A 280581

Uo
cm
AD-A280 581
USACERL Technical Report FE-94/09

April 1994
ofEngineers
cdon EngineeringIIIIII
Co
Riesearch Laboratories
An Economic Analysis of Converting

Large Gas- and Oil-Fired
Heating Plants to Coal
by
Mike C.J. Lin
Public Law 99-190 requires the Department of
Defense to increase the use of coal at its facilities
in the United States. This study investigated the
cost effectiveness of burning coal (versus gas or
oil) in 88 large heating plants located at 55 Army
installations in the continental United States.
Non-coal-fired plants with capacities greater than
50 MBtu/hr were selected, and the USACERLdeveloped Central Heating Plant Economic
Evaluation (CHPECON) program was used to
estimate the life-cycle costs (LCC) of new plants
of equal capacity burning gas, No. 2 oil, No. 6 oil,
or coal using the following technologies: stokers,
coal water slurries, coal-oil mixture, micronized
coal, and fluidized bed combustors.
The study concluded that building new coal-fired
plants to replace aging gas- or oil-fired plants
would be cost effective in only one location,
where coal was competitive with gas. However,
retrofitting heavy oil plants for coal firing may

increase coal consumption and provide potential
cost savings for 38 heating plants. Calculated
savings ranged between $8 million and $239
million over the 25-year plant life. More detailed
engineering studies were recommended to
confirm the projected savings at 15 of the Army
heating plants studied.
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
D ITICC
14-"
TE
G.-L
to
.
594-19505
94 6 2 3
152
The contents of this report ae not to be used for advatising, publication,

or promotional purposes. Citaion of trade names does not constitute an
official ed
1U fn
m t or approval of the use of such commea products.

gs of this epit are not to be constued as an official
Department of the Army position, unless so designated by other authorizd

documents.
DESTROY THIS REPORT WHEN IT IS NO LONGER NEEDED

DO NOT RETURN IT TO THE ORIGINATOR
USER EVALUATION OF REPORT

REFERENCE: USACERL Technical Report FE-94/09, An Economic Analysis of Converting Large
Gas- and Oil-FiredHeating Plantsto Coal
Please take a few minutes to answer the questions below, tear out this sheet, and return it to USACERL.
As user of this report, your customer comments will provide USACERL with information essential for
improving future reports.
1. Does this report satisfy a need? (Comment on purpose, related project, or other area of interest for
which report will be used.)
2. How, specifically, is the report being used?

management procedure, source of ideas, etc.)
(Infonnation source, design data or procedure,
3. Has the information in this report led to any quantitative savings as far as manhours/contract dollars
saved, operating costs avoided, efficiencies achieved, etc.? If so, please elaborate.
4.
What is your evaluation of this report in the following areas?

a. Presentation:
b. Completeness:
c. Easy to Understand:
d. Easy to Implement:
e. Adequate Reference Material:
f. Relates to Area of Interest:
g. Did the report meet your expectations?
h. Does the report raise unanswered questions?
i. General Comments. (Indicate what you think should be changed to make this report and future
reports of this type more responsive to your needs, more usable, improve readability, etc.)
5. If you would like to be contacted by the personnel who prepared this report to raise specific questions
or discuss the topic, please fill in the following information.
Name:
Telephone Number:.
Organization Address:
6. Please mail the completed form to:

Department of the Army
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORIES
ATTN: CECER-IMT
P.O. Box 9005
Champaign, IL 61826-9005
CDeM How"r. Suit 1204. *aUpon. VA Z209430.

1. AGENCY USE ONLY (LeO R TW 2.
idWV'S O0os
PORT DATE
1Muqslg
aik
Rdd
II
P.*IW4070441K). W0W"0Wn DC 255
3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED
VaI Pe
April1994Final
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
5. FUNDOG NUMBERS
An Economic Analysis of Converting Large Gas- and Oil-Fired Heating Plants to
MIPs
WS6HZV-89-AC-,ol
Coal
dated 20 November 1989

6.AUTHOR(S)
Mie CJ. Lin

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADORESS(ES)
U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (USACERL)
S PERFORMING ORGANIZATION
REPORT NUMBER
TR FE-94in9
P.O. Box 9005

Champaign, EL 61826-9005
10. FUN6ORINGNM'IUT.RING
AGENCY REPORT N-MAWR
9. SPONSORINUMONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
U.S. Army Center for Public Works (USACPW)

ATTN4: CECPW-FU-M
7701 Telegraph Road
Alexandria VA 22310-3862
11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
Copies are available from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA
22161
r12b
12L. OISTRIBUTIONIAVAILABILITY STATEMENT
DISTRIBUTION CODE
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

13. ABSTRACT PA(SM) n 200 wo
Public Law 99-190 requires the Department of Defense to increase the use of coal at its facilities in the United
States. This study investigated the cost effwctveness of burning coal (versus gas or oil) in 88 lage heating
plants located at 55 Army installations in the continental United Stat.
Non-coal-fired plants with capacities
greater thanr
50 MBfUhr were selected, and the USACERL-developed Central Heating Plant Economic
Evaluation (CHPECON) progranm was used to estimate the life-cycle costs (LCC) of new plants of equal capacity
burning gas, No. 2 oil, No. 6 oil, or coal using the following technologies: stokers, coal water slurries, coal-oil
mixture, micronized coal, and fluidized bed combustors.
The study concluded that building new coal-fired plants to replace aging gas- or oil-fired plants would be cost
effective in only one location, where coal was competitive with gas. However, retrofitting heavy oil plants for
coal firing may increase coal consumption and provide potential cost savings for 38 heating plants. Calculated
savings ranged between $8 million and $239 million over the 25-year plant life. More detailed engineering
studies were recommended to confirm the projected savings at 15 of the Aimy heating plants studied.
15. NUMBER OF PAGES
14. SUiJECT TERMS
economic analysis
oil-fired heating plants
central heating plants
gas-fired heating plantsI&PCEOD
Central Heating Plant Economic Evaluation (CHPECON)

17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
OF REPORT
Unclassified
NSN 7540-01-2500-5Me
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
OF THIS PAGE
Unclassified
Scoal
9. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
76
RIa E COge
20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT
OF ABSTRACT
Unclassified
SAR
Sladwd FormR
296 (Rev. 2-et)
miMtue by ANl O 2b3o-1o
2Me-l
FOREWORD
This study was conducted for the U.S. Army Center for Public Works (USACPW) under the Coal
Conversion Studies Program, which is administered by the Energy Policy Directorate, of the Office of the
Assistant Secretary of Defense, Production & Logistics, OASD(P&L/EP). Millard Cur is the Program
Manager. Funding was provided under Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR) W56HZV-89AC-01, dated 20 November 1989; Work Unit R-ARMY-TACOM, "Coal Conversion Strategies for the
Army, Installation Technical Assistance." The USACPW technical monitor was James F. Donnelly,
CECPW-FU-M.
The research was performed by the Energy and Utility Systems Division (FE), of the Infrastructure
Laboratory (FL), of the U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (USACERL).
Dr. Mike C.J. Lin was the USACERL principal investigator. Special acknowledgement is given to Meiyi
Feng and Timothy Isaacs, CECER-FE, for their efforts in conducting the CHPECON runs and organizing
technical materials. Dr. David M. Joncich is Chief, CECER-FE, and Dr. Michael J. O'Connor is Chief,
CECER-FL. The USACERL technical editor was William J. Wolfe, Information Management Office.
LTC David J. Rehbein is Commander of USACERL and Dr. L.R. Shaffer is Director.
CONTENTS
Page
SF 298
FOREWORD
LIST OF TABLES
1
2
4
INTRODUCTION ..................................................
Background
Objectives
Approach
Scope
COAL CONVERSION ECONOMIC STUDY ..............................

Army Facility Energy Systems Inventory Program
CHPECON
Results for 88 Gas- or Oil-Fired Heating Plants
11
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
22
............................
REFERENCES
22
APPENDIX A: 1989 CONUS Installation Energy Consumption Report

APPENDIX B: CHPECON Run Results for 88 U.S. Army Heating
Plants
Al
B1
DISTRIBUTION
Aooesslon For
NTIS GRA&I
Cy
DTIC
TAB
Unannouuced
1]
[
Justification
Distributionz.,
Avatlability Codes
plot
AVail
1-and-/or
Special
TABLES
Number
Page
Gas and Oil-Fired Army Heating Plants With Capacity Greater Than 50 MBtu/hr
14
LCC Ratios Relative to Gas (100)
16
CHPECON Results in Order of Increasing Cost Penalty for New Plants
19
CHPECON Results in Order of Decreasing Cost Savings for CWS Retrofit
21
BI
CHPECON Results for Aberdeen Proving Ground, File Prefix: APG I
B2
B2
CHPECON Results for Aberdeen Proving Ground, File Prefix: APG2
B2
B3
CHIPECON Results for Aberdeen Proving Ground, File Prefix: APG3
B3
B4
CHPECON Results for Army Materials and Mech. Research Center,

File Prefix: AMR
B3
B5
CHPECON Results for Badger AAMP, File Prefix: BAM
B4
B6
CHPECON Results for Bayonne, File Prefix: BAY
B4
B7
CHPECON Results for Cameron Station, File Prefix: CRS
B5
B8
CHPECON Results for Defense Depot, File Prefix: DDP
B5
B9
CHPECON Results for Defense Personnel Support Center, File Prefix: DPS
B6
Bi0
CHPECON Results for Fitzsimmons Army Medical Center, File Prefix: FSM
B6
B11
CHPECON Results for Fort Belvoir, File Prefix: FBV
B7
B12
CHPECON Results for Fort Ben Harrison, File Prefix: FBH
B7
B13
CHPECON Results for Fort Bliss, File Prefix: FBS
B8
B14
CHPECON Results for Fort Bragg, File Prefix: FBGI
B8
B15
CHPECON Results for Fort Bragg, File Prefix: FBG2
B9
B16
B9
BI7
BI0
B18
BIO
B19
CHPECON Results for Fort Campbell, File Prefix: FCB1
Bl1
TABLES (Cont'd)
Page
Number
B20
B11
B21
CHPECON Results for Fort Carson, File Prefix: FCS
B12
B22
CHPECON Results for Fort Detrick, File Prefix: FDT
B12
B23
CHPECON Results for Fort Dix, File Prefix: FDXI
B13
B24
CHPECON Results for Fort Dix, File Prefix: FDX2
B13
B25
B 14
B26
B14
B27
CHPECON Results for Fort George Meade, File Prefix: FGM
B15
B28
CHPECON Results for Fort Gordon, File Prefix: FGDI
B15
B29
CHPECON Results for Fort Gordon, File Prefix: FGD2
B16
B30
CHPECON Results for Fort Gordon, File Prefix: FGD3
B16
B31
CHPECON Results for Fort Greely, File Prefix: FGL
B17
B32
CHPECON Results for Fort Indiantown Gap, File Prefix: FIT
B17
B33
CIHPECON Results for Fort Jackson, File Prefix: FJS1
B18
B34
CHPECON Results for Fort Jackson, File Prefix: FJS2
B18
B35
CHPECON Results for Fort Jackson, File Prefix: FJS3
B19
B36
CHPECON Results for Fort Knox, File Prefix: FKX1
B19
B37
CHPECON Results for Fort Knox, File Prefix: FKX2
B20
B38
CHPECON Results for Fort Leavenworth, File Prefix: FLV
B20
B39
CHPECON Results for Fort Leonard Wood, File Prefix: FLW1
B21
B40
B21
B41
B22
B42
B22
B43
CHPECON Results for Fort Myers, File Prefix: FMY
B23
TABLES (Cont'd)
Number
Page
B44
CHPECON Results for Fort Riley, File Prefix: FRL
B23
B45
CHPECON Results for Fort Richardson, File Prefix: FRS
B24
B46
CHPECON Results for Fort Sheridan, File Prefix: FSD
B24
B47
CHPECON Results for Fort Sill, File Prefix: FSL
B25
B48
CHPECON Results for Fort Stewart, File Prefix: FSW
B25
B49
CHPECON Results for Frankfort Arsenal, File Prefix: FFA
B26
B50
CHPECON Results for Harry Diamond Labs, File Prefix: HDD
B26
B51
CHPECON Results for Holston AAMP, File Prefix: HAM
B27
B52
CHPECON Results for Iowa AAMP, File Prefix: IAMI
B27
B53
CHPECON Results for Iowa AAMP, File Prefix: IAM2
B28
B54
B28
B55
B29
B56
B29
B57
CHPECON Results for Jefferson Proving Grounds, File Prefix: JPG
B30
B58
CHPECON Results for Joliet AAMP, File Prefix: JAMI
B30
B59
CHPECON Results for Joliet AAMP, File Prefix: JAM2
B31
B60
CHPECON Results for Letterkeny Army Depot, File Prefix: LAD
B31
B61
CHPECON Results for Lake City AAMP, File Prefix: LCA
B32
B62
CHPECON Results for Lone Star AAMP, File Prefix: LSA1
B32
B63
B33
B64
B33
B65
B34
B66
B34
B67
CHPECON Results for Mcalester AAMP, File Prefix: MAM
B35
TABLES (Cont'd)
Number
Page
B68
CHPECON Results for Natick R & D MA, File Prefix: NCR
B35
B69
CHPECON Results for New Cumberland Army Depot PA, File Prefix: NAD
B36
B70
CHPECON Results for Newport AAMP IN, File Prefix: NAM1
B36
B71
CHPECON Results for Newport AAMP. IN, File Prefix: NAM
B37
B72
CHPECON Results for Picatinny Arsenal, File Prefix: PAR1
B37
B73
CHPECON Results for Picatinny Arsenal, File Prefix: PAR2
B38
B74
CHPECON Results for Redstone Arsenal, File Prefix: RARI
B38
B75
CHPECON Results for Redstone Arsenal, File Prefix: RAR2
B39
B76
CHPECON Results for Riverbank AAMP CA, File Prefix: RBA
B39
B77
CHPECON Results for Ravenna AAMP, File Prefix: RVA
B40
B78
CHPECON Results for Rocky Mountain Arsenal, File Prefix: RMA1
B40
B79
CHPECON Results for Rocky Mountain Arsenal, File Prefix: RMA2
B41
B80
CHPECON Results for Scranton AAMP, File Prefix: SAM
B41
B81
CHPECON Results for Sunflower AAMP, File Prefix: SFA
B42
B82
CHPECON Results for Toole AD, File Prefix: TAD
B42
B83
CHPECON Results for Twin City AAMP. MN., File Prefix: TAMI
B43
B84
CHPECON Results for Twin City AAMP, File Prefix: TAM2
B43
B85
CHPECON Results for U.S. Military Academy, File Prefix: UMA
B44
B86
CHPECON Results for Walter Reed Army Medical Center, File Prefix: WMC1
B44
B87
CHPECON Results for Walter Reed Medical Center, File Prefix: WMC2
B45
B88
CHPECON Results for Watervliet, File Prefix: WAR
B45
AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CONVERTING LARGE

GAS- AND OIL-FIRED HEATING PLANTS TO COAL
INTRODUCTION
Background
The Fiscal Year 1986 (FY86) Defense Appropriations Act (PL 99-190, Section 8110) directed the
Departmeant of Defense to rehabilitate and convert its existing domestic power plants to bum more coal.
The Act set an FY94 coal consumption target of 1.6 million short tons per year beyond the DOD's 1985
U.S. coal consumption. The FY87 Defense Appropriation Act (PL-99-500, Section 9099) reaffirmed the
1.6 million ton target, and added that it should include 300 thousand tons of anthracite coal. The FY87
Defense Authorization Act (PL-99-661, Section 1205) also affects the DOD's coal conversion program
by directing that the primary fuel source in any new heating system be the most life-cycle cost effective.
This means that the DOD cannot specify a new plant to bum coal unless it can also show that coal will
be more economical than oil, gas, or other fuels, over the life of the plant. In addition, the Act amended
Section 2690 of Title 10, U.S. Code by canceling previous restrictions against the construction of large
new oil or gas heating systems (those with an input rate of 50 million Btu per hour or greater). House
Report Hk-101-345, which accompanied the FY90 Defense Appropriations Act, stated that "As a related
issue, the conferees agree with Senate report language, which directs the Department to continue, without
modification, its efforts to increase domestic consumption of coal as outlined in the Department's letter
signed by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Logistics, dated August 30, 1985."
To help the Army comply with these requirements, the U.S. Army Engineering and Housing Support
Center (USAEHSC) requested the U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories
(USACERL) to provide technical studies and support for the Army's coal conversion program. A series
of screening and life-cycle cost-estimating models have been developed to determine when and where
specific coal combustion technologies could be implemented (Lin December 1992a, December 1993).
Potential sites for coal conversion may be identified and ranked by collecting base heating plant
information and conducting computer runs with screening and costing models. In general, coal is cheaper
than gas and oil on a per-Btu basis, but coal-fired plants require considerably more capital and accrue
higher operation and maintenance (O&M) costs due to the additional expense of coal and ash handling
equipment, and air pollution control devices. To offset the extra capital and O&M costs, only those plants
that use large quantities of fuel or that are located in regions where coal is much cheaper than gas or oil,
will realize coal as the lowest life-cycle cost fuel. Therefore, conversion to coal will likely be most
effective in large heating plants located relatively close to coal mines. A first step in the Army's coal
conversion program is to identify candidate plants, and to estimate and compare the economies of
operating these plants with coal and other fuels.
Objectives
The objectives of this study were to identify large gas- or oil-fired heating plants at Army
installations, and to determine the economics of coal conversion for each plant.
Approach
1. Candidate Army installation heating plants (with capacities of 50 MBtuthr or greater) were
identified from a USACERL-dcveloped data base of Army heating plant information (the Army Facility
Energy Systems Inventory Program [INV]).
2. Data from INV was run through the USACERL-developed Central Heating Plant Economics
(CHPECON) program to screen and create cost-estimating models for each identified plant, using several
alternatives. Both new and retrofitted plants were considered using coal, No. 2 oil, No. 6 oil or gas as
primary fuel. Coal technologies considered for new plants were stoker, coal-oil mixture, coal-water slurry,
and fluidized bed combustor. Stoker, coal-water slurry, and micronized coal combustion technologies were
considered for retrofitting the. heavy oil boilers with coal.
3. Results were analyzed, and conclusions and recommendations were formulated.
Scope
"The results are based on current cost estimates for such parameters as future base energy
requrements, fuel price, and price escalation. These parameters change through time and as technology
advances, so these cost estimates will need to be updated as new data become available. However, the
methodology and procedures this study employs can be extended to other federal facilities for similar
studies.
10
COAL CONVERSION ECONOMIC STUDY
Army Facility Energy Systems Inventory Program

