Bustos Profile

INTRODUCTION
In line with participatory development, the University of the Philippines College of Social Work and Community Development (UP CSWCD) undertakes a field instruction program (FIP) where the students learn while doing direct service to communities. The Municipality of Bustos (Bustos) is one of the partners of the UP CSWCD.
The fieldwork program in the Municipality of Bustos focuses on assisting the local government unit (LGU) in development planning and project management. The team, composed of students and faculty, is guided by the concept of Community Governance or the participatory management of community resources through people-centered organizing.1 It is hinged on the principle of inclusive development wherein peoples participation in the development process especially the poor will ensure the surfacing of their needs and the identification of measures to address these problems. It seeks to enhance the capacities of non-government service providers such as non-government organizations (NGOs), civil society organizations (CSOs), and peoples organizations (POs) to become partners of the LGU and meet the service gaps of the government.
Community governance aims to work with the present system of government to ensure that national and local resources are used to enhance the well-being of all citizens. Republic Act 7160 or the Local Government Code (LGC) of 1991 allows for community participation in local development planning. It created autonomous LGUs and devolved certain resources and basic services under their watch. More importantly, it mandated local development councils (LDCs) to lead the development planning and investment programming of these localities. Peoples participation in these LDCs through NGOs and POs is encouraged and guaranteed. Furthermore, the LGC provides for the development of the nongovernment service providers by enjoining LGUs to promote their establishment and support their development endeavors through financial assistance, among others.
1 Most ideas presented here come from discussions with Prof. Oscar Ferrer and the Bustos Fieldwork team. Some input also comes from the paper of the undergraduate students and thesis of Prof. Ferrer.
The question lies, however, on the system of development planning and the readiness of communities and the community organizations in engaging with the LGUs. The highly technical nature of current development planning and investment programming may hinder genuine community participation in these processes. Through their daily endeavors, it is seen that community members have the capacity to plan to analyze their situation, identify their problems and measures to address these issues. However, not everyone has formal education on development planning and therefore many community members may have limited understanding of such endeavor. Thus, it is important to look at the system of planning and programming that has been adopted in localities. The development of the capacities of the community members is imperative to ensure everyones fruitful participation in the process.
Furthermore, some communities or sectors within communities may still need to be organized. Community organizing bonds people through the identification of their common concerns. The process and the resulting collective enhance peoples capacities and strength to pursue their desired goals. The level of organizing one community may require may depend on their factors such as exposure to NGOs/CSOs/POs, past experiences, and composition. It may be assumed that the more organized the community is, the more influence it may have in development planning and investment programming.
Community governance is seen as a sustainable approach to development planning and investment programming. Use of resources may become more efficient because the participants may effectively identify societal issues which may aid targeting of initiatives. Through their participation, people may claim ownership of the development plan and development programs, projects, and activities (PPAs). This may ensure their support for implementation of the identified PPAs and pressure LGUs to deliver the same. Furthermore, as resulting development plans and investment programs are legislated, the environment for the desired development goals both for the short and long term will be provided.
Community governance is seen to ensure accountability.
The participation of the people
increases their awareness and understanding of the systems and processes in development planning and investment programming. This may lead to the greater scrutiny of the decisions of those in power and induce more responsibility to deliver people-centered programs. Also, peoples understanding of the processes may lead to transparency through their increased engagement with the LGUs and greater
demand for development-oriented data and information. Furthermore, the process provides venue for the community to express their grievances and concerns. This is beneficial not only for the community members, but also for the LGUs as it may be seen as a feedback mechanism in determining impacts of public investments.
Objectives and Activities From November 2011 May 2012, the main objective of the fieldwork at the graduate level was the development of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP). The CLUP of Bustos was drafted in 2001 and needs to be updated to reflect national and sub-national policies and other socio-economic and physical developments in the municipality. The initial activity is the preparation of the Socio-economic Profile, as presented in this Report.
Taking into consideration the data at hand and those still needed, a semester would not suffice to be able to update the municipalitys CLUP. However, steps leading to the accomplishment of the main objective were initiated. These include establishing linkage between Bustos and the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB), assisting in the formulation of barangay development plans (BDPs), and consolidating socio-economic indicators.
This socio-economic data were obtained from the LGU and agencies such as the National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB), Community-based Monitoring System (CBMS), Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG), Local Governance Performance Management System (LGPMS), Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB), National Household Targeting System for Poverty Reduction (NHTS-PR), and the Department of Finance (DOF).
Data Scope and Limitations The Socio-economic Profile is divided into three sections: physical profile, social sector indicators, and fiscal performance. The first section covers the physical profile of Bustos. It includes maps obtained from the Municipal Planning and Development Office of Bustos and websites of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) and MGB. Spot maps made by the community members during the BDP formulation workshop were also included in the section. The second section is on the socio-demographic profile taken from NSO, DILG, and DSWD data. This section focused mainly on health, nutrition, housing, water and sanitation, education, income and employment. The last section contains data from DoF regarding the municipalitys finances for the last 10 years (2001 -2010). Bustos income sources and the budget allotted for different services are also reflected in the data.
Since this Report is a work in progress, future endeavors should be undertaken to fill in the information gaps on other important sectors which were not included in this profile. The Socioeconomic Data Report is an initial contribution of the UP CSWCD FIP Team towards the development of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan of the Municipality of Bustos. The UP CSWCD FIP Team (2nd semester, AY 2011-2012) Graduate students: John Anthony U. Geronimo Mary Jane Inocencio Fleureeza Marie A. Liwanag Faculty Supervisor: Dr. Emmanuel M. Luna
Undergraduate students:
Jerome B. Bactol Karl Joseph T. Directo Karla Carizza C. Gallaza Alexia Allyssa G. Olivar
Faculty Supervisor:
Dr. Oscar P. Ferrer
The LGU Supervisors: Hon. Arnel F. Mendoza Mr. Fernando F. Tadeo IV Mr. Gary C. Sta. Rosa
PHYSICAL PROFILE
Location and land use. The Municipality of Bustos sits in the midwest of the Province of Bulacan and about 50 kilometers from Metro Manila. It is a 2
nd
Table 1. Existing Municipal Land Use (MPDO, 2009)
Total Land Area Residential Commercial Industrial & Agro-Industrial Agricultural/Fish Pond Industrial Open Spaces
42,500,000.00 sq.m. 5,550,000.00 sq.m. 40,000.00 sq.m. 420,000.00 sq.m. 40,010,000.00 sq.m. 190,000.00 sq.m. 1,200,000.00 sq.m.
class semi-urban municipality
with a land area of 42,500,000 sq.m. divided into 14 barangays. As of 2009, most of its land is agricultural, 13 percent residential, three percent open spaces, one percent industrial and agroindustrial, and less than one percent industrial and commercial.
Figure 1. Barangay geopolitical divisions
Figure 2. Geographical location of the Municipality of Bustos
Hazard profile. Most barangays are not susceptible to landslide with the exception of Malawak with low landslide susceptibility. On the other hand, all barangays have low to moderate susceptibility to floods with the exception of Malawak which is not susceptible to flood.2
Current physical development. The community sees that the most pressing issue at the moment is the construction of a bypass road that will go through four barangays of Bustos, namely: Liciada, Camachilihan, Bonga Menor, and Malamig. They say that this project may bring about changes in economic activities and mobility of people, among others. With these, they see the need for careful planning to adapt to the possible impacts of the project (i.e., increased transient individuals, in-migration of people) and make the most out of the economic opportunities brought about by the construction of the road.
________________________
2
Please see attached hazard map for visual representation of the mentioned hazard risks.
BULACAN
BULACAN Road Network (1st DEO)
BUSTOS
barangay boundaries road network contour
road network
contour
BUSTOS
barangay boundaries 1 Bonga Mayor 2 Bonga Menor 3 Buisan 4 Camachilihan 5 Cambaog 6 Catacte 7 Liciada 8 Malamig 9 Malawak 10 Poblacion 11 San Pedro 12 Talampas 13 Tanawan 14 Tibagan
10 13 1 11
14
12
5 6
9 3
CAMACHILIHAN
MALAMIG
LICIADA
BONGA MENOR
BONGA MAYOR
boundary road contour
BONGA MENOR
BUISAN
CAMACHILIHAN
boundary road
CAMBAOG
boundary road
CATACTE
LICIADA
MALAMIG
boundary road
MALAWAK
POBLACION
boundary road
SAN PEDRO
boundary road
TALAMPAS
boundary road
TANAWAN
boundary road
TIBAGAN
Landslide and flood susceptibility rate per barangay (Mines and Geosciences Bureau)
Barangay Bonga Mayor Bonga Menor Buisan Camachilihan Cambaog Catacte Liciada Malamig Malawak Poblacion San Pedro Talampas Tanawan Tibagan Landslide susceptibility rate None None None None None None None None Low None None None None None Flood susceptibility rate Low to moderate Low to moderate Low to moderate Low to moderate Low to moderate Low to moderate Low to moderate Low to moderate None Low to moderate Low to moderate Low to moderate Low to moderate Low to moderate
Bustos Population and Households

2007 Population Households
Source: RHU Bustos
2008 58789 11726
2009 65156 13039
2010 67517 13503
2011 69967 13992
57181 11442
Population and Households

80000
70000
60000
50000
40000
population households
30000
20000
10000
0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Data source: RHU Bustos. Graph: Liwanag, F.M.A.
Vital Health Indices

2007 1398 266 2 0 x 24.4/1000 4.6/1000 0.03/1000 x 2008 1400 289 3 0 x 23.8/1000 4.9/1000 0.05/1000 x 2009 1331 278 5 0 x 20.4/1000 4.2/1000 0.76/1000 x 2010 1432 293 5 0 x 21.2/1000 4.33/1000 0.074/1000 x 2011 1327 309 6 0 8 19/1000 4.41/1000 0.08/1000 0.02
Births Deaths Infant deaths Maternal deaths Deaths under age of 5 CBR CDR IMR MMR
Source: RHU Bustos, 2011
Births
1440 1420 1400 1380 1360 1340 1320 1300 1280 1260
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Deaths
320 310 300 290 280 270 260 250 240
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Data source: RHU Bustos, 2011. Graphs: Liwanag, F.M.A.
Leading Causes of Complaints/Morbidity

Causes Acute Respiratory Infection Anemia/Dizziness/Headache Nutritional Deficiency Skin Problem/Allergy Influenza GI disorder Injuries/Wounds, all kinds Urinary Tract Infection HPN Mumps PTB Pneumonia Diarrhea
2007 2310
167 162
272 254 149 25 595
2008 3903 1044 351 487 239 275 248 232 287 97
2009 4190 2021 453 493 494 279 457 362 350 136
2010 5818 1947 634 442 89 542 238 353 644
2011 6438 1314 1269 760 439 361 230 366 277 106
Leading Causes of Morbidity

7000
6000
Acute Respiratory Infection Anemia/Dizziness/Headache
5000
Nutritional Deficiency Skin Problem/Allergy
4000
Influenza
GI disorder Injuries/Wounds, all kinds
3000
Urinary Tract Infection

HPN
2000
Mumps PTB Pneumonia
1000
Diarrhea
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Data source: RHU Bustos, 2011. Graph: Liwanag, F.M.A.
Leading Cuases of Mortality

Causes Cancer (all kinds) Disease of the blood vessel Degenerative heart disease Diseases of the heart Diabetis mellitus Accidents (all kinds) COPD HPN TB Pneumonia Renal failure
2007 55 38 23 30 17 40 13 27 7 10
2008 46 41 35 23 20 12 10 9 9 6
2009 55 18 40 50 29 17 16 25 6 12
2010 58 48 25 42 20 14 19 8 3 3 4
Leading Causes of Mortality

70
60 Cancer (all kinds) 50 Disease of the blood vessel Degenerative heart disease 40 Diseases of the heart Diabetis mellitus Accidents (all kinds) 30
COPD
HPN
20
TB
Pneumonia
Renal failure 10
2007
2008
2009
2010
Attendant at birth Doctors Nurses Midwives Hilot Others

2008 794 25 543 11 0
2009 935 5 352 37 0
2010 1114 8 229 73 6
2011 996 3 249 74 3
Attendants at birth
1200 1000 800 600 400 200
0
2008 2009 2010 2011
Doctors
Nurses
Midwives
Hilot
Others
2008 Deliveries by TYPE Normal Risk Unknown Deliveries by PLACE Home Hospital Others
2009 276 1053
2010
2011
733 654 12 535 845 0
1426 4 167 1262 0 143 1052 100
259 1070 0
Deliveries by Place
2000 1000 0 2008 2009 Home
2010 Hospital Others
2011
Number of Children 5 Years Old and Below According to Weight

