Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
This project is about the development & design of Refinery gas sweetening system of CPCL-plant 12. Refinery gas sweetening is the process used to remove the so called Acid Gases which are hydrogen sulphide and carbon dioxide from the refinery gas streams. These acid gas removal processes used in the refinery are required either to purify a gas stream for further use in a process or for environmental reasons. Though there are various processes meant for the sour gas removal the Chemical reaction type is selected and adopted on grounds that it can selectively remove H2S from all the sour gas components. For serving this purpose, the newly developed MDEA solution of 35 % mol is used in a mole ratio of 2.2. The factors that are all considered for the selection of MDEA over MEA, DEA and DGA are also discussed. For the entire flow sheet the material and energy balances are developed and the corresponding equipment are designed. Plant layout, cost estimation and safety measures are going to be carried out.
ABSTRACT TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 ORGANISATION PROFILE 1.2 CRUDE OIL 1.3 CRUDE OIL REFINERY 1.4 REFINERY OPERATIONS
1 2 3 4
PROPERTIES
2.1 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF MDEA 2.2 PHYSICAL COMPARISION OF MEA AND MDEA 2.3 CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF MDEA 6 7 8
TYPES OF PROCESSES
3.1 VARIOUS PROCESSES FOR THE REFINERY GAS TREATING 3.2 REACTION TYPE GAS TREATING 3.3 PHYSICAL SOLVENT GAS TREATING 3.4 PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL TYPE 3.5 CARBONATE TYPE 9 9 10 11 12
SELECTION OF PROCESS
4.1SELECTION PROCEDURE FOR THE CHEMICAL REACTION
TYPE FOR GAS SWEETENING 4.2 PROCESS PARAMETERS AND DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS AMINE SOLVENTS 4.3 FACTORS THAT ARE CONSIDRED FOR THE SELECTION OF MDEA OVER MEA, DEA & DGA
13 14 19
20
MATERIAL BALANCE
7.1 FLOW RATE OF COMPONENTS OF SOUR GAS THAT DISTILLED OUT FROM THE CDU-2 24 7.2 MATERIAL BALANCE ACROSS ABSORBER 25 7.3 MATERIAL BALANCE ACROSS STRIPPER 26
ENERGY BALANCE
8.1 HEAT CAPACITY CONSTANTS FOR THE COMPONENTS OF
SOUR GAS 29 8.2 ENERGY BALANCE ACROSS THE ABSORBER 30 8.3 ENERGY BALANCE ACROSS THE SOLUTION INTERCHANGER 33 8.4 ENERGY BALANCE ACROSS THE COOLER 35 8.5 ENERGY BALANCE ACROSS THE STRIPPER 36 8.6 CONDENSER DUTY 39
III
10
STRIPPER DESIGN
10.1 FINDING THE NUMBER OF TRAYS (FROM KREMSERS CORRELLATION GRAPH) 10.2 FINDING THE EQUILIBRIUM DISTRIBUTION 51 51 52 52 53 54 59 60
RATIO FOR INDIVIDUAL COMPONENTS 10.3 CALCULATING THE IDEAL NUMBER OF TRAYS 10.4 CALCULATING THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF TRAYS 10.5 KREMSERS CORRELATION GRAPH 10.6 THE INTERNAL DIAMETER OF THE STRIPPING COLUMN 10.7 CALCULATION OF COLUMN HEIGHT 10.8 DESIGN SUMMARY
11
COST ESTIMATION
11.1 INTRODUCTION 11.2 TOTAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT 11.3 CALCULATION OF DIRECT COST FACTOR 11.4 CALCULATION OF INDIRECT COST FACTOR 11.5 ESTIMATION OF THE CAPITAL INVESTMENT IN THE AUXILIARY SERVICE, IA 11.6 ESTIMATION OF THE CAPITAL INVESTMENT AS WORKING CAPITAL, IW 11.7 ESTIMATION OF TOTAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT 61 61 62 63 64 65 65
12
13
13.9IMPORTANT SAFETY RULES TO PREVENT HIGH PRESSURE HAZARDS 13.10 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
74 75
14
CONCLUSION REERENCES
76 77
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. 1Composition of Crude Oil Table 1. 2 Composition of Hydrocarbons Table 1. 3 Physical comparision of MEA and MDEA 2 3 7
Table 7. 1 Flow rate of components of sour gas thats distilled out from the CDU.2 Table 7. 2 The total liquid and vapour flow rates
24 56
Table 8. 1Heat capacity constants for the components of sour gas Table 8. 2 Enthalpy of sour gas entering at 314k Table 8. 3 Enthalpy of sweetened gas leaving absorber at 311k Table 8. 4 Enthalpy of strip out gases at 380 k Table 8. 5 Enthalpy of Acid gas to SRU at 313K:
29 30 31 38 39
Table 11. 1 Estimation of fixed capital investment Table 11. 2 Calculation of direct cost factor Table 11. 3 Calculation of indirect cost factor Table 11. 4 Estimation of the capital investment in the auxiliary service
62 63 63 64
VI
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 6. 1 Process flow diagram 20
Figure 7. 1 Material balance across absorber Figure 7. 2 Material balance across the stripper
25 26
Figure 8. 1 Energy balance across the absorber Figure 8. 2 Energy balance across the solution interchanger Figure 8. 3 Energy balance across the cooler Figure 8. 4 Energy balance across the stripper Figure 8. 5 Condenser duty
30 33 35 36 39
Figure 9. 1 Hot amine cooler Figure 9. 2 Graph for finding the correction factor Figure 10. 1Kremsers correlation graph Figure 10. 2 Graph for finding the Brown and Souders flood constant
42 43
53 58
67
VII
VIII
QH QC U H D L A m k NTU LP LW DP b AP As Xm Nt NP Re Pr Nu
Heat Transfer duty Hot fluid Heat Transfer duty Cold fluid Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient Heat Transfer Coefficient Diameter Length Area Mass flow rate Thermal Conductivity Density Number of Transfer Unit Length of the plate Width of the plate Diameter of the plate Thickness of the plate Area of single plate Effective area of Shell Thickness of Material Total number of tubes Number of passes Reynolds Number Prandtl Number NussultNumber
kcal/h kcal/h W / m2 K W / m2 K m m m2 kg / h W / m oC kg / m3 m m m m m m2 m2 m
IX