There are two principal ways to increase coal use in Army heating plants: either to build new coal-
fired plants to replace old ones, or to retrofit gas and oil-fired plants for coal-firing. To estimate the
relative benefits to the Army of new construction versus retrofit, Army heating plant boiler information
must be available. To respond to this need, USACERL started to develop the Army Facility Energy
Systems Inventory Program (INV) in 1990. This inventory data base program is designed to hold energy
and utility systems information for Army bases, to generate reports about individual bases, to extract
information about a large number of bases, and to supply data to other computer programs for further
analysis. The program operates on an IBM-compatible personal computer (PC). Data was gathered from
a hand-written survey distributed to the bases in the summer of 1990. The survey requested detailed
information about 142 installations, their heating plants, and their boilers. The program can print out
summary data or detailed reports on individual bases.
One important function of the INV data base is to allow rapid access of energy and utility
information for all the listed bases. The inventory programs have prewritten reports that enable the user
to extract data by such detailed categories as boiler manufacturer, size, fuel, age, and type of construction.
The data itself is stored in dBase format,* a common personal computer data base file format widely
known and accessible via custom programs written by any programmer familiar with dBase software. This
data also supplies information for evaluating heating plant options.
CHPECON
The Central Heating Plant Economics Evaluation Program (CHPECON) provides the ability to
perform evaluations of the life-cycle costs of heating plants with Plant Maximum Continuous Ratings
(PMCR) between 50,000 and 600,000 MBtu/hr comprised of individual boilers ranging from 20,000 to
200,000 MBtu/br. Heating plant fuel choices include coal, gas, and/or oil.
The first step in performing an economic evaluation with CHPECON is to provide answers to the
screening models. The screening model allows the user to determine the suitability of a base for a boiler
plant with a specific technology. The evaluation can be performed for any of the following options: new
plant, new plant with cogeneration (of electricity), new plant with third party (outside ownership)
cogeneration, new plant with consolidation of existing plants, or retrofit of a heavy oil plant with a coal
technology. The screening model data requirements include a choice of military installation to be studied,
the average monthly heating load, the boiler technology, and the fuel type. The boiler technology choices
include: (1) dump grate spreader stoker with or without fly ash reinjection; (2) vibrating grate spreader
stoker with or without fly ash reinjection; (3) reciprocating grate spreader stoker with or without fly ash
reinjection; (4) traveling grate spreader stoker with or without fly ash reinjection; (5) traveling grate stoker,
(6) chain grate stoker, (7) coal-oil slurry;, (8) coal-water slurry; (9) bubbling bed; (10) circulating bed; and
(11) gas- or oil-fired boilers. The screening model also includes general questions about the plant to help
calculate a feasibility score that reflects the probability that the proposed plant can be constructed and
operated.
"dBae is a registered trademnark of Borland International, Inc., 1800-T Green Hill Road, Scotts Valley, CA 95066.
11
The second step in completing an economic evaluation of a facility is to run the cost model option
of CHPECON, which uses the screening model data to calculate costs for a plant Cost model inputs
include fuel prices, the fiscal year of evaluation, current escalation and discount rates, and the expected
life of the plant. The cost model calculations predict the cost of boiler fuel and transportation, auxiliary
energy, nonenergy operation and maintenance, and repair and replacement over the life of the plant. The
cost model report includes itemized plant component costs, capital investment costs, year-by-year operating
costs, total life-cycle costs, and levelized plant costs in $/MBtu and $/1000 lb steam (1 lb = 0.453 kg).
CHPECON offers two special options to expedite the analysis of plant options: the multiple run
analysis and the sensitivity analysis. The multiple run analysis allows the user to run combined screening
and costing models for all the appropriate coal-fired technologies, and provides a list of life-cycle costs
for all the technologies in order of increasing cost. Sensitivity analysis automatically varies 11 parameters
to show their effects on the plant costs.
CHPECON uses seven data bases, including coal field information, acceptable coal properties (for
combustion technology options), military base information, boiler stack emission regulations, equipment
emission factors, construction productivity and wage data, and operations labor staffing and wage data.
The user can update these data bases from within CHPECON, and (via a system utilities option) reindex
files, rebuild a case list from present files, read in new LCCID (life-cycle cost in design) cost information,
or set the values for sensitivity analysis.
Both the inventory program and the CHPECON program have been modified to allow CHPECON
to extract data directly from the inventory program. This enables analysis of future energy supply
alternatives according to the most current data available.
Results for 88 Gas- or Oil-Fired Heating Plants
A search was made using the Army Facility Energy System Inventory program to find the gas- or
oil-fired heating plants with capacity greater than 50 MBtu/hr. Eighty-eight heating plants were found that
met the criterion (Table 1)."
CHPECON runs were conducted for these plants to compare the life-cycle costs for new plants
burning coal, gas, No. 2 oil, and No. 6 oil. In this first-pass economic screening study, several
assumptions were made to expedite the CHPECON run. Note that, at the time these runs were made,
many features in the program, such as multiple run capability and sensitivity analysis, were not yet
available. Therefore, selection of coal and coal technology is not optimized. However, better quality coal
(lower ash and sulfur contents) located closer to the base is chosen to minimize transportation and
pollution control costs. Information on energy production for each heating plant is not provided in the
inventory survey for many bases. This study assumed that the PMCR equals the existing plant maximum
capacity, and the plant average load equals one-third of the total plant capacity.
The energy consumption at each installation can be found in the Defense Energy Information System
(DEIS) bi-monthly report." Appendix A lists the 1989 DEIS energy consumption report for the 210
continental U.S. (CONUS) Army installations in order of decreasing energy usage. For the 88 heating
plants with capacities greater than 50 MBtu/hr, about half are under the Army Materiel Command (AMC).
" Tables 1 to 4 are included at the end of Chapter 2.

" The Department of the Army (DA) requires its installations to submit data to the Army DEIS Data Entry System (ADDS) in
accordance with DOD 5126.46-M. the DEIS Manual (Department of Defense [DOD], February 1990), and Army Regulation
(AR) 11-27, Army Energy Program (Headquarters, Department of the Army [HQDA], 14 July 1989).
12
Since little data were available from AMC installations, it is uncertain if the assumption on plant energy
production is valid for all cases. By comparing the 1989 DEIS data with the assumed energy productions
from the 26 AMC installations, it was found that the estimated production was greater than the entire base
consumption for I I AMC bases. Based on the information obtained from four bases (Forts Bragg,
Campbell, and Gordon, and Picatinny Arsenal) where recent plant energy production data were supplied
to USACERL, the 1990 average annual heating plants utilization factors (annual average hourly energy
production divided by PMCR) were in the range of 15 to 25 percent. This study used a 33 percent factor,
which would put coal in a more favorable position since coal use benefits from large-scale fuel
consumption. Assumptions made in this study to run the CHPECON program are generally biased toward
coal to reveal the favorable conditions required for coal to be cost competitive. If the results are negative,
then coal is definitely ruled out as the preferred fuel.
The evaluation was run using most of the CHPECON program's default values. In the gas or oil
option, three boilers were selected, while four boilers were chosen for coal plants. Fuel prices used were
based on published DOE region prices except for Forts Bragg, Campbell, and Gordon, where reported
prices paid by the bases were used.
Appendix B shows the CHPECON results for new plant and retrofit options. The combustion
technologies are shown in the first column of the Tables in Appendix B. The second column of each table
shows the boiler size in MBtu/hr. The third column shows the average production cost in terms of dollar
per MBtu. The fourth column shows the average cost of dollar per 1000 lb of steam. The fifth column
shows the investment amount, the sixth column the fuel costs, and the seventh column the 25-year plant
life-cycle costs all in thousands of dollars. The last column shows the life-cycle cost ratios with respect
to gas when gas was set at 100. For the retrofit option, the inves: ,t amount, the cost of coal, the cost
of heavy oil (negative values are used for subtraction to calculate savings), and the savings (negative
values indicate the amount saved) are shown in thousands of dollars. The results showed that retrofit with
coal water slurries resulted in lower life-cycle cost (LCC) as compared to stoker or micronized coal. A
similar study conducted by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) for the Air Force showed that
micronized coal firing resulted in the most economic system (Griffin et al. 1989; Thomas, Griffin, and
Young 1989). Fuel pricing may be a key factor for the difference in results.
Table 2 lists the new plant LCC ratios relative to gas firing for the 88 heating plants, alphabetically
by base name. Table 3 lists the new plant LCC ratios relative to gas (set at 100), the lowest-cost coal
technology, and the least-LCC plant fuel. The LCCs for the new gas-fired plants and the cost penalties
incurred while choosing the least-cost coal technology (instead of the least-cost LCC fuel) are also
included. Table 3 lists plants in order of increasing cost penalty. The results indicate that using gas or
No. 6 oil always resulted in lower new plant life-cycle cost, except for one case (Fort Bragg's plant in
Building C-1432) where coal is cost competitive with gas. (The LCC for the coal-fired plant was 2
percent lower than that of the gas-fired plant). These results do not encourage the use of coal as fuel in
new Army heating plants built to replace aging plants.
However, Table 4 shows that retrofitting with coal water slurries for the heavy oil plants may result
in significant savings (Table 4). Based on the potential savings estimated by CHPECON program, coal
retrofit may be a viable option for heating plants located in the following bases: Fort Bragg, Sunflower
Army Ammunition Plant, the U.S. Military Academy, Picatinny Arsenal, Fort Detrick, Walter Reed Army
Medical Center, Lack City Army Ammunition Plant, Bayonne Military Ocean Terminal, Rocky Mountain
Arsenal, Redstone Arsenal, Iowa Army Ammunition Plant, Fort Stewart, Fort Jackson, Fitzsimons Army
Medical Center, and Watervliet Arsenal. (Potential LCC savings at those plants may exceed $30 million).
However, boiler manufacturers need to be contacted first to evaluate conversion feasibility, and a detailed
engineering study should be dope to confirm the savings. As mentioned previously, this study assumes
high boiler use (33 percent), which would result in greater fuel consumption; savings could be reduced
13
with less usage. Also note that the CHPECON retrofit models tend to give relatively high savings figures
based on their optimistic assumptions regarding reuse of existing equipment and availability of space for
add-on equipment. The cost of removing old, unusable equipment may sometimes be rather substantial.
A detailed site inspection will help to assess the additional required costs. Expected defense cutbacks that
have followed the end of the cold war may preclude new plant construction. Retrofit to coal firing may
become the preferred choice in meeting the Congressional intent of doubling DOD coal consumption.
Table 1
Gas and ONl-Fired Army Heating Plants With Capacity Greater Than 50 MBtu/br
Prefix
#
APG
Base Name
MBtu/hr Fuel"
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD

Army Materials and Mechanics Research Center, MA
Badger Army Ammunition Plant, WI
113.5FS2
165FS2
150FS2
87.2FS
227.8NG
AMR
BAM
1
2
3
4
5
BAY
CRS
DDP
DPS
FSM
6
7
8
9
10
Bayonne Military Ocean Terminal, NJ

Cameron Station, VA
Defense Depot, UT
Defense Personnel Support Center, PA
Fitzsimmons Army Medical Center, CO
265FS5
77FS5
59NG
103.9NG
224NG
FBV
FBH
PBS
FBG
-
11
12
13
14
15
Fort
Fort
Fort
Fort
Fort
Belvoir, VA
Benjamin Harrison, IN
Bliss, TX
Bragg, NC
Bragg, NC
57.3FS
19ONG
84NG
130NG
125NG
FCB
-
16
17
18
19
20
Fort
Fort
Fort
Fort
Fort
Bragg, NC
Bragg, NC
Bragg, NC
Campbell, KY
Bragg, NC
300NG
10ONG
50NG
62.7NG
115NG
FCS
FDT
FDX
21
22
23
Carson, CO
Detrick. MD
Dix. NJ
Dix. NJ
Dix. NJ
12(NG
390NG
120FS6
200FS6
772FS4
25
Fort
Fort
Fort
Fort
Fort
26
27
28
29
30
Fort Dix. NJ
Fort George G. Meade, MD
Fort Gordon, GA
Fort Gordon, GA
Fort Gordon, GA
S24
FGM
FGD
-
200FS6
88FS2
70NG
175NG
60NG
Note- NO = Natural Gas; FS2 = #2 Fuel Oil; FS5 = #5 Fuel Oil; FS6 = #6 Fuel Oil; FSR
WUD = Wood.
14
Residual Fuel Oil;
Table 1 (Cont'd)
*#
Bae Name
MBl/br Fuel
31
32
33
34
35
Fort Greely, AK
Fort Indiantown Gap. PA
Fort Jackson, SC
Fort Jackson. SC
Fort Jackson, SC
150FSI
82FS6
106NO
178NG
111.2NG
36
37
38
39
40
Fort Knox. KY
Fort Knox, KY
Fort Leavenworth, KS
Fort Leonard Wood, MO
Fort Leonard Wood, MO
52FS
51.8NG
60NG
612.FS2
126.8F56
FMY
FRS
FRL
41
42
43
44
45
Fort
Fort
Fort
Fort
Fort
92PS6
75FS6
132FS6/NG
540MG
107.81G
FSD
FSL
FSW
FFA
HDD
46
47
48
49
50
Fort Sheridan, IL
Fort Sill. OK
Fort Stewart, GA
Frankfort Arsenal, PA
Harry Diamond Laboratory, MD
SONG
58.6NG
191.9FS5/WUD
85FS
55NG
HAM
IAM
-
51
52
53
54
55
Holston Army Ammunition Plant, TN

Iowa Army Ammunition Plant, IA
300NG
192NG
73FS
73FS
73FS
FPG
JAM
LCA
56
57
58
59
60

Jefferson Proving Ground, IN
Joliet Army Ammunition Plant, IL
Lake City Army Ammunition Plant, MO
73FS
72FS
200.8NG
50.2FS
307NG
LAD
LSA
-
61
62
63
64
65
Letterkenny Army Depot, PA

Lonestar Army Ammunition Plant, TX
76.7FS5
70NG
9ONG
80NG
70NG
MAM
NCR
NAD
NAM
66
67
68
69
70

McAlester Army Ammunition Plant, OK
Natick Research and Development Center, MA
New Cumberland Army Depot, PA
Newport Army Ammunition Plant, IN
60NG
73.6NG
111.6FS6
84.8FS6
753NG
Prel
FOL
FIT
FJS
-
FKX
-
FLV
FLW
-
Leonard Wood, MO
Leonard Wood, MO
Myer, VA
Richardson, AK
Riley, KS
Note: NG = Natural Gas; FS2 = #2 Fuel Oil; FS5 = #5 Fuel Oil; FS6 = #6 Fuel Oil; FSR = Residual Fuel Oil;
WUD = Wood.
15
Table I (Cotld)
pII
-
PAR
-
RVA
RAR
-
RBA
RMA
-
SAM
SPA
TAD
TAM
-
UMA
WMC
-
WAR
*
Base Name
MB.tmr Feelr
71
72
73
74
75

Picatinny Arsenal, NJ
Picatinny Arsenal, NJ
Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant. OH
Redstone Arsenal, AL
502.NM
SOFS6
370FS6
77.1FS
232NG
76
77
78
79
80
Redstone Arsenal. AL
Riverbank Army Ammunition Plant, CA
Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO
Scranton Army Ammunition Plantk PA
214NG
70.1NG
23(CNG
35(ONG
85NG
81
82
83
84
85
Sunflower Army Ammunition Plant, KS

Tooele Army Depot, UT
Twin City Army Ammunition Plantk MN
Twin City Army Ammunition Plant, MN
West Point Military Academy, NY
75(CKG
60.3FSR
123.3N0
99NG
129.21S6
86
87
88
Water Reed Medical Center. Washington DC

Water Reed Medical Center, Washington DC
Watervliet Arsenal, NY
58F16
320NG
145.9FS/NG
Note: NG= Natural Gas; FS2

WUD - Wood.
#2 Fuel Oil; 1S5 = #5 Fuel Oil; FS6
#6 Fuel OiP FSR = Residual Fuel Oil;
Table 2
LCC Rados Relative to Gas (100)
Bm
PMCR"
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Coal Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
APGI
APG2
APG3
AMR
BAM
114
165
150
87
228
129
132
132
110
113
101
101
101
89
81
195
172
173
184
129
173
161
162
159
125
169
157
156
158
120
205
185
169
173
167
BAY
CRS
DDP
DPS
FSM
265
77
59
104
224
112
127
110
111
113
87
101
83
88
78
129
215
211
173
131
126
187
181
151
131
123
182
171
149
119
122
220
213
161
135
"PMCR=PlantMaximum
Continuous Ratings; CWS=Coal-Water Slury; COM=Coal-Oil Mixture;

FBC=lPluidized Bed Combustor.
"Indicates actual price paid at military base; other fuel prices based on Department of Energy
region.
16
Tabl 2 (Camt'd)
BM
PRMCR"
Oil
46 Oil
Coal Stoker
CWS
COM
FSC
FBV
FBH
FBS
FBGI
FB02*
57
190
84
130
126
124
113
127
145
136
101
81
101
154
145
245
133
210
132
125
204
131
184
122
115
199
126
180
174
163
234
136
203
128
121
!033
1B34"
FBGS"
FCBI
FCB2FCS
300
1o00
50
63
115
120
149
143
136
116
118
112
159
152
144
120
124
80
100
143
193
230
188
163
102
131
160
198.
172
148
159
179
203
207
183
137
98
139
186
227
192
158
FDT
FDXI
FDX2
FDX3
FDX4
FPM
390
120
200
77
200
88
135
111
112
110
112
127
101
88
87
89
87
101
140
165
138
192
138
210
143
147
132
166
132
185
138
144
129
164
129
181
139
156
130
181
130
202
FGDIO
F0D2"
PMD3"
70
176
60
150
82
106
78
68
72
112
110
129
62
57
63
79
89
101
138
91
147
202
187
185
119
89
125
149
163
169
117
87
123
136
161
167
139
98
147
201
177
183
178
FJS2
111
FJS3
1FKXI 52
52
1FKX2
60
FLV
FLWI
61
132
130
123
123
110
110
101
100
101
101
85
85
155
184
248
248
207
212
153
167
209
209
172
177
150
165
205
205
169
172
156
179
242
242
202
208
FLW2
FLW3
FLW4
FMY
FRS
FRL
127
92
75
132
540
108
112
112
111
130
113
112
82
83
84
101
76
83
159
176
194
184
129
172
143
155
166
168
119
144
138
152
162
163
107
142
163
177
192
180
115
159
FSD
FSL
FSW
FFA
HDD
HAM
80
59
192
85
55
300
il1
125
132
110
123
134
84
101
101
89
101
101
189
242
158
185
251
137
165
199
156
162
207
145
160
195
150
159
205
141
185
225
159
176
239
141
FOL
FIT
FJSI
* PMCR=Plant Maximum Continuous Ratinp; CWS=Coal-Water Slury; COM=Coa1-Oi Mixture;

PBC=Fluidized Bed Combustor.
"Indicates actual price paid at military base; other fuel prices based on Department of Energy region.
17
Table 2 (Comt'd)
bM
PMCR"
2 Oil
6 Oil
Coal Stoker
CWS
COM
FDC
IAMI
IAM2
IAM3
IAM4
IAM5
192
73
73
73
73
113
111
111
111
111
81
84
84
84
84
132
193
193
193
193
129
165
165
165
165
124
162
162
162
162
136
190
190
190
190
JPG
JAMI
JAM2
LCA
LAD
72
201
50
307
77
111
113
110
114
110
84
81
86
80
89
195
136
232
120
189
167
132
189
120
165
165
127
186
115
163
196
138
222
120
180
LSAI
LSA2
LSA3
LSA4
LSA5
70
90
80
70
60
126
128
127
126
125
101
101
101
101
101
225
201
209
225
236
192
179
184
192
199
189
177
181
189
196
215
195
202
215
226
MAM
NCR
NAD
NAMI
NAM2
74
112
85
75
50
126
111
110
111
110
101
88
89
84
86
218
171
184
191
226
188
149
162
166
185
184
147
159
162
182
208
163
176
187
217
PARI
PAR2
RVA
RARI
RAR2
370
50
77
232
214
113
109
111
133
133
86
90
84
101
101
120
229
189
155
159
122
187
165
154
156
119
186
162
150
152
132
214
178
149
164
RBA
RMA1
RMA2
SAM
SPA
70
230
370
85
600
110
113
113
110
115
82
78
77
89
79
214
127
113
185
88
183
131
122
163
94
173
120
112
161
96
203
126
114
176
85
TAD
TAM1
TAM2
UMA
WMCl
60
123
99
400
58
110
112
112
113
124
83
82
83
86
101
212
162
173
119
240
182
143
152
121
201
173
141
149
119
200
202
156
166
115
228
WMC2
WAR
320
146
134
111
101
87
146
155
148
143
143
141
143
148
"PMCR=PIant Maximum Continuous Ratings;
CWS=Coal-Water Slurry; COM=Coal-Oi1 Mixture;
FBC=luized Bed Combustor.