Actual Number of Preschoolers Weighed 8614 8980 8978 9121 9475 Number of Above Normal Weighed 205 179 167 154 132
Year
Number of Very Low Weighed 6 4 4 4 2
Number of Low Weighed 489 492 456 321 315
Number of Normal Weighed 8010 8305 8351 8651 8895
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Source: MNAO Bustos
0.06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.02
5.67 5.47 5.07 3.42 3.28
92.98 92 93 95 94
2.37 1.09 1.86 1.68 1.4
Very Low Weighed

7
6 5 4 300 3 2 1 0 200 100 0 600 500 400
Low Weighed
250
Above Normal Weighed
200
150
100
50
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Data source: MNAO-Bustos. Graphs:Liwanag,F.M.A.
Environmental Health and Water Sanitation

Number of Households w/o w/o w/ Sanitary Sanitary Sanitary Garbage Garbage Toilets Disposal Disposal 118 887 118 125 941 125 47 379 47 65 468 65 153 1127 153 71 481 71 113 867 113 124 920 124 61 439 61 259 1932 259 170 1329 170 94 732 94 73 628 73 168 1221 168 1641 12351 1641 Number of Number of w/o Complete Food Food Basic Sanitation Establishments Handlers Facilities 165 179 70 83 219 94 127 178 81 376 262 142 117 242 2335 17 17 0 9 14 9 24 11 9 41 24 12 7 25 219 40 31 0 12 27 8 75 15 27 152 81 12 20 41 541
Barangay
Total Number w/ Sanitary of Households Toilets 1005 1066 426 533 1280 552 980 1044 500 2191 1499 826 701 1389 13992 887 941 379 468 1127 481 867 920 439 1932 1329 732 628 1221 12351
w/ Complete Basic Sanitation Facilities 840 887 356 450 1061 458 853 866 419 1815 1237 684 584 1147 11657
Bonga Mayor Bonga Menor Buisan Camachilihan Cambaog Catacte Luciada Malamig Malawak Poblacion San Pedro Talampas Tanawan Tibagan Bustos
Number of Households According to Ownership of Sanitary Toilets

Barangay Bonga Mayor Bonga Menor Buisan Camachilihan Cambaog Catacte Luciada Malamig Malawak Poblacion San Pedro Talampas Tanawan Tibagan Bustos
Total 1005 1066 426 533 1280 552 980 1044 500 2191 1499 826 701 1389 13992
Number of Households w/ Sanitary Toilets 887 941 379 468 1127 481 867 920 439 1932 1329 732 628 1221 12351
w/o Sanitary Toilets 118 125 47 65 153 71 113 124 61 259 170 94 73 168 1641
HH accdg to ownership of sanitary toilets

2500
2000
1500
1000
500
w/ Sanitary Toilet
w/o Sanitary Toilet
Number of Households According to Sanitary Garbage Disposal

Number of Households w/ Sanitary Garbage w/o Sanitary Garbage Disposal Disposal 887 118 941 125 379 47 468 65 1127 153 481 71 867 113 920 124 439 61 1932 259 1329 170 732 94 628 73 1221 168 11464 1523
Total 1005 1066 426 533 1280 552 980 1044 500 2191 1499 826 701 1389 13992
HH accdg to sanitary garbage disposal

2500
2000
1500
1000
500
w/ Sanitary Garbage Disposal

w/o Sanitary Garbage Disposal
Number of Households According to Ownership of Basic Sanitation Facilities

Number of Households w/ Complete Basic Sanitation Facilities 840 887 356 450 1061 458 853 866 419 1815 1237 684 584 1147 11657
Total 1005 1066 426 533 1280 552 980 1044 500 2191 1499 826 701 1389 13992
w/o Complete Basic Sanitation Facilities 165 179 70 83 219 94 127 178 81 376 262 142 117 242 2335
HH accdg to ownership of basic sanitation facilities

2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0
w/ Basic Sanitation Facilities

w/o Basic Sanitation Facilities
Number of Food Establishments and Food Handlers

Barangay Bonga Mayor Bonga Menor Buisan Camachilihan Cambaog Catacte Luciada Malamig Malawak Poblacion San Pedro Talampas Tanawan Tibagan
Number of Households 1005 1066 426 533 1280 552 980 1044 500 2191 1499 826 701 1389
Number of Food Establishments 17 17 0 9 14 9 24 11 9 41 24 12 7 25
Number of Food Handlers 40 31 0 12 27 8 75 15 27 152 81 12 20 41
Number of food establishments

50 40 30 20 10 0
Number of food handlers

160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
Data source: RHU Bustos, 2011. Graphs: Liwanag, F.M.A.
Number of Households According to Source of Water Supply

Number of Households with Source of Water Supply Level I Level III Private Public 70 68 866 52 51 783 129 215 0 115 244 0 49 41 1082 119 243 0 242 374 0 159 149 657 219 151 0 128 201 1833 92 79 1312 69 94 657 87 59 531 135 340 504 1665 2309 8225
Barangay Bonga Mayor Bonga Menor Buisan Camachilihan Cambaog Catacte Liciada Malamig Malawak Poblacion San Pedro Talampas Tanawan Tibagan
Bustos
HH according to source of water supply

2000
1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0
Private
Public
Level III
Number of Households According to Access to Safe Water Supply

Total Number of Households
1005 1066 426 533 1280 552 980 1044 500 2191 1499 826 701 1389 13992
Barangay Bonga Mayor Bonga Menor Buisan Camachilihan Cambaog Catacte Liciada Malamig Malawak Poblacion San Pedro Talampas Tanawan Tibagan Bustos
Number of Households with access to safe without access to safe water supply water supply
910 954 405 491 1085 504 865 930 437 2044 1460 703 681 1211 12680 95 112 21 42 195 48 115 114 63 147 39 123 20 178 1312
HH accdg to access to safe water supply

2500
2000
1500
1000
500
with access to safe water supply

without access to safe water supply
SOCIAL SECTOR INDICATORS
Demography. In 2010, the total population in Bustos was 62,415. Barangays with the biggest share in the total population were: Poblacion (25%), San Pedro (10%), Tibagan (10%), and Cambaog (9%) (figure 3).
In 2007, the National Statistics Office (NSO) reported that there were 30,288 male and 30,101 female residents of Bustos. In the same year, it was noted that 56 percent of the population is below 30 years old.
Poverty. In terms of poverty incidence, the Small Area Estimates of the National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB) indicated that Bustos poverty incidence in 2003 was 3.47 percent. This means 1,990 people were without means to provide for their basic food and non-food needs in a sustained manner. This may be seen as relatively small compared to national and Bulacan provincial
average poverty incidence of 30 percent and 12.3 percent, respectively. This is reflected on the very low number of informal settlers in 2007 which is .26% out of the total households.
On the other hand, the 2005 Community-based Monitoring System (CBMS) data showed 45 percent poverty incidence while the National Household Targeting System for Poverty Reduction (NHTSPR) recorded 1,792 poor families in the locality. The NHTS-PR also showed that many of these poor families are from the following barangays: Poblacion (516 families), San Pedro (173), Catacte (149), Liciada (139), and Bonga Menor (129) (figure 4).
Housing. The 2007 NSO study showed that there were only 34 informal settlers in Bustos or .26% out of the total households (figure 5) and only 92 houses (0.71% of total houses) are made of makeshift materials (figure 6). Similarly, the NHTS-PR data showed that there are only eight poor families who live in a rent-free house and lot without the consent of the owner.
However, the MPDO indicated that in 2009 the number of informal dwelling units was 358 or occupied by a total of 586 families. Furthermore, the 2005 CBMS data showed that 3.3 percent of the households in Bustos live in makeshift housing and 1.5 percent of all families are informal settlers. Highest incidences of informal settlers are in Bonga Menor (5.7%), Camachilihan (5.2%), and Catacte (3.0%) (figure 7).
Employment. The 2009 State of Local Development report indicated that Bustos has high unemployment rate and very high underemployment rate. The 2005 CBMS data showed that out of the total population in Bustos, 10.8 percent are unemployed. The NHTS-PR data also showed that there are 2,814 unemployed poor individuals and were identified from Poblacion (700), Liciada (266), and San Pedro (258) (figure 8).
Education. According to the 2007 NSO census, out of the 46,850 Bustos residents aged 10 years old and above, 23,707 had graduated at least from high school while 57,725 had graduated from primary school. (It is however necessary to revisit the data since the number of those who are said to had at least gone through grade school is higher than the actual population of that particular age group). It is revealed further that males had only slightly outnumbered female grade school graduates - 28,922 and 28,803, respectively. This trend is evident in the number of residents attending school in 2007 with 7,914 male and 7,714 female enrollees (that comprised 63.08% of the total 5 to 24 years age population).
In 2009, the MPDO report showed that there are 1,276 out-of-school youths in their locality while the 2005 CBMS noted that out of the six to 16 years old population in the area, 13.1 percent were not attending school. Furthermore, the CBMS data also presented that 2.2 percent of Bustoseos, 10 years old and above are illiterate. More specifically, the NHTS-PR data pointed out that among the 1,646 poor individuals not attending school, majority were found in Poblacion (496), San Pedro (155), and Liciada (140) (figure 9).
Health and nutrition. Based on observations and discussions with the community and municipal officers, it manifested that the main socio-economic issue in Bustos is related to malnutrition. It must be noted however that the problem is not caused by under nutrition due to hunger or deprivation of food, but due to improper diet of the residents. The 2005 CBMS data showed that 4.7 percent of children from zero to five years of age were malnourished and 0.3 percent of these children die. Rates of malnourished children zero to five years old were seen highest in the following barangays: Poblacion (13.5%), Liciada (8.5%), and Buisan (8.1%) (figure 10).
The 2005 CBMS data revealed that maternal mortality rate (MMR) is low in Bustos with most barangays registering zero MMRs. Pregnancy mortality had been noted in the following barangays: Malawak (4.3%), Bonga Menor (3.8%), Liciada (1.9%), and Malamig (1.6%) (figure 11).
Water and sanitation. The 2005 CBMS data had presented that 2.2 percent of the total households in Bustos do not have access to safe water supply while 4.5 percent of them do not have
access to sanitary toilet facilities. Barangays with highest proportion of households without access to safe water supply are Tibagan (6.4%), Liciada (5.1%), Poblacion (3.6%), and Talampas (3.5%) (figure 12).
On the other hand, barangays with the highest proportion of households without access to sanitary toilet facilities are Liciada (12.4%), Poblacion (8.6%), Catacte (8.1%), and Malawak (8.1%) (figure 13).
Nutrition
% children 0-5 who are malnourished
Health
% children 0-5 who died % women who died due to pregnancy
Housing
% HH living in makeshift housing % HH who are squatters
Water and Sanitation

% HH without access to % HH without access to safe water supply sanitary toilet facilities
Bustos Bonga Mayor Bonga Menor Buisan Camachilihan Cambaog Catacte Liciada Malamig Malawak Poblacion San Pedro Talampas Tanawan Tibagan
Source: CBMS, 2005
4.7 6.7 1.2 8.1 0 0.8 1.1 8.5 0.6 4.9 13.5 3.6 1.5 0.4 1.6
0.3 0 0.5 0 0 0.3 0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.4 0 0 0.3 0 3.8 0 0 0 0 1.9 1.6 4.3 0 0 0 0 0
3.3 1.8 3.9 0.3 1.4 0.3 0.7 3.6 8.1 7.1 2.7 4 3.4 0.9 4.9
1.5 1.7 5.7 0 5.2 0.4 3 2.3 1.1 2.6 0.4 0.4 2.4 0.2 0.6
2.2 1.7 1.2 0 0 0.6 1 5.1 0.6 1.4 3.6 0.3 3.5 0 6.4
4.5 1.4 1.9 2.7 4.3 1.7 8.1 12.4 4.7 8.1 8.6 1.4 5.9 0.2 0.6
BARANGAY
Bonga Mayor Bonga Menor Buisan Camachilihan Cambaog Catacte Liciada Malamig Malawak Poblacion San Pedro Talampas Tanawan Tibagan
Source: CBMS, 2005
6.7 1.2 8.1 0 0.8 1.1 8.5 0.6 4.9 13.5 3.6 1.5 0.4 1.6

16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 13.5
8.1 6.7
8.5 4.9
3.6 1.5 0.4
1.2
0.8
1.1
0.6
1.6
Data source: CBMS, 2005. Graph: Geronimo, J.A.U.
BARANGAY
% children 0-5 who died
Source: CBMS, 2005
0 0.5 0 0 0.3 0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.4 0 0 0.3
% children 0-5 who died

