Think about it for Christ sake and Satan is dead God damn it http://www.youtube.com/watch?

NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=X5L_x6RHE4s Empire of the City Vatican, London, DC AMEN Satanic God http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luNgPO-vqBw&feature=related Hitlers Rothchilds http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmgJE8hrL1Y Rothschild 2 World Wars http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzLIz27GqWs Rothschild Federal Reserve http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhL2gxjemLg Bank Cartels Federal Reserve http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx0vrR2BFp8 Money out of thin air http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onWb_ripZ3c How Rothschild controlled the modern world Goldsmiths first bankers started cheating as in Gutenberg Time to bring Crooks before a legal court Central Banks Plutocracy Money Changers http://www.scribd.com/doc/62297204/On-Realizing-the-Debts-Incurred-by-the-Satanic-Theirs-ShouldBe-Enough-to-Make-Even-the-Anti-Christ-Convert-to-Believing-in-God Reality is the Truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception
Truth is that which would be observed by God whether or not He exists r whether or not one believes He exists

IDEAL Simply reality sanely dealt with http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics/2013/03/my-entry.html Arrest warrants Pope Francis, Queen Elizabeth, Pope Benedict XVI, Prime Minister Harper http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XttXhxYIKI Downfall of the Vatican, the Queen and the system February 25 2013 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ormOIlOi4Vc Sentencing

If all Gods children we would be humanity co op with no borders just responsibility jurisdictions. What we have is bulls and screwed cows with ME Mother Earth and her children shit upon royally http://www.scribd.com/doc/113882977/Spirit-Intent-Precedence-de-Jure-Constitution-or-Romans-13Gaming-the-System-de-Facto Spirit intent Precedence De jure

Do not do to others what you would not want for self There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words Benevolence Righteousness and Morality finally I began to make out what was written between the lines. The whole volume was but a single phrase, Eat People Spirit intent Precedence De jure

Do unto others what you would have them do unto you SELF GODIC De facto De jure

UNAZIP
United Nations Alien Zionist Insidious Puppets The Star of David in the Leningrad Codex, 1008 CE Upon independence in 1948, the new Jewish state was formally named Medinat Yisrael, or the State of Israel, after other proposed historical and religious names including Eretz Israel ("the Land of Israel"), Zion, and Judea, were considered and rejected.[25] In the early weeks of independence, the government chose the term "Israeli" to denote a citizen of Israel, with the formal announcement made by Minister of Foreign Affairs Moshe Sharett.[26]

The name Israel has historically been used, in common and religious usage, to refer to the biblical Kingdom of Israel or the entire Jewish nation.[27] According to the Hebrew Bible the name "Israel" was given to the patriarch Jacob (Standard Yisrael, Isrl; Septuagint Greek: Isral;

"struggle with God"

[29]

[28]

after he successfully wrestled with the angel of the Lord.

Jacob's twelve sons became the ancestors of the Israelites, also known as the Twelve Tribes of Israel or Children of Israel. Jacob and his sons had lived in Canaan but were forced by famine to go into Egypt for four generations until Moses, a great-great grandson of Jacob,[30] led the Israelites back into Canaan during the "Exodus". The earliest archaeological artifact to mention the word "Israel" is the Merneptah Stele of ancient Egypt (dated to the late 13th century BCE).[31] The area is also known as the

Holy Land,
being holy for all Abrahamic

religions including

Judaism, Christianity, Islam

and the Bah' Faith.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJxdIXgMGAI The other Israel Pharisees killed Jesus Talmud OK to kill indirectly Zionists will have no other Gods before them caused Romans to carry out their deeds keeping hands filthy clean Spirit intent Precedence De facto

And they called it

Good Friday
Who is they? Easter Bunny
Evolved Aristocrats Satanical Tax Evading Reptilian Bankers United Nations Nefarious Yahoos
http://www.scribd.com/doc/53187051/To-United-Nations

http://www.scribd.com/doc/57985401/To-United-Nations-Again

Old Money Evolves Nefariously OMEN http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy AMEN Pagan God PG Papal Guidance

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=X5L_x6RHE4s Empire of the City Vatican, London, DC AMEN Satanic God NEWS Never Ending War Story

Sphinx
in Greek mythology, a winged creature with a lion's body and a woman's head. It strangled all who could not answer its riddle, but killed itself when Oedipus answered correctly. A sphinx (Greek: /sphinx, Botian: /Phix) is a mythical creature with, as a minimum, the body of a lion and the head of a human or a cat. In Greek tradition, it has the haunches of a lion, the wings of a great bird, and the face of a woman. She is mythicised as treacherous and merciless. Those who cannot answer her riddle suffer a fate typical in such mythological stories,

as they are killed and eaten by this ravenous monster.[1]

Unlike the Greek sphinx which was a woman, the Egyptian sphinx is typically shown as a man (anandrosphinx). In addition, the Egyptian sphinx was viewed as benevolent in contrast to the malevolent Greek version and was thought of as a guardian often flanking the entrances to temples. In European decorative art, the sphinx enjoyed a major revival during the Renaissance. Later, the sphinx image, something very similar to the original Ancient Egyptian concept, was exported into many other cultures, albeit often interpreted quite differently due to translations of descriptions of the originals and the evolution of the concept in relation to other cultural traditions.