"Indicates actual price paid at military hoe, odier fuel prices based on Department of Energy region.
18
Table 3
CHPECON Resalts in Order of Icreauin Cost Penalty for New Plants
CAd
Coal
I900
Tech.
LeaM LCC
Delta
Penty
(MS)
LCCR
(MS)
28.1
32.3
29.3
35.3
28.9
37.0
36.6
36.6
36.6
36.6
31.8
39.3
29.1
41.8
41.8
40.7
-2
15
22
31
6
60
59
95
105
105
60
96
84
99
84
89
89
55
67
105
96
81
65
88
100
87
96
80
98
77
78
78
78
78
90
74
100
70
70
72
-2.8
10.2
14.3
16.2
17.0
19.0
19.1
26.6
26.7
26.7
26.7
26.9
27.0
27.0
272.
27.3
27.3
27.3
27.7
27.7
27.8
27.9
28.0
28.0
28.1
28.1
28.1
28.2
28.3
28.5
28.5
28.5
28.5
28.5
28.6
29.1
29.1
29.3
29.3
29.3
49.7
36.3
37.8
37.8
59
81
78
78
29.3
29A
29.5
29.5
MBU&r
#2 Oil
#6 Oil,
Plnt
PMCR
LCCR
Gns
FBG3"
FBG2"
FBGI"
IBG4"
SFA
lBGS"
NCR
PSL
PKXI
PKX2
PGD3"
LSA5
FLV
FBV
MAM
LSA4
LSAI
FGDI"
FJS1
HDD
NAM2
LSA3
FJS3
DDP
300
126
130
100
600
50
112
59
52
52
60
60
60
57
74
70
70
70
106
55
50
80
111
59
149
136
145
143
115
116
111
125
123
123
72
125
110
124
126
126
126
78
129
123
110
127
130
110
159
145
154
152
79
144
88
101
101
101
63
101
85
101
101
101
101
62
101
101
86
101
100
83
98
115
122
131
85
160
147
195
205
205
123
196
169
199
184
189
189
117
167
205
182
181
165
171
FBC
CWS
CWS
CWS
FBC
CWS
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COAL
GAS
GAS
GAS
#6 OIL
GAS
#6 OIL
GAS
GAS
GAS
#6 OIL
GAS
#6 OIL
GAS
GAS
GAS
GAS
#6 OIL
GAS
GAS
#6 OIL
GAS
GAS
#6 OIL
137.9
67.8
65.1
52.1
282.5
31.6
32.4
28.0
25.4
25A
44.5
28.0
32.1
27.3
32A
30.7
30.7
49.7
41.3
26.4
29.0
34.4
43.0
31.8
WMC1
FLW1
PAR2
IES
58
61
50
84
124
110
109
127
FCBI"
LSA2
IAM4
IAW2
63
90
73
73
116
128
111
111
101
85
90
101
120
101
84
84
200
172
186
180
198
177
162
162
IAW3
IAM5
TAD
LAD
73
73
60
77
111
111
110
110
JAM2
NAD
IA
FIT
50
85
85
82
110
110
110
110
84
84
83
89
86
89
89
89
162
162
173
163
186
159
159
161
COM
COM
COM
COM
CWS
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
GAS
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
GAS
GAS
GAS
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
FRL
PGM
PLW4
NAMI
108
88
75
75
112
127
111
111
83
101
84
84
142
181
162
162
COM
COM
COM
COM
#6 OIL
GAS
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
"Calculation
COAL
LCC (Gas)
3m
uses actual price paid at military base; other fuel prices based on Department of Energy region.
19
Table 3 (Cont'd)
Base
Plant
MBtu/hr
PMCR
#2 Oil
LCCR
6 Oil,
Gas
COAL
I100
Coal
Tech.
Least LCC
Fuel
LCC (Gas)
(MS)
Delta
LCCR
Cost
Pedaty
(M$)
AMI
FDX3
JPG
SAM
DPS
RVA
APGI
FCS
87
77
72
85
104
77
114
120
110
110
111
110
111
111
129
112
89
89
84
89
88
84
101
80
158
164
165
161
149
162
169
137
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
GAS
#6 OIL
42.8
39A
36.7
41.8
49.5
38.9
44.3
53.7
69
75
81
72
61
78
69
57
29.5
29.6
29.7
30.1
30.2
30.3
30.6
30.6
FSD
FLW3
TAM2
FDX1
80
92
99
120
111
112
112
111
84
83
83
88
160
152
149
144
COM
COM
COM
COM
#6
#6
#6
#6
OIL
OIL
OIL
OIL
40.3
44.5
46.7
55A
76
69
66
56
30.6
30.7
30.8
31.0
FMY
FJS2
FLW2
FCB2"
APG3
RBA
TAMI
FGD2"
132
178
127
115
150
70
123
176
130
132
112
118
131
110
112
68
101
101
82
124
101
82
82
57
163
150
138
172
158
173
141
87
COM
COM
COM
CWS
COM
COM
COM
COM
GAS
GAS
#6 OIL
GAS
GAS
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
49.9
63.0
56.8
44.2
55.2
35.4
55.7
112.0
63
50
56
72
58
91
59
30
31A
31.5
31.8
31.8
32.0
32.2
32.9
33.6
FSW
APG2
CRS
WAR
192
165
77
146
132
132
127
111
101
101
101
87
150
157
204
141
COM
COM
COM
COM
GAS
GAS
GAS
#6 OIL
67.7
59.9
33A
64A
50
57
104
54
IAMI
HAM
FBH
FDX4
192
300
190
200
113
134
113
112
81
101
81
87
124
137
126
129
COM
STK
COM
COM
#6 OIL
GAS
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
80.9
99.9
80.0
86.1
43
36
45
42
33.9
34.1
34.7
34.8
34.8
36.0
36.0
36.2
FDX2
BAM
FGL
FSM
200
228
150
224
112
113
112
113
87
81
79
78
129
120
136
119
COM
COM
COM
COM
#6
#6
#6
#6
OIL
OIL
OIL
OIL
86.1
94.5
65.0
91.9
42
39
57
41
36.2
36.9
37.1
37.7
BAY
RAR2
JAMI
RMA1
RARI
LCA
WMC2
PARI
FDT
RMA2
UMA
FRS
265
214
201
230
232
307
320
370
390
370
400
540
112
133
113
113
133
114
134
113
135
113
113
113
87
101
81
78
101
80
101
86
101
77
86
76
122
152
127
120
150
115
143
119
138
112
119
107
FBC
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
COM
#6 OIL
GAS
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
GAS
#6 OIL
GAS
#6 OIL
GAS
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
109.9
74.5
85.0
94.1
79.9
123.5
106.3
145.5
127.8
144.4
160.9
207.3
35
52
46
42
50
35
43
33
38
35
33
31
38.5
38.7
39.1
39.5
40.0
43.2
45.7
48.0
48.6
50.5
53.1
64.3
"Calculation uses actual price paid at military base; other fuel prices based on Department of Energy region.
20
Table 4
CHPECON Results in Order of Decreming Cod Savgp for CWS Retroft
CWS
Unsae
(too/yr)
Coal Only
(tom/yr)
Cumuiadve
Coal Wt
(to/yr)
239
154
102
100
90
84549
211869
36631
35725
112846
59184
148308
25642
25008
78992
59184
207493
233134
258142
337134
#6 OIL
GAS
GAS
GAS
#6 OIL
81
79
65
60
58
104114
110350
89937
86252
74739
72880
77245
62956
60376
52317
410014
48M259
550215
610591
662908
370
232
200
192
192
#6 OIL
GAS
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
GAS
54
46
44
37
37
104114
65213
56647
54381
54381
72880
45649
39653
38067
38067
735788
781437
821090
859157
897224
FJS2
RMAI
FSM
RAR2
WAR
178
230
224
214
146
GAS
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
GAS
#6 OIL
35
34
32
31
31
50128
65381
63395
44828
40716
35090
45767
44377
31380
28501
932313
978080
1022456
1053836
1082337
21
22
23
24
25
FMY
FDX1
TAMI
FLW2
NCR
132
120
123
127
112
GAS
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
26
25
24
24
24
37312
33740
34931
35443
31472
26118
23618
24452
24810
22030
1108456
1132074
1156525
1181335
1203366
26
27
28
29
30
FJS3
FJSI
TAM2
AMR
SAM
1II
106
99
87
85
GAS
GAS
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
21
20
19
19
18
31358
29490
27786
24610
23536
21951
20643
19450
17227
16475
1225316
1245959
1265410
1282637
1299112
31
32
33
34
35
NAD
NAMI
RVA
WMCI
PAR2
85
75
77
58
50
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
GAS
#6 OIL
17
14
14
11
11
23536
21038
22115
16835
14575
16475
14727
15481
11785
10203
1315587
1330314
1345794
1357579
1367781
36
37
38
FBV
JAM2
TAD
57
50
60
GAS
#6 OIL
#6 OIL
11
9
8
16274
14575
17068
11392
10203
11948
1379173
1389375
1401323
CWS
(TON /
YEAR)
2001890
Base
Plant
MBtur
PMCR
Luan LCC
Fuel
1
2
3
4
5
FBG3"
SPA
FBGI"
FBG2"
UMA
300
600
130
126
400
COAL
#6 OIL
GAS
GAS
#6 OIL
6
7
8
9
10
PARI
FDT
WMC2
LCA
BAY
370
390
320
307
265
11
12
13
14
15
RMA2
RARI
FDX2
IAMI
FSW
16
17
18
19
20
TOTAL
CWS Jit.
Savings
(MS)
21
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This initial economic screening study concludes that, in general, it will not be cost effective to build
new coal-fired pVants to replace aging, large, gas- and oil-fired plants at Army installations. Coal was
shown to be cost effective for new construction at only one of 88 studied plants, in a location where coal
is price-competitive with gas. However, this study also concludes that it may be cost-effective to retrofit
heavy oil plants for coal firing. Potential cost savings for 38 heating plants, estimated using CHPECON,
range between $8 million and $239 million during the 25-year plant life.
On-going and expected future defense cutbacks may preclude new plant construction. In light of
these cutbacks and the cost-ineffectiveness of new construction of coal-fired plants, retrofit of existing gasor oil-fired heating plants to coal-firing may become the preferred choice in meeting Army's dual
objective of reducing energy costs and meeting the congressional mandate to double the DOD's coal
consumption.
This study also calculated the cost penalties incurred by not choosing the fuel with the lowest lifecycle cost, It is recommended that this information be used to increase savings by selecting sites with the
lower cost penalties when the DOD is required to increase its coal consumption.
More detailed engineering studies are recommended for the heating plants at 15 Army bases to
confirm the savings projected here. Manufacturers of boilers at these sites should be contacted, and the
sites should be inspected to assess additional required costs.
Other alternatives should also be considered, such as building large regional plants to serve the
thermal and electrical needs of multiple Federal facilities located in a common service territory, or building
third-party cogeneration plants.
REFERENCES
Griffin, F.P., J.F. Thomas, R.S. Holcomb, and J.M. Young, ORNLQTM-11100, Ranking of Air Force Heating Plants Relative to
the Economic Benefit of Coal Utilization (Oak Ridge National Laboratory [ORNL], Oak Ridge, TN, November 1989).
Lin, M.C.J., et al., Central Heating Plant Economic Evaluation Program, Draft Technical Report (U.S. Army Construction
Engineering Research Laboratories [USACERLI, Decrember 1992a).
Lin, M.C.J., L. Thurber, T. Durbin, and R. Tarvin, Coal Conversion at Picatinny Arsenal and Forts Campbell, Bragg, and
Gordon: a Feasibility Study, Technical Report FE-94/02/ADA277734 (USACERL, December 1993).
Thomas, J.F., F.P. Griffin, and J.M. Young, Economic Benefit of Coal UtilizationlConversionat Air Force Bases: Screening
Study, ORNL/TM-11113 (ORNL, August 1989).
22
APPENDIX A: 1989 CONUS Installation Energy Consumption Report
: From January 1989 Through December 1989

