Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.

com Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013 ISSN 2319 - 4847

QoS Taxonomy towards Wireless Body Area Network Solutions

Shah Murtaza Rashid Al Masud
Najran University, P.O. Box 1988 Najran, Saudi Arabia

ABSTRACT
To improve the health care facilities for the people a tiny, automated, and intelligent medical device and technology namely wireless body area network (WBAN) evolved. The derivation of this technology is wireless sensor network (WSN) consists of sensors, actuators, radio systems, and transmission systems which should be situated in, on, and around the human body to measure, store, and transmitted patients vital signs and syndromes for further investigation, treatment, decisions, and awareness. Researchers in all around the world now have very enthusiastic interest to advance this technology especially on certain standardizations like its architecture, cost effectiveness, energy consumption or power efficiency, security and privacy topics. Academicians are trying to improve the QoS factors in sensor networks by suggesting new protocols. But quality of services (QoS) factors concerning WBAN technology still remains insignificant whereas QoS issues are also a major concern. WBAN needs diverse functioning requirements vary from application to application which are very perceptive hence entail more attention. Research personnel concerning QoS issues in WBAN should handle real time data transmission system, data rate, end-to-end data transmission, data transmission accuracy rate, latency, delay time, jitter, low power data transmission, data availability, minimum data loss, data security, network coverage, frequency, bandwidth, throughput, and reliability matters very seriously and an effective way. In this paper we tried to focus on the overall limitation, scopes, and challenges issues concerning QoS factors in WBAN. We have also given our effort to identify, analyze and present some of the recent protocols and technologies developed towards updating QoS issues in WBAN. This research article will help the researchers, academicians and practitioners to further study, modification, and develop more efficient QoS-based-WBAN. At the end of this research paper a number of open research issues are also discussed.

Keywords: Quality of Service (QoS), WBAN, WSN, QoS Requirements

1. INTRODUCTION
Quality of service (or QoS) is one of the important features of any application like internet, wireless networks, ad hoc networks, wireless sensor networks (WSNs), and wireless body area networks (WBANs). But the reality is that QoS matters didnt get more attention in WSNs and WBANs like other features such as design, architecture, energy efficient protocol design, nodes positioning and location [1]. Other than health monitoring the major applications of WSNs include environmental monitoring, military surveillance digitally equipped homes, manufacturing process monitoring, conferences, vehicle tracking and detection (telemetry), and monitoring inventory control. Whereas, WBAN is location independent portable patients monitoring system, sporting activities, and emergency system including military services developed by using tiny and intelligent low powered and cost effective sensor devices [2][3]. The main provisions for WBANs are low power consumption that is energy efficient WBAN protocols, low latency, scalability, quality of service (QoS), reliability, efficient bandwidth utilization, and throughput, co-existence with other WBANs technologies, and high security and privacy [4]. WBAN is classified into three main classes, they are: off-body, on-body, and in-body communication. BAN nodes (BN) and BAN network coordinators (BNC) are used to communicate bidirectional from BNC to BN and vice versa. BNC is the gateway to external networks like internet, wireless local area networks (WLAN), wireless personal area networks (WPAN), and cellular networks. Shorter or limited range WLAN can be used for indoor connectivity like inside room, house, clinic, hospital, or health care center, in the other hand cellular networks can be used for longer distance that is outdoor connectivity. This will help seamless roaming and end-to-end QoS factor. For real time application it doesnt need to store data, but for non-real time applications the gateway can store data locally and use when necessary [5]. A typical BAN structures along with the comparison other types of wireless networks are shown in Figure 1 [6]. Persons vital signs which are usually created by sensors on, in, and around the individual body accountable for sensing organic or biological signals such as movement, temperature, pulse, diabetes, blood pressure, electromyography, electrocardiogram, oxygen saturation, etc. WBAN technology is used to continuously monitoring

Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013

Page 221

Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013 ISSN 2319 - 4847
these vital signs for patients health status analysis. Low frequency, small information bandwidth based physiological signals which are commonly detected by sensors in WBAN is listed in the following Table 1.

Figure 1: A typical wireless body area network (WBAN) application [6] Table 1: Commonly detected Physiological signals by sensors in WBAN Physiological Signal Signal frequency range/ Range of parameter Bandwidth (Hz) ECG signal 0.01-250 0.5-4 mV Respiratory rate 0.1-10 2-50 breaths/min Blood pressure (BP) 0-50 10-400 mg/Hg Blood flow 0-20 1-300 ml/s Blood pH 0-2 6.8-7.8 pH EEG 0.5-60 3V-300V Body temperature 0-0.1 32-40 0 C EMG (Electromyogram) 10-5000 10V-15mV GSR (Galvanic Skin Reflex) 0.03-20 30V-3mV Cardiac rate 0.4-5 Oximetry 0-30 Arterial pressure 0-60 Nerve potentials Max 10,000 0.01-3 mV Patients real time data and vital signs are the key elements for the WBAN technology that is why these data sets should be handled with special care ensuring reliability, security, and accuracy since a wrong signal could make vulnerable the persons life. Towards bridging the physical world and electronic systems in WBAN sensors are playing a vital role, and a wide range of commercially available sensors can be deployed, such as accelerometer and gyroscope, ECG, electromyography (EMG), and electroencephalography (EEG) electrodes, pulse oximetry, respiration, carbon dioxide (CO2), blood pressure, blood sugar, humidity, and temperature sensors etc. The following Table 2 has shown the commonly used sensors along with their work range. It also notices the wide variation in data rate, bit error rate (BER), delay tolerance, duty cycle, and lifetime, which requires scalable solutions with quality of service (QoS) provisions [7]. Table 2: Sensors commonly employed in WBAN systems and their typical data rates. Sensor How it works Data rate (kbps), Bit error rate (BER), Setup

Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013

Page 222

Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013 ISSN 2319 - 4847
time, Duty cycle, Desired battery lifetime, P2P latency Measures the acceleration relative to free fall High, <10 kbps up to 12 nodes, in three axes <10-10, <3s, <1%, >1 week, < 250 ms Measures the orientation based on the High, <10 kbps up to 12 nodes, principles of angular momentum <10-10, <3s, <1%, >1 week, < 250 ms Measures potential difference across electrodes High, 6.0, <10-10, <3s, <10%, put on corresponding parts of the body >1 week, < 250 ms Measures potential difference across electrodes High, 1.536 Mbps for up to 6 put on corresponding parts of the body nodes, <10-10, <3s, <10%, >1 week, < 250 ms Measures potential difference across electrodes High, 3.6, <10-10, <3s, <10%, put on corresponding parts of the body >1 week, < 250 ms Measures ratio of changing absorbance of the Low, <10-10, <3s, <1%, >1 red and infrared light passing from one side to week, < 250 ms the other of a thin part of the body's anatomy Uses two electrodes, cathode and anode Low, 0.24; <10-10 , <3s, <1%, >1 covered by a thin membrane to measure the week, < 250 ms oxygen dissolved in a liquid Uses the infrared light and measures the Low, <10-10, <3s, <1%, >1 absorption of the gas presented week, < 250 ms Measures the systolic pressure (peak pressure) Low, 0.05, <10 kbps up to 12 and diastolic pressure (minimum pressure) nodes, <10-10, <3s, <1%, >1 week, < 250 ms Traditionally analyzes drops of blood from a Low, <10-10, <3s, <1%, >1 fingertip recently, uses non-invasive method week, < 250 ms including a near infrared spectroscopy, ultrasound, optical measurement at the eye, and the use of breath analysis Measures the conductivity changes of the level of humidity Uses a silicon integrated circuit to detect the temperature changes by measuring the resistance Very low Very low, 0.0024-0,05; <10-10, <3s, <1%, >1 week, < 250 ms <16 <320, <10-3, <3s, <50%, >3 years, < 250 ms 70, <10-10, <3s, <10%, >40 hours, < 250 ms 500, <10-10 , <3s, <50%, >24 hours, < 250 ms <0.5, <10-10, <3s, <1%, >24 hours, < 250 ms 1 Mbps for 3 nodes, <10-5, <3s, <50%, >24 hours, < 100 ms <10 Mb/s for 2 node, <10-3, <3s, <50%, >12 hours, < 100 ms

Accelerometer

Gyroscope

ECG EMG

EEG Pulse Oximetry

Respiration

Carbon dioxide Blood pressure

Blood sugar

Humidity Temperature

Drug delivery Deep brain simulations Hearing Aid Capsule Endoscope Drug Dosage Audio Video/ Medical Imaging

Despite the fact that WBAN technology is still new, the industry is expected to grow rapidly in the coming years. Our research paper has been provoked by the recent studies with admiration to WBAN usages and increase of human centric computing using wearable sensing devices. The different aspects of QoS factors of WBAN are presented in our research paper. This paper has been organized as follows. In section 1, we presented a brief introduction of the subject matter. In section 2, we presented the IEEE requirements necessary for WBAN development. In section 3, we focused a general

Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013

Page 223

Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013 ISSN 2319 - 4847
observations on QoS and its main objectives. In section 4, we discussed service issues of WSN towards developing quality enable WBAN. In section 5, we analyzed the challengeable circumstances of QoS in WBAN. In section 6, we discussed various QoS techniques, mechanisms, and metrics necessary to build efficient WBAN. In section 7, we briefly studied, analyzed, and discussed the existing QoS based techniques, protocols and models for WBAN. In section 8, we discussed some open research issues of QoS and then finally in section 9 the conclusion.

2. IEEE AND WBAN

A highly reliable communication for medical devices especially for those which are implanted in the human body a radio frequency (RF) based wireless technology is needed, it was formally defined by the IEEE 802.15 working groups [8] [9]. The transmissions of WBAN nodes cover a short range of about 2 m [10], and other specifications of WBAN [11] are shown in Table 3. Table 3: Technical requirements along with IEEE specification for WBAN technology Requirements Specifications Distance/ operating space 2 m standard and 5 m special use; in, on, and around the body Network Density 2-4 nets/m2 Network Size Max : 100 devices/network, modest < 64 devices per BAN Up to 5 year for implants Up to 1 week for wearable Target lifetime Ultra-long for implants Long for wearable MedRadio, ISM, WMTS, UWB Target frequency bands Global Unlicensed and Medical bands ~1mW/ Mbps, support for several power management and consumption Power Consumption scheme Between 0.0010.1mW in stand-by mode up to Peak power consumption 30mW in fully active mode Scalable Network Throughput 100 Mbps Max From sub kb/s up to 10 Mb/s Data rate Scalable Low power listening, wake up, turn-around and MAC synchronization Scalable, reliable, versatile, self-forming Self-forming, distributed with multi-hop support Topology Star, Mesh or Tree Device Duty cycle, From 0.001% up to 100% Very Low, Low, and High Adaptive, Scalable duty cycle modes Allows device driven degradation of services Startup Time Latency 10 ms Network setup time < 1 sec ( Per device setup time excludes network initialization) Coexistence Simultaneous co-located operation of up to 10 independent BANs BER: from 1010 to 103 P2P latency: from 10ms 250ms QoS support and Reservation and prioritization differentiation Real-time waveform data, periodic parametric data, episodic data and emergency alarms Upgradeable, scalable, backwards compatible, effective sleep mode, peer to peer, point to multi point communication , QoS and guaranteed bandwidth, high privacy and security Ability to isolate and recover from failures. Self-healing capability; No single point of failure