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CPCL - Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited MRL - Madras Refinery Limited GoI - Government of India AMOCO - American Oil Company NIOC - National Iranian Oil Company IOC - Indian Oil Corporation Limited EIL - Engineers India Limited MMTPA - Million Metric Tonnes Per Annum WHO - World Health Organization FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization UNISEF - United Nations Childrens Fund LSRG - Light Straight Run Gasoline NMP - Normal Methyl Pyrrolidone MEA - Mono Ethanol Amine MDEA Methyl di ethanol Amine DEA Di ethanol Amine DGA Di glycol Amine SRC - Solvent Recovery Column IBP - Initial Boiling Point TBP - Total Boiling Point MP - Medium Pressure LP - Light Pressure HP - High Pressure SHE - Spiral Heat Exchanger LEL - Lower Explosive Limit
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1
Organisation profile
Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited (CPCL), formerly known as Madras Refineries
Limited (MRL) was formed as a joint venture in 1965 between the Government of India (GOI), AMOCO and National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) having a shareholding in the ratio 74%:13%:13% respectively. Originally, CPCL Refinery was set up with an installed capacity of 2.5 Million Tonnes Per Annum (MMTPA).
CPCL has two refineries with a combined refining capacity of 11.5 Million Tonnes Per Annum (MMTPA). The Manali Refinery has a capacity of 10.5 MMTPA. CPCL's second refinery is located at Cauvery Basin at Nagapattinam. The Manali Refinery located at Chennai is one of the most complex and integrated refineries with three crude distillation units, Diesel Hydro De-sulphurisation unit, Fluid Catalytic Cracking unit, Furfural Extraction unit, Lube Hydrofinishing unit, NMP Extraction unit, Hydro-Cracker unit, Propylene unit and Petrochemical Feedstock unit.
The main products of the company are LPG, Motor Spirit, Superior Kerosene, Aviation Turbine Fuel, High Speed Diesel, Naphtha, Bitumen, Lube Base Stocks, Paraffin Wax, Fuel Oil, Hexane and Petrochemical feed stocks. CPCL, ever since its inception, has been methodically planning and implementing several environmental conservation measures. A dedicated Environment Management Team functions exclusively to plan, implement, operate and monitor all environment-related activities.
CPCL Manali Refinery has obtained ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and OHSAS-18001 certifications.
Four different types of hydrocarbon molecules appear in crude oil. They are Paraffins, Napthalenes, Aromatics and Asphaltics.
Hydrocarbon
30 49 15 6
Crude oil varies greatly in appearance depending on its composition. It is usually black or dark brown. In the reservoir it is usually found in association with natural gas, which being lighter forms a gas cap over the petroleum, and saline water which, being heavier than most forms of crude oil, generally sinks beneath it. Crude oil may also be found in semi-solid form mixed with sand and water, as in the Athabasca oil sands in Canada, where it is usually referred to as crude bitumen.
1.3
into
more
useful and
products liquefied
such
as petroleum
base, kerosene,
petroleum
gas. Oil
typically
industrial complexes with extensive piping running throughout, carrying streams of fluids between large chemical processing units. The process is very complex and involves both chemical reactions and physical separations.
1.4
on their boiling points. The separation is done in a large tower that is operated at atmospheric pressure. The tower contains a number of trays where hydrocarbon gases and liquids interact. The liquids flow down the tower and the gases up. The lighter materials such as butane and naphtha are removed in the upper section of the tower and the heavier materials such as distillate and residual fuel oil are withdrawn from the lower section.
Catalytic Reforming
Catalytic reforming is a chemical process used to convert petroleum refinery naphthas, typically having low octane ratings, into high-octane liquid products called reformates which are components of high-octane gasoline. Basically, the process re-arranges or re-structures
the hydrocarbon molecules in the naphtha feedstocks as well as breaking some of the molecules into smaller molecules.
Catalytic Cracking
Fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) is the most important conversion process used in petroleum refineries. It is widely used to convert the high-boiling, high-molecular weight hydrocarbon fractions of petroleum crude oils to more valuable gasoline, olefinic gases, and other products. Cracking of petroleum hydrocarbons was originally done by thermal cracking, which has been almost completely replaced by catalytic cracking because it produces more gasoline with a higher octane rating. It also produces byproduct gases that are more olefinic, and hence more valuable, than those produced by thermal cracking.
alkylate is increased to around 93-96 octane. Refiners use this process to improve the octane level of the gasoline pool. Light naphtha can have its octane number improved by the use of an isomerization process to convert normal paraffins into their isomers. This results in an increase in octane number as evidenced by increase in normal pentane to iso-pentane. The process uses a platinum catalyst. Like alkylation, this process improves the octane quality of the gasoline pool.
Hydrotreating
Hydrotreating is a process where a petroleum fraction is reacted with hydrogen for the purpose of removing impurities. The process is usually used to remove sulfur. Hydrotreating processes use hydrogen from the catalytic reformer or a hydrogen plant.