Coven
All MACOMS
Includes
Installation Ranking by Consumption
MBtuu/year
Rank
Instalmtlom
Fort Richardson, AK
5,220,795
Radford Army Ammunition Plant, VA
3,960,608
Hoiston Army Ammunition Plant, TN
3,801,610
Fort Bragg, NC
3,117,543
Fort Hood, TX
2,873,759
Fort Knox, KY
2,718,746
Fort Benning. GA
2,717.107
2,541,672
Fort Lewis, WA
2,515,574
10
Fort Campbell. KY
2,425,919
11
Redstone Arsenal. AL
2,195,256
12
Fort Riley, KS
1,937,176
13
Fort Ord, CA
1,874,942
14
1-urt Dix, NJ
1,793,491
15
Fort George G. Meade, MD
1,719,846
16
Fort Carson. CO
1,706,884
17
Fort Bliss, IX
1,655,909
18
Fort Sill, OK
1,649,784
19
Fort Leonard Wood. MO
1,646,571
20
Sunflower Army Ammunition Plant, KS
1,613,163
21
Fort Stewart GA
1,601,289
22
Fort Drum, NY
1,536,908
23
Fort Belvoir, VA
1,351,474
24
Fort Jackson, SC
1,342,532
25
Rock Island Arsenal, IL
1,296,026
26
West Point, NY
1,289,720
27
Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington DC
1,254,489
28
Fort Devens, MA
1,240,232
29
Picatinny Arsenal. NJ
1,229,515
30
Fort Gordon. GA
1,224,015
31
Fort Polk LA
1,177,156
Al
Mtm/lysr
Rank
Installation
32
Fort Sam Houston, TX
33
Presidio Of San Francisco, CA
966,007
34
Fort Rucker, AL
952,015
35
Fort Monmouth, NJ
934,401
36
Pine Bluff Arsenal, AR
930,685
37
Fort Mcclellan. AL
914,909
38
Fort Eustis, VA
907,831
39
Detroit Arsenal, MI
891,238
40
Lake City Army Ammunition Plant, MO
881,996
41
Fort Leavenworth. KS
868,345
42
Red River Army Ammunition Depot, TX
867,540
43
Fort Benjamin Harrison, IN
842,345
44
Fort Huachuca, NM
821,486
45
Stratford Army Engine Plant CT
774,041
47
Lone Star Army Ammunition Plant, TX
747,764
48
745,734
49
Fort Lee. VA
725,970
50
Anniston Army Depot, AL
700,806
51
White Sands Missile Range, NM
666,540
52
Mississippi Army Ammunition Plant, MS
665,458
53
Watervliet Arsenal. NY
661,868
54
Tobyhanna Army Depot, PA
646,374
55
Fort McCoy. WI
646,369
56
Fort Dietrick, MD
630,684
57
Fort Sheridan. IL
609,520
58
Tooele Army Dcpot, UT
601,416
59
Fitzsimons Army Medical Center, CO
569,836
60
Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant, TX
543,813
61
Lima Army Tank Plant, OH
527,248
62
Letterkenny Army Depot, PA
509,376
63
Fort McPherson. GA
484,372
64
Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant, LA
478,393
65
New Cumberland Army Depot, PA
432,960
66
Fort Hamilton, NY
414,203
67
Fort Irwin. CA
409,088
1,090,090
A2
Rak
htaatlon
68
Scanton Army Ammunition Plant, PA
403,900
69
Fort Myer, VA
400,128
70
Charleton Army Disbic SC
345,633
71
Corpus Christi Army Depot, TX
341,924
72
Bayonne Military Ocean Terminal, NJ
336,471
73
Fort Ritchie, MD
336,323
74
Dugway Proving Ground, UT
315,211
75
McAlister Army Ammunition Plant, OK
303,012
77
279,146
78
Norfolk Army District, VA
264,526
79
Lexington Bluegrass Army Depot, KY
261,240
80
Riverbank Army Ammunition Plant, CA
260,607
81
Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant, MN
259,886
82
New Orleans Army District, LA
253,040
83
Kansas Army Ammunition Plant, KS
252,916
84
Harry Diamond Laboratory, MD
250,856
85
Memphis Army District, TN
241,621
86
Sacramento Army Depot, CA
237,383
87
Fort Chaffee, AR
231,468
88
Carlisle Barracks, PA
230,078
89
Pueblo Depot Activity, CO
228,781
90
Baltimore Army District, MD
227,760
91
Hawthorne Army Ammunition Plant, NV
218,533
92
Fort Monroe, VA
202,581
93
Milan Army Ammunition Plant, TN
199,012
94
Vicksburg Army District, MS
190,291
95
Indiana Army Ammunition PlanK IN
182,625
96
180,873
97
Cameron Station, VA
180,853
98
Michigan Army National Guard, MI
179,729
99
Seneca Army Depot, NY
175,371
100
St Louis Area Support Center, MO
171,058
101
St. Louis Army Ammunition Plant, MO
165,891
102
U.S. Army Natick Research & Development Center, MA
156,968
103
Vint Hill Farms Station, VA
150,481
MBtolear
A3
Rank
Instgailadons
104
U.S. Army Waterways Experiment Station, MS
145,831
105
Mobile Army District, AL
139,117
106
Materials Technology Laboratory, MA
131,041
107
Yuma Proving Ground, AZ
128,895
108
Savannah Depot Activity, IL
128,554
109
Arkansas Army National Guard, AK
128,538
110
California Army National Guard, CA
125,851
!11
Sierra Army Depot, NV
118,299
112
Military Traffic Management Control, Western Area, CA
111,840
113
Sharpe Army Depot, CA
109,986
114
Mimssippi Army National Guard, MS
103,051
115
Philidelphia Army District, PA
101,658
117
Indiana Army National Guard, IN
93,468
118
Fort Leslie J. McNair, Washington, DC
85,073
119
Arlington Hall Station, VA
80,319
120
79,686
121
New York Army National Guard, NY
77,991
122
Rock Island, IL
76,629
123
Minnesota Army National Guard, MN
73,709
124
Pennsylvania Army National Guard, PA
71,281
125
Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant, OH
71,167
127
New Jersey Army National Guard, NJ
63,078
128
Alabama Army National Guard, AL
62,884
129
Jefferson Proving Ground, IN
62,884
130
Idaho Army National Guard, ID
62,454
131
Wilmington, Delaware District, DE
60,550
132
Massachusetts Army National Guard, MA
59,886
133
Detroit Army District, MI
58,148
134
Little Rock Army District, AK
57,759
135
Oklahoma Army National Guard, OK
57,185
136
Alaska Army National Guard, AK
57,014
137
Utah Army National Guard, UT
52,925
138
Tennessee Army National Guard, T"N
52,315
140
Iowa Army National Guard, IA
51,369
141
Omaha Army District, NE
50,544
MB"N*y
A4
Rank
Iniftfttbm
142
Huntington Army District, WV
48,294
143
Georgia Army National Guard. GA
46,796
144
Connecticut Army National Guard, CT
46,358
145
U.S. Army Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory, NH
44.255
146
North Dakota Army National Guard, ND
43,787
147
Badger Army Ammunition Plant, WI
43,072
148
Oregon Army National Guard, OR
42999
149
Wisconsin Army National Guard, WI
42,548
150
Illinios Army National Guard, IL
41,813
152
Pittsburgh Army District, PA
38,517
153
Ohio Army National Guard, OH
37,413
154
Kansas City Army District, MO
37,304
155
Umatilla Depot Activity, OR
36,955
156
Louisiana Army National Guard, LA
36,596
157
Florida Army National Guard, FL
34,938
158
Missouri Army National Guard, MO
33,548
159
Vermont Army National Guard, VT
32,363
160
Kansas Army National Guard, KS
31,854
161
Louisville Army District, KY
31,074
162
Montana Army National Guard, MT
30,961
163
Tulsa Army District, OK
30,707
164
New York Army District, NY
30,636
165
Washington Army National Guard, WA
29,659
166
Texas Army National Guard, TX
29,253
167
Kentucky Army National Guard, KY
28,860
168
Rhode Island Army National Guard. RI
27,740
169
U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories, IL
26,930
170
Arizona Army National Guard, AZ
26,168
171
Maine Army National Guard, ME
25,857
172
New Mexico Army National Guard, NM
25,855
173
Colorado Army National Guard, CO
25,332
174
Virginia Army National Guard, VA
25,031
175
Maryland Army National Guard, MD
24,876
176
Walla Walla Army District, WA
24,845
177
Wyoming Army National Guard, WY
23,131
m~btua/ea
A5
Rak
Intahtiom
178
North Carolina Army National Guard, NC
23,023
179
West Virginia Army National Guard, WV
22,840
180
South Carolina Army National Guard, SC
22,242
181
Fort Wingate Depot Activity, NM
21,617
182
Nebraska Army National Guard, NE
21,509
183
St. Louis Army Ammunition Plant, MO
21,281
184
South Dakota Army National Guard, SD
21,061
185
Nevada Army National Guard, NV
20,401
186
Buffalo Army District. NY
19,326
187
Delaware Army National Guard, DE
18,689
188
Fort Worth Army District, TIX
17,531
189
Sacramento Army District, CA
17,208
190
81st Army Command. GA
15, 591
191
Sunny Point Military Ocean Terminal, NC
15,101
192
89th Army Command, KS
15,078
193
Cornhusker Army Ammunition Plant, NE
14,355
194
U.S. Army, Northeast Division, MA
13,949
195
Seattle Army District, WA
12,352
196
Volunteer Army Ammunition Plant, TN
12,342
197
Nashville Army District, TN
12,183
198
New Hampshire Army National Guard, NH
9,710
199
San Francisco Army District, CA
9,248
200
St. Paul Army District, MN
8,416
201
U.S. Army Medical Center, Washington DC
7.422
202
Albuquerque Army District, NM
7,051
203
District Of Columbia Army National Guard, Washington DC
5,637
204
Jacksonville Army District, FL
3,720
:,.Qe
Pontiac Storage Facility, MI
3,238
206
Los Angeles Army District, CA
2,672
207
Galveston Army District, IX
2,367
208
Alaska Army District, AK
1,011
209
Chicago Army District, IL
78
210
Port A.P. Hill. VA
MDltlyum
A6
APPENDIX B:
CHPECON Run Results for 88 US. Army Heating Plants
BI
Table BI
CUPECON Results for Aberdeen Proving Ground, File Prefx: APG1
New Plant
Teclmaom
Boller
Gas
38/38/38
#2 Oil
38/38/38
#6 Oil
38/38/38
Stoker
26/45/45/45
CWS
23/45/57/37
COM
27/47/47/47
FBC
21/42/53/53
Ban: Aberdeen Proving Ground
File Prefix: APIN
PMCR: 114 L
Ave Mon. Load: 38 M
CHP #14@ 16 M Fuel = FS2
1@ 33.5 M Fuel FS2
SIMBtu
8.952
11.587
9.050
17A91
14.839
14311
18370
S/KiTSrM
10.703
13.853
10.820
20.912
17.741
17.349
21.964
KSINV
5530
5530
5530
43344
31756
25863
41160
KFI!
30896
43937
31380
16879
23312
29199
23332
KSLCC
44302
57343
44786
86561
76743
75044
90912
LCCIR
100
129
101
195
173
169
205
L.(k# Steamhr)
M=(mbtu/hr)
Age = 1941
Age = 1985
Table B2
CHPECON Resulfs for Aberdeen Proving Ground, Fle Prdx: APG2
NOW Plant
Technolg
Boiler
Gas
56/56/56
#2 Oil
56/56/56
#6 Oil
56/56/56
Stoker
38/64/64/64
CWS
33/65/82/82
COM
39/68/68/68
FBC
30/60/76fl6
Base: Aberdeen Proving Ground
File Prefit: APG2
PMCR: 165 L
Ave Mon. Load: 55 M
CHP #2 3@ 55 M Fuel = FS2
S/Mtn
8.364
10.999
8.462
14.396
12.900
12.547
15.481
S/K#STM
10.000
13.150
10.117
17.212
15420
15.001
18.510
L=(K# Seamjhr)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1952
B2
K$INV
6852
6852
6852
49703
39150
30327
47790
K$Fuel
44568
63443
45269
23757
33274
41840
33328
K$LCC
59908
78784
60610
103120
96560
93914
110891
LCC/R
100
132
101
172
161
157
185
Table B3
CHIPECON Results for Aberdeen Proving Ground, Flqe PrIN : APG3
New HaM
Tecnmoloy
GO
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
Boiler
50/50/50
50/50/50
50/50/50
34/59/59/59
30/59/75175
COM
36/62/62/62
FBC
27/54/69/69
Base: Aberdeen Proving Ground
File Prefix: APG3
PMCR: 150 L
Ave Moa. Load: 50 M
2@ 30 M Fuel= FS2
2@ 35 M Fuel = FS2
S/MBit
8.476
11.111
8.574
15.123
13.465
13.003
14.699
S/K#SIM
10.000
13.150
10.117
18.081
16.099
15.546
17.574
KS1NV
6852
6852
6852
47417
37027
28641
44565
Kiuel
44568
63443
45269
21048
29737
37231
22040
lC$1C
59908
78784
60610
95743
89257
86193
93062
LCC/R
100
132
101
173
162
156
169
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1977
Age- 1975
Age = 1953
Table B4
CUIPECON Results for Army Materils and Mech. Reseacb Center, F2e Prefix
New lant
Tecknolm
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Retrofit
Boier
29/29/29
29/29/29
29/29/29
20/34/34/34
17/34/44/44
21/36/36/36
16/32/41/41
Techmoiog
Boller
SIMBmt
11337
12.505
10.046
20.816
17.263
17.123
19.646
AMi
SWAlTM
13.555
14.951
12.011
24.887
20.640
20.472
23.488
KSINV
5155
5155
5155
40712
29447
24815
37669
KSnel
30054
34465
25178
14232
17979
23387
13292
KSLCC
42818
47229
37924
78616
68134
67579
74197
K$1NV
KSCoal
KSHVY Oil
SawVlp
Stoker
12/22/22/22
3678
CWS
10/18/18/18
1933
M-Coal
10/18/18/18
4227
Base: Army Materials and Mech. Research Center
File Prefix: AMR
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
PMCR: 87.2 L
M=(MBtM/HR)
Ave Mon. Load: 29 M
CHP #13@ 24.6 M Fuel = FS
Age = 1956
1@ 13A M Fuel = FS
Age = 1976
B3
12584
16291
12328
-28797
-37013
-28209
-12533
-18787
-11654
LCCIR
100
110
89
184
159
158
173
Table B5
CHPECON Resuis for Badser AAMP, File Prefk: BAM
New Nin
Dollr
TeclMogy
76/76/76
Gas
76/76/76
82 Oil
76176/76
#6 Oil
52/89/89/89
Stoker
45/191114/114
CWS
54)93193193
COM
42/33/105/105
FBC
Bae: Badger AAMP
Pile Prefix: BAM
PMCR: 227.8 L
Ave Mon. Load: 76 M
CHP #1 4 6.7 M Fuel - NO/FS
5@ 50.2 M Pouo = NGIFS
S/Mts
9.543
10116
7.705
12.267
11A09
10.987
15.902
S/KISTM
11AIO
12.931
9.212
14.667
13.041
13. 116
19.013
KSINV
8487
8487
3487
59558
50570
37210
61420
KSFoe
76794
89388
58598
29896
40636
52851
59047
KSLCC
94460
107054
76264
121418
118009
113641
107399
LCC/R
100
113
81
129
125
120
167
L-(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBWuMR)
Age - 1959
Age = 1943
Table B6
CHPECON Ratsei
New MIa
BoDler
y
Tecb
89/89/89
Gas
89/39/9
#2 Oil
89/89/M9
86 Oil
60/103/103/103
Stoker
52/104/132/132
CWS
63/106/106/108
COM
48/96/122/122
FEC
Retreat
BoDler
Techmobg
54/54/54f76
Stoker
45/45/45/63
CWS
45/45/45/63
M.COAL
Bame: Bayonne MOT
File Prefix: BAY
PMCR: 265 L
Ave Mon. Load: 88 M
CHP #130 60 M Fuel = FS5
1@ 85 M Fuel = FS5
S/MIt
9.589
12.862
8.298
12329
11.602
11333
11.727
for Bayomme, FPle Prelk: BAY
SJKUSTM
11.465
10.757
9.922
14.741
13.872
13.549
14.021
KSINV
9591
9591
9591
65179
57377
41788
62606
KSFuel
90714
104098
75917
37810
53042
69015
37133
KSINV
4901
4428
6403
K$Coml
35685
49476
32981
KSHvy O
-87236
-112404
-81565
L--(K STEAM/HR)
MW(MBTU/HR)
AV = 1941
Age = 1971
B4
KSLCC
109903
123288
95107
141305
138956
135725
134401
Saavle
-46649
-58499
-42180
LWCCR
100
112
87
129
126
123
122
Table B7
CHPECON Results for Camer
New Plant
TeCIMAg
Boiler
Gas
26/26/26
#2 Oil
26/26/26
#6 Oil
26/26/26
Stoker
18/30130130
CWS
15/30/39/39
COM
19032/32532
FBC
14(20/36136
Bane: Cameron Station
Pile Prefix: CRS
PMCR: 77 L
Ave Mon. Load: 26 M
2 Boilers for each year
S/MBtu
9.871
12.506
9.969
24380
20.530
20.140
23.90
Station,
(KUETM
11.802
14.952
11.919
29.150
24.550
24.080
27.850
e Prefix: CRS
KSINV
4716
4716
4716
37721
26647
22484
35279
KSFmu
21228
30151
21559
11597
15918
19896
15569
KSLCC
33424
42347
33755
82557
69522
68184
78880
LCC/R
I00
127
101
247
208
204
236
K$LCC
31838
34944
26396
671155
576644
54350
67902
LCC/R
100
110
83
211
181
171
213
L=(K# STBAM/HR)
M=(MBWu/HR)
Age = 1942,1945,1965
Table B8
CHPECON Results for Defense Depot, File Prefix: DDP
New Plant
Technology
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Boler
20/20/20
20/20/20
20/20/20
14/23/23/23
12/23/30/30
14/25/25/25
11/22/28/28
Base: Defese Depot

File Prefix: DDP
PMCR: 59 L
Ave Mon. Load: 20 M
CHP #1 1@ 15.5 M Fuel = NG/FS
5@ 8.7 M Fuel = NG/FS
SIMBtu
12.223
13A16
10.134
25.767
21.186
19.968
26.069
$/K#STM
14.614
16.040
12.116
30.808
25330
23.874
31.169
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/hR)
Age = 1971
Age = 1953
B5
KSINV
4450
4450
4450
36651
25071
21656
34741
KSFuel
20065
23191
14643
9101
13948
14034
11188
Table B9
CHPECON Results for Deem Permwal Support Center, Fbe Pref: DPS
New plant
Tecbnloky
am
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Boiler
35135/35
35035/35
35/35/35
24/41/41/41
21/41/52/52
25/43/43/43
19/38/48/48
Bane: Defense Peruonel Support Center

File Prefix: DPS
PMCR: 103.9 L
Ave Mon. Load: 35 M
$/Mito
10.87
12.038
9.579
18.828
15.753
15.529
17.549
h/K#STM
KSINV
K$FeI
KSLCC
LCC/IR
12.997
14.397
11.453
22.512
18.835
18.566
20.981
5525
5525
5525
44198
32184
26186
39922
36238
41562
30353
15718
21518
28054
14969
49549
54873
43664
85827
75037
73968
79990
100
111
88
173
151
149
161
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1941
Age = 1985
Table BI0
CH]PECON Results for Fitaltnmow Army Medical Center, File Prefix: FSM
New Plant
Technology
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Retrfit
Technology
Boller
$/MBtu
75/75/75
75/75/75
75/75/75
51/87/87/87
44/88/112/112
53i92/92J92
41/81/104/104
9.405
10.597
7316
12.335
11.750
10.729
12.687
Boller
$/KASTM
11.245
12.670
8.747
14.748
14.057
12.827
15.169
KSlNV
Stoker
46/46/54/54
4602
CWS
39/39/45/45
3994
M-Coal
39f39/45/45
5879
Base: Fitzsimmons Army Medical Center
File Prefix: FSM
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
PMCR: 224 L
M--(MBtuHR)
Ave Mon. Load: 75 M
CHP #12@ 52 M Fuel = NG/FS6
Age = 1943
2@ 60 M Fuel = NG/FS6
Age = 1947
B6
KSINV
8098
8098
8098
57572
47041
35006
55277
KSFul
74617
86265
54211
30854
46305
50971
35735
K$Coal
KSHvy ON
28105
43175
26423
-60689
-79138
-56803
KSLCC
91864
103513
71459
120487
120012
149511
123923
Savings
-27981
-31968
-24500
LCC/R
100
113
78
131
131
119
135
Table BII
CHPECON Results for Frt Belvoir, File Prefix: FBV
New saal
Tecaolegy
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Retrofit
Techaloby
Stoker
CWS
M-Coal
Boiler
KSFuel
KSLCC
LCC/R
27258
33779
27459
66836
55676
54366
63846
100
124
101
245
204
198
234
$/KWSTM
K$SNV
13.170
16.321
13.268
32.290
25.744
25.138
30.850
4382
4382
4382
35797
23916
21000
33133
Boiler
K$INV
K$Coad
KSHvy Off
Savinp
19/19/19
14/14/14
14/14/14
2868
1672
1666
7072
10612
10347
-17339
-23185
-22566
-7398
-10901
-10553
20/20/20
20/20/20
20/20/20
13/23/23/23
12/23/29/29
14/24/24/24
11/21/27/27
Base: Fort Belvoir

File Prefix: FBV
PMCR: 57.3 L
Ave Mon. Load: 19 M
CHP #13@ 19.1 M Fuel - FS
$/MBta
11.016
13.651
11.097
27.010
21.532
21.025
25.803
15600
22121
15843
9191
12240
14762
9126
L-(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1956
Table B12
CHPECON Results for Fort Ben Harrison, File Prefix: FBH
New Plant
Technology
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Boiler
$/MBtu
$/K#STM
K$1NV
KSFuel
KSLCC
64/64/64
64/64/64
64/64/64
43/74/74174
37M74/95/95
45178178178
35/69/88/88
9.755
11.027
7.624
13.004
12.201
11.726
13.286
11.663
13.184
9.465
15.547
14.588
14.019
15.885
7624
7624
7624
55066
45814
34507
52065
63182
74121
48599
23074
33821
43769
27810
80037
90476
64954
106694
104616
100536
109009
Base: Fort Ben Harrison

File Prefix: FBH
PMCR: 190 L
Ave Mon. Load: 63 M
CHP #1 1@ 60 M Fuel = NG
1@ 50 M Fuel = NG
1@ 80 M Fuel = NG
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1988
Age = 1989
Age = 1989
B7
LCC/R
100
113
81
133
131
126
136
Table 113
CHPECON Rnsa for Fort BDm Fil
Prefix: FBS
New Plant
Tecnoloy
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Boller
S/Mtu
S/IKUTM
KSINV
K$Fue
KSLCC
28/28/28
28/28/28
8f28/28
19/33133/33
17/33/42/42
20/35f35/35
16131/39139
9.667
12.303
9.765
20.285
16.986
16.613
19.596
11.559
14.709
11.676
24.252
20.308
19.863
23.429
4843
4843
4843
37143
26607
22070
35005
22832
32441
23189
14169
17498
21968
13059
35253
44863
35610
73968
64726
63307
71458
Bae: Fort Bliss

File Prefix: PBS
PMCR: 84 L
Ave Moo. Load: 28 M
CHP #14@ 14 M Fuel= NG/FS2
LCC/R
100
127
101
210
184
180
203
L.=(IO STEAM/HR)
M=(MBIA/HR)
Age = 1939
Age = 1942
Table B14
CHPECON Results for Fort Bran, FVe Prefix: FBGI
New M..t
Techology
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oi
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Refbvff
Technology
Stoker
cWS
M-Cou
Boiler
S/Mit.
44/44/44
44/44/44
44/44/44
30/51/51/51
26/51/65/65
31/53/53/53
24/47/60/60
11.619
16.826
17.915
15310
13.515
19.358
14.884
$/KSTM
KSINV
K$Fuel
51276
80433
86537
17324
25665
67880
17565
13.891
20.117
21.420
18.305
16.159
23.145
17.795
5715
5715
5715
41825
31118
25001
39757
Boiler
K$INV
K$COi
KSHvy Oil
23/23/23/23/23
19/19/19/19/19
19/19/19/19/19
4500
3211
5302
15732
23886
15107
-93136
-129165
-90291
Bae: Fort Bragg

File Prefix FBG1
PMCR: 130 L
Ave Mon. Load: 43 M
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1965
Age = 1969
Age = 1978
B8
KILCC
65067
94224
100328
85737
79092
113287
83350
Savins
-72903
-102068
-69881
LCC/R
100
145
154
1
122
174
128
Table BIS
CHPECON Results for Fort Brnq, File Prefix: FBG2
New plant
Technoboy
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Boiler
42/42/42
42/42/42
42142/42
29/49/49/49
25/49/63/63
30/52/52/52
23/46/58/58
Retrofit
Technol.gy
Stoker
CWS
M-COAL
$/MBtu
$/KWSTM
K$1qNV
KSFei
K$LCC
LCC/R
11.656
16.863
17.953
15.490
13.650
19358
15.049
13.936
20.161
21.464
18.521
16321
23.144
17.992
5625
5625
5625
41320
30776
24442
39269
50068
78568
84529
16975
25051
65901
17147
67757
92237
98198
84731
78026
110648
82311
100
136
145
125
115
163
121
KSINV
KSCoaI
3361
2273
3904
15381
23295
14764
Boiler
34/34/45
28/28/37
28t28/37
Bae: Fort Bragg

File Prefix: FBG2
PMCR: 126 L
Ave Mon. Load: 42 M
CHP #2 2@ 37.9 L Fuel
1@ 50 L Fuel = NG,FS2
KSHvy oi
-91056
-125967
-88234
Savings
-72314
-100400
-69565
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtb/HR)
NG,FS2
Age = 1972
Age = 1952
Table B16
New Plant
Technology
Gas
#2 Oil
"#6Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Retrofit
Technology
Stoker
CWS
M-Coal
Boiler
S/MBtu
S/KSTM
KSINV
KSFuel
100/100/100
100/100/100
100/100/100
68/117/117/117
59/117/150/150
71/123/123/123
54/108/138/138
10.588
15.795
16.885
10.538
10372
16.138
10.388
12.659
18.884
20.187
12599
12.401
19.295
12.420
9051
9051
9051
62367
53143
37872
60181
118957
186764
200957
38337
58437
156267
40010
Boiler
K$1NV
K$Coal
K$Hvy Oil
90/90/90
75/75/75
75f75/75
4575
3787
5888
36441
55131
35296
-215732
-298123
-210934
Base: Fort Bragg

File Prefix: FBG3
PMCR: 300 L
Ave Mon. Load: 100 M
CHP #3 3@ 100 L Fuel =NG,FS6
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1953
B9
KSLCC
137895
205702
219895
137239
141162
219633
135292
Savings
-174717
-239205
-169750
LCC/R
100
149
159
100
102
159
98
Table B17
CHPECON Results for Fort Bran, File Prefix: FBG4
New Plant
Technology
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Boiler
$/MBtu
S/KSrM
K$INV
KSFuel
KSLCC
LCC/R
34/34/34
34/34/34
34/34/34
23/39/39/39
20/39/50/50
24/41/41/41
18/36/46/46
12.133
17340
18.430
17.292
15.209
20.829
16.875
14.506
20.732
22.034
20.675
18.184
24.905
20.176
5028
5028
5028
37447
27421
22346
35433
39387
61764
66447
13377
19703
51578
13658
52145
74522
79205
74318
68307
93547
72526
100
143
152
143
131
179
139
Base: Fort Bragg

File Prefix: FBG4
PMCR: 100 L
Ave Mon. Load: 33 M
CHP #4 2@ 50 L Fuel =NG,FS2
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
Mf(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1973
Table B18
CHPECON Results for Fort Bran, File Prefix: FBGS
New Plant
Tecbaolog
Gas
#2 Oii
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Boiler
$/MBtu
17/17/17
17/17/17
17/17/17
12/20/20/20
10/20/25/25
12/21/21/21
9/18/23/23
14.287
19.494
20.584
27.603
21.877
27.791
26575
Base: Fort Bragg

