polarized by an applied electric (b) Induced dipole moment on a neutral field. piece of paper. Note: The charge on paper is Now consider a dipole consistfrom polarized atoms and molecules. ing of two separated charges +q at + a along the y-axis, as in Figure 3.11 (a). Since the charges are separated by t = 2a, the dipole moment magnitude is given by p - ql - q(2a).
119
Field along Dipole Axis. Let the observation point be along the positive y-axis. Since the positive charge is nearer to the observation point, its upward electric field dominates, in agreement with the field direction at the corresponding point in Figure 3.11 (b). The unit vector to the observer is ~ for both 4-q. Then by (3.7) with p = q (2a),
kq .. k ( - q) .. kq (y + a) 2
_
kq (y - a) 2
E -- ( y _ a ) 2 j -]- (y_q_ a ) 2 j --
(y2 _ a 2 ) 2
(3.11)
In the large distance limit, where y ~ a, we may neglect the a 2 term in the denominator, so (3.11) becomes
E -- y3 J,
2kpA
Y ~ a.
(3.12)
For a water molecule, as in Figure 3.10(a), p ~ 6.0 x 10 -3o C-m. Thus, at 100 nm ( n m - 1 0 -9 m ) , a distance of about 1000 times the size of a water molecule, (3.12) gives IE I - 108 N/C. This is comparable to the field in the earth's atmosphere.
Field Normal to Dipole Axis. Now let the observation point be along the x-axis. It is a distance r ~- ~/a 2 + x S from each charge, so the fields due to each charge have the same magnitude k q / r 2. See Figure 3.1 l(a). However, the unit vectors to the observation point differ. The horizontal components of the two fields cancel, and the vertical components add. Thus the net electric field points
120
vertically downward, in agreement with the field direction at the corresponding pointin Figure 3.11 (b). Its magnitude is twice the vertical component of either E + or E_. Since each unit vector to the observation point contains a factor sin 0 - a / r - a / ~ / x 2 + a 2 along -~, by (3.7) the total field is 2kqa .. (3.13)
(X 2 -s a2)3/2 j.
kp~.
x3J,
x )) a.
(3.14)
3.5.2
(3 15)
By Newton's third law (action and reaction), the force Fp, Q on the dipole p due to the point charge Q must satisfy (3.15). In Section 3.9, we will present an expression for the force on a dipole i0 in the presence of an arbitrary electric field/~.
3.5.3
(field-reduced dipoI~
(For asymmetric molecules, c~ can vary with the molecular axis, but we neglect such complications. Grass seeds are more polarizable along their long axis.) The dipole moment interacts with the original charge Q , and vice versa. Since I E ] - k Q / r 2 due to Q, (3.16) gives p - l i o l - c z k Q / r 2. Using (3.15), the force on the induced dipole moment ~ thus satisfies
-~ IFQ,pl 2kQp
r3 =
2k2c~Q2
rS 9
(3 17)
121
The value of ~ depends upon the atom or molecule. It can be written as ~ V~/k, where V~ is a "volume." (A characteristic atomic volume is (10 -l~ m) 3 10 -3o m 3.) A scan of the polarizabilities of the atoms in the periodic table reveals that those with the largest and smallest "volumes" are, not surprisingly, the very reactive alkali metal cesium (with V ~ s = 59.6 x 10 -3~ m 3) and the very inert noble gas helium (with V ~ e - 0 . 2 0 5 x 10 -3~ m3). The 1/r 5 dependence of (3.17) increases rapidly as r decreases; perhaps you have observed, on rubbing a comb through your hair and bringing it closer to a small piece of paper, that at some point the paper suddenly "jumps" up to the comb. Consider an atom os carbon, with - 1.76 x 10 -3~ m 3 and m - 20.0 x 10 -27 kg. Let it be acted on by a charge Q - 10 -9 C. The jumping Figure 3.12 A pair of point for this carbon atom is found, approximately, equal charges. Individual by equating (3.17) to rag. This leads to a distance contributions and the r = 1.077 m at which the carbon atom jumps up to total field along the y-axis. the charge!
2kqy Ey = (a 2 + y2)3/2"
(3.18)
As expected, the field is zero at the origin (y = 0), where the fields of the individual charges should cancel.
3~
Here dq is the charge at the source point ~ ', R - ~ - ~' is the vector from the observation point ~ to the source point, and R - ]/~].
122
2. dq = (dq/dA) d A = ~ d A for surface charge density ~ = dq/dA. T h u s the charge on an area is q - f ( d q / d A ) d A - fcr dA, w h e r e the integral e x t e n d s
over the area.
Numerical Analysis
Because the electric field is a vector, and vectors in t h r e e - s p a c e have t h r e e c o m ponents, and b e c a u s e (3.19) involves an integral, students often c o n c e n t r a t e on the integral part, and neglect or oversimplify the vector part. To c o n c e n t r a t e on the vector aspects, w e first discuss the integral as a sum. F r o m the v i e w p o i n t of a s p r e a d s h e e t analysis, imagine t h a t s o m e elves app r o x i m a t e the source by m a n y tiny e l e m e n t s of source charge dqi, for e x a m ple, N - 1 0 0 0 . T h e y d e t e r m i n e the dqi and their m i d p o i n t s ri. T h e y also det e r m i n e t h e observation position ~. Let R~ - F -F~ be given by its c o m p o n e n t s Xi = x - x4, and so on, and let, by analogy to (2.12'),
dE'[ =
kdqi
(dE* can be negative, so it is n o t the same as ]dEi].) For i - 1, Table 3.1 gives a set of quantities leading up to the t h r e e c o m p o n e n t s of d Ei in c o l u m n s 10 to 12. S u m m i n g c o l u m n s 10 to 12 w o u l d t h e n yield Ex, Ey, and Ez. ( N o t e t h a t the s u m of c o l u m n 9 is meaningless.) F r o m this E, the force on a charge q w o u l d be given as q E. T h e above p r o c e d u r e is well defined and, for c o m p l e x n u m e r i c a l problems, necessary. O n c e the elves m a k e the source entries in c o l u m n s one to four, and m a k e the observer entries elsewhere, all the o t h e r results are calculated a u t o m a t ically by t h e spreadsheet. If the observation p o i n t is changed, w h e n the observerposition is changed, the s p r e a d s h e e t a u t o m a t i c a l l y redoes all calculations.