Product Blending
Product blending is where the different petroleum fractions are combined together to make the final product. The fractions are mixed so they meet the specifications discussed earlier. Each product has a specific recipe that calls for the proper mix of petroleum fractions. For example, in order to make gasoline, the refiner would mix naphtha, reformate, catalytic gasoline, alkylate and butane so that the mixture had the required octane number, vapor pressure, sulfur level and aromatics content. The process requires knowing these values for all of the components going into the blend.
CHAPTER 2 PROPERTIES
Structure
Molecular weight
35%mol
Boiling point
Refractive index
at 20C -1.4694
Heat of combustion
Flash point
Freezing point
-21C
Vapor pressure
at 20c, mm hg <0.01
Specific gravity
1.03
6
2.2
plant. Later on due to the following advantages that MDEA is possessing over MEA the MDEA has been adopted. The following table gives the physical comparision of MEA over MDEA.
S.No
Monoethanolamine (MEA)
Methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) Higher solvent cost relative to Monoethanolamine, Diethanolamine and Diglycolamine agent. Low vapor pressure which results in potentially lower solvent losses. Methyldiethanolamine is less corrosive. Non-reclaimable by conventional reclaiming techniques, and Minimal COS, CS2 removal. Efficient energy utilization. Selectivity of H2 S over CO2 in mixed gas system. High resistance to degradation. Molecular weight of Methyldiethanolamine is 119.21 g/mol Lower comparative reactivity. Complete H2S removal while only a portion of CO2 is removed. The most significant application of MDEA solvent was in tail gas treating units.
1.
Low solvent cost compared to other solvents. High solvent vapor pressure which results in higher solvent losses than the other alkanolamines. Higher corrosion potential than other alkanolamines. Partial removal of COS and CS2, which requires a reclaimer. High energy requirements due to the high heat of reaction. Nonselective removal in a mixed acid gas system. Formation of irreversible degradation products with CO2, COS and CS2 which requires continuous reclaiming. Molecular weight of Monoethanolamine is 61.1 g/mol High reactivity due to its primary amine character. Gas is treated at low pressures, and maximum removal of H2S and CO2 is required. More efficient solvents particularly for the treatment of high pressure natural gas are rapidly replacing MEA.
2RNH2 + H2S
(RNH3)2S
The above equations mention the chemistry of the reaction between MDEA and H2S. It can be seen that stoichiometrically 1 mol of MDEA can absorbs 1 mol of H2S from the sour gas.
Non formation of corrosive heat stable compounds in the presence of COS, CS2
The MDEA solution doesnt yield a corrosive nature unlike the formation of heat stable compounds by DGA and MEA in the presence of COS, CS2. This gives an advantage not to operate a reclaimer to regenerate the amine solution thereby equipment cost that would be spent is prevented.
CHAPTER 3 TYPES OF PROCESSES 3.1 Various processes for the refinery gas treating
The selected popular processes for the refinery gas treating are grouped as follows:
3.2
The amines (MEA, DEA, MDEA, DGA) are the most popular treating solutions. At one time MEA, and later MEA and DEA, dominated the market. Amines in general should be considered for: Low acid gas partial pressures (product of system pressure and concentration of acid gases-H2S and CO2 in the feed) of roughly 50 psi and below. Low acid gas concentrations in the gas product of roughly 4-8 ppm. Heavier hydrocarbons present ( provide better filtration for DGA) For CO removal with no H2S, a CO2 partial pressure of 10-15 psi.
Among the amines, 1. MEA is preferred for low contactor pressures and stringent acid gas specifications such as H2S well below 0.25grains/ l00scf, and C02 as low as 100 ppmv. MEA is degraded by COS and CS2 with the reactions only partially reversible with a reclaimer.
2. DEA is preferred when system pressure is above 500psi. The 0.25 grains/ l00scf is more difficult to produce with DEA. COS and CS2 have few detrimental effects on DEA. This, and high solution loadings, provide advantages over MEA. DEA will typically be used for refinery and manufactured gas streams that have COS and CS2. 3. MDEA is preferred for selective H2S removal and lack of degradation from COS and CS2. 4. DGA is preferred for cold climates and high (50-70 wt %) solution strength for economy. By comparison, solution strength for MEA is 15-25 wt%, and for DEA, 25-35 wt %. Provide good filtration for DGA because it has a greater affinity for heavy hydrocarbons than other amines. The feed gas must have at least 1% acid gas for DGA to provide savings over MEA.
3.3
The physical solvent types of gas treatment are generally preferred when acid gases in the feed are above 50- 60psi. This indicates a combination of high pressure and high acid gas concentration.
10
Heavy hydrocarbons in the feed discourage physical solvents, but not COS and CS2, which do not degrade the solvents.
Usually, physical solvents can remove COS, CS2, and mercaptans. Physical solvents are economical because regeneration occurs by flashing or stripping which require little energy.
Selexol, licensed by the Norton Company, uses the dimethyl ether of polyethylene glycol. A Selexol plant can be designed to provide some selectivity for H2S. For example, the plant can be designed to provide pipeline quality gas while slipping 85% of the CO.
The Fluor solvent, propylene carbonate, is used primarily for removal of CO, from high pressure gas streams. The CO, off gas stream was used for enhanced oil recovery.
3.4
Physical/chemical type
The Sulfinol process from Shell Development Company is a good example of the physical/chemical type of process. It blends a physical solvent and an amine to obtain the advantages of both. The physical solvent is Sulfolane (tetra hydro thiophene dioxide) and the amine is usually DIPA (di isopropanol amine). The flow scheme is the same as for an amine plant.