0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0.5 0.4 0.3
0.5
0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0
BARANGAY
% women who died due to pregnancy
Source: CBMS, 2005
0 3.8 0 0 0 0 1.9 1.6 4.3 0 0 0 0 0
% women who died due to pregnancy

5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 4.3 3.8
1.9
1.6
BARANGAY
% HH living in makeshift housing
Source: CBMS, 2005
1.8 3.9 0.3 1.4 0.3 0.7 3.6 8.1 7.1 2.7 4 3.4 0.9 4.9
% HH living in makeshift housing

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 8.1 7.1 4.9 3.9 1.8 0.3 1.4 0.3 3.6 2.7 0.7 4 3.4 0.9
BARANGAY
% HH who are squatters
Source: CBMS, 2005
1.7 5.7 0 5.2 0.4 3 2.3 1.1 2.6 0.4 0.4 2.4 0.2 0.6
% HH who are squatters

6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1.7 1.1 0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.6 3 2.3 2.6 2.4 5.7 5.2
BARANGAY
% HH without access to safe water supply
Source: CBMS, 2005
1.7 1.2 0 0 0.6 1 5.1 0.6 1.4 3.6 0.3 3.5 0 6.4
% HH without access to safe water supply

7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1.7 1.2 0.6 0 0 1 1.4 0.6 0.3 0 3.6 3.5 5.1 6.4
BARANGAY
% HH w/o access to sanitary toilet facilities
Source: CBMS, 2005
1.4 1.9 2.7 4.3 1.7 8.1 12.4 4.7 8.1 8.6 1.4 5.9 0.2 0.6
% HH without access to sanitary toilet facilities

14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1.4 1.9 2.7 4.3 1.7 4.7 1.4 0.2 8.1 8.1 8.6 5.9 12.4
0.6
BARANGAY
%HH who experienced food shortage
Source: CBMS, 2005
2.5 2.9 0 0.2 0.2 1.2 11.6 1.1 13.8 6.1 2.4 0.5 2.4 1.2
% HH who experienced food shortage

16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2.5 6.1 11.6 13.8
2.9
0 0.2 0.2 1.2 1.1
2.4 0.5
2.4
2
0
1.2
BARANGAY
% HH members who are unemployed
Source: CBMS, 2005
8 7.4 7.2 10.1 7.6 4.6 10 15 10.4 13.2 11.3 10.7 7.9 16.200001
% HH members who are unemployed

18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 15 13.2 10.1 8 7.4 7.2 7.6 4.6 10 10.4 11.3 10.7 7.9 16.200001
Education
% of children 13% of children 6% of children 6- % of illiterate 16 not 12 not attending 16 not members 10 attending elementary attending years old secondary school school and above school % HH with income below poverty threshold
Income and Employment

% HH with income below food threshold % HH who experienced food shortage
Peace and Order

% HH members % persons who are who are victims of crime unemployed
Source: CBMS, 2005
20.299999 16.5 20.4 21.1 25.29999 17.4 35.2 17.2 20.6 23.7 20.5 21.5 22.4 19.2 16.799999
32.799999 18.6 27.9 38.79999 42.900002 21.6 38.799999 32 39.2 44.4 43.7 32.7 39.4 33.29999 18
13.1 7.9 12.7 12.3 14.6 7.1 26.1 11.4 14.9 18.2 17.4 13.5 16.4 10.9 7.1
2.2 0.9 1 5.3 3.4 1 3.3 1.9 4.2 1.8 1.5 3 4.4 0.5 1.1
44.5 34.900002 88.400002 22.79999 39.79999 34.29999 55.79999 37.900002 67.699997 57.20001 21.6 37.900002 63.29999 35.099998 50.79999
27.700001 15.2 83.900002 8 22.9 15.3 38.29999 19.4 51.599998 33.5 8.5 19 50.90002 17.200001 27.9
3.4 2.5 2.9 0 0.2 0.2 1.2 11.6 1.1 13.8 6.1 2.4 0.5 2.4 1.2
10.8 8 7.4 7.2 10.1 7.6 4.6 10 15 10.4 13.2 11.3 10.7 7.9 16.200001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0
BARANGAY
% of children 6-12 not attending elementary school
Source: CBMS, 2005
16.5 20.4 21.1 25.29999 17.4 35.2 17.2 20.6 23.7 20.5 21.5 22.4 19.2 16.799999
% of children 6-12 not attending elementary school

40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 16.5 20.4 21.1 17.4 17.2 25.29999 23.7 20.5 21.5 22.4 19.2
35.2
20.6
16.799999
BARANGAY
% of children 13-16 not attending secondary school
Source: CBMS, 2005
18.6 27.9 38.79999 42.900002 21.6 38.799999 32 39.2 44.4 43.7 32.7 39.4 33.29999 18
% of children 13-16 not attending secondary school

50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 42.900002 38.79999 27.9 18.6 21.6 18 38.799999 32 44.4 39.2 32.7 43.7 39.4 33.29999
BARANGAY
% of children 6-16 not attending school
Source: CBMS, 2005
7.9 12.7 12.3 14.6 7.1 26.1 11.4 14.9 18.2 17.4 13.5 16.4 10.9 7.1
% of children 6-16 not attending school

30 25 20 15 10 5 0 7.9 12.7 12.3 14.6 11.4 7.1 14.9 26.1
18.2
17.4 13.5
16.4 10.9 7.1
BARANGAY
% of illiterate HH members 10 years old and above
Source: CBMS, 2005
0.9 1 5.3 3.4 1 3.3 1.9 4.2 1.8 1.5 3 4.4 0.5 1.1
% of illiterate HH members 10 years old and above

6 5 4 3 3.4 3.3 1.9 0.9 1 1 0.5 1.8 5.3 4.2 3 1.5 4.4
2
1 0
1.1
BARANGAY
% HH with income below poverty threshold
Source: CBMS, 2005
34.900002 88.400002 22.79999 39.79999 34.29999 55.79999 37.900002 67.699997 57.20001 21.6 37.900002 63.29999 35.099998 50.79999
% HH with income below poverty threshold

100 88.400002 90 80 67.699997 70 57.20001 55.79999 60 50 39.79999 37.900002 34.29999 40 34.900002 22.79999 30 20 10 0
63.29999
50.79999
37.900002 21.6 35.099998
BARANGAY
% HH with income below food threshold
Source: CBMS, 2005
15.2 83.900002 8 22.9 15.3 38.29999 19.4 51.599998 33.5 8.5 19 50.90002 17.200001 27.9
% HH with income below food threshold

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 83.900002
51.599998 38.29999 22.9 15.2 15.3 19.4 8.5 33.5
50.90002
27.9
19
17.200001
Nutrition
Children 0-5 who are malnourished Children 0-5 who died
Health
Women who died due to pregnancy
Housing
HH living in makeshift housing
Sanitation
HH without access to sanitary toilet facilities
HH who are squatters
Wall
Roof 152 8 12 1 4 1 3 15 6 8 7 23 5 4 55 32 9 4 0 3 0 1 4 5 2 3 0 1 0 0 396 5 11 9 16 1 25 101 32 19 143 11 18 1 4
Source: CBMS, 2005
307 25 5 14 0 5 3 49 4 13 148 24 4 1 12
21 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 9 3 0 1 2
4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
127 4 14 0 5 0 3 13 3 22 21 31 5 2 4
BARANGAY
Children 0-5 who are malnourished 25 5 14 0 5 3 49 4 13 148 24 4 1 12
Source: CBMS, 2005
Children 0-5 who are malnourished

160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 148
49 25 5 14 0 5 3 4 13 24 4 1 12
Data source: CBMS, 2005. Graph: Liwanag, F.M.A.
BARANGAY
Children 0-5 who died 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 9 3 0 1 2

Source: CBMS, 2005
Children 0-5 who died

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9
3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 2
BARANGAY
HH living in makeshift housing (wall) 4 14 0 5 0 3 13 3 22 21 31 5 2 4
Source: CBMS, 2005
HH living in makeshift housing (roof) 8 12 1 4 1 3 15 6 8 7 23 5 4 55
HH living in makeshift housing

60 50 40 30 20 10 0 4 22 21 7 31 23 14 12 01 15 13 55
54
01
33
55
24
Wall materials
Roof materials
BARANGAY
Source: CBMS, 2005
9 4 0 3 0 1 4 5 2 3 0 1 0 0

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9
5 4 3 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 3
BARANGAY
HH w/o access to sanitary toilet facilities
Source: CBMS, 2005
5 11 9 16 1 25 101 32 19 143 11 18 1 4
HH w/o access to sanitary toilet facilities

160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 25 1 32 19 11 18 1 4 101 143
11
16
BARANGAY
HH who experienced food shortage
Source: CBMS, 2005
12 15 0 0 0 4 49 1 3 81 21 1 6 9
HH who experienced food shortage

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 81
49
12
15 0 0 0 4 1 3
21 1 6 9
BARANGAY
HH members who are unemployed
Source: CBMS, 2005
1043 975 354 480 1163 444 1233 1432 502 2566 1755 1082 737 1699
HH members who are unemployed

3000
2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 1043 975 354 480 1163 444 1233 1755 1431 1082 502 737 1699 2566
BARANGAY
Source: CBMS, 2005
Persons who are victims of crime 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 1 0 0 0 0
Persons who are victims of crime

7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
BARANGAY
HH with income below food threshold
Source: CBMS, 2005
34 3 5 12 35 25 16 75 15 48 12 49 3 27
HH with income below food threshold

80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 3 5 12 34 35 25 16 15 12 3 27 48 49 75
Education
Chldren 6-12 not Children 13-16 Children 6-16 attending not attending not attending elementary secondary school school school Illiterate members 10 years old and above 806 24 26 62 48 34 48 60 132 27 90 123 79 9 44
Income and Employment

HH with income HH with income HH who below poverty below food experienced threshold threshold food shortage HH members who are unemployed
Peace and Order

Persons who are victims of crime
Source: CBMS, 2005
709 37 46 19 28 33 70 42 63 35 140 80 53 15 48
909 26 64 24 36 54 59 73 103 53 180 99 65 37 36
1618 63 110 43 64 87 129 115 166 88 320 179 118 52 84
719
42 9 7 25 68 52 35 182 46 74 29 63 11 76
359 34 3 5 12 35 25 16 75 15 48 12 49 3 27
202 12 15 0 0 0 4 49 1 3 81 21 1 6 9
15533 1043 975 354 480 1163 444 1233 1431 502 2566 1755 1082 737 1699
9 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 1 0 0 0 0
BARANGAY
Children 6-12 not attending elementary school
Source: CBMS, 2005
37 46 19 28 33 70 42 63 35 140 80 53 15 48
Children 6-12 not attending elementary school

160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 37 46 19 28 33 70 42 63 35 15 80 53 48 140
BARANGAY
Children 13-16 not attending secondary school
Source: CBMS, 2005
26 64 24 36 54 59 73 103 53 180 99 65 37 36
Children 13-16 not attending secondary school

200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
180
103 64 26 24 36 54 59 73 53
99 65 37 36
BARANGAY
Children 6-16 not attending school
Source: CBMS, 2005
63 110 43 64 87 129 115 166 88 320 179 118 52 84
Children 6-16 not attending school

350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 63 110 43 129 115 87 166 88 52 179 118 84 320
64
BARANGAY
Illiterate HH members 10 years old and above
Source: CBMS, 2005
24 26 62 48 34 48 60 132 27 90 123 79 9 44
Illiterate HH members 10 years old and above

140 120 100 90 79 62 48 24 26 34 48 27 9 60
132
123
80
60 40 20 0
44
BARANGAY
HH with income below poverty threshold
Source: CBMS, 2005
42 9 7 25 68 52 35 182 46 74 29 63 11 76
HH with income below poverty threshold

200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 182
68
42 25 9 52 35 46
74 29
63
76
11
BARANGAY Bonga Mayor Bonga Menor Buisan Camachilihan Cambaog Catacte Liciada Malamig Malawak Poblacion San Pedro Talampas Tanawan Tibagan
Source: CBMS, 2005
INDIGENOUS PEOPLE Male Female 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 13 7 13 15 0 0 2 2
Number of IPs per Barangay

30
25 20
15
10 5 0
male
female
Source: CBMS, 2005
Senior Citizens 250 321 111 107 300 124 205 207 139 435 373 224 184 346
Senior Citizens per Barangay

500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0
Source: CBMS, 2005
ILLITERATE male female 9 15 11 15 31 31 21 27 15 19 23 25 28 32 61 71 11 16 47 43 44 79 40 39 1 8 21 23
Illiterate per barangay, by sex