Table 3.1 Spreadsheet entries for field calculation
!i iiiii~ i:iii i:i! i: i~ i~ iii! iiiii i! ~ i:iiili l ill iill iiiill ! iili! ii iii ~ i liii:! i~ iiili:iiiii ~ i!~: ii:iiiiiiii iii!iil~ iil ili il i f!fi iii iiiiiiiiii l iiiili} !i iii ~ ;i~ iii:~ iiii ~i i~ ii~ i:i!i :!i~ i! iiiil i~ il ii! iil iiiii il iililiiiili iiiiii iiii liiiiii i~ iii~ :ii!i i! ~ i!i iiiii !i ii! ii! ilil iiiii i!i! iiiiiiii i!i! iili l ~i i ii:i:iiilii li:;: ii !iiiiliii! i!ilii! il !i if l i! f i! ii!iiiiiiiiiiiii iil ::iiii !:ii i!~ ii~ iii i! iili!iii iiii iii ili ! i!ii l!i!iii! ii iiii i~i ii!i:i~ ! ii~: i ~ i~ iii : ~ i! iiiil iii iiiiii~ i !i il iii~ iili ! il i !i iill ! iiliii f i! iiiijii~ i: ! i iii i: i~ : i~ ii~ iii~ iiiii!i iiiiliiiiil ii! !iil
dql
xl
yl
zl
X1
Y1
Z1
R1
dE{
X1 dE{(--K-i, )
Y1 dE{(N)
Z1 dE{(N)
123
A very similar calculation has already been performed: the spreadsheet exa m p l e in C h a p t e r 2, f o r t h e f o r c e o n a c h a r g e q a t t h e o r i g i n , d u e t o a l i n e c h a r g e )~. F o r q - 10 -9 C, p e r f o r m i n g t h e s u m f o r N = 12 y i e l d e d a f o r c e o f m a g n i t u d e 1 2 . 3 6 x 10 -9 N. U s e o f ( 3 . 2 ) t h e n y i e l d s 1/771- I f : / q l 1 2 . 3 6 N / C . If w e w e r e to move the observer position ~ from the origin, the spreadsheet would rapidly compute the new/~ and E.
3~176
Calculus Analysis
T h e s e e x a m p l e s , i m p o r t a n t in t h e m s e l v e s , ical c a l c u l a t i o n g i v e s t h e c o r r e c t r e s u l t . also c a n b e u s e d as t e s t s t h a t a n u m e r -
Solution: A p r e v i o u s discussion of this case c o n c l u d e d t h a t IEI ~ r -~ 9 T h e previous c h a p t e r c o n s i d e r e d t h e r e l a t e d p r o b l e m of t h e f o r c e / ~ on a c h a r g e q at t h e origin, d u e to a c h a r g e Q u n i f o r m l y d i s t r i b u t e d over a rod of l e n g t h l, at a distance a along t h e x-axis. ( H e n c e t h e c h a r g e p e r u n i t l e n g t h is ;v = Q~ l.) By (3.2), dividing F by q y i e l d s / ~ . Taking t h e limit w h e r e l -+ oo t h e n yields t h e field d u e to an infinite line charge. Specifically, Figure 3.13 depicts t h e force d F on q d u e to t h e c h a r g e d Q - ) ~ d y in an e l e m e n t of l e n g t h dy. T h e result of s u m m i n g t h e dF's d u e to charges d Q on e a c h of t h e l e n g t h e l e m e n t s dy is t h a t Fy = 0, and Fx is given by (2.21), r e p r o d u c e d h e r e as
Fx = -
kq Q av/a 2 + ( / / 2 ) 2
(3.20)
av/a 2 + ( / / 2 ) 2
(3.21)
As a check, n o t e that, as I/a -+ O, (3.21) goes to t h e result for a p o i n t c h a r g e Q at a distance r - a. N o w t a k e t h e limit w h e r e l/r -+ oc. Using E = ]El = IExl, a n d r in place of a, (3.21) yields E -+ kQ/[r(l/2)] - 2kQ/lr. T h u s ~: i~ i :~ i:i~ : i~ i:i~ il; i~ :i~ li! ~i ~ il iii ii l ~ ~i ! iii i~ l i: i ~ i~ i:iii li~ i:ii~ ~i i~il~!i ~ ilii i! a i~ ii ! :~ !i~ i!i ~ !i! i! i ~ ! ~i iiill ~ i ~i il ~ :i~ !ii~i i~ ii ~i ili~ i~ iii i~ iil i:i i ~ ii : ~ ii ! : iii :i~ ii i~ ii~ iii~ il ii~ i~i lii!i i : iii liiil i!i !iii i! iii~ ii~i i~ ilii !ii ! ~ iii iiiii iiii l i ill iii ~i ii!iii ii~ iiii i~ iii ii~ lili! iii i~ i~ ii~ ~i i i:i ! iii i l: ~i i!i ii~i~ ili iii :~ i! i~ i! ~ ii~i !i ~ iiii i~ ii~ li~ ili:i iiii i !i~ i~ il iii ili~ ili il iii ! iiil iiiiiii ~i i! ii !S !i lili ilii ;iii il! i~ iii ilii liii~ ii!l i!i l ! ~!i ~ i iii ilil liiii ! iii ili~ i~ iii i!ii): ii! :ili~ ii iili i ii i ~ ii i iiiii !i i!i~ i~ iiii iiii ! il i!i j ii iii l i! iii liii !i fi!ii~ i !~i ii~ ii l!i i! i!i ! i li!i!~i f iii i !i~ i: ~i i:iiii i! il ~i i! i;!i i ! ~ !i i! ili i~i l ! ii !ii~ i!~i i~ ii i!i ~ ! iili ! i~ i!iiii!iil i !i i! iil i~i i!ii iiil li!i ii liil ii!i : li :ii ili i~ iii! liiii l iil!i iliiii iiJ i! li!i!iiiii!i!iii ~ii:iiiii:i!ii;ii:~i;~i~i!ii~!i~i~ii~iiii~i~i~ii~iiii~ii~i!ii~iiiii~i;ii~i~i~i~iii~ii~i!ii{iii~iii~iiiii!iiii!iii~!iiiiiiii~ii~i~iiiiii~iiiiii!ii~iiiiii~iiiiiiiiiii~iii!i~i~i!iii~iii~ii~ii~i!iii~iiiiiiii~ii~i~iiiii~iiii
dQ = (Q/l)dy
l
X ----~
dF
Figure3.13 Finding t h e field at t h e origin d u e to a line charge: force d/~ on test c h a r g e q at origin due to an e l e m e n t dQ.