Generally the role of sphinxes is associated with architectural structures such as royal tombs or religious temples. The oldest known sphinx was found near Gobekli Tepe at another site, Nevali ori,[2] or possibly 120 miles to the east at Kortik Tepe, Turkey and was dated to 9,500 BC.[3] http://www.scribd.com/doc/113233414/How-Do-You-Inform-the-Brainwashed-They-Are-ReptilianMinded-Zombies-Without-Getting-Hurt All that is written and permitted to stand is that of the WE - Warring Elite who use the word we loosely
There is them and us their unknowing slaves

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy

Popular sovereignty or the sovereignty of the people

is

the belief
that the legitimacy of the state is created by the will or consent of its people, who are the source of all political power. It is closely associated to the social contract philosophers, among whom are Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Popular sovereignty expresses a concept and does not necessarily reflect or describe a political reality.[1]

It is often contrasted with the concept of

parliamentary sovereignty, and with individual sovereignty. Them The best in the fine art of PRICK I FIBIB gain power proclaiming De jure "Thy kingdom come"
The request for God's kingdom to come is usually interpreted as a reference to the belief, common at the time, that a Messiah figure would bring about a Kingdom of God.

Traditionally the coming of God's Kingdom is seen as a divine gift to be prayed for,

not a human achievement.

This idea is frequently challenged by groups who believe that the Kingdom will come by the hands of those faithful to work for a better world. It is believed by these individuals that Jesus' commands to feed the hungry and clothe the needy are the Kingdom to which he was referring.

It is not long before the opposition catches them in De facto mode as the wannabe vie to be the best in the fine art of PRICK I FIBIB Political Religious Intellectual Charlatan Kleptocrats inciting Fickle Inherent Bias Ignorant Bliss

Sovereignty
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty Sovereignty is the quality of having supreme, independent authority over a geographic area, such as a territory.[1] It can be found in a power to rule and make law that rests

on a political fact for which no purely legal explanation can be provided.

In theoretical terms, the idea of "sovereignty", historically, from Socrates to Thomas Hobbes, has always necessitated a moral imperative on the entity exercising it.
According to the Ancient Roman statesman Cicero, "We are all servants of the laws in order that we may be free."[10] During the Roman Republic, controversial magistrates might be put on trial when their terms of office expired. Under the Roman Empire, the sovereign was personally immune (legibus solutus), but those with grievances could sue the treasury.[6 Us http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humans Humans (known taxonomically as Homo sapiens,[3][4] Latin for "wise man" or "knowing man")[5] are the only living species in the Homogenus. Anatomically modern humans originated in Africa about 200,000 years ago, reaching full behavioral modernity around 50,000 years ago.[6] Humans have a highly developed brain and are capable of abstract reasoning, language, introspection, and problem solving. This mental capability, combined with an erect body carriage that frees the hands for manipulating objects, has allowed humans to make far greater use of tools than any other living species on Earth. Other higher-level thought processes of humans, such as self-awareness, rationality, and sapience,[7][8][9] are considered to be defining features of what constitutes a "person".[citation needed] They incorporate self and proclaim to be Legal Persons meaning us persons no legal status I suppose just self-aware, rational, sapient persons known taxonomically as humans 6

From: lawmen@googlegroups.com [mailto:lawmen@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bob Hurt Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 4:16 AM To: 'Lawmen' Subject: [Lawmen: 3525] Attorney Brad Henschel on becoming an attorney and the practice of law I thought you might appreciate this attorneys perspective on the practice of law and what it takes to become an attorney. Bob Hurt 2460 Persian Drive #70 Clearwater, FL 33763 +1 (727) 669-5511 Scholar Fund Jurisdictionary Law Newsletter Archives Downloads GetZooks!

From: Brad Henschel Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 8:38 PM To: lawsters@googlegroups.com; Bob Hurt; Lawmen; John Findley Subject: Re: Rich Cantwell's scurrilous screed about lawyers I went to law school in 1984 in order to help others with Tax problems and following the great example of Larry Becraft. I was 39 at the time. It was really difficult, especially at age 39 to go back to school. I had to go day and night and I had to study ALL THE TIME to get all the confusing information being presented to me. I found out later the teaching methods used in law schools, known was the socratic method was different from paralegal schools were the paralegals were simply told the truth of the course instead of just reading cases to learn what the law really was about, as was done in Law school. The cost was expensive even at UWLA, a State Bar but not ABA approved law school. I had 325 classmates, 1/2 being women. Only about 40-43 graduated and of them 20, including me, passed the State Bar Exam. 20 out of 325 people. Those 325 people were ALL better educated than I was. Most of them were already successful business people. One brought instant printing to the US from Japan. Another was a real estate investor who drove his rolls royce to school. These two dropped out. Another was the paralegal for King of Torts lawyer in San Francisco - she flunked out in Civil Procedure 7

