Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Analysis of Water Quality Parameters of Ground and Surface Water in Siltara Industrial Area, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, INDIA
D. K. Pandey1, S. Biswas2, R. Sharma3 and C. S. Meshram4
Shri Shankaracharya Engineering College, Junwani, Bhilai, India
Abstract: This paper presents water quality Siltara industrial area in Raipur city. Effluents from
sponge-iron, steel & power industries and water sample collected from the ten different locations were selected for the study and compared on quality basis. The parameter physicochemical determined include PH, temperature, conductivity, salinity, total alkalinity, total hardness, chloride, sulphate, fluoride, total suspended solid (TSS), dissolve oxygen (D.O.), chemical oxygen demand (C.O.D.). From overall analysis, it was observed that there was slight fluctuation in the physicochemical parameters among the water sample studied. Comparing of the physicochemical parameter of the water sample with ISI, WHO and ICMR limits showed that water sample is highly contaminated and account of health hazards from human use. Keywords: Physicochemical, pollutants, industrial area, Raipur, India
INTRODUCTION
Water is an important compound that covers approximately 75% of the earths surface, existing in all the three states as ice, liquid and steam. Water is used in many ways from drinking to industrial and agricultural purposes (1). The aim of process industries is to produce intermediate and final products from raw materials from the earth, water or air (1). Inevitably there are wasted to be disposed off which must be returned to the environment in such a way as to minimize any adverse effect on it (2). The impairment of water quality due to the introduction of pollutants is a problem of industrial cities around the world. The uncontrolled releases of waste effluents to large water bodies have negatively affected both water quality and aquatic life [3]. Human activities have introduced potentially hazardous metals to the environment since the onset of the industrial revolution [3-6]. Aquatic ecosystems are polluted with high levels of toxicants (organic and inorganic substances), from wastewater and effluents generated from industrial enterprises [6]. Industrial pollution is a problem and there are attempts to control it. Effluents generated by industries are sources of pollution. Contaminated air, soil, and water by Industrial effluents are associated with disease burden and this could be reasons for the current shorter life expectancy in developing countries [7, 8] when compared with developed nations. Chemicals used in industries are poisonous to man and aquatic life resulting in food contamination [8, 9]. For example, ammonia is harmful to fish and other aquatic organisms at concentrations of 10 50 g L-1, while the sulphide in effluents are of environmental concern [7] because this may lead to poor air quality of an area. The same is applicable to pH if water available for human use is not of the required quality [10]. Low pH values in the river adversely affect aquatic life and impair recreational used of water [11]. High pH values 1
Corresponding Author: D. K. Pandey, Shri Shankaracharya Engineering College,
International Journal of Creative Mathematical Sciences & Technology (IJCMST) 2(1): 1-8, 2012
could also alter toxicity of water pollutants in the water body. A decrease in pH could also decrease the solubility of certain essential elements. Low pH also increases the solubility of many other elements such as Al, B, Cu, Hg, Mn and Fe [11]. Conductivity of water is used as a measure of the total concentration of ionic species or salt content. Wastewater often contains high amounts of Dissolved salts. Sources of dissolved salts include municipal storm, sewage and industrial effluent discharged. High salt concentrations in wastewater can increase the salinity of the receiving water, which may result in adverse ecological effects on aquatic biota [12]. The rates of biological and chemical processes also depend on temperature. Aquatic organisms from microbes to fish are dependent on certain temperature ranges for their optimal health [13]. Optimal temperatures for fish depend on the specie. Some survive best in colder water, whereas others prefer warmer water. Benthic macro invertebrates are also sensitive to temperature and will move in the lake to find their optimal temperature. If temperatures are outside this optimal range for a prolonged period of time, organisms are stressed and can die [14, 15]. Temperature affect the oxygen content of the water (oxygen level becomes lower as temperature increases); the rate of photosynthesis by aquatic plant; the metabolic rates of aquatic organisms; and the sensitivity of organisms to toxic wastes, parasites and diseases [16]. The survey of lead pollution level & fluoride deposition in Chhattisgarh central India also is studied by K. S. Patel et, al[20-21]. In this paper we are discussed the underground and surface water pollution level with pollution controlling suggestion in Siltara industrial area, Raipur.
2
Corresponding Author: D. K. Pandey, Shri Shankaracharya Engineering College,
International Journal of Creative Mathematical Sciences & Technology (IJCMST) 2(1): 1-8, 2012
Fig 1: Above figure represent the country India, state Chhattisgarh & siltara industrial Area Raipur. . Table 1. Sampling point Type of sample water Name of sampling place in siltra Naya talab Hathni talab Chokra nala Kharun river Nawapara Goal chowk Bazar chowk Petrol pump Purani basti Govt. school Sampling point Parameter Temperature pH Conductive Salinity Method Thermometer PH Metry Conductometry Nine parameter analyzer model-172 Gravimetric Method Gravimetric Method Titration with acid HCl EDTA-Titration Method Winkler Titration Method K2Cr2O7 Method Silver Nitrate Method Ion Selective Method Turbidometric Method Table 2. Method used for estimation of various Physico-chemical parameters
Surface water Surface water Surface water River water Ground water Ground water Ground water Ground water Ground water Ground water
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
T.S. T.D.S. Total Alkalinity Total Hardness D.O. C.O.D. Chloride Fluoride Sulphate
Groundwater samples were collected from ten different locations of siltara, Raipur during the post-rainy season (November 2011). Borosilicate glassware, distilled water and E-Merk reagents were used throughout the testing. Samples were collected in sterilized screw-capped polyethylene bottles of one liter capacity and analyzed in laboratory for their physico-chemical parameters Samples collected from study sites were properly labeled and a record was prepared (Table 1). The various physiochemical parameters were analyzed (Table 2) and health effects. Water samples were determined by titrating with N/10 HCl using phenolphthalein and methyl orange as indicators. The chloride ions were generally of chemical parameters are reported (Table 3). 3
Corresponding Author: D. K. Pandey, Shri Shankaracharya Engineering College,
International Journal of Creative Mathematical Sciences & Technology (IJCMST) 2(1): 1-8, 2012
Table 3. Health effect of chemical parameter Parameters of water analysis Temperature pH --6.5 8.5 --Affects mucous membrane; bitter taste;corrosion Objectionable taste to water. May affect osmotic. Undesirable taste; gastro-intestinal irritation; corrosion or incrustation Boiled rice turns yellowish ---Ref.17,18&19 BIS Guideline values (Max. allowable) Potential health effects Reference
Salinity
2000mg/l
Ref.17,18&19
200mg/l
Ref.17,18&19
Total alkalinity
600mg/l
Ref.17,18&19
Total Hardness
600mg/l
Poor lathering with soap; deterioration of the quality of clothes; scale forming Lower DO is harmful for aquatic living organisms High COD level is toxic for aquatic living organisms Taste affected; corrosion Taste affected; irritation gastro-intestinal
Ref.17,18&19
Dissolve Oxygen
6-5 mg/l
Ref.17,18&19
2-4 mg/l
Ref.17,18&19
Ref.17,18&19 Ref.17,18&19
Sulphate
1.5 mg/l
Ref.17,18&19
Total alkalinities of the determined by titrating the water samples against a standard solution of AgNO3 using potassium chromate as an indicator. The conductivity of the water sample was measured using the conductometry method. The total & temporary hardness of the water samples was determined by complex metric titration with EDTA using Erichrome black-T as an indicator. Sulphate and fluoride of 4
Corresponding Author: D. K. Pandey, Shri Shankaracharya Engineering College,
International Journal of Creative Mathematical Sciences & Technology (IJCMST) 2(1): 1-8, 2012
the water samples were estimated by UV-visible spectrophotometer. TDS of water sample were measured using gravimetric method. Salinity was measured by nine parameter analyzer model-172. Dissolve Oxygen was measured by winkler titration method & Chemical Oxygen Demand was measured by titration of digested water with F.A.S. (digestion of water sample in presence of oxidizing agent K2Cr2O7, Ag2SO4, Hg2SO4, and H2SO4).
5
Corresponding Author: D. K. Pandey, Shri Shankaracharya Engineering College,
International Journal of Creative Mathematical Sciences & Technology (IJCMST) 2(1): 1-8, 2012
Table 4. Physico-chemical parameter sample of water sample (with standard deviation) Sampling point 5 6 25 25.7 (0.78) (1.11) 7.01 7.2 (0.95) (0.85) 1400 700 (4.0) (2.51) 1105 620 (2.51) (3.51) 1020 (4.0) 760 (4.50) 800 (4.58) 760 (5.29) 14 (0.55) 9.83 (0.49) 159.7 (2.79) 165 (5.84) 1.1 (0.12) 550 (3.51) 780 (4.01) 600 (5.03) 600 (4.72) 12 (0.60) 13.41 (0.75) 124.2 (4.52) 190 (7.19) 0.9 (0.12)
Parameter Temperature (C) PH Salinity (mg/l) Total solid (mg/l) Total dissolve solid(mg/l)
2 25.5 (0.8) 8.7 (0.95) 1200 (4.6) 910 (1.52) 890 (3.05) 750 (4.58) 1000 (4.50) 800 (5.56) 13.5 (0.7) 13.4 (0.55) 156.2 (3.34) 190 (5.11) 1.2 (0.15)
3 30 (0.75) 7.62 (0.76) 1200 (4.6) 1200 (3.21) 910 (4.04) 840 (4.50) 900 (5.56) 700 (5.50) 13 (0.4) 3.5 (0.56) 181.1 (4.39) 210 (5.63) 0.9 (0.14)
4 30.2 (0.79) 7.64 (0.76) 600 (3.21) 610 (2.51) 520 (4.50) 780 (4.01) 300 (4.58) 620 (4.50) 10 (0.72) 11.25 (0.83) 88.7 (3.49) 185 (6.87) 0.9 (0.18)
7 26.4 (0.91) 7.02 (0.95) 1300 (3.51) 1040 (3.51) 930 (3.51) 810 (4.50) 700 (5.03) 800 (4.16) 14.4 (0.50) 12.6 (0.54) 177.5 (3.08) 150 (4.27) 0.8 (0.20)
8 26.3 (0.81) 7.5 (0.80) 700 (2.51) 700 (3.60) 600 (3.21) 770 (4.01) 400 (5.50) 650 (4.50) 11 (0.56) 11 (0.58) 145 (3.46) 220 (7.03) 1.3 (0.19)
9 27.3 (0.73) 7.6 (0.75) 750 (2.51) 750 (3.05) 625 (3.05) 780 (4.58) 450 (5.50) 700 (5.50) 12 (0.70) 12 (0.87) 148.5 (4.15) 230 (9.65) 1.1 (0.15)
10 25.4 (0.71) 8 (0.55) 775 (3.0) 775 (3.51) 690 (3.05) 780 (4.58) 510 (4.58) 655 (4.50) 12.5 (0.49) 12.5 (0.60) 150.5 (6.57) 190 (5.63) 1.4 (0.24)
500 (5.29) 600 (5.13) 15 (1.0) 10 (0.72) 152.05 (4.43) 180 (4.41) 1 (0.12)
The specific conductivity of water samples under study varies between 800 1000 mho/cm. the maximum permissible limit of this parameter for drinking water is 300 mho/cm. however, the average specific conductivity exceed this limit because of its high values during rainy season. In rainy season due to floods and rains, water level in the well increases, which contain more electrolytes. 6
Corresponding Author: D. K. Pandey, Shri Shankaracharya Engineering College,
International Journal of Creative Mathematical Sciences & Technology (IJCMST) 1(1): 1-8, 2012
Total alkalinity of water in term of CaCO3 varied from 300 mg/l to 1000mg/l in sampling spot-7 and spot-2. The value of total alkalinity were comparatively moderate, the water for domestic use having alkalinity less than 100 mg/l is safe. The high contain of alkalinity is show in table 4. Total hardness was found in the sample water ranges from 600 800 mg/l, which shows that water is unsafe for drinking purpose. However maximum permissible level prescribed by WHO for drinking water is 500 mg/l as set. According to some classifications, water having hardness up to 75 mg/l is classified as soft, 76-150 mg/l is moderately soft, 151-300 mg/l as hard (Dufor & Backer, 1964) and more than 300 mg/l very hard. On this basis, the results show that the entire sample was very hard. The dissolve oxygen (DO) was determined on the spot during water sampling by the instrumental method, deluxe nine parameter analyzer kit model 172. The value was get in ppm than it was converted in to mg/l. the value was showed 10-15 mg/l. all sampling spot mentioned above the desirable and permissible limit prescribed by WHO (2004). The values of dissolve oxygen clear indicate that aquatic environment is fit for the animals. The chemical oxygen demand (COD) was determined by the reflux titrimetric method. The chemical oxygen demand (COD) was determined by the reflux titrimetric method. The value was obtained from the 3.5 13.41 mg/l minimum and maximum range from the sampling spot. The maximum value above the permissible limit of WHO (2004). The high value may cause the presence of high contain of carbanous and suspended particles in different water system. Chloride contain of the water samples was low in rainy season. According to WHO, maximum permissible limit for chloride is 500 mg/l. the observed in present study is in the range of permissible. The sulphate content varies between150 to 230 mg/l and the fluoride content varies between 0.8 to 1.4 mg/l. The sulphate and fluoride values were also found to be within the prescribed limits.