124
where )~ = Q / l is the charge per unit length. As indicated earlier, this varies inversely with r. To obtain a sparking field in air (Ed = IE! = 3 x 106 N/C) at a distance of 1 mm, (3.22) gives ;~ = 1.67 x 10 -7 C/m. This important geometry is used in particle detectors, such as Geiger counters. When there is ionizing radiation, a large enough field causes electrons to avalanche toward a positively charged wire. The field is largest at the wire.
Solution: This problem could be solved using dq = adA, where d A = dxdz, and integrating over both dx and dz. However, the integral over a uniformly charged line (here involving dz rather than dy of Figure 3.13) has already been done in (3.22). Hence the area can be built up as an infinite number of thin strips, each of which can be treated as a line charge. Note that the directions of the fields produced by each line are different. The strip in Figure 3.14, with thickness dx, is parallel to the z-axis, at a distance r = ~/a 2 + x 2 from the point P. As a strip of charge (with a very large length l), it has area d A - l d x , charge dq -- ( d q / d A ) d A = a(ldx), and charge per length d)~ = dq/l = a dx. Since d)~ is Figure 3.14 Finding the field at independent of l, we may let l ~ ~ . In the origin due to a sheet of charge: (3.22), let us replace E by dE and k by field dE due to a strip of charge, dk. This leads to dE = Idf21- 2kd)~ _- 2kadx,
T T
(3.23)
which points along the normal from the strip to the observation point. By symmetry, only Ey will integrate to a nonzero value, which requires the direction cosine cos0 = a/r. Thus
dEy = dE cos0 -
2kadx
T
cos~).
(3.24)
This can be integrated most easily by eliminating x in favor of 0. Since x = a tan O, we have dx = a sec 20dO. Also, a = r cos 0, so r = a sec 0. Then cos0 = 2kr~dO. (3.25) a sec 0 Since J-~/2f~/2dO = rr, (3.25) integrates to Ey - 2k~zr. Thus, with E in place of Ey, we have
dEy =
125
As indicated earlier, this is independent of position. It is normal to the sheet and changes direction on crossing from one side of the sheet to the other. To obtain a sparking field in air (Ed - 3 x 10 ~ N/C), (3.26) gives cr - 5.31 10 -S C / m 2. This important geometry was employed inside older TV tubes to focus the electrons. It is also used in electrostatic precipitators, where it is used to draw off particles of smoke that have been electrically charged. The present method can be applied to compute the field due to a sheet that is finite along x, by changing the limits of integration. In that case, the field may also have an x-component. To an observer near the center of such a finite sheet, the field will appear to be due to an infinite sheet.
Solution: Let the circle lie at the center of the coordinate system, with its normal along z. For an observation point on the axis, all charge is at a distance r - ~fa 2 + z 2. See Figure 3.15. By symmetry, only Ez is nonzero. An element of charge dq produces a field of magnitude dE - Id/~[ - kdq/r 2, and the direction cosine along the z-axis is cos~) - z/r for each dq. Thus kdq z kz dq dEz = ]dE] cosO - .r2 r = 7 "
(3.27)
Since kz/r 3 is a constant on the axis, and since q - f dq - f (dq/ds)ds - f )~ds = )~f ds - ~(27ra), integration over dq yields
(3.28)
Calculus was unnecessary to derive this result: q - f d q - f ) ~ d s - )~(2z~a) is straightforward. Here are two simple checks. (Think of the Sesame Street character Grover, who likes to illustrate near and far.) Near the ring (here, at its center, z - 0), by symmetry the field must be zero; indeed, setting z - 0 in (3.28) gives Ez - 0. Far from the ring ( z ) ) a), the field should be the inverse square law of a point charge; indeed, using q )~(2~a), (3.28) gives Ez -+ kq/z 2. Figure 3.15 Field d/~ due to part of a ring For an off-axis observer, the of charge, problem would be very difficult because r and ~ would be different for each dq, and there would be three components of E to compute. Without advanced techniques, off-axis it would be easier to approximate the integral as a sum on a spreadsheet.
-+
126
!xample 3.
Find the electric field at a point z on the axis of a disk of uniform surface charge density a and radius a. See Figure 3.16. The field lines have already been sketched in Figure 3.9(a).
Solution: Let us build up the disk out of rings to take advantage of the results of the previous example. Since only the z-component will be nonzero, we add up the dEz's due to each of the rings that make up the disk. Thus, consider a typical ring, of radius u and annular thickness du, centered at the origin with normal along the z-axis. Take an observation point that is a distance z along the z-axis. See Figure 3.16. Then the observer is a distance R - ~/u 2 + z 2 from all the charge on the ring. Moreover, Figure 3.16 Field d/~ due to an annulus the ring has charge d Q = r ~ d A of charge. ~ (2zr udu).
To apply the results of (3.28), we let
Ez --, dEz,
= v / a 2 nu z 2 ~
R.
d Ez - - ~ (2Jr~ udu).
kz
(3.29)
Note that d/~ = dEz~ for the total field on the axis of the annulus, because dEx = dEy = 0, by symmetry. Now change to the variable R, so R 2 = u 2 + z 2. Note that d(R 2) =
[~R(R2)]dR = 2RdR, and similarly d(u 2) = 2udu. Since z is constant, we have 2RdR = 2udu. Then (3.29) becomes dEz = ~-g(2zrcr RdR) =
The total Ez is due to all the rings, so
kz
2rr kcrzd R R2
R+
(3.30)
Ez = I dEz = J
2rr ka z
R
(3.31)
R_
E z = 2 z r k o z ( lz
(3.32)
The integrals cannot be done with elementary methods for an observation point off the axis. Here are two simple checks. Near the disk (a/z ~ ec), the field should look like that ofan infinite sheet. Indeed, for a/z -+ ~ , (3.32) goes to Ez = 2zrkcr. This agrees with (3.26) for an infinite sheet built up out of lines, rather than rings. Far from the disk (a/z ~ 0), the field should look like that of a point charge, k Q / z 2,
127
where Q = ~ J r a 2. To show this, consider the parentheses in (3.32), and divide numerator and denominator by z. That gives 1 - ~/a 2 + z 2 = 1 - X/(za)2 + 1
=
1-
1+
(3.33)
As a/z -+ O, this goes to zero. But does this approach zero as 1/z2? To see this, set x = (a/z) 2 and for n - - 89 apply the result
(1 + x) n ~ 1 + nx,
Inxl << 1.
