Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The model can be physical, statistical or twice Very short term statistical approaches use scada as input (look ahead time <6h) A forecast system for horizons >6h always includes a Numerical Weather Prediction system (NWP) and sometimes a Model Output Statistic system to optimize the forecast (MOS)
To define an optimal combination of both physical and statistical modeling in order to reach the highest forecast performance
Statistical modelling
DATA
Mesoscale models compute the wind above the ground with a resolution from 1 km to 5 km. Mesoscale models consider the thermal effects on the boundary layer behaviors. The NWP data defines the stability class at each time step. Mesoscale models can not compute well enough the effects of complex terrains and should be mixed with microscale models. Microscale computations are carried out for various stability classes
The mesoscale points are transfered to each wind turbine thanks to the speed coefficients obtained by the CFD model Local effects taken into account : Orography, Land-use The windspeed coefficients allow the statistical correction of NWP data and power curves correction, by using met mast measurements. Calibration takes into account seasonal variations (snow, foliage density, )
Statistical modelling
DATA
Statistical modelling
DATA
Map several inputs to an output Input: Forecast power, NWP variables and production data Output: wind power or wind speed The supervised mapping function is learnt from data
Define three sets A Testing set choose architecture (testing error) A Training set training the network (training error) Finally, a validation set computes true error.
Training Error Testing error
Wind Farm in China with a complex terrain and weather regimes Learning period : 06/2010 to 02/2012 Testing period : 03/2012 to 11/2012
Mesoscale modeling is used to compute the wind above the site Model GFS/WRF Resolution 5 km
Wind speed and production are computed by considering all the relevant parameters
Orography and roughness of terrains Density of air Power curves Wake effects
CFD
After learning of the ANN model, the production is forecast and compared to the real production Production is globally well forecasted Some time lags are observed
ANN model reduce forecasting errors of pure physical approach Improvements on MAE and RMSE are respectively 5% and 16%
MAE reduced to 10.5% bound
RMSE is roughly constant and depends slightly on the look ahead time ANN model benefits are the same in the ranges 6h-30h and 22h-46h
20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 18 15 19 16 WT WT+ANN
RMSE
6h-30h
22h-46h
An optimal combination of statistical and physical modeling is central to high performance forecasting Even for complex terrains, as soon as micro-CFD modeling is performed, Even with weather regime, by coupling NWP with Statistical learning for short term wind power forecasting, RMSE about 15% can be achieved for horizons in the range 6h-48h. MAE reach 10% bound as for flat terrains.
Introducing advanced statistical learning leads to significant improvement over a pure (even advanced) physical approach