11
MEA when the H2S/CO2 ratio is greater than 1 : 1 while at high acid gas partial pressures. In the solution, the amine DIPA is meanwhile able to achieve pipeline quality gas. COS, CS2 and mercaptans are removed. CO2 slightly degrades DIPA, but reclaiming is easy. Low corrosion/carbon steel. Low foaming.
The U.S. Bureau of Mines was working on Fischer-Tropsch synthesis gas at the time.
Potassium carbonate treating requires high partial pressures of CO2. It therefore cannot successfully treat gas containing only H2S.
12
4.1
Selection procedure for the Chemical Reaction type for gas sweetening
Of the gas treating methods mentioned above, the Chemical reaction type has been selected on basis of the following reasons:
The physical/ chemical type, the SULFINOL process possess high priced
chemicals and process royalty and the licensee requires many engineering services.
The physical solvent types of gas treatment are generally preferred when acid
gases in the feed are above 50- 60 psi. Usually, physical solvents can remove COS, CS2, and mercaptans. But the gas that has to be treated has no presence of mercaptans and else.
Thus the amine solvents- the chemical reaction type can selectively remove H2S and do not show any degradation by COS, CS2 and so it is selected for the sour gas sweeteing.
13
4.2
Process parameters and description of various amine solvents Mono ethanol amine
This is the most common acid gas absorption process. Normally 1520 wt% MEA in
water is circulated down through a trayed absorber to provide intimate contact with the sour gas. The rich solution is routed to a steam stripping column where it is heated to about 250 F at 10 psig to strip out the acid gases. The lean MEA solution is then returned to the absorber.
MEA is the most basic (and thus reactive) of the ethanol amines. MEA will completely sweeten sour gases removing nearly all acid gases if desired. The process is well proven in refinery operations.
Like all of the amine solvents used for acid gas removal MEA depends upon its amino nitrogen group to react with the acidic CO2 and H2S in performing its absorption. The particular amines are selected with a hydroxyl group which increases their molecular weight and lowers their vapor pressures yielding minimum solvent losses to the gas stream. MEA is considered a chemically stable compound. If there are no other chemicals present it will not suffer degradation or decomposition at temperatures up to its normal boiling point.
The process reactions are given below:
HOCH2CH2NH2 = RNH2 = MEA
Low temp
2 RNH2 + H2S
High temp
(RNH3)2S
Low temp
(RNH3)2S + H2S
High temp
2RNH3HS
14
Some of the degradation products formed in these systems are highly corrosive. They are usually removed by filtration or reclaimer operations.
Filtration will remove corrosive by products such as iron sulfide. Reclaiming is designed to remove heat stable salts formed by the irreversible reaction of MEA with COS, CS2 (carbonyl sulfide and carbon disulfide). The reclaimer operates on a side stream of 13% of the total MEA circulation. It is operated as a stream stripping kettle to boil water and MEA overhead while retaining the higher boiling point heat stable salts.
When the kettle liquids become saturated at a constant boiling point with the degradation products it is shut in and dumped to the drain. Union Carbide has developed a well proven corrosion inhibitor system for MEA that allows solution strengths of 2832%. The inhibitor requires payment of a royalty. The inhibitor chemicals are both expensive and hazardous for personnel to handle. The system does reduce corrosion problems to nearly zero and allows much higher system capacity for the same size equipment.
In addition to the chemical degradation mentioned above, MEA oxidizes when exposed to air. Storage and surge tanks must be provided with inert blanket gases such as N2 or sweet natural gas to avoid this degradation.
Amine systems foam rather easily resulting in excessive amine carryover in the contactor. Foaming can be caused by solids such as carbon or iron sulfide; condensed hydrocarbon liquids from the gas stream; degradation products; almost any foreign material introduced to the system such as valve grease, excess corrosion inhibitor, etc. Some of these items such as iron sulfide or carbon particles are removed by cartridge filters. Hydrocarbon liquids are usually removed by the use of a carbon bed filter on a lean amine side stream (about 10% of total flow). Corrosion byproducts are removed by reclaiming as noted above.
15
High skin temperatures on the reboiler / reclaimer tubes promote amine degradation. Steam or hot oil used for the reboiler should be limited to a maximum of 285F (140C) to avoid excessive temperatures. The reclaimer should not see hot oil or steam above 415F (213C).
MEA is nonselective in absorbing acid gases. It will absorb H2S faster than CO2 but the difference is not significant enough to allow its use to separate them. With the lowest molecular weight of the common amines, it has a greater carrying capacity for acid gases on a unit weight or volume basis. This generally means less pure amine circulation to remove a given amount of acid gases. Because the solvent is in solution with water, the gas with which it comes in intimate contact will leave the cotactor at its water saturation point. If dehydration is necessary it must be done after the MEA system.
Diethanol amine
DEA does not degrade when contacted with CS2, COS, and mercaptans as does MEA. However for product gas streams which must meet lower than 1 grain per scf of H2S, MEA must be used. Because of this, DEA has been developed as a preferred solvent when these chemicals are present in the stream to be treated.
The reaction with acid gas for any of the amines is a mole to mole reaction. The molecular weight of DEA is 1.7 times that of MEA. Even after correcting for density it requires 1.6 lb of DEA to react with the same amount of acid gas as 1 lb of MEA.
DEA is a weaker base (less reactive) than MEA. This has allowed DEA to be circulated at about twice the solution strength of MEA without corrosion problems. DEA systems are commonly operated at strengths up to 30 wt% in water and it is not unusual to see them as high as 35 wt%. This results in the DEA solution circulation rate usually being a little less than MEA for the same system design parameters.
