Sie sind auf Seite 1von 1

Saskatoon: Unit 3, 844-51st St.

East Saskatoon, SK S7K 5C7 Tel (306) 975-4725 Toll free (888) 844-8886 Fax (306) 975-4728 vellacott.mp@shawlink.ca HOUSE OF COMMONS CANADA

Ottawa: Suite 610, Justice Bldg. House of Commons Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6 Tel (613) 992-1899 Fax (613) 992-3085 Vellacott.M@parl.gc.ca www.mauricevellacott.ca

Maurice Vellacott, MP Saskatoon-Wanuskewin

Vellacott warns of ruinous lawsuits against his constituents if C-38 passes


For Immediate Release April 29, 2005
OTTAWA Canadian lawyers with expertise in human rights and constitutional law are urging Members of Parliament to vote against the Liberal governments anti-constitutional Bill C-38. In a letter being sent to all MPs and Senators today, and printed in part in the National Post, these lawyers cite a legal opinion provided by law firm of Lang Michener LLP warning about the risk the bill poses to the constitutionally protected freedoms of religion and conscience. Lang Michener LLP was asked if there was a genuine risk in the wake of Bill C-38 that religious groups or officials who refuse to solemnize a marriage could become the subject of actions by others. They answered in the affirmative. These lawyers conclude: There is little doubt that, if passed, Bill C-38 will be used by provincial governments and others to override the rights of conscience and religion of ordinary Canadians. Public officials will in all likelihood lose their employment simply because of their conscientious convictions. It is our view that your constituents, including religious groups and the members of religious groups, will face expensive and ruinous lawsuits if Bill C-38 becomes law. I concur with that assessment, said Conservative Party MP Maurice Vellacott (SaskatoonWanuskewin). The federal government has no power to protect the freedom of religious groups or officials to refuse to perform marriages that are not in accordance with the group's religious beliefs. The level of incompetence and irresponsibility of this Liberal government knows no bounds. They know that changing the definition of marriage puts religious liberty at risk, and they see the flagrant abuses of provincial governments against marriage commissioners in jurisdictions such as my own province of Saskatchewan as a result of same-sex marriage, yet they are intent on moving forward with this agenda. The Canadian human rights and constitutional law lawyers also highlight the activist nature of Paul Martins and Irwin Cotlers anti-marriage bill, pointing out that the Supreme Court reference decision imposed no obligation on the federal government to change the definition of marriage. Canadians are still waiting for the Prime Minister to come clean as to the real agenda behind Bill C-38, said Vellacott. Everywhere you turn, people are exposing the foolishness of his claim that the Supreme Court and Canadian human rights law require this change. The Liberal governments disrespect for fundamental constitutional rights is simply an extension of their corruptness and complete disdain for voters as uncovered by the Gomery Commission, added Vellacott. I urge all MPs to take seriously the advice of these lawyers, which is to carefully consider and vote against Bill C-38. The Supreme Court of Canada has clearly left this option open to Parliament. 30 For further information, call (306) 975-4725 or (613) 992-1966.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen