Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Okobi
librarians and R. Lankes 2008 article about virtual reference, one sees that both authors
view the reference librarian’s position as a continued necessity within the library but from
For Rice, technology has obviated the need for much of the reference librarian’s
record-keeping and this is a definite positive (pg. 2). This leaves the reference librarian
free to pursue the fundamentals of personal service in dealing with patrons, which he
believes will remain the same (ibid). The new optical media will assist in
of databases would be accessible, thus making the reference section more important (pg.
2-3). He thinks that “total user self-sufficiency” is highly unlikely as patrons will not be
able to afford to purchase all of the desired information: “legal and economic realities
will continue to bring people to the library and reference department,” (pg. 3).
For Lankes, most of these issues have already been settled. That people access
the library and its resources remotely is a given for him, rather he focuses on another
issue that Rice mentions, reference as a “one-on-one” conversation (pg. 11). Lankes sees
the continued use of the one librarian-one patron mode of answering reference questions
as outmoded in a virtual environment (ibid). Rather, he cites a test case from the
Information Institute of Syracuse-- they created “StoryStarters” a site that allowed users
to ask and track questions online. The questions could be answered by librarians, experts
or anyone who wished to via a posting to the answerer’s blog that would be included in
2 Terry Wasserman, Changes, ILS 504, Prof. Okobi
the StoryStarters website (pg. 12). Lankes sees this as part of the continual evolution of
reference services from “an in-person place based activity to the anytime-anywhere
Reference List
Rice, J. (1986). The Golden Age of Reference Service: Is It Really Over? Wilson Library
Bulletin 61, 1-4. Retrieved on 6 February 2009, from Library Literature and Information
database.