Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
BASED ON THE
FACILITIES AUDIT PROGRAM OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
January 2001
FIELD AUDITS
MAINTENANCE
PROJECTS
UNDER $15,000
FACILITY
CONDITION INDEX
(FCI)
BUILDING
INFRASTRUCTURE
CONDITION
ASSESSMENT
BUILDING &
INFRASTRUCTURE
DEFICIENCY LIST
AND
OR
FIVE-YEAR
CONTROLLED
MAINTENANCE
PLAN
CONTROLLED
MAINTENANCE
(CM) REQUEST
>$15,000
Done
Simultaneously
Specific FY
Detailed
Requests
FIVE-YEAR
CAPITAL
CONSTRUCTION /
CAPITAL
RENEWAL PLAN
CAPITAL
CONSTRUCTION
(CC) / CAPITAL
RENEWAL
REQUEST
The information gathered in the facility and infrastructure audits are used to generate a
variety of reports. The findings of a properly designed facility audit program can provide
management and maintenance staff useful data including:
Offer a constant flow of essential maintenance and repair work for the maintenance staff
and facilities management.
Provide facilities management with data that will aid in prioritizing building renewal and
deferred maintenance projects.
Present a report to assist administrators, facility managers, and accountants with their
long-range planning and budgeting activities.
Provide cost parameters for the provision of adequate funding for facility renewal.
Reduce the overall costs of maintenance by initiating early corrective actions in lieu of
reacting to later breakdowns.
Increase the reliability and obtain the full economical life of equipment through proper
maintenance, thereby decreasing the need for additional capital investment.
Reduce the number of equipment failures, thereby preventing interference with essential
operation, reducing the dangers to life and property, and avoiding the high cost or long
lead times for replacement of critical support equipment.
Reduce the frequency of trouble calls through proactive maintenance so that fewer
resources are expended on crises, thereby enabling the preventive maintenance
program to become more effective.
Providing data that can be used for justifying and setting priorities.
Time frame (number of buildings per cycle) for completion of the project based upon the:
Number of building (GSF),
Amount of infrastructure,
Maintenance/management personnel available,
Conducted by in-house personnel, professional firm, or a combination of both,
Expected time between inspections.
Historical records must be reviewed to collect historical data on each building. The prints and
drawings will provide the basic familiar knowledge of the different components and should be
referred to prior to conducting the actual audit. Replacement costs, gross square feet, building
construction dates and other historical data will need to be gathered and furnished to the audit
team. Maps identifying the location of underground utilities and the transfer of ownership from
the utility company need produced. The transfer of ownership for utilities varies from next to the
building, the meter, or the property line. Maps locating all sidewalks, walkways, and roads need
to be available. Include a listing of any security, historical, land use easements, or other
constraints on a building or a site.
Establishing a time frame for completion of the field audits (building & infrastructure inspections)
will be based upon an original estimate of man-hours and adjusted after performing test audits
on three campus buildings. It is extremely important, however, to allow adequate time for a
thorough inspection by the team members. The man-hour requirements will be calculated for
the filed inspection and then doubled as a rule of thumb as it takes as long to write the report as
it takes to conduct the audit.
PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS
This program is designed to provide reasonably accurate results, however there are some
qualifications that must be interpreted so that unreasonable expectations do not develop.
Building costs must be current and reflective of total replacement of just existing systems
and shall not reflect items that are not within the building but may be required by code or
programs.
Deficiencies must be rated as accurately as possible. Because there are different levels
of technical abilities of the evaluator, there will be some variation in the results from
different evaluations. The deficiency percentage is somewhat subjective based upon the
evaluators judgment.
It is very important that users understand that any chosen method of evaluation will not produce
infallible results while using commonly available in house staff for the audit team. The results of
this kind of building audit should never be looked upon as a substitute for an engineering study
when renovations are being planned.
Unit of
Measure
10,000 S.F.
10,000 S.F.
10,000 S.F.
10,000 S.F.
10,000 S.F.
10,000 S.F.
10,000 S.F.
1,000 S.Y.
1,000 S.Y.
Structural
Electrical
Mechanical
Total
1.5
2.4
1.8
2.4
2.3
1.8
1.2
0.1
0.1
1.0
1.9
1.4
1.9
1.5
1.4
----
1.3
2.1
1.4
2.1
2.0
1.4
----
3.8
6.4
4.6
6.4
5.8
4.6
Acre
Acre
Acre
0.5
0.4
0.3
----
----
Size
G.S.F.
28,000
Structural
Unit Hours
1.5
4.20
Roof
Unit Hours
1.2
4.20
Mechanical
Unit Hours
1.3
3.64
Building
Electrical
Total
Unit Hours
Hours
1.4
3.92
15.96
4,313
40,931
13,814
3.0
2.0
2.0
1.29
8.19
2.76
1.5
1.5
1.5
0.65
6.14
2.07
2.5
2.0
2.0
1.08
8.19
2.76
2.2
2.0
2.0
0.95
8.19
2.76
3.97
30.71
10.35
34,208
1.8
6.16
1.5
5.13
1.4
4.79
1.5
5.13
21.21
73,027
2.0
14.61
1.5
10.95
2.0
14.61
2.0
14.61
54.78
32,172
1.8
5.79
1.5
4.83
1.4
4.50
1.5
4.83
19.95
49,733
1,059
2.5
1.8
12.43
0.19
1.5
1.5
7.46
0.16
2.0
1.4
9.95
0.15
2.0
1.5
9.95
0.16
39.79
0.66
40,354
1.5
6.05
1.5
6.05
1.7
6.86
1.8
7.26
26.22
57.76
223.6
317,611
61.67
47.64
56.53
Floors Tile/Carpet
Structure
Foundations
Doors/Jambs
Locksets/Hardware
HVAC Experience
Plumber Experience
Piping
Cold Water
Hot Water
Distilled Water
Fire
Drinking Fountains
Steam
Chill Water
Chemical - i.e. (Nitrogen & Oxygen)
Water Closets
Natural Gas
Lavatories
Painter Experience:
Interior Paint
Exterior Paint
Wallpaper
Door Signs
Name Plates
Glass
Air Conditioners
Heating Systems
Controls
Energy Management Systems
Hoods
Preventive Maintenance on Equipment
Electrician Experience
Electric Panel Main / Secondary
Transformers
Switches
Lighting - Relamping Program
Emergency Lighting
Exit Lighting
Safety Standards
Fire Alarm Systems
Handicap Accessibility
Health and Life Safety
Means of Egress
Building Number (Risk Management assigned number and agency assigned number)
Gross Square Footage and number of floor above ground and below grade
Building Replacement Cost. This value needs updated annually. Accurate replacement
cost is important to calculate component renewal costs. This may be obtained from a
number of sources including facilities planning reports, risk management (insurance)
reports, records of recent buildings square footage costs for similar buildings or
construction cost guides such as the Means Square Foot Costs.
Contact the local utility companies to determine location of all buried infrastructure,
ownership, known problems, and other pertinent information.
Foundation System
Floor System
Roof System
Ceiling System
Interior Walls and Partitions
Component
Multiplier
$ 1.40
0.51
$ 1.91
0.023
Structural Walls
Exterior Wall
Total this system
$ 3.98/ $ 82.76
$ 1.87
2.11
$ 3.98
Elevated Floors
Floor Finishes
Slab on Grade
Stairs
Total this system
$ 11.42 / $ 82.76
$ 5.03
3.53
1.66
1.20
$11.42
Superstructure
Covering
Insulation
Openings and Specialties
Total this system
$ 4.60 / $ 82.76
$ 2.77
1.09
0.66
0.08
$ 4.60
Ceiling Finishes
$ 3.63 / $ 82.76
$ 3.63
Partitions
$ 2.95
0.048
0.138
0.056
0.044
Window System
Door System
HVAC System
Plumbing System
Conveying System
Electrical System
Specialties
Safety Systems
Totals
Wall Finished
Interior Surface Exterior Walls
Total this system
$ 5.65 / $ 82.76
2.28
0.42
$ 5.65
Exterior Windows
$ 2.98 / $ 82.76
$ 2.98
Interior Doors
Exterior Doors
Total this system
$ 3.06 / $ 82.76
$ 2.67
0.39
$ 3.06
Heating / Cooling
$ 13.80 / $ 82.76
$13.80
Plumbing
$ 10.09 / $ 82.76
$10.09
Elevators
$ 2.04 / $ 82.76
$ 2.04
$ 2.85
8.27
$11.12
$ 3.32
Fire Protection
Alarm Systems & Emer. Light
Total this system
$ 5.16/ $ 82.76
$ 1.28
3.88
$ 5.16
0.068
0.036
0.037
0.167
0.122
0.025
0.134
0.04
0.062
$82.76 100%
The columns of figures on the right side are the component multipliers for College Classrooms.