class. Another was a government employee. - He moved to Texas never having passed the Bar Exam and he told me that information face to face. Another was the former Iranian Health Minister. Another was the daughter of a lawyer who quit 8 weeks ahead of graduation because she didn't want to be a lawyer, her father pressured her into it, so she quit. She had the highest grade average in the school. Learning the law is only 1/2 of the equation. Then you have to apply it, that's another learning curve. The pressure on lawyers is so extreme and the loss of sleep so pervausive that lawyers usually die before age 50. Cancer is rampant among lawyers as is mental illness due to the pressures. IF you worked two jobs at minimum wage you would have more money and work less than most lawyers work. Most of my law school classmates only wanted to make money. I wanted to learn the law and be good at it. When they saw me coming they would run away so they wouldn't have to talk law with me. I won a lot of cases before the Bar entered my life. Then I learned about how the Bar is really in place to prevent disruption to the large law firms, many of whom are now victims themselves of the economy. The law is like every other occupation, it has great people and it has scum and everything in between. The Bar is used to silence people like Richard Fine. But mainly the general public doesn't understand legal ethics. They are mainly the antithesis of real world ethics. Clients think a bar complaint will force the attorney to be better. Richard Fine was disbarred after exposing judicial corruption of the highest order. The Bar and the legislature covered it up. I had the State of Calif sanctioned $30k for programming their computers to violate the US Bankruptcy laws. I won case after case in criminal court and my motions in bankruptcy court for my clients resulted in the expungement of millions in taxes. Clients in CA are now facing a lack of affordable attorneys or no attorneys to provide legal services to them as the CAL bar took out thousands of attorneys, leaving these people without legal representation and left them at the mercy of the government and it's lawyers. - Brad Henschel, JD, now an inactive member of the State Bar of CA. HENSCHEL NOTICE OF PRIVACY & CONFIDENTIALITY: This message is private and confidential. It contains confidential and privileged information which is both privileged & confidential under state and federal law and/or exempt from disclosure under law, including but not limited to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 2510-2521. NO reader may disclose, distribute or copy this email. If you get this e-mail in error, notify me immediately by electronic-mail reply and delete this original message. No recording, printing or sharing of this email, which has been sent over telephone lines, is allowed, and recording it is illegal. Cal. Penal Code 632.

From: Bob Hurt <bob@bobhurt.com> To: Lawmen <lawmen@googlegroups.com> Sent: Mon, March 22, 2010 4:48:32 8

PM Subject: Rich Cantwell's scurrilous screed about lawyers Rich: In your screed below, you denounce the MAJORITY of attorneys but supply NO facts to support your allegation. Because the lawyers bathwater has become dingy you seem to want to drown them, spank them, or toss them out. That seems a little crazy to me. We Need Attorneys. Lawyers comprise virtually the ONLY PEOPLE IN THIS NATION who can handle litigation competently, so the non-lawyer world generally cannot do without them. Even the lawyers admit that only a fool represents himself in court, and because of vexatious litigant laws, methods of blocking evidence from juries, and frivolous argument standards, even THEY cannot get justice in courts. They pay a fortune for education, pay a fortune to maintain offices, pay a fortune in personal time doing legal research, and pay a fortune for online and other law research services. They risk terrible sanctions and contempt citations whenever they stand up against deluded, incompetent, or corrupt judges, risk absolute destruction of their careers by professional foes in the bar, and then suffer substantial losses of income to clients who stiff them. Many, if not most, attorneys work 70-hour weeks, live on the edge of financial disaster, and take 5 to 10 years to build up a law practice that will allow them enough time and money to take their families on vacation every year. In spite of all that, most attorneys do pro bono work, giving of themselves to help those they consider deserving and unable to afford legal services. So why do you seek to excoriate them with colossally unfair generalizations like those in your obloquy below? Methinks thou doth protest too much. Way too. Licensing. Furthermore, you err in your pronouncements about licensing. The Constitution of Florida in Article V Section 15 empowers the Supreme Court to regulate the practice of law: The supreme court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to regulate the admission of persons to the practice of law and the discipline of persons admitted. It integrated the bar in 1949 partly for that purpose. It has established, through the bar, rules for an independent examiner to determine the qualifications of applicants for membership. Upon successful qualification, the bar issues a bar number and card to the new member, and the Supreme Court clerk issues the LICENSE as attorney and counselor at law which the new attorney typically frames and hangs on the wall in the law office. You have seen many of these licenses, and if you visit the Florida Bar web site you will find the bar number (the equivalent of the license number) for every attorney and jurist bar member in Florida. A Note about Smart People. You seem to imply that smart people (like most attorneys) screw other people (the relatively stupid, I presume). You fail to note that in many, if not most, cases a screwing simply cannot be helped. Should a teacher grind the education of a classroom of students to a snails pace in order to accommodate the stupid children in the classroom? Before busing that did not present much of a problem because smart people generally lived in different school districts from stupid people, owing to their relative abilities to buy nice houses in nice neighborhoods. Now, after busing, schools have honors classes to segregate the smart from the stupid. No matter what, stupid kids dont end up with as good an education as smart kids for the same reason that a pint jar cannot hold the amount of water that a quart jar can hold: inherent capacities simply cannot be exceeded. 9

