Sie sind auf Seite 1von 88

Practice 000.215.

1231 PubLication Date 08Apr94 Page 1 of 21


FLUOR DAMIEL

DRILLED PIER FW)WATIOWS

This practice establishes guidelines and reconmends procedures for design of driLLed pier foundations. A drilLed pier is also referred to as a driLLed shaft 1 beLIed pier, and underreani foundation. ScOPE This practice incLudes the foLlowing:
a a

Feasible areas of application of driLLed piers.


Minimijii requirements from a GeotechnicaL Report and points out the inportant role of a GeotechniceL Consultant. Suggested end reconinended pier detaiLs.


APPLICATIOW

Methods for conputing axial and Lateral capacities of driLLed piers. Brief discussion of settlement, group efficiencies, special requirements in high seismic areas, and potential pier buckling. Sanple conputations.

Drilled piers should be used when reconinended by the Geotechnical Consultant for a particular site or when they are the most economical of several alternatives alLowed by the Geotechnical Consultant. The Lead Structural Engineer will decide when and in which areas drilled piers wilt be used for a specific Project.

GEOTECHNICAL COWSULTANT The design of driLLed piers is a very coaplex subject. Successful design of deep drilled piers requires close collaboration with the Geotechnical Consultant.
Report

The Geotechnical Report should address or provide the foLLowing:


a

Feasibility of using drilled piers. Suitability of soil for drilling and a subsurface soil profile.
Recommended methods of construction and a discussion on potential problems.

Suitability for underreams and recommended bell to shaft diameter ratios. Suitable diameter of piers. SuitabLe depths of straight piers and underreams. Axial capacities, both conpression and uplift, for suitable diameters and Lengths. These axial capacities should list separately end bearing and skin friction capacities and factor of safety used. Estimated settlements for these capacities, spacing, and group efficiency factors will be given. Group effects of adjacent foundations will be addressed. Methods to conpute axial capacities will be given. Lateral capacities for different pier diameters 0 depths, and eccentricities such as moments at top of shaft. Group effects can significantly reduce allowable Lateral capacity. The report will provide recommended spacing and group effect factors. The soil Lateral capacity will be given for a maximum allowable deflection of 0.25 inches at working loads at the top of pier. Deflection at ultimate soil resistance will be greater.

STRUCTULP

ENGINEERING

FLUOR DANIEL
DRILLED PIER FCJJIDATIOWS

Practice 000.215.1231 PbL icat ion Date 08Apr94 Page 2 of 21

Recoamiendations for Lateral toad anaLysis using nonUnear corputer program and P-y curves if appLicable. KoduLus of Lateral sigrade reaction, k,. Soil modulus CE,), density (y), Poissons ratio (i), 50 percent strain (c50), and undrained shear strengths (C,) for cLays. Adhesion coefficient (a,) for cohesive soils for coaputation of skin friction if appLicabLe. Angle of internal friction for sand and pier () for cohesiontess soiL for conputation of skin friction. For cohesiontess soils, uncorrected field vaLues on standard penetration tests, N.

GENERAL

Single piers may be used to support individuaL coLLIIrIs such as pipe racks, structures, and T supports. In seismic areas, UBC (Uniform BuiLding Code) pier cap interconnection requirements wilt be reviewed. A group of piers with a pier cap or grade beams may be used to support structures or vertical and horizontal vessels similar to driven piers. Advantages DriLLed piers are economicaL since no forming and very Little excavation and backfiLL are required. Drilled piers can be designed and constructed to support large axial and lateraL Loads. The diameter can be Large and the pier extended to great depths requiring fewer piers. Pier caps may be eliminated. DrilLed piers can carry Large Loads with minimaL settlement. Larger diameter driLLed piers aLLow direct inspection of bearing area and soil at base. DriLLed piers eLiminate imich of the vibration and noise associated with pier driving affecting nearby existing instaLLations. DriLled piers can go through a boulder soil where driven piers might be defLected. BouLders can be removed directly or broken with speciaL tools and then removed using teoporary casing. UnsuitabLe soil may cave in during underream operation. Bad weather conditions may make drilling and concreting difficult. Need to dispose spoils from driLLing, belting, and slurry operations. In envirorinentaL sensitive areas, cost may be prohibitive due to locaL regulations. SLurry method of construction in an existing plant area is messy and increases cLeanup costs. For large diameter piers in weak soiLs, there may be ground Loss in the vicinity of the drilled hole if adequate precautions are not taken. DriLled piers in groups require special sequencing for drilLing and concreting and may result in additionaL costs. Successful coaptetion depends on drilling operator skills.

Disadvantages
a a

0
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

FLUOR DANIEL DRILLED PIER FOUNDATIONS

Practice 000.215.1231 P.bLication Date 08Apr94 Page 3 of 21

Because of their Larger diameters 1 spacing wilt generalLy be greater than for driven piers resulting in Larger pier caps when used in groups.
PIER DETAILS Shaft diameters wilt be sized to agree with equipment available to the Drilling Contractors in the vicinity of the jobsite that are likely to be doing the work. On a specific site, the ni,rber of different shaft diameters wiLl be reduced to a minieun to speed construction. Belts wILL be sized in 6 inch increments. The belL to shaft diameter ratio wiLt be a maximiin of 3. Quite often soil conditions wiLl restrict this ratio to 2. The mininun toe height of the belL wiLL be 6 Inches. According to ACI (American Concrete Institute) 336.3R 72, for shafts Larger than 30 inches, the mininun slope of the side of the bell wilt be 55 degrees.
-

Use of this criteria requires a 60 series underreamer. A 60 series underreamer for shafts Larger than 30 inches does not fit on a rig without jacking and is not preferred by contractors. Also, the time required to form a 60 degree belt is Longer; therefore, the cost is increased. Use of 45 degree belL slope is permitted provided concrete stress in unreinforced belL is less than aLLowable for pLain concrete and provided the soiL can stand the flatter slope without caving. Use of 45 degree slopes requires approvaL by the Lead Structural Engineer. Details of stresses in plain underreams are found in Plain Concrete Iinderream for Drilled Shafts, by J.S. Farr, L.C. Reese, ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers) StructuraL Journal, June 1980. Mininun vertical reinforcement in shafts is 0.005 times the gross area. The reinforcement will preferably extend fuLl Length of the shaft. For very deep shafts without tension, reinforcement may not be necessary for Lower section. Mininun clear distance of vertical reinforcement wiLt be 3 inches. Mininun cover to verticaL reinforcement is 3 inches and 4 inches in cased piers where casing is to be withdrawn. At pier caps, the shaft will extend a mininun of 4 inches into the cap. shaft is considered free headed for this condition. Pipe cap edge distance from the shaft will be at least 6 inches. For high seismic areas (Zones 3 and 4), the upper part of shaft and the cap wilt be subjected to high moments and shear. The reinforcement splices at this interface and the cap reinforcement require speciaL spiral and hoop reinforcement. For additional details, refer to the Latest ACI code. The

L(DING Drilled piers wilt be designed for axial and lateral loads, including group effects. Static The design procedure presented herein is for static loading and repeated loading. Live and wind loads are usually considered as static equivalents in analysis. Seismic In high seismic areas, cyclic loading has a severe effect on soil behavior. In particular, the lateral capacity could be drastically reduced. The lateral subgrade modulus could be reduced to 30 percent of the initial value. Cyclic Load cdoined with group action may reduce the initial lateral subgrade modulus to 10 percent of its value. Close collaboration with the Geotechnicat Engineer is required in high seismic areas. Field tests may also be required.

STRUCTLAL ENGINEERING

Practice 000.215.1231 PibLication Date 08Apr94 Page 4 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL


DRILLED PIER FCJJ)ATIOWS

CCII1UTER DESIGN

Soil pier interaction is nonlinear and semi-espiricaL. For sites with high wind speeds or high seismic areas, some structures may require use of very deep drilled piers. These structures may require use of nonLinear conputer programs. Use of conputer programs, although easy to use, should be with close collaboration with the Geotechnical Engineer. The Lead Structural Engineer wilL decide which structures require detailed conputer analysis. Note! I I A thorough understanding of the conputer programs and method used is essential. The Geotechnical Engineer should provide all the necessary data and review results in some cases.

NOTATIONS

Base area. Bell or underrearn diameter. C, Cohesive soils cohesion determined from undrained triaxial, direct shear, or vane tests. (This is also called unconfined conpressive strength or undrained shear strength). Cohesion at depth z. Cohesion 1 to 2 bell diameter below base. Pier or shaft diameter. Modulus of elasticity of pier material. Modulus of elasticity of soil. Reduction factor for bearing resistance for Large bells. Moment of inertia of pier section. Cohesionless soils I rankine coefficient of passive lateraL earth pressure.

C,,
COb

D E E, F,

Ethenent depth such as from grade to bottom of pier or bell. Unfactored moment capacity of pier section. pier section capacity. This should be obtained from ultimate

Unfactored maxinun negative moment in a short fixed headed pier. Unfactored maxinLln positive moment in a short or intermediate fixed headed pier. N P Cohesionless soil
-

standard penetration nither.

Actual lateraL load at top of pier. Ultimate lateral load at top of pier at which soil failure occurs. soil resistance. It is not ultimate load for concrete design. This is ultimate

Pa

AlLowable (service load) Lateral load at top of pier. Ultimate soil corpression capacity in base resistance.

Os
TC 0

Ultimate soil side or skin resistance (friction). Ultimate soil conpression capacity of drilled pier foundation. and base resistance. This is total of side

STRUCTtAL ENGINEERING

Practice 000.215.1231 Pibtication Date 08Apr94 Page 5 of 21


FLUOR DAIHEL

DRILLED PIER F(XJ)IDATIOIS

Ultimate soil tension capacity of driLLed pier foundation. and base resistance.
BELL

This is a totaL of side

Ultimate beLt pulL out capacity. Cohesive soils

Sc

shape factor for end bearing.

Weight of concrete and soiL above belt. Deflection at grade at aLLowable or actual appLied Load. a b d, e f,, k k ri Used in computation of base resistance reduction due to Large beLL diameter. Used in computation of base resistance reduction due to large belt diameter. Cohesive soil
-

depth factor for end bearing.

Lateral Load eccentricity (Refer to Attachment 4). ULtimate toad transfer in skin friction at depth z. Cohesive soils
.

moduLus of subgrade reaction.


-

Cohesionless soils
-

coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction.

Cohesiontess soiL coefficient of lateral subgrade reaction for a Long pier with a width of unity at a depth of unity. This coefficient is independent of pier Length and stiffness. It depends on soiL reLative density and ground water table. Surcharge such as soil density times depth. Ultimate soil end bearing stress.

qb,

Reduced uLtimate soiL end bearing stress. diameter. Depth below ground surface.

This reduction is due to Large beLt

z a

Cohesive soiL for Alpha method of skin friction, this is an empirical factor that varies with depth. Refer to Attachment 14.
-

Cohesive soiL

a parameter to compute dimensionless Length.


-

Cohesionless soiL y Soil density.

a factor in computation of side resistance using Beta method.

Soil angle of internal friction. Cohesionless soil Cohesionless soil. times depth).
-

a parameter to compute dimensionLess Length. vertical effective stress at depth z. (This is soil density

Poissons ratio of soil. 50


AXIAL
CIWRESSIOW

50 percent strain of soil.

LOAD Allowable axial compression Load strongly depends on allowabLe settlements. Short term settLements should be restricted to 1 inch. For some piping systems, it may be necessary to restrict short term settlement to 1/2 of an inch.

STRUCT1AL ENGilIEERING

Practice 000.215.1231 Plication Date 08Apr94 Page 6 of 21


FLUOR DANIEL

DRILLED PIER FOUNDATIOMS

Methods presented here are based on corputetiori of ultimate soiL resistance and application of safety factors. For good, dependabLe soil data, the factor of safety wiLL be 2.5 to 3 for coapression Load. The generaL equation for corputing the uLtimate coapression capacity of a drilLed pier is:

ULtimate coapression capacity of driLLed pier fo.mdation. ULtimate capacity of the base resistance. ULtimate capacity in side or skin resistance.

For short rigid piers, a substantiaL portion of the Load wiLt be resisted at base. For intermediate and Long piers, a substantial portion of toad wilt be resisted by skin friction or side resistance. Usually, at a relatively smaLL downward movement, the fulL skin friction resistance is mobilized. For piers in cLays, a vertical movement on the order of 0.25 inches will mobiLize fuLl skin resistance. In sands, vertical movement on the order of 0.4 inches wiLl mobilize full skin resistance. The amount of dispLacement necessary to mobilize full base resistance is a function of the base diameter and is on the order of 10 percent of the base diameter. Settlements may be too excessive for devetopaent of fuLl base resistance.