Some agencies/institutions include the architectural and contractor fees in the component
multiplier calculations. Therefore, the denominator than would be $110.7 instead of $82.76.
This can work if the building replacement value is calculated based upon construction cost,
architectural, and contractor fees. The architectural and contractor fees need to be in both the
component multiplier calculations and building replacement value, or in neither location to have
accurate component renewal values. This is explained in more detail in the calculation the
renewal costs section in a few pages.
Another benefit of the component multiplier calculation is a check of the replacement value for a
building. If the components are closed matched to the building, then the final $/SF is a start for
determining the cost to replace a building.
The following list of building types were selected to be representative categories for CSU
buildings, recognizing that the component values will vary widely between, for instance,
classroom building and an office building.
M.120 Classroom (2-3 Story)
M.150 College Laboratory
M.290 Garage Repair
M.310 Gymnasium
M.330 Hospital (2-3 Story)
M.390 Library
M.410 Medical Office (2 Story)
M.460 Office (2-4 Story)
M.470 Office (5-10 Story)
More accuracy may be gained from a large number of building types, but too many may cause
unnecessary complexity.
the inspector to determine the value that best fits the deficiency of the component sub category.
Since a rating of 1.0 would represent a completely deficient system, there should be very few
instances where the total rating will approach 1.0. The ratings are based upon what exists in a
building and not what by code, academic program, or occupancy used is required in the
building. The prioritization process used to determine what deficiencies are put forward as
maintenance request included a review of applicable building codes, academic/agency master
plans, and other important and relevant concerns. The inspectors need to consider the age of a
component in relation to its expected life and how well it has been maintained. Below is a chart
with assumed expected life of components.
The inspection process is subjective, but inspectors should evaluate buildings as objective as
possible.
In determining a rating for a system, multiple categories may be used with the final system
rating being the sum of all categories.
The inspector uses these priorities in scoring his observed deficiencies and he should be aware
that in many instances, repair of higher priority deficiencies cannot be accomplished without first
correcting a deficiency in a lower priority category. In this case, it makes sense to combine the
deficiencies into a higher priority category.
An inexperienced audit team may find it difficult to assign accurate percentages in the rating
section, therefore until a certain level of expertise or confidence is achieved, the inspectors can
work the formula backwards by computing a cost first and then computing the percentage.
There are several sources of accurate repair cost data that will help inspectors verify their
results. Some of them are:
Contractors Estimates
Selecting and defining the following six priority categories best suits CSU needs and has been
adopted by State Buildings. Any number of priority categories may be established, however,
our audit has been developed using only six, as defined below:
Six priority categories have been established for the facilities audit:
1. SAFETY - Situations or conditions, which pose an immediate danger to life, limb or
property, if the deficiency is not corrected. Matches the Health and Safety Hazard
operational criteria used in the CM evaluation scoring process.
2. DAMAGE/WEAR OUT - Potential for serious damage to the building or the building
components if the deficiency is not corrected. Matches the Disruption Operations
(Agency Programs) operational criteria used in the CM evaluation scoring process.
3. CODES/STANDARDS - Building codes and/or institutional standards were not met
during construction or renovation. Condition may or may not represent an urgent
situation if deficiency is not corrected.