16
2R2NH + H2S
High temp
(R2NH2)2S
Low temp
(R2NH2)2S + H2S
High temp
2R2NH2HS
Because the system has much fewer corrosion problems and removes acid gases to nearly pipeline specifications it has been installed as the predominant system in recent years.
Diglycol amine
This process has been developed by the Fluor Company. It originally began as a combination of 15% MEA, 80% tri ethylene glycol, 5% water. The system would both sweeten and dehydrate (to the same level as 95% TEG) the gas in a single step.
The high vapor release during regeneration (both water vapors and acid gases) causes severe erosion/corrosion problems in the amine/amine exchanger and in the regeneration column. This system has generally been abandoned.
The present system uses 2- (2-amono ethoxy) ethanol at a recommended solution strength of 60 wt% in water. DGA has almost the same molecular weight as DEA and reacts mole for mole with acid gases. DGA seams to tie up acid gases more effectively so that the higher concentration of acid gas per gallon of solution does not cause corrosion problems as experienced with the usual amine systems.
17
2RNH2 + H2S
High temp
(RNH3)2S
Low temp
(RNH3)2S + H2S
High temp
2RNH3HS
DGA does react with COS and mercaptans similarly to MEA but forms N, N1, bis (hydroxy, ethoxy ethyl) urea, BHEEU. BHEEU can only be detected using an infrared test rather than chromatography. Normal operating levels of 24% BHEEU are carried in the DGA without corrosion problems. BHEEU is removed by the use of a reclaimer identical to that for an MEA system but operated at 385F (196C).
There has been a concern that DGA might be a good solvent for unsaturated hydrocarbons. A survey of the DGA users indicates that many of the systems are operated on gas containing concentrations of C5+ above 2% without any indication of hydrocarbon loading of the system.
Those systems near their hydrocarbon dew point are usually installed with a flash tank on the rich amine from the absorber. The flash tank is operated at a reduced pressure just high enough to get into the plant fuel gas system. It reduces the vapor load on the regenerator column. (A similar system is recommended on MEA systems operating near the hydrocarbon dew point.)
DGA allows H2S removal to less than 0.25 grain per 100 scf and removes CO2 to levels of about 200 ppm using normal absorber design parameters.
18
4.3
Factors that are considred for the selection of MDEA over MEA, DEA & DGA
1. The overall reaction of MEA gives us one mole of H2S to one mole of MEA. But this is seldom experienced in actual contactor due to the limitations in ideal contacting. A ratio of 3 moles of MEA to 1 mole of acid gas is used.
2. The usage of MEA has receded in the recent years due to its corrosive nature by forming heat stable compounds in the presence of COS & CS2. This requires the use of a reclaimer to regenerate back the amine solution. But this leads to the loss of amine and also adds up to the equipment cost.
4. DEA does not degrade but has lesser absorbing capacity as it is a weaker base.
5. In the case of DGA the high vapor release during regeneration (both water vapors and acid gases) causes severe erosion / corrosion problems in the amine exchanger and in the regeneration column. So this system has generally been abandoned.
19
20
6.1
which are hydrogen sulphide and carbon dioxide from the refinery gas streams. These acid gas removal processes used in the refinery are required either to purify a gas stream for further use in a process or for environmental reasons. Clean air legislation now being practiced through most industrial countries require the removal of these acid gases to very low concentrations in all atmosphere to form very diluted sulphuric acid and carbon dioxide to form carbonic acid both of which are considered injurious to personal health. These compounds also cause excessive corrosion to metals and metallic objects. The removal of sour or acid gas components such as hydrogen sulphide, carbon monoxide, carbonyl sulphide and mercaptans from gas and liquid hydrocarbon streams is a process requirement in many parts of the hydrocarbon processing industry. Typical industrial gas treating application include the production of natural gas, refinery fuel gas, high purity hydrogen and carbon monoxide, and purification of ammonia, synthesis gas, landfill gas, coke oven gas or sulphur recovery unit tail gas. For over fifty years, the alkanolamines have been utilized for acid gas removal in the natural gas and petroleum processing industries.
21
6.2
Process description
Sour gas (rich in H2S) enters the bottom of the trayed absorber (or Contactor).
Lean Amine is introduced at the top tray of the absorber section to move down the column operating at 45 MPa g. Contact between the gas and amine liquid on the trays results in the H2S in the gas being absorbed into the amine. The sweet gas is water washed to remove any entrained amine before leaving the top of the contactor. Rich amine leaves the bottom of the contactor at 340.51 k to enter a surge drum. If the contactor pressure is high enough a flash stream of H 2S can be routed from the drum to a trayed stripper. The liquid is preheated to 459.01 k before entering a stripping column on the top stripping tray that is operating at 125 kPa a. This stripper is reboiled with 10.5 bar saturated steam. The H2S is stripped off and leaves the reflux drum to the sulphur production plant 12 at 313 k. The lean amine leaves the stripper bottom at 389 k and is cooled. The cooled stream is routed to the contactor.
6.3
Process chemistry
(RNH3)2S 2 RNH3HS
2RNH2 + H2S
(RNH3)2S
Though stoichiometrically, MDEA of 1 mol absorbs 1 mol of H2S, for practical cases the mole ratio is set at 2.2 mol MDEA/ mol H2S.
22
6.4
Thermodynamic principles
2 RNH2 + H2S
High temp
(RNH3)2S
Low temp
(RNH3)2S + H2S
High temp
2RNH3HS
The underlying thermodynamic principle for any reaction at equilibrium is Le Chatliers principle.
A simple study of the above reaction would indicate that a high pressure and low temperature is expected for thermodynamic feasibility of absorption of the acid gases.
Thus a high pressure of 45 MPa g is maintained in the absorber and the inlet sour gases are fed at a low temperature of 314 k.
Similarly, due to the inverse nature of stripping process, a low pressure of the order of 150 kPa is maintained in the stripper. Here steam at 10.5 bar is provided to strip the acid gases from the down coming amine solution. A reboiler is used to maintain the temperature profile along the column. This is limited by the boiling point of the amine solution or the point to which it is not degradable.
23
CHAPTER 7 MATERIAL BALANCE 7.1 Flow rate of components of sour gas that distilled out from the CDU-2
kmol/h 27.21 36.32 59 35.7 46.6 18.9 20.4 1.3 1.6 247.03
Table 7- 1 Flow rate of components of sour gas thats distilled out from the CDU-2
24
7.2
Total sour gas into the absorber = 247.03 kmol/h As a mole ratio of 2.2 kmol MDEA/ kmol H2S is set and a solution of strength 35 % mol has been used, Total Lean Amine circulation rate for the absorption of 27.21 kmol H2S Rich Amine rate which has absorbed 27.21 kmol H2S
= 170.97 kmol/h
25
7.3
Rich Ammine entering the stripper = 198.18 kmol/h = 500 * 10-6 *170.97 = 0.085 kmol/h
Stripped gas contains H2S & water thats condensed and returned as Reflux. In the accumulator , the H2S leaves at 40C with moisture in it. 26
Now we can obtain the mole fraction of H2O in H2S, using Raoults law.
Pa = ya P ; where Pa= partial pressure of the component a in vapour. P = Total pressure of the gas stream =150-25 = 125 kPa. Assuming 25 kPa pressure drop in condenser. ya= 7.375/125 = 0.059
27
28
CHAPTER 8 ENERGY BALANCE 8.1 Heat capacity constants for the components of sour gas
kmol/h 27.21 36.32 59 35.7 46.6 18.9 20.4 1.3 1.6 247.03
B*103 -17.64 1.0194 52.113 155.021 306.26 419.53 391.82 487.4859 581.9223
C*106 67.66 -0.1476 11.973 -81.545 -158.63 233.633 -202.98 -258.0312 -311.8584
D*109 -53.24 0.769 -11.317 16.975 32.145 51.043 40.793 53.0488 64.9193
29
8.2
30
nil 1039.13 1135.71 193.24 -196.98 -166.94 -50 -4.71 -7.06 1942.39
Nil 37.02 3074.7 6357.71 14271.90 7929.19 7993.28 398.14 931.08 40993.02
nil -5.36 706.41 -2405.28 -7392.23 4415.67 -4140.96 -206.22 -498.97 -9526.94
31
32
8.3
353 k
= 456.72 KW
Heat given up as the solution cools down = 9121.25 * 3.77 * (389 - 353)
= 1299.07 KW This much heat would be picked up by the Rich Amine entering at 340.51 k with 2% radiation loss. Thus heat absorbed by Rich Amine = 1299.07 * 0.98 = 1273.09 KW
= 869.23 KW
34
8.4
In this cooler, the Lean Amine is cooled down to 316 K from 353 K and then it enters the absorber. Heat transfer duty = 9121.25 * 3.77 * (353-316) Q = 353.42 KW
35
8.5
36
Finding ya = = (27.125+1.70) / (27.125+1.70+27.125) = 0.52 Therefore, Pa = 0.52*150 kPa = 77.28 kPa Now finding Xa = = (1.70+ 170.97*0.65)/(170.97+27.125) = 0.57 And now Pa = Pa/ xa = 77.28/0.52 = 148.62 kPa From the vapour pressures table, Temperature of gas stream leaving the stripper=107.13C = 380k
8.6
Condenser duty
Condenser duty at 2%radiation loss = Enthalpy of (Stripped gas- acid gas to SRU Reflux)
Enthalpy of Reflux:
= (27.21*18) ( h at40C- h at25C) =27.21*18 (168.771-104.771) = 8.71 KW 39
Therefore condenser duty at 2%radiation loss = (72.09 - 4.40 - 8.71) / 0.98 = 60.18 KW
40
Shell side temperature (cooling water) Tube side temperature (lean amine) Thermal Conductivity of lean amine Thermal Conductivity of cooling water
Lean amine flow rate from stripper to absorber (tube side) = 9121.25 kg/h Cooling water flow rate (shell side) Shell side fluid: Cooling water Tube side fluid: Hot lean Amine Heat load (Q) = 9121.25 * 3.77 * (80-43) / 3600 = 353.42 KW = 3038.89 kg/h
TLMTD
41
Picturistic description:
9.2
Properties
Density Specific Heat Capacity Viscosity Thermal Conductivity
Shell Side
995 kg/m 3.77 kJ/kg K 0.00095 kg/ms 0.519 W/mk
Heat profile:
hot amine 80C 42C cold water 43C 32C
42
9.3
Calculation of P & R
P = dTh / (Th1- Tc1) =10 / 48 = 0.2083 R = dTh / dTc = 37/10 = 3.7 R= 1/R = 0.27 P= R*P = 0.77
43
To find Correction Factor, consider 1 Shell and even even Tube pass Ft = 0.87 Tm = Ft * TLMTD Tm = 0.87 * 21.78 Tm = 18.95 C Assuming an Overall heat transfer coefficient of U = 500 W/m2 0 C
Provisional Area:
A = Q/U Tm A = 353.42*103 / 500*18.95 A = 37.3 m2
Tube description:
Outer Diameter Bwg Internal Diameter Length = 20 mm = 14 = 15.8 mm = 4880 mm
44
Shell description:
Inner Diameter Number of shell side passes = 387.35 mm = 1 as theres a temperature approach only.
