Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
gemiusAdHoc
February 2012
5th edition (2011, 2010, 2009, 2008) The results of the study are compared with the data obtained in 2011 and statistical differences were investigated. The study identifies the perception of the characteristics determining a leading and online brand. Two main goals were achieved as a result of the study: indication of the leading brands in various categories as perceived by the Romanian internet users finding out which are the most online present brands, in Romanian internet users opinion
2 2
Research method
Data were gathered between 13th-30th January 2012. Invitations to take part in the survey were displayed on sites: eJobs.ro, Imedia, Rol.ro, Tpu.ro and Trilulilu.ro. Target group of the study are Romanian internet users aged 18-45. The final sample (N) consists of 2057 questionnaires completed by Romanian internet users aged 18-45. Results of the study were presented with the use of an analytical weight, based on data concerning structure of the online population in terms of gender and age of internet users. The structural data was taken from the Omnibus study provided by Mercury Research.
3 3
Survey Structure
The survey was divided into three main sections: 1. leading brands and online presence characteristics 2. Romanian brands: popularity, trustworthiness, online presence 3. product categories (banks and insurance; personal care/cosmetics; auto; telecommunications). The first two sections were displayed to all respondents In the third section (product categories) one respondent was asked questions about only one product category.
4 4
Leading Brands and Online Presence Indices values range between 0 and 1 created on the basis of the most important features indicated by users
20%
40%
60% 66%
80%
100%
66,9% 37% 38,0% 32% 28,9% 23% 21,0% 20% 20,2% 5% 6,4% 2% 1,1% 2011 2012
5
It is widely known
High quality of products or services and being widely known are the two most important attributes when evaluating a brands success. It seems that having products that sell very well has decreased in importance as compared to one year ago. Having a lot of fans is on the last place, but more users than in 2011 think this is a key feature of a leading brand.
5 5
Base: All respondents 2011 N=2337, 2012 N=2057 Source: gemiusAdHoc, February 2012
Which of the features given below are, in your opinion, to the greatest extent those of a brands online presence? Please, indicate up to 2 features. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 42% 43,3% 41% 34,6% 26% 28,8% 31% 28,4% 25% 24,5% 14% 16,5% 3% 2,7% 2011 2012 The ranking used to determine the online presence index changed in 2012 the online communication its slightly more important this year than selling the products online. Displaying a seamless online image has decreased in importance. Being discussed on blogs, forums and social networks has increased compared to the 2011 readings.
6 6
Necessary data about its products/services and contact are available online Its online image [website, banners, design, graphics] is seamless and constantly improving Communicates with its clients online through as many ways as possible- blog, newsletters, social networks, etc...
It is intensively promoted online (banners, sponsored links, contextual) It is intensively discussed by internauts on blogs, online forums, chats and social networks
Base: All respondents 2011 N=2337, 2012 N=2057 Source: gemiusAdHoc, February 2012 Source: gemiusAdHoc, February 2012
20%
2011 2012
7 7
0% Dacia Borsec eMag BCR Ursus ProTV Dorna Petrom Romtelcom Ciocolata cu Rom
Base: All respondents 2011 N=2337, 2012 N=2057 Source: gemiusAdHoc, February 2012
20%
15%
10%
5%
5%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
8
0% Dacia Borsec Ursus Ciocolata cu Rom ProTV eMag Arctic Napolact Timisoreana Poiana
Base: All respondents 2011 N=2337, 2012 N=2057 Source: gemiusAdHoc, February 2012
30%
15%
14%
10% 7% 6% 5% 6% 6% 6% 5% 4%
2011 2012 4%
9 9
0% Dacia Borsec Ursus Dorna BCR eMag Gerovital (Ana Aslan) ProTV Napolact Poiana
Base: All respondents 2011 N=2337, 2012 N=2057 Source: gemiusAdHoc, February 2012
1 1 0 0
2011 2012
10
Base: respondents to whom the block of questions about banks/insurance was displayed (N=529) Source: gemiusAdHoc, February 2012
1 1 1 1
2011
11
2012
Base: respondents to whom the block of questions about banks/insurance was displayed (N=529) Source: gemiusAdHoc, February 2012
1 1 2 2
2011
12
2012
Base: respondents to whom the block of questions about personal care was displayed (N=522) Source: gemiusAdHoc, February 2012
1 1 3 3
2011 2012
13
Base: respondents to whom the block of questions about personal care was displayed (N=522) Source: gemiusAdHoc, February 2012
1 1 4 4
2011 2012
14
Base: respondents to whom the block of questions about auto was displayed (N=499) Source: gemiusAdHoc, February 2012
1 1 5 5
2011 2012
15
Base: respondents to whom the block of questions about auto was displayed (N=499) Source: gemiusAdHoc, February 2012
Orange
0,461
Vodafone
0,439
Cosmote
0,436
RDS-RCS
0,279
1 1 6 6
Romtelecom
UPC
0,135
Base: respondents to whom the block of questions about telecommunication was displayed (N=507) Source: gemiusAdHoc, February 2012
Vodafone
0,545
Orange
0,513
Cosmote
0,422
Romtelecom
0,280
1 1 7 7
RDS-RCS
0,259
2011
17
Base: respondents to whom the block of questions about telecommunication was displayed (N=507) Source: gemiusAdHoc, February 2012
Va Multumesc !
Catalin Emilian, Country Manager Romania & Moldova GEMIUS RESEARCH SRL
Str. Cezar Bolliac Nr. 8, Ap.6 Sector 3, Bucuresti Phone: +40213233523 contact@gemius.ro