The administrative ministry introduced the practice in the current parliamentary term, which is in the spirit of public servants

get the opportunity to "confess " means a member of any secret society? Of course, only if you want. I've resear ched this strange order of the nation's security check routine does not really f it into practice. The alleged acts of secret societies, global narrative on the Functioning of the background power, made up of a number of conspiracy theories structural source code. The Freemasons, the Illuminati, the Rosicrucians, the Priory of Sion, the Trilateral Commission, the Council of Foreign Relations and the Bilderberg Group machinations revealing publications are usually noisy (POS) home prizes among t he faithful. This "information dissemination" has recently joined the public ser vice TV. And the official Vatican publishing house today is a labor of love as t he unveiling of the Freemasons. In fact, honatyjtl Veszprem, Fidesz has also learn ed it together in 2014 for a secret society. But this issue seems to be the aver age person just yet exotic, fairy-tale-like (global) political horrors which had very little to do with the daily administration. If the NAV of the Labor Office , the Office Act or any other government agency, building authority go into or c omplicate paperwork violation, theft, accident record regarding the importation of our testimony, sitting across from us brokratrl hardly a secret societies come t o mind. The administration, however, operators of brain encountered this association. "T he Government Personnel Service System (KSzSzR) The central module of the HR mod ule administration by adding the change as a result of professional managers and government officials CVs." - Came out in autumn 2011th It is also concerned tha t, declare a member of this secret society. And 'may indicate that the autobiogr aphy is that before 1990, "violence was a member of this organization." If it wa s, the person turns material anyway, so the question up to serve as test honesty . Seems like a pointless box of secret society membership, because if someone on this statement, there confidentiality. "- The view of the author of the People of Freedom report cited. Karcosabban formulate a working before, during and afte r the transition counterintelligence and counterterrorism positions, after remov ing the security advisor to the private sector, source requesting anonymity. "In quire into membership in a secret society as much nonsense as if he would ask: A re you a spy? If yes, tick one of the following the country / organization with spies. Whoever invented this should be fired immediately, but not before kivizsgl tatnm a psychiatrist. "- Says employee loyalty and intelligence monitoring the me antime, was more skilled work, study publishing in national security officer. Officially, there is nothing about them After that, we were wondering, how do you see this Public Administration and Hom e Affairs (KIM). Most interested in the concept of the secret society of our exi sting domestic law when it is specifically defined, legally? Obviously there are keeping the secret societies, if so, exactly which items are considered to orga nizations? This question is also relevant, because if someone is asked to be inv olved in something, the thing in question does not hurt to define or recorded. I t is we asked the competent agency is a consequence of being part of a governmen t official concerned by law secret societies, but it has not made, does not conf ess? "The records of secret societies." - Was the laconic answer of the ministry . Adding to that is the "secret society membership (name of company)," filling i n the person required to submit your resume is optional. "Therefore, there is co nsequence if a person can not be completed." Then we have to ask, whether we understand the vlaszukbl to Hungary in the civil s ervice, civil servants, government officials working relationship and membership in a secret society is incompatible? In other words, there is no reporting requ irement and, consequently, such, such a membership ground kiderlsre not be a public employee is dismissed or other handicaps inflicted? Also, again, we asked the A