Future proof Fault tolerance

Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013

Page 224

Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013 ISSN 2319 - 4847
Dynamic Environment Security Safety/Biocompatibility Ergonomic consideration Reprogramming, Calibration, Customization Antenna Pattern Seamless operation of multiple nodes moving in and out of range of each other; Body shadowing (twisting, turning, running), Attenuation Authentication, Authorization, Privacy, Confidentiality, Encryption, Message integrity; Many levels, long term, short term, light weight Meet regulatory requirements. e.g., FDA, SAR and HIPPA; No harmful effects of long term continuous use Non-invasive, unobtrusive, small size, weight and form-factor Size, shape, weight and form factor restricted by location and organ Ability to reprogram, recalibrate, tune and configure devices wirelessly; Personalized, integrated, configurable and context aware services Omni Directional, small, and flexible

3. QOS OBSERVATIONS AND MAIN OBJECTIVES

It is very difficult to find and give definition of QoS related to wireless sensor networks. Among many of definitions we can select the following as examples. The number of useful sensors used to send data at any given period of time [12]. QoS can also determine by network characteristics like data transmission, and error rates [13]. QoS also depends on the network quality types such as bandwidth, latency, and jitter [14]. In most of the cases the performance or quality service vary from application to application and these applications can be classified as reliability, timeliness, robustness, trustworthiness, and adaptability [15]. QoS issues towards developing high-quality and well-organized WSN and WBAN is a great research area. But it needs more attention due to the critical level of operations for example critical information with zero delay, real time data transmission with no error or drop, deployment, reliability, security, privacy, and some features related to power or energy. There are two perspectives in traditional QoS point of view, they are applications and network. In the first case, QoS usually refers to the quality as apparent by the user/application, but in networking perspective, QoS is accepted as a measure of the service quality that the network offers to the applications/users. The two QoS perspectives can be demonstrated using a simple form as shown in Figure 2 [16].

Figure 2: QoS perspectives: a general view The efforts of QoS are categorized as best effort (no QoS), guaranteed services (hard QoS) or differentiated services (soft QoS). Any application must satisfy any one of the above three categories to achieve its QoS goal [17]. QoS goals for any application should include the maximization of services by the network by minimal usage of energy (energy consumption) and efficient bandwidth utilization [18]. So the technologies like WBAN, WSN we should be very careful that in both cases we have inadequate computational resources, restricted memory and limited time (deadlines) for an event. Major QoS of wireless WBANs are latency & reliability [18].

Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013

Page 225

Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013 ISSN 2319 - 4847 4. CONCERNING SERVICE ISSUES OF WSN TOWARDS DEVELOPING QUALITY ENABLE WBAN
Wireless sensor network is an intelligent, agile, low-cost, and ultra-low power technology developed by using sensors that can collect data and help to transmit when necessary. The fundamental differences between sensor networks and ad hoc networks are illustrated in the following Table 4. Table 4: Difference between sensor networks and ad-hoc networks Wireless Sensor Network Ad-hoc Network High Low Frequently changes Almost fixed for a long time Sensors nodes are densely developed Flexible High due to sensor nodes Low Used for broadcast communication Used for point-to-point communications Computing capacity Limited in power, computational capacities and High memory Cost High due to large number of sensors and overhead Reasonable

Parameter Sensor nodes number Topology Efficiency Failure rate Communication

For healthcare monitoring system, WSN, wearable and implantable wireless body area network emphasis on some significant components such as Tele-monitoring, tracing and monitoring doctors and patients, and drug administration [19]. Almost similar technologies used and applications of WSN are gradually moving into BBAN. The key goal of WSN system is patients' physiological signals monitoring, where the main goal of WBAN is providing real time feedback of patients biological data, and uninterruptedly observing health parameters like heartbeat rate, blood pressure level in an efficient way and also some other parameters of patients' on-body, around body and in-body [20]. Depending on the level of usages of WSN and WBAN technologies information or facts acquirement through sensor devices can be point-to-point or multipoint-to-point. A WSN system that detects and transmits patients' vital signs through electric signals is illustrated in Figure 3 [19].

Figure 3: A typical WSN system for detecting and transmitting signals from a human body: (a) current application and (b) future application [19]. WBANs have some own characteristics which are different from conventional wireless sensor networks (WSNs) and also characterized into some categories such as architecture, network density, data rate, latency, mobility, and many more. It may include many devices and applications and has the characteristics of general wireless sensor networks. In Table 5 in our research paper a schematic overview of differences between WSN and WBAN are given [21] [22] [23]. A WBAN can use the outmoded approaches existing for general sensor networks and must also have support to handle life-threatening emergency situations.

Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013

Page 226

Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013 ISSN 2319 - 4847
Challenges Scale Node number Result accuracy Node tasks Node size Network topology Data rates Table 5: Differences between WSN and WBAN WSN Monitored environment (m/km) Many redundant nodes for wide area coverage Through node redundancy Node performs a dedicated task Small is preferred, but not important Very likely to be fixed and static Homogeneous Human body (cm/m) Fewer, limited in space Through node accuracy and robustness Node performs multiple task Small is essential More variable due to body movement Heterogeneous WBAN may occur in a more periodic manner and stable data rate. The data rate may vary from few kb/s to few Mb/s. Replacement of batteries in WBAN nodes is much easier done when energy conservation is definitely beneficial. WBAN

Latency

Node replacement Node lifetime Power supply Power demand Energy scavenging source Biocompatibility Security level Impact of data loss

Nodes can be physically unreachable after deployment. It may be necessary to maximize battery life-time in WSN at the expense of higher latency. Performed easily, nodes even disposable Several years/months Accessible and likely to be replaced more easily and frequently Likely to be large, energy supply easier Most likely solar and wind power Not a consideration applications Lower in most

Replacement of implanted nodes difficult Several years/months, smaller battery capacity Inaccessible and difficult to replace in an implantable setting Likely to be lower, energy supply more difficult Most likely motion (vibration) and thermal (body heat) A must for implants and some external sensors Higher, to protect patient information

Likely to be compensated redundant nodes Bluetooth, Zigbee, GPRS, WLAN

by

Wireless technology Mobility

More significant, may require additional measures to ensure QoS and real-time data delivery Low power technology required WBAN users may move around. WBAN nodes share the same mobility pattern.

WSN nodes are usually considered stationary.

5. THE CHALLENGES CIRCUMSTANCES OF QOS IN WBAN

In our research paper we have studied and analyzed the major challenges while developing a QoS based WBAN. The most important QoS challenges in WBANs are illustrated in following Table 6. Parameters Table 6: Major challenges in order to develop QoS based WBAN Related challengeable Circumstances to ensure QoS and Limited energy, bandwidth, memory, and processing and communication capabilities. Number of WBAN nodes may be increased or decreased, but QoS should not be affected for this reason. Platform heterogeneity, service-oriented architecture, resource selfmanagement and security requirements [24]. And also critical infrastructure protection [25]

Limited resources capabilities Scalability Multi-source systems

multi-sink

Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013

Page 227

Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013 ISSN 2319 - 4847
Node deployment Dynamic network topology QoS methods must have available geographical information of the BAN nodes. QoS is constant and should not be affected with network topology changes due to link failures, node power failures, or different power management mechanisms. Large number applications with various QoS requirements. QoS method should be equal effective during peak and low traffic periods. The wireless links among the sensor nodes can be easily affected by various environmental factors, shorter links appears to be more reliable than longer links. Medical care are mostly used in real-time WBANs system. They have high requirements on bandwidth, delay guarantees and delivery time, packet delivery, guaranteed medium access and also end-to-end delay guarantee. High throughput, low delay and data redundancy, successful deliver multimedia content. Is very important in multimedia and real-time WSNs and WBANs. It is usually reduced with different data aggregation technologies [26]. Otherwise, it should be taken into account in QoS methods.

Various types of applications Various traffic types Wireless link unreliability

Real-time system

Multimedia data in WSNs and WBANS in some cases Data redundancy

6. QOS TECHNIQUES, MECHANISMS, AND M ETRICS NECESSARY TO BUILD EFFICIENT WBAN

For managing risks in medical applications it is important to properly handling QoS issues [27] [28] [29]. Reliability is the key factor towards guaranteed delivery of data in reasonable time. It directly affects the quality of patient monitoring; in other hand it can be disastrous when a life-threatening result has gone unobserved and undetected. WBAN layers along with QoS metrics, techniques, and mechanisms which must be fulfilled at these layers [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] are described in Table 7 bellow. Table 7: WBAN layers along with QoS issues QoS issues QoS metrics, techniques, and mechanisms It includes system lifetime, response time, data novelty, detection probability, data reliability and data resolution. It includes reliability, bandwidth, latency, and cost. Coverage, Exposure, Measurement errors, Optimum number of active sensors.

Layers Application Layer

Transport Layer

Network Layer

It includes path latency, routing maintenance, congestion probability, routing robustness and energy efficiency.

Maximizing end-to-end reliability. Bandwidth/throughput fairness. Minimizing congestion probability. Minimizing energy consumption. QoS mechanisms are: Loss recovery, Congestion control, Flow control, Source prioritization. QoS metrics: Minimizing path latency/delay, Maximizing routing reliability, Minimizing energy consumption, Minimizing congestion probability, Providing effective sample rate. Routing QoS techniques are: Minimum cost forwarding, Energy aware routing, Maintaining low routing control overhead, In-network data aggregation and Differentiation routing:

Connectivity Maintenance Layer Coverage Maintenance Layer

it includes network diameter, network capacity, average path cost, connectivity, robustness and connectivity maintenance It includes coverage percentage, coverage reliability, coverage robustness, coverage maintenance.

Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013

Page 228

Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013 ISSN 2319 - 4847
MAC Layer It includes communication range, throughput, transmission reliability, and energy efficiency QoS metrics: Minimizing medium access delay, Minimizing collisions, Maximizing reliability. Minimizing energy consumption, Minimizing interference and maximizing concurrency, Maximizing adaptively to changes. QoS mechanisms: Adaptation and learning, Error control, Data suppression and aggregation, Power control, Clustering, and Service differentiation

Physical Layer

It includes physical capabilities impose resource

7. STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF EXISTING QOS BASED PROTOCOLS, TECHNIQUES AND MODELS FOR WBAN
A superior number of QoS solutions specific for WSNs have been proposed by many researchers previously but these solutions mainly focus on one or a few QoS features such as reliability, delay, bandwidth specification or reservation [36]. For WBANs, researchers have shown little effort to provide QoS solutions. In this research paper we have studied and analyzed existing QoS based WBAN techniques and models which are illustrated in the Table 8. Table 8: Existing QoS based WBAN techniques, and models Main Features

Existing QoS based WBAN Model, and Techniques Improvements to CICADA BodyQos

NGL03-6

Ad-hoc wireless network e-emergency

Studied and analyzed the reliability issues and proposed some additional mechanisms to improve the reliability [37]. These improvements will positively affect the throughput of the network and lead to fewer retransmissions. BodyQos [38] focused on three unique challenges: To use an asymmetric architecture where most of the processing is done at the central device. To support a wide variety of different MACs. An adaptive resource scheduling strategy is used in order to provide statistical bandwidth guarantees as well as reliable data communication in WBANs. Vergados et al. show different QoS requirements for medical data over the broadband networks using the wireless DiffServ technology. Different biomedical measurements need different sampling rate as well as service time and it introduces the need of QoS provisioning in WBAN [39]. High reliability of message delivery technology is proposed [40]. Gama et al. present a low power real time (LPRT) protocol to fulfill the QoS requirements of an e-Health care system. Authors discussed the need for QoS in wireless e-health and eemergency services [41]. An overview of the e-Health technology with QoS provisioning is presented in [42].

QoS provisioning in emergency telemedicine Mission-critical mhealth services with some QoS constrain A prototype system for continual health monitoring at home. Ambulatory monitoring and health care AFTCS

Mei et al. work on a mission-critical m-health services with some QoS constrain. End-toend delay, system availability and battery lifetime are considered as the key performance matrices for the critical health care application [43]. Otto et al [44] present some of the key factors that could affect the performance of such a network, thereby reducing the reliability of the WBAN. Peiravi et al discuss a scheme where a set of sensors are connected to a central controller node in a star topology, and the central controller node forwarding data to the personal server. The researchers have shown that neither the controller nor the sensors would know a failure in each other. Also the reliability of a sample WBAN is computed [45]. G. Wu et al explained that a high degree of reliability for critical data transmission is required in body sensor networks (BSNs). An adaptive and flexible fault-tolerant communication scheme for BSNs, namely AFTCS, is proposed. AFTCS adopts a channel bandwidth reservation strategy to provide reliable data transmission when channel impairments occur [46].

Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013

Page 229

Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013 ISSN 2319 - 4847
WASP Braem et al [47] present an autonomous spanning tree protocol called WASP (Wireless Autonomous Spanning tree Protocol), to improve the reliability of multi-hop WBANs. They identify the energy efficiency provided by employing multi-hop communication, and present a slotted multi-hop approach to improve the medium access control and routing, thereby improving the reliability of WBAN communication. Latre et al [48] present a low delay protocol to improve communication among the sensors and the sink node, thereby improving the reliability of data communication. A. Willig et al give an introduction to the reliable data transport problem and surveys protocols and approaches for this protocol [49]. Urgency based MAC protocol for WBAN, U-MAC, is a priority access mechanism to allow sensor nodes with urgent health information contend for the channel more than the nodes with non-urgent information [50]. The main consideration of the protocol is on the system design. Based on the performance results, this protocol can help on adjusting the critical node's packet retransmission times for supporting a certain number of critical nodes with desired traffic arrival rate, or achieve certain arrival rate for a given number of critical nodes. Employing IEEE 8025.15.4 for QoS in WBAN [51] proposes a QoS provisioning framework by employing IEEE 802.15.4 super frame structure in beacon enabled mode. It defines four QoS parameters to specify the QoS requirements. Priority of the applications, delay constraint, arrival rate, and the available burst size are considered. QoS for IEEE 802.15.4 based WBAN [52] also defines QoS provisioning scheme in IEEE 802.15.4 with service differentiation and prioritization. It differentiates the traffic into different service classes and prioritizes them. For secure and authenticated data transfer, secure and QoS assurance scheduling scheme is provided which further classify the traffic broadly into real time and non-real time in terms of QoS parameters [53]. The scalable and robust MAC protocol is proposed for appropriate and accurate channel sensing and another contention based method in CAP without carrier sense is discussed [54]. DQBAN [60] uses fuzzy-logic decision technique based scheduling algorithm to improve the overall performance and scalability [55]. PNP-MAC presents QoS in accordance with the priority of traffic. It also handles the QoS requirements through preemptive slot allocation and non-preemptive transmission [56]. QoS based MAC protocol design for WBAN proposed in MedWin [57]. It also proposed three types of access mechanism: scheduled access (1-periodic, m-periodic), improvised access (polls and posts), and random access (CSMA/CA). QoS based MAC protocol proposed in Inha for WBAN where traffic is first categorized into three classes: emergency, normal, and on-demand [58]. IMEC-NL and Holst Centre proposed IMEC. IMEC proposed priority guaranteed MAC in beacon enabled mode [59]. National Institute of Information and Communication of Japan proposed NICT [60], IMEC-NL and Holst Centre proposed IMEC [59], Samsung Electronics proposed Samsung [61], Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited proposed Fujitsu [62], etc. All of these protocols have claimed to be compatible with IEEE 802.15.6 QoS requirements. Some Routing protocols such as Sequential Assignment Routing, Multi-path and multispeed routing protocol, an Energy-Aware QoS Routing Protocol with focus on QoS are discussed [63].