So, naturally, smart people generally exhibit more sense in managing money and their other affairs, and that can make them seem to take advantage of stupid people, particularly in a free-enterprise capitalist economic system. OUR particular system has in the past 100 years become burdened with thousands of laws and regulations that protect the stupid from the smart and the weak from the strong. But at the same time, our nations states have eliminated every vestige of eugenics laws that might eventually have obviated those protectionist laws. What do I mean here? Our land needs fewer stupid people in it, by at least an order of magnitude. Then caveat emptor wont seem like such a dirty term because far fewer people will seem screwed. And I mean that everybody, not just attorneys, need to learn the equivalent of the first two years of law school in their public education. Legitimate Complaints, with Solutions. Regardless of the licensing issue, you dont have a valid point to make in your anti-lawyer tirade, even though you could make some very valid points. Please allow me to make some of them for you: 1. Bar Integration Destroys Republic. a. The integration of the bar with the Supreme court makes every bar member a member of the Judicial Branch of government. The Florida Constitution requires in Article II Section 3 that The powers of the state government shall be divided into legislative, executive and judicial branches. No person belonging to one branch shall exercise any powers appertaining to either of the other branches unless expressly provided herein. It does not permit bar members outside the judiciary except as Attorney General and State Attorneys and their assistant attorneys. All legislator attorneys and staff attorneys in the Legislative and Executive branches operate in violation of the Constitution and to that extent create a judicial oligarchy because the Supreme Court can and does exercise dominion over all of them. That violates CUSA Article IV Section 4 which provides in pertinent part The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government. b. Solution: de-integrate the bar and turn the regulation of the practice of law over to the Executive branch. 2. Attorneys dont regulate judges, but tolerate judicial immunity. a. Attorneys form the pool from which judges rise to office, and so attorneys comprise the group best suited to lead in judicial reform for eliminating judicial corruption. They have the requisite skills and the proximity to judges, so they know better than any public other than victims of corruption which jurists have become corrupt or downright evil. They have let the people down because they dont use their bar to police the judiciary. In case you havent noticed, the bar governors and grievance committees ignore grievances against jurists. But they can and should work to revoke the bar licenses of corrupt judges, for that would disqualify the judges from office (the state constitutions typically make bar membership a qualification for becoming a jurist). Many attorneys fail to hold the courts accountable or engage in guerilla activism against crooked judges. By guerilla I mean a form of activism like hiring a Private Investigator to dig up the dirt on a judge, and then hiring a Public Relations agency to expose that dirt to 10

the press and the public through blogs, etc, without the attorney coming under fire for bring disrepute to the profession. b. Solution: litigate and lobby against judicial immunity and for empowerment and independence of grand juries to investigate government employee crimes. 3. Unfair Business Practices. a. Some law firms overcharge for services rendered and overbill clients by charging for services not rendered. Some attorneys suffer from incompetence or laziness and dont give clients their best effort at advocacy. As a consequence, many people who need advocacy simply cannot afford the service, and of those who manage to afford it, many dont get adequate advocacy, and lose the case as a result. Pro bono work does not balance this out. The bar seems to turn a blind eye to much of this, and the public has no clue whether the attorney for hire will do a good job or not. b. Solution: Lobby for laws to require attorneys to give clients satisfaction questionnaires and make the results public. 4. Legal Services Monopoly. a. Attorneys seem loathe to campaign against the unfair Unlicensed Practice of Law statutes with which the bar and state attorneys attack private citizens who help one another with legal matters. They have helped create a legal services monopoly that has led to their overcharging for legal services. Attorneys really should become leaders in the communities of their residence, guiding people in ways to keep our governments constitutional. Many dont seem to participate nearly to the extent they should or could. b. Solution: Lobby for change in UPL to apply only to specifically defined activities that actually require knowledge gained in law school or other special certification. The law should allow anybody to practice an area of law upon a demonstration of competent knowledge in that area. You have probably noticed that I offered solutions to each problem. Lawyers cannot implement three of the solutions by themselves. They need public support. You could help educate the public about their need to provide that support. You could encourage attorneys to do the lobbying. 11

