Operation of every single claim in a nutshell In shipping language, the chartered vessel (United States) took on cargo (the

people), mortgaged that cargo to the hilt to pay for the voyage (used the credit of the people), then dumped that cargo (the people) over the railing and into the seas (commerce) to collect on the insurance (social security). Then, came back to the point of dumping for a salvage operation.(admiralty / maritime lien) First, one is welcomed into a foreign jurisdiction by the "host nation" of whom, though its "occupying army", extended its hospitality to a foreigner upon registration of the birth event and, per the custom of the host nation, provided a vessel (NAME) whose cargo is destined for the Treasury and an indemnity receipt guaranteeing care and maintenance of the vessel by the host nation in order his burden be light. (Read Law of Nations Book II Section 99 and on for the ramifications of this action) Until, that is, the host nation decided to grant an entrance and extend hospitality for the purpose of drawing foreigners into a snare. For once the snare was engaged, ones duty as a foreigner is now towards defense of the host nation against pirates or robbers, against the ravages of an inundation, or the devastations of fire, for how can one pretend to live under the protection of a state, to participate in a variety of advantages that it affords, and yet make no exertion for its defense, but remain an unconcerned spectator of the dangers to which the citizens are exposed?

Now, the same foreigner is shanghaied at birth into that foreign jurisdiction (origination to image-nation), conscripted into citizenship (United States or whatever nation) as one can only become a Citizen and not otherwise via 2 Stat 153, given a christened vessel (NAME), then sent to battle across the seas (capitalism: war-shipper of a relegion), and left for dead (collateral damage and casualty of war). (See Law of Nations Book III Section 15 for the ramifications of this action) Then a presumption of death exists because the infant (foreigner) is missing from beyond the seas under International Maritime Law via Cestui Que Vie Acts 1540, 1666, and 1707. Now comes the enforcement of a maritime lien under Admiralty Law ... the IRS or any maritime lien is ONLY VAILD if one is dead (dead have no power over the living)

26 USC 6903 (a) Rights and obligations of fiduciary

Upon notice to the Secretary that any person is acting for another person in a fiduciary capacity, such fiduciary shall assume the powers, rights, duties, and privileges of such other person in respect of a tax imposed by this title (Form 56)

(d) Definition of fiduciary. The term fiduciary is defined in section 7701(a)(6) to mean a guardian, trustee, executor, administrator, receiver, conservator, or any person acting in any fiduciary capacity for any person.

26 USC 1040 Transfers of real property (issuance of securities under UCC 8-308 as the appropriate person is the accommodation party)

(a) executor of estate (Name) (resident) you are master of your dominion, correct? (b) trustee of a trust (any portion of which is included in the gross estate of the decedent) (NAME) (14th Amendment Citizen) you are here to fulfill divine providence and self-determination (Gods will) for the benefit of all, thus are trustee. IRS manual 21.7.13.3.2.2 - An infant is the decedent of an estate or grantor, owner or trustor of a trust, guardianship, receivership or custodianship that has yet to receive an SSN. How can one be an executor of an estate of a decedent when the SSN has been issued? Exactly what estate of what decedent is one administrating? 26 USC 2032A (a) (1)(A) decedent was a citizen/resident of the United States to time of death (a)(1)(B) an election made on behalf of the executor (d) election : agreement (remember accommodation party.this is where you come in) (2) The agreement referred to in this paragraph is a written agreement signed by each person in being who has an interest. (could be anything from a court case to a utility bill) Now check out 26 USC 674 and Treas. Reg. 1.674(b)... the back door

