Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1/20/2010
Agenda
3:30-4:00 Registration, Snacks, Voting 4:00-4:30 Merix Presentation 4:30-6:30 Plant Tour
Table of Contents
Specifications & Drawing Communications (slide 3) Common Errors (slides 4-12) Copper Foil & Plating Thickness Requirements (slides 13-17) Balanced Circuitry (slide 18) Clearance Rings (slide19) Laser Drilling (slides 20-23) Electrical Test: IPC Definitions (slide 24)
Common Errors
IPC 4552 Specification for Electroless Nickel/Immersion Gold (ENIG) Plating for Printed Circuit Boards
Merix commonly sees a misinterpretation of the Immersion Gold thickness spec As written, the gold thickness spec is 0.05um (1.97 uin) minimum. No maximum value is specified.
Common Errors
ENIG Spec (Continued)
Paragraph 3.2.2 Immersion Gold Thickness The minimum immersion gold thickness shall be 0.05 m [1.97 in] at four sigma (standard deviation) below the mean; the typical range is 0.075 to 0.125 m [2.955 to 4.925 in]. We see a lot of callouts for a gold thickness spec of 2-5 or 3-5 uin based on this paragraph Statistics reminder: Range = Max Min Specs of 2-5 or 3-5 uin are nearly impossible to meet and exceed not only the capability of the process but also the verification equipment. Merix typical process capability for immersion gold is 2 8 uin, which has a range of 6 uin
Common Errors
ENIG Spec (Continued)
Paragraph 3.2.2 Immersion Gold Thickness The minimum immersion gold thickness shall be 0.05 m [1.97 in] at four sigma (standard deviation) below the mean; the typical range is 0.075 to 0.125 m [2.955 to 4.925 in]. We see a lot of callouts for a gold thickness spec of 2-5 or 3-5 uin based on this paragraph Statistics reminder: Range = Max Min Specs of 2-5 or 3-5 uin are nearly impossible to meet and exceed not only the capability of the process but also the verification equipment. Merix typical process capability for immersion gold is 2 8 uin, which has a range of 6 uin
Common Errors
Specifying Plated Conductor Layers Or How Thick is an Ounce?
What is 1 oz copper? A square foot of 1 oz thick copper will weigh 1 oz. According to IPC 4562 the nominal equivalent thickness for 1 oz copper 34.3 um (.00135)
1.35 mils 1 oz Foil
Common Errors
Specifying Plated Conductor Layers Or How Thick is an Ounce?
IPC 4562 and 4101 allow purchased foil to be 10% below nominal. This means the 1 oz foil Merix buys may be as low as 30.9 uin (.00122)
1.22 mils 1 oz Foil
Common Errors
Specifying Plated Conductor Layers Or How Thick is an Ounce?
IPC 6012 allows 1 oz foil in finished board to be as thin as 24.9 uin (.00098)
0.98 mils
1 oz Foil
10
Common Errors
What does this have to do with plated conductor layer thickness?
Merix commonly sees plated layer callouts using oz for thickness For example
0.5 oz plated with 1.0 oz 1.5 oz finished
No industry standard for converting weight to thickness for plated layers (1.4, 1.2 or 1.0?) Are the specified values min, nominal, max?
11
Common Errors
IPC 6012 to the Rescue
Table 3.8 specified minimum external conductor thickness after plating based on specified starting foil
12
Common Errors
IPC 6012 to the Rescue
Caveats:
Table specifies external thickness does it apply to plated inner layers? Assumes copper in hole is also plated on the surface. This isnt necessarily compatible with some HDI plating strategies filled vias, button plate, etc.
13
Preferred dimension in inches. Specify dimension as a minimum or a nominal with a tolerance. Do not use copper weights [oz/in2 or g/M2]
There is no industry standard for conversion of copper weight to thickness.
14
Spec Drawing/Stack-up Callout Finished copper thickness on the surface layers to be .002 inch minimum Final copper thickness 1.9+/- 0.40 mil Where Plated OL Plated IL
OL OL
15
Spec Drawing/Stack-up Callout 0.5 oz + Plating (2.0 mils thick) 0.5 oz copper callout + 1.9 mils finished thickness in stack-up 0.5 oz (.0024" thick after plating) Where OL OL or IL OL Plated OL Plated IL
1/2 oz plated with 1oz 1oz plated up to 2oz, finished external copper thickness: 2oz Outer layers shall be produced by starting with 1/2 oz. copper and plate up to a nominal finish of 2 oz. copper. 1 oz copper clad/1 oz copper plating
OL OL
OL OL
16
OL
1/2 to 1 oz 1.5-2 oz. copper after fabrication on external layers 0.5 oz copper foil plated to 1 to 1.5 oz
OL OL OL
17
IPC-6012B, Am. 1
18
19
21
The smaller thermal relief pad diameter is used in the coupon pattern used for annular ring inspection. This results in a pad diameter that exceeds the registration tolerance for manufacturing. Product is non-compliant for annular ring failures on IPC Class 3 product. When this condition is evident, some design have a larger pad diameter for holes connected to traces.
22
Condition A Condition B
B
23
Isolated circuitry
Thieving applied
24
The small surface area of a clearance ring is difficult to hold good Resist adhesion. 8.0 mils give a good bond area to with stand any plating conditions and possible handling damage
25
26
Laser in action
28
6.
29
Electrical Test
IPC-9252 Vs IPC-9252A Class III 10 Ohm 9252A Class III 20 Ohm 9252 Concerns that the industry is designing product under the Class III category but copper lengths within the layout exceed 10 Ohms. By referee modeling, any net with any point-to-point length of ~20 may violate Class III. This is creating a hybrid type of design as requests are being made to allow the Class II nets to be accepted. This requires double testing and manual programming as CAM software has not adapted to this new scenario. IPC has not addressed on what appears to be emerging as Class 2.5. Indirect Continuity/Isolation Testing by Signature Comparison Concern on Class III, AABUS. Difficulty for manufactures to revisit customers to allow Flying Probe (Capacitive Discharge) on Class III product. Not addressed in 9252. Adjacency (for isolation testing) Concern on Class III, AABUS. Same difficulty as noted above IPC-9252A Table 4-1 Quick reference table does not address Class 3/A Exceptions for Space and Military Avionics (IPC-6012B w/Amendment 1)
30
Thank You
31