Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ABSTRACT
Impingement water jets are used as a fast cooling system ( ≈ 85°C/s) for hot strip mill, because of the high extracted heat
flux (≈ 10 MW/m2). The microstructure and mechanical properties are dependent on the controlled cooling in the run-out table
hence it is important to obtain an accurate heat transfer coefficient value.
This paper presents an experimental and numerical study on the heat transfer behavior of a high temperature steel plate
cooled by a subcooled impinging circular water jet. The effects of the surface temperature on the heat transfer regimes were
analyzed by the transient inverse heat conduction method to calculate the heat flux on the impinging surface from the
temperatures measured with thermocouples inserted in square steel test plates.
The results showed that the water jet will be in direct contact with the surface even if the temperature (600 to 900°C)
exceeds the boiling temperature and also that the heat transfer regime is not single-phase. The water jet can be in contact with a
hot strip surface without the formation of a vapor film, with strip traveling at 10 m/s. The results will contribute to a better
understanding of the heat transfer regimes during hot strip mill cooling.
Cooling curves
Figure 10-a shows the cooling curves obtained from the Figure 10: (a) Internal temperatures measured at “r” positions
thermocouples 1 to 4, at r = 0, 15, 35 and 55 mm, during of the radial distance from the center of the plate;
cooling process for Ti = 900°C, as seen in Fig. 7. (b) Calculated surface and measured internal
The cooling process started at instant t = 148 s and the temperature at r = 0 at stagnation point.
internal temperature was 900°C. The temperature drop was
more evident for curve 1, r = 0, where the cooling was more
intense. As the dark diameter increases the cooling is
intensified in the other curves. Using the inverse heat
conduction analysis the surface temperatures were calculated
from temperatures inside the test plate (Fig. 10-b) at position r
= 0. It was observed that the surface temperature falls faster
than the internal temperature in the first seconds at the
beginning of the cooling process indicating a highly nonlinear
temperature profile inside the plate. These trends also were
observed in tests with Ti = 600 and 750°C.
The Fig. 11 shows the nonlinearity inside the plate through Figure 11: Isothermals at t = 16.8 s after start cooling process
the isotherms 16.8 s from beginning of cooling. At for Ti = 900°C.
impingement point for r = 0 and y = 14 mm, has a temperature
of 156°C while for y = 0 the temperature is approximately The time between the beginning of the cooling process and
624°C. the appearance of the dark zone was approximately Δt = 0.2 s.
When Δt = 0.4 s the surface temperature was Ts = 877°C and
Figure 12: Analysis of the visual observations with the surface cooling curves for Ti = 900°C.
for Δt = 2.0 s Ts = 574°C. In the impact zone there was an increases even after the heat flux reaching the CHF. The
absence of bubbles and film boiling. The water jet penetrates transition regime is between 506°C < Ts < 893°C. Therefore,
the vapor layer and the bubbles formed on the hot surface for the surface temperatures of Ts = 877 and 574°C, shown in
condense in the subcooled liquid [6, 7]. For the water jet Fig. 12, in the dark zone, the heat transfer regime is transition.
temperature Tj < 60°C, the wetting occurs when the water jet This conclusion is consistent with the comments of Timm et
touches the superheated surface, regardless of its temperature al. [3] but contradicts the statements of Hatta et al. [15].
[8]. Figure 13-b shows that an increase in the initial test
temperature (Ti) promotes an increase in the CHF. For Ti =
Boiling curves 600, 750 and 900°C the CHF occurs at Ts = 340, 365 and
506°C, respectively. However, Ti does not affect the
The Fig. 13-a shows the heat flux curve at r = 0 for Ti = beginning of the single-phase and nucleate boiling regimes.
900°C. The curve can be divided into three regions: single For all tests, the single-phase has begun by Ts ≈ 140°C and
phase forced convection, nucleate boiling and transition. The after the CHF all curve have the same declivity.
critical heat flux value, CHF = 3MW/m2 at Ts = 506°C, is Figure 14 shows the effect of the initial temperature on the
three times greater than the value for pool boiling. The in heat transfer coefficients, in the stagnation zone, for Ti = 600,
single phase regime occurs when Ts ≈ 140°C. These results 750 and 900°C. The heat transfer coefficient in the transition
indicate that the subcooled and forced convection strongly region is strongly affected by Ti until Ts ≈ 300°C, where the
affects the boiling curve, consistent with the analysis carried curves meet and remain together until the Ts ≈ 50°C, through
out by Robidou et al. [14]. The heat transfer coefficient single phase forced convection and nucleate boiling.
Figure 13: (a) Heat flux and heat transfer coefficient curves at r = 0 for Ti = 900°C and (b) initial test temperature influence on heat
flux curve.
