Karbala and Hussain before meeting tragedy.

Article By: Raees Mustafa

Introduction
Assalmu Alaykum Dear readers, this is my 7th successful article published thanks to the almighty grace of Allah (swt). It's all because of him we win everything, and it's because of him, we see the finishing line through our defeats. Though one defeat and win which has bamboozled us this concept of Karbala, which we Muslims have adopted. Some regard Karbala as absolute blasphemy, whereas some mention it to be suitable cause for the health and the life of Islam. Existence and love is only a trailer through the sacrifice of Imam Hussain (as). And that sacrifice is analysed here in this article, we here discuss and examine the history, upon what before Karbala had gone through. As in what did the Prophet (saws) talk about it? Was there any knowledge to him upon Allah's submission of such a futur upon his love Hussain (as)? This article is quite lengthy, and even went to a thought of turning it into a book. But merely, regarding today, not much is understood except hate with just a glance. Therefore I hope, through this article, we'll see lost Sunnah of the Prophet (saws). And the glamorous Shine of Hussain (as), through the revelation of special Angels! I hope you find the article informing, and educating. Any comment or question is welcomed, I'm up for a debate, you can contact me through 2 blogs, but I'd rather really prefer you from contacting me via http://exposingthesalaf.blogspot.co.uk/. Or if you have any enquiry or debate to instruct quickly! You can email me direct here at; raees.mustafa@gmail.com

In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful (1) Praise be to Allah, Lord of the Worlds, (2) The Beneficent, the Merciful. (3) Owner of the Day of Judgment, (4) Thee (alone) we worship; Thee (alone) we ask for help. (5) Show us the straight path, (6) The path of those whom Thou hast favoured. Not (the path) of those who earn Thine anger nor of those who go astray. (7)

Keywords to note and know;

Saheeh meaning Authentic. - It can either be used to define a personality's character or the status of Ahadith. Hassan meaning Good. - Again, this can either be referred to a personality's reliability, character, or Ahadith. Thiqah meaning Reliable. - Yet again, a person can be reliable upon the fact that he is saying the truth with its application upon Ahadith too. Mutawatir meaning Strong. - Mutawatir is at the highest level of grading upon any Hadith's status or any personality's reliability and character. Qawiyun meaning Strong. - It doesn't differ much from Mutawatir, except for the fact that this word is normally associated outside the usage examining a narrator or Ahadith. Da'eef meaning Weak. Coming from above, a narrator can be weak, and so can be a narration. Therefore its reliability is very low. Kafir meaning an Infidel. Kuffar is the plurality of Infidels. And Kufr means Infidelity. Shirkh meaning an act of such disobedience, where almighty God's power, will, command and everything to do with him and him only, is applied of some kind or some way upon other than Allah. Ibn/bin means Son. So if it is written (for example) Ibn/bin Muhammed it means the Son of Muhammed. And if it is after a name like Muhammed Ibn/bin Abdullah it means Muhammed the son of Abdullah Ahadith meaning Narrations. Hadith meaning a Narration. Mustahab meaning Recommended. Sunnah meaning adhering of Prophet Muhammed (saws)'s holy acts, commands and following them. Karbala Land upon which Imam Hussain (as) was killed. Jibreel Angel Gabriel. Trubah Piece of soil, or mud. Ulama meaning Scholars. Alim meaning a Scholar. Ummah meaning a Nation. Bid'ah meaning Innovation. Just to note, the exact translation of Innovators in Arabic would be Bid'ati.

Allama meaning a person knowledgeable in practically all fields of knowledge.

References as usual...
Ibn Taymiyyah in his book, Minhaj-As-Sunnah An-Nabawiyah, verified by Muhammed Rashad Salim, second edition of this book. Vol. 3, p 70 states: It is well known that Umer Ibn Saa'ad was the leader of the military detachment, that killed Imam Hussain. Even though he was wrong, and his preference of this world over the religion, his sin was not as bad as Mukhtar ibn Abi Ubayd who (later) rose to get revenge for Hussain. Have a look at this man saying: It is well known that Umer Ibn Saa'ad was the leader of the military detachment What military detachment, was Imam Hussain (as) killed by an army of 1000s or just a few 100s? Ibn Taymiyyah is trying to hide the auspiciousness of the crime, by degrading the issue of discussing the amount of people going to kill Imam Hussain (as). And then he goes on to state: Even though he was wrong, and his preference of this world over the religion, his sin was not as bad as Mukhtar ibn Abi Ubayd who (later) rose to get revenge for Hussain. This is absolute lunacy from this man. Talk of common sense, even that is lacking, for someone who takes the revenge, of a righteous person being killed, how does he become bad, and even worse than the killer of the person killed at the first place Imam Hussain (as)? Use your common sense, if Imam Hussain (as) is killed, then that means his killer is bad, isn't it? Then if someone avenges the killers, isn't he supposed to be good, as in reality, he has fought the ones whom Imam Hussain (as) was fighting? Of course he is! Over here we read that Imam Hussain (as)'s killer is Umer Ibn Saa'ad, and he is addressed with this title by Sheikh Ibn Taymiyyah himself! Book: Fadha'il-As-Sahaba, written by Ahmed Ibn Hambal, this particular version is verified by Wasi ul-Allah ibn Muhammed Abbas who is a teacher at the Ummul Qura University in Mecca tul-Makramah. This version of the book which I'm referring to you is of the 3rd Edition, from Dar Al-Ibn Jawzi who published this particular book in 1426 A.H. Vol. 2, p 965, in Hadith No. 1357, we read; Abdullah narrated from his fathers, (list of narrators is long) from A'isha and Umme Salama who said that: (Wakee said: I can't remember which one narrated this, whether it's A'isha or Umme Salama, but it's either one of them) Prophet (saws) said: An angel that has never visited me before, came into this house today. It told me: This son of yours Hussain, will be killed. If you wish, I can give you some soil of that Earth which he will die upon. He (angel) then brought me some soil, which was red. Dear readers, is there any excuse to refuse to discuss such a dramatically spiritual moment in life of Prophet Muhammed (saws)? Even what if the Prophet himself requests for the soil, upon his Hussain's martyrdom. How can this be true when the so called Sunni doesn't also derive upon that wanting of the soil, or at least, wishing to go and get that soil of Karbala? Prophet Muhammed (saws) is asking for the soil, on which his son Hussain (as per the narration in the book and the event), would be martyred. And when that soil was brought, it was red! Is there any reason why it was red than the fact that only bloodshed was a happening there? This is rhetorician at its very peak! Dear readers, this is the news, which an angel brought, not a Muslim living on the planet! If an angel comes to give such a great news, how comes we don't greet and mourn for Imam Hussain

(as), as per the asking, and emotions shown in this narration of Prophet Muhammed (saws)? And just have a look at what the footnote says: Saheeh Authentic! It's not Hassan (Good), neither is it Thiqah - Reliable, but true and authentic! Is there any reason why we should still argue? The verifier of this book says: he (Ahmed Ibn Hambal) has brought this Hadith in his Musnad, and also Haythami in Majma Az-Zawa'id and has said: Ahmed has narrated this Hadith, and its narrators are true and Saheeh. The verifier further writes on the same page of the book: At-Tabarani has brought this Hadith from A'isha, and Ahmed has mentioned it. And in Majma AzZawa'id it is mentioned: Ahmed has narrated this, Abu Ya'laa and Bazzar state that all the narrators are Thiqah! Musnad Abu Ya'laa Mowsili, By Imam Hafiz Ibn Tameemi, Ahadith verified by Hussain Saleem Asad. The type of book which I'm referring to you is from the first Edition, which was published in 1430 A.H. In Vol. 1, p 298, Hadith 363 - it's written: Abdullah Ibn Nujjay, who heard from his father that he went with Ali, and faced Naynawwah, since they were going to the battle of Siffeen (against Mu'awiah). Then Ali called out: Have patience Oh Abu Abdullah! Have patience Abu Abdullah on the Banks of Euphrates. I asked Ali: What and who do you mean by Abu Abdullah? He (Ali) then said: I went into the room with the Prophet (saws) one day, and saw his eyes were gushing with tears. I then asked the Prophet (saws): Oh Prophet! Did someone anger you? What makes your eyes gush with tears? He (Prophet ~saws~) said: No, Jibreel (Angel Gabriel) just left me now, and informed me that Hussain will be killed on the Banks of Euphrates river. Gibreel then asked: Shall I let you smell the soil upon which he will die? I said yes! So he (Jibreel) then extended his hand, took a handful of the soil and gave it to me. And then I couldn't control my eyes from further gushing of tears. The verifier of the Hadith says it is Hassan. The chain of narrators are good - Hassan! He (verifier) further comments: Haythami has mentioned this in Majma Az-Zawa'id. As well as Ahmed in his Musnad with Abu Ya'laa, Bazzar and Tabarani. And the narrators of this Hadith are Thiqah. Amazing, Prophet Muhammed (saws) was informed long ago the killing of Hussain! And inquired to have some of the soil of the land upon which Hussain would die, to be smelt and loved! If Imam Hussain (as) was on the evil side, I ask the big bearded Alim like the one you see to explain why Prophet was crying upon a person, whom actually was mislead? According to Sheikh Abdul Azeez Al-Sheikh, we come to know that he has famously, and publicly mentioned, that Yazid, was in his rights to kill Imam Hussain (as), and Hussain (as) was mislead these are the sincere words of the Sheikh of Saudi Arab. I ask him and his follower upon the fact that if Imam Hussain (as) was on the wrong path, and was mislead, what is the need for Prophet (saws) to gush tears for? Is it for Yazid or Hussain? If it was for Yazid, then I can vouch my life upon the statement that I will quit my religion! Because the book states, the history states, that Prophet (saws)'s grandson Hussain was martyred upon Karbala, not Yazid, Hussain (as) was oppressed, not Yazid!

Sheikh Abdul Azeez Sunni say they follow the Sunnah, henceforth call themselves Sunnis - people whom follow the Sunnah. I'm sorry, am I mistaken to hear that you don't complete and follow the Sunnah of the Prophet upon crying and shedding tears for Hussain? Do you even know of this Sunnah or not? Do you even follow the Prophet correctly, because as far as I know, Sunnis follow the Sunnah, but this Sunnah has been left out in the hate of Hussain (accordingly to some people), and has been dismissed by lunatics when not having enough knowledge upon this and for some people (like the one you see below), it's just the case of complete infidelity (Kufr), whom claim that it's totally fine to call out the slogans in the Summer of 2009 in Pakistan (if I'm not mistaken upon the date);

Ali Mu'awiah Bhai Bhai, Shahadat Ya Hussain Murdabaad

Translation: Ali

and Mu'awiah brothers, Martyrdom of Hussain useless, cursed and bad!

Molana Fazlur-Rahman, Secretary General of JUI. It makes us cry dear readers, that why the Ummah of Prophet (saws) had betrayed Hussain and left him butchered in Karbala, these people and their ancestors did play a role in that, and are also doing it now! Fie upon such people, and Fie upon the killers of Hussain! The Verifier further explains: Naynawaah was a village of Prophet Yunus (as) in Mosul Iraq. ___________________________________________________
Abu Abdullah is the Kuniyat of Imam Hussain (as). Meaning, the father of Abdullah.

Another referred book dear viewers is the same of source, Musnad of Abu Ya'laa, edition along with the publications and the verifier, are the very same, from which you can read above. In Vol. 6, p 129, Hadith No. 3402. Narrated from Anas Ibn Malik: The Angel of rain asked his Lord's permission to visit the Prophet (saws).

Before, we go anywhere, let's see what Anas has to say of a man in the chain of this narrators; Of Course just to let you know the chain of narrators include Imarah Ibn Zathaan Anyway, continuing with the above Hadith: Allah gave permission to the Angel, to visit Prophet (saws). And this day, he was with Umme Salama, the mother of the believers, the Prophet said: Guard the door, don't let anyone come in. He said: While She (Umme Salama) was at the door, Hussain Ibn Ali burst into the room, so the Prophet (saws) began to hug him and kiss him. The Angel then said: Do you love him? He (Prophet ~saws~) said: Yes. The Angle then further proclaimed: Your nation will kill him! He (Angel) said: If you wish, I will show you the place in which they will kill him. He (Prophet ~saws~) said: Yes! Of course! So he (Angel) took a handful of soil from the place in which he would be killed and showed it to the Prophet (saws). And when the soil was shown to the Prophet by the Angel, it was Sahla (Red soil). Look at Ibn Taymiyyah address this issue fairly lightly with the words: Military detachment will kill him, instead, we see an Angel of rain say to the Prophet that his nation would kill him. Is the nation of the Prophet a small detachment of some kind or what? Look at him manipulate the wordings, look at him destroy the minds of innocents all over the world, as well as of course, brain washing even his own men with invalidity! The verifier further commentates: In Musnad of Ahmed ibn Hambal, it says he struck his hand out and brought red sand. Nonetheless, we still continue with the Hadith from above: Umme Salama took it, and collected it all over her clothes. I don't know why dear readers, if Umme Salama, can cry and preserve such depth of humility for just the soil upon the killing of Hussain, why can't we develop that habit and structure of organising ourselves to be in the favour of Imam Hussain (as)? This is utter lunacy, and sheer determination, to uproot Islam. Though it is impossible, we do have failing attempts, which do rather look a bit frightening, and these Ahadith show, why some people don't like the truth! Those ignorants, whom say, that this is absolute Bid'ah, innovation, to keep soil of whatsoever kind upon you, I want to ask them just one simple question, then that certainly means, Prophet's wife, Umme Salama (Ummul Mo'mineen), is doing Shirkh or even Bid'ah! I ask, if this was innovation, why didn't Prophet (saws) stop here from performing this? Not only that, but why did Prophet (saws) himself wish to acquire some soil, and preserve it and weep upon it? Then call Prophet (saws) an innovator! These I'm afraid are allegations, and attempts to ruin the Sunnah of the Prophet (saws) to degrade the value of Islam, and most importantly Imam Hussain (as), but this will never ever happen, as long as Mahdi is our saviour, and as long as Allah is our Lord! Thabit says: We would say that this soil, which Umme Salama preserved and Prophet (saws) wanted to smell, was of Karbala. The Verifier says: The chain of narrators are Good - Hassan (for the second footnote). Ahmed has narrated this, so has Abu Na'eem in Dalail al-Nubuwwah. Ahmed has narrated it with 2 chains. Whereas Haythami has mentioned it in Majma Az-Zawa'id, concluding: Ahmed has narrated and