Cohesive SoiLs (Clay) Side Resistance (Skin Friction)


a

For skin friction resistance, the Alpha (a) method is used beLow.
=aCs5.5ksf 1 f

where f,. a
= =

Ultimate load transfer in skin friction at depth z, ks Undrained shear strength at depth Z, ksf EapiricaL factor that varies with depth

Refer to Attachment 14. Q where dA L


= =

dA

Differential area of the perimeter, square feet.

Entecinent depth below ground surface, feet.

For Lateral defLections greater than 0.2 inches, the skin friction down to the point of zero deflection is negLected. Base Resistance (End Bearing) For end bearing resistance, the general bearing capacity equation is used here.
,Sd+g 1 qb=5.14

0
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

FLUOR DMIEL DRILLED PIER FOUNDATIONS

Practice 000.215.1231 Ptication Date 08Apr94 Page 7 of 21

where
=

Ultimate soil end bearing stress, ksf. Average undrained shear strength 1 to 2 bell diameters below base, kaf. Shape factor Depth factor

6 S

1.2 for circular base. 1


+

0.2L/Bb; but not greater than 1.5.

Embedment depth of pier, feet.

Ecu

diameter, feet.

Total unit surcharge (Soil density x L). ksf.

For a pier at least 2.5 beLL diameters beLow grade and using net capacities (weight of drilled pier not considered as load).
g
=

80 ksf

q, will be reduced when the base diameter Bb is greater than 75 inches to reduce excessive short term settlements.
Reduced q, where 2.5 F 1 r [i2aB, + 2.5b a=0.0071+0.0021(L/Bb) b

F, q,

10 a0.015

0.45f

0.5b1.5

Note!!!

Above reduction equation is from tests in very stiff cLays, soft clay shates, and restricts a, to a settLement of 2.5 inches. If end bearing constitutes more than 50 percent of design Load, a minimtin factor of safety of 2.5 wiLL be used to restrict settlements at alLowabLe Loads to 1 inch.

where Ab Cdiesiontess SoiLs () Side Resistance (Skin Friction) For skin friction, the Beta
=

Base area, square feet

method is used here.

4.0 ksf

where
=

ULtimate toed transfer in skin friction at depth Z, ksf. Depth beLow grade, feet. Vertical effective stress at depth z, ksf (soil density x depth)

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

Practice 000.215.1231 Piblication Date 08Apr94 Page 8 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL


DRILLED PIER FOUNDATIONS

1.5

0.135

1.2

0.25

f
= =

dA

where
dA Differential area of the perimeter, square feet.
E,rbedoent depth below ground surface, feet.

For lateraL deflections greater than 0.2 inches, the skin friction down to the point of zero deflection is negLected.
a

Base Resistance (End Bearing)

For end bearing resistance, short term settLements are the governing criteria. Sand tends to Loosen at the bottom of an excavation. Also there appears to be some densification beneath the base. Since a Large amount of settLement cannot be tolerated, the Limiting values for end bearing resistance is restricted to a downward base movement of 5 percent of base diameter. Note!!! Bells are not recomnended in cohesionLess soils. difficuLt to construct. They are

UlZimate end bearing stress, a,, is a function of the uncorrected field vaLues on standard penetration tests, N. Fr 5 percent base diameter settLement: 0N75 NTh q=1.2Nksf. o=90.0ksf.

q, wiLl be reduced when the base 1 diameter Bb, is greater than 50 inches. Reduced q
= =

(Z
V

l2Bb

where Ab
V

= =

Base area, square feet. BeLL diameter, feet A mininun factor of safety of 2.5 will be used to restrict settLement to 1 inch.

Bb

Note!!!

AXIAL TENSION LOAD


a

For axial tension Load or uplift, field test results are limited. factor of safety wilL be used.

A higher

The general equation for coffputing the uLtimate tension capacity of drilled pier is as foLLows:
=

Q+Qi+Wc

a
.TRUCThRAL ENGINEERING

FLUOR DANIEL
DRILLED PIER FOUNDATIONS

Practice 000.215.1231 Pi.blication Date 08Apr94 Page 9 of 21

where
= =

ULtimate tension capacity of drilLed pier fowidation. Ultimate capacity in side or skin resistance. ULtimate belL puLlout resistance

IJeight of concrete (shaft and belt) and soiL above belt.

To obtain service Load aLLowable, a gLobal factor of safety of 3 to 4 wiLl be applied. Alternatively individual factors of safety could be used.
-

Safety factor skin resistance = 4. Safety factor belt pultout= 3 to 5. Safety factor weight of pier= 1.5.
Q

UpLIrr

3to5

1.5

Straight Pier Betted Pier Fotmdation One coninonly used method is the assLJition of a vertical fictitious cyLinder of soil of belt diameter 8 b above the belt and then copputirig skin (frictional) resistance along this surface. The copputation of skin resistance is same as for conpressive Loading. By this method,
=

The uLtimate capacity is coaputed from skin resistance and weight of pier. The coapitation of skin resistance is the same as for coppressive Loading.

Q+Ws+W

where
SB 0

Ultimate capacity in friction or skin resistance using belt diameter Bb aLong entire cylinder Length. Weight of soil within the assuned fictitious cylinder. Weight of concrete.

= =

A minimun factor of 3 wilL be used with no increase in allowable for transient loads. Note!!! Axial resistance due to skin friction must neglect any skin friction for the depth of frost. Frost causes jacking forces on piers. The minimun depth to prevent this must be 2 1/2 times the frost depth.

LATERAL L(1) General The analysis of lateralLy loaded piers is a copplicated soil structure interaction problem. Closed form solutions to predict deflection and reaction are available. However, these solutions assi.sne a Linear elastic soil response which may resuLt in erroneous results. In order to correctly model the soil response, a nonlinear Load transfer method is required. One such method is the P-y curve method.

STRUCTURAL ENGI ERING

FLUOR DAJIIEL DRILLED PIER FOUNDATIOIIS

Practice 000.215.1231 PiELicaticn Date 08Apr94 Page 10 of 21

Pier behavior (Attachment 4) jider Lateral Load is governed by the fLexureL stiffness of the pier relative to the stiffness of the soiL surrounding the upper portion of the pier. A stiff or a short pier, rotates as a rigid element around a fixed point beLow grade. Failure for a stiff or short pier occurs when the uLtimate passive resistance of soil is exceeded. For a flexibLe or Long pier, the fLexuraL capacity of the pier is the Limiting criteria. Failure for a Long pier occurs when the bending moment in the pier is equal to the moment capacity of pier. The fulL passive resistance in the soiL along the entire Length of pier is not deveLoped for Long piers. The Lateral capacity of a pier also depends on the fixity at the top of the pier. At working Load Levels, belLs, or jderreams have no infLuence on aLLowabLe LateraL capacity. At uLtimate soil resistance, bells have a marginaL and insignificant effect on LateraL resistance. Cooputation of pier Lateral capacity is based on uLtimate soiL resistance with a factor of safety applied for aLLowable Loads. The miriins.sn factor of safety is 2. Also, a Limiting factor in co1putation of LateraL capacity is the pier deflection at grade. This should be Limited to 0.25 inches at working Loads. (Higher values will reduce axial skin friction capacity).

Brc Method (Hand Calculations)

This is a sinple but conprehensive method for coffputing the LateraL capacity of piers by hand. This method uses the Linear theory of subgrade reaction and gives an approximate solution that is good for substantiaL portion of driLled piers designed at Fluor Daniel. The method uses uLtimate soiL resistance and application of a factor of safety. The results are corparabLe to nonlinear conputerized solution at Loads of one-third to one-haLf of the ultimate soiL resistance. At these Loads, deftections at the ground Line are small and the linear theory of subgrade reaction (P = ky) is valid. This method characterizes pier behavior as short or Long and faiLure modes depends on pier head fixity according to Attachment 4.

P-y Curve Method (NonLinear Cuteri zed CaLcuLations)

The P-y curve is a mathematicaL representation of the soil reaction versus pier defLection. SoiL reaction is a function of pier defLection and pier deflection depends on soiL reaction. Therefore, the soLution invoLves equations of equilibrhjn and cocpatibility that need to be satisfied. This solution is difficult to soLve by hand and requires use of conputer programs. Attachment 13 shows a modeL of LateraLLy Loaded deep pier. SoiL is replaced by a series of mechanisms that models soil response. Soil response, P, is a function of Lateral defLection, y and depth, x. P-y curves for soil will be obtained from the GeotechnicaL Report. From experimental results and theory, P-y curves, both for static and cyclic Loading are available for the folLowing situations:
-

Soft Clay BeLow Water (Matlock, 1970). Stiff CLay Below Water (Reese, 1973). Stiff Clay above Water Table (Welch and Reese, 1972). Sand (Cox, 1974). Unified Criteria for Clay (SuLLivan, 1979).

The Geotechnicat Report should cLarify if the above P-y curves are applicable.

C
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

Practice 000.215.1231 PiELicaticn Date 08Apr94 Page 11 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL DRILLED PIER F(XJN)ATIONS

The P-y method wiLL be used for structures carrying significant Loads. The Lead Structural Engineer wilt decide the structures that require detailed Lateral Load analysis. CLose coLlaboration with the Geotechnical ConsuLtant is very essentiaL. Coaputer progr allow investigation of the influence of a Large n4.Iiter of parameters such as Loading, geometry, pier penetration, soil properties, pier/superstructure interaction, and buckLing with miniasri difficulty.
LATERAL L(D DESIGN USING SRMS *TH

Linitatione This method assunes a uniform soiL profile. This method uses the Linear theory of s.tgrade reaction and is applicable to isolated piers such as 6 to 8 pier diameter spacing. This method wiLl be used on existing sites where previous Geotechnicat Reports have not adequately addressed allowable lateral toad capacity. This method will be used with cLose collaboration with the Geotechriicat Consultant. The required parameters will be obtained from the Geotechnical Report. This method does not give shear, moments, and deflections along the pier Length at allowable Loads. The method uses the concept of ultimate soil resistance at failure and an application of factor of safety to obtain aLLowable Lateral load. Concrete design is on the conservative side. For additional discussion, refer to sanpLe corputations.

Cohesive SoiLs

(Clays)
General

Broms assi.anes soil and pier as elastic materials and the forimitation is based on results from saturated cohesive cLays that are over consoLidated. The method assi.res ultimate soil resistance as 9 times the undrained soiL shear strength (C,) times the pier diameter CD) such as 9 C,D, regardless of depth. Soil resistance at top 1.5 pier diameters is negLected. (Refer to Attachment 5). The ultimate shear strength of fissured clays is less than 9 C,; hence, this procedure may lead to sLightly unconservative answers for such soils.

The behavior of pier depends on the dimensionless Length L:


r
A

O.2S

k D E I, L

= =

=
= =

Modulus of subgrade reaction for cohesive soil, Lbs/ct*ic inch. Pier diameter, inch. Pier modulus of elasticity, Lbs/square inch. Pier moments of inertia, inch . 4 Pier eobednent length, inch.

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

Practice 000.215.1231 PubLication Date 08Apr94 Page 12 of 21


FLUOR DANIEL

DRILLED PIER FOUNDATIOWS

I ()
Terzaghis recceriendations for k are as foLLows: Unconfined Conressive Strength (Tons/Square Feet) 1-2 2-4 >4 For Free Headed Piers:
-

k (Tons/Cubic Feet) 75 150 300 (Lbs/Cubic Inch) 87 173 347

Short
Long

If L < 1.5 (Refer to Attachment 5, Figure 2) If L > 2.5 (Refer to Attachment 5, Figure 3) Transition between L 1.5 to 2.5.

For Fixed Headed Piers:


-

Short Intermediate Long

If L 0.5 < If L

< >

0.5 (Refer to Attachment 5, Figure 4) < 1.5 (Refer to Attachment 5, Figure 5) 1.5 (Refer to Attachment 5, Figure 6)

Free Headed

The capacity of short pier depends on soiL shear strength, whereas capacity of Long pier depends on uLtimate concrete capacity of pier section. Pier behavior is governed by soiL properties at the top. the top wiLL be used. Average vaLues at

(E)

Refer to Attachments 5, Figure 2 (short) and Figure 3 (Long). Short Pier For a short pier (Refer to Attachment 5, Figure 2) faiLure takes pLace when the pier rotates and uLtimate soiL resistance has deveLoped aLong entfre pier Length. Point of maximun moment and zero shear is at distance (1.5D From statics:
+

f) beLow grade.

9CD

(e 1 ?

i.5D

0.5f)

2.25 CDg 2 1.5D


+

Substituting wiLL produce a quadratic equation in PULT which can be soLved. ALternativeLy, Attachment 6 couLd be used. A factor of safety wiLL be appLied to obtain aLLowabLe P,. The LateraL defLection at ground Line is as foLLows:
4Pa(1
+

1.5)

kDL

ALternatively, Attachment 8 couLd be used.

ST.. JCTURAL ENGINEERING

Practice 000.215.1231 PiA,Lication Date 08Apr94 Page 13 of 21


FLUOR DANIEL

DRILLED PIER FOUNDATIOMS

Long Pier For a Long pier (Refer to Attachment 5, Figure 3), failure occurs with the formation of a pLastic hinge in the pier (materiaL faiLure) at a depth of (1.50 + f) beLow ground surface. From statics:
f = p
-

ULT 9C D N_ax (e+i.5D+O.5f

where
= Moment capacity of pier section, unfactored.

Substituting wiLt produce a quadratic equation in 1 P which can be soLved. ALternativeLy, Attachment 7 could be used. A factor of safety wiLL be applied to obtain aLlowabLe P,. The LateraL deflection at ground line is as foLLows: 2P_P(e+1)

lcD

ALternativeLy, Attachment 8 couLd be used. Note!!! For 1.5 < < 2.5, coepute ULT as if it were a short pier. Then coapute maximun moment, M,,_a.,. If this exceeds pier moment capacity, then use Long pier equations.

Fixed Headed Refer to Attachment 5, Figure 4 (Short), Figure 5 (Intermediate), and Figure 6 (Long). Short Pier For a short pier (Attachment 5, Figure 4), faiLure takes place when the pier moves horizontalLy and ultimate soiL resistance is deveLoped along entire pier Length. (Except top 1.5 pier diameters).
From statics:
= 9D (L 1.5D)

The maximun moment occurs at the top and wilt be tess than moment capacity of pier section.
(0.5L+0.7D) SM_ax. 7 H_a,=P

where
=

Moment capacity of pier section, izifactored.

A factor of safety wiLt be applied to obtain alLowabLe P,.

The Lateral deflection at ground line is as lot Lows:

a kDL

Alternatively, Attachment 8 could be used.

STRUCTLAL ENGINEE.. NG

Practice 000.215.1231 Publication Date 08Apr94 Page 14 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL

DRILLED PIER FOUNDATIOMS (___ Intermediate Pier For an intermediate pier (Refer to Attachment 5, Figure 5), failure takes place with the formation of a plastic hinge at the top (material faiLure) aLlowing the pier to rotate. From statics:
DOLT

9Cd
P,,J.(1.SD
+

0.5f

2.25 Dg 2 L 1.5D
+

Substituting wiLL produce a quadratic equation in P which can be solved. A factor of safety will be applied to obtain aLlowable P. The Lateral defLection at groi.rd Line, Long Pier For a Long pier (Refer to Attachment 5, Figure 6), faiLure occurs with the formation of a plastic hinge at the maxinun negative moment (top of pier) and another hinge at the maximun positive moment Located at a distance (1.50 + f) below grade. This mode of failure is material failure of pier section.
From statics:
f
-

can be obtained from Attachment 8.

UL?

SCUD 2M (1.5D+0.5f)

ULT

where
= Moment

capacity of pier section, jiifactored.

Substituting wiLt produce a quadratic equation in uLT which can be solved. AlterativeLy, Attachment 7 could be used. A factor of safety will be applied to obtain allowable P. The Lateral deflection at ground Line is as follows: yo
-

aP

ALternatively, Attachment 8 couLd be used.


Cohesionless Soils (Sands)

General The method is based reaction increases (k,, = n, z/D). Also the passive rankine on the assiJttion that the lateral modulus of subgrede linearly with depth and decreases Linearly with width the ultimate soiL Lateral resistance is equal to 3 times earth pressure.

The assi.ined distribution of Lateral earth pressure at failure is shown on Attachment 9. The uLtimate soiL reaction, Q, per unit length of pier is: 5 Q=3DYZK

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

FLUOR DANIEL DRILLED PIER FOLDATI0iS

Practice 000.215.1231 PLicatian Date 08Apr94 Page 15 of 21

where D y
= =

Diameter of pier. Unit weight of soil. Depth below ground surface. Rankine coefficient of passive earth pressure Soil angle of internal friction.
-

z
K.,,

Behavior of pier depends on the dimensionLess Length AL:


I C.2

I,,

=
= =

Coefficient of LateraL subgrade reaction for a Long pier with a width of unity at a depth of unity, Lbs/cubic inch. Pier moment of inertia, inch . 4 Pier modulus of eLasticity, Lbs/square inch. Coefficient of horizontaL subgrade reaction, Lbs/cubic inch. Pier ethenent Length, inch.

Terzaghis recoomendation for n, are: Sand ReLative Density r, (Tons/cubic feet) Above Ground Water Table 7 30 21 56 r, (Tons/cubic feet) Below Ground Water Table 4 14 34

Loose,4CN<1O

MediLin, 10
Dense, N
>

<

<

30

Piers are cLassified as:


-

Short If AL Long If AL

C >

2.0 Attachment 9, Figure 2, Figure 6 4.0 Attachment 9, Figure 5, Figure 6

Between AL 2.0 and 4.0, pier behavior is transition for Free Headed and Intermediate for Fixed Headed. (Refer to Attachment 9, Figure 5).
Free Headed

The capacity of short pier depends on soiL properties whereas capacity of Long pier depends on uLtimate concrete capacity of pier section. Pier behavior is governed by soil properties near the top. at 3 to 5 pier diameters from top wilL be used. Average properties

Refer to Attachment 9, Figure 2 (Short) and Figure 3 (Long). Short Pier For a short pier (Attachment 9, Figure 2), failure takes pLace when the pier rotates and ultimate soiL resistance has developed along entire pier Length. Point of maximun moment and zero shear is at a distance f below grade.

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

Practice 000.215.1231 PiLicatian Date 08Apr94 Page 16 of 21


FLUOR DAMIEL DRILLED PIER FOUNDATIONS

From statics:
I 3 yDL
ULT

2(eL)
I

ULT f =0 8161 yDK

PULT(e

f)

L=f+g

The above equations can be used for conputing and a factor of safety wILL be appLied to obtain aLLowabLe P. AlternativeLy, Attachment 10 couLd be used. The LateraL defLection at ground Line: = 18P.(1
+

1.33)

2h L ALternatively, Attachment 12 couLd be used. Long Pier For a Long pier (Attachment 9, Figure 3), faiLure occurs with the formation of a pLastic hinge in the pier (materiaL faiLure) at a depth f beLow grade. From statics:
P f=0.816()

C
1/2

ULT

0.544(_)

where = Moment capacity of pier section unfactored. Substituting wiLL produce a quadratic equation in UIT which can be soLved. ALternativeLy Attachment 11 couLd be used. A factor of safety wiLL be appLied to obtain aLLowabLe P,. The LateraL deflection at ground Line:
y0
-

2.40P
5 h

) 1 5 (E

Alternatively, Attachment 12 couLd be used. Note!!!


< L < 4.0, conpute LJU and maxhm.in moment, M,,. as if it were a short pier. If the maximun moment exceeds moment capacity of pier, then use Long pier equations.

For 2.0

Fixed Headed Refer to Attachment 9, Figure 4 (Short). Figure 5 (Intermediate), and Figure 6 (Long).

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

Practice 000.215.1231 PibLicaticn Date 08Apr94 Page 17 of 21 FLUOR DAIIIEL DRILLED PIER FOUNDATIOWS

Short Pier For a short pier (Refer to Attachment 9, Figure 4), failure takes place when the pier moves horizontalLy and uLtimate soiL resistance is developed along entire pier Length. From statics:
1.5 y 5 DK 2 L

The maximun moment occurs at the top and wilt be Less then moment capacity of the pier section.
= 0.67 P L

where
= Moment capacity of pier section, unfactored.

A factor of safety wilt be applied to obtain allowable P,. The lateral deflection at ground line:
Y
=

fl 2 L

Alternatively, Attachment 12 couLd be used. Intermediate Pier For an intermediate pier (Attachment 9, Figure 5), faiLure takes place with the formation of a plastic hinge at the top (material failure) allowing the pier to rotate. From statics:
putr0.5YDL2K+

where M,
=

Moment capacity of pier section, unfactored.

The above equation is valid only if the maximuii positive moment at distance f below grade is less than Mma, = P (e
f
=
+

0.67f)

(...!9L.)i/2

yDK
ULT

The above equation can be used for conputing be applied to obtain allowable P . 1

and a factor of safety will

The lateral deflection at ground, Y 0 can be obtained from Attachment 12. Long Pier For a tong pier (Attachment 9, Figure 6), faiLure occurs with the formation of a plastic hinge at the maxinun negative moment (top of pier) and another hinge at the maximun positive moment Located at a distance f below grade. This mode of failure is material failure of pier section.

STRUCT1AL ENGINEERING

Practice 000.215.1231 PLbLicatiori Date 08Apr94 Page 18 of 21


FLUOR DANIEL
DRILLED PIER FQJICATIOIS

From statics: 2M / p 0.544I__i_ 1% yD K

e
where
=

Moment capacity of pier section, ixifactored.


ULT

For e

o such as

at bottom of pier cap:

0 =[3.676 M_. (yDIC,)./2JS/3 P

The point of maximuli positive moment, f:


I p f.O.816I ly P
\.f2

The previous equation can be used to coipute PULT and a factor of safety wiLt be applied to obtain allowable Pa. ALternativeLy, Attachment 11 couLd be used to cocpute PUIT. The Lateral deflection at grouad Line is as follows: =0.93 0 Y
3

(EI)

Alternatively, Attachment 12 couLd be used.

atw

z---

EFFECTS

The design methods outlined in previous sections are for single isoLated piers at a spacing of 6 to 8 pier diameters. Group effects significantly reduce aLLowable capacities and are an inortant consideration. The miniimzn recomended pier spacing wiLt be 3 pier diameters. This is also the minimun for constructibitity of pier without significant problems.

. AxiaL Cohesive

For cohesive soiLs, the capacity of individual pier wilL be reduced to 0.7 at a spacing of 3 pier diameter. For greater spacing, interpolate from 1.0 at 8 pier diameter to 0.7 at 3pier diameter spacing. Group effects also depend on the group configuration and settlements of the group. For exarrle, the capacity of a group of 4 by 4 piers is less than a group of 2 by 2 piers. A sinple block method could be used to conpute group efficiency. The Geotechnicat Report will provide recoewnendations. Where pier caps are used, the cap will be in firm contact with the soil or else the capacity will be further reduced to 0.67 the capacity at 3 pier diameter spacing. For cohesionless soils, the capacity of individual piers is the same at a spacing of 3 pier diameters as an isolated pier. Where pier caps are used, the capacity of individual piers will be reduced to 0.67 the capacity at 3 pier diameter spacing regardless of whether the pier cap is in firm contact with the soil.
For lesser spacing, block method could be used. provide reconinendat ions.

CohesionLess

The Geotechnical Report will

STRUCTLAL ENGINEERING

Practice 000.215.1231 Ptthticaticn Date 08Apr94 Page 19 of 21


FLUOR DANIEL

DRILLED PIER FCLR)ATIOWS

Lateral Group effect of lateralLy Loaded pier is a corplex problem and is a fi.riction of geometrical Layout, pier diameter, and spacing. Using the P-y method, the P-y curves could be modified by reducing P by a group efficiency factor. For the Broms method, the Lateral capacity will be reduced by a group efficiency factor. The GeotechnicaL Report will provide reconmendation on group efficiency factors. These factors are normally in the range of 0.62 for a 2 by 2 group at 3 pier diameter spacing to 0.44 for a 4 by 4 group. For high seismic zone, conbination of cycLic Loading and group action could very significantLy reduce allowable Lateral capacity. The P-y method conputer programs are recormended for corputing the Lateral capacity for this case. This will be done with close collaboration with the Geotechnical Consultant.

SETTLEMENTS One of the advantages of driLLed piers is that they can carry larger Loads with Less settLement than for instance, spread footings. However, cooputation of a corpression Load depends on acceptable settlements. This is more pronounced when more than 50 percent of the load is resisted by the base. Long drilled piers resisting a good percentage of applied loads in skin resistance tend to settle the least and are more acceptable for performance of the structure. The settlement at the top of the pier is due to the elastic shortening of the shaft and the settlement at the base is due to base resistance and skin resistance. Short term settLement is of significant irportance to prevent differential settlements. Si,ipLified methods are available and may be required for long heaviLy loaded piers. Conputer programs normally provide short tern settlements. Long term settlement is conplex to conpute and is done by Geotechnical Consultants using consolidation and elastic half space theories. Both short and long term settLements are of significant irportance for a successful design of driLled pier and close colLaboration with GeotechnicaL Consultant is required.

PIER BUCKLING Potential pier investigated. buckLing under high axiaL Loads in weak soil will be

Normally, soils having a standard penetration value of II equal or greater than 2 may be considered to provide adequate lateral support to prevent buckling. For additional details refer to: U.S. Naval Manual NAVFAC OH 7.2, May 1982.

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

Practice 000.215.1231 h.blication Date 08Apr94 Page 20 of 21


FLUOR DANIEL

DRILLED PIER FJiDATI0NS

REFERENCES

C)
Bowles, I.E.

Foundation AnaLysis and Design, 4th Edition 1988.

Woodward, R.J., W.S. Gar&er, and D.M. Greer. DriLLed Pier Fo4xdations, 1st Edition, 1972.
ACI (American Concrete Institute):

Proposed Revisions to Standard Specification for the Construction of Drilled Piers. AC! 336.1-79, AC! StructuraL JournaL. January/February 1989: 94-103.
Suggested Design and Construction Procedures for Pier Foundations: 336-3R-72, Revised 1985. ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers): Baker, C.N., F. Kahn. Caisson Construction Problems and Correction in Chicago. SM2, February 1971: 417-440. Broms, B.B. Design of LateralLy Loaded Piles. SM3, May 1965: AC!

7999.
SM3, May

Brcms, B.B. Lateral Resistance of Piles in Cohesionless Soils. 1964: 123-157. Broms, B.B. 27-63. Lateral Resistance of Piles in Cohesive SoiLs.

5142, March 1964: ST6,

Farr, J.S., L.C. Reese. June 1980: 1329-1341.


Ismaet, N.A., T.bI. KLn.

Plain Concrete Underreams for Drilled Shafts.

GT8, August 1978:

Behavior of Rigid Piers in Layered Cohesive Soils. 1061-1074. GT3,

Meyerhof, 0.0. Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Pile Foundations. March 1976: 197-228. Federal Highway Adninistration:

Reese, L.C., M.W. ONeiLl. Drilled Shafts: Construction Procedures and Design Methods. FHWA-HI-88-042, August 1988. U.S. Naval Manual, NAVFAC DM 7.2, May 1982 Structural Engineering Practice 000.215.1207: Structural Engineering Practice 000.215.1232:

Anchor Bolt Design Criteria

Driven Pile Foundations

Structural Engineering Specification 000.215.02380:

Drilled Caissons

C
STRUCTURA. ENGINEERING

Practice 000.215.1231 Pitlication Date 08Apr94 Page 21 of 21 FLUOR DANIEL DRILLED PIER FOUNDATIOWS

ATTACI*IEWTS Attach.amt 1: TypicaL DrilLed Pier Foundation* Attadnt 2: Typical Underream Shape* Attadnt 3: Design Procedure For DrilLed Pier Foundation AttecInt 4: FaiLure Modes For Piles* Attachnt 5: Deflection, SoiL Reaction, And Bending Moment Diagram For Piles In Cohesive Soil* Attactent 6: Cohesive Soils Attach.ent 7: Cohesive SoiLs Attachnt 8: Cohesive Soil Ultimate Lateral Resistance Of Short PiLes*
Ultimate Lateral Resistance Of Long Piles*

Geotechnical*

Lateral Deflection At Ground Surface*

Attachent 9: Deflection, Soil Reaction, And Bending Moment Diagram For Piles In CohesionLess Soils* Attactent 10: Cohesionless Soil Attach.ent 11: Cohesionless Soil AttacIent 12: Cohesiontess SoiL

Ultimate Lateral Resistance Of Short Piles* Ultimate Lateral Resistance Of Long PiLes* Lateral Deflections At Ground Surface*

Attactent 13: Model Of A Deep PiLe Foundation Under Lateral Loading Showing Concept Of Soil Response Curves* Attachent 14: Explanation Of Portions Of Drilled Pier Not Considered In Coupiting Side Resistance* Attachent 15: Crane Mounted Drilling Unit* Attach.ent 16: Sanle Design 1: Attach.ent 17: Sanle Design 2: Attachment 18: Sanpie Design 3: Attachment 19: Sanple Design 4:
*

Straight Pile In Cohesive Soil* BelIed Pier In Mixed Soil Profile* Short Straight Pile In Sand* Short Bet led Pier In Clay*

This material was not created using WordPerfect; the Central Library is the curator of this material.

IRUCTLRAL ENGINEERING

C)

FLUOR DANIEL
Typical Drilled Pier Foundation

000 215 1231 December 1992 ATTACHMENT 1 ...Sheet 1 of 1

AXIAL LOAD

MOMENT

LATERAL LOAD

>-

SHAFT DIAMETER, D, CAN VARY WIDELY AND DEPENDS ON EMBEDMENT DEPTH, L

-J LU

>-

z
C-) -J I LU I

REINFORCING STEEL

LU LU

m
LU

SIDE (FRICTION) RESISTANCE BELL

MAY BE USED IF REQUIRED

BASE RESISTANCE BELL

SIZE VARIES MAXIMUM IS THREE TIMES SHAFT DIAMETER. SOIL CONDITIONS AND EMBEDMENT DEPTH WILL DICTATE THIS.

DIAMETER, Bb

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

C,

LUOR DANIELTypcaI Underream Shape

000 215 1231 December 1992 ATTACHMENT 2 ...Shee 1 of 1

NOTE: MINIMUM ANGLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 336 IS 55 45 MAY BE USED IF UNREINFORCED BELL HAS ADEQUATE CONCRETE STRENGTH (SEE SECTION ON PIER DETAILS).

PIER EXTENSION DEPENDS ON REAMER USED UNDERREAM CUT WITH STANDARD REAMER

TOE HEIGHT MINIMUM 6

UNDERREAM CUT WITH BUCKET REAMER

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

C)
C 0
I XI

>
GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT -[GROUP EFFECTS
CD C),
tO

z
ri
I0

LEUFLEMENTSJ

GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT

SHOR1 LONG AXIAL

0
C)

ERI

CD 0 C CD

0
-I

CD 0

-El
CD
1

COHESIONLESS (SANDS)

-9 0 C D 0 0

C)
CD 0 CD (-3

-3
-3
C,

C,)

C,

-3 C-) 0

z -3
c.z
CD

C)

z
_-1

z
o

CD

CY

C)

CDC) 3

LUOR DANIEL
Failure Modes for Piles
[AFTER BROMS (1964)]

000 215 1231 December 1992 ATTACHMENT 4 ...Sheet 1 of 1

Figure 1. Free Headed


P P

//////

/ /

// /

LONG

SHORT

Figure 2. Fixed Headed


P
p p

/ /

LONG

INTERMEDIATE

SHORT

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

C,

C)

FLUOR DANIEL-

000 215 1231 December 1992 ATTACHMENT 5 ...Sheet 1 of 3

Deflection, Soil Reaction and Bending oment Diagram for Piles in Cohesive Soils
[AFTER BROMS (1964)]

Figure 1. Distribution of Lateral Eorth Pressures in Cohesive Soil

3D
D

(a) DEFLECTION

(b) PROBABLE DISTRIBUTION OF SOIL REACTIONS

(c) ASSUMED DISTRIBUTION


OF SOIL REACTIONS

Figure 2. Short FreeHeaded Pile

(a) DEFLECTION

(b) SOIL REACTION

(c) SHEAR

(d) BENDING MOMENT

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

:.
CD CD

C 0
ci

(-n
0

I0

>
Z .9 I

CD

a1 I

CD CD

I
1 I

m
CD 0

I
m

C) P1

CD CD

a0
Z
-.

o
Z
CD

-o
CD

3
(I)

r
P1

(I) 0

P1

o z
0

.cJ,
0

.2or,,
ZZ C)

or,

zz

U)

0
-

C) Cr CD CflCD CD

FLUOR DANIEL

000 215 1231 December 1992 ATTACHMENT 5 ...Sheet 3

Figure 5. IntermediateLength FixedHeaded Pile

(a) DEFLECTION

(b) SOIL REACTION

(c) SHEAR

(d) BENDING MOMENT

Figure 6. Long FixedHeaded Pile

Mmax Mmax

(a) DEFLECTION

(b) SOIL REACTION

(c) BENDING MOMENT

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

FLUOR DANIEL-

000 215 1231 December 1992 ATTACHMENT 6 ...Sheet 1 of 1

0
Cohesive Soils

Ultimate Lateral Resistance of Short Piles


[AFTER BROMS (1964)]

:3

C)

Li C.)

z
I

Cr)
(.1) Li -J Li

Li
I

H-J

12

16

20

EMBEDMENT LENGTH, L/D

q.

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

FLUOR DANIEL

000 215 1231 December 1992 KI1ACIIMENT 7 ...Sheet 1 of 1

Cohesive Soils

Ultimate Lateral Resistance of Long Piles


[AFTER BROMS (1964)]

cJ
D C-)

LU C-)

U, 1t) LU -J LU I

LU

I -J

3 4

10

20

40

60

100

200

400

600

PILE SECTION MOMENT CAPACITY, Mmox/Cu D 3

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

FLUOR DANIEL
Cohesive Soil

000 215 1231 December 1992 ATTACHMENT 8 ...Sheet 1 of 1

Lateral Deflection at Ground Surface


[AFTER BROMS (1964)]

-J

0
>-

8
2: 0

w
-J Li -J

L)

(I) CI) Li -J

2:

0
CI) Li

4 L

DIMENSIONLESS LENGTH,

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

C)

FLUOR DANIEl.

000 215 1231 December 1992 A11ACHMENT 9 ...Sheet 1 of 3

Deflection, Soil Reaction and Bending Moment Diagram for Piles in Cohesionless Soils [AFTER BROMS (1964)j

Figure 1. Assumed Distribution of Soil Reactions in Cohesionless Soil


LATERAL LOAD. P

(a) DEFLECTIONS

(b) DISTRIBUTION OF SOIL REACTIONS

Figure 2.

Short FreeHeaded

Pile

3D7 L<
(a) DEFLECTIONS (b) SOIL REACTION (c) SHEAR (d) BENDING MOMENT

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

-n
C CD CD

C 0 XI
I-

C))
0

>
0
D

z
1 CD

I, I-

CD 0 C) 19 19 --F
I

CD

E
19

I-U

19 -9

0 0
-4

CD 0 0 CD

19

0 CD 0

a-

0
CD U,

-o

-o
CD

z
0
I

(1) 19 > F

19

c) 4
0

C.)

C)

019

zz
40

ZZ

U,

C)

-3
C,

-3

=
tEl

0 CI ID 1 IJ CD

z erJ

000 215 1231 December 1992

LUOR DANIEL

ATTACHMENT 9 ...Sheet 3

Figure 5. IntermediateLength FixedHeaded Pile

3
(c) DEFLECTION (b) SOIL REACTION Cc) BENDING MOMENT

Figure 6. Long FixedHeaded Pile

Mmcx Mmcx

3D) LpK (a) DEFLECTIONS (b) SOIL REACTION (c) BENDING MOMENT

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

000 215 1231 December 1992

FLUOR DANIEL

A11ACHMENT 10 ...Sheet 1 of 1

Cohesionless Soils

Ultimate Lateral Resistance of Short Piles [AFTER BROMS (1964)]

t)

0
-J -J U F.

Ui -J
c1

20
LENGTH, L/D

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

0...

FLUOR DANIEL
Cohesionless Soils

000 215 1231 December 1992 ATIACHMENT 11 ...Sheet 1 of 1

Ultimate Lateral Resistance of Long Piles


[AFrER BROMS (1964))

0
bJ C)

z
I

C) LU -J LU

LU

-J

.1D

1.0

10.0

100.0

1000.0

10,000.0

PILE SECTION MOMENT CAPACITh, 4 Mmax/D Kp 7

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

.fl c-I

FLUOR DANIEL

000 215 1231 December 1992 ATTACHMENT 12 ...Sheet 1 of 1

C)

Cohesionless Soil

Lateral Deflection ot Ground Surface

[AFTER BROMS (1964)]

cJ

Q_ _J uJ D >

0
I

-J U U

C-)

0
-J U

(I, U) U-J

0
U)

6 XL

10

DIMENSIONLESS LENGTH,

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

0*

FLUOR DANIEL

000 215 1231 December 1992 ATTACHMENT 13 ...Sheet 1 of 1

Model of a Deep Pile Foundation Under Lateral Loading Showing Concept of Soil Response Curves
[Federol Highwoy Administrotion (1988)]

AXIAL LOAD MOMENT

LATERAL
LOAD

//////

cxxrxrr)I

//////

:
y

crrmm
P

cmmm I

//////

V
/
y

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

fl

FLUOR DANIEL

000 215 1231 December 1992 AACHMENT 14 ...Sheet 1 of 1

Explanation of Portions of Drilled Pier Not Considered in Computing Side Resistance


[Federal Highway Administration (1988)]

TOP 5 FEET NONCONTRIBUTING

TOP 5 FEET NONCONTRIBUTING

BOTTOM ONE PIER DIAMETER N ON CONTRIBUTING

BOTTOM LE DIAMETER NONCONTRIBUTING

PERIPHERY OF BELL NONCONTRIBUTING

STRAIGHT PIER FOUNDATION

BELLED PIER FOUNDATION

RECOMMENDED VALUES OF

FOR DRILLED PIERS IN CLAY VALUE OF az LIMITING VALUE OF LOAD TRANSFER, f sz (ksf)

LOCATION ALONG DRILLED PIER

FROM GROUND SURFACE TO DEPTH ALONG DRILLED PIER OF 5 Fr* BOTTOM PIER OR THE TOP FRICTION 1 DIAMETER OF THE DRILLED 1 PIER DIAMETER ABOVE OF THE BELL (IF SKIN IS BEING USED).

ALL OTHER POINTS ALONG THE SIDES OF THE DRILLED PIER.

0.55

5.50

THE DEPTH OF 5 FEET MAY NEED ADJUSTMENT IF THE DRILLED PIER IS INSTALLED IN EXPANSIVE CLAY, OR IF THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL GROUNDLINE DEFLECTION FROM LATERAL LOADING, OR IF THE FROST DEPTH EXCEEDS 5 FEET.

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

LUOR DANIELCrane Mounted Drifling Unit

000 215 1231 December 1992 ATTACHMENT 15 ...Sheet 1 of 1

TOOL FOR UNDERREA4

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

000 215 1.231 December 1991 ATTACHMENT 16 ...Sheet 1 of 6

FLUOR DAMEL

Sample Design 1.

Straight Pile in Cohesive Soil

FWOR DANIEL
CALCULAUONS

0*1! C091. 140.


,

s.d SKETCHES
519!T

C10

Z!LLcD

PJ5

pAIDAr7I

140,

<k

5T-Arr

pL rN REv oX/

P,A777 ooo -2i-/Z3i


A-i.IPL D7CM

cHgE1 OF

A r4 w OI

ceAoc
--

4,

if.
:0

1
I:

71E2

PLA

N
AJMo 8Lrs (vi,m,M AOC 6e4)

Is

6
7

4 9 20 21
22

4J.C SEAM 12E NPoec6uekr


JOT S/IOWM oe

CIjf(.

23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31

P,z

* 3

i,Wi(A. TIC

32
33 3

IZ
A-A I-EVr,oK
I

Vr/,4.J

35 36 2 3
4 5 8 7 9

II

12

13

15

17

15

20

21

22

23

24

Z3

26

27

28

29

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

000 215 1231 December 1991 ATACRMENT 16 ...Sheet 2

FLUOR DANIEL

FWOR DANIEL
CALCULATIONS o,, SKETCHES

qcoNT.No.z3gJ(

f 8

K
,1

CIII<D

flri,jc,i. Prr

u,VM1Ofl

SSSET NO. /

5r2PJ1wr PILE. IA) (OHE.cfV cOIL

21 -/231 floO P2Tf i cA-pLc DE/c,t,


-

5H

2O

DE-.5I4

DATA

/0wN0A-17OAI
6

Fot? A FJNLSfrfIN ,v M. riQi--r 0ZitQ PrE5 vJ,7i 4/2AQE 48dc/1 /0 F7. 1 DIzn4D Pf PAciJ4 z

AE SrP-(NGTh es) f f cjgAaV(O 7 c P0 C5 2O

LOADS:
a

PA XiA1
2 3
14

Pi2SJ71P
f(

280 16
((fj.
l.L

PAy,4f.

,jo

pq.
-

-6O
30

Si

15 16 7

,L(oi

,ky,,4L /NCL(JE5 WiNo ?0MS PoGC /5 thk CoMPff-.fSSIo,J:

So IL

Fr2o PJz17 ES

9 20 21

AY,kL

D.fcM
CJZOUP

Fo
&Ffcr

22
23 26
N ,S III

o 1 f-r 25 c t /iu... Qeoue (-rj

i O7 1 tii Ei/6vc

ES(A)

L0/rO Fc o/t Ef!7Z71CF

(20X 2S)/7
I000O

b<ip..

25

26
27 28 29 30
SI

1 1a

r DMiP13

P)L.

A D&PTH
=

o, SOP-r.

La) Qf-PLi7 tOC 2ESIf TM/CC .L r


05
IsA

4j
cs.

/Q
0

32 33 34 35 26 I 4 S

S 30 3o-4-r 47-50

-27xxi7 537T

252

6oi
3.x3iT

23

Z16 3-/b 4-0 4-0

0
6 352

0
IS

77

18

20

27

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTiCE

en
0

) I V
I 0

It)
U C)

I,

I:,

4C 0
2

7-)

A
S

cJ-en

c-I

40I

z
-3
(

w w

0 _t
I.

r)

Ii C)

L-i
I, + N
Nr

w x

;T-

S
r)

2
rI
z

a
II!

r-

u I
U

e4

cc
c

u c

_
Q

jj

>

-r :s -v
LI

,.
t, t 1 5

c:?y

-L
fl

0
C
I,

Ih IL c

71

I
IU-S

I
u
-S cL

\.

.3-

cx
1 I
C

z
0

cc
0
-J LL

C)

-J
w

z
I
0

:c3
s. U b

r r
0
9 C

0
I 0

0
-J LL
Ni
a 0
7 I
U I.,

D
z
I

I,
(54

4
Li
c

Ix

IU
S

q
5

0 0

C)
(5

L
1.1

4
(
LU
S

&
,-

N
0
p1

1:
C
V

c1 S)

II

e
V
*_S_ S

A
N
, 4

P1

c
hL

>(Th

:
L

-U

N 0 k
C
c
I

u
C)

-I-.

Ij

4(4

-1

p
P 3
c:3

to

1II
ii

.oJ

9
C

Q
In I.

V
7 7

U)

lb

0,

0,

-nmn.n

IS

0,

Cl

0.0fl010

000 215 1231 December 1991 ATIACHMENT 16 ...Sheet 5

FLUOR DANIEL

FLUOR DANIEL
CALCULATIONS or,d SKETCHES

DAE

tI go
zSif C,

C0N1.No.

DIZILLr,

Pir (-,uNnAr1(N
OK6tyoIL PArfi
A-MPIE

sr o.
-

6r2AfcT- ILI IN

r)e5fcAJ

Ooo-zLc-12.7/

5wr5O

4Ai-.4/.. 40Ao

(QNrD

oN
$

oQ-Lo 5CA

W VgA

3Q,LL1flG4

77i-M- IS

r7f

JOLIW. Q tt1/T1ON SO4LITTQ(

13

ACCI2Ar.

U4rr4A1-E SOIL h/kThi2A- QgiIciriqc Putr = I77 I(pr is T7+ rjlikL 2.EA-Ctff I D6vLoP A WHiCH 77f if Pi ifcrw fl Hfr-y)/.4 C,4-p4C(r-f 7 A/1t/M ,4V4/Ik&( .50,1- .QCSfS7*.I( T17C S , FCP-4 t 1 13 STWC7 13-i PiLe 5TT0 rJ MP-rnL C;4p,C in rit bOAt A-r wHitti 5o/1 Th1-iLc/e wiuocccrn. r Pt,-77
4

IS l6

OF A F,jtiviZ OF 5A16rf

,4-r4b

oi (P) eu ,i2-4 Pjf1 ICTWN Fe. cuP Ep-rs, = ,q5,cor = Z

18

11fl.5

I Foz

Aw C)4-7

P,Le Ar To

PIiif I)MZZ

21 22

F rr
Iv

Pir CcFi U12IITtQN /F? m-s yiPE, 77f qPCP 7CiC f F/7V
. 6,1

:
25 26 27

rite .ZOIrI.CMIkf &e6CT7ON (94E As ul2/IfYf SA4) Ss

6z
fl

q.

D&FjCTrOfr4

Ar

Pa
PILE,

(iJ5 FMC,.4 , 0 50x IQQOX O0074Z7 7% (Iz)


I2I) -S

Ff4 WIZE ) < /4 AtL)WEO

:
32 36 2 3 4

5OFr

8OM4T Z 01<

QE r,p:
I275 OCuz Ar raP OF PILL Vu = ft_ UVAT PUAI?4. 2/ bd o5joq.3Iqx27/fooo ?z b= 3iqo d -q
MArnuI.i

25>6Y75,pJ.
OP 16
7 6 9 20 21 92

fr
3

3
4

75
7 4

,4T
9

A44XfqM
to 2 13

PACIAIC
4

15

23

24

23

25

27

28

29

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

000 215 1231 December 1991 ATIACRMENT 16 ..Sheet 6

LUOR DANIEL

FWOR DANIEL
CALCULATIONS
and

DATE

((,
i

CONT. NO.

II
CHD

SXETCHES
SHEETNO.

DIZruO

P.rr2

U?SIflAI-TOU

5rM4frr prt r -ctvc OrL

2/c /23/
I

SN4PL. ricIc,v
1 O4 S/tf!

D6W

P,

crTOt

CZT

7C1L

180.r.4.I.n DL.dr..

ZACOL

S&Li(VALf17

CoMPciiZ

PP-OQf2k,..(

CM

C45& FoR.. PILE $ofC77OJ( IrpAi(r

I0

4i4

2
13

I 5 6
4

i
0.i. 1..a L..,d. $0.1. a, IX*JII1.It.010.
4.t.r1..L Pn..flt.a,

<iI

Acr COLU.LIN CLv5 A-Lso E C.4ED.

Coqto

C)
4, 5 0.009 1 20440 P00.9.001
La/l.a 1.0
*

7 4

PnJ.0SI 00021$.Ltl IJMOU St lOt SI 1101 10.10 P101 00 E4.tn..: 5.5.

1.0.8
72...: 21:0011

8,

9841 5.0

01,04/10

2.38 090
fta... $04801. 1.00lStS.:

C.d.t 4C1 31119

0.10

0.10

20
SI

11..dfln.4a l c..a1d.d 0.ifl

22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31

CCr oE.s.zcil A-MD

620MS

MH-OO

32 33 34 35 36 2

MTf i?-u( U(i/!3PJM ,r U71AiA,4 f*T77y2, PPz.,Cnioy z-ua.) A- 771q &6sThice Nor .,5AFry TV Otr rnj3z( ,OAO$. T7ffJ M6i7D) Pitt n #flOW- fft /4iYX/,4WM ff1iz Awn MOiE P,-14 /,v/i2cnoAJ 5o,L Ai- ALkGe..G o O Lri2M S 4vt SIff* /?iZ A R/&c) .s ThWv.f N tI 4/A14ta.. ro 8ril Mo,4M WON JA,(A1?... CIPt PC.(. pto ZEr/6c USE CF ii 7- q /ff 1 A-1,4d%.,c z 5io Fr qp. 4 , Pacr 5OOIL4 I OR 10 .MQ43 1. rzt PILE hr Pci CkM(ri T111 C 1.101 ,t4&j.) uCfl0A1 /1-i eMFZr. T1#j Pi- 1 MC IL .T7OA/ CArPA-!T 61i2MZME Ptr.

ANf,5,j B

B,z4S

..

11

14

16

18

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

24

2,3

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

000 215 1231 December 1991 ATFACUMENTI7 ...Sheetlof9

FLUOR DANIEL-

Sample DesIgn 2

Belied Pier In Mixed Soil Profile

FLUOR DANtEL
CAL,CULATtONS **d SKETCHES

04T I4T.

II

,<
(6C

rIPJ/,f, [LLIJ

Pr

n,JirAnAJ
tN

S*E6 p13.

I fr I

pr

MryD
.

OI/

PiLc

PiZ,ri,.c
cA.MpLl
ff-rf

nr,-Zi-23I cIQ,v f) C 1 2

cq

T?P

,,

D,t-P Irnd

Jot N r)

U. STRJPPAL3LE FcP-M Sb4 45 S0N0yu&& F


IS

seQ POtI.
(7

Dict f T71r5

SCTT0,4 fr1 B ZA4 1$I: PiLE 4-i.ria

.4

t4 5r2i 170K

To(-4JCS )

.9

nk44
I?

Ci.1.A
TI

9 23 SI 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 25 30
SI 32 33
,.

Is 71CA-

os

CoiLi
I

E Lt IA rip iV
Nors: 86LL.

?0 FiIZM M ill-IS OEP1Y

VIF1 W1771 0/L5

3* 35

Z
36

1TZ4C1o 0R 8EZL orLMprILir1. ot4cI44vr,+s4r ANO iz/Ljj,ai( fUEA/ 2QIV 3oUw *77011 L5 ot7?-uC71O4 -o,inLNct7( if-irZL CONU-, YrIk. Bkrd.. oEoPN*73
4

Qi1D.
57 24 25

11

12

15

20

21

22

23

24

53

26

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

000 215 1231 December 1991 ATACRMENT 17 ..Sheet 2

FLUOR DANIEL

FLUOR DANIEL
CALCULATIONS nd SXETCNES

QA1E

CONY. NO. BY

6fr
-

MK
j

c-

O!2i,r

Pi-i=c-

nIAIflAT1(u.i

5ME1 NO.

6LL

PIEe LV MLX

SOIL iZOPiL

PAri
5hc-r

000 zic-/73J MP!.OICW 2


zo

DezM DA-rA
A
OP

5
ItO

P[

.r. .cjpPOiTt FOUNDfr77OP


Fr.