Many Attorneys Deserve Our Appreciation. Bottom line, instead of flaying the flesh off the stooped backs of overworked Patriot Attorneys, you ought to bless them for their general goodness and generosity, and encourage more to join their ranks and help them excise and bring to justice crooked judges and over-zealous prosecutors. What law professionals do you know who have created web sites and led movements to educate patriots in the law and constitutional principles, and to mobilize people to effective political activism? Can you name any? I can name three: 1. Larry Becraft http://hiwaay.net/~becraft - for at least 20 years, Larry has at some expense hosted a web site that does not sell his legal services, but educates people in the law and guides patriots away from harmful myths that will land them in prison, and guides students toward sound principles of economics. Larry spent hundreds of hours scanning and converting to searchable text the Statutes at Large for the income tax laws and the related Code of Federal Regulations, put them on DVDs, and makes them available via the web and on disk to serious students. He operates a radio show at his own expense weekly to educate people about tax issues and patriot myths, encouraging people to learn and use the law, and participate in honest government. 2. Tom Cryer http://truthattack.org for the past 2+ years, Tommy has led patriots in attacking the errors of the IRS, making a public, political issue of those errors (such as the Stop Thief rallies at post offices at tax time) and educating people about income tax laws and issues. He has posted all of Larrys searchable laws and codes on his web site, making them freely available to everyone. He co-hosts the radio show with Larry, as a public service, free. 3. Jon Roland http://constitution.org Jon does not practice as an attorney, but as an educator and law philosopher he devotes his life to helping our governments adhere to the Constitution and our people become better Citizens. He interacts with many attorneys and leaders in the Patriot movement to encourage people to become activists in reforming our government and courts. His web site constitutes a treasure trove of related educational information, including Larrys searchable laws. I love these men. I invoke Gods most precious blessings upon them. I honor them for their devotion to truth and their selfless contributions to our nations underlying greatness. I dont examine them under a microscope for their peccadilloes, vices, and sins. I dont expect perfection of them. But, I do encourage them toward whatever perfection they can achieve in their short lives on this whirling rock. I encourage you to do the same. Bob Hurt 2460 Persian Drive #70 Clearwater, FL 12

33763 +1 (727) 669-5511 Scholar Fund Jurisdictionary Law Newsletter Archives Downloads GetZooks! You received this because you have membership in the "Lawmen" Google Group. Comment to group owner - reply to the message (only the owner posts messages). See the archives, change options - visit http://groups.google.com/group/Lawmen Join / Subscribe - send email to Lawmen+subscribe@googlegroups.com Resign / Unsubscribe- send email to Lawmen+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lawmen+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.

********************************************

*** Note**** Bob Hurt never responded to me, as he and approximately 47,000 members use the information to sue the governments that is ultimately the taxpayer keeping them all busy in luxurious life style along with the other Bottom Feeder Piranha To get up to speed and have a daily diet of how corrupt governments are join Bob Hurt's lawmen+owners@googlegroups.com One massive group of Bottom Feeder Piranha that donate to Bob's lawmen for information to sue the asses off the government's 90% majority taxpayers Please fasten your seat belts A confidential e-mail from an Attorney states if a lawyer does the legal thing he or she will be called to the Bar and dismissed I looked into it further to find that Richard Fine was not only dismissed from the Bar, but put behind bars and has been in solitary confinement for over 18 months now without charges laid against him presumably holding him there until the Bilderberg New World Order is in place having been meeting since 1954 began their initiative in 2007 with the world financial collapse that we ain't seen nothing yet.

10 Years if you think Government corrupt USA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSYLdoRwkrs
13

Richard a Fine example goes to jail

11/15/10

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine/ Please join the Facebook Cause: FREE THE LA-FIPs (Los Angeles Falsely Imprisoned Persons) http://www.causes.com/causes/222335/about INTRODUCTION - MULTI-IDIOMAS English Intro: Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case. Richard Fine attempted to have his habeas corpus reviewed by the United States courts, from the US District Court, through the US Court of Appeals, to the Supreme Court of the United States; however, all United States courts involved in the matter denied Richard DOCUMENTS The two records below, produced by the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, and by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department as the legal foundation for the holding of Richard Fine are alleged as fraud, each on its own. Moreover, the production of contradictory records by the two justice system agencies of Los Angeles County is alleged as additional fraud to top it off. 1) View the FALSE AND DELIBERATELY MISLEADING records provided by Sheriff Lee Baca in letter to Los Angeles County Supervisor, Michael Antonovich, in response to request for access to the California public records that were the non-existing warrant and booking records of Richard Fine. For over a year, Sheriff Lee Baca insists on providing false records - claiming that Richard Fine was arrested on location and by authority of the "San Pedro Municipal Court". No such court has existed for almost a decade: http://inproperinla.com/10-01-08-antonovich-ltr-repeat-mailing-w-attch-env-s.pdf