26 USC 2001 (a) imposes tax on the decedents estate for the transfer

26 USC 2002 executor of estate liable for the tax

So there is a claim in a nutshell. If one does not provide proof of life (infant still using the estate and trust) then the one before the court/corporation is presumed to be an executor of a decedents estate and trustee of the citizen trust. The claim is nothing more than a ruse to get one to be an accommodating party via UCC 3-419 for the agreement under 2032A(d)(2) for one is presumed to be an executor of a decedents estate and the 14th amendment citizen. NAME, is just a trust ANYONE can operate under 26 USC 674 and Treas. Reg. 1.674(b), but you are trustee as the presumed citizen and thus liable under 26 USC 1040(b) for the tax imposed under 26 USC 2001(a) via 26 USC 2002 as if one were executor. Now this is also the basis for the operation of the exemption, so do not go out and try to destroy this, you will not succeed, they will not allow it . Once proof of life has been established, NAME now is the security entitlement holder and NAME now has whatever credit it needs as the IRS and all these other corporations are now bound to service the securities account (SS#) under UCC 8 as securities intermediary and usufructuary. So, in reality "they" are actively engaged in infanticide and genocide in violation of international law and agreements under the Law of Nations and Lieber Code (Presidential Admiralty Law) for the purposes of accessing the estates of presumed decedents and while these apparent acts of genocide and infanticide may only be on paper, the results of these shenanigans crosses and carries over into the real world and real people suffer because of it each and every time one of their agents come to the door and identifies one through both name and number because one is the infant, now age of majority.

...committing all the oldest sins in all the newest ways

Now ask one of these guys something like:

Do I have a name? Do I have a SS number? Are you aware of IRS manual 21.7.13.3.2.2? Then why am I being held liable as the executor of a decedents estate and as trustee of the resulting trust when it appears the infant has a SS number? Would you like production of the footprints of the infant to verify and validate this interest?

The insanity has to stop.

Now, before you guys got out and start running these guys down in the streets, one must also remember, this is also the operation of a peace treaty under Article 2 of the Lieber Code thru Article 43 of the Hague (restoration of public order and safety) of which the 1st essential task is to ensure the inhabitants can live their day to day lives, 2 nd essential task is to establish an agreement which maximizes the benefits of both inhabitants and occupying army, and, in keeping with the provision of Article 2 of the Lieber Code that the occupying army remain as a condition of the peace, the 3 rd essential task is that government administrates the agreement of which is laid out in Article 31 and 38 of the Lieber Code and Article 55 of the Hague, of which the occupying army is administrator and usufructuary of all public buildings, real estate, agricultural estates, etc and must administrate them in accordance with the rules of usufruct. The live birth certificate is an indemnity receipt issued to the spoliated owner. So, when these guys approach you and identify you by both name and number, whatever lien right they think they have has just been invalidated by the very fact the name and number was used to identify you. The infant now has a SS number and is no longer a decedent, thus no lien, trusteeship, or executorship to enforce and it is actually a breach of the International Peace Agreement between the living and the dead. So, there you have it the presumption of death is the only thing wrong with the system but since it all operates on paper and translates into the real world with real ramifications, then that is a big problem. But a problem we can fix literally overnight. Just have to accept one has a NAME and one has a NUMBER but owns neither, then since both NAME and NUMBER have vested within the one, the estate also revests within the one as the infant is no longer dead or missing from beyond the seas, which automatically invalidates all maritime liens as those are just salvage rights, and is of age of majority and now you operate in pure equity and they are now the usufruct and you are the naked owner with disposal rights over all of the estate of the Earth, just like the peace treaty demands. Just be a good steward.

Posted by CREO HARMONY at 4:54 AM Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook Labels: admiralty, birth certificate, boris, cestui que vie trust, court case, estate, executor estate PO Box, live, social security trust, sovereign, spirit, strawman, surety, tax, title 16 comments:

1. Brettperkins PerkinsOctober 17, 2012 at 3:41 PM Hi Jade this is such good for all of us an would love to try this aspect and be able to have some results as to the forth coming ideas and the filing of the paper work I believe at this point we need to collapse the trust and take over Reply

2. Brettperkins PerkinsOctober 17, 2012 at 3:44 PM Jade Thanks so much for your energy to bring forth this info that we all need and I thank You for your active spirit in all this Brett Reply

3. AnonymousOctober 17, 2012 at 4:39 PM Excellent, Captain; just wonderful. Great work on by you & your team. Now I will be going through the references for due diligence - and will see how this changes my own process, thinking, etc. as well as the process of my friends & family. Once again, kudos to the entire group/team etc. TJ Reply

4. BdaswonOctober 17, 2012 at 10:55 PM With all this said, the corporate denial affidavit should work in my traffic court case and pretty much in any case? I hope, I'll find out Oct.25th. I submitted a corporate denial,reservation of rights and statement of facts before I went to court back in July. The judge was pissed and the prosecutor didn't know what to do and gave me a continuance. I should have objected, I'll update on the 25th after court,I hope for FTA by cop. Reply

5. SIRKLE SITY'S K.L.October 22, 2012 at 3:48 PM Now with info out, it's time to put together the paperwork to be submitted to the proper authorities! Reply Replies

1. AnonymousNovember 4, 2012 at 9:14 PM Actually i filed a claim through the Coastguard using this info and it created a serious shit storm... Reply

6. Colleen DevineOctober 25, 2012 at 8:54 AM With the size of that IRS manual, what are the odds that this could be found? I guess it was time. AND now "getting" it about what they say about The wizard of oz. We've ALWAYS HAD THE POWER!