UJpA(Mt
0

E-UGiI (L 7 Sb*a S

1 77 CO L /A1 8Lt D/Z1LtL


B

/ae S PA

CO1S(L
WATeR T&L

AT iC PtZS , Pc o A-1 A DP17f OF

C:2I.1

aASf

N,q

w
l0 Il 12 13

Z 1 Z 4

44

Is

6-ow QR..AD6
-

.SIL PPrL6 03Fr tA

i3-1Fr
!S-ZZFr

CaI7rONf5Fr riq SAiJt


SAJD
N2Z

CtAy
4

14
IS 16

Z2-0F1

C.t.fr(

CzzrzIr4Is&r-r

50

So/k V5i7

cork PoP&z( 47pc;


(5u8Me)
2pc. (sle)

Il
Is

rci.-j

ItO PC
1(5 pc.c

20
21 22 23

LOA.o

co LOAD
O&r
Liv

30
/70 2-0

ILpr
qps

Cspri)
(oPr2FtT7tl1cJ

24
LI,

/opiij
/rffA1

I<IP

2$

26
27 2$

Wi

iqoiipt
25K1pS

WiNO 5/1tfr2.

29
30 31 32 33
34

Jor

35 36 1 2 3 4 5

PU7?tfIO i4S e&.uip4i fO 11 ,p-E DS/ ii ZL-UT7 5 7 T BO ptEtZ 7716. rO,zwAGLtr OF BeuNs AiM6OMr 1-eN 4TH t. 3FFiCULr. 712-6 of5 GvcuIA MD DEtP6D(ttt( CoNrP+avrZ SiMtt. 86 CNS C4L1fi. FCCF?UMM1WJ5, 57zi1tffr PILtS Jt#kLL 8e PP4L L1.
-

HI

II

12

13

14

15

19

2021

22

23

24

25

26

37

25

29

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

000 215 1231 December 1991 ATTACHMENT 17 Sheet 3

FLUOR DANIEL-

FLUOR DANIEL
CALCULATIONS 4nd SKETCI4ES

CONt. .

rLLfl PZP ,OUNtDA7/OAJ

((-7 O 6 l3f1 Y MK S966T .2


OA6

C,KQ

Bj[

Pze I-4 MLxo

cOVrL

PROFVLE

P.A(ricc frOOp -Z1c--123L_


4MPLE Dr * 2

cf-r -3o=q

krAL

sio:
At-L
i7oZ0 + 1W

H&,(MUM
6
7

3oKp1
A-

Dsi Frz A
;. D.s,Qt.4 L0,4D O
1zf

OPSA-fe,- 3 5iL g6SISrttNCE


G.
1

Qpu
0-7

eciJ

Rm2O-7

i6zq Kp!
Er-tvA-rTo.v z 6LO.4) f2AOE,

9 10

3 /tfr At-JO

Cc?)
t2

1 cIt-fr(O,vLec
14 Is IS 17 18 19

MPc4-r Soit 5,tj E4..S7sT/i-f1C6 (rqcflQN) Jy4z5 dA -cs OMIVE) CLA,,g .

5A-,o

iS-O.I35j

I-a -/ 7,.O-25
+

rne p..eS?sTlrACf
(3IS
1S-22

f,a,/

SA7 747 2-552

,4. 4 i

i.-c
2O

a
O

-q PIf 1 i

b/2

i-5o-(35 471 o-qy x!,a+747+75Z 1353 plfI-3S If

(5oZL
-

3-135

o-qO

20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
-

AA
ciFr

HriZrflO2

M11(Z

Vff4.
.3,4.
3- 4

A s g :p
0 /41

4-7-1

SM
IS22
CLMl CLMI
Z2 -26

15-4-

oo.q7

/-12..

4.
-

-3-7-7 37.7 56-S

I,

35

o-qO

7 2. 45-8
1-2. 0
3Z-2. P(tpi

4-4

o 55
0

2.6-32.

4-4.

0MZ.

5lD

Prfl#JcE Q

32 33
34

35

13

II

12

13

19

20

21

22

23

24

23

26

27

28

29

STRUCrURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

iJI

0 4
1

-q

00 *1
I (b (I-)

ES I

I
I
*1
**

Ii 0 :5 U- -4 -1o5 0 II

cc?
0 0
,

) :5
C-
I

0
Us q

I 3 U,

*
II
-

C-

1
z
Ii -

cr,

>(
oc
-

0 UI ii

& 0

C 1 0

0
1 ft 0 0
(I1
I

0-

a,

0 0

1 U
IA

P1 -I

1
z 0

-1

-1 I,

c
IA
0
/1

a
0
0
U

I
0
U

1t
0

0 0 0

0
0
0

[I

I-

000 21.5 1231 December 1991 ATTACHMENT 17 ...Sheet 5

FLUOR

FWOR DANIEL
CALCULATIONS nd SKETCNE5

41E

(-7go
NO.

C. NO. 8Y .AJ f

r&r I, t-..--PJELL0

\
-

P r

P,iti

i7rJ
-.--.

SH6E1

OF
-

-.-

PZE2.LAJ

MIn

corL

PP_or,-

cAMP!c

4 2

Ay/AL

TAfsf0,4:
IPLI

Mi4/AIIA4

iqo

30

160 1cpf

o
5fC/gi

CON

C,aCf
.

5-/4o-cq- 2-2 68- 73yc-aq= o.iq


rI523oo.oq
-

70

BM4 1 Pii

P/thz.-

62-6 yooql4-63
49-5(dIS z 74-2.

7i i-s -x

30-50
73 4

OF

5f2

rt30VE

Bt_

a
7 4. 256 2 (17X )
-.

Is 16 17 IN

)xo-os

DO

D,z-f p,

2 z3-/6z-6jco (nY4 - _4.2.4)10.11 2 J7y4

ZQS 4-968
-

252-

ioS

-f As

20 21 22 23 24 25
26

$o/Z5v P
8L

JSrfiNcEOP,4 ff77oU.f
3

CI1IArnffZ Stcsi

2qz- 7 3 37K1pJ S 7
L..._ FOF-C

Snr 2
-

Ust A (.o&1 F/rC7- ci:


UPjr

OF

3
989-4-/3 = 3zq-8

-g(o;-77.)/ 3 (3o.5o

v4c

27 28 29 30
3,

US/NC INtJ/i1IfJIfl.

Fkao(l o 5A-,
-

QkzoLrntE
kz-wk& u pt-i
=

37Zfl9 4 4 7

k
Zq3> )6oKipr

32
33

PP

0.- /9,e CiPLFf-

34 35 36
I

II

12

14

IS

17

20

21

22

23

24

20

26

27

28

29

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

000 215 1231 December 1991

ATIACUMENT 17 ...Sheet 6

FLUOR DANIEL

FlUOR DANIEL
CALCULATIONS nd SKETCHES

OAE

II

T go
:o

CONI. NO.

ay 1 g_
SN6Er NO.

n1rLLD 8LL6

Fut.iflA-rrfJ

pr-2

t?4 &4IXp
.

.OrL PPDiL

PIZicfl4
4iErA

t700

Mpc O</4A(

2I- IZL 2

(-c7

ChK 6(NFOZC BL1.. Aci 1m


C,ZL
u (es
L/7

OJCPr CAPACtrI

F5fz
o

A2Z

,(1f,./McA

A-rqt

55.

o UsE W A ieg Dsf!2h3LC Fe U ir MO IZ.E OAJ CP-6-r

S6 z

w -i c. & s PiL. Az.So, A 55 p

,cc

Q Cl /rljfl 11.

G 4-5 f P-i.i,ir7 PrVir Pt/4 USE OF A aIOE,zI*M this AvEu/c1E 5&cn1. t(N/)6 i3a

FOL
12 3

Z&fE- W PLAIN CONoz/2er FAe AM LC 2.Eec y 4 r Z kj. ouI v AC 3rqcri1-L 9


rL5

DZjjtz)
JtV

IS

16

WL.Ti/1icj
SadL

r
LILnAIA1

COMpP!S7OAI cr1nvc4.

,c-rE,l5E 1

I-OS (170) f275(2O)46K.p seF- z 3zq2..gf f(-IJ rnc/oAc; 44


-

ULT1NFrIr
21 22 23 I6

/05C3P-54S1O) ziI1.l
if 7.f.L.ff

.<
G 45

4133 1 J

f2

71Z1

4q2 IZ

OP /rl3OVE ..ffI72ji(

:
26 27 28 29 30
SI

szz-

.zs

32 33

35 36
1

10

II

16

IS

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERiNG TECHNICAL PRACTICE

000 215 1231 December 1991 AflACHMENT 17 ...Sheet 7

FLUOR DANIEL

FLUOR DANIEL
CALCULATIONS ond SKETCHES

OAr6

1/ 7 o
CNXO
.

CON1. NO.
By

MK

Thi7-r,,-r

P,,-p
P,E,2

F,f,Afn,1,IAi

S446T NO.

OF

lEtEn

1IJ

Loft

P2OqL

Pi2Mr7c
5AMPL Dec/cA) t&r 7 Off
-

LATRA
71

t-O,4

!L6

15

AWkLi1D

A AZt

hD.

PILE BEHAV!ok Ii o, G SoiL Co DiT7o/S ,-f 7?t ro p. Fo i1i1c


) ofz Ufrr7o,vS 1 ci-,v Ci ,kiz tI.st

01

10 Ii 2 73 14

MfD&7

3L -2 rs = 3oo
D:3o
-

Faa.
FOP

E
44

7x 36
16 7
18

/
OO274Z7

F-LRO

7
PIi.

/3k
20 21 22 23

O74Z7 Y 0

32/Z: ZS oFLcA PIL&.

> Z-5

IC%14

86HV1O

Ar COWMN U/2,L,S OR
= /05(17Q)+

R covOwe/ B1 PiLe cic..v C.4pcirf PcAotJ Co4PW PP-oci2Ml M SIYVWN OM .Stir9, fZ75(z-f.fL) 46.YLr 1
6,-Ip
.

24
25 26 27 29 29 30 3!

ULiiMfrr Fa,z UAI


iOi-C- cA-

/4aMfi PAc(N
Se77av frnnAc
z

o/iz-r5= 517

J
5r7 5-to-s

Fotz ,oA/4

PIr2s,

PC1LT

e-f5DO5f
D

irg(3)+o5
=

3 q x 4
uA-T1ot

1H ,4QV6

Eprr/1/J.S

SL4LTh

Iii A QuAC-tA47C 0

32
33 34 30

.q
))

-P

so4q.f-t7
TE

t,Et F 5oLvi. QL4L 3f US&f..

Putr866<ips SCV6 QuA24M7 (M7ov C4v6S I/J FIGUC 7 0 , 5(7 = 5-63 *.&L 2-7--. P.Z-6
e=q4F1-

II

18

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

000 215 1231

December 1991
ATTACHMENT 17 ...Sheet 8

FL.JOR DANIEL

FWOR DANIEL
CALCULATIONS ond SkETCNES

OA CONT. NO.

5Zcf 7 pp

DIZ.ZLLE.D

Pi5Q

tOUNA nON

su

wiD prQ ve MfEzJ

cnr

P2..Th9/r

fT1( #Ooo-ZIc- 123(


SAMpLc D6N g cr

LAip-L

4OA

COrUD
z.s r (LT1)-ckr m 5Or 2A172A1..

6 beVLOPE Awti
6

P-SfS74CE

/?vqr(

(j,t.I&J p

pf SEcriog

6Pc

7S /(IArYIA4t(A4

6
it

CAP,#cgr(. rm -l/rfMU.1 Vir1Lt SoiL ifirj. EST72iC7.D 8-1 Pt4 6C71014 /-I/i,AL F7/Lq,2 occq.e. ciq_ rs Ti oi4 Ac 14*Cw 50th
LOAP

Acnif1 AIOL3tE L-iaA-z


FACr
FACrr2 0F
5rj OF

CP)
A.
-

ves ,4-ppLicA-y7Q

OF A
3
4

oqp
Z
A-wO

U,.ai A
CEDCACflOA1

oc1P

!CIEiC-f

Aitj

OP 062

26SKr

>

25Q K (A-CTtIPrL) .rs (w

eFC7TOA) r Q24-O( Fi Acrw/ Miizii. Mi


2
20 21

(e

--i

zZ5XoyOO74-Z7 (fxpco7427 i) O(2t4 1

87JC36

<

Pi
24

32 r

MM6)r

zs AtrwN R. AAiue hWZ2,t

27
-

M/rxiqqM
I-75 x 25

$
3l-

OC.u(?

A-i- ruP d P(LE

25

Va-

i ,-

31qQ j

Foe.
31

31-qa c4ii)

z7-qon

Vc?2v6d

Vc.

7//&oo 82SS O5x oq-5 31 r,- Ar MA-/Mw.1. pAtiN aP /6 &f


ii AcitrnL MOM6iT ,ir rzi,w n
(F.)