File Prefix: FBG5
PMCR: 50 L
Ave Mon. Load: 17 M
CHP #5 2@ 25 L Fuel = NG,FS6
$/K#STM
17.082
23.307
24.610
33.002
26.150
33.227
31.774
Lf(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1985
BI0
K$INV
KSFuel
KSLCC
LCC/R
4020
4020
4020
32334
21129
18719
30190
20398
31926
34339
7595
10605
27526
750l.
31631
43159
45572
61111
50615
64296
58837
100
136
144
193
160
203
186
Table B19
CHPECON Results for Fort Campbell, File Prefix: FCBI
New Plat
Teclmolow
Boiler
Gas
21W21/21
#2 Oil
21/21/21
#6 Oil
21/21/21
Stoker
15/25/25125
CWS
13/25/32/32
COM
15/26/26/26
FBC
12/23/29/29
Base: Port Campbell
File Prefix: FCB1
PMCR: 63 L
Ave Mon. Load: 21 M
CHP #1 2@ 25.1 L Fuel = NGFS2
1@ 12.5 L Fuel = NGFS2
Sff4Bto
10-565
12.216
12.680
24-347
20.018
20.916
24.023
SIKUSTM
12.631
14.605
15.161
29.109
23.933
25.007
28.721
KIiNV
4400
4400
4400
35693
24269
20867
33204
KSFuel
17161
21677
22947
9360
13190
20198
10837
KSLCC
28894
33410
34680
66587
57211
59778
65699
LCCR
100
116
120
230
198
207
227
KSLCC
44209
52381
54679
83224
75940
80823
84667
LCC/R
100
118
124
188
172
183
192
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1985
Age = 1958
Table B20
New Plant
Technolomy
Boiler
Gas
3909/39
#2 Oil
3909/39
#6 Oil
39/3909
Stoker
26/45/45/45
CWS
23/45/58/58
COM
28/47/47/47
FBC
21/42/53/53
Base: Fort Campbell
File Prefix: FCB2
PMCR: 115 L
Ave Mon. Load: 38 M
CHP #2 1@ 15 L Fuel = NG,FS2
2@ 50 L Fuel = NGFS2
$/M~tu
8.933
10.584
11.049
16.817
14.684
15.628
17.108
$/K#STM
10.680
12.654
13.210
20.106
17.556
18.685
20.455
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtV/HR)
Age = 1976
Age = 1976
BI1
K$INV
5495
5495
5495
42349
31094
25296
39995
KSFuel
30835
39006
41305
15622
23159
35545
19198
Table B21
CHPECON Results for Fort Carson, Fib Prefi.
New Plat
Boiler
TeclhologY
40/40/40
Gas
'40/40/40
#2 Oil
40/40/40
#6 Oil
27/47/47/47
Stoker
24/47/60/60
CWS
29/49/49/49
COM
22/44/56/56
FBC
Ban: Fort Carson
File Prefix: FCS
PMCR: 120 L
Ave Mon. Load: 40 M
CHP #1 3@ 40 M Fuel = NG/DF2
$/MBtu
10.302
11.494
8.213
16.769
14.592
13.527
16.264
$/K#9TM
12.317
13.743
9.819
20.049
17.447
16.173
19.445
KSINV
5774
5774
5774
44412
32460
26080
40979
FCS
K$Fue
39909
46122
29026
17441
24999
27385
17641
KSLCC
53667
59879
42784
87357
79437
73640
84724
LkC/R
100
112
80
163
148
137
158
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1966
Table B22
CHPECON Results for Fort Detriek, File Prefix: FDT
New Plant
$/MBmt
$/KAMM
Boiler
Technololy
9.023
7.547
130/130/130
Gas
12.174
130/130/130
10.182
#2 Oil
9.140
7.645
130/130/130
#6 Oil
12.760
10.672
88/152/152/152
Stoker
12.313
10.298
76/152/194/194
CWS
11.918
9.969
93/159/159/159
COM
10.493
12.545
71/141/180/180
FBC
Retrofit
KSINV
Boiler
Technolog
6193
58/58/58/58/117
Stoker
5877
48/48/48/48/97
CWS
8671
48/48/48/48/97
M-Coal
Base: Fort Detrick
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
File Prefix: FDT
M=(MBtu/HR)
PMCR: 390 L
Age = 1956
CHP #1 2@ 65 M Fuel = NG/FS6
Age = 1966
Age = 1990
B12
K$INV
11489
11489
11489
82553
70581
49662
77766
KSFlei
104948
149563
106605
51654
77787
97816
58109
K$LCC
127773
172387
129430
178332
182201
176368
177653
K$Coal
48988
71955
48093
KSHvy ORl
-121919
-157212
-119693
Savings
-66739
-79380
-62929
LCC/R
100
135
101
140
143
138
139
Table 323
CHPECON Results for Fort Dix, File Prefix: FDXI
New Plant
Technology
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Retrofit
Technololy
Stoker
CWS
M-Coal
Boiler
$/MBtu
$11S[0M
KSINV
40/40/40
40/40/40
40/40/40
27/47/47/47
24/47/60/60
29/49/49/49
22/44/56/56
10.637
11.805
9346
17.567
14.994
14.709
16.587
12.718
14.115
11.175
21.003
17.927
17.586
19.831
6058
6058
6058
46919
35273
28328
43424
Boiler
KSINV
KSCoI
36/36/36
30/30/30
30/30/30
3306
2212
3821
15753
21779
15289
Bae: Fort Dix

File Prefix: FDX1
PMCR: 120 L
Ave Mon. Load: 40 M
CHP #13@ 40 M Fuel =FS6
K$Fue
41373
47457
34647
17925
24374
31568
16960
KSHvy Oil
-38902
-49396
-37758
KsLCC
55415
61499
48689
91512
81625
80072
86406
LCC/R
100
111
88
165
147
144
156
Savinlp
-19842
-25405
-18647
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtU/HR)
Age = 1958
Table B24
New Psant
Technology
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Retrofit
Technology
Stoker
CWS
M-Coal
Ban: Fort Dix
Boiler
$/MBtu
$/K#STM
KIiNV
KSFuel
67/67/67
67/67/67
67/67/67
45/78/78/78
39/78/100/100
48/32/82/82
36/72,92/92
9.863
11.031
8.572
13.569
12A89
12.188
12.818
11.792
13.189
10.249
16.223
14.932
14.572
15.325
8047
8047
8047
58000
47989
35936
53482
69109
79301
57845
28968
40403
52571
28228
Boiler
K$IEV
45/45/45/45
37/37/37/37
37/37/37/37
4455
3741
5609
File Prefix: FDX2
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
PMCR: 200 L
Ave Mon. Load: 67 M
M=(MBu/HR)
CiP#2 3@ 50 M Fuel =FS6
Age = 1953
1@ 50 M Fuel = PS6
Age = 1963
B13
KSCoal
26983
37500
26267
KSHvy Oil
-66742
-85196
-64970
KSLCC
86064
96256
74800
118397
113883
111136
111847
Saving
-35303
-43955
-33094
LCC/R
100
112
87
138
132
129
130
Table B25
CHPECON Remdt. for Fort Dix File Prefix: FDX3
New Plasnt
Technolok
Boiler
4MBtu
26/26/26
26/26/26
26/26/26
18/30)30(30
15/30C39139
19132/32/2
14/28/36/36
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Base: Fort Dix

File Prefix: FDX3
PMCR: 77.2 L
Ave Mon. Load: 26 M
CHP #3 2@ 38.6 M Fuel =FS4
S/KNSTM
KSINV
KSFuel
K$LCC
13.904
15.301
12358
26.711
22.079
21.800
25.144
4923
4923
4923
40419
28804
24306
37099
36974
30929
22605
12035
16242
21142
11343
39379
43334
35000
95647
65342
64569
71211
11.63
12.798
10.336
22.341
18.466
18.234
21.031
LCC/R
100
110
89
192
166
164
181
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1972
Table B26
New Plant
Technobloy
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Retrofit
Technolog
Stoker
CWS
Boiler
$MBtu
SIKASTM
K$INV
K$SFaI
67/67/67
67/67/67
67/67/67
45/78/78f78
39/78/100/100
48/82/82/82
36(72192)92
9.863
11.031
8.572
13.569
12.489
12.188
12.818
11.792
13.189
10.249
16223
14.932
14.572
15.325
8047
8047
8047
58000
47989
35936
53482
69109
79301
57845
28968
40403
52571
28228
Boiler
KSINV
KSCoI
45/45/45/45
37/37/37/37
4455
3741
26983
37500
Base: Fort Dix

File Prefix: FDX4
PMCR: 200 L
Ave Mon. Load: 67 M
CHP #4 2@ 50 M Fuel =FS6
2@ 50 M Fuel = FS6
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1964
Age = 1965
B14
K$Hvy OR
-66742
-85196
KSLCC
86064
96256
74800
118397
113883
111136
111847
Savior
-35303
-43955
Table B27
C'HPECON Results for Fort George Meade, File Prefix: FGM
New Plumt
Boiler
Techmolow
30/30/30
Gas
30/30/30
#2 Oil
30/30/30
#6 Oil
20/35/35/35
Stoker
18/35/44/44
CWS
21/36/36/36
COM
16/32/41/41
FBC
Base: Fort George Meade
File Prefix: FOM
PMCR: 88 L
Ave Mon. Load: 29 M
CHP #12@ 40 M Fuel FS2
2@ 8 M Fuel =FS2
h/MtB
9.618
12.253
9.716
20.253
17.031
16.614
19.458
SIK#STM
11.499
14.650
11.617
24.214
20.363
19.863
23.264
KSINV
5079
5079
5079
39496
28376
23861
36744
KSFIP
23635
33588
24005
13283
18117
22327
13488
K$LCC
36326
46279
36696
76486
67217
65569
73489
LCC/R
100
127
101
210
185
181
202
KSLCC
49672
33543
30942
68368
59062
58085
69211
LCC/R
100
78
62
138
119
117
139
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBu/HR)
Age = 1953
Age = 1954
Table B28
CHPECON Results for Fort Gordon, File Prefix: FGDI
New Plant
Boiler
Technolovy
24/24/24
Gas
24/24/24
#2 Oil
24/24/24
#6 Oil
16/28/28/28
Stoker
14/28/35/35
CWS
17/29/29/29
COM
13/26/33/33
FEC
Base: Fort Gordon
File Prefix: FODI
PMCR: 70 L
Ave Mon. Load: 23 M
CHP #12@ 35 L Fuel = NGFS2
$/MBtu
16.583
12.867
10330
22.824
18.869
18.556
23.106
$/#STM
19.826
15.384
12350
27.289
22.559
22.186
27.625
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(Btu/HR)
Age =1975
B15
K$INV
4498
4498
4498
35846
24739
21252
33669
K$Fuel
37779
26650
19049
10360
14323
17932
12729
Table 329
CHPECON Results tr Fart Gordon, Flk Pruk: iGD2
New Plant
Techmlm
Gas
#2 Oil
06 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Base Fart Gordon
File Prefix: FGD2
PMCR: 176 L
Ave Mon. LoA& 59 M
CHiP #2 3@ 35.9 L Fuel
3 34 L Fuel = NGFS
Boiler
59/59/59
59/59/59
59/59/59
40/69/69/69
35/69/8/88
42/72/72/72
32/64/81/81
S/MIt
14.574
9.875
8322
13.2D4
12.368
12.071
14.250
S IKTM
17A25
11.806
9.950
15.787
14.788
14A32
17.037
KSNV
6890
6890
6890
48926
39405
30081
47540
KSFe
96487
60379
48444
24030
35329
44823
31837
KLCC
111966
75877
63942
101461
99314
96923
109495
LLCA
100
68
57
91
89
87
98
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
=
NG.FS
Age = 1965
Age = 1967
Table 330
CHPECON Resuts for Fort Gordon, Fie Prefx: FGD3
New Plan
Boiler
Techmohgy
Gas
20/20/20
20/20/20
#2 Oil
2M/20/20
#6 Oil
Stoker
14/24/24/24
12/24/30/30
CWS
15/25125/25
COM
11D2/28/28
FBC
Bam: Fort Gordon
File Prefix: FOD3
PMCR: 60 L
Ave Mon. Load: 20 M
CHP #3 2@ 30 L Fuel = NGFS2
S/Mit.
17.082
12383
10.829
25.071
20A93
20.118
25.192
1K
MSTM
20A24
14.805
12.948
29.975
24.502
24M053
30.119
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1972
B16
KSINV
4300
4300
4300
34817
23517
20307
32522
KF
32891
20651
16605
9059
12607
15791
11122
Iw KSWLC
44494
32253
28207
65302
55780
54759
65616
LCC/R
100
72
63
147
125
123
147
Tabbl
331
CHPECON Rais for Fort Grely, M Pf:

New PIma
Boier
T-- oaw
50t5/
oam
50/50/50
#2 Oil
501/X150
#6 Oi
34/59/59/59
Staker
30/59/75/75
CWS
35/62/62/62
COml
27/54/69/69
FEC
Eam: Fort Greely
Pile Prefix: POL
PMCR: 150 L
Ave Mon. Load: 50 M
50 M Fuel='FSI
CHP#13
S/MisSm
9.94
11.177
7.895
20.210
14.278
12.983
15.902
SKTM
11.937
13.363
9A40
24.163
17.071
15.522
19.012
KSINV
6918
6918
6918
56363
42836
33074
50675
FGL
K$Fmd
49816
57581
36212
44656
31263
34437
25019
KLCC
65017
72782
51413
131601
97161
88343
103548
LCC/R
100
112
79
202
149
136
201
KL=
40677
44784
36137
75914
66145
65493
71900
LCC/R
100
110
89
187
163
161
177
L=(K# STBAM/HR)
Mm(MBtu/-R)
Age - 1954
Table 332
CHPECON Runlot for Fort lmiatowa Gap, Fle Prefix:F
New Ph"
Boilr
Teebmolqg
28=28/28
Go.
28/28/28
#2 Oil
230M28
16 Oil
19/32/32/32
Stoker
16132/41/41
CWS
20/34/34/34
COm
15/30/38f38
FIC
Bin: Fort Idiamown Gap
Fie Prefix: FIT
PMCL 82 L
Ave Mon. Load: 27 M
CHP #1 2@ 41 M Fuel = FS6/FS2
$/Mn
11.568
12.736
10.277
21.589
18.001
17.824
20A48
$/KNfM
13.831
15.227
12287
25.812
21.522
21310
24.447
L=(K. STEAMIHR)
M(MBtuiHR)
Age = 1940
B17
KSiNV
5126
5126
5126
40605
28990
24420
37438
KSl
28001
32107
23460
11893
16669
21859
11471
Tab 133
CHECON Rmu
for Faw
t Jackmm., Mb Pruft: FJSI
New rho
T PM Mao
on
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
CCU
FlC
Boler
36/36/36
36/36/36
36/36A36
24/42/42/42
21/42/53/53
26/44/44/44
20/39/49/49
$use
S KUM
KSINV
10133
13.984
10.950
20.068
17.494
17.276
19.826
5029
5029
5029
37017
26878
21935
35255
KSINV
3209
2090
3662
KSCod
12198
18749
11935
9061
11.696
9.159
16.801
14.632
14A49
16-583
KS Vu
28483
40495
28929
14614
21454
27128
15455
KSLCC
41302
53313
41748
76583
69696
68827
75586
LWR
100
129
101
135
169
167
183
Remrk
Teck~oh~
Stkek
CWS
M-Coal
Base. Fort Jason
Pile Prefix: FJSi
PMCR: 106 L
Ave Mon. Load: 35 M
CIIP #1 3@ 35.6 M Fuel
Boller
32/32/32
26/26/26
26/26/26
L=(KO ST
M(MBtuHR)
= NG/FS6
KSHvy O3
-29390
-40890
-28652
Savip
-13983
-20050
-13054
)AMAHR)
Age = 1965
Table B34
CHPECON Results for Fort Jack.m, Fle Prdex: FJ82
TekmAioWy
0u
#2 Oil
6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Boiler
60/60/60
60/60/60
60/60160
41/69/69/69
35/70/39/89
43/73/73/73
33/65/92/92
Boiler
Teebmololy
32/32/32/32/32
Stoker
26/26/26/26/26
CWS
26/26/26/26/26
M-Coal
Ban: Fort Jackson
Mle Prefix: FJS2
PMCR: 178 L
Ave Mon. Load: 59 M
CHiP #2 3@ 35.6 M Fuel = NG/FS6
1@ 35.6 M Fuel = NG/IFS6
1@ '5.6 M Fuel = NO/FS6
SNA4Bt
8.200
10.835
8.297
12.721
12.636
11.753
12.817
S/WSTM
9.804
12.954
9.921
15.209
14390
14.052
15324
KSINV
6606
6608
6606
45617
36215
27739
44145
ESFud
47785
68034
48538
23263
35825
44605
25609
KSLCC
63005
83254
63758
97745
96645
94373
98485
KSINV
4813
3702
5924
KSCoal
20854
32687
20598
KSHvy O
-50332
-71416
-49766
Saviap
-24665
-35027
-23244
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtuHR)
Age = 1969
Age = 1974
Age = 1987
B18
LCC/R
100
132
101
155
153
150
156
Table B33
CHPICON R3mblt for Fort Jackmam, F&e Prefix: FJS3
New Plat
Techmuah
Gas
'2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoka"
CWS
COM
FBC
Boner
37037/37
37/37/37
37t37/37
25/44/44/44
22/456
27/46/46/46
2040/52/52
SMIft
8.931
11.565
9.028
16397
14292
14.110
15.998
SSAM
10.677
13.828
10.794
19.605
17.068
16.870
19.127
KSV
5094
5094
5094
36392
27628
22537
35791
K$mPel
30092
42789
30563
15252
22757
28592
16220
KSLCC
43032
55730
43504
79013
71968
71051
77063
KSHvy On
-30790
-43481
-3096
Savbp
-14767
-21410
-13964
LCC/R
100
130
100
184
167
165
179
Retrolk
Techolmog
Bonler
Stoker
32/32/36
CWS
26/26/30
M-c,
2626/30
Baa. Fort Jacon
File Prefix: FJS3
PMCR. 111.2 L
Ave Mon. Loas 37 M
CHP #3 2 335.6 M Fuel = NG/FS6
1@ 40.0 M Fue = NG/FS6
K$INV
YSComl
3243
12779
2134
19937
3719
12546
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/-R)
Age = 1972
Age = 1985
Table B36
CHPECON Results for Fort Knox, Fie Prefix: FKXI
New Pla1
Technolo~
Boiler
Gas
18/18/1S
#2 Oil
18/18/18
#6 Oil
18/18/18
Stoker
12/21/21/21
CWS
11/21/26/26
COM
13/22/22/22
FBC
10/19/24/24
Base: Fort Knox
File Prefix: FKX1
PMCR: 52 L
Ave Mon. Load: 17 M
CHP #12@ 26 M Fuel = FS
S/MBtu
11.488
14.123
11.586
28.514
22.983
22503
27.794
$/K#STM
13.735
16.886
13.852
34.091
27A79
26.904
33.231
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(Mu/HR)
Age = 1966
B19
KSINV
4224
4224
4224
34569
22913
20274
32024
KSFuel
13992
19827
14209
7324
10927
13297
8202
K$LCC
25433
31268
25650
63128
53174
52061
61535
LCC/R
100
123
101
248
209
205
242
Table B37
CHPECON Resolts for Fort Kam, File Prefir. FKX2
New Flent
Boier
Teelmolagy
18/18/18
Gas
18/18/18
#2 Oil
18/18/18
#6 Oil
12/21t21/21
Stoker
11/21/26/26
CWS
13/22/22/22
COM
10/19/24/24
FEC
Bma: Port Knox
Pile Prefix: FKX2
PMCR: 51.8 L
Ave Mon. Load: 17 M
CHP 42 2@ 17.4 M Fuel = NG/FS
1@ 17.0 M Fuel =NG/FS
W4Btu
11.488
14.123
11.586
28.514
22.983
22.503
27.794
iKUTM
13.735
16.886
13.852
34.091
27.479
26.904
33.231
KlINV
4224
4224
4224
34569
22913
20274
32024
KISlFel
13992
19827
14209
7324
10927
13297
8202
K$LCC
25433
31268
25650
63128
53174
52061
61535
LCCR
100
123
101
248
209
205
242
KSLCC
32068
35382
27279
66255
55127
54113
64679
LCC/R
100
110
85
207
172
169
202
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M-(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1957
Age = 1957
Table B38
CHPECON Results for Fort Leavenworth, File Prefix: FLV
New Plant
Boiler
Tecmhology
20/20/20
Gas
20/20/20
#2 Oil
20/20/20
#6 Ol
14/24/24/24
Stoker
12/24/30/30
CWS
15/25/25/25
COM
11/22/28/28
FEC
Base: Fort Leavenworth
Pile Prefix: FLV
PMCR: 60 L
Ave Mon. Load: 20 M
CHP #13@ 20 M Fuel =NG/FS2
WMlts
12.312
13.584
10.473
25.453
20.254
17.881
24.832
S/K#STM
14.720
16.214
12.522
30A31
24.215
23.770
29.689
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age =1960
B20
KSINV
4355
4355
4355
35514
24087
20799
33016
KSFael
20409
23724
15621
9474
11383
14653
9921
Table B39
CHPECON Reaults for Fort Leonard Wood, Fnle Prefix: FLW1
New Plant
Technlbogy
Boie
Gas
21/21121
#2 Oil
21/21/21
#6 Oi1
21121121
Stoker
14924/24t24
CWS
12/24/31/31
COM
15125/25/25
FBC
11122129129
Base: Fort Leonard Wood
PilPrefix: PLWI
PMCR: 61.2 L
Ave Mon. Load: 20M
CHP #1 2@ 17.2 M Fuel = PPG
2@ 13.4 M Fuel =PS2
S/MBtu
12.417
13.689
10.578
26.410
21.101
20.559
25.961
SJK#STM
14.864
16367
12.647
31.576
25.228
24.580
31.039
KSINV
4629
4629
4629
38485
26560
22880
35431
KSFel
20407
23721
15619
8997
11208
14420
10451
KSLCC
32342
35656
27553
68789
57434
55958
67620
LCC/R
100
110
85
212
177
172
208
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age - 1966
Age = 1972
Table B40
New Plant
Techmnlgy
Boiler
Gas
43/43/43
#2 Oil
43/43/43
#6 Oil
43/43/43
Stoker
29/50/50/50
CWS
25/50/64/64
COM
31/52/52/52
FBC
23/46/59/59
Retrofit
Technolo
Boiler
Stoker
17/17/26126/26
CWS
14/14/21121/21
M-Coal
14/14121/2/121
Base: Fort Leonard Wood
Pile Prefix: PLW2
PMCR: 128.2 L
Ave Mon. Load: 42 M
CHP #2 3@ 29.0 M Fuel= FS6
2@ 19.9 M Fuel = FS6
$/MBtu
10388
11.660
8.541
16-513
14.241
13.736
16.892
/K#STM
12.420
13.541
10.212
19.743
17.027
16.423
20.197
KSINV
6219
6219
6177
47472
36418
28833
44693
KSFuel
42556
49516
32500
17331
22763
29377
21339
K$LCC
56821
63781
46721
90322
81403
78516
92398
KSINV
4481
3180
5263
KSCoal
15388
20511
15143
KSHvy Ol
-38313
-47303
-37705
Savings
-18445
-23613
-17299
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtUHR)
Age = 1966
Age = 1963
B21
LCC/R
100
112
82
159
143
138
163
Table B41
CHPECON Results for Fort Leommrd Wood, lqs Prefix: FLW3
Nw Plant
Boiler
Techmnoly
Gas
31/31/31
31 31/31
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
31/31/31
Stoker
21/36/36/36
18/36/46/46
CWS
COM
22138138138
FBC
17134143/43
Bae: Fort Leonard Wood
File Prefi: FLW3
PMCR: 92 L
Ave Mon. Load 31 M
$/MiBto
11.020
12.M3
9.132
19.341
16.387
15.996
19.514
SAKWM
13.176
14.697
10.928
23.124
19-593
19.124
23331
KSINV
5355
5355
5355
42141
31228
25908
39351
KSFwl
31470
36607
24048
13070
16984
22090
15904
KSLC
44491
49628
37069
78065
69136
67484
78782
LCC/R
100
112
83
176
155
152
177
L=(K# STBAM/HR)
M=(MBEu/HR)
Age = 1969
Table 342
CHPECON Results for Fort Leomard Wood,
New Plht
Boiler
Technology
25/25/25
Gas
#2 Oil
25)25)25
25/25/25
#6 Oil
Stoker
17/30f30130
CWS
15130138138
18131131131
COM
14/27)35f35
FBC
Bae: Fort Leonard Wood
File Prefix: FLW4
PMCR: 751. L
Ave Mon. Load: 25 M
CHP #4 1@ 10.7 M Fuel =FS6
3@ 21- M Fuel FS6
$Mtn
11.597
12.869
9.758
22.482
18.454
17.985
22.320
$S/K#STM
13.865
15.387
11.667
26.880
22.064
21.53
26.686
L=(Kt STEAM/R)
M=(M~t/HR)
Age = 1959
Age = 1959
B22
ble Prefix: FLW4
KSINV
4870
4870
4870
40068
28704
24203
37063
KSFel
25435
29578
19450
10908
13851
17977
12884
KSLCC
37758
41901
31772
73197
62787
61192
72670
LCI. R
100
111
86
196
166
162
192
Table B43
CHPECON Results for Fort Myers, Fie Prefix: FMY
New Flow
Tehebwhw
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Retrofit
Techulmo
Stoker
CWS
M-CC-1
Boiler
44/44/44
44/44/44
44/44/44
30/52/52/52
26/52/66W66
32/54/54/54
24/48/61/61
S/MBtu
8.699
11.355
8.797
16.007
13.948
13.592
15.624
Boiler
23t23/36/36
19/19/30/30
19/19/30/30
BaE: Fort Myers