140 71 120 79
100 43 39 60 31 27 25
80
32 23 61 16 47 44 40 21 11 8 1 28
40
19
20 15 9
15
31 11 21 15 23
male
female
EMPLOYED BARANGAY 15 YEARS OLD AND ABOVE 2164 2264 1007 1230 3069 1187 2551 2728 1253 5015 3681 2031 1564 3523 UNEMPLOYED TOTAL 1117 1282 653 750 1906 743 1326 1291 749 2445 1921 930 826 1816 Permanent 975 1089 172 91 1076 459 1123 572 540 2008 1453 706 552 1396 Short-term, seasonal or casual 116 153 471 647 753 267 182 673 192 379 416 159 247 357 Worked on different jobs on daya to day or week to week 25 35 9 11 75 17 11 37 15 46 42 49 26 60 Unknown status 1 5 1 1 2 0 10 9 2 12 10 15 1 3 UNKNOWN
IF UN/EMPLOYED
Source: CBMS, 2005
1043 975 354 480 1163 444 1233 1431 502 2566 1755 1082 737 1699
4 7 0 0 0 0 2 6 2 4 5 20 1 8
15 YEARS OLD UNEMPLOYED AND ABOVE 2164 1043 2264 975 1007 354 1230 480 3069 1163 1187 444 2551 1233 2728 1431 1253 502 5015 2566 3681 1755 2031 1082 1564 737 3523 1699
EMPLOYED 1117 1282 653 750 1906 743 1326 1291 749 2445 1921 930 826 1816
UNKNOWN 4 7 0 0 0 0 2 6 2 4 5 20 1 8
Source: CBMS, 2005
15 years old and above employment status

3000
2500
2000 1500 1000 500 0
UNEMPLOYED
EMPLOYED
UNKNOWN
Work status of the employed

2500
2000
1500
1000
500
Permanent
Short-term, seasonal or casual
Worked on different jobs on daya to day or week to week
Unknown status
Reasons why unemployed

0.11% 1.17% 1.53%
10.53% 20.26%
1.12% 0.03% 0.75% Believes no work available Await results of previous application Temporary illness/disability 14.83% Bad weather Waiting for rehire Too young/old, retired or permanently disabled Housekeeping Schooling Other reasons blank
49.67%
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS OF WALLS

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
BARANGAY
TOTAL
STRONG MATERIALS
LIGHT MATERIALS
SALVAGED/ MAKESHIFT MATERIALS
MIXED BUT MIXED BUT MIXED BUT Un PREDOMINANTLY PREDOMINANTLY PREDOMINANTLY known STRONG LIGHT SALVAGED
Bustos BONGA MAYOR BONGA MENOR BUISAN CAMACHILIHAN CAMBAOG CATACTE LICIADA MALAMIG MALAWAK POBLACION SAN PEDRO TALAMPAS TANAWAN TIBAGAN
Source: CBMS, 2005
11175
7727
1711
127
1147
329
120
14
723 751 337 420 1089 405 869 941 421 1727 1180 656 464 1192
552 603 308 376 391 298 762 266 307 1179 715 503 407 1060
104 91 26 35 674 103 33 111 68 165 79 52 52 118
4 14 0 5 0 3 13 3 22 21 31 5 2 4
60 21 1 2 11 0 17 445 22 319 176 62 3 8
1 16 2 2 11 1 36 50 2 20 168 18 0 2
2 6 0 0 2 0 8 64 0 23 11 4 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 12 0 0
Construction Materials of Walls

1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
STRONG MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG Un known

LIGHT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT
SALVAGED/ MAKESHIFT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGED
Bustos
1% 3% 10% 1%
STRONG MATERIALS LIGHT MATERIALS 16% SALVAGED/ MAKESHIFT MATERIALS
MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG

MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGED Un known 69%
BONGA MAYOR
1% 2%
BONGA MENOR
1%
8%
3% 2%
12% 15%
76% 80%
STRONG MATERIALS LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGED/ MAKESHIFT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGED
Data source: CBMS, 2005. Graphs: Liwanag, F.M.A.
BUISAN
1% 8%
CAMACHILIHAN
1% 1% 8%
91%
90%
STRONG MATERIALS LIGHT MATERIALS

MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGED
CAMBAOG
1% 1%
CATACTE
1%
25% 36%
62% 74%
STRONG MATERIALS LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGED/ MAKESHIFT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG
MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT

MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGED
LICIADA
1% 4% 2% 4% 5% 1%
MALAMIG
7%
28%
12% 47% 88%
1% STRONG MATERIALS LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGED/ MAKESHIFT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGED Un known
MALAWAK
1% 5% 5% 19%
POBLACION
1% 1%
16% 1%
10%
73%
68%
SAN PEDRO
1% 14%
TALAMPAS
3% 2% 9%
1%
8% 15%
3% 7%
60%
77%
STRONG MATERIALS LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGED/ MAKESHIFT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGED Un known

TANAWAN
1% 11% 10%
TIBAGAN
1%
88%
89%
STRONG MATERIALS
STRONG MATERIALS
LIGHT MATERIALS
SALVAGED/ MAKESHIFT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGED
LIGHT MATERIALS
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS OF ROOF

BARANGAY
TOTAL
STRONG MATERIALS
LIGHT MATERIALS
MIXED BUT MIXED BUT MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY PREDOMINANTLY PREDOMINANTLY STRONG LIGHT SALVAGED
Un known
Source: CBMS, 2005
11175 723 751 337 420 1089 405 869 941 421 1727 1180 656 464 1192
7712 569 618 309 353 480 298 740 247 351 1262 739 477 394 875
1468 55 57 16 51 566 103 37 92 41 107 37 76 50 180
152 8 12 1 4 1 3 15 6 8 7 23 5 4 55
1246 85 12 6 6 18 0 27 475 11 308 177 63 16 42
449 2 49 5 6 15 1 41 51 8 19 192 20 0 40
127 4 3 0 0 1 0 9 68 2 24 12 4 0 0
21
11
Construction Materials of Roof

1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
STRONG MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG Un known

LIGHT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT
SALVAGED/ MAKESHIFT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGED
Bustos
1% 4% 11% 2% STRONG MATERIALS LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGED/ MAKESHIFT MATERIALS 13%

MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGED
Un known
69%
BONGA MAYOR
2%
BONGA MENOR
2% 6%
12% 1%
8% 8%
79% 82%

BUISAN
2% 1% 5%
CAMACHILIHAN
1% 2% 1%
12%
92%
84%
STRONG MATERIALS
LIGHT MATERIALS
CAMBAOG
2% 1% 1%
CATACTE
1%
25%
44%
52%
74%
LICIADA
1% 2% 4% 5% 3%
MALAMIG
7%
5%
26%
10%
51% 85%
1%
STRONG MATERIALS LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGED/ MAKESHIFT MATERIALS
STRONG MATERIALS LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGED/ MAKESHIFT MATERIALS

MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGED Un known

MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGED
MALAWAK
2% 3% 2% 10% 18%
POBLACION
1% 1%
1% 6%
73% 83%
STRONG MATERIALS LIGHT MATERIALS

MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGED
SAN PEDRO
1%
TALAMPAS
1% 2% 3%
16% 1%
9%
11% 15%
63% 2% 3% 73%
TANAWAN
1% 3% 11% 5%
TIBAGAN
4% 3%
15%
73% 85%
STRONG MATERIALS
LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGED/ MAKESHIFT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGED
TENURE STATUS BY HOUSE/LOT

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Owner, ownerlike possession of house and lot Own house, Own rent-free lot house/rent lot with consent of owner Own house, rent-free lot without consent of owner
116
BARANGAY
TOTAL
Rent house/room including lot
Rent-free Rent-free house and lot house and lot without with consent of consent of owner owner
616 32
Unknown
Source: CBMS, 2005
11175 723 751 337 420 1089 405 869 941 421 1727 1180 656 464 1192
7673
1067
378
1008
285
554 547 297 206 933 219 452 670 166 1060 906 499 307 857
87 57 18 31 89 7 81 88 9 293 74 65 56 112
1 2 1 34 4 4 4 12 89 184 9 14 3 15
15 62 14 81 19 141 155 110 99 43 87 19 70 93
2 38 0 19 11 11 9 4 9 4 3 1 1 4
14 37 6 44 18 21 136 45 31 42 94 43 18 67
9 4 0 3 0 1 4 5 2 3 0 1 0 0
41 2 1 2 15 1 28 7 16 98 7 14 9 44
Tenure Status by House/Lot

1200
1000
800
600
400
200
Owner, owner-like possession of house and lot Own house/rent lot Own house, rent-free lot without consent of owner
Rent house/room including lot Own house, rent-free lot with consent of owner Rent-free house and lot with consent of owner
Rent-free house and lot without consent of owner

Unknown
Bustos
1%
5%
3%
9% Owner, owner-like possession of house and lot 3% Rent house/room including lot Own house/rent lot 10% Own house, rent-free lot with consent of owner Own house, rent-free lot without consent of owner Rent-free house and lot with consent of owner 69% Rent-free house and lot without consent of owner Unknown
BONGA MAYOR
2% 2% 1% 6%
BONGA MENOR
1% 5% 5% 8%
12%
8%
77%
73%
Owner, owner-like possession of house and lot Rent house/room including lot Own house/rent lot Own house, rent-free lot with consent of owner Own house, rent-free lot without consent of owner Rent-free house and lot with consent of owner Rent-free house and lot without consent of owner Unknown
BUISAN
4% 6% 5% 2%
CAMACHILIHAN
1%
11%
49% 19%
8%
88%
7% Owner, owner-like possession of house and lot Rent house/room including lot Own house/rent lot Own house, rent-free lot with consent of owner Own house, rent-free lot without consent of owner Rent-free house and lot with consent of owner Rent-free house and lot without consent of owner Unknown
CAMBAOG
2% 1% 2% 1%
CATACTE
5% 3%
8%
35% 54%
86% 1% 2% Owner, owner-like possession of house and lot Rent house/room including lot Own house/rent lot Own house, rent-free lot with consent of owner Own house, rent-free lot without consent of owner Rent-free house and lot with consent of owner Rent-free house and lot without consent of owner Unknown
LICIADA
3% 16% 1% 1%
MALAMIG
1% 1% 5% 12%
9%
52%
18%
71%
1%
MALAWAK
1% 4% 2% 7%
POBLACION
6%
2%
3%
11% 39%
24% 17%
61%
21%
SAN PEDRO
1% 8% 7% 1% 2% 3%
TALAMPAS
7% 2%
6%
10%
77%
76%
Owner, owner-like possession of house and lot Rent house/room including lot Own house/rent lot Own house, rent-free lot with consent of owner Own house, rent-free lot without consent of owner
Rent-free house and lot with consent of owner Rent-free house and lot without consent of owner
Unknown
TANAWAN
4% 2% 6% 8% 1% 1% 9% 12%
TIBAGAN
4%
15%
66% 72%
Owner, owner-like possession of house and lot

Rent house/room including lot Own house/rent lot Own house, rent-free lot with consent of owner Own house, rent-free lot without consent of owner Rent-free house and lot with consent of owner Rent-free house and lot without consent of owner Unknown
TYPE OF TOILET FACILITY

BARANGAY
TOTAL
Water-sealed Water-sealed flush to sewerage/ flush to sewerage/ septic tank-own septic tank-shared
Closed pit
Open pit
No toilet
Others
Unknown
Source: CBMS, 2005
11175 723 751 337 420 1089 405 869 941 421 1727 1180 656 464 1192
8526
1038
120
46
396
11
1038
602 655 293 318 332 329 656 772 256 1281 1086 605 374 967
73 68 33 79 8 22 73 84 110 184 67 7 71 159
1 13 1 3 3 20 7 34 8 5 5 5 2 13
0 2 0 2 1 8 3 11 12 0 5 0 0 2
5 11 9 16 1 25 101 32 19 143 11 18 1 4
2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 1
40 2 1 2 743 1 29 7 16 114 6 15 16 46
Type of Toilet Facility

1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
Water-sealed flush to sewerage/ septic tank-own

Closed pit No toilet Unknown
Water-sealed flush to sewerage/ septic tank-shared

Open pit Others
Bustos
9% 1% 1% 4% Water-sealed flush to sewerage/ septic tank-own Water-sealed flush to sewerage/ septic tank-shared Closed pit Open pit No toilet Others Unknown
9%
76%
BONGA MAYOR
1%
6%
BONGA MENOR
2% 2% 9%
10%
83%
87%
Water-sealed flush to sewerage/ septic tank-own Water-sealed flush to sewerage/ septic tank-shared Closed pit Open pit No toilet Others Unknown
BUISAN
3% 10%
CAMACHILIHAN
1% 4%
19%
76%
87%
CAMBAOG
2%
CATACTE
6%
5%
31% 6%
1% 68%
81%
LICIADA
3% 4% 12% 1% 9%
MALAMIG
1% 3% 1%
8%
76% 82%
Water-sealed flush to sewerage/ septic tank-own

Water-sealed flush to sewerage/ septic tank-shared Closed pit Open pit No toilet Others Unknown
MALAWAK
4% 2% 3% 4% 8%
POBLACION
7%
11%
26%
61%
74%
SAN PEDRO
1% 1% 6% 1%
TALAMPAS
1% 3% 1%
2%
92% Water-sealed flush to sewerage/ septic tank-own Water-sealed flush to sewerage/ septic tank-shared Closed pit Open pit No toilet Others Unknown
92% Water-sealed flush to sewerage/ septic tank-own Water-sealed flush to sewerage/ septic tank-shared Closed pit Open pit No toilet Others Unknown
TANAWAN
1% 4%
TIBAGAN
4%
15%
14%
81%
81%
Water-sealed flush to sewerage/ septic tank-own Water-sealed flush to sewerage/ septic tank-shared Closed pit Open pit No toilet Others
Unknown
TYPE OF WATER FACILITY

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Community water Deep well- Deep well- Artesian systemown shared well-own shared
BARANGAY
TOTAL
Community water system-own
Dug/ Dug/shall Artesian wellshallow ow wellshared well-own shared
River, stream, lake, spring, bodies of water

8
Bottled water
Others/ Blank
Source: CBMS, 2005
11175 723 751 337 420 1089 405 869 941 421 1727 1180 656 464 1192
5308
913
912
1246
274
645
68
144
623
1034
440 505 52 17 298 12 108 303 59 1112 958 526 368 550
67 37 29 20 17 6 33 89 53 26 87 17 38 394
20 32 113 126 2 78 132 228 68 30 16 31 12 24
5 84 129 165 6 52 134 158 214 156 47 53 11 32
10 3 3 10 0 99 100 32 0 3 7 2 3 2
2 12 8 2 2 152 239 58 4 136 6 3 8 13
3 5 0 0 3 1 3 4 4 5 1 5 0 34
3 4 0 0 1 2 38 1 1 54 0 3 0 37
3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
129 67 2 78 16 1 53 60 3 94 51 1 8 60
41 2 1 2 744 2 26 8 14 111 6 15 16 46
Type of Water Facility

1200
1000
800
600
400
200
Community water system-own Deep well-shared Dug/ shallow well-own Bottled water
Community water system-shared Artesian well-own Dug/shallow well-shared Others/ Blank
Deep well-own Artesian well-shared River, stream, lake, spring, bodies of water
Bustos
9% 1% 1% 6% 2% 48% 6%
11%
8% 8%
Community water system-own Deep well-shared Dug/ shallow well-own Bottled water
Community water system-shared Artesian well-own Dug/shallow well-shared Others/ Blank
Deep well-own Artesian well-shared River, stream, lake, spring, bodies of water
BONGA MAYOR
6% 1% 2%
BONGA MENOR
1%
9%
18% 11%
1% 1% 1% 3% 61% 9%
4%
5% 67%
Community water system-own Community water system-shared Deep well-own Deep well-shared Artesian well-own Artesian well-shared Dug/ shallow well-own Dug/shallow well-shared River, stream, lake, spring, bodies of water Bottled water Others/ Blank
BUISAN
1%
CAMACHILIHAN
4% 15% 19% 5%
1%
2%
1% 9% 38% 2% 30%
34%
39%
CAMBAOG
CATACTE
1% 1% 3% 1%
27%
19%
38%
2% 1% 68% 2%
13%
24% Community water system-own Community water system-shared Deep well-own Deep well-shared Artesian well-own Artesian well-shared Dug/ shallow well-own Dug/shallow well-shared River, stream, lake, spring, bodies of water Bottled water Others/ Blank
LICIADA
6% 4% 4% 3% 3% 13% 6% 1%
MALAMIG
1% 6%
32%
15% 17% 28%
10%
15% 12% Community water system-own Community water system-shared Deep well-own Deep well-shared Artesian well-own Artesian well-shared Dug/ shallow well-own Dug/shallow well-shared River, stream, lake, spring, bodies of water Bottled water Others/ Blank
24% Community water system-own Community water system-shared Deep well-own Deep well-shared Artesian well-own Artesian well-shared Dug/ shallow well-own Dug/shallow well-shared River, stream, lake, spring, bodies of water Bottled water Others/ Blank
MALAWAK
1% 1%
POBLACION
14% 3% 6% 6%
1%
3%
13%
8%
9% 51% 16% 2% 2% 64%
SAN PEDRO
1% 1% 1% 4% 1%
TALAMPAS
1% 8% 5% 3% 1% 2%
4%
7%
81%
80%
Community water system-own Community water system-shared Deep well-own Deep well-shared Artesian well-own Artesian well-shared Dug/ shallow well-own Dug/shallow well-shared River, stream, lake, spring, bodies of water Bottled water
TANAWAN
1%
2% 3% 8% 2% 1% 3% 3% 2% 2% 3% 3% 5%
TIBAGAN
4%
46%
79%
33%
Population
1990
Population
2000 76506928 2234088 47091
2010 92337852 2924433 62415
Philippines Bulacan Bustos Growth Rate Philippines Bulacan Bustos

Source: NSO, 2007
60703810 1505219 34965
2.34 4.02 3.02
1.9 2.73 2.86
2.12 3.37 2.94
Population growth rate

4.5 4 3.5 3
Philippines
growth rate
2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 1990 2000 2010
Bulacan Bustos
Data source: NSO, 2007. Graph: Liwanag, F.M.A.
Population Per Barangay Barangay Bonga Mayor Bonga Menor Buisan Camachilihan Cambaog Catacte Liciada Malamig Malawak Poblacion San Pedro Talampas Tanawan Tibagan
Source: NSO
2007
4360 4623 1847 2312 5551 2395 4251 4526 2168 9501 6501 3581 3042 6023
2010
4407 4742 1783 2289 5592 2367 4702 5313 2383 9641 6506 3660 2946 6084
Population per barangay, 2007

Bonga Tibagan, 6023, Mayor, 4360, 10% 7%
Tanawan, 3042, 5%
Bonga Menor, 4623, 8%
Buisan, 1847, 3% Camachilihan, 2312, 4%
Talampas, 3581, 6%
San Pedro, 6501, 11%
Cambaog, 5551, 9%
Poblacion, 9501, 16%
Liciada, 4251, 7% Malamig, 4526, 7%
Catacte, 2395, 4%
Malawak, 2168, 3%
Data source: NSO. Graph: Geronimo, J.A.U.
Population per barangay, 2010
Tanawan, 2946, 5%
Tibagan, 6084, 10%
Bonga Mayor, 4407, 7%
Bonga Menor, 4742, 8%
Buisan, 1783, 3% Camachilihan, 2289, 4%
Talampas, 3660, 6%
San Pedro, 6506, 10%
Cambaog, 5592, 9%
Poblacion, 9641, 15% Liciada, 4702, 7% Malamig, 5313, 8% Malawak, 2383, 4%

Data source: NSO. Graph: Geronimo, J.A.U.
Catacte, 2367, 4%
Household Population by Age Group and Sex, 2007
Age Group Both Sexes All Ages Under 1 1-4 5-9 10 - 14 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39 40 - 44 45 - 49 50 - 54 55 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 69 70 - 74 75 - 79 80 and over
60,389 1,426 5,346 6,767 6,709 5,949 5,350 5,207 4,698 4,321 3,678 2,848 2,434 1,761 1,281 935 661 504 514
Male
30,288 734 2,797 3,510 3,404 3,022 2,710 2,586 2,348 2,182 1,866 1,434 1,208 841 624 410 267 196 149
Female
80 and over
30,101 692 2,549 3,257 3,305 2,927 2,640 2,621 2,350 2,139 1,812 1,414 1,226 920 657 525 394 308 365
75 - 79 70 - 74 65 - 69 60 - 64 55 - 59 50 - 54 45 - 49 Age 40 - 44 35 - 39 30 - 34 25 - 29 20 - 24 15 - 19 10 - 14 5-9 1-4 Under 1 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 1,000 Female 2,000 3,000 Male 4,000
0-17 18 and over
23,965 36,424
12,343 17,945
11,622 18,479
Number of Households
Data source: NSO, 2007. Graph: Geronimo, J.A.U.
Household Population 5 to 24 Years Old who were Attending School at Anytime During SY 2007 - 2008
Household Population 5 to 24 years old who were attending school at anytime during school year 2007 to 2008
Age Group 5-9 10 - 14 15 - 19 20 - 24
Province/ Municipality and Sex
BULACAN Both Sexes Male Female BUSTOS Both Sexes Male Female
Source: NSO, 2007
748,920 380,357 368,563
288,374 147,544 140,830
285,883 145,029 140,854
147,970 73,421 74,549
26,693 14,363 12,330
15,628 7,914 7,714
6,105 3,134 2,971
6,143 3,064 3,079
2,906 1,456 1,450
474 260 214
Household Population Attending School During SY 2007-2008

7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 5-9 10 - 14 Male
15 - 19 Female
20 - 24
Occupied Housing Units by Construction Materials of the Roof and Outer Walls, 2007
Construction Materials of the Roof Construction Materials of the Outer Walls Total Occupied Housing Units
Galvanized Iron/ Aluminum Tile Concrete/ Clay Tile Half Galvanized Iron and Half Concrete Cogon/ Nipa/ Anahaw Makeshift/ Salvaged/ Asbestos/ Improvised Others materials
Wood
Not Reported
Total Concrete/Brick/Stone Wood Half Concrete/Brick/Stone and Half Wood Galvanized Iron/Aluminum Bamboo/Sawali/Cogon/Nipa Asbestos Glass Makeshift/Salvaged/Improvised Materials Others/Not Reported No Walls
Source: NSO, 2007
12,981 8,424 832 3,139 90 326 9 1 92 68 0
12,105 8,166 754 2,746 85 228 3 1 83 39 0
32 23 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 1 0
634 208 43 368 5 7 0 0 0 3 0
39 1 19 15 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
106 5 11 2 0 82 0 0 4 2 0
5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0
9 1 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 2 0
51 20 3 5 0 2 0 0 0 21 0
Occupied Housing Units by Construction Materials of Walls, 2007

0.07% 0.69% 2.51% 0.01% 0.71% 0.52%
Concrete/Brick/Stone Wood
24.18%
Half Concrete/Brick/Stone and Half Wood Galvanized Iron/Aluminum Bamboo/Sawali/Cogon/Nipa Asbestos Glass Makeshift/Salvaged/Improvised Materials
6.41%
64.89%
Others/Not Reported No Walls
Occupied Housing Units by Construction Materials of the Roof, 2007

0.82% 0.30% 0.04% 0.07% 0.39%
0.25%
4.88%
Galvanized Iron/ Aluminum Tile Concrete/ Clay Tile
Half Galvanized Iron and Half Concrete

Wood Cogon/ Nipa/ Anahaw Makeshift/ Salvaged/ Improvised materials Asbestos/ Others Not Reported 93.25%
Households by Tenure Status of the Lot

Owned/ Being Amortized
426,603 10,289
Province/ Municipality
Total Households
Rent-free Rented with consent of owner

85,888 1,433 62,052 1,231
Rent-free wihtout consent of owner

5,963 34
Not Not reported Applicable
BULACAN BUSTOS
Source: NSO, 2007
588,693 13,077
7,702 62
485 28
Households by Tenure Status of the Lot

0.26% 9.41% 0.47% 0.21%
10.96%
78.68%
Owned/ Being Amortized Rent-free with consent of owner Not reported

Rented Rent-free wihtout consent of owner Not Applicable
BARANGAY
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF POOR POOR POOR HOUSEHOLDS AGRICULTURAL HOUSEHOLDS WITH DISABLED HOUSEHOLDS MEMBER/S
NUMBER OF URBAN POOR INDIVIDUALS
NUMBER OF POOR SENIOR CITIZENS
NUMBER OF POOR WOMEN
NUMBER OF POOR YOUTH
NUMBER OF POOR CHILDREN
NUMBER OF POOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLE
Source: NHTS-PR, 2009
75 129 43 74 68 149 139 81 112 516 173 26 104 103
7 11 2 4 4 6 3 12 10 29 8 1 1 13
10 29 3 30 10 89 17 437 62 2,656 936 8 64
6 37 9 12 8 27 21 14 23 69 39 4 32 31
233 392 107 200 185 406 417 248 307 1,281 469 74 286 319
115 190 55 102 75 215 219 136 173 719 239 43 157 152
271 395 122 234 206 405 462 253 315 1,367 475 84 255 319
75 129 43 74 68 149 139 81 112 516 173 26 104 103
BARANGAY
NUMBER OF POOR HOUSEHOLDS
Poor Households Per Barangay, 2009