Low delay protocol Reliable data transport model Urgency based MAC protocol for WBAN, U-MAC

Employing IEEE 8025.15.4 for QoS in WBAN

QoS assurance scheduling scheme Scalable and robust MAC protocol DQBAN PNP-MAC MedWin [

Inha IMEC NICT [60], IMEC [59], Samsung [61], Fujitsu [62], Some Routing protocols with focus on QoS: SAR, SPEED, Energy aware

8. OPEN RESEARCH ISSUES

After a long discussion and analysis we found that the fundamental QoS metrics for WBAN technology are: Decreasing overall energy consumption. Maximizing network lifetime.

Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013

Page 230

Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013 ISSN 2319 - 4847
Maximizing network throughput. Minimizing end-to-end delay. Maximizing overall reliability. Minimizing collisions Minimizing congestion Providing effective sample rate. Finally, we generalize assembled a list of current sensor networks research problems, which provide more opportunities and advantages of the WBANs systems. Along with the current problems of research, we encourage a deeper understanding of the problems and a lot of more development in solutions to the open research problems, as we have described in this paper. Transport, network, data link, physical layer, application layer and MAC layer Power control, mobility and task management planes Distributed network and Internet access to sensors, controls, and processors Data dissemination protocols Security protocol Information networking architecture Framework for implementing adaptive energy-aware distributed microsensors Cluster formation protocol Laser communication from a cubic millimeter Scalable coordination architectures for deeply distributed and dynamic systems Routing and power aware sensor management Distributed query processing Mathematical framework that incorporates key features of computing nodes and networking elements Computation is directly limited due to the limited amount of power. Typically, biosensors are not expected to have the same computational power as conventional WSN nodes. Material constraints are another issue for wireless sensor networks application to WBANs and healthcare applications. A biosensor must be in contact with human body, or even on it. If the biosensor is inside a pill, the choice of construction materials must be careful, especially on batteries. Also chemical reactions with body tissue and the disposal of the sensor are of utmost importance. The authors believe that the role of WBANs in medicine can be further enlarged. In the near future, the use of WBANs will increase because smart spaces will be enabled with wireless sensor networks which can sense environmental conditions and take preventive actions based on the presence of humans is those spaces. The system can therefore reach ubiquity, where each individual would have a computational module able to seamlessly interact with the smart spaces system and prevent health problems.

9. CONCLUSION
QoS has come forward as a foremost apprehension and research vicinity in the field of ad-hoc, sensor network, and body sensor network applications such as WBAN. But at a standstill much work has to be done. We believe that there should be further and more QoS definite WBAN research. To handle QoS challenges and issues in WBAN predominantly to advance the general functionality there is also need more research on energy efficient MAC and routing protocols. Its also very important to monitor the QoS in body area sensor networks itself and we desire to take account of it in our upcoming research work. Its a huge research domain for us especially for academicians and researchers to work for improving the performance level as well as QoS level in sense of in-body and out body WBAN.

REFERENCES
[1] Munir, S.A.; Yu Wen Bin; Ren Biao; Ma Man, "Fuzzy Logic Based Congestion Estimation for QoS in Wireless Sensor Network," Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2007.WCNC 2007. IEEE, vol., no., pp.4336- 4341, 11-15 March 2007. [2] http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/9103/InTech-Wireless_body_area_network_wban_for_medical_applications.pdf [3] http://www.ukessays.co.uk/essays/communications/the-emerging-wireless-body-area-network.php [4] IEEE 802.15.6, Technical requirement documents (TRD), 15-08-0644-09-0006-tg6-technical-requirementsdocument

Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013

Page 231

Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013 ISSN 2319 - 4847
[5] eksandar, Sanders Corey, Jovanov Emil, System Architecture Of A Wireless Body Area Sensor Network For Ubiquitous Health Monitoring, Journal Of Mobile Multimedia, Vol.1, No.4 (2006) 307-326 Rinton Press http://zeitgeistlab.ca/doc/Advanced_WBANs_for_an_Ageing_e-Health_Society.html Huasong Cao and Victor Leung, Cupid Chow and Henry Chan Enabling Technologies for Wireless BodyArea Networks: A Survey and Outlook, IEEE Communications Magazine , December 2009 http://www.ieee802.org/15/pub/TG6.html http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse574-08/ftp/ban/index.html B. Zhen, H.-bang Li, and R. Kohno, Networking issues in medical implant communications, International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, vol. 4, no. 1, 2009. M.Arif Siddiqui, Shah Murtaza Rashid Al Masud, Towards Design of Novel Low Power MAC Protocol for Wireless Body Area Networks, http://www.svpublishers.co.uk/#/ijcis-apr-2012/4564734051, issue 4, volume 4, 2012 http://pdf.aminer.org/000/369/962/qos_support_in_wireless_sensor_networks_a_survey.pdf http://www.pcmag.co.uk/networkitweek/features /2059634/jargon-buster http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2004/hd_051904c.html Feng Xia, Wenhong Zhao, Youxian Sun and Yu- Chu Tian. Fuzzy Logic Control Based QoS Management in Wireless Sensor/Actuator Networks, Sensors, vol.7, no.12, pp. 3179-3191, 2007. Aura Ganz, Zvi Ganz, Kitti Wongthavarawat, Multimedia Wireless Networks: Technologies, Standards, and QoS, Prentice Hall PTR, September 2003, pp.37-38. Gang Zhou, Jian Lu, Chieh-Yih Wan, Mark D. Yarvis, and John A. Stankovic, "BodyQoS: Adaptive and RadioAgnostic QoS for Body Okundu Omeni, Alan Chi Wai Wong, Alison J. Burdett, and Christofer Toumazou, Energy Efficient Medium Access Protocol for Wireless Medical Body Area Sensor Networks, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, Vol. 2, No. 4, December 2008. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3231450/ Joel JPCR, Pereira OE, Neves PCS. Biofeedback data visualization for body sensor networks. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2011;34:151158. Chen, M., Gonzalez, S., Vasilakos, A., Cao, H., & Leung, V. C. M. Body Area Networks: A survey, Mobile Networks and Applications, vol. 16, 2011, pp. 171-193, doi:10.1007/s11036-010-0260-8. Jang, C. S., Lee, D. G., Han, J.-W., & Park, J. H.. Hybrid security protocol for wireless body area networks, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 11, 2011, pp. 277-288, doi: 10.1002/wcm.884. Latr, Benot, Bart Braem, Ingrid Moerman, Chris Blondia, and Piet Demeester. A survey on wireless body area networks, Wireless Networks, vol. 17, 2010, pp. 1-18, doi: 10.1007/s11276-010-0252-4 Xia F. QoS Challenges and Opportunities in Wireless Sensor/Actuator Networks. Sensors 2008; 8: 1099-12. Chen J, Daz M, Llopis L, Rubio B, Troya JM. A Survey on Quality Of Service Support in Wireless Sensor and Actor Networks: Requirements and Challenges in the Context of Critical Infrastructure Protection. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 2011; 34: 1225-15. Cheng C, Tian B, Li Y, Yao O. Data Aggregation Technologies of Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks: A Survey. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety. QingDao, China, July 15-17, 2010. B. Zhen, H.-bang Li, and R. Kohno, Networking issues in medical implant communications, International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, vol. 4, no. 1, 2009. M. Ameen, A. Nessa, and K. S. Kwak, QoS Issues with Focus on Wireless Body Area Networks, in 2008 Third International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology, 2008, pp. 801-807. C. Li, H.-B. Li, and R. Kohno, Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4 for Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN), in 2009 IEEE International Conference Chen D, Varshney PK. QoS Support in Wireless Sensor Networks: A survey. Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Wireless Networks. Las Vegas, USA, June 21-24, 2004. Yigitel MA, Incel OD, Ersoy C. QoS-aware MAC Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks: A survey. Computer Networks (Elsevier) 2011; 55: 1982-23. Ehsan S, Hamdaoui B. A Survey on Energy-Efficient Routing Techniques with QoS Assurances for Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 2011; 99: 1-14. Djenouri D, Balasingham I. Traffic-Differentiation-Based Modular QoS Localized Routing for Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 2011; 10: 797-13. Wang C, Li B, Sohraby K. In: Zhenog J, Jamalipour A, Eds. Transport Protocols and Quality of Service. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2009: 343-26. Munishwar VP, Tilak SS, Abu-Ghazaleh NB. In: Misra S, Woungang I, Misra SC, Eds. Congestion and Flow Control in Wireless Sensor Networks. London: Springer 2009: 205-24.

[6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]

[12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]

[19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]

[26]

[27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35]

Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013

Page 232

Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013 ISSN 2319 - 4847
[36] D. Chen and P. K. Varshney, \Qos support in wireless sensor networks: A survey," in Int. Conference on Wireless Networks (ICWN 2004). CSREA Press, June 2004. [37] B. Braem, B. Latr_e, C. Blondia, I. Moerman, and P. Demeester, Improving reliability in multi-hop body sensor networks," in Second International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications ( SENSORCOMM 2008), Cap Esterel, France, 25-31 August 2008, pp. 342-347. [38] G. Zhou, J. Lu, C.-Y. Wan, M. Yarvis, and J. Stankovic, Bodyqos: Adaptive and radio-agnostic qos for body sensor networks," April 2008, pp. 565-573. [39] D. Vergados, D. Vergados, and I. Maglogiannis, Ngl03-6: Applying wireless diffserv for qos provisioning in mobile emergency telemedicine, in Global Telecommunications Conference, 2006. GLOBECOM 06. IEEE, nov. 2006, pp. 1 5. [40] U. Varshney and S. Sneha, Patient monitoring using ad hoc wireless networks: reliability and power management, in Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 44, no. 4, apr. 2006, pp. 49 55. [41] O. Gama, P. Carvalho, J. A. Afonso, and P. M. Mendes, Quality of service support in wireless sensor networks for emergency healthcare services, in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2008. EMBS 2008. 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, aug. 2008, pp. 1296 1299. [42] A. Zvikhachevskaya, G. Markarian, and L. Mihaylova, Quality of service consideration for the wireless telemedicine and e-health services, in Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2009. WCNC 2009. IEEE, apr. 2009, pp. 1 6. [43] H. Mei, B.-J. van Beijnum, I. Widya, V. Jones, and H. Hermens, Enhancing the performance of mobile healthcare systems based on task-redistribution, in INFOCOM Workshops 2008, IEEE, apr. 2008, pp. 1 6. [44] C. Otto, A. Milenkovic, C. Sanders, E. Jovanov, System Architecture of a Wireless Body Area Sensor Network for Ubiquitous Health Monitoring, In Journal of Mobile Multimedia, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 307- 326, 2006. [45] A. Peiravi, M. Farahi, Reliability of Wireless Body Area Networks used for Ambulatory Monitoring and Health Care, In Life Science Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2. 2010. [46] G. Wu, J. Ren, F. Xia, Z. Xu, An Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Communication Scheme for Body Sensor Networks, In Sensors 2010, 10, pp. 9590-9608. DOI: 10.3390/s110201383. [47] B. Braem, B. Latre, I. Moerman, C. Blondia, P. Demeester, The Wireless Autonomous Spanning tree Protocol for Multiple Hop Wireless Body Area Networks, In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Personalized Networks, 2006, pp. 284-291, July 2006, DOI: 10.1109/MOBIQW.2006.361753. [48] B. Latre, B. Braem, I. Moerman, C. Blondia, E. Reusens, W. Joseph, P. Demeester, A Low-delay Protocol for Multihop Wireless Body Area Networks, In Proceedings of MobiQuitous 2007: Fourth Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking & Services, 2007, pp. 1-8, August 2007. DOI: 10.1109/MOBIQ.2007.4451060. [49] A. Willig, H. Karl, Data Transport Reliability in Wireless Sensor Networks A Survey of Issues and Solutions, In Praxis der Informationsverarbeitung und Kommunikation, vol. 28, pp. 86-92, April 2005. [50] K. Ali, J. Sarker and H. Mouftah, "Urgency-based mac protocol for wireless sensor body area networks," in Communications Workshops, pp.1-6, May.2010. [51] H. Cao, S. Gonza andlez Valenzuela and V. Leung, "Employing ieee 802.15.4 for quality of service provisioning in wireless body area sensor networks," in Proc. of Advanced Information Networking and Applications, pp.902909, Apr.2010. [52] J. Garcia and T. Falck, "Quality of service for ieee 802.15.4-based wireless body sensor networks," in Proc. of Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, pp.1-6, Apr.2009. [53] M. Barua, M. Alam, X. Liang and X. Shen, "Secure and quality of service assurance scheduling scheme for wban with application to ehealth," in Proc. of Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, pp.1102-1106, Mar.2011. [54] C. Li, L. Wang, J. Li, B. Zhen, H.-B. Li and R. Kohno, "Scalable and robust medium access control protocol in wireless body area networks," in Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, pp.2127-2131, Sept.2009. [55] B. Otal, L. Alonso and C. Verikoukis, "Highly reliable energy-saving mac for wireless body sensor networks in healthcare systems," in Journal Selected Areas in Communications, vol.27, no.4, pp.553-565, May.2009. [56] J. Yoon, G.-S. Ahn, S.-S. Joo and M. Lee, "Pnp-mac: Preemptive slot allocation and non-preemptive transmission for providing qos in body area networks," in Proc. of Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, pp.1-5, Jan.2010. [57] 15-09-0326-00-0006-medwin-mac-and-security-proposalpresentationpart- 1-mac. [58] 15-09-0366-01-0006-inha-mac-proposal. [59] 15-09-0341-01 -0006-imec-narrowband-mac-proposalpresentation. [60] 15-09-0346-01-0006-nict-s-mac-proposal. [61] 15-09-0315-01 -0006-samsung-mac-proposal-part- 1-apower-efficientmac- for-ban. [62] 15-09-0286-01-0006-fujitsu-partial-phy-mac-proposal.

Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013

Page 233

Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org, editorijaiem@gmail.com Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013 ISSN 2319 - 4847
[63] Annette Bhm, State of the Art on Energy- Efficient and Latency-Constrained Networking Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks, Technical Report, IDE0749, June 2007. AUTHOR Shah Murtaza Rashid Al Masud is a lecturer at the faculty of Computer Science and Information Systems, Najran University, Najran, KSA. He received his M.Sc and B.Sc in Computer Engineering in the specialization of Computer intellect systems and networks in 2000, and 2001 respectively from Khrakov State University of Radio Electronics, Kharkov, Ukraine. His current research interest include parallel and distributed systems, GIS, GRID, Cloud computing, wireless BAN, expert systems, fuzzy logic, physical computation and thermodynamics, reversible logic, , and quantum computation. He has also published papers in accredited national and international journals and conference proceedings. Besides that, he also serves as a reviewer for various conferences and journals. Currently he is the member in various academic and scientific organizations.

Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013

Page 234