File Prefix: FMY
PMCR: 132 L
Ave Mon. Load: 44 M
/KTM
10.401
13.552
10.518
19.138
16.676
16.251
18.681
KSINV
6026
6026
6026
45483
34231
27507
42702
KSFuel
35721
50822
35282
19015
26505
33521
20336
KSLCC
49850
64951
50412
91923
83523
81393
89533
KSINV
3988
3022
4778
K$Coai
16775
24330
16548
KSHvy Oil
-41197
-53158
-40640
Savings
-20434
-25806
-19314
LCCIR
100
130
101
184
168
163
180
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1977
Age = 1972
Age = 1990
Table B44
CHPECON Results for Fort Riley, File Prefix: FRL
New Plant
Technology
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Boiler
36/36/36
36t36/36
36f36/36
25/42/42/42
21/42/54/54
26/44/44/44
20/39/50/50
$/MBtu
10.600
11.872
8.761
18.241
14.570
14.400
16.859
$/K#STM
12.673
14.194
10.475
21.809
17.420
17.216
20.157
Base: FortRiley
File Prefix: FRL

PMCR: 107.8 L
Ave Mon. Load: 36 M
CHP #12@ 53.9 M Fuel
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
=
NG/FS2
Age
1956
B23
K$1NV
5359
5359
5359
42535
30205
24977
38227
K$Fuel
36519
42454
27900
17977
19741
25720
15897
KSLCC
49696
55661
41077
85520
71383
70549
79041
LCC/R
100
112
83
172
144
142
159
Table B45
CHPECON Results for Fort Rkhardson, File Prefix: FIRS
New Plant
Techology
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Boiler
S/MBtu
$/KSSTM
180/180/180
180/180/180
180/180/180
122/210/210/210
105/210/269/269
128/220/220/220
98/195/249/249
8.843
10.036
6.754
11370
10.033
9.013
10.590
10573
11.999
8.075
13.594
11.995
10.776
12.146
Base: Fort Richardson

File Prefix: FRS
PMCR: 540 L
CHP #14@ 135 M Fuel = NC/FSI
KSINV
15200
15200
15200
103330
97606
66703
105460
K$Fw!
178697
206651
129725
116742
110254
121903
82978
KSLCC
LCC/R
207306
235260
158334
266542
245778
220787
238151
100
113
76
129
119
107
115
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1952
Table B46
CHPECON Results for Fort Sheridan, File Prefix: FSD
New Plant
Technology
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Boiler
$/MBtu
27/27/27
27/27/27
27/27/27
18/31/31531
16/32/40/40
19/33/33/33
15/29/37/37
11.455
12.728
9.617
21.664
18.054
17.561
21.192
Base: Fort Sheridan

File Prefix: FSD
PMCR: 80 L
Ave Mon. Load: 27 M
$/K#STM
13.696
15.217
11.498
25.902
21.585
20.996
25.338
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1966
B24
KSINV
K$Fuel
KSLCC
LCC/R
5284
5284
5284
42556
30866
26012
39044
27449
31923
20984
11167
15012
19324
12748
40281
44754
33816
76178
66339
64528
74518
100
111
84
189
165
160
185
Table B47
CHPECON Results for Fort SIM Fle Prel.: FSL
New Plant
Boller
Teemology
20r20/20
Gas
20/20/20
#2 Oil
20=20/20
#6 Oil
Stoker
14123/23/23
CWS
12/23/30/30
14125/25125
COm
11122=28/28
FlC
Base: Fort Sill
File Prefix PSL
PMCR: 58.6 L
Ave Mon. Load: 20 M
CHP #1 2@ 10.0 M Fuel = NG/FS2
2@ 9.7 M Fuel = NG/FS2
1@ 8.0 M Fuel = NG/FS2
1 11.2 M Puel= NG/FS2
$S/Mtn
10.748
13383
10.846
26.074
20.486
20.015
24.219
S/KSTM
12.850
16.001
12.967
31.174
24A93
23.930
28.956
K$INV
4285
4285
4285
35325
23378
20198
32254
KSFIl
16408
23272
16663
11127
12736
15621
9328
K$LCC
27995
34859
28250
67912
55760
54478
63062
LCC/R
100
125
101
242
199
195
225
L-(K# STEAM/IHR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age =
Age =
Age =
Age =
1979
1982
1986
1988
Table B48
CHPECON Results for Fort Stewart, File Prefix: FSW
New Plant
Boiler
Technolog
64/64/64
Gas
#2 Oil
64/64/64
64/64/64
#6 Oi
44/75/75/75
Stoker
38115/96/96
CWS
46/79/79/79
COM
35/70/89/69
FBC
Retrofit
Boller
Technology
Stoker
43/43/52/85
36/36/43/71
CWS
36t36/43fl 1
M-Coai
Base: Fort Stewart
File Prefix: PSW
PMCR: 191.9 L
Ave Mon. Load: 64 M
CiP #1 20 48.5 M Fuel = FSS/FS2
$/MBt.
8.125
10.761
8.224
12.835
12.101
11.696
12.952
$IKJSTM
9.715
12.866
9.832
15.345
14.468
13.984
15.485
K$INV
7163
7163
7163
50729
41504
31092
48405
K$Fuel
51805
72769
52621
27214
38792
48464
30214
KSLCC
67727
89691
68543
106977
105401
101872
107954
KSINV
4383
3642
5490
K$Coal
24162
34575
23679
K$Hvy Oi
-55235
-75405
-54130
Savings
-26689
-37188
-24961
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M--(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1976
1@ 57.8 M Fuel = FSS/FS2
Age = 1978
1@ 94.9 M Fuel = WUD/FS2
Age = 1983
B25
LCC/R
100
132
101
158
156
150
159
Table 549
CHPECON Results for Frmauirt Arsenal, File Preir. IWA
New plant
Technoloy
Ga
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Bogiler
S/M~to
29/29/29
29/29/29
29/29/29
20/33/33/33
17/34/43/43
21/35/35/35
16/31/40/40
11.460
12.628
10.169
21.216
17.735
17.416
20.181
Bae: Frankfort Arsenal

File Prefix: FFA
PMCR: 85 L
Ave Mon. Load: 28 M
CHP #12@ 20.8 M Fuel = FS
1@ 20.1 M Fuel = FS
1@ 23.6 M Fuel = FS
$/K#SFM
13.702
15.098
12.158
25366
21.204
20.823
24.128
LCCk
KSINV
K$hel
K$LCC
5182
5182
5182
40978
29719
24592
37936
29027
33286
24319
12835
17228
22494
12493
41790
46049
37082
77366
67581
66365
73591
100
110
89
185
162
159
176
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1942
Age = 1941
Age = 1955
Table 350
CHPECON Results for Harry Diamond Labs File Prefix: HDD
New Plant
Teclmnol
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Bogiler
$/M~tu
19/19/19
19/19/19
19/19/19
13/22/22/22
11/22/28/28
13/23/23/23
10/20/26/26
11.253
13.888
11.351
28.232
22.343
22.027
26.893
Bae: HaMy Diamond Labs

Pile Prefix: HDD
PMCR: 55 L
Ave Mon. Load: 18 M
$/K#STM
13.454
16.605
13.571
33.755
26.713
26336
32.153
L-(K# STEAM/HR)
M-(MBft/HR)
Age = 1972
Age = 1975
B26
K$1NV
KSFel
K$LCC
LCC/R
4336
4336
4336
35690
23813
20938
32969
14796
20974
15025
8763
11484
14478
8607
26379
32557
26609
66182
54732
53959
63041
100
123
101
251
207
205
239
Table B51
CHPECON Readst for Holsi
AAMP, File Prefix: HAM
New Pbo
Tecdolog
BoDler
S/MBt.
S/KITM
Gas
100/100/100
7.677
9.178
#2 Oil
100/100/100
10.312
12.330
#6 Oil
100/100/100
7.779
9.297
Stoker
68/117/117/117
10.512
12.568
10.675
12.763
cWS
59/117/150/150
COM
71/123/123/123
10.343
12366
FBC
54/108/138/138
10.842
12.962
Bae: Holston AAMP
File Prefix: HAM
L=(K- STEAM/HR)
PMCR: 300 L
M=(MBt/HR)
CHP #13 100 M Fuel = NG
Age = ?
KSINV
9306
9306
9306
64652
55872
39728
62365
KSFaI
80793
11512
82069
37390
59827
75542
43251
KSLCC
99907
134306
101263
136904
145281
140764
141197
LCC/R
100
134
101
137
145
141
141
Table B52
CHPECON Results for Iowa AAMP, File Prefix: IAMI
New plant
TechnolOy
Boller
64/64/64
Gas
64/64/64
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
64/64/64
Stoker
44(75/75/75
CWS
38/75,96/96
COM
46/79(79/79
FBC
35(70/89/89
Reroflt
Techmolog
BoDler
Stoker
43/43/43/43
cWS
36/36/36/36
M-Coal
36/36/36/36
Base: Iowa AAMP
File Prefix: IAMI
PMCR: 192 L
Ave Mon. Load: 64 M
CHP #14@ 48 Fuel = NG/FS
S/MBta
9.706
10.978
7.868
12.860
11.953
11.496
13.180
S/K#STM
11.604
13.126
9.407
15.375
14.291
13.745
15.758
KIINV
7454
7454
7454
53545
44524
33268
50829
KlFue
64687
75282
49365
24994
34482
44551
29798
KSLCC
80899
91505
65577
107186
104111
100135
109854
K$INV
4400
3656
5511
K$Coal
22800
31470
22320
KSHvy Oil
-58232
-72578
-57006
Savinp
-31032
-37452
-29175
L-(K# STEAM/KR)
M=(MBV/MR)
Age = 1948
B27
LCC/R
100
117
81
132
129
124
136
Table B53
CHPECON Roultt fo. lawn AAMP, File Pr.
New Ph"
TedhWoy
Ou
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Base: Iowa AAMP
Pile Prefix: IAM2
PMCR: 73 L
Ave Moo. Load: 24 M
ClP #2 2@ 36.6 Fuel =
Boller
25/25/0 5
2525O2O
25125125
17/29/29129
15/29(37/37
18/30/30/30
14/27/34/34
$/MBht
11.706
12.978
9.868
22.644
18.483
18.112
22.259
S/WATM
13.995
15.517
11.797
27.073
22.098
21.655
26.613
KSINV
4732
4732
4732
38345
26854
23004
35556
: IAM
K
l
24429
28406
18683
10303
13412
17189
11630
KLCC
36587
40564
30641
70776
60369
59159
69573
LCCIR
100
111
84
193
165
162
190
KSLCC
36587
40564
30841
70776
60369
59159
69573
LCC/iR
100
111
84
193
165
162
190
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBW/HR)
FS
Age = 1941
Table B54
CHPECON Resuits for Iowa AAMP, Fle Prefti: KAM3
New Pl..t
Technobg
Gas
#2 Oi
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Base: Iowa AAMP
File Prefix: IAM3
PMCR: 73 L
Ave Mon. Load: 24 M
CHP #3 2@ 36.2 Fuel =
Boiler
25t25125
25/25/25
25/25/25
17/29129/29
15/29/37/37
18130/30/30
14127/34/34
$/Mtn
11.706
12.978
9.868
22.644
18.483
18.112
22.259
$/KNSTM
13.995
15.517
11.797
27.073
22.098
21.655
26.613
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M(MBtu/HR)
FS
Age = 1941
B28
KSINV
4732
4732
4732
38345
26854
23004
35556
SFuei
24429
28406
18683
10303
13412
17189
11630
Table BS5
CHPECON Results for Iowa AAMP, IUe Prefi: IAM4
New Pha
Techmulob
Boiler
Gau
25/25/25
#2 Oil
25/25/25
#6 Oil
25/25/25
Stoker
17/29/29/29
CWS
15/29/37/37
COM
18/30/30/30
FBC
14/27/34/34
Bane: Iowa AAMP
Pile Prfix: IAM4
PMCR: 73 L
Ave Mon. Load: 24 M
CHP #4 2@ 36.2 M Fuel = FS
$iMBtu
11.706
12.978
9.868
22.644
18.483
18.112
22.259
h/K M
13.995
15517
11.797
27.073
22.098
21.655
26.613
K$1NV
4732
4732
4732
38345
26854
23004
35556
KSfW
24429
28406
18663
10303
13412
17189
11630
KSLCC
36587
40564
30641
70776
60369
59159
69573
LCC/R
100
ill
84
193
165
162
190
KSLCC
36587
40564
30641
70776
60369
59159
69573
LCCR
100
111
84
193
165
162
190
L-(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBmuHR)
Age = 1941
Table B56
CHPECON Results for Iowa AAMP, File Prefix: IAMS
New Pant
Techmologa
Boiler
Gas
25/25/25
#2 Oil
25/25/25
#6Oil
25/25/25
Stoker
17/29/29/29
CWS
15/29/37/37
COM
18/30/30/30
FBC
14/27/34/34
BaRse: Iowa AAMP
Pile Prefix: IAM5
PMCR: 73 L
Ave Mon. Load: 24 M
CHP #5 2@ 36.6 M Fuel FS
$/MBtu
11.706
12.978
9.868
22.644
18.483
18.112
22.259
S/KISTM
13.995
15.517
11.797
27.073
22.098
21.655
26.613
L-(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1941
B29
KINV
4732
4732
4732
38345
26854
23004
35556
KSFuel
24429
28406
18683
10303
13412
17189
11630
Table 3i7
CHPECON Rmda for Jdhrm having Gremak Mle Prd1w JPG