14

2) View the FALSE ON ITS FACE March 4, 2009 Judgment and Order of Contempt. Such judgment record is missing any authentication at all. It was stamped on its face "FILED" with the date of March 4, 2009, but signed on its last page by Judge Yaffe and dated March 24, 2009. Such judgment was never entered as required by California Code to make it "effectual for any purpose": http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-marina-v-county-09-03-04-false-fine-judment-record-copyfrom-us-dist-ct-habeas-corpus-doc-16-response-by-la-sup-ct-filed-may-1-2009.pdf MISSING DOCUMENTS The case of Richard Fine documented a pattern of publication of false records in online public access systems, and denial of access to or missing true judicial records: 1) The Los Angeles Superior Court in Marina v LA County (BS109420) published a false online "Case Summary", but denied access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) in the case management system of the court. 2) The Sheriff of Los Angeles County in re: Richard I Fine, (Inmate #1824367) published false online arrest and booking records in its "Inmate Information Center", but denied access to the true Los Angeles County Booking Record of Inmate Richard Fine. 3) The US District Court, Los Angeles in Fine v Baca (2:09-cv-01914) published a false online "PACER docket", which the Clerk of the Court refuses to certify, but denied access to the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing - the authentication records) in the case, and to the paper record, which was Richard Fine's commencing record - the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which was allegedly adulterated at the US District Court. 4) The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit in Fine v Sheriff (09-71692) and Fine v Sheriff (09-56073) published false online "PACER dockets", but denied access to the NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity - the authentication records), and also to critical records filed by respondents in the appeal. 5) The US Supreme Court in Fine v Baca (09-A827) published a false online "docket" noting denials on both March 12, 2010 and April 23/26, 2010, which were not supported by the Court records in the case. Any evidence of valid judicial review of the Application was missing from the Court file. http://www.scribd.com/doc/35193676/ http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/ http://www.scribd.com/doc/34940014/ http://www.scribd.com/doc/34834530/ http://www.scribd.com/doc/35014599/ http://www.scribd.com/doc/35149271/ COMPLAINTS 15

Below are links to two complaints filed with the office of US Attorney, Central District of California - for public corruption and deprivation of rights in the case of Richard Fine: 1) View complaint filed with US Attorney Office, alleging public corruption and deprivation of rights by the California Judicial Council and California Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald George, relative to their conduct in the habeas corpus at the US District Court: http://www.scribd.com/doc/33879469/ 2) View the Complaint filed July 8, 2010 against Judge David Yaffe and Sheriff Lee Baca - for Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights in re: Imprisonment of Richard Fine: http://www.scribd.com/doc/34057033/ 3) View the Complaint filed July 1, 2010, against Counsel Danny Bickell, of the US Supreme Court, alleging public corruption and deprivation of rights relative to his conduct in the Application Fine v Baca (09-A827). http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/ PETITION WE ASK SHERIFF LEE BACA TO USE HIS DUE AUTHORITY AND PROPERLY ADDRESS THE LEGAL, CIVIL, AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF AN AMERICAN, INMATE RICHARD FINE (CJ INMATE 1824367). WE PRAY SHERIFF LEE BACA REVIEW THE ARREST AND BOOKING RECORDS, AND IF FOUND NOT CONFORMING WITH THE FUNDAMENTALS OF THE LAW - INITIATE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AND IMMEDIATELY RELEASE ATTORNEY RICHARD FINE. WITH IT, THE SHERIFF MAY MARK A NEW BEGINNING FOR THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY JUSTICE SYSTEM, WITH DIGNITY OF THE LEGAL, CIVIL, AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF ALL... Executive Summary: Instant petition is filed with Los Angeles County Sheriff LEE BACA, to use his due authority and properly address the legal, civil and human rights of an American, inmate RICHARD FINE (#1824367). Reconstructed Chronology: - Prior to the March 4, 2009 proceeding, a request was forwarded by the court of Judge David Yaffe to the Sheriff Department to have the Warrant Detail present in the proceeding, with the understanding that the proceeding would end with the sentencing and jailing of Attorney Richard Fine for contempt. - On March 4, 2009 Judge David Yaffe indeed pronounced such sentence in open court, as evidenced in the Court Reporter's transcript. Through such oral directives, Judge Yaffe misled the Sheriff's Warrant Detail to arrest Attorney Richard Fine at 11:05 am - albeit - with no written, valid, and effectual warrant at all. - On March 4, 2009, at 11:05 am, the Sheriff's Warrant Detail arrested Richard Fine in open court, at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, albeit - with no warrant at all. 16

- On March 4, 2009 Judge Yaffe then left the courtroom, and likewise - left the Warrant Detail with no record as an adequate legal foundation for the arrest. Instead, Judge Yaffe proceeded to create a second, contradictory record in the court file. The court file to this date does not reflect any sentencing or jailing at all. In fact, the March 4, 2009 proceeding was entirely omitted from the record! - On March 4, 2009, at 12:32 pm, the Sheriff's Warrant Detail, having no record as foundation for the arrest and jailing, recorded the arrest and booking of Richard Fine as if they had taken place on location, and pursuant to the authority of the non-existent "San Pedro Municipal Court." Such records were a false and deliberately misleading records, and out of compliance with the law. They had no valid court order or judgment as its foundation. No such court had existed for almost a decade! The false and deliberately misleading booking record is the main subject of instant petition. - On March 4, 2009, at 4:31 pm, papers were received by the Sheriff's Department through an anonymous fax transmission, unauthenticated, and with no cover sheet, from "Judicial Services". Such papers reflected yet a third, again false and deliberately misleading set of retroactive records for the arrest and booking of Richard Fine. Such records included invalid records: (a) The March 4, 2009 Remand Order and (b) the March 4, 2009 Judgment for contempt. On such background it was understandable why Sheriff Lee Baca refused to respond to Attorney Richard Fine's habeas corpus petition, and likewise - why Sheriff Lee Baca has refused to allow access to the California public records, which are the arrest and booking record of Richard Fine. Pleading: We pray Sheriff Lee Baca review the arrest and booking records, and if such records are found failing to conform with the fundamentals of the law - take corrective actions and immediately release Attorney Richard Fine. With it, the Sheriff may mark a new beginning for the Los Angeles County justice system, with dignity of the legal, civil, and human rights of all. Joseph Zernik, PhD Jz12345@earthlink.net Human Rights Alert (NGO) o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f"> style='width:201pt;height:103.5pt'> o:href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_4QooSf0l1yE/S7GNMg5PW6I/AAAAAAAABRQ/sdbzbE4EqpM/S1 600-R/HRA%20Logo.jpg"/> Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States. Frank, You signed on May 25, 2010.

