Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
=
(
(
(
|
|
|
.
|
\
|
|
.
|
\
|
|
.
|
\
|
2
2
1 ln
2
arctan
2
4
S
W
W
(3)
where l
so
and l
st
represents the width oI a stator slot opening and slot top respectively, W
d
, is the stator tooth pitch.
- the air gap for calculus :
ef c c
g k g g + = 1 (4)
- flux densitv in the air gap:
r
m
c
r
m
r
gc
h
g
h
B
B
P
P
+
= (5)
where h
m
is the permanent magnet`s height.
- phase resistance and excitation coil resistance:
c
ph ph cu
ph
S
N l
R
=
U
(6)
Fig. 2. Motor`s geometry
Workshop on V VA AR RI IA AB BL LE E R RE EL LU UC CT TA AN NC CE E E EL LE EC CT TR RI IC CA AL L M MA AC CH HI IN NE ES S
Technical University oI Cluj-Napoca, 17
th
September 2002
12
cec
ec ec cu
ec
S
N l
R
=
U
, (7)
where l
ph
, l
ec
, and N
ph
, N
ec
are the length Ior the stator and the excitation coil respectively and the number oI
turns.
- stator and rotor leakage reactance:
s s
ph
s s
L
q
N
f X O P S
V
=
0
2
4 (8)
r r
ec
s r
L
q
N
f X O P S
V
=
2
4 (9)
where
s
and
r
are the stator and rotor permeances respectively.
- the iron losses:
ed hvs fer
p p p + = (10)
where p
hvs
and p
ed
are the hysteresys and eddy current losses.
- Joule effect losses:
2 2
ec ec ph ph J
I R I R m P + = (11)
- the electrical power: G G G G sin cos sin cos
1 dr qr ph ds qs ph
I I J I I mJ P + = (12)
where / is the load angle.
- the mechanical power:
= P P P
1 2
(13)
where P represents the total losses.
The main design data, the main dimensions and the perIormances oI the designed machine are given in Table 1:
Table I.
1 Output power 550 W
2 Mechanical speed 200 RPM
3 Battery voltage 36 V
4 Nominal current 10.8 A
5 Nominal torque 26 Nm
6 Number oI phases 3
7 Outer rotor`s diameter 210 mm
8 Outer stator diameter 170 mm
9 Air gap 1 mm
10 Magnet height 3 mm
11 Stator phase resistance 0.303
12 Excitation coil resistance 0.97
Flux-weakening regime
13 Motor`s eIIiciency 67.8 %
14 Power Iactor 0.83
Without flux weakening
15 Motor`s eIIiciency 73 %
16 Power Iactor 0.68
4. FEM RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Eor the validation oI the analytical model the magnetic Iield computation soItware Flux2D has bees used. AIter
creating the geometry, deIining the material properties Ior each part oI the machine and starting the solving
process the Iollowing results has been obtained:
Workshop on V VA AR RI IA AB BL LE E R RE EL LU UC CT TA AN NC CE E E EL LE EC CT TR RI IC CA AL L M MA AC CH HI IN NE ES S
Technical University oI Cluj-Napoca, 17
th
September 2002
13
- flux densitv repartition in different parts of the machine:
- normal and tangential components and the harmonics of the flux densitv in flux-weakening regime:
- motor torque for the sixth part of the machine, on the flux-weakening regime:
(a) (b)
Fig. 5. Motor torque on no load (a) and on rated load (b)
(b)
(a)
Fig. 4. Normal and tangential component (a) and the harmonics oI Ilux density in the air gap (b)
Fig. 3. Elux density in stator(a), rotor(b)
(b) (a)
Workshop on V VA AR RI IA AB BL LE E R RE EL LU UC CT TA AN NC CE E E EL LE EC CT TR RI IC CA AL L M MA AC CH HI IN NE ES S
Technical University oI Cluj-Napoca, 17
th
September 2002
14
- speed-torque characteristics:
Torque-Speed
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 50 100 150 200 250
speed [tr/min]
t
o
r
q
u
e
[
N
m
]
Fig. 6a. Speed-torque characteristic on normal operating
Torque-Speed
0
5
10
15
20
0 50 100 150 200 250
speed [tr/min]
t
o
r
q
u
e
[
N
m
]
Fig. 6b. Speed-torque characteristic on Ilux-weakening operating
Torque-Speed
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 50 100 150 200
speed [tr/min]
t
o
r
q
u
e
[
N
m
]
Fig.6c. Speed-Torque characteristic on Ilux strengthening
Workshop on V VA AR RI IA AB BL LE E R RE EL LU UC CT TA AN NC CE E E EL LE EC CT TR RI IC CA AL L M MA AC CH HI IN NE ES S
Technical University oI Cluj-Napoca, 17
th
September 2002
15
The EEM analysis shows a good concordance with analytical results. The air gap Ilux density value, in the case
oI analytical model is 0.84T, and Irom EEM model resulted a maximum value oI 0.85T. In saIe operating
conditions, eliminating the demagnetization eIIect, is obtained a plus oI 13% speed in the Ilux-weakening
regime. One can see also that in the case oI Ilux weakening, the motor`s eIIiciency decreases, because oI joule
losses, which are increasing.
In conclusion, the double excited machines can be a good choice Ior a direct drive system. The Ilux-weakening
regime beneIits oI the advantage oI permanent magnets motors eIIiciency and oI the possibility to extend the
speed domain by using an excitation coil.
5. REFERENCES
|1] Y. Amara: Contribution a la conception et a la commande des machines svnchrones a double excitation.
Application au vehicule hvbride, These de Doctorat, Universite de Paris, 2001.
|2] C. Espanet: Modelisation et conception optimale de moteurs sans balais a structure inversee. Application
au moteur-roue, These de Doctorat, Universite de Eranche-Comte, 1999.
|3] G. Henneberger J. R. Hadji-Minaglou R. C. Ciorb: Design and test oI permanent magnet synchronous
motor with auxiliary excitation winding Ior electric vehicle application, in: Proceedings of the European
Power Electronics Chapter Svmposium, Lausanne, October, 1994, pp. 645-649.
|4] S. Huang J. Luo E.Leonardi: A general approach to si:ing power densitv equation for comparison of
electrical machines
|5] A. Lange, W. R. Canders E. Laube: Comparison oI diIIerent drive systems Ior a 75 kW electrical vehicle
drive, in: Proceedings if the ICEM 2000 International Conference, Helsinki (Einland), August, 2000, vol. 2,
pp. 1308-1312.