Figure 15 shows the calculated heat flux in the stagnation The time that the steel strip remains under the water jet is
zone and in zones 2, 3 and 4, as shown in Fig. 6, for the initial of the order of thousandths of a second. This is not sufficient
test temperature Ti = 600°C. The time intervals between the to reduce the strip surface temperature of 900°C to a
CHF increase over time. temperature below the saturation temperature, where the
The CHF peaks observed in the curves are due to the single-phase regime could occur, as shown in the graph and
arrival of the wet front. The CHF peaks decrease as they move photographs of Fig. 12. According to Zumbrunnen et al. [2],
away from the stagnation zone. This reduction is due to the in during the hot strip mill cooling the regime is single-phase
the subcooling of the water and this trend was observed in all forced convection in the impact region and the surface
tests. temperature is below saturation temperature, as shown in Fig.
2.
CONCLUSION
The authors are grateful for the support of the CNPq, and
Hot Rolling Division, Research Center and Maintenance
Engineering Division, Usiminas, for providing the test
samples, design and assembly of the experimental apparatus
and financial support.
NOMENCLATURE
Figure 16: Photograph of a water curtain impinging on the hot Latin symbols
strip mill at 10 m/s and Ts ≈ 900°C where the dark cp: Specific heat of test plate (J/kg°C)
zone can be seen. CHF: Critical heat flux (MW/m2)
Dn: Nozzle exit diameter (mm)
Dj: Impinging jet diameter (mm) 5. M. M. Prieto, L. S. Menendez, Thermal performance of
Dest: Stagnation zone diameter (mm) numerical model of hot strip mill runout table,
H: Height of the water jet exit (mm) Ironmaking and Steelmaking, v. 28, nº 6, pp. 474-480,
k: Thermal conductivity of test plate (W/m°C) 2001.
Patm: Atmospheric pressure (kPa) 6. R. Viskanta, T. Bergman, Heat Transfer in Materials
Pj: Stagnation pressure (kPa) Processing, Handbook of Heat Transfer, cap. 8, 3ª
Qn: Water flow at nozzle exit (ℓ/min) edition, McGraw-Hill, USA, 1998.
r: Radial distance (mm) 7. W. Timm, K. Weinzierl, A. Leipertz, Heat transfer in
t: Time (s) subcooled jet impingement boiling at high wall
T: Temperature (ºC) temperatures, International Journal of Heat and Mass
Ti: Initial temperature test of plate (°C) Transfer, v. 46, pp. 1385 - 1393, 2003.
Tj: Impinging water jet temperature (°C) 8. T. Ochi, S. Nakanishi, M. Kaji, S. Ishigai, Cooling of a
Ts: Surface temperature (°C) hot plate with an impingement circular water jet, Multi-
Tsat: Saturation temperature (°C) Phase Flow and Heat transfer III. Part A: Fundamentals,
Vj: Impinging water jet velocity (m/s) pp. 671-681, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984.
Vn: Nozzle water velocity (m/s) 9. H. Leocadio, A.F.C. Silva, J. C. Passos, Analysis of the
cooling effect of a water jet on a hot steel plate,
Greek symbols Proceedings of 19th International Congress of
ρ: Density of test plate (kg/m3) Mechanical Engineering, Brasília, DF, 2007.
10. F. Xu, M. S. Gadala, Heat transfer behavior in the
impingement zone under circular water jet, International
REFERENCES Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 49, pp. 3785–
3799, 2006.
1. P. Lee, H. Choi and S. Lee, The Effect of Nozzle Height 11. F.P. Incropera, D. P. De Witt, Fundamentals of Heat and
on Cooling Heat Transfer from a Hot Steel Plate by an Mass Transfer, 5th Edition, Rio de Janeiro, 2003, 494 p.
Impinging Liquid Jet, Iron and Steel Institute of Japan 12. D.M. Trujillo, H.R. Busby, INTEMP - Inverse Heat
International ISIJ, v. 44, n° 4, pp. 704–709, 2004. Transfer Analysis - User’s manual, TRUCOMP CO.,
2. D. A. Zumbrunnen, F.P. Incropera, R. Viskanta, A FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA, 47 p.,2003.
method and apparatus for measuring heat transfer 13. B. W. Webb, C. F. Ma, Single-phase jet impingement
distributions on moving and stationary plates cooled by a heat transfer, Advances in heat transfer, v. 26, pp. 105-
planar liquid jet, Experimental Thermal and Fluid 217, Academic press, San Diego, 1995.
Science, v. 3, n° 2, pp. 202-213, 1990. 14. H. Robidou, H. Auracher, P. Gardin, M. Lebouché,
3. C. J. Barros, H. P. Luna, B. R. Menezes, Study of Controlled cooling of a hot plate with a water jet,
Applied Models for Hot Strip Mill Cooling Control, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, v. 26, pp.123–
Master thesis, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo 129, 2002.
Horizonte, Brazil, 1995. 15. N. Hatta, J. Kokado, H. Takuda, J. Harada, J. Hiraku,
4. J. Filipovic, R. Viskanta, F.P. Incropera, T. A. Veslocki, Predictable Modeling for Cooling Process of a Hot Steel
Cooling of a Moving Steel Strip by an Array of Round Plate by a Laminar Water Bar, Archiv für das
Jets, Steel Research, v.65, n° 12, pp.541-547, 1994. Eisenhüttenwesen, v.55, n°4, pp. 143-148, 1984.