Forced Forced Circumcision is countered by first exposing the falseness of its supposed connection to legality

Amen Ronald Oberhollenzer, Jerusalem 1976 19

The CAPTADefinition on Child Abuse

This is Child Abuse, thus already Outlawed! Nulla est maior probatio quam evidentia rei There is no greater proof than the evidence of the thing

From the state of NORMALITY to the state of ABNORMALITY

ENDORSE the Universal Declaration of Demand for Law Enforcement Enfor ement on Forced Circumcision!

http://www.intacthumanity.org/declaration demand.html http://www.intacthumanity.org/declaration-of-demand.html

We know what Child Abuse is in psychological, physical, emotional and legal terms.
We know: Child Abuse is classified as the general mishandling and wrongdoing with regard to a child or an individual considered being a minor. Child Abuse can range from neglect to aggravated assault of a child. Child Abuse can be psychological, physical, emotional, and sexual in nature. It can mirror any type of abuse directed at an adult, yet due to the nature of the age(s) of the victim(s), punishment for convicted child abusers are typically severe. We know: infliction of non-accidental injury to a child of any age and gender = Physical Child Abuse. We know: Forced Child Circumcision = infliction of non-accidental injury to a child = Physical Child Abuse. CHILD ABUSE = is a CRIMINAL OFFENSE that involves the PHYSICAL, emotional, or sexual MISTREATMENT OF or INFLICTION OF NONACCIDENTAL INJURY TO A CHILD committed by a parent or another party if responsible for the childs welfare or not, either purposefully, or due to neglect. CHILD ABUSE is defined by Liberal Democratic Right State Laws and is also defined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; in particular in the Universal Declaration of the Rights of the Child. E.g.: In the USA: Although State laws vary, the Federal CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT ACT (CAPTA) requires that States incorporate a minimum set of acts or behaviors into their JURISTIC DEFINITIONS of CHILD ABUSE and NEGLECT.

The CAPTA DEFINITION OF "CHILD ABUSE and NEGLECT" refers to:

The CAPTA DEFINITION OF "CHILD ABUSE and NEGLECT" refers to: "Any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent or caretaker or any other person, which results in death, SERIOUS PHYSICAL or EMOTIONAL HARM, sexual abuse, or exploitation, or AN ACT OR FAILURE TO ACT WHICH PRESENTS AN IMMINENT RISK OF SERIOUS HARM".

"Any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent or caretaker or any other person, which results in death, SERIOUS PHYSICAL or EMOTIONAL HARM, sexual abuse, or exploitation, or AN ACT OR FAILURE TO ACT WHICH PRESENTS AN IMMINENT RISK OF SERIOUS HARM".

We know every adult citizen in any democratic right state law society has the legal obligation to report any form of Child Abuse upon knowledge or suspicion of such an act to the state-authority. We know it is a violation of law to not report Child Abuse to the state-authority. We know the Child Mutilators and the General Public and even the State-Authority is acting as if this >Infliction of NonAccidental Injury to the Male-Childs Genital< were a state secured right. We know if we report >Forced Male Child Circumcision< to the authority, that the authority - due to the dire fact that also the authority sees this act as legal-act - refuses to enforce the current law which has also this >infliction of preventable injury done to any child of any age and gender< outlawed. We know not to be impressed by the child-mutilators claim and the publics and authoritys Complicity in this FALLACY in thinking that what is done to the child were a state guaranteed right to >inflict non-therapeutic foreskinectomy<, and in this to >violate the state guaranteed right of the child of equal protection< from any >infliction of non-accidental injury and other harm<. We know the Principle of Liberal Democracy and the Concept of The Rule of Law obligates the Authority to act upon knowledge or suspicion of any form of Child Abuse no matter of the Abusers Motive.

We DEMAND from STATE-AUTHORITY to ENFORCE the LAW on FORCED CIRCUMCISION.

PEOPLE MUST BE TOLD THAT MGM IS CHILD ABUSE and ALREADY OUTLAWED!!! The Intactivist Movement MUST DEMAND LAW ENFORCEMENT and finally STOP all these petitions and therefore STOP giving this WRONG impression of routine circumcision were up to parents, doctors, religion, tradition to decide to whether or not mutilate the child. Since MGM IS CHILD ABUSE under the CAPTA-Definition, thus ALREADY OUTLAWED, such a legal right of decision DOES NOT EXIST!!! Routine Circumcision IS a Form of CHILD ABUSE under the CAPTA-Definition, and the authority DOES HAVE the OBLIGATION to ENFORCE THE LAW on any form of CHILD ABUSE and therefore also on MGM!!! It is CORRECT to DEMAND LAW ENFORCEMENT on MGM, but it is WRONG to petition the CHILD ABUSER to please dont mutilate the child. So, it is high time that the entire intactivist movement ENDORSES the >Global Declaration of Demand for Law Enforcement on MGM<, just as is stated in

http://www.intacthumanity.org/declaration-of-demand.html
In the horrific face of this Global Collective Human Abuse of Forced Circumcision on Children and Adults, this is the ONLY CORRECT HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE ADVOCACY in order to finally bring this GLOBAL HOLOCAUST of FORCED CIRCUMCISION to its END! When will the intactivist movement finally COMPREHEND its RESPONSIBILITY and COOPERATE? Surely all CHILDREN DEMAND UNDIVIDED GLOBAL COOPERATIVE DIRECT ACTION! Prof. Amen Ronald Oberhollenzer-Paternoster School of Humanity Global Symposium for an Intact Humanity www.intacthumanity.org intact.humanity@gmail.com