Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

BA Hons Dance Performance 2009-10

Assessment feedback Collaborative PracticesDevised Performance- Body Project Student: Eleni Andreoulaki Comments (1st Marker) Mariza Vinieratou 1. Evidence of intelligent engagement with the learning experience provided: Excellent Very Good Good Concern

2. Evidence of the ability to synthesise ideas and information, ordering existing knowledge and/or developing new knowledge: Excellent Very Good Good Concern

3. Evidence of the ability to assess the status of and strategies behind processual work: Excellent Very Good Good Concern

4. Evidence of knowledge of key issues in current practice and address them in your discussion/reflection. Excellent Very Good Good Concern

5. Evidence of the ability to formulate a critical framework to enable a reflection on your emergent methods of practice including the ability to document, analyse and reflect on practice (including students own practice), with reference to formative influences, critical and evaluative strategies and working processes Excellent Very Good Good Concern

6. Evidence of your role as artist/researcher at work, demonstrating rigorous attention to stages of experimentation in the process Excellent Very Good Good Concern

Additional comments: It was clear that Eleni was able to understand what it means to engage with research in the studio. She was also able to identify and work on Labans theory on dynamics. She now needs to explore further the complexities of movement and its performance and connect concepts to practice in order for her to arrive on a more complex manifestation of movement. She was very good into communicating her ideas to the group and worked harmoniously with the others. Suggested mark (first marker); Signed: Date: 10th November 2010 64

2nd Marker FOR MODERATION/ NOT FOR STUDENTS Name of 2nd Marker: Dimitris Tsioukas Student: Eleni Andreoulaki Please rate as EXCELLENT, VERY GOOD, GOOD, CONCERN next to each criteria 1. Evidence of intelligent engagement with the learning experience provided: VERY GOOD 2. Evidence of the ability to synthesise ideas and information, ordering existing knowledge and/or developing new knowledge: VERY GOOD 3. Evidence of the ability to assess the status of and strategies behind processual work: GOOD 4. Evidence of knowledge of key issues in current practice and address them in your discussion/reflection: GOOD 5. Evidence of the ability to formulate a critical framework to enable a reflection on your emergent methods of practice including the ability to document, analyse and reflect on practice (including students own practice), with reference to formative influences, critical and evaluative strategies and working processes: GOOD 6. Evidence of your role as artist/researcher at work, demonstrating rigorous attention to stages of experimentation in the process: GOOD Further comments: Good work. Should develop more her technical skills. Suggested Mark: 63 Signed: Date: 10th November 2010

MODERATED RESULTS First Marker: Suggested mark (second marker) _________ Agreed Mark (if applicable) _________ ________

____________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ____________________

(signature of first marker) (signature of second marker) (date finalised)

(date finalised)

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen