Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SECOND SERIES
HISTOEYj
PUBLISHED BY
THE
KRISHNASWAMI
MADKAS
THE MODERN PKINTING WORKS,
MOUNT ROAD.
1918
Prick Rs.
3/12.]
[5
^ n^.^.
First Editi(yn:
March
1918.
PREFACE.
The
following pages contain the substance of the
before the
way
of introduction
two other
lectures
the
first of
these
was intended
them bearing
directly
on the subject
delivered
was
sion
to
make
fuller.
Otherwise
volume
The
and
starts, for
various
No
one,
critical
attempt to
of,
make
Kanakasabhai
Pillai
of
it
the
Madras Postal
Service.
does
VI
PREPAOB.
still fell
insight,
worth.
Notwithstanding
this
defect
is
monumental
though
may
not
them
his
time
and
criticism,
Since
time
we have
have
of the classics
Improvements are
certainly possiis
and
will surely
come
if
some
interest
evinced
The names
of
Pandit
of
Madras,
Kumbhakonam and
of
Vaniambadi deserve
It
mention
in
this
connection.
gives
me
acknowledge
my obligation
W. Thamotharam
for a
Pillai
num-
been ordinarily
inaccessible.
late
was fashionable
It
work was
is-
patriotic'.
Patriotism
PRE PAGE.
the last resort of the scoundrel.'
^11
This remark of
in
may have had its application and may not be altogether without it
The
I
late
in
other times.
let his
occasions.
to
avoid laying
My
is
trouble
difficulty of
making
arrive
facts already
at.
known
not
we may
This
a test
may
gone together.
to avoid
commisattempt-
ed to be
made
and
me
in the connection.
for
Venkayya
obliged to
near
may even
this
field
say that I
am
Mr.
him
led
for a part
ultimately
me
to
work.
Venkayya was
in substantial
agreement with
me
his
had
am
had he
lived
Ill
PREFACE.
I leave the
reader
;
to
all
here
is
that
patriotism
'
to take
command
may
The whole
nature
of
by the collective
the
name
'
Sangam
Works,'
is
of
They were
occa-
the celebration
of
the
achievements of patrons.
Having regard
for the
panegyrist
in
These poems
fall
into
two
classes
Those relating
to
the
field of
action
specific
'
are direct
events and
'
of the patron.
Those
regard
to
dealing
to
with emotion
points
of
are less
direct
in
the
reference,
celebrate
of the
latter
provide
material
only
is
as
valuable
as
the
former does.
respect
of
The
these
compre-
parison possible in
the
PRBPACB.
lat
Homeric
lays or the
bardic
tales
of the
days of
are
this
chivalry in
Europe, or
even
India.
There
go
into
Of these
all
The
In the use
undoubtedly
ence,
is
of this
wealth of
material,
which
of the nature of
contemporary evid'
what
is
required
is
of the
general
is
lie of
the land
attempted.
Much
a
work that
of
is
want
this
preliminary
I
equipment.
it
In
the
following pages
have had
before
I
me
all
the
time to
success,
I take
avoid
it is
this.
How
me
far
have
achieved
not for
to say.
On
48 Pinna
Ramaraja.
Timma
This
wi:io
referred to as the
grandson
of
latter is likely to
fell
be understood
as the
Ramaraja
at
Talikota.
The next
were
Both Pinna
alike
of Talikota
Raja,
who
served
Narasimha.
Timma
were
fisst
PREFACE.
Madura
The next
on
p.
this
was due
to
poem was
temple
of Pattini
which came
of his reign,
when
(vide Silappadika-
ram
I
canto
XXVII.
11.
118-128
&
11.
165-175).
in
acknowledg-
ing
my
Madras
copying for
my
to
Eai Sahib
in lending
H. Krishna
Sastrigal for
his kindness
me
office transcripts of
two
valuable
and to
and supply
me
text
of
the
Ahananiiru.
am
equally
obliged to Mr.
prietor of the
M. K.
having
PBBPAaB.
Xty
and
for
having done
it
so well,
less
One
my
research students,
Mr, N. R. Sattanathan,
trouble
it
of
preparing the
owing
to the rapidity
went through
pleasure
offices.
the
Press.
acknowledge
with
my
1st
Ml^ehlhs.
^-
Krishnaswami Aiyangar.
CONTENTS.
Page.
Bbsbarch
in Indian
History
...
...
33
59
...
...
81
...
104
161
...
The Age
of Paranar
...
211
Talaiyalanganat-tup-Pandyan
...
240
287
331
...
...
...
349
INTRODUCTORY
I
RESEARCH
IN INDIAN HISTORY
IB
*
WHAT HISTORY
*
History
is
fable
agreed
at
upon
was
how
lite-
history
was understood
We have since
is,
gone a long
way from
to set
baffled
that position.
Without attempting
a task which
greater
forth
what history
men than
I am,
may make an
thereto, to
mane
ley has
*
in his
Notes on Politics
has
often
seen far
one
another towards
INTRODUCTORY
An
ingenious
learned writer the
other day amplified
set
of
and
volcanic
islands
at
the sea,
and not to a
sailor
as
the
politician.
The
historian, without
prejudice to monographic
and ascendbird.'
and modern
ley passes
Lord Morof
on to some
shortcomings
time,
historical
study at the
present
and
comfort
of
truth that
though
to
spe-
cialization is bad,
make
into
it is
system
is
worse.
In reading history
one
of
common
measure
RBSEAEGH
the play as
if
IN INDIAN HISTORY
were the
all
it
fifth
act,
and so
is
amiss.
The event
only comprehended in
its fullest
dimensions,
like or
and
for
that
him,
needs insight
and
iinagination.'"
*
:
authority says
we have no
business to seek
very past
itself.
:
more from the past than the Nobody disputes with Cicero
it is
when he
the
first
is false
asks
is true.
No partiality,
no gru^e."
Though
?'
history
is
according to
what
difficulties
coafront a labourer
a
the
journeyman labourer
in
in
of that history
explored.
eagle
India as yet
but
little
Even from
if
4
feist.ory of
INTRODUCTORY
Hindu India one
of
feels
one
see,
hardly
sees
enough even
one feels
of age
It is notorious
that
WANT OF CHRONOLOGY
It
was the
illustrious
historian of India,
event can
be
fired
before
the invasion of
the
Muhammadan
Hindu
conquest.*
Oowell
way
of India
is
Hindu
much advance
part of Elphin-
is
first
of
Indian History
The inaugural
1914 by the
address delivered
in
January
Holden Hutton,
is
b. d.,
He
(the
Eeader)
to
lecture
on
**
The
the
to
Rise,
Growth
Power
and
Organization
of
British
in India."
This leads
me
much
of
Indian History
I should like
control
of
the
Chancellor's
strange
omission.
A
is
enormous importance
entirely neglected in
INTKODUCTORY
we have distinguished
scholars
who
but
a subject so wide
our midst.
literature
historical
and
am
told
to deal
with
it)
a subject of extraordinary
fascination in
itself,
unprovided
In spite of
it
it
might
educa-
play,
to play, in the
tion at Oxford.
What
am
afraid, stilJ
The
of
social
intercourse
Its
Museum
ional
has
failed
to
bring
together
to
present a fair
epitome of
India,
nationalities.'
The
scheme
of constant lectures
by distinguished
fallen
The
Institute possesses
is
no
in
ill-provided
INTRODUCTORY
THE DEMAND OF THE GREATEST OF OXFORD HISTORIANS (BISHOP STUBBS)
I believe that this
is
largely
that
we have still
left
made
so
want',
then
the
(after
Begins Professor of
proclaiming another
Modern History
need which
unsatisfied)
is still,
:
as I think
most disastrously,
"
We
of
Indian
History.
The
the importance
of
which can
a permanent
chair, because
that
is
numismatology, in which
may
serve
ment of the man is of equal importance with the endowment of the chair or study."
made nearly
I appeal
is
to
real,
fally
who known
she
desire that
amoag
and
to
Indian
princes,
in India,
which
is
more
Empire.
Oxford forty
equipment to meet
to the
particular
need.
Thanks
of India
now
to
which the
dist-
century ago.
10
INTRODUCTORY
have to be overcome in
this field are
any work
a wide
of research in
many
study.
Indian
;
Literaktre
{Traditionary and
Historical)
IL
III.
Foreign Literature,
(S;c,\
chiefly
the works
of travellers^
Archaeology,
Monumental,
Numi-
INDIAN LITERATURE
these classes falls naturally into
(a)
The
first of
Ordinary
literature,
traditional
history in
regard to
incidents
and
personalities.
These
histori-
cal object of
will be
of
invalu-
The
here
clue.
chronological
BESEAECH IN INMAN HISTOKY
which many
of the classical
11
works of Uterafeure
in our
want
Dravidian Vernaculars.
name
and ancestors
the
of
name and
composition or
this
Where
of
clue
is
the
work
is
some value
to as
the historian
it is
not
Arrangement upon a Chronological Scheme The greater part of the literature of the
country has
critically
first of all
to be carefully
studied
and
arranged on a
well- planned
chronological scheme.
This
is
true alike of
the
only
Sanskrit
some work has already been done, while in regard to the Dravidian languages which are
of material
12
INTRGDUCTOEY
work has hardly
re-
To
will
prove the
first
essential to
any undertaking.
He
has unfor-
five languages,
according
and the
locality to
which he
It is
the
is
each one
of
whom
limiting
his
might have
directly contributed to
make.
of the literature
of
the country that has here to be taken into the purely historical literafar
department in which, so
materials go
as the
available
India
is
is
peculiarly
it
weak, so
in India.
much
so that
we often hear
utterly
said
absent
13
term now
is
practically the
work
still
of
nineteenth-century Europe,
we can
is
Europe,
well
for
many
many
countries.
So
it is
even with
China.
In regard to India
we can hardly
limit our vision
is
when we
none
his-
such at
all.
The absence
of professed
There
is
much
can be mined
in literature, but
data
and slag
of
confirma-
figments of imagination in
embedded.
Much
of this is
The
and
tarangini,
Baaa's
Harsha
Charitam
for Sans-
14
INTRODUCTORY
the
is
in
Mackenzie
Manuscripts
collection.
There
the Rajavalikathe in
Kanarese,
and
we have
for Ceylon.
they deal
the
themselves.
of the
These,
however,
and
most other
liable to
History
is
On
the
oifer
connected sources do
to
the
critical
material, neglect of
descrip-
15
work that
lies
ahead
is
here, almost
critical
immediately in front
of us,
up
to the writing
the
lines
of
similar
works
European
When
is
this is
done
it
will be
at first-sight.
II.
Greek
Passing on to the next division,
sources of Indian History
' *
Foreign
we have here a
Herodotus.
a
we have
number
of
and when
this begins to
fail,
Chinese sources
beginning of the
fche
16
Christian era.
just
INTBODUCTOBY
Of the Greek sources I may
besides
mention
Herodotus,
not
to
of
Kte^ias,
Megasthenes and
Arrian,
mention
Tyana.
Chinese
Of Chinese sources there
Father
century
is
the
Chinese
time
a large
Thsaug
Ex-
an occasional
is
reference to
South India.
There
besides
this
is
not without
own
There
is
17
chronological
order the
unknown
some valuable information from Hiuen Thsang. Last -of all there is Marco
Polo.
For periods
later
the
Muhammadan
travellers,
some
of
them
Batutah
came to
some part
of the
Nicolo^dei-Conti
who was
a contemporary of
Deva Raya
traders
I,
Varthema, the
Portuguese
others.
among them can be regarded as of value only when we have other sources of information to control them. All the same we owe it to them that we have recovered a few bright chapters
of
18
ledge
INTRODUCTORY
our
obligations
to the
disinterested
whom
entirely
of
able to us.
MUHAMMADAN HISTORIANS
I
have so
far not
of the
Muhammadan
later period of
historians as a class
For the
Hindu History
of
South India
I class
them
as outside
none
of
of
any State
Hindu
India.
Such reference
and bring
as they
make
them
particular
Muhammadan State
or States
whose
These again
for use
by us by an
though
European
for
scholars,
there
left
is
still
room
upon
these.
RESEARCH
IN INDIAN HISTORY
19
Aech^bological Sources
(I)
MONUMENTAL
the sources, archaeo(1)
We
come
last of all to
logical.
monumental,
graphic.
numismatic
and
(3) epi-
of buildings,
and
They
also let
of these monuments.
To
be
able
to study
monuments, these
monuments must
of archaeology,
an organisation
monuments
then
it
requires
for
exposition of those
may
20
INTRODUCTOBY
In a vast country
ours and having
monuments
itself
first
work
to
in regard to its
it,
branch
in
research
work
monuments, may
is
some extent be
this
so
necessary for
satisfactorily,
where the
involve as
in
excavations, or
excavations
on
at
this branch
ningham
to
Director-General
decade
later
when
and
their
staff
21
of
Archso-
Survey
XXII by
the
first,
and
XXXIII
by the second.
at
first
conservation of
existing
made monuments in
more comprehensive
are
new
century, and
we
now on a
of
further
India Re-
J!?UMi8MATics :
It is in the
of
work
museums
all
in India
and elsewhere.
They have
addition to
been done.
may
turn
it
22
INTRODUCTOKY
Invaluable to the Cheonology of
Particulab Periods
Costly or otherwise
it is
many
parts of Indian
and several
chronologi-
much needed
EPIGRAPHY
Lastly
we come
is
to epigraphy,
which
of
for the
we
are directly
concerned,
sources,
these
to us lost
periods, localities
and
very
dynasties.
For the
India.
period anterior
far,
to
are not
The
whole
about
1100 to 3200.
Becords Preponderate
For the period on
in
Number
in
South
number already brought to notice up to 1906, when the late Professor Kielhorn compiled his
indexes to the inscriptions,
is
23
There
which
it is
only a comparatively
before
small
manner.
has
it,
And, where-
as
new
in
records
are every
known
there
of material the
made by
Sir
Royal
two
volumes
of
issue of
one
24
INTRODUCTORY
of
more part
by
his
of Vol. Ill,
Venkayya
Mr. Rice
number to tdese, though he has not published them in the same form as his predecessor had
done.
placed
them
all in
the
*
Bombay Museum.
He
Dharwar which abound with such materials, and some parts of Belgaum and Bijapur Districts, and the Nizam's Dominions still remain
to be explored.
And
Southern India.'
Their Value
Apart from this copiousness these inscriptions have a historical value
which
is all
their
own.
They vary
in substance
who
fell
widow's
husband, to a
If it
RESEARCH
or a Brahman
details of the
IN INDIAN HISTORY
25
elaborate
details
rural
administration.
of
how
was administered,
ments.
them
concisely
set
precisely
in regnal
Thus
modern character
that
it is
will
so
more
than mere
Thanks
to the exertions of
we
have
all
26
INTRODUCTORY
Co-ordination of
Work
it
Desirable
These
possible to compile a
from the
first
cen-
tury B.C.
onwards with
sufficient fullness
up
But
work in
'
which
will
have to be
hereafter
Fleet's
Two Desiderata
(i)
Research
in
Monuments
Dr. Fleet calls for two lines of work of which
we have
tically
and
in
in a
more
liberal
spirit
than
India
heretofore,
the
Government
of
Eesolution
27
is
This
supplement
available
the
for
rather
periods-
meagre
information
which he
calls
Corpus Liscriptionem Indicarum of which a beginning was made in the only two volumes so far published, Vol. I, The Inscriptions of Asoka by General Sir Alexander Cunningham, and Volume III, The
Gupta
Inscriptions,
certainlj' is
by
The need
very great.
FOR History
Along with
this
work has
of
all
to go
on work
historical material
of
these
are
examined
carefully
no
historical
will
work
This
involve^
'^
INTRODUCTORY
of
four or live
all
languages,
besides
the
monuments,
and works
of art generally.
that these
coming
of
at the
some individuals and Governments, and what is more they are coming to
be studied with
hands
more
of that
sympathy which
In
the
It has
hitherto
words
of Justice
been the
the merits of
it
has
The examples
it is
and
which they
further a juster
is
29
of a school of aesthetic
articulate
and highly
Medieval
"
Architecture,"
Gopinatha Rao's
Hindu
upon a narrower
field of
and Iconography
breuil
of
"
by Professor Jouveau-Duall
Pondicherry,
works
of
recent
Universities
It
is
Shew Interest
too
therefore
none
to utilise
Government
Indian History
The success
^
interest
it
INTKODUCTORY
scheme depends upon the
it
or failure of this
can
enlist
the
University
he once
study,
'
of
historical
co-operation,
better
more
organisation,
for
criticism,
more advise
the need,
is
if
And
not
History
lengthening
and widening, and deepening. It is lengthening at both ends, for while modern States in
many
making history
at
history
;
is
no longer, by any
hands.
And
history
is
widening.
Could we
be
still
KESEAECH
be
or
told,
IN INDIAN HISTOEY
31
to tell
them
well
is
to
them
badly.
And
if
history
deepening.
satisfied
We
could not,
we would, be
Literature
prices,
and
art,
religion
creeds
political
and
superstitions
burst
the
to be
barrier
and
are
of
longer
expelled.
The study
is
interactions
and
interdependences
There is
much
to he
there will be
more
easier
done every
year.'
is
the
languages that
mastered are
many
a deep knowledge of
The other
technical
easy of acquisition.
talent
offered
is
largely
and
32
ambition.
INTRODUCTORY
I leave
it
in
of the eternal
want
of historic sense.
II
seems
historical
History, as
we understand
it,
is
entirely a
product of the
modern
historian.
may
be subjected to
criti-
wanting
in India.
of constructing the history
So the problem
of India as a whole, or of
any part
of
it, is
Defective
may
be and
much more
33
so than in
European
34
countries.
left,
INTRODUCTORY
Still
there
is
despite
good results
exploited systematically.
Hisbe
may
(III) Literature.
Of these the
first
What can
source
is,
we
are
thrown upon
Buddhistic.
also
Vedic and
With
respect
to
South India
take
archiBological
evidence
may
us
back beyond the beginning of the Christian Era except for a few Asoka and Satavahana
records.
Whether
literature
will
take
us
as
we
in this direction
may
35
results
set
have not
it
whether
is
so,
nor whether
literary
if it is
the
of re-
indis-
This
is
clear from
what we know
Indian history.
When we come
Tamil
take
to deal
becomes
available
equally essential.
Of the
literature
much
upon
anterior
litera-
to the
ture
seems to be modelled
Kanarese
has
Sanskrit
a
entirely.
certainly
of the
more
of
ancient literature.
A
is
work
the
ninth cen-
tury undoubtedly
Kavirajamarga
Nripatunga*
If a
work
had
of anterior
Malayalam seem s
to
of
36
INTRODUCTORY
But Tamil which,
It hjas a
aoGordiog to .some,
goes back to a
f^-r
is
greater antiquity.
worth study on
scientific lines.
This body
and yet
it,
deserves well of
among the educated of It may not be all who their country's sons. can afford to study it, but those who can ought
those
who
wish, to be
not to neglect to do
literature,
so.
How
is
this
vast
exploited to
to
is
likely
for
be
history?
I
two has been considered to belong to the province of Government, for it is beyond the resources of private work, though private
agency
may do much
the third
if
Work upon
iiteratiire
is
that
is
my
conoera
'37
so far as
it
can be
of use
making
of history.
That
literature
can provide
for history
needs
no proof now.
The study
of the literature of
Northern India
opened to us a
domain
cient India.
que^
my
southern
tongues, as they are at present. That a systematic study of this literature will yield resulta
of great value
least
expects
itr,
the
life of
apostle.
Kamanuja constructed
of
Tirupati,
and
enshrined
the
image
ol
'Govindaraja there.
to have been the
image
of of
Govindaraja at
the tepaple and
8B
INTBODUCTORY
So
far as I
kaow
at
present,
there
It
was asserted
of
existence
the
Vishnu shrine
pious fraud of
image
If
of
Vishnu
are
in the Saiva
(Holy
as in hoaesty
we
bound
to grant he did,
We
the
his
credulity
or
otherwise,
tale.
but
we
Stanza 86
of
the Tiruchchirram-
words
in
of the
baram supplicating
1
LfffiBiSL-iB ^rreoriifL
^tTemuirair
neSaSemQ
LfdjBfSujfr
THE VALUE OF LITEKATURB
ing the earth to
discover the
foot,
39
he displayed one
the other as
that he might
is
show
des-
well.
This
a clever
two
Natesa
is
in
his self-forgetful
lifted
up.
Govindaraja
in his
bhogasayana
(reclin-
ing posture).
Kulasekhara
Alvar
states
regarding the
his
praise
in
the
Chitrakuta
of
The
first
extract
(StriB/SeoBnrss
Qetrn^^tpsufr M9ffeu
Qn^^
u6tai.LD6ifr6orQtiT u&o&oqjit
Qsit(^u a^^
40
INTRODUCTORY
The second
*
the temple.
that Vishnu
was in
couch.
The
God
does now.
Let us
dated as
tunga Chola
son
He was
;
succeeded by
he
his
Vikramachola
II,
and
by
his
son
Kulottunoa
Raja
11.
The
^qjH^
Q^n^^
41
Among
him
by elaborate descriptions
duced upon the lady folk
of the city.
and Hdjarajanula
at
regarding the
Vishnu shrine
passages
Chidambaram.
iu
These two
terms
of
indicate
no
uncertain
the
temple,
opportunity
'
old
little
gods
which were
to this pious
LUfTITLJLl
^QJfS ^(e^muiB
Qu(Tarssi^p
^aSpjSu
L^roLoi3p
(^^Lcu2sifT^^
42
INTEODUCTOKY
is
devotee
^L^eQeo
clear from
submerging
clear
then
that
Kulottunga
that
II,
first of
name,
to
perpetrated this
pious
hostility
led to
the establishment by
Ramanuja
of the
Last
us
which
lets
know how
came
to
be again where
ation from the
at present.
It is
a quot-
Prapannamritram
of
of a certain
Anantarya, a descendent
was a contemporary
of
of
Ramanuja and
gives his
own
43
once
him
his GVuru
Mahacharya
called)
(Doddayacharya,
of
as
he
is
popularly
the Vadiilagotra
at the height of
fame
for learning,
was then
in
residence
at
Ghatikachalam (Sholingar).
of
He
raja
Godndawhich
Chidambaram
in
(Chitrakiita),
Overcoming
argument
the
invincible
j?tr^^rf%^2 ^r^nrr
^^^
ii
44
Saivas,
this
INTRODUCTORY
great
even
facts gathered
from
number
brought
of works,
How
used
are they to be
to
and
?
serve
the
purposes of history
The
If
first
essential to history
is
chronology.
which
will
be
this
unintelligible
in
order
more
is
ingenuity.
If
predecessor,
Unfortunately, how-
them
law
am
facts in
for a
The
first of all
to be
45
offcen-
without evideace.
century A.D.
;
Some
refer
him
to the fifth
others agaia to an
ascertainable.
antiquity not
definitely
That
Sundaramurtinayanar
among
the Tiruttondar
;
one fact
all
are agreed
of a
upon
and that he
is
w^as a
contemporary
Varagunapandyan
all
also tradition
epigraphifit
of
accepted on
hands.
The
to the
Varaguna
the eighth
after
Christ.
The
the
and adaptation
of
Saiva hagiology.
That
his
of
Manikkavasagar was
46
ascribed
to
for
INTRODUCTORY
Kamban, who, there
believing,
lived
are
good
reasons
in
the twelfth
cenfenry a.d.
In
this, as is
evident,
the thousand of
give no milk.
We
it
must be
said in passing
is far
from
for
he says in
the Bamayana^^^
salvation for those
it
is
impossible to attain
dispute in ignorance
who
that
Hara
is
Hari.'
more
They
which
are both of
them
eleventh century
inscriptions of
11
^rar^a,^&>s^j5ji osifluj^sem
Uffa^Qssr
cissrei\sins(^
peeDL^onfinj uif^Q^Quirio
47
^^
One
of
meghan
in
the following
is
terms.
The
in
first
being, that
in
Attahhuyagaram
Kanchi,
Vairameghan
of long
submission of the
Tondas (people
of
Tondamandalam).
two
the
ruler of
Kanchi (Tondayarkon)
and another
Dantivarman
This
king
the Kashtrakuta
of
the name,
and not
Dantidurga
A. D.
the
Rashtrakuta dynasty
half
of
is
754.
The
latter
the eighth
century
a. d.
may,
therefore,
be
taken
as
The
earlier
[(jpi^LDn^sv suaSaCoLDsek
13
Yide Obapter
XIX
of
INTEODUCTORY
the latest for the
A. D. at
Chi-
dambaram.
was Kulobtunga
the son
of Rajaraja
II A.D.
work
of
is
renovation
clear from
This
Sanskrit
good
offices of
a Ramaraja
It
who
ruled after
Krishnaraya.
this
was
teacher
(acharya)
came
in
contact
In his commentary
on Vedanta Desika's Yadavdbhyudayavi, this scholar says that he took up the work of a
commentary on this kavya at the instance of Pinna Timma, grandson of Ramaraja. The
Ramaraja
referred to
is
clearly the
one that
fell
49
Timmaraya on
Kumarata-
namrtam
whose
ruled
till
was a
disciple of
tarya, popularly
Kotikanyakadanam Tatachar,
was Vankatapatiraya,
patron
who
a.d. 1614. It
We
vicissitudes
this
I
five
centuries at least.
The
as
now
the dates
many
now
appear
absurd,
What
study
wanted, therefore,
for
his-
and organized
60
krit, in
INTRODUCTOKY
a
way
that will
facilitate
work both
literary
and
historical.
done by one
requirements.
tion of a
man He
all
own
collabora-
number
of others.
student engaged
himself
in
keep
phical
and
literary
an archaBologist
that
is
but
any one
the three by
in
himself
beyond
This
is
human
possibility
most
cases.
In point of
litera-
ture
also
am
concerned with
literature
the collection
Most
India
editions
till
of
in
and
It
the
Bombay
5i
The advan-
The
also
to choose from
noted.
the variety of
this
is
comments
are
When
well
ately done
What
then
is
such editions
To
or
two.
Tne
to
learned editor of
the Silap-
jpadliikaraMy Pundit
taken care
lines
give in
footnote thirteen
canto,
he consulted.
He
have been
ticulars.
many
refer
parto
These
thirteen
lines
him
by
the
author,
with
same incident
in other
INTRODUCTORY
Similarly in staaza fourteea of Kalidasa's
is
the reference to
infcerprefca-
struck
whole,
me
;
that the
to
tioa of the
as applied
for in
DianagaMallinatha
oharya,
was forced
the alternative
iaberpretation
the commentator
The
I
whom
no bar
to the slesha
entendre).
Bombay
edition of the
The
result is
falls
to
the ground so
Hemadri may be
right or
Mallinatha
to building
but he
who
reads with
a view
up a hypothesis
of
in history
ought
to have
an opportunity
Then he formulates his hypothesis at his own risk. Further down Mallinatha lays down that the three slokas which he comments on are
commentaries.
interpolations.
He
so,
tell
us
why he
thinks
There
is
a great
and
5S
examining
with a
genuine
from the
alleged,
often
This no doubt
is
If the record of
in
The
defect
from an insufficiency
of
information
men and
is
of the period
he
is
dealing
This
on in
It is in regard to
took occasion to
make
the remark.
This defec-
among a
work.
our
class of scholars
is
engaged in research
the
It
traceable to
importing
of
owH
ideas
to periods of
H
no means
hatkatha.
of
INTRODUCTORY
having,
full
information.
To
Dandi
to the
We
have
knowledge
of the work.
is
The Kathasarithis
;
sagara of Somadeva,
tion;
stories
professedly a transla-
Brhatkathamanjari
collection of
a third version
;
and
an
Tamil translation
of
it,
which
is
of
antiquity which
may be prior to
that of the
now
known Sangam works. Professor Speyer, a Dutch scholar, who has made a critical study of
the Kathasarithsagara has, on the strength of
the supernatural powers ascribed to Nagarjuna
in
the w^ork,
referred the
Brhatkatha to
This
is
power unless a considerable interval had The inference would certainly be elapsed.
tuial
55
all
people
an equal degree
All
periods
history.
the
world
over,
and
play
stage
in
regard to
all
religions,
miracles
particular
an
of
important
part
;
at
development
in
the
enlightened
faith
it
who
have
ism.
full
in
occultism and
spiritual-
This
is
that
makes
several
Indian
the inexerts
fluence
belief
transmigration
how
interwoven
is
in all
the varying
that
what
strikes
them
as absurd
quite
obviously
ries.
believable
even by
contempora-
That
this has, as
a matter of course,
if
Tamil
liter-
the Brhatkatha,
sirukappyam
or
minor
kavya
called
Udayanan
Jcadai or
INTRODUCTOKY
work which gave
the
This work
is
of
of
my
arguments
hence
Sangam
to the earlier
centuries
this
of
the
Christian
era
work
ought; to be referable
to a period
Kan-
which there
is
yet considerable
any yet
of
because,
Somadeva, the
translator
the
Brhatkatha, says in so
many
of
language
It
would be
an
essential pre-requisite.
This consideration
There
is
work
57
both.
In the absence
translation
of
the original,
if
the
Sanskrit
would go
namely,
problems
Indian History
in
so
many
fanciful
ways by great
thamanjari to
scholars.
Vikramaditya-Vishamasila,
who
of
us.
Mlecha
trouble,
and came to
Vishnu or Siva,
it
This question
is
here.
My
Now
more
object
is
or to formulate a
new
historical hypothesis.
the
to
literature
the country,
with a view
making them
capable
of.
Inscriptions
and archaeological
58
INTEODUCTORY
all
Besides, there
is
vernaculars.
to, his
country to do
power to advance
In addition to
the discharging of a duty, this study of literature will be a source of pleasure even to busy
people.
Here individual
effort
if
can take us
But
made
to
volume
CHAPTER
I.
The
sion
of
a distinct expres-
to
the
southernmost
goes
portion
to
our country,
of
India,
back
in
its
the
days
the
its
Mahabharata
authority.
all
present
it
form, for
That distinction
has maintained
through historical
present.
times
even
of
down
is
to
the
The
whole
India
roughly
what
is
now known
as Hindustan,.
in olden times
included in
Uttarapatha.
In days
when
the
Vindhyas
was
somewhat
compilation of
the Mahabharata in
what we now
60
BEGINNINGS OF
Sahadeva in
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
eldest
Pulindas,
into
marched
southwards
from
them
the
Pandya country.
wards towards the
Mahabharaba Kambb.
3^.Rr^n^imH
%i^^
^ f^^r^
II
?<^
ii
^R^H^d
(Mahabharata
(See also
SI.
70-76)
61
went to oa
this frontier
was Kish-
kinda, (the
modern Hampi).
to
w^as
river).
that he
came
on the Narmada
Similarly in
2
the
Sugriva
5ET?^ t%?:h
^^ ^[^ri^^cTiger^
=^
H^rviwt ^rff^f^R^iT^
II
^
o
II
3T^^^[JT5Rff =^ ^l^^rgq^^rT
II
II
Rishikaa
for Rishfcikan.
in the texfc is
an obvious
error,,
^ ^^4
^i%(lf
Rfla'm'^^dJM:
II
II
^^*^rK<^t<*i^mj|F^RHTR'T
II
II
'62
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
them the
in the
Madyadesa which
into
flows in a circle
and
He
obviously
three
portions
the
region
the Vindhyas
then
of
the
^iwq^r
II
? v9
II
II
<i
II
3^
^^13 qiD^r?rt
^rTF ^^q^r
^mv.
w ?
ii
^J|^Hkd<
cT5r
||
^^Ri^qiFr: ^R[?r^[|[
(Vaimiki
^m^\ IR ?
II
Bamayana
63
on
the one
side,
Vanga,
Then he
which
is
Dandakaranyam
in
in
the
hill
sage
Agastya.
river,
is
Then
Then
generally
Kapatapuram
the
hill
in
Tamil-
Then
is
described
Mahendra
The
Vayu,
older Paranas
^
such as
the Matsya,
same
lines.
In respect
of these works,
however,
like
it
would
a chrono-
XLV
si.
70 onwards to the
the above.
64
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
ifc
logical inference,
though
may now
be taken a&
agreed
thafe
referred
is
the
fifth
century B. C.
still
matter of great
is
doubt as to
what exactly
what on a
better footing
than tbe
Maha-
made
in respect of
of these
of
works can be
any chronological
of the
datum.
names of the divisions stated above is a matter of some importance, the references do not
enable us exactly to
fix
We may
state roughly, however, that these were probably divisions definitely formed
and familiarly
Another class
of literary sources
is
which can
the Buddhist
generally.
and Buddhist
literature
The countries in India which figure among them have reference to about sixteen kingdoms and a few tribal republics. Arranging
65
The
the
does
not
take
much beyond
reflected
dramas
to
of
Bhasa.
'
The
our
verse
merely
refers
a wish
mt^j
Bajasimba
from sea to
bring
sea,
the
whole
of
the earth
now
Grammarian Panini the south was a land unknown. The countries farthest to the south mentioned by him are Kachcha,
that to the
3
(I,
63. 12)
The Mabahbarata in another place refers to A^maki a Yddhava princess married to Prachinvan
of
the Godaveri
A^makn.
66
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
None
Vindhyas. Ail " these are in fact states on the back of the
The
VartikaoQ Panini
of
Pandus
extended by Katyayana to
apply to the
Oholas
and
others.
Coming
down
of
to Patanjali,
we
find a very
much more
he
them
which
of the
the extreme
south.
There
besides the
down
7
used to denote
it
hence
is
possible
Bombay Gaz.
Vol.
I, Parfe 2, p.
13839.
6?
noroherners.
about.
Katyawats
yana
fairly
350
B.
C, South
in
India
well-known
while
the
days
of
was
practically
unknown.
to
Coming down
torical
more
following
at
definitely
his-
works,
the
extract
from
Magasthenes shows
knowledge
ed
tion
of the
any
rate
that
some
him.
He
says,
obviously,
that
Herakles
daughter in India
whom
he called
Pandaia,
To
lies to
sea
365
villages,
village each
queen might
men whose
who
for the
payment-
He
68BEaiNNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
and
130,000
infantry,
fishery
and
for
possessed
pearls,
treasure in the
The Arthasastra of Chanakya, referable to the same time as Magasthenes, has two references known to me to the South. Speaking of pearls and their quality, Chanakya refers to
Tamravarnika " that which
is
produced in the
6,
Tamravarni
is
"
;
Pandya Kavataka
that which
(p.
86
of
Mr.
Shama
"this
has
^
is
a door-way of the
Pandyas/
of tho
a fine
BamayaDa.
plains
it
extha^
as a
Pandya
country.
mountain.
sion
It
sea.
69
which the
southern
commentafcor explains
rightly
as
Madura, and
other places
figures
it
may
among
cloth
remarkable for
the Tamil
cotton fabrics
Kalinga,
name
(p.
for
94, Ibid).
Next
Asoka do
specifically
Mauryan Empire.
Three
of
his
rock
II,
edicts
V, and
II.
S^iD,
*
XIIL
Everywhere
in
fehe
among tbo^e
natioz^s
who
has founded
two
(2) kinds
of hospitals,
men and
some
for
And
of
*
the
enjoyment
V.
called
men and
beasts.'
Now a
Sacred
Law
have formerly
70
BEGINNINGS OF
exififcef?.
S. I
INDIAN HISTORY
anointecl
thirteen-
not
Now, when
had been
Law.
They
are busy
among
all seofcs
Uw,
and happiness
my
loyal
subjeots,
as
among
and
which are
my
neighbours,'
of the
XIII.
gods holds
the chiefest,
And
that}
neighbours,
of the
ewen as far as
six
Kings dwell,
viz,,
he called
Turamaya, be
called
Maka, and ho
where tho
;
Aiikasudara*
turther
in the south,
as far as
Tambapamni
like-
wise where the king dwells, among the Vi^as, Vajris, the
Amdhras,
and
Pnlidas
everywhere
they follow
the
respect to the
Sacred Law.
Even those
to
whom
the
messengers of
Law,
Magas
of
Gyrene,
d.
258 B.C.
(5)
Alexander of Bpirua,
272? 258
B.C.
71
will
in future.*
(Buhler
in
Epigraphia Indioa
refer
II).
These
edicts, it of rulers
will be seen,
to
number
and by implication
into two groups
to the
They seem
:
those
whom
to
on terms
Among
Kambojas,
the
them along the north-western frontier. The Yonas, must have been the Greek state of Bactria and the subordinate chieftaincies thrown out from there perhaps in the Kabul Valley and elsewhere, where they
Gandharas,
out.
The Kambhojas
are
Kashmir extending downwards. The Gandharas were the people in the region westward of
is
Kabul and India along the Kaibar way. The other two regions mentioned are the Rashtikas
72 BEGINNINGS
OF
The
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
and Pitenikas.
whom
Mahrattas
There
is
country
may
be originally
traceable
if
to them.
It is a little
more doubtful
the
same could be said of Gurjarashtra (Gujarat) and Pitenikas,^ the country round about
Paitan on the Godaveri.
We
sin
King Pryadarindependent
and
his
neighbours
the
his vassal-kings in
They
are respectively
is
considered
unsound
Sans.
Pritbishtana,
beoompossi-
73
TJraiyur.
following extending
line
drawn from
extending northwards
it
and including in
of Travancore,
siderable portions
Malabar.
The
Satiya-
immediately north
of this
Law.
of
level
(God), grandson
Chandragupta.
of the
empire
of
Asoka.
Coming down
to edict V,
which
relates to
"My
loyal
among
all
and then
74
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
sub-^
him.
him perhaps tributary states under The Edict XIII on the contrary makes
between his empire and
all
the division
his
neighbours the
Pandyas.
He makes the further distinction of those to whom the " Messengers of the Beloved of the Gods'* are sent, and those to whom t'ley do not
go.
The
of
best
commentary upoa
cbis arrange-
ment
his is in the
Mahavamsa
of
Ceylon
whera we
"When
brought
illu-
Conqueror, had
month Kattika he
sent
The
Mahishamandala.
thera
To Vanavasa he
to
sent the
Aparantaka
75
Yona named Dhammarakkhita to Maharattha (he sent) the thera named Mahadhamhita,
marakk
Yoaa.
He sent
and
to
Sona and
the
theras
The
Itthiya,
Uttiya,
Sambaia
*
:
and
shall
Bbaddasala his
he
sent
disciples,
charge
Ye
(Geiger's
Maha-
command
purpose
Asoka to various
Enlightened
One
to those regions.
Among
the territories
Then
which in
this
may have
to be identified with
Mahishis
name Mahishamandala
to
of
is
equal application
now Mysore,
as
w^ill
The next
76
BEGINNINGS OF
is
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
is
region
Vanavasa, which
in the
the Banavasi,
12,000
district
southern
Mahratta
Then comes the region of the northern Konkan coast and that is Aparanta. Then comes Maharashtra then
country and Mysore.
;
of the
immedi-
Beluchistan.
Then comes
which
is
Suvarnabhumi,
with
the
gold-producing
province
the
(the
Malaya Peninsula
Chryse
important of
history of
and
Tennassarim
;
last
and most
it
Ceylon, because
in
is
the
Buddhism
Ceylon that
is
the
This enumeration of
Asoka
of states in
tions. If the
Mahishamandala
for
which there
is
is
good
reason,
then Banavasi
the
SOUTH INDIA A DISTINCT ENTITY
southerniDOst
limit,
77
and
we
find
India
This
is
somewhat less directly from the Mahavamsa Duttagamani Abhaya on the occasion itself.
of laying the
Stiipa (Thupa)
had called
for
an assembly
of
most of the leading Buddhists from the various Buddhist centres. In response to this invitation there assembled
:
Bhikhus from
1 Indagutta
Maghada).
Dhammasana
3 Fiyadassi
60.000
,,
Jatarama-vihara(Viharaoufc
side of SraTasti in
Nepal
Tharai.)
4 Urubuddharakkhite 80.000
Mahavana
(in Vai^ali.)
7 Mittinna
160,000 A^okarama in
Pupphapura
(Pataliputra or Patna.)
XJtti^ria
280.000 Kashmir.
78
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
Pallavabbogga(tbe Eief o! the
Pallavas
Gujarat,
9 Mahadeva
460.000
probably
also
in
regions of
tbe Indus).
10 yonamahadbammarakkbita
,.
30,000
Alasanda,
the city
of
the
many
Alexandrias,
Alexandria
near
Kabnl,
tbe
Jhelum and
or
tbe
Indus
Karachi^
which
was
itself
one
of
tbe Alexandrias.
11 Ubtara
.,
60.000
Eoad
of the
n d b y a n
forests.
12 Gbittagupfca
30.000
Bodhimanda-vibara
Bodhgaya).
13 Cbandagupfca
80.000
Dharwar
dist.)
14 Suriyagufcba
96.000
Kailasa-vibara
which
may
Ellora
the
present
or
Nizam's
dominions,
Amaravati, Guntur.
(Opusciti pp. 193, 194.)
1
79
will
Buddhififc centres
382
on the basis of
This position
is
passing on to that, we
this Ceylon chronicle.
may
This
a chronicle
of
many
monk,
Mahanaman, Tnat was done obviously in commentary upon the earlier, but somewhat
less classical
stops short
Dipavamsa
is
believed to
meanmg
gospel).
of various
portions
it
of
the
Buddhist
Thus while
is
possible
80
BEGINNINGS OF
we could have
any rate
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
doubt that
it
rity,
little
belongs
if
at
not
earlier.
is
unconsciously expounded
Tamil
literature.
We
shall pass
on
(^.HAPTER
Till recently
II.
INDIA.
Buddhist
edicts at
Emperor.
vara
hill in
The
discovery
of
his
Mysore
in
The
copy
of Asoka's edicts in
Maski, in the
the
contention
of
those
that
maintained
that Asoka's
territory
actually
This
discovery
is
of
the highest
historical
of
those at Sahasram
and therefore
of
a time
^
somewhere about
The
Mysore
1
edicts
seem
If then,
as the
Hyderabad Arcbselogical
81
Series
No.
1.
p. 3.
82
BEGINNINGS OF
edicts
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
was a
southern
Maski
shew,
there
if
Mahamatras,
itself or in
2
Ancient Kuntala,
when
far did
shed upon
source,
and
that
is,
classical
Tamil Literature.
let this
Before proceeding to
necessary to
light in,
is
it is
know what
exactly
the present
which
is
later
than
The Tamil
of the Peninsula,
Pahdya kingdoms,
The
may
be des-
mouth
of the
2 Para. 1. Ibid.
83
of the
Tuluva country,
southern
Satiyaputra.''
In
regard to
on the information
This correctness
is
furnished by epigraphy.
Tamil
of
which
is
the
Anglo-Indian
(old forest of
of Palaverkkadu
This
ture
is
referred to in Ancient
Tamil
the
litera-
as
Verkkadu,
'
withouG
adjective
for *old
This
Mamular
in
Kurcmtokai 11,
84
is
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
Vadukarmunai, the
*
usually described as
territory.
When
changes
The
limit on
Konkanam
^,
Nannan
which
Mamulanar
in
Aham.
210/11,
Mamalanar
5
in Ibid 31.
Aham
16.
&
Narri9ai 391.
Aham.
QufTGfTuQ
GairsKircSiircsr
jBGarcar
15.
Mamulanar
emeariQ/Z.
ojwQfffT
i3d^Qp
ueuCoff.
Perungadungo,
85
was broken into by a new people Ko^ar, as a result of a war in which Nannan obviously
suffered defeac^
and
Thus
then,
Tamil
literature
ascribable to
about the
first
The Dekhan,
or Peninsular India,
was inherited from the latter by Asoka, whose only recorded war was the conquest of Kalinga;
and
it is
of
ifc
was effected by
Mr. Vincent
Taranatha (Scheifner p. 89) attributes to Bindusara and Chanakya the conquest of the
country between the eastern and western seas,
6
potest
Paraoar
in
Kuruntogai 73.
86
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HIBTORY
of
The
Femained so
three
no
further
direct
lio
information
than the
inference
we
extent of
of
of the south.
Among
to tradition,
J?1T2?#
(J.
'
B. A. S. 1909
p. 29).
'
BoIe sovereignty
in four years
As a matter of fact
is
very doubtful
a fact
if
at
all
as rook
p.
162,
note 4)
and
sisters.
87
of the
character
poems which
all of
various collections,
them generally
'
re-
imprimatur.
Without basing
his
antiquity
upon the
fact, that
enough
elder
contemporary perhaps
and an exact
contemporary
of
*
of the
Nannan, the
Woman
He
is
re-
number
references
to the
at least as far
south as
Madura and
belonged
to
his
the
part
by
presence,
that
the
country
round
the
Podiyil
Ghats
in the
South-West
parts of the
88
BEGINNINGS OF
The
first
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
this
reference
ia
author to
call
^or notice is in
Aham
15
refers
to the entry
of a
warlike
Kosar into
the
of
Tulu
Nadu
of
Nannanagain
Aham
251
to these
admihistered a
upon
their
On
not
*
this occa-
poet,
Mohur
having sub-
mitted,
the newly-installed
Mauryas came
the rolling
up
at the
head
of a
great army,'
^ Vide note 3.
eSeareffffaaS'
Qpa^iasu^u i3t^^^nsk}&^
Aham
text obligingly copied by him.)
261. Mamijlanar.
Iyer's
89
way along
refereace
to
the
enormous wealth
is ^^ of is
the
refe-
another
poem 265
passage
In
this
given the
information, which
is
the wealth of
first
the
in
Ganges-*
'
Hence the expression Vamba Moriyar the Maurya novae hominae is justified in respect
of this author,
Poem
i^ga<Jiiu^
^stDLOnj,?
Q-9^QjU(SB)n
inn^iEiQsrT&oQedn
Compare
90
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
same work, contains
These
last
details.
are
Vadukar
in
ples)
(Northerners
but
(2)
way
across a
high
hill
which barred
suggests
their way.
The
ex-
the
latter
even
tunnel
being
cut
through.
the
consideration
to the
in
these
references of
(1)
Mamulanar
Mauryas are
South by
of
The
being Podiyil
11
s'2eifT(^ff
Hill
in
the
S.W. corner
Vide
laafc
two
lines of note 9.
Abam,
281.
text.)
(Maham
Swaminathaiyar'g
MAUBYAN INVASION OF SOUTH INDIA
Madura.
(2)
91
of the inva-
(3)
The
are referrable.
In regard to point
are
1,
quite
clear
and unmistakeable.
He
is
One
of
them
is
Library
of
Aham
name
as
reference
su(SS)iruSp(h ^siarpsortrfTttit^
Qustecu J7a.
Aham
13
69. Paramkorranar*.
Puram
* Another reading
:
Gutt^ ujir.
92
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
by
Adan Ungan has an equally clear to the army of the Maury as cutting
middle
ously
of the world.
reference
their
way
The commentator
obvi-
The
is
<3omment
reading.
The manner
clear that
The
is to a lover
his
sweetheart,
and
brought in
her
much
in
is
husband
of
historical
In respect
of the
we have
One
9S
in Paranar,
a contemporary poet
with
Mamulanar,
states
that
this
warlike
tribe entered
Nannan's
in
which Nannan
lost
his
is,
state
elephant.
to
This
Nannan's
territory
according
certain
15)
Aham
Konkaaam (Tamil
Indian, Konkan).
Konkanam,
or Anglo-
That
took
in
is
parts
of
Konkan and
by the
fact
Canara
that
or
Tulu
borne out
one
(Aham 195 and Siliappadhikaram, Kongilangosar) till they reached the Podiyii Hill much
farther south.
refer
to
Mauryas,
Kurumbogai
73.
See
nofce 4.
3.
15 Narrinai
Mont D'Ely
of
fche
medieval writers. Yule's Marco. PoIo Bk. III. Cb. 24. note 1.
94
BEOINNINGS OF
army
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
The Ramayana con-
their
of invasion.
the
equivalent
of
:
following passage
Kumbakonam
Edn.)
The among
party.
of
city
of
The commentary
reference
river in
a circle
If
it
and
loses
in
the
sands.
is
data available to us in
the
this,
the habitat of
Kosakara
will
is
correspond to Assam.
explained by the com-
mentary called Tilaka, as a people engaged in the work of rearing silk- worms and manufacturing
silk.
If this interpretation
is
correct,
formed part
to be these
hill
fort
Pali of
Nannam
probabi-
Chola.
referred
Vada Vadakar (the Northern Northerners) in Puram 378,^^ and Vamba Vadukar (the new Northerners) in Aham
375.
^^
It is
of
ment
the northerners
reflected
16 0^sBrLJ/r;a>/f iSieo
s=tTiu
earppp a&raB^
Qs^fTLfisar
QsnuSei,
in
Puram
378.
Uupodi Payungudayar
honour
of
Qu^ioaasT
QfmLfpip
Ljffl<oB><S=U
UFTlf S^fS
Aham
96
in
BEGINNINGS OF
Narrinai 170,
of
^^ is
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
chief
Mullur
have
*
sallied
out
Aryas
'
to
the
fort.
We
and to
have
already referred to
Pulikat
as the limit of
the-
Aryan land
change
of
in
Kuruntogai
11,^^
this or the
Venkata
(Tirupati).20
These
Aryan invasions
and
chiefs
stemmed the
tide of
invasion suc-
the great
In this connection
same poet
ueO0L^ear Aifi^^
QeijirarQirrar Lofeoujear
20
Aham
3.
MAUEYAN INVASION OF SOUTH INDIA
97
Mamulanar refers, in Aham 115, ^i to a chieftain Erumai of Kudanadu (parts of Mysore and Coorg). The chief's name seems to have stuck on to the country so far as to make it
referrable in
of
Tamil
literature as the
territory
Erumaiyuran.
Eru-
frontier
satis-
notwithstanding
indentification
Dr.
of
Fleet's
factory
Mandhata on
was a
the
city
the
the
is
it
city of Kartavirya-Arjuna
but there
good
authority
equating
name with
usually
town
is
or state,
to
it
possible
understand
that
the
whole
This
is
only by the
What
the
is
is
that
references to
Aham
7
15/14 Mamulanar.
98
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
contemporaneous
or to almost
contemporaneous events.
The
one
side,
and the
crushing of the
lished
Vamba Vadukar
there by
(newly estabIlanjetchenni
norDherners)
refer to the
cannot
same
Maurya invasions
of
^^
^atmfSuj QuiBeiD^
oSloluld
Padirruppattu I
(i)
2325 &
II.
^^^^
Ljsa/D^H'
spL9p QpeSfiosr^LuTa^L^tu
earasrSiLi^ eSp^i^'^uu
CcariB^CffifujsSr
99
to
who
all
lay
claim
to
victory
Aryas,
and
having
and the
'^^^
tiger
layas.
All these
seem
to refer to action
taken
to weaken, to beat
also the
Southern
chat
their
(2)
that
northern borders
24
(^65)ifiiiJ
of
ajjemfDii-l^
lds^
[BeisT^LL(bi QjiT&rQjrruj
Qojik^m
Ibid. V. L.
35 siuQ<sO(LgSiu
eBuiiu
^lEjb^aS
Opue.
cifc.
XVII.
11. 1
&
2.
100
BEGINNINGS OF
and
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
(3)
beaten
become too
feeble or too
much
Coming down
any
direct lead.
do not give us
invasions are
these
references
is
historical.
see
the
line of
advance
Kongu,
Therefrom there
double
lur, to
objective,
of
its
having gone so
famous
historical
route through
Palnis
Mauryan
power
after
101
may
The invasion must have come through the later BurhanpurEoad, the ancient
Vidisa.
the
Tamil
(Sans.
Dandakaranyam .)
(1)
The infer-
ence
is
supported by
language,
(2)
which
cattle forays
(3) their
Dandaranyam
26
The surname
Amifcrachafees
fchafe
he was a
conqueror,
as the Greeks
his
knew him by
this
name
is
not clear.
It
In the Ramayaria
(VI.
for
Kum60.
bhakarna
is
described
as
Amitraghatin
97
Kumbh.
Edition.)
We
have no precedents
Gangai-
for Ajataisatrn.
1909
p.
34 &
p.
42f.)
102
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
and
Erythr^an
Sea^^.
the afctempt at
period intervening
Their dislodgnrienb
psmL^naof^iu^^m
QaiTLl.uLLL^Qi06S)u.6a)uu/i
Commentary.
Padirrupattu. VI.
28
u^sth,
extends in
coaBfc
the natives
".
many
desert
and
all
kinds of wild
beasts
serpents, hyenas,
and baboons
Edn.
p.
43.
103
internal
between the
being
and others
Madura.
of the
third
CHAPTER
J.
III.
east,
as
it
is
called,
to the west,
Our knowledge
of
India at
all of
a definite character
may
be
than a great
raid.
It
is
own
notion
owing to a
his
mutiny among
cavalry
his
soldiers
headed by
commander Koinos.
Before leaving
on
viceroyaUies as follows
101
105
in
it
;
the kingdom
that
of
of Taxila,
Porus
the
territories of the
son of Machetas
natfVe
of
Mouof
sikanos,
Agenor,
death
of
taken
called
away
in
Antigonus
the Diadochi.
When the
Macedonian Empire
in 321 B-C.
the
first
partition,)
the
left
Indian
out of
to the
account,
as Peithon
had
to
withdraw
100
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
river.
About 305
to
B. C.
Seleucus Nikator
made an attempt
Maurya emperor
believed to have
This personage
of
is
great
Alexander to
Nanda
in
Magadha, before he
In the course
set
known
to history.
to
of fifteen
make himself
so strong
Afghanistan up to the
generations
this
Hindu-Kush.
dynasty
held
For
its
three
power
the
undiminished.
great
His grandson
Asoka,
India,
Buddhist
hold his
Emperor
of
was
able
of
to
own
with the
successors
Seleucus,
and
107
seems to
and Ptolemy Philadelphus had sent ambassadors to the courts of Chandragupta and Bindusara,
who
mere
230 B. G.
With the death of Asoka about the Mauryan empire loses its hold
powerful and
of
distant
of
its
the
dynasty are
numbered.
From
this event
to
Imperial
yet
quite
Guptas, the
history of India
uncertain, although
we
a few
glimpses as
history
of
to
the
that period.
The
Asiatic empire
of the Seleucidae
About the
B.
beginning
Parthia
of
the second
century
C,
made
good
her
I,.
Mithridates
108
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
movements
of
the
nomad tribes in the far-off plains of Mongolia. The great tribe of the Hiung-nu fell with all
the hostility of immediate neighbours upon the
the
fell
plains
of
Zungaria.
These
in their turn
killed the
Wu-sung
further
of the Se,
chieftain in
and marched
had to make
of the
in the occupation
last
Oxus
The
Yueh-chi
of
were themselves
the late
fell
the son
his
Wu-sung
in
battle
When
father
with
the
Hiunglost
to regain his
patrimony.
was
in
movements that the Sakas and possibly some of the Hiung-nu moved down the
Kabul valley into India, and occupied the
country on the right bank of the Indus, another
p.
210
ff.
THE DAWN OF THE CHEISTIAN EEA
body
one
the
109
probably from
fehe
region of
Seistan
It is
coins
Muttra
While
all
this
forward a revolution of no
less
consequence.
was overthrown
by
Yegnasena Satakarni
of the
Dekhan.
The
:
(2)
against
(3)
a counter-claimant
of
throne of the
for the
kingdom
Vidharba.
all
Though
these,
time
successful against
or viceroyalty
of service
by
no BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
the occasion
of
Vikramaditya
of Saka.
As
to both
among
chi,
scholars.
shiftings
way
in
and
establish
kingdom
the
Punjab
ruler
including
Kashmir.
The
greatest
among them,
whose empire
came
Empire on
is
of
the
Buddhism
Learned scholars
eras above
others,
referred to,
who would dissociate him from either and refer him to a period later than both. None of them, however, take him beyond the
period I have marked at
the beginning.
At
1}1
Gujarat and Malva> including northern Konkan, were under the Sakas.
Buddhism
tion of the
be
re-
garded as appropriate at
Brahman ascendancy, on
in
the
Hinduism
maintains,
of the Gita.
on the authority
Tibetan
Baddharma-punschool
disciple of the
Madhyamika
indebt-
This
is
and
later
Hinduism.
all
During
this period
of
active
mutations
^ Manual of ladian
Baddbismi
p. 122.
1J2
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
South India would
politics,
This
is
infor-
The
and
edicts of
Ceylon
into
among
his
those
diplomatic
whom relations. He
with
he entered
thought
it
worth
put
son and
daughter ta
facts
it
Ceylon as
These
by
way
of
Chapter II that
also brought into
The Ceylonese tradition, as embodied in the Mahavamsa, is quite Between the in support of this conclusion. Maharashtra and Malva there was a great
of
way
land.
them.
This road
it
is
that
name
by
Most
likely this
over
the
hills
way
Burhanpur into
the
western Malva,
113
which
it
days
of
Harsha.
period,
During this
and
for a long
time
after,
Hindustan
Viudhyas)
way
of
land mainly
itself in
contact
of
by way
in
There
is iirst
who says
driven
course of a
quite a precise
and
is
colours
in
certain
and Tamil.
the latter
Among
the
places mentioned in
East Indian
110.
114
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
Kalahm (Burma) not to mention China. It may now be taken for certain that in the
sixth
and
fifth centuries
derable
intercourse
with
Babylonia
and
this
proof
It
of
would thus
very consider-
used to
have
is
warn
ships
mouth
oil
of the
huge
the
that
lamp.
classical
The
of
Periplus
and
knowledge
of a
The author
The
4
Periplus
The Early Oommerce of Babylon wifeh India 700 300 B.C. by J. Kennedy J.R.A.S. 1B98. pp. 241288.
:
edited by
translated
and
115
He
On
of
of
(The city
Min, Scythians)
It seems to
country
of
of
(Syrashtrene)
sailing across
what
the Gulf of
Kambay, he
Broach),
'^
With
this is
which
is
the beginning
0/ aZZ
the kingdom of
Nambanus and
India.''
This division
is
also
omission of some
The southern limit of this coast Tindis according to both. The corresponding
116
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
is
described in
the country
is
producing wheat,
butter
;
sesame
oil
and
clarified
made
therefrom
and dark
in colour.
The
chief
this
statement
of the
is
Periplus
is
under reference
of the
kingdom
of
Nambanus and
of all India.
The
latter expression
time
known
to the
In otherof
words,
it
the
Andhra empire
banus
itself is
Magadha.
Lambodara
of
the pauranic
list
of
the
of the
Dekhan.
these
The chronology
117
and
of
at
seems
Kshaharatta
culties of navigating
up
to the port of
Broach
for
the
between Barbari-
cum
at the
mouth
of the
Broach.
He
gives
Southern Afghan-
the
the
Gandaraei
people
in
Gandhara)
and
of Poclais
(Sans.
kalavati) both
the region
in
Pushbetween the
where
was
also
of
Alexandria.
He
gives an
interesting fact
118
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
Coming
as the for-
Ozene
(Ujjain),
and
refers
to
it
mer
royal capital.
Passing over
all
that he
is
not to
in Sec. 50 to
He
and so
Dachinabades, for
Dachan
*'
means
desert
south."
many
and
all
mountains
kinds
leopards,
tigers,
elephants,,
of
many
sorts,
far
as the Ganges."
and the
;
Dandakaranyam
modern
describes
division
the-
to our
thert
the Dekhan.
He
119
and
he
of
the
sea-ports
along
the
till
reached
of
the
first
marts
Damirica
he
calls
them
valent
the
Greek).
Damirica,
is
some-
the Sans-
perhaps a
little
far-fetched to see in
it
Tamito both of
lakam.
50
mouth of
a river
(Muyiri or Musiri of
Cranganore). Fifty
the
sea-port
of
south was
late
Mr. Kanakasabhai
with Nirkunram in
river,
it
we know
now.
The kings
of
The
120
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
*'
as
great
topaz, thin
clothing, not
coral,
much much
dealt
crude
but as
;
wine not
much
as at Barigaza
realgar
and orpiment
for this
is
not
by
the
merchants
there."
The
from
interior)
silk
ivory,
spikenard
from
the
Ganges,
Mala-
kinds,
diamonds
"
and
saphires
and
tortoise-shell.
(golden) and
compare
sifi^Q/SfTessf^ujiTiTS setoff
Qfns^ik^
L^iSBreoikisefteiB^ Quir&d!Bfiniis(^LLQjsar
uaeami,
Puram 343.
121
to
refers
district
^Taralia" generally
Pural,
coast)
is
;
taken as
first
equivalent to
in
this
the
port
coast
region
what he
with
Varkkali or Janardhanam,
which
in those
days had
sea-shore.
and a harbour.
also referred to as a
is
till it
offers
demned
criminals."
Then
follows
another
be the
of
differently
named
in
Ptolemy.
He
called
the
s&>ld
region
&i&r(ki(olsQQp
<9rffiiijffiTLjQuear^
6snLL^iT^;lfrijjfEiS6sar6safsa7 .
Ah am
148.
122
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HI8T0KY
(Tamil Aay).
he
calls
Then
of
follows
which
Karaiyar,
coast
is
Kareoi (Tamil
fisherfolk)
;
Karai or
a class
and
in
the
country
extending
of
from
Korkai upwards
spoken
by
Ptolemy
of
two
divisions.
The
country
the
Batoi
region according
'^
the pearls
at
gathered from
part of what
7
**
is
brought
Pliny says
(Chap.
glory
IX 5458.)
having pearls suspended from
of
Our
ladies
in
their fingers, or
ears,
two or three
their
delighted even
wif.h the
of the pearls
as
the
'
a pearl
worn by a
woman
ber.'
feet,
all
in public is as
good as a
this,
lictor
walking before
but
they must tread upon them, and walk with them under
foot as well,
once saw Lollia Paulina, the wife of the Emperor it was not at any public festival, or any solemQ< oeremonial, bub only at an ordinary betrothal entertainI
*'
Caius
123
by the Periplus
three
Caniara
be a Puduvai) and
stands for
vicinity.
is
doubtful whether
a place
in
it
Pondicherry or
the
or
Then Sopatma (Tamil Sopattanam fortified port). There come ships from
he
calls
what
Damirica
and
from
the
important statement to
covered
wreaths,
alfcernafce
layers
in
her
hair,
in
in
her
hracelets,
and on her
in all to
of
which
amounted
prepared
40,000(000 sesterces
prove
showing the any presents made hy a prodigal potentate, hut treasures which bad descended to her from ,her grandfather, and obtained by the spoliation of the provinces. Such are the fruits of
at
once to
the fact, by
Nor were
these
plunder and
extortion
It
was
for
all
this
reason that
M.
he extorted from the kings the which was, that he was denied the friendship of Caius Caesar, and took poison and all this was done, I say, that his granddaughter might be seen, by the
the presents which
result of
;
amount
124
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
make
of the
Tamils.
he men-
as
he
calls it;
these were
small
large
Those
and
to the
Ganges were
called,
according to
is
the equiva-
seems to
refer to
Suvarnnabhiimi
with the
Periplus
it
identified
of
by the
island.
That
indi-
Malaya Peninsula
in
clear from
what he says
;
regard
to
the
(Ganges) there
is
to
it
the
is
east
itself
called
Chryse
of
all
and
the
it
has
the
best
tortoise-shell
places
on the
Erythraean Sea.
these
made
what
in
is
Damirica
got
part
of
from
125
Then
he
proceeds
to
mention
this,
according to
Ptolemy
the
of
the Periplus)
Aruvalar
known
to the
Vada
of
Talai
(northern
or
less
take us
more
to the
of
mouth
Maisalos
Ptolemy,
of this coast, the
Of the trade
ant ports are
most importto
set
the
three referred
of
already,
and
the
imports
trade
are
down
part of what
is
Egypt comes here together with most kinds of all the things that are brought from Damirica
and
of those
that
are.
carried through
Paralia."
We
at
Kaveripatam
126
'pali
BEGINNINGS OF
*'
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
from distant lands
beyond the
came
from, the
The
produce of the
;
regions
all
;
that
is
grown on
from
of
articles of food
llam
or Ceylon in
Kala-
kam
ment
Burma."^
like a re-state-
in a
of
what
is
found
Such was
is
Internal condition
To
among
later.
'
the
three
crowned kings
'
and seven
chieftains, with
an
There were
Pattinappalai
II.
127
ff.
p. 27.
127
open
middle regions of
hills
and
forests
belonged to
The
east
coast
from
the Zamindari of
its
northern viceroy-
Tirukoilur, in the
chieftains
a class
of
often loyal
supporters
their
suzerain,
occasionally
of the
Chola kingdom lay that of the Pandya, which extended from coast to coast, and embraced
within
its
South
borders
Madura and
of
of
This incllided in
it
the
Aay
hill
and
of
Korkai
the do-
in Tinnevelli,
besides
128
BEGINNINGS OF
of
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
fche
mains
Pehan
their
of
round
sphere
Palnis which,
influence
as
comes under
well.
of
North
this
Chera a
:
territory stretching
out
among
was
number
of
chieftains
corresponding
allegiance
to the
at
Arayam, Pari
of
Parambunad,
of these
Adiyaman
of the Kolli-
of
malais.
The
first
was
within the
of
Mysore
his
territory proper,
to the
The northern frontier of the Tamil land was held by Nannan of the Tulu country in the West, and Pulli of Vengadam (Tirupati)
south.
in the
east, the
further north
having been
Dandaconten-
ranyam
tion
(Sans.
Dandakaranyam).
of
When
129
supreme under
throne, probably
Karikala,
affcer
who
defeating
Pandya
in a battle at
in the
Vennil
Tanjore
(Koilvenni as
district.
it is
now called)
He was
in
many
been handed
down
to posterity as a beneficent
and
port
wise
monarch.
for the
He
constructed
the
embankments
coast.
taken along
with those
period of the
south.
fiirst
In the reign
successor
a great
and
the
city
and
of
But
the
rival.
This
stead-
alliance
the
Cholas
in
good
reign
with a
him,
which
his heir-apparent
won
for
130
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
at
Pandya combined,
When
Puhar was destroyed there was a civil war, owing perhaps to liUe uatimely death of the young Ghola prince
region.
;
for
He
to
some power
surely
The
ascendancy
under
the
Eed-Chera
;
one generation
successor
the Pandyas
rose
to
importance
suffered
and
imprisonment
his
hands.
lasted
This
on somewhat longer
in
the
Pallavas
Kanchi.
of
This
gravity
in
course
in
of
centre
south-
India
is
borne out
very important
Mahavamsa,
According
to
this
work,
the
of
131
century
On one
to
Ceylon and
set
them
work
it. ^
at
'
the Kavery
'
as the Chronicle
has
of
much
like
an exploit
was he who
King
Gajabahu
of
of
temple to the
'
Chaste Lady
(Pattini Devi) at
The ascendancy
Pandyas
^
of
the
Chera,
however,
to
the
son,
elephant look,
at
'
who was
figured
his father's
viceroy
Tondi,
and
of his predecessor in
He was
designated
With
this
Upham'8 Mahavamsa,
Vol.
i,
p.
228.
132
BEGINNINGS OF
to
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
ascendancy
mishap
passes away.
their
The Pandyans
of
Madura bake
the
position of
hegemony up
This, in brief
and
iu very general
of
history
South
India
at
the
beginning
condition of India,
we have already
If,
des-
cribed the
principal sea-ports,
both on the
as has been
many
of
thriving ports
foreign
trade
at
considerable risk
so
there was
much
enterprise
in sea-going
itself,
among
the conclusion
on examihave been.
appears certainly,
of
to
Petronius that
Roman
'
ladies
exposed
their
charms much
too immodestly
by clothing
wind', as he
themselves in the
webs
of
woven
133
India
drained
the
Eoman
empire
which sold
India.^i
^
at
He
we pay
our luxuries
and
our women.'
That the
industrial arts
most scep-
six groups
commerce and
re-
and
importance.
Flourishing
which was
weaving then,
as
iti
Mommben
gives tha
fcofcal
11.000,000, 6,000.000
lor Arabia,
11
5,000,000
for India.
1.
pp. 150-1.
184
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
we
find
of
mention
rats,
of
manufactures
from the
parti-
wool
which
was regarded as
are
cularly
of
silks
warm.
There
thirty
varieties
distinctive
appellation of
The character
is
indicated by the
and,
sloughs of serpents' or
as
'
those
The
The
produce of the
of
soil like
the
best pearl
are
purchased
from
spikenard
the east,
transparent
stones
of
from the
islands off
all
or
from
This
the
is
Damirike.
135
There
is
great resort
of shipping to this
port for
bathrum
the
and
at
wheat, not for sale but for the use of the crew.
is
in
Tamil
litera-
ships of
the
Yavanas,
and
of
Puhar
' :
Horses
gold and
precious stones
seas
and
coral
from
The
;
produce
of the region
12 See note 6 p.
120 above.
; ;
136
all
BEGINNINGS OF
that
is
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
of the
Kavery
and the
i^
articles
of food
manufactures
Kalaham
(Burma),
^ere
The products
Tondi
in the
of
Tondi
(East
or
Chola
Eamnad
Dt.) are
aghir (a kind
silk,
camphor,
and
teams
these
articles
and
salt
were
carried
means
of
wagons drsiwn by
along through
com-
Tolls were
paid on the
many months.
brisk
to
They
of
did
officials
which
PaUiaapalai, 127
ff,
go
p. 27.
137
measured and
them
their
own
ships; and
have
attained
some
proficiency,
of
experts
artisans from
Magadha,
racta),
mechanics from
^^
ters
artisans of the
of a
Tamil land.
There
is
mention
In
in the
same
city, built
by the Gurjjaras.^^
and
in
the
providing
missiles,
both for
Twenty-four
Manimokhalai, Canto
I,
xix,
11*107 and
ff.
16 Ibid xviii.
145.
138
BEGINNINGS OF
and
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
religious
which we have
so
been considering, we
The Cholas had their capital at Uraiyur, with Puhar for an alternative capital and chief
port
;
the
Pandyas
had
their
capital
at
Tondi.
their
premier
viceroy,
who was
or at least a
bulk very
and
literary traditions
the
period.
to
From
UraiyQr)
Madura
it
more
arid parts of
in the state
Kodumbai
Nedumgulam
three branches.
close to the
and
led
up to Madura
in
Prom
this last
139
went up the
and down
town
least,
of
Vanji,
situated
near
its
;
mouth.
one at
safe in
all
parts alike,
being certain
portions
of
them that
who were
thing to
lose,
impalement.
frequent
for
the
or
less
pilgrimage,
or
in
learning,
for
the
commerce.
held before
The
them
high ideals of
government.
Their absolute
*five
great assem-
generals, heralds,
and
ambassadors.
140
BEGINNINGS OF
Mahamatras
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
as the
ly viceroys of
Brahman
;
durbar
to speak his mind in any and these Brahmans often gave out
their opinions
most
fearlessly.
This privilege
also to
men
of learning.
A Brah-
man
to be present at the
army
in
some northern
him.
was
told,
had given
the
The
Brahman
years of
his
little to
to come.
was
countermanded, and
make
A young Pandya
it
to the lot
one
of
him
of
141
war
craze.
If
language
The next
instance takes
Vaiyyavikkonperum-Pehan who neglected his wife Kannaki. A number of poets of the first
rank interceded and restored him to her.
next case that I will mention here
poet,
is
The
that of a
who enjoyed
rulers.
Chola
He
found that
aCt
the end of
to
was about
The
poet
name
defeat,
of the
Cholas,
quite as
much
as the
to
for the
cei'-
vanquished one.
tainly effective.
The
These
intercession was
illustrations
show
in
commanded.
refer-
more
illustration to
show
17
this respect.
red to already,
This
is
came
He
Maduraikkaoji,,
one
142
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
war against a combi-
had immediately
to go to
The young
prince in a poem,
full of
them
that
that he
if
would return
fail,
victorious and
his court
he should
the poets of
cease to
The
their
them
in those
utmost to attain
;
ideal
or bad
upon
Oh the
is
king he
is
if
blame
it
the
rains
fail
he
to
blame
woman
estate,
go astray.
except
What
is
there in a king's
anxiety,
of a
perpetual
that
people should
for!'
king
of patronage.
was doubtless
to
check
instituted.
It is a
143
information
regarding
this
period.
This
is
of the origin
Tamil
literature
;
or
of
its
independence or otherwise
with the literature
of
or of its connexion
Sanskrit.
But
may
to
claim
votaries
demand
Women
had
the number of
women
poets indicates.
to
Nor
of
was
^
the
Brahman
the
sole
custodian
Jains, Buddhists,
Brahmans, Saivas,
all
*
lived together
and at
giving
da
(the
thunderbolt
of Indra),
Baladeva,
144
BEGINNINGS OF
Chandra,
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
Subramanya, Sata-
Surya,
Siva,
and Sans
of love),
:)
Jina or Nirgratha,
Kama
(god
and
Yama
viharas
(God
of death).
There
were
built
seven
reputed to
have been
of the gods, in
which
dwelt no less
The temple
of
Yama was
The
three
of
systems
of the
the Jains
each with
own
clientele
unhampered by
its
own holy
A devout
him with
great
respect.
He was the
the Veda)
fire,
lore,
{i^^Py
sacred
of the
state
he
was
the
person
to
who
the
perfordifficult
rain..
med
orthodox
145
These are the terms in which these heterodox He had a function in writers refer to him.
society
and he discharged
of the
it
faithfully.
The
was
the
heterodox,
in matters
bitter, as
Max
Muller
Animism seems
ant
parti in
to have played
an import-
Chaste
Lady
band.
'
was
called,
who
Her images
are preserved
in
temples
Dr.
up
images depict-
Ceylon
vogue,
women.
only
to
Sati
was
in
This
was
upon,
permitted
natural
woman,
to
who had
fall
neither
guardians
to bring
for
back
it
nor
children
up.
That
was not
i8
uncommon
p.
young women
to
J.E.A.S. 1909,
10
292.
146
BEGINNINGS OF
by
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
is
vouched
between
and the
husband had
festivals
lately
fallen
were celebrated
one
of the grandest
brated at Puhar-
my
facts
of
made
now
classical
writers,
Indian
the
literature,
and
Sanskrit,
first
and
group, Strabo
;
Sea was
60 but not
his
later
than A.D. 80
Ptolemy wrote
;
the Peutin-
in
A.D. 222.
later,
but
I
we
them
directly.
three
points,
taken
of classical writers.
147
made
on board, because
pirates'.
is
Later on
desirable
he says
place of
*
:
It
(Muziris)
pirates
not
in
call,
being
the
neigh;
bourhood,
who occupy
it is
and besides
for traffic'.
wares
an emporium,
Aioi
and places
Bakarai.
division
the
country
of
south of
Though Ptolemy does mark the of the Konkan coast extending northNitra (Nitrias of Pliny)
is
wards
of
and up
to
identified with
definitely accepted in
the
as
the pirates
;
in
his
time,
says
no
more
piracy,
of pirates at all
&c.
The
make
its
mention
ports in
the
neighbourhood.
The
bearing
148
BEGINNINGS OF
we
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
The Peutintwo
of this
Roman
The following
account;
of this coasfc
worth DotiDg
hundred cor-
sair vessels
on
take with
their wives
the whole
them sum-
call a sea
cordon,
that
is,
they drop
cover something
like a
hundred miles
of sea,
and
no merchant ship can escape them. For when any one corsair sights a vessel a signal is made hy fire or smoke, and then the whole of them make for this, and seize
and plunder them. After they have plundered them they let them go, saying, Go along with you and get more gain, and that mayhap will fall But now the merchants are aware of this, to us also !'
the
merchants
and go so well manned and armed, and with such great Still mishaps ships, that they don't fear the corsairs.
do
befall
them
at times."
He
'*
also notes in
:
respect of the
kingdom
of
Ely the
following
If
their estuary
having been bound for some other port, they seize her and plunder the cargo. For they say, You were hound
for
us,
somewhere
so
it is
else,
and
'tis
God has
all
to-
we have
no
a right to
your goods,'
this
And they
if
think
And
naughty customa;
149
Eoman commerce.
elaborate
Mr.
Sewell,
study of the
Roman
coins
found in India,
With Augustus began an intercourse which, enabling the Romans to obtain oriental luxuship
is
than that
plundered.
which
if
it
Bat
a ship
it
to
bo
to the
it
with
due
protection."
It
it
would be interesting
to note as
was in this neighbourhood that Ibn Batuta fell into the hands of pirates and was 'stripped to the very drawers.* That region continued to be piratical up to the days of Clive and Watson as we know. In the days of Sivaji it
continued to ba piratical
Teplied to
also, as he is said to have an English embassy protesting against this
'*
it was againat the laws of Conchon any ship or goods that were drivan ashore." The central Asian ambassador Abd-er-Razzak has something to say of pirates near the Calicut coast,
piracy
that
"
to restore
Marco. Polo
XXIV
and
XXV.
150
ries
BEGINNINGS OF
during
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
the empire,
of Nero,
who
died
A.D. 68.
3.
From
till
clined
4.
Prom
it
almost
entirely ceased.
5.
It revived again,
though
slightly,
under
the
He
also
infers
early emperors
was
luxuries
under the
Byzantines the commerce was with the southwest coast only, and not with the interior.
He
tion
differs
explana-
of this
and
and the
facili;
to
be
sought
of
the political
and
social
condition
Rome.
From an examination
of
my
we
find that
under great
rulers,
151
and thus provided the indispensable security This period can be shown to for commerce.
correspond to that of the
Eoman
empire from
Augustus to Garacalla.
find the
flux.
least,
we
at
So then
of
we may
most
still
find one,
of
the
potent
causes
this
of
tion the
Eoman
The
is
first
exploit of
the destruction of
compliment that the poets never miss an opportunity of bestowing upon this Eed-Chera himself is
of that littoral
security.
21
(1)
Qfi^gHuSluuQQjdj.
3.
(3)
II. 17. U.
56.
152
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
has
as the
Kadambas
page which
the
Kadambu and
^^
brought his
If this
enemies to
subjection to him.
view be correct,
with
it
security.
Prom
the body of
The Augustan
if
had been the tree-totem of this tribe. One tree in particular might have been regarded aa peculiarly sacred by the tribe like the famous Oak at Dodoaa of the ancient Greeks or the slightly less famous 0<ik trunk of the Saxons of tihe days
the country-date or
it
the
Kadambu
of
Charlfimagne.
153
fiud the
name
name
of
two individuals,
a
older
of a family.
of,
would
Ked-Chera, and
Gajabahu
of
Ceylon,
who
visited the
reign,
Ked-Ohera almost
according to
at
ruled
the
Allowing
for
the
difference
between
of the
the
Ceylonese date
of the
Nirvana
Buddha,
Gaja-
at
namely sixty
The Chera
Here has
to
ascendancy then would cover the latter twothirds of the second century A.D.
Among
hana.
found at Puhar was one dedicated to SatavaThis personage was the ruler in whose
court flourished the minister Gunadya,
who
work
was
the
author
of
this
stupendous
154
BEGINNINGS OF
stands
at
S.
INDIAN HISTOBY
all
which
the root of
romantic
or
rest
literature
in India,
whether in Sanskrit
any
of
vernacular,
and
may
It
be
of
the
the
world as well.
was a translation
fashion
in
of this
for
work that
set the
of
Tamil
epics..
the composition
the romantic
The age
question
matter under
investigation.
is
would place
earliest
D.
at the
date
about
of the
it
here
now but
;
only remark
this,
that one
has to be
Varahamihira A. D. 533.
This work,
MANI-
MEKHAL
the
A.
under which
also
deserves
to
be
investigated more carefully. So far investigations from different points of view only appear
to
confirm
its
the
possible correction
made
above.
155
vahanas
of
opinion the
power
of
the
Kushanas
also
same
period. In
South
of
the
Guptas in the
north
of the
of
the
Pallavas
Before closing, I
sions of a
scholar,
may
T.
refer
to
the conclu-
C.
Evans,
in
who has
a thesis,
period
Greek and
Roman
Anglo-American Magazine
cludes that "
He
conthere
usages
exist
and modes
of living
at the present
time
;.
of verifying
was as great
in that
this,
Commenting on
156
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
re-
is
correct, India
was the
of
of the Periplus, as it
the
most
active, industrial
and commercial,
teaming
in
the
poverty
least
of
its
millions
and the
powerful
that
politically.'*
He
that
further
of
follows
" the
it
economic
impossible
status
the country
of
made
any one
these
tical force
commensurate with
It
population,
of
was made up
and organised
they were
relatively
military
power only so
do so
in
;
far as
compelled to
unconcerned
While there
in these
is
that
fail
is
just
remarks,
some
of
them
to take
couQtry and
of
character
the
communications
157
that of
in
communities
inefficient
the
extreme.
It is true
perhaps that
they had
all
time
was
it
upon
it,
often
by
defending the
After
all
country against
is
there
the possibility
difference of
ideal in
organisation.
for
society
its
essentially
is
organised
certainly
of
peace and
requirements
for
defectively orgaIf
nised
purposes
war.
the
Hindu
society at
any
and
basis, it certainly
was on the
of
basis of peace
the
It
happiness
is
the
bulk
of
the
people.
this
ideal
as well as the
defect of
Hindu organisations
of
India.
It
is
not
to
understand by a comparison of
British
the
organisation of the
Empire
be
at
the
present
time
which
can
looked
German
empire, which,
to
at
any
shows
have been
It
organised upon
basis for
war.
ought
158
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
rather to be said to
an
of affairs that
and
this is evident
for
possible
available
to U3.
of the Periplus,
West own as
coast
were
against the
finally
Greeks on the
quished,
it
sea, and,
though
van-
These
instances
ought to make
us
pause
uneven
in
the organisation
Indian society.
may
quote
here an
a parti-
made
on
to a king,
one,
he
ought to
set before
him
at a
for
Here
is
translation of the
passage
as far as
159
English prose.
adorns the
the
single
eye that
of
Majestic
crescent face
for his
Siva,
string,
fortifications of the
may
of
count, elephants of
horses
exceediug
fleetness,
tall flags
and valiant
the
soldiers
of a
Majesty
monarch
with long
lies
of rectitude.
life,
Therefore
may you
be blessed
little
may
in
the sun.
it all
May
your power
of protection
show
the moon.
May
tial as
of the sea
washed
160
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
of Sendil
ashore
It
would only be
fair to
the ancients to
give
credit of their
having
CHAPTEE
IV.
This
Tamil,
the
eldest
among the sisterhood of languages known commonly as the Dravidian languages. In the
early years of the last
well
successful
body
'
the Augustan
Age
Tamil Literature' to
Christian
era-
them merely
;
re-stating
Caldwell's
conclusions
controvert
to this
made to
them and
higher antiquity
recent editors of
Augustan Age.
161
The
11
162
BEGINNINaS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
CaldwelTs Comparative
following
Grammar
to
allow
:
the
statement
remain
"
The
(the
Period of the
predominance
in intellect
of Jainas
predominance
was
the
literature,
College,
literary
association,
and
This
when
the
Kural, Chintamani,
and
classical
vocabularies
period
is
and
grammars
written.''^
"
much
earlier date
on almost unbroken
find the statement
We
any on
modification
in
Reinhold Host's
of the
Encyclopaedia
What
ever else
may
as
it
cation, by
religion, of periods
mast be
given
up
finds
no support
of
any
kind to
kept up.
16B
"
Literary History of
edition
II.
India
and
not
the
new
of
the
Imperial
did
Gazetteer Volume,
This
position
It
go
unchallenged,
however.
Pillai
of
was
Trivan;In
the challenge
first.
contributed
on
did
much
destruc-
constructive
period,
work,
to
this
particular
to
his
though
must be
said
credit that
he succeeded in fixing,
stones in
one or
two mile-
Tamil Literature.
eSorb
constructive
was
Mr. Kanaka-
working out
could hardly
the
as
main
lines
be
regarded
fixed.
standing, his
deal of
matter
which had
remained buried
and understood,
This work was
decade
of
if
accessible,
by but a few.
in
done by
last
him
the last
in
the
century
and
the
164
first
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
of the
present.
It
this
scholar^s
work
much
an
respected
European
place
Scholar^
occupying
honoured
upon
tha
position of
University,
much
force,
was the
whole
late
questioQ
the
various
periods of
Tamil
literature in
an
article
the
Age
of
Manikkavasagar.
it
Ona
small identification in
in
Augustan
particular
means a
against
it
in
a.
The letter
that he wrote
I
which
sent
him
to,
me
on,
thanks to the
man
make an
effort
at fixing this
Augustan Age
CHRONOLOGY TAMIL LITERATURE
:
165
from
of
my
point of view.
"
the
published,
again
in
somewhat
modified
with permission,
by
the
Tamilian Ar-
Tamil Antiquary.
the then
The
essay attempted to
set forth
"
of great literary
activity in
the existence of
"
of the greatest
Sangam
activity
was a prominent
politics".
(3) "
That
this age of
Senguttuvan
was the
find support in
what
is
known
of
India.
im BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
that contained in a
life
of
Senguttu-
Office, read in
meeting in
is
Ramnad
in
May
of
other
final
statement,
by Mr. Subramaniya
phisfe
in an
Ancient History of
propose attempting
of these
two scholars
and restate
my
my
it
position
requires
Taking the
for atteatioQ
point
that calls
is
that he
much
disputed
chronology,
question
167
fiDally.
The
who had
gations before
*
him most
As has been remarked already the dates when these poems were composed are not given
anywhere.
To
settle this
amount
of probability,
we
to look for
Even
to
in this
much
of
help us
recently.
The discovery
grant
lot
the
Velvikudi
of
the
of
reliable
examination
enable
of their
contents
is
sure
to
him
to
all
arrive
at a satisfactory solution
which has
along
been
sought
for
in
vain.
The previous
mislead
inquirers
'
2.
For purposes
of history
fuller
Examination
168
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
These poems have
hopadyaya V.
Aham which
are
has
Although Silapclassed
and Manimekhalai
works,
I
entertain serious
may
be said
ing
wholesale
I
the
contained
in
them.
know I am
feelings of several
savants of
Tamil
litera-
ture
who would
of abuse if
of theirs.
I were
Fortunately I
am
not such
one.
But
all
to record here
my
the position.
The two
and
an
certain
Kannagi famed
for chastity
of a
hetaira of
at
Enraged
to the city of
169
hills
liimself,^
heavenly palanquin
to carry
is
Kannagitothe abode
The
people
who observed
is
this, erect
at once followed
by the
coun-
same worship
not
in other
The romantic
fail
to
strike
any one
not
events.
for
one would
grant
that
it
relates to
contemporary
it
On
the
other
hand
would
be
spun
if
not
at least
beliefs
with
extant
addition
at the time, of
Is
it
possible,
I ask, that a
or she
may
be,
at the
moment
of
death
In
my
opinion, which
of the
memory
of
any halo
died
upon the
fchrone
where
170
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
it 4.
It
passes
ask further
how
long
it
for her
to spread but
bear in mind
that
In
all
the story
is
due to a developlife, it
ment
of events taken
from
must have
tion of
Europe
while yet
alive.
Augustus was
there
was
a tenople to
him
in India
first
shrine.
Ptolemy II
and
by
their
loving, hut
subjects.
171
My
OWQ view
is
not know-
them
individually
have treated
ages as contogether a
temporaries and
thus
brought
same
time.
In
my
articles
on
century apart.
And
identification
of
Nurranwifcb
no warrant
Satakarni of the
name Satakarni which we find in all inscriptions and coins. Though attempts at translating proper names are not quite uncommon,
yet
it
gamian
the
If
Tamil name
the
result
of
perfect
translation,
gadan
instead.
No
We
bave^
172
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
writers
Koman
and by the
may note
none
^.
of
method
similar
And
is
a wonder that a
attempt
translation
was
not
made
bahu
that
if
other
name Gaja-
into Yanaikkai.
you examine
carefully
systems
of belief
^The Hon.
Dewan Bahadur
L. D. Swami-
kannu
ing
note
on the
question of the
:
date
of
padikaram
by Adiyarkunallar
/5/r,rsB3r<s/r6^
and the
for \n
What
sena
in this
17S
^t^&dCo^ir
(<^lLl^^
^/'
i.e..
regarding
the
Muhurtam
for
construction of
/r63r<5eSL-.7(5
and commentary
by Naohchinarkiniyar
the poems
may have
'^.
My
view
details only
if
materials used by
them
for the
poems.
In the
on hand.
"
The
^eduu^sirirui
and
^eu^s^hi^Tuisssfl
Pillai
If a
174
*
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
We
Pillai's date, A.
Still,
D. 756,
for
nature
useless for
purposes of history.
If
we
why we adopt
from the
the accounts
furnished in
Puranauuru and
to us
hand
of
Perundevanar,
an
author
who
can-
we
great
trustworthy
merit,
^
historical
documents
of
and
The
that
their compositions
of improbabilities, impossibilities
italics are ours.
and
inconsistencies.'
The
first
word by way
8
remark
is
This
is
is
later,
according to him.
9
How
Were they
written to
iiand
down
history ?
175
is
not to
forth
purposes of history.
He sets
:
He
an ignorance
contemporary
rulers,
and sees
Nedum-
He further
of
refers to
Mr. Kanakasabhai's
**
identification
Satakarni with
Nurran-
gannan
(3)
" as
unwarranted.
He
and
next sets
down
philosophy
till
that
could
not
have
struck root
(4)
And
lastly
Pillai,
the
overstating
his
In regard to the
at
first
point
is
it
may
be stated
once
that
there
no
immutable
In
irom
believing
in
the
supernatural.
176
BEGINNINGS OF
many
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
centuries from us
it
is
a natural
lives*
is
to import
their
The
its
first essential to
an
attitude of
mind
from
present
itself
back to
another environment.
regard the story of
are
people
who
it
and
is
hardly
fair
in
any one
does
to
ascribe
to those with
whom
manner
it
he
not
make
use of
consideration in the
this remark.
suggested
it
by
Nor does
make
share
necessary
the
occurrence
for
to
this belief.
Granting
177
in
the
manner that
author
liter-
would
for the
still
two books
is
story
is historical, and
it
so
critics.
We
contemporaneity of the
later.
it
rulers
is
not clear
Nurrangannan comes
the Silappadhika-
Mr.
merely
I
Kannar,
but
of
" Nurrangan-
nan"
the
am
Mr.
unable to
see
any
reference
or in
either in
Kanakasabhai's
It
book
be
Silappadhikaram.
may
stated,
however, that
tion
is
hardly tenable on
other
grounds.
We
some reason
Oviasenan
for Chitrasena)
though we
may
178
BEGINNINGS OF
know
be.
it,
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
that others
not
it
should
In respect
of the
third
point of his,
one
would wish
to
know
a general statement
put forward.
What
are the
century and
why
Where do
these
systems
is
it
go back
for authority
Manimekhalai?
will be accepted.
These
points
ought to be
In regard to the
cal data that
astronomi-
Mr. Swamikaunu
Pillai relies
on
They
commentator
details.
strikes
me
that he noted
for
a
a
day,
such
Q3^susufnu^9ipiDtiiy
There
is
179
details
than
this.
Whether that
works seems to
me
exceedingly doubtful.
of
Going
to the
Mr.
to face
The Madras
Jatilavarman,
Museum
plates
of
(2)
(3)
(4)
The smaller Sinnamanur plates. The larger Sinnamanur plates. The Velvikudi grant.
series of
to in these
four
grants.
We
should invite
attention particularly to
the identification of
Sinnamanur
plates.
This
the
name
occurs merely
as
Jatila,
equivalent of the
other
detail to lead us to
identified
him with a
Jatila
whose name
tions
is
This person
180
is
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
name
in the
undated, thus
What
is
more, a
name
the
Marankari, whose
name
is
in
Anaimalai
inscriptions,
mudura-
of
the
Aoamalai
rests the
inscriptions.
On
of
this identification
whole chronology
Mr, Subramaniya
Ayyar's thesis.
These
identifications
and the
to
the
Pandyas.
The
identification
of
Maran-kari
If
accepted
for other
is
one thing,
it
ought to be accepted
Madurakavi
by-
common
tradition a
Brahman and
a native of
181
at
any
rate,
as
an
official
of the
is
There
anything
such
a
more
basis
than
pious
devotee.
On
of identification
and combination
beginning with
^^
of the four
Ayyar constructs a
Palyaga-
Mudukudumi Peruvaludi
and ending
won a
victory over a
Pandya by name
plates them-
Rajasimha, which
name
unfortunately occurs
It will be clear
from
this
how
valueless would
on Mr. Subramaniya Ayyar's own showing were composed in the 8th, 9t:h and 10th centuries, in regard to matters relating
^^
grant; to
which
Whose name, by fche way, is broughb infco this justify fche name "Velvikkudi and establish a
any organic connectio-n.
details see Oh. vi-ii following.
For further
182
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
earlier at
to even
the
very worst.
Immediately
salai
name PalyagaThis
Kalabhra
Kalabhra
Inter-regnum
taken to be an Inter-regnum
the story
of
Miirti-
n.yanar in
the Periyapuranam.
Fixing up
enumerate
names
650 which
with
the
Neduih
Seliyan,
the
victor of
But
there
is
difficulty in ac-
of
various
Pandyas
Pallavas.
500
183
latter
half of
it,
was
to
greatest
among
the great
Pallavas,
Narasimha
of
which
is
Sambandar
who
destroyed Vatapi.
and
towns
come
and
to this
chronology
''The
man who
is
specialistic in a
single
special studies.
184
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
to this stage,
in
some
special field
men
of diverse types
that
it
takes
all
make a
world.
The
desire
men
with strong
knowothers.
there
of
In
is
and
religion,
feeling
completest
equilibrium
or
harmony
manifest
in one's
itself in
world of thought
that can
impatience towards, or in a
over,
provoking superiority
those
who
one's
differ.
harmony
own
own
lines
whole world
of
is
Ragava AyyanSenguttuvan,
in
of
work,
called
Seran
XIII
CHRONOLOGY TAMIL LITERATURE
the book to the determination of the age
185
in
which Senguttuvan
flourished.
and
his
contemporaries
down
:
his
main
position some-
what
as follows
It is well
known
that
among
constituted the
Sangam,
Kapilar,
Paranar,
certain
poems included
Kalvar
in the
Koman
in
much
the
parts
of
the
Tamil
of
it.
country
and
is
countries
north
This poet
he
refers,
in
Aham
251, to a
of
war
Mohur
fought
^'^
which
is
Maran who
said
elsewhere to have
Aham 265,
186
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HI8T0EY
the
first
and in
argument
Senguttuvau to the
by a
find
series of
me
to
no
justification in history.
He
interprets
Patahpura by the
fact
it
Ganges;
whereas
in
actual
could
Nandas
collected in
Patalipura,
the Ganges.
This
might
by the Nandas
the
river,
themselves
throwing
it
it
into
fall
into
the hands
that
of
subhis
verted
peculiar
dynasty.
Starting
of
from
passage
interpretation
the
he
postulates
Fa Hian
CHEONOLOGY TAMIL LITEBATURE
the 5th century and
187
the
Hiuen Tsang
in
He
the territory of
previous generation,
army
of
the
finds
sup-
who
is
taken to be
'
King
of
Kerala
'
and
of
the same as
his reasoning
Mandaram
in the
Serai.
The
is
rest
whole Chapter
of
of the
same
character
for the
and
minor consequence.
that his
is
Granting
sake of argument
would be
very
difficult
to justify
Samudra Gupta and his army being referred to as Mauryas by a poet of the standing and reputation of Mamulanar.
There
is
absolutely
^^ of
Samudra
Kau^alaka-Mahendra-Maha
kantaraka-Vyaghra-
raia-Kaurajaka--Mantaraja--Pfti8htapuraka-- Mahendragiri
Kautturaka Svamidattia-AiraDC[apallaka--Dftmana-
Kancheyaka-Vi8hnugop-Avamukfcaka.
Nilaraja-Vaingeyaka
Hasfcivarmma Palakkak
Ogra8ona--Daivara8btraka--Kubera--Kau8fcha1apuraka--
Dhananjayaprabhribi sarvva-dakehiriapatharaja-g^rahftnamoksh-anugraba-janita-pratap-onmi^ra-mababhagyasya-
188
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
The
text of
to
Gupta
the
inscription
contains
reference
Kauralaka
Mantaraja.
He
of
is
mentioned
Vishnuetc.
gopa
of
is
Kanchi, Ugrasena
absolutely
to
Palaka
in
There
cription
nothing
to
the insthat
lead
us
believe
Sa-
of
Kanchi.
to be
Mandaram
Serai
is
identification of the
most
unreasonable kind.
tion, Dr. Fleet, did
The
for,
it
for-
whether
has
It
Kauralaka
for
is
very pro(of
bably a mere
mislection
Kaunalaka
Kunala)
lake.i*
perhaps
the
region
round Koller
But whatever it is, it is now certain that there is no reference whatsoever to Kerala
1^
p.
note by
the
late
Prof. Kiebhorn.
189
As
to the destruction of
is
no authority
for
the site
recent investigations on
to
indicate
fire
certain
amount
of destruction
by
very
much more
After
all if
of
Mamular makes
of the
Tamil
Mohur
(near
Madura)
of
this
can only
mean
ces.
that Mamiilanar
most
neity with
all
the incidents he
might have
Pidiyan with
The identification
of
There
is
work Digambara
10th
century,
Darsana,
(ascribed
to
it
the
and
to a statement in
of
as to the establishin
ment
a Dravida
Sangam
Madura by
190
BEGINNINGS OF
in
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
470
(Samvat
that
this
of
Vajranandi
A.
D.
526).
There
is
nothing to prove
was
Tamil
may
well
be a Jain
Sangam
some
Thus
exhibited in
clearly to rest
It is
Chapter XIII
work seems
VIII
Vanji
where he
of the
tries
the
Cheras was
the
Karur in the
texts
upon a number
of
distortions of
and a
number
thesis.
in a case
like this is
CHKONOLOGY TAMIL LITEKATUEE
historical evidence that
191
we
get,
establish the
undoubted contemporaneity
connections
of poets
and pat-
Those
Tamil gram(2)
marians, with
porul.
Ahapporul, and
Purap-
The
is
distinction
hroadly
that
emotion which
expression on
various
and has reference principally to Erotics the other refers to action and partakes more or less
;
of the
character of exhibition
of
valour
in
attack, defence of
and the various other aspects Of these two classes the war-like life.
is
latter
makes
direct
;
work
is
making
192
it
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
ence to contemporary
life.
Poems
in
this group
make
similar
of
references though
they are
always
clear evidence of
group advisedly
Manimekhalai to which I shall return later to see how far the almost contemptuous reference to them
the two works Silappadhikaram and
of
Even so
number
thesisall
of poets
and patrons
thafe
figure in the
works are
I
far too
many to be
dealt
with in one
^^
shall take
occasion
to
Of these
number by the veteran Pandit Saminatha Jyer, but the last two are edited by two others whose labours deserve as much credit as the other's. Narrinai was published by the late Mr, Narainasami Kuruntokai by Pandit Iyer of Kumbhakonam and Eangasami Aiyangar of the Madrasa at Vaniambady.
excellent form, the larger
193
more
elaborately,
and on a
of
degree
lucidity
of
demand
to illustrate the
work
to
of
be a
done by one or
telling
character.
In taking up a question
research
is
like this a
student
of
of
pretty
much
in the
position
advocate.
Feeling and
There
two ques-
tions
fact,
coming up
for
examination questions of
:
and questions
of law.
One has
as such
;
to
examine
them
one has to
much
as
in
their applifirst
of all to consider
literature that
These Sangam
are,
common
con-
194
sent,
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
better
Mr.
Subramania
of
Ayyar
takes
Perundevanar as
composition-
But he
in
forgets this, at
any rate
of
he seems
to,
to
exemplify
facts
this position
as
we could
him of an undoubtedly
find
historical character,
we can
the political
position
the
In stanza 4
of
rising
the
sea, in his
This king
known from
195
ame class, but of other poets, to be the father of Karikala. The terms in which Paranar chose to describe hira in this poem raise the presumption that he was the ruler, Tigalolinayirrel pari-
vanSera; but
of the
this is
by the way.
Poem 63
same
king,
on
refer to
referred to
by the
somewhat
later NallQr
Sirupanarruppadai.
addressed to this
Perungunrur Kilar
these two
Such a reference
contemporaneity^^.
"
as
we
get
in
16
Kattur Tayangarinan.
"
196
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
it,
The
sea to be -distributed
that might go there.
among those
^
in
need^
Narrinai 6 of the
of the
is
same
good bow.'
celebrated,
to
In
Aham
396,
Sehguttuvan
poem
the
hill-fort
and to
to the
There
is
further reference
Attanatti,
story of xAdi
Mandi and
and possibly
The poem
also appears to
bow emblem of the Cbera on the Himalayas. Poem 62 of Aham, as also poem 208, refer to the
famous KoUippavai having been erected by the
gods.
He
war
with
It
must be noted in
tradition regarding
KoUippavai
author
is
the following
poem
Ahananuru by another
known as Kalladanar who refers in the same poem to Pandyan Nedum Seliyan, victor
Talaiyalanganam.
at
There
is
similar refe-
197
the Tirupati
hills.
There
is
also a
made over
his
territory
round Kolli-
malais to
Narrinai refers to
with
cut
folk,
ofi for
the purpose.
Poem 73
of
Kurun-
Nannan's
elephant.
territory after
his
state
people are
referred to in other
poems
of
and almost
in the
same terms.
One
of
them
ram".
These
are, in
Kongu
Nannan
292 gives
fallen
in
detail
the
story that
fruit
having eaten a
that had
a stream
198
BEGINNINGS OF
dowa by
offered
it.
8.
INDIAN HISTOKY
not accept the
carried
He would
girl of
ransom
of
a golden statue
It
of the
own
weight.
must be said
to the
honour
of the
Tamils
name was handed down to posterity branded ^'as Nannan the woman- killer.*' Aham 147 of the same author states that Aay Eyinau, known as the commander-in-chief of
that his
fell
in the
Poem
152
has
reference
to
Veliyan
of
another chieftain
hill
and
Nalli.
Aham
Kongu.
contains
too corrupt to
know
of
Aham
lur,
372
the
capital
Kari
by Adiyaman of
this inci-
Tagadur.
dent
is
poetess, in
poem 99
of
Purananuru.
collected
in
this
From
fashion
these
references
or less definite
199
Tamil
This
land
in
the generation of
Paranar.
much more
collate
it
definite
and
we could
v^ith
similar
We
shall
Now
we
find
him
cele-
who was
father of Karikala
Nedum
was
dakkai Peruvirarkkilli.
father.
We
find
this
Paranar celebrating
fifth
section of the
Pehan,
Nannan,
and
all
others.
must
therefore have
is,
come
in one genera-
tion, that
the grand-father of
Senguttuvan.
The
any one
would
of these chiefs
fit
in with
200
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
South
is
capable of
made
of
it
from other
works have
of
Paranar.
that
elaborately into
comparison I
may
at
among
the
Pandya with
his
his
capital at
at Vanji
capital
Uraiyur,^'^ at the
commen-
cement
of this generation.
The intervening
among
number
of chiefs
who were
them.
The information
is
that
confirmed and
poets
supplemented
^"^
venerable
among
ih
Aham
31.
Qeo<s^fSIQiutTQ
sSleoeo'^^^eim^u
^eo
Q^eifit^
umui'^
uSpibQ^.
201
mention
may
be
made
of
Mamulanar
infor-
whom
have to draw
for further
mation
later on.
makes
frontier
mention
(northern
frontier
of Palikat
as the
Vaduka
frontier)!^.
The
of the
corresponding
Tulu country
which,
as
with the
name
in the days of
east
of
them were
of
the
of
hill
two
chiefs
Vichchikkon and
Irungovel
the western
To
of
the east of
it
was the
territory of
Adiyaman
to the south
east of
Kur.
11
(^&)'2eods6tar0sisft
Qi(dsfr(Tf)^oSTuu^.<Si}&dQQip
19
Aham
15
sneSp
Kur. 73.
fB^afrearsor^pwrr
Qan&sr^
tSfTLlt^p
GuiT-iQuj
QoiiTair^QunTi^Jd QsirsnQtjrreo
202
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
malais.
was
his capital
Tiru-
in a sort of
second
his
territory
Aay round
the
Podiyil
tricts
;
hill in
territory
Pudukkotta
There
is
state
Kamnad.
of
wha
Avvai and
mentioned
Adiyaman
Kanchi and ha
works
in the
of
Kongu
Tamil land
in the generation of
Paranar
the poet.
Any
age
therefore
that could be
political
distribution of
territory
in
the
Tamil country.
Any
age
203
known
of
it,
does
The question
latter
therefore
of the
now
is
whether
first
the
half
6th
and the
half of
the
7th
the
5th
century
to
which
Mr.
fit
Eagava
forth
alter-
in with the
Paranar.
The
of.
first
The
period
of a century
when
the
Pallavas
were
prominent
influence
in
the
northern
half.
The
the
among whom
Kun Pandyan
Nedumaran.
or
His contemporary
I,
north
was Narasimhavarman
of
Pallavamalla.
Both
them had
is
for their
no reflection
204
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
is
Id the literature
in
the region
number
literary
of references to
make.
While these
same
men
The
of
identification of
Sendan Seliyau
of the
Talaiyalauganam fame
Silappadhikaram
is,
not proven.
of the
and
Manimekhalai
way
of
reply to
amount
of ignorance
Henguttuvan Sera
the works.
The author of the first is the younger brother of Senguttuvan. The author of the other is his friend and both of them worked at
205^
a subject,
legendary or other,
that
it
caught
their iraagination
poetically,
laying the
scene,
Now
the
of
this prince-poet
when he speaks
mouth
of
of
his parenit>
one under a
spell ?
his
statement in regard
to
be
confirmed in every
celebrates
him
?
work
Padirrupattu
it
upon
presumably with
But
wholesale
con-
demnation such as
is
and
situations.
206
BEGINNINGS OF
now
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
Passing oq
perhaps on a
little
more
he finds
it
shows
its
weakness.
(1)
points here:
Kurala with
Mandaramseral
in
my
knowledge
of
The equation
the
wrong
of
altogether,
and that
it is
so
is
in lines 4 and 5 of
poem 251
Aham^^ but
;
Palayan Maran.
any
rate, the
to establish the
contemporaneity
this
un-
is
used in the
Compare note
10, S.
89
anfee.
207
Mohur
re-
Palayan Maran.
That
Mauryas in Mamiilanar,
to their cutting their
their
We
in the
Asoka
at
Maski
Nizam's dominions,
that Asoka's
territory
down
to the frontier of
Mysore no
We
know
of
Asoka carried on
the further
for purposes of
conquestto
do
conquest
his his
of
territories
not
included within
Empire
but
included
historians
within
ascribe
that
to
of
grand-son,
Chandragupta's
son Bindusara,
himself held the
who
Aham
is
reading in
tator
69 & Puram
281.
175.
(^i^rTifiiun
The blundering
commen-
worth remarking.
208
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
at
Vidisa
(Bilsa)
the
south
by the
therefore
been
made
either
by Bindusara
his
son-
this connection
by
a general designation
indicates,
for all
and
in
the
various
wards
of certain
ments
of
the Pallavas
till
they come
power
and
Kumbhakonam.
All
the
passages
of
Mamulanar,
to
them
as past occurrences
temporary events.
which attribute
22
p.
is
specifically given
(3rd edition)
149,
of
209
Pandyan Nedum Seliyan whose name figures in the Silappadhikaram. Such a general movement against the north could
of confusion
on
general
that
followed
the
decline
rise,
of
Maurya power
the
imperial
in the north
and the
to
position
afterwards,
of
the
The
fifth
century
is
in
a glimpse
of such a
movement
of people.
With
not
this general
us,
the
Gajabahu
synchronism does
;
but appears on
The
infor-
Mahavamsa compiled
in its present
form
commencement
is
traceable to the
unreliable as
century B.C.,
not as
]f
it is
that Buddhist
chronicle
does not
refer
to
Pattinidevi in so
many
plain words
we
have.
no
right
14
210
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
no satisfactory reason
The newer information only goes so far to confirm it. The tradition of Pattini has taken
it.
of
Ceylon that
it
was introduced under the favourable auspices inferable from the Silappadhikaram, though naturally the Buddhist
quite likely
it
chronicle of the
of it
24.
23 It muafc be noted,
however,
that other
chronicles^
which may
Upham's
Eajaratnacari
&
Eajavali)
24 Indian Antiquary.
XLV
pp. 7278.
CHAPTEE
V.
Era that the information put together has been drawn from
at the
of the
dawQ
Christian
various
sources
which
have
been
merely
It
would be worthwhile classifying and arranging these sources with a view to investigating
relative in
value of each of
respect
of
would be
the
has reference.
Some
Dipavamsa
Buddhist Ceylon.
We
in
&
III the
relative
^
writers;
and
211
212
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
reference
detail in chapter I
and
Coming down
may
we
might
assume
that
the
legends
on coins
for the
is
few others
is left
India.
There
and Sanskrit, and various Sanskritic languages could be exploited usefully. But for this period
even Sanskrit and Sanskritic languages are of
comparatively minor importance to classical
Tamil
literature,
and that we
shall take
into
and appraise
it
us see a
little
more
closely
what exactly we
authors,
generations
of
and
is
alone,
213
may
South India
Era.
To do
we
known
to readers of classical
Tamil as Paranar.
of
Paranar
literary
of
was one
those traditional 49
men who constituted the third academy Madura. His name is of peculiar importance
literature as
it
in
Tamil
connects
itself
with the
names
round
of certain
well-known
celebrities in that
literature,
his
name
man and
we can
series of rulers
and
poets.
By
studying him
idea of
full
what
is
Paranar
regarded traditionally as
writings occur in a large
classics
known
is
collectively
Sangam
litera-
ture.
who sang of the Chera Senguttuvan, whose name is connected at once with the Sangam classics on the one side.
a poet
He
^14
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
if
Paranar
fifth
if
Senguttuvan's
of
the Sila-
must be one and the same whatever that age might be. Of Paranar*s works we have
twelve short pieces in the collection Narrinai,.
fifteen
poems
ten of
the
ten-tens
(Padirruppattu)
thirty-two
poems
and twelve
And such
number
Puram
4, ^
he
tu^SesT&Doj lutrseoriDfrQp.
Paranar,
Param
4.
215
Uruvapahrer Ilanjetchenni
whose
somewhat queer name seems to be derived from a comparison which this poet has instituted to him in the poem, under reference, where he is likened to the morning
sun who in radiant majesty
rises out
of the
This Chola
Mudattamakkanniyar,
of
He
celebrates in
Puram 63
ladan
*,
of
This same
event
is
celebrated by
another poet
laiyar
5.
who
goes by the
name Kalatta-
One of the so called last seven patrons by name Pehan whose territory was round the Palnis was celebrated by this poet. One of the references to him is in regard to his large
beneficence without expectation of a reward
^.
One supreme
instance
of
such
being
his
216
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
The second
his interces-
which
sion
(not
more
to
our point
is
in
behalf of
Pehan's
of
wife
Kannaki
a court-
the
heroine
the
Silappadikaram)
whom
esan.
he had abandoned
in favour of
Paranar pursuaded
path of
rectitude
him
to
walk in
the
wife.
by returning to his
in
On
this
same occasion
the
the
same
Their
behalf
are
:
of
abandoned
wife.
names
gunrur Kilar,
authors
respectively
*
of
'
the the
seventh, eighth,
*ten-tens'
is
and nineth
In
tens
of
collection.
Puram 369
there
Seraman Kadalottiya
his javelin
Vel
Kelu Kuttuvan
on the
with
sea)
as
identical
Senguttuvan
Sila-
ppadikaram, as Paranar
Padirruppattu
'^.
In Narrinai
six,
he refers
QsrrQfBff&i QuoTQjiEJsedisisQQieSil.
217
and in
famous statue
of
the
goddess
Kollidetail
some
Chief
among
against him.
this
war or in
Aay Eyinan,
fell
in
Nannan's commander-in-chief
also refers to the
Gnimili
^.
He
accumulation
the
citadal
of the vast
wealth of
in
Nannan
in
Pali.
One poem
Nannan's putting
the
girl
carried
down stream
in a canal
through the
11.
lifcol3.
Aham
180*
Aham.
147.
218
BEGINNINGS OF
9.
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
of this
garden
The savagery
is
chieftain is
where he
enemies
ropes of
'
women
their hair
to
make
them
for fastening
captured elephants.
state
of allusions to
incidents
the
life
of
Nannan.
some importance,
is
to the
entry of the
Aham
195
^^.
fifth-ten of the
Padirru-
we find Senguttuvan Chera described in the Padikam (epilogue) as the son of Nedumseraladan " King of the westerners by Manakkilli
'*
i-f6ifrp(^usf-iEisfTLu
^Gsrp^^puup
Qstr^uueijraQsiT&retnT'ar
Qunar
Qffdj
uiT<sa>eu
Queaa Qsrr'^
Lfiftii^iBeorear&fr
QupeO,
Kuruntogai 292.
10
^argv
QiDfTifis
Qstr^nsQsn&srSf QpneaaQuirQuu
219
He
is
said
way
pose of a stone to
(the
make the
statue of Pattini
deified heroine
Kannaki).
He
is
also
said
to
expedition
bringing in a vast
number
of
heads of cattle
achieve-
The next
ment
at Viyalur
of the
place-
He marched
Palayan
and
number
folk
of
his
made
women
is
of
the
enemies.
destruction
collateral
number
war
of
Chola princes,
ruler,
who
last
carried on constant
And
to
enemies on the
in
which
was
already
referred
in the Silappadikaram.
220
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
Of the various
connection with
Puram
of
369.
poem) some
in
them
are described in
detail
poem
of
itself.
His
northern invasion
in lines 6 to 11 of
poem 43
the Padirrupterritory of
is
pattu
^2.
Palayan and
and what he
said to
of this
war are
poem 44
*
i^.
There
is
a reference to his
in line
to 14,
wearing
of
poem
is
In poem 46,
lines 11
there
QjL^^GDf Qajeo'^
uSldujldits^
Qpa^&iitu Qu0(e^^ui!B^
ea>^uuQjfriTLjQuL^s=
(^LLQea
13 QmtTs^iT wearearesr
QpnsihQsnesa
14 eTQpQ^L^
unTfftSliosr
(Siib^uu
Q^neO.
221
In line 4
of stanza 48, he
described figuratively as a
^^,
veritable fisherman
who
constantly engaged
with a view to
over sea,
territory.
making the
articles
coming
available to
own
in
final
destruction
^'^.
The
last
poem
is
an obvious
three rivers
^s.
This
16
ilT
Ljd^S
QLoirm^ Quhtl^is^
Q^^sQ
18 sneSiBiuek
rSiLiLjD(^(sSifl
LjearQeOir^
.222
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
here,
of
it
as
to
recently
made
show that
Karoor on the
Amravati
a number
water
(An Porunai
is
or
Porundam.)
very
As
itself
in this
poem
in his
is
Periyar,
which
in
one place
its
at any rate
described as having
source
itself
into the
own
territory.
(L. 13 to 18 of
poem
48)
1^.
15 of poem 43
The meaning
is
of the reference
if
one remem-
said to
have conquered
the country of
Kongu
in line 15 to 16 of
poem
22
of this collection
21.
elaborately
his northern
mesa
invasion,
20 ^^eStDjbjD
QuQ^supp
srr'^eoiLjir)
.ill
unrQanpQstTiEja^ iBrrLsuu^^
223
having under-
for the
and
to
his victories
but
how
far the
invasions were
true
is
not
is,
exactly
to
our
purpose at present.
that there
in
is
It
however,
a pity
those words in
the
work
a
What
called
padikam
or
a prologue respectively,
not to be added at
It is
the author.
do
this is a
generally one
who
is
would be
by
in
all
ments made
in
this
Even
there
is
no reference as
it is
224
in lines 6 to 11 of
4322.
them
in at least
two places
the
no
of this
respect
of
these
His
father
in
claims
lines
victory
over
14,
13 and
of
reference to the
2*,
same
inci-
poem 12
in lines 4
&
5 of
^6.
poem 17
25^
and
in lines 2 to 4 of
poem 20
QJL-.^(SS)<SP
QujSo'^uSujUjlditss^
Q^rr6du6i>iBnLL<ss)L^ji
Q^neos&)arL^^^
QuiTn/in'2einu
Qun'&)!s^ffiTS(^LLai.
36
cTiEjQsir
oS^QpofTQ^ iT;ij[i0^fi
(Tfiffesifi(cLuiTiT^^'2ecs=
iLjeaar
Q^eBrgm
225
an island
of his delta.
enemies which
may
be of the nature of a
He
is
ted his
But,
he
the
is
also given
of
credit in
the padikam
of
at
end
the second-ten
his having
on their heads
to
and
for
taking
what
ranson
seems
for
heavy
setting
of
his,
It is the first
achievement
which in
among
rulers
him the
the
This expression,
like
few others
Imayavarman
of
'
for
which there
is
abso-
lutely
These incidents
15
importance as the
226
are
this
BEGINNINGS OF
applied
to
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
The
to
the son.
reference
third ten of
work
has
younger
therefore
brother of
Imayavaramban,
and
is
He
the
given credit
of
having
overthrown
line
fort
is
Ayirai
credit
(poem 21
for
29)
^7
he
given
Nadu under
Line
credit for
poem. 23.
26
2^
of the
same poem
gives
him
having destroyed a
10 and 11
of
hill fort
^9
somewhere. In lines
is
poem 28
of
there
again a clear
Gheras.
But
may
be
interpreting this,
statement that he
Kongu under
of the
his control
and not in a
227
of stating
his
So then we
territory
right
the
coast
through Kongu.
or
Whatever the
both
the father
justification
otherwise,
',
which could
the
Mummudi
This seven
to
is
not
There seem
have been
the
among whom
was divided
at the time,
as
we
shall
notice
in
another connection.
Padigam.
228
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
greatest
in
historical
the
twin-epic
Silappadikaram
against
Manimekalai.
But
as
them
and
this
must be
other
a
of
said
of
them
of
brother,
the
friend
Senguttuvan
to
them
of
has
say
in
historical passages
distinguishable
detail
for
from
detail in these
poems which
are
very
much
more
fore
historical.
must accept
difficulty
as historical such
personal
The
in
the
necessary
is
critical
faculty to distinguish
what
historical
an unhistorical
father
work.
Senguttuvan
the
Sera's
and
uncle, therefore,
in
were historical
western
personages
whose
reigns
view
of
koowa 'Ka^ambia
paruvayil' {vide
Padigam
229
father
untiringly
put
an
end
to
it
on
their coast.
is
with great
various
success
in
the the
of
Tamil poems
which
describe
flourishing
Such a
state of
and
Koman
trade in the
work
of
the classical
geographers.
It has already
perhaps
of
(cultivafeors)
Puram. 335
7 and
8. 2.
Kappiyarrukkappiyanar on
diohcberal.
Kalangaykkanui
narmu-
2 ^L^uiear urretzi&ir
uetDpuum SL^ihuQearasr
Mangudi
Kilar,
2B0
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
calls^
He
down
of
to
Naura
first
markets
Damirica.
The Chersonesus
in the Periplus to
seems unof
doubtedly to refer
the
tongue
land
of
called in
North Canara.
Opposite to this
the
'
is
Oyster Rocks
White Island is the Lieuke of the geographers and is the same as the vernathe Periplus.
cular Velliyan Kallu or Tuvakk^il, either of
which
is
an exact translation
Island.
of
Lieuke or
with
White
This
is
identified
Then we come
Damirica
Naura
mart
in the
which he describes as
is
the Ariaka of
that Pliny
It is of this Nitras
remarks
frequenting the
great
emporium
32
Vol. 20 p. 136.
231
who
infested the
neigh-
bourhood and possessed a place called Nitras. Thus Nitras figures both as a mart and as an
island off the coast.
was on the
entry to
Nitras
Naura of Pliny is identified by Mr. Schofi with Cannanore which appears too far south.
Cannanore, as has been already pointed out,
is
the
Mont d'Ely
of the mediaeval
geogra-
phers.
Nitras refers to
correct.
Mangalore
is
and Gurupa.
It is the Nitravati
name Nitrias or Nitron or perhaps even Naura to the city. That may also have been the cause of the name of the
Nitron
is
island
set
over
against
the
port.
Tyndis
much
farther south
Beypore
pirate
is
at present.
of
coast
mity
of
North
Canara
and the
port
to
of
Mangalore.
the
232
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY,
description that
ture of the
pirates)
Chera Senguttuvan
nothing more to say
and
his
father.
ThsLt
pirates
than the
as
mere
pirate
chracterization
coast.
of
the
coast
the
The Kadambas
must have
till
they
This
conclusion
is
certainly
in
whose
capital
is
Kadambin
after cons-
Peruvayil, that
of the
is
Kadamba
war put
country.
to death
He was
tant
by another
Chera
celebrity
Kalangaykkanni Narmudi-ch-Cheral,
'
ten
'
of the
ten-tens.'
Thus then
classical
it
is
clear
that
these
poems
of
is
Tamil taken
along
with what
geographers makes
known
to history
THE AGE OF PAEANAR
sition set
233
up
to the
north, and
made conquests
India
to
coast
Their particular
consisted in
however
to
civilization
on the
first
Chera known
chieftains did
make
was
contribution
The
period
when
this littoral
free
the date
of
Peutingerian Tables.
of the
A study
poems
of
lines
:
of
namely
from
the
classical
Roman
coins
;
down
as follows
234
BEGINfTINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
Paranar has reference principally only to the Chola kings and the Chera kings. He does not
appear to have celebrated the Pandya
very much.
rulerss
He
of three or four
rulers
of the
would
known
in
Tamil
rature.
Killi, his
number
of the
(Cholas)
who
fought in fratricidal
Red Chera
he
(Senguttuvan). In regard to
celebrates
the Chera,
Imayavaramban
and another chiefas
it
Nedum
tain
younger brother
Narmudi Cberal
figuring
were in
We
otherwise
called
of the
Vayavikkon-perum-Pehan.
Chola and the Chera who
field of battle
The mention
fought and
fell
on the
brings
him
235
contemporaneity
with
another
poet
Kalattalayar,
who
celebrated the
same event.
This
another poem
Araiyam
of
whose
in a previous in
to
who
is
feeling
ashamed
of a
wound on
is
the back
stated to
This
by two other
66.
While the
quite
first
poet's
other two
is
direct
and
and
Aham
a clear reference
236
BEGINNINGS OF
may
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
and
to
this
He
refers
Pandyan
as
to
is
also
indication
it is.
which
the
Pandyans
There
in
who
is
Bharata war.
where Evvi,
country, one
battle.
What
is
more particularly
the
chieftain
Pandyan
fell
among
in
Paranar
fallen
that
makes Evvi
contemporary
is
with
Paranar.
the
Adigaman Anji
of
This chief
said in
poem 114
Mamular
to
who seems
is
to be
Nannan,
In poem
correct.
poem
237
According to
who made
The
of
allusion here
to a
war
or rather a
series
wars perhaps
of ambition.
Anji of Tagadur
him in the field. to make an effective stand against the enemy, went for protection to the Chera who was
feated
anxious to
gret
possession of the
Kollimalais.
the
head
of
made
refers
the Chera.
to
We
further unnecessary
take
it
that
to speak of the
We
with Nannan.
to
Cheras and
238
BEGINNINGS OF
who go by
in
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
of
name the
last
seven
shall
patrons
Tamil
literature/
We
of
the like
academy
of
we might put
his father
and grand-father were contemporaries with the Chera Nedum Serai and his father,
perhaps also this Chera^s son Senguttuvan.
The
chieftains are
these the
seem
that
referable to the
same
age,
that of
The poets
:
across are
Para-
Perungunrur
yattiyar
kilar, Kalattalaiyar,
Vennikkuthese
and
Kalladanar,
and
give
itself.
Though
is
specifical-
Aham
115.
There
is
239
simply interpreted
beat
off
who simultaneously
their
war drums.
Pandya king
at
as
victor
Talaiyalanganam,
Sangam Literature,
is
This personage
a great Pandyan,
one of
consideration.
composed
of the general
Seliyan or
may
is
be
NedumTo
distinguish
him from
a
the
because this
the Pandyas,
added of his
far
Kailway
In that
station
battle
in
Tanjore
to
district.
he
stated
have won
a victory against a combination of all the kings and chieftains of the Tamil country.
The
fact
that
he
is
given
this
distinct
of
men
the
was no other
of a
battle
of that
name
known, nor
victorious.
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP-PANDYAN
To us
this
241
character
is
seems to be he
From
the poems
it is
clear he
new
successor,
chieftains,
marched with
and
laid
their to
allies,
the five
It is
siege
Madura.
is
stated to
of
Puram
i
in
which he
saying
who
is
young marched
at the
head
uuessfluSirLLir) urroju^uuSessr^jSir
QemQiBeOiufr^esnijiB Q^^Lorrofih
Qeuis/feiDff
QoitrmiStu
^ipuiS^iunk/f Qs&reS
16
242
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
my
capital
talking lightly of
my
their
may my rule offer no protection to my subjects; may my subjects weep for lack of it, and blame me as an unworthy monarch; may the poets of my
war drums and themselves
as prisoners,
Mangudi Marudan cease to celebrate me in poems of praise." The same sentiment and the mean advantage that the other
court with
rulers
and
what they
who who
name Idaik-Kunrur
first
Pandya.
He
sight of the
seven'
Pandyan and
of the attack
LjffuQufTir L^arsGSBtsp^n
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP-PANDYAN
beat the enemies oE to their
243
own
territory
and
115
own
city, is referred to in
Aham
was
of Paranar.2
It
was
cele-
Maogudi Marudan> otherwise referred to as Mangudi Kilar, and the poem Nedunal Vadai of
battle itself
is
The
Aham
36.^
Of the poets
Q^(ipi^ eSI(T^Qu0(oaji3^iT
Qnii(d LfpiEJseetBL^
(^nm&Dp.
Paranar in Aham. 110.
^eariaQsop^^iuear^
QuniJQjeSliurT'BesTLJ QuireOihL^QesinL^eaff,
iBifn^iBpeS QesT^n^aain^g&sr^
QsrTor^s&Tu> QQjLlu^(^rrareap.
244
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
Mangudi
respected.
Marudan was perhaps the oldest and the most Next follows the great poet and
Another one
of equal
grammarian Narkirar.
as he was
Ilanagan,
some
detail
by Narkirar who
to,
sets
down, in
Aham
against
36 already referred
the combatants
him as eral,Sembian (Chola), Titiyan, Elini (son of the Adiyaman Anji of Tagadur), Erumaiyuran, Irungo Venman, Terpporunan.
Aham
of
208
of
Kalladan
refers
to the
battle
Alanganam and speaks of the seven, referring in the same poem as an event of the past
the capture of the Kollimalais by Kari from
Kalladan
in
Aham
208.
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP-PANDYAN
Ori,
245
and
Among
Chera by the former ^. these seven were the Chera and the
its gift
to the
Chola who are taken to be respectively the Chera Yanaik-kat-Chey Mantaram Serai
Irumporai and the Chola Rajasuyam Vitta
Perunarkkilli,
who
name Vadavannakkan Perumjattan though the two are not connected by name in the poem itself ^. This defect is remedied to a great extent by the direct reference in Puram
poet by
the Pandya,
who
is
^
clearly this
Pandyan
the
of
is
Talaiyalanganam.
That
to
is
this
Chera chief
sometimes
referred
with
attribute
of the elephant-look
clearly explained
in
Qp&T^fr
LDiiresresr
SL^Q(rij'isf.saniB
QeoniflsQsneksi (cfueOiTs^/SjS
QfGuajiTUJu ueoeSear ULUis/QsQ^Gsir&i&S
Ibid in
6
7
Aham
208.
Param
11.
125.
21. read in connection
pit.
20 and
See also
Commen*
246
BEGINNINGS OF
22.
^
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
Puram
celebrates
this
Chera
of
the elephant-look,
poem
to a
Chera
in
respect of the
of the
age to
which
we
shall
have to
allot
and
patrons.
there
better that
illustrious
name,
in
making poetry,
and
whose information on matters of importance, were unparalleled." The poet says that this remark was made by the prince himself and
approves of
it,
following that
set
if
he were alive he
would certainly
forth
The
group-
KurungoHyar Kilar
9
in
Param
22..
Q^&i^^
Qs^iLil^lL
Q fibs'
QfiBistreiSafr
8f^afr^<sfri^aSsarear^tD QesrearpiSair
@)'8
QsiTsirQiif^(SS)fd
Qairuuu
utf^doiGfT
i)^^pueB}SQj<ss)na sl^uQu,
Porundil Ilangiran in
Puram
63.
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP-PANDYAN
therefore
is
247
to be referred to a time
after the
whom we
hare
a comparatively junior
contemporary
of Paranar.
is
forced
upon us by
who
cele-
In
Aham
Parambuelder poet
the
who was
at
who being
advice of Kapilar.
Pari's fortress
This
is
last
history
that
in
this
siege
and
In 253-52 there
a reference to the
away the Kongar, wherefrom is not exactly stated. In the same poem this Narkirar refers
248
to
BEGINNINGS OF
the chief
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
290-89 of
Pandyan
Kudal
(Madura).
The camp
of
this
Vadai, one
of
the
Patfcuppattu.
jMresently.
Puram
of
57,
But we may nobe in passing here, where a poet by name Kari Kannan
all
desist
down what
maram).
are
Guard-trees
(Kaval'
may
let
crops of the
let
them
set fire
to their cities
you may
kill
enemy
warriors,
the
way
three contemporary
victor at Talaiya-
young Pandyan,
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP-PANDYAN
langaaam; the Chera
of
249
the elephant-look,
as
A number of chiefs
are
of
brought
in,
but they
minor
character.
The
greater chiefs,
*
who went by
seven
last
the
common
designation,
the
lived
Alanganam
generation,
of
the
following
as
mention
of
Elini,
Adigaman unmistakeably shows. Bound these rulers are gathered some of the poets of the first rank, among them prominent mention must be made of Mangudi Marudan, Narkirar, Madurai Marudan Ilanagan, Kalladan and a number of others. Of these, the latter
son
of
and Kalladan
connection.
come
together in
is
particular
Kalladan
comsaid
Ahaporul., the
section
story
is
of
classical
Tamil grammar.
The
briefly
this
250
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
Pandya country was afflicted by a twelveyears famine. The Pandyan finding it impossible to
men
of
learning,
to
leave
the country
when
the famine
together
such of them as
were
still
on examination
knew anything,
tion of
Tamil grammar.
this,
When
he was
much
exercised about
pity
of
upon
his
himself took
this section
grammar, which
by
and
and
them on copper
plates
them underneath
the
temple of Madura.
clean
The
in
priest
who went to
Sanctum
on
examination proved to
contain
that
particular section of
grammar.
could
made
it
extraordinarily
and
hardly be
understood
without commentary.
of the
Pandits aa
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP.PANDYAN
were
at court to take
251
upon themselves
of
to write
the commentary.
it,
Some
best
was a matter
of great difficulty
They
god
Siva himself,
indicated the
dumb
little
son of a
child
who Brahman in
years old,
Madura.
The
was
of
five
Uppuri Kudi
Of the
number
;
as each one
was read
got
he kept quiet
to read
his
commentary the child wept at certain places; when again Narkirar read his comment the child was perpetually weeping The story in token of complete approval.
when
the
extraneous
embellishments
to
this
:
are
that
the
grammar known as Iraiyanar Ahapporul was commented upon by a number The most approved commentary of scholars.
turned out to be that by Narkirar
;
Ilanagan's
came next
best,
very
much
like
Parimelala-
252
gar's
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
commentary now
others.
We
have no evidence
of the existence
of Ilanagan's
all.
commentary on these
sutras at
The whole question now is who is this Narkirar and who was the Pandyan. A continuous
commentator Narkirar
with the famous Narkirar of the Sangam,
who
from
in another story
is
God Siva
tail
grammar.^^
it
The
seem
fact
may
Marudan Ilanagan
Narkirar.
history at
It
all
two as referring to
in
in
of
Sangam
The poem
works.
in
Kurumfcogai which
this diiference
is
this classical
qaoted in illustration
(vide p.
Sucra 2 of
the Iraiyanar
Ahapporul
39
of
Mr. 0.
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP.PANDYAN
253
Paadyan victor at Talaiyalanganam. The commeatary that has actually come down ta us is the commentary of this Narkirar handed down by word of mouth through ten generations of pupils
till,
at last,
Nilakantan, the
it
on
to
others.
is
The
great
that
commentator
known
as
It
Ilampuranar
put
it
may
be Nila-
this.
is,
commentary,
layers,
such
as
is
it
one which
old
illustrations in archaic
315 stanzas
of
poetry are
made on purpose
in a
more modern
in
clearly
of the late
evidence Mr. 0. W.
Thamodaram
actually put
Irayanar
sentiments
being
same,
every
detaiL
264
BEGINNINGS OF
of
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
two commentaries
The importance
consists in this
of
:
these
that the
modern stanzas
all
them celebrate the exploits of a particular Pandyan, several of whose achievements get
to be mentioned in the course of these verses,
of all these
seem
to indicate
they
all
went in
praise
of
one and
The
older
of
tains illustrations,
most
name Sangam
commentary
it-
Tolkappiyam
Tolkappiyam got
mentary
commented upon
is
as in
com-
which
attempt
there
old
authority.
Narkirar's
therefore
was
easy.
one
of
grammar
Casting
we
are
bound
the work of
and committed
form
may
be a few genera-
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP-PANDYAN
tions more, after the time of Narkirar.
255
For
to
these
ten
genorations,
having
regard
the elaborate
course
of
intricate
to allow a period of
30
mean
first
that
edition
Then it would the second commentary or the of the commentary was made
some 300 years after the Narkirar wrote his first comment. If then we could find out from
the 315 stanzas, which give a large number of
historical details, as to
who
the
Pandyan
is
in
whose
court, or
we might say at once that this was the Pandyan who won victories over his neighbouring kings and is referred to as
too elaborate
much
victor at
Nelveli,
He
a
given
other
titles
such as
is
Varodaiyan,
with
Paramkusan
etc.
and
credited
his
is
number
the
of
victories
over
neighbours.
therefore
of
Identification of this
monarch
to
utmost
importance
is
Tamil
literary
history.
There
256
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
in
honour of
important
contemporary
but
The stanza
which a
is
^^
indication of the
later
Sangam,
Pandyan
II
Kun Pandya
Epigraphy
seems possible on the
Such an
identification
we
find in the
and
attempted before us by
to the
Government of
India.
In the course
of a
we
re-
his
own
^p^^&^esip
Quju^is^0LLZsat Qfipp^^uuihn
QLDfdQpaQf,
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP-PANDYAN
on the basis
257
as
well.
It is
of
Mr.
Venkayya's
base their
ter.
that follow
him
own
The grants
Museum
plates of
man and
the two
Sinnamanur
plates.
The
ed
his
Mr. Venkayya
Government
for
are
and the
difficulties in
all
way
of their
acceptance could
referred to.
of the
The
succession of the
Pandyas based on
here for conveni-
set
down
it.
Pal^alai-Peruvaludi.
Kadungon Pandyadhiraja.
2.
Adhiraja Maravarman
3.
Avanisulamani*
Seliyan SeodaD.
4.
defeated the
army
ab Nelvoli'.
I
6.
Kochchadaiyan Eanadhira fought the battle of Marudur defeated tbe Mabaratba ic the city of Mangalapuram,
; ;
6.
Arik68ariu Paranku^a Maravarman Tor-Maran defeated the Pallava at Kiilumbur conquered tbe Pallavas at Samkaramangai Rajaaimba (l) defeated Pallavamalla renewed tbe wails of Kudal, Vanji and Koli.
; ; ;
7.
Jatila Nedunjadaiyan
Parantaka
I
defeated tbe
Kadava
at
Pennagadam
Rajasimba
I
(II.)
9.
Varaguna-Mabaraja;
Jayantavarman
(?)
J
10.
Srimara, Srivallabba, Ekavira, Paracbakrakolahala conquered Maya-Paadya, Kerala, Siinbala, Pallava and Vallabba; Paliavabbanjana
11.
Varagunavarman
tbe
aficended
throne in
A.D.
862-863.
12.
married Vanavan
Jatila
of tbe smaller
ma.badevi,
13.
(III)
Manda-
ragurava Abhimanamtiru.
P.
for 1908.
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP-PANDYAN
Our
table
presenfc
is
259
the
the
famous
with
to
Pandyan
the
315
Iraiyanar Abapoiul
No. 6
these
Parankusa
is
Maravarman,
Ter-Maran;
at
at
he
said
to
Kulumbur, and
;
Sankaramangai he
defeated Pallava-
called
Kajasimha
I,
who
is
That
abstract
on the table
itself.
He was
this,
the
immediate predecessor
of
which the
dates
A. D.
769-770.
The conidentifica-
siderations on
tion are
given by himself in
the following
words
He takes the
part,
names
in the
Tamil
which
differs
considerably from
Having done
he states
;
culty
when we
get
to
260
BEGINNINGS OF
is
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
because
complication
much
is
greater,
the
number
to early
I
of
Pandya kings
very small.
Besides^
am
the
names
the
fit
into
manur
plates,
which
gave
in
the
last
Annual Report."
solely on
He
any
sufficiently
number
of
inscriptions in
that alphabet
comparison.
and
to a certain extent
from a
comparison
the
few
available
Vatteluttu inscriptions, we
may
not be far
wrong
if
we
assign
quarter of the
tenth century A. D.
*'
The
last
name
there-
This
must be borne
in
mind
itself
in regard to
what
It will
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP-PANDYAN
tions
261
six,
intervene
between
the
number
of
Here
is
the
it
whole
argument
Mr.
Veokayya, which
"
down
The
first
that
who was
de-
the Madras
Museum
plates,
but
that
the
latter.
The
plates
Museum
Velvikudi
grant.
In other words
the
the
first
must
be
than
between
the
Nedunjadaiyan
of the
namesake
of the
262
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
is
This
is,
in all probability,
any
of the
may
will
be forthcoming.
From
the foregoing
it
Madras
Museum
and paleographical
As both
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP-PANDYAN
may
263
even be questioned
main
line
or not. to
But
until
we have
definite
evidence
show that these three represent a distinct family, I propose to treat them as belonging
to the
italics
main
line,
and
to insert their
names
in
where they
in.
may
at present be
supposed
to
come
It is true
we have
absolutely no
But
his son
Maravarman
of
the Madras
Museum
may
Museum
boasts of
length his
it
campaign
in
Kongu.
Consequently
is
not altogether
the Madras
to the
Museum plates
264
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
epigraphof
in
reconciling
the
various
records
bases
Epigraphy on which
he mainly
his
particular investigations.
comes
to
available in literature,
become
only be
considerable hesitation.
Even
with
so
certainly would be
scientific
spirit,
more
that
as
in keeping
the
such
an
investigation
would
call
for
a necessary
pre-requisite to such
an enquiry, to reconcile
say
and arrive
;
at
to
definitely first
for
there
is
such connection at
points. Mr.
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP.PANDYAN
that the
table
is
265
first
literature as Palyagasalai
Mudukudumi Peru-
valudi of
whom we
Purananuru, but from the point of view of epigraphy he is brought into no organic
connection with the rest of the dynasty
indicated in
as
the
genealogical
is
table of
Mr.
Venkayya.
to
His name
drawn
in incidentally
village
previous
vikudi because
was a
gift,
as a result of the
performance of a
sacrifice (Yaga).
That point
connection.
must be
carefully noted
is
in this
The second
And
We
KaduDgon and his predecessors a little later. But here we might pass on immediately to number six with whom Mr. Venkayya shows an inclination to identify the Pandya who is
celebrated
in
the
modern
poems
of
the
let
commentary
to Iraiyanar Ahaporul,
and
266
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOBY
is
general significauce.
He
native
titles, all of
16
titles
that can be
made out
of the part of
They
are
here set
down
1.
Arikesari.
2.
3.
4. 5.
Uchitan.
Mummadil Vendan.
Visaridan.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Satrudurandharan.
10.
14.
15.
16.
Coming down
to
in the table, there are two such specifically general in perhaps one and referred,
terms; and
red as
what
is
is
most
remarkable
all
in
respect of these
that
they are
refer-
against the
Pallavas, one
of
which.
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP-PANDYAN
referring to a defeat of Pallavamalla.
battles,
^67
Of these
the
name Kulumbur
two or three
places, not
as
and
in one place I
will
fear the
reading
of
"Sankaramangai
;
spoil the
metre
the
poem but in none of the 14 battles which can be made out from the commentary does the name Pallava once occur either explicitly or
by obvious implication. The fourteen battles referred to in the commentary are
:
1.
(Stanza 309).
2.
Kulandai or Kalattur.
Naraiyur, against the Chera (Villavan,
this
is
3.
sometimes used
(possibly
to
designate Pallavas.)
4.
Sankamangai
mangai).
Sankara-
5.
6.
7.
Vallam. Arrukkudi
Nelveli.
of
Vanavan.
8.
Kottaru, where a victory was won and the Thennadu conquered a naval victory against the Chera
;
(241).
268
BEGINNINGS OF
9.
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
Kadayal
10.
11.
12.
Nedungulam.
Piilandai of
of
Venmatti.
list
scrutiny of this
As
this particular
is
there
to
the
possible
exception
it
3 above.
On
the
contrary
will be noticed in
the genealogical
of
table that
this
number four, the grand father number six, is given credit for a victory
army
of Vilveli.
at
is
There
very
good
authority
for
interpreting
this
Tirumangai Alvar
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP-PANDYAN
in the
269-
same terms.
In the second-ten
is
of his
in cele-
who made
Koil),
donations
to
the
temple
of
Paramesvara
In
to
he refers
Pallava
is
term Villavan.
Whether
Nenmeli
of
may
the verse.
But from the other stanzas of the same section, the enemy that the Pallava
he
is
Thus then
Arikesari
a Pallava.
Mara Yarman
That
is all
make out
at
present and
this is accepted,
we
270
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
to
support
it
the
Pandyas
Pallavas
Kanchi.
politics
For
this
position
of
South Indian
tions there
is
and international
rela-
commentary.
In
all
is
on the contrary
specific
references
battles
to
at
the
least
Four
Pandya
the
country
which
at
constitutes
part of
battles,
we already noticed, formed the Pandya country. Of these four we have specific indications, but many
more probably,
locality as a
will
mere
investigation
would,
in
my
or
The remaining
three
Pali or
Ten
Pali,
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUF-PANDYAN
possibly Nelveli and
271
confederate
either the
enemies,
alliance
in
or
And
such
a detailed statement of these, one would certainly expect to find reference to the Pallavas,
if
in
That omission
which
are merely
to
the conclusion
Pandyan
celebrity,
commen-
Pandyas
at a
somewhat
The
to
later
power
had
first of all
to
maintain
that
is
against
the
272
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
Chalukyas, and the records both of the Pallavas and of the Chalukyas are
full of
references
of
Kanchipuram
Chalukyas.
itself
several
times
by
the
The
of
latest of
which,
according
maditya II
which there
is
Kanchi
in the shape of
puram during the period 733-4 to 746-7^^. With this constant warfare on the northern frontier,
the Pallavas
it is
could not
to extend their
to
come
to
into
contact
The
latest
time thererefer
the
Pandyan
great
modern commentary
is
of the
Iraiyanar Ahapporul
Pallavas.
were
is
occupied
13
in the
in the
northern
war,
there
I,
Fleet
Bombay
Gazetteer Volume
Part 2
p. 327.
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP-PANDYAN
reference or two to
273
Kongu without
the slightest
make
a
We
age
are
therefore
than
the
of
the
great
varman as the country of the Chola and the Pandya and even the Kerala, occurs more or less in a conventional form among the conquests of his father Simhavishnu,
who may
the
sixth
have
to be referred to
the
end
of
century
A.D.
Among
great
grama and
of the
Nelveli.
Sankaragrama may
well
Tamil poem.
But there
is
nothing to
enemy.
detail
some
Udayachandra
in
is
supposed to
have slain
this
battle
the
Sahara king, Udayana and seized his mirrorbanner with a peacock's tail, and he carried
on the war
18
274
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
of
the eastern
Chalukya Vishnu.^^
Udayachandra's battle
could not be
the
Mara Varman,
number four of the genealogical table. It must much rather be that of his grandson
Arikesari
Parankusa,
is
otherwise
to
known
as
Bajasimha, who
Pal lava
said
have defeated a
great
Maila among
bore this
is
the
Pallavas.
Two rulers
ally.
title
The one
first
Naudivarman, the
is
Narasimhavarman
the
half
of
the
seventh century.
The Pallavamalla, enemy of Rajasimha, must have been Naudivarman under this
arrangement
predecessors
and
that
it
must
be
one
of
his
was
defeated at
Nelveli
by his grandfather.
Therefore
we
end
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP-PANDYAN
of the
275
arrangement.
Hi.
Later Literature.
for a while,
we
aid
to
make an
elective
Nelveli.
literature specifically,
some amount
of
certiainty be
who was
victor at Nelveli.
This
is
Pandyan contemporary
to the faibh of Siva
of
Tirugnana Sam-
by
Sambandar
himself.
at
He
in
is
a victory
dadi
stanza
60).
The same
fact
is
who
in
stanza eight of
There again
Nedumawe fail to
If
to
who
the
enemies were
the
Pandya overthrew
to look for this
at Nelveli.
we have
Nedumaran among
27^
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
in the
those,
table.
genealogical
the
there
may
be
the
Pandya
some
the
commentary
on
i&
Iraiyanar Ahapporul.
little
of a detail
Puranam, which
contained
in
elaborates
statement
v/hich
the
two
works from
Keferring
is
that
is
stated there
that
on the
field
of
battle at Nelveli
by
this
Pandya
in
Puranam.
Bat
there
to us
is
little
and that
There
it
is
said that
it
is
the
first of
from the
field
Margossa
l/o^^
The northerners
{(LpSssnuL^ii^sui^
enemy from
the distant
country
Q^^suQir^irQi3oQ&j(3Q)
have
to be interpretei
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP-PANDYAN
as perhaps
277
this
the Pallavas
and therefore
Pandyan
in all probability
who
was
Sambandar on the one side, certainly may be identical with the Pandyan, Maravarman,
Arikesari
number 4
of the
genealogical table.
If the period to
which
this ruler
can be referred
on the
becomes
table
very great.
And on
only
the
genealogical
we
are
left
one
Maravarman, and that is the grandfather of number 4. Whether he is the Pandyan referred
to in the
commentary
All
is
is
says about
called
personage
that
he was
Adhiraja
Maravarman Avanisulamani, who made the earth his exclusive possession and wedded
the
in
it
goddess of
absolutely
Prosperity.
That contains
to
no clue
there
lead
to
this
identification,
but
is
the
possibility
No. 2 in
Mr.
Venkayya's
of the
table,
might
be the Mara-
varman
commentator.
278
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
But
let
us
look
about a
little
Pandyan Maravarman, the grandson of this one whom we identify with the Pandyan
contemporary
of
the great
We
have some
regarding
him from
little
literature,
which
may
be of some
particular question.
He was
a Jaina
first
The
be included
among
of
the 63
Saiva devotees.
Mangaiyark-Karasi
was
the
daughter of a
is
Chola ruler
as
referred to
such by
Sambandar
himself.
One
is
reis^
ference in particular by
Sambandar
to her
worthy
of notice here,
on
Tevaram
father
is
of
the
there
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP-PANDYAN
referred to as
as king,
'
279
who
ruled
well-known
That
terms
is
an indica-
still
retained
some power,
is
avail-
we know
that
great
Pallavas.
refers to a
In another
same author
Pandyan
in
Tennan
and
at
him
as exercising
capitals.
In
in
who was
whose
Tenna-
Tennavan and
In another place, he
van,
is
referred to
as
who was
also
AH
contemporary Pandyan or an
280
ly
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
was
by a Nedyaa,
who was
also
who had
in the
who is
said
same verse
have
built
the
temple,
Sambandar's time.
If this interpretation is
to Sambandar's contemporary
who
could, with-
as equal to
mean
the
great
fiad in
the general part of the verses in the commentary to the Iraiyanar Ahapporul, and there
is
it
may
just
be of the
commentator
of
the
Iraiyanar
to a time
Ahapporul.
little
may perhaps
say
be a
generation,
to
Sambandar,
of the
about
the
commencement
seventh century or a
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP-PANDYAN
little
281
is
earlier,
we have
for
to allow
Narkirar and
the
Pandyau
of
Talaiyalanganam.
We
have
not
be extravagant for
Pandyan
Talaiyanganam
time
is
at the outside.
That length
not too
much nor
too extravagant
a tradition
reagarding the
Sangam
to
to
grow.
the
Sangam
any
rate
of
an
unmistakeable
Nambiyandar Nambi
referred to
spoken of as the
gam.
The Sangam
end
of
it
and
the
names
is
associated
first
unmistakeable
Sangam
this
282
BEGINNINGS OF
Sangam
is
S.
INDIAN HI8T0KY
of references to
author.
the
works
of
Tirumangai Alvar^
of
who
anterior in
point
time to Nambi-
yandar
plates,
Nambi.
one
The
larger
Sinnamanur
so far been
of the records
we have
There
is
one
passage in the
Tamil
The
first
is is
is
The
epigraphists,
including
even
the
late-
by taking
to
this
Tamil version
cf
the
Mahabharata
of
be
the
same
as the-
Bharatavenba
name
the
dedi-
Sangam
works.
The Perundevanar
of
the
in the
work
varman
victor at Tallaru.
TALAIYALANGANAT-TUP-PANDYAN
28B
to a dynasty of rulers
'
who had
for
is
possible.
The
and
Mr.
Venkayya saw
it
this difficulty,
tion
ot
earlier
No
other
conclusion
possible
and
it
must be
said to
Mr.
Pinnathur
Narayanasami
Aiyar,
the
must be regarded
seems
to
as distinct from
of
view.
Perun-
be
rather
of that
common
in the
name
who wrote
commentary
besides this
Therefore then
the
^4 BEGINNINGS OF
Bharatavenba probably
S.
INDIAN HISTOBY
the ninth century,
of the
of
Bharatam and
in the so-called
also
Sangani collection.
The
institution of the
Sangam
is
referred to
^nd the
battle at Talaiyalanganam.
It is not
necessary that these three should have happened together in the same reign, but they were
new dynasty
That
would
who
drafted
the
inscription.
conclusions
we have
is
stated in the
is
not obligat-
whole
of
langanam was a
with
the
celebrity,
who was
associated
Sangam prominently.
of that
His chief
important member
Academy.
285
of the
Bharata
scholar of reputation
of
literature,
according
to
this
body
who
the
made
tive
the
collections,
and
composed
name Sangam
find
works.
three
Therefore then
referred
we
are
that
the
less
incidents
to are
more or
closely
to
connected, and
the same
age,
referrable practically
age
of
the
Talaiyalanganat-Tup-Pandyan.
and that
for
this
The Ahanaauru
verse
is
collection
which
this
Bharatampadiya Perundevanar
believed to
made an invocatory
Kudrasarman, son
collection
of
have
Brahman
was made
for the
uvaludi.
and arrange
it
known
divisions.
We
of
find the
name
of this
Eudrasarman, son
ciated with the
commentary
the
286
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOBY
is
Iraiyanar Ahaporul.
He
described; there in
have to take
them, to
must
Narkirar and
all lines of in-
Thus then
vestigation
seem
to lead us
the
Sangam
activity for
Tamil was
CHAPTEE
VII.
We
refer-
works respectively
of
On
from
the
therefore they
must be contemporary
it
is
all
is
internal
evidence
which
of
marshalled in the
Literature."
^
"Augustan Age
would
Tamil
here
We
mention
the
karam
in
what ought
to be regarded Narkirar's
The
first
daram
Pillai's edition,
forms stanza 8
1
of
Canto
Silappadika-
See
my
288
BEGINNINGS OF
;
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
is
Silappadikaram.
Taken
able to
of
various other
of
quotations from
I
literature,
which
am
identify
Nar.
14),
its illus-
of
and
of
Pandyan
Ma
Ibid)of the
older
commentary
of
it
as the
work
Narkirar
He
Tolkappiam
different
for us to
p.4 of
Swaminabbayar's Param
ASTEONOMICAIi
ary for the
to this
&c.
CONSIDERATIONS
289
with Narkirar.
further
till
point
are
my
studies
for
Kalladam
advanced enough
as to the
me
to express
an opinion
genuieneness or
otherwise of the
work.
But enough has been said here to indicate that the commentary on the IraiAhapporul
is,
yanar
in
all
probability,
passages, and
clear
from some
being
modern renderings
It is thus clear,
the
Sutras,
among
so
far
testi-
other passages.
against such
3
edition.
290
BEGINNINGS OF
is
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
mony
at
least
for
some
shall
;
There
is
we
have
that
to
is,
examine perhaps
some care
which the
details are
found in
the
most
branch of work,
may
chrono-
work
epigraphical dates
position to
we
of
approve
the
matter
great
that,
satisfaction
however, that,
to
mind,
the
a
and
in respect of the
dates of
to
Alvars,
he
re-
has thought
cantation,
it
fit
make
complete
as
these
astronomical
details
vera-
examina-
vestigation,
which
works oi
ASTEONOMICAL
literature,
&c.
CONSIDEKATIONS
291
It is
to be
hoped that he
particular connection.
The whole
relating
astronomical investigations
particular part
fall
to this
under which come in those various considerations as to the character of Indian astronomy,
how
far
it
has borrowed
its
sources, etc.,
and
one ex-
other words
calendrical parts of
his scheme.
Wo
wish to
part
say
nothing more
about
this
latter
than to remark
details
that
in
in regard
to the
few
found
the
Silappadikaram and
at
all
Manimekhalai that
use of in a
could
be called
made
way which
point
of
is
very
of
unsatisfactory
from
gation
^
the
view
to
any
investi-
which
pretends
be
scientilBc. *
arfciclea in
See
my
friend
thd
292
BEGINNINGS OF
taken
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
mentions in
with
The few
the
texts
are
in combination
perhaps
the
somewhat
clumsy
calendrical
efforts of the
came three centuries after the author, and what is worst of all for the case, these
estimate
details
in with
It is
not necessary
as the
curious
may
find
it
worked out in
Mr. Swamikannu
cular subject.
Pillai's papers
on
this parti-
We
shall
content ourselves
which
leads.
He
the Todas ta
tenth century
he
is
driven to regard
While admitting that there is a somewhat close agreement, deliberately aimed at by the commentator, between the commentary and the text in respect of
5
these
details',
that requires
we cannot help feeling that a set of detail so many modifications cannot be held ta
it is
claimed
ASTRONOMICAL
Tamil,
&c.
CONSIDEEATIONS
293
of
having
had
an
of
anterior
Kanarese
Papyrus
of
Oxyrhynchus
^,
of the
No
two
that pass.
We
data of astroof
nomy
chronology.
we think
it
perhaps very
much more
Pillai
has
Dewan
Bahadur.
As an
illustration
of
his
method, we shall
399405.
294
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
which occurs
in
Puram
229.
We set
down poem
un5](56cf\qLurr(i|>sy^ag|
i3sSsisTQajif^uirLJu<s
sfrQs^^irLjQurriEjQ
A
is
glance
down
to passage will
show that
it
The
of the stars
The
given
are,
in
literal
day
^.g.>
was
the
(Krittika belonging to
first
Adu
(Aries),
quarter of
it
it
ASTEONOMICAL
;
&c.
CONSIDEEATIONS
visible
295
were those
Anuradha
Punarvasu
{qpiuuSsbt) to
(^^DL-ii^srrifi)
;
the
margin-star of
the
changed
;
position (descended
the
just
was
the old
constellation
in such a situation
earth without
north- (both
without
striking
auspicious directions).
Mr. Swamikannu
Pillai
tries
to eke very
much more
proceed
to
astronomically
refer to
two
the
Mr. Kanakasabai
drawn.
Pillai to
is
which attention
assumption
Aries (Adu).
The
first
sun was in
The second
Panguni
to
is
according to the
the
solar
be
lunar
Panguni
296
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
Pillai
which Mr.
gorically
Swamikannu
far
states cate-
know is never the case" that Panguni means lunar Panguni. Whether the Tamils knew the lunar
"so
as I
arrangement
cern at
will
jis
appear
later.
present
another criticism
Dewan Bahadur
poem and
ed,
in
his
commentator
in
what
This
mind
to do.
my
of
the
expression
Panguni Uyar
i
Aluvam
two
{uiEi(^aFI-\rS^iufr+^(ipULD),
made up
words
of this is the
'
Zenith Arc'
He complains
Sangam
dictionary nor
fortnight of Panguni".
One would
for
like to
ask the
got
his
same
expression,
read his
own
expression.
at
any
rate,
The equivalent Zenith Arc' has, too much of that look, though it
ASTKONOMICAL
may
for
&c.
CONSIDERATIONS
modern
for
297
not
be a very bad
derivative
down
*
here,^
the
ia
synonyms
the
Aluvan
lexicon
of
as
we
find
it
new Tamil
my
There are 12
of
Aluvam
of
lexicon
is
anywhere near
Zenith
Arc'.
The
actual
to
primary meaning
8 ^(tpsuihy
be
Depth
41,1^^.
;
aluvam, n, si-^weaBiL^QpQj^^
(.i)7.)
-^S^^eo.
(ldTisou,
528)-
Wide
sea
*^eo.
3 Pit; ^ifi. ^ifiL^ff(Lp6U;i^ {u)'2eo u. 368.) 4 ExbensioD, as of a forest, extended surface* extended
level, plain
.
unuLf,
{seS^ 121.)
QjSemsu^ejQpQj^^
5 Country,
diatricfc
tsrT(d.
{^L.ir.)
6 Field of
Qsirear
battle
QuiriTSS&rut. (OJireinoffQpQi^^eifasair
(L./fa)L/.
^i/isiT. 51.)
7 Battle?
Qqi. Q. 23).
^ Orowdedneaa, closeness
ffl9Dz_.
Qts^dstc.
19).
',
^i^^. uipuueaiuj
10 Trenabling 12
fs^saih.
[jt/s rS,)
11 Fortress; ^itssl^,
{^oirr),
(|f.
War drum
(pa^i^.
/^).
298
BEGINNINGS OF
*
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
;
merely
expanse
of the
and no more
all
other
meanings
I set
down below
Purananuru
to ^Zenith
^.
In none
of
these
is
there
the
Arc'
It
GhiDtamani Q319.
2
^iT^^s
sefriEjaesBiQiiT
aiTwuii^&ia^^.
Silap.
V. 83.
3 Qojih^ inTiTLjuQsu(^<FLD^^
Qeusoin<oiith.
Pur.
Vemba
p.
116.
Ibid
p. 70:
Ibid
p.
107.
Ibid
iLGsaLipQi^^sf a>ujSinius(duu
/)'fewu.
11.
p.
79.
ai-.&)
528.
Ibid
u^ffQj^ /7in6uJ Q^iTs&}iEis6BiffiLii}).
1.
368.
Q u(n^ihuiT6aaf
35o.
Aham.
20.
ASTRONOMICAL
fore to
&c.
'
CONSIDERATIONS
Zenith Arc
'
299
imagine that
is
at all
an
word
Aluvam.'
its literal
first
word as standthird
large
rising, the
of a
word
in
its
literal
significance
collection or expanse.
The
significance of the
Without
the star
Mr. Swami-
kannu
of
Pillai
wishes to
know where
for
first fifteen
Panguni from.
the
Speaking
of
moment
month Panguni is the month when the full moon is in conjunction with
Panguni or Uttara Phalguni, that
full
is,
on the
moon day of that month whatever that be, the full moon rises in the asterism- Uttara Phalguni and keeps company with it to its
300
BEGINNINGS OF
that
is, all
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
In the
its
first
setting,
the night.
till it
quadrant
both
the
of its course
reaches
zenith
Uttara Phalguni
described
and
the
moon
(not
would
be
by
star-gazer
necessarily an astronomer
as rising.
or even astrologer)
month however,
would be correct literally if the author described Uttara Phalguni in the bright
it
Hence
whole
the
this
of the
zenith.
meant
correct in his
point
of
of
mathematical astronomy.
This
may
ASTEONOMICAL
&c.
CONSIDEEATIONS
301
meant a complete lunation. The name Tingal for the month in these classics (note passages
quoted
us
the a
by
clear
Mr. Swamikannu
lead for
of
it,
Pillai,
gives
this
supposition,
and
a
first
is
half
or
what
the
is
called
puksha,
commentator
first
renders by the
fifteen
days
if
of
Panguni.
thus
clear
that
of the
words and
way
it,
that
and
it is
hardly necessary to
for
hold any-
body responsible
account
him ta
to
read
in his language.
What
is,
is
much more,
to
draw
abso-
ed our
own way
it,
lutely unwarranted.
We
shall
now
proceed
The more
own
theory,
rest
is
that
and they
upon more
302
BEGINNINGS OF
poem
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
The main point
examined
is,
of
just
we, re-
on a particular day
fall,
at mid-night,
he
his
saw a meteor
friends, that
no harm might
the
king,
would have
it,
The
poet
simply takes
it
upon himself
Those
meteor
The
corrections, is
and
as
he
when
the
meteor
fell.
it
would
proceeds
put
himself
three
ASTRONOMICAL
questioQS
&c.
CONSIDERATIONS
303
which
the
The
the
first
of course is
quote
the
day
of
month
the
;
second,
omission to note a
the omission other planets.
third,
of
to note
the
We
the
explanation
for
these
but
Mr.
Swamikannu
Pillai's
answers
find
very consi-
To
an answer he goes
of Dr. Fleet,
and
known
In findpro-
make
the following
remark.
The
modern astrologer in the same circumstances would have endeavoured to discover whether
the remaining planets were likely to avert or
accentuate the
poet
disaster."
Precisely.
as
The
poets
at the
are not
many men
present time
who know
804
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
The
further
know no further.
of
which he proceeds
are that
time, in
India
apparently,
and
the
when the movements of the sun moon were regarded loithout any
;
and
that the
Hindus
also appear
to
have been
motions
the
moon
more
shows
origin of
also
among
Hindus
italics
is
The
are
and we
shall
examine
little detail.
We
of the
knowledge
of
by the Hindus. In regard to this, the first point to examine is, what exactly the nature
of the
week
day
is
to find reference to
is
includ-
ASTRONOMICAL
in
&c.
CONSIDEEATIONS
to
305
the
following
order according
their
as the centre
of
the
universe
the
Moon,
of the
this,
he
nomy
latter.
was borrowed
He
before A. B.
who wrote
who wrote
week got
in A. D. 378.
He
to
then
proceeds to explain
how
day
of the
the
various planets.
The
Aryais
that
306
BEGINNINGS OF
;
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
centre
is
and
for this
first.
They
got arranged in
this order
Saturn,
Jupiter,
Mars,
hour
of the
of
with
Saturday
and
following
to state
Friday.
Then Dr.
Fleet proceeds
somehow equated
he
of
first
how
with
Sunday
the
and when
the
west,
it
became
Christian
the
by
an
edict
of
emperor
Constantine in A, D. 321.
in the days of
He
in
Dio Cassius
or soon
after
ASTRONOMICAL
names
of the
&c.
CONSIDERATIONS
of the
307
planetary
week days had become general in the Koman world. So the week began with
Sunday,
*
ended
Sabbath,
use.
It is
Hindus
He quotes the
authority
He
proceeds
to
ex-
amine where
not find
it
it
any inscription before A.D. 484, where the day of the week Thursday is menin
tioned.
He
finds the
had got
On
Fleet,
10
of the
day
plainly
enough due
pre-eminence of
name Bfaattaraka
308
BEGINNINGS OF
if
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
any undated work^
did
in
the
name
of
week day
work
as
occur that
stamped
A-D. 400
the
work
probably
any
rate.
That
is
the position of
Let us
Kali-
closely.
and by
the
Tara he means
tions,
five planets
stars other
is
and by Graha he
beginning with
Bhauma
(Mars),
Moon
being omitted on
are too plainly
first
two
among
Darpana
Puranas
explains^!.
of classification is followed
in
Puranas
but
the
cannot
will
be
quoted as against
hear
of
Dr. Fleet,
as
who
of
not
any
such,
they
cannot
be
accurately dated.
11
The tendency
western
thereon.
ASTRONOMICAL
scholars
&c.
CONSIDERATIONS
is
30^
now-a-days
variety
earlier
to
date
Kalidasa
on
a
of
considerations,
perhaps
is
little
than 400.
Bub
gives
this
not
There
the
exactly
The
text occurs
of
poem 14
of
the second
section
the
Senguttuvan
ancient
poet
Sera
and
is
ascribed
to
an
KumattQr Kannan^^
is
and the
glory
the conjoint
lustre
the
Moon,
the Sun,
and
the
five
planets
beginning
{f^fren Qsureft,)
doubt,
and
fche
passage
thus
f^^
^ff6aaLD [<iQ
(SearjD
ejL^^uo SjouLjuudifS
QojQff&pnemu
310
BEGINNINGS OF
old
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
the
following
the
commentator
of
ofiers
explanation
to
the
passage.
Attempting
here used in
is
two
well-known
that term
;
are
not
included
in
and therefore
five.
Of course the
answer
of Dr. Fleet
and those
this
that follow
him would
be
that
poem
and therefore
Quite
been proved
but there
is
very
much more
in
It will
be noticed that the text begins with the Moon, next comes the Sun, and next follow the five
in
is
not
Moon
first
is
by the exigencies
of metre.
The
line
would
ASTEONOMICAL
What
takes
is
it
&c.
CONSTDEKATIONS
?.
311
Dr. Fleet
of a
sudden something
end
of the
at the
fourth
nomers
of
the
Eoman Empire
to the
We
would
order in which
list
do occur in a bilingual
now
full
in the British
seven,
:
planetary group
arranged as follows
Venus, Ishtar,
Saturn, Ninip (Nirig)
The reason
regarded the
for this
primacy
of the
*
Moon
as
Of
Moon
312
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
very early, and
of the
Hammurabi Pantheon
a study of the various attributes of these gods associated with the days
different in character
in
To
Nebo
(Nebu)
of the
Babylonians.
He
was no doubt
it
him
^^
he
is
source of wisdom.
therefore of
all
The
writing
and
literature is
more particularly
name
designates
Stylus^^."
This is a character
with that
agrees
far closer
Hindus
Although in
this bilingual
which we have
E*.
is
the
Babylonian god
Beligious
Beliefs
and Practice ia
Page 95.
ASTKONOMICAL
them
&c.
CONSIDEBATIONS
heading of the
list
313
at present, the
is
by the
moon
it
in respect of its
Sumerian associations.
Could
from Babylonians
have
the
Moon
for
Mars may
great
Mars
to
is
which according
him
Mars,
the
would be a
ki-gaU^.
Bresh-
there
is
among
was a planet
animal
of evil,
its
was the wolf." The Indian god associated with Mars is Yama or death,
form
the nearest
Whereas
in Greece,
who assumed
his
boar-
The goddess
314
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
The
Indian,
rather
We
The
drift
of
the Phoenician
but
eastward
Sumerian
mythologies.
When
the
"
new
god,
sky and
ocean
who resembles Ea-Oannes and MitraShamash, were already declinOther cultural influences
Certain of the Aryan tribes, for
who
links with
ing in
splendour.
were at work.
their dead
and worshipped
god-
At the
"late
beliefs,,
ASTKONOMICAL
and
&c.
CONSIDEEATIONS
315
Ages
of
the Universe.
and subject
These "late
we
are forcibly
reminded
of the
who
is
an authority
calculated
of
Brahma" was
resembles closely an
astronomical
of
Babylonia
and Assyria
p. 199.
then that
the Indians
the possi-
were that
if
borrowed
these,^^ the
16 Reference
chances
of their
borrowing from
to the article in the>
may
here be
made
Mr. B. Go
316
BEGINNINGS OF
far
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
than from the
Babylonia were
greater
late,
as after Firmicus
Maturnus
and
Panlus
Alexandrinus.
In
In the arrangement
zodiac,
it
of the
houses of the
it
is
now admitted
that
was the
divided
Babylonian
who
which there
is
a noticeable distinction in
house
as
it is
known
to
The Babylonians
The Greek
cornus,
The Hindu
the goat-
equivalent
fish
Makara
is
much
nearer
The name of the planet Venus gives it among the Greeks the character of the woman-Aphrodite, and Venus
than the goat
itself.
in
Babylonia
but
Venus
is
among
that
The
regarded as
or a god-
ASTKONOMICAL
rishi.
&c.
CONSIDERATIONS
317
It is
now
Yuga and
which
of
Brahmana
period
Indo-Aryan history show very close associations with the Saroi of the Babylonians,
in the
and
an
of
the cosmic
latter are
Irish^*^.
of
the
The Indian
Indian
order
of
of high reputation
anterior to Kaiidasa
Krbayuga Vishnu was Narayana of Couch-whita colour. In the Tretayuga he was Vishnu, who measuin the
colour.
of
who
killed
Havana,
In
green).
Kali he
becomes Damodara
This
view.
is
of
quite representative
orthodox scholarly
318
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
Brown
of
Primitive
Constellations
a resume
quotes
Diadorus,
"
who gave
five ^planets
Babylonian astrono:
The
in
were called
interpreters'
and
divinities
of
the council.
The
chiefs
of
number, to each
whom
they assign a
month
and one
the
of the twelve
system
of
the
Hindus.
We
kannu
basis as essentially
<}hronological
whereas,
is
the
basis
of
the
Babylonian system
even seasonal.
-as
astrological
and perhaps
That
this is so is in evidence
ASTEONOMICAL
This quotation
seasonal
early
of the
&c.
CONSIDEKATIONS
319
it
was
as
well
as
of
astrological.
We
have
evidence
the
of
seasonal
character
arrangement
in
6,
year
the
Tolkappiam
where
in
is
Sutra
clearly
made on
the zodiac,
season.
and beginning
explains
a
'
later
man
is
it
The year
which
time.
who marks
Sun
to
From
of
the house
Cancer, which
is
a division,
rainy
season,
The six this year make each two months and are named respectively the
;
season,
August-September
;
windyof early
season
of
of
the
warm
Myfchs
p.
of
By DA, Mac-
kenzie
309.
320
sun,
BEGINNINGS OF
June- July.
S.
INDIAN HISTOBY
there
is
So
seasons
that
is
one
division
basis
of
it
now which
the
is
altogether
of
on the
the
year,
and
of
that
the
is
time-honoured
division
the Tamils
purposes of
rest
grammar and
poetics,
whether they
upon
But
Baby-
by the
system
as the
their
of the
the
souls of the
departed good,
who from
distant positions
exercised an influence
The Appa-
stamba Dharmasutra,
^^
which
is
an early Sutra
earlier
than A. D, 400r
those of "
Good Works
24,
13.
the
all
IX
Tafera ye.
punyakrtab,
taaham
ASTBONOMICAL
else
;
&c.
CONSIDEEATIONS
is
321
The same idea occurs in the Ramayana in a more general and popular connection when Indrajit, son of Bavana, by
tiriya Sarnhita.^^
his extraordinary
power
of
head
of
.
Rama
mitage.
husband.
She
is
made
to state in this
connection that
of
his
he
is
said to see
of
'
family
royal
but,
as
she said,
forelorn
in
that
is
down
below.'^^
This
a clear
Sukrfeam va etani.
jydiimshi yannaksbatrarii.
Tai
21 Pitra
Sam
V.
iv. 9.
nunam
svarge sama-
galah
divi Daksbatrabbufcastvam
mabatkarmakrtam priyam.
puriyam
rajarsbi
veksbaae.
&g,
322
BEGINNINGS OF
of
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
belief
indication
the general
of
men
of
good
into
stars,
that
of
which
con-
one
of the
main items
Babylonian
astronomical
tic
belief,
minor
differences.
it
Babylonian astrology appears to be the recognition of the astral bodies as spirits or fates,
who
in
It
and
mankind.
were
Babylonia.
That
contact with
quotation
planets,
from
Plutarch they
call
" respecting
the
which
the
birth-ruling
divinities,
down
that two
of
a
is
middle
"
nature
an astrologer
with
the
are propitious
good,
and
may
be
malign
with
ASTKONOMICAL
bad. 22
&c.
OONSIDERATIONS
of
323
That
is
this
the
Greeks also
Pax
of
A^ristaphanes.
is
character Trygaeus
shown
is
as
having just
;
slave
we become
stars
when we
die
Certainly
'
And Trygaeus
is
made
to follow the
answer by pointing to
metamorphosed.
this
is
" Aristaphanes
making fun
of
some
(Custom and
Myth
in
of
The counterpart
^^ >dMR^Rr ^n^
Vishnu Parana
I. xii
JT^TPpr
ii
8991.
324
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
penance
result of a severe
all
the
is
stars
and
The
is
star
Dhruva
according
pole
star,
Hindu astronomical
above
ideas the
all
which, as such,
constellations
shayab).
When
get
seasonal year of
times,
we
the
things,,
which
that
is
where exactly we
county.2* There
is
Tamil
would ascribe
astronomy
exactly
is
all
elements in
is
to
the Greeks,
and that
of
what
at the
bottom
To
this
school belongs
Professor Jastrow
practically
all
the
of
Puram
with which
we
ASTRONOMICAL
&c.
CONSIDi^KATIONS
325
research
seems to
Professor
Goodspeed
aiigury.
mapped
out,
heavenly
destinies. "^5
What
i's
this claim
in
behalf
of
Greece
with a body of
business
it
official
astronomers,
eclipses
whose
was to predict
and issue
and obser-
very
\^ell
it
from
and the following extracts are taken with the comments of Mr. D. A.
"
Mackenzie.
-about
As
the^Moon,
My
to me, a watch
was kept
for
in the ditles of
p.
93.
326
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
We
observe it
the city
of
Akkad
ordered
and
My
Lord,
me
to
passed before
king,
my
now
it
report to the
of
My
Lord.
was an
eclipse
the
Moon
was
total,
over
on the land
of the
on the land
of
the Chaldees."
Professor Sayce
comments
northern
Sippara
;
"
We
Babylonia
one
at
Akkad,
;
near
and one
at Borsippa,
As
was, natural
not necessary to
go very
much
We
the
may
state,
however, that
according
to
zodiac
Myths
of
22.
ASTEONOMICAL
seq.) ]f
&c.
CONSIDEKATIONS
327
early
and
early
astronomical
and
of the
side,
there
had been borrowing by the Hindus the chances are that the borrowing was from Babylonia
rather than from Greece, whatever might have
Even
difficult
in respect of this
to
what we
very
understand
is
why an
astronomer
of the reputation of
Varahamihira,
who examiues all the systems of astronomy then known to him dispassionately, and agrees
with some views
of
of
with
that
he
often
quotes
with
approval
Yavanacharya
others,
as against
at
Satyacharya
as
and
is
so
far
any
rate
astrology
328
BEGINNINGS OF
But that
S.
INDIAN HI8T0KY
not to our present
is
concerned.
purpose.
is
What we
that
in the particular
Pillai
poem
We
of
in
same Tamil
reference
to
the
month
^''^
of
Masi which
is
It
must however
month
used there
is
lds^
The oommentary explains MSiSi, as the character of Masi and fehe expression Ma-kiic which gives fche nam fco the poem maaas the doubling of the body owing to cold* (In the month, of Cf. Sans: Makare Kumdalakrtih. Makara people double up their bodies owing to the cold.)
ASTRONOMICAL
become
&c.
CONSIDERATIONS
It
329
has perhaps
now
hazardous to make,
be very
v/ould
it
works
of literature
making
refer-
It
now
The
animistic ideas
pects,
of the stars in
early notions of
We
shall not
enter
who
and whether they were at all connected with the South Indian Tamils but we might state
;
is
very
little
doubt that
28 Attention
may
Megasthenes extracted: on
may
This pre-
sumes a year
of
365 days.
30
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
way
at
of the sea.
least in the
6th and 5th centuries B.C., and that communication would certainly bear the inference thai
some
of these ideas
also travelled
therefrom^
although we are in no position to state definitely that the borrowing w^as all
side.
on the Indian
The
fear,
proved to be
on,
we
cannot stand.
We
week day
week and
of
presiding deity
the
day,
astronomers
do bring in the
into consideration.
But
this, it
strikes us,
is-
All
else
is
augury and
lying that.
animistic notions
that,
it
under-
seems
much.
an>
Magazine,
already
referred
to,
by
We
sus, in regard to
poem 229
of
Purara, of
our
own
in the
body
of the paper.
" (1)
The passages
in Siiappadikaram
Piliai
that
are
are discussed
by Mr- Swamikannu
text
found in
/5/r/r6jwrai/r6TO^,
and commentary,
and
siUSstnir^'fr&oi^s.
^tressrsir^m^.
tell
nam
took place.
These
^atjih^'SF
Q^^,<^siiT^
881
332
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
(Lfih ^ffSssariLjiEi
^^.tsj^iu
^^suirir^^/D
Q^ins^Qiup;Sl^
Q<3=^!rLiieuT ffQpiliQupp
^^L-'^^(ffd
f5irLL'35L<sOiru^
eat
^<oQ^
stR6u<srrQ
^ f^u^Q^freku^/D
Q<3='6ijsufnLJ'i
Sip
^ ^Q^et^Q
ei)
QtijesrpeuTj}/.
The passage
iollows
:
in sLLQeanr^TeiD^
which reads as
Madura by
fire
as
Of these, the
they
text, valuable as
the
commentator's
it
note
and
if
the
details
mentioned in
be accurate,
we ought
APPENDIX.
certainty
333
the date
of
Silappadikaram.
Mr.
Swamikannu
a
definite,
by
us
the commentator
capable of
date,
giving
unimpeachable
says that
and
1
he
exultantly
"between A.D.,
and
all
Let
The passage
details
(i)
:
was hoisted
(iii)
After 28 days,
the
duration
the
was lowered.
28th
Vaikasi,
On
the
Monday,
the
Anusham
(v)
On
834
BEGINNINGS OF
moon had
left
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
moon,
when
dark Kovalan
It will be
with Kannaki.
with
set
his
wife,
last
that
it
was
after the
moon had
on the
day
next morning,
posing for
when the sky was dark. Supa moment the details given by
lived probably in
if
them?
kannu
The commentator
;
and even
Mr. Swami-
was writcalcula?
own
Mr.
Swamikannu
have been
of
*
Pillai opines
that there
should
a continuous unbroken
tradition
the
and
the
commentator
in
the
he had
Even upon
APPENDIX.
not be accepted as really of value, as after
it
335
all
of
and as
in the
process
of repetition
However,
the
as
one
Pillai's
paper
the
that
We
are told
and
as
we
was
Monday, the month of Chifcrai in that year must have had only thirty days. So the festival,
which was
of
twenty-eight days
'
duration must
flag
must
see
fails
to
how
There
is
poem that Kovalan and Kannaki left for Madura on the night of the bath itself, before dawn of next morning, and yet we read in the note that they left on the
of the story in the
Obviously
336
the
BEGINNINGS OF
note as
ifc
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
its
sfcands,
is
astronomical learning,
explicable.
at
Is the astronomical
information,
any
rate, free
that
Swamikannu
who enabled
of
are
Mahama-
hopadhyaya's footnote
To arrive at 756 A. D. Diwan Bahadur L.D. Swamikannu Pillai has freely edited the commentator's note. As regards the commencement
of Ghitrai in that year,
he says that
it
was a day
of
38 Ghatikar
after sunrise^
He
commentator appears
to have^
APPENDIX.
337
from **Jyeshta," the star under whose malignant influence, Kovalan and Kannaki
left for
Madura.
This
itself
demn
What is
the
and wife
left their
house in Kaveripattinam
of
the popular
star,
and
ward as
first
best as he
If the star
on the
to
day
of Chitrai
Pillai,
has according
Mr.
Swamikannu
note, so has
also
the Thithi
is
for
he
tells
us
a mistake
Thus
:
make
A. D. 756
acceptable,
should be
made
to read
The month
of Chitrai in
that year
The second
shatra. Mr.
22
moon
Chitra nak-
Swamikannu Pillai
338
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
of Chitrai, the full
in 756 A.
D. in the month
moon commenced
full
moon
rent
at
all.
at
sunrise
on
speaking the thithi of that day was Thrayodasi, the thirteenth lunar day.
However, Mr.
difficulty
Swamikannu
Pillai
gets
over the
inconvenient
*'fuli
full
moon!
Why
the commentator,
who
is
at
such
up lacunae
with unreliability.
Eelating
to
Kovalan's
it
departure
with
was on Tuesday,
the
(Jyeshta),
after
moon
of
the
and before
sunrise.
The statement
is
APPENDIX.
very specific
;
339
it
to
that
the
loose.
Though
denote
language
the
note
would
left
Kovalan
of the
and Kannaki
of
the
fourteenth thithi
existed with
started.
moment they
that
Mr.
Swamikannu
Pillai finds
given
on Tuesday
of
that there
was no combination
;
when they started (as a matter of fact Anusham lasted till 10 A. M. on Tuesday)
that there was no Chadurdasi at
all
on Tuesday,
full
moon moon
;
day.
We
Swamikannu
to doubt
Pillai that
and
if
we may be permitted
Mr. Swamikannu
fact could
whether,
340
leffc
BEGINNINGS OF
out
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
who
in
by
the commentator
is
the
trying to account
befell
Kovalan.
day
astrologically
condemned
;
and
it is
pre-eminently bad
omen
to
is
mentioned
at
all,
when, according
Adyarkunallar
is
Mr.
Swamikannu
Pillai,
so scru-
pulous as to mention the subsequent co-existense of Jyeshta star with Tuesday, the
first
day
of
the journey
of
It
may
also
have tried so
far to
show how
Mr, Swamikannu
A.D.
satisfies
all
is
Pillai's
down
in
the note,
there
without very
material alteration
could be
made
Pillai
Mr. Swamikannu
aside
has
abs^olutely
brushed
the
of his
own
that will
APPENDIX.
support his viewIf
341
still
be adopt-
eighth century
mekalai.
is
by Manithe argu-
ment
is
Mani
f!FQj6sar^mp(D(in^i^ OiTiLt-.Temnf-i)
xi.
4046
QuJT/Oleu'rstr^ Q(7r^&irj^Ui,
Mani
xii.
778
342
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
Mani
xv,
226.
are
told,.
The
is
we
that they
us that the
at his first
Manimekalai
appeared
before
the
pool
of
I
am
Pillai has
misunderstood the
to
takes
them
mean
when Manimekalai
expected
appearance.
It
is
in
the
extract
from canto
erru
XI
^fits'r&-BiBt^ir
Quir(ip^uQuir(ip^ occurs.
There
is
na
tell
If
Divatilakai intended to
Manimekalai that that day Buddha was expected to reappear, she would have in unambigu-
ous
terms
proclaimed
that
great
and
all
important
fact,
APPENDIX.
mentioniDg
ance
of the
is
343
merely
the miraculous
appear-
sacred bowl.
referring to
There
is
no doubt
that she
an annually recurring
Budbe
may
made
from which
clear that
when
Tamil
scholar,
The Mahamahopadhyaya
of
it.
if
may
be permitted to say so in
agree
humility, I
perfectly
with
that
interpretation.
1,616 years
is
and he
when Buddha is born again in the year 1616, a new era of universal peace and love and
344
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
matter of fact
the
Buddha has already appeared again on the day and at the moment when Manimekalai obtained the bowl, Aravana Adigal would have told her that the new era had already dawned as
the
already born;
but he
but only
is
makes a
happen.
The language
advent
pre-
eminently suggestive of an
It
is
'^
yet
to
QujT/6lUfrefr^(o(n^drj)i,
L6jS/D-
Mr. Swamikannu
Pillai
upon
as
it
built
is
an argument.
of
If
my view
it is
supported
by the view
is
correct,
of the
problem we
view of
Supposing, howPillai's
Mr. Swamikannu
is
the passages
effect is
correct,
to
make out
of
APPENDIX.
consider
to
345
from
what
date
1,616
years are
three
his
be
counted,
and to which
history,
of the
events in
Buddha's
or
his
birth,
sambodhi
of
his nirvana,
refers.
the combination
time
units
it
Mr.
Swamikannu
to
Pillai
thinks
has reference
Buddha's
nirvana,
and
from that
be reckoned.
He
none
of
purposes, as that
near what
is
said to
have
Christ
to 771 A.D.
poem Maniat
To
arrive
this
Mr.
Swamikannu
Pillai
of
arbitrarily
the nirvana
Buddhists had in
be reckoned
that
from
the
date
*'
of
the
nirvana,
the
expression
5^0
u^^otQll^
Qlltq^^^jj^
346
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
date of the solar
is
Q^^piSesr'' refers to
the
month and
in
is
not mentioned
full
'
the
passage, but
is
moon.
It
the middle of
is
the
14th in
the
list
of 27
stars,
counting from
Karthigai.
Let
that,
however, pass.
the
What
The Tamil Buddhists of South India had no doubt their own traditional dates based on the
accounts current in the Tamil country.
cording to such tradition
(1)
Ac-
Buddha's birth
was
full
in
moon; and
in
full
Rishaba
Tuesday,
Vaisakha
moon.
us,
tells
life
had
events
Buddha ranging from 2422 B.C. to 546 B.C. The southern Buddhists too had possibly a fairly large number ranging over a similarly
APPENDIX.
long
Pillai's
347
period.
Accepting Mr,
Swamikannu
purposes
the
:
we
find that
Bishabha
7th, Fri-
59 gh. 18
2.
p.
Sambodhi: 1415 B.
Nirvana:
1371
Eishabha
lOfch,
Wednesday, Visakha
3.
8-37, full
moon
p.
48-28-
B.C.
Rishabha
2nd,
full
and
moon
after
15 gh. 52
p.
month
thithi,
also accord
notion
that
Buddha
dates
neither
in
his
improbable
nor fanciful
places
Kalhana
Kanishka
brothers
Rajatharangini
after
150
years
the
nirvana of
and
his
and Huvishka
ately before
him
348
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
I
am
not
but I refer to
of a tradition
him only
which
that
to
account of
Kanishka's date.
The
will
be
forty
years)
is
but which
according
to
will
Dr. Luders
This
So
if
we accept
would
be,
the
of
next
question
from which
we
Buddha.
is
To me
it is
nus a quo
is
Buddha
for all
Buddhists.
date of Buddha's
reappearance
also be the
of
will
Manimekalai's
acquisition
the
divine bowl."
CHAPTEE
As a
VIII.
CONCLUSION
result of this detailed investigation,
of
it
would be
some advantage
to gather together
we have sa
arrived
at
in
respect
of
South Indian
History.
Aryans
nection
in India.
is
The
Buddhist
All that
this
to
is
that,
at
the time
tradition
history
got
be
written,
connected Vijaya
by
marriage
with
the
Pandyas.
to
us.
That
is
The
story as
is
found
in
the
was a considerable
island
intercourse
between the
what
is
^60
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
bachelor immigrants
from India
may have
we come
a substratum of fact.
is
Leaving
this
made by Magasthenes to the female ruler of this Pandya country, and its resources as indicated by the army that this state usually maintained according to him.
to
of
Asoka,
we
are
certainly
on
surer
ground.
The
Tamil
of
country had so
civilisation
a degree
and
suflScient
development
able
to with-
of
their
resources as
to
be
or
stand
successfully
one
more
Maurya
invasions.
a previous
which went
itself,
as far as the
Tinnevelly District
and
left
behind
of
it,
more
sections
people finally
settling in
it
South India.
We
was
conquer-
CONCLUSION
ing South India in
all
351
Asoka, thought
it
With
the
death
of
independence were
states took
full
But the
not but
Tamil
advantage
of this
retaliation perhaps
per-
that the
available
to
us
from
these
have reference.
From
we
well-known states
Pandya and
ing these
intervenof
chief-
taincies usually
more, sometimes
have to note
at
least
incidents which
seem
352
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
Ceylon
and
of
On
Tamil invasious
Buddhism.
southern
it
We have
opposition
that
the
Mauryan
invasion had in
and
Buddhism
this
it
into the
In the light
that
of
is
nothing
the
Ceylonese
complained
Hindu
inva-
It is in
Mahasena that
an unorthodox school
India are for the
this
ijfn
of
Buddhists in South
first
takes
us on course
to very near
of
D. 300.
the
these
invasions,
one
who
is
described
CONCLUSION
as a Tamil
*
353
'
of a
noble descent
came
into
up, on
the throne.
He
is
is
called
known
He
ruled
and
foe,
is
on occasions
This ruler
Karnata country, as
instance in
Miss
am
which we
an ancient
Chola by name
Manu
them
He is
said,
plaint of an old
to
and
This
a story
quite
similar to that
23
354
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
abund-
All this
of
which
fact
of
the
that
peerless virtues
the most
It is
gave great
credit,
in the
of
Buddhists, to one
of
Ceylon's
His
successor got
number
of great
Viharas
great
Buddhists
in
of
in the period
44 to 29 B. C,
when
rulers
five
in
the
island
from
the
Tamil and
country
perhaps
was
fre-
by
dissensions
wars
CONCLUSION
quenbly.
355
to
When we come
itself
Gajabahu,
to say
the
Mahavamsa
his
has not
much
about
other
connection
of
with India, do
but
the
that
chronicles
it
Ceylon
state
he found
necessary to go to war, as on
and carried
away
of
as
many
as twelve
thousand inhabitants
king Karikala.
is historical
in this
Ceylon tradition,
;
we cannot say we
names
of
we have the
refer-
some
of the
The
this
first
ruler that
is
we have
Kudakko
notice
from
source
Peruvirark-
Killi,
who fought
Serai,
Nedum
and both
the
them
fell
in battle.
The next
rulers of these
Ilanjet-Chenni,
father
Karikala
the
Then we
get
on to
356
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTORY
Karikala in the Chola country, and somewhat later than the date of Karikala's accession to
the throne or even perhaps after his death
in the
Chera
Between
his
this
Chera and
was
uncle
Chera
rule.
This
rule
was further
Kollimalais
of
when
the
Malayaman
chieftain
Tirukkovilur,,
fugitive in
of
war against
of
Adiyaman
in
Anji
Tagadur
to
(Dharmapuri
conquer
his
Salem),
volunteered
Ori
of
enemy-neighbour,
the
Kollimalais,
territory to
him asylum
his difficulties.
successor or
and destroyed
in battle.
the Anji
son certainly
Karikala.
CONCLUSION
identical with Perunark- Killi,
367
who
celebrated
of
whom
this
dynasty
at
any
we can
see at present.
During
Nedum
Senguttuvan
Ghera
of the
Elephant Look.'
With him the Chera territory suffers considerable damage at the hands of the young contemporary Pandyan though it recovered partly from but with him this diminution of prestige
;
history
of the
Cheras
of
the
particular
sources
go.
information
under
consideration
the
Conlist
Pandyan
Pandyan Nedum oeliyan, victor over the Aryan forces, whom for certain valid reasons I identified with Ugra Pandyan.
1
may have
to be given
up
I shall
evidence for
358
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOEY
was
is
his
father's
Viceroy
at
Korkai.