LIFE CYCLE
A building's useful life is limited by the durability of its systems (a building does not fail as a
whole but by components). A building's production life is limited by its continuing ability to meet
the needs of the institution, which change over time.
Each building on Colorado State University campus consists of a set of subsystems such as:
Life
Range
N/A
25
N/A
50
10
40
30
15
50
35
50
50
50
N/A
15-40
50 Up
25 Up
5 Up
20-75
20-80
15-25
30-75
20-50
30-75
20-100
10-50
Useful
Life
Chosen
Current
Replacement
Cost
Provision for
Renewal
20
50
25
12
75
40
20
40
35
50
50
15
The characteristics of facilities subsystems are that they collectively constitute the building, that
each subsystem has a definable useful life.
Inspector
Description
Location (room)
0.25
0.0164
0.0041
Renewal Cost $
$9,014,969
$ 36,961
0.55
0.0691
0.0380
$ 342,569
Floors
0.21
0.1560
0.0328
$ 294,790
Roof
0.31
0.0468
0.0145
$ 130,717
0.6
0.0622
0.0373
$ 336,258
0.61
0.1198
0.0731
$ 658,994
Windows
0.27
0.0375
0.0101
Doors
0.32
0.0397
0.0127
$ 114,490
Cooling/Ventilation
0.39
0.1397
0.0545
$ 491,316
Heating
0.26
0.1398
0.0363
$ 327,243
Plumbing
0.44
0.0338
0.0149
$ 134,323
Electrical
0.17
0.0778
0.0132
$ 118,998
Conveying
0.55
0.0437
0.0240
$ 216,359
0.2
0.0177
0.0036
1.0
0.3690
$3,326,522
Ceiling
Safety
Totals
Total
Rating
Component
Multiplier
Component
Deficiency
91,051
32,454
In determining the overall condition of the building, a point system will be used to classify the
building maintenance rating. This point system summary is as follows:
Facilities Condition
100
95-99
75-94
55-74
35-54
0-34
Camera/Film
Master Keys
Flashlight
Clipboard
Component Worksheets
Roof Plan
Roof Warranty
REFERENCES/BIBLIOGRAPHY
Financial Planning Guidelines for Facility Renewal and Adaption by The Society for College and
University Planning, 1989.
Facilities Audit Workbook A Self-Evaluation Process for Higher Education by Harvey H.
Kaiser APPA Association of Physical Plant Administrators, 1987.
Facilities Audit Workshop The Arizona Approach How to Conduct a Facilities Audit
Presentation by H. Val Peterson, Arizona State University, 1990 & 1991.
Means Square Foot Costs by R.S. Means Company, Inc., 1992.
Facility Condition Analysis by ISES Intelligent Systems Engineering Services, 1991.
Managing the Facilities Portfolio by National Association of College & Universities Business
Offices, 1991.
The Decaying American Campus A Ticking Time Bomb APPA, 1989.
Colorado State University Facilities Audit, 1990
Date of Audit
Construction Date
Building Type
Number of Stories
System Category
Foundation
Columns and
Exterior walls
Floors
Roof
Ceiling
Interior walls and
Partitions
Windows
Doors
Cooling / Ventilation
Heating
Plumbing
Electrical
Conveying
Safety
Total Rating
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SUBTOTAL
* AE/OP
0
Component Deficiency Total
Total Project Cost:
0
Facilities Condition Index (FCI) = 100 (deficiency total x 100)
100.00
* AE/OP component multiplier x sum of component deficiency x building replacement cost
* AE/OP Component Multiplier x Subtotal of Component Deficiency = AE/OP Component Deficiency, which is the A/E
fees, overhead and profit for the construction costs. The building replacement cost x AE/OP Component Deficiency =
Renewal Cost for AE/OP.