600
75 129 43 74 68 149 139 81 112 516 173 26 104 103

0 100 200 300 400 500
Data source: NHTS-PR, 2009. Graph: Liwanag,F.M.A.
BARANGAY
NUMBER OF POOR HOUSEHOLDS WITH DISABLED MEMBER/S
Poor Households with Disabled Member/s, 2009

35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
7 11 2 4 4 6 3 12 10 29 8 1 1 13
BARANGAY
NUMBER OF POOR AGRICULTURAL HOUSEHOLDS
Poor Agricultural Households, 2009

500
450
10 29 3 30 10 89 17 437 62
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
8 64
BARANGAY
NUMBER OF URBAN POOR INDIVIDUALS
Urban Poor Individuals, 2009

3,000
2,000 1,000 0 Poblacion
Poblacion San Pedro
2,656 936
San Pedro
BARANGAY
NUMBER OF POOR SENIOR CITIZENS
Senior Citizens Per Barangay, 2009

80
6 37 9 12 8 27 21 14 23 69 39 4 32 31
20 10 0 30 60 50 40
70
BARANGAY
NUMBER OF POOR WOMEN
Poor Women Per Barangay, 2009

1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200
233 392 107 200 185 406 417 248 307 1,281 469 74 286 319
BARANGAY
NUMBER OF POOR YOUTH
Poor Youth Per Barangay, 2009

800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
115 190 55 102 75 215 219 136 173 719 239 43 157 152
BARANGAY
NUMBER OF POOR CHILDREN
Poor Children Per Barangay, 2009

1600 1400 1200 1000 800
271 395 122 234 206 405 462 253 315 1,367 475 84 255 319
600
400 200 0
BARANGAY
NUMBER OF POOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLE
Poor Indigenous People Per Barangay, 2009

600
75 129 43 74 68 149 139 81 112 516 173 26 104 103
500
400
300
200
100
BARANGAY
NUMBER OF POOR ATTENDING SCHOOL

147 230 35 139 123 220 257 132 158 574 243 34 121 194
NUMBER OF POOR NOT ATTENDING SCHOOL

75 119 57 59 34 119 140 94 104 496 155 25 97 72
POOR INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT OCCUPATION

128 249 95 109 69 198 266 150 157 700 258 29 235 171
NUMBER OF POOR NUMBER OF POOR HH NUMBER OF POOR HH SINGLE PARENTS WITHOUT ELECTRICITY
WITH ELECTRICITY
47 81 40 57 61 106 90 57 90 385 143 23 77 89
3 11 7 12 1 12 10 3 9 15 6 3 5 5
28 48 3 17 7 43 49 24 22 131 30 3 27 14
BARANGAY
NUMBER OF POOR ATTENDING SCHOOL

147 230 35 139 123 220 257 132 158 574 243 34 121 194
NUMBER OF POOR NOT ATTENDING SCHOOL

75 119 57 59 34 119 140 94 104 496 155 25 97 72
Poor Not/Attending School, 2009

700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 NUMBER OF POOR NOT ATTENDING SCHOOL NUMBER OF POOR ATTENDING SCHOOL
BARANGAY
POOR INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT OCCUPATION

128 249 95 109 69 198 266 150 157 700 258 29 235 171
Poor Individuals w/o Occupation, 2009

800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
BARANGAY
NUMBER OF POOR SINGLE PARENTS 3 11 7 12 1 12 10 3 9 15 6 3 5 5
Poor Single Parents, 2009

16 14 12 10 8 6
4
2 0
BARANGAY
NUMBER OF POOR HH NUMBER OF POOR HH WITHOUT ELECTRICITY WITH ELECTRICITY

28 48 3 17 7 43 49 24 22 131 30 3 27 14 47 81 40 57 61 106 90 57 90 385 143 23 77 89
Poor HHs with and without electricity, 2009

450
400
350 300 250 200 150 100 50
Number of Poor Households Without Electricity
Number of Poor Households With Electricity

NUMBER OF POOR HOUSEHOLDS WITH DISABLED MEMBER/S, 2009

BARANGAY HEARING VISUAL SPEECH ORTHOPEDIC MULTIPLE DISABILITIES 2 1 0 2 0 1 0 4 3 3 1 0 0 1 MENTAL OTHER DISABILITIES 2 1 1 0 0 3 0 2 3 16 6 0 0 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 3
0 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 2 3 0 1 0 7
0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
3 5 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 5 1 0 0 2
0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0
Number of Poor Households with Disabled Member/s Per Barangay, 2009

18 16
14
12
10
HEARING
VISUAL
SPEECH
ORTHOPEDIC
MULTIPLE DISABILITIES
MENTAL
OTHER DISABILITIES
NUMBER OF POOR HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF OUTERWALL MATERIALS, 2009

NUMBER OF POOR HOUSEHOLDS BARANGAY
TOTAL LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGE MATERIALS STRONG MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MATERIALS
36 3 3 27 27 47 41 19 50 265 46 13 21 15
MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGE MATERIALS

4 0 40 2 14 2 1 1 2 58 12 3 0 3
MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MATERIALS

4 0 0 30 17 22 19 10 26 109 84 7 10 66
BONGA MAYOR BONGA MENOR BUISAN CAMACHILIHAN CAMBAOG CATACTE LICIADA MALAMIG MALAWAK POBLACION SAN PEDRO TALAMPAS TANAWAN TIBAGAN
75 129 43 74 68 149 139 81 112 516 173 26 104 103
9 108 0 9 2 54 37 22 24 41 20 0 63 10
1 2 0 0 3 2 19 5 0 3 0 0 0 0
21 16 0 6 5 22 22 24 10 40 11 3 10 9

300
250
200
150
100
50
LIGHT MATERIALS
MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MATERIALS
SALVAGE MATERIALS
STRONG MATERIALS
BONGA MAYOR
5%
BONGA MENOR
2%
12%
5%
12%
2%
2%
28%
48%
84% LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGE MATERIALS STRONG MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGE MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MATERIALS
Data source: NHTS-PR, 2009. Graphs: Liwanag,F.M.A.
LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGE MATERIALS STRONG MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGE MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MATERIALS
BUISAN
7%
CAMACHILIHAN
12%
8% 41%
36% 93% 3% LIGHT MATERIALS LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGE MATERIALS

STRONG MATERIALS
SALVAGE MATERIALS
STRONG MATERIALS
MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGE MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MATERIALS
MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGE MATERIALS
CAMBAOG
3% 4% 15% 7% 25% 1%
CATACTE
36%
21%
40%
32%
1% 15% LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGE MATERIALS

STRONG MATERIALS
MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGE MATERIALS
LICIADA
14%
1%
MALAMIG
12% 1% 26% 27%
24% 29% 6% 14%
16%
LIGHT MATERIALS
30% LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGE MATERIALS STRONG MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGE MATERIALS
SALVAGE MATERIALS STRONG MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGE MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MATERIALS
MALAWAK
POBLACION
8% 1%
23%
21%
21%
8%
2% 9% 11%
45%
LIGHT MATERIALS
51%
LIGHT MATERIALS
SALVAGE MATERIALS
SALVAGE MATERIALS STRONG MATERIALS

STRONG MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGE MATERIALS
MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGE MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MATERIALS
SAN PEDRO
12%
TALAMPAS
11%
6%
27%
48%
27% 12% 50%
7%
TANAWAN
10%
TIBAGAN
10%
9%
20%
14%
60% 64% 10%

3%
LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGE MATERIALS STRONG MATERIALS

LIGHT MATERIALS
SALVAGE MATERIALS
STRONG MATERIALS
NUMBER OF POOR HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF ROOF MATERIALS, 2009

NUMBER OF POOR HOUSEHOLDS
BARANGAY
TOTAL STRONG MATERIALS LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGE MATERIALS

4 2 0 31 17 25 17 12 16 133 89 8 12 68

36 2 2 26 20 44 36 18 45 243 41 13 18 12

3 0 41 2 12 2 1 1 1 56 10 2 0 3
75 129 43 74 68 149 139 81 112 516 173 26 104 103
25 24 0 9 14 28 58 36 41 52 12 3 11 10
6 98 0 5 2 50 27 11 9 31 20 0 63 10
1 3 0 1 3 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 0

300
250
200
150
100
50
STRONG MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MATERIALS

LIGHT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MATERIALS
SALVAGE MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGE MATERIALS
BONGA MAYOR
4%
BONGA MENOR
1% 2% 2% 19%
34%
48%
8% 76%
5%
1%
STRONG MATERIALS LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGE MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGE MATERIALS
BUISAN
5%
CAMACHILIHAN
3%
12%
7% 1% 35%
42% 95%
STRONG MATERIALS
LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGE MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGE MATERIALS
CAMBAOG
18%
CATACTE
1%
21%
19%
29%
3% 4%
29% 34% 25%

17%
STRONG MATERIALS LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGE MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MATERIALS
LICIADA
1%
MALAMIG
1%
26%
22%
42%
44%
15% 12%
4%
19% STRONG MATERIALS LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGE MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGE MATERIALS
14% STRONG MATERIALS LIGHT MATERIALS SALVAGE MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY STRONG MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY LIGHT MATERIALS MIXED BUT PREDOMINANTLY SALVAGE MATERIALS
MALAWAK
1%
POBLACION
11% 10%
6% 37%
40%
26%
47%
8% 14%
SAN PEDRO
6% 7%
TALAMPAS
8%
11%
11% 24%
1%
31%
50%
51%
TANAWAN
11%
17%
TIBAGAN
3% 11% 10% 10%
11%
61%
66%
STRONG MATERIALS
LIGHT MATERIALS
SALVAGE MATERIALS

NUMBER OF POOR HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF TENURE STATUS, 2009

NUMBER OF POOR HOUSEHOLDS BARANGAY
TOTAL Own House and Own House, Lot or Owner- Rented House / Own House but Rent-Free Lot like Possession Room including Rented Lot with Consent of Lot of House and Owner Lot
4 22 10 24 12 20 9 18 12 34 43 8 20 57 2 0 0 11 1 2 4 7 1 19 4 0 8 11 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 2 2 97 12 0 26 1 42 82 28 17 17 71 75 29 77 187 80 8 32 10
Own House, Rent-Free Lot without Consent of Owner

1 6 0 4 0 6 2 2 3 7 0 0 1 1
Rent-Free Rent-Free House and Lot House and Lot without with Consent of Consent of Owner Owner
26 16 5 18 38 46 49 23 16 168 32 10 17 23 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2 0 0 0
75 129 43 74 68 149 139 81 112 516 173 26 104 103

200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20
Own House and Lot or Owner-like Possession of House and Lot Own House but Rented Lot Own House, Rent-Free Lot without Consent of Owner Rent-Free House and Lot without Consent of Owner
Rented House / Room including Lot Own House, Rent-Free Lot with Consent of Owner Rent-Free House and Lot with Consent of Owner
BONGA MAYOR
0% 5% 3% 0%
BONGA MENOR
1% 12%
17% 0% 1%
5% 35%
56%
1%
64% Own House and Lot or Owner-like Possession of House and Lot Rented House / Room including Lot Own House but Rented Lot Own House, Rent-Free Lot with Consent of Owner Own House, Rent-Free Lot without Consent of Owner Rent-Free House and Lot with Consent of Owner Rent-Free House and Lot without Consent of Owner
Own House and Lot or Owner-like Possession of House and Lot Rented House / Room including Lot Own House but Rented Lot Own House, Rent-Free Lot with Consent of Owner Own House, Rent-Free Lot without Consent of Owner Rent-Free House and Lot with Consent of Owner Rent-Free House and Lot without Consent of Owner
BUISAN
0% 12% 23% 24% 0%
CAMACHILIHAN
0%
33%
0% 0%
5%
23% 65% 0% Own House and Lot or Owner-like Possession of House and Lot Rented House / Room including Lot Own House but Rented Lot Own House, Rent-Free Lot with Consent of Owner Own House, Rent-Free Lot without Consent of Owner Rent-Free House and Lot with Consent of Owner Rent-Free House and Lot without Consent of Owner
15%
CAMBAOG
CATACTE
13% 1% 31%
1%
18%
3%
56%
25%
4%
48%
LICIADA
7%
3%
MALAMIG
22% 28% 35%
9% 2% 3% 54% 1% 36% Own House and Lot or Owner-like Possession of House and Lot Rented House / Room including Lot Own House but Rented Lot Own House, Rent-Free Lot with Consent of Owner Own House, Rent-Free Lot without Consent of Owner Rent-Free House and Lot with Consent of Owner Rent-Free House and Lot without Consent of Owner
MALAWAK
1% 11% 1%
2%
POBLACION
1%
7% 4%
14%
2%
32% 19%
1%
SAN PEDRO
1%
TALAMPAS
19% 25% 31%

38%
2%
7%
46% 31% Own House and Lot or Owner-like Possession of House and Lot Rented House / Room including Lot Own House but Rented Lot Own House, Rent-Free Lot with Consent of Owner Own House, Rent-Free Lot without Consent of Owner Rent-Free House and Lot with Consent of Owner Rent-Free House and Lot without Consent of Owner
TANAWAN
TIBAGAN
16%
19%
22%
1%
8%
1%
10%
55%
31%
1% 25% 11%
NUMBER OF POOR HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF TOILET FACILITIES, 2009

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS BARANGAY
TOTAL Water-sealed Closed Pit Open Pit Others None
75 129 43 74 68 149 139 81 112 516 173 26 104 103
2 18 4 0 1 2 4 1 6 11 3 3 8 2
23 38 29 48 48 74 54 28 45 271 118 10 44 76
37 64 9 17 2 28 44 20 27 63 15 3 23 11
7 1 1 1 0 0 8 20 7 23 5 3 7 9
6 8 0 8 17 45 29 12 27 148 32 7 22 5

300
250
200
150
100
50
Water-sealed
Closed Pit
Open Pit
Others
None
BONGA MAYOR
8% 3% 1%
BONGA MENOR
6% 14%
9%
31%
29%
50%
49%
Water-sealed
Closed Pit
Open Pit
Others
None
Water-sealed
Closed Pit
Open Pit
Others
None
BUISAN
0% 2% 9%
CAMACHILIHAN
21%
68%
Water-sealed
Closed Pit
Open Pit
Others
None
Water-sealed
Closed Pit
Open Pit
Others
None
CAMBAOG
1%
CATACTE
1%
25% 30%
0%
3%
50%
0%
71% 19%
Water-sealed
Closed Pit
Open Pit
Others
None
Water-sealed
Closed Pit
Open Pit
Others
None
LICIADA
3% 15%
21%
MALAMIG
1%
34% 54, 39%

6% 25%
31% 25%
Water-sealed
Closed Pit
Open Pit
Others
None
Water-sealed
Closed Pit
Open Pit
Others
None
MALAWAK
6%
POBLACION
2%
24% 29%
40%
6% 53%
4%
12%
24%
Water-sealed
Closed Pit
Open Pit
Others
None
Water-sealed
Closed Pit
Open Pit
Others
None
SAN PEDRO
2% 18% 27%
TALAMPAS
11%
3%
9%
38%
12%
68%
12%
Water-sealed
Closed Pit
Open Pit
Others
None
Water-sealed
Closed Pit
Open Pit
Others
None
TANAWAN
8% 21%
9%
TIBAGAN
5% 2%
10%
7%
42%
22%
74%
Water-sealed
Closed Pit
Open Pit
Others
None
Water-sealed
Closed Pit
Open Pit
Others
None
NUMBER OF POOR HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY, 2009

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS BARANGAY
TOTAL Own Use, Shared, Own Use, Shared, Faucet, Faucet, Tubed / Piped Tubed / Piped Community Community Well Well Water System Water System
11 14 0 1 7 1 6 5 2 65 36 6 7 49 11 19 0 13 15 2 47 9 20 17 8 4 33 17 11 6 3 6 6 0 6 12 5 35 31 3 18 4 40 65 37 53 36 144 78 54 84 396 96 12 40 32
Dug Well
Spring, River, Stream, etc.
Collected Rainfall
Peddler
75 129 43 74 68 149 139 81 112 516 173 26 104 103
1 24 3 0 4 2 2 1 1 0 2 0 3 1
1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

450 400
350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0
Own Use, Faucet, Community Water System Shared, Tubed / Piped Well Collected Rainfall
Shared, Faucet, Community Water System Dug Well Peddler
Own Use, Tubed / Piped Well Spring, River, Stream, etc.
BONGA MAYOR
1%
1% 0%
BONGA MENOR
1% 11%
18%
15%
15% 15%
5%
53%
15% 50% Own Use, Faucet, Community Water System Shared, Faucet, Community Water System Own Use, Tubed / Piped Well Shared, Tubed / Piped Well Dug Well Spring, River, Stream, etc. Collected Rainfall Peddler
Own Use, Faucet, Community Water System Shared, Faucet, Community Water System Own Use, Tubed / Piped Well Shared, Tubed / Piped Well Dug Well Spring, River, Stream, etc. Collected Rainfall Peddler
BUISAN
7% 7%
CAMACHILIHAN
1% 1%
18%
8%
72%
86% Own Use, Faucet, Community Water System Shared, Faucet, Community Water System Own Use, Tubed / Piped Well Shared, Tubed / Piped Well Dug Well Spring, River, Stream, etc. Collected Rainfall Peddler
CAMBAOG
6% 10%
CATACTE
1% 1% 1%
22%
53% 9%
97%
Own Use, Faucet, Community Water System Shared, Faucet, Community Water System Own Use, Tubed / Piped Well Shared, Tubed / Piped Well Dug Well Spring, River, Stream, etc. Collected Rainfall
LICIADA
2% 4%
MALAMIG
1% 6%
11%
34% 15%
56%
67%
4%
MALAWAK
1% 2%
POBLACION
65, 13%
18%
17, 3%
35, 7% 4%
84, 75%
396, 77%
SAN PEDRO
1%
TALAMPAS
4% 21% 23%
5%
55% 18%
46% 15%
TANAWAN
3% 3% 7%
TIBAGAN
1%
31%
32%
48%
38%
4%
16%
e-SLDR
Municipality of Bustos, Bulacan, PY 2009 General Profile
Income Cl a s s : 2nd Cl a s s Popul a ti on: 58,789 La nd Area (i n ha s ): 4,750.00 Ma jor economi c a cti vi ty: Agri cul tura l
State of Local Development, Electronic Report Municipality of Bustos, Bulacan, PY 2009

e-SLDR i s a n a pproxi ma ti on of the s ta te of s oci oeconomi c a nd envi ronmenta l devel opment i n a l oca l i ty. The res ul t i s ba s ed on LGU s el f-a s s es s ment or es ti ma tes of key devel opment i ndi ca tors . Na ti ona l ta rget, a vera ge a nd expert i nference a re us ed a s benchma rks .
How to interpret the chart? A 5-point scale and color codes are applied to visualize the result. The numerical equivalent used to gauge the level of development is called "Development Index". Development Index:
Level of analysis: Indicator level (focus on the smallest slice, seen at the outermost layer of the chart) - it describes specific development condition, e.g., "Poverty incidence is high. Many families live below poverty threshold". LGU data or estimate on poverty incidence is compared to national average. The LGU should have a lower poverty incidence than that of the national average to get an acceptable development index (DI) of at least "3". Sub-sector level (focus on a slice that binds a number of indicators, seen at the second outer layer of the chart) - it is the average of indicator indices under a sub-sector. It describes the sub-sector development condition, e.g., "Sub-sector: Income; DI: 2.5, Poor". Sectoral level (focus on a slice that binds a number of sub-sectors, seen at the second inner layer of the chart) - it is the average of sub-sector indices. It describes the sectoral development condition, e.g., "Sector: Economic; DI: 2.7, Poor". Overall Development (focus on the innermost circle) - It is the average of sectoral indices, i.e., Social, Economic and Environment. It describes the overall development condition in a locality, e.g., "Overall Development Index: 3.2, Fair".
CORE DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES State of Employment - Unempl oyment ra te i s hi gh.; Underempl oyment ra te i s very hi gh State of Income - Income per ca pi ta i s extremel y l ow. State of Agricultural Ecosystems - Crop producti on i ndi ca tes very l ow a gri cul tura l l a nd producti vi ty. State of Freshwater Ecosystems - Fi s h ca tch i n ri ver or l a ke ha s decrea s ed over the pa s t fi ve yea rs ; Fres hwa ter qua l i ty i s poor. Note: Core Development Challenges are those development indicators where the LGU failed to achieve the minimum or acceptable condition, and got an equivalent development index of "2" or "1"
e-SLDR
State of Local Development, Electronic Report Municipality of Bustos, Bulacan, PY 2009
Socio-Economic and Environmental Interdependencies
How to Interpret the Plot? Green line - Ideal level of development (DI: 5) Red line - Danger Zone (DI: 3) Blue line - LGU development index The plot helps you determine w hich sector needs special attention, or w hich needs to be sustained. Once the blue line lies inside the red plot, it means that sector needs close attention. If the blue line meets the green line, it means your LGU is doing great in that sector and has to be sustained.
Socio-economic and environment are inter-dependent. A healthy and good quality human resource (labor force) is a productive working force that breeds a healthy economy and one that recognizes the value of environmental quality. A well-managed economy sustains the productivity of natural endowments and the life support system needed to build a health society. Well-conserved natural resources provide communities with a sustainable source of livelihood and income and thus improve their economic welfare. Clean environment and good economy ensure the quality of life.
It is, therefore, important that these three sectors are equally given importance to achieve a balanced and sustained development.
More on Socio-Economic and Environmental Interdependencies

How does an economic problem such as "low income" affect social and environmental dimensions? Low family income would impact to education of children. Children may opt to work instead of going to school
to help the family with the basic necessity such as food. Poor nutrition due to imbalance food intake may lead to many forms of illnesses or worse, even death.
Low income is a hindrance in accessing decent shelter and basic utilities such as water, electricity and sanitary
toilet facility. Difficulty to access water and sanitary toilet facility poses environmental and health problems.
The overriding motivation is survival. One sample is illegal fishing, say, the use of dynamite to increase fish catch. While dynamite fishing may increase income, it is not sustainable. What is irreversible is the destruction of coastal habitat.
Low income may lead to illegal activities that impact on the integrity of the environment or social disharmony.
What are the impacts of illegal fishing to socio-economic and environmental dimensions?
Illegal fishing destroys marine life which contributed to the loss of seaweed beds, tidal marshes, coral reefs, mangrove forests, and other important biotic communities. The loss of important marine organisms such as those mentioned above has an impact to marine nutrient imbalances leading to declining of fish resources, as well as degeneration of the natural resilience or cleansing ability of marine ecosystems which, later on, would result to serious marine pollution. Livelihoods of fisherfolk and food security are issues that would crop up because of declining fish resources. Marine pollution definitely affects biodiversity and marine ecosystem health, including the marine ecosystem services.
In brief, recognizing these interdependencies is about understanding human life.
Every action or inaction corresponds to great benefits or serious problems in the future. The future of next generation lies in our hands. Think! There's no option but to ACT... now.
FISCAL PERFORMANCE
Receipts. The total revenue of Bustos rose by 12 percent from PhP80,361,602 in 2009 to PhP90,318,620 in 2010. Locally-sourced revenue, which shows the amount of revenue under local government unit (LGU) control and may signify results from local economic activity, grew by 43.26 percent from PhP13.74 million in 2009 (17.10% of total LGU revenue in 2009) to PhP19.68 million in 2010 (21.79% of total LGU revenue in 2010; see figure 14). This growth was pushed primarily by increases in other receipts, service/user charges, and real property tax which expanded by 159.57 percent, 109.48 percent, and 37.20 percent, respectively. Business tax grew modestly by nine percent from PhP3,171,347 in 2009 to PhP3,452,266 in 2010. The growth of Bustos locally-sourced revenue during the period is significantly faster than its neighbors Obando and Pandi, both also classified as second class municipalities, which grew by 10.95 percent (from PhP17.41M in 2009 to PhP19.31M in 2010) and 18.75 percent (from PhP22.04M in 2009 to PhP26.17M in 2010), respectively. However, even with the notable fast growth, Bustos locally-sourced revenue per capita of PhP315.37 in 2010 is still lower than that of Obandos (PhP332.91) and Pandis (PhP392.71).
Nevertheless, looking at the average performance of all second class municipalities on the following indicators: locally-sourced revenue (PhP9.930M); locally-sourced revenue to total income (18.98%); locally-sourced revenue per capita (PhP222.41) (source: DILG/LGPMS, 2010), it is notable that Bustos rendered better results.
In 10 years, total revenue from real property, business tax, other taxes, regulatory fees, service/user charges, receipts from economic enterprise, toll fees, other receipts, internal revenue allotment, other shares, extraordinary receipts/aids, loans and borrowings, and other inter-local transfers has grown by 145 percent from 36,910,706 in 2001. Revenue sourced locally grew by 133 percent in the cited period (figure 15).
Economic productivity in the municipality is primarily hinged on agriculture.3 The Municipal Planning and Development Office (MPDO) noted that in 2009, commercial farms produced 29,330 swines and 286,000 chickens while backyard farms produced 19,870 swines. Other perceivable economic growth areas of the locality include tourism, food production, textiles, and cargo, freight, and trucking.
________________________
3
Unfortunately, there is a lack of data which indicates agricultural production and other sectoral economic productivity indicators to fully assess sectoral productivity and growth.
Table 2. Swine and Chicken Production, by Farm Classification (MPDO, 2009)