(3.34)
Equation (3.34) follows from the straight-line (or linear) approximation y = mx + b for small x, applied to y = f (x) = (1 + x) n, where b = f (0) = 1. To obtain the slope m = d f / d x at x = 0, take the derivative of (1 + x) n, and then substitute x = 0. This gives d f / d x = n(1 + x) n-1 at any x, so m = df/dxlx=o = n. Applying (3.34) to (3.33) yields
(
~/a 2 + z 2 = 1 1+
(a)2)
z
1
) l(a)2 (a )
~1 .
1 .~
l(a)2
+"" . ~ 2
'
z <<1.
(3.35)
Use of (3.35) in (3.32) then yields that, far from the disk, Ez -+ (2Jrk~) 89 2= k~(zra2)/z 2 = k Q / z 2, as expected. For a position off-axis, the field also has a radial component, which typically is very difficult to calculate.
IEI = 4zrk~.
(3.36)
Crl =~ I
E1
E2
Figure 3 . 1 7 Field due to two sheets of charge that intersect normal to the page.
This case is important because parallel plate capacitors have this geometry. Note that/~ and/~2 add vectorially in each region by the principle of superposition; the field due to one sheet is independent of the presence of the other sheet.
3.7
3.7.1
(the other sides of the tubes are perpendicular to the paper). Eight lines leave each positive charge (at equal angles of 360/8 =45~ See Figure 3.18(a). Far from these charges, this combination of two charges looks like a single line charge with net charge 2)~. This corresponds to 16 field lines leaving, at equal angles of 360/16 = 22.5~ See Figure 3.18(a). The boxed point is a position where/~ = 0. It
129
I I I
+
I I I
(a)
(b)
Figure 3.18 Representations of the field lines due to two equal positively charged rods normal to the page. (a) Representation with field lines going from one rod toward the other. These field lines appear to end at the origin (surrounded by a box), with two lines leaving vertically. Thus the net number of field lines leaving the origin is zero. (b) Representation with field lines that do not go from one rod toward the other.
has two lines entering and two lines leaving so that it encloses no net charge. Field lines don't really cross where/~ = 0 since there is no field there. Figure 3.18(b) has been drawn with the field lines at another angle. Faraday would imagine the charges repelling because of the parallel field lines pushing away from each other.
I I
(a)
Figure 3.20 Geometry associated with dipole field lines. (a) Sphere defining the polar angle 0 relative to the dipole axis. (b) Field lines for an electric dipole. ~ Flux tubes and solid angle for a point charge
Find the solid angle subtended by a cone formed by rotating a line at an angle 0 relative to the polar axis, as in Figure 3.20(a). Relate this to flux tubes.
Solution: Your calculus course may have shown that the area A projected on a sphere of radius r of a cone of angle 0 is A - 2zrr2(1 - cos0). By definition, the solid angle fa subtended by this cone is given by fa = A / r 2 so that
~2 = 2zr(1 - cos0). The larger the solid angle, the larger the flux of the associated flux tube.
(3.37)
"1~'1
force -q/~ on the negative charge, so there is no net force on the dipole. A wellknown magnetic analog is an ordinary compass needle in the earth's magnetic field: the needle rotates, but the compass is subject to no net force. This is because the earth's magnetic field is nearly uniform in the vicinity of the compass needle, so its north and E south poles feel equal and opposite forces. Nevertheless, a magnet placed in the nearly uniform magnetic field of the earth feels a torque ~ that tends to make it point Figure 3.21 Electric dipole of toward the north pole. We will later describe moment ~ in a uniform applied the magnet as a magnetic dipole in a uniform electric field/~. Two equal and magnetic field, so we will say that the magnetic opposite charges are separated dipole feels a torque that tends to align it with the by l. magnetic field. Now consider the analogous case of a permanent electric dipole ;~ in a uniform electric field/~ (The dipole could be the water molecule in Figure 3.10a~. The electric dipole ~2 feels a torque that tends to align it with the electric field E. To determine the value of the torque ~, consider that there are two charg~es +q connected by a rod of length l, the charges at positions +~/2. (Thus 26 = ql.) See Figure 3.21. Let there be a uniform field E that points to the right. The force on each of the charges is +q/~. Hence the torque ~, measured from their midpoint, is r-(2~)x With ~ - q~, ~ becomes
!iiiiiiiiiiiiilii i!iii!iiiiiii!i~ iiiiiiiiiii i!iiiiiiii!iiiii!i!iii!il iilii ii!i!i!ii!!i iii!i!i !i!i i!ilii!l!ii!ili iiiiiii iiili !iiiiii!i ~ii ~iii!!ii !iii!i!ii!i!ii!~!i~ii~iiii !!iii!iiiii~ i!i!iiii!iiiili~ iii !i!i!!!ii!iii!iiii!iii~i
(q/~)+ ( - 1 [ )
x (-q/~)
-(qh x/~.
...............
For the dipole and field in Figure 3.21, use of the vector product right-hand rule yields a torque that is into the page, which tends to cause a clockwise rotation of the dipole. We can obtain the energy by using an analogy to gravity. There, a single mass m at position ~ in a uniform gravitational field ~ has gravitational potential energy Ugr~v -- mgy or, with ~ - -g56
(3.39)
By analogy, a single charge q at position ~ in a uniform electric field/~ has electrical potential energy
Uel -- - q ( E . ~).
If we now apply this to our two charges, on summing over both we have
(3.40)
Udip--Iq(E"
~)]-I(-q)(/~"
(-~))]--q/~'~,
(3.41)
3.9
F o r c e o n a D i p o l e in a N o n u n i f o r m
Field
In the amber effect, there is a force on an induced dipole in a nonuniform field. Equation (3.17) applies only when the electric field is due to a point charge. More generally, there can be a permanent dipole (e.g., due to a water molecule) in an electric field due to many charges. Before getting into mathematical detail, we present some general considerations. | O Since the force 1fi on a dipole ~ in a uniform field E O 2 | is zero, in general the force on the dipole must depend upon the strength of the dipole moment and on how E varies in space. Consider Figure 3.22, depicting a nonuniform electric field/~ and three Figure 3.22 Electric dipole dipoles in different orientations. From our earlier moments in a nonuniform considerations about field lines, the electric field is applied electric field E. stronger where the field lines are closer. Further, the force on the end of the dipole in the larger field dominates. Thus dipole 1 feels a net force to the right, dipole 2 feels a net force to the left, and dipole 3 feels no net force.