He
Pandyan victor at Talaiyalanganam, though we have no information to settle his relationThis last Pandyan ship with his predecessor. seems to be followed by another one, who goes' by the name Ugra Pandya, but under whom'
some
of the
Sangam
works, at
any
rate,
got
We have
country
already
age, the
among
pation
number
the
of
:
chieftains
distributed
somewhat
of
as follows
Nannan
part
is
was
in occuof
coast
probably
the
Kadamba
country, that
a great portion of
of
Malabar on the
West Coast. There was an elder Nanuan known generally as the woman-killer', and
*
his son
Nannan,
in
what
is
now
on this
the
side of the
of
territories
Araiyam^
CONCLUSION
359
Proceeding further eastwards into the Salem district, there was in the region of the Baramahals,
son
Pohuttelini.
Further
east-
wards from
ing his
this
and immediately
adjoin;
territory
was Ori
of the Kollimalais
Tirukkoilur and
who
a
figures later,
Tirukkannan,
general of
who
is
called
Malayaman and
to the
Going westwards
famous chieftain
South-west of this
we come Madura
Pehan.
across
the
district
was Aai
of
the
Across the
whole
of
Kurram
but
by the
of
time
we come
as
to
the
Pandyan
those
Talaiyalanganam, the
disposi-
tion changes
somewhat
we
indicated,
and
him
360
BEGINNINGS OF
slightly
S,
INDIAN HISTORY
names.
were
not
it is
different
That does
mean
that they
came then
less
into existence
important ones
the time, the
at
more important ones becoming extinct as in the case of Ori and Pari, and some of the other
chiefs
losing
their
importance.
The
five
son
of
Anji
of
chieftain
Erumai, as
the
name
Irungovel;
and Porunan.
strued
as
an
as
some
of
the
other
chieftains
the
time
might
of this parti-
among
Sangam and
in the
two
celebrities,
some
of
whom
were considered in
detail
will
in
and others
come
when occasion
offers.
CONCLUSION
361
of
We
the
the
<}ouiitry
made
a combination
to
resist
We
have also
probably by
way
of
the sea
to
and
long
this
communication takes us
to
times
anterior
the
Christian
Era.
At
had probably
any rate
on the one
extensive
trade
reaching
at
as far as the
side,
We
have
great
service
commerce
of
the
and
We
also sug-
haps in
it
something
Buddhist Emperor
taken
as
Asoka.
hostility
That
as
is
not to be
peaceful
any
to the
following of
Bud-
dhism,
we
do
find
Buddhist
of
authors,
Jain authors,
362
BEGINNINGS OF
S.
INDIAN HISTOKY
is
flourishing
We
we have
may
we we
particular inference.
a great deal of
usefully be done
upon
the
this sub-
further.
And now
that
necessary
work
all
will be
that
may
up
of the history of
and
of that comparatively
remote period.
ERRATA.
Page.
Line.
27
9
13
For
'
Inscripbionem
advise
'
'
read
,,
'
Inscripbionum
'
'
30
42
advice'
15
lasfc
Prapannamrifcram
*
,,
'Prapannamritam*
*
59 62
line
urinderstand
underaband
here
be
'
'
Vaimiki
'
,,
'Vaimiki'
*
70
86
94 95
11
hers
'
,,
'
10
5 4
F.N.
'he'
..
Nannam
Maoridle
,,
'
Nannan
'
>-113
,,
'
Macriodle
palai
114
21
1
The'
pali
126
133
'
'
F.N. 10
Mommhen
For
*
Momrasen
'
135
152
17 19
bo
'
read
'
bhe
'
and omit
of
Onoib
'bhe
Appendix
:
on 'and read
'
(in
of
my
Anoient India
Literabure.'
Tamil
187 188
F.N. 13
1.
Kanrajaka
Kiebhorn
'2
ab
'
Kauralaka
Kielhorn
'
2
,.
'
F.N. 14
190
17
F.N. 16
F.N. F.N. 9
1.
Omit
For For
* '
of
read
'
'
Page
INDEX.
The numbers in
the index refer to the pages of the booh.
Imperial position explained,
109.
Aay
C-in-Chief.
Abdur-Razak,
Abhira. 116.
17, 149.
128, 198,
Appaiya Dikshita, the great 8Ind. Scholar and philosopher, commentary on Yadavabhadayam, 48. contemporary of Doddayacharya and Rama Raya,
49.
commentary
Archaeology,
19.
conservation
of
to,
monuments, preliminary
Agenor, 105.
196.
help to history, little scope for private work, 20. its gradual expansion in India, 20, 21.
Akalavarsha, 101. Alexander of Epirus, 70 Alexander the Great, 104, 158. Alexandrinus, Paalus, 345. Aliyasantanam Law, or Matriarohate, 73.
dependence
Archaeology
in, 36.
of history on, 36
and
impossiblity of private
tory, 58.
Argaritic. 123.
Epigraphy, work
Empire, 116.
364
Arriacie. 68. Arisil Kilar, 195, 216, 238. Arthasastra, see Chanakya.
Aryabhatta, 306.
INDEX.
Barbarioum, 115.
perhaps the same Barbaraka-
Asmaka,
65.
106. 74.
etc., 81.
Barygaza, 102, 118. 120. Barukachoha or Broach, 115. Batoi (Tamil Vettuvar), 122. Batutah. Ibn, 17, 149. Bhandarkar, Sir R. G.. 6567. Bharatavenba of Perundevanar, 282 diff. from Bharatan of P. Bhasa, dramatist, 65, 317. Bilhana, author of Vikramankadeva charitam, 13. Bindusara, 85, 86, 107, 207,
208,
Sidadhapura,
Amitraghata, 101.
Brahmagi Maski
Bombay
50.
96, 112, 207. Rcf. to ihe B in, 350. Kalinga war, his territorial extension, 207. Attakathas, or Arthakathas, 79. Attanacti, story of, 196. Attirayauar, Kallil, 91, 92. -Augustus, 146. 149. deified, 170. Avanti, 66. Avv-iiyar, poetess, 198. Ayirai fort, 226.
of critical
Brhatkathamanjari, 54. Brown, Mr. Robert, 315. Author of Primitive Constellations, 322, 323, 318.
On
327.
Bucephalus, 117.
B
Babylonia interoourse with, 114. communication with India,
330.
Madhyamika
South Indian
99.
hostility to,
System
318.
of
trological
Traditions,
312 3*6
basal
System
Bacara
of astrology,
Buddhist Jatakas, 6465. Buddhist, Nirvana, 79. Burgess, 20. Byzantine Emperors, 150.
idea, 322.
or Bakarai, or Vaikkarai, 119, 147. Bactria, 108. Baotrians, 117. Balitai.e. Janardhanam, 121. Bana, author of Haraha ohaii*
76,
Caenitae (Periplus), 230. Caldwell, Bishop on the Augustus age of Tamil Lit., 1612. His theory restated, 164. Camara, identified with Kaveri
pattAnam, 123.
INDEX.
Caracalla, 150, 161, 155. GaBsiuB Dio. 306. Caius, Emperor, 122. Ceylon, semi-histl. immigration intercurse with into, the
365
of Fleet's
rum, one
two
desi-
Gel. 20 Sir Alexander, author of Inscriptions of Asoka, 27. Curtius, Quinctus, 16.
Cunningham,
Asoka's
diplomatic
rela-
Chanakya's
9
;
Arthasastra, 68
85.
Dakshinapath
Damirica or
(Dachi.
of
nabadesGk,)chaige
danota-
Chandra gwpta,
Dramidaca, 119,
Dandakaranya
128.
Dandi, 54.
Cheras. 63. Chera, achievements. 151. Chera ascendancy, 130. the, of the elephant look,
lai, 245, 246.
Dantivarman Pallava, Vairameghau, 47. D'Ely Mont, 231. Deva Raya I, 17. Dharmasutra Apastamba. Dhruva, story. 3334.
Star, pole-star, 324.
not
320.
Babya
Digambara
their Ist supremacy. 129. Three generations of, 356. to 1st essential Chronology,
Jain
history. 44.
Dipavamsa, 79. Dinnaga, 52. Dosarene or Dasarna, 125. Dravida Sangam, 189, 190.
of history,
Duttagamani
patron, 77,
of
Abhaya,
great
Buddhism, 354.
Clive and Watson. 149. Colandial name of the large vessels of the Tamils, 124, Constantine, Emperor, 306. Cook, Mr. Stanley A. on the defects of specialistic research.
1834.
Cornelius Nepos, 113.
Montd'ely
of
mediaeval
writer*",) 93.
-366
IHDW.
Geiger's Mahavamsa, 75. Gnimili, Nannan'a O.in. Chief,
217.
10, 19. for 8.
Epigraphy
its
Goodspeed Prof,
author
of
Isd
its its
Eras
history of the Babylonions and Assyrians : about the astronomical knowledge of the
Eiriuon (Rann
Cutch), 115.
chief-
Sumerians, 325. Gopinatha Rao, author of Hindu Iconography, 29 Govinda Raja, image taken from
Eudamos
105.
Chidamoaram
the history
of, 37-44.
to Tirupati
of
37.
Philip's
Sucoesscr,
the temple
Eukratides. 108.
of
Greek Sources, failure after the time of Asoke, 15. Gunadya, 153. Guptas Imperial, their rise,
107, 155.
Gurjjaras, 137.
Guruparamparais,
37.
Fa-Hien, Chinese
traveller, 16
H
Hammurabi Pantheon,
312.
186. Fleet Dr. 86, 101, 153, 188. the greatest authority on
his
Harper Prof, 325. Harsha, 113. Hastivarman of Vengi, 188. Havell, author of Ancient. Med-
Historical
2.
Hemadri,
15.
his Gupta'Inscriptions, 27. his identification of Mahisha Mandala, 97.' his theory about the use of week-days in India, 303308.
Hindu
Frazer, 163.
tion, 330.
its basis
329
Gajabahu, King
of
Ceylon, 131,
320.
its similarity to
153, 171, 172, 175, 210. his synchronism, 209. Gandharas, 70, 71. Gangaikonda, 101.
Babylonian
notions,
and
if
Sumerian
327, 329.
INDEX.
ferenoes to, in vedie Literature, and Ramayana.
Its
367
study, needs for. Prof. Maitland's view, short com-
Hinduism, re-assertion
of,
110.
ings
of,
2, 3,
Historical Research, Indian, Requistes, organised study of Sanskrit and the Dravidian
dates of
works
Hiuen Thsang,
Hiung-uu, 108.
authors essential 49. Go-operation indispensable but easy, 31. touch with arohteoIogical epigraphioal and literary
work
essential, 50.
Hultzech, Dr. 23. Hutton, Rev. Williams Holden, on limiting the Oxford chair for Indian History to the History of British connection with India. Hyderabad Achaeological Series.
81.
little
I
want
of
chronology,
of
the
complaint
Elphin-
Ilampuranar, commentator 253. Ilanagan Marudan, 244, 251. cammentary on Iraiyanar Ahappnrnl.
Ilandirayan, Tondaman, 202. Ilangiran Porundil. celebrating the Chera of the elephant
look. 246.
stone and Cowell, 4. of provision for the study of, in Oxford pointed out by Hutton, 56. demand of a permanent chair for, by Stubbs, 8. and its non-fulfilment, 9. Indications of the interest
want
lango,
author of Silappadikaram, 287. Uangosar Kongu, 197. Ilanjet Checni, Chola King
95. 98, 215, 234.
Imayavaramban
Perum Serai
of
Sources
for,
and
their
1.
professed histories, 33. rational and system : study necessary to yield good
results, 5, 7, 8, Indrajit, son of Ravana, 321. Innes Mr. L. C, on the age of Manikkavasagar. 164, Ion of the Chios, 323.
what
1,
it
is,
Morley's view,
2.
Cicero's dictum, 3. necessity for a permanent chair of, 8. its modern tendency leng-
and
Tamil Grammar
249250.
368
Commentary on
kirar 251.
INDEX.
it of Narand Ilanagan, 249,
IruDgo
of
Arayam,
128. 201.
on
Tol-
kappiyam, 249.
Kalvar
Jataka, Bavern, 114.
Koman
Kambar, prince
son
of
Jatilavarman Pandya,
Kambojas,
257. his piases, 179. Jastrow Prof., author of Religious Beliefs etc. in Babylonia and Assyria, 312. an Assyriologist, on che basal ideas of Indian as-
Maravarman,
Kanakasabai
Pillai Mr, 119, 126, 163, 173, 185, 225. his identification of Nurran-
his
Kanarese,
not
the
Jivaka Gbintamani, 173 Jouveau-Dubreuil Prof, author of South Indian Arohiteotuce and Iconography', 29.
than Telugu lit, 35. Kanchi, occupation of, by the Cbalukyas 272, by the
Pallavas, 208.
K
race, 232. their destruction, 224. Kadava defeat at Pennagadam, 258. Kadurigon, 258.
47.
of
Kanishka,
the Constantine
110. 56.
Mahayana, Bud,
170. story of, 176. ber curse. 332.
of 8. 168.
Kannaki, Pehan's
wife, 216,
Kalabhra
258.
Interregnum,
182,
Kaunan Kumattur,
's
Kkreoi,
(Tamil Karaiyar),
about
Kanishka and
his
euccesBors, 347.
Kalidasa, his Meghaduta, 52. his date according to W. Scholars, 309. distinction bet nakhis shatra, tara and graha,
308.
Karikkanan, 244,
Kariyar, Victory, l30. Kartavirya, Arjuna, 97.
Kalinga, 63, 66. Asok>\'s conquest of, 85. Cotton fabrics of, 69. Kalladanar, 192, 366, 238.
INDEX.
Kavirajamarga, a Kanacese work on poetics, 35.
369
Kennedy
J., 114.
Kulumbur, Pallava
258.
defeat
at,
Manual
Bm.
111.
Kharavela, Kalinga ruler, 109. Kielhorn Prof. 22, 188. Kilar, Idaikkunrur, 195. 244. Kilar, Perungunrur, 195.
Killi, Peruviral, 234.
Kumarasami, Dr. A.K., 145. Kumaratatarya, 49. Kumari, 121. Kumbhakarna, the Amitragha*
tin of
Bamayana,
101.
Kun
Pandya,
puranam, 256.
Kuntala, ancient, 82, Kural of Tiruvalluvar, 93.
Koduhur
fortification, 219.
Bajasimbha, 258.
KoUimaiais. Gcvpture
for Ori
of
by Kari
155,
and the
gift of it to the
Kongudesa Rajakkal,
18.
of
Custom and
Konkanam, Tululand,
84, 93.
Korkoi, 121-127. Korranar, Idayan Sendan, 96. Kosala, 66. Kosar (Kongilangosar) a Warlike people, 85, 88. 91. 92. 93.
M
Macdonnell, Prof.,
6.
Kongu coun-
Macedonian Empire,
105,
Kovalan, 168. Kovalan and Kannaki,departure from Kaveripatnam, 331. persecuting a Krimikanta,
Chola, 38, 43.
on the Baby,
319.
comment
Madhyadesa,
of,
325. 6.
Ktesias, 16.
Madras Museum
Madura Academy
238.
plates of
239.
Madura, destruction
333,
by
fire,
Kulasekhara Alvar, 39, KulottUDga Chola I, his death Chola of beginning the
decline, 40,
Madura Kavi.
24
m
Magas
of
INDEX.
Gyrene, 70.
Manimekhalai,
Manta
188.
Raja
Kauralaka,
identified Serai,
43,
U.
Wrongly
206.
with
1878,
Mandaram
Mantaram
at
Mahanaman.a
79.
Sthavira monk,
Serai, 245.
Mangala-
Manu
Ghola, 253.
Mahavamsa,
74,
86,
112,
Madura*
61,
kavi impossible. Marco Polo, 17, 93. on the pirate coast, 148.-9.
Maravarman,Termaran, associated in Literature with 16 titles and li battles with no, ref. to a Pallava, 266-7, 258.
Maitland, Prof, on the need for hiatl, Study, 30, 31, 53.
of
Malayaman
of
Mullur,
52,
Marudan, Mangudi. poet of the Pandyan Court, 142, 242, 243, Marudur, battle of, 258,
Masalia, 125. Maternus Firmious, 305.
Commeutator,
Mambarus,
dara
of
Mamulanar,
83, 84, 86, 90, 93, 97, 98, 103, 185, 186. 187, 189, 201, 208. 238.
of
to the
Karikala
-
and
Nannaa
nar,87.
the Mauryas, 207. ref. to the battle of Vennil about the Chera's aohievmentag. the pirates. 235.
ref. to
Menander,
118.
Kabul. 109,
Mandagara
queen,
port, 147.
r
Mangayark Ka
ref. to
i,
Pandya
oy Sambandar,
278, 279.
Mithridates Atsakes I, 107. Mitton, Miss, authoress of the ruined cities of Ceylon 353. Mohur, Chief of, 185. 206.
Mommsen,
133,
92.
Moriyar or Oriyar,
INDEX.
Motley, Lord, on history, 1-2 on the shortcomings of histl. study, 2-3. Mousikanos, 105.
;
371
member
yanar
251.
of
the
Sangam,
Irai-
Mudukudumi, Paodya
dhi Raja, 227,258,
Raja-
on Ahapporul
the
308. 9.
Murtinayanar, story of, 182. Muttra, antiquities of, 109. Muyiri (mod CranMuziris,
ganore), 119,120,134,135, 147 195, 230.
Nattan,Nallur, 195. Nedumaran, Pandyan, Victor, at Nelveli, importance of his identification to Tamil Literary History, 255.
N
Nachohinarkkiniyar, 87, 173. Nagarjuna, 54, 111, Nagas, 134.
Nedura Jadayan, Jatila, donor of the Madras Museum and Sinnamanur plates, 258. Nedum Jadaivan, Pandyan, 98
171, 175, 209.
Nedumjadayan,
taka, donor of grant, 258.
Jatila,
Paran-
Nahapana,
117. Nalli, 198,
Kshaharata
ruler,
the Velvikudi
Nedum
kingdom
of,
Nambanus,
116, 117.
115,
of,
Imayavaramban,
238.
225, 234,
to.
in later
literature,
76.
Peiiapuranam, 273.
Nero, 150. Netravati river, 231.
Nioolo-dei-conti, 17. Nilakanran of Muairi, 253. Ninevah Archives, receut discovery in, and the commentu of Mackenzie D. A. and 8ayce 325, 326.
Nirkuuram,
mod.
form
o*
Narayanaswami,
Pinnathur,
Iyer
Mr.
(the
372
Numismatics, work 80 far,
largely
21. invaluable for 17.
INDEX.
private
a-
the
Nuniz,
Nurraugannan,
128, 201,
bis defeat, 196. his death, 197 237. Oriental, Mss. Library, 91. Ottakkuttan, poet. 40. Oviasenan, 172, 177.
Owen, Mr.
Paddirruppattu, 98,
192, 199, 205.
102,
168,
239.
Parantaka
261.
I,
219.
95, 196, 196. 217. its destruction, 98. Pali, Literature, its service to the history of Ancient India,
hill-fort,
Nannan's
commentary Parimelalagar's, on Kural, 251. 2. Pari of Parambnnad, 201. friend of Kapilar, 247. Paropanisadae, Ind viceroyalty of Alex 105. Parthians, 107. their indepce 107.
their Empire, 110. Pasungudayar, Unpodi, 95.
.
37.
Pataiiputra, destruction of, 186 189. excavations in, 23. Patanjali, 66, 7. to dedicated Pattinappalai, Karikaia, 51, 125. 126, 136-7. Pattini devi, 131, 145. 209.210. Pattuppattu 167-8 167, 192. the Paulina Loliia wife of
INBEX.
Fehan chieftaiD
128. 199, 215. 234, 238. his liberality 195. Peithon, Viceroy 105.
202,
373
Prapannamrtam
Priyadarsin
42.
Pindan, 198.
d e fe a destrsctioD of 258. Perdicoas, 105.
see Ascka, Ptolemy, astronomer and geographer 16,114, 115, 119, 121,
king,
Pennagadam,
and
122. 12 5, 146, 147, 151, 172. 230, his age synchronous with the
276
Saugam
of the Erythraean Sea, 102, 115, 115, 116, 117, 119. 121. 122, 123, 126, 146, 156-8 on the piratical west coast 229, 146; on S. Ind. exports, 134-5. Periyar, Chera river 222, 226. Perunjatian, 245. Periindevanar, 174 194. rather a common name, 283. Bharatavenba 282. Bharatampadiya, 285. Parundurai port, 198 Perungunrur Kilar, 216, 238.
Periplus
17,
of
the
destruction 129
Pulindas, 60,
Pulli ofVengadam 128. chieftain of Tirupati,
197.
Pundras,
63,
Purananuru,
194. 198.
167,
174,
152,
Peruvaludi,Palvagasali Pandya,
181, 2, Peruvirarkkilli 195, 199, 215, 245. Petronius, 132. Peutingerian Tables, 146, 148, 151, 233 Philip, viceroy, murder of, 105. Pidiyao, ridiculous idendification with Palayan 189.
Puranas, 103.
oldest, 63.
Pitenikas 70, 72. Pliny, geographer, 16,146, 151. on piracy 147, 229. on the drain from the
Senguttuvan, 166,
period, 203.
184185.
on the
Sangam
Roman
India 133.
Empire
of
into
on the luxuries
ladies, 123-3.
Roman
Rahulabhadra, 111. Raja Raja II, 40, 48. Raja Rajanula, 41. Rajasimha I, defeat of Pallavamalla, renewal
of
Plutarch 322.
PodiyilHill,
90,' 93, 100.
the walls of
Mauryan
Kosar
88.
Rajasimha Rajasimha
374
Ramannja, the reconstruction
the
life of,
INDEX.
of
on the posRibilitieR
mem-
research in Tamil Literature, 37. etseq. his life, contained in Praof historio
pannamrtam,
Tal. Pand. associated with, 284. ref to in the larger Hinnamanur plates, 282. distribution of political
.
and
to
Sangam
in the,
321, 322.
Ramayana and
Mahabarata,
difficulties
ohronologi oal
connected with, 64. Ranadhira, 258. Rangaswami Aiyangar, 192. Rashtikas, 702. Rice, Mr., of the Epigraphia Carnataka, 24. Roman Commerce, 149 to 150.
decline
of
of,
works, their contemporary value, 1914. absence of ref, to the Pallavas in, 182. their chronology discussed, 161 to 210. Bangara, Periplus' name for the smaller vessels of the Tamils,
124.
of the Pallavas at, 258, 273. Sanskrit, indispensable for Ind. Histl. Research, 35.
Sankaramangai, defeat
owing
to
change
political
conditions,
Saiagoparandadi, 45.
Satakarni. 185. Satakarui Yegnasena, 109. their disappce, Satavahanas,
116, 155. their records, 34,
Rost, Reinold, echoing the Galdwellian tradition, 162. Roxane, wife of Alexander,
105.
Satiyaputra,
mentioned
112
of
in
Rudrasarman, believed
made
the
AsoVa
lai,
edicts,
Sattan, author
Manimekha-
tion, 285.
s
Saddharma-pundarika, founder
of a school of
Bahadeva,
214, 287. Satyacharya, 327. Savaham, 113. Bayce. Prof, on obserratotiei in Bibylonia. 326. Scbeifner, 85. Schofi.
WH.,
102, 114.
of S.
on the condition
Ind.,
156. his identification, 231. Seleucus Nicator, 73. his treaty with Chandrsgupta 100, 103, 106, 107. Seliyan Seudau, identification
Senguttuvan,
INDEX.
beagutiuvaQ his
life
375
the
chieftaincies, seven bone of contention bet Cholaa and Cheras, 127-8,
by Baghava
Saraman
169.
Nedum
Seraladan,
ports
and roads,
royal power. 139, to 142. religious toleration and happy confusion, 143 to 146. its ideal of justice, 142-3.
T. C. Evans and W. H. SchofE on, 1566. its stand against the Gks, 158. its peace ideals, 158 to 160.
Speyer, Prof.
154.
Dutch
scholar, 54,
Ssu-ma-ch'ien,
of history, 16.
Chinese Father
167,
179.
and 282.
oaing turned into
Sitaou
Rama
Strabo, 146. Stubbs Bishop, Regius Prof, of Mod. His, Oxford, on the need for a permanent chair of
a star, 321.
India hisooiy,
8.
Smith, Vincent A, author of the Early History of India, and History of Fine Art in India
Subramania
29.
mental
attitu-
the former a vindication of of the possibility a connected His. of Ind., 4. on the S. frontier of Asoka'a Empire, 82 3.
Somadeva,
his
sarith
Eashmerian,
Sundaram
Kathasagara, 54-6
South India, a distinct entity in Indian History, Chap. I., Mauryan invasion of, Chap.
II, fairly
in Tamil Lit., 163. Sundaramurti Nayanar, 45. Sundara (Kuu) Pandya, 203.
Sungas, their
fall,
103.
Suvarnabhumi,
Suvarnagiri. 82.
75, 76.
Swamikannu
Pillai
Dewan
pol.
and
religious
else-
Bahadur, on the date of B. and M., 172 to 174. on their astronomioal data, 29C 348. passim the unbroken tradition
of
376
INDE^.
Telugu
35.
Lit.,
modelled on SanSi,
Pillai,
editor of I. Ah*pporul, 253, Tidayan, idenoification with, of Tadayan, 189. Tilak, B.G. on the Veda, etc. 315 Tilaka, a commentary, 94.
Timma
TalayalaDgaaam
247.
capital
of
Kari,
Pandyan
age
of,
of,
the
Sangam, 282.
Sendan
Tirupati temple, 37. Tiruvoimoli, of Nammalvar, 45. Todas, emigration, date of, 292.
to
ia
the
Tolkappiam,
classical
Tamil
grammar,
Tulu Nadu,
entry into, bv Kosar, 88. Tyndia, 116, 119,' 230, 231. Trygaeus, a character of Aristaphanes, 323.
ary of the
pire
and
gener-
273.
editor of the
Upham,
Maharef.
vamsa, 131.
Uruvapahrerilaujetchenni, to, by Paranar, 194. old expr. Uttarapatha,
59. Uttar Phalguni, 299, 300.
for
modern Hindustan,
system,
ref.
Tamravarnika, Chanakya's,
to, 68.
Taranatha,
Tibetan historian,
Vadukar, 90, 91, 92, 97. munai, boundary of Tamil country, 84.
frontier, 201.
the
Vada, 201.
INDEX.
Vamba, 95, 98. VambaMofiyar, (Maurya nouac ?iomin<E), expr.of Mamulanar,
89.
377
w
Week-Day,
Fleet's contention about, 304 etseq astrological character of and animtstio notions in, 330. West Coast, piracy in, 228, 9, 231, 147-9. free from the pest, 232. the Red Chera's achievement in this connection,
;
wrong equation
Vanga,
63.
of,
206.
identification with
basis, 190.
Karut
the walls
45.
of,
258.
Varaguna Pandya,
Tarahamihira,
307. 327.
astronomer,
author
48.
of
151, 236.
on Indian
Yadavabhyudayam,
Venkayya, Mr.,
24.
Yadavabhyudayam,
hamihira.' 327.
48.
9.
Zenith Arc, contention about, 296 to 299. ^angaria, plains of, 108.
J
m^^^
PLEASE
DO NOT REMOVE
FROM
THIS
CARDS OR
SLIPS
UNIVERSITY
OF TORONTO
LIBRARY
DS
4^4 K7
':<mm^:'