New Ph"
Todm&U
Boler
Gao
24/24/24
#2 Oil
24/24/24
#60Oi
24/24/24
Stoker
17/28/28/28
CWS
14/28/36f36
COM1
183000M
FBC
13/26M34(34
Bane: Jefferson Proving Grounds
File Prefix: JPG
PMCR: 72 L
Ave Mon. Load: 24 M
CHP #13@ 24 M Fuel =FS
$MSUW
11.728
13.001
9.890
22.913
18.773
18.11
23.003
S/CAMM
14.023
15.544
11.825
27397
22.445
22.096
27502
KsNV
4806
4806
4806
39560
27887
23982
Wd
24433
28407
18634
9958
13357
17420
11574
KSLCC
36659
40636
30912
71618
61317
60363
71897
LCC/
100
111
34
195
167
165
196
L(K# STEAM/FR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1972
Table B58
CHPECON Relesh for Jolle AAMP, Pik Prefi: JAMI
New PMh
Teduogy
Doler
Gas
67/67/67
#2 Oil
67/67/67
#6 Oil
67/67167
Stoker
46/78/78/78
CWS
40/79/100/100
COM
48/82/82/S2
FBC
37/73)93/93
Bae: Joliet AAMP
Pile Prefix: JAMI
PMCR: 201 L
Ave Mon. Load: 67M
S/M~ts
9.737
11.009
7.899
13.256
13.344
11.805
13.473
S/KSTM
11.641
13.163
9.444
15.849
14.759
14.114
16.109
L=(KI STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu%%MR)
Age = 1941
B30
K 4INV
8311
8311
8311
59481
50675
37843
55683
K$hl
67741
78843
51702
25184
35963
46760
30277
KISLCC
84961
96063
68920
115665
112561
107644
117563
LCC/R
100
113
81
136
132
127
138
Table B59
CHPECON Reaft for Jaot AAMP, Fle Prf: JAM2
New NOut
Tedclay
Gas
#2 0i
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Retrofit
Tecimoiky
Boller
17/17117
17/17/17
17/17/17
12/20/=
10/20I/525
12121/21121
9/18=23123
$MBMs
13.163
14.435
11324
30.572
23.849
23A14
29.193
Boler
9/18/18
Stoker
7/15/15
CWS
7/15/15
M-Coai
Base: Joset AAMP
File Prefix: JAM2
PMCR SOL
Ave Mon. Load: 17 M
CHP 2 1 10 M Fuel =FS
2@ 20.1 M Fuel= FS
VKWTM
15.737
17.259
13.539
36.552
28.514
27.994
34.903
K$SNV
4543
4543
4543
39033
26422
23435
35415
K$1u!
17385
20202
13314
7670
9853
12685
8086
K$LCC
29142
31958
25071
67684
55177
54171
64631
KSINV
KSComl
2831
1612
3038
5904
8435
5668
KSHvy 03
-15631
-19453
-15005
Savhs
-6896
-9406
-6300
LCC/
100
110
86
232
189
136
222
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBWuIHR)
Age = 1950
Age = 1955
Table B60
CHPECON Results for Lvterkmy Army Depot, File Prefix: LAD
New Plha
Boller
Tedoiy
26126/26
Gu
26/26f26
#2 Oil
26126126
#6 Oil
18130/3(030
Stoker
15/30/39/39
CWS
19/32/32/32
COM
14128/36/36
FBC
Base: Ltekeny Army Depot
File Prefix: LAD
PMCR: 77 L
Ave Mon. Load: 26 M
CHP #12@ 27.2 M Fuel = FS5
1@ 22.3 M Fuel = FS5
$SMItS
11.615
12.783
10323
21.988
18.337
18.125
20.963
$S/KWM
13.886
15.283
12343
26289
21.924
21.670
25.063
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtU/HR)
Age = 1952
Age = 1952
B31
K$INV
4781
4781
4871
39869
28348
23920
36725
K$Fuel
26977
30931
22605
11391
16242
21142
11463
KLCC
39328
43283
34956
24452
64886
64134
70980
LC/R
100
110
89
189
165
163
180
Table B61
for " ke City AAMP, File Prek.: LCA
CKPCON Reait
New Fhm
.Baue
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
103/103/103
103/103/103
103/103/103
70/119/I 191119
60/120/153/153
73/1251125/1125
56/1211142/142
ft.
9.26
10.568
7.458
11.149
10.652
10.254
11.157
SJK0sTM
KSINV
KIFId
KLCC
11.114
12.635
3.916
13329
12.735
12.260
13.340
10090
10090
10090
71300
63202
45139
67707
102977
119879
73558
40814
54224
70678
43734
123485
140386
99065
148098
147865
142351
148216
Tecmlbog
Stoker
CWS
Bier
67/67/67/72
56/56/56/60
KSINV
5190
4872
KICoa
38329
49913
KSHvy 0
-92257
-115113
Savimp
-48737
-60327
M-Cod
56/56/56/60
6917
37822
-91035
-46296
Bane: Lake City AAMP

File Prefix: LCA
PMCR: 307 L
Ave Mon. Load: 102M
CHP #13@ 75. M Fue = NG/FS
10 80.5 M Fe= NGIFS
LCCR
100
114
s0
120
120
115
120
L-(4 STrAM/HR)
M-(MBtUIHR)
Age = 1942
Age = 1974
Table B62
CHPKCON Resdit fbr LowaStar AAMP, Fl IPrek: LSAI
New Raw
Tecmoaiqo
Boiler
Gas
24/24/24
#2 Oil
24124t24
#6 Oil
24/A24
Stoker
16/28/23/23
CWS
14/28/35/35
COM
17/29/29/29
FC
13/26033/33
Base: Lone Star AAMP
File Pifix: LSAI
PMCR: 70 L
Ave Mon. Load: 23 M
CHP #1 20 M Fuel = NG/FS2
S/MB.
1025
12.880
10.343
23.032
18.871
13.557
22.074
$/K#STM
12.249
15A00
12.366
29.538
22.562
22.137
26392
L=(K# STEAM/R)
M=(MBtU/HR)
Age = 1942
Age = 1942
B32
K$INV
4479
4479
4479
35586
24546
21036
33260
KSFuel
18813
16707
19107
11376
14523
13098
10601
KSLCC
30637
33581
30981
68990
59069
58066
66121
LCC/R
100
126
101
225
192
139
215
Table 363
CHPECON Ruut for LUe Star AAMP, Fil Prefl
New IMe
Boiler
Taclebwhy
30/30/30
Gas
3W30/30
#2 Oil
30/3(030
#6 Oil
21135/35/35
Stohim
18/35145/45
CWS
227/37/3737
COM
17033142/42
FBC
Fe Prefix: LSA2
PMCR: 90 L
Ave Mon. Load: 30 M
1@ 30 M Fuel =NGIFS2
SNBDt
9477
12.112
9.575
19.940
16.284
16.019
18.517
$/KMTM
11331
14.4A1
11.448
22.829
19.469
19.152
22.139
KSINV
4950
4950
4950
37747
27078
22780
35514
L-A2
KiFue
24409
34735
24822
14079
18609
23181
13759
K CC
37027
47323
37409
74602
66484
65403
72347
LCCT
100
128
101
201
179
177
195
K$LCC
34362
43628
34706
71971
63247
62048
69524
LCC/R
100
127
101
209
184
181
202
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1942
Age = 1969
Table B64
CHPECON Results for Lame Star AAMP, File Prefix: LSA3
New Phmt
Boller
Techmolqy
27/27/27
Gas
27/27/27
#2 Oil
27/27/27
#6 Oil
18/31/31/31
Stoker
16/32/40/40
CWS
COM19/33/33/33
15/29137/37
FBC
Fie Prefix: LSA3
PMCR: 80 L
Ave Mon. Load: 27 M
CHP#3 I@ 20 M Fuel = NG/FS2
$/MBtm
9.772
12.407
9.890
20A68
17.212
16.886
19.772
$/IKSTM
11.684
14.834
11.801
24.471
20.579
20.189
23.639
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBu/HR)
Age = 1942
Age = 1942
B33
KSINV
4783
4783
4783
36684
25907
21825
34412
KSFuel
22031
31287
22375
12831
16879
21031
12405
Tpol 365
CHPECON Remdt for LAme Star AAMP, F"V Prdk: LSA4
New Fhut
Tecoh~y
Gao
#2 Oil
LCCWm
Boner
/MiB
SWKATM
K$UNV
KSFoe
KSLCC
24/24/24
24/24/24
10.245
12.880
12.249
15400
4479
4479
18813
16707
30687
38581
100
126
#6 Oil
24/24/24
10.343
12366
4479
19107
30961
101
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
16/28/23/28
14/28/35/35
17/29/29/29
13/26/33/33
23.032
18.871
18.557
22.074
29.538
22.562
22.187
26.392
35586
24546
21066
33260
11376
14523
18098
10601
68990
59069
58066
66121
225
192
189
215

Fide Prefix: LSA4
PMCR: 70 L
Ave Mon. Load: 23 M
1@ 30 M Fuel =NG/FS2
L=(KI STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1942
Age = 1942
Table 36
CHPECON Results for Low Star AAMP, File Prefix: LSAS
New Plait
Tecumolou
Gam
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Boiler
20/20)20
20/20/20
20/20/20
14/24/24/24
12/24/30/30
15/25/25/25
11/22/28/28

File Prefix: LSA5
PMCR: 60 L
Ave Mon. Load: 20 M
CHP #5 2@ 30 M Fuel =NG/FS2
$/MiBt
10.746
13.381
10.844
25.349
20A95
20.118
24.255
$/K#iTM
K$1NV
K$SeI
K$LCC
LCC/R
12.848
15.999
12.965
30.307
24.504
24.054
29.000
4281
4281
4281
34584
23332
20148
32191
16404
23269
16659
10134
12795
15954
9486
27969
34853
28244
66025
55704
54763
63177
100
125
101
236
199
196
226
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1942
B34
Table 367
CHPECON Results for Mealehr AAMP, File Preftx: MAM
New Flamt
TechnlOy
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Boller
S/Mtu
$/K#TM
KSINV
KSFuel
KSLCC
LCC/R
25n25/25
25/25/.5
25/25/25
17/29/29/29
15129/37/37
18/31/31/31
14/27(35(35
9.959
12.594
10.057
21.670
17.902
17.542
20.718
11.907
15.058
12.024
25.909
21.404
20.973
24.771
4550
4550
4550
36071
24980
21435
33823
20424
29004
20743
12295
15770
19232
11181
32425
41005
32744
70555
60909
59683
67454
100
126
101
218
188
184
208
Base: Mcalester AAMP

File Prefix: MAM
PMCR: 73.6 L
Ave Mon. Load: 25 M
CHP #1 2@ 8.4 M Fuel =NG/FS
20 11.7 M Fuel = NO/IS
L-=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBu/HR)
Age = 1967,1971
Age = 1971,1971
Age = 1975, 1984
Table B6U
CHPECON Results for Natick R & D MA, File Prefix: NCR
New Plant
Techmology
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Boller
$/MBtu
$/K#STM
K$INV
K$Fel
K$LCC
38(38/38
38(38M38
38/38/38
26/44/44/44
22/44/56/56
27/46/46/46
21/41/52/52
10.746
11.914
9.455
18.365
15.334
15.120
17.479
12.848
14.245
11.305
21.958
18333
18.077
20.898
5642
5642
5642
44621
32857
26795
41509
38292
63913
32070
17664
22770
29413
17088
32425
41005
32744
70555
60909
59683
67454
Boiler
KSINV
KSCoai
KSHvy O
Savings
33f33/33
27/27/27
27/27/27
3263
2151
3745
15976
20834
15722
Retrofit
Techmology
Stoker
CWS
M-Coal
Base: Natick R & D MA

File Prefix: NCR
PMCR: 111.6 L
Ave Mon. Load: 37 M
CHP #13@ 37.1 M Fuel =FS6
1@ 0.3 M Fuel = FS
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/IIR)
Age = 1953
Age = 1981
B35
-36694
47333
-36112
-17455
-24347
-16645
LCC/R
102
111
88
171
149
147
163
Table B69
CHPECON Results for New Cambpiuma Army Depo PA, F
New P"t
Techmolby
Boiler
SAID.
SmKoTM
Gas
28/28/28
11.460
13.702
#2 Oil
21/23/28
12.628
15.098
#6 Oil
28/28/28
10.169
12.158
Stoker
20033/33/33
21.106
25.234
CWS
17/34/43/43
17.735
21.204
COM
21/35/35/35
17A16
20.823
FBC
16/31/40/40
20.133
24.071
Retrofit
Twemlogy
Boiler
KSINV
Stoker
16/
02
3665
CWS
13/16/16/16
2524
M-Coal
13/16/16/16
4203
Base: New Cumberland Army Depot PA
Pile Prefix: NAD
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
PMCR: 34.8 L
M=MBtu/HR)
Ave Mon. Load: 28 M
Age - 1952
1@ 17.9 M Fuel FS6
Ages= 1977
Pref.
NAD
KSINV
5182
5182
5182
40978
28719
24592
37936
KSpuel
28027
33286
24319
12431
17228
22494
12318
KSLCC
41790
46049
37082
76963
67581
66365
73416
K$C.I
10744
15581
10520
KSHvy 01
-27878
-35398
-27297
Saviy s
-13469
-17293
-12544
LCC/R
100
I10
89
184
162
159
170
Table B70
CHPECON Results for Newport AAMP IN, File Prefix: NAMI
New Plant
Technoogy
Boiler
Gas
25/25/25
#2 Oil
25/25/25
#6 Oil
25/252
Stoker
17/30/3(030
CWS
15/0/38/38
COM
18/31/31/31
FBC
14/27/35/35
Retrofit
Technolog
Boiler
Stoker
16t20/20/20
CWS
13/16/16/16
M-Coai
13/16/16/16
Bae: Newport AAMP IN
File Prefix: NAMI
PMCR: 75.3 L
Ave Mon. Load: 25 M
CHP #13@ 25.1 M Fuel = NG/FS
1@ 17.9 M Fuel = FS6
S/MBtu
11.595
12.867
9.757
22.167
18.432
17.966
21.709
$/K#STM
13.863
15384
11.665
26.503
22.037
21.481
25.956
K$1NV
4863
4863
4863
29977
28627
24138
36838
ISFuei
25435
28578
19450
9972
13851
17977
11380
K$1NV
3005
1829
3323
g$Coal
8131
12174
7911
KSHvy ONl
-22680
-28078
-22067
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBW/HR)
Age = 1959
Age = 1979
B36
I5LCC
37751
41893
31765
72171
62711
61128
70681
Savip
-11544
-14074
-10833
LCC/R
100
111
84
191
166
162
187
Table B71
CHPECON Results for Newport AAMP. IN, File Prefix: NAM2
New Plant
Techmolky
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Boiler
SM[Btu
17/17/17
17/17/17
17/17/17
12/20/20/20
10/20/25=25
12121/21/21
9/18(23/23
13.099
14.372
11.261
29.636
23.235
22.870
28.439
Newport AAMP. IN
FIle Prefix: NAM 2
PMCR: 50.2 L
Ave Mon. Load: 17 M
$/KSSTM
15.662
17.183
13.464
35.432
27.780
27.343
34.002
K$INV
K!Fel
KSLCC
LCC/R
4403
4403
4403
37247
25002
22174
34023
17385
20202
13314
7383
17214
12685
7810
29002
31819
24931
65611
53756
52910
62962
100
110
86
226
185
182
217
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1971
Table B72
CHPECON Results for Picadtny Arsenal, File Prefix: PARI
New Plant
Technoloy
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Retrofit
Technology
Stoker
CWS
M-Coal
Boiler
S/Matu
124/124/124
124/124/124
124/124/124
84/144/144/144
72/144/184/184
88/151/151/151
67/134/171/171
9.340
10.513
8.052
11.206
10.841
103581
12.342
$/K#STM
KSINV
KSFei
11.167
12.570
9.627
13.397
12.961
12.650
14.756
11539
11539
11539
81979
72567
51153
80809
123089
141366
103024
50484
71777
93558
69238
Boiler
K$INV
K$Coa1
K$Hvy Oil
45/144/144
37/120/120
37/120/120
5044
4378
6660
48230
67203
47303
-118672
-152423
-116390
Bane: Picatinny Arsenal

lfle Prefix: PAR1
PMCR: 370 L
CHP #12@ 160 L Fuel = FS6
1@ 50 L Fuel = FS6
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
Mf(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1952/1954
Age = 1971
B37
KSLCC
145468
163744
125403
174524
176779
172536
192226
Savings
-65397
-80841
-62426
LCC/R
100
113
86
120
122
19
132
Table B73
CHPECON Results for Picatiany Arsenal, Fik Pref: PAR2
New Plant
Technology
Gam
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Retrofit
Technology
Stoker
CWS
M-Coal
Boiler
$/MBtu
$/K#STM
K$1NV
KSIFel
KSLCC
17/17/17
17/17/17
17/17/17
12I20t20/20
10/20/25/25
12/21/21/21
9/18t23/23
13.255
14.423
11.964
30.417
23.729
23-550
28.423
15.848
17.244
14.304
36367
28.371
28.156
33.982
4406
4406
4406
37350
25050
22199
34038
17727
20313
14868
8439
10969
14234
7617
29347
31932
26488
67342
54900
54484
62927
Boiler
KSINV
K$Coal
18/18/18
15/15/15
15/15/15
2830
1611
3037
Base: Picatinny Arsenal

File Prefix: PAR2
PMCR: 50 L
Ave Mon. Load: 17 M
CHP #2 1@ 50 L Fuel = FS6
6810
9649
6810
KSHvy Oil
-16784
-21921
-16784
LCC/R
100
109
90
229
187
186
214
Saving
-7143
-10660
-6935
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1970
Table B74
CHPECON Results for Redstone Arsenal, File Prefix: RARI
New Plant
Technology
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Retrofit
Technology
Stoker
CWS
M-Coal
Boiler
$/MBtu
78/78/78
78/78/78
78/78/78
53/90/90/90
46/91/116/116
55/95/95/95
42/84/107/107
7.966
10.601
8.064
12.337
11.750
11.464
11.862
KSINV
KSFel
KSLCC
LCC/R
9.524
12.675
9.642
14.751
14.048
13.706
14.182
8374
8374
8374
58944
48994
36178
55346
62299
88724
63281
28736
46348
58438
30448
79885
106310
80867
123720
123133
120134
118949
100
133
101
155
154
150
149
Boiler
K$[NV
K$Coal
K$Hvy Oil
Savings
52/52/52/52
43/43/43/43
43/43/43/43
4674
4079
6000
26007
42522
26489
-70409
-92906
-64483
-39727
-46304
-31993
Base: Redstone Arsenal

File Prefix: RARI
PMCR: 232 L
Ave Mon. Load: 77 M
$/K#STM
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1960
B38
Table B75
CHPECON Results for Redstone Arsenal, File Prefix: RAR2
New Plant
Teclnology
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Retrofit
Technology
Stoker
CWS
M-Coal
KSINV
KSFuel
KSLCC
LCC/R
9.633
12.784
9.750
15.310
14.415
14.020
21.210
7996
7996
7996
56725
46606
34668
55625
57475
81842
58380
26517
42756
53635
33523
74503
98870
75408
118406
116504
113309
122449
100
133
101
159
156
152
164
Boiler
KSINV
KSCoaf
48/48/48/48
40/40/40/40
40/40/40/40
4551
3888
5779
Boiler
S/MBtu
SA/#STM
72/72/72
72/72/72
72/72/72
49/83/83/83
42/84/107/107
51/88/88/88
39/78d99/99
8.057
10.692
8.155
12.805
12.057
11.726
17.740
Base: Redstone Arsenal