3.9.1
Quantitative Considerations
Consider a dipole with q at F + [ and - q at F. By (3.6), the force on the combination is given by
(3.43)
where E is evaluated at F + 89 We wish to evaluate this when/~ varies slowly in space. First consider the straight-line approximation applied to a function only of x. If a is small, then f ( x + a ) - f(x) is nearly given by the slope m - d f / d x times the coordinate difference a: f ( x + a ) - f ( x ) ~ (df/dx)a. Now include the coordinate differences in all three directions, and let f = q Ex, so f (x) -+ f (x, y, z) = q E~(x, y, z). Then f (x+a) generalizes to q Ex(x+lx, y+ly, z+lz), so f (x+a) - f (x) generalizes to
D -- q[,
(3.44)
-~
d dx
d
JJ ~ y
+ k
d dz
133
with similar equations for Fy and F~. (The quantity V is called the gradient operator.) For a dipole } aligned with E, this says that the dipole is attracted to regions of larger E. Magnetic dipoles have analogous behavior. Verify that this equation agrees with the qualitative considerations for the three dipoles in Figure 3.22. It is not important that you remember this equation~it is better that you don't ~.What is important is that, just as we argued above, this force is proportional to the dipole moment and to how the electric field varies in space.
In 1910 Rutherford, winner of the 1908 Nobel Prize in Physics for his discovery of alpha particles, had a student measure the alpha particles that are back-scattered by nuclei. The then current "plum-pudding" model of the atom (due to J. J. Thomson) had positive charge, with most of the mass of the atom uniformly distributed throughout the atom. For this model Rutherford expected to find negligible large angle-scattering. When appreciable back-scattering (nearly 180 ~!) was found, Rutherford developed a model where the positive charge was concentrated at a massive point. Working out the theory of the alpha particle orbit, he obtained agreement with his experimental results.
Figure 3.24 Motion of a negative charge - q above a positive, uniformly charged sheet +~ that intersects normal to the page.
Consider a uniformly charged sheet in the yz-plane, with positive charge density ~, as in Figure 3.24. Above itself it produces a uniform u p w a r d electric field of m a g n i t u d e E = 2zr~. A negatively charged particle - q w o u l d feel a constant force downward; the m o t i o n would be very like the m o t i o n of a baseball t h r o w n directly u p w a r d against gravity. See Figure 3.24. Let us analyze this situation neglecting the force of gravity. T h e force is downward, and of m a g n i t u d e F - q E. Let us call this the y-direction. By
N e w t o n ' s second law, this force produces a uniform d o w n w a r d acceleration ay, w h e r e may = F = q E. T h e n
dvy
dt - a y
qE - -m '
(3.45)
vy
vo +
t,
(3.46)
y - yo+vot+-;
(3.47)
w h e r e y0 is the initial position. This is very like w h a t we have for the gravity problem, except t h a t the acceleration no longer is g, b u t q E / m .
135
H~ 1
cathode
. . . . . . .
Phosphor~screen
Figure 3.25 Deflection of an electron emitted from a hot cathode. It is attracted to a positively charged grid screen (an anode), overshoots, is deflected by the electric field due to the charge on a pair of parallel plates, and then hits a phosphor screen, where it causes light to be emitted. For many years, television screens used this principle of electrostatic deflection.
3~ M o t i o n in a Plane, w i t h a U n i f o r m Electric Field
Older TV tubes and cathode ray tubes, as well as ink-jet printers, use electrostatic deflection to guide the electrons. Once the electron has passed through the grid and is moving at about the desired velocity, it passes through two pairs of deflecting plates, of length L, to cause the appropriate deflections in the y- and z-directions. See Figure 3.25. (At the TV or oscilloscope screen, the electron collides with a phosphor material, and excites an electron from an atom in the phosphor. The excited electron quickly returns to its ground state, emitting visible light in the process.) Most of the deflection occurs in the region of length D that follows the deflecting plates. However, the deflection angle ~) develops while the electron passes through the deflecting plate region. For simplicity, we will not consider motion in the z-direction. See Figure 3.25. For simplicity, we assume three clear-cut regions: the grid acceleration region (which can be treated as in the previous example), the deflecting plate region, and the post-deflecting plate region. In the deflecting plate region, the electron has a constant velocity Vx in the x-direction, obtained from the grid region. Thus, measuring from an origin that is at the left edge of the deflecting plates,
x - Vxt
(3.48)
describes the motion in the x-direction, with x - 0 at t - 0. In the y-direction, there is uniform acceleration starting from rest (vy - 0) at the origin (y0 - 0). With ay - F y / m - ( q E ) / m for the acceleration due to the deflecting plates L, the motion along y is described by
vy - ayt, y-
1a y t 2, vot + ~
Fy qE ay - ~ - --~.
(3.49)
136
In the post-deflecting plate region, the electron moves in a straight line, at an angle 0 determined by the velocity components at time T: tan ~) v!
Vx T
= a
(L/vx) = a y L
72x 722 "
(3 .so)
By suitably adjusting the charge densities + a on the deflecting plates, which can adjust a y - q E / m - ( e / m ) ( 4 n k a ) and therefore the deflection of the electron.
Forces Alone
From the properties of field lines, we can prove that, when Newton's laws of motion (defining classical mechanics) apply, a set of electric charges Qi alone cannot produce any position where a test charge q can be in stable equilibrium. Applied to ordinary matter, where the electrical interaction dominates, this means that stability is impossible. This is known as Earnshaw's theorem. Here is a graphical proof. Consider a point P at which/~ - O. (Note that 0 means that all three components are zero.) Surround P by a sphere of radius so small that it contains no charge. See Figure 3.26, which is based on Figure 3.18(b). If there is an excess of inward (or outward) field lines, then the sphere must contain negative (or positive) source charge. Since there is no charge within the sphere, if four field lines enter then four field lines must leave. N o w p l a c e Figure 3.26 a test charge q at P. It feels no force, by F - q E - O. Representation of the However, if it is displaced slightly, in some direcfield lines and an tions it will feel a force pushing it back to P (staimaginary spherical bility), and for others it will feel a force pulling it surface centered along from P (instability). Thus, there is always a directhe line between two tion for which displacements from equilibrium will be equal point charges, unstable. Since matter is stable, Earnshaw's theorem is an indication that Newton's laws of motion are inadequate at the atomic scale. At the atomic level, classical mechanics (i.e., Newton's laws of motion) must be replaced by quantum mechanics. Q u a n t u m mechanics eliminates, at the microscopic level, the instability of Earnshaw's theorem.