9.4
hi Di/ k = 0.023 Re0.8 Pr0.33 (/w )0.14 Re Gt At = Gt Di / where Gt = Mass velocity of the fluid in tube side. = mh /At where At = area of tube side per pass. = /4 * Di2 * Nt/ Np = 0.0060 m2 Gt = 2.534 / 0.0060 = 422.33 kg/m2s 45
Re
Pr
hi
9.5
ho De/ kf = 0.36 Re0.55 pr0.33 (/w )0.14 for triangular pitch De = 4/Do * ( 0.86 Pt2- /4 Do2 ) = 4/*0.02 * ( 0.86 0.0252- /4 0.022 ) = 0.0127 m
Gs As
= mc/ As = B c D / Pt The baffle cut is kept to be 40 % of the shell ID. = (0.4 * 0.387) *0.005 * 0.387 / 0.025 = 0.0120 m2 46
Gs
Re
Pr
ho ho
9.6
Rw Rw
9.7
Uo Uo
47
9.8
Ar Ar Ar
9.9
Pt
L Np Di
= 4.88 m =4 = 0.0158 m =1
48
s Pt Pt
9.10
Ps
Gs De Nb
= 0.995 =1
Ps
= 1.147 kPa.
49
50
CHAPTER 10 STRIPPER DESIGN 10.1 Finding the number of trays (from Kremsers Correllation Graph):
In order to find the number of trays of the stripper where the H2S is stripped off from the rich amine by making use of the stipping steam thats used as a heating medium the stripping factor has to be calculated. Stripping factor = VK/L where, L is the number of moles of liquid V is the number of moles of vapour K is the equilibrium distribution ratio
53
For finding the Internal Diameter of the column, the cross sectional area has to be calculated.
The cross sectional area of the tower will be based on the vapour and liquid flow rates at the bottom tray.
= 55.95 kmol/hr Finding the volume occupied by the vapour thats stripped out of the column at the prevailing conditions: At standard Temperature and pressure P1 =101.325 k Pa T1 =273 k As we know that at NTP ( thats P=101.325 kPa and T=273 k) 1 kmol of gas occupies 22.414 m3. V1 = 55.95 * 22.414 =1254.06 m3/h
And now the prevailing conditions of pressure and temperature in the stripper are as follows :
54
By volumetric law thats by the combination of Boyles law and Charles law,
V2 =
V2 =
V2 = 1190.08 m3/h Finding the total vapour flow rate in terms of mass flow rate:
= 518.85 + 922.25
= 1441.1 kg/h
55
The following tabular column shows the total liquid and vapour flow rates to and from the bottom tray respectively: kmol/h liquid flow rate vapour flow rate 198.18 55.95 kg/h 10046 1441.1 m3/h 10.046 1190.08
vapour density =
= 1000 kg/m3
56
57
Figure 10- 2 Graph for finding the Brown and Souders flood constant
58
= 38.1 * ( 30-1)
= 11.05 m
59
*2
*2
= 0.32 m3.
Height of the liquid level = = 2.95 m say 3 m. As an allowance of 1 m has to be given so the bottom tray to bottom tan is 4m. So, the tan-to-tan distance = 16 m. And now, a skirting of 5 m is also provided which makes the entire structure to rise to a height of 21 m or 69 ft. 10.8
Design summary
Thus a stripper of ID 2 ft., height 69 ft., and with 30 trays each of 15 inch spacing is designed for the purpose.
60
11.1 Introduction
Cost estimation is the approximation of the cost of a program, project, or operation. The cost estimate is the product of the cost estimating process. The cost estimate has a single total value and may have identifiable component values. A problem with a cost overrun can be avoided with a credible, reliable, and accurate cost estimate. The cost estimation of the sour gas treating unit , plant 12 of CPCL are as follows.
61
S.No.
Equipment
Units
Cost in lakhs/unit
Cost in lakhs
Absorption column
150
150
2 3
1 2
150 50
150 100
1 2+1
15 25+50
15 75
5 tanks,etc Total
490 lakhs
62
5 6 7 8 9
75 30 10 20 5 300
Direct plant cost = [(Delivered cost of major equipments) x (Total direct cost factor) / 100] Direct plant cost = [(490 x 300) / 100] = 1470 lakhs
S.No 1 2 3
= [(Direct plant cost) x (Total indirect cost factor))/100] = [(1470 x 56)/100)] = 823.2 lakhs
Fixed capital investment in the process area, IF = Direct plant cost + Indirect plant cost = 1470+823.2 = 2293.2 lakhs
63
S.No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Items Auxiliary buildings Water supply Electric Main Sub station Process waste system Raw material storage Fire protection system Roads Sanitary and waste disposal Communication Yard and fence lighting Total
Cost in Lakhs 114.66 45.864 45.864 22.932 45.864 34.398 22.932 11.466 11.466 11.466 366.912
Capital investment in the auxillary services = [(Fixed capital investment in the process area) x (Auxiliary services cost factor) / 100] = 366.912 lakhs Installed cost = Fixed capital investment in the process area + Capital investment in the auxiliary service = 2293.2 + 366.912 = 2660.112 lakhs
64
65
66
Two-dimensional Lay-out
To visualize the layout problem, two dimensional scaled templates or small cutouts of unit areas and equipment within each areas are shifted about on crosshatched scale paper.
67
of equipment and also for access way around doors and underground hatches. But a little regard should be given for proper placement of each of these services, practicing good design, aids in ease of operation, orderliness, and reduction in costs of maintenance.
Building
After a complete study of qualitative factors, the selection of the building or buildings must be considered. A complete architect should be consulted to design a building around the process. It is fundamental chemical engineering industries that the buildings should be built around the process, instead of the process being made to fit buildings of conventional design.
