Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
com defines existentialism theory as A philosophy that emphasizes the uniqueness and isolation of the individual experience in a hostile or indifferent universe, regards human existence as unexplainable, and stresses freedom of choice and responsibility for the consequences of one's acts. 1 Existentialism is generally an atheistic philosophy though some theists have attempted to adopt it into their individual theistic paradigms. Although many, if not most, existentialists were atheists, [Sren] Kierkegaard, Karl Jaspers and Gabriel Marcel pursued more theological versions of existentialism. The one-time Marxist Nikolai Berdyaev developed a philosophy of Christian existentialism in his native Russia and later France during the decades preceding World War II. 2 Existentialism, for most of its adherents, can be understood as atheistic. In order to see this, it helps to look at the philosophy of existentialism as it contrasts with that of theism. Theists generally believe in an ultimate transcendent reality. Existentialists believe each persons experience is unique and truly known only by that person. In other words, theists point to an objective reality, while existentialists see only a subjective one. Theists emphasize interpersonal relationships (between a person and God, a believer and other believers, a believer and non-believers, etc). Existentialists emphasize the isolation of the individual experience in a hostile or indifferent universe. Theists believe that humans are created by God and are given a purpose by that Maker. Existentialists regard human existence as ultimately unexplainable. Theists and existentialists generally agree on freedom of choice and responsibility for the consequences of one's acts. But they differ significantly in that theists hold to an absolute moral standard, while existentialists believe in moral relativism.
Existential" redirects here. For the logical sense of the term see Existential quantification. For other uses see Existence (disambiguation). Existentialism is the philosophical and cultural movement which holds that the starting point of philosophical thinking must be the experiences of the individual. Moral and scientific thinking together do not suffice to understand human existence, so a further set of categories, governed by a norm[clarification needed] of "authenticity", is necessary to understand human existence.[1][2][3] ("Authenticity", in the context of existentialism, is being true to one's own personality, spirit or character.[4]) Existentialism began in the mid-19th century as a reaction against the then-dominant systematic philosophies, such as those developed by Hegel and Kant. Sren Kierkegaard, generally considered to be the first existentialist philosopher,[3][5][6] posited that it is the individual who is solely responsible for giving meaning to life and for living life passionately and sincerely ("authentically").[7][8] Existentialism became popular in the years following World War II and influenced a range of disciplines besides philosophy, including theology, drama, art, literature and psychology.[9]
Existentialists generally regard traditional systematic or academic philosophies, in both style and content, as too abstract and remote from concrete human experience.[10][11] Scholars generally consider the views of existentialist philosophers to be profoundly different from one another relative to those of other philosophies.[3][12][13] Criticisms of existentialist philosophers include the assertions that they confuse their use of terminology and contradict themselves.[14][15][16]
Subaltern (postcolonialism)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search
In the critical fields of post-colonialism, the term subaltern identifies and describes the person who is socially, politically, and geographically outside of the hegemonic power structure of the colony and of the colonial Mother Country. In describing history told from below, the term subaltern derived from the cultural hegemony work of Antonio Gramsci, which identified the social groups who are excluded from a societys established structures for political representation, the means by which people have a voice in their society. The usage and the application of the terms subaltern and subaltern studies entered the field of post-colonial studies through the works of the Subaltern Studies Group of South Asian historians who explored the political-actor role of the men and women who are the mass population rather than the political roles of the social and economic lites in the history of South Asia. In the 1970s, the application of subaltern began to denote the colonized peoples of the South Asian Subcontinent, and described a new perspective of the history of an imperial colony, told from the point of view of the colonized man and woman, rather than from the points of view of the colonizers; in which respect, Marxist historians already had been investigating colonial history told from the perspective of the proletariat. In the 1980s, the scope of enquiry of Subaltern Studies was applied as an intervention in South Asian historiography. Yet, as a method of intellectual discourse, the concept of the subaltern occasionally proved culturally problematic, because it remained a Eurocentric method of historical enquiry when studying the nonWestern peoples of Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. From having originated as an historical-research model for studying the colonial experience of South Asian peoples, the applicability of the techniques of subaltern studies transformed a model of intellectual discourse into a method of vigorous post-colonial critique. The intellectual efficacy of the term Subaltern eased its adaptation and adoption to the methods of investigation in the fields of history, anthropology, sociology, human geography, and literature.[1]
Gayatri Spivak suggests that the subaltern is denied access to both mimetic and political forms of representation.
websites