Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1988 0038-0717
88 S3.M)t0.00
Printed m Great Britam Pergamon Pressplc
Fig. I. Calendar. soil water content (line graph) and rainfall (histogram) for field site in this study
been laid out at this time. Samples were also taken RESULTS
immediately before fertilizer application, and at
approximately regular intervals thereafter until mid- Soil-water content
November. Rainfall on this site in 1985 was low in spring but
frequent and regular throughout the summer (Fig. I).
Biomass determinations Consequently, the soil water content was stable
The chloroform fumigation-incubation technique throughout the growing season from mid-May on-
was used to estimate both biomass C (Jenkinson and wards (Fig. I). The soil was driest in early May, with
Powlson, 1976) and N (Shen er al., 1984). Duplicate a water content of 15%. Thus, only small additions
subsamples (30 g) of soil were fumigated, inoculated of water were required to bring the soils to 55% of
with 0.4% (w/w) unfumigated soil and held for IO their water-holding capacity for all but the samples
days at 25’C. Incubation was carried out at 55% of taken in early May.
the soil water-holding capacity (sieved soil), corre-
sponding to 30% water content. For biomass C Soil respiration
estimation, duplicate control samples were incubated Fumigated soils always evolved more CO, over IO
for IO days corresponding to days IO-20 relative to days incubation than their respective controls (Fig.
the fumigated samples. Total CO& evolved from the 2). The C-flush, indicating biomass C, showed a
soils was measured by gas chromatography (Sparling, sharp increase up to approx. 50 days after sowing,
1981). The C-flush was taken as the difference and declined thereafter at a decreasing rate (Fig. 3).
between CO& evolved by fumigated vs control There was no significant effect (P > 0.05) of fertilizer
samples. Biomass C was estimated using a kc value rates upon the C-flush except at the 52-day sampling;
of 0.45 (Jenkinson and Ladd. 1981). For biomass N here 25N plots apparently supported a significantly
estimation, duplicate control samples were incubated smaller biomass than 75 N or l25N plots (P < 0.05;
for IO days in parallel with fumigated samples. Fig. 3). Between approx. 50 and 140 days, the C-flush
Mineral N was extracted into 2bt KCI (soil:extractant from soils samples from 25N plots was consistently
ratio I : 5) and determined calorimetrically. Am- lower than from 75N or l25N plots. Assuming a kc
monium-N was determined using the salicylate- of 0.45 is valid (see below), biomass C therefore
dichloriosocyanurate reaction (Fraser and Russell, ranged from 20655Opg C g-’ soil (Fig. 3).
1969) and NO,-N was measured as NO,-N following corresponding to 250-685 kg C ha-’ in the &I 5 cm
reduction by copperized cadmium (Henriksen and horizon.
Selmer-Olsen. 1970). The N-flush was calculated as
Nitrogen minerali:ation
the difference between mineral N extracted from
fumigated vs control soils. Biomass N was estimated Amounts of mineral-N in the fumigated soils were
using a k, value of 0.68 (Shen er al., 1984). always higher than in control soils after IO days
incubation even when background concentrations of
Construction o/‘ time courses mineral-N were high due to fertilizer application (Fig.
Since the randomized block design was not estab- 4). This was primarily due to considerably higher
lished at sowing, samples taken at this time are not amounts of NH,-N in the fumigated vs the control
strictly comparable with subsequent samples. Pre- soils. Concentrations of NH,-N in fumigated soils
sowing points (time 0 on graphs) were therefore were on average 44 times greater than those in
joined to the rest of the time-courses by broken lines. control soils (range 16-172 x ). Nitrification always
All other points are joined assuming that they are occurred in the control soils. Amounts of NO,-N in
directly comparable. This is likely to be a valid control soils exceeded those in fumigated soils by
assumption since the incubation conditions and lO.5-25.5pg N g-’ dry soil.
analytical methods were kept as consistent as was Amounts of mineral-N in both fumigated and
practically possible at all sampling times. control soils showed a sharp increase following fertil-
Variations in biomass C and N 621
I I I I
50 100 150 200
Time since sowing (days)
Fig. 2. Soil respiration by fumigated (closed symbols) and control (open symbols) soils. 0 25N plots;
q 75N plots; A 125N plots.
izer application and generally declined thereafter sowing, declined until approx. 150 days, and there-
(Fig. 4). In 125N plots, elevated concentrations of after recovered to concentrations prevailing at 60
mineral-N remained in the soil for longer periods days (Fig. 5). The main exception to this trend was
than in 25N or 75N plots (Fig. 4). This pattern is in l25N plots, where the post 60-day decline was less
consistent with mineral-N content of soils immedi- marked (Fig. 5). The N-flush was significantly greater
ately following sampling (data not presented). The in mid-November than in early April (P < 0.001;
mineral-N flush, indicating biomass N, was some- November data pooled).
what variable and did not show simple trends in
relation to either time or fertilizer rate (Fig. 5). Anomalous samples
Analysis of variance of the combined data (all sam- On two sampling occasions the soil-water content
ples excluding time 0) indicated significant variation was greater than 30% (122 and I64 days after sowing;
in the N-flush over time (P < 0.001) but no signifi- Fig. 1). In these cases the samples proved extremely
cant effect of fertilizer level (P > 0.05). Generally, difficult to sieve, requiring great force to push the soil
values for N-flush increased up to 60 days after through the mesh. This treatment resulted in an
XI i I I I x I I I I
I I I I
SO 100 150 200
Fig. 3. C-flush due to fumigation and biomass C estimates for 25N plots (0). 75N plots (0) and l25N
plots (A). Bars show standard errors. $& Values significantly different within time (P c 0.01).
628 K. RITZand D. Roerssos
Fig. 4. Extractable mineral N from fumigated (closed symbols) and control (open symbols) soils. 0 ZSN
plots: 0 75N plots: A l2SN plots. Arrow shows time of fertilizer application.
extruded rather than sieved soil, with a highly with the plateaux forming at approx. I20 days after
modified structure. This problem has been reported sowing for 2SN plots. and 100 days for 75N and
previously for grassland soil (Ross et al., 1985). The l25N plots (Fig. 6). Plant yields from 2SN plots were
biomass estimates were clearly influenced in such a always lower than from 75N or l25N plots, particu-
way that they were not comparable with the estimates larly from 100 days after sowing (Fig. 6). There was
obtained for other “sievable” samples, as also re- no significant difference between plant yields from
ported by Ross (1987). In addition, these samples 75N or l25N plots at any time (P > 0.05).
were incubated at a higher soil-water content than
55%. since no attempt was made to dry them.
Consequently, biomass data from these sampling DISCLSSION
times have been omitted from the time courses.
Biomass C
Crop growfh It is unlikely that the observed
peak in biomass C
Crop growth followed typical sigmoidal patterns, in the spring was due solely to a crop-related factor.
Fig. 5. hlineral-S Rush due to fumigation and biomass N estimates for 25N plots (0). 7SN (G) and 125X
plots (A). Bars show standard errors. * Values significantly different Nithin time (P < 0.05).
Variations in biomass C and N 629
(C,-to-N,). They reason that where C,-to-N, is high, method for the determination of cation-exchange capacity
the microbes involved in mineralizing N are likely to of clay minerals. Cfav Minerals 8. X9-230.
become somewhat N-limited and a greater pro- Glentworth R. and Muir J. (1963) The Solis of fhe Counrrj
portion of the mineralized N will be reimmobilized, round Aberdeen. Inoerurie and Fraserburgh. Memoirs of
the Soil Survey of Great Britain. HMSO, Edinburgh.
resulting in lower k, values. Conversely, lower
Henriksen A. and Selmer-Olsen A. R. (1970) Automated
C,-to-N,, values will result in higher k, values. methods of determining nitrite and nitrate in water and
They showed experimentally that k, = -0.014 soil extracts. Annl~sr !?$ 514-518.
C,-to-N, + 0.39 (Voroney and Paul. 1984). Here, C, Jenkinson D. S. and Ladd J. N. (1981) hlicrobial biomass
is the CO,-C evolved over 10 days by fumigated soil in soil: measurement and turnover. In Soil Biochemisrry,
(i.e. no subtraction of control) and N, is the net Vol. 5 (E. A. Paul and J. N. Ladd. Eds). pp. 415-471.
production of NH,-N in the soil (i.e. no account Dekker, New York.
taken of NOJ-N). We do not consider it valid to Jenkinson D. S. and Powlson D. S. (1976) The effects of
correct k, using this equation with our data since, biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil-V. A method
for measuring soil biomass. Soil Biology & Biochemistry
unlike those of Voroney and Paul, our soils were
8, 209-213.
reinoculated with unfumigated soil, and the level of Jenkinson D. S., Davidson S. A. and Powlson D. S. (1979)
reinoculation has a significant effect on the C-flush Adenosine triphosphate and microbial biomass in soil.
(Chapman, 1987). The C-to-N ratios of the Rushes Soil Biology & Biochemisq II, 521-527.
measured in this experiment varied significantly over Lynch J. M. and Panting L. M. (1980a) Cultivation and the
time (P < O.OS), ranging from 3.1 to 10.4, with no soil biomass. Soil Biology & Biochemistrv 12, 29-33.
consistent trends or significant effect of fertilizer rate Lynch J. M. and Panting L. M. (1980b) Variation in the size
(P > 0.05). Assuming that the C-to-N ratio of the -of the soil biomass.- Soil Biology’ & Biochemistry 12,
547-550.
flush, however it is estimated, does influence k,, there
Lynch J. M. and Panting L. M. (1982) Effects of season,
is therefore evidence that in this experiment k, varied cultivation and nitrogen fertiliser on the size of the soil
significantly over time. Consequently the time- microbial biomass. Journal of rhe Science of Food and
courses of N-flush are likely to be poor indicators of Agriculfure 33. 249-W.
temporal variations in biomass. This conclusion is Meteorological Office (1985) .Ilonrh!, tC.eafher Repporn.
supported by the relative stability of the time-courses HMSO. London.
for C-flush compared to those for N-flush. Powlson D. S. (1980) The effects of grmding on mrcrobial
and non-microbial organic matter in sorl. Journul of Soil
Science 31, 77-85.
REFERENCES
Ross D. J. (1987) Soil microbial biomass estimated by the
fumigation-incubation procedure: seasonal fluctuations
Adams T. McM. and Laughlin R. J. (1981) The effects of and influence of soil moisture content. Soil Biology &
agronomy on the carbon and nitrogen contained in the Biochemisrr.v 19. 397 404.
soil biomass. Journal of Agricuirurul Science (Cambridge) Ross D. J., Speir T. W., Tate K. R. and Orchard V. A.
97, 3 19-327. (1985) Etfects of sieving on estimations of microbial
Anderson J. P. E. and Domsch K. H. (1980) Quantities of biomass, and carbon and nitrogen mineralisation. in soil
plant nutrients in the microbial biomass of selected soils. under pasture. Ausfroliun Journal of Soil Reseurch 23,
Soil Science 130. ?I I-216. 319-324.
Bottner P. (1985) Response of microbial biomass to Schniirer J.. Clarhoim M. and Rosswall T. (1986) Fungi.
alternate moist and dry conditions in a soil incubated bacteria and protozoa in soil from four arable cropping
with “C and “N-labelled plant material. Soil Biology & systems. Biology cmd Ferfiliry of Soils 2. 119-126.
Biochemistry 17, 329-337. Shen S. M.. Pruden G. and Jenkinson D. S. (1984) Miner-
Campbell C. A. and Biederbeck V. 0. (1976) Soil bacteria) alisation and immobilisation of nitrogen in fumigated soil
changes as affected by growing season and weather and the measurement of microbial biomass nitrogen. Soil
changes: a field and laboratory study. Cunadiun Journal Biology & Biochemisfry 16, 437444.
of Soil Science 56, 293-310. Sparling C. P. (1981) Microcalorimetry and other methods
Carter M. R. (1986) Microbial biomass as an index for to assess biomass and activity in soil. Soil Biology &
tillage-induced changes in soil biological properties. Soi/ Biochemisfry 13, 93-98.
& Tillage Research 7. 2930. Van de Werf H. and Verstraete W. (1957) Estimation of
Carter M. R. and Rennie D. A. (1984) Dynamics of soil active soil microbial biomass by mathemetical analysrs of
microbial biomass N under zero and shallow tillage for respiration curves: calibration of the test procedure. Soil
spring wheat, using 15N urea. PIanr und Soil 76, 157-164. Biology & Biochemisrry 19. 261-265.
Chapman S. J. (1987) lnoculum in the fumigation method Voroney R. P. and Paul E. A. (1984) Determination of
for soil biomass determination. Soil Biology & Bio- kc and k, rn sifu for calibration of the chloroform
chemistry 19. &87. fumigation-incubation method. Soil Biology & Bio-
Fraser A. R. and Russell J. D. (1969) A spectrophotometric chemisrry 16, 9-14.