Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Defining Bullying. O O O The School Yard Bully vs. the Workplace Bully The Legal Ramifications of Bullying/Harassment Recognizing Bullying Behavior
Effects of Harassment. O O Effects of harassment on the individual Cost of workplace Harassment to organizations
Dealing with Harassment. O O Responsibilities of employers Actions managers and employees can take
COURSE DESCRIPTION
This workshop is designed for all staff, teaching employees to recognize bullying in the workplace. This is an interactive workshop that focuses on the effects of bullying in the workplace. Bullying in the workplace hurts morale & productivity. Everyone is at risk when bullying is allowed to exist. To maintain bully-free work environment employees must take proactive steps. Participants will learn how to identify the problem of workplace bullying, recognize bullying behavior in the workplace and walk away with tools for dealing with bullying in the work place.
Page 1
DEFINING BULLYING
The origin of Bullying comes from a school yard bully that uses verbal threats, physical intimidation and aggressiveness on someone else. More recently its definition has become broader and has taken more psychological attributes (nonphysical) of harassment. People still tend to associate Bullying with physical violence. Today perhaps due to an abundance of media attention people are becoming much more aware of its psychological attributes. The term Bullying then expanded to encompass groups in the sense that a group could unite to bully an individual.
SCHOOLYARD BULLYING
Schoolyard Bullying is more associated to physical violence and physical threats than Workplace Bullying. Schoolyard Bullying usually involves children trying to dominate each other through physical strength and threats of more physical violence. The actions are usually fighting, punching or hitting followed by threats of more of the same treatment or abuse. Verbal abuse is also common such as name calling. The psychological attributes usually include fear and the loss of self-esteem.
WORKPLACE BULLYING
In the past the term bully or Bullying had been applied in the workplace to describe a supervisor that was verbally aggressive and threatening towards employees or would use his/her power to abuse employees. Workplace Bullying continues to expand its definition and includes more psychological attributes that people might usually associate to terms such as psychological abuse, psychological harassment, psychological manipulation, or psychological warfare as more information is collected or published. Here Bullying is defined as direct or indirect verbal comments, actions, behavior, or tactics such as verbal abuse or psychological manipulations that are used to harm an individual or an attempt to harm an individual. The bullying acts do not need to be repetitive since a single act or event can have a serious or lasting effect. The use of threats or fear is common. The verbal abuse usually consists of threats or personal attacks. For example the targets means of support or career can be threatened or the individuals personal beliefs such as religion can be ridiculed.
Page 2
PSYCHOLOGICAL MANIPULATION
The person doing the Bullying can try to induce as much stress as possible and use Psychological Manipulations that are aimed at destroying a persons self-esteem, self-worth, and self-image. The effects can range from stress, hypertension, or in some extreme cases depression that has a downward spiral which can lead to suicide or the victim can be pushed to or influenced to commit homicide. An example of Psychological Manipulation is to have an individual do a task that is below their capabilities for the simple intention of humiliating them in front of their peers or to give an individual a highly repetitive task that is deprived of purpose. Another example iswearing the individual out tactics that mainly consists of trying to induce as much stress on the person as possible. Its also sometimes the intent to make the target seem emotionally or psychologically unstable and try to confuse or make them paranoid and aggressive. Here are more examples: Constant threats of dismissal or intimidation False insinuations, attacks to the individuals dignity, integrity, or self -image Constant negative remarks or repeated criticism or sarcasm Attempts to destroy or harm the persons self-esteem or confidence Consistent over time, unrealistic work demands, or work overloading Spreading false information or rumors Isolating or systematically isolating the person
Page 3
would consider intimidating, hostile, or abusive. Anti-discrimination laws also prohibit harassment against individuals in retaliation for filing a discrimination charge, testifying, or participating in any way in an investigation, proceeding, or lawsuit under these laws; or opposing employment practices that they reasonably believe discriminate against individuals, in violation of these laws (EEOC).
Page 4
Managerial duties in themselves, such as coaching or counseling an employee, providing a performance review, dealing with staff relations matters and implementing disciplinary measures, are not harassment. However these actions might appear to qualify as harassment if they are carried out in a manner that is offensive, humiliating or embarrassing rather than in a constructive and sensitive manner. To determine whether the conduct is offensive, ask yourself, Would a reasonable person have known or thought that the conduct was offensive?
Page 5
Page 6
EFFECTS OF HARASSMENT
Stressors, aspects of the work environment and the behavior of people working there can generate stress. Stress is a biological human response. It is physiological and real, not just imagined. Low-level stress may be necessary to compel people to act. However, severe stress, which prevents rational, controlled action, has overwhelmingly negative consequences. In 2001 Maarit A-L Vartia wrote a journal article titled Consequences of workplace bullying with respect to the well-being of its targets and the observers of bullying. This article reports the results of a survey taken by 1037 employees from different levels within organizations and from a variety of organizations. Maarits findings after performing this study were as follows. The present study confirmed the results of earlier studies showing that being bullied at work is a threat to the psychological well-being of bullied employees; the respondents who were subjected to bullying experienced all the measured stress reactions more than the others. It is important, however, to note that bullying at work appears to not only have negative effects on the wellbeing of the victims, but also on the observers of bullying, who reported more general stress and mental stress reactions than those from the workplaces without bullying. (Vartia) Physical health problems from stress include: Cardiovascular problems: Hypertension, Strokes, Heart Attacks Adverse Neurological changes: Neurotransmitter Disruption, Immuni-logical impairment: More frequent infections in greater severity Fibromyalgia, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Diabetes Skin Disorders Nausea Tremors of the lips, hands, etc. Feeling uncoordinated Chills Profuse sweating Rapid Heartbeat Rapid breathing Elevated blood pressure Chest Pain Uncontrollable crying Headaches Page 7
PSYCHOLOGICAL-EMOTIONAL-MENTAL EFFECTS
Bullying is often called psychological harassment. What makes it psychological is bullyings effect on the persons mental health and sense of well -being. The personalized, focused nature of the assault destabilizes the targets identity, ego strength and ability to rebound from the assaults. The longer the exposure to stressors like bullying the more sever the psychological impact. When stress goes unabated, it compromises both a targets physical and mental health. Please note that depression starts in bullied workers who never experienced depression before. For the person who was previously depressed and successfully managing it, bullying exacerbates the condition. Bullying causes injuries, albeit psychological in nature and unseen, as surely as one can be injured from physically unsafe conditions at work.
SOCIAL HARM
Humans are social animals. We routinely rely on others to make us feel human and connected. Bullying disrupts groups of co-workers. Sometimes bullies play divide n conquer games ordering colleagues to not help or communicate with the target. More common is the groups tendency to informally separate themselves from the target. Resentment for exposing peers to the targets misery evolves into estrangement and eventual abandonment. Co-workers dont want to be near the target lest they become the next prey. Vartias article Consequences of workplace bullying with respect to the well-being of its targets and the observers of bullying also shows that witnesses suffer from bullying, as well. When the bully is a co-worker, the principal weapon is to withhold approval of human contact and validation. Targets begin to doubt their sanity. Family and friends remain supportive for targets longer than co-workers. If the bullying does not stop, and the target does not stop obsessing, spouses can tire of the vicarious misery and leave the emotionally draining relationship.
BULLYING-ECONOMIC CRISIS
In these times of pandemic unemployment and loss of health insurance, many people are stressed as much as bullied workers have always been. Without insurance, mental health treatment is often unaffordable. The raging economic crisis takes a significant toll on individuals, couples, families, and children. Financial strain is linked to increased incidence of domestic violence, substance abuse, divorce, and disruption of normal childhood development.
Page 8
Page 9
PREVENTION/RAISE AWARENESS
Managers should speak to their staff about the key organizational and human values the organization wants to promote in the workplace and emphasize that harassment can seriously undermine these values. Employees should find out about the training their department or organization offers on raising awareness, conflict and dispute resolution and eliminating harassment. Managers should encourage employees to attend such sessions and attend the training with them. Employees providing front-line services to clients must know what to do should an incident or a conflict areise with the client. It is strongly recommended that these emplloyees receive this training before they start providing srvices to the public. Managers should discuss the Diversity, Non-Discrimination and Respectful Workplace policy with their staff, either individually or at meetings. This will help ensure that employees know what attitudes and behaviors could lead to perceptions of harassment. Managers should clarify what constitutes acceptable behavior in the workplace, or at any place or event related to work. These standard includes an employees behavior toward all persons in the workplace, including coworkers, other employees, contractors, students, casual employees, agency personnel, volunteers, service providers and clients. Managers should explain the consequences of harassment in the workplace. 21st Century Managers will Coach or counsel individual staff where necessary. Managers should ensure staff know that regardless of the source of harassment, wheter it be from co-workers, supervisors, managers, other employees, contractors, students, casual employees, agency personnel, volunteers, clients or service providers, it is not acceptable and they must inform you if it happens.
Page 10
Page 11
PROBLEM SOLVING
If prevention has not worked, take steps to end harassment. The first step is to talk to the staff member(s) experiencing the problem. Manages should fing out if the involved parties have talked to each other about the matter and what was the out come of their discussion. Tips for sensitive interviewing should help with this.
INTEREST-BASED APPROACHES
Using an interst based approach means looking for solutions that are satisfactory to all parties, such as looking for a win-win solution rather than a win-lose solution. Some of these approaches presented in this guide include facilitated discussion, coaching, group development and mediation. You may want to discuss the situation with your supervisor and/or your human resources specialist to determine the best course of action.
Page 12
FACILITATED DISCUSSION
If the persons involved refuse to meet or cannot resolve their differnces, the manager must take a more active role. The manager should offer to facilitate a discussion between them, and if necessary, contact the departments or ther organizations human resources specialist for assistance. A facilitated discussion is an informal process that allows for expedited and efficient resolution of low level disputes that are relatively new and that have not escalated to significant polarization between the parties. 1. 2. 3. Follow the tips for sensitive interviewing Do not judge what the persons say Obtain all the pertinent facts and keep a record. Your notes may come in handy if the situation persists and you have to consider disciplinary measures. It may also be useful to keep a record of the actions that you took to resove the issue 4. 5. Suggest remedial actions or other potential solutions Take all reasonable steps to ensure that the matter does not become an item of office gossip; advice the persons involved mot to discuss the issue except with those who need to know Here are some indicators where it is appropriate to use a facilitated discussion Level of Communication: Parties are still willing and able to talk together about the situation. They may be more comfortable with another trusted party present for that discussion Trust Level: Each party is focused on solving the problem and acknowledges that the other party has the same focus. In this regard there is a relatively high level of trust between parties. Neither party is, for example. Assuming that the other has ulterior motives or will intentionally sabotage the process. Commitment toResolve the Situation: All involved parties are committed to resolving the situation and have expressed some openness to considering the options that differ from their current position. In other words, they are open to potential compromise
Page 13
COACHING
Once the manager sits down with the individuals in the conflict, the manager may realize there are underlying issues. It may be that one or more of the parties needs more guidance or specific directions from management either in what is appropriate behavior or about spevific tasks they are assigned. Oneon-one discussions may bring openness and sharing of information that would not otherwise happen. Identify the area that requires improvement and the consequences this area has on the organization Describe the behaviors or tasks expected of staff Determine the changes that are required Follow up closely for improvement Coaching is a one-on-one process that is designed to help parties deal with conflicts, disputes and harassment situations. Coaching encourages parties to recognize the impact of their behavior and actions on others and how others might perceive such behavior and actions. Mirroring of behavior and giving feedback on the effect of behavior can facilitate resolution. Here are some indicators where it is appropriate to use coaching: Level of Communication: Parties may be willing to communicate with each other but one or both parties experiences extreme frustration with the communication process. They may say things such as, he/she doesnt hear/listen/understand anything I say. Trust Level: The trust level between the parties may not be particulary high. Nevertheless, the party or parties receiving coaching are committed to rebuilding trust with the other person. Commitment to Resolve the Situation: There is a high level of commitment to resolve the situation. Individuals being coached are willing to explore their individual role in the situation. They are open to taking personal responsibility for their behaviors and actions and are committed to improving or building skills and making changes that will allow them to resolve the situation.
Page 14
GROUP DEVELOPMENT
Group or team development is a proactive approach that works at identifying underlying issues and potential conflicts within a group that, left unchecked, have resulted in and may continue to result in harassment situations. With a facilitator, the group or team identifies issues and conflicts that are negatively affecting the group. The group clarifies roles and expectations within the group. It also sets mutual goals for the group and develops a plan of action for future behavior and interaction. Here are some indicators where it is appropriate to use group development: Level of Communication: Parties are communicating little if at all or are communicating with some members of the group and not others. The communication process is not effective. Parties are preoccupied with the situation and find that it is affecting their ability to communicate with each other. Level of Trust: Parties may express some trust in each other but will frequently question the motivation for other parties actions and words. Commitment to resolve the situation: The parties may not initially express a commitment to resolve the situation but there is recognition that the productivity and effectiveness of the group have decreased and that the group cannot continue as it is. Use of ths method should be discussed with the delegated manager if it is to be used as a means to restoring work relationships following a harassment complaint process.
Page 15
MEDIATION
Mediation involves an impartial thired party that hears both sides of the situation and helps the parties reach a satisfactory decision about the issue at hand. The mediator provides a forum where the parties can construct their own mutual agreement. The mediator can work directly and in-depth with the disputants and encourage discussion. The mediator tries to help disputants reach their own agreement but does not decide what the solution should be. The mediator helps disputants achieve lasting decisions but cannot enforce agreements once they have been reached. Here are some indicators where it is appropriate to use mediation: Level of Communication: Communication between the two parties has broken down. Parties are not speaking to each other at all or, at the very least, are not speaking to each other about the situation. They are, howeve. Willing to talk to each other with a neutral party present. Trust Level: There is moderateto low levels of trust between the parties. This lack of trust is often a result of confusion about the other partys actions and/or words. Issues, actions and even ts will need to be discussed and explored in the mediation process to increase trust. Commitment to Resolve the Situation: the parties express a moderate to high level of commitment to resolve the situation although they may not see a possible solution. Prior to mediation, one should consider other interest-based approaches such as facilitated discussions or coaching. If it involves a group of employees, see Group Development.
Page 16
Depending on the situation, you may need to intervene and inform one of the indiviuals that his or her behavior is unacceptable and should dtop, whether the individual is your employee, colleague, another person working for you, an employee from another division, a client, a customer or a service provider. Recognize a situation that is serious enough to warrant disciplinary action, whether or not the employee files a complaint. Contact your departments or your organizations human resources person for assistance. If a contractors behavior is unacceptable, inform t hat person that everyone in the workplace is to be treated with respect. Talk to the owner of the company to report the incident. Depending on the severity of the misconduct, consider putting your concerns in writing and presenting them to the individual and to the owner of the company. If warrented, consider ending the contract. The company is responsible for theconduct of its staff and for the application of disciplinary measures. If the improper behavior comes from a client or a customer, apply your departments or your organizations guidelines on providing service to the public. If you do not have any guidelines, inform the individual about acceptable behavior and the consequences of his/her actions. If unacceptable behavior persist, have a meeting or discussion with the client to try to resolve the issue. Should these steps not be successful, inform the client in writing as to how you will proceed with future provision of your services. If the situation involves threats, stalking or violence, seek help immediately from your security division or depending on the situation, you may meed to call the police immediately. Work closely with your human resouces specialists so they sufficienty understand the situation and the views of the various parties to be able to provide advice. WHEN A COMPLAINT IS FILED The above problem resolution mechanisms may not work and a complaint may be filed. Your policy should outline the process and list the senior manager(s) delegated to apply the established steps in the complaint process. Familiarize yourself with the Diversity, Non-Discrimination and Respectful Workplace Policy, and find out what responsibilities are yours and which ones are the delegated managers. If you reveive a complaint of harassment, refer the complaint to the delegated manager. APPROPRIATE COURSE OF ACTION The delegated manager will determine the appropriate course of action to deal with the complaint. For example he/she might decide that a grievance or another problem resolution mechanism is more appropriate. The delegated manager may contact you for additional information or for your collaboration. Unloading the Effects of Bullying Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20