Problems
3-2.1 In fair weather, at the surface of the earth normally there is a downward directed electric field. (a) Assuming it to have magnitude 125 N/C, what is the force on a water molecule to which an electron has become attached? (b) Corn-
Problems
137
due to gravity that cancels the electrical force in a field of 2 N/C? (b) In what direction should the field point for such cancellation? 3 - 2 . 3 (a) Consider a dust particle of mass 5 x 10 .8 kg and an excess of five electrons. How large an electric field would be needed to produce a force of the same magnitude as the gravitational force on the surface of the earth? (b) For an electron, how large a gravitational field would be needed to produce a force of the same magnitude as an electric field of magnitude 100 N/C?
toner particle that has an excess of 150 electron charges. 3 - 2 . 1 1 One property that makes the electric field a field is that it is well defined everywhere in space. Within air, the quantities pressure, density, flow velocity, and temperature are everywhere well defined, and therefore they too are fields. Classify them as scalar or vector fields. 3 - 2 . 1 2 The intensity of light from a point source (e.g., a small light bulb) falls off as r -2, just as for electric fields. Consider a light source at ( - a , 0, 0) to also have charge q. If it produces intensity I0 and electric field/~0 at the origin, find the total intensity and the total electric field at the origin if an identical light source with charge q is at (a, O, 0). 3 - 2 . 1 3 Consider gravity between two point masses ml and m2. (a) Show that the gravitational field ~ due to m2 points toward m2. This is opposite the direction of E for a positive charge q?. (b) Write down the gravitational analog of (3.7), making sure that you get the direction correctly.
3-2.4 Let the electric field be/~ at a point P near a conducting foil (or any kind of conductor). Because of electrostatic induction, the force on a charge q at P will not yield/~. Show, however, that the average of the fields for two equal and opposite test charges q > 0 and - q gives the correct value" F_, = ( F q - F_q)/2q. 3-2.5 A string of length l hangs from the ceiling. At its bottom end is a small sphere of mass m and charge Q < 0. A uniform horizontal field of magnitude E points rightward. (a) Find the angle 0 that the string deflects from the vertical (and which way it deflects). (b) Find the tension T in the string. (c) Evaluate 0 and T for m = 4 2 g, l = 1 2 cm, Q = - 3 . 9 nC, and E = 875 N/C. 3-2.6 A fellow student gives you the following information to represent the force and electric field acting on a charge q: Fx - 6 x 10 -9 N and Ex = 2 N/C, Fy = - 4 x 10 -9 N and Ey = --5 N/C, Fz = 4 x 10 .9 N, E~ = 0. (a) Does this data make any sense? (b) If it does, deduce q. If it doesn't, explain why not. 3-2.7 Is F - (1, 2, 3) N a possible force for a charge subject to a field E - (2, 4, - 1 ) N/C?
3 - 2 . 8 A charge - 2 #C at the origin is subject to a force of 1.8 x 10 -6 N along the +y-axis, due to an applied electric field/~. (a) Determine/~ at the origin. (b) Can you use this information to obtain the electric field anywhere else? 3 - 2 . 9 A charge Q is known to produce a 5/xN force on a charge 2 nC at a distance of 2 cm. (a) Find the magnitude of the electric field due to Q. (b) Find [Q[. 3 - 2 . 1 0 Photocopying uses negatively charged toner particles and a positively charged imaging drum. If the field of the imaging drum has magnitude 4 x l0 s N/C, find the force acting on a
3-3.1 A charge Q = 8 . 5 nC is at the origin. (a) Find the magnitude and direction of the electric field it produces at (0, I), where I = 3 cm. (b) Repeat for ( 0 , - l ) . 3-3.2 At the origin, an electric field points along the +y-axis, with magnitude 560 N/C. (a) Where would you put a charge Q = 42 nC to produce such a field? (b) Repeat for Q - 42 nC. (c) What charge, placed at (0, l) for l = 16 cm, would produce such a field? 3-4.1 For drag-dominated motion, as in wires or electrolytes, ~ points along E. In the absence of drag, df2/dt points along E. Which of these systems, dragdominated or dragless, would be more useful for relating measured flow patterns by charged particles and electric field lines? 3-4.2 In considering the field lines for an infinitely long line charge with uniform density, we only considered the field line density along the angular direction. Discuss how the field line density varies along the axis of the line. 3-4.3 In addition to drawing continuous field lines, there is another way to represent a vector field like/~, which is the vector defined at all points in real space (the field): for a representative sample of points in space, draw an arrow pointing along/~, with length proportional to I/~ I, (a) What
138
advantages does this method have when there is a sphere containing a uniform volume distribution of charge? (b) What disadvantages does this method have? (c) How do both methods compare relative to the information gained from grass seed alignment?
3-5.4 A square centered at the origin has corners at ( - a , - a ) , ( a , - a ) , (a, a), and ( - a , a). If charges Q are at the top left and top right, find the electric field at the other two corners and at the origin. See Figure 3.29.
3-4.4 At point P, Faraday represents the electric field, of magnitude 20 N/C, with a density of eight lines per unit area. At point P', the density of field lines is 20 lines per unit area. (a) Find the field magnitude at P'. (b) If the strength of the charges producing the field now suddenly quadruples, find the density of field lines at P and at P'.
QA
AQ
3-5.5 Physics recitation is held in a tower that, viewed from above, rotates clockwise once every two minutes. Each of 23 students is given an electric charge. The total electric field at the front of the class is then calculated, and at 2:01:08 pm is found to have components Ex = 47 N/C and Ey = - 3 6 N/C as seen by an elevated external observer. (a) If the class members remain in their seats, find the field components 35 seconds later, as seen by the external observer. (b) Compare the calculation done in part (a) with the calculation that would have to be done by adding up the individual fields a second time.
3 - 5 . 6 A rod of length 10 cm points along the x-axis. It contains 2000 identical dipoles of moment 0.25 nC-m each, equally spaced and aligned with their dipole moments along the x-axis. Estimate the electric field along the x-axis at 2 m. (Hint: For estimation purposes, you may assume that the separation s between dipoles equals the charge separation I within each dipole.)