Commercial Farm Backyard Farm
No. of Farms/Poultry
Swine Chicken Total 11 12
No. of Heads Raised 29,330 286,000 315,330
No. of Farms/Poultry 14
No. of Heads Raised 19,870
23
14
19,870
Expenditure. Between 2001 and 2010, bulk of the operating expenditures of the municipality had been consistently on general public services (e.g., overall financial and fiscal services, civil service, planning). From 2009 to 2010, expenditures for health, nutrition and population control rose by 45 percent from PhP6.5 million in 2009 to PhP9.6 million in 2010 while economic services and social security/social services and welfare dipped by 17 percent and 12 percent, respectively (figure 16).
In 2010, 61 percent of the budget went to general public services, while social security/social services and welfare, health, nutrition and population control, and economic services received 12 percent, 12 percent, and 11 percent, respectively (figure 17). The shift of priority of expenditure to general public services is attributed to the new LGU leadership.
INCOME LOCAL SOURCES TAX REVENUE
Year
Total Income
Total Local Sources
Total Tax Revenue
Real Property Tax
Business Tax
Other Taxes
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Source: DoF-BLGF
36,910,706 43,590,794 42,743,000 43,034,031 43,034,031 53,944,715 56,414,714 72,639,258 80,361,602 90,318,620
8,456,188 11,490,792 9,413,000 9,499,825 9,499,825 10,948,460 11,902,352 13,066,794 13,740,412 19,684,098
4,868,273 7,130,619 6,036,000 5,932,660 5,932,660 6,768,366 7,257,020 7,810,302 8,099,629 10,111,246
2,555,263 4,465,059 3,219,000 2,924,766 2,924,766 3,125,155 3,778,236 4,018,269 4,397,786 6,033,579
1,966,580 2,310,163 2,280,000 2,609,443 2,609,443 2,983,822 2,995,939 3,283,249 3,171,347 3,452,266
346,430 355,397 537,000 398,450 398,450 659,388 482,844 508,785 530,496 625,401
Note: *Reactivated SIE data from Q4 CY-2004
Bustos Total Tax Revenue 2001 - 2010

12,000,000 10,111,246 10,000,000 8,000,000 7,130,619 6,036,000 5,932,660 5,932,660 4,868,273 6,768,366 7,257,020 7,810,302 8,099,629
6,000,000
4,000,000 2,000,000 0
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Data source: DoF-BLGF. Graph: Geronimo, J.A.U.
INCOME LOCAL SOURCES NON-TAX REVENUE Receipts from Economic Enterprise 841,685 1,042,260 823,000 1,856,135 1,856,135 644,965 675,996 1,124,989 1,444,735 2,630,387 Total Shares from National Tax Collections 25,208,617 31,900,002 33,254,000 33,498,908 33,498,908 42,489,451 43,946,495 58,702,256
INCOME Shares from National Tax
Year
Total Non-Tax Revenue
Regulatory Fees
Service/User Charges
Toll Fees
Other Receipts
Internal Revenue Allotment 25,208,617 31,900,002 33,254,000 33,498,908 33,498,908 42,489,451 43,946,495 58,627,518 65,362,870 69,419,626
Other Shares
Extraordinary Receipts/ Aids
Loans & Borrowings
Inter-Local Transfers
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
3,587,915 4,360,173 3,377,000 3,567,165 3,567,165 4,180,095 4,645,332 5,256,492 5,640,784
2,669,805 1,267,413 998,000 1,144,918 1,144,918 1,199,310 1,235,686 1,340,942 1,650,376 1,443,079
76,425 165,416 1,466,000 381,959 381,959 1,189,230 962,778 991,421 2,212,812 4,635,380
0 0 0 0 0 1,077,450 1,668,910 1,663,590
0 1,885,084 90,000 184,153 184,153 69,140 101,962 135,550 332,860 864,007
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74,738 1,158,319 1,214,896
3,245,901 200,000 76,000 35,298 35,298 506,804 565,867 870,208 100,000 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2010 9,572,853 Source: DoF-BLGF
Bustos Total Income 2001-2010

100,000,000 90,000,000 80,000,000 70,000,000 60,000,000 50,000,000 40,000,000 36,910,706 43,590,794 42,743,000 43,034,031 53,944,715 43,034,031 56,414,714 80,361,602 90,318,620
72,639,258
30,000,000
20,000,000 10,000,000 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
EXPENDITURES
EXPENDITURES
Year
Total Expenditures
General Public Services
Education, Culture & Health, Nutrition Labor and Sports/ & Population Employment Manpower Control Development 1,506,534 2,054,755 3,080,000 1,793,772 1,793,772 1,934,794 1,941,843 1,458,172 2,304,830 2,672,380 4,267,486 5,092,268 4,680,000 4,820,380 4,820,380 6,262,779 6,875,379 7,747,295 6,636,981 9,603,606 0 0 99,000 177,709 177,709 157,700 150,000 199,719 0 0
Housing and Social Security/ Community Social Services & Development Welfare 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 798,604 1,013,338 1,165,000 1,186,244 1,186,244 4,524,836 5,066,195 7,336,926 10,005,598 8,941,572
Economic Services
Debt Service
Other Purposes
Excess (deficit) of Income over Expenditures 1,031,241 3,208,296 -3,045,000 1,784,264 1,784,264 3,174,631 -223,455 8,998,528
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
35,879,465 40,382,498 45,788,000 41,249,767 41,249,767 50,770,084 56,638,169 63,640,729
22,974,179 28,848,755 23,047,000 21,965,313 21,965,313 22,703,786 25,542,844 30,717,427 43,675,274 46,730,501
4,441,102 704,952 4,569,000 4,231,834 4,231,834 6,737,679 4,911,511 5,590,393 10,094,008 8,597,512
743,549 742,647 486,000 750,000 750,000 743,098 743,098 752,998 154,033 387,650
1,148,009 1,925,783 8,662,000 6,324,515 6,324,515 7,705,412 11,407,299 9,837,799
2010 Source: DoF-BLGF
Expenditures, 2001-2010
50,000,000 45,000,000 40,000,000 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 Labor and Employment Housing and Community Development Social Security/ Social Services & Welfare Economic Services 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Debt Service General Public Services
Education, Culture & Sports/ Manpower Development Health, Nutrition & Population Control
15,000,000
10,000,000 5,000,000 0
CURRENT OPERATING EXPENDITURES
CURRENT OPERATING EXPENDITURES
Year
General Public Services
Education, Culture & Sports/ Manpower Development
Health, Nutrition & Population Control
Labor and Employment
Housing and Community Development
Social Security/ Social Services & Welfare
Economic Services
Debt Service (Interest Expense & Other Charges)
TOTAL CURRENT OPERATING EXPENDITURES
NET OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) FROM CURRENT OPERATIONS
2009 2010
43,675,274 46,730,501
2,304,830 2,672,380
6,636,981 9,603,606
0 0
0 0
10,005,598 8,941,572
10,094,008 8,597,512
154,033 387,650
72,870,724 76,933,221
7,490,878 13,385,398
Source: DoF-BLGF
Bustos Current Operating Expenditures, 2010

Economic Services 11%
Social Security /Social Services & Welfare 12%
Debt Service (Interest Expense & Other Charges) 1%
Health, Nutrition & Population Control 12%
General Public Services 61%
Education, Culture & Sports/ Manpower Development 3%
Data source: DoF-BLGF. Graph: Liwanag, F.M.A.
NON-OPERATING EXPENDITURES CAPITAL/INVESTMENT EXPENDITURES DEBT SERVICE (Principal Cost) Fund Balance, End Payments NET Purchase Purchase/ Cash Fund of Prior TOTAL of Debt Grant/Make INCREASE/ TOTAL NONTOTAL Construct of Retirement/ Balance Balance Year DEBT Securities of Loan to Payment of OPERATING (DECREASE) Beginning Available Accounts Property Plant CAPITAL/ Redemption Other Other Loan SERVICE EXPENDITURES IN FUNDS and Equipment of INVESTMENT Paybles Entities Entities Amortization (Principal (Assets/ Bonds/Debt EXPENDITURES (Investment (Investment Cost) Securities Capital Outlay) Outlay) Outlay) 8,223,616 8,015,308 0 0 0 0 8,223,616 8,015,308 446,996 242,101 0 0 446,996 242,101 8,670,612 8,257,409 -1,179,734 5,127,989 8,913,551 7,733,816 2,143,078 715,971 5,843,960 2,154,682
Year
2009 2010
5,590,738 3,689,278
Source: DoF-BLGF
Bustos Non-Operating Expenditures, 2010

TOTAL DEBT SERVICE (Principal Cost) 3% Purchase/Construct of Property Plant and Equipment (Assets/Capital Outlay) Purchase of Debt Securities of Other Entities (Investment Outlay)
Grant/Make Loan to Other Entities (Investment Outlay)

Payment of Loan Amortization Retirement/ Redemption of Bonds/Debt Securities TOTAL CAPITAL/INVESTMENT EXPENDITURES 97%
Data source: DoF-BLGF. Graph: Liwanag, F.M.A.

Bustos Profile

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Bustos Profile

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

INTRODUCTION

Community governance is seen to ensure accountability.

The participation of the people

Dr. Oscar P. Ferrer

Table 1. Existing Municipal Land Use (MPDO, 2009)

class semi-urban municipality

Figure 1. Barangay geopolitical divisions

Figure 2. Geographical location of the Municipality of Bustos

BULACAN Road Network (1st DEO)

Bustos Population and Households

2008 58789 11726

2009 65156 13039

2010 67517 13503

2011 69967 13992

Population and Households

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Data source: RHU Bustos. Graph: Liwanag, F.M.A.

Vital Health Indices

Source: RHU Bustos, 20

Data source: RHU Bustos, 2011. Graphs: Liwanag, F.M.A.

Leading Causes of Complaints/Morbidity

272 254 149 25 595

2010 5818 1947 634 442 89 542 238 353 644

Leading Causes of Morbidity

Acute Respiratory Infection Anemia/Dizziness/Headache

Nutritional Deficiency Skin Problem/Allergy

Urinary Tract Infection

Mumps PTB Pneumonia

Data source: RHU Bustos, 2011. Graph: Liwanag, F.M.A.

Leading Cuases of Mortality

Leading Causes of Mortality

Data source: RHU Bustos, 2011. Graph: Liwanag, F.M.A.

Attendant at birth Doctors Nurses Midwives Hilot Others

2008 794 25 543 11 0

2009 935 5 352 37 0

2010 1114 8 229 73 6

2011 996 3 249 74 3

Data source: RHU Bustos, 2011. Graph: Liwanag, F.M.A.

2009 276 1053

733 654 12 535 845 0

1426 4 167 1262 0 143 1052 100

2010 Hospital Others

Number of Children 5 Years Old and Below According to Weight

Number of Very Low Weighed 6 4 4 4 2

Number of Low Weighed 489 492 456 321 315

Number of Normal Weighed 8010 8305 8351 8651 8895

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0.06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.02

5.67 5.47 5.07 3.42 3.28

2.37 1.09 1.86 1.68 1.4

Very Low Weighed

Above Normal Weighed

Data source: MNAO-Bustos. Graphs:Liwanag,F.M.A.

Environmental Health and Water Sanitation

Source: RHU Bustos, 2011

Number of Households According to Ownership of Sanitary Toilets

HH accdg to ownership of sanitary toilets

w/o Sanitary Toilet

Number of Households According to Sanitary Garbage Disposal

HH accdg to sanitary garbage disposal

w/ Sanitary Garbage Disposal

w/o Sanitary Garbage Disposal

Number of Households According to Ownership of Basic Sanitation Facilities

HH accdg to ownership of basic sanitation facilities