17

Your signature has been delivered to: Sheriff Lee Baca, Los Angeles County, California About What have the experts said over the past decade? * "Innocent people remain in prison" * "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of... LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) * judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) * This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted. Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000) Please see additional information and sign the petition: FREE RICHARD FINE http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free... Positions 1. Richard Fine is held under false records - he must be immediately released 2. Official reports show that thousands were falsely imprisoned as part of the Rampart scandal (1998-2000) they must be immediately released. 3. Review of the computerized records of the Sheriff's Department documented routine ongoing false imprisonments - they must be stopped.

18

4. US and/or international investigation must be instituted of the widespread public corruption in Los Angeles County, California.

How large is the cause?

From: Campbell, Larry W [mailto:campbel@SEN.PARL.GC.CA] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 8:18 PM To: '1@1lifeme.com' Subject: Re: World War Bilderberg

Exactly.
From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:kccm13@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 07:25 PM To: Campbell, Larry W Subject: Re: World War Bilderberg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU

This kind of coo coo?

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Campbell, Larry W <campbel@sen.parl.gc.ca> wrote:

Still coo coo I see.

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frankly1@rogers.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 12:58 AM To: Cools, Anne C.; cookj@sen.parl.gc.ca <cookj@sen.parl.gc.ca>; Cochrane, Ethel M.; Chaput, Maria; Carstairs, Sharon; carnep@sen.parl.gc.ca <carnep@sen.parl.gc.ca>; Campbell, Larry W; Callbeck, Catherine; Day, Stockwell - M.P.; dwatch@web.net <dwatch@web.net>; grandmaitre@gg.ca <grandmaitre@gg.ca>; dramsay.mpp.kirklandlake@liberal.ola.org <dramsay.mpp.kirklandlake@liberal.ola.org>; dduncan.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org <dduncan.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org>; dcaplan.mpp@liberal.ola.org <dcaplan.mpp@liberal.ola.org>; dcansfield.mpp@liberal.ola.org <dcansfield.mpp@liberal.ola.org>; Dawson, Dennis; Day, Joseph; DeBan, Pierre; Di Nino, Consiglio; Dyck, Lillian; dinovocqp@ndp.on.ca <dinovoc-qp@ndp.on.ca>; dhowlett@makepovertyhistory.ca <dhowlett@makepovertyhistory.ca>; dacitic.petersen_1967@hotmail.com <dacitic.petersen_1967@hotmail.com>; Dallaire, Romo; damphh@sen.parl.gc.ca <damphh@sen.parl.gc.ca>; elisabeth.nadeau@ps.gc.ca <elisabeth.nadeau@ps.gc.ca>; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca <Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca>; Eggleton, Art; editor@tor.sunpub.com <editor@tor.sunpub.com>; ernie.hardeman@pc.ola.org <ernie.hardeman@pc.ola.org>; elizabeth.witmer@pc.ola.org <elizabeth.witmer@pc.ola.org>; dacitic.petersen_1967@hotmail.com <dacitic.petersen_1967@hotmail.com>; Dallaire, Romo; damphh@sen.parl.gc.ca <damphh@sen.parl.gc.ca>; editor@rd.ca <editor@rd.ca>; francois-giroux@cas-satj.gc.ca <francois-giroux@cas-satj.gc.ca>; Flaherty, Jim - M.P.; Finley, Diane - M.P.; Fairbairn, Joyce; fitzpr@sen.parl.gc.ca <fitzpr@sen.parl.gc.ca>; fortim@sen.parl.gc.ca <fortim@sen.parl.gc.ca>; Fraser, Joan; Furey, George; Fitzpatrick.B@parl.gc.ca