-8
Figure 3.27 Problem 3-5.2. 3-5.3 A circular loop of radius a, centered at the
origin, has seven charges equally spaced around it. The middle of the three adjacent - Q charges is uppermost, at (0, a). The other four are q. See Figure 3.28. (a) With Q, q > O, find the direction of the electric field at the center of the loop. (b) Find the magnitude of the electric field. -Q -Q -Q
Problems
139
q3 = q
Q/2
Q/2
T
Figure 3.31 Problem 3-6.3.
ql = q
a a
q2 =q
3-6.4 Consider a uniformly charged arc of radius a and angle ~ in the xy-plane, centered about the xaxis. See Figure 3.32. If it has charge per unit length ;% find the magnitude and direction of the electric field at the origin.
(c) Show that, in addition to the root at s = a/~/3, there is also a root near s ~ 0.24858a. (Due to S. Baker.)
3 - 6 . 5 Consider a ring of radius a in the xy-plane, centered at the origin. Its upper half has charge per unit length +)~, and its lower half has charge per unit length -)~. See Figure 3.33. (a) From symmetry considerations, determine the direction of the electric field at its center. (b) Find the magnitude of the electric field at this point.
3-6.1 A rod in the xy-plane has its ends at (0, 0) and (L, 0). It has uniform charge per unit length )~. (a) Find the total charge Q on the rod. (b) Find the electric field on the x-axis for x > L, and verify that it has the expected result for x -+ oo. (c) Find the electric field on the x-axis for 0 < x < L, and verify that it has the expected result for x = L/2.
3 - 6 . 2 A rod with ends at (0, 0) and (L, 0) has charge per unit length X = o~x,where ~ is a constant. (a) Give the units of ~ and find the total charge Q on the rod. (lo) Find the electric field on the x-axis for x > L. (c) Verify that the field has the expected result for x -+ 0o. 3 - 6 . 3 Consider a uniformly charged rod of two pieces, from (a, a) to (3r a) and from ( - 3 r a) to (-a, a). See Figure 3.31. Each piece has charge Q/2. Find the field at the origin. Hint: Use superposition.
140
C h a p t e r 3 ~ T h e Electric Field
its charge per unit length is X = c~cos0, where is a constant. (a) Find the net charge. (b) Find the electric dipole moment, defined as a generalization of (3.10) to be ~ = f~dq. Measure ~ relative to the origin. (When an object has zero net charge, it doesn't matter where ~ is measured from.) (c) Find the electric field at the origin.
charge densities are both X. (b) Repeat if the leftmost charge density is -,~. ~ : ~ ! ~ .? . i ~ .i ; :.. 3 - 6 . 1 2 A square of side 2a is centered about ..~: .: ....... :: the origin in the xy-plane. Its border has a uniform charge per unit length )~. (a) Find the electric field at (0, 0, z). (b) Find its total charge. (c) Verify that the electric field goes to the expected result as
Z ---~ OO.
3 - 6 . 1 3 You are to produce at the origin a field I/~1-~ 250 N/C pointing along the 4-x-axis. How would you do this with each of the following sources: (a) a point charge q -- - 6 #C; (b) an infinite line charge ;~ ~ 4 #C/m; (c) an infinite sheet of charge ~ - 4/~C/mZ?
3 - 6 . 1 4 A uniformly charged semicircular arc of radius a and total charge Q lies in the upper half xy-plane, with its center at the origin. See Figure 3.36. Find all three components of E for a point a distance z along the z-axis.
Z
Figure 3.36 Problem 3-6.14. 3 - 6 . 1 5 The field above two uniformly charged, infinite sheets normal to 51 is 20 N / C upward, and the field between them is 30 N / C downward. (a) Find the field below the sheets. (b) Find the charge density on each sheet.
3 - 6 . 1 6 Consider two co-axial disks, each of radius a, and common axis z. One lies on the z - d/2 plane and has uniform charge density er. The other lies on the z - - d / 2 plane and has uniform charge density - ~ . (a) Show that, between the disks (Izl < d/2), the field on the z-axis is
(z-d~2)
Ez -- 2 z r k e r [ ( 1 - v/a2 4 . ( z - d / 2 ) z
(z 4- d/2)
4- ~(1 - v/aZ 4. (z 4- d/2) 2)['~7"j (Izl < d/2). (b) Show that, outside the disks (Iz] > d/2), the field on the z-axis is Ez
--a
A w
A w
(z-d~2)
2Jrkcr [ - via 2 -4- (z - d/2) z
Problems
141
(c) Show that, for a ~ c~, part (a) goes to 4zrka, and part (b) goes to zero, and show that these results are expected for very large uniformly charged plates. (d) Show that, as Izl ~ ~ , Ez -~ (2nka)(a2d/z3), as expected on the axis of a dipole of moment p = a (rr a2)d. Hint: You may find (3.35) helpful.
3-7.6 A uniformly charged rod of total charge Q has its ends at (0, O) and (0, L). Sketch the field lines.
3-7.1 As indicated by Figure 3.2, field lines can be visualized with grass seeds. What does the fact that grass seeds tend to align along/~ say about which orientation has the lower energy, along or perpendicular to/~? 3-7.2 Sketch the electric field lines for two line charges )~ and -4)~ that are normal to the page, and separated by a, as in Figure 3.37. Take four lines per )~. Find the position where the field is zero.
3-8.1 The dipole moment of a water molecule (H20) is about 6.0 x 10 -3o C-m. (a) Find the energy to reorient it from pointing along a field of 30 kN/C to pointing against the field. (b) Find the angle to the field where the torque is a maximum, and find the maximum torque. 3-8.2 Show that the position where the potential energy is zero is irrelevant to the final answer for the dipole energy of (3.42), although it does affect the energy (3.40) of a single charge. Thus we are allowed to use (3.40) in deriving (3.42). 3-8.3 The dipole moment of an ammonia molecule (NH3) is approximately 5.0 x 10 -3o C-m. (a) Find the torque on the dipole when it is aligned normal to a field of 50 kN/C. (b) Find the torque on the dipole when it is at 28 ~ to the field. (c) Find the energy change to go from the first position to the second. 3-8.4 A small irregular object is centered about the origin. Far away from it, measurements indicate that the electric field varies as r -3, where r is the distance from the origin. Also, at fixed r = 40 cm, as the orientation varies, ]EI varies, with a maximum value of 14 N/C. (a) Find the net charge Q. (b) Find the dipole moment. 3-8.5 A charge .Q is placed along the axis of a dipole }, as in Figure 3.11. (a) Find the force on the charge Q. (b) Find the force on the dipole ~. (c) If the force is 8 x 10 -is N at y = 2 cm, and Q = 5/zC, find IPl.