Abu Ya'laa. Further people mentioning are: Bazzar, and Tabarani, with chains including Imarah Ibn Zathaan, and a group of Scholars, have deemed him to be Thiqah - trustworthy. Because the verifier mentions Imarah bin Zathaan as weak, there are still other great Scholars, whom complete go against that: Abu Ya'laa says all the narrators are Saheeh! Not just one man, but in fact all! To confirm its authenticity, let's see what Musnad of Ahmed Ibn Hambal holds for us, the writer of this particular book which I'm referring to you is from Imam Hambal (of course), who died in year 241 A.H. This particular referred book has been authenticated and verified by 4 different Scholars. As mentioned, my book references may be different to the ones you may find in libraries or at home, because I'm taking this piece of info from the 2nd Edition, published particularly in the year 1429 A.H. Vol. 44, p 143, Hadith No. 26524 states: The Prophet (saws) said to one of them Meaning A'isha or Umme Salama An angel entered the house, whom I have never seen before. It told me that your son Hussain will be killed, and if you wish, I will show you the soil in which he will be killed. Then he brought out red soil. Verifiers and commentators of this book have recorded this Hadith to be Hassan Good, per its chain. Amazing, this Hadith turns out to be Hassan, despite the fact that there is one person, in the chain, for whom there is a bit of confusion, whether being fine to be accepted or not, whether trustworthy or not, all other men to have narrated this Hadith are actually labelled as Saheeh Authentic by Allama Al-Bani, who further comments: Although there is some weakness in this chain, the majority are Saheeh Authentic! Verifiers and commentators of this book further state: This hadith is in Ahmed's Musnad, as well as the book; Fadha'il-As-Sahaba (Virtues of Companions), with more people too. Tabarani and Haythami have narrated this, and have its authenticated its narrators. And so has Ibn Tahmam in his book Manshikha and Tabarani. Why do they mention the name Tabarani twice? Because dear readers, Tabarani has recorded this with ultimate authenticity, and has narrated it with a long chain of narrations, concluding them all authentic! Book Tareekh-ul-Islam, written by Imam Dhahabi. Verifier of this book is Umer Abdul Salaam Tadmuri. The Edition number I'm afraid doesn't exist, so the one which I'm referring to you is probably from the first one, but anyway, p 123 of this book states the exact same narration of Umme Salama which we encountered before, and gives an expression too. But the book states what I really want you to read: Abdul-Razzaq has also narrated this, and its chain of narrators are Saheeh! Ahmed has narrated this, and a similar Hadith has been narrated by so and so that an Angel entered the house etc...