19

<Fitzpatrick.B@parl.gc.ca>; gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca <gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca>; Guergis, Helena - M.P. Subject: FW: World War Bilderberg

www.mcfrauds.com The evidence is clear of the Canadian governments are the elites organized crime against the majority no different than world wide as they have always been. The world is in serious trouble as these insatiable people will not stop. We have the only viable plan to stop the insanity beginning with returning the RCMP to the people absolutely independent of the governments. From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frankly1@rogers.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 12:53 AM To: 'Toews.V@parl.gc.ca'; 'MCU@JUSTICE.GC.CA'; 'atipb@rcmp-grc-gc.ca'; 'chookiehagar@yahoo.ca'; 'ingwenet@mtnloaded.co.za'; 'belljp@rcn.com'; 'motomaniac02186@yahoo.com'; 'donbar@eol.ca'; 'Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca'; 'Mel.Abramovitch@rcmp-grc.gc.ca'; 'Denise.Brennan@tbssct.gc.ca'; 'atip.aiprp@tbs-sct.gc.ca'; 'michel.gervais@cpc-cpp.gc.ca'; 'general@oic-ci.gc.ca'; 'robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca'; 'ontpc@ontla.ola.org'; 'temporal@archtoronto.org'; 'miandima@greenpeace.org'; 'pressdesk@int.greenpeace.org'; 'AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca'; 'submissions@openDemocracy.net'; 'editorial@opendemocracy.net'; 'info@openDemocracy.net'; 'info@judicialwatch.org'; 'istiftaa@wilayah.org'; 'aimember@aiusa.org'; 'info@theexclusivenews.com'; 'supporter.services@int.greenpeace.org'; 'dion.s@parl.gc.ca'; 'premier@gov.nl.ca'; 'debra.eindiguer@greenparty.ca'; 'info@metisnation.ca'; 'alerts@takeaction.amnestyusa.org'; 'unn@bayworld.net'; 'patrizia.cuonzo@int.greenpeace.org'; 'support@corruptionmonitor.com'; 'andy@canadiancorruption.ca'; 'rick@federaljack.com'; 'info@canadianactionparty.ca'; 'chiefrainstorm@spiritfoxy.com'; 'barbey59@yahoo.ca'; 'dolsmith@shaw.ca'; 'oppa@oppa.ca'; 'psb@yrp.ca'; 'info@yrp.ca'; 'mayor@newmarket.ca'; 'jtaylor@newmarket.ca'; 'tvegh@newmarket.ca'; 'dkerwin@newmarket.ca' Subject: World War Bilderberg From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frankly1@rogers.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 12:56 AM To: 'andy@canadiancorruption.ca'; 'lblight@newmarket.ca'; 'vwoodhouse@newmarket.ca'; 'dramsarran@newmarket.ca'; 'jsponga@newmarket.ca'; 'cemanuel@newmarket.ca'; 'rgrossi@georgina.ca'; 'dwheeler@georgina.ca'; 'mjordan@georgina.ca'; 'rjamieson@georgina.ca'; 'dszollosy@georgina.ca'; 'khackenbrook@georgina.ca'; 'bsmockum@georgina.ca'; 'pressdesk@int.greenpeace.org'; 'Spiritchaser1@gmail.com'; 'Joe.Warmington@sunmedia.ca'; 'unionpri3@xplornet.com'; 'attorneygeneral@jus.gov.on.ca'; 'ltgov@gov.on.ca'; 'justice.comments@gnb.ca'; 'valerie.kilfoil@gnb.ca'; 'info@gg.ca'; 'reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca'; 'cdnfirearms-chat@scorpion.bogend.ca'; 'legal@nfa.ca'; 'jschnoor@jus.gov.mb.ca'; 'mpatz@bcli.org'; 'dbourque@flsc.ca'; 'edmonton@cba-alberta.org'; 'communications@ps.gc.ca'; 'cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca'; 'cowanj@sen.parl.gc.ca'; 'christine.elliott@pc.ola.org'; 'city@thestar.ca'; 'ipp@canadianipp.org'; 'info@police.york.on.ca'; 'archbishop@archtoronto.org'; 'Rightsdroits@sen.gc.ca'; '-corruption@unodc.org'; 'citydesk@tor.sunpub.com'; 'comail@lsuc.ca'; 'cgrech@yrng.com'; 'copelandj@scc-csc.gc.ca'; 'letters@globeandmail.com'; 'cdavis@relevantknowledge.com'; 'Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca'; 'charrf@sen.parl.gc.ca' Subject: FW: World War Bilderberg

Truth kills truth saves Save yourself and the world http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3117338213439292490#
In this lecture by Michel Chossudovsky, he blows away the smokescreen put up by the mainstream media, that 9/11 was an attack on America by "Islamic terrorists". Through meticulous research, he has uncovered a militaryintelligence ploy behind the September 11 attacks, and the cover-up and complicity of key members of the Bush Administration. According to Chossudovsky, the "war on terrorism" is a complete fabrication based on the illusion that one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40 billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus. The "war on terrorism" is a war of conquest. Globalisation is the final march to the "New World Order", dominated by Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex. September 11, 2001 provides a justification for waging a war without

20

borders. Washington's agenda consists in extending the frontiers of the American Empire to facilitate complete U.S. corporate control, while installing within America the institutions of the Homeland Security State.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU Truth Kills

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8K9dgqKmJ50&feature Fema Detention Camps Marshall Law http://www.infowars.com/obama-implementing-martial-law-coup/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0xzsbSbVUE After overcoming the willing suspension of disbelief High Ranking US Major General Exposes September 11 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68LUHa_-OlA CIA Whistleblower Susan Lindauer EXPOSES Everything! "Extreme Prejudice"

Its them or us www.cdfji13.ws

21