File Prefix: RAR2
PMCR: 214 L
Ave Mon. Load: 71 M
CHP #2 4Q 15.6 M Fuel = NG/FS
17816
29230
18219
KSHvy Oil
Savinp
-48233
-63865
-44352
-25865
-30745
-20352
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1942
Table B76
CHPECON Results for Riverbank AAMP CA, File Prefix: RBA
New Plant
Technology
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Boiler
$/MBtu
$/K#STM
24/24/24
24/24/24
24/24/24
16/28/28/28
14/28/35/35
17/29/29/29
13/26/33/33
11.829
13.022
9.740
25.286
20.689
19.568
24.015
14.143
15.569
11.689
30.230
24.736
23.396
28.713
Riverbank AAMP CA
File Prefix: RBA
PMCR: 70.1 L
Ave Mon. Load: 23A M
CHP #15@ 10 M Fuel =NG/PPG
CHP #1 1@ 20.1 M Fuel = NG/IPPG
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1943
Age = 1969
B39
KSINV
4987
4987
4987
41839
129817
25641
37386
KSFnel
KSLCC
LCC/R
23051
26623
167937
11804
14798
16275
11658
35433
39005
29175
75735
64760
61252
71934
100
110
82
214
183
173
203
Table B77
CHPECON Results for Ravemma AAMP, Fib Prefix: RVA
New pFml
Techmolbg
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Boiler
$/MBt.
26/26/26
26/26/26
26/26/26
18/30/30/30
15M30(39/39
14/28136/36
67/134/171/171
1A.78
12.751
9.640
21.686
18.137
17.800
20.446
Retrofit
KSFel
KSLACC
13.714
15.245
11.525
25.928
21.685
21.282
24.445
4943
4943
4943
40711
29165
24622
37152
26443
30752
20218
9579
14521
18770
9480
38867
43175
32642
73431
64178
62985
69231
KSiNV
K$Coml
KSHvy Oil
4155
2666
4614
7682
12797
8787
-21071
-29515
-21101
LC/R
100
111
84
189
165
162
178
Boiler
Technoogy
Stoker
CWS
M-Coal
KSINV
$/K#STM
12/12/14/14/14
10/10/12/12/12
10/10/12/12/12
Ravenna AAMP
File Prefix: RVA
Savlag
-9233
-14050
-7698
L-=(K# STEAM/R)
PMCR: 77.1 L
Ave Mon. Load: 26 M
M=(MBtu/HR)
CHP #13@ 163 L Fuel =FS

CHP #1 2@ 14.1 M Fuel =Coal
Age = 1941
Age = 1941
Table B78
CHPECON Results for Rocky Mountain Arsenal, File Prefix: RMAI
New Plant
Technololy
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Retrofit
Technology
Stoker
CWS
M-Coal
Boiler
S/MBtu
$/K#STM
K$INV
KS.iel
KSLCC
77M/77
77M7/77
77(77(77
52/90/90/90
45/90/115 /115
55/94/94/94
42/83/106/106
9.380
10.572
9.291
11.951
11.747
10.796
11.860
11.215
12.640
8.717
14.289
14.044
12.908
14.180
8258
8258
8258
57188
48101
35529
54510
76598
88556
55649
30309
47725
52596
31785
94064
106022
73114
119848
123099
113136
118938
Boiler
KSINV
K$Coal
69/69/69
57/57/57
57/57/57
4086
3177
5090
28220
44527
29048
Base: Rocky Mountain Arsenal

File Prefix: RMAI
PMCR: 230 L
Ave Mon. Load: 77 M
CHP #1 2@ 115 L Fuel = NG/FS
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M-(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1942
B40
KSHvy Oi
-60376
-81617
-62102
Saving
-28069
-33912
-27964
LCC/R
100
113
78
127
131
120
126
Table B79
CHPECON Results far Rocky Mountain Arsenal, File Preflx: RMA2
New Plant
Technholoy
On
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
Crl
COM
FBC
Retrofit
Boiler
SIMBtu
S/KSTM
KSINV
KSFuel
KSLCC
124/124/124
124/124/124
124/124/124
84/144/144/144
72/144/184/184
88/151/151/151
67/134/171/171
9.014
10.206
6.925
10.191
10.563
9.647
10.249
10.776
12.202
8.279
12.184
12.621
11.534
12.254
11062
11062
11062
76169
67371
47655
73983
122193
141297
88736
47654
75554
83125
50528
144386
163489
110922
163251
176821
161487
164186
100
113
77
113
122
112
114
Boiler
Techmolog
Stoker
CWS
M-Coal
LCC/R
1890/1121112
15/75/93193
15/75/93193
Rocky Mountain Arsenal CO.

File Prefix: RMA2
PMCR: 370 L
CHP #2 2@ 125 L Fuel =NAG/FS
CHP #2 1@ 100 M Fuel = NAG/FS
CHP #2 1@ 20 M Fuel = NAG/FS
KSINV
KSCoal
KSHvy Oi
Savinp
5622
5538
7687
45196
70906
46243
-96197
-128967
-98862
-45878
-53522
-44932
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1942
Age = 1968
Age = 1984
Table B80
CHPECON Results for Scranton AAMP, File Prefix: SAM
New Plant
Technology
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Retrofit
Technology
Stoker
CWS
M-Coal
Boiler
$/MBtu
$/K#STM
K$INV
K$Fuel
KSLCC
29/29/29
29/29/29
29/29/29
20133/33/33
17/34/43/43
21/35/35/35
16/31/46,40
11.460
12.628
10.169
21.202
17.840
17.612
20.170
13.702
15.098
12.158
25.349
21.330
21.057
24.115
5182
5182
5182
40978
29810
24683
37703
29027
33286
24319
12782
17230
22696
12792
41790
46049
37082
77314
67983
67112
73549
Boiler
K$INV
K$Coal
KSHvy Oil
Savings
19/19/36
16/30/30
16/30/30
3074
1916
3436
11110
15580
10878
-27877
-35397
-27296
-13692
-17900
-12980
Scranton AAMP
File Prefix: SAM
PMCR: 85 L
Ave Mon. Load: 28.5 M
CHP #1 1@ 41 L Fuel =NG/FS
CHP #12@ 22 M Fuel =NG/FS
L-=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtm/HR)
Age = 1968
Age = 1961
B41
LCC/R
100
110
89
185
163
161
176
Table 35I
CHPECON Remitb for Sunflower AAMP, File Prefix: SIA
New Plant
S/K#STM
S/MItm
Boiler
Technlmogy
10374
8.677
200r20/200
Gas
11.896
9499
2001200/2
# OiI
8.177
6.839
200/200/200
#6 Oil
7.654
9.151
135/233/233/233
Stoker
9.288
7.769
117/234/299/299
CWS
9.528
7.970
142/245/245/245
COM
8.845
7.398
106/216/276/276
FBC
Retrofit
KSINV
Boiler
Technology
6668
225/2251225
Stoker
6396
187/187/187
CWS
9308
187/187/187
M-CoaI
Sunflower AAMP
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
Pile Prefix: SPA
M=(MBtuJHR)
PMCR: 600 L
Age = 1942
CHP #13@ 250 L Fuel NAG
KSINV
15159
15159
15159
100676
90577
61362
91855
KSFe
251919
293345
92068
94839
132181
171921
101820
KSConI
90517
122605
89038
KSHvy Oil
-213658
-282761
-210167
KSLCC
282521
323947
222670
249214
264330
271163
240684
LCCR
100
115
79
88
94
96
85
Savinp
-116472
-153759
-11820
Table B82
CHPECON Results for Toole AD, File Prefix: TAD
New Plant
Boiler
Technoly
20/20/20
Gas
20/20/20
#2 Oil
20120/20
#6 Oil
14/24/24/24
Stoker
12/24/30/30
CWS
15,"25/25/25
COM
11/22/28/28
FBC
Retrofit
Boiler
Technology
18/18/18
Stoker
15/15/15
cWS
15/15/15
M-Coal
Toole AD
File Prefix: TAD
PMCR: 60.3 L
CHP #1 3@ 20.1 M Fuel = FSR/FS2
S/MBtu
12.226
13418
10.136
25.915
21.269
20.218
24.669
$IK#STM
14.617
16.043
12.119
30.984
25.426
24.173
29.494
KSINV
4458
4458
4458
36813
25213
21778
33805
KSFuel
20082
23188
14640
9287
13014
14335
9043
KSLCC
31844
34950
26402
67500
57885
55032
64254
KSINV
2900
1698
3151
KSComl
7676
11614
7436
KSHvy Oil
-16047
-21307
-15545
Savings
-5470
-7983
-4957
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1972
B42
LCC/R
100
115
79
88
94
96
85
Table B3
CHPECON Results for Twin City AAMP. MN., File Prefi: TAMI
New Plat
Techmokosy
Boiler
SIMBtu
$/KM
Gas
41/41/41
10.424
12.463
#2 Oil
41141/41
11.696
13.984
#6 Oil
41/41/41
8.585
10.265
Stoker
28/48/48/48
16.883
20.185
CWS
24/48/62/62
14.311
17.110
COM
30/51/51/51
14.016
16.757
FBC
23/45/57/57
16.223
19.356
Retrolit
Technolosy
Boiler
KSINV
Stoker
36/36/36
3339
CWS
30f30f30
2246
M-Coal
30f30f30
3870
Twin City AAMP. MN.
File Prefix: TAMI
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
PMCR: 123 L
M=(MBtu/HR)
CHP #1 3@ 41.1 M Fuel = NG/FS= 1942
KSINV
6096
6096
6096
46687
34477
28528
43186
KSFmei
41549
48343
31734
18068
22441
28047
18033
K$LCC
55659
62453
45843
90147
79853
78206
86625
K$Coal
16193
20214
15908
KIHvy Oil
-17391
-46619
-36778
Saviup
-17877
-24158
-16999
LCC/R
100
115
82
162
143
141
156
Table B84
CHPECON Results for Twin City AAMP, File Prefix: TAM2
New Plant
Technology
Gs
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
CO'M
FBC
Boiler
33/33/33
33/33/33
33/33/33
23/39/39t39
20/39/39/39
24/41/41/41
18136/46/46
Retrofit
Technology
Boiler
Stoker
29/29/29
CWS
24/24/24
M-Coal
24/24/24
Twin City AAMP
File Pfefix: TAM2
PMCR: 99 L
Ave Mon. Load: 33 M
CHP #2 3@ 33 M Fuelf
S/MBtu
10.857
12.129
9.019
18.790
15.771
15.520
18.035
S/KSTM
12.980
14502
10.782
22.465
18.857
18.556
21.563
K$INV
5454
5454
5454
42812
31781
26261
39394
KSFuel
33479
38947
25578
14822
18032
23513
14981
KSLCC
46660
52128
38759
80752
70832
69704
77510
K$INV
3172
2037
3596
KSCoal
12991
16079
12726
KSHvy Ol
-30035
-37083
-29422
Savinls
-13071
-18966
-13099
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age =1941
B43
LCC/R
100
112
83
173
152
149
166
Table B85
CHPECON Results for US. Military Academy, PlUe Prefix: UMA
New Ptut
Teclmdob
Gn
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Rebmf
Tecalopos
Stoker
CWS
M-Coal
Boiler
S/MIto
134/134/134
134/134/134
134/134/134
90/155/155/155
78/186/199/199
95/163/163/163
92/44/184/184
9.290
10.457
7.998
11.029
10.715
10.565
10.711
$SK#STM
11.106
12-503
4.563
13.186
12.811
12.632
12.807
KSINV
KSFuel
KSLCC
12454
12454
12454
89519
78592
54773
83755
136963
157194
114600
56798
79710
104213
60005
160902
181133
138540
191032
193936
191238
185536
Boiler
KSINV
K$Coal
K$Hvy 0
Savbtp
180/180/180
150/150/150
150/150/150
5272
4656
7028
54346
74702
47822
-131901
-169715
-118147
-72282
-90356
-63296
LCC/R
100
113
86
119
121
119
115
U.S. Mlita-ry Academy

File Prefix: UMA
PMCR: 400 L
Ave Moen. Load: 133 M
CHIP #12@ 200 M Fuel = FS5
L=(KI STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtu/HR)
Age = 1968
Table B36
CUIPECON Results for Walter Reed Amy Medical Ceater, File Prefix: WMC1
New Plant
Teclbalogy
Gas
#2 Oil
#6 Oil
Stoker
CWS
COM
FBC
Retrofi
Techbas
Boiler
S/BMt
SKIDSTM
KSINV
KSFml
20/20/20
20/20/20
20/20/20
14/23/23/23
12/23/29/29
14/24/24/24
11/21/27/27
10.789
13.425
10.887
25.988
20.791
20.638
24.585
12.900
16.051
13.017
31.071
24.837
24.675
29395
4390
4390
4390
36032
24128
21178
33094
10411
23275
16666
9697
12676
15883
9367
KSINV
KSCaal
K$Hvy 011
Saviap
7698
10977
7465
-19004
-23985
-18428
-8419
-11326
-7834
B04
Stoker
2886
CWS
1681
M-CoaI
3129
Base: Walter Reed Army Medical Center
File Prefix: WMCl
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
PMCR: 58 L
M=(MBu/-HR)
Ave Mon. Load. 19.3 M
CHP # 1@ 21 L Fuel = FS6
Age = 1938
1@ 24 L Fuel = FS6
Age = 1982
1@ 13 L Fuel = FS2
Age = 1938
B44
K$LCC
28102
34967
28357
67690
56589
56174
64037
LCC/R
100
124
101
240
201
200
228
Table B87
CHPCON Remsts far Walter Reed Meica Center, FiU Prefix: WMC2
New PIant
Tecbuolqy
Bo1wr
Oas
107/107/107
#2 Oil
107/107/107
#6 Oil
107/107/107
Stoker
72/124/124/124
CWS
63/125/159/159
COM
76/131/131/131
FBC
581116/148/148
Walter Reed Medical Center
File Prefix: WMC2
PMCR: 320 L
CHP #2 2@ 100 L Fuel = NO/FS2
CHP #2 2@ 60L Fuel =NGIFS
S/M~ts
7.697
10.332
7.795
11205
10.874
10.566
11.014
SK1STM
9202
12.353
9.319
13.397
13.000
12.633
13.168
KSIMN
10009
I1009
10029
71098
61265
43461
67845
KSFwd
85649
122029
87001
43355
63568
79867
46188
KLCC
106250
142629
107603
154691
156864
152428
152045
LCC/R
100
134
101
146
148
143
143
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBtuvIR)
Age =1987
Age =1973
Table B88
CHPECON Remdts for WatervIlet, File Prefix: WAR
New Plant
Teclmoloa
Boller
Gas
49/49/49
#2 Oil
49/49/49
#6 Oil
49/49/49
33/57/57/57
Stoker
29/57/57/57
CWS
35/60/60/60
COM
FBC
27/53/68/68
Retreflt
Tecliowo"
Boiler
Stoker
18/21/31/31
CWS
15/18/18/26/26
M-Coal
15/18/26/26
Baae: Watervliet
FRe Prefix: WAR
PMCR: 146 L
Ave Mon. Load: 48 M
CHP #6 2@ 24.2 M L Fuel = FS
CHP 06 2@ 35.2 M Fuel = FS
CHP #6 1@ 7.0 M Fuel = FS
S/MBtu
10303
11.471
90.125
15.973
14.097
13.876
15.210
$/KSSTM
12319
13.715
10.775
19.097
16.855
16.590
18.246
K$1NV
6592
6592
6592
50301
39469
30849
46459
K$1Fel
49590
7855
41519
21731
28248
37954
22141
K$LCC
64408
71710
56338
99848
92091
90645
95397
KSINV
4084
3169
4948
K$Coal
19943
26953
1970
KSHvy ON
-47531
-61236
-46981
Savbap
-23503
-31112
-22302
L=(K# STEAM/HR)
M=(MBui/HR)
Age = 1952
Age = 1956, 1957
Age = 1978
B45
LCC/R
100
111
87
155
143
141
148
USACERL DISTRIBUTION
Chief of Engirn
ATTN: CEHEC-IM-LH (2)
AWlN: CEHEC-IM-LP (2)
AWrN: CERD-L
CECPW 22060
ATTN: CECPW-FU-M
AIrN: Lbray
US Army Engr District
ATTN: Lbray (40)
US Army Engr Division
ATTN: Ubrary (13)
US Army Europe
ATTN: AEAEN-ODCS 09014
US Army Mate"el Command (AMC)
Alexandria. VA 22333-0001
ATTN: AMCEN-F
US Army HSC
Fort Sn Houslon 78234
AWTN: HSLO-F
Fisblons
" Medical Ctr
ATMN: H04G-DPW 80045
Walr ee Army Medical Ctr 20307
Nationalmd Bureau 20310
ATTN: bukellations Div
Tyndel FS 32403
ATTN: HOAFCESA Program Ofc
Duefgus Tech Info Center 22304
ATTN: DTIC-FAB (2)
Delens Fuel Supply Cenoer
ATTN: DFSC-PR 22314
81
4/94
FORSCOM
Forts GUlem & McPherson 30330
ATTN: FCEN
TRADOC
Fort Monroe 23651
ATTN: ATBO-G
Fort Belvoir 22060
ATrN: CECC-R
USARPAC 96858
ATrN: DPW
ATTN: APEN-A
CEWES 39180
ATTN: Ubrary
CECRL 03755
ATTN: Ll.rary
USA AMCOM 61299
ATrN: AMSMC-IR
ATTN: AMSMC-IS
Naval Facilities Engr Command
AITN: Code 16528 22332-2300
Naval Facilities Engr Service Center 93043
AITN: Code 241
This publicalion was mproduced on recycled papw.
* US. GOVEedMeAr PNTNG OFRMC

19H9-51o-as/o

A 280581

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

A 280581

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Uo

USACERL Technical Report FE-94/09

An Economic Analysis of Converting

retrofitting heavy oil plants for coal firing may

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

The contents of this report ae not to be used for advatising, publication,

m t or approval of the use of such commea products.

Department of the Army position, unless so designated by other authorizd

DESTROY THIS REPORT WHEN IT IS NO LONGER NEEDED

USER EVALUATION OF REPORT

2. How, specifically, is the report being used?

(Infonnation source, design data or procedure,

What is your evaluation of this report in the following areas?

6. Please mail the completed form to:

CDeM How"r. Suit 1204. *aUpon. VA Z209430.

An Economic Analysis of Converting Large Gas- and Oil-Fired Heating Plants to

dated 20 November 1989

Mie CJ. Lin

U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (USACERL)

P.O. Box 9005

9. SPONSORINUMONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)

U.S. Army Center for Public Works (USACPW)

12L. OISTRIBUTIONIAVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

15. NUMBER OF PAGES

14. SUiJECT TERMS

oil-fired heating plants

central heating plants

gas-fired heating plantsI&PCEOD

Central Heating Plant Economic Evaluation (CHPECON)

COAL CONVERSION ECONOMIC STUDY ..............................

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

APPENDIX A: 1989 CONUS Installation Energy Consumption Report

LCC Ratios Relative to Gas (100)

CHPECON Results in Order of Increasing Cost Penalty for New Plants

CHPECON Results in Order of Decreasing Cost Savings for CWS Retrofit

CHPECON Results for Aberdeen Proving Ground, File Prefix: APG I

CHPECON Results for Aberdeen Proving Ground, File Prefix: APG2

CHIPECON Results for Aberdeen Proving Ground, File Prefix: APG3

CHPECON Results for Army Materials and Mech. Research Center,

CHPECON Results for Badger AAMP, File Prefix: BAM

CHPECON Results for Bayonne, File Prefix: BAY

CHPECON Results for Cameron Station, File Prefix: CRS

CHPECON Results for Defense Depot, File Prefix: DDP

CHPECON Results for Fort Belvoir, File Prefix: FBV

CHPECON Results for Fort Ben Harrison, File Prefix: FBH

CHPECON Results for Fort Bliss, File Prefix: FBS

CHPECON Results for Fort Bragg, File Prefix: FBGI

CHPECON Results for Fort Bragg, File Prefix: FBG2

CHPECON Results for Fort Bragg, File Prefix: FBG3

CHPECON Results for Fort Bragg, File Prefix: FBG4

CHPECON Results for Fort Bragg, File Prefix: FBG5

CHPECON Results for Fort Campbell, File Prefix: FCB1

CHPECON Results for Fort Campbell, File Prefix: FCB2

CHPECON Results for Fort Carson, File Prefix: FCS

CHPECON Results for Fort Detrick, File Prefix: FDT

CHPECON Results for Fort Dix, File Prefix: FDXI

CHPECON Results for Fort Dix, File Prefix: FDX2

CHPECON Results for Fort Dix, File Prefix: FDX3

CHPECON Results for Fort Dix, File Prefix: FDX4

CHPECON Results for Fort George Meade, File Prefix: FGM

CHPECON Results for Fort Gordon, File Prefix: FGDI

CHPECON Results for Fort Gordon, File Prefix: FGD2