This is Imam Dhahabi saying this dear readers, not me, not me at all, he confirms the fact that all the people narrating this Hadith are Saheeh Authentic! Hugely well known book, Siyar A'lam Al-Nubala, a book which I present very often for references, written by Imam Dhahabi in Vol. 3, p 290 states with a chain or Saheeh narrators! And another very important source is the book Sahih il-Jamay'As-Sagheer, written by Muhammed Nasiruddeen Albani, verified by Zuhair Shaweesh. Vol. 1, published from the Islamic Library, p 73 Hadith No. 61, it states: Jibreel came to me and informed me that my nation (Ummah) will kill my son i.e. Hussain. And brought me some red soil from amongst the place of Hussain's martyrdom! Angel Gabriel only comes down for important issues, and doesn't waste time, but here, it is seen that he comes down to reveal this news to the Prophet (saws), and offers him the soil upon which he (Hussain) would die. And guess what, the Angel already told the Prophet of the killers of Hussain, it would be his Ummah the Prophet's own nation! And we read in the footnote of the Hadith regarding its validity as Saheeh! Albani has authenticated this Hadith, upon the fact that it's been recorded in another one of his book called The series of Saheeh Ahadith, Hadith No. 821. So he has authenticated in both of his books, is there still some doubt on why it's not Mustahab to weep over Hussain, visit Hussain's shrine, have love for him as much as Prophet (saws) did? And most importantly, he was on the righteous path? These are questions to be asked, and questions to be answered... But please pardon me, as I have this auspicious behaviour of seriously exposing the Salaf, let's just see what is stated in this book of Albani (Series of Saheeh Hadith)... In total this book from Albani contains 501 to 1000 Ahadith, as this is Vol. 2, and Hadith 821 (as mentioned): Jibreel came to me and informed me that my Ummah will kill my son Hussain. I said this Hussain? He (Angel Jibreel) replied: Yes! Then he brought me some of his soil, which was red. Haakim and Bayhaqi have narrated it from Umm-il-Fadhl bint-al-Harith. She went to the Prophet (saws) and said: Oh Prophet of God! I saw an unclear dream tonight! He (Prophet) asked: What was it? Bint Al-Harith replied: It was very intense! He (Prophet ~saws~) asked: What was it? In return, Bint Al-Harith answered: I saw as if a part of your body was cut from you and put upon my chest! He (Prophet) said: You have seen something good! Fatima (Insha'allah) will bear a baby boy, and he will be upon your chest. So Fatima (sa) gave the birth to Hussain, and he was on my chest, as the Prophet (saws) said. Therefore, one day, I went to Prophet (saws), and put Hussain on his chest, then he turned his face to the side, and started pouring tears. I said to the Prophet (saws) of God: May my parents be sacrificed for you, what is wrong? Let's have a look at what the book's verification has in for us; This Hadith is Saheeh by the conditions of Shaikhain Imam Muslim and Bukhari. But, Al-Dhahabi narrated this as weak Da'eef. But Allama Albani refutes who? He refutes AlDhahabi! Let's see what Albani says on the same page: There are many proofs which testify to its authenticity. Some of which Ahmed has narrated them,

Then Albani writes: The narration An Angel which never came to this world entered proves its authenticity! Al-Dhahabi doubted this Hadith, and recorded it as official Da'eef, though apparently, we see Imam Muslim and Bukhari favouring the authenticity of the Hadith, as explored by Allama Albani, and we see Ahmed narrating this with also not to mention Imam Hakim Al-Nisapouri. In his book, Mustadrak Al-Hakim, he has narrated this Hadith clearly too! Allama Albani in the very same book: Series of Saheeh Ahadith, has recorded something special to be noted. In Vol. 3, Hadith No.s 1001 to 1500. In Hadith No. 1171 dear readers, we concentrate on the footnote of the Hadith. But let's read the Hadith first shall we; Jibreel (Gabriel) just left me now, and he informed me that Hussain would be killed on the Banks of Euphrates. Remember the statement of Imam Ali (as) in the beginning, where he was just calling out have patience O Abi Abdullah, have patience and then someone asked what do you mean by Abu Abdullah, and he replied so and so... (see the Hadith above for more info). This very same piece of text which we are sighting from Allama Albani's book is regarding that, or at least, we can take it as to that referred source. We read regarding another Hadith's verification in the book: He narrates that very same Hadith, Ahmed, narrated in his musnad, from Abdullah: I went to the Prophet (saws) and his eyes were gushing with tears etc... However dear readers, he (Albani) says the narrations weak! Da'eef... To verify and be content upon his opinion regarding the value of the Hadith being degraded, is the presentation of one of the narrators Najjiye - the father of Abdullah, nobody knows who he is, AlDhahabi has mentioned, and nobody trusts him except Ibn Habban.

Right dear readers, just as I thought, and knew for just about a fact that some of you may have been confused. Let's see what Allama Albani had to say, but this time, in steps and small chunks of info; 1. Regarding the Hadith of Imam Ali (as), when he went to Siffeen's battle, and cried out have patience Abi Abdullah (2 times). Allama Albani says it is weak, as one of the narrators of the Hadith includes this man named Najjiye. 2. Therefore, through that analyses, Albani regards the Hadith as officially weak, and not trustworthy. 3. Though he does present later on the view of Ibn Habban, another Scholar, whom in fact doesn't believe he (Najjiye) is weak. Now our role and play is to analyse, who is right, it's probably the person in the back seat of the Kuffar saying that this Hadith is Da'eef, as entirely upon the declaration of the findings of this man named Najjiye by Allama Albani, but hang on guys, does having just a single Da'eef narrator in a Hadith, make the whole Hadith fake, when you see people before him narrating the very same thing, but whom have been regarded as ultimately Saheeh Authentic? And we will insha'allah look upon whether Allama Albani done the justice to this issue or not? Though we read something further on from the pen of Albani; ...his son (Najiyye's son) is more famous than him, and who ever authenticates his Hadith, has made an error!

So dear readers, we can assure ourselves entirely from the view of Albani's declaration, that this Hadith, regarding the Angel coming to inform the Prophet of Hussain's killing, is absolute rubbish, right? But I wouldn't eccentrically agree with those whom don't read and research, as we go onto read something staggering, from the very same pen of Allama Albani, whom from the style of this writing, expresses his view, and turns the table upside down, pointing the needle of the Hadith to the authenticity side! We read; I (Albani) say: Haythami writes this that Ahmed has narrated it as well as Abu Ya'laa, Badhar, and A-Tabarani. And the narrators have been regarded Trustworthy!

Then we ask Mr Albani, if all the narrators are trustworthy, what is the reason behind you declaring it Da'eef?
And guess what, we read a totally different mindset now from Allama Albani; Najjiye isn't the only one who has narrated this! Therefore I say it clearly, that there are multiple proofs to strengthen the this Hadith, and the Hadith (in fact), is strong! Wow! A sudden change in the mind of Albani, he has now commented on behalf of other great supreme Alims of Sunni sect, whom have recorded this Hadith to be strong! Not even Saheeh, but Strong! Allama Albani continuing; I (Albani) say in one sentence: This Hadith with its meaning, and interpretation, is Saheeh authentic, by the collection of all its different chains! Even if some of the single narrators have weakness, but all others are trustworthy, this ideology and system, can be fairly applied to abstain from defying the Hadith to be false! Book, Sahih Ibn Habban, Vol. 5, p 142, this particular book has been verified and authenticated by Sho'aib Arna'oot. We read in Hadith No. 6742; It's narrated from Anas Ibn Malik: The Angel of rain asked, permission from Allah to visit the holy Prophet (saws). He was allowed to, and it was the day of Umme Salama, he told her not to let anyone enter, when suddenly Hussain opened the door and burst into the room and jumped on the Prophet (saws)'s back. And then Prophet (saws) began to hug and kiss him. The Angel on behalf of witnessing this asked: Do you love him? He (saws) said: Yes! On behalf of this, the Angel then replied: Your nation will kill him! If you wish, I can show you the place upon which he will be killed. He (saws) said: Yes! Then he (The Angel) brought a handful from the place of his martyrdom and showed it to Prophet (saws), and it was red soil. So Umm-e-Salama took it and kept it in her clothes. Amazing dear readers, is there any reason except for the tragedy of Hussain, which could've made the soil red? If there was, believe me, I think you're on the wrong path... I've mentioned this before, and will mention it again, it's dear readers an Angel coming to inform Prophet (saws) of his son Hussain (as)'s death. If this military detachment did kill him (as), then I ask was the Prophet's Ummah really known truly by that term military detachment? What blasphemy! Did the Prophet's nation consult of just a few 100 people, and not thousands? As per the narration from Mustadrak AlHakim, we read Prophet (saws) addressing at least 110,000 people. Weren't they included in the Ummah of Prophet (saws)? These are such people, whom were raised with evil sculptured minds, and designed to eradicate Islam from the very beginning of Prophet (saws)'s life. They were never a part of Islam. And those who say that Shias killed Imam Hussain (as), it were the Shias of Uthmaan, Mu'awiah and other

cruel members of the nation of Prophet (saws). Imam Hussain (as)'s murder wasn't an ordinary one, it was of such stature, that Prophet (saws) gushed tears and tears for, whom had wished to have some soil of that land upon which Hussain would be killed, in his dear possession, so to his decree, patience would be a virtue at all... She (Umme Salama), preserved the soil, took the soil with her, in fact, displayed in within her cloths. I ask, if this is Bid'ah (innovation), why didn't Prophet (saws) stop her from performing it? It's simple, if you think, that we Shias, whilst preserving the precious soil of Karbala, are innovators, then call Prophet (saws)'s witness and companion an innovator too! But, as according to you, Prophet (saws) also becomes an innovator (Heavens forbid), as a) He didn't stop here performing it didn't warn her. b) And in fact wished for some soil to be preserved by himself as well (see the narrations above). But any knowledgeable person wouldn't agree with me at all, as entirely, the Quran states:

-
Sahih International

Nor does he speak from [his own] inclination.

Muhsin Khan

Nor does he speak of (his own) desire.

Pickthall

Nor doth he speak of (his own) desire.

Yusuf Ali

Nor does he say (aught) of (his own) Desire.

Shakir

Nor does he speak out of desire.

Dr. Ghali

And in no way does he pronounce (any word) out of prejudice

Sahih International

It is not but a revelation revealed,

Muhsin Khan

It is only an Inspiration that is inspired.

Pickthall

It is naught save an inspiration that is inspired,

Yusuf Ali

It is no less than inspiration sent down to him:

Shakir

It is naught but revelation that is revealed,

Dr. Ghali

Decidedly it is nothing except a revelation revealed. Prophet Muhammed (saws) says nothing but what Allah wishes, and reveals, so here, it's indeed, a through message of some kind, by the Glorious Lord, to Prophet (saws) regarding the ultimate love for Hussain (as) through through the inclined incident, of the Angel, and weeping and much more... We read in Majma Az-Zawaa'id wa Manba'a Al-Fawa'id, written by Al-Haythami al-Misri. This particular referred book which I'm reading from is verified by Muhammed Abdul Qadir. In Vol. 9,

he mentions a collection of different narrations, which really, will be long and disturbing to mention, especially when they don't have much to do with our topic clearly. Though I will point out to one very useful narration; Umme Salama took it, and put it into a bundle, and kept it in her clothing. Thabit says: We were told it was from Karbala. Truly magnificent, she placed it in a Bundle, as well as in her clothing, is there a problem why we (Shia's) can't do that? After all, we are just following the Sunnah of the Prophet (saws)... We further read; This has been narrated by Ahmed, Abu Ya'laa, Bazzar and At-Tabarani with chains containing Imarah - for whom some Scholars have put an opinion of authenticity with him. This is the same Imarah ibn Zathaan we talked about, whom has some weakness in him. And the rest of the narrators are though Saheeh Authentic! And there for you my dear readers, were dozens of narrations, mentioned through the books of great Sunni Scholars, some narrations which haven't even been read by the Sunni sect them self. Though there has been the accountability of the fact that Ahl-e-Sunnah don't complete this one Sunnah, this lost Sunnah... Is it out of love for Hussain, or just the reality hidden away by Scholars like Ibn Taymiyyah? Perhaps it's just the case of lack of knowledge and understanding. As I say, we Shias may not know how to read or memorize the Quran, but we certainly know how to understand, and understand it better than you! Dear readers, I can present many verses from the Quran, supporting mien and Prophet (saws)'s same view, regarding the love and the attitude of love for Imam Hussain (as)'s killing, as well as the fact that of his tragedy, in Karbala. Imam Hussain (as)'s given respect by Sunnis, but really, not as much as how the Prophet (saws) did, and therefore, the Sunnah isn't even preserved! I ask yet again, if you do love Imam Hussain (as), and do have the fulfilment in life of being a real Sunni, I ask, why didn't you go to Karbala? Who stopped you from taking the soil with you? Who stopped you from preserving it? The Prophet or the misguided big bearded Mullahs of today? Nonetheless, it isn't about whom stopped you and whom didn't, it's really about why did you stop yourself from being blind of truth? That's the main question, because when we go onto the grave, we will be alone, and petrified, no point will be taken on behalf of the fact that I saw/heard from him saying this and that, therefore without researching into it, or asking others of it, to assure whether it's correct or not, I just done it. I'm afraid that kind of blasphemy will not be taken seriously, and torture will only be the result of it. Because really, discussing Quranic verses now will be incredibly long, I myself do believe that this is one, if not, one of the longest and my best articles, probably articles coming next will have a database of Quranic verses explaining beautifully the Shi'ah Aqeeda of many things! For now, as Imam Ali (as) said: When you are happy or sad, or in any mood, remember your Grave... But before I go away, let's end with the name Ibn Taymiyah too, has a sunnah in his name, which turns out to be true, curse the killers of Imam Hussain (as)!

Whoever killed Hussain, or contributed or was pleased with it, may Allahs, Angels and peoples curse be upon him, may Allah dont accept his worship and acts. Majmoa al-Fatawa, Volume 4 page 487
Astonishing is it not? Ibn Taymiyyah then really, curses Umer Ibn Sa'ad, the Kafir who killed Imam Hussain (as), through his own feat! Yazid definitely killed Imam Hussain (as), and was involved with him in killing Imam Hussain (as) was Umer Ibn Sa'ad! Wow! Why don't these Sunnis follow the Sunnah of Ibn Taymiyyah regarding the curse upon the killers of Imam Hussain (as)? We read something regarding the curse an even greater aspect in the Sunni Islam. Below is the statement of a Sunni converted Alim, called Allama Abdul Kareem Mushtaq, whom was murdered by Saudi American funded terrorist organisations, namely Taliban and Sipah Sahaba. The following is an excerpt from 100 questions asked by Allama to Nawasibs, regarding their faith. We read;
You have six Kalimas, the sixth of which is called Radde Kufr wherein you do tabarra. Like in: Fatabarratu Minal Kufri wash Shirki wal Kidhb. I disassociate myself from Kufr and Shirk. Do you regard the doing of tabarra as permissible?

As mentioned by Allama, if Tabarra is a part of a statement which is durable for anyone to become a Muslim, then why isn't that part of a Kalima not practised or given attention upon by Sunnis? We have here in front of us a situation, where really, Tabarra is permissible, and in fact allowed upon the person whom performs Shirkh and Kufr right? Then why on earth, doesn't the killer of Hussain look to you a Kafir? Is this some kind of a joke you're playing with the nation or what? At one point you accept Tabarra to be a pillar of religion, and the other point, you degrade it! This tells me nothing but of the fact that your religion is absolutely fake and disgusting! You haven't fulfilled 3 precious Sunnah of Prophet (saws) which have been analysed briefly in this article; 1. Crying and weeping and gushing tears for Imam Hussain (as). 2. Preserving and honouring the soil of Karbala. 3. Not cursing the enemies of Prophet's son Hussain (as) through the reference of the Kalimah, and Ibn Taymiyyah's scripture. Let's just note the fact that in Ahadith examination, dear readers, we come across a rule established by great Scholars of previous times, that any 5 people, whom are Saheeh, highly trustworthy, and really can never lie, and have never lied as far as history is concerned upon their biography. They together make the Hadith Mutawatir and Qawiyun meaning incredibly strong! Now in the above article, we have listed hugely well known men and women, whom have narrated incredible narrations of Prophet (saws) meeting an Angel, and all that regarding Hussain (as)'s killing, here are some of those people; A'isha wife of the Prophet (saws); considered absolutely Saheeh by 72 sects in Islam. Umme Salama wife of the Prophet (saws); considered absolutely Saheeh by all sects of Islam!

Imam Ali (as) the cousin of Prophet (saws), his son in law, as well as a student and the greatest companion of Prophet (saws); considered absolutely Saheeh by every Muslim in the world! Imam Hussain (as) the spoken son of Prophet (saws), his grand son as well, Prophet absolutely loved him, if you still have some doubt over this fact, then believe me, the torture of hell would satisfy you; considered absolutely Saheeh by most of the Islamic sects. Umm-il-Fadhl bint-al-Harith or Anas bin Malik - Umm-il-Fadhl bint-al-Harith, a respected narrator during the time of Prophet (saws); considered healthily Saheeh by great Islamic Hadith Scholars. As far as Anas bin Malik is concerned, he is highly accepted and thoroughly well known, though wasn't in Prophet (saws)'s time, he is one of the top 10 Sunni narrators regarding the Ahadith he mentioned in his books of Prophet (saws); considered an honest and a trustworthy person by 71 Islamic sects.

Let's learn something here dear readers, that even if a chain includes a weak person, we can still take the Ahadith, upon the fact that if other narrators are highly good, and making sure they have narrated it before the doubted person. In this case, we have the above 5 people narrating this way before so who are we to doubt this incident, which upon the Ummah is silent? Till then.... Just say this; ________________________________________________________________________________

Oh Allah!
For our

Forgive us all.

Bad Sins...

Wassalaam... Keep me and most importantly your Eiman's safety in your Duas...