FOUNDATION SYSTEM
System Type:
1. Exterior Columns: Individual footings & piers
Pre-drilled/driven piling
Continuous footings
Caissons
Mats
2. Foundation Materials: Steel
Concrete
Wood
Masonry
Combination
Other
_________________
3. Interior Footings: Individual footings & piers
Piling, pile caps and piers
Other
_________________
4. Foundation Walls : Continuous Footings
Grade Beams
Other
__________________________________
RENEWAL
COS COMMENTS
T
PRIORITIZED RATING
SYSTEM
EVALUATION
1) Cracked Walls
2) Foundation
Settlement
3) Foundation
Deterioration
4) Design Load
5) Surface Condition
6) Maintainability
7) Drainage /
Infiltration
Rating Sub-Totals
Total
Rati
ng
Total
Rating
Component
Multiplier
X
Component
Deficiency
Equals
0
Bldg Replacement
Cost
X
Renewal Cost
For Component
Equals $
-
Rating Explanation:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
RENEWAL
COS COMMENTS
T
PRIORITIZED RATING
SYSTEM
EVALUATION
1) Physical
Condition
2) Waterproofing
3) Caulking
4) Cleaning /
Pointing
5) Insulation
6) Maintainability
7) Painting
Rating Sub-Totals
Total
Rati
ng
Total
Rating
Component
Multiplier
X
Component
Deficiency
Equals
0
Bldg Replacement
Cost
X
Renewal Cost
For Component
Equals $
-
Rating Explanation:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
FLOOR SYSTEM
System Type:
Classification: 1 hour
2 hour
4 hour
Other
_____________________
Structure:
1.Reinforced Concrete: Slab & Beam
Pan Joist
2-Way Slab
Waffle Slab
Flat Slab
Pre-Cast Concrete: Double Tee
Span Deck
Single Tee
Structural Steel: Bar Joist
Metal Deck
Steel Frame
Wood Frame
Other
________________
2.Floor Finish: Vinyl Asbestos Tile
Vinyl Composition Tile
Asphalt Tile
Concrete
Wood
Carpet
Terrazzo
Brick
Epoxy
Quarry Tile
Ceramic Tile
Other
_________________________________
RENEWAL
COST
PRIORITIZED RATING
SYSTEM
EVALUATION
1) Structural
Condition
2) Maintainability
COMMENTS
3) Floor Finish
4) Vibration
5) Fire Rating
6) Design Load
7) Acoustical Quality
8) Stairs & Stairwells
Rating Sub-Totals
Total
Rating
Component
Multiplier
X
Total Rating
Component
Deficiency
Equals
0
Bldg Replacement
Cost
X
Renewal Cost
For Component
Equals $
-
Rating Explanation:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
ROOFING SYSTEM
System Type:
1. Flat: a: Concrete: Slab & Beam
Flat Slab
Joists & Slab
Waffle Slab
Other ____________________
b: Pre-Cast Concrete: Double Tee
Single Tee
Span Deck
c: Steel: Metal Deck & Beam
Metal Deck & Joist
Tectum & Joist
Other ____________________
2. Pitched a: Steel: Truss & Wood Deck
Truss & Nailable Concrete
Other
________________________
b: Wood Rafter & Sheathing
Wood Truss & Sheathing
Other
________________________
3. Insulation: Light weight concrete
Rigid Fiberglass
Vermiculite
w/Asphalt Binder
Urethane
Polystyrene
Fesco Board
Foam Glass
Fiberglass Batt
Other
_____________________
4. Roof Material : Built Up Asphalt
Built Up Coal Tar Pitch
Asphalt Shingles
Clay Tile
Slate
Asbestos Shingles
Copper
Steel
Aluminum
Other
__________________________________
5. Parapets : Concrete
Brick
Block
Pre-cast Concrete
Other
________________________________
RENEWAL
COS
T
PRIORITIZED RATING
SYSTEM
EVALUATION
1) Physical Condition
COMMENTS
2) Leaks
3) Drainage
4) Insulation
5) Dissimilar Types
6) Fire Rating
7) Design Load
8) Opening &
Specialties
7) Maintainability
Rating Sub-Totals
Total
Ratin
g
Total
Rating
Component
Multiplier
X
Component
Deficiency
Equals
0
Bldg Replacement
Cost
X
Renewal Cost
For Component
Equals $
-
Rating Explanation:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
CEILING SYSTEM
System Type:
1. Integral Systems: Exposed Structure
Attached to Structure
Other ________________________
2. Suspended System: Lay in Metal Grid
Gypsum Board
Concealed Spline Metal Grid
Plaster
Other
_
3. Materials: Mineral
Wood Fiber
Fiberglass
Metal
Wood
Other
_____________________
4. Finishes: Integral Paint
Fabric
Other
__________________________________________
RENEWAL
COS
T
PRIORITIZED RATING
SYSTEM
EVALUATION
1) Physical Condition
COMMENTS
2) Suitability
3) Accessibility
4) Appearance
5) Maintainability
6) Acoustical Quality
Rating Sub-Totals
Total
Ratin
g
Total
Rating
Component
Multiplier
X
Component
Deficiency
Equals
0
Bldg Replacement
Cost
X
Renewal Cost
For Component
Equals $
-
Rating Explanation :
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
RENEWAL
COST
PRIORITIZED RATING
SYSTEM
EVALUATION
1) Strength &
Stability
2) Appearance
COMMENTS
3) Physical
Condition
4) Acoustical Quality
5) Adaptability
6) Maintainability
7) Specialties
Rating Sub-Totals
Total
Rating
Component
Multiplier
X
Total Rating
Component
Deficiency
Equals
0
Bldg Replacement
Cost
X
Renewal Cost
For Component
Equals $
-
Rating Explanation:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
WINDOW SYSTEM
System Type:
1. Wood
Steel
Aluminum Other ________________________
2. Double Hung
Fixed Glass
Casement
Projected
Awning
Other
________
3. Single Glazing
Double Glazing
Clear Glass
Tinted Glass
Heat Absorbing Glass
Other
______________________________
4. Shading Devices: Interior Blinds
Exterior Blinds
Solar Screens
Awning
Shades
Architectural Devices
Other
__________________________________________
Glass Block
Drapes
RENEWAL
COS
T
PRIORITIZED RATING
SYSTEM
EVALUATION
1) Functional Ability
COMMENTS
2) Physical Ability
3) Appearance
4) Infiltration
5) Maintainability
Rating Sub-Totals
Total
Ratin
g
Total
Rating
Component
Multiplier
X
Component
Deficiency
Equals
0
Bldg Replacement
Cost
X
Renewal Cost
For Component
Equals $
-
Rating Explanation :
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________
DOOR SYSTEM
System Type:
Aluminum
Steel
Wood
Glass
Sliding
Hinged
Folding
Other
________________________
RENEWAL
COS
T
PRIORITIZED RATING
SYSTEM
EVALUATION
1) Door Leaf
COMMENTS
2) Frame
3) Hardware
4) Closers
5) Security
6) Panic Devices
7) Fire Rating
8) Keying
9) Maintainability
Rating Sub-Totals
Total
Ratin
g
Total
Rating
Component
Multiplier
X
Component
Deficiency
Equals
0
Bldg Replacement
Cost
X
Renewal Cost
For Component
Equals $
-
Rating Explanation:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
RENEWAL
COS COMMENTS
T
PRIORITIZED RATING
SYSTEM
EVALUATION
1) Cooling Capacity
2) Temperature
Controls
3) Piping Ductwork
4) Noise Level
5) Energy
Consumption
Reasonable
6) Air Circulation &
Venting
7) Reliability
8) Economizer Cyc.
Inst.
9) Filtration
10) Humidity
11) Maintainability
Rating Sub-Totals
Total
Rati
ng
Total
Rating
Component
Multiplier
X
Component
Deficiency
Equals
0
Bldg Replacement
Cost
X
Renewal Cost
For Component
Equals $
-
Rating Explanation :
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
HEATING SYSTEM
System Type:
1. Transfer Medium: Steam
Hot Water
Air
Electric
Other
________________________
RENEWAL
COS
T
PRIORITIZED RATING
SYSTEM
EVALUATION
1) Heating Capacity
COMMENTS
2) Temperature
Controls
3) Heating All
Seasons
4) Noise Level
5) Energy
Consumption
6) Air Circulation &
Venting
7) Filtration
8) Humidity Control
9) Maintainability
Rating Sub-Totals
Total
Ratin
g
Total
Rating
Component
Multiplier
X
Component
Deficiency
Equals
0
Bldg Replacement
Cost
X
Renewal Cost
For Component
Equals $
-
Rating Explanation :
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
PLUMBING SYSTEM
System Type:
1. Services Available: Cold Water
Hot Water
Sanitary
Drain
Storm Drain
Acid Waste
Natural Gas
Vacuum
Compressed Air
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Deionized Water
Distilled Water
Sprinkler
Standpipe
RENEWAL
COS
T
PRIORITIZED RATING
SYSTEM
EVALUATION
1) Supply Quantities
COMMENTS
Total
Ratin
g
Total
Rating
Component
Multiplier
X
Component
Deficiency
Equals
0
Bldg Replacement
Cost
X
Renewal Cost
For Component
Equals $
-
Rating Explanation:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
System Type:
1. Power System:
2. Lighting System:
RENEWAL
COS
T
PRIORITIZED RATING
SYSTEM
EVALUATION
1) Power System
1a) Safety Conditions
1b) Service Capacity
COMMENTS
1c) Switchgear
Capacity
1d) Feeder Capacity
1e) Panel Capacity
1f) Conventional
Outlets
1g) Branch Circuits
2) Lighting System
2a) Light Levels
2b) Fixtures
2c) Emergency
Lighting
2d) Exit Lighting
3) Maintainability
Rating Sub-Totals
Total
Ratin
g
Total
Rating
Component
Multiplier
X
Component
Deficiency
Equals
0
Bldg Replacement
Cost
X
Renewal Cost
For Component
Equals $
-
Rating Explanation :
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
CONVEYING SYSTEM
System Type:
1. Conveying Systems & Quantities of Each
a: Elevators: Gearless
________Electric Gear
________Hydraulic
________ Other ________________
b: Dumbwaiters
________Lifts
________Escalators
________Pneumatic Tube
Other ____________
2. Elevator Speed:
Electric
__________Feet / Minute
Hydraulic
__________Feet / Minute
3. Elevator Capacity:
Electric
__________Pounds
Hydraulic
__________Pounds
4. Elevator Control Type: Manual
Selective
Selective Collective
Other
________________________
RENEWAL
COS
T
PRIORITIZED RATING
SYSTEM
EVALUATION
1) Speed
COMMENTS
2) Size
3) Condition
4) Appearance
5) Maintainability
6) Noise
Rating Sub-Totals
Total
Ratin
g
Total
Rating
Component
Multiplier
X
Component
Deficiency
Equals
0
Bldg Replacement
Cost
X
Renewal Cost
For Component
Equals $
-
Rating Explanation :
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________
2. Fire Ratings:
Institutional
E Assembly
F - Storage
G - Industrial
H - Hazardous
3. Extinguishing Systems: Portable Extinguishers
Type__________ Size__________ Standpipe
Hose Cabinets
Sprinklers
Other
______________________________
4. Detection & Alarm Systems : Manual Alarm
w / Annunciator
Smoke Detectors
Fire Detectors
Visual
Audible
Other
______________________________
5. Lighting Systems : Exit Signs
Exit Lighting
Emergency Power Batteries
Emergency Generator
Other Power
______________________________
RENEWAL
COS
T
PRIORITIZED RATING
SYSTEM
EVALUATION
1) Means of Egress
COMMENTS
2) Fire Ratings
3) Extinguishing
Systems
4) Detection & Alarm
System
5) Lighting System
6) Handicap
Accessibility
7) Asbestos
8) Electrical /
Emergency
Lighting
Rating Sub-Totals
Total
Ratin
g
Total
Rating
Component
Multiplier
X
Component
Deficiency
Equals
0
Bldg Replacement
Cost
X
Renewal Cost
For Component
Equals $
-
Rating Explanation :
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________