>

31S K-.p.f

7 P!L Ar

Pa 265

iZ

P25o /

pr
II 12

p,i Cm- P
13 4 5 16 17

36 I 2 3 4 $ 6

AOO(J7QN,tt
7 8 9 10

C.c4.cio-,

fL 517 Fl 66 D8Q1s/deW) Colct2r 5,+,18 19 20 21 22 23 24 23 26 27 28 29

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

000 215 1231 December 1991 AT1ACHMENT 17 ...Sheet 9

FLJOR DANIEL-

FWOR DANIEL
CALCIJLAflONS
ond

DATE CONTHO.

5<ETCHE5

9 SHEET NO.

C1IEO

DZrLLII)
Rc/D

Pr
t

cniiNnAi-tr7w

ri

/-1tX 5OrL

PPOFILE

Zi PP-PCritZ6 cAMpLc 5rN # 2


-

CONCIZETI

57-IOf( CAPA(zTi

CA42L

I.t...cts..

Dt.noa

S 6 7 5 I IS II 2 3 14 IS 16 I? B IN 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 as 29 30 3 32 33 34 35 26 I
7.10 4.00 10 71.4 7.34 Ia 42448 ik 4 0.00 4* 42444 Ia. 7
4

IS00-

E@q(vA-jj3q7 CMP7&iZ. PR..CQ2AM AJ U5E FOZ PILE 5Ec.77

PoL

o(a

iir.j

PCz cot.uMq cuRVES CcutD

4.00 Ia

t:
ILls ban452 h...clt..:

AtSo

1110 504 LI....d 0.:

713.. bobS. Inc.. 4c.a. 104. 0... 71 00*

P803nc11

40001111 41042J 42

CaI.:. 141 00 I4 24b 7440 Zabo*n4 LII 3444 U.24 04..i 14:48:19 054.4 *00 311.41
7.ntsk- 0.14 40k 414.fld kala

14
107

4
4

l 001 1.14 441 hobbS. 1


0

0.003 10.,
4

441

PocolcIl. 4.70
4

bSL4a

0.10

51cN 0 ONC2ET 6

i4N

8OMS A1&WtD

Mj7fOD

-.uI4S Q((Lj8PJM flrr tIrf,iAi 5ozt P-51f?cNCL (FAL1-t-4-E) A T71s ArPP1A11ON 0F A f1t::7D. c 5A.FtII1 ro o8mfN fr WAL LOA-D5, T7fZ /-1111 DO Nor /*1-V TZIE PI Ai FO12 A1/r/M(,/M 5/ri ,+t /4OAC7V7 NTfACT1C)M IS ,t(Ow#&i O. OT7i- 2A1Ei2rL 4AS, 5or 14I4I-f-iq LON -L/N4.. n O8M-i4 MO4&J7 A-sJti .5t F A i (1614 V CcMPui Ptzc 1 A PPt LA -EcaZ t4.Se CF A N 0/4 -Zi 577 66 Ar pcit-r ,4r Pz65 o. PILe T7 17ff N0MN13 T M*t4 EOCICflO z 5Z/.J FL9E? Lesc rm P.IZ.6 CA14czr1 QRIWt PuLl zij& PiLE &TTO4 pcr,r- I

ANkL.l 65

8PMS

210

II

123

141516

1714192021

22232425

26272529

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

:.

..

. ...

C)

000 215 1231 December 1991 AflACRMENT 18 ...Sheet 1017

FLUOR DANIEL

Sample DesIgn 3

Short Straight Pile in Sand

FLUOR DANIEL
CALCULATIONS ond SKETCHES

Dir!

/Il

C9. NO.Zf(

9,1c
S.10 O.

PrEp 4o.T

-ouNfrro

<I. I ht

4rArQWr

p,ic
.

!FJ

SArMfl

P2ACTTC * OGOZI
4AMpfc f)fC C 7 cfr j 1 #

fZ3I

,NCK SOt7
A6Ov COI4Sr4lcrTO,,

:OI.r)

l0

Ue Srr-ZPPkLS FCI2MS 5L4c1 Ai c,ilsC Fo


6CIVO
19 14

17

20
21 22

3 CiszcuM
TI6 /4

23
24 25 26
2,

26
29

-LgyM1o tI

30
31

92

1
33 3. 3$

STIIUCflQ,V

30,Air

L1YArTQM ZS
Q

B-E1.

2IO01

(QL4 3 461Vr

8E.OW i4OC

,A-N t&71JO$

Cfl1, 4 ,

Ar4CH-Qc.-t3LT

V6r2-(7cAFirA-

Bi
..

36
I 2 3 4 5 6

iQ

II

1514

18

192021

2223

2423

26273829

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

000 215 1231 December 1991

ATTACHMENT 18 ...Sheet 2

FLUOR DANIEL

FWOR DANIEL
CALCULATIONS and SKETCHES

OAT6 CONt.

//
o.
N

6Z8II

sy

2rLLb

RZZ

OI,IflATfOFJ

Hr pjc

1v 4AFifl

47OO-Zi-IZI
cpr.1pfe tiA/

D5.zCN
T1-t15

DArA
L,oep11

t,%A14Pi4 1qST-M
$771rf*(

tL5 OF
6

Piis
IL

(u C7 ,L

10

5zL PzF,: N6 5,i-ri (3o5o) io s/cu.V. Zi Giw 4ME

4
IS

or tJ

PNEWd17Q1J Tsr ,NUN8rL.


Tc14DA1z

I-cA-PS
COLa,MV
21
-

/h1A

PN 8f5apptzr.

c LS

22
22

4OKlP5
=

ida-

Kips

25 26

27
29

50.rL5 -Qpo wiu Pi2ovi ECc 1/k77aN,c f -6/ir1 OF I21I.L PZi2 FOuNOifI7OW$ /v COtt.IONcS B6.L iEP_S A- .blF-FICC4Lr 70 FeM 19 54ID. Scu-S. ,jor 5H1Uw 5r1zA1 p,cE If 5A-I. /re4
TE

CCM1D6
33 34

10

II

12

13

15

17

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

fl

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

000 215 1231 December 1991 ATTACHMENT 18 ...Sheet 3

FLUOR DANIEL

FLUOR DANIEL
CALCULATIONS Kd SKETCHES

I
CONrNO.

62f
C
H K

5 i4
54CE7

r)c-/Ji, Pi:5 PnfJ&fr)47TOPJ 772.Ar47,r lL IN cAN,)


cAM PL1

NO.

PAcrIr # 417U-21-t23/

2 3
4

AzAL

MPm:
= Q+4Q =120 OF 3 A4A-illSr flM&g 5ofL
I2O-p!: OLfS

5 6 7

Ot f-IAX,MUM Pf2co/- D5I6(4 F. A FACTvR. op


,F.5.

pig COMP,zgsrLrn ia-y

6
9
10
II

26 5i

Pt ,
P
-c

1geMENr IzFr.
Z

roi

I$TkP z

&6 S(iMt4C

Q tQ

2 3 4 5
16

a) oe stsc
,

g: 50I35J
Dep6,Jour Op i771

(2

f A Fi4jVia

O A /iME 5rS frr 0 6-Fnl

7
6 IS 20 21 22

DPrf, Fr 3 0 3 q
q (2

A,
if

rr2S

gi-z sC)
f-O(35y75:/.33

1Tx2Sx 3Z36

o.!zi5=OI3
CZX&O :o7z

54I

2S%-6 47i #( 253=276

5-ol3sl17

olaxIo5=/z6

(-5-o!3.5/k5=jO6
rol7cZ. 5sX 2(-i7C

iLi
73

23
..

b)

24 25 26 27

AS M7577r?Jg N ae
b iZN 3

%1Z N

FQI2.

0N <5

BsLoc

&i6 Xs

50

,zc5o= 6aKS
qi
To1kL

28 29 30 SI
32 33 3 35 36

4qI.6 zqd-.

8s11rt1C-E

c)

rcr1c1

:Z77MA-f fL

pE:s/S!-f1ce 763+46 37L1

:<pS

> 36Q/4o(

26 AYIAz.
77iz
3 4 5 6

CJ

PILE

S/ttI rs CiM FC 2

1E,vSIcN
/c
7

NO
4 9

uPi-icr.
3 I3
4

16

17

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

a
-j

Ui

z
,-

0
U
(V

0
(V

-J Ua
z
I 0

U 11

o_
SJ-c-S-

(Thfl

0 a

Vcb

C
(
c

.?Ir

I Id 0

-l
o
C
.

OU)

ia-a

ii

c I)
0
,

ii

a
? *

:
E
SQ
S.( -S

k
S

11
(
.1 I

;
!
q
VI:

:
-

:Zt

p
Id.

(3

f)

:51/
-

(-a)

I, I)

r
0

q 4-)

df- !i
II
SO

to

N
<
,->(

,-

sq

i;
9
-&
+
\S5

co

L)

9
S

I
IJ

-J

(I,
00

&.
C
S,Sz

ii
-.4

II

c-

I,

0-

H1
z
I p
p ,s,r S1SR!V,

II
I p ppI

I
C

000 215 1231 December 1991 AflACHMENT 18 ..Sheet 5

FLU3R DANIEL

FWORDANIEL
CALCULATIONS ond SKETCHES

o.
By

,igo
,4
-

CNT. NO.

co

jD2rtgp

POMMrIA-rrnFJ

HOT 5TAvTh- PL#

rN cr

PArn

-,-zfc-I23,

c4Mp1 EItI 6thi

Ccpr
A) M,qtNr.S Ar A

ZA-7,4i

ZAiA

Lok
OiiLt 771-u

2ofGcp!,
D6L1eOP

77t

SQi
F/rf%..

P-tST7rNC6

PtOiJQ T71 1 r C)f4

Pf(fV

TFi

fr5 1A-(MUM
w,L4

LiLT7Nfrr

Ai

1 ptE Soi/. /jfr

Th6
IC

,q,f,44c(,-4

MONvr
-

Ai

I.a4.
j

A-354- r K(P. F of<ipS A ,Tr2kt. 1L8t?-i A ( 6is I1T71cO i46) vt 17t APPLJCkT7OP Q A LILT7/.4,4f 5O/L 2S(S7ii)C( I /3/2OX4f i1t17f CTV& 1F 5frFrf C*)A13L .4A1(Z,iL ni NA-fMi Mo-ii- f,i 1*: PiLE A-i77 SOIL P,- /,vrEkc,7J 8eu6sI F A-si
HI4?1(

4 LriV&ft.
WILL.

Mo r

,4-r PrUowA? tE

1 q /-iq-t- it.4-

-&U

E LI5 0P

-L/AJb1

19

20 21 22 23

Piia Qr4M. 7V6L-1, /rSSJM6 Tlt*r r M/iIWA4 MOMJV kr P 45A r K(. (Nor-m1S HMi4-p 5MWt A /rr Ptr X V f4Q7 ,4ssclMPrroP bo ,vor SWLT fAI CSn 1,VP-CtMei-.
(-0MPiT
(0/

Lif

b1ELOP T71 /OV ,.dOFT

C.4-p,rf).
rPcwriw,i

F. A
5OJL

frTi2A-L

M Lsr 77M Pa
A-f
AA-f4-z.
.-

:
26 28 29 31 32

is P&!g / i7

OAt!

r7flpV

/3 TP

Zr/

,4-pp/r/,ty Zi,vA.
1524.

i/MCM 1 i 4

/-(OMJrS /,41Th

_L4. x
V

P,r-E A-i-

I 4-Kf,f

.Mf1Z,#L Lo.o (S btI it, ui


,_

U#/r4f-r

/A4(M

IN

I 275 :X /2 4

14-

3 F Kq-

OLiiii&j ArX,,-L/Ca11J /PtrV


V

i-occD
V
V

4-f275(w)
2.x65xOiS) J,z75
OF

is (sot I
V V V

()

g) Cij , 1
41Z 4 W6j2PPoc1.4 ZS )/j
-

14-01 K4,bf

USi,Ic ,4- c. CO.U,4.Y ZE


r
I 2 3
4

CA CO C1UPu7

(Q1% (N13T)
2
13 4 15

14

20

Cl

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

000 215 1231

December 1991 ATTACHMENT 18 ...Sheet 6

FLUOR DANIEL

F /

FLUOR DANIEL
CALCULATIONS snd SKETCHES

DA1E

//-

-4O

CONT. NO.

6z3fI

flP ru --v .--

PTCp

.-.

ffJf77f,.I

OH1

NO.

SHr cA- p1/6 IN

cAAJ

P/2AC7IC # OOO -2/5


4AI.IPL.C !)ECIA)

1231

CoNcie

D5tCJ

tAi-AL

LAs

Co,cr

83 Si&r.
5 6 7 8

>PPM LO/r P, O , r Ai 4 Cpc7T2,4r c9t: Ar Go ruM 1.

9
10 II 12 13
4

o<pg C-.L) 5 I J5 i2x Z.54O2X 5.(665H2)


=

Iso4.pr
flt

pOINT OP. EPO 5l1fPR.