CONCLUSION
The result also show that three ground water, one river water & six surface water are contaminated where the concentration of physicochemical parameter are above the standard acceptable levels which required for drinking water adapted by ISI (1991), WHO (2004) & ICMR (1985). Water of almost all point is hard and contaminated because of this Siltara industrial area, Raipur for the immediate health problems such as skin diseases, stomach diseases, gastric trouble etc. therefore waste water treatment at this area is recommended to surface & ground water.
REFERENCES
[1]. [2]. [3]. [4]. [5]. Ross, R.D., Air Pollution and Industry Ed. Van Nonstrand Reinhold Co. (1972) pp18-20. Walters, J.K. and A. Wint, Process design and the environment, the Chemical Engineer, 1976, pp. 19-26. Udosen, E.D., Determination of trace metals and fluxes in sediments along a segment of Qua beo River in Southern Nigeria. Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 2 (2006), pp. 82-90. Nriagu, J.O., A history of global metal pollution. Science, 272 (1996), pp. 233-224. Celik, A., Kartal .A.A., Akdogan .A and Y. Kaska, Determining the heavy metal pollution in Denizli(Turkey) by using Robinio Pseudo-acacia L. Environmental International, 31 (2005), pp.105-112. 7
Corresponding Author: D. K. Pandey, Shri Shankaracharya Engineering College,
International Journal of Creative Mathematical Sciences & Technology (IJCMST) 1(1): 1-8, 2012
[6].
[13]. [14].
[15].
[16].
Yang, H. and N.L. Rose, Trace element pollution records in some UK lake sediment, their history, influence factor and regional differences. Environmental International, 31, (2005), pp. 63-75. Water Pollutants: Biological Agents, Dissolved Chemicals, Non-dissolved Chemicals, Sediments, Heat, WHO CEHA (2002), Amman, Jordan. The World Health Report: Shaping the Future, World Health Organization, (2003) 1211Geneva 27, Switzerland. Novick R., Overview and the Health in Europe in the 1990s, World Health Organization, Europe Regional Office, Copenhagen, EUR/ICP/EH/CO020205/6, (1999) pp 20. Guidelines for Technologies for Water Supply Systems in Small Communities, World Health Organization, CEHA, (1993). South Africa Water Quality Guideline 1: Domestic water use (2nd edn) Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria, DAWF (1996). Morrison, G., Kotoki, O. S., Person, I. and A. Ekberg, Assessement of the impact of point source pollution from the Keiskammahoek sewage treatment plant on the Keiskamma river pH, conductivity, oxygen demanding substance (COD) and nutrients. Water SA, 27 (2001), pp. 475-480. APHA., Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 18th Edition.American Public health Association, Washington, DC (1992), pp. 45-60. J. C. Akan, F. I. Abdulrahman, V.O. Ogugbuaja and K. D. Reuben, Study of the Physicochemical Pollutants in Kano Industrial Areas, Kano State, Nigeria. 102 Journal of Applied Sciences in Environmental Sanitation, 4 (2) ,(2009), pp. 89-102. Chapman, D., Water Quality Assessment. A Guide to the use of Biota, Sediments and water in Environmental Monitoring. Second Edition. E& FN Spon, London. file: A Hydrology and Water Quality of Lake Merced.htm, (1997). Volunteer lake monitoring: A methods manual. EPA 440/4-91-002. Office of water. U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.file: A Hydrology and Water Quality of Lake Merced.htm, USEPA (1999). Margaleff R., Limnology Now, A Paradigm of Planetary Problems. Elsevier, Amsterdam. (1996) , pp. 220-222. Standards Methods for Examination of Water, ICMR Standards (1985). Indian standard Drinking Water Specifications, ISI (1991) New Delhi, 5-16 International standards of drinking water. World Health organization, Geneva, (2004), pp. 55. C. K. Chandrawanshi and K. S. Patel, Fluoride deposition in central India, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 55 (1999), pp. 251265. K.S. Patel, K. Shrivas, P. Hoffmann & N. Jakubowski, A survey of lead pollution in Chhattisgarh State, central India, Environmental Geochemistry and Health 28 (2006) , pp. 11 17. ________________________
8
Corresponding Author: D. K. Pandey, Shri Shankaracharya Engineering College,