Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The convergence of telecommunications and IT The convergence of telecommunications and media The convergence of fixed, mobile and IP communications (service convergence) Supplier convergence (consolidation) Convergent charging Convergent rating Convergent billing Convergent mediation Convergent CRM Etc
As it happens most of these aspects of convergence are interrelated and some are manifestations of much the same thing. What is clear is that convergence is a very heavily used word at the moment and unfortunately means different things to different people. As a result,
Page 1
the term convergence in the telecommunications industry is in itself almost meaningless. Most conversations on convergence in the telecommunications industry start with well lets define exactly what aspect of convergence we are talking about. A very important aspect of convergence in the mobile communications world is the convergence of the prepaid and postpaid charging environments. Prepaid/postpaid convergence is not confined to mobile communications, but it is here that it has the most obvious impact, because of the large and growing global base of prepaid mobile subscribers. The concept of prepaid/postpaid convergence is not new. Mobile operators have been looking at the possibilities for a number of years, but despite the compelling advantages for mobile operators, there have been few operational deployments of convergent prepaid and postpaid charging solutions.
Page 2
Drivers
Constraints
Changing Face of Prepay Cost Reduction Operating Efficiency Reduction of Debt and Fraud Exposure Customer Management & Business Intelligence 3G Services Product Innovation & Service Differentiation Competition Subscriber Cost Control
Technology Legacy Systems Cost Supply Side Constraints Operator Reluctance Organisation Consumer Indifference
Market Drivers
Market drivers can be grouped under three primary headings:
Operator Cost Reduction Operator Product Innovation and Service Differentiation Subscriber Spending Control and Account Management
Operator Cost Reduction A primary driver for the early implementation of mobile convergent prepaid/postpaid charging solutions has been operators striving to reduce the cost of billing platforms. There are two aspects to this: acquisition cost and operational cost. Operational cost issues include:
Multiple software license fees and maintenance contracts. Maintaining the skills necessary to operate and maintain disparate systems, including training costs for operational and end user staff. Maintaining multiple vendor relationships.
Page 3
Multiple configurations required to apply new offer new products, packages, tariffs to customers across billing platforms. Integration, interworking and consolidation costs e.g. to get a complete picture of billing data.
On top of the operational costs there are replacement/acquisition costs. System replacements are expensive, they consume vast amounts of costly staff time and effort, apart from the actual purchase cost of the solution. Couple this with the economies of scale and operating efficiencies mentioned above and there are real cost advantages to platform consolidation. Product Innovation & Service Differentiation The second driver group is the need for operators to find new ways of non-price differentiation, both to acquire customers and to retain them. This focuses on product innovation and pricing flexibility. It also focuses on the need to be able to make the same offers to all customers, whether they are prepaid or postpaid customers New network and handset technologies and a wealth of specialist WASPs (Wireless Application Service Providers) are increasing the opportunities for innovative product and service delivery and increasing the pressure on operators and service providers to innovate. Of course if one operator in a country market introduces convergent prepaid and postpaid charging and the pricing flexibility that goes with it, there is increased the pressure on other CSPs (Communications Service Providers) in the same market to follow suit, providing further market impetus. Subscriber Spending Control and Account Management For mobile subscribers there are also tremendous attractions to convergent charging options. Customers are now starting to look at prepaid and postpaid charging as just charging options for individual (or types) of transaction, not as a different type of account. For operators, giving subscribers the tools for better cost control helps to promote confidence and controlled increase in usage. Typical scenarios where a mixture of prepaid and postpaid charging on an account for cost control purposes would be:
Family accounts, with a postpaid parent account, but prepaid child sub accounts allowing child account top up from the parents postpaid account. This scenario would allow parents to provide a set amount for the childs mobile phone, whilst giving them the flexibility to add to their balance by purchasing prepaid units. Business accounts, where the employer does not want to pay for private use. In this scenario the phone number would have say two associated accounts, one postpaid by the employer applicable during work hours and the other prepaid by the employee for private use, applicable out of work hours.
Market Constraints
Despite the compelling drivers for the deployment of convergent mobile charging solutions there are a number of constraints. These are quite significant and to date very few implementations have taken place. Of those that have, many have been restricted in application e.g: for value added data services only, or just for corporate customers. The principal constraints are discussed below.