Ar

Ptur 8oi<4ic,
T3

SOIL

&

II

LA)IU.. .*l

7TIJfIIE fpfrar

Is 16 Il IS 19 20 21 22 23 24 05 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 I 2 3

,4 FiL.
4) .sc b:,t 1,s O pia4 F16P1 3(Z4?IS

t:is

jcMr.

Dp . 7 3
SOIL I(TM #V F

AION T
ia F t 7

Pit( A-r

&i41,zE

TilTS

M6T71 POEr ic,- frhc-vI &LJM7oA/c

5f/2. Ar flLOW/f3L( Ao5,

W DlSCaS5/Q. FifZ IItA1Z Ic fMfA1r V ML/4&T / S(ff

5i , 3oiu o F Pi Pf4.K4pI

/ O 4-f

3.17 g,t

4.

Vcitr

/-Z7563I1 = EfUIVk_&4T rOL 3o zs dZ35


c

5LIA-I6

2653 U4S

4 0 2v b
7J

5 f5.252652//OQo.= S33Lf
ZZITPtJ
(xo-f!) 6a z3 _/4-c4J

Ys=

So5-33

ciz. # 3
/

Avf.d

2.ZI7
Oi,46i2s

.Th It js
14-

3
4 5 5 7 8 9

Ccucp r76S
10 II 12 13 14 13 16

L4.iC1.f.
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

17

STRUCTURAL ENGiNEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

oo 215 1231 December 1991 ATIACHMENT 18 ...Sheet 7


FLUOR DANIEL-

FLUOR DANIEL
CALCULATIONS 8nd SKETCHES

DAIC

:061.

q ir_- 0 ?ff
-

f)(II1n

9, O(IfItAflO1

SHEEI NO.

HO2.rrf2Ar(,H7 p/L iN SAN()

PAcri( #Oo-2Lc-(23f
A7.4L5 D-fW Wr7 *

P1r

5ScrToL

CpNC67

APAC1ZY

5 S
7

0
II

12 3
IA IS

16
17

4
19

20
21

22
23 24

25 26 27 28 23 30
31 32

Sugar Land, Tx.. TX USA Project: 000-2151231 EX.MPLE 3 C1umn Id: 30 INCH ROUND PIER Engineer: E.M.K
Date:

File name: EXAtIPLE3.COL ateria1 Properties: 3321 ksi 0.003 in/in E 29000 ksj

11/06/90 31889

Time:

15:06:15

2.55 ksi

Code: Ad

Stress Profile : Reduction:

Parabolic
0.70 0.90

Version: 2.10 S1endernes not considered x-axis

33

35 36
I

56

11

16

14

19

20

21

22

22

24

25

26

27

26

29

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

.1

C
-n r
C
I

a
0
0
)

z rn

Cl

cC 10

60
0-

II

x
I,.

0 0

z tl z
0

1,

0
C

H!
a

000 215 1231 December 1991

ATTACHMENT 19 ...Sheet 2

FLUOR DANIEL

()

FLUOR DANIEL
CALCULATIONS 4nd SKETCHES

0A

I--gp
O.

cor.
9Y S4T

iS

ii
C 1<0

Pt13ILLD

Jk(tAr7fAI

NO.

/ C

OeT

PE

ZN

\f / k 4

/)cfCu IflT 2. 0P7


$MPLC
fu

#f2,7-2I5-/2/ 4

5IW
1*15

DATA
5172ME5

X,4MPLE I

i5
IEps

4i >

El- (Q(O
L IOOQ

0F N

S/f?f7T 6ciiI&)

BE-uff

M0&7V1f PP77ts:

TIrF tLk15.

QiL
10

= IZTQi4$/.5Fr 4 C

5(4 UNIJ
NAriz
IL

24

12 .3

rAj3L.Es , tLr/up-r. r4ST1

IS

40
L6.SI4/

6
I7 lB

D6#c LoPS
WIND
,4I/i-i

40
3S

9 2$ 21 22
23

=
=

t_ folio
(0,1014

k4,(D Mou&fl:s

24 2$

27 23 29 30
31

r4oi f!!
Th
5c!L5 ZLt,Zr

(&)(Lt

Pzov,o6

,7-ECaM&JoA-f701Yc

T71- .uer7 Pr2Sivr6 )E2-US Si1TiE1&7S, A--LWkB 0i&$ .T?fr LU/U.. -fI H&t2E Fc. Atki./-J/1 Zs A 4eN1- h&97IDI

32 33
34

A 5t1 TR-1-( 5&rrMei-r c AppOx/fr1k7_y I wag. T7t1.5 :: ON 56rZ$46Jr ,L1k gC UJrQLLg. A PEDUCe A*&E MFc1
5Qi6

P-6u!RE

515ii-7vE

pp,/

(4S

7 Mk

P-TPJCT

5tEV.
t+
.27

35 26

cZROqP 9fftc-z WILL ik1 A /A CArPA/ r.i.


I 2 3 4
5

--cr-tic
5 IS 7 9 19

rzMs-T A14 R-6z,it6


20
21

10

II

l4

22

23

24

25

26

28

29

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

_
E
0 0

I
z Ip

00 0 U0I >I.- II)


ii
z w

1 II

I 1
V
0

L
II c 4 t

11
bc
I

I
I
%1

11

j
II I

3I -o 4
Ii

cL

cl

ci

0 C

I
:2
>(

*4

-0

I
I 1) 3
I) U U [I I

0
I)

I
Ii It
0

I I
oei,-,,a,
.0 0) 0, 0

I
q4

-J I1J

z
0
-j

0)

0)

4%

0)

0)

.0

I)

0)

a:

U-

000 215 1231 December 1991 AflACHMENT 19 ..Sheet 4

FLUOR DANIEL

FLOOR DANIEL
CALCULATIONS 4nd SKTCHS
8Y

!iao
CONT. o.

6z31
:o

riiiirr

T-O

POIu.ir3ArrO.i

SHET

NO.

: OF

cHorpLLI)

Pip

IN

CLAy

PPJCfl(F #(.pn-Z(5-123(
<14J fl t cAcMpL 1
-F-r
-

O 7

ArEr2AL

L,:
I

1fr PLz
6

15 A/JkL S6 AS fate
z

13

@
7O

/ f O u6

C
CL,ki

r?ftS / /ir 5T /r8th/c 7Op oF


Swz:.5/cIpr

uT 7 5L4/ tJ,

5 i p .5 I;: Pif:.

6r

Cq
24s

10 Ii

ciqP,r /3.
4 f2.C

l2 3
4 Is I6 17 9
Is

12 TO/JS
oaa,

S7t/a4M

f131z

6= 31;2000 hs/

(.)
a
:..

i OOf42.3x IX roc. Ho.r

724.

o25 o,oI#2

_( 3Iz2oox(62g)

/2 =

37

<

i-s

5hO-

PnE

20 21

Pic,

Putr

=
43-2..

242.

22 23
24

M=7.PqLr
L =

(e+I53of)

P (6s(z)--5-)
24 x

(q+c5)

25 26
27 22 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 9 0 1 12

2ZS b

= 225

2:I4,

.3
71
4ov

_(s-) U

Zf$a Z.

A
-

2417 C

;2 4q6-f

270=O

LA17OAJ

IJ
2/4-.S

rK(p.
C LIAJ f/i

1i // E4 a F 5o 1. ) /N4 A-i-7 Low..


4/=/z4.

fl i 1

A-80 V
Th

WArfl.1A-71

6 ((MO

FJUIaE 6 C./4 E USE,

t,t)Er A12 J,f-fiU1LT


2
19

/=b/z3
13

f
z 4
1 14 IS 17

f1r4ar 1 PuLr=?3z12= Z2

(
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

\.
,_1

20

21

SThUCTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

u0

I 0

1) F-

Cl) C
I:;

C
.
J 0 1 I
, U,

0
U, II
4

z
40
I

0 I)

I
.
K

.3.

II N
U,

4-

t
4

N
0 I

1
-J 0

/,

.4

.4

0 II C
II

I. C
4..

w z
0
-J
U

-J

I
C

9
4-j

I-n

>

I
IC I. 2:40772424 7

0 Et

C)

000 215 1231 December 1991

ATFACHMENT 19 ...Sheet 6

FLUOR DANIEL

FLUOR DANIEL
CONt. NO.

CALCULATIONS nd SXETCHES

2
CN O

MK

r,,aru
hLO,2r

tL2

FOUNiA777W PrQ
-.

5IcLLL,

PpACricJZ*rO-2i5-fZI

4..
5F47

OF7

Cpcr

D5t(
BiZMS

AtLS (

Mr7f-b
ANb

PLLlIZ(S

LJIt-/13R4M

iT

U.T14kT
FkCT

CIxL.ui-e)

77tI A-PpL!CA-TlOfl f A

a F 5Ar4 TO OB71H AUOWA-8LE 1-a,4is. 77f15 Mt17D DQE-S N Or 5ft,tiA1Jt MOA11d fA i-f P,L HrV6 .qPtflOt.S fa

-LL.O L41k3tE Cia

Or71-f7._ L172A-f ,A-zS.


UL.4I2ti Ai

L 1 5

P,E

77J /M2J 1

Is H-1411t T PLr PciiW


*

,o,4is B E-rWi- PQ O67MH MOM-rs 43VL St7ZJ Ftf2. A IL/6-11 APPL/92 .CAr tI6: OF A HC7A( /.-tNt-AiC Compy

NO M bi#6A, Pk

2 3

t 1

A s w6 UM.4 LIM Sfri- A-rIO


.2s
T

Mo,d&1T

Ai

M4UWP&4 AGMJ
(of

PL.iLr.

77fl.S

,4SIL4

pr7c..J -ccw&r 1

/JSfrIL

i4f /4 -xCfSW6
cp.r ni

,MFo,Zc&E, /- At orr
S,7 ,uO

15
IS

l4I/1*
F0. .AL

I?

ZoA

IE.f IItAIY

Pi,rrzb. 5it Pi Ppppxf,MM1t1f ?v-*fa

Q/1 /3 /C 1 /Z Pr, /M(* IM!&l.AQ/7 TQ /LPLILf 1.5 /,i-A-ci-raJ p m

21 22 23

A) MoFsJr5

,4rPc#.-rz,
M
-h1

I1tYXp

z-214.S trip

Pq

6)

MMAXp

Z14-

F-f
.

A-i-

= so I IZ75x q 2

ZIsr qzo

25

:
29

WCTTHA7f M0M6W75
Lfti1MA1
-

j pi- 1Lp

-oos-o

I275

)
Ar

31 32

3 4-s2-4x2x4=q6- PLrz2, Mh-,Mu 5t,ip, =4t 3P SE i ,

14

24i P,LE,S(

35

i7

d I Q 3
5
Ii

5
I 3 5

z
5 7 5
-

IZ7ty b 2IZ7 dI27 ErS&f.iiEt 2 J t 1 fb73/{.pt y52.q_36.z= 2vpf i1r U( 3 7i6 ,4--4.( 73 2xcffI8.z7//
l

f2 sS
26 27 28 29

14

15

IS

20

21

ZZ

23

24

25

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE

000 215 1231 December 1991 ATACIIMENT 19 ...Sheet 7

C)

FLUOR

FWOR DANIEL
CALCULATIONS nd SKETCHES

OATS CONT. NO. 1 6


V

ZRuf
C9
0

fir
54-

Pr
LL

nuNAflOM

ONSET 60.1

,ck

PrEp rti CLAY

PATII-c
5IMPL

oo 21/2I_. fAJ 4..

IL
3
4

C .W N

CJ TI CAR S CO ?st CR-CT 5

2 PCACOL
6

Interaction Diagram

9
0 Ii 12

T
600

0
4

P
0

15 6
I?

20 21 22 22 24

3.0 ksi 60.0 ksi fy = 8#6 0.8% = 3.52 in 2 Ast Tied cc = 3.00 in spacing = 5.85 in a 16286 in 4 a 0.00 in 4 = 16286 in = 0.00 in

1c i p
S

I f0

7/. /A

200

25
25 27 28

200

1990 PCA Licensed To: Fluor Daniel, Inc., Sugar Land, Tx., TX USA File name: EXAMPLE4.cOL Material Properties:
a

Project: 0002151231 EXAMPLE #4


Column Id:

29
30 31 32 33

24 INCH ROUND PIER Time: 15:06:15

Engineer: E.M.K Date: 11/06/90 Code: ACI 31889 Version: 2.10 Slenderness not considered x-axia

3321 ksi 2.55 ksi


a

0.003 in/in 29000 ksi 0.90

5 E 0.70

Stress Profile : Reduction:


00

Parabolic b 0
a

34 35
36 I 2 2
4

II

12

13

17

20

21

22

23

24

23

26

27

28

29

STRUCTURAL ENGIKEERING TECHNICAL PRACTICE


I

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen