Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
- GREECE
Urban Morphology Laboratory Scientific and Technical Centre for Building (CSTB) 4 av. du Recteur Poincar 75016 Paris, France Email: loeiz.bourdic@m4x.org
Abstract
Cities are complex open systems; they are almost entirely fed by flows coming from the outside. As such, approaches based on the second law of thermodynamics and entropy maximisation that only apply to isolated physical systems fail to properly address urban complex issues. Cities are historically driven by external flows, which push them away from classical closed-systems thermodynamic equilibriums. According to the thermodynamics of dissipative systems, urban systems respond spontaneously with the emergence of structure and order and the steady-states reached correspond to exergy maxima. Elaborating on the World Banks forms and flows approach, this paper investigates the relationships between exergy and urban structures, especially by considering the role of scale hierarchy within urban elements. It shows how scale hierarchic structures are the only relevant way to maximise urban exergy production, and thus cities effectiveness in that they make more effective use of the resources allocated, such as energy or land. Authors show that structures with appropriate scale hierarchies are the key for efficient urban planning, be it for energy use or for economic value creation. Starting from Alexanders famous thought on cities and trees, authors eventually scrutinize the concepts of efficiency and resilience within urban networks.
Introduction
Urban world is experiencing a never before seen growth. When put into perspective with climate change mitigation, fossil energy scarcity and poverty issues, this growth highlights the crucial need for more urban efficiency, be it on the energy or socio-economic side. A World Bank initiative [1] insists on the role of synergies and interdependences within urban structures, of a coordination between urban forms and urban flows. Taking this coordination between forms and flows as a starting point, this paper aims to investigate the relationships between urban structures, energy use and economic value creation. At the crossing between thermodynamics, industrial ecology and urban morphology, this paper summarises the lessons that can be drawn from each field and applied to urban analysis. It aims though to a pragmatic objective, keeping in mind that urban development is in the end primarily decided by policy-makers and urban authorities. In the first part, authors present a brief overview of thermodynamics, stressing the difficulties in applying it to complex open systems like cities. Investigating these issues further, authors highlight the relationships between thermodynamic aspects and organisation within complex systems. Discussing the influence of order and complexity on urban efficiency, this paper eventually stresses the role of scale hierarchic structures within cities.
2nd International Exergy, Life Cycle Assessment, and Sustainability Workshop & Symposium (ELCAS2) 19 21 June, 2011, NISYROS - GREECE
2nd International Exergy, Life Cycle Assessment, and Sustainability Workshop & Symposium (ELCAS2) 19 21 June, 2011, NISYROS - GREECE
Furthermore, it should be kept in mind that cities efficiency eventually relies on policy-makers and local authorities decisions. Entropy is an abstract object, a creation of mind, but has no tangible and sensible value. It is moreover a pretty obscure concept for a non-scientific audience. Stakeholders may not be fully convinced and follow policy recommendations that are based on incomprehensible pundit thoughts. This paper aims to conciliate the hard-core thermodynamic science applied to cities with another much more meaningful and easy-to-handle concept: Order and organisation within urban structures.
2nd International Exergy, Life Cycle Assessment, and Sustainability Workshop & Symposium (ELCAS2) 19 21 June, 2011, NISYROS - GREECE
urban structures fail in optimising energy use for transport especially, but also for buildings. Some of them, for a wide range of reasons, have already been destroyed after no more than 40 years. Lets hope what will replace them will be more efficient. Interestingly, this modernist failure related to urban sprawling and large-scale inefficiencies can be put into perspective with science history. From Newtonian gravity to Einsteins relativity, there has been a natural tendency for science towards reductionism [15]. Every single problem has to be reducible to its simple elements, and equals the sum of its elements. Science has been developing alongside the inherent human difficulty to grasp and apprehend complexity. As such, modernist urbanism is a major outcome of this encompassing thought: cities are built with elementary blocks added on the existing urban fabric. But both on economic and energy aspects, the addition of a new subsystem does not necessarily lead to an overall optimisation, even though each addition is locally optimal [16]. The optimisation under a wide range of constraints (transport, buildings, socio-economic aspects) mathematically leads to a sub-optimisation in every sector. The former destructive-constructive process mitigated this phenomenon and drove urban tissues towards efficiency. To compensate this process which is not happening anymore in these times of steady growth, a crucial attention has to be paid to urban structures efficiency as a whole and not only to subsystems.
2nd International Exergy, Life Cycle Assessment, and Sustainability Workshop & Symposium (ELCAS2) 19 21 June, 2011, NISYROS - GREECE
Interestingly, three recent papers [21,22,23] have drawn analogies between leaves and urban networks, giving a facelift to Alexanders arguments. Corson notably shows that the redundancy within leaves venation networks improves the tolerance to damage. When a major vein is cut, smaller parallel veins take over and irrigate the structure almost as usual. This resilient phenomenon cannot happen with a tree structure: if a branch is cut, all the small branches belonging to the larger one will die. Transposed to urban networks, semi-lattice structures could then be a way to improve resilience, and reduce the damages caused by local changes. Let us consider an underground network. The more redundancy there are in the network (leaf structure), the less influence an incident on a track has. Whereas in the extreme case of a tree-like network, an incident on a single track could paralyse a part of the city. 5
2nd International Exergy, Life Cycle Assessment, and Sustainability Workshop & Symposium (ELCAS2) 19 21 June, 2011, NISYROS - GREECE
To sum up this point, a tree structure tends to maximise the efficiency (in thermodynamic arguments), whereas a leaf structure improves the resilience and the resistance to damage. There is certainly a trade-off to be done between the tree structure and the leaf structure, depending on which aspect is regarded as primary: energy and efficiency on the one hand, or risk and resilience on the other hand.
Conclusions
The city is the particular arena where both the climate and the development challenge will take place in the century to come. Most of the current urban development is not sustainable, mainly because most of the new urban structures are intrinsically energy greedy. Building low energy buildings and eco-districts is a part of the solution. It is not sufficient though. Cities are large and complex systems. As such, the overall optimisation will not be achieved by adding up locally optimised subsystems. On the contrary, the overall optimisation is achieved for sub-optimised subsystems. Building an eco-district outside from a city is a non-sense: sure it can perform well in heating energy consumption, but because of its distance from the existing city, it will structurally need a lot of energy for people transportation. As in every complex open system, forms and flows play a major role within cities. Thermodynamics of dissipative structures provides a relevant and robust framework in order to address cities efficiency issues. However, theory is pretty hard to grasp. This could jeopardize the chances thermodynamics-based tools being used for urban policy making. Authors propose an innovative approach that is based on urban order and structures considerations. This paper has scrutinised the relationships between exergy and entropy within urban systems on the one hand, and urban complexity on the other hand. It has notably highlighted the crucial role of scale hierarchic structures to maximise cities efficiency. The main advantage of this approach is to be easier to handle in an urban policy making process. The pictorial tree-leaf example does not aim to provide any policy recommendation about urban structure. At least it has the virtue to highlight the very different implications of each kind of structure. Cities cannot be limited to a point-to-volume flow optimisation problem. Cities are the superimposition of numerous flow structures (point-to-volume, area-to-volume, volume-tovolume...) connected one with the others. As we discussed here above, the optimisation of every layer though will not lead to the overall optimum. On the contrary, the overall optimum is reached for a sub-optimisation of every element. City efficiency has to be analysed as a complex problem and thus as a whole. Thermodynamics insights are crucial. But a morphology approach, based on scale hierarchy and form optimisation, may be a powerful steering tool for urban policy.
2nd International Exergy, Life Cycle Assessment, and Sustainability Workshop & Symposium (ELCAS2) 19 21 June, 2011, NISYROS - GREECE
References
[1] World Bank, "Eco2 Cities: Ecological Cities as Economic Cities" (2010). [2] R. Bussiere & F. Snickers, "Derivation of the negative exponential model by an entropy maximizing method," Environment and planning A, 2 (1970) 295301. [3] Y.C. Chen, "A wave-spectrum analysis of urban population density: entropy, fractal, and spatial localization," Discrete dynamics in nature and society, 22 (2008). [4] M. Batty, "Cities as complex systems: scaling, interactions, networks, dynamics and urban morphologies", CASA Working Papers, 131 (2008) Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (UCL), London, UK. [5] N.A. Salingaros & B.J. West, "A universal rule for the distribution of sizes", Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26, (1999) 909-923. [6] C. Balocco & G. Grazzini, "Thermodynamic parameters for energy sustainability of urban areas", Solar Energy, 69, issue 4 (2000) 351 356. [7] Y. Zhang, S.F. Yang & W. Li, "Analyses of urban ecosystem based on information entropy", Ecological Modelling, 8, issue 10 (2006) 1-12. [8] C. Balocco, S. Papeschi, G. Grazzini & R. Basosi, "Using exergy to analyze the sustainability of an urban area", Ecological Economics, 448 (2004), 231-244. [9] Sir A. Eddington, The nature of the physical world (MacMillian, New York, 1930). [10] I. Prigogine, Introduction to non-equilibrium thermodynamics (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1962). [11] J.J. Kay, On complexity theory, exergy and industrial ecology: some implications for construction ecology". in C. Kibert, J. Sendzimir & B. Guy, Construction Ecology: Nature as the basis for green buildings, (Spon Press, 2002) 72-107. [12] D. Mangin & P. Panerai, Projet Urbain (Eupalinos, Parenthses, 1999). [13] S. Salat, Cities and Forms, Sustainable Urbanism (Techne Press, 2011). [14] APUR, "Consommations d'nergie et missions de gaz effet de serre lies au chauffage des rsidences principales parisiennes" (2007). [15] E. Morin, Science avec conscience (Fayard, 1982). [16] D.J. Fisk & J. Kerherv, "Complexity as a cause of unsustainability", Ecological complexity, 3 (2006) 336-343. [17] A. Bejan & S. Lorente, "The constructal law of design and evolution in nature", Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society B, 365 (2010) 1335-1347. [18] A. Heitor Reis, "Constructal Theory: From Engineering to Physics, and How Flow Systems Develop Shape and Structure", Applied Mechanics Reviews, 59 (2006) 269-282. [19] C. Alexander, "A city is not a tree," Design, 206 (1965) 46-55. [20] P. Portoghesi, Natura e architettura. (Skira,Milano, 1999). [21] P.D. Dodds, "Optimal form of branching supply and collection networks", Physical Review Letters, 104 (29 January 2010). [22] F. Corson, "Fluctuations and redundancy in optimal transport networks", Physical Review Letters, 104 (29 January 2010). [23] E. Katifori, G.J. Szllsi & M.O. Magnasco, "Damage and fluctuations induce loops in optimal transport networks", Physical Review Letters, 104 (29 January 2010).