Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
A.Mosavi
A.Mosavi, Interactive Multiobjective Optimization and Decision-Making, Product Design and Optimization Lab, Mechatronic Systems Engineering, School of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, 2012.
The V-2 rocket; first human artifact to enter outer space 1950s
Energy minimization
Making the point (1) In fact the integration of multiple criteria in product design, Whether in SBD or traditional methods, is the success-key
Simplification;
Identifying the potential algorithms in OR community and adopting them for engineering applications. Numerus algorithms exist, but no awareness!
7
Major remarks
The majority of the companies try to achieve optimized design. 40% support continuous improvement as a way to improvement. Optimization of the design are mostly expert-based optimization approach. Design optimization is time consuming. FEA and CAE followed by classical DOE. The main criterion to optimize a design is cost. Expert-based optimization approaches are less time consuming than GA. Developing novel designs using GAs fails to describe a logical product development process involving DM.
10
Software tools In fact the usage of an algorithm is limited unless implemented via a software tools
1. The reactive tabu search, R Battiti, G Tecchiolli, ORSA journal on computing, 1994. Software tool released in 2012 LIONsolver CAE integration
11
Software tools
2. I.N. Egorov. Indirect Optimization Method on the Basis of Self-Organization,1998. Software tool released in 2007 IOSO approach CAE, CAD integration e.g ANSYS, Solidworks
12
Software tool released in 2007 CAE, CAD integration e.g ANSYS, Solidworks
13
Making a point Once the algorithm is presented via a software tool engineers become more interested. What engineer needs: less mathematics and more integration capabilities with major CAE codes.
14
Human; the most reliable DM Although human is not ideal for decision-making but still is way more intelligent vs bees, ants, immune and genetic operators.
16
17
MCDM INTEGRATED WITH MECHANICAL MODELING OF DRAPING FOR MATERIAL SELECTION OF TEXTILE COMPOSITES
18
Evaluating the beauty is possible just with human interaction Just like my recent work; optimal design of curve and surfaces
19
NIMBUS methods
20
learning while optimizing; (R Battiti, 2010, 2012) The human inteligence is integrated via advanced Visualization tools
21
Many thanks
A.Mosavi, Interactive Multiobjective Optimization and Decision-Making, Product Design and Optimization Lab, Mechatronic 22 Systems Engineering, School of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, 2012.