Even with THAT said, we have to re-learn OUR authority. I found out that tonight Angela from "my private audio" website is having Boris as a guest on explaining more about this info. So thrilled to be getting this knowledge, I've been doing what Boris wants us to do. Get this info out. I've givin it to Alfred Adask,Tammi Pepperman, and Rod Class with Carl Weston and hope to do more. Together, our freedoms CAN be had.-love it! Reply

7. BASOctober 28, 2012 at 8:27 PM Amazing! i am currently in the process of "dont' claim the name" and now it's CLAIM THE NAME? roller coaster indeed but worth it. about What Sirkle said...where do we file this? what will it look like (or how would it be tracked) to not have all these taxes, fines, ect taken from all of us? i'm willing to volunteer time if anyone has ideas. people should be getting this info out to big Alternate media like Alex Jones, David Icke, etc... How does this go viral??? much love to all Reply Replies

1. CREO HARMONYOctober 29, 2012 at 4:41 PM Dear BAS! thanks so much for your comment. You may wish to make this site and youtube channel viral as that would assist many others. The NAME is a vessel and can be taken over to be controlled. The concept by Boris is to have use of the NAME while informing the right officials that he is alive. Have a bless day! -Captain jade Reply

8.

Ruff rider for christOctober 31, 2012 at 7:34 AM I just got off phone with irs and the section 21.7.13 Is in relation to ein numbers and business. So i told agent i needed to correct the record as I believe I have been declared legally dead. My son is 21 never worked or filed taxes but an agent did verify the federal courts have placed a lien on his property, he is in jail currently. So my question is if they recodified the manual as theg have as of 5/2012 how do we prove to the local agents who have not been trained accordingly that the record is inaccurate and if on their side it doesnt indicate we are dead but higher up in locked files it does? Reply Replies

1. CREO HARMONYOctober 31, 2012 at 3:39 PM

Stick situation, your son is in jail for not filing taxes? And who placed lien on his property? Get the records straight with Everyone, he is alive, and then bring back to the county recorder ( file a declaration ). Bring to court, certified copy. It's too complicated to explain here, but you can call us at the number to the left. Cheers, Captain jade Reply

9. superflyTNTNovember 26, 2012 at 8:43 PM Cap'n Jade are you First Nation peoples? I am Lakotah Sioux and see much of the info here lies at the heart of many treaties, we are wards Indians not taxed by occupying army etc...I used Indians not taxed and the Constitution particularly the spereation of powers doctrine to beat a 3rd degree felony traffic BS charge as a habitual offender, the judge simply canceled the case, which I thought was highly irregular since the state attorney has the sole authority to do this. I was going straight for the jugular here no quater given to the enemy so far as I was concerned. If you'd like the details let me know and I will type it up with evidence case number et.al.so there;s no roo for trolls and asshats to claim "fake and gay". Thanks so much! Respectfully in truth and liberty, Phil Freeman Reply Replies

1. AnonymousDecember 29, 2012 at 9:07 PM Will you please fill us in on the details? Reply

10. AnonymousDecember 16, 2012 at 8:36 AM

I'm in the UK (England) and I'm experiencing difficulties in locating anything of use among the mountain of manuals issued by HMRC. I know that these people are not going to give us answers on a plate, but we have to begin somewhere. In the US you have your IRS manual 21.7.13.3.2.2, but please can you tell me what is the UK equivalent? Reply

11. Mirian G PinheiroJanuary 19, 2013 at 6:10 PM If one files a 'death certificate' on their 'birth certificate', does this form apply? http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f706.pdf Reply

12. ziggy784April 5, 2013 at 9:24 AM http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.com/2013/02/hard-evidence-of-corporate-takeoverat.html