Page 4
Technology The technology to implement various prepaid/postpaid convergent charging architectures around real time rating engines is available; it has been implemented and is proven to work. However, convergent prepaid/postpaid mobile charging is not a trivial task. If it was, a lot more MNOs would have implemented it by now. It is not surprising that early implementations have tended to focus on point solutions for particular customer, or service groups, turnkey solutions for start ups, or small operators and network centric solutions for larger operators with a heavy predominance of prepaid subscribers in their total customer base. Among the technical challenges facing mobile operators implementing convergent prepaid/postpaid charging solutions are:
Real time rating performance under heavy loading Handling complex product and tariff plans in a real time charging environment Integration with disparate legacy components
Greatest technical challenges are for operators with heavy investment in legacy charging systems and operators with a fairly even split of prepaid and postpaid subscribers. Most of the larger Western European operators fall into both these categories and not surprisingly little progress has been made amongst major operators in Western Europe to date in terms of operational systems. Many operators that have heavy investment in legacy systems, wish to maximise return on that investment before installing alternative solutions, or before entrenching themselves further within their existing architecture. For this reason many deployments will have to wait until the appropriate time in the Charging infrastructure replacement cycle. Cost Despite the prospect of operational cost savings through the implementation of convergent mobile charging solutions, complex carrier grade solutions do not come cheap. It is not just the direct costs, but also all the indirect costs associated with organisational change. Mobile operators of any age have possibly been through many phases of OSS/BSS investment to maximise the opportunities presented by advances in network technology and mobile data products. Many of these same operators are still trying top recoup the vast expense of acquiring 3G licenses. Business cases for convergent charging solutions need to be very carefully prepared and considered along with ways of phasing implementation and associated costs and benefits. Juniper believes that many convergent mobile prepaid/postpaid solution deployments will be phased to gain incremental benefits and control CAPEX. Operator Reluctance Operator reluctance to take the plunge relates to perceptions of:
Largely untried technical solutions (few reference sites) Complex implementations and organisational upheaval An aversion to putting even more eggs in one basket
Page 5
The strength of an operators aversion, or enthusiasm will depend on the organisations individual market and structural circumstances and its attitude to risk. A significant constraint on the implementation of mobile prepaid/postpaid convergent charging solutions is uncertainty within many operators of where responsibility for such a solution would lie. IN platforms have traditionally been the responsibility of Engineering departments. IT platforms (BSS and most OSS) have traditionally been the responsibility of IT departments. Engineering depts work in the world of high reliability, high throughput, real-time network solutions. IT depts come from a different world, where only a small proportion of solutions are real time and high availability. In addition, the approach to the prepaid and postpaid customer bases of many operators has been to treat them as separate entities, presenting further organisational difficulties in converging the environments. Consumer Indifference Whilst it is clear that convergent prepaid and postpaid charging environments present an opportunity for consumers to tailor their mobile accounts to suit their purposes, there is still a question market over how many actually want it. Certainly the demand from the consumer side is probably strongest in the most developed markets, where sophisticated product packaging and account structures are necessary to for operators to compete. However these are also the markets with the greatest legacy system constraints. In many developing markets the main demand remains the acquisition of low cost mobile, largely voice, communications, with the opportunity for a few fun add-ons like ringtones. In these markets the drivers are coming from operator cost reduction, not subscriber demand. In more developed markets, consumer indifference at the lower end of the market may lead to convergent solutions being applied for premium customers only, at least initially.
Page 6
Figure 2: Total Cumulative Revenues from Convergent Prepaid/Postpaid Charging Solutions 2006 to 2011. Regional Split (%).
34%
20%
North America
Latin America
Europe
Asia Pacific
RoW
14%
7%
25%
The largest expenditure element is forecast to be on professional services. This is particularly true for the largest deployments in the European and North American markets. Software related expenditure comes second, with expenditure on the hardware element of convergent prepaid/postpaid solutions making up the smallest element. This breakdown is clearly shown in Figure 3. Figure 3: Total Cumulative Revenues from Convergent Prepaid/Postpaid Charging Solutions 2006 to 2011. Expenditure Type Split (%).
43%
36%
Software
Hardware
Prof Services
21%
Source: Juniper Research
To claim your Total Telecom discount, simply quote TT5 when you order by fax/tel or online at www.juniperresearch.com. Please note the discount will be deducted at the
invoice stage if you order online
For more details on this report visit the website www.juniperresearch.com or phone +44 (0)1256 830002
Page 7
Page 8