20
Ia
-4~ 9
dO
Ia
3-9.1 A dipole } points along the x-axis. It is in a field/~ = Ax~ + A y ~ - 2Az~. (a) Find an expression for the force on the dipole in terms of I~1 and X (b) Let IPl = 3 x 10 -12 C-m and A 790 N/C-m. Evaluate the force on the dipole for position (2, O, O) (in cm units). (c) Repeat for position ( 4 , - 3 , 1) (in cm units). 3-9.2 In Figure 3.22, indicate the direction of the force on each of the dipoles, and explain why it has that direction.
3-10.1 A sheet of uniform charge density 5.6 nC/m 2 lies in the xy-plane. An electron starts from
142
rest at z = 6 cm. See Figure 3.39. (a) Determine its velocity when it reaches the sheet. (b) Determine how long it takes to reach the sheet.
O-e Iz
A
-e
o-
3-G.1 (a) Evaluate [(1 + x) -3/2 - 1 ]/x using your calculator for x = l 0 -14. (b) Evaluate it using (3.34). 3-G.2 (a) Evaluate [(1 + x ) 3 / 2 - ( - 1 -J- x)3/2]/x 1/2 using your calculator for x = 1014. (b) Rewrite it so that you can use (3.34), and then evaluate.
3 - G . 3 Let n = 100. (a) Evaluate (1 + x) n and 1 + nx for x = 0.001. Compare the results. (b) Repeat for x - 0.01 and x = 0.1. 3 - G . 4 (a) Use the principle of superposition to find the electric field midway between an infinitely long line charge ;~ > 0 through the origin, along the z-axis, and a charge q > 0 that is in the xy-plane at (a, 0). (b) For what value of ~ will the electric field at (a/2, 0) be zero? (c) How do these answers change if the line charge is rotated about the x-axis, to coincide with the y-axis? ~!~i~ .... 3-G.5 Consider a conducting disk of radius '~;'~ a and charge Q in the xy-plane and centered at the origin. Its charge density (including both sides) is ~ = (2 Q / a v / 1 - r2/a2). (a) Find the electric field along the z-axis. (b) Compare this with the electric field if the disk were uniformly charged. (c) Is the field for the conductor larger or smaller? Why?
-e
--(7
Problems
143
(d) For z << a, what is the electric field? For z >> a? Do these results make sense?
3-G.6 Discuss the difficulties associated with the following measurements of the electric field: (a) using a 2 cm radius insulating sphere coated with net charge q to measure the electric field at 1 cm from a point charge Q; (b) using a 2 cm radius conducting sphere with net charge q to measure the electric field at 1 m from a point charge .0.
3 - G . 7 Consider a dipole } at the origin. For an observer at position F, decompose } into two parts, P~ = (io-~)~ and io2 = io - (P" ~)~. Use (3.12) and (3.14) to show that the dipole field is given by
distance from the midpoint of the dipole lines to an observer at (x0, y0) This corresponds to a line of dipoles along the z-axis, with dipole moment along +y.
~ = k-~+3ff.~)~
/.3
(Due to Mark Heald.) :::%:~ 3 - G . 8 Consider a spherical shell of radius ....~ .! ~ i ~ .i.i. l...a and uniform charge density ~. (a) By doing the integral, show that the electric field inside (r < a) is zero. (b) By doing the integral, show that the electric field outside (r > a) is the same as if all the charge were at the center of the shell. (This last is an integral that, in the context of gravitation, gave Newton some difficulty. However, you may have learned enough calculus that you can do it. Newton had to invent his mathematics as he went along.) 3 - G . 9 A cylinder of length l and radius a, with charge Q, is centered at the origin, its axis along z. The field at z' is 2 N/C. If the object is now scaled up in size by a factor of two with Q fixed, find the field at 2z'. Hint: Show that this is equivalent to a making a change in the unit of distance. 3 - G . 1 0 Consider a fixed dipole i0 atthe origin that points along - z . A charge q > 0 of mass m moves in a circular orbit of radius a about the +z-axis, where the plane of the orbit is a distance b from the origin. (a) Show that a/b = v~. (b) Show that the charge has velocity v = v/3qpk/21/2m/r, where r = ~/a 2 + b 2. (Due to A. Zangwill.) 3 - G . 1 1 Consider two line charges 4-X that are both parallel to ~. They intersect the z = 0 plane at (x, y) = (0, 0) and (x, y) = (0, l), respectively. See Figure 3.43. Define the dipole moment per unit length to have magnitude IA] = xl, and to point from negative to positive. Let l--, 0, and let ;~ grow to keep A finite. Show that /~ = 2 k [ - A + 2(A./~)/~]/R 2, where R is the nearest
--O"
3-G.13 The previous problem obtained the ~i~iii .......electric . field of a dipole sheet by adding up the fields of many parallel dipole lines. Now obtain the electric field for that same dipole sheet by adding up the electric fields of two nearby parallel planes with equal and opposite charges. To avoid infinities, make the sheets extend from x = 0 to x = - L , and only after including both sheets take the limit L -~ ec.
...i .! .!ii!!"!ii~.:~i 3 - G . 1 4 Consider the amber effect when ......... the neutral object has one axis that is more polarizable than the others. In the dipole
144
system, let Px' = o~lE~,, and p / = cg2Ey,, where c~2 < c~1. Let (x', y') be rotated by 0 relative to the lab frame (x, y), so Ex, = cos 0 Ex + sin 0 Ey and E / = c o s 0 E y - sin0Ex. See Figure 3.45. (a) Show that py = cos Op/+ sin Opt, can be rewritten
as
y
Y' x'
Figure 3.45 Problem 3-G. 14. 3-G.15 The 18th-century philosopher Bishop
Berkeley (pronounced "Barkley") posed the question "If a tree falls in a forest and there is no one to hear it, does it make a sound?" Show that the answers are different for the two viewpoints of action at a distance and of field (here, the pressure field). Berkeley is also responsible for questioning the mathematical rigor of Newton's approach to calculus. This issue was not resolved until a century later, when mathematicians developed ideas associated with continuity and l i m i t s - - w h a t students study, perhaps without fondness, using the machinery of epsilon (E) and delta (S).
and that