Waste-Disposal
Throughout the chemical industry much thought should be given to the disposal of waste liquor, fumes, dusts and gases. Ventilation, fume elimination and drainage may require the installation of extra equipment. In the selection and the placement in the process area, such pieces of equipment for doing the above services is also an important point. Sometimes air conditioning of the plant is called for that may require an elaborate set up.
Primary factors
Availability of raw materials The location of the factory is influenced by the sources of raw materials. It is definitely advantageous things of the factory is located near the source of raw materials.
Availability of power, Fuel Power is an essential requirement for a factory. Therefore sufficient quantity of power should be available for the needs of the factory without failure.
Availability of water Water is important requirement for a factory. It is used for cooling the reactors. So, plant is located near the rivers.
Availability of labour Availability of required number of labour in the requisite type is also an essential consideration. Density of population is not only the consideration. The people in surrounding areas are willing to work the factory. This depends on the maturity of citizens, influence of local industries lively hood, etc.
Climatic and atmosphere conditions If the climatic and atmosphere conditions are not favourable, employees may not be willing to work. The second consideration is the precision machines get spoiled. a) If there is much fluctuation of temperature. b) If the factory is within the vicinity of the sea breeze it requires a cool atmosphere. In modern days the temperature inside the factory is regulated by scientific method. Market facilities Facilities for marketing the finished goods should be available. If the markets are near to factory, a) The cost of transportation will be less. b) The finished goods will be known in the market.
70
Transport facilities Economical conveyance a quick transport facilities should always be available whenever the raw materials, etc. are to be transported to the factory or finished products to the markets. Road, rail, water or air transportation facilities are required for the plant under consideration.
Secondary Factors
The following factors are also be taken into account before selecting a site for a factory. 1. Cost of land 2. Laws governing the area 3. Fire protection 4. Availability of water for the employees and factory purposes 5. Progressive attitude of the citizens of the area towards the industry
71
13.1 Safety
Safety is a science which deals with aspects that keeps away the working atmosphere out of hazard. Hence safety is the prime consideration in the design of process plants. Disregard of safety is comparable to criminal negligence. The general safety code applies to all employees.
safe trips for critical equipment. Static electricity has been cause of many fires in the oil industry. Refineries also deal with toxic chemicals. Health monitoring is necessary for the operating personnel who work in the areas where these toxic chemicals are handled.
13.4 Layout
Layout consideration has to be given for the inter spacing between 1) Equipment within the process block 2) Utilities 3) Tankage & Loading gantries to minimize the involvement of adjacent equipment in the event of fire. 4) The effects of radiant heat from storage tanks & the BLEVE effects from LPG storage vessels are to be given serious consideration.
13.7 Fire
Fire in petroleum industry can breakout due to any of the following reasons, Spark by Electrical circuit, Hot work, Storage vessel not earthed, etc,. Hence a good fire protection systems like Detectors, Monitors, Sprinklers, etc, should be considered inside the plant to kill the fire if triggered. 73
74
75
CHAPTER 14 CONCLUSION
Firstly, the organization profile has been given and followed by that the characteristics of crude oil is explained. The various refinery operations are also mentioned.
The Material and Energy balances have been developed to the whole of the process flow diagram.
The cooler is designed to be consisting of tubes of 20mm OD * 15.8 mm ID * 4880 mm long and a shell ID of 387.35 mm of passes 4 and 1 respectively. The overall heat transfer coefficient for the respective duty is found to be 524.97 W/m2 C. A pressure drop of 2.3258 k Pa is achieved in tube side and a drop of 1.147 k Pa in shell side.
A stripper of ID 2 ft., height 69 ft., and with 30 trays each of 15 inch spacing is designed for the purpose of regeneration of rich amine.
The safety and handling procedures for the refinery are elaborately studied and given and the plant location and layout are clearly depicted.
76
REFERENCES
1. Bhatt .B.I., Vora .S.M., Stoichiometry, 4thEdition, McGrawHill. 2. Coulson & Richardsons, (1999), Chemical Engineering, Vol.1, Sixth Edition. 3. Coulson & Richardsons, (2002), Chemical Engineering, Vol.2, Fifth Edition. 4. Coulson & Richardsons, (2005), Chemical Engineering Design, Vol.6, Fourth Edition. 5. David M.Himmelblau, Basic Principles and Calculation in Chemical Engineering Prentic Hall of India. 6. G.K.Roy, Solved Examples in Chemical Engineering, Khanna Publishers Delhi, 6th Edition. 7. Harry Silla, Chemical Process Engineering Design and Economics 8. James G.Speight (2006), The Chemistry and Technology of petroleum(4thEdition). 9. Jullius Scherzer and A.J.Gruia Hydrocracking Science And Technology,Marcel dekker publications. 10. McCabe L. Warren, Smith C. Smith, Harriot Peter, Unit Operations in Chemical Engineering, Sixth edition, 2007, McGrawHill. 11. Peters and Klaus D. Timmerhaus, Process Economics and Plant Design, McGraw Hill International Edition. 12. Process design principles: Synthesis, analysis and evaluation by 13. Robert E Meyers ,Handbook of Petroleum Refining Processes 14. Robert E.Treyball, Mass Transfer Operations, Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co.3rd Editon. 15. Robert H. Perry, Don W. Green, Perrys Chemical Engineers Handbook, Fifth Edition, 1978, McGrawHill Sherves Chemical Process Industries, G.T. Austin 5th edition, McGraw Hill publications 16. Stanley M.Walas, Chemical process Equipment Selection and Design, ButterworthHeinemann series. 17. Warren D. Seider, Daniel R. Lewin, J.D. Seader
77