MA questions that could be made for regulating conflict, EU registration and / o r west, so international examples of secret corporate membership? Came the reply that "compared to the CV data base Additional information about the secret soci ety membership, and therefore the completion of the officer can not be required. If a public official names, being a member of that secret society, the relevant data, such as the CV part to the public official's personal file, as well as pu blic service base records. "But conflict of interest all of this just in case re sult when some impartiality of the Civil Service Law interference with relief pr escriptive rules of conflict (eg, party membership, banning party appearances). "If corporate membership secret of public officials is also a reason for conflic t of interest, then the public officer is required to report that fact in writin g to the employer. The employer shall promptly call upon the powers exercised by writing to the government officials to eliminate conflicts of interest. If a go vernment official does not remove the conflict of interest within thirty days af ter service of the notice, government service is terminated. "- KIM discussed in detail in the official position. In the European Union, "there is no control on this model, and it is important t o note that the EU Member States' competence development scheme for public serva nts legal relations", - told the KIM. Of the Interior and Defense ministries tha t questioned whether any other employees in his attitude towards members of a se cret society like the civil ministries. Professional service personnel among tho se recording of the Notice of the 1996. Act XLIII. Act (Hszt. well). "The CMW. 1 99 of of the records is determined by the form of the register of authorized sco pe of use of the data is 7 exhaustively listed in the Annex. The list does not a llow for secret data management companies. In view of the above, professional st aff members in relation to the questioning can not be interpreted. "- The Minist ry of Interior informed. Adding a secret society membership, personnel records a re not asking questions competence of the ministry, to develop, they have no inf luence in the operation, just as a user-cooperative "in the register of members of the professional staff of CMW. 2011 and on the right of self-determination an d freedom of information. CXII. provisions of the Act in full accordance with th e. In this light the "secret societies" are those describing the nature and the participation of members of staff in the data we do not have. "- Replied to our request to the Interior Ministry. "Especially the rule of not secret society." - Adapted to the personnel policies of HM. Adding that "the Ministry in respect of distinguished government officia ls and professional llomnyakat." We have raised, "need a CV for government official s to fill government officials. Filling part involving the autobiography of secr et societies membership is not required. No record of when it was passed fill, s o is not included in any repository "contrast".. Staff members of the profession al curriculum vitae format for government officials may not be so secret they do not make a corporate statement "- makes it clear that the ministry. However, "a member of the staff required to existing unrelated association or membership in the newly established relationship prior to the relevant staff notified orally or in writing to the commander of the mission. The staff responsible commander m aintenance or prohibit the establishment of the membership in writing of the pro fession or the service is not compatible with graduations, or forbid, if the int erests of service violation or threat. " Our questions to the Office for Protection of the Constitution also assumes no r esponse came from. Chief's permission will not be a swinger club? Actually, this image does not turn the wiser of the secret societies, public sec tor status. Optional Prompt for membership, there can be too much sense. As it i s not mandatory to answer, so the answer is no denying any legal consequences, h e hardly says a member of the circle of this kind, the absence of sanctions. Thi

s contrasts with the C-type national security check. He must answer, and then lo ok for the answer of, and lie in itself disqualify. Asked in marriage or civil p artnership outside partner relationships, including sexual relationships with th e same sex as well. The casual partner of the person is required to name. And to be expected to know whether the person is / was a relationship of "constitution al principles of a democratic state denying or such activities are carried out o rganization, movement, group, etc" Also, before the person whether known as a ri sk factor, "a sign of the security calls for audit purposes - such as compromisi ng, giving rise to blackmail information. " It also appears to have been more se rious glance as a volunteer, exploring the "honesty" of the secret society membe rship. The transparent legal expert, Tibor Sepsi in Hungary secret societies, or for th ose with membership in any law, regulation or other legislation does not exist. The record on the existence of secret societies can not, "who has one of these t hings pose threat to national security, national security screened it anyway, an d certainly not in itself be a member of the final," - says the lawyer. "Loss of confidence can be based on almost anything, it is ultimately up because of this so I may try to kick someone in the public sector, but it is hardly qualify as rational in court. So the real secret society membership has hardly any legal sa nction. "- Adds Sepsi. In other words, this option confessional hardly anything to do with national sec urity. The transition "Type C" and more connected parts. "Certified behavior out side of work," "personal relationships" or "financial income levels." - Control of such things, that is obviously a potential relationship a secret, illegal and / or conspiratorial companies also cover (may) criticized this bill. "Mechanica l tightening is insufficient guarantees, in addition to a highly professional le vel tvilgthatsgt opens, while the level of political narrows." - Says lawyer portal, T ibor Sepsi. "The mere creation of a single test frequency shall not be a problem : most amenable to the free portion of the bill, in essence, part personal range can be extended without examination. So far, specialized ministerial decrees we re told more or less principled, who is to be considered - although it has not r ule out that as the Prime Minister's Office investigated all employees. Then a r elatively broad statutory rule interpreted (the "unlawful influence intentions d isguised attack or threat" persons highly exposed) is much more freedom to be pu blic bodies to - if they want to, either individually considering - extending th e range of subjects. Discretion based on the test results of the employer in tur n narrows to the current one, so much less say it lap to thank you, glad you kid ertetttek to swinger club involves the subject, but I was appointed. That said, th e proposal being discussed, the version is expected to be adopted next week, the employer supervisor, for example, a police leader, appointed by the National Po lice to the Minister gives the possibility for review consideration, and to the results of the study provide internal redress "- sums up Sepsi.